Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
606
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 03:49:00 -
[1] - Quote
You play a properly balanced, fair and fun class. Liking the class, you dump all 15 mill SP to your name into the class. Suddenly, new build/patch comes around and your class is nerfed without your consent and you now suck at the game. You spawn in your proto suit or your vehical and you are killed over and over, loosing all your ISK. You are told you can not play PC because the one class you are good at, sucks. Nobody wants you in any serious endeavor in dust because your class is nerfed to the point of uselessness. Like current shield tanks, dropships, lazers, plasma cannons and soon to be armor tanks when they fix the bug that is causing them to be balanced. You no longer want to play dust, as the class you played is ruined and so is your ability to enjoy playing dust, because the developers ruined the class you speced into. CCP later anounes that they will not be fixing your class for many months and they ask you to accept their most sincere apologies, despite changing the class that you speced into many months beforehand. Should you get a respec? This happened to the classes mentioned previously and will happen again when the fix the armor tanks |
Alaika Arbosa
Matari Combat Research and Manufacture Inc. Interstellar Murder of Crows
768
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 03:50:00 -
[2] - Quote
Run free fits for fun until you can pretend that you're an athlete again. |
Malkai Inos
Opus Arcana Covert Intervention
885
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 03:50:00 -
[3] - Quote
Balance issues are balance issues. There, easy. |
XxWarlordxX97
187.
4279
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 03:51:00 -
[4] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:You play a properly balanced, fair and fun class. Liking the class, you dump all 15 mill SP to your name into the class. Suddenly, new build/patch comes around and your class is nerfed without your consent and you now suck at the game. You spawn in your proto suit or your vehical and you are killed over and over, loosing all your ISK. You are told you can not play PC because the one class you are good at, sucks. Nobody wants you in any serious endeavor in dust because your class is nerfed to the point of uselessness. Like current shield tanks, dropships, lazers, plasma cannons and soon to be armor tanks when they fix the bug that is causing them to be balanced. You no longer want to play dust, as the class you played is ruined and so is your ability to enjoy playing dust, because the developers ruined the class you speced into. CCP later anounes that they will not be fixing your class for many months and they ask you to accept their most sincere apologies, despite changing the class that you speced into many months beforehand. Should you get a respec? This happened to the classes mentioned previously and will happen again when the fix the armor tanks
They need to bring the MAG respec system |
Iron Wolf Saber
Den of Swords
6654
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 03:52:00 -
[5] - Quote
Why did you constantly put more skill levels into an item you hate using? Then why are you hanging out with a corp that doesn't appreciate what you bring to the table? Then why are you wasting your energy asking for a respec instead of asking for balance to include missing items? |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
606
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 03:53:00 -
[6] - Quote
Alaika Arbosa wrote:Run free fits for fun until you can pretend that you're an athlete again. lolol. your suggesting to run milita gear for another 15 mill SP... +1 |
Knightshade Belladonna
Mannar Focused Warfare Gallente Federation
730
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 03:53:00 -
[7] - Quote
This one time, I used to have a front line assault starter fit
and that was it... |
AAA Hellcab
Theia Orpheum
39
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 03:55:00 -
[8] - Quote
There is a war between accountants and artists within CCP. |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
606
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 03:58:00 -
[9] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Why did you constantly put more skill levels into an item you hate using? Then why are you hanging out with a corp that doesn't appreciate what you bring to the table? Then why are you wasting your energy asking for a respec instead of asking for balance to include missing items?
Nooo dident skill into something you hate using. You had a very balanced class and enjoyed it. Then, your class is nerfed and you NOW hate using these items, after they are nerfed into uselessness. Becuase your class is useless, you are useless and no corp worth looking at will take you seriously. As the person who is now the victim of a nerfed class, I would totally ask for balance if it was plausable. Us tankers have been asking for balanced and it is ignored by the governing DEVS (i.e. CCP Blam!) and when we do hear word of balance it is surprised pushed back over and over in date. However, CCP seems to be very adapt at giving respecs, they were successful before. So it is a waste of energy to ask for balance when we do not get it, but productive to ask for respecs because we have gotten respecs |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1314
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 04:03:00 -
[10] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Why did you constantly put more skill levels into an item you hate using? Then why are you hanging out with a corp that doesn't appreciate what you bring to the table? Then why are you wasting your energy asking for a respec instead of asking for balance to include missing items?
Cause we all know balance is months and months away... Iike it always has been for dust.
When it comes to corps... If you want to be competitive in PC you can't run terrible builds just cause you're a special snowflake. Most corps would probably tell him "Exmaple... You're a beast tanker. And when tanks become viable again next February we would love to run you again, but until then we need another assault on the field." |
|
Duran Lex
Silver Talon Corporation
116
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 04:03:00 -
[11] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:You play a properly balanced, fair and fun class. Liking the class, you dump all 15 mill SP to your name into the class. Suddenly, new build/patch comes around and your class is nerfed without your consent and you now suck at the game. You spawn in your proto suit or your vehical and you are killed over and over, loosing all your ISK. You are told you can not play PC because the one class you are good at, sucks. Nobody wants you in any serious endeavor in dust because your class is nerfed to the point of uselessness. Like current shield tanks, dropships, lazers, plasma cannons and soon to be armor tanks when they fix the bug that is causing them to be balanced. You no longer want to play dust, as the class you played is ruined and so is your ability to enjoy playing dust, because the developers ruined the class you speced into. CCP later anounes that they will not be fixing your class for many months and they ask you to accept their most sincere apologies, despite changing the class that you speced into many months beforehand. Should you get a respec? This happened to the classes mentioned previously and will happen again when the fix the armor tanks
Hmm, but if it was properly balanced and fair, then why would it get a nerf or buff?
To be fair, plasma cannon was always bad.
Laser nerf was pretty much just the viziam, otherwise the guns major change was just the iron sights. Which DID make it, in effect, a nerf...but technically it isnt. (and anyways, they are adding the red dot sight back to lasers which will bring back the melting of faces)
I dunno, my HMG was nerfed into a shorter range then a shotgun with worse dispersion than an SMG...my forge gun was never correctly registering direct and splash radius hits for months, strafe speed was increased but they still left me fat and slow to turn... yet i still had fun.
maybe I'm just a rare breed that enjoys the game i play, even through the rough patches.
|
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
608
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 04:04:00 -
[12] - Quote
ZDub 303 wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Why did you constantly put more skill levels into an item you hate using? Then why are you hanging out with a corp that doesn't appreciate what you bring to the table? Then why are you wasting your energy asking for a respec instead of asking for balance to include missing items? Cause we all know balance is months and months away... Iike it always has been for dust. When it comes to corps... If you want to be competitive in PC you can't run terrible builds just cause you're a special snowflake. Most corps would probably tell him "Exmaple... You're a beast tanker. And when tanks become viable again next February we would love to run you again, but until then we need another assault on the field."
lolol. Fortionetly, i was told this... yet. Though i have talked to many ppl who were told this line. looks like you saw these things too... |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1314
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 04:05:00 -
[13] - Quote
Once we've reached some semblance of balance, respecs won't be necessary. But the people on this forum are dellusional if they think we are balanced now or will be balanced by the end of the year.
FOTM is a symptom of bad balance, not of the ability to respec. |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
608
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 04:06:00 -
[14] - Quote
ZDub 303 wrote:Once we've reached some semblance of balance, respecs won't be necessary. But the people on this forum are dellusional if they think we are balanced now or will be balanced by the end of the year.
FOTM is a symptom of bad balance, not of the ability to respec. very well said, sir |
Cosgar
ParagonX
3312
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 04:07:00 -
[15] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Why did you constantly put more skill levels into an item you hate using? Then why are you hanging out with a corp that doesn't appreciate what you bring to the table? Then why are you wasting your energy asking for a respec instead of asking for balance to include missing items? Probably the same reason why even after my optional respec, went back into the Mass Driver, which was bugged, and Minmatar logi, which was lumped up with the CaLogi during everyone's nerf witch hunt. It's something you find fun, like doing, and you have faith in the developers that they'll make things right. If everyone cared more about being effective than having fun, we'd all be running around in shield tanking suits and ARs.
Exmaple Core, I've been in the same boat you're in now. Not just with Dust or EVE, but in a lot of online games. Some of us are too stubborn to take the road less traveled with hopes that it pays off in the end. Sometimes it does, sometimes it doesn't, there's no guarantee. The only thing you can really do is think of the good times, or dream of the possible good times around the corner. If you decide to do anything that matters- don't give up. Whether it's too expensive, underpowered, or your peers don't respect what you do, find a way to keep things going- keep the faith and do it because it's what you like doing.
"Adapt or Die..." |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1314
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 04:07:00 -
[16] - Quote
Duran Lex wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:You play a properly balanced, fair and fun class. Liking the class, you dump all 15 mill SP to your name into the class. Suddenly, new build/patch comes around and your class is nerfed without your consent and you now suck at the game. You spawn in your proto suit or your vehical and you are killed over and over, loosing all your ISK. You are told you can not play PC because the one class you are good at, sucks. Nobody wants you in any serious endeavor in dust because your class is nerfed to the point of uselessness. Like current shield tanks, dropships, lazers, plasma cannons and soon to be armor tanks when they fix the bug that is causing them to be balanced. You no longer want to play dust, as the class you played is ruined and so is your ability to enjoy playing dust, because the developers ruined the class you speced into. CCP later anounes that they will not be fixing your class for many months and they ask you to accept their most sincere apologies, despite changing the class that you speced into many months beforehand. Should you get a respec? This happened to the classes mentioned previously and will happen again when the fix the armor tanks Hmm, but if it was properly balanced and fair, then why would it get a nerf or buff? To be fair, plasma cannon was always bad. Laser nerf was pretty much just the viziam, otherwise the guns major change was just the iron sights. Which DID make it, in effect, a nerf...but technically it isnt. (and anyways, they are adding the red dot sight back to lasers which will bring back the melting of faces) I dunno, my HMG was nerfed into a shorter range then a shotgun with worse dispersion than an SMG...my forge gun was never correctly registering direct and splash radius hits for months, strafe speed was increased but they still left me fat and slow to turn... yet i still had fun. maybe I'm just a rare breed that enjoys the game i play, even through the rough patches.
There's a difference between casual play and wanting to compete in corp v corp matches. If CCPs goal is to chase out all of the competitive players.. They are doing a real disservice to this game. |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
611
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 04:09:00 -
[17] - Quote
Duran Lex wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:You play a properly balanced, fair and fun class. Liking the class, you dump all 15 mill SP to your name into the class. Suddenly, new build/patch comes around and your class is nerfed without your consent and you now suck at the game. You spawn in your proto suit or your vehical and you are killed over and over, loosing all your ISK. You are told you can not play PC because the one class you are good at, sucks. Nobody wants you in any serious endeavor in dust because your class is nerfed to the point of uselessness. Like current shield tanks, dropships, lazers, plasma cannons and soon to be armor tanks when they fix the bug that is causing them to be balanced. You no longer want to play dust, as the class you played is ruined and so is your ability to enjoy playing dust, because the developers ruined the class you speced into. CCP later anounes that they will not be fixing your class for many months and they ask you to accept their most sincere apologies, despite changing the class that you speced into many months beforehand. Should you get a respec? This happened to the classes mentioned previously and will happen again when the fix the armor tanks Hmm, but if it was properly balanced and fair, then why would it get a nerf or buff? To be fair, plasma cannon was always bad. Laser nerf was pretty much just the viziam, otherwise the guns major change was just the iron sights. Which DID make it, in effect, a nerf...but technically it isnt. (and anyways, they are adding the red dot sight back to lasers which will bring back the melting of faces) I dunno, my HMG was nerfed into a shorter range then a shotgun with worse dispersion than an SMG...my forge gun was never correctly registering direct and splash radius hits for months, strafe speed was increased but they still left me fat and slow to turn... yet i still had fun. maybe I'm just a rare breed that enjoys the game i play, even through the rough patches.
Dunno! this is what happens though, has all the time. But its not about nerfing a class into uselessness now and fixing them 6 months later. Its about having your class ruined and not having a reason to play for the next 6 months, as youve been swindled out of your SP. So, your entitled to respecs |
Duran Lex
Silver Talon Corporation
116
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 04:10:00 -
[18] - Quote
ZDub 303 wrote:Once we've reached some semblance of balance, respecs won't be necessary. But the people on this forum are dellusional if they think we are balanced now or will be balanced by the end of the year.
FOTM is a symptom of bad balance, not of the ability to respec.
I humbly disagree.
FOTM is a symptom of both bad balance and respecs, imo.
Bad balance is the drug.
Respecs are the drug dealers. |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1315
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 04:11:00 -
[19] - Quote
Duran Lex wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:Once we've reached some semblance of balance, respecs won't be necessary. But the people on this forum are dellusional if they think we are balanced now or will be balanced by the end of the year.
FOTM is a symptom of bad balance, not of the ability to respec. I humbly disagree. FOTM is a symptom of both bad balance and respecs, imo. Bad balance is the drug. Respecs are the drug dealers.
So if we had a perfectly balanced game and unlimited respecs... There would still be FOTM chasing?
Fact of the matter, without respecs people are still FOTM chasing, it just takes a few weeks longer. Thus rewarding the people who speced early giving them much longer to play with OP weapons than they should have been able to.
Case in point: flaylocks.
They were OP for almost 6 weeks before they became FOTM. |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
611
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 04:12:00 -
[20] - Quote
Cosgar wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Why did you constantly put more skill levels into an item you hate using? Then why are you hanging out with a corp that doesn't appreciate what you bring to the table? Then why are you wasting your energy asking for a respec instead of asking for balance to include missing items? Probably the same reason why even after my optional respec, went back into the Mass Driver, which was bugged, and Minmatar logi, which was lumped up with the CaLogi during everyone's nerf witch hunt. It's something you find fun, like doing, and you have faith in the developers that they'll make things right. If everyone cared more about being effective than having fun, we'd all be running around in shield tanking suits and ARs. Exmaple Core, I've been in the same boat you're in now. Not just with Dust or EVE, but in a lot of online games. Some of us are too stubborn to take the road less traveled with hopes that it pays off in the end. Sometimes it does, sometimes it doesn't, there's no guarantee. The only thing you can really do is think of the good times, or dream of the possible good times around the corner. If you decide to do anything that matters- don't give up. Whether it's too expensive, underpowered, or your peers don't respect what you do, find a way to keep things going- keep the faith and do it because it's what you like doing. "Adapt or Die..."
this makes me wanna cry... your so right. Im gona try and better this game cuz its really cool, im hoping theres enough ppl like you and zdub who think alike with us and continue to balance the game AND its mechanics |
|
Malkai Inos
Opus Arcana Covert Intervention
885
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 04:13:00 -
[21] - Quote
ZDub 303 wrote:Duran Lex wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:Once we've reached some semblance of balance, respecs won't be necessary. But the people on this forum are dellusional if they think we are balanced now or will be balanced by the end of the year.
FOTM is a symptom of bad balance, not of the ability to respec. I humbly disagree. FOTM is a symptom of both bad balance and respecs, imo. Bad balance is the drug. Respecs are the drug dealers. So if we had a perfectly balanced game and unlimited respecs... There would still be FOTM chasing? There is no perfectly balanced game of this complexity. We could argue with fairies aswell by that standard.
|
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1315
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 04:15:00 -
[22] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote: Dunno! this is what happens though, has all the time. But its not about nerfing a class into uselessness now and fixing them 6 months later. Its about having your class ruined and not having a reason to play for the next 6 months, as youve been swindled out of your SP. So, your entitled to respecs
So true.. Very well put. |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1315
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 04:16:00 -
[23] - Quote
Malkai Inos wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:Duran Lex wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:Once we've reached some semblance of balance, respecs won't be necessary. But the people on this forum are dellusional if they think we are balanced now or will be balanced by the end of the year.
FOTM is a symptom of bad balance, not of the ability to respec. I humbly disagree. FOTM is a symptom of both bad balance and respecs, imo. Bad balance is the drug. Respecs are the drug dealers. So if we had a perfectly balanced game and unlimited respecs... There would still be FOTM chasing? There is no perfectly balanced game of this complexity. We could argue with fairies aswell by that standard.
Point still stands no? Yes reality is we will never have perfect balancing, but get close enough and 'fotm chasing' will be indistinguishable from play style preference. |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
611
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 04:17:00 -
[24] - Quote
Malkai Inos wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:Duran Lex wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:Once we've reached some semblance of balance, respecs won't be necessary. But the people on this forum are dellusional if they think we are balanced now or will be balanced by the end of the year.
FOTM is a symptom of bad balance, not of the ability to respec. I humbly disagree. FOTM is a symptom of both bad balance and respecs, imo. Bad balance is the drug. Respecs are the drug dealers. So if we had a perfectly balanced game and unlimited respecs... There would still be FOTM chasing? There is no perfectly balanced game of this complexity. We could argue with fairies aswell by that standard.
If there is no balance than we need respecs to keep people enjoying the game |
Duran Lex
Silver Talon Corporation
116
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 04:18:00 -
[25] - Quote
ZDub 303 wrote:Duran Lex wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:Once we've reached some semblance of balance, respecs won't be necessary. But the people on this forum are dellusional if they think we are balanced now or will be balanced by the end of the year.
FOTM is a symptom of bad balance, not of the ability to respec. I humbly disagree. FOTM is a symptom of both bad balance and respecs, imo. Bad balance is the drug. Respecs are the drug dealers. So if we had a perfectly balanced game and unlimited respecs... There would still be FOTM chasing?
That hypothetical is a matter of opinion.
One side of the coin will say "the game is perfectly balanced, so you don't need respecs"
The other side "the game is perfectly balance, so whats the harm in respecs?"
|
DUST Fiend
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
5534
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 04:19:00 -
[26] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Why did you constantly put more skill levels into an item you hate using? Then why are you hanging out with a corp that doesn't appreciate what you bring to the table? Then why are you wasting your energy asking for a respec instead of asking for balance to include missing items? Isn't 1.4 supposed to be some massive shakeup?
How are we supposed to plan for the future when we have absolutely no idea what is changing.
:/ |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1315
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 04:20:00 -
[27] - Quote
Duran Lex wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:Duran Lex wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:Once we've reached some semblance of balance, respecs won't be necessary. But the people on this forum are dellusional if they think we are balanced now or will be balanced by the end of the year.
FOTM is a symptom of bad balance, not of the ability to respec. I humbly disagree. FOTM is a symptom of both bad balance and respecs, imo. Bad balance is the drug. Respecs are the drug dealers. So if we had a perfectly balanced game and unlimited respecs... There would still be FOTM chasing? That hypothetical is a matter of opinion. One side of the coin will say "the game is perfectly balanced, so you don't need respecs" The other side "the game is perfectly balance, so whats the harm in respecs?"
It's up to the game design philosophy at that point and i can live with either argument just fine.
Until we're even remotely balanced through, I think respecs would help more than they hurt. For reasons already listed. |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1315
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 04:22:00 -
[28] - Quote
DUST Fiend wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Why did you constantly put more skill levels into an item you hate using? Then why are you hanging out with a corp that doesn't appreciate what you bring to the table? Then why are you wasting your energy asking for a respec instead of asking for balance to include missing items? Isn't 1.4 supposed to be some massive shakeup? How are we supposed to plan for the future when we have absolutely no idea what is changing. :/
You don't plan for the future. And you don't spend any of your SP.
Even 1.4 won't be the end of it I'm positive.
Best off not spending any SP until Christmas IMHO....
It's why nobody wants to play anymore. |
Malkai Inos
Opus Arcana Covert Intervention
885
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 04:22:00 -
[29] - Quote
ZDub 303 wrote:Malkai Inos wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:Duran Lex wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:Once we've reached some semblance of balance, respecs won't be necessary. But the people on this forum are dellusional if they think we are balanced now or will be balanced by the end of the year.
FOTM is a symptom of bad balance, not of the ability to respec. I humbly disagree. FOTM is a symptom of both bad balance and respecs, imo. Bad balance is the drug. Respecs are the drug dealers. So if we had a perfectly balanced game and unlimited respecs... There would still be FOTM chasing? There is no perfectly balanced game of this complexity. We could argue with fairies aswell by that standard. Point still stands no? Yes reality is we will never have perfect balancing, but get close enough and 'fotm chasing' will be indistinguishable from play style preference. No because respecs make the came much more succeptible to problems with balancing by lowering the barrier of "chasing" if you will. Just as PC with it's high performance pressure, small balance imperfections suddenly break the game because it's either too easy or to important to chase.
Edit: But in the end the balance issue breaks into personal opinion somewhere beyond that. Have a look here for a few more "nay" arguments that are mostly unrelated to FOTM stuff. |
Duran Lex
Silver Talon Corporation
116
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 04:22:00 -
[30] - Quote
DUST Fiend wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Why did you constantly put more skill levels into an item you hate using? Then why are you hanging out with a corp that doesn't appreciate what you bring to the table? Then why are you wasting your energy asking for a respec instead of asking for balance to include missing items? Isn't 1.4 supposed to be some massive shakeup? How are we supposed to plan for the future when we have absolutely no idea what is changing. :/
Here
this might help too |
|
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
613
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 04:22:00 -
[31] - Quote
ZDub 303 wrote:Duran Lex wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:Duran Lex wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:Once we've reached some semblance of balance, respecs won't be necessary. But the people on this forum are dellusional if they think we are balanced now or will be balanced by the end of the year.
FOTM is a symptom of bad balance, not of the ability to respec. I humbly disagree. FOTM is a symptom of both bad balance and respecs, imo. Bad balance is the drug. Respecs are the drug dealers. So if we had a perfectly balanced game and unlimited respecs... There would still be FOTM chasing? That hypothetical is a matter of opinion. One side of the coin will say "the game is perfectly balanced, so you don't need respecs" The other side "the game is perfectly balance, so whats the harm in respecs?" It's up to the game design philosophy at that point and i can live with either argument just fine. Until we're even remotely balanced through, I think respecs would help more than they hurt. For reasons already listed. yes, this is true right here. this right here, is a good point. like, srly. read this comment. +1 soooo hard |
calvin b
Molon Labe. League of Infamy
165
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 04:22:00 -
[32] - Quote
I understand how you feel. I also know that if CCP fails to offer a optional respec after all suits, weapons, and vehicles are released there will be a lot of unhappy players. Balance is needed, but lets be patient and wait for them to fix the current problems and release of all items. I say 6 months from now if not half of these items are not fixed, there may not be enough people left. You can only take so much before you throw your hands up. For example American cars, the auto industry thought they were invincible and kept making crap. Americans had enough of it and moved to Japanese built cars. |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1315
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 04:25:00 -
[33] - Quote
calvin b wrote:I understand how you feel. I also know that if CCP fails to offer a optional respec after all suits, weapons, and vehicles are released there will be a lot of unhappy players. Balance is needed, but lets be patient and wait for them to fix the current problems and release of all items. I say 6 months from now if not half of these items are not fixed, there may not be enough people left. You can only take so much before you throw your hands up. For example American cars, the auto industry thought they were invincible and kept making crap. Americans had enough of it and moved to Japanese built cars.
No one wants to sit on ****** builds for 6 months while they wait for CCP to figure this out though. We're all better of playing a different game :( |
DUST Fiend
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
5534
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 04:25:00 -
[34] - Quote
Duran Lex wrote:DUST Fiend wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Why did you constantly put more skill levels into an item you hate using? Then why are you hanging out with a corp that doesn't appreciate what you bring to the table? Then why are you wasting your energy asking for a respec instead of asking for balance to include missing items? Isn't 1.4 supposed to be some massive shakeup? How are we supposed to plan for the future when we have absolutely no idea what is changing. :/ Here That tells us nothing. Not to say it's not a useful devblog, but apparently the entire Shanghai team has essentially been gutted, and 1.4 is supposed a big design leap. Vehicles and AV are getting a "balance pass" which with CCP, could literally be anything. That tank you love to drive today, might feel like garbage to you tomorrow. That forge gun you really enjoy all of a sudden just doesn't function like it has for so long, and the style is no longer fun. Those AV grenades you dumped oodles of SP into? Nah sorry, balance, those suck.
We have no idea
It's a crap shoot. |
Duran Lex
Silver Talon Corporation
116
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 04:26:00 -
[35] - Quote
ZDub 303 wrote:Duran Lex wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:Duran Lex wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:Once we've reached some semblance of balance, respecs won't be necessary. But the people on this forum are dellusional if they think we are balanced now or will be balanced by the end of the year.
FOTM is a symptom of bad balance, not of the ability to respec. I humbly disagree. FOTM is a symptom of both bad balance and respecs, imo. Bad balance is the drug. Respecs are the drug dealers. So if we had a perfectly balanced game and unlimited respecs... There would still be FOTM chasing? That hypothetical is a matter of opinion. One side of the coin will say "the game is perfectly balanced, so you don't need respecs" The other side "the game is perfectly balance, so whats the harm in respecs?" It's up to the game design philosophy at that point and i can live with either argument just fine. Until we're even remotely balanced through, I think respecs would help more than they hurt. For reasons already listed.
Yes, once it gets to that point. But its not...so we still have the same argument being thrown back and forth.
One side - "It helps the game by letting people choose what they want to have fun with"
Other side - "It helps ruin the game by letting people choose the FOTM to have fun with."
It will never end. |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
616
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 04:28:00 -
[36] - Quote
calvin b wrote:I understand how you feel. I also know that if CCP fails to offer a optional respec after all suits, weapons, and vehicles are released there will be a lot of unhappy players. Balance is needed, but lets be patient and wait for them to fix the current problems and release of all items. I say 6 months from now if not half of these items are not fixed, there may not be enough people left. You can only take so much before you throw your hands up. For example American cars, the auto industry thought they were invincible and kept making crap. Americans had enough of it and moved to Japanese built cars.
no no no no more "being patient" and "waiting 6 months from now". were told this far too often, we have been patient sence the idea of dust has first been formed and when we are promised or suggested a date that progress is on the way we are told to continue being patient becuase things went wrong. If you fool us once, shame on you. Fool us twice, shame on us. We are far, far past twice at this point. Something good needs to happen, all were being patient for is getting empty promises of balance, wich ruins our classes that we cant respec out of. This needs to stop, we need respecs to give those who are nerfed into dispare incentive to continue playing dust |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1317
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 04:28:00 -
[37] - Quote
DUST Fiend wrote:Duran Lex wrote:DUST Fiend wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Why did you constantly put more skill levels into an item you hate using? Then why are you hanging out with a corp that doesn't appreciate what you bring to the table? Then why are you wasting your energy asking for a respec instead of asking for balance to include missing items? Isn't 1.4 supposed to be some massive shakeup? How are we supposed to plan for the future when we have absolutely no idea what is changing. :/ Here That tells us nothing. Not to say it's not a useful devblog, but apparently the entire Shanghai team has essentially been gutted, and 1.4 is supposed a big design leap. Vehicles and AV are getting a "balance pass" which with CCP, could literally be anything. That tank you love to drive today, might feel like garbage to you tomorrow. That forge gun you really enjoy all of a sudden just doesn't function like it has for so long, and the style is no longer fun. Those AV grenades you dumped oodles of SP into? Nah sorry, balance, those suck. We have no idea It's a crap shoot.
Amen, good post. |
Duran Lex
Silver Talon Corporation
116
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 04:28:00 -
[38] - Quote
DUST Fiend wrote: That tells us nothing. Not to say it's not a useful devblog, but apparently the entire Shanghai team has essentially been gutted, and 1.4 is supposed a big design leap. Vehicles and AV are getting a "balance pass" which with CCP, could literally be anything. That tank you love to drive today, might feel like garbage to you tomorrow. That forge gun you really enjoy all of a sudden just doesn't function like it has for so long, and the style is no longer fun. Those AV grenades you dumped oodles of SP into? Nah sorry, balance, those suck.
We have no idea
It's a crap shoot.
You don't think aiming being taken care of isn't something big?
With all the complaints about how aiming is terrible?
Assuming if course this patch WILL fix aiming.
But bringing back the proper aim assist, and removing the turning speed cap on the mouse sounds like a pretty large step in a good direction.
Edit - that "balance pass" is the large vehicle/AV rework that prolly won't make it into 1.4. Thats the post that first gave us insight into this major change. |
Ivan Avogadro
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
434
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 04:29:00 -
[39] - Quote
Malkai Inos wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:Duran Lex wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:Once we've reached some semblance of balance, respecs won't be necessary. But the people on this forum are dellusional if they think we are balanced now or will be balanced by the end of the year.
FOTM is a symptom of bad balance, not of the ability to respec. I humbly disagree. FOTM is a symptom of both bad balance and respecs, imo. Bad balance is the drug. Respecs are the drug dealers. So if we had a perfectly balanced game and unlimited respecs... There would still be FOTM chasing? There is no perfectly balanced game of this complexity. We could argue with fairies aswell by that standard.
Don't be dismissive out of hand. There is a plenty of room between DUSTs current level of balance and fictional perfect, and you know it.
Think of League of Legends as an example. You essentially "respec" every game by picking a new character. Some champions go through phases of popularity or FOTM. But that doesn't ruin the game, because balance is so tight that other champions are viable if not always popular. Now imagine you had to pick our one champion, could never use any others, and Riot nerfed your one guy. Sounds like super duper fun right?
Respecs don't do anything except allow people to use different skills they otherwise already earned the points for. All whey did wrong was not correctly read CCPs mind months in advance. |
DUST Fiend
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
5534
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 04:29:00 -
[40] - Quote
Duran Lex wrote:One side - "It helps the game by letting people choose what they want to have fun with"
Other side - "It helps ruin the game by letting people choose the FOTM to have fun with." Other other side - "It helps ruin the game by forcing people to stick with things CCP decides to cripple after a drunken night on the town" |
|
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1317
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 04:33:00 -
[41] - Quote
Duran Lex wrote:
Yes, once it gets to that point. But its not...so we still have the same argument being thrown back and forth.
One side - "It helps the game by letting people choose what they want to have fun with"
Other side - "It helps ruin the game by letting people choose the FOTM to have fun with."
It will never end.
Respecs have a few unique advantages though.
1. They show the metrics for FOTM much clearer to CCP, getting us closer to balance faster. 2. They allow people to spec into FOTM counters until FOTM can get fixed. 3. They don't alienate players who've been nerfed into oblivion by a 'balance patch' like tankers and scouts and heavies. 4. They can clearly see which suits are underutilized since people don't have to use them anymore, instead... People are just stuck with ****** suits and left to complain endlessly on the forum until they give up and quit the game. |
Malkai Inos
Opus Arcana Covert Intervention
885
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 04:34:00 -
[42] - Quote
Ivan Avogadro wrote:Malkai Inos wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:Duran Lex wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:Once we've reached some semblance of balance, respecs won't be necessary. But the people on this forum are dellusional if they think we are balanced now or will be balanced by the end of the year.
FOTM is a symptom of bad balance, not of the ability to respec. I humbly disagree. FOTM is a symptom of both bad balance and respecs, imo. Bad balance is the drug. Respecs are the drug dealers. So if we had a perfectly balanced game and unlimited respecs... There would still be FOTM chasing? There is no perfectly balanced game of this complexity. We could argue with fairies aswell by that standard. Don't be dismissive out of hand. There is a plenty of room between DUSTs current level of balance and fictional perfect, and you know it. Think of League of Legends as an example. You essentially "respec" every game by picking a new character. Some champions go through phases of popularity or FOTM. But that doesn't ruin the game, because balance is so tight that other champions are viable if not always popular. Now imagine you had to pick our one champion, could never use any others, and Riot nerfed your one guy. Sounds like super duper fun right? Respecs don't do anything except allow people to use different skills they otherwise already earned the points for. All whey did wrong was not correctly read CCPs mind months in advance. I have acknowledged a post later that the FOTM argument is not the end-all counterargument so while i maintain the position that respecs can amplify balance issues you're right in principle.
|
Duran Lex
Silver Talon Corporation
116
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 04:34:00 -
[43] - Quote
Ivan Avogadro wrote:
Don't be dismissive out of hand. There is a plenty of room between DUSTs current level of balance and fictional perfect, and you know it.
Think of League of Legends as an example. You essentially "respec" every game by picking a new character. Some champions go through phases of popularity or FOTM. But that doesn't ruin the game, because balance is so tight that other champions are viable if not always popular. Now imagine you had to pick our one champion, could never use any others, and Riot nerfed your one guy. Sounds like super duper fun right?
Respecs don't do anything except allow people to use different skills they otherwise already earned the points for. All whey did wrong was not correctly read CCPs mind months in advance.
You are comparing watermelons to raisins. |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
616
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 04:36:00 -
[44] - Quote
ZDub 303 wrote:Duran Lex wrote:
Yes, once it gets to that point. But its not...so we still have the same argument being thrown back and forth.
One side - "It helps the game by letting people choose what they want to have fun with"
Other side - "It helps ruin the game by letting people choose the FOTM to have fun with."
It will never end.
Respecs have a few unique advantages though. 1. They show the metrics for FOTM much clearer to CCP, getting us closer to balance faster. 2. They allow people to spec into FOTM counters until FOTM can get fixed. 3. They don't alienate players who've been nerfed into oblivion by a 'balance patch' like tankers and scouts and heavies. 4. They can clearly see which suits are underutilized since people don't have to use them anymore, instead... People are just stuck with ****** suits and left to complain endlessly on the forum until they give up and quit the game.
right here. this guys on fire, listen to him. Someone please, prove this wrong. Only truths and good points here |
Ivan Avogadro
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
434
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 04:38:00 -
[45] - Quote
Duran Lex wrote:Ivan Avogadro wrote:
Don't be dismissive out of hand. There is a plenty of room between DUSTs current level of balance and fictional perfect, and you know it.
Think of League of Legends as an example. You essentially "respec" every game by picking a new character. Some champions go through phases of popularity or FOTM. But that doesn't ruin the game, because balance is so tight that other champions are viable if not always popular. Now imagine you had to pick our one champion, could never use any others, and Riot nerfed your one guy. Sounds like super duper fun right?
Respecs don't do anything except allow people to use different skills they otherwise already earned the points for. All whey did wrong was not correctly read CCPs mind months in advance.
You are comparing watermelons to raisins.
And my favorite no respec battle cry has always been "Welcome to New Eden htfu" because yaknow, what's good for EVE... |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1319
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 04:41:00 -
[46] - Quote
I will fully admit, respecs go against the design philosophy of this game and will probably be bad in the long run. But right now the game needs help, and people just want to have fun while they play.
For many people sitting on nerfed builds, not having the ability to spec out of bad design decisions made by CCP means they cannot have fun... So why should they play?
I'm happy with my cal logi build, I don't even want a respec that badly. I just sit here now and make comments on it everyday for people like Exmaple who got boned by bad design and just left the deal with it.
I like this game, and I want more people to play it. Despite any of my forum rage ive posted in other threads. |
Malkai Inos
Opus Arcana Covert Intervention
885
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 04:43:00 -
[47] - Quote
ZDub 303 wrote:
Respecs have a few unique advantages though.
1. They show the metrics for FOTM much clearer to CCP, getting us closer to balance faster. 2. They allow people to spec into FOTM counters until FOTM can get fixed. 3. They don't alienate players who've been nerfed into oblivion by a 'balance patch' like tankers and scouts and heavies. 4. They can clearly see which suits are underutilized since people don't have to use them anymore, instead... People are just stuck with ****** suits and left to complain endlessly on the forum until they give up and quit the game.
In the right order:
1. They also amplify possibly insignificant balance issues, making reasonable balance harder to achieve and "nerfed into oblivion" scenarios more common.
2. A measure that could be fixed directly and and possibly easier without respecs as per my response to 1.
3. They alienate players whom value the "no respec" mentality and would take issue with such a step. (Leaving justification for either position aside for the sake of the argument)
4. "Underutilized does not mean UP. There are other possible reasons for that and better metrics to asses relative power in a no respec environment.
Lastly there are other reasons against respecs, most of which have nothing/not much to do with FOTM chasing here, here, here, here, here and here.
It is often overlooked that the no respec mentality of CCP has as variety of reasons behind it and the subject is not done due justice if they are ignored.
|
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
617
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 04:45:00 -
[48] - Quote
ZDub 303 wrote:I will fully admit, respecs go against the design philosophy of this game and will probably be bad in the long run. But right now the game needs help, and people just want to have fun while they play.
For many people sitting on nerfed builds, not having the ability to spec out of bad design decisions made by CCP means they cannot have fun... So why should they play?
I'm happy with my cal logi build, I don't even want a respec that badly. I just sit here now and make comments on it everyday for people like Exmaple who got boned by bad design and just left the deal with it.
I like this game, and I want more people to play it. Despite any of my forum rage ive posted in other threads.
MY HERO!! <3 |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1321
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 04:48:00 -
[49] - Quote
Malkai Inos wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:
Respecs have a few unique advantages though.
1. They show the metrics for FOTM much clearer to CCP, getting us closer to balance faster. 2. They allow people to spec into FOTM counters until FOTM can get fixed. 3. They don't alienate players who've been nerfed into oblivion by a 'balance patch' like tankers and scouts and heavies. 4. They can clearly see which suits are underutilized since people don't have to use them anymore, instead... People are just stuck with ****** suits and left to complain endlessly on the forum until they give up and quit the game.
In the right order: 1. They also amplify possibly insignificant balance issues, making reasonable balance harder to achieve and "nerfed into oblivion" scenarios more common. 2. A measure that could be fixed directly and and possibly easier without respecs as per my response to 1. 3. They alienate players whom value the "no respec" mentality and would take issue with such a step. (Leaving justification for either position aside for the sake of the argument) 4. "Underutilized does not mean UP. There are other possible reasons for that and better metrics to assess relative power in a no respec environment. Lastly there are other reasons against respecs, most of which have nothing/not much to do with FOTM chasing here, here, here, here, here and here. It is often overlooked that the no respec mentality of CCP has as variety of reasons behind it and the subject is not done due justice if they are ignored.
I would completely agree with all of your points and linked posts... If this game was even close to balanced.
So what should someone in exmaple's position do? Just quit the game? |
Xbox One
Intara Direct Action Caldari State
22
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 04:49:00 -
[50] - Quote
I respect Cosgar too much to troll, but this thread IS DUMBER THAN ME. Quit speccing into things you use so once they get nerfed to non-OP status, and play the game like someone respectable. |
|
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
618
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 04:50:00 -
[51] - Quote
Malkai Inos wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:
Respecs have a few unique advantages though.
1. They show the metrics for FOTM much clearer to CCP, getting us closer to balance faster. 2. They allow people to spec into FOTM counters until FOTM can get fixed. 3. They don't alienate players who've been nerfed into oblivion by a 'balance patch' like tankers and scouts and heavies. 4. They can clearly see which suits are underutilized since people don't have to use them anymore, instead... People are just stuck with ****** suits and left to complain endlessly on the forum until they give up and quit the game.
In the right order: 1. They also amplify possibly insignificant balance issues, making reasonable balance harder to achieve and "nerfed into oblivion" scenarios more common. 2. A measure that could be fixed directly and and possibly easier without respecs as per my response to 1. 3. They alienate players whom value the "no respec" mentality and would take issue with such a step. (Leaving justification for either position aside for the sake of the argument) 4. "Underutilized does not mean UP. There are other possible reasons for that and better metrics to assess relative power in a no respec environment. Lastly there are other reasons against respecs, most of which have nothing/not much to do with FOTM chasing here, here, here, here, here and here. It is often overlooked that the no respec mentality of CCP has as variety of reasons behind it and the subject is not done due justice if they are ignored.
1. Nothing will change about the balance of the game with respecs. If you are in an unbalanced class, you will move to a balanced class so the promblem of unbalanced classes will be lessened.
2. That measure does not exist, and CCP does not have the time to search for that measure, look how long it takes them to do the little they do now.
3. Players with the "no respec" will HTFU and fight more balanced battles in game.
4. You are correct, Underutilized does not mean UP but it is no coensidence that the UP classes and items are underutlized |
OZAROW
A.N.O.N.Y.M.O.U.S. League of Infamy
250
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 04:52:00 -
[52] - Quote
ZDub 303 wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Why did you constantly put more skill levels into an item you hate using? Then why are you hanging out with a corp that doesn't appreciate what you bring to the table? Then why are you wasting your energy asking for a respec instead of asking for balance to include missing items? Cause we all know balance is months and months away... Iike it always has been for dust. When it comes to corps... If you want to be competitive in PC you can't run terrible builds just cause you're a special snowflake. Most corps would probably tell him "Exmaple... You're a beast tanker. And when tanks become viable again next February we would love to run you again, but until then we need another assault on the field." Same as scouts an heavies an armored infantry too |
Bleeding Knight
Sardaukar Merc Guild General Tso's Alliance
6
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 04:53:00 -
[53] - Quote
Malkai Inos wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:
Respecs have a few unique advantages though.
1. They show the metrics for FOTM much clearer to CCP, getting us closer to balance faster. 2. They allow people to spec into FOTM counters until FOTM can get fixed. 3. They don't alienate players who've been nerfed into oblivion by a 'balance patch' like tankers and scouts and heavies. 4. They can clearly see which suits are underutilized since people don't have to use them anymore, instead... People are just stuck with ****** suits and left to complain endlessly on the forum until they give up and quit the game.
In the right order: 1. They also amplify possibly insignificant balance issues, making reasonable balance harder to achieve and "nerfed into oblivion" scenarios more common. 2. A measure that could be fixed directly and and possibly easier without respecs as per my response to 1. 3. They alienate players whom value the "no respec" mentality and would take issue with such a step. (Leaving justification for either position aside for the sake of the argument) 4. Underutilized does not mean UP. There are other possible reasons for that and better metrics to assess relative power in a no respec environment. Lastly there are other reasons against respecs, most of which have nothing/not much to do with FOTM chasing here, here, here, here, here and here. It is often overlooked that the no respec mentality of CCP has as variety of reasons behind it and the subject is not done due justice if they are ignored. Nice links. If you have 15 million skill points and have your core skills, you don't need another 15 million SP. That's just silly.
|
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
618
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 04:53:00 -
[54] - Quote
Xbox One wrote:I respect Cosgar too much to troll, but this thread IS DUMBER THAN ME. Quit speccing into things you use so once they get nerfed to non-OP status, and play the game like someone respectable.
The OP describes the oppostie of what your saying and Cosgar is not the thread creator, i am. Imgaine you have a balanced class. Next patch or build you play your class is nerfed to nonfactor. It is nerfed AFTER you speced into it, not before. In that case, should you be allowed to respec? |
Duran Lex
Silver Talon Corporation
116
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 04:53:00 -
[55] - Quote
ZDub 303 wrote:Duran Lex wrote:
Yes, once it gets to that point. But its not...so we still have the same argument being thrown back and forth.
One side - "It helps the game by letting people choose what they want to have fun with"
Other side - "It helps ruin the game by letting people choose the FOTM to have fun with."
It will never end.
Respecs have a few unique advantages though. 1. They show the metrics for FOTM much clearer to CCP, getting us closer to balance faster. 2. They allow people to spec into FOTM counters until FOTM can get fixed. 3. They don't alienate players who've been nerfed into oblivion by a 'balance patch' like tankers and scouts and heavies. 4. They can clearly see which suits are underutilized since people don't have to use them anymore, instead... People are just stuck with ****** suits and left to complain endlessly on the forum until they give up and quit the game.
It can also be detrimental though.
Lets say they gave the respec for tankers and most tankers respecced out of tanks.
Now theres no use for large amounts of SP invested in AV, so AVer's respec out of it.
There's very few tanks and AV now, so how are they going to collect data for those to balance it?
Or what if those Tankers all decided to spec into LLAV, which is truly OP. Now you have 6 LLAV's driving around all match neigh unstoppable.
LLAV gets nerfed too strong because of glorified data, everyone respecs out of it. No more LLAVs anymore.
Respecs are indeed a way to keep things fresh, and to add enjoyment by speccing out of something you personally think isn't fun to play anymore.
It just my opinion thats it cant work well for this game. It will only create a merry-go-round of extreme buffs and nerfs. |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1321
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 04:54:00 -
[56] - Quote
It's easier for the 'no respec' crowd to deal with a temporary design philosophy change than it is for players who cannot enjoy the game with a broken class to wait months for CCP to fix their game. |
Heathen Bastard
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
399
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 04:55:00 -
[57] - Quote
Yeah. I specced into something I knew was UP when I did it. I prefer the hard road, it forces me to be better than the kid who specs FOTM, because I have to be so to beat them.
think of it like this: When you use a crutch, and someone kicks it out, you can't get up as as easily because your legs got weak. Me? I laugh at the guy on the ground since I already did my getting up. Giggity. |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1321
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 04:55:00 -
[58] - Quote
Duran Lex wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:Duran Lex wrote:
Yes, once it gets to that point. But its not...so we still have the same argument being thrown back and forth.
One side - "It helps the game by letting people choose what they want to have fun with"
Other side - "It helps ruin the game by letting people choose the FOTM to have fun with."
It will never end.
Respecs have a few unique advantages though. 1. They show the metrics for FOTM much clearer to CCP, getting us closer to balance faster. 2. They allow people to spec into FOTM counters until FOTM can get fixed. 3. They don't alienate players who've been nerfed into oblivion by a 'balance patch' like tankers and scouts and heavies. 4. They can clearly see which suits are underutilized since people don't have to use them anymore, instead... People are just stuck with ****** suits and left to complain endlessly on the forum until they give up and quit the game. It can also be detrimental though. Lets say they gave the respec for tankers and most tankers respecced out of tanks. Now theres no use for large amounts of SP invested in AV, so AVer's respec out of it. There's very few tanks and AV now, so how are they going to collect data for those to balance it? Or what if those Tankers all decided to spec into LLAV, which is truly OP. Now you have 6 LLAV's driving around all match neigh unstoppable. LLAV gets nerfed too strong because of glorified data, everyone respecs out of it. No more LLAVs anymore. Respecs are indeed a way to keep things fresh, and to add enjoyment by speccing out of something you personally think isn't fun to play anymore. It just my opinion thats it cant work well for this game. It will only create a merry-go-round of extreme buffs and nerfs.
You give it 2-3 weeks and it would all settle to equilibrium. |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
618
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 04:58:00 -
[59] - Quote
Duran Lex wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:Duran Lex wrote:
Yes, once it gets to that point. But its not...so we still have the same argument being thrown back and forth.
One side - "It helps the game by letting people choose what they want to have fun with"
Other side - "It helps ruin the game by letting people choose the FOTM to have fun with."
It will never end.
Respecs have a few unique advantages though. 1. They show the metrics for FOTM much clearer to CCP, getting us closer to balance faster. 2. They allow people to spec into FOTM counters until FOTM can get fixed. 3. They don't alienate players who've been nerfed into oblivion by a 'balance patch' like tankers and scouts and heavies. 4. They can clearly see which suits are underutilized since people don't have to use them anymore, instead... People are just stuck with ****** suits and left to complain endlessly on the forum until they give up and quit the game. It can also be detrimental though. Lets say they gave the respec for tankers and most tankers respecced out of tanks. Now theres no use for large amounts of SP invested in AV, so AVer's respec out of it. There's very few tanks and AV now, so how are they going to collect data for those to balance it? Or what if those Tankers all decided to spec into LLAV, which is truly OP. Now you have 6 LLAV's driving around all match neigh unstoppable. LLAV gets nerfed too strong because of glorified data, everyone respecs out of it. No more LLAVs anymore. Respecs are indeed a way to keep things fresh, and to add enjoyment by speccing out of something you personally think isn't fun to play anymore. It just my opinion thats it cant work well for this game. It will only create a merry-go-round of extreme buffs and nerfs.
You are correct, it would be a promblem for lavs to go around and run ppl over because there are no tanks, and no tanks means no AV. However, there will always be AV to take out all land vehicals becuase everyone has OP AV nades and milit AV is enough to kill dropships. This concern is not a concern at all |
dday3six
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
126
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 04:58:00 -
[60] - Quote
Malkai Inos wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:
Respecs have a few unique advantages though.
1. They show the metrics for FOTM much clearer to CCP, getting us closer to balance faster. 2. They allow people to spec into FOTM counters until FOTM can get fixed. 3. They don't alienate players who've been nerfed into oblivion by a 'balance patch' like tankers and scouts and heavies. 4. They can clearly see which suits are underutilized since people don't have to use them anymore, instead... People are just stuck with ****** suits and left to complain endlessly on the forum until they give up and quit the game.
In the right order: 1. They also amplify possibly insignificant balance issues, making reasonable balance harder to achieve and "nerfed into oblivion" scenarios more common. 2. A measure that could be fixed directly and and possibly easier without respecs as per my response to 1. 3. They alienate players whom value the "no respec" mentality and would take issue with such a step. (Leaving justification for either position aside for the sake of the argument) 4. Underutilized does not mean UP. There are other possible reasons for that and better metrics to assess relative power in a no respec environment. Lastly there are other reasons against respecs, most of which have nothing/not much to do with FOTM chasing here, here, here, here, here and here. It is often overlooked that the no respec mentality of CCP has as variety of reasons behind it and the subject is not done due justice if they are ignored.
Whatever harmful effects respecs might have on the player market that has no ETA and we know nothing about, cannot be used as a valid argument against respecs in the present. Let's look at CCP's history of promises vs fulfillment in regards to Dust, frankly we don't even know that it will be added at this point.
|
|
Duran Lex
Silver Talon Corporation
116
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 04:59:00 -
[61] - Quote
ZDub 303 wrote: You give it 2-3 weeks and it would all settle to equilibrium.
Problem is you can't guarantee that anymore then i can guarantee it won't happen.
opinions based on speculation will always be such. |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
618
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 05:00:00 -
[62] - Quote
Heathen Bastard wrote:Yeah. I specced into something I knew was UP when I did it. I prefer the hard road, it forces me to be better than the kid who specs FOTM, because I have to be so to beat them.
think of it like this: When you use a crutch, and someone kicks it out, you can't get up as as easily because your legs got weak. Me? I laugh at the guy on the ground since I already did my getting up. Giggity.
This is good effort, but not very realistic in dust. The best players in the game sometimes migrate to the most FOTM classes in the game. When the best players go for FOTM, the UP does not win, skilled or no |
Malkai Inos
Opus Arcana Covert Intervention
885
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 05:03:00 -
[63] - Quote
ZDub 303 wrote:So what should someone in exmaple's position do? Just quit the game? If the game in its current state is incapable of providing him the fun he's looking for than at least a break might be in order.
We are now getting to the point where we have to acknowledge that different people have different expactations of a fun game and that probably each of us has his own personal "screw this then" scenario. It might be that the prevention of my "screw this then" scenario might directly or indirectly trigger his "screw this then" scenario and vice versa. Now how do we deal with it?
In the end we all are standing up for what we believe is the best for the players and the game, knowing that our priorities might alienate someone else from it.
I'm not going to bs you in saying that i wasn't aware of the fact that i endorse a position that screws some people over. Every position screws somebody over.
|
CoD isAIDS
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
65
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 05:04:00 -
[64] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:You play a properly balanced, fair and fun class. Liking the class, you dump all 15 mill SP to your name into the class. Suddenly, new build/patch comes around and your class is nerfed without your consent and you now suck at the game. You spawn in your proto suit or your vehical and you are killed over and over, loosing all your ISK. You are told you can not play PC because the one class you are good at, sucks. Nobody wants you in any serious endeavor in dust because your class is nerfed to the point of uselessness. Like current shield tanks, dropships, lazers, plasma cannons and soon to be armor tanks when they fix the bug that is causing them to be balanced. You no longer want to play dust, as the class you played is ruined and so is your ability to enjoy playing dust, because the developers ruined the class you speced into. CCP later anounes that they will not be fixing your class for many months and they ask you to accept their most sincere apologies, despite changing the class that you speced into many months beforehand. Should you get a respec? This happened to the classes mentioned previously and will happen again when the fix the armor tanks C'mon dude... |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
618
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 05:08:00 -
[65] - Quote
Malkai Inos wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:So what should someone in exmaple's position do? Just quit the game? If the game in its current state is incapable of providing him the fun he's looking for than at least a break might be in order. We are now getting to the point where we have to acknowledge that different people have different expactations of a fun game and that probably each of us has his own personal "screw this then" scenario. It might be that the prevention of my "screw this then" scenario might directly or indirectly trigger his "screw this then" scenario and vice versa. Now how do we deal with it? In the end we all are standing up for what we believe is the best for the players and the game, knowing that our priorities might alienate someone else from it. I'm not going to bs you in saying that i wasn't aware of the fact that i endorse a position that screws some people over. Every position screws somebody over.
Well. Supporting a position that screws somebody over is not what makes this game better. You just told me to stop playing because there is no help comming my way or for the same people cought in my position. You should be supporting a position that makes ppl want to play, fixing the promblems so people do not get screwed over. Respecs is the answer, telling ppl that they are screwed and should go take a brake, stop playing, is not how you keep your players |
Heathen Bastard
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
399
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 05:11:00 -
[66] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:Yeah. I specced into something I knew was UP when I did it. I prefer the hard road, it forces me to be better than the kid who specs FOTM, because I have to be so to beat them.
think of it like this: When you use a crutch, and someone kicks it out, you can't get up as as easily because your legs got weak. Me? I laugh at the guy on the ground since I already did my getting up. Giggity. This is good effort, but not very realistic in dust. The best players in the game sometimes migrate to the most FOTM classes in the game. When the best players go for FOTM, the UP does not win, skilled or no
I do sometimes. it just requires better tactics becoming so ingrained to my thought processes that it's second nature for me to observe a fight and scatter the enemy by flanking with an HMG and grenades(real ones,not contacts.) to flush the poor little pricks out of cover and into fire, since they lose that edge you have when you know you're outnumbered, outgunned, and out-healthed in your fatsuit.
its not aiming better or something simple. it's being forced to think with real tactics that's giving me the edge in a fight. Sure, sometimes the enemy being so damn much better equipped makes this nigh insurmountable, but still, it's only mostly impossible. Feels good to know I won because I out-thought the opponent(like say, tricking a flaylogi into some remote explosives around a corner) or because they lost their edge(using splash weapons makes your aim real ****ty, so that even a fatsuit can dance circles around you while turning you into a fine mist with an HMG.) |
DUST Fiend
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
5536
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 05:11:00 -
[67] - Quote
I hope our new EP can grasp that while this game takes place in the EVE universe, it is not EVE, and it plays VASTLY different. While I don't necessarily support full blown respecs, a gradual skill reallocation system would certainly be desirable. As it is, you're expected to understand exactly how your playstyle will be, long before you get the chance to play it, or test the equipment that it requires.
You must invest blindly or through spreadsheets, ultimately theory crafting until you are rewarded with being stuck with the results, like or not. |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
620
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 05:11:00 -
[68] - Quote
CoD isAIDS wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:You play a properly balanced, fair and fun class. Liking the class, you dump all 15 mill SP to your name into the class. Suddenly, new build/patch comes around and your class is nerfed without your consent and you now suck at the game. You spawn in your proto suit or your vehical and you are killed over and over, loosing all your ISK. You are told you can not play PC because the one class you are good at, sucks. Nobody wants you in any serious endeavor in dust because your class is nerfed to the point of uselessness. Like current shield tanks, dropships, lazers, plasma cannons and soon to be armor tanks when they fix the bug that is causing them to be balanced. You no longer want to play dust, as the class you played is ruined and so is your ability to enjoy playing dust, because the developers ruined the class you speced into. CCP later anounes that they will not be fixing your class for many months and they ask you to accept their most sincere apologies, despite changing the class that you speced into many months beforehand. Should you get a respec? This happened to the classes mentioned previously and will happen again when the fix the armor tanks C'mon dude...
Am i and the many other people wrong for wishing we were not screwed over and shuned because our classes are now ruined, out of the blue? Is it wrong for the hungry to want food? Is it wrong to correct what mistakes were made? |
Heinz Doofenshertz
BetaMax. CRONOS.
459
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 05:18:00 -
[69] - Quote
Please note, this is the internet, we can and will argue against anything, because we can.
to the point, they did give a respec when the massively changed the skills and the tree, this I agree with, but if the FOTM is what you are chasing, why are you playing? I thought the FOTM was what ever COD Activision released this week.
This being New Eden, and me being a crazy EVE player that seems to mean I don't understand shooters, /me rolls eyes, I think you should say screw flavor of the month, what can I do to ruin their day. lately it was standing on a rather high spot and blowing up people driving around in free lav's and I laughed alot. I think this is called having fun. |
Malkai Inos
Opus Arcana Covert Intervention
886
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 05:20:00 -
[70] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:Well. Supporting a position that screws somebody over is not what makes this game better. You just told me to stop playing because there is no help comming my way or for the same people cought in my position. You should be supporting a position that makes ppl want to play, fixing the promblems so people do not get screwed over. Respecs is the answer, telling ppl that they are screwed and should go take a brake, stop playing, is not how you keep your players The problem is that i don't agree that respecs are the answer, that's why we are arguing in the frist place.
dday3six wrote:Whatever harmful effects respecs might have on the player market that has no ETA and we know nothing about, cannot be used as a valid argument against respecs in the present. Let's look at CCP's history of promises vs fulfillment in regards to Dust, frankly we don't even know that it will be added at this point. CCP has stated earlier that a large part of the development of the market is monitoring player behavior after every intermediate feature is added (donation, isk transfer, later item trade etc.)
Putting respecs into this equation makes the whole thing volatile to no end. A temporary respec phase would invalidate all gathered data and CCP would risk damaging both economies if they merge them based on these false data.
And we know quite a bit about the basic functionality of the market. The planned eve dust connection pretty much predefined a range range of funcionality that will have to be definitely implemented or the feature can be scrapped altogether.
Lastly the market is only mentioned in one of those links iirc. Those are still standing.
|
|
Sinboto Simmons
SVER True Blood
812
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 05:22:00 -
[71] - Quote
I skilled into:
Remote explosives
Proximity mines
Nova knives
Shotguns
Plasma cannons
SMGs
Mass drivers
Minmatar scout
Out of all the things I just listed the mass driver is the only thing I can truly say I can depend on at all times because the other gear is A:bugged in someway or B:not powerfull enough to do it's job effectively.
I have not once asked for a respec because of the reasons abovementioned opting to attempt to get the gear balanced, while this is difficult due to much of the gear I choose to use not being 'mainstream' I'd rather a long tearm fix then a short tearm one, this is why I find the recent outcry for respecs due to the coming rebalancing of the flaylock and calldari logi suit humorous seeing as both were being used in unintended ways by those who wanted an unfair advantage and are not being unjustly brought down.
Oh and warning: my grammar sucks |
Malkai Inos
Opus Arcana Covert Intervention
886
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 05:23:00 -
[72] - Quote
DUST Fiend wrote:I hope our new EP can grasp that while this game takes place in the EVE universe, it is not EVE, and it plays VASTLY different. While I don't necessarily support full blown respecs, a gradual skill reallocation system would certainly be desirable. As it is, you're expected to understand exactly how your playstyle will be, long before you get the chance to play it, or test the equipment that it requires.
You must invest blindly or through spreadsheets, ultimately theory crafting until you are rewarded with being stuck with the results, like or not. I support the re-skill booster because it avoids most of the problems by not completely circumventing the most important part of the SP system: Time.
Because of this though those boosters might not be terribly helpfull for exmaple's situation.
|
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
621
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 05:25:00 -
[73] - Quote
Malkai Inos wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:Well. Supporting a position that screws somebody over is not what makes this game better. You just told me to stop playing because there is no help comming my way or for the same people cought in my position. You should be supporting a position that makes ppl want to play, fixing the promblems so people do not get screwed over. Respecs is the answer, telling ppl that they are screwed and should go take a brake, stop playing, is not how you keep your players The problem is that i don't agree that respecs are the answer, that's why we are arguing in the frist place. dday3six wrote:Whatever harmful effects respecs might have on the player market that has no ETA and we know nothing about, cannot be used as a valid argument against respecs in the present. Let's look at CCP's history of promises vs fulfillment in regards to Dust, frankly we don't even know that it will be added at this point. CCP has stated earlier that a large part of the development of the market is monitoring player behavior after every intermediate feature is added (donation, isk transfer, later item trade etc.) Putting respecs into this equation makes the whole thing volatile to no end. A temporary respec phase would invalidate all gathered data and CCP would risk damaging both economies if they merge them based on these false data. And we know quite a bit about the basic functionality of the market. The planned eve dust connection pretty much predefined a range range of funcionality that will have to be definitely implemented or the feature can be scrapped altogether. Lastly the market is only mentioned in one of those links iirc. Those are still standing.
Respecs has solved the balancing promblems before and it is obvious it will fix them again. Yes, this is a temporary fix but everything in dust seems to be temporary with how balance works in this game. There wont be a game if people dont play, and being unfair is what is pulling people away from dust. Untill this game has a balance, when things are set in stone and are constant, our skill points should not be constant, it leads to rage, derp, QQ, and no desire to play dust at all. In fact, it leads to ppl telling those afflicted that they should stop playing because their well, simply, screwed. We need an answer, ans the only answer is respecs |
Duran Lex
Silver Talon Corporation
116
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 05:31:00 -
[74] - Quote
Sinboto Simmons wrote:I skilled into: Remote explosives Proximity mines Nova knives Shotguns Plasma cannons SMGs Mass drivers Minmatar scout Out of all the things I just listed the mass driver is the only thing I can truly say I can depend on at all times because the other gear is A:bugged in someway or B:not powerfull enough to do it's job effectively. I have not once asked for a respec because of the reasons abovementioned opting to attempt to get the gear balanced, while this is difficult due to much of the gear I choose to use not being 'mainstream' I'd rather a long tearm fix then a short tearm one, this is why I find the recent outcry for respecs due to the coming rebalancing of the flaylock and calldari logi suit humorous seeing as both were being used in unintended ways by those who wanted an unfair advantage and are not being unjustly brought down. Oh and warning: my grammar sucks
Don't know how many times i died at an objective to RE. (i know its my fault for not seeing them, but sometimes they are just so hard to see!
Proxy mines - can't comment
I've seen a scout with proto knives running faster then his leg animations could keep up with, killing 3 people unawares with ease.
Don't know how many times a shotgun scout pegged me in the face twice for a quick kill (Heavy suit)
Plasma cannons are lol
SMG's are just straight up fuckin powerful at proto.
Mass Driver - understandable.
Sounds like you just aren't fully specced into making those weapons awesome.
|
Meeko Fent
Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State
396
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 05:31:00 -
[75] - Quote
Very rarely do classes that weren't being abused get nerfed hard enough to makes respec necessary
Lets say you were a scout, and you think that with aiming fixes coming in 1.4, you think that the scouts advantage of being hard to hit, well make a big damn uproar for a buff to ease the issue. Now, lets say you were a CalLogi. If you were using it for what it was supposed to do, while you'll have to sacrifice some tank, you'll not be bothered by the nerf. And if you were dumb enough to spec into it for its mega assault capabilities, not thinking it would be nerfed, then shame on you. Spec into something that is supposed to mega assault, the heavy. Then maybe it can get balanced, cause people used to say it is UP, and I really don't know. |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1322
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 05:35:00 -
[76] - Quote
I agree, once were relatively close to balancing the core gameplay (ie drop suit and weapon stats) then we can all confidently say that our skill points are true investments and we have no reason to QQ about changes.
But until then...
Until then, the answer is to stop playing. And that's what a lot of people are doing... Games generally die when people stop playing them... |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
625
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 05:37:00 -
[77] - Quote
Meeko Fent wrote:Very rarely do classes that weren't being abused get nerfed hard enough to makes respec necessary
Lets say you were a scout, and you think that with aiming fixes coming in 1.4, you think that the scouts advantage of being hard to hit, well make a big damn uproar for a buff to ease the issue. Now, lets say you were a CalLogi. If you were using it for what it was supposed to do, while you'll have to sacrifice some tank, you'll not be bothered by the nerf. And if you were dumb enough to spec into it for its mega assault capabilities, not thinking it would be nerfed, then shame on you. Spec into something that is supposed to mega assault, the heavy. Then maybe it can get balanced, cause people used to say it is UP, and I really don't know.
Unfortionetly classes that are not being abused do get nerfed... in dust. For example, 4 out of 6 of all vehical classes in dust and the HMG. In fact, they are nerfing the very balanced armor tank soon. And not soon tm. Also, specing into something that is UP does not balance the UP class. When has this happened in dust history? It hasent |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1323
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 05:40:00 -
[78] - Quote
Meeko Fent wrote:Very rarely do classes that weren't being abused get nerfed hard enough to makes respec necessary.
That's a matter of opinion though. Should people not have the ability to choose if that's the case? |
Heathen Bastard
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
399
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 05:40:00 -
[79] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:Meeko Fent wrote:Very rarely do classes that weren't being abused get nerfed hard enough to makes respec necessary
Lets say you were a scout, and you think that with aiming fixes coming in 1.4, you think that the scouts advantage of being hard to hit, well make a big damn uproar for a buff to ease the issue. Now, lets say you were a CalLogi. If you were using it for what it was supposed to do, while you'll have to sacrifice some tank, you'll not be bothered by the nerf. And if you were dumb enough to spec into it for its mega assault capabilities, not thinking it would be nerfed, then shame on you. Spec into something that is supposed to mega assault, the heavy. Then maybe it can get balanced, cause people used to say it is UP, and I really don't know. Unfortionetly classes that are not being abused do get nerfed... in dust. For example, 4 out of 6 of all vehical classes in dust and the HMG. In fact, they are nerfing the very balanced armor tank soon. And not soon tm. Also, specing into something that is UP does not balance the UP class. When has this happened in dust history? It hasent
nope, but CCP can't do small balance patches they only do huge pendulum swings. so whats UP right now, could be crazy OP next patch. and likewise, what's OP will likely be kneecapped with a ball-pein hammer. Live with your choices. |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
625
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 05:43:00 -
[80] - Quote
Heathen Bastard wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:Meeko Fent wrote:Very rarely do classes that weren't being abused get nerfed hard enough to makes respec necessary
Lets say you were a scout, and you think that with aiming fixes coming in 1.4, you think that the scouts advantage of being hard to hit, well make a big damn uproar for a buff to ease the issue. Now, lets say you were a CalLogi. If you were using it for what it was supposed to do, while you'll have to sacrifice some tank, you'll not be bothered by the nerf. And if you were dumb enough to spec into it for its mega assault capabilities, not thinking it would be nerfed, then shame on you. Spec into something that is supposed to mega assault, the heavy. Then maybe it can get balanced, cause people used to say it is UP, and I really don't know. Unfortionetly classes that are not being abused do get nerfed... in dust. For example, 4 out of 6 of all vehical classes in dust and the HMG. In fact, they are nerfing the very balanced armor tank soon. And not soon tm. Also, specing into something that is UP does not balance the UP class. When has this happened in dust history? It hasent nope, but CCP can't do small balance patches they only do huge pendulum swings. so whats UP right now, could be crazy OP next patch. and likewise, what's OP will likely be kneecapped with a ball-pein hammer. Live with your choices.
It is not your choices to live with when the DEVs make your choices for you. The choices you make when you spend your SP are invalidated and molested when your class is changed after you speced into it. Its not your choice at that point. Its CCPs |
|
dday3six
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
126
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 05:44:00 -
[81] - Quote
Malkai Inos wrote:dday3six wrote:Whatever harmful effects respecs might have on the player market that has no ETA and we know nothing about, cannot be used as a valid argument against respecs in the present. Let's look at CCP's history of promises vs fulfillment in regards to Dust, frankly we don't even know that it will be added at this point. CCP has stated earlier that a large part of the development of the market is monitoring player behavior after every intermediate feature is added (donation, isk transfer, later item trade etc.) Putting respecs into this equation makes the whole thing volatile to no end. A temporary respec phase would invalidate all gathered data and CCP would risk damaging both economies if they merge them based on these false data. And we know quite a bit about the basic functionality of the market. The planned eve dust connection pretty much predefined a range range of funcionality that will have to be definitely implemented or the feature can be scrapped altogether. Lastly the market is only mentioned in one of those links iirc. Those are still standing.
See, I don't believe anything CCP says in regards to Dust, until I see it happen. They don't have a good history of telling the truth about it, and misinformation or lacking of any is a bit of an issue for them to put it mildly. However if you believe what is said, CCP has admitted to doing a great deal of rethinking as to what they're going to do with Dust. They also have not mentioned any current plans dealing with the player driven economy since that reevaluation. Therefore how can we know that a previous plan, conceived from before CCP shifted gears about Dust is still up to date. Then we can't guesswork how Dust's economy will function based on EVE's, the games play vastly different and are both subject to change. CCP could very well change something in EVE in conjunction to intergrating both games.
|
Heathen Bastard
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
399
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 05:45:00 -
[82] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:Meeko Fent wrote:Very rarely do classes that weren't being abused get nerfed hard enough to makes respec necessary
Lets say you were a scout, and you think that with aiming fixes coming in 1.4, you think that the scouts advantage of being hard to hit, well make a big damn uproar for a buff to ease the issue. Now, lets say you were a CalLogi. If you were using it for what it was supposed to do, while you'll have to sacrifice some tank, you'll not be bothered by the nerf. And if you were dumb enough to spec into it for its mega assault capabilities, not thinking it would be nerfed, then shame on you. Spec into something that is supposed to mega assault, the heavy. Then maybe it can get balanced, cause people used to say it is UP, and I really don't know. Unfortionetly classes that are not being abused do get nerfed... in dust. For example, 4 out of 6 of all vehical classes in dust and the HMG. In fact, they are nerfing the very balanced armor tank soon. And not soon tm. Also, specing into something that is UP does not balance the UP class. When has this happened in dust history? It hasent nope, but CCP can't do small balance patches they only do huge pendulum swings. so whats UP right now, could be crazy OP next patch. and likewise, what's OP will likely be kneecapped with a ball-pein hammer. Live with your choices. It is not your choices to live with when the DEVs make your choices for you. The choices you make when you spend your SP are invalidated and molested when your class is changed after you speced into it. Its not your choice at that point. Its CCPs
It's your choice to spend the SP on something that is obviously OP. It's your choice to continue playing after you were invalidated. It's your choice to whine on the forums for a respec that won't come. |
Malkai Inos
Opus Arcana Covert Intervention
886
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 05:47:00 -
[83] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:Respecs has solved the balancing promblems before and it is obvious it will fix them again.
Last i checked the first respec brought us the duvolle killerbee army. The second one spawned more killierbees, this time with flaylocks.
So out subjective experience i disagree. I even think they were a perfect example of "amplifies balance issues".
Exmaple Core wrote:Yes, this is a temporary fix but everything in dust seems to be temporary with how balance works in this game. There wont be a game if people dont play, and being unfair is what is pulling people away from dust. I can perfectly understand where you're coming from but please understand that there are numerous other players that are attracted by the unfair nature of the game, that are here because of the no respec approach. We've seen heists in the younger past that would've got several players a permaban in most other games and rightly so for breaking the rules This game has other rules and relates to other types of players.
Exmaple Core wrote: Untill this game has a balance, when things are set in stone and are constant, our skill points should not be constant, it leads to rage, derp, QQ, and no desire to play dust at all. In fact, it leads to ppl telling those afflicted that they should stop playing because their well, simply, screwed. We need an answer, ans the only answer within the next 6 months or even a year is respecs
Again this game will never be "set in stone". It will continue to iterate for it's whole lifespan, improving the game for some, breaking it for others. The objective is to help more people than are screwed over. But since balance is always relative someone will always be nerfed. Someone will always be screwed over. I have over 2m reserved already, knowing that my cal logi would be nerfed some day, to be prepared when this happens so i can deal with it if it screws me over.
And i don't think it will take 6-12 months to sort the rough parts out. The MD was broken with uprising and is fixed now. The laser was broken and is gaining popularity again while awaiting a new scope with 1.4 at the latest. Vehicle overhaul is sceduled 1.4 and following.
Things are bad for many players but not hopeless.
|
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1323
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 05:48:00 -
[84] - Quote
Heathen Bastard wrote:
It's your choice to spend the SP on something that is obviously OP. It's your choice to continue playing after you were invalidated. It's your choice to whine on the forums for a respec that won't come.
What did he spec into that was obviously OP? Have you even read a single post in this thread?
/facepalm |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
625
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 05:51:00 -
[85] - Quote
Heathen Bastard wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:Meeko Fent wrote:Very rarely do classes that weren't being abused get nerfed hard enough to makes respec necessary
Lets say you were a scout, and you think that with aiming fixes coming in 1.4, you think that the scouts advantage of being hard to hit, well make a big damn uproar for a buff to ease the issue. Now, lets say you were a CalLogi. If you were using it for what it was supposed to do, while you'll have to sacrifice some tank, you'll not be bothered by the nerf. And if you were dumb enough to spec into it for its mega assault capabilities, not thinking it would be nerfed, then shame on you. Spec into something that is supposed to mega assault, the heavy. Then maybe it can get balanced, cause people used to say it is UP, and I really don't know. Unfortionetly classes that are not being abused do get nerfed... in dust. For example, 4 out of 6 of all vehical classes in dust and the HMG. In fact, they are nerfing the very balanced armor tank soon. And not soon tm. Also, specing into something that is UP does not balance the UP class. When has this happened in dust history? It hasent nope, but CCP can't do small balance patches they only do huge pendulum swings. so whats UP right now, could be crazy OP next patch. and likewise, what's OP will likely be kneecapped with a ball-pein hammer. Live with your choices. It is not your choices to live with when the DEVs make your choices for you. The choices you make when you spend your SP are invalidated and molested when your class is changed after you speced into it. Its not your choice at that point. Its CCPs It's your choice to spend the SP on something that is obviously OP. It's your choice to continue playing after you were invalidated. It's your choice to whine on the forums for a respec that won't come.
The vast majority of the classes to spend on in dust are not OP and are very close to balance. When they, or the OP classes are nerfed, then they are invalidated, yes you got that one. Obviously ppl are generally not choosing to play those invalidated classes after their nerf and they stop playing dust. If this continues then dust is out, its finnished, every day more and more ppl post their goodbye threads here saying their done bcuz of imbalance and no ability to respec. I, we are not whining on these forums. We, the intelligent and neglected, are giving our feedback. Our ideas to fix dust |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1323
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 05:52:00 -
[86] - Quote
Opus,
I think you're too optimistic. Given the last 6 months ive played this game, and how little has gone right since the beginning of chromosome. I cannot imagine this game with be balanced before February next year. |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
625
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 06:03:00 -
[87] - Quote
No Malki Inos you are wrong, balance exist and other games have achieved this, Eve has and it is the same system skill points. The goal is not to screw over the least amount of ppl, its to balance the game. Yes, balance is relative with how much SP you have but it is set that way to show progression, to fix weapons and play styles from ever "making them the undisputed best choice to bring to a fight, no matter what.", a direct quote from CCP Wolfman in this Dev blog of 1.2 about balancing this game: http://dust514.com/news/blog/2013/07/explosive-dampening-weapon-rebalancing-in-uprising-1.3
Evidently, it took 3 or 4 months to balance two weapons. Balancing other things? No, it will take 6 to 12 months to balance other things, like vehicals. Did you know they already pushed the vehical fix from 1.4 to 1.5 or 1.6?
Exmaple Core wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:I hate to burst your bubble but if you read the AMA 1.4 is more infantry focused from early looks. Vehicles are simply too massive to squeeze into 1.4 and that would be changing far too much. your kidding.... we have to wait more months for vehical balance??? https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=97190&p=1read. listen. watch. Ah i see, the orginal word was 1.4 and i have unfortionetly been busy so i missed this post. Very good idea, and im greatful you took the time to do this and correct my thread. thanks sir, really sucks that its pushed back tho :/ |
Malkai Inos
Opus Arcana Covert Intervention
886
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 06:05:00 -
[88] - Quote
ZDub 303 wrote:Opus,
I think you're too optimistic. Given the last 6 months ive played this game, and how little has gone right since the beginning of chromosome. I cannot imagine this game with be balanced before February next year. Completely balanced? I agree.
There will be a periodic exchange of OP/UP cycles with less and less steep flanks but a state that we could call "properly balanced" will take quite some time. But now that we can be pretty sure that something wen't wrong with CCP Blam! we might see some great steps taken with regards to vehicles/AV in the near future if at least in relative terms.
And this is a matter of personal preference but i perceived Uprising and the later patches as very positive in my experience. Sure much is still broken and the pace of change could be improved but when i grow sick of the game i just take a break and come back when i feel like it.
I think the best approach is to ask oneself "is it fun?" and whenever the answer is "no" step aside and do things you enjoy. Did it a few times already and it really helps keep the distance.
|
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
625
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 06:12:00 -
[89] - Quote
Malkai Inos wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:Opus,
I think you're too optimistic. Given the last 6 months ive played this game, and how little has gone right since the beginning of chromosome. I cannot imagine this game with be balanced before February next year. Completely balanced? I agree. There will be a periodic exchange of OP/UP cycles with less and less steep flanks but a state that we could call "properly balanced" will take quite some time. But now that we can be pretty sure that something wen't wrong with CCP Blam! we might see some great steps taken with regards to vehicles/AV in the near future if at least in relative terms. And this is a matter of personal preference but i perceived Uprising and the later patches as very positive in my experience. Sure much is still broken and the pace of change could be improved but when i grow sick of the game i just take a break and come back when i feel like it. I think the best approach is to ask oneself "is it fun?" and whenever the answer is "no" step aside and do things you enjoy. Did it a few times already and it really helps keep the distance.
no, that is not an acceptable solution and if thats the only way to cope with DUSTs promblems then this game is done, the competition will sweep this hunk of junk through. Youl be on a new game that actually deals with their promblems and communicates positively with their players instead of playing a game were "your screwed and should stop playing".
Btw, i called you out a post or 2 above. Comment on it |
Heathen Bastard
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
399
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 06:13:00 -
[90] - Quote
I'm a shield-missile tanker. My entire playstyle is invalidated by a single forge gunner, or even half-decent tank on the field. you know what I did? grabbed a heavy machine gun and a fatsuit after a week long break. it's nice to start at the bottom again, keeps you from making bullcrap posts demanding a respec even though they already said NO MORE a while ago. |
|
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
625
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 06:15:00 -
[91] - Quote
Heathen Bastard wrote:I'm a shield-missile tanker. My entire playstyle is invalidated by a single forge gunner, or even half-decent tank on the field. you know what I did? grabbed a heavy machine gun and a fatsuit after a week long break. it's nice to start at the bottom again, keeps you from making bullcrap posts demanding a respec even though they already said NO MORE a while ago.
Sorry, some of us want to have meaning on the battlefeild and use the classes were all of our SP are sunk into rather than being a nonfactor scrub heavy on the battlefeild becuase our class was ruined |
Cat Merc
BetaMax. CRONOS.
3607
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 06:16:00 -
[92] - Quote
That's just the nature of things. Just pray to the CCP gods to have mercy and not to bring the nerf hammer, but the nerf chisel for your OP item. |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1323
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 06:17:00 -
[93] - Quote
Heathen Bastard wrote:I'm a shield-missile tanker. My entire playstyle is invalidated by a single forge gunner, or even half-decent tank on the field. you know what I did? grabbed a heavy machine gun and a fatsuit after a week long break. it's nice to start at the bottom again, keeps you from making bullcrap posts demanding a respec even though they already said NO MORE a while ago.
That's easy to say when you're in an npc corp.
This kind of thinking needs to go away if things like corp battles and PC (ie non public matches) are to ever be taken seriously in this game.
And they've never once said no more respecs, they've only said no more resets. |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1325
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 06:20:00 -
[94] - Quote
Cat Merc wrote:That's just the nature of things. Just pray to the CCP gods to have mercy and not to bring the nerf hammer, but the nerf chisel for your OP item.
But it doesn't have to be. |
TEXA5 HiTM4N
ROGUE SPADES EoN.
150
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 06:22:00 -
[95] - Quote
I find it funny when whole corps are begging for the respec because they went full cal logi and flaylocks. |
Heathen Bastard
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
399
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 06:26:00 -
[96] - Quote
My opinion is that you should live with it. they said your decisions matter, And they do. You chose to spec into a very specific role on an ever changing battlefield. when the battlefield changed, and you broke. I decided to be more flexible.
If the balance has been shown to be volatile at best, then try to avoid speccing into things too terribly heavily unless you're sure that come rain, snow, fire, or flood, you'll be able to be happy with it. |
Kane Fyea
DUST University Ivy League
1511
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 06:29:00 -
[97] - Quote
How about a full reset. Sounds good to me. (BTW I have 10 mil SP) |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
625
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 06:31:00 -
[98] - Quote
Heathen Bastard wrote:My opinion is that you should live with it. they said your decisions matter, And they do. You chose to spec into a very specific role on an ever changing battlefield. when the battlefield changed, and you broke. I decided to be more flexible.
If the balance has been shown to be volatile at best, then try to avoid speccing into things too terribly heavily unless you're sure that come rain, snow, fire, or flood, you'll be able to be happy with it.
If you dont full spec into a class than you cant do anything well, thats as basic as it gets on an SP system. in fact, CCP encourages ppl to invest all their skill points into one class and become very efficent at it, there are videos with devs encouraging this from closed beta. You can not contribute to a team and make a difference without a full spec, nor will you be included in PC without a mono spec. Besides, we should not have to compensate with developers issuies, we should play the game like its meant to be played and feel secure in doing so. Do not post your incompetence on my threads |
Malkai Inos
Opus Arcana Covert Intervention
887
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 06:33:00 -
[99] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:no, that is not an acceptable solution and if thats the only way to cope with DUSTs promblems then this game is done, the competition will sweep this hunk of junk through. Youl be on a new game that actually deals with their promblems and communicates positively with their players instead of playing a game were "your screwed and should stop playing".
Btw, i called you out a post or 2 above. Comment on it I have read your reply and apologize for speaking of ignorance about the latest developments. I can only imagine how aggrevating it must be to get set back yet another month or even longer. Maybe we will have another discussion in two days when i get my share of the nerf bat and find that i can change my class now.
I can understand if this "solution" i described is unacceptable for you. Other things would be unacceptable for me. What i stated was a pragmatic (if optimistic) view of what CCP can actually pull of in the best case. Balance changes like that will require several iterations to get somewhat right and there's hardly a point in wishing otherwise. This will just lead to disappointment and a videogame is the wrong source to willfully endure disappointment from.
|
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
625
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 06:33:00 -
[100] - Quote
Kane Fyea wrote:How about a full reset. Sounds good to me. (BTW I have 10 mil SP) as awsume as that would be, CCP said absolutely no more resets. respecs are still on the table |
|
dday3six
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
126
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 06:33:00 -
[101] - Quote
Kane Fyea wrote:How about a full reset. Sounds good to me. (BTW I have 10 mil SP)
It's double edged. If at launch CCP would have reset everyone it would have lessened the protostomping issue, but it also would have had the potential to upset players who had a lot of SP wiped. |
Kane Fyea
DUST University Ivy League
1511
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 06:35:00 -
[102] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:Kane Fyea wrote:How about a full reset. Sounds good to me. (BTW I have 10 mil SP) as awsume as that would be, CCP said absolutely no more resets. respecs are still on the table Unless something catastrophic happened..... Time to infiltrate CCP and delete all the player stats and the backups too. Be back in a few months. |
Malkai Inos
Opus Arcana Covert Intervention
888
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 06:39:00 -
[103] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:My opinion is that you should live with it. they said your decisions matter, And they do. You chose to spec into a very specific role on an ever changing battlefield. when the battlefield changed, and you broke. I decided to be more flexible.
If the balance has been shown to be volatile at best, then try to avoid speccing into things too terribly heavily unless you're sure that come rain, snow, fire, or flood, you'll be able to be happy with it. If you dont full spec into a class than you cant do anything well, thats as basic as it gets on an SP system. in fact, CCP encourages ppl to invest all their skill points into one class and become very efficent at it, there are videos with devs encouraging this from closed beta. You can not contribute to a team and make a difference without a full spec, nor will you be included in PC without a mono spec. Besides, we should not have to compensate with developers issuies, we should play the game like its meant to be played and feel secure in doing so. Do not post your incompetence on my threads It is currently designed that way but I don't think this is in line with CCPs vision.
The skillsystem should allow specialization and generalization to be viable alternatives with varying ups and downs. The bonuses from Pro mods however (especially tanking) are so strong that it's far too viable to fit proto whatever really. Since that one level can easily increase ehp by 20% with just the mods and almost triple it if combined with the suit.
This defies the concept of diminishing returns. And is thus bad.
I think that CCP can improve on this and interesting concepts have been proposed on these forums (among others from cat merc, of all people ) |
Beowulf Folkvar
HavoK Core RISE of LEGION
3
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 06:39:00 -
[104] - Quote
I want a respec but then Im ganna hoard my sp :) |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1325
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 06:41:00 -
[105] - Quote
Malkai Inos wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:My opinion is that you should live with it. they said your decisions matter, And they do. You chose to spec into a very specific role on an ever changing battlefield. when the battlefield changed, and you broke. I decided to be more flexible.
If the balance has been shown to be volatile at best, then try to avoid speccing into things too terribly heavily unless you're sure that come rain, snow, fire, or flood, you'll be able to be happy with it. If you dont full spec into a class than you cant do anything well, thats as basic as it gets on an SP system. in fact, CCP encourages ppl to invest all their skill points into one class and become very efficent at it, there are videos with devs encouraging this from closed beta. You can not contribute to a team and make a difference without a full spec, nor will you be included in PC without a mono spec. Besides, we should not have to compensate with developers issuies, we should play the game like its meant to be played and feel secure in doing so. Do not post your incompetence on my threads It is currently designed that way but I don't think this is in line with CCPs vision. The skillsystem should allow specialization and generalization to be viable alternatives with varying ups and downs. The bonuses from Pro mods (especially tanking) are so strong that it's far too viable to fit proto whatever really. Since that one level an easily increase ehp by 20% with just the mods and almost triple it if combined with the suit. This defies the concept of diminishing returns. And is thus bad. I think that CCP can improve on this and interesting concepts have been proposed on these forums (among others from cat merc, of all people )
When it comes down to it, proto gear is the only gear worth using. And anyone who thinks otherwise is playing this game like an rpg and not an FPS.
And hey... Maybe that's what it really is. And all us FPS players should just gtfo.
|
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
625
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 06:42:00 -
[106] - Quote
Malkai Inos wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:no, that is not an acceptable solution and if thats the only way to cope with DUSTs promblems then this game is done, the competition will sweep this hunk of junk through. Youl be on a new game that actually deals with their promblems and communicates positively with their players instead of playing a game were "your screwed and should stop playing".
Btw, i called you out a post or 2 above. Comment on it I have read your reply and apologize for speaking of ignorance about the latest developments. I can only imagine how aggrevating it must be to get set back yet another month or even longer. Maybe we will have another discussion in two days when i get my share of the nerf bat and find that i can change my class now. I can understand if this "solution" i described is unacceptable for you. Other things would be unacceptable for me. What i stated was a pragmatic (if optimistic) view of what CCP can actually pull of in the best case. Balance changes like that will require several iterations to get somewhat right and there's hardly a point in wishing otherwise. This will just lead to disappointment and a videogame is the wrong source to willfully endure disappointment from.
I accept your apology, iknow you dident mean it to be offensive. Sadly there is no "best case" with CCP, as evident by the quotes from IWS and all of our experience with dust over the last 1.6 years, it jus gets worse with a few ups thrown in randomly. However, they are finally starting to listen to us and we need to take this oppertunity to work with CCP towards the balance of the game and keeping everyone happy and playing dust along the way. Both have to happen at the same time or its a lost cause, as that disappointment is already rampant and will grow to a majority of the playerbase with further, much needed balancing. we need respecs to balance out this disappointment, frustration and general lack of wanting to play. We need incentive to play after our classes are rebalanced for the worse. Respecing into a new class is the best incentive |
Bob Teller
Red Star. EoN.
49
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 06:44:00 -
[107] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:You play a properly balanced, fair and fun class. Liking the class, you dump all 15 mill SP to your name into the class. Suddenly, new build/patch comes around and your class is nerfed without your consent and you now suck at the game. You spawn in your proto suit or your vehical and you are killed over and over, loosing all your ISK. You are told you can not play PC because the one class you are good at, sucks. Nobody wants you in any serious endeavor in dust because your class is nerfed to the point of uselessness. Like current shield tanks, dropships, lazers, plasma cannons and soon to be armor tanks when they fix the bug that is causing them to be balanced. You no longer want to play dust, as the class you played is ruined and so is your ability to enjoy playing dust, because the developers ruined the class you speced into. CCP later anounes that they will not be fixing your class for many months and they ask you to accept their most sincere apologies, despite changing the class that you speced into many months beforehand. Should you get a respec? This happened to the classes mentioned previously and will happen again when the fix the armor tanks Armor tank crying for 1.4 fix?Oh and no respec sorry |
Phazoid
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
33
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 06:44:00 -
[108] - Quote
yeah CCP is a good game company with no previous FPS experience, but that is not really important, the deal is you have to spend all of your SP to get something that you cannot previously test, its like a leap of faith for each skill, with respecs there will be the people that will get to the FOTM, the people that will leave the FOTM, and the people that will stay the same just moving some skillpoints here an there, all i hear is dust has potential, sure, its NOT taking advantage of its potential, but i am surprised that they dont take in account the feelings of the players, myself as an example, i am a scout, i love the scout idea , but since sometime we have been really UP, then like a mont ago i read the annoucements and i read that after hundreds os threads on the scout, CCP only says "we are aware of this", thank you for your very motivating 5 words ccp, i mean the game is on its infant stage, many mistakes have been done, but thats a part of the road to sucess, respecs could bring good things and bad things, and i reas many good reasons here, but its like schoerdingers cat, we have to open the box |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
625
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 06:45:00 -
[109] - Quote
Malkai Inos wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:My opinion is that you should live with it. they said your decisions matter, And they do. You chose to spec into a very specific role on an ever changing battlefield. when the battlefield changed, and you broke. I decided to be more flexible.
If the balance has been shown to be volatile at best, then try to avoid speccing into things too terribly heavily unless you're sure that come rain, snow, fire, or flood, you'll be able to be happy with it. If you dont full spec into a class than you cant do anything well, thats as basic as it gets on an SP system. in fact, CCP encourages ppl to invest all their skill points into one class and become very efficent at it, there are videos with devs encouraging this from closed beta. You can not contribute to a team and make a difference without a full spec, nor will you be included in PC without a mono spec. Besides, we should not have to compensate with developers issuies, we should play the game like its meant to be played and feel secure in doing so. Do not post your incompetence on my threads It is currently designed that way but I don't think this is in line with CCPs vision. The skillsystem should allow specialization and generalization to be viable alternatives with varying ups and downs. The bonuses from Pro mods however (especially tanking) are so strong that it's far too viable to fit proto whatever really. Since that one level can easily increase ehp by 20% with just the mods and almost triple it if combined with the suit. This defies the concept of diminishing returns. And is thus bad. I think that CCP can improve on this and interesting concepts have been proposed on these forums (among others from cat merc, of all people )
No its working as intended, there are videos of devs saying they expect ppl to monospec into one class and do it very well to contribute to a team. They set up this game to punnish those who do not monospec, and those who do monospec get nerfed and end up getting punnished almost just as badly as those who dont. Respecs solves this |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
625
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 06:47:00 -
[110] - Quote
Bob Teller wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:You play a properly balanced, fair and fun class. Liking the class, you dump all 15 mill SP to your name into the class. Suddenly, new build/patch comes around and your class is nerfed without your consent and you now suck at the game. You spawn in your proto suit or your vehical and you are killed over and over, loosing all your ISK. You are told you can not play PC because the one class you are good at, sucks. Nobody wants you in any serious endeavor in dust because your class is nerfed to the point of uselessness. Like current shield tanks, dropships, lazers, plasma cannons and soon to be armor tanks when they fix the bug that is causing them to be balanced. You no longer want to play dust, as the class you played is ruined and so is your ability to enjoy playing dust, because the developers ruined the class you speced into. CCP later anounes that they will not be fixing your class for many months and they ask you to accept their most sincere apologies, despite changing the class that you speced into many months beforehand. Should you get a respec? This happened to the classes mentioned previously and will happen again when the fix the armor tanks Armor tank crying for 1.4 fix?Oh and no respec sorry
i am a shield tanker and infaintry player. Im pleaing for everyones right to have a fair and enjoyable game, not just armor tankers. Btw, check a few posts above its 1.5, dumbass |
|
Cat Merc
BetaMax. CRONOS.
3608
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 06:52:00 -
[111] - Quote
A reset won't fix anything. Sure, it will even the playfield... FOR NOW. What about in 2-3 months? New players will step in and find themselves in the same situation. So you will do another reset? |
Kane Fyea
DUST University Ivy League
1511
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 06:55:00 -
[112] - Quote
Cat Merc wrote:A reset won't fix anything. Sure, it will even the playfield... FOR NOW. What about in 2-3 months? New players will step in and find themselves in the same situation. So you will do another reset? This is a respec thread not a reset one. Everyone knows we'll never get another reset anyways so I don't know what you're arguing about. |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
626
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 06:59:00 -
[113] - Quote
Cat Merc wrote:A reset won't fix anything. Sure, it will even the playfield... FOR NOW. What about in 2-3 months? New players will step in and find themselves and the same situation. So you will do another reset?
You respec every few months untill you reach a point were the game is balanced enough for players to temper the game. Its called upkeep checks, attending to your players general interest to play your game even though you treat them like shiet, or fixing the mistakes you made ruining everyones playstyles and cadering to those still wanting to play dust. With all the rebalancing done, comming and will be comming later everyone is extreemly p*ssed off with whats happening to their classes and the SP they spent quiet some time ago now being garbage and unrefundable. People are great one day and their their garbage, shuned by strong corps and excluded in PC because of their class got changed suddenly. Should we all be garbage and just deal with it? No. You respec at reasonable intervals, when needed, so this game is still playable and tolerable. Simply telling everyone to stop playing, being patient, HTFU cuz your screwed or staying silent is killing dust and its playerbase. Compensation is needed to those wrongly afflicted by developer errors |
Heimdallr69
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
359
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 07:00:00 -
[114] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:You play a properly balanced, fair and fun class. Liking the class, you dump all 15 mill SP to your name into the class. Suddenly, new build/patch comes around and your class is nerfed without your consent and you now suck at the game. You spawn in your proto suit or your vehical and you are killed over and over, loosing all your ISK. You are told you can not play PC because the one class you are good at, sucks. Nobody wants you in any serious endeavor in dust because your class is nerfed to the point of uselessness. Like current shield tanks, dropships, lazers, plasma cannons and soon to be armor tanks when they fix the bug that is causing them to be balanced. You no longer want to play dust, as the class you played is ruined and so is your ability to enjoy playing dust, because the developers ruined the class you speced into. CCP later anounes that they will not be fixing your class for many months and they ask you to accept their most sincere apologies, despite changing the class that you speced into many months beforehand. Should you get a respec? This happened to the classes mentioned previously and will happen again when the fix the armor tanks I agree with a respec but after all the weapons are implemented and balanced so there is no fotm **** |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
626
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 07:02:00 -
[115] - Quote
Heimdallr69 wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:You play a properly balanced, fair and fun class. Liking the class, you dump all 15 mill SP to your name into the class. Suddenly, new build/patch comes around and your class is nerfed without your consent and you now suck at the game. You spawn in your proto suit or your vehical and you are killed over and over, loosing all your ISK. You are told you can not play PC because the one class you are good at, sucks. Nobody wants you in any serious endeavor in dust because your class is nerfed to the point of uselessness. Like current shield tanks, dropships, lazers, plasma cannons and soon to be armor tanks when they fix the bug that is causing them to be balanced. You no longer want to play dust, as the class you played is ruined and so is your ability to enjoy playing dust, because the developers ruined the class you speced into. CCP later anounes that they will not be fixing your class for many months and they ask you to accept their most sincere apologies, despite changing the class that you speced into many months beforehand. Should you get a respec? This happened to the classes mentioned previously and will happen again when the fix the armor tanks I agree with a respec but after all the weapons are implemented and balanced so there is no fotm ****
That wont help those screwed over right now or for the next 2 years (ish) |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1326
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 07:04:00 -
[116] - Quote
Heimdallr69 wrote: I agree with a respec but after all the weapons are implemented and balanced so there is no fotm ****
Essentially you're telling people to stop playing for the next 4 months while CCP balances weapons then?
FOTM weaponry is largely unaffected by respecs anyways. Operation 5 is 1-2 weeks of SP. it's drop suits and vehicles that need respecs.
Telling a tanker to wait for weapon releases is pointless. |
Heimdallr69
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
359
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 07:05:00 -
[117] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:Heimdallr69 wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:You play a properly balanced, fair and fun class. Liking the class, you dump all 15 mill SP to your name into the class. Suddenly, new build/patch comes around and your class is nerfed without your consent and you now suck at the game. You spawn in your proto suit or your vehical and you are killed over and over, loosing all your ISK. You are told you can not play PC because the one class you are good at, sucks. Nobody wants you in any serious endeavor in dust because your class is nerfed to the point of uselessness. Like current shield tanks, dropships, lazers, plasma cannons and soon to be armor tanks when they fix the bug that is causing them to be balanced. You no longer want to play dust, as the class you played is ruined and so is your ability to enjoy playing dust, because the developers ruined the class you speced into. CCP later anounes that they will not be fixing your class for many months and they ask you to accept their most sincere apologies, despite changing the class that you speced into many months beforehand. Should you get a respec? This happened to the classes mentioned previously and will happen again when the fix the armor tanks I agree with a respec but after all the weapons are implemented and balanced so there is no fotm **** That wont help those screwed over right now or for the next 2 years (ish) Get rid of the cap and ill agree otherwise I could care less I skilled into what I need for situations |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
626
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 07:08:00 -
[118] - Quote
Heimdallr69 wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:Heimdallr69 wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:You play a properly balanced, fair and fun class. Liking the class, you dump all 15 mill SP to your name into the class. Suddenly, new build/patch comes around and your class is nerfed without your consent and you now suck at the game. You spawn in your proto suit or your vehical and you are killed over and over, loosing all your ISK. You are told you can not play PC because the one class you are good at, sucks. Nobody wants you in any serious endeavor in dust because your class is nerfed to the point of uselessness. Like current shield tanks, dropships, lazers, plasma cannons and soon to be armor tanks when they fix the bug that is causing them to be balanced. You no longer want to play dust, as the class you played is ruined and so is your ability to enjoy playing dust, because the developers ruined the class you speced into. CCP later anounes that they will not be fixing your class for many months and they ask you to accept their most sincere apologies, despite changing the class that you speced into many months beforehand. Should you get a respec? This happened to the classes mentioned previously and will happen again when the fix the armor tanks I agree with a respec but after all the weapons are implemented and balanced so there is no fotm **** That wont help those screwed over right now or for the next 2 years (ish) Get rid of the cap and ill agree otherwise I could care less I skilled into what I need for situations
Were always going to have a cap, no matter what and we should. But you would care if you suddenly suck at the game because what you skilled into get nerfed into unreasonable levels. Then a respec would be appropriate |
Heimdallr69
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
359
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 07:15:00 -
[119] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:Heimdallr69 wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:Heimdallr69 wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:You play a properly balanced, fair and fun class. Liking the class, you dump all 15 mill SP to your name into the class. Suddenly, new build/patch comes around and your class is nerfed without your consent and you now suck at the game. You spawn in your proto suit or your vehical and you are killed over and over, loosing all your ISK. You are told you can not play PC because the one class you are good at, sucks. Nobody wants you in any serious endeavor in dust because your class is nerfed to the point of uselessness. Like current shield tanks, dropships, lazers, plasma cannons and soon to be armor tanks when they fix the bug that is causing them to be balanced. You no longer want to play dust, as the class you played is ruined and so is your ability to enjoy playing dust, because the developers ruined the class you speced into. CCP later anounes that they will not be fixing your class for many months and they ask you to accept their most sincere apologies, despite changing the class that you speced into many months beforehand. Should you get a respec? This happened to the classes mentioned previously and will happen again when the fix the armor tanks I agree with a respec but after all the weapons are implemented and balanced so there is no fotm **** That wont help those screwed over right now or for the next 2 years (ish) Get rid of the cap and ill agree otherwise I could care less I skilled into what I need for situations Were always going to have a cap, no matter what and we should. But you would care if you suddenly suck at the game because what you skilled into get nerfed into unreasonable levels. Then a respec would be appropriate Wait you went tanker again wtf? |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
627
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 07:21:00 -
[120] - Quote
Sadly. a motivator in why i stand up to the haters, speds, Devs and derps who vote against respecs. Because iknow first hand what its like to invest time and SP into a class and have it ruined due to balancing. I would gladly respec if i could, to have a fighting chance and be useful again but i cant becuase im doomed to play the mistake CCP gave me. Myslef and others |
|
Heimdallr69
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
360
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 07:21:00 -
[121] - Quote
For tankers should be given a respec..... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T85rSUPT5w8&feature=youtube_gdata_player , ill sign |
Heimdallr69
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
360
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 07:22:00 -
[122] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:Sadly. a motivator in why i stand up to the haters, speds, Devs and derps who vote against respecs. Because iknow first hand what its like to invest time and SP into a class and have it ruined due to balancing. I would gladly respec if i could, to have a fighting chance and be useful again but i cant becuase im doomed to play the mistake CCP gave me. Myslef and others I support it for vehicles but none of those calogis anything but them |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1326
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 07:24:00 -
[123] - Quote
A hilariously sad yet perfect description of the state of game balance in dust. +1 |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1326
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 07:25:00 -
[124] - Quote
Heimdallr69 wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:Sadly. a motivator in why i stand up to the haters, speds, Devs and derps who vote against respecs. Because iknow first hand what its like to invest time and SP into a class and have it ruined due to balancing. I would gladly respec if i could, to have a fighting chance and be useful again but i cant becuase im doomed to play the mistake CCP gave me. Myslef and others I support it for vehicles but none of those calogis anything but them
Yes those evil caldari logis should pay for their sins! |
Heimdallr69
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
360
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 07:27:00 -
[125] - Quote
ZDub 303 wrote:Heimdallr69 wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:Sadly. a motivator in why i stand up to the haters, speds, Devs and derps who vote against respecs. Because iknow first hand what its like to invest time and SP into a class and have it ruined due to balancing. I would gladly respec if i could, to have a fighting chance and be useful again but i cant becuase im doomed to play the mistake CCP gave me. Myslef and others I support it for vehicles but none of those calogis anything but them Yes those evil caldari logis should pay for their sins! Not so much that its OP but after the respec everyone went to it even though they knew it would get nerfed |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
628
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 07:30:00 -
[126] - Quote
LOLOL +1 so hard |
dday3six
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
126
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 07:34:00 -
[127] - Quote
Heimdallr69 wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:Heimdallr69 wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:Sadly. a motivator in why i stand up to the haters, speds, Devs and derps who vote against respecs. Because iknow first hand what its like to invest time and SP into a class and have it ruined due to balancing. I would gladly respec if i could, to have a fighting chance and be useful again but i cant becuase im doomed to play the mistake CCP gave me. Myslef and others I support it for vehicles but none of those calogis anything but them Yes those evil caldari logis should pay for their sins! Not so much that its OP but after the respec everyone went to it even though they knew it would get nerfed
"Don't play with that, it'll get nerfed", shouldn't be a required line of thinking when judging what to skill into. |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
628
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 07:34:00 -
[128] - Quote
Heimdallr69 wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:Heimdallr69 wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:Sadly. a motivator in why i stand up to the haters, speds, Devs and derps who vote against respecs. Because iknow first hand what its like to invest time and SP into a class and have it ruined due to balancing. I would gladly respec if i could, to have a fighting chance and be useful again but i cant becuase im doomed to play the mistake CCP gave me. Myslef and others I support it for vehicles but none of those calogis anything but them Yes those evil caldari logis should pay for their sins! Not so much that its OP but after the respec everyone went to it even though they knew it would get nerfed
as much as i agree that they dont diserve respecs for that logi abuse their class was molested by ccp so im morally inclined to say they should have respecs. reluctantly, of course but its the right thing to say ;3 |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1328
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 07:35:00 -
[129] - Quote
Heimdallr69 wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:Heimdallr69 wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:Sadly. a motivator in why i stand up to the haters, speds, Devs and derps who vote against respecs. Because iknow first hand what its like to invest time and SP into a class and have it ruined due to balancing. I would gladly respec if i could, to have a fighting chance and be useful again but i cant becuase im doomed to play the mistake CCP gave me. Myslef and others I support it for vehicles but none of those calogis anything but them Yes those evil caldari logis should pay for their sins! Not so much that its OP but after the respec everyone went to it even though they knew it would get nerfed
What if some people spec'd into it, wanting a shield tanked logistics, knowing full well the shield buff was probably going to be removed, but then are forced to deal with -40 base CPU. They tried to predict CCPs nerfs and failed. Now they have to pay for it. Running a logi class that might not be suited to what they intended from the get go?
Saying oh they have 9 slots stfu and gtfo is the reasonable answer?
Honestly, after they fix armor, min logi and gal logi will be the much better choice, and many of those guys who picked cal logi to logi with shields would probably have picked min... Now they just have to live with it... I think its ****** personally.
I actually think the CPU nerf is probably perfect for balance. But it's not what people bought with their 10 weeks of SP.
Hopefully we can see a respec for logis in 1.4, once they redone bonuses. Cause sounds like the changes are drastic. |
Heimdallr69
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
362
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 07:36:00 -
[130] - Quote
That was the first thing that came to my mind when I heard tanks, I love them so much but they suck |
|
Heimdallr69
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
362
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 07:39:00 -
[131] - Quote
ZDub 303 wrote:Heimdallr69 wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:Heimdallr69 wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:Sadly. a motivator in why i stand up to the haters, speds, Devs and derps who vote against respecs. Because iknow first hand what its like to invest time and SP into a class and have it ruined due to balancing. I would gladly respec if i could, to have a fighting chance and be useful again but i cant becuase im doomed to play the mistake CCP gave me. Myslef and others I support it for vehicles but none of those calogis anything but them Yes those evil caldari logis should pay for their sins! Not so much that its OP but after the respec everyone went to it even though they knew it would get nerfed What if some people spec'd into it, wanting a shield tanked logistics, knowing full well the shield buff was probably going to be removed, but then are forced to deal with -40 base CPU. They tried to predict CCPs nerfs and failed. Now they have to pay for it. Running a logi class that might not be suited to what they intended from the get go? Saying oh they have 9 slots stfu and gtfo is the reasonable answer? Honestly, after they fix armor, min logi and gal logi will be the much better choice, and many of those guys who picked cal logi to logi with shields would probably have picked min... Now they just have to live with it... I think its ****** personally. I actually think the CPU nerf is probably perfect for balance. But it's not what people bought with their 10 weeks of SP. Hopefully we can see a respec for logis in 1.4, once they redone bonuses. Cause sounds like the changes are drastic. Well I get that but the people that think they should have the bonus the highs lows and the equipment and use it for assault purposes..for true logis I apologize |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
629
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 07:40:00 -
[132] - Quote
Heimdallr69 wrote:That was the first thing that came to my mind when I heard tanks, I love them so much but they suck
We all wanted them to work out jus like we wanted the Olsen twins to make a good movie. Sucks how things end up. The only diffrence is were not forced to watch the Olsens twins movies if we bought them. If we bought tanks, were forced to ride them :(( |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1329
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 07:42:00 -
[133] - Quote
Heimdallr69 wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:
What if some people spec'd into it, wanting a shield tanked logistics, knowing full well the shield buff was probably going to be removed, but then are forced to deal with -40 base CPU. They tried to predict CCPs nerfs and failed. Now they have to pay for it. Running a logi class that might not be suited to what they intended from the get go?
Saying oh they have 9 slots stfu and gtfo is the reasonable answer?
Honestly, after they fix armor, min logi and gal logi will be the much better choice, and many of those guys who picked cal logi to logi with shields would probably have picked min... Now they just have to live with it... I think its ****** personally.
I actually think the CPU nerf is probably perfect for balance. But it's not what people bought with their 10 weeks of SP.
Hopefully we can see a respec for logis in 1.4, once they redone bonuses. Cause sounds like the changes are drastic.
Well I get that but the people that think they should have the bonus the highs lows and the equipment and use it for assault purposes..for true logis I apologize
It's the same song and dance for anything that gets nerfed in this game though, you know?
It's the reason I'm advocating respecs on changes... So people can adapt to nerfs/buffs CCP implements. I have no personal agenda here. |
Heimdallr69
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
362
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 07:44:00 -
[134] - Quote
dday3six wrote:Heimdallr69 wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:Heimdallr69 wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:Sadly. a motivator in why i stand up to the haters, speds, Devs and derps who vote against respecs. Because iknow first hand what its like to invest time and SP into a class and have it ruined due to balancing. I would gladly respec if i could, to have a fighting chance and be useful again but i cant becuase im doomed to play the mistake CCP gave me. Myslef and others I support it for vehicles but none of those calogis anything but them Yes those evil caldari logis should pay for their sins! Not so much that its OP but after the respec everyone went to it even though they knew it would get nerfed "Don't play with that, it'll get nerfed", shouldn't be a required line of thinking when judging what to skill into. I had to, I looked at it and thought and thought then decided wasn't worth the chance if you can see it coming why not avoid it? |
Heimdallr69
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
362
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 07:47:00 -
[135] - Quote
ZDub 303 wrote:Heimdallr69 wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:
What if some people spec'd into it, wanting a shield tanked logistics, knowing full well the shield buff was probably going to be removed, but then are forced to deal with -40 base CPU. They tried to predict CCPs nerfs and failed. Now they have to pay for it. Running a logi class that might not be suited to what they intended from the get go?
Saying oh they have 9 slots stfu and gtfo is the reasonable answer?
Honestly, after they fix armor, min logi and gal logi will be the much better choice, and many of those guys who picked cal logi to logi with shields would probably have picked min... Now they just have to live with it... I think its ****** personally.
I actually think the CPU nerf is probably perfect for balance. But it's not what people bought with their 10 weeks of SP.
Hopefully we can see a respec for logis in 1.4, once they redone bonuses. Cause sounds like the changes are drastic.
Well I get that but the people that think they should have the bonus the highs lows and the equipment and use it for assault purposes..for true logis I apologize It's the same song and dance for anything that gets nerfed in this game though, you know? It's the reason I'm advocating respecs on changes... So people can adapt to nerfs/buffs CCP implements. I have no personal agenda here. It would be nice to try other stuff cuz spending sp on a third and fourth rifle will suck just to see which you like more same goes for suits and if hmgs get racial variants and all that ****....yup I'm up for respecs seems legit to me |
AAA Hellcab
Theia Orpheum
39
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 07:52:00 -
[136] - Quote
If everyone starts using Flaylocks, I won't feel so ashamed for what I am about to do. What the ****? Honestly, what are they even doing in this game? |
dday3six
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
126
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 08:04:00 -
[137] - Quote
Heimdallr69 wrote:I had to, I looked at it and thought and thought then decided wasn't worth the chance if you can see it coming why not avoid it?
It's a huge black mark for any new content, if players have to constantly worry about trying new toys which might be broken for their trouble. It's a whole lot of forbidden fruit nonsense which only stigmatizes player experimentation. New content is going to keep the game alive, having to worry about booty traps within said new content is going to drive players away. |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
631
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 08:08:00 -
[138] - Quote
dday3six wrote:Heimdallr69 wrote:I had to, I looked at it and thought and thought then decided wasn't worth the chance if you can see it coming why not avoid it? It's a huge black mark for any new content, if players have to constantly worry about trying new toys which might be broken for their trouble. It's a whole lot of forbidden fruit nonsense which only stigmatizes player experimentation. New content is going to keep the game alive, having to worry about booty traps within said new content is going to drive players away.
As much as i hate you caldari logi f8gs your right, you guys speced into a class that could do everything and now you guys cant play it like you used to. I hate you guys, i really do, but your right. yal should get respeced out of it if youd still rather be a slayer over a logi. Logi does not appeal to slayers, its no longer what yal signed up for |
Heimdallr69
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
364
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 08:16:00 -
[139] - Quote
dday3six wrote:Heimdallr69 wrote:I had to, I looked at it and thought and thought then decided wasn't worth the chance if you can see it coming why not avoid it? It's a huge black mark for any new content, if players have to constantly worry about trying new toys which might be broken for their trouble. It's a whole lot of forbidden fruit nonsense which only stigmatizes player experimentation. New content is going to keep the game alive, having to worry about booty traps within said new content is going to drive players away. Yeah but a new player would be screwed where as players like us can blow sp and not worry cuz we've got others maxed |
Twomanchew
G.R.A.V.E
31
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 10:52:00 -
[140] - Quote
FOTM CAN SUCK IT! All I care about is getting skills put where I want them to be. I want the core foundation done so I can take the million of skills I have in other racial stuff and bring it to my own. I want one last respec when that day comes with that wonderful patch that will bring me something I have been waiting for since I heard about this game. If they choose not to do it, cause they do have that power to do that since it's their game. I am sure they will see a giant drop in the populace. Plus people who left the game have giant mouths. They should say some day soon that they will implement one last respec when all base racial stuff is in. That will remove a lot of pressure. Those who go up in arms and get all mad about respec(S) and their FOTM argument won't matter anymore. Sure people will always want something done here and there. That is always going to be in the forums. But unfinished game basics are a giant eye sore that needs to be fixed.
One last respec, after that, NO MORE! |
|
Xero The Mishima
Vherokior Combat Logistics Minmatar Republic
305
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 10:57:00 -
[141] - Quote
Heimdallr69 wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:Sadly. a motivator in why i stand up to the haters, speds, Devs and derps who vote against respecs. Because iknow first hand what its like to invest time and SP into a class and have it ruined due to balancing. I would gladly respec if i could, to have a fighting chance and be useful again but i cant becuase im doomed to play the mistake CCP gave me. Myslef and others I support it for vehicles but none of those calogis anything but them
Lol you support it for HIS case but not everybody elses... WHAT A SURPRISE! A "NF" supporting a "NF"! I would never think of this to happen! What a joke. |
Xero The Mishima
Vherokior Combat Logistics Minmatar Republic
305
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 10:58:00 -
[142] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:Heimdallr69 wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:Heimdallr69 wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:Sadly. a motivator in why i stand up to the haters, speds, Devs and derps who vote against respecs. Because iknow first hand what its like to invest time and SP into a class and have it ruined due to balancing. I would gladly respec if i could, to have a fighting chance and be useful again but i cant becuase im doomed to play the mistake CCP gave me. Myslef and others I support it for vehicles but none of those calogis anything but them Yes those evil caldari logis should pay for their sins! Not so much that its OP but after the respec everyone went to it even though they knew it would get nerfed as much as i agree that they dont diserve respecs for that logi abuse their class was molested by ccp so im morally inclined to say they should have respecs. reluctantly, of course but its the right thing to say ;3
Glad somebody in "NF" isn't worthless. +1 |
The Robot Devil
BetaMax. CRONOS.
788
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 11:10:00 -
[143] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:You play a properly balanced, fair and fun class. Liking the class, you dump all 15 mill SP to your name into the class. Suddenly, new build/patch comes around and your class is nerfed without your consent and you now suck at the game. You spawn in your proto suit or your vehical and you are killed over and over, loosing all your ISK. You are told you can not play PC because the one class you are good at, sucks. Nobody wants you in any serious endeavor in dust because your class is nerfed to the point of uselessness. Like current shield tanks, dropships, lazers, plasma cannons and soon to be armor tanks when they fix the bug that is causing them to be balanced. You no longer want to play dust, as the class you played is ruined and so is your ability to enjoy playing dust, because the developers ruined the class you speced into. CCP later anounes that they will not be fixing your class for many months and they ask you to accept their most sincere apologies, despite changing the class that you speced into many months beforehand. Should you get a respec? This happened to the classes mentioned previously and will happen again when the fix the armor tanks
They gave us all of our points back and some people dumped all their points into an untested class. No one was forced to place points anywhere and no one was forced to level 5 skills. If people would have taken their time and slowly skilled into proto gear then they would have know the problems before they were at level 5.
Things were changed with Uprising and we should have tested the waters more before we spent out points in a build that seems useless. It was a nice little trap. I keep telling you people that CCP is the ultimate troll. |
KEROSIINI-TERO
Seraphim Auxiliaries
617
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 12:23:00 -
[144] - Quote
ZDub 303 wrote:Duran Lex wrote:
Yes, once it gets to that point. But its not...so we still have the same argument being thrown back and forth.
One side - "It helps the game by letting people choose what they want to have fun with"
Other side - "It helps ruin the game by letting people choose the FOTM to have fun with."
It will never end.
Respecs have a few unique advantages though. 1. They show the metrics for FOTM much clearer to CCP, getting us closer to balance faster. 2. They allow people to spec into FOTM counters until FOTM can get fixed. 3. They don't alienate players who've been nerfed into oblivion by a 'balance patch' like tankers and scouts and heavies. 4. They can clearly see which suits are underutilized since people don't have to use them anymore, instead... People are just stuck with ****** suits and left to complain endlessly on the forum until they give up and quit the game.
That would also mean that those 'abandoned' speccing options are HARDER to balance (buff) again because no-one is using them anymore. No metrics, as you said. |
GTA-V FTW
Mannar Focused Warfare Gallente Federation
184
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 12:25:00 -
[145] - Quote
I demand a respec! |
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star. EoN.
749
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 12:29:00 -
[146] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:You play a properly balanced, fair and fun class. Liking the class, you dump all 15 mill SP to your name into the class. Suddenly, new build/patch comes around and your class is nerfed without your consent and you now suck at the game. You spawn in your proto suit or your vehical and you are killed over and over, loosing all your ISK. You are told you can not play PC because the one class you are good at, sucks. Nobody wants you in any serious endeavor in dust because your class is nerfed to the point of uselessness. Like current shield tanks, dropships, lazers, plasma cannons and soon to be armor tanks when they fix the bug that is causing them to be balanced. You no longer want to play dust, as the class you played is ruined and so is your ability to enjoy playing dust, because the developers ruined the class you speced into. CCP later anounes that they will not be fixing your class for many months and they ask you to accept their most sincere apologies, despite changing the class that you speced into many months beforehand. Should you get a respec? This happened to the classes mentioned previously and will happen again when the fix the armor tanks
We dont have proto tanks
When vehicles skills got changed we got a respec, not because they had changed but because the description was wrong and the skills didnt work and CCP didnt tell us what the new skills were and what they did
I found out via a GM response and got banned for posting it on the forums
The current changes to the FOTM toys are called balancing, they are blatently OP, kingbabar himself say he ran the numbers and found that the Cal Logi was the best suit, better than the assualt suits which logi were not designed for
Flaylocks are better than mass drivers and are spammed in PC and pubs
The armor rep nerf isnt coming in yet, thats been put back until 1.5 with the vehicle changed
Bottom line you shouldnt skill into FOTM stuff because it will get nerfed and you know it yet you will do it anyways |
Orion Vahid
DUST University Ivy League
93
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 12:33:00 -
[147] - Quote
Simply put: The only people against respecs are "veterans" with +20 million SP and do want anyone to become nearly as effective as them. There will ALWAYS be new content. Am I supposed to "wait" for a year before specing into anything? You are kidding yourselves. Just because something isn't FOTM right now and you spec into it, that doesn't mean that it won't be FOTM the next month. and then what are you supposed to do? Always spec into the worst things so they are never nerfed? CCP needs to stop catering to "veterans" and big corps and actually do what is best for everyone. |
TEXA5 HiTM4N
ROGUE SPADES EoN.
150
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 12:36:00 -
[148] - Quote
sucka. i only have 9 mill skill points and i am against a full respec. |
MlDDLE MANGEMENT
lMPurity
226
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 12:36:00 -
[149] - Quote
Cosgar wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Why did you constantly put more skill levels into an item you hate using? Then why are you hanging out with a corp that doesn't appreciate what you bring to the table? Then why are you wasting your energy asking for a respec instead of asking for balance to include missing items? Probably the same reason why even after my optional respec, went back into the Mass Driver, which was bugged, and Minmatar logi, which was lumped up with the CaLogi during everyone's nerf witch hunt. It's something you find fun, like doing, and you have faith in the developers that they'll make things right. If everyone cared more about being effective than having fun, we'd all be running around in shield tanking suits and ARs. Exmaple Core, I've been in the same boat you're in now. Not just with Dust or EVE, but in a lot of online games. Some of us are too stubborn to take the road less traveled with hopes that it pays off in the end. Sometimes it does, sometimes it doesn't, there's no guarantee. The only thing you can really do is think of the good times, or dream of the possible good times around the corner. If you decide to do anything that matters- don't give up. Whether it's too expensive, underpowered, or your peers don't respect what you do, find a way to keep things going- keep the faith and do it because it's what you like doing. "Adapt or Die..."
Yea but in those other games would it take you literally months to get into a new weapon or item was it plausible to get them in short order(2 weeks)
If the anti-respec crowd want it there way im willing to let them have it but we get NO SP CAP or 3x SP as the base weekly cap UNTIL a TRUE BALANCE is achieved,
/thread. |
Thor Odinson42
Molon Labe. League of Infamy
747
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 13:05:00 -
[150] - Quote
ZDub 303 wrote:Once we've reached some semblance of balance, respecs won't be necessary. But the people on this forum are dellusional if they think we are balanced now or will be balanced by the end of the year.
FOTM is a symptom of bad balance, not of the ability to respec. / thread |
|
ADAM-OF-EVE
Svartur Bjorn
141
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 13:28:00 -
[151] - Quote
i argue against it,
as much as i would like a respec to get back sp from skills i am no longer able to use effectively i disagree with your post. for a few reasons.
why should ccp punish players who didn't use op/unbalanced gear by rewarding people who did respecs so they can spec into the next op/unbalanced gear. its not ccp's problem you used op/unbalanced gear and as such are going to get nerfed. you reaped the rewards of the unbalance for months and now you have to pay for it
you only have yourself to blame by dumping everything you had into 1 role. i myself have about 20 different suits/vehicle fits for different roles and situations even specific ones for certain maps. some have been nerfed heavily and others not touched at all yet i fully expect more changes in the future.
everyone knows dust is going to be permanently adjusted over and over again and that sticking to 1 role is just a bad idea yet people still do it and cry respec when the inevitable balance happens |
Jason Pearson
Seraphim Auxiliaries
2214
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 13:52:00 -
[152] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Why did you constantly put more skill levels into an item you hate using? Then why are you hanging out with a corp that doesn't appreciate what you bring to the table? Then why are you wasting your energy asking for a respec instead of asking for balance to include missing items?
Because it was originally fine, we expected balancing issues to be fixed not amplified. They don't appreciate it because it's been nerfed into the ground? Example, Tanks, Tankers were key players in CBs, not anymore. Just have one AVer take on all the tanks. Because we ask for balance and CCP says yes, see you in 6 months.
Why are you CPM? |
Jason Pearson
Seraphim Auxiliaries
2214
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 13:55:00 -
[153] - Quote
ADAM-OF-EVE wrote:i argue against it,
as much as i would like a respec to get back sp from skills i am no longer able to use effectively i disagree with your post. for a few reasons.
why should ccp punish players who didn't use op/unbalanced gear by rewarding people who did respecs so they can spec into the next op/unbalanced gear. its not ccp's problem you used op/unbalanced gear and as such are going to get nerfed. you reaped the rewards of the unbalance for months and now you have to pay for it
you only have yourself to blame by dumping everything you had into 1 role. i myself have about 20 different suits/vehicle fits for different roles and situations even specific ones for certain maps. some have been nerfed heavily and others not touched at all yet i fully expect more changes in the future.
everyone knows dust is going to be permanently adjusted over and over again and that sticking to 1 role is just a bad idea yet people still do it and cry respec when the inevitable balance happens
*Claps*
I would never take you in to a Planetary Conquest battle, simply because you are not specialized. Maybe when you have about 50m SP? But at this moment in time you'd be as useless as someone spec'd into something useless.
We play our roles because we expect them to be competitive, not nerfed to ****. People always seem to look at this from a pubmatch PoV, but face it, Pub games are ******* shite and useless for balancing, you're always going to get bad players crying about others, because they're using teamwork. |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1333
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 14:10:00 -
[154] - Quote
ADAM-OF-EVE wrote:i argue against it,
as much as i would like a respec to get back sp from skills i am no longer able to use effectively i disagree with your post. for a few reasons.
why should ccp punish players who didn't use op/unbalanced gear by rewarding people who did respecs so they can spec into the next op/unbalanced gear. its not ccp's problem you used op/unbalanced gear and as such are going to get nerfed. you reaped the rewards of the unbalance for months and now you have to pay for it
you only have yourself to blame by dumping everything you had into 1 role. i myself have about 20 different suits/vehicle fits for different roles and situations even specific ones for certain maps. some have been nerfed heavily and others not touched at all yet i fully expect more changes in the future.
everyone knows dust is going to be permanently adjusted over and over again and that sticking to 1 role is just a bad idea yet people still do it and cry respec when the inevitable balance happens
We need to abandon this kind of thinking if we're ever going to be able to take organized corp battles seriously in this game.
You know IWS is very similar to do you? He's put one point into every single skill and working on level 2 now.
That's cool and all, and good for him, but he will never have a place in PC, which is the only thing still keeping a lot of us here. |
Th3rdSun
L.O.T.I.S. RISE of LEGION
449
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 14:54:00 -
[155] - Quote
I'm starting to wonder if all of these tweaking,retweaking,nerfing,and buffing is all done by design to help sell more AUR based items.
I have no doubt that devs aren't that insidious to do stuff like that,but is CCP that clever? Makes one take pause. |
Aaroniero d'Lioncourt
The Southern Legion
3
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 15:19:00 -
[156] - Quote
Knightshade Belladonna wrote:This one time, I used to have a front line assault starter fit
and that was it...
This one time, at band camp. |
Heimdallr69
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
364
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 15:38:00 -
[157] - Quote
Xero The Mishima wrote:Heimdallr69 wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:Sadly. a motivator in why i stand up to the haters, speds, Devs and derps who vote against respecs. Because iknow first hand what its like to invest time and SP into a class and have it ruined due to balancing. I would gladly respec if i could, to have a fighting chance and be useful again but i cant becuase im doomed to play the mistake CCP gave me. Myslef and others I support it for vehicles but none of those calogis anything but them Lol you support it for HIS case but not everybody elses... WHAT A SURPRISE! A "NF" supporting a "NF"! I would never think of this to happen! What a joke. Good job skilling into something OP and incase you need glasses I ended up agreeing to a respec not just for vehicle users |
Heimdallr69
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
364
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 15:42:00 -
[158] - Quote
Glad somebody in "NF" isn't worthless. +1[/quote] Here yo go looking for another fight ill save the community the trouble and not reply to anymore of your posts since no one wants to read them anyways |
XOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXO XOXOXOXOXOXO
Storm Wind Strikeforce Caldari State
154
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 15:51:00 -
[159] - Quote
CCP needs to rework stuff like weapon balance new suits new content and so forth
before a respec is ever back on the table
IMO scout's Heavy's and pilot's should be the only ones given a partial respec
|
Klash 816
Sand Mercenary Corps Inc. Interstellar Conquest Enterprises
38
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 19:46:00 -
[160] - Quote
Lol it seems CCP has made everyone think balancing means hitting stuff with the nerf hammer, and that respecs are bad because respecs are bad because respecs are bad because... I personaly well continue to play dust wether we have respecs or not, because I believe that CCP well get the game whole balanced wether we like it or not :)
But whatever just my .02isk Klash out~ |
|
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
649
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 03:11:00 -
[161] - Quote
MlDDLE MANGEMENT wrote:Cosgar wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Why did you constantly put more skill levels into an item you hate using? Then why are you hanging out with a corp that doesn't appreciate what you bring to the table? Then why are you wasting your energy asking for a respec instead of asking for balance to include missing items? Probably the same reason why even after my optional respec, went back into the Mass Driver, which was bugged, and Minmatar logi, which was lumped up with the CaLogi during everyone's nerf witch hunt. It's something you find fun, like doing, and you have faith in the developers that they'll make things right. If everyone cared more about being effective than having fun, we'd all be running around in shield tanking suits and ARs. Exmaple Core, I've been in the same boat you're in now. Not just with Dust or EVE, but in a lot of online games. Some of us are too stubborn to take the road less traveled with hopes that it pays off in the end. Sometimes it does, sometimes it doesn't, there's no guarantee. The only thing you can really do is think of the good times, or dream of the possible good times around the corner. If you decide to do anything that matters- don't give up. Whether it's too expensive, underpowered, or your peers don't respect what you do, find a way to keep things going- keep the faith and do it because it's what you like doing. "Adapt or Die..." Yea but in those other games would it take you literally months to get into a new weapon or item was it plausible to get them in short order(2 weeks) If the anti-respec crowd want it there way im willing to let them have it but we get NO SP CAP or 3x SP as the base weekly cap UNTIL a TRUE BALANCE is achieved, /thread.
No, if you give more SP to ppl everyone will be able to do everything as oppossed to giving respecs so ppl can refine their class, whatever they choose, and be very efficient at one class. Giving everyone an insaine amount of SP reduces the demand for speced players |
Heathen Bastard
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
404
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 04:40:00 -
[162] - Quote
A free respec will see around 80-90% of players switching to the current FOTM and then demanding another free respec when that gets balance properly. CCP caves now, they'll never stop.
EDIT: not in favor of paid respecs either. spec what you love, and the kills will come. |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
649
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 05:06:00 -
[163] - Quote
Heathen Bastard wrote:A free respec will see around 80-90% of players switching to the current FOTM and then demanding another free respec when that gets balance properly. CCP caves now, they'll never stop.
EDIT: not in favor of paid respecs either. spec what you love, and the kills will come.
thats what so many of us thought and then our belovid classes were nerfed and we hate the game
Exmaple Core wrote:Cat Merc wrote:A reset won't fix anything. Sure, it will even the playfield... FOR NOW. What about in 2-3 months? New players will step in and find themselves and the same situation. So you will do another reset? You respec every few months untill you reach a point were the game is balanced enough for players to temper the game. Its called upkeep checks, attending to your players general interest to play your game even though you treat them like shiet, or fixing the mistakes you made ruining everyones playstyles and cadering to those still wanting to play dust. With all the rebalancing done, comming and will be comming later everyone is extreemly p*ssed off with whats happening to their classes and the SP they spent quiet some time ago now being garbage and unrefundable. People are great one day and their their garbage, shuned by strong corps and excluded in PC because of their class got changed suddenly. Should we all be garbage and just deal with it? No. You respec at reasonable intervals, when needed, so this game is still playable and tolerable. Simply telling everyone to stop playing, being patient, HTFU cuz your screwed or staying silent is killing dust and its playerbase. Compensation is needed to those wrongly afflicted by developer errors
|
Morrigan Uroboros
The Phoenix Federation
18
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 05:12:00 -
[164] - Quote
So if I understand it right, CCP want us to focus skilling into one role? Is it me, or is the obvious fix to make the suit skills more like eve? Your looking at 2.5mil sp to max one suit in one role... and as a new player thats a long investment in time with little reward or incentive during the grind from ADV to PRO. But if say we had to get the racial suit to 3 as we do now, and then have the advanced classes such as logi and assault become blanket skills rather than race dependant you would still have the concept of locking into a class, but you open yourself upto the potential to use multiple suits. This stops players being screwed over to a certain degree when the one suit they chose for their class gets nerfed. Obviously theres currently the problem that lights and heavys would currently be left out with this, but once they have their missing suits it could add variety to the game. |
Heathen Bastard
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
405
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 05:24:00 -
[165] - Quote
why is it that what you're using has to be all-powerful for you to have fun? I specced into missile tanks because I like blowing shite up, and the caldari tanks specialize in missiles, which are all about blowing shite up. they were crap when I started, and have since gotten worse. According to everyone here, I should have quit to send a message to CCP. How's about I just keep doing what I like, since I don't need it to be OP to have fun. |
lowratehitman
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
777
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 05:36:00 -
[166] - Quote
I have basically stopped playing the game, and doing videos. The whole experience has been a waste of many moons of grinding SP.
This community I have found out is not who you know but who you blow.... Too many "big chiefs" running around with titles that I NEVER NEVER see in the game, yet represent out best interests.....
I do not believe the forums are even related to the actual game anymore, or the interest of the daily player |
Aythadis Smith
The Generals EoN.
109
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 05:37:00 -
[167] - Quote
I specced into too much. I seen the down fall of shields, but before I dumped my whole lot into it. FROM THE INITIAL RESPEC. From Chrome to here. So I dabbled back into my scout suit. Iffy results, then spent a few into a Gal Assault suit, again kinda iffy.
So far, I still play PC ( when MY time permits), and still turn a profit. I'm not even running proto suits yet and still working fine.
Look, try new things, here and there. Check out the MLT fit first, find one you like, and slowly spec into it.
Nothing is definitive in this game, let alone the company. We all knew this. You just had to Google "CCP" and probably see "NERF and BUFF Champions and still reigning"
I'm no special kitten here, but... if my scrubby butt can learn a new trick, I think an old vet like yourself can do the same.
Maybe if something is grossly UP, start a thread, which ( tankers and scouts) have, and at least a comment from a DEV. I don't have a magic crystal ball that will tell me the next nerf is coming, but I can tell you it is a matter of "when". |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
649
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 05:38:00 -
[168] - Quote
Heathen Bastard wrote:why is it that what you're using has to be all-powerful for you to have fun? I specced into missile tanks because I like blowing shite up, and the caldari tanks specialize in missiles, which are all about blowing shite up. they were crap when I started, and have since gotten worse. According to everyone here, I should have quit to send a message to CCP. How's about I just keep doing what I like, since I don't need it to be OP to have fun. OP? we want balance, and 99% of all FPS players dont want to be nonn factors, your the 1%. 100% of ppl dont want their class to be nerfed and be told to deal with it |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
649
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 05:46:00 -
[169] - Quote
Aythadis Smith wrote:I specced into too much. I seen the down fall of shields, but before I dumped my whole lot into it. FROM THE INITIAL RESPEC. From Chrome to here. So I dabbled back into my scout suit. Iffy results, then spent a few into a Gal Assault suit, again kinda iffy.
So far, I still play PC ( when MY time permits), and still turn a profit. I'm not even running proto suits yet and still working fine.
Look, try new things, here and there. Check out the MLT fit first, find one you like, and slowly spec into it.
Nothing is definitive in this game, let alone the company. We all knew this. You just had to Google "CCP" and probably see "NERF and BUFF Champions and still reigning"
I'm no special kitten here, but... if my scrubby butt can learn a new trick, I think an old vet like yourself can do the same.
Maybe if something is grossly UP, start a thread, which ( tankers and scouts) have, and at least a comment from a DEV. I don't have a magic crystal ball that will tell me the next nerf is coming, but I can tell you it is a matter of "when".
Sounds like your talking to noobs who picked up the game last week. Weve tried to make balance changes sence the week chromosome started, look whats happened so far. Nerfed classes and ppl quiting the game bcuz you cant recover for many months after your class of millions of SP is ruined. Yes, we have many more balancing nerfs and buffs comming. We will have many more players leaving if they can not respec out of them when it happens |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1345
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 05:51:00 -
[170] - Quote
lowratehitman wrote:I have basically stopped playing the game, and doing videos. The whole experience has been a waste of many moons of grinding SP.
This community I have found out is not who you know but who you blow.... Too many "big chiefs" running around with titles that I NEVER NEVER see in the game, yet represent our best interests.....
I do not believe the forums are even related to the actual game anymore, or the interest of the daily player
Sad to see you go lowrate, I think a lot of us are right behind you...
Post QFT... All so pathetically true. |
|
Heathen Bastard
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
406
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 05:53:00 -
[171] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:why is it that what you're using has to be all-powerful for you to have fun? I specced into missile tanks because I like blowing shite up, and the caldari tanks specialize in missiles, which are all about blowing shite up. they were crap when I started, and have since gotten worse. According to everyone here, I should have quit to send a message to CCP. How's about I just keep doing what I like, since I don't need it to be OP to have fun. OP? we want balance, and 99% of all FPS players dont want to be nonn factors, your the 1%. 100% of ppl dont want their class to be nerfed and be told to deal with it
No. you want the balance to be in your favor. The second it isn't you throw up a huge shitstorm and act like you speak for everyone, making up statistics to support your views.
|
lowratehitman
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
780
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 05:53:00 -
[172] - Quote
ZDub 303 wrote:lowratehitman wrote:I have basically stopped playing the game, and doing videos. The whole experience has been a waste of many moons of grinding SP.
This community I have found out is not who you know but who you blow.... Too many "big chiefs" running around with titles that I NEVER NEVER see in the game, yet represent our best interests.....
I do not believe the forums are even related to the actual game anymore, or the interest of the daily player Sad to see you go lowrate, I think a lot of us are right behind you... Post QFT... All so pathetically true.
I still get on perhaps 1-2 hr per week vs the 40+ hrs a weeks I was sinking into the game. I have not and will not spend anymore money on boosters or anything like that, and have not for awhile now. |
dday3six
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
127
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 05:54:00 -
[173] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:MlDDLE MANGEMENT wrote:Cosgar wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Why did you constantly put more skill levels into an item you hate using? Then why are you hanging out with a corp that doesn't appreciate what you bring to the table? Then why are you wasting your energy asking for a respec instead of asking for balance to include missing items? Probably the same reason why even after my optional respec, went back into the Mass Driver, which was bugged, and Minmatar logi, which was lumped up with the CaLogi during everyone's nerf witch hunt. It's something you find fun, like doing, and you have faith in the developers that they'll make things right. If everyone cared more about being effective than having fun, we'd all be running around in shield tanking suits and ARs. Exmaple Core, I've been in the same boat you're in now. Not just with Dust or EVE, but in a lot of online games. Some of us are too stubborn to take the road less traveled with hopes that it pays off in the end. Sometimes it does, sometimes it doesn't, there's no guarantee. The only thing you can really do is think of the good times, or dream of the possible good times around the corner. If you decide to do anything that matters- don't give up. Whether it's too expensive, underpowered, or your peers don't respect what you do, find a way to keep things going- keep the faith and do it because it's what you like doing. "Adapt or Die..." Yea but in those other games would it take you literally months to get into a new weapon or item was it plausible to get them in short order(2 weeks) If the anti-respec crowd want it there way im willing to let them have it but we get NO SP CAP or 3x SP as the base weekly cap UNTIL a TRUE BALANCE is achieved, /thread. No, if you give more SP to ppl everyone will be able to do everything as oppossed to giving respecs so ppl can refine their class, whatever they choose, and be very efficient at one class. Giving everyone an insaine amount of SP reduces the demand for speced players
IMO, the biggest issue with SP, the skilltree, and the grind is that everything is designed around maximizing revenue. It's built ground up to sell AUR. Dust is strangely lacking the most common cash items of other F2P business models which are character and home customizations, and because of this the game has more aspects which revolve around selling cash items. |
Grief PK
DUST University Ivy League
21
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 05:57:00 -
[174] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Why did you constantly put more skill levels into an item you hate using? Then why are you hanging out with a corp that doesn't appreciate what you bring to the table? Then why are you wasting your energy asking for a respec instead of asking for balance to include missing items?
Are these serious questions or troll? |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1346
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 05:58:00 -
[175] - Quote
lowratehitman wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:lowratehitman wrote:I have basically stopped playing the game, and doing videos. The whole experience has been a waste of many moons of grinding SP.
This community I have found out is not who you know but who you blow.... Too many "big chiefs" running around with titles that I NEVER NEVER see in the game, yet represent our best interests.....
I do not believe the forums are even related to the actual game anymore, or the interest of the daily player Sad to see you go lowrate, I think a lot of us are right behind you... Post QFT... All so pathetically true. I still get on perhaps 1-2 hr per week vs the 40+ hrs a weeks I was sinking into the game. I have not and will not spend anymore money on boosters or anything like that, and have not for awhile now.
Same, Oceania afk farming till cap... Then a few PC matches.. And that's it. But I'm sadly struggling to even afk farm anymore... Haven't bought a merc pack since chrome... |
Grief PK
DUST University Ivy League
22
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 06:02:00 -
[176] - Quote
Balance issues are part of every game throughout its entire life cycle. There is never a game that is 100% balanced 100% of the time. We know this so why weigh it so heavily in the argument.
The reality is that its about time. Balance aside, when I respect I am not respecing SP, I am respecing hundreds of hours of my life. So knowing that balance will always be ... out of balance. Allow players to ebbe and flow with it instead of feeling caged by their SP and their by devaluing the hours of their life spent earning it. |
lowratehitman
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
782
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 06:02:00 -
[177] - Quote
lowratehitman wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:lowratehitman wrote:I have basically stopped playing the game, and doing videos. The whole experience has been a waste of many moons of grinding SP.
This community I have found out is not who you know but who you blow.... Too many "big chiefs" running around with titles that I NEVER NEVER see in the game, yet represent our best interests.....
I do not believe the forums are even related to the actual game anymore, or the interest of the daily player Sad to see you go lowrate, I think a lot of us are right behind you... Post QFT... All so pathetically true. I still get on perhaps 1-2 hr per week vs the 40+ hrs a weeks I was sinking into the game. I have not and will not spend anymore money on boosters or anything like that, and have not for awhile now.
Damn.. I threw 40 + hrs a week out there like it is NOTHING... haha. I have a new game I have been playing that treats my time spent grinding much better. So it would be unfair of me to say it is CCP's fault that I have not played as much.
A few things such as how the CPM was chosen, being how they was the ones supposed to represent us, and I know at least one of them could not even hold a full time job let alone represent a army of nerds. I have seen favoritism for people not that I myself wanted anything yet only for my voice and opinion to be equal to that of the next mans.
Perhaps I will finally break down and do a final video where I just let it all rip and I can get flamed for being mean and for lying on people.
After all DUST 514 made my channel, before dust I had 300 friends, but I am comfortable with losing all if it means me speaking my mind and my truth....
I am done ranting, you guys take care... |
lowratehitman
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
782
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 06:03:00 -
[178] - Quote
Grief PK wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Why did you constantly put more skill levels into an item you hate using? Then why are you hanging out with a corp that doesn't appreciate what you bring to the table? Then why are you wasting your energy asking for a respec instead of asking for balance to include missing items? Are these serious questions or troll?
That is one of the people that was chosen to represent you and your ideas...no offense |
Heathen Bastard
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
407
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 06:04:00 -
[179] - Quote
Grief PK wrote:Balance issues are part of every game throughout its entire life cycle. There is never a game that is 100% balanced 100% of the time. We know this so why weigh it so heavily in the argument.
The reality is that its about time. Balance aside, when I respect I am not respecing SP, I am respecing hundreds of hours of my life. So knowing that balance will always be ... out of balance. Allow players to ebbe and flow with it instead of feeling caged by their SP and their by devaluing the hours of their life spent earning it.
yes, because everyone should only ever run what is FOTM. all others are scrubs and "nonn factors" right?
NOTE: The quotation marks are from what Exmaple called me a few posts ago. |
Grief PK
DUST University Ivy League
22
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 06:04:00 -
[180] - Quote
ZDub 303 wrote:lowratehitman wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:lowratehitman wrote:I have basically stopped playing the game, and doing videos. The whole experience has been a waste of many moons of grinding SP.
This community I have found out is not who you know but who you blow.... Too many "big chiefs" running around with titles that I NEVER NEVER see in the game, yet represent our best interests.....
I do not believe the forums are even related to the actual game anymore, or the interest of the daily player Sad to see you go lowrate, I think a lot of us are right behind you... Post QFT... All so pathetically true. I still get on perhaps 1-2 hr per week vs the 40+ hrs a weeks I was sinking into the game. I have not and will not spend anymore money on boosters or anything like that, and have not for awhile now. Same, Oceania afk farming till cap... Then a few PC matches.. And that's it. But I'm sadly struggling to even afk farm anymore... Haven't bought a merc pack since chrome...
I think if they fix afk farming pubmatches we will loose a huge amount of the weekly player base. It just wont be worth the time sink to spend the hours into permanent skill tree. |
|
Grief PK
DUST University Ivy League
23
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 06:05:00 -
[181] - Quote
lowratehitman wrote:Grief PK wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Why did you constantly put more skill levels into an item you hate using? Then why are you hanging out with a corp that doesn't appreciate what you bring to the table? Then why are you wasting your energy asking for a respec instead of asking for balance to include missing items? Are these serious questions or troll? That is one of the people that was chosen to represent you and your ideas...no offense
I am offended, that this guy has any say in a game I hope will be better then it is now. |
Grief PK
DUST University Ivy League
23
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 06:08:00 -
[182] - Quote
Heathen Bastard wrote:Grief PK wrote:Balance issues are part of every game throughout its entire life cycle. There is never a game that is 100% balanced 100% of the time. We know this so why weigh it so heavily in the argument.
The reality is that its about time. Balance aside, when I respect I am not respecing SP, I am respecing hundreds of hours of my life. So knowing that balance will always be ... out of balance. Allow players to ebbe and flow with it instead of feeling caged by their SP and their by devaluing the hours of their life spent earning it. yes, because everyone should only ever run what is FOTM. all others are scrubs and "nonn factors" right?
I don't know what you are getting at here. I disagree strongly that just because you respec you will go FOTM. If i respec'd right now I would go a heavy because I have never fired a heavy machine gun because I am to busy putting everything I have into shotguns.
Sure there will always be FOTM chasers, but they are there no matter what. You can not stop them so lets not destroy the game for everyone else in the hopes we stifle the FOTM folks. |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
650
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 06:09:00 -
[183] - Quote
Grief PK wrote:lowratehitman wrote:Grief PK wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Why did you constantly put more skill levels into an item you hate using? Then why are you hanging out with a corp that doesn't appreciate what you bring to the table? Then why are you wasting your energy asking for a respec instead of asking for balance to include missing items? Are these serious questions or troll? That is one of the people that was chosen to represent you and your ideas...no offense I am offended, that this guy has any say in a game I hope will be better then it is now.
he may make mistakes, but i like IWS. he does alot for us and really trys to make our dust experience better |
lowratehitman
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
782
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 06:11:00 -
[184] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:Grief PK wrote:lowratehitman wrote:Grief PK wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Why did you constantly put more skill levels into an item you hate using? Then why are you hanging out with a corp that doesn't appreciate what you bring to the table? Then why are you wasting your energy asking for a respec instead of asking for balance to include missing items? Are these serious questions or troll? That is one of the people that was chosen to represent you and your ideas...no offense I am offended, that this guy has any say in a game I hope will be better then it is now. he may make mistakes, but i like IWS. he does alot for us and really trys to make our dust experience better
and he is in a group of how many? you know as well as I do maple it was a popularity contest |
Heathen Bastard
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
407
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 06:12:00 -
[185] - Quote
"There will always be FOTM chasers" They're called about 90% of the population of any given FPS, probably more in dust with the EVE "any advantage I can take" mentality.
That is what will destroy the game, you'll go from a myriad selection of suits, guns, and vehicles to one of each, kitted out exactly the same. Unless you want to outright lose every fight you're in since every time the balance changes, the majority of the game switches to whatever's OP. You can only dodge so many flaylock shots. |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
650
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 06:13:00 -
[186] - Quote
Its more than jus popularity, the evidence is there he does do alot for us. I dont agree with all of his ideas and sometimes he deffenetly derps out but its okay in my book. He would be more popular with me if hed post up his oppinion on respecs or some meaningful news in this thread |
Grief PK
DUST University Ivy League
23
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 06:15:00 -
[187] - Quote
Heathen Bastard wrote:"There will always be FOTM chasers" They're called about 90% of the population of any given FPS, probably more in dust with the EVE "any advantage I can take" mentality.
That is what will destroy the game, you'll go from a myriad selection of suits, guns, and vehicles to one of each, kitted out exactly the same. Unless you want to outright lose every fight you're in since every time the balance changes, the majority of the game switches to whatever's OP. You can only dodge so many flaylock shots.
I disagree, whole heartedly. I believe CCP should take a chance, if you are correct they will know within a month and change it back no harm done. If you are incorrect we could have a phenomenal new game on our hands. |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
650
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 06:16:00 -
[188] - Quote
Heathen Bastard wrote:"There will always be FOTM chasers" They're called about 90% of the population of any given FPS, probably more in dust with the EVE "any advantage I can take" mentality.
That is what will destroy the game, you'll go from a myriad selection of suits, guns, and vehicles to one of each, kitted out exactly the same. Unless you want to outright lose every fight you're in since every time the balance changes, the majority of the game switches to whatever's OP. You can only dodge so many flaylock shots.
Things will get better and more balanced as time passes, 1.2 is a balance patch and that is progress. And in the progress of the balance ppl will get nerfed and the FOTM class will kill them even worse. So, if your able to respec you can spec into that FOTM class or more idealy, a more balanced class and repeat the process untill dust is more roundly balanced. That, keeps ppl happy and playing |
lowratehitman
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
782
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 06:17:00 -
[189] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:Its more than jus popularity, the evidence is there he does do alot for us. I dont agree with all of his ideas and sometimes he deffenetly derps out but its okay in my book. He would be more popular with me if hed post up his oppinion on respecs or some meaningful news in this thread
If it puts a position in jeopardy, it will not likely happen. He seems like a cool dude, but looking at the respect debate as if it is BS, nothing, will go away, or as a matter that is not serious, is not the way to approach the topic.
|
Heathen Bastard
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
407
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 06:18:00 -
[190] - Quote
Grief PK wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:"There will always be FOTM chasers" They're called about 90% of the population of any given FPS, probably more in dust with the EVE "any advantage I can take" mentality.
That is what will destroy the game, you'll go from a myriad selection of suits, guns, and vehicles to one of each, kitted out exactly the same. Unless you want to outright lose every fight you're in since every time the balance changes, the majority of the game switches to whatever's OP. You can only dodge so many flaylock shots. I disagree, whole heartedly. I believe CCP should take a chance, if you are correct they will know within a month and change it back no harm done. If you are incorrect we could have a phenomenal new game on our hands.
no they won't. they are already getting HUGE backlash and people demanding respecs right now over putting one suit and gun in line. Imagine the shitstorm if they took out a month's worth of SP in a rollback?
And it's human nature to want to win. that doesn't change. It's why I know that so much of the playerbase will flock to the statistical "best" items and fits in the game. |
|
Heathen Bastard
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
407
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 06:19:00 -
[191] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:"There will always be FOTM chasers" They're called about 90% of the population of any given FPS, probably more in dust with the EVE "any advantage I can take" mentality.
That is what will destroy the game, you'll go from a myriad selection of suits, guns, and vehicles to one of each, kitted out exactly the same. Unless you want to outright lose every fight you're in since every time the balance changes, the majority of the game switches to whatever's OP. You can only dodge so many flaylock shots. Things will get better and more balanced as time passes, 1.2 is a balance patch and that is progress. And in the progress of the balance ppl will get nerfed and the FOTM class will kill them even worse. So, if your able to respec you can spec into that FOTM class or more idealy, a more balanced class and repeat the process untill dust is more roundly balanced. That, keeps ppl happy and playing
And then your choices mattering? that doesn't actually mean ****, since you can completely change your choices whenever you want. |
Grief PK
DUST University Ivy League
24
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 06:20:00 -
[192] - Quote
Heathen Bastard wrote:Grief PK wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:"There will always be FOTM chasers" They're called about 90% of the population of any given FPS, probably more in dust with the EVE "any advantage I can take" mentality.
That is what will destroy the game, you'll go from a myriad selection of suits, guns, and vehicles to one of each, kitted out exactly the same. Unless you want to outright lose every fight you're in since every time the balance changes, the majority of the game switches to whatever's OP. You can only dodge so many flaylock shots. I disagree, whole heartedly. I believe CCP should take a chance, if you are correct they will know within a month and change it back no harm done. If you are incorrect we could have a phenomenal new game on our hands. no they won't. they are already getting HUGE backlash and people demanding respecs right now over putting one suit and gun in line. Imagine the shitstorm if they took out a month's worth of SP in a rollback? And it's human nature to want to win. that doesn't change. It's why I know that so much of the playerbase will flock to the statistical "best" items and fits in the game.
Again, I disagree, the only way we can find out is to try. To not try leaves the power in the FOTM folks more so then the risk of failure. |
Stands Alone
Ultramarine Corp
42
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 06:20:00 -
[193] - Quote
exmaple. i respect you so im not trolling, however, i disagree with you.
1) after the last respec, they were pretty fair in telling us that things are still changing and to invest wisely because there will not be another.
2) this game will constantly evolve, it will never be fully balanced... why?? because when it finally starts getting fully balanced, CCP will add a new dynamic whether it comes in the version of a skill or the version of a weapon... and this will all start up again about how people should get a rebalance.
3) choose your skills solely on what YOU like to to not on what is the best at the time that you can get the best k/d with... that way, even nerfed, you still have fun and know that sooner or later you will be back on top when a new game dynamic is added or a new balance is brought.
its like the huge amount of people that dumped SP into the flaylock, most of them didnt choose the flaylock because they thought it would fit their playstyle, they dumped huge amounts of SP into to benefit their k/d...
so far, this id from observation, the only people who really care about respec from a 1st hand perspective, are those who chose to dump SP in a fitting solely to increase their k/d... those who dropped SP into what they like to do i.e. minnie logi, dropships, shotty scouts, etc dont seem to have a problem
so... did you? or those whom you speak of really invest the SP into the gear and equipment that fits their individual play style? or did they just choose the most powerful at the time?
and this time, they would have learned the nature of CCP and how dynamics and mechanics of a CCP game will change and evolve constantly... yet they still invested 15 mil sp?
also just a side note. i still have yet to see a class that, as a whole, is underpowered or sucks |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
650
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 06:21:00 -
[194] - Quote
Heathen Bastard wrote:Grief PK wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:"There will always be FOTM chasers" They're called about 90% of the population of any given FPS, probably more in dust with the EVE "any advantage I can take" mentality.
That is what will destroy the game, you'll go from a myriad selection of suits, guns, and vehicles to one of each, kitted out exactly the same. Unless you want to outright lose every fight you're in since every time the balance changes, the majority of the game switches to whatever's OP. You can only dodge so many flaylock shots. I disagree, whole heartedly. I believe CCP should take a chance, if you are correct they will know within a month and change it back no harm done. If you are incorrect we could have a phenomenal new game on our hands. no they won't. they are already getting HUGE backlash and people demanding respecs right now over putting one suit and gun in line. Imagine the shitstorm if they took out a month's worth of SP in a rollback? And it's human nature to want to win. that doesn't change. It's why I know that so much of the playerbase will flock to the statistical "best" items and fits in the game.
It will take months and months, years and years+ to put one suit and gun in line. It took sence the start of uprising to get the flaylock and contact grenades balance patch (1.3) to come out! We need something in the mean time to keep people here while their classes become ruined. Look on these forums, ppl are leaving because they dont want to be a non factor due to nerfed classes. If they can get out of it when its nerfed theyl stay. Then 6 months down the road they can skill back into it or something else when its fixed |
lowratehitman
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
782
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 06:22:00 -
[195] - Quote
Heathen Bastard wrote:Grief PK wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:"There will always be FOTM chasers" They're called about 90% of the population of any given FPS, probably more in dust with the EVE "any advantage I can take" mentality.
That is what will destroy the game, you'll go from a myriad selection of suits, guns, and vehicles to one of each, kitted out exactly the same. Unless you want to outright lose every fight you're in since every time the balance changes, the majority of the game switches to whatever's OP. You can only dodge so many flaylock shots. I disagree, whole heartedly. I believe CCP should take a chance, if you are correct they will know within a month and change it back no harm done. If you are incorrect we could have a phenomenal new game on our hands. no they won't. they are already getting HUGE backlash and people demanding respecs right now over putting one suit and gun in line. Imagine the shitstorm if they took out a month's worth of SP in a rollback? And it's human nature to want to win. that doesn't change. It's why I know that so much of the playerbase will flock to the statistical "best" items and fits in the game.
75% of the game including myself already runs the FOTM... the OP AR
so what does it matter if they get a respect for THEIR time invested.... They didn't ask for a NERF.. or give them back what they invested in, whatever it may be. |
Heathen Bastard
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
407
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 06:23:00 -
[196] - Quote
Grief PK wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:Grief PK wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:"There will always be FOTM chasers" They're called about 90% of the population of any given FPS, probably more in dust with the EVE "any advantage I can take" mentality.
That is what will destroy the game, you'll go from a myriad selection of suits, guns, and vehicles to one of each, kitted out exactly the same. Unless you want to outright lose every fight you're in since every time the balance changes, the majority of the game switches to whatever's OP. You can only dodge so many flaylock shots. I disagree, whole heartedly. I believe CCP should take a chance, if you are correct they will know within a month and change it back no harm done. If you are incorrect we could have a phenomenal new game on our hands. no they won't. they are already getting HUGE backlash and people demanding respecs right now over putting one suit and gun in line. Imagine the shitstorm if they took out a month's worth of SP in a rollback? And it's human nature to want to win. that doesn't change. It's why I know that so much of the playerbase will flock to the statistical "best" items and fits in the game. Again, I disagree, the only way we can find out is to try. To not try leaves the power in the FOTM folks more so then the risk of failure.
Really? how? since they are taking away the FOTM's power? or are you just uninformed? flaylocks, contact nades, and the callogi are all taking nerfs. |
dustwaffle
Gravity Prone EoN.
241
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 06:23:00 -
[197] - Quote
FOTM is common in games which allow for customizable fittings, especially when skillpoints/experience points come into play.
Such games will always be rebalanced over and over while FOTM would still occur with each rebalance pass, since it is virtually impossible to properly balance everything equally (unless they just made all the suits have the same slots, bonuses etc. and all the weapons have the same stats)
Allowing for unlimited respecs just means most people will put all their points into something that's 'optimal' for each rebalancing CCP does, which kills diversity in the game. 1.0 -> Cal logi TAR 1.1 -> Cal logi flaylock 1.2 -> Cal logi .......
What can players do to avoid feeling they've been screwed over? Well, spec into something that you find fun to play with. Don't specialize too much into one role, unless you really really really enjoy that role, otherwise you'll be shooting yourself in that role.
My 2 cents |
Grief PK
DUST University Ivy League
24
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 06:25:00 -
[198] - Quote
dustwaffle wrote:FOTM is common in games which allow for customizable fittings, especially when skillpoints/experience points come into play.
Such games will always be rebalanced over and over while FOTM would still occur with each rebalance pass, since it is virtually impossible to properly balance everything equally (unless they just made all the suits have the same slots, bonuses etc. and all the weapons have the same stats)
Allowing for unlimited respecs just means most people will put all their points into something that's 'optimal' for each rebalancing CCP does, which kills diversity in the game. 1.0 -> Cal logi TAR 1.1 -> Cal logi flaylock 1.2 -> Cal logi .......
What can players do to avoid feeling they've been screwed over? Well, spec into something that you find fun to play with. Don't specialize too much into one role, unless you really really really enjoy that role, otherwise you'll be shooting yourself in that role.
My 2 cents
How do you know you enjoy the role if you are a new player... how do you know you will enjoy the role in 6 months or even 1 month? |
Stands Alone
Ultramarine Corp
42
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 06:27:00 -
[199] - Quote
dustwaffle wrote:FOTM is common in games which allow for customizable fittings, especially when skillpoints/experience points come into play.
Such games will always be rebalanced over and over while FOTM would still occur with each rebalance pass, since it is virtually impossible to properly balance everything equally (unless they just made all the suits have the same slots, bonuses etc. and all the weapons have the same stats)
Allowing for unlimited respecs just means most people will put all their points into something that's 'optimal' for each rebalancing CCP does, which kills diversity in the game. 1.0 -> Cal logi TAR 1.1 -> Cal logi flaylock 1.2 -> Cal logi .......
What can players do to avoid feeling they've been screwed over? Well, spec into something that you find fun to play with. Don't specialize too much into one role, unless you really really really enjoy that role, otherwise you'll be shooting yourself in that role.
My 2 cents
this |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
650
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 06:27:00 -
[200] - Quote
Stands Alone wrote:exmaple. i respect you so im not trolling, however, i disagree with you.
1) after the last respec, they were pretty fair in telling us that things are still changing and to invest wisely because there will not be another.
2) this game will constantly evolve, it will never be fully balanced... why?? because when it finally starts getting fully balanced, CCP will add a new dynamic whether it comes in the version of a skill or the version of a weapon... and this will all start up again about how people should get a rebalance.
3) choose your skills solely on what YOU like to to not on what is the best at the time that you can get the best k/d with... that way, even nerfed, you still have fun and know that sooner or later you will be back on top when a new game dynamic is added or a new balance is brought.
its like the huge amount of people that dumped SP into the flaylock, most of them didnt choose the flaylock because they thought it would fit their playstyle, they dumped huge amounts of SP into to benefit their k/d...
so far, this id from observation, the only people who really care about respec from a 1st hand perspective, are those who chose to dump SP in a fitting solely to increase their k/d... those who dropped SP into what they like to do i.e. minnie logi, dropships, shotty scouts, etc dont seem to have a problem
so... did you? or those whom you speak of really invest the SP into the gear and equipment that fits their individual play style? or did they just choose the most powerful at the time?
and this time, they would have learned the nature of CCP and how dynamics and mechanics of a CCP game will change and evolve constantly... yet they still invested 15 mil sp?
also just a side note. i still have yet to see a class that, as a whole, is underpowered or sucks
That is a very easy question to answer, some people only enjoy the most OP class in the game. Others, like myself, enjoy every balanced class in the game because i am (we are) good enough to get the class to work and destroy everyone in the game, no matter what class/fit were using... as long as its balanced. When our classes that we are now, currently balanced, are nerfed the next day to uselessness we dont want to play dust at all anymore because there is simply no recovering that 15 mill SP we invested into something that we did once enjoy. We need the ability to get out of the shiet storm we are put in and play /something/ that we enjoy. Yeah, we cant play our favorite nerfed class but there are other classes out there that we can enjoy and compete in |
|
Stands Alone
Ultramarine Corp
42
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 06:28:00 -
[201] - Quote
Grief PK wrote:dustwaffle wrote:FOTM is common in games which allow for customizable fittings, especially when skillpoints/experience points come into play.
Such games will always be rebalanced over and over while FOTM would still occur with each rebalance pass, since it is virtually impossible to properly balance everything equally (unless they just made all the suits have the same slots, bonuses etc. and all the weapons have the same stats)
Allowing for unlimited respecs just means most people will put all their points into something that's 'optimal' for each rebalancing CCP does, which kills diversity in the game. 1.0 -> Cal logi TAR 1.1 -> Cal logi flaylock 1.2 -> Cal logi .......
What can players do to avoid feeling they've been screwed over? Well, spec into something that you find fun to play with. Don't specialize too much into one role, unless you really really really enjoy that role, otherwise you'll be shooting yourself in that role.
My 2 cents How do you know you enjoy the role if you are a new player... how do you know you will enjoy the role in 6 months or even 1 month?
if you like to blow **** up, then get a ******* mass driver and some remote explosives... if you like to head shot people, get a sniper rifle... simple |
lowratehitman
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
782
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 06:28:00 -
[202] - Quote
Grief PK wrote:dustwaffle wrote:FOTM is common in games which allow for customizable fittings, especially when skillpoints/experience points come into play.
Such games will always be rebalanced over and over while FOTM would still occur with each rebalance pass, since it is virtually impossible to properly balance everything equally (unless they just made all the suits have the same slots, bonuses etc. and all the weapons have the same stats)
Allowing for unlimited respecs just means most people will put all their points into something that's 'optimal' for each rebalancing CCP does, which kills diversity in the game. 1.0 -> Cal logi TAR 1.1 -> Cal logi flaylock 1.2 -> Cal logi .......
What can players do to avoid feeling they've been screwed over? Well, spec into something that you find fun to play with. Don't specialize too much into one role, unless you really really really enjoy that role, otherwise you'll be shooting yourself in that role.
My 2 cents How do you know you enjoy the role if you are a new player... how do you know you will enjoy the role in 6 months or even 1 month?
this |
Heathen Bastard
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
408
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 06:29:00 -
[203] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote: That is a very easy question to answer, some people only enjoy the most OP class in the game. Others, like myself, enjoy every balanced class in the game because i am (we are) good enough to get the class to work and destroy everyone in the game, no matter what class/fit were using... as long as its balanced. When our classes that we are now, currently balanced, are nerfed the next day to uselessness we dont want to play dust at all anymore because there is simply no recovering that 15 mill SP we invested into something that we did once enjoy. We need the ability to get out of the shiet storm we are put in and play /something/ that we enjoy. Yeah, we cant play our favorite nerfed class but there are other classes out there that we can enjoy and compete in
So, you stop playing something when it gets weak, and play it only when it's strong.
FOTM chaser spotted, 200 meters, opening fire. GOD-damned missiles! go straight for more than 40 feet! |
Grief PK
DUST University Ivy League
25
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 06:31:00 -
[204] - Quote
Heathen Bastard wrote:Grief PK wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:Grief PK wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:"There will always be FOTM chasers" They're called about 90% of the population of any given FPS, probably more in dust with the EVE "any advantage I can take" mentality.
That is what will destroy the game, you'll go from a myriad selection of suits, guns, and vehicles to one of each, kitted out exactly the same. Unless you want to outright lose every fight you're in since every time the balance changes, the majority of the game switches to whatever's OP. You can only dodge so many flaylock shots. I disagree, whole heartedly. I believe CCP should take a chance, if you are correct they will know within a month and change it back no harm done. If you are incorrect we could have a phenomenal new game on our hands. no they won't. they are already getting HUGE backlash and people demanding respecs right now over putting one suit and gun in line. Imagine the shitstorm if they took out a month's worth of SP in a rollback? And it's human nature to want to win. that doesn't change. It's why I know that so much of the playerbase will flock to the statistical "best" items and fits in the game. Again, I disagree, the only way we can find out is to try. To not try leaves the power in the FOTM folks more so then the risk of failure. Really? how? since they are taking away the FOTM's power? or are you just uninformed? flaylocks, contact nades, and the callogi are all taking nerfs.
You want new content right? The only people screaming louder then the people being ground into dust by flaylock pistols are the people demanding new content because they are bored. Flaylocks are new content... when they are balanced the 'NEW CONTENT!!!" chanting will pick up again and something else will be added to the game that requires balancing. That balance will take several months, whereby we start the process all over.
The point being that there is never a point where things reach 'balance', its the nature of game development. So knowing that, how do we keep the average joe playing so there is still enough player base to keep the whole cycle turning?
You give people flexibility to roll with the punches ... you say 'sorry for the inconvenient punches, but here is a way to make it hurt less and please keep having fun and paying money' |
dday3six
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
127
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 06:32:00 -
[205] - Quote
Stands Alone wrote:Grief PK wrote:dustwaffle wrote:FOTM is common in games which allow for customizable fittings, especially when skillpoints/experience points come into play.
Such games will always be rebalanced over and over while FOTM would still occur with each rebalance pass, since it is virtually impossible to properly balance everything equally (unless they just made all the suits have the same slots, bonuses etc. and all the weapons have the same stats)
Allowing for unlimited respecs just means most people will put all their points into something that's 'optimal' for each rebalancing CCP does, which kills diversity in the game. 1.0 -> Cal logi TAR 1.1 -> Cal logi flaylock 1.2 -> Cal logi .......
What can players do to avoid feeling they've been screwed over? Well, spec into something that you find fun to play with. Don't specialize too much into one role, unless you really really really enjoy that role, otherwise you'll be shooting yourself in that role.
My 2 cents How do you know you enjoy the role if you are a new player... how do you know you will enjoy the role in 6 months or even 1 month? if you like to blow **** up, then get a ******* mass driver and some remote explosives... if you like to head shot people, get a sniper rifle... simple
No, not so simple. 6 months down the line, the basic functions of whatever you choose could change. |
lowratehitman
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
782
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 06:33:00 -
[206] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:Stands Alone wrote:exmaple. i respect you so im not trolling, however, i disagree with you.
1) after the last respec, they were pretty fair in telling us that things are still changing and to invest wisely because there will not be another.
2) this game will constantly evolve, it will never be fully balanced... why?? because when it finally starts getting fully balanced, CCP will add a new dynamic whether it comes in the version of a skill or the version of a weapon... and this will all start up again about how people should get a rebalance.
3) choose your skills solely on what YOU like to to not on what is the best at the time that you can get the best k/d with... that way, even nerfed, you still have fun and know that sooner or later you will be back on top when a new game dynamic is added or a new balance is brought.
its like the huge amount of people that dumped SP into the flaylock, most of them didnt choose the flaylock because they thought it would fit their playstyle, they dumped huge amounts of SP into to benefit their k/d...
so far, this id from observation, the only people who really care about respec from a 1st hand perspective, are those who chose to dump SP in a fitting solely to increase their k/d... those who dropped SP into what they like to do i.e. minnie logi, dropships, shotty scouts, etc dont seem to have a problem
so... did you? or those whom you speak of really invest the SP into the gear and equipment that fits their individual play style? or did they just choose the most powerful at the time?
and this time, they would have learned the nature of CCP and how dynamics and mechanics of a CCP game will change and evolve constantly... yet they still invested 15 mil sp?
also just a side note. i still have yet to see a class that, as a whole, is underpowered or sucks That is a very easy question to answer, some people only enjoy the most OP class in the game. Others, like myself, enjoy every balanced class in the game because i am (we are) good enough to get the class to work and destroy everyone in the game, no matter what class/fit were using... as long as its balanced. When our classes that we are now, currently balanced, are nerfed the next day to uselessness we dont want to play dust at all anymore because there is simply no recovering that 15 mill SP we invested into something that we did once enjoy. We need the ability to get out of the shiet storm we are put in and play /something/ that we enjoy. Yeah, we cant play our favorite nerfed class but there are other classes out there that we can enjoy and compete in
I think the approach people are taking on this subject is backwards. People are upset with people wanting a respect, but are not upset that CCP made the things OP in the first place, knowing that mass amounts of people will spec into them. Than when the items get nerfed... laugh and taunt the people that invested countless hours into a game. If the nerf came a week after the mistakes was made, that would had been cool, but they wait MONTHS and base their NERFS on QQing...... |
Heathen Bastard
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
408
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 06:33:00 -
[207] - Quote
and then one of the huge things for this game goes right out the window. Your choices mean nothing if they have no permanence. without consequence, choice is meaningless. its like handing out trophies to all the kids for participation. |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
651
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 06:34:00 -
[208] - Quote
lowratehitman wrote:Grief PK wrote:dustwaffle wrote:FOTM is common in games which allow for customizable fittings, especially when skillpoints/experience points come into play.
Such games will always be rebalanced over and over while FOTM would still occur with each rebalance pass, since it is virtually impossible to properly balance everything equally (unless they just made all the suits have the same slots, bonuses etc. and all the weapons have the same stats)
Allowing for unlimited respecs just means most people will put all their points into something that's 'optimal' for each rebalancing CCP does, which kills diversity in the game. 1.0 -> Cal logi TAR 1.1 -> Cal logi flaylock 1.2 -> Cal logi .......
What can players do to avoid feeling they've been screwed over? Well, spec into something that you find fun to play with. Don't specialize too much into one role, unless you really really really enjoy that role, otherwise you'll be shooting yourself in that role.
My 2 cents How do you know you enjoy the role if you are a new player... how do you know you will enjoy the role in 6 months or even 1 month? this If you spread out your SP into even 2 classes you are not mono tasking. You will not be in any serious involvement in dust and the best corps will not talk to you other than the i killed you mails they send. The DEVs encourage mono specing and becoming very efficent in one class so you can contribute to a team. If you spread out your sp, you are nothing. Mono specing is how dust is supposed to be played and is how corps are seccessful, because they are a collection of players who mono speced into a class who work together to contribute their specific roles as a team. If you can do everything, but are not particulary good at anything, you are a bad player. Sadly, of late, the good players who mono speced like they should be doing, have been getting nerfed so they are just as bad and worthless |
Mintqueer
Mikramurka Shock Troop Minmatar Republic
61
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 06:34:00 -
[209] - Quote
Respecs are needed. CCP doesn't likes them. FoTM will occur always. QQs and more QQs. Downward population trend... Nerf announcement. Respecs petitions. Downward population trend... CCP makes a SoonTM announcement. Downward population trend... Holy Sh*t Fail Cascade ahead.
Please ignore this non-factor game |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
651
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 06:35:00 -
[210] - Quote
Heathen Bastard wrote:and then one of the huge things for this game goes right out the window. Your choices mean nothing if they have no permanence. without consequence, choice is meaningless. its like handing out trophies to all the kids for participation. truth |
|
Stands Alone
Ultramarine Corp
42
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 06:37:00 -
[211] - Quote
dday3six wrote:Stands Alone wrote:Grief PK wrote:dustwaffle wrote:FOTM is common in games which allow for customizable fittings, especially when skillpoints/experience points come into play.
Such games will always be rebalanced over and over while FOTM would still occur with each rebalance pass, since it is virtually impossible to properly balance everything equally (unless they just made all the suits have the same slots, bonuses etc. and all the weapons have the same stats)
Allowing for unlimited respecs just means most people will put all their points into something that's 'optimal' for each rebalancing CCP does, which kills diversity in the game. 1.0 -> Cal logi TAR 1.1 -> Cal logi flaylock 1.2 -> Cal logi .......
What can players do to avoid feeling they've been screwed over? Well, spec into something that you find fun to play with. Don't specialize too much into one role, unless you really really really enjoy that role, otherwise you'll be shooting yourself in that role.
My 2 cents How do you know you enjoy the role if you are a new player... how do you know you will enjoy the role in 6 months or even 1 month? if you like to blow **** up, then get a ******* mass driver and some remote explosives... if you like to head shot people, get a sniper rifle... simple No, not so simple. 6 months down the line, the basic functions of whatever you choose could change.
so what you are saying is that the mass driver/grenade launcher might no longer shoot explosive rounds, and remote explosives might now blow up into confetti, and sniper rifles might end up as glorified laser pointers?
dude... you pick the weapons and suits that fit your play style, simple...
if you dont know what you want to pick, invest into your core skills that are not weapon, suit, or module specific... because those will never be wasted sp |
Heathen Bastard
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
408
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 06:37:00 -
[212] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:and then one of the huge things for this game goes right out the window. Your choices mean nothing if they have no permanence. without consequence, choice is meaningless. its like handing out trophies to all the kids for participation. truth
so then you agree that respecs are a bad idea? |
lowratehitman
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
782
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 06:38:00 -
[213] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:lowratehitman wrote:Grief PK wrote:dustwaffle wrote:FOTM is common in games which allow for customizable fittings, especially when skillpoints/experience points come into play.
Such games will always be rebalanced over and over while FOTM would still occur with each rebalance pass, since it is virtually impossible to properly balance everything equally (unless they just made all the suits have the same slots, bonuses etc. and all the weapons have the same stats)
Allowing for unlimited respecs just means most people will put all their points into something that's 'optimal' for each rebalancing CCP does, which kills diversity in the game. 1.0 -> Cal logi TAR 1.1 -> Cal logi flaylock 1.2 -> Cal logi .......
What can players do to avoid feeling they've been screwed over? Well, spec into something that you find fun to play with. Don't specialize too much into one role, unless you really really really enjoy that role, otherwise you'll be shooting yourself in that role.
My 2 cents How do you know you enjoy the role if you are a new player... how do you know you will enjoy the role in 6 months or even 1 month? this If you spread out your SP into even 2 classes you are not mono tasking. You will not be in any serious involvement in dust and the best corps will not talk to you other than the i killed you mails they send. The DEVs encourage mono specing and becoming very efficent in one class so you can contribute to a team. If you spread out your sp, you are nothing. Mono specing is how dust is supposed to be played and is how corps are seccessful, because they are a collection of players who mono speced into a class who work together to contribute their specific roles as a team. If you can do everything, but are not particulary good at anything, you are a bad player. Sadly, of late, the good players who mono speced like they should be doing, have been getting nerfed so they are just as bad and worthless
You are right... and one of the main pitches for the game was.... Design YOUR suite how you WANT... not based around nerfs.
Until balance is created... which balance can INDEED be created, than the option to get a full or partial respect should be available to those that a nerf hammer has affected. |
Grief PK
DUST University Ivy League
26
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 06:40:00 -
[214] - Quote
Mintqueer wrote:Respecs are needed. CCP doesn't likes them. FoTM will occur always. QQs and more QQs. Downward population trend... Nerf announcement. Respecs petitions. Downward population trend... CCP makes a SoonTM announcement. Downward population trend... Holy Sh*t Fail Cascade ahead.
Please ignore this non-factor game
Many a game has fallen in this spiral. I hope dust can pull out of it. |
dday3six
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
129
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 06:41:00 -
[215] - Quote
Heathen Bastard wrote:and then one of the huge things for this game goes right out the window. Your choices mean nothing if they have no permanence. without consequence, choice is meaningless. its like handing out trophies to all the kids for participation.
The real question is how are people suppose to judge the consequneces of their choices their don't have all the info. In the time it takes a player to spec into a PRO suit for example, the bonuses and stats on said suit could very well be completely different. Under those circumstances (not directly speaking to current issues with Callogi, but more the future) can you really blame players for feeling a sense of "buyer's remorse"? |
Grief PK
DUST University Ivy League
26
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 06:41:00 -
[216] - Quote
Heathen Bastard wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:and then one of the huge things for this game goes right out the window. Your choices mean nothing if they have no permanence. without consequence, choice is meaningless. its like handing out trophies to all the kids for participation. truth so then you agree that respecs are a bad idea?
Everyone is paying good money... everyone gets a trophy ... cuz you paid for it. Now if you are more adept at hitting other kids over the head with that trophy then the other guy... you get a good k/d ratio. But the trophy is paid for ... |
Grief PK
DUST University Ivy League
26
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 06:42:00 -
[217] - Quote
dday3six wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:and then one of the huge things for this game goes right out the window. Your choices mean nothing if they have no permanence. without consequence, choice is meaningless. its like handing out trophies to all the kids for participation. The real question is how are people suppose to judge the consequneces of their choices their don't have all the info. In the time it takes a player to spec into a PRO suit for example, the bonuses and stats on said suit could very well be completely different. Under those circumstances (not directly speaking to current issues with Callogi, but more the future) can you really blame players for feeling a sense of "buyer's remorse"?
Buyers remorse is a REALLY good way of putting it. |
Heathen Bastard
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
408
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 06:42:00 -
[218] - Quote
"paid for"? Free game. |
Grief PK
DUST University Ivy League
26
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 06:43:00 -
[219] - Quote
dday3six wrote:Stands Alone wrote:Grief PK wrote:dustwaffle wrote:FOTM is common in games which allow for customizable fittings, especially when skillpoints/experience points come into play.
Such games will always be rebalanced over and over while FOTM would still occur with each rebalance pass, since it is virtually impossible to properly balance everything equally (unless they just made all the suits have the same slots, bonuses etc. and all the weapons have the same stats)
Allowing for unlimited respecs just means most people will put all their points into something that's 'optimal' for each rebalancing CCP does, which kills diversity in the game. 1.0 -> Cal logi TAR 1.1 -> Cal logi flaylock 1.2 -> Cal logi .......
What can players do to avoid feeling they've been screwed over? Well, spec into something that you find fun to play with. Don't specialize too much into one role, unless you really really really enjoy that role, otherwise you'll be shooting yourself in that role.
My 2 cents How do you know you enjoy the role if you are a new player... how do you know you will enjoy the role in 6 months or even 1 month? if you like to blow **** up, then get a ******* mass driver and some remote explosives... if you like to head shot people, get a sniper rifle... simple No, not so simple. 6 months down the line, the basic functions of whatever you choose could change.
^this |
Stands Alone
Ultramarine Corp
42
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 06:44:00 -
[220] - Quote
lowratehitman wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:lowratehitman wrote:Grief PK wrote:dustwaffle wrote:FOTM is common in games which allow for customizable fittings, especially when skillpoints/experience points come into play.
Such games will always be rebalanced over and over while FOTM would still occur with each rebalance pass, since it is virtually impossible to properly balance everything equally (unless they just made all the suits have the same slots, bonuses etc. and all the weapons have the same stats)
Allowing for unlimited respecs just means most people will put all their points into something that's 'optimal' for each rebalancing CCP does, which kills diversity in the game. 1.0 -> Cal logi TAR 1.1 -> Cal logi flaylock 1.2 -> Cal logi .......
What can players do to avoid feeling they've been screwed over? Well, spec into something that you find fun to play with. Don't specialize too much into one role, unless you really really really enjoy that role, otherwise you'll be shooting yourself in that role.
My 2 cents How do you know you enjoy the role if you are a new player... how do you know you will enjoy the role in 6 months or even 1 month? this If you spread out your SP into even 2 classes you are not mono tasking. You will not be in any serious involvement in dust and the best corps will not talk to you other than the i killed you mails they send. The DEVs encourage mono specing and becoming very efficent in one class so you can contribute to a team. If you spread out your sp, you are nothing. Mono specing is how dust is supposed to be played and is how corps are seccessful, because they are a collection of players who mono speced into a class who work together to contribute their specific roles as a team. If you can do everything, but are not particulary good at anything, you are a bad player. Sadly, of late, the good players who mono speced like they should be doing, have been getting nerfed so they are just as bad and worthless You are right... and one of the main pitches for the game was.... Design YOUR suite how you WANT... not based around nerfs.[/quote]
what does this even mean?
[/quote]Until balance is created... which balance can INDEED be created, than the option to get a full or partial respect should be available to those that a nerf hammer has affected.[/quote]
dont pick a weapon or suit that is obviously out of balance and being over-used then
|
|
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
653
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 06:44:00 -
[221] - Quote
Grief PK wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:and then one of the huge things for this game goes right out the window. Your choices mean nothing if they have no permanence. without consequence, choice is meaningless. its like handing out trophies to all the kids for participation. truth so then you agree that respecs are a bad idea? Everyone is paying good money... everyone gets a trophy ... cuz you paid for it. Now if you are more adept at hitting other kids over the head with that trophy then the other guy... you get a good k/d ratio. But the trophy is paid for ...
No, he said your choices mean nothing if they have no permanence. When we make our choices, we expect our class to be permanent the way we skilled into them. When they are changed, nerfed, it is no longer our choice. Its CCPs |
Grief PK
DUST University Ivy League
26
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 06:44:00 -
[222] - Quote
Heathen Bastard wrote:"paid for"? Free game.
You need to run that one by CCP, see if they are making it for free or not. |
Grief PK
DUST University Ivy League
26
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 06:45:00 -
[223] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:Grief PK wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:and then one of the huge things for this game goes right out the window. Your choices mean nothing if they have no permanence. without consequence, choice is meaningless. its like handing out trophies to all the kids for participation. truth so then you agree that respecs are a bad idea? Everyone is paying good money... everyone gets a trophy ... cuz you paid for it. Now if you are more adept at hitting other kids over the head with that trophy then the other guy... you get a good k/d ratio. But the trophy is paid for ... No, he said your choices mean nothing if they have no permanence. When we make our choices, we expect our class to be permanent the way we skilled into them. When they are changed, nerfed, it is no longer our choice. Its CCPs
I am agreeing with you. |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
653
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 06:47:00 -
[224] - Quote
[/quote] If you spread out your SP into even 2 classes you are not mono tasking. You will not be in any serious involvement in dust and the best corps will not talk to you other than the i killed you mails they send. The DEVs encourage mono specing and becoming very efficent in one class so you can contribute to a team. If you spread out your sp, you are nothing. Mono specing is how dust is supposed to be played and is how corps are seccessful, because they are a collection of players who mono speced into a class who work together to contribute their specific roles as a team. If you can do everything, but are not particulary good at anything, you are a bad player. Sadly, of late, the good players who mono speced like they should be doing, have been getting nerfed so they are just as bad and worthless[/quote]
[/quote]You are right... and one of the main pitches for the game was.... Design YOUR suite how you WANT... not based around nerfs.[/quote]
what does this even mean?
[/quote]Until balance is created... which balance can INDEED be created, than the option to get a full or partial respect should be available to those that a nerf hammer has affected.[/quote]
dont pick a weapon or suit that is obviously out of balance and being over-used then [/quote]
Not much was obviously getting nerfed when it happened. No one expected lazers to get nerfed THAT hard, we were promised a nerf that would grant balance and it was not delivered. The hmg needed a small nerf and it suffers now. The vehicals of all classes got royaly fuc ked with their nerf that was very uncalled for. There was no way of telling these nerf hammers would have been so severe and in some cases, even happen at all when you first speced into it |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
653
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 06:48:00 -
[225] - Quote
so then you agree that respecs are a bad idea?[/quote]
Everyone is paying good money... everyone gets a trophy ... cuz you paid for it. Now if you are more adept at hitting other kids over the head with that trophy then the other guy... you get a good k/d ratio. But the trophy is paid for ...[/quote]
No, he said your choices mean nothing if they have no permanence. When we make our choices, we expect our class to be permanent the way we skilled into them. When they are changed, nerfed, it is no longer our choice. Its CCPs[/quote]
I am agreeing with you.[/quote]
sorry directed at heathen lol |
Grief PK
DUST University Ivy League
27
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 06:51:00 -
[226] - Quote
If you spread out your SP into even 2 classes you are not mono tasking. You will not be in any serious involvement in dust and the best corps will not talk to you other than the i killed you mails they send. The DEVs encourage mono specing and becoming very efficent in one class so you can contribute to a team. If you spread out your sp, you are nothing. Mono specing is how dust is supposed to be played and is how corps are seccessful, because they are a collection of players who mono speced into a class who work together to contribute their specific roles as a team. If you can do everything, but are not particulary good at anything, you are a bad player. Sadly, of late, the good players who mono speced like they should be doing, have been getting nerfed so they are just as bad and worthless[/quote]
[/quote]You are right... and one of the main pitches for the game was.... Design YOUR suite how you WANT... not based around nerfs.[/quote]
what does this even mean?
[/quote]Until balance is created... which balance can INDEED be created, than the option to get a full or partial respect should be available to those that a nerf hammer has affected.[/quote]
dont pick a weapon or suit that is obviously out of balance and being over-used then [/quote]
Not much was obviously getting nerfed when it happened. No one expected lazers to get nerfed THAT hard, we were promised a nerf that would grant balance and it was not delivered. The hmg needed a small nerf and it suffers now. The vehicals of all classes got royaly fuc ked with their nerf that was very uncalled for. There was no way of telling these nerf hammers would have been so severe and in some cases, even happen at all when you first speced into it[/quote]
... and the only thing harder to get fixed then unbalanced new content is unbalanced nerfed content ... none of those things are going backing onto the balance 'to-do' list for CCP. So in essence Lasers are historical content for Dust, put them in display cases and bubble wrap. So if your toon was 100% laser based and you just don't want to spend another 400 hours grinding something else ... go head and put your account in bubble wrap too.
|
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
653
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 06:53:00 -
[227] - Quote
Exactly, grief. so true |
Stands Alone
Ultramarine Corp
42
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 06:57:00 -
[228] - Quote
If you spread out your SP into even 2 classes you are not mono tasking. You will not be in any serious involvement in dust and the best corps will not talk to you other than the i killed you mails they send. The DEVs encourage mono specing and becoming very efficent in one class so you can contribute to a team. If you spread out your sp, you are nothing. Mono specing is how dust is supposed to be played and is how corps are seccessful, because they are a collection of players who mono speced into a class who work together to contribute their specific roles as a team. If you can do everything, but are not particulary good at anything, you are a bad player. Sadly, of late, the good players who mono speced like they should be doing, have been getting nerfed so they are just as bad and worthless[/quote]
You are right... and one of the main pitches for the game was.... Design YOUR suite how you WANT... not based around nerfs.[/quote]
what does this even mean?
Until balance is created... which balance can INDEED be created, than the option to get a full or partial respect should be available to those that a nerf hammer has affected.[/quote]
dont pick a weapon or suit that is obviously out of balance and being over-used then [/quote]
Not much was obviously getting nerfed when it happened. No one expected lazers to get nerfed THAT hard, we were promised a nerf that would grant balance and it was not delivered. The hmg needed a small nerf and it suffers now. The vehicals of all classes got royaly fuc ked with their nerf that was very uncalled for. There was no way of telling these nerf hammers would have been so severe and in some cases, even happen at all when you first speced into it[/quote]
lasers seem to still be very effective if put in the right hands, or squad... i think vehicles are fine... half my sp went into them.
i have no complaints after the last respec since i used my SP to cater my play-style, i still have fun and do pretty good while at it...
|
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
653
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 07:04:00 -
[229] - Quote
Stands Alone wrote:If you spread out your SP into even 2 classes you are not mono tasking. You will not be in any serious involvement in dust and the best corps will not talk to you other than the i killed you mails they send. The DEVs encourage mono specing and becoming very efficent in one class so you can contribute to a team. If you spread out your sp, you are nothing. Mono specing is how dust is supposed to be played and is how corps are seccessful, because they are a collection of players who mono speced into a class who work together to contribute their specific roles as a team. If you can do everything, but are not particulary good at anything, you are a bad player. Sadly, of late, the good players who mono speced like they should be doing, have been getting nerfed so they are just as bad and worthless
You are right... and one of the main pitches for the game was.... Design YOUR suite how you WANT... not based around nerfs.[/quote]
what does this even mean?
Until balance is created... which balance can INDEED be created, than the option to get a full or partial respect should be available to those that a nerf hammer has affected.[/quote]
dont pick a weapon or suit that is obviously out of balance and being over-used then [/quote]
Not much was obviously getting nerfed when it happened. No one expected lazers to get nerfed THAT hard, we were promised a nerf that would grant balance and it was not delivered. The hmg needed a small nerf and it suffers now. The vehicals of all classes got royaly fuc ked with their nerf that was very uncalled for. There was no way of telling these nerf hammers would have been so severe and in some cases, even happen at all when you first speced into it[/quote]
lasers seem to still be very effective if put in the right hands, or squad... i think vehicles are fine... half my sp went into them.
i have no complaints after the last respec since i used my SP to cater my play-style, i still have fun and do pretty good while at it... [/quote]
nooo do the research or try the classes, they are very underpowered and do not work well in general because of nerfs. Yes, they can barely be effective if the best players use them but the results are medicore at best. No one wants to play that way, all risk no or little reward. Its not fun to get your ass handed to you on a regular basis, to go into every combat expecting to loose because your class sucks and theirs do not. What if the game was even and you could use that too? that, would be grand. only a respec could provide that sence of fairness, and correct the wrong that the nerf has done |
dday3six
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
129
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 07:05:00 -
[230] - Quote
Stands Alone wrote:dday3six wrote:Stands Alone wrote:Grief PK wrote:dustwaffle wrote:FOTM is common in games which allow for customizable fittings, especially when skillpoints/experience points come into play.
Such games will always be rebalanced over and over while FOTM would still occur with each rebalance pass, since it is virtually impossible to properly balance everything equally (unless they just made all the suits have the same slots, bonuses etc. and all the weapons have the same stats)
Allowing for unlimited respecs just means most people will put all their points into something that's 'optimal' for each rebalancing CCP does, which kills diversity in the game. 1.0 -> Cal logi TAR 1.1 -> Cal logi flaylock 1.2 -> Cal logi .......
What can players do to avoid feeling they've been screwed over? Well, spec into something that you find fun to play with. Don't specialize too much into one role, unless you really really really enjoy that role, otherwise you'll be shooting yourself in that role.
My 2 cents How do you know you enjoy the role if you are a new player... how do you know you will enjoy the role in 6 months or even 1 month? if you like to blow **** up, then get a ******* mass driver and some remote explosives... if you like to head shot people, get a sniper rifle... simple No, not so simple. 6 months down the line, the basic functions of whatever you choose could change. so what you are saying is that the mass driver/grenade launcher might no longer shoot explosive rounds, and remote explosives might now blow up into confetti, and sniper rifles might end up as glorified laser pointers? dude... you pick the weapons and suits that fit your play style, simple... if you dont know what you want to pick, invest into your core skills that are not weapon, suit, or module specific... because those will never be wasted sp
I don't know how many shooters you've played, but I'll tell you something about Dust. It's going to require a serious overhaul of your playstyle, and there are very much wasteful skills. Armor and shield upgrades to 5 is a good buy all around sure. However the CPU/PG increases can very much be wasted if your not going to use them. They are huge sinks at the levels 4 and 5. Furthermore you can't know if you're going to use/need them for fitting until you start speccing into weapons, suits, and modules.
Take the MD for example. Until the hit detection issue were resolved it was very frustrating to use. Explosions or headshots is only the surface. Very few people if any, play the game to be monkey-stomped daily. Fun for most people is tied to being able to "hold their own" at the very least, and often winning, cause it just not fun to lose all the time. Now the difference is how they define "winning". Some are going to do with through overall effectiveness, some are going to by hold their own, and then every specturm inbetween. However it's asinine for any to go around tell people they are wrong for their definition of what "winning" is. |
|
Grief PK
DUST University Ivy League
28
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 07:27:00 -
[231] - Quote
Duran Lex wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:Once we've reached some semblance of balance, respecs won't be necessary. But the people on this forum are dellusional if they think we are balanced now or will be balanced by the end of the year.
FOTM is a symptom of bad balance, not of the ability to respec. I humbly disagree. FOTM is a symptom of both bad balance and respecs, imo. Bad balance is the drug. Respecs are the drug dealers.
SO who exactly is dealing these bad drugs atm? because there are no respects and the drug is out there |
Stands Alone
Ultramarine Corp
42
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 07:28:00 -
[232] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:Stands Alone wrote:If you spread out your SP into even 2 classes you are not mono tasking. You will not be in any serious involvement in dust and the best corps will not talk to you other than the i killed you mails they send. The DEVs encourage mono specing and becoming very efficent in one class so you can contribute to a team. If you spread out your sp, you are nothing. Mono specing is how dust is supposed to be played and is how corps are seccessful, because they are a collection of players who mono speced into a class who work together to contribute their specific roles as a team. If you can do everything, but are not particulary good at anything, you are a bad player. Sadly, of late, the good players who mono speced like they should be doing, have been getting nerfed so they are just as bad and worthless You are right... and one of the main pitches for the game was.... Design YOUR suite how you WANT... not based around nerfs.
what does this even mean?
Until balance is created... which balance can INDEED be created, than the option to get a full or partial respect should be available to those that a nerf hammer has affected.[/quote]
dont pick a weapon or suit that is obviously out of balance and being over-used then [/quote]
Not much was obviously getting nerfed when it happened. No one expected lazers to get nerfed THAT hard, we were promised a nerf that would grant balance and it was not delivered. The hmg needed a small nerf and it suffers now. The vehicals of all classes got royaly fuc ked with their nerf that was very uncalled for. There was no way of telling these nerf hammers would have been so severe and in some cases, even happen at all when you first speced into it[/quote]
lasers seem to still be very effective if put in the right hands, or squad... i think vehicles are fine... half my sp went into them.
i have no complaints after the last respec since i used my SP to cater my play-style, i still have fun and do pretty good while at it... [/quote]
nooo do the research or try the classes, they are very underpowered and do not work well in general because of nerfs. Yes, they can barely be effective if the best players use them but the results are medicore at best. No one wants to play that way, all risk no or little reward. Its not fun to get your ass handed to you on a regular basis, to go into every combat expecting to loose because your class sucks and theirs do not. What if the game was even and you could use that too? that, would be grand. only a respec could provide that sence of fairness, and correct the wrong that the nerf has done[/quote]
i have... started using the laser last month... works amazing with the right squad or with the right side arm... try what classes? i dont see any that are underpowered... only those who are being misused |
dustwaffle
Gravity Prone EoN.
241
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 07:31:00 -
[233] - Quote
Grief PK wrote:dustwaffle wrote:FOTM is common in games which allow for customizable fittings, especially when skillpoints/experience points come into play.
Such games will always be rebalanced over and over while FOTM would still occur with each rebalance pass, since it is virtually impossible to properly balance everything equally (unless they just made all the suits have the same slots, bonuses etc. and all the weapons have the same stats)
Allowing for unlimited respecs just means most people will put all their points into something that's 'optimal' for each rebalancing CCP does, which kills diversity in the game. 1.0 -> Cal logi TAR 1.1 -> Cal logi flaylock 1.2 -> Cal logi .......
What can players do to avoid feeling they've been screwed over? Well, spec into something that you find fun to play with. Don't specialize too much into one role, unless you really really really enjoy that role, otherwise you'll be shooting yourself in that role.
My 2 cents How do you know you enjoy the role if you are a new player... how do you know you will enjoy the role in 6 months or even 1 month? I tried the basic assault fitting, found it OK, but something was lacking. Tried the militia logistics fitting, found I preferred a more supportive role. Tried the heavy role, both HMG/Forge gun provided some novelty but decided it wasn't much to my liking. Flew/drove some militia stuff around, decided I didn't want to go down that route. Tried scouts, both shotgun and sniper, a bit too squishy for my liking.
Therefore, I took the logical route and specced into something that was FUN for me. By fun, I don't mean something that gave me a high KDR, nor something that allowed me to pubstomp all day everyday, but something that I could see myself doing on a regular basis.
Once this playstyle gets too boring for me, I will give myself more options by putting skillpoints into different things. People say you HAVE to min/max a fit before it's 'competitive', but honestly, I prefer having few hundred thousand (1-2 weeks worth of SP) in stuff other than my main role, since this gives me more options, diversifying my gameplay a bit.
PS. I'm callogi using a TAR, and not fussed about whether I get a respec or not. If I did, I would still stick with what I have now since I find it fun, if I didn't, no biggie. |
dday3six
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
130
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 07:35:00 -
[234] - Quote
Stands Alone wrote:i have... started using the laser last month... works amazing with the right squad or with the right side arm... try what classes? i dont see any that are underpowered... only those who are being misused
I'm curious how "no underpowered, only misued" jives with the future Amarr Logi buff. Obviously CCP saw that suit to be underpowered and buffed it as a result. Are you truly saying it wasn't actually underpowered and simply misused? |
dustwaffle
Gravity Prone EoN.
241
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 07:37:00 -
[235] - Quote
dday3six wrote:Stands Alone wrote:Grief PK wrote:dustwaffle wrote:FOTM is common in games which allow for customizable fittings, especially when skillpoints/experience points come into play.
Such games will always be rebalanced over and over while FOTM would still occur with each rebalance pass, since it is virtually impossible to properly balance everything equally (unless they just made all the suits have the same slots, bonuses etc. and all the weapons have the same stats)
Allowing for unlimited respecs just means most people will put all their points into something that's 'optimal' for each rebalancing CCP does, which kills diversity in the game. 1.0 -> Cal logi TAR 1.1 -> Cal logi flaylock 1.2 -> Cal logi .......
What can players do to avoid feeling they've been screwed over? Well, spec into something that you find fun to play with. Don't specialize too much into one role, unless you really really really enjoy that role, otherwise you'll be shooting yourself in that role.
My 2 cents How do you know you enjoy the role if you are a new player... how do you know you will enjoy the role in 6 months or even 1 month? if you like to blow **** up, then get a ******* mass driver and some remote explosives... if you like to head shot people, get a sniper rifle... simple No, not so simple. 6 months down the line, the basic functions of whatever you choose could change. Well, unless assault rifles get modified to shoot lasers or grenades, or lasers become burstfire etc. I do not see how the 'basic function' of whatever chosen will change. Mostly number tweaking, which does not equate to a change to fundamental basics of the game.
|
Stands Alone
Ultramarine Corp
42
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 07:39:00 -
[236] - Quote
Take the MD for example. Until the hit detection issue were resolved it was very frustrating to use. Explosions or headshots is only the surface. Very few people if any, play the game to be monkey-stomped daily. Fun for most people is tied to being able to "hold their own" at the very least, and often winning, cause it just not fun to lose all the time. Now the difference is how they define "winning". Some are going to do with through overall effectiveness, some are going to by hold their own, and then every specturm inbetween. However it's asinine for any to go around tell people they are wrong for their definition of what "winning" is.[/quote]
that would be careless spending of sp then
i dont now what the second paragraph really has to do with what i said... other than. if you are the OP chaser, then this isnt the game for you, if you wanna think outside the box and rely on a squad and let the squad rely on you and learn to adapt to each change to maximize potential of a "nerfed" class (i put that in quotes since i still dont see how anything is under powered if they are used right) then stick with it....
lasers got nerfed? ever see a laser logi with a mass driver assault come at you? they drop your shield in a snap then boom explosive damage, you dead...
i dont really see these "nerfs" as nerfs... i see them as a chance think outside the box and catch others by surprise |
Stands Alone
Ultramarine Corp
42
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 07:45:00 -
[237] - Quote
dday3six wrote:Stands Alone wrote:i have... started using the laser last month... works amazing with the right squad or with the right side arm... try what classes? i dont see any that are underpowered... only those who are being misused I'm curious how "no underpowered, only misued" jives with the future Amarr Logi buff. Obviously CCP saw that suit to be underpowered and buffed it as a result. Are you truly saying it wasn't actually underpowered and simply misused?
well... the fact that a logi suit is made as a support role to back up and not really get in the line of fire. yes... you can make major points with a needle and a rep tool. if you came in a battle with a logi suit expecting to get kills, then it is misuse |
dday3six
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
130
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 07:48:00 -
[238] - Quote
dustwaffle wrote:dday3six wrote:Stands Alone wrote:Grief PK wrote:dustwaffle wrote:FOTM is common in games which allow for customizable fittings, especially when skillpoints/experience points come into play.
Such games will always be rebalanced over and over while FOTM would still occur with each rebalance pass, since it is virtually impossible to properly balance everything equally (unless they just made all the suits have the same slots, bonuses etc. and all the weapons have the same stats)
Allowing for unlimited respecs just means most people will put all their points into something that's 'optimal' for each rebalancing CCP does, which kills diversity in the game. 1.0 -> Cal logi TAR 1.1 -> Cal logi flaylock 1.2 -> Cal logi .......
What can players do to avoid feeling they've been screwed over? Well, spec into something that you find fun to play with. Don't specialize too much into one role, unless you really really really enjoy that role, otherwise you'll be shooting yourself in that role.
My 2 cents How do you know you enjoy the role if you are a new player... how do you know you will enjoy the role in 6 months or even 1 month? if you like to blow **** up, then get a ******* mass driver and some remote explosives... if you like to head shot people, get a sniper rifle... simple No, not so simple. 6 months down the line, the basic functions of whatever you choose could change. Well, unless assault rifles get modified to shoot lasers or grenades, or lasers become burstfire etc. I do not see how the 'basic function' of whatever chosen will change. Mostly number tweaking, which does not equate to a change to fundamental basics of the game.
Ok. Let's use a vanilla AR magazine size decrease as an example. What if CCP decided decrease the mag size to 40. This would alter how a person needed to approach fire fights, and even change the playstyle required for max effectiveness because running your mag dry and reloading at the wrong time could get your killed. That's what I mean by the basic functions could change. |
Stands Alone
Ultramarine Corp
42
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 07:50:00 -
[239] - Quote
dday3six wrote:dustwaffle wrote:dday3six wrote:Stands Alone wrote:[quote=Grief PK] if you like to blow **** up, then get a ******* mass driver and some remote explosives... if you like to head shot people, get a sniper rifle... simple No, not so simple. 6 months down the line, the basic functions of whatever you choose could change. Well, unless assault rifles get modified to shoot lasers or grenades, or lasers become burstfire etc. I do not see how the 'basic function' of whatever chosen will change. Mostly number tweaking, which does not equate to a change to fundamental basics of the game. Ok. Let's use a vanilla AR magazine size decrease as an example. What if CCP decided decrease the mag size to 40. This would alter how a person needed to approach fire fights, and even change the playstyle required for max effectiveness because running your mag dry and reloading at the wrong time could get your killed. That's what I mean by the basic functions could change.
adapt or die |
dday3six
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
130
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 07:56:00 -
[240] - Quote
Stands Alone wrote:dday3six wrote:Stands Alone wrote:i have... started using the laser last month... works amazing with the right squad or with the right side arm... try what classes? i dont see any that are underpowered... only those who are being misused I'm curious how "no underpowered, only misued" jives with the future Amarr Logi buff. Obviously CCP saw that suit to be underpowered and buffed it as a result. Are you truly saying it wasn't actually underpowered and simply misused? well... the fact that a logi suit is made as a support role to back up and not really get in the line of fire. yes... you can make major points with a needle and a rep tool. if you came in a battle with a logi suit expecting to get kills, then it is misuse
Ok, so why was it buffed, then? You didn't answer the question you just pigeonholed what a Logi is sort of suppose to do. I could have swore that Dust was about breaking class molds and playing the game your way as advertised by CCP. |
|
dday3six
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
130
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 08:06:00 -
[241] - Quote
Stands Alone wrote:that would be careless spending of sp then
i dont now what the second paragraph really has to do with what i said... other than. if you are the OP chaser, then this isnt the game for you, if you wanna think outside the box and rely on a squad and let the squad rely on you and learn to adapt to each change to maximize potential of a "nerfed" class (i put that in quotes since i still dont see how anything is under powered if they are used right) then stick with it....
lasers got nerfed? ever see a laser logi with a mass driver assault come at you? they drop your shield in a snap then boom explosive damage, you dead...
i dont really see these "nerfs" as nerfs... i see them as a chance think outside the box and catch others by surprise
So part of the major issue is that you don't understand what underpowered means. Ok. how about for your odd little circular logic loop, that underpowered is that even though it might have use, that use it not overly needed or so obtuse that it doesn't warrent being used.
You do understand there is a good chance CCP is catering to "OP chasers" by releasing OP gear only to nerf it later. Other games (*cough-cough* Mass Effect 3) did it often to increase mirco-transactions revenue. |
Stands Alone
Ultramarine Corp
42
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 08:07:00 -
[242] - Quote
dday3six wrote:Stands Alone wrote:dday3six wrote:Stands Alone wrote:i have... started using the laser last month... works amazing with the right squad or with the right side arm... try what classes? i dont see any that are underpowered... only those who are being misused I'm curious how "no underpowered, only misued" jives with the future Amarr Logi buff. Obviously CCP saw that suit to be underpowered and buffed it as a result. Are you truly saying it wasn't actually underpowered and simply misused? well... the fact that a logi suit is made as a support role to back up and not really get in the line of fire. yes... you can make major points with a needle and a rep tool. if you came in a battle with a logi suit expecting to get kills, then it is misuse Ok, so why was it buffed, then? You didn't answer the question you just pigeonholed what a Logi is sort of suppose to do. I could have swore that Dust was about breaking class molds and playing the game your way as advertised by CCP.
if you havent played eve for a decent amount of time, then its hard to explain how CCP does things.
it could have been buffed for many reasons... maybe it was buffed to allow more breaking of its class... maybe they want people to get more kills and not have to focus on support as much.
is something underpowered when you can reach the top of the leaderboard in it if you use it as intended? or are you just using it outside its intended use but with a bad layout?
i put stuff on my suit that most would not expect and it goes good with my playstyle. most with the same meduim suit have 150 to 300 more hp then i. more damage, more shield regan... but i put a specific module and sacrificed all the just for a simple boost to my personal preference in my tactics...
i think they didnt research what they were getting into |
dday3six
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
130
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 08:11:00 -
[243] - Quote
Stands Alone wrote:dday3six wrote:
Ok. Let's use a vanilla AR magazine size decrease as an example. What if CCP decided decrease the mag size to 40. This would alter how a person needed to approach fire fights, and even change the playstyle required for max effectiveness because running your mag dry and reloading at the wrong time could get your killed. That's what I mean by the basic functions could change.
adapt or die
Not like and the HTFU line of thinking might be the very reason CCP is struggling with keeping Dust's player count up or anything. |
Malkai Inos
Opus Arcana Covert Intervention
896
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 08:15:00 -
[244] - Quote
dday3six wrote:Ok. Let's use a vanilla AR magazine size decrease as an example. What if CCP decided decrease the mag size to 40. This would alter how a person needed to approach fire fights, and even change the playstyle required for max effectiveness because running your mag dry and reloading at the wrong time could get your killed. That's what I mean by the basic functions could change. This is what happened to the tac. The important part here is that this change (amongst others) was designed to and succeeded in getting a mid-ling range weapon out of short range engagements without breaking it in its niche.
Let's look at the changes of the tac very briefly:
The high RoF was useless for mid-long range, the mag size unecessary with a modicum of precision and the hipfire irrelevant on an ADS weapon. On top of that, people switching to other ARs, SCRs and MDs means that the range advantage has become much more noticable.
I like to refer to this as the "stealth range buff". For me, the weapon works better than pre-nerf.
Balance is supposed to allow you to use the type of gear you personally like and maintain a playstyle that you like. The numbers are merely the tool to ensure that.
|
Stands Alone
Ultramarine Corp
42
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 08:16:00 -
[245] - Quote
dday3six wrote:Stands Alone wrote:dday3six wrote:
Ok. Let's use a vanilla AR magazine size decrease as an example. What if CCP decided decrease the mag size to 40. This would alter how a person needed to approach fire fights, and even change the playstyle required for max effectiveness because running your mag dry and reloading at the wrong time could get your killed. That's what I mean by the basic functions could change.
adapt or die Not like and the HTFU line of thinking might be the very reason CCP is struggling with keeping Dust's player count up or anything.
thats the nature of CCP games... they arent hurting for a player base... they built one slowly in EVE and they know it will be the same in dust. many will leave because they do not like the "adapt or die" model. but that is just what is gonna happen.
they will have a steady growth of very dedicated players while 10 times that amount will try and quit, do to the harshness and complexity that is put on the table in front of them...
in the beginning they may grant your wishes of a respec, but sooner or later, they will throw you into New Eden and it will be "adapt or die".
so... might as well get used to it lol
|
dday3six
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
130
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 08:16:00 -
[246] - Quote
Stands Alone wrote:dday3six wrote:Stands Alone wrote:dday3six wrote:Stands Alone wrote:i have... started using the laser last month... works amazing with the right squad or with the right side arm... try what classes? i dont see any that are underpowered... only those who are being misused I'm curious how "no underpowered, only misued" jives with the future Amarr Logi buff. Obviously CCP saw that suit to be underpowered and buffed it as a result. Are you truly saying it wasn't actually underpowered and simply misused? well... the fact that a logi suit is made as a support role to back up and not really get in the line of fire. yes... you can make major points with a needle and a rep tool. if you came in a battle with a logi suit expecting to get kills, then it is misuse Ok, so why was it buffed, then? You didn't answer the question you just pigeonholed what a Logi is sort of suppose to do. I could have swore that Dust was about breaking class molds and playing the game your way as advertised by CCP. if you havent played eve for a decent amount of time, then its hard to explain how CCP does things. it could have been buffed for many reasons... maybe it was buffed to allow more breaking of its class... maybe they want people to get more kills and not have to focus on support as much. is something underpowered when you can reach the top of the leaderboard in it if you use it as intended? or are you just using it outside its intended use but with a bad layout? i put stuff on my suit that most would not expect and it goes good with my playstyle. most with the same meduim suit have 150 to 300 more hp then i. more damage, more shield regan... but i put a specific module and sacrificed all the just for a simple boost to my personal preference in my tactics... i think they didnt research what they were getting into
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n_LlH2c5dyA&list=PLFC7B99173F4DC31F - I have a trailer for you. Pay special attention starting at 1:20. CCP markets Dust as player not be nailed down to traditional FPS combat roles. |
Johnny Guilt
Algintal Core Gallente Federation
204
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 08:16:00 -
[247] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote: Suddenly, new build/patch comes around and your class is nerfed without your consent ...
As if you own the rights to the class? |
Stands Alone
Ultramarine Corp
42
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 08:24:00 -
[248] - Quote
ok... and i play with my suit outside of its role... i have no side arm and less effective hp then most other logi's... i gain a bonus to hacking, and an equipment slot... i do very well on average... i wont tell you how i play outside my role or it may give away my exact layout... but i play one of the least "combative" medium suits in the game and use it otherwise... think outside the box...
|
dday3six
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
130
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 08:29:00 -
[249] - Quote
Stands Alone wrote:dday3six wrote:Stands Alone wrote:dday3six wrote:
Ok. Let's use a vanilla AR magazine size decrease as an example. What if CCP decided decrease the mag size to 40. This would alter how a person needed to approach fire fights, and even change the playstyle required for max effectiveness because running your mag dry and reloading at the wrong time could get your killed. That's what I mean by the basic functions could change.
adapt or die Not like and the HTFU line of thinking might be the very reason CCP is struggling with keeping Dust's player count up or anything. thats the nature of CCP games... they arent hurting for a player base... they built one slowly in EVE and they know it will be the same in dust. many will leave because they do not like the "adapt or die" model. but that is just what is gonna happen. they will have a steady growth of very dedicated players while 10 times that amount will try and quit, do to the harshness and complexity that is put on the table in front of them... in the beginning they may grant your wishes of a respec, but sooner or later, they will throw you into New Eden and it will be "adapt or die". so... might as well get used to it lol
Yeah I get that Dust is connected to Eve via backstory and universe, but Dust is not Eve. Free to play cannot function under the same revenue gain strategy as subscription based. Building a playerbase slowly is not a sustainable financial model for F2P. |
Stands Alone
Ultramarine Corp
42
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 08:35:00 -
[250] - Quote
dday3six wrote:Stands Alone wrote:dday3six wrote:Stands Alone wrote:dday3six wrote:
Ok. Let's use a vanilla AR magazine size decrease as an example. What if CCP decided decrease the mag size to 40. This would alter how a person needed to approach fire fights, and even change the playstyle required for max effectiveness because running your mag dry and reloading at the wrong time could get your killed. That's what I mean by the basic functions could change.
adapt or die Not like and the HTFU line of thinking might be the very reason CCP is struggling with keeping Dust's player count up or anything. thats the nature of CCP games... they arent hurting for a player base... they built one slowly in EVE and they know it will be the same in dust. many will leave because they do not like the "adapt or die" model. but that is just what is gonna happen. they will have a steady growth of very dedicated players while 10 times that amount will try and quit, do to the harshness and complexity that is put on the table in front of them... in the beginning they may grant your wishes of a respec, but sooner or later, they will throw you into New Eden and it will be "adapt or die". so... might as well get used to it lol Yeah I get that Dust is connected to Eve via backstory and universe, but Dust is not Eve. Free to play cannot function under the same revenue gain strategy as subscription based. Building a playerbase slowly is not a sustainable financial model for F2P.
i guess we will see... CCP has already broken new ground with EVE, they have broken new ground with Dust, and they will continue to do so... i like the "adapt or die" model... therefore myself and many others i know would stay and probably pay.... many im assuming like yourself will move on... but thats just the nature of CCP games... like i said... better get used to it or this may turn out not to be the right FPS for you... no offense... its true though... for many of its players |
|
dustwaffle
Gravity Prone EoN.
243
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 08:37:00 -
[251] - Quote
dday3six wrote:Ok. Let's use a vanilla AR magazine size decrease as an example. What if CCP decided decrease the mag size to 40. This would alter how a person needed to approach fire fights, and even change the playstyle required for max effectiveness because running your mag dry and reloading at the wrong time could get your killed. That's what I mean by the basic functions could change. Ah, that would be a change in the overall tactics used PER engagement. However, my point is that the rifle itself would work the same way, i.e. you aim and shoot and bullets fly out. Changing the ammo count, absolute/optimal range, damage per shot etc. do NOT change the basic function of the gun itself.
Granted, you would have to adapt your playstyle etc. given the changes made, but hey, for some people (like me), adapting to the overall metagame and adapting tactics etc. keeps a game fresh. |
dday3six
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
130
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 08:37:00 -
[252] - Quote
Stands Alone wrote:ok... and i play with my suit outside of its role... i have no side arm and less effective hp then most other logi's... i gain a bonus to hacking, and an equipment slot... i do very well on average... i wont tell you how i play outside my role or it may give away my exact layout... but i play one of the least "combative" medium suits in the game and use it otherwise... think outside the box...
You're missing the point. Dust is marketed as a game which encourages players break outside of the mold or you know think outside of the box. You stance is that nothing is underpowered only misused. I'm telling how CCP, by their own advert, present Dust to players in a manner which conflicts and contradicts with your stance.
And, I couldn't care less about your "supa-secret tech". |
Malkai Inos
Opus Arcana Covert Intervention
897
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 08:42:00 -
[253] - Quote
dday3six wrote:Stands Alone wrote:ok... and i play with my suit outside of its role... i have no side arm and less effective hp then most other logi's... i gain a bonus to hacking, and an equipment slot... i do very well on average... i wont tell you how i play outside my role or it may give away my exact layout... but i play one of the least "combative" medium suits in the game and use it otherwise... think outside the box... You're missing the point. Dust is marketed as a game which encourages players break outside of the mold or you know think outside of the box. You stance is that nothing is underpowered only misused. I'm telling how CCP, by their own advert, present Dust to players in a manner which conflicts and contradicts with your stance. And, I couldn't care less about your "supa-secret tech". He's just saying that encouranging "thinking outside the box" does not equal "every conceivable combination of fit and playstyle has to be equally viable".
There will be shitfits. Doesn't always mean that there's a balance issue.
Edit: In other words: What would be the point of options if every option turns out to yield the same results? |
Stands Alone
Ultramarine Corp
42
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 08:44:00 -
[254] - Quote
dday3six wrote:Stands Alone wrote:ok... and i play with my suit outside of its role... i have no side arm and less effective hp then most other logi's... i gain a bonus to hacking, and an equipment slot... i do very well on average... i wont tell you how i play outside my role or it may give away my exact layout... but i play one of the least "combative" medium suits in the game and use it otherwise... think outside the box... You're missing the point. Dust is marketed as a game which encourages players break outside of the mold or you know think outside of the box. You stance is that nothing is underpowered only misused. I'm telling how CCP, by their own advert, present Dust to players in a manner which conflicts and contradicts with your stance. And, I couldn't care less about your "supa-secret tech".
no not contradicting... i said they didnt do their research, as in they didnt think it through... if they wanted to break out of the mold, like i did.. and continue to do... then they need to think it through, as it is much more complex when you break out of the mold... if i set my suit up for the intended role then it will fail in head to head combat. if i set it up for combat, due to its available slots and the fact that i am "breaking out" it will fail in head to head combat. however if i get creative and actually think... it breaks the mold perfectly... so whoever it is that you know that is not using the suit for its intended purpose, is, like i said, not doing their research |
Panther Alpha
DarkWingsss
810
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 08:56:00 -
[255] - Quote
I assuming that you talking about the Caldari Logistics...it haven't been nerf, its been redesign to do their specific role, if you want to Assault, use the Assault suit... Proper logibros will still use it, and enjoy it very much. |
Rogue Saint
Science For Death The Shadow Eclipse
74
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 08:56:00 -
[256] - Quote
I'm so tired of respec threads, people seem to forget this game is not meant to be a "grind to the max and leave" like the rest of the off the shelf titles that you then have to wait for the next release and start all over again!
The "nerfs" that have happened and will continue to happen are part of the process for an evolving game. If you have spent 15m SP for that pwn suit/weapon and then coming here to cry about it then you clearly are missing the point of Dust.
Did you intend playing the same suit/weapon for the rest of the lifetime of the game? Sad! |
Malkai Inos
Opus Arcana Covert Intervention
897
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 08:58:00 -
[257] - Quote
Panther Alpha wrote:I assuming that you talking about the Caldari Logistics...it haven't been nerf, its been redesign to do their specific role, if you want to Assault, use the Assault suit... Proper logibros will still use it, and enjoy it very much. He's not.
|
dday3six
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
130
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 08:59:00 -
[258] - Quote
Stands Alone wrote:dday3six wrote:
Yeah I get that Dust is connected to Eve via backstory and universe, but Dust is not Eve. Free to play cannot function under the same revenue gain strategy as subscription based. Building a playerbase slowly is not a sustainable financial model for F2P.
i guess we will see... CCP has already broken new ground with EVE, they have broken new ground with Dust, and they will continue to do so... i like the "adapt or die" model... therefore myself and many others i know would stay and probably pay.... many im assuming like yourself will move on... but thats just the nature of CCP games... like i said... better get used to it or this may turn out not to be the right FPS for you... no offense... its true though... for many of its players
1-month-plan $ 14.95 / $ 14.95 3-month-plan $ 12.95 / $ 38.85 6-month-plan $ 11.95 / $ 71.70 12-month-plan $10.95 / $ 131.40
That's EVE's sub costs in USD as I found it here. You and the many people you know are all willing to spend something similar each month on Dust?
F2P doesn't work on a small, slowing growing playerbase because players don't have to pay. They need larger, steadily growing playbases because the more players, the more potential for players who are going to spend cash. You ever wonder why Dust works so much better with squads? It's not a ground breaking element of game design. It's a marketing strategy. F2P always offer better gameplay with friends by design to encourage players to enlist others to play. |
Malkai Inos
Opus Arcana Covert Intervention
897
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 09:05:00 -
[259] - Quote
dday3six wrote:1-month-plan $ 14.95 / $ 14.95 3-month-plan $ 12.95 / $ 38.85 6-month-plan $ 11.95 / $ 71.70 12-month-plan $10.95 / $ 131.40 That's EVE's sub costs in USD as I found it here. You and the many people you know are all willing to spend something similar each month on Dust? F2P doesn't work on a small, slowing growing playerbase because players don't have to pay. They need larger, steadily growing playbases because the more players, the more potential for players who are going to spend cash. You ever wonder why Dust works so much better with squads? It's not a ground breaking element of game design. It's a marketing strategy. F2P always offer better gameplay with friends by design to encourage players to enlist others to play. F2P games tend to live off from the 10% of dedicated players that pay for the rest of them. The number of players is not as important as the willingness to spend money of those who do.
There has been a thread somewhere here that showed that numerous players bought packs, boosters and AUR worth several hundred dollars in just a few months.
|
Panther Alpha
DarkWingsss
810
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 09:08:00 -
[260] - Quote
Malkai Inos wrote:Panther Alpha wrote:I assuming that you talking about the Caldari Logistics...it haven't been nerf, its been redesign to do their specific role, if you want to Assault, use the Assault suit... Proper logibros will still use it, and enjoy it very much. He's not.
Really ? because it sounds like another Logi Pro-Assaulter cry.... what class hes talking about then ? |
|
dday3six
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
131
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 09:25:00 -
[261] - Quote
Malkai Inos wrote:dday3six wrote:1-month-plan $ 14.95 / $ 14.95 3-month-plan $ 12.95 / $ 38.85 6-month-plan $ 11.95 / $ 71.70 12-month-plan $10.95 / $ 131.40 That's EVE's sub costs in USD as I found it here. You and the many people you know are all willing to spend something similar each month on Dust? F2P doesn't work on a small, slowing growing playerbase because players don't have to pay. They need larger, steadily growing playbases because the more players, the more potential for players who are going to spend cash. You ever wonder why Dust works so much better with squads? It's not a ground breaking element of game design. It's a marketing strategy. F2P always offer better gameplay with friends by design to encourage players to enlist others to play. F2P games tend to live off from the 10% of dedicated players that pay for the rest of them. The number of players is not as important as the willingness to spend money of those who can. There has been a thread somewhere here that showed that numerous players bought packs, boosters and AUR worth several hundred dollars in just a few months.
Nevertheless, 10% of a larger number is more. The smaller the base, the smaller that 10% is, and the more money that 10% must pay in for CCP to turn a profit. It's easier to motivate 10% of 1,000 to spend $1 a month, then it is to get 10% of 100 to spend $10. |
Malkai Inos
Opus Arcana Covert Intervention
897
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 09:38:00 -
[262] - Quote
dday3six wrote:Malkai Inos wrote:dday3six wrote:1-month-plan $ 14.95 / $ 14.95 3-month-plan $ 12.95 / $ 38.85 6-month-plan $ 11.95 / $ 71.70 12-month-plan $10.95 / $ 131.40 That's EVE's sub costs in USD as I found it here. You and the many people you know are all willing to spend something similar each month on Dust? F2P doesn't work on a small, slowing growing playerbase because players don't have to pay. They need larger, steadily growing playbases because the more players, the more potential for players who are going to spend cash. You ever wonder why Dust works so much better with squads? It's not a ground breaking element of game design. It's a marketing strategy. F2P always offer better gameplay with friends by design to encourage players to enlist others to play. F2P games tend to live off from the 10% of dedicated players that pay for the rest of them. The number of players is not as important as the willingness to spend money of those who can. There has been a thread somewhere here that showed that numerous players bought packs, boosters and AUR worth several hundred dollars in just a few months. Nevertheless, 10% of a larger number is more. The smaller the base, the smaller that 10% is, and the more money that 10% must pay in for CCP to turn a profit. It's easier to motivate 10% of 1,000 to spend $1 a month, then it is to get 10% of 100 to spend $10. Very true. What I'm arguing is that a game can stay alive with comparatively few players as long as it manages to "monetise" those players with high efficiency and it seems to me that dust is designed to do just that. It's just a different approach, actually. |
Panther Alpha
DarkWingsss
810
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 09:39:00 -
[263] - Quote
dday3six wrote:Malkai Inos wrote:dday3six wrote:1-month-plan $ 14.95 / $ 14.95 3-month-plan $ 12.95 / $ 38.85 6-month-plan $ 11.95 / $ 71.70 12-month-plan $10.95 / $ 131.40 That's EVE's sub costs in USD as I found it here. You and the many people you know are all willing to spend something similar each month on Dust? F2P doesn't work on a small, slowing growing playerbase because players don't have to pay. They need larger, steadily growing playbases because the more players, the more potential for players who are going to spend cash. You ever wonder why Dust works so much better with squads? It's not a ground breaking element of game design. It's a marketing strategy. F2P always offer better gameplay with friends by design to encourage players to enlist others to play. F2P games tend to live off from the 10% of dedicated players that pay for the rest of them. The number of players is not as important as the willingness to spend money of those who can. There has been a thread somewhere here that showed that numerous players bought packs, boosters and AUR worth several hundred dollars in just a few months. Nevertheless, 10% of a larger number is more. The smaller the base, the smaller that 10% is, and the more money that 10% must pay in for CCP to turn a profit. It's easier to motivate 10% of 1,000 to spend $1 a month, then it is to get 10% of 100 to spend $10.
That is the beauty of the F2P model ... lets say you have 50,000 players, about 50% of that people eventually is going to spend $5 or more.. if you can keep new people interested in the game for long periods, then that percentage goes up to 65%...if the regular players are happy ( about 15% ) the are likely to spend $15--ú20 a month "minimum".
Targeted player base doesn't work in F2P games, you need a more "general" approach. |
Jathniel
G I A N T EoN.
723
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 09:43:00 -
[264] - Quote
We need our respecs already.
A nice monthly respec offer after every patch.
Don't want us to spam it? Don't offer ISK or AUR respecs.
Whenever you do a major patch, offer a respec. That too much to ask? |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
654
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 09:51:00 -
[265] - Quote
Stands Alone wrote:dday3six wrote:Stands Alone wrote:dday3six wrote:
Ok. Let's use a vanilla AR magazine size decrease as an example. What if CCP decided decrease the mag size to 40. This would alter how a person needed to approach fire fights, and even change the playstyle required for max effectiveness because running your mag dry and reloading at the wrong time could get your killed. That's what I mean by the basic functions could change.
adapt or die Not like and the HTFU line of thinking might be the very reason CCP is struggling with keeping Dust's player count up or anything. thats the nature of CCP games... they arent hurting for a player base... they built one slowly in EVE and they know it will be the same in dust. many will leave because they do not like the "adapt or die" model. but that is just what is gonna happen. they will have a steady growth of very dedicated players while 10 times that amount will try and quit, do to the harshness and complexity that is put on the table in front of them... in the beginning they may grant your wishes of a respec, but sooner or later, they will throw you into New Eden and it will be "adapt or die". so... might as well get used to it lol No it is not us who need to adapt or die anymore, its ccp. Weve been dealing with this game long enough and it gets worse the older it gets. We are done being misstreated and its evident with all the quiting posts on these forums. We are being directly abused, taunte, misstreated and robed of ourclasses with these "rebalncing" patxhes and were sick of it. We are fps gamers, not wannabe columbus in space and we will have compensation when the developers wrong us or there will be no more dust. Adapt or die, ccp |
Malkai Inos
Opus Arcana Covert Intervention
897
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 09:53:00 -
[266] - Quote
Panther Alpha wrote:dday3six wrote:Malkai Inos wrote:dday3six wrote:1-month-plan $ 14.95 / $ 14.95 3-month-plan $ 12.95 / $ 38.85 6-month-plan $ 11.95 / $ 71.70 12-month-plan $10.95 / $ 131.40 That's EVE's sub costs in USD as I found it here. You and the many people you know are all willing to spend something similar each month on Dust? F2P doesn't work on a small, slowing growing playerbase because players don't have to pay. They need larger, steadily growing playbases because the more players, the more potential for players who are going to spend cash. You ever wonder why Dust works so much better with squads? It's not a ground breaking element of game design. It's a marketing strategy. F2P always offer better gameplay with friends by design to encourage players to enlist others to play. F2P games tend to live off from the 10% of dedicated players that pay for the rest of them. The number of players is not as important as the willingness to spend money of those who can. There has been a thread somewhere here that showed that numerous players bought packs, boosters and AUR worth several hundred dollars in just a few months. Nevertheless, 10% of a larger number is more. The smaller the base, the smaller that 10% is, and the more money that 10% must pay in for CCP to turn a profit. It's easier to motivate 10% of 1,000 to spend $1 a month, then it is to get 10% of 100 to spend $10. That is the beauty of the F2P model ... lets say you have 50,000 players, about 50% of that people eventually is going to spend $5 or more.. if you can keep new people interested in the game for long periods, then that percentage goes up to 65%...if the regular players are happy ( about 15% ) the are likely to spend $15--ú20 a month "minimum". Targeted player base doesn't work in F2P games, you need a more "general" approach. Not necessarily. The more targeted your appraoch, the smaller the potential player base (that we all agree on). But the more targeted the player base the higher the rate of "perfect match" customers that basically have nowhere else to go and lose any interest in the competitions offerings.
Those are the people that play an MMO for a decade straight without any sign of wear. Those are the guys that pay thousands upon thousands of dollars to improve their experience because they identify the product as part of their everyday life and as a worthwhile area to invest money into.
You can target a very general group of people to maximize player count viral effectiveness. But the more general the group your product appeals to, the less is this product able to satisfy each of the subsets your general group is composed of.
The consequence is a general loss of long term retention and less incentive to invest money that is offset by having a large number of players that, on average, spend less. |
dustwaffle
Gravity Prone EoN.
244
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 10:57:00 -
[267] - Quote
Jathniel wrote:We need our respecs already.
A nice monthly respec offer after every patch.
Don't want us to spam it? Don't offer ISK or AUR respecs.
Whenever you do a major patch, offer a respec. That too much to ask? Yes. |
dustwaffle
Gravity Prone EoN.
244
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 11:05:00 -
[268] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:No it is not us who need to adapt or die anymore, its ccp. Weve been dealing with this game long enough and it gets worse the older it gets. We are done being misstreated and its evident with all the quiting posts on these forums. We are being directly abused, taunte, misstreated and robed of ourclasses with these "rebalncing" patxhes and were sick of it. We are fps gamers, not wannabe columbus in space and we will have compensation when the developers wrong us or there will be no more dust. Adapt or die, ccp While your thread started off being fairly decent, this post here has descended into the realm of whining and hyperbole.
Abused? Taunted? Mistreated? Robbed of your classes?
Not to troll, but that's a bit of a stretch considering the game is free to play, and you can leave at any time you desire, wouldn't you say?
You may call me a fanboy, couldn't be less bothered, but having played EVE for a fairly long time, they've taken a similar approach to development as EVE, and expect to see steady growth over the years, which I can't fault. The instant gratification crowd come and go, but CCP will probably retain a growing number of players that click with the game.
The game will always have balancing, rebalancing and more rebalancing, FOTM will come and go and return with a vengeance. That is a fact from the way CCP develops their games. If you feel that is unacceptableto you, you may actually have to seek entertainment elsewhere (I mean this in the nicest possible way). |
Panther Alpha
DarkWingsss
810
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 11:17:00 -
[269] - Quote
Malkai Inos wrote:Panther Alpha wrote:dday3six wrote:Malkai Inos wrote:dday3six wrote:1-month-plan $ 14.95 / $ 14.95 3-month-plan $ 12.95 / $ 38.85 6-month-plan $ 11.95 / $ 71.70 12-month-plan $10.95 / $ 131.40 That's EVE's sub costs in USD as I found it here. You and the many people you know are all willing to spend something similar each month on Dust? F2P doesn't work on a small, slowing growing playerbase because players don't have to pay. They need larger, steadily growing playbases because the more players, the more potential for players who are going to spend cash. You ever wonder why Dust works so much better with squads? It's not a ground breaking element of game design. It's a marketing strategy. F2P always offer better gameplay with friends by design to encourage players to enlist others to play. F2P games tend to live off from the 10% of dedicated players that pay for the rest of them. The number of players is not as important as the willingness to spend money of those who can. There has been a thread somewhere here that showed that numerous players bought packs, boosters and AUR worth several hundred dollars in just a few months. Nevertheless, 10% of a larger number is more. The smaller the base, the smaller that 10% is, and the more money that 10% must pay in for CCP to turn a profit. It's easier to motivate 10% of 1,000 to spend $1 a month, then it is to get 10% of 100 to spend $10. That is the beauty of the F2P model ... lets say you have 50,000 players, about 50% of that people eventually is going to spend $5 or more.. if you can keep new people interested in the game for long periods, then that percentage goes up to 65%...if the regular players are happy ( about 15% ) the are likely to spend $15--ú20 a month "minimum". Targeted player base doesn't work in F2P games, you need a more "general" approach. Not necessarily. The more targeted your appraoch, the smaller the potential player base (that we all agree on). But the more targeted the player base the higher the rate of "perfect match" customers that basically have nowhere else to go and lose any interest in the competitions offerings. Those are the people that play an MMO for a decade straight without any sign of wear. Those are the guys that pay thousands upon thousands of dollars to improve their experience because they identify the product as part of their everyday life and as a worthwhile area to invest money into. You can target a very general group of people to maximize player count and viral effectiveness. But the more general the group your product appeals to, the less is this product able to satisfy each of the subsets your general group is composed of. The consequence is a general loss of long term retention and less incentive to invest money that has to be offset by having a large number of players that, on average, spend less.
And how you will keep you "selective" players happy ? You need fresh players and a big player base to keep them happy. look at what is happening to MAG ... they tried to be "selective" and is proven to be a fail marketing strategy.
Games like LOTRO where forced by the regular player base to change to F2P, because the Fanboys where getting bore with empty servers, and playing with the same people all the time.
|
dday3six
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
132
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 11:29:00 -
[270] - Quote
Malkai Inos wrote:Panther Alpha wrote:dday3six wrote:Malkai Inos wrote:dday3six wrote:1-month-plan $ 14.95 / $ 14.95 3-month-plan $ 12.95 / $ 38.85 6-month-plan $ 11.95 / $ 71.70 12-month-plan $10.95 / $ 131.40 That's EVE's sub costs in USD as I found it here. You and the many people you know are all willing to spend something similar each month on Dust? F2P doesn't work on a small, slowing growing playerbase because players don't have to pay. They need larger, steadily growing playbases because the more players, the more potential for players who are going to spend cash. You ever wonder why Dust works so much better with squads? It's not a ground breaking element of game design. It's a marketing strategy. F2P always offer better gameplay with friends by design to encourage players to enlist others to play. F2P games tend to live off from the 10% of dedicated players that pay for the rest of them. The number of players is not as important as the willingness to spend money of those who can. There has been a thread somewhere here that showed that numerous players bought packs, boosters and AUR worth several hundred dollars in just a few months. Nevertheless, 10% of a larger number is more. The smaller the base, the smaller that 10% is, and the more money that 10% must pay in for CCP to turn a profit. It's easier to motivate 10% of 1,000 to spend $1 a month, then it is to get 10% of 100 to spend $10. That is the beauty of the F2P model ... lets say you have 50,000 players, about 50% of that people eventually is going to spend $5 or more.. if you can keep new people interested in the game for long periods, then that percentage goes up to 65%...if the regular players are happy ( about 15% ) the are likely to spend $15--ú20 a month "minimum". Targeted player base doesn't work in F2P games, you need a more "general" approach. Not necessarily. The more targeted your appraoch, the smaller the potential player base (that we all agree on). But the more targeted the player base the higher the rate of "perfect match" customers that basically have nowhere else to go and lose any interest in the competitions offerings. Those are the people that play an MMO for a decade straight without any sign of wear. Those are the guys that pay thousands upon thousands of dollars to improve their experience because they identify the product as part of their everyday life and as a worthwhile area to invest money into. You can target a very general group of people to maximize player count and viral effectiveness. But the more general the group your product appeals to, the less is this product able to satisfy each of the subsets your general group is composed of. The consequence is a general loss of long term retention and less incentive to invest money that has to be offset by having a large number of players that, on average, spend less.
You do understand that the end result of what you're talking about is handful of players pouring thousands of dollars a month into Dust, right? The likelihood of a demographic that is going to be willing to do that is slim to none.
Eve Online has some 500K Subscribers. CCP gathers more money from subscriptions fees then they do from the small percentage of players who pour thousands into the game.
Look at the choices CCP made with Dust. They went FPS, arguably the most popular gaming genre. They choose console, a larger, more accessable gaming platform than PC, and one with less of a history of players spending thousands on a single title. They did it as an F2P, a more widely accepted model over subscription. You really think those choices point to CCP's ultimate intention being a targeted, playerbase who is willing to spend thousands a month on Dust?
|
|
Mortal Maximus
KNIGHTZ OF THE ROUND Lokun Listamenn
34
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 11:36:00 -
[271] - Quote
Uuuuh.... Derp OpO. |
Malkai Inos
Opus Arcana Covert Intervention
898
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 11:48:00 -
[272] - Quote
Panther Alpha wrote:
And how you will keep you "selective" players happy ? You need fresh players and a big player base to keep them happy. look at what is happening to MAG ... they tried to be "selective" and is proven to be a fail marketing strategy.
I haven't played MAG and thus have no idea what exactly happened to it. Reading around these forums though it seems to me that a patch of some sorts pissed people off which is indicative of them trying to switch the target group and this attempt firing back horribly as expected.
As i said "perfect match" players are happy because the game is already in a general state that appeals to them. Once aquired, all you have to do is not abandon your core game design concept to keep them. Getting players to try a very specific game is the hard part but once they're here you have a good chance on keeping them.
I suspect that just as many players would leave if respecs where added as without them. The difference is that the one group would've otherwise stayed for years and the other is mainly waiting for the next game or console release either way.
Panther Alpha wrote: Games like LOTRO where forced by the regular player base to change to F2P, because the Fanboys where getting bore with empty servers, and playing with the same people all the time.
Games like LOTRO (read: almost all MMOs of the last 6 years) where cookiecutter copies of the EQ/WOW concept, often of considerably worse quality. They tried to attract a very washy market segment that is highly oversaturated without bringing anything worthwhile or unique with them. What forced all those games down the F2P road was the almost complete lack of a unique identity (besides the occasional movie license, wohoo) so they have to attract new players constantly to compensate for the bleed.
LOTRO going f2p was the "many players" approach. I expect dust to follow the "loyal players" approach if you will.
|
Panther Alpha
DarkWingsss
810
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 12:00:00 -
[273] - Quote
Malkai Inos wrote:Panther Alpha wrote:
And how you will keep you "selective" players happy ? You need fresh players and a big player base to keep them happy. look at what is happening to MAG ... they tried to be "selective" and is proven to be a fail marketing strategy.
I haven't played MAG and thus have no idea what exactly happened to it. Reading around these forums though it seems to me that a patch of some sorts pissed people off which is indicative of them trying to switch the target group and this attempt firing back horribly as expected. As i said "perfect match" players are happy because the game is already in a general state that appeals to them. Once aquired, all you have to do is not abandon your core game design concept to keep them. Getting players to try a very specific game is the hard part but once they're here you have a good chance on keeping them. I suspect that just as many players would leave if respecs where added as without them. The difference is that the one group would've otherwise stayed for years and the other is mainly waiting for the next game or console release either way. Panther Alpha wrote: Games like LOTRO where forced by the regular player base to change to F2P, because the Fanboys where getting bore with empty servers, and playing with the same people all the time.
Games like LOTRO (read: almost all MMOs of the last 6 years) where cookiecutter copies of the EQ/WOW concept, often of considerably worse quality. They tried to attract a very washy market segment that is highly oversaturated without bringing anything worthwhile or unique with them. What forced all those games down the F2P road was the almost complete lack of a unique identity (besides the occasional movie license, wohoo) so they have to attract new players constantly to compensate for the bleed. LOTRO going f2p was the "many players" approach. I expect dust to follow the "loyal players" approach if you will.
Only Star Wars have been available to be selective with a player base.. E.G "Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic" and "Battlefront" ...i'm sorry but i don't think EvE is anywhere near that magnitude and scope. |
Jathniel
G I A N T EoN.
724
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 12:07:00 -
[274] - Quote
dustwaffle wrote:Jathniel wrote:We need our respecs already.
A nice monthly respec offer after every patch.
Don't want us to spam it? Don't offer ISK or AUR respecs.
Whenever you do a major patch, offer a respec. That too much to ask? Yes.
I can do that too:
"No."
|
Malkai Inos
Opus Arcana Covert Intervention
898
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 12:09:00 -
[275] - Quote
dday3six wrote:[snip against pyramid quoting]
You do understand that the end result of what you're talking about is handful of players pouring thousands of dollars a month into Dust, right? The likelihood of a demographic that is going to be willing to do that is slim to none. A handful of players (in relative terms) that pays more on average for longer periods of time, yes.
dday3six wrote:Eve Online has some 500K Subscribers. CCP gathers more money from subscriptions fees then they do from the small percentage of players who pour thousands into the game. Probably. That's how p2p games used to work at least.
dday3six wrote: Look at the choices CCP made with Dust. They went FPS, arguably the most popular gaming genre. They choose console, a larger, more accessable gaming platform than PC, and one with less of a history of players spending thousands on a single title. They did it as an F2P, a more widely accepted model over subscription. You really think those choices point to CCP's ultimate intention being a targeted, playerbase who is willing to spend thousands a month on Dust?
Judging by the things they done in the game - long TTK, RPG elemts, no custom servers, no spectator, no respecs etc. p.p and my general experience with them as a developer i'm inclined to say yes. Dust tries to target a specific subset of console FPS players with game design choices that no other game in this huge market has dared to make so far.
And just to for clarity. The goal is to get a larger relative part of the playerbase to spend than in other games, not the same small percentage to spend more. I'm not talking about literally ten people paying half their salary for AUR tanks.
Panther Alpha wrote:Only Star Wars have been available to be selective with a player base.. E.G "Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic" and "Battlefront" ...i'm sorry but i don't think EvE is anywhere near that magnitude and scope. Not sure what you're trying to say here |
Michael Cratar
Fenrir's Wolves RUST415
249
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 12:17:00 -
[276] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Why did you constantly put more skill levels into an item you hate using? Then why are you hanging out with a corp that doesn't appreciate what you bring to the table? Then why are you wasting your energy asking for a respec instead of asking for balance to include missing items?
1. No one said he did.
2. his corp did appreciate him untill his suit *or whatever he is useing now* got nerfed to uselessness. Its not his fault he got nerfed, and now he is stuck with it. You are saying he should just htfu and get another 15m sp? This game is bad enough with its constant bugs and annoyances and now he has to spend more time just to get back to where he once was? I'd say fk that.*allready did*.
3. Because he dosn't want to wait another 20+ years for ccp to add new content or fix the already existing content.
Normally I agree *or get a good laugh out of* with what you post, but example has a valid point. I'ts not cool to say "Sorry buddy, you're f**ked! go farm another 15+m, and remember that aur items require less skill points to use!" You cant just say htfu because any person that is not 100% dedicated to a game would drop it after something like this *I did*.
If you are wondering why i still come to the forums even tho I dont play anymore is because i still like to see if anything worth noteing has changed. |
Rei Shepard
Spectre II
424
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 12:17:00 -
[277] - Quote
Until they fix the aiming in this game, anything they do to balance this game will be be for nothing.
Myself, i stopped playing at 1.2, currently the way Explosives & Tanks are spammed and how all the new Armor plates are crap for armor tanking Amarr suits coupled to the current Caldari Logi FoTm crap enhanced by the inability to properly aim with KBM setups = Camping the MCC till all this gets reversed.
Giving respecs when the core gameplay (Aiming) isnt working just helps those guys that jump from FOTM to FOTM more then it does the rest of us, who just want to play their class. |
Panther Alpha
DarkWingsss
810
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 12:18:00 -
[278] - Quote
Malkai Inos wrote:Panther Alpha wrote:Only Star Wars have been available to be selective with a player base.. E.G "Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic" and "Battlefront" ...i'm sorry but i don't think EvE is anywhere near that magnitude and scope. Not sure what you're trying to say here
- Star Wars proximately 93,000,000 worldwide fans.
- EvE 500,000 subscribers,. |
Malkai Inos
Opus Arcana Covert Intervention
898
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 12:25:00 -
[279] - Quote
Panther Alpha wrote:Malkai Inos wrote:Panther Alpha wrote:Only Star Wars have been available to be selective with a player base.. E.G "Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic" and "Battlefront" ...i'm sorry but i don't think EvE is anywhere near that magnitude and scope. Not sure what you're trying to say here - Star Wars: proximately 93,000,000 worldwide fans. - EvE: 500,000 subscribers. And yet SWTOR had to go fp2 hybrid to avoid a complete fiscal failure. You need to try hard not to dominate any market you engage with what is essentially the greatest franchise to have ever existed. The current 2m subs are not particularly exiting in general, even less so with 'star wars' in the name. |
Panther Alpha
DarkWingsss
810
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 12:40:00 -
[280] - Quote
Malkai Inos wrote:Panther Alpha wrote:Malkai Inos wrote:Panther Alpha wrote:Only Star Wars have been available to be selective with a player base.. E.G "Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic" and "Battlefront" ...i'm sorry but i don't think EvE is anywhere near that magnitude and scope. Not sure what you're trying to say here - Star Wars: proximately 93,000,000 worldwide fans. - EvE: 500,000 subscribers. And yet SWTOR had to go fp2 hybrid to avoid a complete fiscal failure. You need to try hard not to dominate any market you engage with what is essentially the greatest franchise to have ever existed. The current 2m subs* are not particularly exiting in general, even less so with 'star wars' in the name. 2m accounts, created since going f2p.
Right... so that prove my point..? If something as big as Star Wars have problems being selective... what makes you think that EvE is going to be fine ? |
|
Rei Shepard
Spectre II
424
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 12:46:00 -
[281] - Quote
Panther Alpha wrote:Malkai Inos wrote:Panther Alpha wrote:Malkai Inos wrote:Panther Alpha wrote:Only Star Wars have been available to be selective with a player base.. E.G "Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic" and "Battlefront" ...i'm sorry but i don't think EvE is anywhere near that magnitude and scope. Not sure what you're trying to say here - Star Wars: proximately 93,000,000 worldwide fans. - EvE: 500,000 subscribers. And yet SWTOR had to go fp2 hybrid to avoid a complete fiscal failure. You need to try hard not to dominate any market you engage with what is essentially the greatest franchise to have ever existed. The current 2m subs* are not particularly exiting in general, even less so with 'star wars' in the name. 2m accounts, created since going f2p. Right... so that prove my point..? If something as big as Star Wars have problems being selective... what makes you think that EvE is going to be fine ?
Eve isnt F2P even after 10 years, unless you make 500m ISK a month and can buy plexes, luckely i make 500m ISk in under 3 hours playing :)
|
Malkai Inos
Opus Arcana Covert Intervention
898
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 12:50:00 -
[282] - Quote
Panther Alpha wrote:Malkai Inos wrote:Panther Alpha wrote:Malkai Inos wrote:Panther Alpha wrote:Only Star Wars have been available to be selective with a player base.. E.G "Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic" and "Battlefront" ...i'm sorry but i don't think EvE is anywhere near that magnitude and scope. Not sure what you're trying to say here - Star Wars: proximately 93,000,000 worldwide fans. - EvE: 500,000 subscribers. And yet SWTOR had to go fp2 hybrid to avoid a complete fiscal failure. You need to try hard not to dominate any market you engage with what is essentially the greatest franchise to have ever existed. The current 2m subs* are not particularly exiting in general, even less so with 'star wars' in the name. 2m accounts, created since going f2p. Right... so that prove my point..? If something as big as Star Wars have problems being selective... what makes you think that EvE is going to be fine ? Especially SWTOR was not selective. It was all but. Reviews on all accounts agreed that it was an average WoW style MMO that had a nice story but did nothing new in terms being a good MMO. People left in the millions after finishing one or two quest lines. Expensive fluff makes does not make a unique game. |
Panther Alpha
DarkWingsss
812
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 12:53:00 -
[283] - Quote
Rei Shepard wrote:Panther Alpha wrote:Malkai Inos wrote:
- Star Wars: proximately 93,000,000 worldwide fans.
- EvE: 500,000 subscribers.
And yet SWTOR had to go fp2 hybrid to avoid a complete fiscal failure. You need to try hard not to dominate any market you engage with what is essentially the greatest franchise to have ever existed. The current 2m subs* are not particularly exiting in general, even less so with 'star wars' in the name. 2m accounts, created since going f2p. Right... so that prove my point..? If something as big as Star Wars have problems being selective... what makes you think that EvE is going to be fine ?
Eve isnt F2P even after 10 years, unless you make 500m ISK a month and can buy plexes, luckely i make 500m ISk in under 3 hours playing :)
[/quote]
I wasn't talking about EvE "the game", i was talking about the EvE "concept" in Dust 514.
Because something works in EvE, that doesn't means that it will work in Dust 514. The same way as for what works in the Star Wars movies, doesn't necessarily works in games.
|
dday3six
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
132
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 12:56:00 -
[284] - Quote
Malkai Inos wrote:dday3six wrote:[snip against pyramid quoting]
You do understand that the end result of what you're talking about is handful of players pouring thousands of dollars a month into Dust, right? The likelihood of a demographic that is going to be willing to do that is slim to none. A handful of players (in relative terms) that pays more on average for longer periods of time, yes. dday3six wrote:Eve Online has some 500K Subscribers. CCP gathers more money from subscriptions fees then they do from the small percentage of players who pour thousands into the game. Probably. That's how p2p games used to work at least. dday3six wrote: Look at the choices CCP made with Dust. They went FPS, arguably the most popular gaming genre. They choose console, a larger, more accessable gaming platform than PC, and one with less of a history of players spending thousands on a single title. They did it as an F2P, a more widely accepted model over subscription. You really think those choices point to CCP's ultimate intention being a targeted, playerbase who is willing to spend thousands a month on Dust?
Judging by the things they done in the game - long TTK, RPG elemts, no custom servers, no spectator, no respecs etc. p.p and my general experience with them as a developer i'm inclined to say yes. Dust tries to target a specific subset of console FPS players with game design choices that no other game in this huge market has dared to make so far. And just to for clarity. The goal is to get a larger relative part of the playerbase to spend than in other games, not the same small percentage to spend more. I'm not talking about literally ten people paying half their salary for AUR tanks.
I'm sure you understand that all of the present cash items become less attractive to purchase the longer a merc plays Dust. Even boosters lose appeal once a player has filled out their roles and that of their alts. This why Dust needs to cast a wider net for new players, they don't have the back of subscription fees that Eve does. |
Lucifalic
Baked n Loaded
26
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 13:06:00 -
[285] - Quote
With 15 mil sp your core stuff must all be maxed. Just start another class. Doesn't have to be all proto shizz. Won't take u that long to build up another class. God it's bs that u think u should get a respec just so you can go straight to proto something else. I'm sorry your class got nuked but so did mine. Scouts are all but useless. 1.2 was a heavy nail for them. But at under 4 mil sp no proto stuff and not having core skills maxed I'm not sharing any tears. I have to adapt and deal with bears all the time. Try doing the same |
Malkai Inos
Opus Arcana Covert Intervention
898
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 13:14:00 -
[286] - Quote
dday3six wrote:I'm sure you understand that all of the present cash items become less attractive to purchase the longer a merc plays Dust. Even boosters lose appeal once a player has filled out their roles and that of their alts. This why Dust needs to cast a wider net for new players, they don't have the back of subscription fees that Eve does. Yes. That's why i'm puzzled that there's not even any sign of vanity items or customization within the game.
And efforts to increase the playerbase are fine and important. I just think that certain actions might, in the long run, do more harm than good by washing out the games identity and thus USP.
|
dday3six
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
132
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 14:30:00 -
[287] - Quote
Malkai Inos wrote:dday3six wrote:I'm sure you understand that all of the present cash items become less attractive to purchase the longer a merc plays Dust. Even boosters lose appeal once a player has filled out their roles and that of their alts. This why Dust needs to cast a wider net for new players, they don't have the back of subscription fees that Eve does. Yes. That's why i'm puzzled that there's not even any sign of vanity items or customization within the game. And efforts to increase the playerbase are fine and important. I just think that certain actions might, in the long run, do more harm than good by washing out the games identity and thus USP.
I've questioned a lack of those items as well. Best I can think of is for lore reasons they don't want players running around in hot pink tanks for example. Character and home customizations are normally stables of F2P games, so it seems odd they are absent in Dust.
Personally I don't quite understand why Dust didn't go either all 3rd person, or a swappable view as found in Bethesda titles to allow players to see their clones even in the field of battle and milk the customizations angle. Removable helmets and character face customization would have created further opportunity for cash items. |
Malkai Inos
Opus Arcana Covert Intervention
898
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 14:36:00 -
[288] - Quote
dday3six wrote:Malkai Inos wrote:dday3six wrote:I'm sure you understand that all of the present cash items become less attractive to purchase the longer a merc plays Dust. Even boosters lose appeal once a player has filled out their roles and that of their alts. This why Dust needs to cast a wider net for new players, they don't have the back of subscription fees that Eve does. Yes. That's why i'm puzzled that there's not even any sign of vanity items or customization within the game. And efforts to increase the playerbase are fine and important. I just think that certain actions might, in the long run, do more harm than good by washing out the games identity and thus USP. I've questioned a lack of those items as well. Best I can think of is for lore reasons they don't want players running around in hot pink tanks for example. Character and home customizations are normally stables of F2P games, so it seems odd they are absent in Dust. True. That could be alleviated by simply giving limited option for color combinations. Even tiered offerings are possible.
Tier one: A wide variety of flat colors for a very minor AUR cost. Tier two: Colors with a selection of overlay patterns. Tier three: Coloring of individual segments (excluding class displaying areas) Tier four: All of the above applicable to all corp members for the largest cost.
Personadday3six wrote:lly I don't quite understand why Dust didn't go either all 3rd person, or a swappable view as found in Bethesda titles to allow players to see their clones even in the field of battle and milk the customizations angle. Removable helmets and character face customization would have created further opportunity for cash items. The problem with 3rd person is always the ability of "peeking" around corners with the camera. I think this alone could be a no-go in a game that tries to appeal to competitive players. |
dday3six
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
132
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 14:57:00 -
[289] - Quote
Malkai Inos wrote:dday3six wrote:Malkai Inos wrote:dday3six wrote:I'm sure you understand that all of the present cash items become less attractive to purchase the longer a merc plays Dust. Even boosters lose appeal once a player has filled out their roles and that of their alts. This why Dust needs to cast a wider net for new players, they don't have the back of subscription fees that Eve does. Yes. That's why i'm puzzled that there's not even any sign of vanity items or customization within the game. And efforts to increase the playerbase are fine and important. I just think that certain actions might, in the long run, do more harm than good by washing out the games identity and thus USP. I've questioned a lack of those items as well. Best I can think of is for lore reasons they don't want players running around in hot pink tanks for example. Character and home customizations are normally stables of F2P games, so it seems odd they are absent in Dust. True. That could be alleviated by simply giving limited option for color combinations. Even tiered offerings are possible. Tier one: A wide variety of flat colors for a very minor AUR cost. Tier two: Colors with a selection of overlay patterns. Tier three: Coloring of individual segments (excluding class displaying areas) Tier four: All of the above applicable to all corp members for the largest cost. The last tier could possibly allow for full rgb color palettes that are pre approved by devs (to filter out wierd combinations and as a service to avoid mimicing). The demand will naturally be comparatively low and, based on the AUR cost, could still be worth the effort. dday3six wrote: Personally I don't quite understand why Dust didn't go either all 3rd person, or a swappable view as found in Bethesda titles to allow players to see their clones even in the field of battle and milk the customizations angle. Removable helmets and character face customization would have created further opportunity for cash items.
The problem with 3rd person is always the ability of "peeking" around corners with the camera. I think this alone could be a no-go in a game that tries to appeal to competitive players. Edit: fixed fail quoting
I'm not so sure the demand would be low for RPG'ers. From that point of view immersion is based on being able to govern over as many aspects of the character as possible. The more players can mold a character the more likely they are to form a greater attactment to that character as well.
Gears of War does well competitively even being 3rd person. Players can also look through walls and other objects in Dust by terrian glitching in certain areas. |
Malkai Inos
Opus Arcana Covert Intervention
898
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 15:13:00 -
[290] - Quote
dday3six wrote:I'm not so sure the demand would be low for RPG'ers. From that point of view immersion is based on being able to govern over as many aspects of the character as possible. The more players can mold a character the more likely they are to form a greater attactment to that character as well.
Gears of War does well competitively even being 3rd person. Players can also look through walls and other objects in Dust by terrian glitching in certain areas. I mean that the demand for the corp wide tier would be low compared to the earlier tiers because it's only purchased by corp CEOs, not every individual player. This is actually a good thing since CCP can manually look at every submission to make sure that no two corps choose very similar color/camo comb+¡nations by accident (which would be annoying i'd imagine).
And i agree that this would strengthen the corporate identity (fourth tier) and general attachment to the character (earlier tiers). I think they could make good money and improve the game by this.
The peeking issue applies only if it's optional of course. Making the game full 3rd person at this point would be a little late though. And i can just hope that head glitching will be fixed rather sooner than later so that an optional 3rd person view would be perceived as imbalanced. |
|
semperfi1999
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
693
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 15:22:00 -
[291] - Quote
Honestly the way CCP is going with Dust and how much things are being nerfed so hard......making some people completely worthless (IE current heavies or commando suits).
Basically with the FPS genre and what CCP has been doing with all their changes.......it would probably be best if CCP just scheduled a monthly respec option. First week of every month you have the option to respec you char.....at the cost of 2% of your total SP.......this is automatically deducted from your SP total.
This would force there to be a "cost" for the respec while still allowing people to respec and change things that they find done work for them (or gets completely changed by CCP).
In the end I really dont care but offering respecs would increase the length of time that people are willing to play this game if they can try out multiple things and find the play style they prefer. |
Malkai Inos
Opus Arcana Covert Intervention
898
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 15:31:00 -
[292] - Quote
semperfi1999 wrote:Honestly the way CCP is going with Dust and how much things are being nerfed so hard......making some people completely worthless (IE current heavies or commando suits).
Basically with the FPS genre and what CCP has been doing with all their changes.......it would probably be best if CCP just scheduled a monthly respec option. First week of every month you have the option to respec you char.....at the cost of 2% of your total SP.......this is automatically deducted from your SP total.
This would force there to be a "cost" for the respec while still allowing people to respec and change things that they find done work for them (or gets completely changed by CCP).
In the end I really dont care but offering respecs would increase the length of time that people are willing to play this game if they can try out multiple things and find the play style they prefer. A cost of 2% would be insignificant for most players (a weeks cap for a 10m toon).
Making it 20% would solve that but at the same time disincentivice gaining large amounts of SP. Why hoarding SP when you can respec quicker and and end up loosing more SP per respec?
In either case, say goodbye to booster sales CCP because buying them after maxing your first class is a pure waste when respecs are faster and easier. |
Smooth Assassin
Condotta Rouvenor Gallente Federation
7
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 15:33:00 -
[293] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:You play a properly balanced, fair and fun class. Liking the class, you dump all 15 mill SP to your name into the class. Suddenly, new build/patch comes around and your class is nerfed without your consent and you now suck at the game. You spawn in your proto suit or your vehical and you are killed over and over, loosing all your ISK. You are told you can not play PC because the one class you are good at, sucks. Nobody wants you in any serious endeavor in dust because your class is nerfed to the point of uselessness. Like current shield tanks, dropships, lazers, plasma cannons and soon to be armor tanks when they fix the bug that is causing them to be balanced. You no longer want to play dust, as the class you played is ruined and so is your ability to enjoy playing dust, because the developers ruined the class you speced into. CCP later anounes that they will not be fixing your class for many months and they ask you to accept their most sincere apologies, despite changing the class that you speced into many months beforehand. Should you get a respec? This happened to the classes mentioned previously and will happen again when the fix the armor tanks Agreed. Imagine if you got respec and you got everything you wanted you could get bored and want to go back to your old class but you will want a respec again. But as much as i agree to you they are soon gonna give us a respec cos of the new dropsuit and changes and the complaints |
Cannibus Lecktor
Stoned Kloned Killers
2
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 16:13:00 -
[294] - Quote
I have been playing FPS/MMO/RPG games for 20 Years now... I have played many enjoyable games that i loved to play and in an instant, i moved on to something else without ever looking back.. This game will be no different i am sure, except the amount of time its going to take me to leave this game will most likely be a lot shorter than any other. All ready i tire of the same old maps, with the same old objectives. No variety at all, may as well be playing Pac-Man.. Now they say they are going to NERF my Caldari Logi because so many people abuse the character and use it not as intended.. I run my Logi as a Logi, Not an assault, not a scout, and not as a tank. I would be fine with the Nerfing of the shield extenders as i do not count on them to keep me alive. However, My role as a Logi will become far less efficient if i am penalized 40 cpu. I already struggle to equip my proto nanos/droplinks/repair tools as it is without trying to carry high offensive equipment.. I already get my @ss handed to me when going against other races with my GEK when they are running Proto rifles and mass driver and Flaylock pistols and Boundless HMG.. I am a logi damn it.. How am i to revive someone in the heat of battle when only 2 seconds of fire from one enemy kills me already.. And now i will have less CPU than all other Logi's... I do believe a respec is only fair.. Leave my CPU alone or give me a bonus to equipment CPU or give me a respec.. This is not an unreasonable request.. On the other hand, why not make a respec something you can spec into? 500,000 SP or even a mill? If you want a respec once a month, go ahead and get you one, but it will cost you...
To really balance this game CCP must make additional game modes for lower lvl players.. Advance gear versus proto is a loss most times, so militia versus Proto, you can forget it.. Make Game modes that are gear specific, Instant Proto, Instant Militia, Instant Advanced, All other gear prohibited.... Oh, thats right, because then people would have to come to grips that they never really had any skill.. Respec or not, next FOTM is PS4 and im sure there will be a lot of great games on it for me to chose from.. I like this game, its a great concept, but it is broken in my opinion.. I know you are going to have cheaters/boosters in every game, but in this one its just too much.. Would be an easy fix though, stop rewarding bad behavior and punish some of them publicly and prove it wont be tolerated.. CCP may not be able to ban an IP but they can damn sure strip them of their SP and ISK.. Couple of those and people will stop. Sorry, im done ranting for now |
Stands Alone
Ultramarine Corp
42
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 17:28:00 -
[295] - Quote
I think those of you who mention quitting, should stop making threats and just quit. Eve grew at a very slow pace, even though millions have tried and quit. but CCP kept it going, and now there is nothing to compare to the magnitude of what heppens in Eve. in fact, they just made BBC news today.
I know plenty of people who like this "adapt or die" about Dust, how you will not get a respec, to think ahead before you invest SP on whether you are investing it on yourself, or investing it into you K/D ratio...
they have a small team, they aren't a giant corporation. they dont need a huge amount of players to pay to keep operating... BF does, COD does, Halo does, but not Dust... there is like 10% of the team that those companies have working on dust...
you can keep telling yourself that they will not make enough to keep dust going but they will...
you can keep saying that all the players will leave, but they wont. there will always be the ones who are curious to see where it goes, and there will always be the ones who know where its going...
This is not a just a mindless FPS. this is a thinking man's game, and it will remain that way.
its not my fault if you didnt think ahead and chose the "best" weapon or suit at the time. you didnt think ahead to the consequences of using that too your advantage.... shoulda invest SP into yourself and not your K/D |
Grief PK
DUST University Ivy League
30
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 17:50:00 -
[296] - Quote
Almost 300 post in a single night, over 1500 views in that same night ... I bet we put a big spike in CCP's forum statistics tracking! Are you checking the numbers CCP, the community is telling you something! |
trollsroyce
Ametat Security Amarr Empire
625
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 17:56:00 -
[297] - Quote
I'd just argue that the longevity of the sandbox demands no respecs. You live with your choises. New players to dust have to grind all that SP from the bottom in any case.
SP should just not be as meaningful as it is now. Win-by-SP makes for boring games, and FPS cannot be boring unlike spreadsheet spaceships which have the luxury.
Do it like it is in EVE, but get rid of the skills that boost your base attributes like damage and HP. Make SP primarily a mechanic that opens up new, specialized suits. Make the sinks big enough for veterans to be fielding extra rare but not overpowered stuff: 20 million SP just into locking a special vehicle or suit that does it's own thing but doesn't step on other classes toes. |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1354
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 18:02:00 -
[298] - Quote
Stands Alone wrote:I think those of you who mention quitting, should stop making threats and just quit. Eve grew at a very slow pace, even though millions have tried and quit. but CCP kept it going, and now there is nothing to compare to the magnitude of what heppens in Eve. in fact, they just made BBC news today.
I know plenty of people who like this "adapt or die" about Dust, how you will not get a respec, to think ahead before you invest SP on whether you are investing it on yourself, or investing it into you K/D ratio...
they have a small team, they aren't a giant corporation. they dont need a huge amount of players to pay to keep operating... BF does, COD does, Halo does, but not Dust... there is like 10% of the team that those companies have working on dust...
you can keep telling yourself that they will not make enough to keep dust going but they will...
you can keep saying that all the players will leave, but they wont. there will always be the ones who are curious to see where it goes, and there will always be the ones who know where its going...
This is not a just a mindless FPS. this is a thinking man's game, and it will remain that way.
its not my fault if you didnt think ahead and chose the "best" weapon or suit at the time. you didnt think ahead to the consequences of using that too your advantage.... shoulda invest SP into yourself and not your K/D
There is no 'think before you spend your SP'... its 'try your best to predict the future before you spend your SP'. |
Stands Alone
Ultramarine Corp
42
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 18:03:00 -
[299] - Quote
ZDub 303 wrote:Stands Alone wrote:I think those of you who mention quitting, should stop making threats and just quit. Eve grew at a very slow pace, even though millions have tried and quit. but CCP kept it going, and now there is nothing to compare to the magnitude of what heppens in Eve. in fact, they just made BBC news today.
I know plenty of people who like this "adapt or die" about Dust, how you will not get a respec, to think ahead before you invest SP on whether you are investing it on yourself, or investing it into you K/D ratio...
they have a small team, they aren't a giant corporation. they dont need a huge amount of players to pay to keep operating... BF does, COD does, Halo does, but not Dust... there is like 10% of the team that those companies have working on dust...
you can keep telling yourself that they will not make enough to keep dust going but they will...
you can keep saying that all the players will leave, but they wont. there will always be the ones who are curious to see where it goes, and there will always be the ones who know where its going...
This is not a just a mindless FPS. this is a thinking man's game, and it will remain that way.
its not my fault if you didnt think ahead and chose the "best" weapon or suit at the time. you didnt think ahead to the consequences of using that too your advantage.... shoulda invest SP into yourself and not your K/D There is no 'think before you spend your SP'... its 'try your best to predict the future before you spend your SP'.
is that not thinking? |
da GAND
187.
201
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 18:04:00 -
[300] - Quote
It's probably best for CCP to give repecs to people that want a respec due to how much more balancing is gonna be done in the future. They should have it optional for now. |
|
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1354
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 18:11:00 -
[301] - Quote
Stands Alone wrote:ZDub 303 wrote: There is no 'think before you spend your SP'... its 'try your best to predict the future before you spend your SP'.
is that not thinking?
yeah I'll concede that. Its a terrible way to treat your player base though imo. |
Egypt Musk
A.N.O.N.Y.M.O.U.S. League of Infamy
0
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 18:15:00 -
[302] - Quote
Grief PK wrote:Almost 300 post in a single night, over 1500 views in that same night ... I bet we put a big spike in CCP's forum statistics tracking! Are you checking the numbers CCP, the community is telling you something! +1 |
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star. EoN.
752
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 18:16:00 -
[303] - Quote
Egypt Musk wrote:Grief PK wrote:Almost 300 post in a single night, over 1500 views in that same night ... I bet we put a big spike in CCP's forum statistics tracking! Are you checking the numbers CCP, the community is telling you something! +1
Ye we are
Dont give out respecs like candy because of FOTM players |
Brolaire of Asstoria
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
80
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 18:20:00 -
[304] - Quote
Grief PK wrote:Almost 300 post in a single night, over 1500 views in that same night ... I bet we put a big spike in CCP's forum statistics tracking! Are you checking the numbers CCP, the community is telling you something!
Still only a fraction of what little community we have currently and I've seen nothing in here that any of the other million of these respec threads hasn't hashed out and droned on about over and over. No respec....Just No! |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1354
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 18:27:00 -
[305] - Quote
Sadly... this whole thread probably doesn't matter at all.
I doubt CCP could/would develop a system to implement respecs before 1.5... at which point they will have done a pass at both infantry and vehicle balancing.
I would be very surprised if they don't offer a respec for 1.5 after they have done these changes.
|
Brolaire of Asstoria
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
81
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 18:56:00 -
[306] - Quote
While I'm all against it for the moment I do realise that there probably is one coming at some stage and if the vehicle and infantry passes they are planning go according to plan then after that "balancing" would seem like that most logical time. This is gonna keep coming up though...if we are all still here in 2 years ill bet we will still have at least 9 of these threads constantly on the go. It would be interesting to see what the forum numbers are in ref to being for or against another respec A referendum/vote of sorts perhaps?? |
dday3six
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
134
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 19:25:00 -
[307] - Quote
Stands Alone wrote:I think those of you who mention quitting, should stop making threats and just quit. Eve grew at a very slow pace, even though millions have tried and quit. but CCP kept it going, and now there is nothing to compare to the magnitude of what heppens in Eve. in fact, they just made BBC news today.
I know plenty of people who like this "adapt or die" about Dust, how you will not get a respec, to think ahead before you invest SP on whether you are investing it on yourself, or investing it into you K/D ratio...
they have a small team, they aren't a giant corporation. they dont need a huge amount of players to pay to keep operating... BF does, COD does, Halo does, but not Dust... there is like 10% of the team that those companies have working on dust...
you can keep telling yourself that they will not make enough to keep dust going but they will...
you can keep saying that all the players will leave, but they wont. there will always be the ones who are curious to see where it goes, and there will always be the ones who know where its going...
This is not a just a mindless FPS. this is a thinking man's game, and it will remain that way.
its not my fault if you didnt think ahead and chose the "best" weapon or suit at the time. you didnt think ahead to the consequences of using that too your advantage.... shoulda invest SP into yourself and not your K/D
I'll let you in on a little secret. Some of the most adamant anti-respec voices have threatened to quit both Dust and Eve if respecs were added to Dust. Would you say the same to them, "Just quit already!" or would you be a little more understanding because their position aligns better with your own?
The question is not how many people you know who like adapt or die etc, but rather how many people do you know who are willing to support Dust by actually spending money on cash items on a continual basis. Dust has no sub fees to keep it afloat, which is a stark comparison to Eve.
A desire to have a positive KDR in a game which tracks it, has leaderboards with that metric, rewards you based on it with ISK and SP, is wrong? Sure.... I hate to break it to you, but neither your point of view or the point of view of someone who is concerned about their KDR is wrong. It's just different, and if you only want to play with players who sure your absolute opinion, considering how your telling those who don't to just quit, prepare for a lonely gaming expierence. |
Stands Alone
Ultramarine Corp
42
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 19:38:00 -
[308] - Quote
dday3six wrote:Stands Alone wrote:I think those of you who mention quitting, should stop making threats and just quit. Eve grew at a very slow pace, even though millions have tried and quit. but CCP kept it going, and now there is nothing to compare to the magnitude of what heppens in Eve. in fact, they just made BBC news today.
I know plenty of people who like this "adapt or die" about Dust, how you will not get a respec, to think ahead before you invest SP on whether you are investing it on yourself, or investing it into you K/D ratio...
they have a small team, they aren't a giant corporation. they dont need a huge amount of players to pay to keep operating... BF does, COD does, Halo does, but not Dust... there is like 10% of the team that those companies have working on dust...
you can keep telling yourself that they will not make enough to keep dust going but they will...
you can keep saying that all the players will leave, but they wont. there will always be the ones who are curious to see where it goes, and there will always be the ones who know where its going...
This is not a just a mindless FPS. this is a thinking man's game, and it will remain that way.
its not my fault if you didnt think ahead and chose the "best" weapon or suit at the time. you didnt think ahead to the consequences of using that too your advantage.... shoulda invest SP into yourself and not your K/D I'll let you in on a little secret. Some of the most adamant anti-respec voices have threatened to quit both Dust and Eve if respecs were added to Dust. Would you say the same to them, "Just quit already!" or would you be a little more understanding because their position aligns better with your own? The question is not how many people you know who like adapt or die etc, but rather how many people do you know who are willing to support Dust by actually spending money on cash items on a continual basis. Dust has no sub fees to keep it afloat, which is a stark comparison to Eve. A desire to have a positive KDR in a game which tracks it, has leaderboards with that metric, rewards you based on it with ISK and SP, is wrong? Sure.... I hate to break it to you, but neither your point of view or the point of view of someone who is concerned about their KDR is wrong. It's just different, and if you only want to play with players who share your absolute opinion, considering how your telling those who don't to just quit, prepare for a lonely gaming expierence.
ok... i will... i think ill live, and so will all the people i play with, who enjoy the way CCP works... stop threatening... just do it... come back later.... or dont... someone else will take your position
|
dday3six
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
135
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 19:50:00 -
[309] - Quote
Stands Alone wrote:dday3six wrote:Stands Alone wrote:I think those of you who mention quitting, should stop making threats and just quit. Eve grew at a very slow pace, even though millions have tried and quit. but CCP kept it going, and now there is nothing to compare to the magnitude of what heppens in Eve. in fact, they just made BBC news today.
I know plenty of people who like this "adapt or die" about Dust, how you will not get a respec, to think ahead before you invest SP on whether you are investing it on yourself, or investing it into you K/D ratio...
they have a small team, they aren't a giant corporation. they dont need a huge amount of players to pay to keep operating... BF does, COD does, Halo does, but not Dust... there is like 10% of the team that those companies have working on dust...
you can keep telling yourself that they will not make enough to keep dust going but they will...
you can keep saying that all the players will leave, but they wont. there will always be the ones who are curious to see where it goes, and there will always be the ones who know where its going...
This is not a just a mindless FPS. this is a thinking man's game, and it will remain that way.
its not my fault if you didnt think ahead and chose the "best" weapon or suit at the time. you didnt think ahead to the consequences of using that too your advantage.... shoulda invest SP into yourself and not your K/D I'll let you in on a little secret. Some of the most adamant anti-respec voices have threatened to quit both Dust and Eve if respecs were added to Dust. Would you say the same to them, "Just quit already!" or would you be a little more understanding because their position aligns better with your own? The question is not how many people you know who like adapt or die etc, but rather how many people do you know who are willing to support Dust by actually spending money on cash items on a continual basis. Dust has no sub fees to keep it afloat, which is a stark comparison to Eve. A desire to have a positive KDR in a game which tracks it, has leaderboards with that metric, rewards you based on it with ISK and SP, is wrong? Sure.... I hate to break it to you, but neither your point of view or the point of view of someone who is concerned about their KDR is wrong. It's just different, and if you only want to play with players who share your absolute opinion, considering how your telling those who don't to just quit, prepare for a lonely gaming expierence. ok... i will... i think ill live, and so will all the people i play with, who enjoy the way CCP works... stop threatening... just do it... come back later.... or dont... someone else will take your position
I'm wondering why you think I'm threatening to quit. Never in the course of this thread have I threaten to do so. See that's your problem. You've got an over inflated sense of self importance. I'm not quitting because you think I should, nor will I ever for that matter, and the fact that you think I would is not only amusing, but also sad at the same time. |
Stands Alone
Ultramarine Corp
42
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 19:54:00 -
[310] - Quote
dday3six wrote:Stands Alone wrote:dday3six wrote:Stands Alone wrote:I think those of you who mention quitting, should stop making threats and just quit. Eve grew at a very slow pace, even though millions have tried and quit. but CCP kept it going, and now there is nothing to compare to the magnitude of what heppens in Eve. in fact, they just made BBC news today.
I know plenty of people who like this "adapt or die" about Dust, how you will not get a respec, to think ahead before you invest SP on whether you are investing it on yourself, or investing it into you K/D ratio...
they have a small team, they aren't a giant corporation. they dont need a huge amount of players to pay to keep operating... BF does, COD does, Halo does, but not Dust... there is like 10% of the team that those companies have working on dust...
you can keep telling yourself that they will not make enough to keep dust going but they will...
you can keep saying that all the players will leave, but they wont. there will always be the ones who are curious to see where it goes, and there will always be the ones who know where its going...
This is not a just a mindless FPS. this is a thinking man's game, and it will remain that way.
its not my fault if you didnt think ahead and chose the "best" weapon or suit at the time. you didnt think ahead to the consequences of using that too your advantage.... shoulda invest SP into yourself and not your K/D I'll let you in on a little secret. Some of the most adamant anti-respec voices have threatened to quit both Dust and Eve if respecs were added to Dust. Would you say the same to them, "Just quit already!" or would you be a little more understanding because their position aligns better with your own? The question is not how many people you know who like adapt or die etc, but rather how many people do you know who are willing to support Dust by actually spending money on cash items on a continual basis. Dust has no sub fees to keep it afloat, which is a stark comparison to Eve. A desire to have a positive KDR in a game which tracks it, has leaderboards with that metric, rewards you based on it with ISK and SP, is wrong? Sure.... I hate to break it to you, but neither your point of view or the point of view of someone who is concerned about their KDR is wrong. It's just different, and if you only want to play with players who share your absolute opinion, considering how your telling those who don't to just quit, prepare for a lonely gaming expierence. ok... i will... i think ill live, and so will all the people i play with, who enjoy the way CCP works... stop threatening... just do it... come back later.... or dont... someone else will take your position I'm wondering why you think I'm threatening to quit. Never in the course of this thread have I threaten to do so. See that's your problem. You've got an over inflated sense of self importance. I'm not quitting because you think I should, nor will I ever for that matter, and the fact that you think I would is not only amusing, but also sad at the same time.
nope... i just think, if you cant adapt... then this isnt for you. Respec is dumb. shoulda did more research. |
|
dday3six
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
135
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 20:01:00 -
[311] - Quote
Stands Alone wrote:dday3six wrote:Stands Alone wrote:dday3six wrote:Stands Alone wrote:I think those of you who mention quitting, should stop making threats and just quit. Eve grew at a very slow pace, even though millions have tried and quit. but CCP kept it going, and now there is nothing to compare to the magnitude of what heppens in Eve. in fact, they just made BBC news today.
I know plenty of people who like this "adapt or die" about Dust, how you will not get a respec, to think ahead before you invest SP on whether you are investing it on yourself, or investing it into you K/D ratio...
they have a small team, they aren't a giant corporation. they dont need a huge amount of players to pay to keep operating... BF does, COD does, Halo does, but not Dust... there is like 10% of the team that those companies have working on dust...
you can keep telling yourself that they will not make enough to keep dust going but they will...
you can keep saying that all the players will leave, but they wont. there will always be the ones who are curious to see where it goes, and there will always be the ones who know where its going...
This is not a just a mindless FPS. this is a thinking man's game, and it will remain that way.
its not my fault if you didnt think ahead and chose the "best" weapon or suit at the time. you didnt think ahead to the consequences of using that too your advantage.... shoulda invest SP into yourself and not your K/D I'll let you in on a little secret. Some of the most adamant anti-respec voices have threatened to quit both Dust and Eve if respecs were added to Dust. Would you say the same to them, "Just quit already!" or would you be a little more understanding because their position aligns better with your own? The question is not how many people you know who like adapt or die etc, but rather how many people do you know who are willing to support Dust by actually spending money on cash items on a continual basis. Dust has no sub fees to keep it afloat, which is a stark comparison to Eve. A desire to have a positive KDR in a game which tracks it, has leaderboards with that metric, rewards you based on it with ISK and SP, is wrong? Sure.... I hate to break it to you, but neither your point of view or the point of view of someone who is concerned about their KDR is wrong. It's just different, and if you only want to play with players who share your absolute opinion, considering how your telling those who don't to just quit, prepare for a lonely gaming expierence. ok... i will... i think ill live, and so will all the people i play with, who enjoy the way CCP works... stop threatening... just do it... come back later.... or dont... someone else will take your position I'm wondering why you think I'm threatening to quit. Never in the course of this thread have I threaten to do so. See that's your problem. You've got an over inflated sense of self importance. I'm not quitting because you think I should, nor will I ever for that matter, and the fact that you think I would is not only amusing, but also sad at the same time. nope... i just think, if you cant adapt... then this isnt for you. Respec is dumb. shoulda did more research.
Are baseless assumptions a hobby of yours? |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1357
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 20:03:00 -
[312] - Quote
Stands Alone wrote:nope... i just think, if you cant adapt... then this isnt for you. Respec is dumb. shoulda did more research.
So have you found a way to predict the future? I would really like to know what it is.
Shoulda done more research... what a joke response. |
Oso Peresoso
RisingSuns
382
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 20:13:00 -
[313] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:Liking the class, you dump all 15 mill SP to your name into the class.
Haha, dummy. |
Stands Alone
Ultramarine Corp
42
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 20:25:00 -
[314] - Quote
um yes... i predict the future all the time... but it doesnt always happen the way i predict it... not sure if you know the definition...
i need a respec... sorry. go back to COD and BF3 |
SILENTSAM 69
SONS of LEGION RISE of LEGION
519
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 20:27:00 -
[315] - Quote
I can not only argue with this. I can dismiss it out right.
I love seeing tears like this. I really hope CCP just ignores all thee tears, collects them for later enjoyment maybe, and just continues without respecs.
Respecs are for lesser people in other shooters. |
dday3six
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
136
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 20:37:00 -
[316] - Quote
Stands Alone wrote:um yes... i predict the future all the time... but it doesnt always happen the way i predict it... not sure if you know the definition...
i need a respec... sorry. go back to COD and BF3
Assume is the word for what you do. However I'm guessing that your "predictions" about the Caldari Logi and the Flaylock had something to do with mercs being able to quickly spec into them in mass. What's the word for what happened that allowed players to do that? hmm...I wonder, could it be respec.
Do Call of Duty or Battlefield even have respecs, I honestly don't know cause I've never played either. |
dday3six
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
137
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 20:40:00 -
[317] - Quote
SILENTSAM 69 wrote:I can not only argue with this. I can dismiss it out right.
I love seeing tears like this. I really hope CCP just ignores all thee tears, collects them for later enjoyment maybe, and just continues without respecs.
Respecs are for lesser people in other shooters.
Seriously? Is there something in the water? WTF. |
Heathen Bastard
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
418
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 20:41:00 -
[318] - Quote
dday3six wrote:Stands Alone wrote:um yes... i predict the future all the time... but it doesnt always happen the way i predict it... not sure if you know the definition...
i need a respec... sorry. go back to COD and BF3 Assume is the word for what you do. However I'm guessing that your "predictions" about the Caldari Logi and the Flaylock had something to do with mercs being able to quickly spec into them in mass. What's the word for what happened that allowed players to do that? hmm...I wonder, could it be respec. Do Call of Duty or Battlefield even have respecs, I honestly don't know cause I've never played either.
No. they have unlocks, that you can reset after hitting the maximum level for no other reason than a little icon next to your name. you don't even get to pick your unlocks anymore in battlefield. you get x amount of points, y gun is unlocked. |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1359
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 20:44:00 -
[319] - Quote
dday3six wrote:SILENTSAM 69 wrote:I can not only argue with this. I can dismiss it out right.
I love seeing tears like this. I really hope CCP just ignores all thee tears, collects them for later enjoyment maybe, and just continues without respecs.
Respecs are for lesser people in other shooters. Seriously? Is there something in the water? WTF.
Just people drinking some awesome koolaid apparently.
Notice how all of the people arguing against respecs are non factors in npc corps or corps that could never compete in PC? |
Stands Alone
Ultramarine Corp
42
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 20:48:00 -
[320] - Quote
ZDub 303 wrote:dday3six wrote:SILENTSAM 69 wrote:I can not only argue with this. I can dismiss it out right.
I love seeing tears like this. I really hope CCP just ignores all thee tears, collects them for later enjoyment maybe, and just continues without respecs.
Respecs are for lesser people in other shooters. Seriously? Is there something in the water? WTF. Just people drinking some awesome koolaid apparently. Notice how all of the people arguing against respecs are non factors in npc corps or corps that could never compete in PC?
we used to compete PC in a PC alliance... as did my previous corp... not sure why it makes a difference... |
|
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1359
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 20:53:00 -
[321] - Quote
Stands Alone wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:dday3six wrote:SILENTSAM 69 wrote:I can not only argue with this. I can dismiss it out right.
I love seeing tears like this. I really hope CCP just ignores all thee tears, collects them for later enjoyment maybe, and just continues without respecs.
Respecs are for lesser people in other shooters. Seriously? Is there something in the water? WTF. Just people drinking some awesome koolaid apparently. Notice how all of the people arguing against respecs are non factors in npc corps or corps that could never compete in PC? we used to compete PC in a PC alliance... as did my previous corp... not sure why it makes a difference...
The fundamental difference in both arguments comes down to PC in its essence (organized battles). You need to be specialized and effective to make a difference in a corp battle. This is why people want respecs, so they can rework their SP to remain effective after their specialization has been nerfed. Everyone who is against just RPs in pub matches.
Your corp may have participated in the early days of PC but they clearly got run out by people with more skill and better planning of their SP paths., They may participate now simply because large corporations like EoN allow you to. But not having a solid specialization means you aren't competitive in PC.
This may not matter in another 6-8 months once a lot of people are pushing 30 million SP... but it matters right now.. and a lot of people are unhappy they don't really have a place in PC (or those kinds of matches in general).
god this game is just so broke.. |
Malkai Inos
Opus Arcana Covert Intervention
915
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 20:54:00 -
[322] - Quote
ZDub 303 wrote:dday3six wrote:SILENTSAM 69 wrote:I can not only argue with this. I can dismiss it out right.
I love seeing tears like this. I really hope CCP just ignores all thee tears, collects them for later enjoyment maybe, and just continues without respecs.
Respecs are for lesser people in other shooters. Seriously? Is there something in the water? WTF. Just people drinking some awesome koolaid apparently. Notice how all of the people arguing against respecs are non factors in npc corps or corps that could never compete in PC? How is that relevant? Last i checked the subject was not PC. Engage the argument, not the person arguing.
|
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1359
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 20:56:00 -
[323] - Quote
Malkai Inos wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:dday3six wrote:SILENTSAM 69 wrote:I can not only argue with this. I can dismiss it out right.
I love seeing tears like this. I really hope CCP just ignores all thee tears, collects them for later enjoyment maybe, and just continues without respecs.
Respecs are for lesser people in other shooters. Seriously? Is there something in the water? WTF. Just people drinking some awesome koolaid apparently. Notice how all of the people arguing against respecs are non factors in npc corps or corps that could never compete in PC? How is that relevant? Last i checked the subject was not PC. Engage the argument, not the person arguing.
Read my next post. Most of it comes down to how you approach the game play. And hell maybe it doesn't matter... by the time this game is worth playing 'competitively' it'll all be balanced and maybe corp matches will matter at that point. and most of the competitive players will probably be on PS4 anyways lol.
I dunno why I even care anymore. |
dday3six
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
138
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 21:00:00 -
[324] - Quote
ZDub 303 wrote:dday3six wrote:SILENTSAM 69 wrote:I can not only argue with this. I can dismiss it out right.
I love seeing tears like this. I really hope CCP just ignores all thee tears, collects them for later enjoyment maybe, and just continues without respecs.
Respecs are for lesser people in other shooters. Seriously? Is there something in the water? WTF. Just people drinking some awesome koolaid apparently. Notice how all of the people arguing against respecs are non factors in npc corps or corps that could never compete in PC?
I've been noticing that trend, and it seems to be very much the same "competitive vs causal" BS that most games and hobbies suffer from. "Causals" seems to hate "Competitors" because they don't understand their outlook, meanwhile many competitors ultimately desire a healthly mix of both players because they know Competitors often start as Causals.
It's the people who want tears and suffering from Cal-logis and Flaylock users. Some feel they should be punished for using the tools the developers gave them. It makes no sense to me. |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1361
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 21:02:00 -
[325] - Quote
dday3six wrote:I've been noticing that trend, and it seems to be very much the same "competitive vs causal" BS that most games and hobbies suffer from. "Causals" seems to hate "Competitors" because they don't understand their outlook, meanwhile many competitors ultimately desire a healthly mix of both players because they know Competitors often start as Causals.
It's the people who want tears and suffering from Cal-logis and Flaylock users. Some feel they should be punished for using the tools the developers gave them. It makes no sense to me.
The fundamental argument.
Is this an FPS or an RPG? |
LongLostLust
Dead Six Initiative Lokun Listamenn
99
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 21:03:00 -
[326] - Quote
Respec for AUR in 1.4!!! |
Malkai Inos
Opus Arcana Covert Intervention
915
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 21:06:00 -
[327] - Quote
dday3six wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:dday3six wrote:SILENTSAM 69 wrote:I can not only argue with this. I can dismiss it out right.
I love seeing tears like this. I really hope CCP just ignores all thee tears, collects them for later enjoyment maybe, and just continues without respecs.
Respecs are for lesser people in other shooters. Seriously? Is there something in the water? WTF. Just people drinking some awesome koolaid apparently. Notice how all of the people arguing against respecs are non factors in npc corps or corps that could never compete in PC? I've been noticing that trend, and it seems to be very much the same "competitive vs causal" BS that most games and hobbies suffer from. "Causals" seems to hate "Competitors" because they don't understand their outlook, meanwhile many competitors ultimately desire a healthly mix of both players because they know Competitors often start as Causals. It's the people who want tears and suffering from Cal-logis and Flaylock users. Some feel they should be punished for using the tools the developers gave them. It makes no sense to me. It's not "competitive vs casual" it "those who feel that respecs are breaking vital game mechanics vs. those who feel that those mechanics shouldn't matter"
Stop willfully ignoring that people have put up worthwhile points on the subject and making this a mudd throwing concept. And i'm a cal logi myself so yet another strawman burns down.
|
Malkai Inos
Opus Arcana Covert Intervention
915
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 21:08:00 -
[328] - Quote
ZDub 303 wrote:dday3six wrote:I've been noticing that trend, and it seems to be very much the same "competitive vs causal" BS that most games and hobbies suffer from. "Causals" seems to hate "Competitors" because they don't understand their outlook, meanwhile many competitors ultimately desire a healthly mix of both players because they know Competitors often start as Causals.
It's the people who want tears and suffering from Cal-logis and Flaylock users. Some feel they should be punished for using the tools the developers gave them. It makes no sense to me. The fundamental argument. Is this an FPS or an RPG? That's a good question and i answer it's both. The SP system is clearly a RPG mechanic. Respecs make this mechanic void. Unless we are fine with effectively removing this mechanic altogether respecs are out of question in my opinion.
|
dday3six
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
138
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 21:10:00 -
[329] - Quote
ZDub 303 wrote:dday3six wrote:I've been noticing that trend, and it seems to be very much the same "competitive vs causal" BS that most games and hobbies suffer from. "Causals" seems to hate "Competitors" because they don't understand their outlook, meanwhile many competitors ultimately desire a healthly mix of both players because they know Competitors often start as Causals.
It's the people who want tears and suffering from Cal-logis and Flaylock users. Some feel they should be punished for using the tools the developers gave them. It makes no sense to me. The fundamental argument. Is this an FPS or an RPG?
It's trying to be too much of both, and that's becoming an issue. Longterm role choices and consequence with long grind, but nothing to do other then lobby shoot on the same 4 maps. |
dday3six
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
138
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 21:14:00 -
[330] - Quote
Malkai Inos wrote:dday3six wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:dday3six wrote:SILENTSAM 69 wrote:I can not only argue with this. I can dismiss it out right.
I love seeing tears like this. I really hope CCP just ignores all thee tears, collects them for later enjoyment maybe, and just continues without respecs.
Respecs are for lesser people in other shooters. Seriously? Is there something in the water? WTF. Just people drinking some awesome koolaid apparently. Notice how all of the people arguing against respecs are non factors in npc corps or corps that could never compete in PC? I've been noticing that trend, and it seems to be very much the same "competitive vs causal" BS that most games and hobbies suffer from. "Causals" seems to hate "Competitors" because they don't understand their outlook, meanwhile many competitors ultimately desire a healthly mix of both players because they know Competitors often start as Causals. It's the people who want tears and suffering from Cal-logis and Flaylock users. Some feel they should be punished for using the tools the developers gave them. It makes no sense to me. It's not "competitive vs casual" it's "those who feel that respecs are breaking vital game mechanics vs. those who feel that those mechanics shouldn't matter" Stop willfully ignoring that people have put up worthwhile points on the subject and making this a mudd throwing concept. And i'm a cal logi myself so yet another strawman burns down.
Yes, some people feel that, and I'm not ignoring it. I'm acknowledging that some players don't want respecs because they want players to be punished for how they choose to play the game. |
|
dday3six
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
138
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 21:16:00 -
[331] - Quote
Malkai Inos wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:dday3six wrote:I've been noticing that trend, and it seems to be very much the same "competitive vs causal" BS that most games and hobbies suffer from. "Causals" seems to hate "Competitors" because they don't understand their outlook, meanwhile many competitors ultimately desire a healthly mix of both players because they know Competitors often start as Causals.
It's the people who want tears and suffering from Cal-logis and Flaylock users. Some feel they should be punished for using the tools the developers gave them. It makes no sense to me. The fundamental argument. Is this an FPS or an RPG? That's a good question and i answer it's both. The SP system is clearly a RPG mechanic. Respecs make this mechanic void. Unless we are fine with effectively removing this mechanic altogether respecs are out of question in my opinion.
The SP system is a marketing ploy wearing an RPG mask. |
Buddha Brown
Factory Fresh
215
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 21:16:00 -
[332] - Quote
1 player. 1 respec for the lifetime of each character. Stop making these threads. |
Stands Alone
Ultramarine Corp
42
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 21:19:00 -
[333] - Quote
ZDub 303 wrote:Stands Alone wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:dday3six wrote:SILENTSAM 69 wrote:I can not only argue with this. I can dismiss it out right.
I love seeing tears like this. I really hope CCP just ignores all thee tears, collects them for later enjoyment maybe, and just continues without respecs.
Respecs are for lesser people in other shooters. Seriously? Is there something in the water? WTF. Just people drinking some awesome koolaid apparently. Notice how all of the people arguing against respecs are non factors in npc corps or corps that could never compete in PC? we used to compete PC in a PC alliance... as did my previous corp... not sure why it makes a difference... The fundamental difference in both arguments comes down to PC in its essence (organized battles). You need to be specialized and effective to make a difference in a corp battle. This is why people want respecs, so they can rework their SP to remain effective after their specialization has been nerfed. Everyone who is against just RPs in pub matches. Your corp may have participated in the early days of PC but they clearly got run out by people with more skill and better planning of their SP paths., They may participate now simply because large corporations like EoN allow you to. But not having a solid specialization means you aren't competitive in PC. This may not matter in another 6-8 months once a lot of people are pushing 30 million SP... but it matters right now.. and a lot of people are unhappy they don't really have a place in PC (or those kinds of matches in general). god this game is just so broke..
na... we left on our own. didnt like the the drama. the last corp i was in was the same... didnt like the drama of PC... |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1362
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 21:26:00 -
[334] - Quote
Malkai Inos wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:dday3six wrote:I've been noticing that trend, and it seems to be very much the same "competitive vs causal" BS that most games and hobbies suffer from. "Causals" seems to hate "Competitors" because they don't understand their outlook, meanwhile many competitors ultimately desire a healthly mix of both players because they know Competitors often start as Causals.
It's the people who want tears and suffering from Cal-logis and Flaylock users. Some feel they should be punished for using the tools the developers gave them. It makes no sense to me. The fundamental argument. Is this an FPS or an RPG? That's a good question and i answer it's both. The SP system is clearly a RPG mechanic. Respecs make this mechanic void. Unless we are fine with effectively removing this mechanic altogether respecs are out of question in my opinion.
On the other hand, the SP system is really hurting the idea of competitive game play when people are suddenly distinctly less effective after skill system changes.
The SP system is fundamentally designed such that you cannot ever max out the skill tree. By the time you could even get all of the current content there would be twice as much added in already.
So you have to make meaningful choices on what and where your SP should go... so when they nerf down a certain class.. that SP is essentially wasted. Some people may think its okay, and that others should 'adapt or die', but the fundamental issue at hand comes down to the fact that wasted SP = wasted time and for some, wasted money.
Is that the culture we want to encourage from CCP and this game? That this game is a waste of time and money? |
Malkai Inos
Opus Arcana Covert Intervention
916
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 21:29:00 -
[335] - Quote
*snip* quote limit
dday3six wrote:Yes, some people feel that, and I'm not ignoring it. I'm acknowledging that some players don't want respecs because they want players to be punished for how they choose to play the game. You are picking out the weakest argument there is, spice it up with some nice hyperbole and keep smashing as if this is all that the SP system is supposed to do and does.
Have a look here, here, here, here, here and here for reasons that are largely independent from the whole FOTM rambling that is going on here. It gets tiring when you have to repeat yourself countless times so i have picked a few good pieces to refer to.
|
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1362
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 21:33:00 -
[336] - Quote
Stands Alone wrote:na... we left on our own. didnt like the the drama. the last corp i was in was the same... didnt like the drama of PC...
Yeah a lot of corps that got run out of PC say that.
"She didn't dump me... I broke up with her!"
(just kidding there)
Anyways... the fact remains... these kinds of changes can hurt PC players fairly significantly. And will only encourage the burn out we're already seeing. Is it worth alienating people who want to play competitively just because some pub match role-players are inconvenienced? |
Malkai Inos
Opus Arcana Covert Intervention
916
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 21:33:00 -
[337] - Quote
ZDub 303 wrote:Malkai Inos wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:dday3six wrote:I've been noticing that trend, and it seems to be very much the same "competitive vs causal" BS that most games and hobbies suffer from. "Causals" seems to hate "Competitors" because they don't understand their outlook, meanwhile many competitors ultimately desire a healthly mix of both players because they know Competitors often start as Causals.
It's the people who want tears and suffering from Cal-logis and Flaylock users. Some feel they should be punished for using the tools the developers gave them. It makes no sense to me. The fundamental argument. Is this an FPS or an RPG? That's a good question and i answer it's both. The SP system is clearly a RPG mechanic. Respecs make this mechanic void. Unless we are fine with effectively removing this mechanic altogether respecs are out of question in my opinion. On the other hand, the SP system is really hurting the idea of competitive game play when people are suddenly distinctly less effective after skill system changes. The SP system is fundamentally designed such that you cannot ever max out the skill tree. By the time you could even get all of the current content there would be twice as much added in already. So you have to make meaningful choices on what and where your SP should go... so when they nerf down a certain class.. that SP is essentially wasted. Some people may think its okay, and that others should 'adapt or die', but the fundamental issue at hand comes down to the fact that wasted SP = wasted time and for some, wasted money. Is that the culture we want to encourage from CCP and this game? That this game is a waste of time and money? That is all true and i feel you in that regard. I'm probably going to dump 1.5m sp in core skills tomorrow just to maintain the current functionality of my cal logi.
And i don't think it's ok to overnerf stuff, i assume no one does. But what we are looking at is a balancing issue first and foremost. [tbc in 10m, match started. ] |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1362
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 21:35:00 -
[338] - Quote
Malkai Inos wrote:*snip* quote limit dday3six wrote:Yes, some people feel that, and I'm not ignoring it. I'm acknowledging that some players don't want respecs because they want players to be punished for how they choose to play the game. You are picking out the weakest argument there is, spice it up with some nice hyperbole and keep smashing as if this is all that the SP system is supposed to do and does. Have a look here, here, here, here, here and here for reasons that are largely independent from the whole FOTM rambling that is going on here. It gets tiring when you have to repeat yourself countless times so i have picked a few good pieces to refer to.
We've already discussed all of that. None of it matters, as that content won't be out before initial balance passes are done and the respec options being proposed (released with balance patches) will be done anyways.
If you think a secondary market is out before Q2 2014, you're delusional. |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1362
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 21:38:00 -
[339] - Quote
Malkai Inos wrote:That is all true and i feel you in that regard. I'm probably going to dump 1.5m sp in core skills tomorrow just to maintain the current functionality of my cal logi. And i don't think it's ok to overnerf stuff, i assume no one does. But what we are looking at is a balancing issue first and foremost. [tbc in 10m, match started. ]
nerfing/buffing and balancing in general is a necessity. We just want a way to adapt to the changes while CCP figures out where they want this game to be. They could make more meaningful changes this way as well as they wouldn't have to worry about screwing people over. |
Malkai Inos
Opus Arcana Covert Intervention
916
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 21:49:00 -
[340] - Quote
ZDub 303 wrote:Malkai Inos wrote:*snip* quote limit dday3six wrote:Yes, some people feel that, and I'm not ignoring it. I'm acknowledging that some players don't want respecs because they want players to be punished for how they choose to play the game. You are picking out the weakest argument there is, spice it up with some nice hyperbole and keep smashing as if this is all that the SP system is supposed to do and does. Have a look here, here, here, here, here and here for reasons that are largely independent from the whole FOTM rambling that is going on here. It gets tiring when you have to repeat yourself countless times so i have picked a few good pieces to refer to. We've already discussed all of that. None of it matters, as that content won't be out before initial balance passes are done and the respec options being proposed (released with balance patches) will be done anyways. If you think a secondary market is out before Q2 2014, you're delusional. It matters because we all know too well that CCP won't get away with a "temporary respec phase" if you will. As soon as CCP is admitting that balance changes warrant a respec, this inevitably is the new default position.
It also seems like every other patch will have some content to it - 1.2 had, 1.4 will most likely have. So new content will not wait for several months, even when basic balance is not complete. They have to release this stuff because every addition can possibly change the combat dynamics and throw all balance back into the bin (cloack, everyone needs a sensor booster in PC, readjust all cpu to allow for that.)
|
|
dday3six
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
140
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 21:56:00 -
[341] - Quote
Malkai Inos wrote:*snip* quote limit dday3six wrote:Yes, some people feel that, and I'm not ignoring it. I'm acknowledging that some players don't want respecs because they want players to be punished for how they choose to play the game. You are picking out the weakest argument there is, spice it up with some nice hyperbole and keep smashing as if this is all that the SP system is supposed to do and does. Have a look here, here, here, here, here and here for reasons that are largely independent from the whole FOTM rambling that is going on here. It gets tiring when you have to repeat yourself countless times so i have picked a few good pieces to refer to.
Did you ever think that the comment wasn't made in reference to you?
EDIT: or arguments that you put forth. |
dday3six
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
140
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 21:58:00 -
[342] - Quote
ZDub 303 wrote:Stands Alone wrote:na... we left on our own. didnt like the the drama. the last corp i was in was the same... didnt like the drama of PC... Yeah a lot of corps that got run out of PC say that. "She didn't dump me... I broke up with her!" (just kidding there) Anyways... the fact remains... these kinds of changes can hurt PC players fairly significantly. And will only encourage the burn out we're already seeing. Is it worth alienating people who want to play competitively just because some pub match role-players are inconvenienced?
Very true, and let's not forget that CCP marketed the game as a competitive shooter as well, which is in part what attracted that crowd. They aren't all here purely by chance. |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1364
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 22:01:00 -
[343] - Quote
Malkai Inos wrote:It matters because we all know too well that CCP won't get away with a "temporary respec phase" if you will. As soon as CCP is admitting that balance changes warrant a respec, this inevitably is the new default position.
It also seems like every other patch will have some content to it - 1.2 had, 1.4 will most likely have. So new content will not wait for several months, even when basic balance is not complete. They have to release this stuff because every addition can possibly change the combat dynamics and throw all balance back into the bin (cloack, everyone needs a sensor booster in PC, readjust all cpu to allow for that.)
They could do it if they wanted to... some people might get mad when its over but that's fine.
but we are not at a point where CCP can say 'classes in this game are pretty close to where we want them to be'... not at all... most of it comes down to the fact that uprising was never beta tested.
So now we're all in limbo with classes changing every patch. How can you make meaningful choices with your SP when literally every class will have changed within the next few months?
Are people supposed to just not play and wait until CCP can get around to figuring their **** out? |
low genius
the sound of freedom Renegade Alliance
235
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 22:04:00 -
[344] - Quote
no respecs. ever. |
Malkai Inos
Opus Arcana Covert Intervention
916
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 22:14:00 -
[345] - Quote
dday3six wrote:Malkai Inos wrote:*snip* quote limit dday3six wrote:Yes, some people feel that, and I'm not ignoring it. I'm acknowledging that some players don't want respecs because they want players to be punished for how they choose to play the game. You are picking out the weakest argument there is, spice it up with some nice hyperbole and keep smashing as if this is all that the SP system is supposed to do and does. Have a look here, here, here, here, here and here for reasons that are largely independent from the whole FOTM rambling that is going on here. It gets tiring when you have to repeat yourself countless times so i have picked a few good pieces to refer to. Did you ever think that the comment wasn't made in reference to you? EDIT: or arguments that you put forth. I know that and it doesn't matter. Disproving a few individuals who have a particularly weak argument does not prove your position right. That's what i was trying to point out and then I provide a little material to fuel the discussion. That's it. |
copy left
SyNergy Gaming EoN.
248
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 22:16:00 -
[346] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Why did you constantly put more skill levels into an item you hate using? Then why are you hanging out with a corp that doesn't appreciate what you bring to the table? Then why are you wasting your energy asking for a respec instead of asking for balance to include missing items?
If you are part of the CPM and you know we are having these problems.....
Then why are you doing nothing to get it fixed? |
LongLostLust
Dead Six Initiative Lokun Listamenn
99
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 22:26:00 -
[347] - Quote
Malkai Inos wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:dday3six wrote:I've been noticing that trend, and it seems to be very much the same "competitive vs causal" BS that most games and hobbies suffer from. "Causals" seems to hate "Competitors" because they don't understand their outlook, meanwhile many competitors ultimately desire a healthly mix of both players because they know Competitors often start as Causals.
It's the people who want tears and suffering from Cal-logis and Flaylock users. Some feel they should be punished for using the tools the developers gave them. It makes no sense to me. The fundamental argument. Is this an FPS or an RPG? That's a good question and i answer it's both. The SP system is clearly a RPG mechanic. Respecs make this mechanic void. Unless we are fine with effectively removing this mechanic altogether respecs are out of question in my opinion. Disagree on respecs voiding the rpg element. Warcraft is a rpg and has the ability to respec. The difference with war raft is you can cap out in a reasonable amount of time. Ie a limited amount of sp where as dust has a seemingly unlimited amount.
Honestly I do t tho I this is a game mechanic arguement as much as a business model one. Boosters are dusts form of a subscription. Respecs would eliminate the need for boosters after someone hits about 15mil sp. sadly there is just far more content in other games to keep one interested and in this game we get an endless grind.
Heaven forbid we could respec, change play styles completely and extend the fun of this game. Respecs are a form of content. It allows a heavy to play a proto scout when they are bored with the fatty. |
Malkai Inos
Opus Arcana Covert Intervention
918
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 22:55:00 -
[348] - Quote
ZDub 303 wrote:Malkai Inos wrote:It matters because we all know too well that CCP won't get away with a "temporary respec phase" if you will. As soon as CCP is admitting that balance changes warrant a respec, this inevitably is the new default position.
It also seems like every other patch will have some content to it - 1.2 had, 1.4 will most likely have. So new content will not wait for several months, even when basic balance is not complete. They have to release this stuff because every addition can possibly change the combat dynamics and throw all balance back into the bin (cloack, everyone needs a sensor booster in PC, readjust all cpu to allow for that.)
They could do it if they wanted to... some people might get mad when its over but that's fine. but we are not at a point where CCP can say 'classes in this game are pretty close to where we want them to be'... not at all... most of it comes down to the fact that uprising was never beta tested. So now we're all in limbo with classes changing every patch. How can you make meaningful choices with your SP when literally every class will have changed within the next few months? Are people supposed to just not play and wait until CCP can get around to figuring their **** out? Well, being confrontational i could say that "some people getting mad" describes the current situation pretty accurately. CCP has to decide wether discontent from parts of the player base warrants deep changes to game mechanics.
Meaningful choices will always be an iffy subject. As i've said, new content always has the chance to shift balance just as improvements/changes to, say, aiming might change what's viable and what's not. Keep in mind that the MD buff was a general client/server communication fix. The balance changes with uprising that broke the gun turned out to be pretty decent once it behaved in our living rooms as it did in CCPs office during testing.
We will most likely have to see a bunch of similar situations for years to come.
The question is if we can at least view the intended changes as a natural part of the game, a chance for players to shift the power balance, along with game balance. As i've pointed out in at least two of the linked posts, smarts and luck can allow even new players to get relevant in the game quicker if they adapt quickly to those changes.
Respecs allow competitive players to avoid suffering from outside factors and maintain their position, which i would consider good from their point of view. They also mean that nothing that is not full proto gets a chance to leave pub matches as vets will be more powerful in whater they deem worthy in an instant.
We effectively create an environment that doesn't punish good decisions punishes all but the best decisions. Even slight discrepancies from the optimal route make you useless since everybody else has aquired the optimal set of skills and gear through the last balance respec.
|
Malkai Inos
Opus Arcana Covert Intervention
918
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 23:05:00 -
[349] - Quote
LongLostLust wrote: Disagree on respecs voiding the rpg element. Warcraft is a rpg and has the ability to respec. The difference with war raft is you can cap out in a reasonable amount of time. Ie a limited amount of sp where as dust has a seemingly unlimited amount.
Honestly I do t tho I this is a game mechanic arguement as much as a business model one. Boosters are dusts form of a subscription. Respecs would eliminate the need for boosters after someone hits about 15mil sp. sadly there is just far more content in other games to keep one interested and in this game we get an endless grind.
Heaven forbid we could respec, change play styles completely and extend the fun of this game. Respecs are a form of content. It allows a heavy to play a proto scout when they are bored with the fatty.
Respecs allow you to change your SP distribution without any time delay or effort. This means that the way you spec is largely irrelevant since it's consequences (including negative) can be circumvented altoger.
Allocating made up numbers to made up nodes does not make it role playing. Making you play a role does.
|
Tech Ohm Eaven
L.O.T.I.S. RISE of LEGION
646
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 23:22:00 -
[350] - Quote
calvin b wrote:I understand how you feel. I also know that if CCP fails to offer a optional respec after all suits, weapons, and vehicles are released there will be a lot of unhappy players. Balance is needed, but lets be patient and wait for them to fix the current problems and release of all items. I say 6 months from now if not half of these items are not fixed, there may not be enough people left. You can only take so much before you throw your hands up. For example American cars, the auto industry thought they were invincible and kept making crap. Americans had enough of it and moved to Japanese built cars.
In the case of this game I put up with every bug and glitch from Developers closed beta until today.
I looked at the Tournament and my comment was:
No.
Then I looked at where they wanted me to participate in August and September.
And after looking at Mr. Realm, Mr. Saints and Mr. GTA V my comment was:
Hellll NOOOOO!!!
Looks fondly at PS4 pre-order. |
|
Heimdallr69
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
380
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 23:25:00 -
[351] - Quote
Should make a list of who is for respecs and who is not to show ccp what they should do...I'm for respecs now I wasnt a few days ago but zdubs and xmaple talke some since into me..very good points |
Malkai Inos
Opus Arcana Covert Intervention
923
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 23:31:00 -
[352] - Quote
Heimdallr69 wrote:Should make a list of who is for respecs and who is not to show ccp what they should do...I'm for respecs now I wasnt a few days ago but zdubs and xmaple talke some since into me..very good points Vethosis has a thread that lists pro posters and is regularly updated. And it's still CCPs game, not ours. I don't see why a poll, let alone one that only includes forum posters, should have any bearing on their busines and product development decisions. |
KING SALASI
MAJOR DISTRIBUTION
162
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 23:41:00 -
[353] - Quote
This game needs a respec option period. They need to code it in the game charge 40,000 aurum points. Sony makes money off the PSN cards and CCP makes money.
It will also make boosters even more valuable. The QQ on the forums goes way down, CCP can tweak like crazy and the playerbase doesn't have to suffer for it.
|
Cross Atu
Conspiratus Immortalis Covert Intervention
1341
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 23:52:00 -
[354] - Quote
Maple, bro, I love you but respecs are bad mojo in a persistent game. The impacts on the econ alone are very negative and the net result of unlimited respec is a harshly truncated lifespan for the game.
Now that being said there are some concerns which do need to be addressed, I believe this idea, is a good start on that road. Add in more frequent bonus SP events and some wise advanced planning (like focusing on passive skills first and avoiding all FotM builds) and you've got a pretty good solution which would at least heavily minimize the drawbacks of being invested into gear that has been nerfed.
Cheers, Cross
ps ~ A few highlights regarding the problems with respecs |
KING SALASI
MAJOR DISTRIBUTION
162
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 00:45:00 -
[355] - Quote
Bump |
Heimdallr69
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
383
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 00:56:00 -
[356] - Quote
Malkai Inos wrote:Heimdallr69 wrote:Should make a list of who is for respecs and who is not to show ccp what they should do...I'm for respecs now I wasnt a few days ago but zdubs and xmaple talke some since into me..very good points Vethosis has a thread that lists pro posters and is regularly updated. And it's still CCPs game, not ours. I don't see why a poll, let alone one that only includes forum posters, should have any bearing on their busines and product development decisions. That's why I said should never said they have to, just ment if they're debating on it a poll might help them and thanks for the poll ill go sign it |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
658
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 01:55:00 -
[357] - Quote
Cross Atu wrote:Maple, bro, I love you but respecs are bad mojo in a persistent game. The impacts on the econ alone are very negative and the net result of unlimited respec is a harshly truncated lifespan for the game. Now that being said there are some concerns which do need to be addressed, I believe this idea, is a good start on that road. Add in more frequent bonus SP events and some wise advanced planning (like focusing on passive skills first and avoiding all FotM builds) and you've got a pretty good solution which would at least heavily minimize the drawbacks of being invested into gear that has been nerfed. Cheers, Cross ps ~ A few highlights regarding the problems with respecs
Unlimmited respecs would be wrong, your absolutely right but it would be just as wrong to nerf classes and expect ppl to be okay with being a non factor for months. If there is ever a time or place for a respec it is to correct the mistake of screwing over peoples spent SP and classes that were good choices before the class changes. Dont ever give a regular respec, ever, whatever thats not what this thread is about. Its about providing a reason to play dust to the victims of useless classes due to nerf hammers. They are here now and will happen in the future |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1369
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 02:07:00 -
[358] - Quote
At this point maple... I think its best to just live with the state of the game until 1.5.
At which point we will probably get another respec, and if we're lucky the game will be halfway to balanced by then.
Its true 1.5 probably isn't due until late October though. So I suggest finding a new game until then. I'm currently working through my steam library right now.
Should have a solid month you can enjoy the game before PS4 releases.
So what I'm really saying.. is that anyone looking for a competitive fps should probably just quit now. |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
659
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 02:33:00 -
[359] - Quote
ZDub 303 wrote:At this point maple... I think its best to just live with the state of the game until 1.5.
At which point we will probably get another respec, and if we're lucky the game will be halfway to balanced by then.
Its true 1.5 probably isn't due until late October though. So I suggest finding a new game until then. I'm currently working through my steam library right now.
Should have a solid month you can enjoy the game before PS4 releases.
So what I'm really saying.. is that anyone looking for a competitive fps should probably just quit now.
sadly. Really sucks bcuz i like dust.... or at least i used to. The devs turned this game to poop sence chromosome and the playerbase turned full ****** sence open beta. Really unfortionet. Never thought ppl would be okay with being screwed over by the developers. smh |
ANON Illuminati
A.N.O.N.Y.M.O.U.S. League of Infamy
138
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 02:39:00 -
[360] - Quote
FOTM is a pain in the arse yes. but to respec everytime someone gets nerfed isnt the answer. instead ccp needs to stop the fotm and actually use the made and released model in game vs the players of the community and test it to see if its op. then decide if it needs balancing or nerfing then put it into game after its been tweaked out to the point that it is fair.
do i agree with a respec? no because 98% of people who spec'ed into the flaylock knew what it was and what it did. new players arent joining this community so everyone knew what it was. the excuse of i didnt know the logi or the flaylock was op is an excuse.
exmaple u a cool dude and i respect you but i do not agree with you on this and on a respec. this only gives people like me and you 15mill or 20 mill sp a chance to rain dominance and ruin fun times for the new players that are trying to creap into this game and it makes pc matches unbalanced because u got tryhards who use exploit tactics to win games rather then to actually use gun game.
|
|
The Robot Devil
BetaMax.
791
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 02:41:00 -
[361] - Quote
Grief PK wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:"There will always be FOTM chasers" They're called about 90% of the population of any given FPS, probably more in dust with the EVE "any advantage I can take" mentality.
That is what will destroy the game, you'll go from a myriad selection of suits, guns, and vehicles to one of each, kitted out exactly the same. Unless you want to outright lose every fight you're in since every time the balance changes, the majority of the game switches to whatever's OP. You can only dodge so many flaylock shots. I disagree, whole heartedly. I believe CCP should take a chance, if you are correct they will know within a month and change it back no harm done. If you are incorrect we could have a phenomenal new game on our hands.
That's what we need. CCP to remake the game again, try to rebalance again, read every respec and QQ balance thread again and be mocked by some armchair game developer again. We need a new game like we need a bigger blast radius on a flaylock.
Allowing respecs is not going to do anything for the game except cause more problems because the data from the previous day will change because I like a shotgun more today than yesterday. I still haven't heard one good reason - barring missing suits and vehicles - that warrants respecs. The reasons I see are usually short sighted and do not address the problems the game actually has.
Player retention is bad because this is not a game you can be l33t at in a day. The learning curve is steep and choices do effect how you play. Gamers are not used to the idea of persistence and it flies in the face of every other game fps players play. The grind mentality hurts the player base and causes burn out very quickly. Stagnation due to lack of content and low numbers. CCP does things differently when compared to the other game developers and it comes off as them ignoring us, not listening or general ineptness. Not one of these problems will be solved by giving back SP, we will be in the same spot in one month or less and I will have to thumb out this diatribe almost verbatim.
Play the game for fun and not for SP. Play the game you want to play and not for what is best. Don't grind. I know this sounds stupid but RP some because it does add to the experience. Come to the forums to provide feedback but don't let them pull you down under the bridge. PLAY OTHER GAMES because games are supposed to be fun not a source of stress.
|
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
659
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 03:04:00 -
[362] - Quote
ANON Illuminati wrote:FOTM is a pain in the arse yes. but to respec everytime someone gets nerfed isnt the answer. instead ccp needs to stop the fotm and actually use the made and released model in game vs the players of the community and test it to see if its op. then decide if it needs balancing or nerfing then put it into game after its been tweaked out to the point that it is fair.
do i agree with a respec? no because 98% of people who spec'ed into the flaylock knew what it was and what it did. new players arent joining this community so everyone knew what it was. the excuse of i didnt know the logi or the flaylock was op is an excuse.
exmaple u a cool dude and i respect you but i do not agree with you on this and on a respec. this only gives people like me and you 15mill or 20 mill sp a chance to rain dominance and ruin fun times for the new players that are trying to creap into this game and it makes pc matches unbalanced because u got tryhards who use exploit tactics to win games rather then to actually use gun game.
Its not all about the ppl who speced into FOTM, its about ppl who spec into a class and get nerfed to the point were they dont want to play anymore like heavys, lazers, dropships and tanks. Thats is a significant amount of players and more ppl quit each day because of this injustice. What other solution is there than respecs? wait 6 months for things to be balanced? |
Stands Alone
Ultramarine Corp
42
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 03:06:00 -
[363] - Quote
The Robot Devil wrote:Grief PK wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:"There will always be FOTM chasers" They're called about 90% of the population of any given FPS, probably more in dust with the EVE "any advantage I can take" mentality.
That is what will destroy the game, you'll go from a myriad selection of suits, guns, and vehicles to one of each, kitted out exactly the same. Unless you want to outright lose every fight you're in since every time the balance changes, the majority of the game switches to whatever's OP. You can only dodge so many flaylock shots. I disagree, whole heartedly. I believe CCP should take a chance, if you are correct they will know within a month and change it back no harm done. If you are incorrect we could have a phenomenal new game on our hands. That's what we need. CCP to remake the game again, try to rebalance again, read every respec and QQ balance thread again and be mocked by some armchair game developer again. We need a new game like we need a bigger blast radius on a flaylock. Allowing respecs is not going to do anything for the game except cause more problems because the data from the previous day will change because I like a shotgun more today than yesterday. I still haven't heard one good reason - barring missing suits and vehicles - that warrants respecs. The reasons I see are usually short sighted and do not address the problems the game actually has. Player retention is bad because this is not a game you can be l33t at in a day. The learning curve is steep and choices do effect how you play. Gamers are not used to the idea of persistence and it flies in the face of every other game fps players play. The grind mentality hurts the player base and causes burn out very quickly. Stagnation due to lack of content and low numbers. CCP does things differently when compared to the other game developers and it comes off as them ignoring us, not listening or general ineptness. Not one of these problems will be solved by giving back SP, we will be in the same spot in one month or less and I will have to thumb out this diatribe almost verbatim. Play the game for fun and not for SP. Play the game you want to play and not for what is best. Don't grind. I know this sounds stupid but RP some because it does add to the experience. Come to the forums to provide feedback but don't let them pull you down under the bridge. PLAY OTHER GAMES because games are supposed to be fun not a source of stress.
the game is never finished, therefore they can not remake it... since it is always being made... players either stick it out and adapt or they leave... i think CCP is giving its player base a crash course on the way new eden works on purpose. the ones that arent familiar with it have to learn sooner or later |
Stands Alone
Ultramarine Corp
42
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 03:07:00 -
[364] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:ANON Illuminati wrote:FOTM is a pain in the arse yes. but to respec everytime someone gets nerfed isnt the answer. instead ccp needs to stop the fotm and actually use the made and released model in game vs the players of the community and test it to see if its op. then decide if it needs balancing or nerfing then put it into game after its been tweaked out to the point that it is fair.
do i agree with a respec? no because 98% of people who spec'ed into the flaylock knew what it was and what it did. new players arent joining this community so everyone knew what it was. the excuse of i didnt know the logi or the flaylock was op is an excuse.
exmaple u a cool dude and i respect you but i do not agree with you on this and on a respec. this only gives people like me and you 15mill or 20 mill sp a chance to rain dominance and ruin fun times for the new players that are trying to creap into this game and it makes pc matches unbalanced because u got tryhards who use exploit tactics to win games rather then to actually use gun game.
Its not all about the ppl who speced into FOTM, its about ppl who spec into a class and get nerfed to the point were they dont want to play anymore like heavys, lazers, dropships and tanks. Thats is a significant amount of players and more ppl quit each day because of this injustice. What other solution is there than respecs? wait 6 months for things to be balanced?
i personally really like my dropships and lasers.... not to argue, but i dont see the problem with them |
Heathen Bastard
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
421
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 03:10:00 -
[365] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:ANON Illuminati wrote:FOTM is a pain in the arse yes. but to respec everytime someone gets nerfed isnt the answer. instead ccp needs to stop the fotm and actually use the made and released model in game vs the players of the community and test it to see if its op. then decide if it needs balancing or nerfing then put it into game after its been tweaked out to the point that it is fair.
do i agree with a respec? no because 98% of people who spec'ed into the flaylock knew what it was and what it did. new players arent joining this community so everyone knew what it was. the excuse of i didnt know the logi or the flaylock was op is an excuse.
exmaple u a cool dude and i respect you but i do not agree with you on this and on a respec. this only gives people like me and you 15mill or 20 mill sp a chance to rain dominance and ruin fun times for the new players that are trying to creap into this game and it makes pc matches unbalanced because u got tryhards who use exploit tactics to win games rather then to actually use gun game.
Its not all about the ppl who speced into FOTM, its about ppl who spec into a class and get nerfed to the point were they dont want to play anymore like heavys, lazers, dropships and tanks. Thats is a significant amount of players and more ppl quit each day because of this injustice. What other solution is there than respecs? wait 6 months for things to be balanced?
The solution is to live with it.
If your choices lack permanence, then they are meaningless. Notably you got this whole thing entirely ****ing wrong last time. I said it to mean that you should have to live with the choice you made. Permanently. If your choices aren't permanent, then they are meaningless. this does not mean that balance should be locked and stagnant. it means your choices, once locked in should be unchangeable. so you specced into something that was obviously OP and headed for nerf-city, full steam ahead? Now try to spec into something you actually like. |
Heimdallr69
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
385
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 03:16:00 -
[366] - Quote
Heathen Bastard wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:ANON Illuminati wrote:FOTM is a pain in the arse yes. but to respec everytime someone gets nerfed isnt the answer. instead ccp needs to stop the fotm and actually use the made and released model in game vs the players of the community and test it to see if its op. then decide if it needs balancing or nerfing then put it into game after its been tweaked out to the point that it is fair.
do i agree with a respec? no because 98% of people who spec'ed into the flaylock knew what it was and what it did. new players arent joining this community so everyone knew what it was. the excuse of i didnt know the logi or the flaylock was op is an excuse.
exmaple u a cool dude and i respect you but i do not agree with you on this and on a respec. this only gives people like me and you 15mill or 20 mill sp a chance to rain dominance and ruin fun times for the new players that are trying to creap into this game and it makes pc matches unbalanced because u got tryhards who use exploit tactics to win games rather then to actually use gun game.
Its not all about the ppl who speced into FOTM, its about ppl who spec into a class and get nerfed to the point were they dont want to play anymore like heavys, lazers, dropships and tanks. Thats is a significant amount of players and more ppl quit each day because of this injustice. What other solution is there than respecs? wait 6 months for things to be balanced? The solution is to live with it. If your choices lack permanence, then they are meaningless. Notably you got this whole thing entirely ****ing wrong last time. I said it to mean that you should have to live with the choice you made. Permanently. If your choices aren't permanent, then they are meaningless. this does not mean that balance should be locked and stagnant. it means your choices, once locked in should be unchangeable. so you specced into something that was obviously OP and headed for nerf-city, full steam ahead? Now try to spec into something you actually like. What about the **** that not out yet? Not our fault we had to choose something else because the amarr tanks arnt out yet and stuff like that..your basically telling all these players to wait till all the racials are out |
Heathen Bastard
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
422
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 03:19:00 -
[367] - Quote
Heimdallr69 wrote: What about the **** that not out yet? Not our fault we had to choose something else because the amarr tanks arnt out yet and stuff like that..your basically telling all these players to wait till all the racials are out
work your core skills and spec into a facsimile of what you want. then when you know it's coming out, stockpile your resources for a bit beforehand and immediately proto it. |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
661
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 03:19:00 -
[368] - Quote
Heathen Bastard wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:ANON Illuminati wrote:FOTM is a pain in the arse yes. but to respec everytime someone gets nerfed isnt the answer. instead ccp needs to stop the fotm and actually use the made and released model in game vs the players of the community and test it to see if its op. then decide if it needs balancing or nerfing then put it into game after its been tweaked out to the point that it is fair.
do i agree with a respec? no because 98% of people who spec'ed into the flaylock knew what it was and what it did. new players arent joining this community so everyone knew what it was. the excuse of i didnt know the logi or the flaylock was op is an excuse.
exmaple u a cool dude and i respect you but i do not agree with you on this and on a respec. this only gives people like me and you 15mill or 20 mill sp a chance to rain dominance and ruin fun times for the new players that are trying to creap into this game and it makes pc matches unbalanced because u got tryhards who use exploit tactics to win games rather then to actually use gun game.
Its not all about the ppl who speced into FOTM, its about ppl who spec into a class and get nerfed to the point were they dont want to play anymore like heavys, lazers, dropships and tanks. Thats is a significant amount of players and more ppl quit each day because of this injustice. What other solution is there than respecs? wait 6 months for things to be balanced? The solution is to live with it. If your choices lack permanence, then they are meaningless. Notably you got this whole thing entirely ****ing wrong last time. I said it to mean that you should have to live with the choice you made. Permanently. If your choices aren't permanent, then they are meaningless. this does not mean that balance should be locked and stagnant. it means your choices, once locked in should be unchangeable. so you specced into something that was obviously OP and headed for nerf-city, full steam ahead? Now try to spec into something you actually like.
They are not permante because CCP chances the classes your spend SP on. For example, heavys are good one day. The next day, your heavy is garbage and ppl seem not to care if your on their PC team. The only thing that is perminate is you are now stuck with a trash, UP classed and everyone is going to mop the floor with you because your class is nerfed. And "the solution is to live with it" are you serious? Its not about specing into something OP, FTOM. Its about having a class that is nerfed into uselessness and not wanting to play anymore, steamhead. Look at dropships this build, some ppl liked playing that class and now look at them, they are worthless. same as tanks. But they should just "live with it" for the next 6 months untill its finally balanced, right? they shouldent be respeced out of it so they have reason to play, is that what your saying? perminatly being Sheit no matter how you play your now ruined class? SHOULD that be perminate? |
Stands Alone
Ultramarine Corp
42
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 03:19:00 -
[369] - Quote
Heimdallr69 wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:ANON Illuminati wrote:FOTM is a pain in the arse yes. but to respec everytime someone gets nerfed isnt the answer. instead ccp needs to stop the fotm and actually use the made and released model in game vs the players of the community and test it to see if its op. then decide if it needs balancing or nerfing then put it into game after its been tweaked out to the point that it is fair.
do i agree with a respec? no because 98% of people who spec'ed into the flaylock knew what it was and what it did. new players arent joining this community so everyone knew what it was. the excuse of i didnt know the logi or the flaylock was op is an excuse.
exmaple u a cool dude and i respect you but i do not agree with you on this and on a respec. this only gives people like me and you 15mill or 20 mill sp a chance to rain dominance and ruin fun times for the new players that are trying to creap into this game and it makes pc matches unbalanced because u got tryhards who use exploit tactics to win games rather then to actually use gun game.
Its not all about the ppl who speced into FOTM, its about ppl who spec into a class and get nerfed to the point were they dont want to play anymore like heavys, lazers, dropships and tanks. Thats is a significant amount of players and more ppl quit each day because of this injustice. What other solution is there than respecs? wait 6 months for things to be balanced? The solution is to live with it. If your choices lack permanence, then they are meaningless. Notably you got this whole thing entirely ****ing wrong last time. I said it to mean that you should have to live with the choice you made. Permanently. If your choices aren't permanent, then they are meaningless. this does not mean that balance should be locked and stagnant. it means your choices, once locked in should be unchangeable. so you specced into something that was obviously OP and headed for nerf-city, full steam ahead? Now try to spec into something you actually like. What about the **** that not out yet? Not our fault we had to choose something else because the amarr tanks arnt out yet and stuff like that..your basically telling all these players to wait till all the racials are out
yup... just like the EVE players had to do for 10 years... |
Heimdallr69
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
386
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 03:21:00 -
[370] - Quote
Heathen Bastard wrote:Heimdallr69 wrote: What about the **** that not out yet? Not our fault we had to choose something else because the amarr tanks arnt out yet and stuff like that..your basically telling all these players to wait till all the racials are out
work your core skills and spec into a facsimile of what you want. then when you know it's coming out, stockpile your resources for a bit beforehand and immediately proto it. So then you gota run ****** ass gear tell it comes out...I disagree that's stupid...shouldn't even play till the gear comes out then |
|
Heimdallr69
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
386
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 03:22:00 -
[371] - Quote
Stands Alone wrote:Heimdallr69 wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:ANON Illuminati wrote:FOTM is a pain in the arse yes. but to respec everytime someone gets nerfed isnt the answer. instead ccp needs to stop the fotm and actually use the made and released model in game vs the players of the community and test it to see if its op. then decide if it needs balancing or nerfing then put it into game after its been tweaked out to the point that it is fair.
do i agree with a respec? no because 98% of people who spec'ed into the flaylock knew what it was and what it did. new players arent joining this community so everyone knew what it was. the excuse of i didnt know the logi or the flaylock was op is an excuse.
exmaple u a cool dude and i respect you but i do not agree with you on this and on a respec. this only gives people like me and you 15mill or 20 mill sp a chance to rain dominance and ruin fun times for the new players that are trying to creap into this game and it makes pc matches unbalanced because u got tryhards who use exploit tactics to win games rather then to actually use gun game.
Its not all about the ppl who speced into FOTM, its about ppl who spec into a class and get nerfed to the point were they dont want to play anymore like heavys, lazers, dropships and tanks. Thats is a significant amount of players and more ppl quit each day because of this injustice. What other solution is there than respecs? wait 6 months for things to be balanced? The solution is to live with it. If your choices lack permanence, then they are meaningless. Notably you got this whole thing entirely ****ing wrong last time. I said it to mean that you should have to live with the choice you made. Permanently. If your choices aren't permanent, then they are meaningless. this does not mean that balance should be locked and stagnant. it means your choices, once locked in should be unchangeable. so you specced into something that was obviously OP and headed for nerf-city, full steam ahead? Now try to spec into something you actually like. What about the **** that not out yet? Not our fault we had to choose something else because the amarr tanks arnt out yet and stuff like that..your basically telling all these players to wait till all the racials are out yup... just like the EVE players had to do for 10 years... This is DUST not eve... |
Stands Alone
Ultramarine Corp
42
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 03:23:00 -
[372] - Quote
Heimdallr69 wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:Heimdallr69 wrote: What about the **** that not out yet? Not our fault we had to choose something else because the amarr tanks arnt out yet and stuff like that..your basically telling all these players to wait till all the racials are out
work your core skills and spec into a facsimile of what you want. then when you know it's coming out, stockpile your resources for a bit beforehand and immediately proto it. So then you gota run ****** ass gear tell it comes out...I disagree that's stupid...shouldn't even play till the gear comes out then
militia gear with tons of SP into core skills is actually pretty insane |
Heathen Bastard
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
422
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 03:24:00 -
[373] - Quote
Heimdallr69 wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:Heimdallr69 wrote: What about the **** that not out yet? Not our fault we had to choose something else because the amarr tanks arnt out yet and stuff like that..your basically telling all these players to wait till all the racials are out
work your core skills and spec into a facsimile of what you want. then when you know it's coming out, stockpile your resources for a bit beforehand and immediately proto it. So then you gota run ****** ass gear tell it comes out...I disagree that's stupid...shouldn't even play till the gear comes out then
really? there isn't an armor tank in the game yet? somebody tell the gallente guys they're supposed to be running shield mods then.
did I say use **** gear? no, I said spec into a facsimile(amarr? use gallente., minmatar? use caldari.) and work your core skills, these get you the things you really need,(your tank, your modules, etc etc) |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
661
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 03:24:00 -
[374] - Quote
Stands Alone wrote:Heimdallr69 wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:Heimdallr69 wrote: What about the **** that not out yet? Not our fault we had to choose something else because the amarr tanks arnt out yet and stuff like that..your basically telling all these players to wait till all the racials are out
work your core skills and spec into a facsimile of what you want. then when you know it's coming out, stockpile your resources for a bit beforehand and immediately proto it. So then you gota run ****** ass gear tell it comes out...I disagree that's stupid...shouldn't even play till the gear comes out then militia gear with tons of SP into core skills is actually pretty insane
Your saying... you would take milita gear into a PC/FW match? Or against a good team in a pub? wow. Dust is done |
Stands Alone
Ultramarine Corp
42
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 03:25:00 -
[375] - Quote
Heimdallr69 wrote:Stands Alone wrote:Heimdallr69 wrote: What about the **** that not out yet? Not our fault we had to choose something else because the amarr tanks arnt out yet and stuff like that..your basically telling all these players to wait till all the racials are out
yup... just like the EVE players had to do for 10 years... This is DUST not eve...
made by CCP... dont expect it to be that much different... |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
661
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 03:26:00 -
[376] - Quote
Heathen Bastard wrote:Heimdallr69 wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:Heimdallr69 wrote: What about the **** that not out yet? Not our fault we had to choose something else because the amarr tanks arnt out yet and stuff like that..your basically telling all these players to wait till all the racials are out
work your core skills and spec into a facsimile of what you want. then when you know it's coming out, stockpile your resources for a bit beforehand and immediately proto it. So then you gota run ****** ass gear tell it comes out...I disagree that's stupid...shouldn't even play till the gear comes out then really? there isn't an armor tank in the game yet? somebody tell the gallente guys they're supposed to be running shield mods then. did I say use **** gear? no, I said spec into a facsimile(amarr? use gallente., minmatar? use caldari.) and work your core skills, these get you the things you really need,(your tank, your modules, etc etc)
Working your core skills is not going to turn your class around for the next 6 months. In fact, the 15 mill SP you have prolly maxed them out. When your class is nerfed it doesent matter if their maxed or untouched, you loose. Thats all there is. Loosing your suits and vehicals |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
661
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 03:27:00 -
[377] - Quote
Stands Alone wrote:Heimdallr69 wrote:Stands Alone wrote:Heimdallr69 wrote: What about the **** that not out yet? Not our fault we had to choose something else because the amarr tanks arnt out yet and stuff like that..your basically telling all these players to wait till all the racials are out
yup... just like the EVE players had to do for 10 years... This is DUST not eve... made by CCP... dont expect it to be that much different...
This is an FPS were it matters if your suck on your 16 man team, its way different than space boats shooting each other |
Stands Alone
Ultramarine Corp
42
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 03:27:00 -
[378] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:Stands Alone wrote:Heimdallr69 wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:Heimdallr69 wrote: What about the **** that not out yet? Not our fault we had to choose something else because the amarr tanks arnt out yet and stuff like that..your basically telling all these players to wait till all the racials are out
work your core skills and spec into a facsimile of what you want. then when you know it's coming out, stockpile your resources for a bit beforehand and immediately proto it. So then you gota run ****** ass gear tell it comes out...I disagree that's stupid...shouldn't even play till the gear comes out then militia gear with tons of SP into core skills is actually pretty insane Your saying... you would take milita gear into a PC/FW match? Or against a good team in a pub? wow. Dust is done
if you dont want to. then you better choose your SP wisely... |
Stands Alone
Ultramarine Corp
44
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 03:29:00 -
[379] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:Stands Alone wrote:Heimdallr69 wrote:Stands Alone wrote:Heimdallr69 wrote: What about the **** that not out yet? Not our fault we had to choose something else because the amarr tanks arnt out yet and stuff like that..your basically telling all these players to wait till all the racials are out
yup... just like the EVE players had to do for 10 years... This is DUST not eve... made by CCP... dont expect it to be that much different... This is an FPS were it matters if your suck on your 16 man team, its way different than space boats shooting each other
well thats the nature of the game... if you dont like it, then dont pay money.... its free |
Heathen Bastard
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
423
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 03:29:00 -
[380] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:Heimdallr69 wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:Heimdallr69 wrote: What about the **** that not out yet? Not our fault we had to choose something else because the amarr tanks arnt out yet and stuff like that..your basically telling all these players to wait till all the racials are out
work your core skills and spec into a facsimile of what you want. then when you know it's coming out, stockpile your resources for a bit beforehand and immediately proto it. So then you gota run ****** ass gear tell it comes out...I disagree that's stupid...shouldn't even play till the gear comes out then really? there isn't an armor tank in the game yet? somebody tell the gallente guys they're supposed to be running shield mods then. did I say use **** gear? no, I said spec into a facsimile(amarr? use gallente., minmatar? use caldari.) and work your core skills, these get you the things you really need,(your tank, your modules, etc etc) Working your core skills is not going to turn your class around for the next 6 months. In fact, the 15 mill SP you have prolly maxed them out. When your class is nerfed it doesent matter if their maxed or untouched, you loose. Thats all there is. Loosing your suits and vehicals
Neither is bitching on the forums for something that's not going to happen. Guess what? shield and missile tanker. I have to out play everything under the sun just to not ****ing die if someone looks at me too hard. See me bawling my eyes out and crying to mommy for a respec? **** NO. I made my choice. I live with it's consequences. Why can't you? |
|
KING SALASI
MAJOR DISTRIBUTION
165
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 03:32:00 -
[381] - Quote
ANON Illuminati wrote:FOTM is a pain in the arse yes. but to respec everytime someone gets nerfed isnt the answer. instead ccp needs to stop the fotm and actually use the made and released model in game vs the players of the community and test it to see if its op. then decide if it needs balancing or nerfing then put it into game after its been tweaked out to the point that it is fair.
do i agree with a respec? no because 98% of people who spec'ed into the flaylock knew what it was and what it did. new players arent joining this community so everyone knew what it was. the excuse of i didnt know the logi or the flaylock was op is an excuse.
exmaple u a cool dude and i respect you but i do not agree with you on this and on a respec. this only gives people like me and you 15mill or 20 mill sp a chance to rain dominance and ruin fun times for the new players that are trying to creap into this game and it makes pc matches unbalanced because u got tryhards who use exploit tactics to win games rather then to actually use gun game.
Too late new players bounced see grinding for 3 mill sp was cute, it's no longer cute. When a game becomes a 2nd job rather than being fun it's doimed. Repecs keep the game fresh and fun.
It also buys CCP time to tweak, and make Money off the respecs. Nope they want ti carry the Eve mantra will not work on console players.
I love EVE one of the best video games ever made i have fun. Dust is not Eve it's a 2nd job and i already have demanding job.
Hence why i play video games to relax and keyword have FUN.
Stick with no respecs and have fun with little bit players you have.
Next up will be merging the servers due to low player counts to save money. |
Heimdallr69
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
386
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 03:34:00 -
[382] - Quote
Neither is bitching on the forums for something that's not going to happen. Guess what? shield and missile tanker. I have to out play everything under the sun just to not ****ing die if someone looks at me too hard. See me bawling my eyes out and crying to mommy for a respec? **** NO. I made my choice. I live with it's consequences. Why can't you?[/quote] Im happy with my choices I just think there should be respecs not often but still some |
Heathen Bastard
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
424
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 03:40:00 -
[383] - Quote
why? what is the point of saying your choices matter when those choices can just be changed on a whim? |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
662
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 03:47:00 -
[384] - Quote
Working your core skills is not going to turn your class around for the next 6 months. In fact, the 15 mill SP you have prolly maxed them out. When your class is nerfed it doesent matter if their maxed or untouched, you loose. Thats all there is. Loosing your suits and vehicals[/quote]
Neither is bitching on the forums for something that's not going to happen. Guess what? shield and missile tanker. I have to out play everything under the sun just to not ****ing die if someone looks at me too hard. See me bawling my eyes out and crying to mommy for a respec? **** NO. I made my choice. I live with it's consequences. Why can't you?[/quote]
SO MAD!! x) Im a sheild tanker too and i have missles as well. Thats the diffrence between you and me (besides your a dumbass scrub) your fine with sucking at this game, being a non factor and not being included in PC because ppl know very well that you will not pull your weight, that you will not contribute to a winning team, that you are a worthless trash player who amounts to nothing. All becuase you play a class nerfed by CCP |
Stands Alone
Ultramarine Corp
44
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 03:48:00 -
[385] - Quote
KING SALASI wrote:ANON Illuminati wrote:FOTM is a pain in the arse yes. but to respec everytime someone gets nerfed isnt the answer. instead ccp needs to stop the fotm and actually use the made and released model in game vs the players of the community and test it to see if its op. then decide if it needs balancing or nerfing then put it into game after its been tweaked out to the point that it is fair.
do i agree with a respec? no because 98% of people who spec'ed into the flaylock knew what it was and what it did. new players arent joining this community so everyone knew what it was. the excuse of i didnt know the logi or the flaylock was op is an excuse.
exmaple u a cool dude and i respect you but i do not agree with you on this and on a respec. this only gives people like me and you 15mill or 20 mill sp a chance to rain dominance and ruin fun times for the new players that are trying to creap into this game and it makes pc matches unbalanced because u got tryhards who use exploit tactics to win games rather then to actually use gun game.
Too late new players bounced see grinding for 3 mill sp was cute, it's no longer cute. When a game becomes a 2nd job rather than being fun it's doimed. Repecs keep the game fresh and fun. It also buys CCP time to tweak, and make Money off the respecs. Nope they want ti carry the Eve mantra will not work on console players. I love EVE one of the best video games ever made i have fun. Dust is not Eve it's a 2nd job and i already have demanding job. Hence why i play video games to relax and keyword have FUN. Stick with no respecs and have fun with little bit players you have. Next up will be merging the servers due to low player counts to save money.
works for me.... just asked most of the channels im in... majority said they dont mind it... sooo... we will miss those who quit... and will see you after BF4 gets old
|
Heathen Bastard
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
425
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 03:52:00 -
[386] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:
SO MAD!! x) Im a sheild tanker too and i have missles as well. Thats the diffrence between you and me (besides your a dumbass scrub) your fine with sucking at this game, being a non factor and not being included in PC because ppl know very well that you will not pull your weight, that you will not contribute to a winning team, that you are a worthless trash player who amounts to nothing, as evident by your npc corp. All becuase you play a class nerfed by CCP
The other difference is that I can spell properly and I don't spend my time bitching about things that won't change. I ***** about things that are being changed, but are moving too slowly for my tastes. And again, being forced to play better because I work against more while using less does come with advantages. |
Heimdallr69
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
387
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 03:53:00 -
[387] - Quote
Stands Alone wrote:KING SALASI wrote:ANON Illuminati wrote:FOTM is a pain in the arse yes. but to respec everytime someone gets nerfed isnt the answer. instead ccp needs to stop the fotm and actually use the made and released model in game vs the players of the community and test it to see if its op. then decide if it needs balancing or nerfing then put it into game after its been tweaked out to the point that it is fair.
do i agree with a respec? no because 98% of people who spec'ed into the flaylock knew what it was and what it did. new players arent joining this community so everyone knew what it was. the excuse of i didnt know the logi or the flaylock was op is an excuse.
exmaple u a cool dude and i respect you but i do not agree with you on this and on a respec. this only gives people like me and you 15mill or 20 mill sp a chance to rain dominance and ruin fun times for the new players that are trying to creap into this game and it makes pc matches unbalanced because u got tryhards who use exploit tactics to win games rather then to actually use gun game.
Too late new players bounced see grinding for 3 mill sp was cute, it's no longer cute. When a game becomes a 2nd job rather than being fun it's doimed. Repecs keep the game fresh and fun. It also buys CCP time to tweak, and make Money off the respecs. Nope they want ti carry the Eve mantra will not work on console players. I love EVE one of the best video games ever made i have fun. Dust is not Eve it's a 2nd job and i already have demanding job. Hence why i play video games to relax and keyword have FUN. Stick with no respecs and have fun with little bit players you have. Next up will be merging the servers due to low player counts to save money. works for me.... just asked most of the channels im in... majority said they dont mind it... sooo... we will miss those who quit... and will see you after BF4 gets old A complete game where you unlock things as you level so your not limited to one role, you don't have a cap and is on ps4..every game gets old after a while just as dust has |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
663
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 04:07:00 -
[388] - Quote
Heathen Bastard wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:
SO MAD!! x) Im a sheild tanker too and i have missles as well. Thats the diffrence between you and me (besides your a dumbass scrub) your fine with sucking at this game, being a non factor and not being included in PC because ppl know very well that you will not pull your weight, that you will not contribute to a winning team, that you are a worthless trash player who amounts to nothing, as evident by your npc corp. All becuase you play a class nerfed by CCP
The other difference is that I can spell properly and I don't spend my time bitching about things that won't change. I ***** about things that are being changed, but are moving too slowly for my tastes. And again, being forced to play better because I work against more while using less does come with advantages.
The other other difference is how butthurt you are x) you dont even have a corp how can you play better? who even are you?? Besides, it doesent matter if you use more advanced tactics or play better, you play a nerfed and worthless class. You suck no matter what. Respecs would help you out, bro. Prolly even get a corp too P: doesent matter if i cant spell or not. Iknow what im talking about, call it bitching if you want. Your jus mad |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1372
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 04:19:00 -
[389] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:They are not permante because CCP chances the classes your spend SP on.
This... we're not at a point where there is permanence in your decisions, as the classes change all of the time.
And there is a distinct difference between enjoying your time as a non factor in an npc corp derping in pub matches and wanting to be an integral part of a corp participating in high level corp matches.
I'm seriously starting to think... if you play competitively, you're best off just quitting. Maybe come back in a year or two once its on the PS4 and somewhat balanced with most of the missing basic content finally added in. By then im sure a respec will have been issue, and you can come back to 30-40 million unallocated SP.
Let the faithful non factors beta test the content |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
664
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 04:26:00 -
[390] - Quote
ZDub 303 wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:They are not permante because CCP chances the classes your spend SP on. This... we're not at a point where there is permanence in your decisions, as the classes change all of the time. And there is a distinct difference between enjoying your time as a non factor in an npc corp derping in pub matches and wanting to be an integral part of a corp participating in high level corp matches. I'm seriously starting to think... if you play competitively, you're best off just quitting. Maybe come back in a year or two once its on the PS4 and somewhat balanced with most of the missing basic content finally added in. By then im sure a respec will have been issue, and you can come back to 30-40 million unallocated SP.
yeah your right. Why play now when your getting screwed over when you can be rewarded for not playing at all and come back later? deffenetly how dust is supposed to be played. Its sad that CCP is endorsing this way of thinking by nerfing the classes we play so we cant win, and forcing us to stay in them for months. A shame, i once enjoyed dust. back when i was good... btw check out my post were i qouted that dude above yours. Hes prolly off crying somewere |
|
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1373
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 04:30:00 -
[391] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:They are not permante because CCP chances the classes your spend SP on. This... we're not at a point where there is permanence in your decisions, as the classes change all of the time. And there is a distinct difference between enjoying your time as a non factor in an npc corp derping in pub matches and wanting to be an integral part of a corp participating in high level corp matches. I'm seriously starting to think... if you play competitively, you're best off just quitting. Maybe come back in a year or two once its on the PS4 and somewhat balanced with most of the missing basic content finally added in. By then im sure a respec will have been issue, and you can come back to 30-40 million unallocated SP. yeah your right. Why play now when your getting screwed over when you can be rewarded for not playing at all and come back later? deffenetly how dust is supposed to be played. Its sad that CCP is endorsing this way of thinking by nerfing the classes we play so we cant win, and forcing us to stay in them for months. A shame, i once enjoyed dust. back when i was good... btw check out my post were i qouted that dude above yours. Hes prolly off crying somewere
Let the faithful non factors beta test the content
Dude, some of the people in this thread are drinking some major koolaid.
Its cool though, Titanfall and BF4 will be out soon. I'll have FF14 to keep me occupied until then.
Then hopefully TESO will be good too. We've got a bright, clean, non dusty future to look forward to! |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
666
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 04:33:00 -
[392] - Quote
ZDub 303 wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:They are not permante because CCP chances the classes your spend SP on. This... we're not at a point where there is permanence in your decisions, as the classes change all of the time. And there is a distinct difference between enjoying your time as a non factor in an npc corp derping in pub matches and wanting to be an integral part of a corp participating in high level corp matches. I'm seriously starting to think... if you play competitively, you're best off just quitting. Maybe come back in a year or two once its on the PS4 and somewhat balanced with most of the missing basic content finally added in. By then im sure a respec will have been issue, and you can come back to 30-40 million unallocated SP. yeah your right. Why play now when your getting screwed over when you can be rewarded for not playing at all and come back later? deffenetly how dust is supposed to be played. Its sad that CCP is endorsing this way of thinking by nerfing the classes we play so we cant win, and forcing us to stay in them for months. A shame, i once enjoyed dust. back when i was good... btw check out my post were i qouted that dude above yours. Hes prolly off crying somewere Let the faithful non factors beta test the content Dude, some of the people in this thread are drinking some major koolaid. Its cool though, Titanfall and BF4 will be out soon. I'll have FF14 to keep me occupied until then. Then hopefully TESO will be good too. We've got a bright, clean, non dusty future to look forward to!
One were we dont have to put up with the Tards of New Eden and dont get bullied by devs! Im waiten for planetside. Its obvious dust will not survive when the big bois come out to play.. with us ;) |
Tallen Ellecon
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
354
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 05:43:00 -
[393] - Quote
Spec into what you love using, but first ask yourself,
"Do I love this setup because I kill a lot of people, or do I love this setup because I'd have fun even if it kept me from being the deadliest shot on the field?"
Invest in core skills, and you'll never go wrong. |
dustwaffle
Gravity Prone EoN.
252
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 05:48:00 -
[394] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:yeah your right. Why play now when your getting screwed over when you can be rewarded for not playing at all and come back later? deffenetly how dust is supposed to be played. Its sad that CCP is endorsing this way of thinking by nerfing the classes we play so we cant win, and forcing us to stay in them for months. A shame, i once enjoyed dust. back when i was good... btw check out my post were i qouted that dude above yours. Hes prolly off crying somewere
Exmaple Core wrote:. A shame, i once enjoyed dust. back when i was good... So you need a respec to be good again?
By the way, what's with all the needless hostility? Your posts were OK up until you started ranting. This kind of behaviour is just going to get the thread locked for ranting and CCP will not bother reading this. |
dustwaffle
Gravity Prone EoN.
253
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 05:53:00 -
[395] - Quote
Tallen Ellecon wrote:Spec into what you love using, but first ask yourself,
"Do I love this setup because I kill a lot of people, or do I love this setup because I'd have fun even if it kept me from being the deadliest shot on the field?"
Invest in core skills, and you'll never go wrong. I think that's the difference in mentality between so-called 'competitive' and 'casual' players.
The 'video games are serious business and a second job' types want something that let's you kill lots of people, as that's the source of their fun.
The 'it's just a game, I'll play it to have fun and if I stop having fun I'll do something else' types are the ones that choose something that they have fun playing.
The difference in mentality is that some people can only have fun when they win (carebears) and some people just have fun throughout the process. Hence why EVE is being infested with carebears who do nothing but shoot red NPC crosses all day, since shooting other players present a risk of not doing well.
Dust can and SHOULD cater to both crowds. BUT, it should not PANDER to either of them. |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
667
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 05:54:00 -
[396] - Quote
dustwaffle wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:yeah your right. Why play now when your getting screwed over when you can be rewarded for not playing at all and come back later? deffenetly how dust is supposed to be played. Its sad that CCP is endorsing this way of thinking by nerfing the classes we play so we cant win, and forcing us to stay in them for months. A shame, i once enjoyed dust. back when i was good... btw check out my post were i qouted that dude above yours. Hes prolly off crying somewere Exmaple Core wrote:. A shame, i once enjoyed dust. back when i was good... So you need a respec to be good again? By the way, what's with all the needless hostility? Your posts were OK up until you started ranting. This kind of behaviour is just going to get the thread locked for ranting and CCP will not bother reading this.
Only lashed out because he directly insulted me and sent the personal attacks first when i was being reasonable. But yeah, kinda. Im a good sheild tanker but tanks are worthless and shield tanks are the worst kind of tanks. So im not really that good. If i was something other than a shield tank than yeah, itd be pretty terrorfing like i used to be and i would enjoy playing dust again. A respec would really turn things around |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
667
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 05:55:00 -
[397] - Quote
dustwaffle wrote:Tallen Ellecon wrote:Spec into what you love using, but first ask yourself,
"Do I love this setup because I kill a lot of people, or do I love this setup because I'd have fun even if it kept me from being the deadliest shot on the field?"
Invest in core skills, and you'll never go wrong. I think that's the difference in mentality between so-called 'competitive' and 'casual' players. The 'video games are serious business and a second job' types want something that let's you kill lots of people, as that's the source of their fun. The 'it's just a game, I'll play it to have fun and if I stop having fun I'll do something else' types are the ones that choose something that they have fun playing. The difference in mentality is that some people can only have fun when they win (carebears) and some people just have fun throughout the process. Hence why EVE is being infested with carebears who do nothing but shoot red NPC crosses all day, since shooting other players present a risk of not doing well. Dust can and SHOULD cater to both crowds. BUT, it should not PANDER to either of them. very well said. abit off topic, but well said none the less. +1 |
Heathen Bastard
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
426
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 05:58:00 -
[398] - Quote
Guess I fall into the "I already have two jobs, why do I need three" crowd. I don't need to be the best as I play a specialized role to my friends. "that psychopath who can occasionally break a siege on nothing but flanking, a militia shotgun, and pure, batshit insanity." |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
669
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 06:20:00 -
[399] - Quote
Heathen Bastard wrote:Guess I fall into the "I already have two jobs, why do I need three" crowd. I don't need to be the best as I play a specialized role to my friends. "that psychopath who can occasionally break a siege on nothing but flanking, a militia shotgun, and pure, batshit insanity."
EDIT: See Maple, you don't want a respec to try something new, you just want it to you can stomp in the current "best" version of what you do already. FOTM chasing. When tanks get nerfed again in 6 months(since they're taking out the bug that makes armor tanks repair ultra-fast SOONtm) Will you be demanding another respec so you can switch back to shields since they will have a slight edge then?
Please point out were i said im after the "current best version" of anything? Im after classes i can compete in and enjoy at the same time, i cant do that in a class that gets blown up by everything in the game and cost me all my isk, because my class sucks. Do i win? yeah, sometimes but i loose even more often than that, being held back by a class that was nerfed. Blowing up and loosing over and over is not a class i can win with, or enjoy. In fact, if i could respec i would switch back into the scout shotty. Its not the best class in the world but im good with it, i enjoy it and most importantly, it is balanced enough to compete. I could enjoy dust again if i was able to play a class that has the ability to compete and something i like. Same gos for pretty much everyone |
Zatara Rought
TeamPlayers EoN.
583
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 06:30:00 -
[400] - Quote
Honestly, if you'd saved your sp since you specced into tanks and started saving almost what 2 months ago...you could have made 5 mill sp in that time, enough sp to run a protosuit and protoweapon and be competitive. I rather miss you out of tanks and in that lol caldari logi you used to run so well. |
|
Heathen Bastard
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
426
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 06:34:00 -
[401] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:Guess I fall into the "I already have two jobs, why do I need three" crowd. I don't need to be the best as I play a specialized role to my friends. "that psychopath who can occasionally break a siege on nothing but flanking, a militia shotgun, and pure, batshit insanity."
EDIT: See Maple, you don't want a respec to try something new, you just want it to you can stomp in the current "best" version of what you do already. FOTM chasing. When tanks get nerfed again in 6 months(since they're taking out the bug that makes armor tanks repair ultra-fast SOONtm) Will you be demanding another respec so you can switch back to shields since they will have a slight edge then? Please point out were i said im after the "current best version" of anything? Im after classes i can compete in and enjoy at the same time, i cant do that in a class that gets blown up by everything in the game and cost me all my isk, because my class sucks. Do i win? yeah, sometimes but i loose even more often than that, being held back by a class that was nerfed. Blowing up and loosing over and over is not a class i can win with, or enjoy. In fact, if i could respec i would switch back into the scout shotty. Its not the best class in the world but im good with it, i enjoy it and most importantly, it is balanced enough to compete. I could enjoy dust again if i was able to play a class that has the ability to compete and something i like. Same gos for pretty much everyone
Okay, this is just annoying me, the word is losing. Not loosing. For god's sake, it makes me want to brain someone with a soup spoon every single time I see anyone type that.
You don't enjoy it because you lose. You want to spec into something you can win with. I believe in keeping with the design of the game and having your choices matter. We are at odds, and you keep insulting me for supporting the dev's position of no more respecs, resets, or whatever else you would like to term it.
Are you sure you're good with it? Or are you remembering the borked hit detection that was the only thing that kept people from shredding you? They mostly fixed the close range hit detection.
I don't need to be "competitive" seeing as competitive means playing this as a job, and playing something that's needed, not fun. As I mentioned earlier, I have two jobs already, and do not need a third. You seem to support doing this as such, and I would suggest just getting a job, they pay better than playing video games all day. |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
669
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 06:36:00 -
[402] - Quote
Zatara Rought wrote:Honestly, if you'd saved your sp since you specced into tanks and started saving almost what 2 months ago...you could have made 5 mill sp in that time, enough sp to run a protosuit and protoweapon and be competitive. I rather miss you out of tanks and in that lol caldari logi you used to run so well.
you must have the wrong person, i never went cal logi, ive always been heavy, scout or tank. If i wouldve saved all my SP then i would never have been playing because i wouldent have any gear... lol. Thats a crazy suggestion, if i have no spent SP then i wouldent be in PC or having fun in dust. Waiting to play video games is not how you play video games... |
Zatara Rought
TeamPlayers EoN.
583
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 06:41:00 -
[403] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:Zatara Rought wrote:Honestly, if you'd saved your sp since you specced into tanks and started saving almost what 2 months ago...you could have made 5 mill sp in that time, enough sp to run a protosuit and protoweapon and be competitive. I rather miss you out of tanks and in that lol caldari logi you used to run so well. you must have the wrong person, i never went cal logi, ive always been heavy, scout or tank. If i wouldve saved all my SP then i would never have been playing because i wouldent have any gear... lol. Thats a crazy suggestion, if i have no spent SP then i wouldent be in PC or having fun in dust. Waiting to play video games is not how you play video games...
Hmmm..
I coulda sworn I have video's of you post uprising in a yellow suit with a shotgun and core locus owning fools. But anyhoo
You mentioned to me when you got your respec you put 14.4 mill sp into tanks. I had about 13.5 at the time. I now have 19.8 mill sp. What i'm suggesting is that you've been complaining about this for 2 months since you got the respec, why haven't you saved the about 6 mill potential and placed it into a different role? You failed to understand the intent of my first post so I hope this one clarifies it. ^_^ |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
669
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 06:43:00 -
[404] - Quote
Heathen Bastard wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:Guess I fall into the "I already have two jobs, why do I need three" crowd. I don't need to be the best as I play a specialized role to my friends. "that psychopath who can occasionally break a siege on nothing but flanking, a militia shotgun, and pure, batshit insanity."
EDIT: See Maple, you don't want a respec to try something new, you just want it to you can stomp in the current "best" version of what you do already. FOTM chasing. When tanks get nerfed again in 6 months(since they're taking out the bug that makes armor tanks repair ultra-fast SOONtm) Will you be demanding another respec so you can switch back to shields since they will have a slight edge then? Please point out were i said im after the "current best version" of anything? Im after classes i can compete in and enjoy at the same time, i cant do that in a class that gets blown up by everything in the game and cost me all my isk, because my class sucks. Do i win? yeah, sometimes but i loose even more often than that, being held back by a class that was nerfed. Blowing up and loosing over and over is not a class i can win with, or enjoy. In fact, if i could respec i would switch back into the scout shotty. Its not the best class in the world but im good with it, i enjoy it and most importantly, it is balanced enough to compete. I could enjoy dust again if i was able to play a class that has the ability to compete and something i like. Same gos for pretty much everyone Okay, this is just annoying me, the word is losing. Not loosing. For god's sake, it makes me want to brain someone with a soup spoon every single time I see anyone type that. You don't enjoy it because you lose. You want to spec into something you can win with. I believe in keeping with the design of the game and having your choices matter. We are at odds, and you keep insulting me for supporting the dev's position of no more respecs, resets, or whatever else you would like to term it. Are you sure you're good with it? Or are you remembering the borked hit detection that was the only thing that kept people from shredding you? They mostly fixed the close range hit detection. I don't need to be "competitive" seeing as competitive means playing this as a job, and playing something that's needed, not fun. As I mentioned earlier, I have two jobs already, and do not need a third. You seem to support doing this as such, and I would suggest just getting a job, they pay better than playing video games all day.
Lol you insulted me first, i was defending my name and i apologize if you think otherwise but its up there in the posts. You dont need to be competitive but the nature of the game is competitive, this game is all about owning ppl to get money to continue owning ppl and taking ppls territory in PC, this is a very competitive game and the vast majority of players play it as intended. Nerfing classes to the point were they are not competitive and keeping ppl in that state does not bode well with the spirit of the game or the players who are robbed of their enjoyment. I actually already run around with a proto basic scout wiht some milita gear on it and im doing fine because it is mostly a competive fit because it is a more reasonably balanced and un nerfed class. Im doing awright, could do better if i had more SP so i could get out of milita gear.... respec |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
669
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 06:46:00 -
[405] - Quote
Zatara Rought wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:Zatara Rought wrote:Honestly, if you'd saved your sp since you specced into tanks and started saving almost what 2 months ago...you could have made 5 mill sp in that time, enough sp to run a protosuit and protoweapon and be competitive. I rather miss you out of tanks and in that lol caldari logi you used to run so well. you must have the wrong person, i never went cal logi, ive always been heavy, scout or tank. If i wouldve saved all my SP then i would never have been playing because i wouldent have any gear... lol. Thats a crazy suggestion, if i have no spent SP then i wouldent be in PC or having fun in dust. Waiting to play video games is not how you play video games... Hmmm.. I coulda sworn I have video's of you post uprising in a yellow suit with a shotgun and core locus owning fools. But anyhoo You mentioned to me when you got your respec you put 14.4 mill sp into tanks. I had about 13.5 at the time. I now have 19.8 mill sp. What i'm suggesting is that you've been complaining about this for 2 months since you got the respec, why haven't you saved the about 6 mill potential and placed it into a different role? You failed to understand the intent of my first post so I hope this one clarifies it. ^_^
No you do not sir, post the videos up and you will see me as a scout shotty P: because i dumped another 2 mill SP into that poor excuse of a tank and then i started specing into heavy so i could have a hardy fit to protect my tank were it was needed. sence then ive been skilling back into scout and i jus now got my proto basic suit with a few core skills. If i could respec i would get out of this half track and play a class i enjoy and effectively compete in |
Zatara Rought
TeamPlayers EoN.
583
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 06:51:00 -
[406] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:Zatara Rought wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:Zatara Rought wrote:Honestly, if you'd saved your sp since you specced into tanks and started saving almost what 2 months ago...you could have made 5 mill sp in that time, enough sp to run a protosuit and protoweapon and be competitive. I rather miss you out of tanks and in that lol caldari logi you used to run so well. you must have the wrong person, i never went cal logi, ive always been heavy, scout or tank. If i wouldve saved all my SP then i would never have been playing because i wouldent have any gear... lol. Thats a crazy suggestion, if i have no spent SP then i wouldent be in PC or having fun in dust. Waiting to play video games is not how you play video games... Hmmm.. I coulda sworn I have video's of you post uprising in a yellow suit with a shotgun and core locus owning fools. But anyhoo You mentioned to me when you got your respec you put 14.4 mill sp into tanks. I had about 13.5 at the time. I now have 19.8 mill sp. What i'm suggesting is that you've been complaining about this for 2 months since you got the respec, why haven't you saved the about 6 mill potential and placed it into a different role? You failed to understand the intent of my first post so I hope this one clarifies it. ^_^ No you do not sir, post the videos up and you will see me as a scout shotty P: because i dumped another 2 mill SP into that poor excuse of a tank and then i started specing into heavy so i could have a hardy fit to protect my tank were it was needed. sence then ive been skilling back into scout and i jus now got my proto basic suit with a few core skills
Welp, good luck! Yeah, I'd have had a nice protosuit with 6 mill sp...keep trucking it dude! Oh, and I hear respecs when they redo the dropsuit bonus's, something about everything being changed so respec time for everyone :P |
Heathen Bastard
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
426
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 06:54:00 -
[407] - Quote
I break sieges with nothing but militia. to kill with each shell, and pelt a heavy with a perfectly cooked grenade right in his/her(can't tell on the field) soft bits. I lead the charge and the protos come in after. It's not all gear, some of it is just knowing the situation, and doing the unexpected.
My enjoyment comes from seeing a proto die and knowing that I won with inferior gear.
Sorry that you need to have better to do better. I'm used to doing more with less. |
Heimdallr69
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
389
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 06:55:00 -
[408] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:Zatara Rought wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:Zatara Rought wrote:Honestly, if you'd saved your sp since you specced into tanks and started saving almost what 2 months ago...you could have made 5 mill sp in that time, enough sp to run a protosuit and protoweapon and be competitive. I rather miss you out of tanks and in that lol caldari logi you used to run so well. you must have the wrong person, i never went cal logi, ive always been heavy, scout or tank. If i wouldve saved all my SP then i would never have been playing because i wouldent have any gear... lol. Thats a crazy suggestion, if i have no spent SP then i wouldent be in PC or having fun in dust. Waiting to play video games is not how you play video games... Hmmm.. I coulda sworn I have video's of you post uprising in a yellow suit with a shotgun and core locus owning fools. But anyhoo You mentioned to me when you got your respec you put 14.4 mill sp into tanks. I had about 13.5 at the time. I now have 19.8 mill sp. What i'm suggesting is that you've been complaining about this for 2 months since you got the respec, why haven't you saved the about 6 mill potential and placed it into a different role? You failed to understand the intent of my first post so I hope this one clarifies it. ^_^ No you do not sir, post the videos up and you will see me as a scout shotty P: because i dumped another 2 mill SP into that poor excuse of a tank and then i started specing into heavy so i could have a hardy fit to protect my tank were it was needed. sence then ive been skilling back into scout and i jus now got my proto basic suit with a few core skills. If i could respec i would get out of this half track and play a class i enjoy and effectively compete in. Same for many other ppl This is true I've gone against xmaple all closed beta I've yet to see him run assault or logi he has more varitey than most people |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
669
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 06:57:00 -
[409] - Quote
Zatara Rought wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:Zatara Rought wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:Zatara Rought wrote:Honestly, if you'd saved your sp since you specced into tanks and started saving almost what 2 months ago...you could have made 5 mill sp in that time, enough sp to run a protosuit and protoweapon and be competitive. I rather miss you out of tanks and in that lol caldari logi you used to run so well. you must have the wrong person, i never went cal logi, ive always been heavy, scout or tank. If i wouldve saved all my SP then i would never have been playing because i wouldent have any gear... lol. Thats a crazy suggestion, if i have no spent SP then i wouldent be in PC or having fun in dust. Waiting to play video games is not how you play video games... Hmmm.. I coulda sworn I have video's of you post uprising in a yellow suit with a shotgun and core locus owning fools. But anyhoo You mentioned to me when you got your respec you put 14.4 mill sp into tanks. I had about 13.5 at the time. I now have 19.8 mill sp. What i'm suggesting is that you've been complaining about this for 2 months since you got the respec, why haven't you saved the about 6 mill potential and placed it into a different role? You failed to understand the intent of my first post so I hope this one clarifies it. ^_^ No you do not sir, post the videos up and you will see me as a scout shotty P: because i dumped another 2 mill SP into that poor excuse of a tank and then i started specing into heavy so i could have a hardy fit to protect my tank were it was needed. sence then ive been skilling back into scout and i jus now got my proto basic suit with a few core skills Welp, good luck! Yeah, I'd have had a nice protosuit with 6 mill sp...keep trucking it dude! Oh, and I hear respecs when they redo the dropsuit bonus's, something about everything being changed so respec time for everyone :P
Ty... lol. When your speced into all tanks 6 mill SP isent even enough for a lv4 suit and core skills, never mind a nice suit. I hope they do give out respecs after changing everyones class, that would be very fair and responseable for messing with ppls classes and spent SP |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
669
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 06:59:00 -
[410] - Quote
Heathen Bastard wrote:I break sieges with nothing but militia. to kill with each shell, and pelt a heavy with a perfectly cooked grenade right in his/her(can't tell on the field) soft bits. I lead the charge and the protos come in after. It's not all gear, some of it is just knowing the situation, and doing the unexpected.
My enjoyment comes from seeing a proto die and knowing that I won with inferior gear.
Sorry that you need to have better to do better. I'm used to doing more with less.
in pubs... lol. You will not be brought to any serious endevor in dust with milita gear. Js. Also, funny that you jus insult me with that last line when i try to kiss and make up with you above. I also said im doing well with milita gear up there, ty. drop the E-peen, gawsh. This thread is about the respecs we should be having |
|
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
669
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 06:59:00 -
[411] - Quote
Heimdallr69 wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:Zatara Rought wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:Zatara Rought wrote:Honestly, if you'd saved your sp since you specced into tanks and started saving almost what 2 months ago...you could have made 5 mill sp in that time, enough sp to run a protosuit and protoweapon and be competitive. I rather miss you out of tanks and in that lol caldari logi you used to run so well. you must have the wrong person, i never went cal logi, ive always been heavy, scout or tank. If i wouldve saved all my SP then i would never have been playing because i wouldent have any gear... lol. Thats a crazy suggestion, if i have no spent SP then i wouldent be in PC or having fun in dust. Waiting to play video games is not how you play video games... Hmmm.. I coulda sworn I have video's of you post uprising in a yellow suit with a shotgun and core locus owning fools. But anyhoo You mentioned to me when you got your respec you put 14.4 mill sp into tanks. I had about 13.5 at the time. I now have 19.8 mill sp. What i'm suggesting is that you've been complaining about this for 2 months since you got the respec, why haven't you saved the about 6 mill potential and placed it into a different role? You failed to understand the intent of my first post so I hope this one clarifies it. ^_^ No you do not sir, post the videos up and you will see me as a scout shotty P: because i dumped another 2 mill SP into that poor excuse of a tank and then i started specing into heavy so i could have a hardy fit to protect my tank were it was needed. sence then ive been skilling back into scout and i jus now got my proto basic suit with a few core skills. If i could respec i would get out of this half track and play a class i enjoy and effectively compete in. Same for many other ppl This is true I've gone against xmaple all closed beta I've yet to see him run assault or logi he has more varitey than most people
ty pal <3 |
Zatara Rought
TeamPlayers EoN.
584
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 07:03:00 -
[412] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:Zatara Rought wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:Zatara Rought wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:
you must have the wrong person, i never went cal logi, ive always been heavy, scout or tank. If i wouldve saved all my SP then i would never have been playing because i wouldent have any gear... lol. Thats a crazy suggestion, if i have no spent SP then i wouldent be in PC or having fun in dust. Waiting to play video games is not how you play video games...
Hmmm.. I coulda sworn I have video's of you post uprising in a yellow suit with a shotgun and core locus owning fools. But anyhoo You mentioned to me when you got your respec you put 14.4 mill sp into tanks. I had about 13.5 at the time. I now have 19.8 mill sp. What i'm suggesting is that you've been complaining about this for 2 months since you got the respec, why haven't you saved the about 6 mill potential and placed it into a different role? You failed to understand the intent of my first post so I hope this one clarifies it. ^_^ No you do not sir, post the videos up and you will see me as a scout shotty P: because i dumped another 2 mill SP into that poor excuse of a tank and then i started specing into heavy so i could have a hardy fit to protect my tank were it was needed. sence then ive been skilling back into scout and i jus now got my proto basic suit with a few core skills Welp, good luck! Yeah, I'd have had a nice protosuit with 6 mill sp...keep trucking it dude! Oh, and I hear respecs when they redo the dropsuit bonus's, something about everything being changed so respec time for everyone :P Ty... lol. When your speced into all tanks 6 mill SP isent even enough for a lv4 suit and core skills, never mind a nice suit. I hope they do give out respecs after changing everyones class, that would be very fair and responseable for messing with ppls classes and spent SP
6 mill? I have an alt with 6.2 mill and he has
shield extension 5 core skills each to three (upgrades, cpu, pg) ar operation 5, proficiency 3 armor plating 1 armor and shield upgrades 4 minmatar assault racial 5 grenades 3 nanohives 3 uplinks1 smg 3
I think that's right.
good enough for 500 shields 200 armor with officer ar, m1's k2 nano, and moves at 5.0 move speed. What's the big deal? |
Heathen Bastard
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
428
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 07:05:00 -
[413] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:I break sieges with nothing but militia. to kill with each shell, and pelt a heavy with a perfectly cooked grenade right in his/her(can't tell on the field) soft bits. I lead the charge and the protos come in after. It's not all gear, some of it is just knowing the situation, and doing the unexpected.
My enjoyment comes from seeing a proto die and knowing that I won with inferior gear.
Sorry that you need to have better to do better. I'm used to doing more with less. in pubs... lol. You will not be brought to any serious endevor in dust with milita gear. Js
And I don't want to. So much bluster and bullshit, and you run into sooooo many more FOTM chasing douchebags there. people who only play this broken game to be "competitive" by using the most broken crap they can find. I'm happier in pub matches, much more variety of players and stratagems. No "ONLY ONE JOB PER PERSON! YOU BETTER BE USING THE STATISTICALLY BEST GUN AND SUIT FOR YOUR ROLE! SKILL DOESN'T MATTER, IT'S ALL GEAR!" people like you to annoy me. |
lowratehitman
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
784
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 07:15:00 -
[414] - Quote
Dust 514: Player Spotlight EXMAPLE CORE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lqf09bHRFYQ
we need to do another video maple |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
669
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 07:46:00 -
[415] - Quote
Heathen Bastard wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:I break sieges with nothing but militia. to kill with each shell, and pelt a heavy with a perfectly cooked grenade right in his/her(can't tell on the field) soft bits. I lead the charge and the protos come in after. It's not all gear, some of it is just knowing the situation, and doing the unexpected.
My enjoyment comes from seeing a proto die and knowing that I won with inferior gear.
Sorry that you need to have better to do better. I'm used to doing more with less. in pubs... lol. You will not be brought to any serious endevor in dust with milita gear. Js And I don't want to. So much bluster and bullshit, and you run into sooooo many more FOTM chasing douchebags there. people who only play this broken game to be "competitive" by using the most broken crap they can find. I'm happier in pub matches, much more variety of players and stratagems. No "ONLY ONE JOB PER PERSON! YOU BETTER BE USING THE STATISTICALLY BEST GUN AND SUIT FOR YOUR ROLE! SKILL DOESN'T MATTER, IT'S ALL GEAR!" people like you to annoy me. Okay? Thats how teams win. if your not disaplined enough to play pc or jus dont like being told what to do or be the leader tha awright. Your too casual for pc and prolly shouldent be concerning yourself with this thread |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
669
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 07:48:00 -
[416] - Quote
I wouldent mind! I have a better mic this time x) |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
669
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 07:56:00 -
[417] - Quote
@ zatra that is not a pc ready or pub stomping chachter and youknowit :p because all my sp were into tanks and i needed heavy to protect my tank i only had between 3(low) and 5(high) mill sp to make a scout. 6.2 isent even enough, if there was a respec i wouldent have to worry about these 1st world problems. I could play a balanced class |
Zatara Rought
TeamPlayers EoN.
586
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 08:10:00 -
[418] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:@ zatra that is not a pc ready or pub stomping chachter and youknowit :p because all my sp were into tanks and i needed heavy to protect my tank i only had between 3(low) and 5(high) mill sp to make a scout. 6.2 isent even enough, if there was a respec i wouldent have to worry about these 1st world problems. I could play a balanced class
Ummm...actually it is. It's pretty damn viable. My own corp mates that run in PC matches run m1 and k2's with proficiency 4 ar's with about 650 tank assaults, they were in the hellstorm matches brah. 775 tank is pretty damn good with a 1hp/s rep. It's not fully specced, given, but It's compltely viable. I could slay with it just as much if not more so than my logi owned in some of those hellstorm matches we fought recently. My suit had less tank, one level more of proficiency on the ar, and proto nades and nano's, that's all that was really better than the alt in terms of assault and killing power. Maybe add in proto smg and some hacking skills and a stamina regulator if ya need but overall yeah 800 tank with proficiency 3 ar is damn viable. And for protostomping? Cubs has been using level one heavies in pubs for forever with complex damage mods on level one hmg's and owning, if you're looking for a cheap stomping fit his runs 32k I think.
My assertion stands. The fit I described is a super viable assault suit ready for pc war. You can contest that if ya want, but you're still wrong. Most fits can't get that kind of tank with auto armor rep and that move speed. add in proto nades at 7 mill sp and proficiency 4 for the ar...I don't see the problem. |
The Robot Devil
BetaMax.
792
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 08:16:00 -
[419] - Quote
Stands Alone wrote:The Robot Devil wrote:Grief PK wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:"There will always be FOTM chasers" They're called about 90% of the population of any given FPS, probably more in dust with the EVE "any advantage I can take" mentality.
That is what will destroy the game, you'll go from a myriad selection of suits, guns, and vehicles to one of each, kitted out exactly the same. Unless you want to outright lose every fight you're in since every time the balance changes, the majority of the game switches to whatever's OP. You can only dodge so many flaylock shots. I disagree, whole heartedly. I believe CCP should take a chance, if you are correct they will know within a month and change it back no harm done. If you are incorrect we could have a phenomenal new game on our hands. That's what we need. CCP to remake the game again, try to rebalance again, read every respec and QQ balance thread again and be mocked by some armchair game developer again. We need a new game like we need a bigger blast radius on a flaylock. Allowing respecs is not going to do anything for the game except cause more problems because the data from the previous day will change because I like a shotgun more today than yesterday. I still haven't heard one good reason - barring missing suits and vehicles - that warrants respecs. The reasons I see are usually short sighted and do not address the problems the game actually has. Player retention is bad because this is not a game you can be l33t at in a day. The learning curve is steep and choices do effect how you play. Gamers are not used to the idea of persistence and it flies in the face of every other game fps players play. The grind mentality hurts the player base and causes burn out very quickly. Stagnation due to lack of content and low numbers. CCP does things differently when compared to the other game developers and it comes off as them ignoring us, not listening or general ineptness. Not one of these problems will be solved by giving back SP, we will be in the same spot in one month or less and I will have to thumb out this diatribe almost verbatim. Play the game for fun and not for SP. Play the game you want to play and not for what is best. Don't grind. I know this sounds stupid but RP some because it does add to the experience. Come to the forums to provide feedback but don't let them pull you down under the bridge. PLAY OTHER GAMES because games are supposed to be fun not a source of stress. the game is never finished, therefore they can not remake it... since it is always being made... players either stick it out and adapt or they leave... i think CCP is giving its player base a crash course on the way new eden works on purpose. the ones that arent familiar with it have to learn sooner or later
Yes and vets who thought they knew what they were doing got taken to the bank because the didn't think or test the new build. It was reckless and kind of cocky to assume that things wouldn't or shouldn't change. Especially when it was called a NEW build and not an update or expansion. You know what the say about assumptions, they will make and ass out of u and me. |
xAckie
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
280
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 08:34:00 -
[420] - Quote
1) it would be the only thing worth paying for in this F2P game
2) relieves boredom of playing the same role over and over and over and over and over and over again.
this last point is more a problem of CCPs making - their SP / grind system is f'ing broke with stupid artificial SP sinks to create a grind (high core skill multipliers) rather than getting players to finish the basics quickly so they can start building characters. |
|
Tech Ohm Eaven
L.O.T.I.S. RISE of LEGION
649
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 10:31:00 -
[421] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:Stands Alone wrote:Heimdallr69 wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:Heimdallr69 wrote: What about the **** that not out yet? Not our fault we had to choose something else because the amarr tanks arnt out yet and stuff like that..your basically telling all these players to wait till all the racials are out
work your core skills and spec into a facsimile of what you want. then when you know it's coming out, stockpile your resources for a bit beforehand and immediately proto it. So then you gota run ****** ass gear tell it comes out...I disagree that's stupid...shouldn't even play till the gear comes out then militia gear with tons of SP into core skills is actually pretty insane Your saying... you would take milita gear into a PC/FW match? Or against a good team in a pub? wow. Dust is done
Bro militia and starter fits is all that I run.....all of the time.
How else can I keep a kdr of 1.6 to 2 and closeing fast on a billion isk? |
Seamie Schmoove
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
116
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 10:33:00 -
[422] - Quote
Wow....This moanfest is still going?? I'd be careful people...I've heard too much exposure to this thread and you may catch the menopause... True story! |
xAckie
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
280
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 10:44:00 -
[423] - Quote
Tech Ohm Eaven wrote:
Bro militia and starter fits is all that I run.....all of the time.
How else can I keep a kdr of 1.6 to 2 and closeing fast on a billion isk?
Why a billion - serious question - for a personal achievement perhaps? As far as I can see hording ISK is in part breaking the RPG element of this game (as well as the lack of an mmo / open world experience, stuck in a 16 v 16 experience). |
Mossellia Delt
Militaires Sans Jeux
49
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 11:16:00 -
[424] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:You play a properly balanced, fair and fun class. Liking the class, you dump all 15 mill SP to your name into the class. Suddenly, new build/patch comes around and your class is nerfed without your consent and you now suck at the game.
A good player can play well in any suit using any weapon. Get good |
Tallen Ellecon
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
355
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 13:40:00 -
[425] - Quote
If you respec in order to try new things, people will just jump onto the FOTM and when it gets nerfed, they'll ask for another one. You'll never be satisfied with one respec, you'll keep wanting and expecting more. What happens when you respec into a class you were curious about and find out you don't enjoy it? "GIVE ME ANOTHER RESPEC!!!"
Variety is nice, and it doesn't take that much SP to try something new. Invest in core skills first, and learn to run in non proto gear for awhile. My sympathies to those who don't know how to plan out their skills, and those who have their passions nerfed though. |
KING SALASI
MAJOR DISTRIBUTION
166
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 13:56:00 -
[426] - Quote
Blame CCP for FOTM don't blame the players for that. We need respec option abaible at all times. Since CCP.is going to tweak this game to hell and back give us the option to respec out of what ever they break. |
Tech Ohm Eaven
L.O.T.I.S. RISE of LEGION
651
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 15:35:00 -
[427] - Quote
xAckie wrote:Tech Ohm Eaven wrote:
Bro militia and starter fits is all that I run.....all of the time.
How else can I keep a kdr of 1.6 to 2 and closeing fast on a billion isk?
Why a billion - serious question - for a personal achievement perhaps? As far as I can see hording ISK is in part breaking the RPG element of this game (as well as the lack of an mmo / open world experience, stuck in a 16 v 16 experience).
My fits are free and in the 1k to 3k range so the isk just keeps piling up. And its fun to have enemies in advanced suits and even some protos see me in a militia or starter fit and the assume its an easy kill.
Plus with all the flaylocks, fused locus, invisible enemies and Charbydis murder taxis its less stressfull to die in a starter fit then when its a proto fit.
Plus folks keep telling me that its impossible to run militia and starter fits. And I say really?? |
Heathen Bastard
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
431
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 19:11:00 -
[428] - Quote
Tech Ohm Eaven wrote:xAckie wrote:Tech Ohm Eaven wrote:
Bro militia and starter fits is all that I run.....all of the time.
How else can I keep a kdr of 1.6 to 2 and closeing fast on a billion isk?
Why a billion - serious question - for a personal achievement perhaps? As far as I can see hording ISK is in part breaking the RPG element of this game (as well as the lack of an mmo / open world experience, stuck in a 16 v 16 experience). My fits are free and in the 1k to 3k range so the isk just keeps piling up. And its fun to have enemies in advanced suits and even some protos see me in a militia or starter fit and the assume its an easy kill. Plus with all the flaylocks, fused locus, invisible enemies and Charbydis murder taxis its less stressfull to die in a starter fit then when its a proto fit. Plus folks keep telling me that its impossible to run militia and starter fits. And I say really??
It's not impossible, you're just playing on hard mode. I'm a tanker who spends more time out of his tanks than in. I like hard mode. |
Heimdallr69
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
390
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 19:23:00 -
[429] - Quote
Okay I got an idea since you guys are against respecs then give one last respec and take vehicles and av out of the game since there is no longer a need for them in this game..that way everyone can run proto assault and be "good" you claim a good player can use any suit yet I bet you skilled into assault roles not vehicles so lets see you go fit a mlt tank and see how you do? With no vehicles skills |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
673
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 19:33:00 -
[430] - Quote
Mossellia Delt wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:You play a properly balanced, fair and fun class. Liking the class, you dump all 15 mill SP to your name into the class. Suddenly, new build/patch comes around and your class is nerfed without your consent and you now suck at the game. A good player can play well in any suit using any weapon. Get good
Yeah i need to get good, your right i suck at dust. I do suck at dust, a play a sheild tank. i pull out enforcer 3 proto missles with a damage mod with this builds "proto tank" and i cant kill a standard armor tank. Im not good because my class isent good. That would be like someone going into PC with a lazer or plasma cannon and finnishing high on the bord. Not going to happen, the classes suck. But they need to get good right? No, they need to get respeced so they can have their talents utilized on a class that works. So they can, youknow, get good |
|
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
675
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 19:40:00 -
[431] - Quote
Tallen Ellecon wrote: If you respec in order to try new things, people will just jump onto the FOTM and when it gets nerfed, they'll ask for another one. You'll never be satisfied with one respec, you'll keep wanting and expecting more. What happens when you respec into a class you were curious about and find out you don't enjoy it? "GIVE ME ANOTHER RESPEC!!!"
Variety is nice, and it doesn't take that much SP to try something new. Invest in core skills first, and learn to run in non proto gear for awhile. My sympathies to those who don't know how to plan out their skills, and those who have their passions nerfed though.
You cant invest in core stats and simply try something new when you are any sort of vehical pilot. That is a lot of players, and it is a major setback to invest in an entirely different set of dropsuits and weapons when your class gets nerfed. Say you have a proto sentinel heavy and HMG/forge gun profficentcy 3 when heavys recive another class nerf once again making them useless so you then have to spec into the equivalent suit (or millions of SP to get close) of assualt to be useful in PC again.
As this person says here
KING SALASI wrote:Blame CCP for FOTM don't blame the players for that. We need respec option abaible at all times. Since CCP.is going to tweak this game to hell and back give us the option to respec out of what ever they break.
So yeah, we should be respeced whenever our classes are changed untill there is a sort of balance in dust, untill FOTM wont be too much of a promblem. Its only right |
Cannibus Lecktor
Stoned Kloned Killers
3
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 20:11:00 -
[432] - Quote
I'm just going to assume all of you guys that are opposed to a respec , never asked for one when uprising released, otherwise all of your rants of how respecs are bad are meaningless... So go ahead, lie and say you have never had a respec or asked for one..
|
Malkai Inos
Opus Arcana Covert Intervention
937
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 20:15:00 -
[433] - Quote
Cannibus Lecktor wrote:I'm just going to assume all of you guys that are opposed to a respec , never asked for one when uprising released, otherwise all of your rants of how respecs are bad are meaningless... So go ahead, lie and say you have never had a respec or asked for one..
Haven't asked for one and, being a cal logi, still not interested. I give my consent for any dev or gm (who can be bothered) to confirm this. |
Promethius Franklin
DUST University Ivy League
141
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 20:27:00 -
[434] - Quote
Cannibus Lecktor wrote:I'm just going to assume all of you guys that are opposed to a respec , never asked for one when uprising released, otherwise all of your rants of how respecs are bad are meaningless... So go ahead, lie and say you have never had a respec or asked for one.. And yet you know that's BS. You know what happened with the skill tree itself prior to that request. And you know how that is very much different to what is happening with balance changes. To be honest I'd really prefer a system not be put in place that does it's best to amplify the magnitude game play effect an imbalance has. |
Cannibus Lecktor
Stoned Kloned Killers
3
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 20:29:00 -
[435] - Quote
Well then, cudos to you... Lets see if you feel the same way when you have to try to fit your calogi with the same equipment as other races with 40 less CPU, and im not refering to the Douvall rifle and 5 shield ext., Im talking about a core repair tool, an Ishkone nano, and an advanced injector, or maybe some droplinks... I could care less about the race bonus, but to give me a handicap of 40 CPU which by the way will be more like a 50 point handicap if you include the loss of 25% at proto lvl.. |
Cannibus Lecktor
Stoned Kloned Killers
3
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 20:34:00 -
[436] - Quote
Promethius Franklin wrote:Cannibus Lecktor wrote:I'm just going to assume all of you guys that are opposed to a respec , never asked for one when uprising released, otherwise all of your rants of how respecs are bad are meaningless... So go ahead, lie and say you have never had a respec or asked for one.. And yet you know that's BS. You know what happened with the skill tree itself prior to that request. And you know how that is very much different to what is happening with balance changes. To be honest I'd really prefer a system not be put in place that does it's best to amplify the magnitude game play effect an imbalance has.
Argue it however you want to, A respec is a respec... Why didnt you adapt or die then? All the newcomers came into the game with only 500k to allocate which could have been easily achieved in a weeks worth of play and would have still given you an unfair advantage against all newcomers.. So the question remains, Why didnt you just adapt and overcome?
|
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
675
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 20:34:00 -
[437] - Quote
Cannibus Lecktor wrote:Well then, cudos to you... Lets see if you feel the same way when you have to try to fit your calogi with the same equipment as other races with 40 less CPU, and im not refering to the Douvall rifle and 5 shield ext., Im talking about a core repair tool, an Ishkone nano, and an advanced injector, or maybe some droplinks... I could care less about the race bonus, but to give me a handicap of 40 CPU which by the way will be more like a 50 point handicap if you include the loss of 25% at proto lvl..
Logis cant be logis anymore? |
Alaika Arbosa
Matari Combat Research and Manufacture Inc. Interstellar Murder of Crows
810
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 20:38:00 -
[438] - Quote
lol.
I Logi just fine in my Minmatar Logi.
lol. |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
675
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 20:41:00 -
[439] - Quote
Alaika Arbosa wrote:lol.
I Logi just fine in my Minmatar Logi.
lol.
minilogi dident get nerfed |
Cannibus Lecktor
Stoned Kloned Killers
3
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 20:45:00 -
[440] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:Cannibus Lecktor wrote:Well then, cudos to you... Lets see if you feel the same way when you have to try to fit your calogi with the same equipment as other races with 40 less CPU, and im not refering to the Douvall rifle and 5 shield ext., Im talking about a core repair tool, an Ishkone nano, and an advanced injector, or maybe some droplinks... I could care less about the race bonus, but to give me a handicap of 40 CPU which by the way will be more like a 50 point handicap if you include the loss of 25% at proto lvl.. Logis cant be logis anymore?
Sure you can, just not a caldari Logi, Those will become extinct and the suit will still be abused, people will just drop all of the equipment and use it as an assault... Like i said before, make game modes that are gear specific, then all you have are your core upgrades and skill.. I am by far not "great" at this game, but i hold my own and i play it for fun... Lately, the fun has been lacking and only frustration remains in its place..
|
|
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
675
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 20:48:00 -
[441] - Quote
Cannibus Lecktor wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:Cannibus Lecktor wrote:Well then, cudos to you... Lets see if you feel the same way when you have to try to fit your calogi with the same equipment as other races with 40 less CPU, and im not refering to the Douvall rifle and 5 shield ext., Im talking about a core repair tool, an Ishkone nano, and an advanced injector, or maybe some droplinks... I could care less about the race bonus, but to give me a handicap of 40 CPU which by the way will be more like a 50 point handicap if you include the loss of 25% at proto lvl.. Logis cant be logis anymore? Sure you can, just not a caldari Logi, Those will become extinct and the suit will still be abused, people will just drop all of the equipment and use it as an assault... Like i said before, make game modes that are gear specific, then all you have are your core upgrades and skill.. I am by far not "great" at this game, but i hold my own and i play it for fun... Lately, the fun has been lacking and only frustration remains in its place..
So it will be great if you could respec out of your nerfed class and once again have the fun youve been lacking, and instead lack only the frustration of having a nerfed class. right? with a respec you could play a more viable class and have fun playing dust. right? |
Promethius Franklin
DUST University Ivy League
142
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 20:50:00 -
[442] - Quote
Cannibus Lecktor wrote:Promethius Franklin wrote:Cannibus Lecktor wrote:I'm just going to assume all of you guys that are opposed to a respec , never asked for one when uprising released, otherwise all of your rants of how respecs are bad are meaningless... So go ahead, lie and say you have never had a respec or asked for one.. And yet you know that's BS. You know what happened with the skill tree itself prior to that request. And you know how that is very much different to what is happening with balance changes. To be honest I'd really prefer a system not be put in place that does it's best to amplify the magnitude game play effect an imbalance has. Argue it however you want to, A respec is a respec... Why didnt you adapt or die then? All the newcomers came into the game with only 500k to allocate which could have been easily achieved in a weeks worth of play and would have still given you an unfair advantage against all newcomers.. So the question remains, Why didnt you just adapt and overcome? There is no way to "adapt" to skill tree changes. Cal logis have the option to change their fits and chose between equipment or a assault like fit. Flaylock users can actually aim to take out targets. The skill tree on the other hand can't be adapted to when prerequisites are changed. |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
675
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 20:54:00 -
[443] - Quote
Cannibus Lecktor wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:Cannibus Lecktor wrote:Well then, cudos to you... Lets see if you feel the same way when you have to try to fit your calogi with the same equipment as other races with 40 less CPU, and im not refering to the Douvall rifle and 5 shield ext., Im talking about a core repair tool, an Ishkone nano, and an advanced injector, or maybe some droplinks... I could care less about the race bonus, but to give me a handicap of 40 CPU which by the way will be more like a 50 point handicap if you include the loss of 25% at proto lvl.. Logis cant be logis anymore? Sure you can, just not a caldari Logi, Those will become extinct and the suit will still be abused, people will just drop all of the equipment and use it as an assault... Like i said before, make game modes that are gear specific, then all you have are your core upgrades and skill.. I am by far not "great" at this game, but i hold my own and i play it for fun... Lately, the fun has been lacking and only frustration remains in its place..
ill also valadate his concerns in this thread https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=98490&find=unread wich details all the effects of how the nerf ruined his class.
particularly, this quote from the same thread:
THEAMAZING POTHEAD wrote:regulators leave no room for equipment and CPU modules are mandatory on every fit. hes right to run regulators and cpu leaves no room for equipment and makes you a fake logi. you literally cant fit sh*t on the suit anymore. ill never run my logi equipment in pub matches again because it requires so much cost of survivability its not worth it whatsoever, so now my pub protologi is completely assault oriented. yep. CCP turned them into assault suits.
PS. i thought it was funny and ironic, on his fit he had logi stuff pre nerf and just a nanohive post nerf. hilarious because thats how my proto fits turned out. Yes, the Call logi was OP and it should have been nerfed but this discription is not competitive and the class apears to been over nerfed to the point of uslessness, even in pubs, barley scraping by as an assult fit and unable preform its roll. As this man says in the qoute in this post, he does not enjoy dust anymore and is frustraited that his class has been over nerfed (like many, many others). He and other victims should be allowed to respec after their classes have been molested by nerfs. Their dust experiences are now ruined and only a respec or waiting for many months will solve this promblem |
Cannibus Lecktor
Stoned Kloned Killers
3
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 21:01:00 -
[444] - Quote
Promethius Franklin wrote:Cannibus Lecktor wrote:Promethius Franklin wrote:Cannibus Lecktor wrote:I'm just going to assume all of you guys that are opposed to a respec , never asked for one when uprising released, otherwise all of your rants of how respecs are bad are meaningless... So go ahead, lie and say you have never had a respec or asked for one.. And yet you know that's BS. You know what happened with the skill tree itself prior to that request. And you know how that is very much different to what is happening with balance changes. To be honest I'd really prefer a system not be put in place that does it's best to amplify the magnitude game play effect an imbalance has. Argue it however you want to, A respec is a respec... Why didnt you adapt or die then? All the newcomers came into the game with only 500k to allocate which could have been easily achieved in a weeks worth of play and would have still given you an unfair advantage against all newcomers.. So the question remains, Why didnt you just adapt and overcome? There is no way to "adapt" to skill tree changes. Cal logis have the option to change their fits and chose between equipment or a assault like fit. Flaylock users can actually aim to take out targets. The skill tree on the other hand can't be adapted to when prerequisites are changed.
]I guess you just dont get it, so let me break it down for you.. When I speced into my Caldari Logistic suit, I knew full well there would be a "nerf" to this class, but i could not have foreseen a 50 point CPU hadicap compared to other Logistic suits. Ok, nerf my shields, they dont work worth a crap anyhow and I dont rely on them to keep me alive, However, i do rely on that CPU to carry the same equipment mods that other will now be able to carry without having to adjust their fits.. A logi supports the team, If i cant carry sufficient gear to fullfill that role, then my suit will then be rendered useless as a Logi.. Please explain how this doesnt change my skill tree..
While we are at it, Why dont we slow down those Minmatar shotgun scouts... I just cant seem to hit those guys.. |
Promethius Franklin
DUST University Ivy League
142
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 21:17:00 -
[445] - Quote
Cannibus Lecktor wrote: ]I guess you just dont get it, so let me break it down for you.. When I speced into my Caldari Logistic suit, I knew full well there would be a "nerf" to this class, but i could not have foreseen a 50 point CPU hadicap compared to other Logistic suits. Ok, nerf my shields, they dont work worth a crap anyhow and I dont rely on them to keep me alive, However, i do rely on that CPU to carry the same equipment mods that other will now be able to carry without having to adjust their fits.. A logi supports the team, If i cant carry sufficient gear to fullfill that role, then my suit will then be rendered useless as a Logi.. Please explain how this doesnt change my skill tree..
While we are at it, Why dont we slow down those Minmatar shotgun scouts... I just cant seem to hit those guys..
Your skill tree didn't change because, well, factually your skill tree didn't change. Your suit changed, nerfs have a tendency to do that, but you still have access to the same suits and no one else is getting them under a different set of rules or numbers than you are. Everyone using the Cal logi has the same set of decisions to make regarding how they use the suit. That wasn't the same with the skill tree change. With that change someone was getting to the same suit with a lower investment and still had to invest in the options with which people are now deciding on compromises. |
Cannibus Lecktor
Stoned Kloned Killers
3
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 21:23:00 -
[446] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:Cannibus Lecktor wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:Cannibus Lecktor wrote:Well then, cudos to you... Lets see if you feel the same way when you have to try to fit your calogi with the same equipment as other races with 40 less CPU, and im not refering to the Douvall rifle and 5 shield ext., Im talking about a core repair tool, an Ishkone nano, and an advanced injector, or maybe some droplinks... I could care less about the race bonus, but to give me a handicap of 40 CPU which by the way will be more like a 50 point handicap if you include the loss of 25% at proto lvl.. Logis cant be logis anymore? Sure you can, just not a caldari Logi, Those will become extinct and the suit will still be abused, people will just drop all of the equipment and use it as an assault... Like i said before, make game modes that are gear specific, then all you have are your core upgrades and skill.. I am by far not "great" at this game, but i hold my own and i play it for fun... Lately, the fun has been lacking and only frustration remains in its place.. So it will be great if you could respec out of your nerfed class and once again have the fun youve been lacking, and instead lack only the frustration of having a nerfed class. right? with a respec you could play a more viable class and have fun playing dust. right?
I have already found a way to have fun playing Dust but it too will soon be "NERFED"... I have a ball on my alt. Vehicular Genocide, running over protos with their Flaylocks in my 1 hit 1 kill logistic LAV mobile death dealer, Even my wife has joined in the fun and rides with me shooting A holes as we go with a scattered Ion Cannon.. Ever see my Jenny in a game, hit me up and ill take you for a ride, either in the gunners seat or on the front bumper, it doesnt matter much to me.. |
cedz636
Brutor Vanguard Minmatar Republic
28
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 21:25:00 -
[447] - Quote
Cannibus Lecktor wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:Cannibus Lecktor wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:Cannibus Lecktor wrote:Well then, cudos to you... Lets see if you feel the same way when you have to try to fit your calogi with the same equipment as other races with 40 less CPU, and im not refering to the Douvall rifle and 5 shield ext., Im talking about a core repair tool, an Ishkone nano, and an advanced injector, or maybe some droplinks... I could care less about the race bonus, but to give me a handicap of 40 CPU which by the way will be more like a 50 point handicap if you include the loss of 25% at proto lvl.. Logis cant be logis anymore? Sure you can, just not a caldari Logi, Those will become extinct and the suit will still be abused, people will just drop all of the equipment and use it as an assault... Like i said before, make game modes that are gear specific, then all you have are your core upgrades and skill.. I am by far not "great" at this game, but i hold my own and i play it for fun... Lately, the fun has been lacking and only frustration remains in its place.. So it will be great if you could respec out of your nerfed class and once again have the fun youve been lacking, and instead lack only the frustration of having a nerfed class. right? with a respec you could play a more viable class and have fun playing dust. right? I have already found a way to have fun playing Dust but it too will soon be "NERFED"... I have a ball on my alt. Vehicular Genocide, running over protos with their Flaylocks in my 1 hit 1 kill logistic LAV mobile death dealer, Even my wife has joined in the fun and rides with me shooting A holes as we go with a scattered Ion Cannon.. Ever see my Jenny in a game, hit me up and ill take you for a ride, either in the gunners seat or on the front bumper, it doesnt matter much to me..
I hate you |
Cannibus Lecktor
Stoned Kloned Killers
3
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 21:26:00 -
[448] - Quote
Promethius Franklin wrote:Cannibus Lecktor wrote: ]I guess you just dont get it, so let me break it down for you.. When I speced into my Caldari Logistic suit, I knew full well there would be a "nerf" to this class, but i could not have foreseen a 50 point CPU hadicap compared to other Logistic suits. Ok, nerf my shields, they dont work worth a crap anyhow and I dont rely on them to keep me alive, However, i do rely on that CPU to carry the same equipment mods that other will now be able to carry without having to adjust their fits.. A logi supports the team, If i cant carry sufficient gear to fullfill that role, then my suit will then be rendered useless as a Logi.. Please explain how this doesnt change my skill tree..
While we are at it, Why dont we slow down those Minmatar shotgun scouts... I just cant seem to hit those guys..
Your skill tree didn't change because, well, factually your skill tree didn't change. Your suit changed, nerfs have a tendency to do that, but you still have access to the same suits and no one else is getting them under a different set of rules or numbers than you are. Everyone using the Cal logi has the same set of decisions to make regarding how they use the suit. That wasn't the same with the skill tree change. With that change someone was getting to the same suit with a lower investment and still had to invest in the options with which people are now deciding on compromises. Except mt cpu upgrades suddenly become more expensive then others, having to spend 1.6 million more to get to lvl 5 CPU upgrades to carry the same gear as others can at lvl 2 and 3... Yea thats no change at all.. |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1388
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 21:27:00 -
[449] - Quote
Exmaple.
Doesn't matter now. OMS was removed from the queue this morning.
This game is officially dying.
Jump ship dude, I hear there are still a few lifeboats left over that way ~~~> |
Promethius Franklin
DUST University Ivy League
142
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 21:29:00 -
[450] - Quote
Cannibus Lecktor wrote:Promethius Franklin wrote:Cannibus Lecktor wrote: ]I guess you just dont get it, so let me break it down for you.. When I speced into my Caldari Logistic suit, I knew full well there would be a "nerf" to this class, but i could not have foreseen a 50 point CPU hadicap compared to other Logistic suits. Ok, nerf my shields, they dont work worth a crap anyhow and I dont rely on them to keep me alive, However, i do rely on that CPU to carry the same equipment mods that other will now be able to carry without having to adjust their fits.. A logi supports the team, If i cant carry sufficient gear to fullfill that role, then my suit will then be rendered useless as a Logi.. Please explain how this doesnt change my skill tree..
While we are at it, Why dont we slow down those Minmatar shotgun scouts... I just cant seem to hit those guys..
Your skill tree didn't change because, well, factually your skill tree didn't change. Your suit changed, nerfs have a tendency to do that, but you still have access to the same suits and no one else is getting them under a different set of rules or numbers than you are. Everyone using the Cal logi has the same set of decisions to make regarding how they use the suit. That wasn't the same with the skill tree change. With that change someone was getting to the same suit with a lower investment and still had to invest in the options with which people are now deciding on compromises. Except mt cpu upgrades suddenly become more expensive then others, having to spend 1.6 million more to get to lvl 5 CPU upgrades to carry the same gear as others can at lvl 2 and 3... Yea thats no change at all.. No, actually proto CPU upgrades cost the same SP no matter what suit you run. Are you willing to downgrade or stack CPU upgrades? Or wait till the greater rebalance that will likely render all of these complaints moot? |
|
Cannibus Lecktor
Stoned Kloned Killers
3
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 21:30:00 -
[451] - Quote
|
Cannibus Lecktor
Stoned Kloned Killers
3
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 21:36:00 -
[452] - Quote
Promethius Franklin wrote:Cannibus Lecktor wrote:Promethius Franklin wrote:Cannibus Lecktor wrote: ]I guess you just dont get it, so let me break it down for you.. When I speced into my Caldari Logistic suit, I knew full well there would be a "nerf" to this class, but i could not have foreseen a 50 point CPU hadicap compared to other Logistic suits. Ok, nerf my shields, they dont work worth a crap anyhow and I dont rely on them to keep me alive, However, i do rely on that CPU to carry the same equipment mods that other will now be able to carry without having to adjust their fits.. A logi supports the team, If i cant carry sufficient gear to fullfill that role, then my suit will then be rendered useless as a Logi.. Please explain how this doesnt change my skill tree..
While we are at it, Why dont we slow down those Minmatar shotgun scouts... I just cant seem to hit those guys..
Your skill tree didn't change because, well, factually your skill tree didn't change. Your suit changed, nerfs have a tendency to do that, but you still have access to the same suits and no one else is getting them under a different set of rules or numbers than you are. Everyone using the Cal logi has the same set of decisions to make regarding how they use the suit. That wasn't the same with the skill tree change. With that change someone was getting to the same suit with a lower investment and still had to invest in the options with which people are now deciding on compromises. Except mt cpu upgrades suddenly become more expensive then others, having to spend 1.6 million more to get to lvl 5 CPU upgrades to carry the same gear as others can at lvl 2 and 3... Yea thats no change at all.. No, actually proto CPU upgrades cost the same SP no matter what suit you run. Are you willing to downgrade or stack CPU upgrades? Or wait till the greater rebalance that will likely render all of these complaints moot?
Your just not getting it, guess my expectations are just too high.. |
Promethius Franklin
DUST University Ivy League
142
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 21:45:00 -
[453] - Quote
Cannibus Lecktor wrote:Your just not getting it, guess my expectations are just too high.. I'm responding to what you are posting, if I'm not getting it it's because you aren't saying it. |
Cannibus Lecktor
Stoned Kloned Killers
3
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 21:55:00 -
[454] - Quote
I would like to take a minute and make a few suggestions for other changes in upcoming patches to help "balance" the game..
First lets start with those darn heavies. They just take too many bullets to kill.. I say we should reduce their shields and armor to match those of the Minmatar assault suits and slow down their rate of fire by 20%.. That should fix those guys..
Now lets move on to the assault suits.. I firmly believe they should all carry a sidearm only and be limited to only 1 grenade that should be more than enough for those guys to work with..
Ok, as i said before those spry little shotgun scout need to slow it down a bit, They are nearly impossible to run over and even harder to hit with your riflebutt... Fixed!
How bout those pesky Flaylocks and Massdrivers... I have just the thing for those too.. How bouit if you fire your weapon within 5m of the intended target, Not only will the enemy receive no damage whatsoever, but you and any of your teammates within a 10m radius will be vaporized into a fine pink DUST.. Hot Dam, its gettin good now
The LAV's need an obvious boost in speed and handling, maybe some fatter tires as well as an onboard navigation unit with Ipod dock... Yea, now we are talking ..
And last, but certainly not least, absolutely NO respecs for anyone!
|
Vehicular Genocide
Stoned Kloned Killers
0
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 22:19:00 -
[455] - Quote
Sounds perfect to me.. |
KING SALASI
MAJOR DISTRIBUTION
168
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 22:34:00 -
[456] - Quote
Watching CCP kill Dust all by itself is amazing. Why did you bring this game on console since you have no clue how the console community reacts.
Stop developing on the PS3 put Dust on PC. It's obvious you don't want this market. Your Eve PC ways of doing things don't work here. I love you CCP for Eve, but the Eve mentality will not work on console. Repecs would save you so many headaches but you refuse to bend cuz if the EVE policy.
You will be left the EVE players in the end if you continue on this path of destruction.
|
Promethius Franklin
DUST University Ivy League
142
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 22:38:00 -
[457] - Quote
Cannibus Lecktor wrote:I would like to take a minute and make a few suggestions for other changes in upcoming patches to help "balance" the game..
First lets start with those darn heavies. They just take too many bullets to kill.. I say we should reduce their shields and armor to match those of the Minmatar assault suits and slow down their rate of fire by 20%.. That should fix those guys..
Now lets move on to the assault suits.. I firmly believe they should all carry a sidearm only and be limited to only 1 grenade that should be more than enough for those guys to work with..
Ok, as i said before those spry little shotgun scout need to slow it down a bit, They are nearly impossible to run over and even harder to hit with your riflebutt... Fixed!
How bout those pesky Flaylocks and Massdrivers... I have just the thing for those too.. How bouit if you fire your weapon within 5m of the intended target, Not only will the enemy receive no damage whatsoever, but you and any of your teammates within a 10m radius will be vaporized into a fine pink DUST.. Hot Dam, its gettin good now
The LAV's need an obvious boost in speed and handling, maybe some fatter tires as well as an onboard navigation unit with Ipod dock... Yea, now we are talking ..
And last, but certainly not least, absolutely NO respecs for anyone! Yay hyperbole! The last resort of someone desperately in search of a valid argument and failing to find it. |
LCB Holdings
Expert Intervention Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 23:14:00 -
[458] - Quote
I think it is funny to see CCP's fail cascade.
CCP obviously must thinks they can continue making drastic changes, bad balancing and terrible mechanics without sinking the already low population base. Denying players to re-espec when it is a common feature of the market is foolish but constantly changing in-game items, skills or mechanics without such system going to increase the turnover ratio of veteran and new players.
Something that is worrysome is the lack of petitions for re-spec lately, it signals several things...
1. Players do not care about CCPs actions so they do not come to the forums. 2. Players are moving on to other games and lost any faith left on CCP. 3. Most veteran players left due to ineptitude apfrom Shangai. 4. Players acceptance with praise to CCPs late actions.
Personally I am more inclined to believed in options 1 to 3. Some people might be under option 4 but that will be until they are next in the line of nerfs ( looks at Mass Drivers+Flux and Forge Guns )
|
Heimdallr69
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
390
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 23:31:00 -
[459] - Quote
ZDub 303 wrote:Exmaple.
Doesn't matter now. OMS was removed from the queue this morning.
This game is officially dying.
Jump ship dude, I hear there are still a few lifeboats left over that way ~~~> they lead to the ps4 Fixed ill jump intime, I like to make close calls they're more fun |
dday3six
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
144
|
Posted - 2013.07.31 00:11:00 -
[460] - Quote
KING SALASI wrote:Watching CCP kill Dust all by itself is amazing. Why did you bring this game on console since you have no clue how the console community reacts.
Stop developing on the PS3 put Dust on PC. It's obvious you don't want this market. Your Eve PC ways of doing things don't work here. I love you CCP for Eve, but the Eve mentality will not work on console. Repecs would save you so many headaches but you refuse to bend cuz if the EVE policy.
You will be left the EVE players in the end if you continue on this path of destruction.
Given some of the comments made by EVE players, I'm starting to think they want only EVE players to play Dust, and I'm honestly starting to wonder if CCP doesn't want the same. |
|
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
677
|
Posted - 2013.07.31 01:01:00 -
[461] - Quote
Heimdallr69 wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:Exmaple.
Doesn't matter now. OMS was removed from the queue this morning.
This game is officially dying.
Jump ship dude, I hear there are still a few lifeboats left over that way ~~~> they lead to the ps4 Fixed ill jump intime, I like to make close calls they're more fun
yeah im the same. Im gona ride the sinking ship down and see if i can make a difference. Not expecting anything but maby theyl start listening to us vets. If they dont well. Like yalk are saying. Ps4 |
INFINITE DIVERSITY IDIC
TYRANNY of EVIL MEN
17
|
Posted - 2013.07.31 01:34:00 -
[462] - Quote
You all know that this weak sauce cry baby ***t has lead to us losing something I paid for and after a hard core nerf nothing is offered? Dude the day Destiny touches down infinite diversity will get the delete button. These people are stupid if they think that they can take my money for boosters, and my money for the elite packs and my AURUM for things like fuse locus grenades which combined with my cpu reduction on my logi I can't even run, and I purchased 3000 of them, this is criminal, I am not even being offered an Aur refund? Who is advising you on your business model? Do you really think I will be retained as a customer? Do you think I will spend another 100 dollars on you? No, I will spend it on the game that doesn't change my entire setup on the whims of the owned....... I mean really I can't have my Aur back? You can't buy back these 3 thousand useless grenades? Ccp you are super fails, I believed in you I purchased your product and was ripped off......RRRRRRRRRRAAAAAAAAAAAAAGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
677
|
Posted - 2013.07.31 02:23:00 -
[463] - Quote
INFINITE DIVERSITY IDIC wrote:You all know that this weak sauce cry baby ***t has lead to us losing something I paid for and after a hard core nerf nothing is offered? Dude the day Destiny touches down infinite diversity will get the delete button. These people are stupid if they think that they can take my money for boosters, and my money for the elite packs and my AURUM for things like fuse locus grenades which combined with my cpu reduction on my logi I can't even run, and I purchased 3000 of them, this is criminal, I am not even being offered an Aur refund? Who is advising you on your business model? Do you really think I will be retained as a customer? Do you think I will spend another 100 dollars on you? No, I will spend it on the game that doesn't change my entire setup on the whims of the owned....... I mean really I can't have my Aur back? You can't buy back these 3 thousand useless grenades? Ccp you are super fails, I believed in you I purchased your product and was ripped off......RRRRRRRRRRAAAAAAAAAAAAAGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
damnn. Would an SP reset change your disposition any? |
INFINITE DIVERSITY IDIC
TYRANNY of EVIL MEN
17
|
Posted - 2013.07.31 02:57:00 -
[464] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:INFINITE DIVERSITY IDIC wrote:You all know that this weak sauce cry baby ***t has lead to us losing something I paid for and after a hard core nerf nothing is offered? Dude the day Destiny touches down infinite diversity will get the delete button. These people are stupid if they think that they can take my money for boosters, and my money for the elite packs and my AURUM for things like fuse locus grenades which combined with my cpu reduction on my logi I can't even run, and I purchased 3000 of them, this is criminal, I am not even being offered an Aur refund? Who is advising you on your business model? Do you really think I will be retained as a customer? Do you think I will spend another 100 dollars on you? No, I will spend it on the game that doesn't change my entire setup on the whims of the owned....... I mean really I can't have my Aur back? You can't buy back these 3 thousand useless grenades? Ccp you are super fails, I believed in you I purchased your product and was ripped off......RRRRRRRRRRAAAAAAAAAAAAAGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH damnn. Would an SP reset change your disposition any? Absolutely, that was my request, hell just giving me the aur back I spent on 3000 fused grenades would be great, my help ticket was denied promptly. |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
679
|
Posted - 2013.07.31 03:04:00 -
[465] - Quote
INFINITE DIVERSITY IDIC wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:INFINITE DIVERSITY IDIC wrote:You all know that this weak sauce cry baby ***t has lead to us losing something I paid for and after a hard core nerf nothing is offered? Dude the day Destiny touches down infinite diversity will get the delete button. These people are stupid if they think that they can take my money for boosters, and my money for the elite packs and my AURUM for things like fuse locus grenades which combined with my cpu reduction on my logi I can't even run, and I purchased 3000 of them, this is criminal, I am not even being offered an Aur refund? Who is advising you on your business model? Do you really think I will be retained as a customer? Do you think I will spend another 100 dollars on you? No, I will spend it on the game that doesn't change my entire setup on the whims of the owned....... I mean really I can't have my Aur back? You can't buy back these 3 thousand useless grenades? Ccp you are super fails, I believed in you I purchased your product and was ripped off......RRRRRRRRRRAAAAAAAAAAAAAGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH damnn. Would an SP reset change your disposition any? Absolutely, that was my request, hell just giving me the aur back I spent on 3000 fused grenades would be great, my help ticket was denied promptly.
yeah no doubt, they wont do resets. What about a skill respec? |
dustwaffle
Gravity Prone EoN.
257
|
Posted - 2013.07.31 03:07:00 -
[466] - Quote
INFINITE DIVERSITY IDIC wrote:You all know that this weak sauce cry baby ***t has lead to us losing something I paid for and after a hard core nerf nothing is offered? Dude the day Destiny touches down infinite diversity will get the delete button. These people are stupid if they think that they can take my money for boosters, and my money for the elite packs and my AURUM for things like fuse locus grenades which combined with my cpu reduction on my logi I can't even run, and I purchased 3000 of them, this is criminal, I am not even being offered an Aur refund? Who is advising you on your business model? Do you really think I will be retained as a customer? Do you think I will spend another 100 dollars on you? No, I will spend it on the game that doesn't change my entire setup on the whims of the owned....... I mean really I can't have my Aur back? You can't buy back these 3 thousand useless grenades? Ccp you are super fails, I believed in you I purchased your product and was ripped off......RRRRRRRRRRAAAAAAAAAAAAAGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
LOL
|
dustwaffle
Gravity Prone EoN.
258
|
Posted - 2013.07.31 03:10:00 -
[467] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:Cannibus Lecktor wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:Cannibus Lecktor wrote:Well then, cudos to you... Lets see if you feel the same way when you have to try to fit your calogi with the same equipment as other races with 40 less CPU, and im not refering to the Douvall rifle and 5 shield ext., Im talking about a core repair tool, an Ishkone nano, and an advanced injector, or maybe some droplinks... I could care less about the race bonus, but to give me a handicap of 40 CPU which by the way will be more like a 50 point handicap if you include the loss of 25% at proto lvl.. Logis cant be logis anymore? Sure you can, just not a caldari Logi, Those will become extinct and the suit will still be abused, people will just drop all of the equipment and use it as an assault... Like i said before, make game modes that are gear specific, then all you have are your core upgrades and skill.. I am by far not "great" at this game, but i hold my own and i play it for fun... Lately, the fun has been lacking and only frustration remains in its place.. So it will be great if you could respec out of your nerfed class and once again have the fun youve been lacking, and instead lack only the frustration of having a nerfed class. right? with a respec you could play a more viable class and have fun playing dust. right? So if everyone got their respec requests granted along with this guy, they could all spec into the same thing he does.
Great, since we're all clones let's all look alike too.
Everyone using the same thing = balance, right? |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
680
|
Posted - 2013.07.31 03:22:00 -
[468] - Quote
dustwaffle wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:Cannibus Lecktor wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:Cannibus Lecktor wrote:Well then, cudos to you... Lets see if you feel the same way when you have to try to fit your calogi with the same equipment as other races with 40 less CPU, and im not refering to the Douvall rifle and 5 shield ext., Im talking about a core repair tool, an Ishkone nano, and an advanced injector, or maybe some droplinks... I could care less about the race bonus, but to give me a handicap of 40 CPU which by the way will be more like a 50 point handicap if you include the loss of 25% at proto lvl.. Logis cant be logis anymore? Sure you can, just not a caldari Logi, Those will become extinct and the suit will still be abused, people will just drop all of the equipment and use it as an assault... Like i said before, make game modes that are gear specific, then all you have are your core upgrades and skill.. I am by far not "great" at this game, but i hold my own and i play it for fun... Lately, the fun has been lacking and only frustration remains in its place.. So it will be great if you could respec out of your nerfed class and once again have the fun youve been lacking, and instead lack only the frustration of having a nerfed class. right? with a respec you could play a more viable class and have fun playing dust. right? So if everyone got their respec requests granted along with this guy, they could all spec into the same thing he does. Great, since we're all clones let's all look alike too. Everyone using the same thing = balance, right?
Everyone runs an AR anyways. And besides, you see his post, his class sucks and he can no longer compete because of his class getting nerfed. Its better he respec and go into another class, even if its played by everyone, than having to stay his pathetic class and be a non factor as he hates playing dust |
dustwaffle
Gravity Prone EoN.
259
|
Posted - 2013.07.31 03:42:00 -
[469] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:Everyone runs an AR anyways. And besides, you see his post, his class sucks and he can no longer compete because of his class getting nerfed. Its better he respec and go into another class, even if its played by everyone, than having to stay his pathetic class and be a non factor as he hates playing dust Everyone runs AR -> Look at all the Flaylock QQ's, Forge QQ's, tanker QQ's etc.
Sure, AR is the most common weapon, and to be honest I don't see too much of a problem with that since it's a staple in most FPS games and versatile but not particularly excelling in any particular role.
Look at his post? -> Look at his fit. Tell me he was using the logi suit as a logi focused on supporting his teammates.
He decided to use logi suit as an assault suit, and even after nerf, still wants to use it as one. The mentality of this kind of player is equivalent to someone walking in straight line, a wall shows up in his way eventually, and said person walking repeatedly into that wall wondering what has happened. |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
680
|
Posted - 2013.07.31 04:27:00 -
[470] - Quote
dustwaffle wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:Everyone runs an AR anyways. And besides, you see his post, his class sucks and he can no longer compete because of his class getting nerfed. Its better he respec and go into another class, even if its played by everyone, than having to stay his pathetic class and be a non factor as he hates playing dust Everyone runs AR -> Look at all the Flaylock QQ's, Forge QQ's, tanker QQ's etc. Sure, AR is the most common weapon, and to be honest I don't see too much of a problem with that since it's a staple in most FPS games and versatile but not particularly excelling in any particular role. Look at his post? -> Look at his fit. Tell me he was using the logi suit as a logi focused on supporting his teammates. He decided to use logi suit as an assault suit, and even after nerf, still wants to use it as one. The mentality of this kind of player is equivalent to someone walking in straight line, a wall shows up in his way eventually, and said person walking repeatedly into that wall wondering what has happened.
You are right. But he gos on to say he cant even deck it out as a logi. Also, his class was made to be an assault and a logi. OP? yes, but his class was changed to make a new role, whatever that is cuz aperantly nethire is viable, but he cant play it like an assault anymore, his class was changed from its original standing point. He should be respeced, he is not enjoying the change to his class, or dust anymore |
|
RA Drahcir
Psygod9 RISE of LEGION
50
|
Posted - 2013.07.31 04:54:00 -
[471] - Quote
INFINITE DIVERSITY IDIC wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:INFINITE DIVERSITY IDIC wrote:You all know that this weak sauce cry baby ***t has lead to us losing something I paid for and after a hard core nerf nothing is offered? Dude the day Destiny touches down infinite diversity will get the delete button. These people are stupid if they think that they can take my money for boosters, and my money for the elite packs and my AURUM for things like fuse locus grenades which combined with my cpu reduction on my logi I can't even run, and I purchased 3000 of them, this is criminal, I am not even being offered an Aur refund? Who is advising you on your business model? Do you really think I will be retained as a customer? Do you think I will spend another 100 dollars on you? No, I will spend it on the game that doesn't change my entire setup on the whims of the owned....... I mean really I can't have my Aur back? You can't buy back these 3 thousand useless grenades? Ccp you are super fails, I believed in you I purchased your product and was ripped off......RRRRRRRRRRAAAAAAAAAAAAAGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH damnn. Would an SP reset change your disposition any? Absolutely, that was my request, hell just giving me the aur back I spent on 3000 fused grenades would be great, my help ticket was denied promptly.
I am right there with you buddy, I spent 30k AUR on blueprints I cannot/do not use. |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
680
|
Posted - 2013.07.31 06:02:00 -
[472] - Quote
i like how no one answered the OP 25 pages in.... lolol
|
dustwaffle
Gravity Prone EoN.
259
|
Posted - 2013.07.31 06:11:00 -
[473] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:You are right. But he gos on to say he cant even deck it out as a logi. Also, his class was made to be an assault and a logi. OP? yes, but his class was changed to make a new role, whatever that is cuz aperantly nethire is viable, but he cant play it like an assault anymore, his class was changed from its original standing point. He should be respeced, he is not enjoying the change to his class, or dust anymore He says he can't deck it out as a logi, despite the countless replies saying that he should use it as a logi suit, which he disregards anyway? You're agreeing with that kind of response?
His class was NOT made to be an assault and a logi. The logistics suit was meant to be more of a supporting suit, and the equipment slots allow for more flexibility. It was never meant to be Assault suit + 2 equipment slots. Your point that his class was changed doesn't stand, because the logi suit itself was adjusted, but it still performs it basic function. The reason why people can't fit their equipment on them, if you check the fit, was because he fitted a shield tanked suit with 2 damage mods which are fittings intensive. Most likely (haven't check the fittings myself) a proto weapon etc.
And you're partially wrong there. He can still play it as an assault. Is it less effective than an actual assault? Well, of course it is, since it's actually called 'Logistics' rather than 'Assault'.
If he chose to spec into something OP, rather than because he enjoyed that weapon/dropsuit/role, then giving someone like him multiple respecs a year will make no difference to the forum whining: Respec 1: New FOTM CCP balancing Forum whining
Respec 2: New FOTM CCP balancing Forum whing
etc.
Do you see where I'm going with this? |
INFINITE DIVERSITY IDIC
TYRANNY of EVIL MEN
17
|
Posted - 2013.07.31 07:31:00 -
[474] - Quote
dustwaffle wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:You are right. But he gos on to say he cant even deck it out as a logi. Also, his class was made to be an assault and a logi. OP? yes, but his class was changed to make a new role, whatever that is cuz aperantly nethire is viable, but he cant play it like an assault anymore, his class was changed from its original standing point. He should be respeced, he is not enjoying the change to his class, or dust anymore He says he can't deck it out as a logi, despite the countless replies saying that he should use it as a logi suit, which he disregards anyway? You're agreeing with that kind of response? His class was NOT made to be an assault and a logi. The logistics suit was meant to be more of a supporting suit, and the equipment slots allow for more flexibility. It was never meant to be Assault suit + 2 equipment slots. Your point that his class was changed doesn't stand, because the logi suit itself was adjusted, but it still performs it basic function. The reason why people can't fit their equipment on them, if you check the fit, was because he fitted a shield tanked suit with 2 damage mods which are fittings intensive. Most likely (haven't check the fittings myself) a proto weapon etc. And you're partially wrong there. He can still play it as an assault. Is it less effective than an actual assault? Well, of course it is, since it's actually called 'Logistics' rather than 'Assault'. If he chose to spec into something OP, rather than because he enjoyed that weapon/dropsuit/role, then giving someone like him multiple respecs a year will make no difference to the forum whining: Respec 1: New FOTM CCP balancing Forum whining Respec 2: New FOTM CCP balancing Forum whing etc. Do you see where I'm going with this? Yes but what you don't see is that this is about ccp losing customers, in doing so they have simultaneously nerfed many things the best killers in the game own with, check the top 1000 players and see how many use core flaylock, cal logi, fused/contact grenade, you will find that many do. While ccp has found it difficult to retain new players they found it necessary to drive top tier players away, after all you have so many more sp than post beta players, once you have at least thinned the herd it will become easier to get new players to stay. The next thing is the logis will have the built in repair bonus removed, this is why the amarr gained their low slot, they will soon need to use an armor repair module, this change will effectively make these suits combat ineffective.
|
dustwaffle
Gravity Prone EoN.
262
|
Posted - 2013.07.31 07:40:00 -
[475] - Quote
INFINITE DIVERSITY IDIC wrote: Yes but what you don't see is that this is about ccp losing customers, in doing so they have simultaneously nerfed many things the best killers in the game own with, check the top 1000 players and see how many use core flaylock, cal logi, fused/contact grenade, you will find that many do. While ccp has found it difficult to retain new players they found it necessary to drive top tier players away, after all you have so many more sp than post beta players, once you have at least thinned the herd it will become easier to get new players to stay. The next thing is the logis will have the built in repair bonus removed, this is why the amarr gained their low slot, they will soon need to use an armor repair module, this change will effectively make these suits combat ineffective.
IMO, CCP has stated before, that there are certain types of customers that try their games, fall in love and these people form a loyal fanbase that continues enjoying the game for a long time. On the other hand, there are certain people that their games don't appeal to, and these players will walk away after a short period of playing. CCP has stated that they've realized that losing these players is OK.
Balancing changes the way the suits work relative to each other, and forces evolving tactics, and this will become more and more apparent as more variety of suits and fittings are added into the game. If you don't enjoy that sort of thing, it's easy, go pick up one of those GENERIC FPS X+1 where everything stays the same throughout the lifecycle of the product (1-2 years give or take a few months), and the game will remain pretty much the same from release till when the servers are empty. |
INFINITE DIVERSITY IDIC
TYRANNY of EVIL MEN
17
|
Posted - 2013.07.31 07:55:00 -
[476] - Quote
dustwaffle wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:You are right. But he gos on to say he cant even deck it out as a logi. Also, his class was made to be an assault and a logi. OP? yes, but his class was changed to make a new role, whatever that is cuz aperantly nethire is viable, but he cant play it like an assault anymore, his class was changed from its original standing point. He should be respeced, he is not enjoying the change to his class, or dust anymore He says he can't deck it out as a logi, despite the countless replies saying that he should use it as a logi suit, which he disregards anyway? You're agreeing with that kind of response? His class was NOT made to be an assault and a logi. The logistics suit was meant to be more of a supporting suit, and the equipment slots allow for more flexibility. It was never meant to be Assault suit + 2 equipment slots. Your point that his class was changed doesn't stand, because the logi suit itself was adjusted, but it still performs it basic function. The reason why people can't fit their equipment on them, if you check the fit, was because he fitted a shield tanked suit with 2 damage mods which are fittings intensive. Most likely (haven't check the fittings myself) a proto weapon etc. And you're partially wrong there. He can still play it as an assault. Is it less effective than an actual assault? Well, of course it is, since it's actually called 'Logistics' rather than 'Assault'. If he chose to spec into something OP, rather than because he enjoyed that weapon/dropsuit/role, then giving someone like him multiple respecs a year will make no difference to the forum whining: Respec 1: New FOTM CCP balancing Forum whining Respec 2: New FOTM CCP balancing Forum whing etc. Do you see where I'm going with this? Also iam tired of hearing these simpletons tlk about a role. This is something someoen else said and everyone jumps on a band wagon with. There is no role, there is only ability. No one cries on these forums about the proto sentinel sniper, assault rifle scout, logi anti vehicle, heavy dropship pilot, no one cries when another assault is using a rep tool on a heavy, this is not about roles, you ladies are crying because you get shot in the face over and over and over, to you its about failing, to ccp its about customers, new ones not old, and to us ALL it should be about ccp changing a dominant build that became to good, and it was changed inspite of consideration for those who spent money and time for sp on them, it should concern you all as a practice. You see I am just as upset about nerfing flaylocks though I don't use them, as I am about contact grenades which I use, but I understand unlike ccp who apparently doesn't play their own game very often, that both of these items increased as a balance to one another, because all we had to do was throw 2 fused grenades to end the core flaylock, simple direct balance, and yet becausenwe used thesenitems more then less they got nerfed, and you believe that? It just happened to coincide with the most successful combat suit being nerfed as well, and you believed that? Peak play time is about 40 thousand now and dropping everyday and you believed that? Full games harder to find? Matches half over more and more often when you enter the server, they decided to join ambush and oms together now and you still don't see that there is a floundering vessel listing to port throwing men overboard as it try to right it self? Fool!!!! Wake up.
|
dustwaffle
Gravity Prone EoN.
262
|
Posted - 2013.07.31 10:11:00 -
[477] - Quote
INFINITE DIVERSITY IDIC wrote: Also iam tired of hearing these simpletons tlk about a role. This is something someoen else said and everyone jumps on a band wagon with. There is no role, there is only ability. No one cries on these forums about the proto sentinel sniper, assault rifle scout, logi anti vehicle, heavy dropship pilot, no one cries when another assault is using a rep tool on a heavy, this is not about roles, you ladies are crying because you get shot in the face over and over and over, to you its about failing, to ccp its about customers, new ones not old, and to us ALL it should be about ccp changing a dominant build that became to good, and it was changed inspite of consideration for those who spent money and time for sp on them, it should concern you all as a practice. You see I am just as upset about nerfing flaylocks though I don't use them, as I am about contact grenades which I use, but I understand unlike ccp who apparently doesn't play their own game very often, that both of these items increased as a balance to one another, because all we had to do was throw 2 fused grenades to end the core flaylock, simple direct balance, and yet becausenwe used thesenitems more then less they got nerfed, and you believe that? It just happened to coincide with the most successful combat suit being nerfed as well, and you believed that? Peak play time is about 40 thousand now and dropping everyday and you believed that? Full games harder to find? Matches half over more and more often when you enter the server, they decided to join ambush and oms together now and you still don't see that there is a floundering vessel listing to port throwing men overboard as it try to right it self? Fool!!!! Wake up.
Troll: Us 'simpletons' know to use decent spelling, and more importantly, some simple formatting so our rants don't look like massive blocks of text typed out by ADD kids.
Non-troll: OK, to use your term 'ability', CCP limited the so-called logi assaults' ability to perform both effective slayer and effective logistics, forcing them to choose being a sub par assault player (compared to an assault suit) or a decent logi. This is called 'balancing abilities'. No difference in the argument, unless you get too hung up on semantics.
You're upset about flaylocks even though you don't rely on them as a crutch? Why? Because you have nothing better to do? Or you just have an unpleasant disposition in general?
The rest of your crying is off-topic but I'll address them anyway:
Regarding your claim about 2 fused grenades as a balance against flaylocks.... Throwing 2 grenades against a flaylock user has the same effect has shooting said flaylock user... I don't even see how you can use that as an argument. Anyway, you're barking up the wrong tree with your contact nade nerf whine here. This thread is about respec etc.
'The most successful' combat suit was nerfed since they gave a player too many 'abilities' without a significant cost to those abilities, thus making other suits redundant to a certain extent. This is BAD for a game, and if you don't know why, well, you should try engaging your brain sometimes.
Your argument about peak play time being 40 thousand and dropping everyday? LOL this may seem to help your argument but 40K is the TOTAL number of players logged into Dust AND EVE, not Dust alone. Spouting numbers when you don't even know what they mean makes you look like an idiot. Please stop. Finally, the number of players in Dust peaks at around 5100 almost everyday. And when I make a claim, I actually have numbers to back them up. Also, using anecdotal evidence to back up and provide reasoning for your arguments? This one time, I killed a dual core flaylock, contact grenade wielding Cal logi assault player with my melee. Clearly those things are underpowered and melee is overpowered.
To your parting shot of 'Fool, wake up!!' I will not deign to lower myself a level of attempting to get my point across by insulting another person while thinking it makes my argument stronger and makes me look like an adult.
tl;dr Quit your crying, or at least cry on-topic |
RA Drahcir
Psygod9 RISE of LEGION
54
|
Posted - 2013.07.31 12:38:00 -
[478] - Quote
don't people spec into certain dropsuits in pursuit of the passive skills they offer? so when they change up the racial bonuses, why wouldn't they offer a respec?
I am glad the CalLogi got nerfed because all the idiots that ruined it for tru LogiBros that could use the shield tank, sorry LogiBros, there is always the precious few that screw everything up. In that case, CalLogiASSaulters were the many. But in hindsight, I understand that a respec should be offered. I hope that they offer a respec when they release, if they ever do, racial variants of heavies. |
Cannibus Lecktor
Stoned Kloned Killers
3
|
Posted - 2013.07.31 15:13:00 -
[479] - Quote
dustwaffle wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:Everyone runs an AR anyways. And besides, you see his post, his class sucks and he can no longer compete because of his class getting nerfed. Its better he respec and go into another class, even if its played by everyone, than having to stay his pathetic class and be a non factor as he hates playing dust Everyone runs AR -> Look at all the Flaylock QQ's, Forge QQ's, tanker QQ's etc. Sure, AR is the most common weapon, and to be honest I don't see too much of a problem with that since it's a staple in most FPS games and versatile but not particularly excelling in any particular role. Look at his post? -> Look at his fit. Tell me he was using the logi suit as a logi focused on supporting his teammates. He decided to use logi suit as an assault suit, and even after nerf, still wants to use it as one. The mentality of this kind of player is equivalent to someone walking in straight line, a wall shows up in his way eventually, and said person walking repeatedly into that wall wondering what has happened.
Where did i say i use my Logi as an assault? Check your facts buddy. I chose a Logistic suit because i have really bad aim and had no interest in becoming a frontline assault character.. I have over 800,000 war points and only just over 5k in kills, my KDR is 1.02.. I generate my points doing exactly what a logistic suit was designed for... I have invested millions of SP into proto nanos/droplinks and repair tool of which now, if i try to equip them i, I have to sacrifice survivability at which point i become useless on the battlefield.. If i am to be penalized CPU because of the FOTM a@@holes that abused this suit to use it as an assault then give me a bonus to equipment mods instead of shield regen and i would be perfectly happy.. NO other Logi suit lost CPU and they wont have to struggle fitting their equipment... And for the record, i chose my suit mostly on aesthetics, I just liked the way it looked... I liked the Minmatar for the extra equipment slot but i just didnt like the way it looked. |
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
1357
|
Posted - 2013.07.31 15:15:00 -
[480] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:You play a properly balanced, fair and fun class. Liking the class, you dump all 15 mill SP to your name into the class. Suddenly, new build/patch comes around and your class is nerfed without your consent and you now suck at the game. You spawn in your proto suit or your vehical and you are killed over and over, loosing all your ISK. You are told you can not play PC because the one class you are good at, sucks. Nobody wants you in any serious endeavor in dust because your class is nerfed to the point of uselessness. Like current shield tanks, dropships, lazers, plasma cannons and soon to be armor tanks when they fix the bug that is causing them to be balanced. You no longer want to play dust, as the class you played is ruined and so is your ability to enjoy playing dust, because the developers ruined the class you speced into. CCP later anounes that they will not be fixing your class for many months and they ask you to accept their most sincere apologies, despite changing the class that you speced into many months beforehand. Should you get a respec? This happened to the classes mentioned previously and will happen again when the fix the armor tanks
I've bolded the parts where you screwed up.
Did CCP take away your free fits, or militia gear as well? No excuse for losing ISK then.
Diversify and bank your SP.
No respecs. |
|
RA Drahcir
Psygod9 RISE of LEGION
56
|
Posted - 2013.07.31 22:28:00 -
[481] - Quote
Comment for respecs. Ignore if you agree. |
Stands Alone
Ultramarine Corp
44
|
Posted - 2013.07.31 23:06:00 -
[482] - Quote
We will all mourn and lose sleep over the loss of so many players... 5000-6000 players down to 2000 players who dont complain about everything... sounds good to me |
dday3six
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
147
|
Posted - 2013.07.31 23:35:00 -
[483] - Quote
Stands Alone wrote:We will all mourn and lose sleep over the loss of so many players... 5000-6000 players down to 2000 players who dont complain about everything... sounds good to me
Sure, cause a playerbase comprised totally of yes-men will make this game so much better. |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
681
|
Posted - 2013.08.01 01:55:00 -
[484] - Quote
Buster Friently wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:You play a properly balanced, fair and fun class. Liking the class, you dump all 15 mill SP to your name into the class. Suddenly, new build/patch comes around and your class is nerfed without your consent and you now suck at the game. You spawn in your proto suit or your vehical and you are killed over and over, loosing all your ISK. You are told you can not play PC because the one class you are good at, sucks. Nobody wants you in any serious endeavor in dust because your class is nerfed to the point of uselessness. Like current shield tanks, dropships, lazers, plasma cannons and soon to be armor tanks when they fix the bug that is causing them to be balanced. You no longer want to play dust, as the class you played is ruined and so is your ability to enjoy playing dust, because the developers ruined the class you speced into. CCP later anounes that they will not be fixing your class for many months and they ask you to accept their most sincere apologies, despite changing the class that you speced into many months beforehand. Should you get a respec? This happened to the classes mentioned previously and will happen again when the fix the armor tanks I've bolded the parts where you screwed up. Did CCP take away your free fits, or militia gear as well? No excuse for losing ISK then. Diversify and bank your SP. No respecs.
You are wrong and are a nonfactor on the battlefeild and in will never be included in PC because you do not spesicalise. If you spread out your SP then you can do everything, but you will not be good at anything. This means you will never be combat effective and all intelligent players who fully speced into one class will destroy you over and over. A competitive team is made up of players who mono spec into one class and use the best gear available to them. These players contribute their specializations and all work together to form an effective team. If no one has spescialised on your team your team will loose and will loose miserably. However, your team can not win if you are not organised into ppl who now how to play dust and full spec. However, you also cannot win when your star players classes are nerfed and you no longer have an effective team. But if your star players, or any players, who are nerfed can respec into a more playable class then theyy can still play dust, enjoy doing so and even allow their team to win |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
681
|
Posted - 2013.08.01 06:52:00 -
[485] - Quote
dday3six wrote:Stands Alone wrote:We will all mourn and lose sleep over the loss of so many players... 5000-6000 players down to 2000 players who dont complain about everything... sounds good to me Sure, cause a playerbase comprised totally of yes-men will make this game so much better.
very well said +1 ppl want respecs to get out of the shitstorm they are placed in. Someone has to represent them |
Heimdallr69
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
404
|
Posted - 2013.08.01 07:56:00 -
[486] - Quote
Don't worry maple if 1.4 brings new racials everyone will want a respec |
137H4RGIC
SVER True Blood
108
|
Posted - 2013.08.01 08:04:00 -
[487] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote: You are told you can not play PC because the one class you are good at, sucks. Nobody wants you in any serious endeavor in dust because your class is nerfed to the point of uselessness. I have not seen anyone in SVER be told they can't play because of the 'uselessness' of their chosen class and/or weapon in PC. I've seen Scouts, Snipers, Assaults, Heavies, Logis, Tanks, Logi Lavs, Dropships, Snipers all play parts in various strategies for various maps in PC.
It sounds like someone is lacking some strategical vision, or you just aren't as good as your FC would like you to be. |
Heimdallr69
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
404
|
Posted - 2013.08.01 11:12:00 -
[488] - Quote
137H4RGIC wrote:Exmaple Core wrote: You are told you can not play PC because the one class you are good at, sucks. Nobody wants you in any serious endeavor in dust because your class is nerfed to the point of uselessness. I have not seen anyone in SVER be told they can't play because of the 'uselessness' of their chosen class and/or weapon in PC. I've seen Scouts, Snipers, Assaults, Heavies, Logis, Tanks, Logi Lavs, Dropships, Snipers all play parts in various strategies for various maps in PC. It sounds like someone is lacking some strategical vision, or you just aren't as good as your FC would like you to be. You already forget about teamplayers? I havnt |
Illuminaughty-696
Galere Omega Battle Services
294
|
Posted - 2013.08.01 12:29:00 -
[489] - Quote
Heathen Bastard wrote:It's your choice to spend the SP on something that is obviously OP. It's your choice to continue playing after you were invalidated. It's your choice to whine on the forums for a respec that won't come.
lol. Because everyone spent SP knowing it was obviously OP. No one was Caldari Logi before the respec or immediately after the respec BEFORE it became clear it was OP. ALso, clearly, you seem to think it is the job of the players to figure out what is OP rather than the devs, and worse, the players have to figure it out BEFORE the devs. ROFLMAO.
|
NAV HIV
The Generals EoN.
318
|
Posted - 2013.08.01 13:05:00 -
[490] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Why did you constantly put more skill levels into an item you hate using? Then why are you hanging out with a corp that doesn't appreciate what you bring to the table? Then why are you wasting your energy asking for a respec instead of asking for balance to include missing items?
^ This |
|
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star. EoN.
771
|
Posted - 2013.08.01 13:27:00 -
[491] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:You play a properly balanced, fair and fun class. Liking the class, you dump all 15 mill SP to your name into the class. Suddenly, new build/patch comes around and your class is nerfed without your consent and you now suck at the game. You spawn in your proto suit or your vehical and you are killed over and over, loosing all your ISK. You are told you can not play PC because the one class you are good at, sucks. Nobody wants you in any serious endeavor in dust because your class is nerfed to the point of uselessness. Like current shield tanks, dropships, lazers, plasma cannons and soon to be armor tanks when they fix the bug that is causing them to be balanced. You no longer want to play dust, as the class you played is ruined and so is your ability to enjoy playing dust, because the developers ruined the class you speced into. CCP later anounes that they will not be fixing your class for many months and they ask you to accept their most sincere apologies, despite changing the class that you speced into many months beforehand. Should you get a respec? This happened to the classes mentioned previously and will happen again when the fix the armor tanks
Im not sure if i already commented on this but im not reading 25pages or searching because im lazy
I am in that boat currently or close to it
I have nearly 20mil SP
Majority of it into all vehicles, DS, LDS, HAVs, LAV, LLAV and a few into the bare basics into infantry lvl1 skills because they are cheap, the rest is free SP waiting for the 1.5 vehicle overhaul and hopefully the introduction of pilot suits, advanced/proto vehicles and balancing between AV and also shield/armor vehicles
Lately ive taken a break from using vehicles and have run around in infantry gear, milita mostly and get proto stomped alot of the time, but even if i use my 1.8mil top of the range HAV i still get proto stomped by proto AV and im in basic gear with no chance to upgrade the hull or even many of the mods because im already using the best i have which still isnt good enough
5 builds 5 nerfs of somekind or another
I am restricted in what i can do, i am fighting with both arms behind my back, i cannot improve my vehicle anymore, i cannot go toe to toe with proto AV let alone defend myself i have to run everytime
Every game i am now seeing proto AV
Every game i am fighting further away from the battlefield
Every game i am becoming more useless in the field
As time goes on i will become obsolete
2months till 1.5 is out, in 2 months you can earn at least a minimum of 3mil which is more than enough to skill into proto AV which is easy enough to use to solo every type of vehicle currently available
I have more of a right to ask for a respec than these FOTM players but i wont
Simply because i want to use vehicles, i dont want to be scrub with a gun, in time i will be able to do all anyways and in many games i can shoot ppl all day long but i cant always dominate with a vehicle because generally everything is geared towards infantry or vehicles are not included
I dont ask for a respec because this is the path i chose |
GTA-V FTW
Mannar Focused Warfare Gallente Federation
253
|
Posted - 2013.08.01 13:29:00 -
[492] - Quote
dustwaffle wrote: Everyone runs AR -> Look at all the Flaylock QQ's, Forge QQ's, tanker QQ's etc.
You forgot Derpship QQ's.
But you would not see any of these QQ's if we had a choice to respec out of broken stuff. In fact if we got a respec you most likely would see less QQ and more constructive threads. Spec into something and see what is wrong with it, make a thread of what is wrong with it and then respec into something else.
Meh whatever.
Broke game is broke game. |
GTA-V FTW
Mannar Focused Warfare Gallente Federation
253
|
Posted - 2013.08.01 13:35:00 -
[493] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:
Im not sure if i already commented on this but im not reading 25pages or searching because im lazy
I am in that boat currently or close to it
I have nearly 20mil SP
Majority of it into all vehicles, DS, LDS, HAVs, LAV, LLAV and a few into the bare basics into infantry lvl1 skills because they are cheap, the rest is free SP waiting for the 1.5 vehicle overhaul and hopefully the introduction of pilot suits, advanced/proto vehicles and balancing between AV and also shield/armor vehicles
Lately ive taken a break from using vehicles and have run around in infantry gear, milita mostly and get proto stomped alot of the time, but even if i use my 1.8mil top of the range HAV i still get proto stomped by proto AV and im in basic gear with no chance to upgrade the hull or even many of the mods because im already using the best i have which still isnt good enough
5 builds 5 nerfs of somekind or another
I am restricted in what i can do, i am fighting with both arms behind my back, i cannot improve my vehicle anymore, i cannot go toe to toe with proto AV let alone defend myself i have to run everytime
Every game i am now seeing proto AV
Every game i am fighting further away from the battlefield
Every game i am becoming more useless in the field
As time goes on i will become obsolete
2months till 1.5 is out, in 2 months you can earn at least a minimum of 3mil which is more than enough to skill into proto AV which is easy enough to use to solo every type of vehicle currently available
I have more of a right to ask for a respec than these FOTM players but i wont
Simply because i want to use vehicles, i dont want to be scrub with a gun, in time i will be able to do all anyways and in many games i can shoot ppl all day long but i cant always dominate with a vehicle because generally everything is geared towards infantry or vehicles are not included
I dont ask for a respec because this is the path i chose
Yet it is the scrubs with guns that scare you behind the redline, lol.
You derps crack me up.
Proto AV is hear to stay and your win buttons will never return to be the killing machines they once where.
1.5 will come and go and balance will not be obtained and then you will do one of two things, quit or ask for a respec.
|
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star. EoN.
771
|
Posted - 2013.08.01 13:42:00 -
[494] - Quote
GTA-V FTW wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:
Im not sure if i already commented on this but im not reading 25pages or searching because im lazy
I am in that boat currently or close to it
I have nearly 20mil SP
Majority of it into all vehicles, DS, LDS, HAVs, LAV, LLAV and a few into the bare basics into infantry lvl1 skills because they are cheap, the rest is free SP waiting for the 1.5 vehicle overhaul and hopefully the introduction of pilot suits, advanced/proto vehicles and balancing between AV and also shield/armor vehicles
Lately ive taken a break from using vehicles and have run around in infantry gear, milita mostly and get proto stomped alot of the time, but even if i use my 1.8mil top of the range HAV i still get proto stomped by proto AV and im in basic gear with no chance to upgrade the hull or even many of the mods because im already using the best i have which still isnt good enough
5 builds 5 nerfs of somekind or another
I am restricted in what i can do, i am fighting with both arms behind my back, i cannot improve my vehicle anymore, i cannot go toe to toe with proto AV let alone defend myself i have to run everytime
Every game i am now seeing proto AV
Every game i am fighting further away from the battlefield
Every game i am becoming more useless in the field
As time goes on i will become obsolete
2months till 1.5 is out, in 2 months you can earn at least a minimum of 3mil which is more than enough to skill into proto AV which is easy enough to use to solo every type of vehicle currently available
I have more of a right to ask for a respec than these FOTM players but i wont
Simply because i want to use vehicles, i dont want to be scrub with a gun, in time i will be able to do all anyways and in many games i can shoot ppl all day long but i cant always dominate with a vehicle because generally everything is geared towards infantry or vehicles are not included
I dont ask for a respec because this is the path i chose
Yet it is the scrubs with guns that scare you behind the redline, lol. You derps crack me up. Proto AV is hear to stay and your win buttons will never return to be the killing machines they once where. 1.5 will come and go and balance will not be obtained and then you will do one of two things, quit or ask for a respec.
Scrubs with guns carry lolavnades which are easy to use and cause more damage than mines and the damage is instant
Proto AV here to stay, just imagine if we had advanced/proto vehicles and only you have basic AV the tears would flood the forums about vehicle users proto stomping in pub matches while 4ppl with basic AV cant dent it, i would love it but tbh it wont happen because this is infantry514 and you have to be able to solo vehicles because teamwork is so last season
I wont quit and i wont ask for a respec because im not an infantry player who skills into FOTM things because the majority are short sighted and only skill into the next crutch |
GTA-V FTW
Mannar Focused Warfare Gallente Federation
255
|
Posted - 2013.08.01 14:17:00 -
[495] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:GTA-V FTW wrote:Yet it is the scrubs with guns that scare you behind the redline, lol. You derps crack me up. Proto AV is hear to stay and your win buttons will never return to be the killing machines they once where. 1.5 will come and go and balance will not be obtained and then you will do one of two things, quit or ask for a respec. Scrubs with guns carry lolavnades which are easy to use and cause more damage than mines and the damage is instant Proto AV here to stay, just imagine if we had advanced/proto vehicles and only you have basic AV the tears would flood the forums about vehicle users proto stomping in pub matches while 4ppl with basic AV cant dent it, i would love it but tbh it wont happen because this is infantry514 and you have to be able to solo vehicles because teamwork is so last season I wont quit and i wont ask for a respec because im not an infantry player who skills into FOTM things because the majority are short sighted and only skill into the next crutch
I do not have to imagine, I was there when your win buttons would go 50-0 while the tears flowed form Proto AV users not doing a damn thing to your win buttons.
Hence the reason why you derps have oceans of derp tears right now.
You all abused the hell out of your op win buttons and they got Nerf slapped hard.
It is funny that you think that 1.5 will be the return of the Derp win button, sorry bub but it will not. But lets just believe for a second that it is and you get your win buttons back how long will it take for CCP to nerf you all back into the ground again because as you put it, "infantry514" is the name of this game. It being a FPS and all.
Again you will make one of two choices, quit or ask for a respec. |
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star. EoN.
771
|
Posted - 2013.08.01 14:32:00 -
[496] - Quote
GTA-V FTW wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:GTA-V FTW wrote:Yet it is the scrubs with guns that scare you behind the redline, lol. You derps crack me up. Proto AV is hear to stay and your win buttons will never return to be the killing machines they once where. 1.5 will come and go and balance will not be obtained and then you will do one of two things, quit or ask for a respec. Scrubs with guns carry lolavnades which are easy to use and cause more damage than mines and the damage is instant Proto AV here to stay, just imagine if we had advanced/proto vehicles and only you have basic AV the tears would flood the forums about vehicle users proto stomping in pub matches while 4ppl with basic AV cant dent it, i would love it but tbh it wont happen because this is infantry514 and you have to be able to solo vehicles because teamwork is so last season I wont quit and i wont ask for a respec because im not an infantry player who skills into FOTM things because the majority are short sighted and only skill into the next crutch I do not have to imagine, I was there when your win buttons would go 50-0 while the tears flowed form Proto AV users not doing a damn thing to your win buttons. Hence the reason why you derps have oceans of derp tears right now. You all abused the hell out of your op win buttons and they got Nerf slapped hard. It is funny that you think that 1.5 will be the return of the Derp win button, sorry bub but it will not. But lets just believe for a second that it is and you get your win buttons back how long will it take for CCP to nerf you all back into the ground again because as you put it, "infantry514" is the name of this game. It being a FPS and all. Again you will make one of two choices, quit or ask for a respec.
OP wrong
OP only because barely anyone skilled into proper AV and tried to kill it with basic, at least back in the day when someone did kill my tank it was teamwork and not lol imma just solo this brb
1.5 may offer some changes, im hoping advanced/proto vehicles so we can stand up to 2 proto AV users but it prob wont happen
Infantry allowed to proto stomp but its OP when a vehicle does it
CCP wont change, infantry need the crutches and advantages when it comes to fighting vehicles
You will quit long before me FOTM player
|
GTA-V FTW
Mannar Focused Warfare Gallente Federation
257
|
Posted - 2013.08.01 14:48:00 -
[497] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:
You will quit long before me FOTM player
I use an Exile on a Sever Logi suit.
I carry BPO repair tool, advanced nanohive, a BPO pick me up stick, and a advanced flux. I have Two advanced code breakers and two BPO shield extenders.
Last time I looked nothing in this ^ list was ever the FOTM, lol.
Good try though.
Humm last time I looked HAV's where on that FOTM list though and then they got nerfed and the tears have not stopped since. You are still holding on to that proud tradition as well, good for you.
Again, you will either quit or respec when you get the chance. |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1415
|
Posted - 2013.08.01 14:56:00 -
[498] - Quote
GTA-V FTW wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:
You will quit long before me FOTM player
I use an Exile on a Sever Logi suit. I carry BPO repair tool, advanced nanohive, a BPO pick me up stick, and a advanced flux. I have Two advanced code breakers and two BPO shield extenders. Last time I looked nothing in this ^ list was ever the FOTM, lol. Good try though. Humm last time I looked HAV's where on that FOTM list though and then they got nerfed and the tears have not stopped since. You are still holding on to that proud tradition as well, good for you. Again, you will either quit or respec when you get the chance.
I love how people throw around 'FOTM Player'.
Its like some sort of scarlet letter branded insult lol.
"Go back to COD FOTM player" ... sigh... /facepalm |
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star. EoN.
771
|
Posted - 2013.08.01 14:57:00 -
[499] - Quote
GTA-V FTW wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:
You will quit long before me FOTM player
I use an Exile on a Sever Logi suit. I carry BPO repair tool, advanced nanohive, a BPO pick me up stick, and a advanced flux. I have Two advanced code breakers and two BPO shield extenders. Last time I looked nothing in this ^ list was ever the FOTM, lol. Good try though. Humm last time I looked HAV's where on that FOTM list though and then they got nerfed and the tears have not stopped since. You are still holding on to that proud tradition as well, good for you. Again, you will either quit or respec when you get the chance.
HAVs on the FOTM list lolno
Takes months worths of SP to skill into
Last 5 builds 5 sets of nerfs
Still using UP HAVs even after all the nerfs where as FOTM players drop the item in question and demand a respec or quit
Im still here using UP vehicles against OP AV and il still be here longer than you
Keep fighting for that respec because you are a short term short sighted player |
GTA-V FTW
Mannar Focused Warfare Gallente Federation
259
|
Posted - 2013.08.01 15:00:00 -
[500] - Quote
ZDub 303 wrote:GTA-V FTW wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:
You will quit long before me FOTM player
I use an Exile on a Sever Logi suit. I carry BPO repair tool, advanced nanohive, a BPO pick me up stick, and a advanced flux. I have Two advanced code breakers and two BPO shield extenders. Last time I looked nothing in this ^ list was ever the FOTM, lol. Good try though. Humm last time I looked HAV's where on that FOTM list though and then they got nerfed and the tears have not stopped since. You are still holding on to that proud tradition as well, good for you. Again, you will either quit or respec when you get the chance. I love how people throw around 'FOTM Player'. Its like some sort of scarlet letter branded insult lol. "Go back to COD FOTM player" ... sigh... /facepalm
Your guy is the one throwing it around you tool, LOL! Are you telling your own guy to go back to COD?
LOL pure fail, I love it.
|
|
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star. EoN.
771
|
Posted - 2013.08.01 15:02:00 -
[501] - Quote
GTA-V FTW wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:GTA-V FTW wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:
You will quit long before me FOTM player
I use an Exile on a Sever Logi suit. I carry BPO repair tool, advanced nanohive, a BPO pick me up stick, and a advanced flux. I have Two advanced code breakers and two BPO shield extenders. Last time I looked nothing in this ^ list was ever the FOTM, lol. Good try though. Humm last time I looked HAV's where on that FOTM list though and then they got nerfed and the tears have not stopped since. You are still holding on to that proud tradition as well, good for you. Again, you will either quit or respec when you get the chance. I love how people throw around 'FOTM Player'. Its like some sort of scarlet letter branded insult lol. "Go back to COD FOTM player" ... sigh... /facepalm Your guy is the one throwing it around you tool, LOL! Are you telling your own guy to go back to COD? LOL pure fail, I love it.
lol
He thinks because we in the same alliance we have to follow orders and all stick to the same mindset
lol dumbass |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1416
|
Posted - 2013.08.01 15:02:00 -
[502] - Quote
GTA-V FTW wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:GTA-V FTW wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:
You will quit long before me FOTM player
I use an Exile on a Sever Logi suit. I carry BPO repair tool, advanced nanohive, a BPO pick me up stick, and a advanced flux. I have Two advanced code breakers and two BPO shield extenders. Last time I looked nothing in this ^ list was ever the FOTM, lol. Good try though. Humm last time I looked HAV's where on that FOTM list though and then they got nerfed and the tears have not stopped since. You are still holding on to that proud tradition as well, good for you. Again, you will either quit or respec when you get the chance. I love how people throw around 'FOTM Player'. Its like some sort of scarlet letter branded insult lol. "Go back to COD FOTM player" ... sigh... /facepalm Your guy is the one throwing it around you tool, LOL! Are you telling your own guy to go back to COD? LOL pure fail, I love it.
No... how other people say it... hence the quotes.. I wasn't directing that comment at you.. more of an example of the decreasing mental capabilities of people on this forum. |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1416
|
Posted - 2013.08.01 15:03:00 -
[503] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:Keep fighting for that respec because you are a short term short sighted player
Hard not to be shortsighted when this game won't be around much longer... |
GTA-V FTW
Mannar Focused Warfare Gallente Federation
259
|
Posted - 2013.08.01 15:05:00 -
[504] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:
HAVs on the FOTM list lolno
If they were not FOTM's then why did they get nerfed?
|
GTA-V FTW
Mannar Focused Warfare Gallente Federation
259
|
Posted - 2013.08.01 15:08:00 -
[505] - Quote
ZDub 303 wrote:GTA-V FTW wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:GTA-V FTW wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:
You will quit long before me FOTM player
I use an Exile on a Sever Logi suit. I carry BPO repair tool, advanced nanohive, a BPO pick me up stick, and a advanced flux. I have Two advanced code breakers and two BPO shield extenders. Last time I looked nothing in this ^ list was ever the FOTM, lol. Good try though. Humm last time I looked HAV's where on that FOTM list though and then they got nerfed and the tears have not stopped since. You are still holding on to that proud tradition as well, good for you. Again, you will either quit or respec when you get the chance. I love how people throw around 'FOTM Player'. Its like some sort of scarlet letter branded insult lol. "Go back to COD FOTM player" ... sigh... /facepalm Your guy is the one throwing it around you tool, LOL! Are you telling your own guy to go back to COD? LOL pure fail, I love it. No... how other people say it... hence the quotes.. I wasn't directing that comment at you.. more of an example of the decreasing mental capabilities of people on this forum. Oh LOL okay then I agree, Takahiro Kashuken does have decreasing mental capabilities.
LOL ahhhh I love it! |
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star. EoN.
771
|
Posted - 2013.08.01 15:15:00 -
[506] - Quote
GTA-V FTW wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:
HAVs on the FOTM list lolno
If they were not FOTM's then why did they get nerfed?
Because infantry cried OP and refused to use teamwork to take them out until it got to a point where you can solo them without any skill required while on the otherhand AV got buffed
90% of the playerbase didnt use tanks, they all ran proto infantry and complained when a tank would kill them but wouldnt swap out to AV and even try to do so
So what happened? Turrets nerfed, small and large nerfed, missiles/railguns nerfed, mods nerfed, resistances nerfed, speed mods nerfed, passive resistance mods nerfed, skills nerfed, pg nerfed, turret damage nerfed, skills removed, mods removed, AV buff
It happened in BF3 to where majority of vehicles in the game are a joke and can be soloed by a player |
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star. EoN.
771
|
Posted - 2013.08.01 15:16:00 -
[507] - Quote
ZDub 303 wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:Keep fighting for that respec because you are a short term short sighted player Hard not to be shortsighted when this game won't be around much longer...
Vehicles will be long dead before the game is
1 foot in the grave already |
Jaqen Morghalis
Abandoned Privilege General Tso's Alliance
237
|
Posted - 2013.08.01 15:23:00 -
[508] - Quote
ZDub 303 wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:Keep fighting for that respec because you are a short term short sighted player Hard not to be shortsighted when this game won't be around much longer...
If you honestly believe this, then why bother asking for a respec for a game that will probably be dead and buried by the time you get it anyway?
In fact, why bother posting on the forum for an inevitably dead game at all?
Just seems like a pointless waste of time and energy to me. In fact, without even trying, I'm sure I could think of literally HUNDREDS of better, more constructive things a person could do with their time, just off the top of my head. |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1416
|
Posted - 2013.08.01 15:35:00 -
[509] - Quote
Jaqen Morghalis wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:Keep fighting for that respec because you are a short term short sighted player Hard not to be shortsighted when this game won't be around much longer... If you honestly believe this, then why bother asking for a respec for a game that will probably be dead and buried by the time you get it anyway? In fact, why bother posting on the forum for an inevitably dead game at all? Just seems like a pointless waste of time and energy to me. In fact, without even trying, I'm sure I could think of literally HUNDREDS of better, more constructive things a person could do with their time, just off the top of my head.
I hope I'm wrong, and I post in threads like these that have good ideas to keep it from dying... at least until FF14 comes out later this month.
|
GTA-V FTW
Mannar Focused Warfare Gallente Federation
261
|
Posted - 2013.08.01 15:42:00 -
[510] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:GTA-V FTW wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:
HAVs on the FOTM list lolno
If they were not FOTM's then why did they get nerfed? Because infantry cried OP and refused to use teamwork to take them out until it got to a point where you can solo them without any skill required while on the otherhand AV got buffed 90% of the playerbase didnt use tanks, they all ran proto infantry and complained when a tank would kill them but wouldnt swap out to AV and even try to do so So what happened? Turrets nerfed, small and large nerfed, missiles/railguns nerfed, mods nerfed, resistances nerfed, speed mods nerfed, passive resistance mods nerfed, skills nerfed, pg nerfed, turret damage nerfed, skills removed, mods removed, AV buff It happened in BF3 to where majority of vehicles in the game are a joke and can be soloed by a player
Okay so then you are blaming the FOTM players for your win button getting nerfed. Just admit it you suck at FPS's and you need a win button, and now that the FOTM skilled FPS's can destroy you over priced nerfed win button you are pissed.
Anyway my guess is that since you are saying you are a CCP DUST fanboy that you will be taking a respec and not quiting then.
What happens if and when CCP finally releases all the racial variants to the HAV's and there is a better one than what you have your 20 million SP's into and then that HAV starts blowing your derp HAV up? |
|
lDocHollidayl
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
195
|
Posted - 2013.08.01 15:44:00 -
[511] - Quote
Respecs make moral logical sense. If I pay "x" for a product "y", and then the merchant changes "y" to "y-2" morally one would support the choose to use "x" differently.
I say morally because as I understand it we are paying "x" with CCP in tiny letters saying "We have a right to change all "y"'s whenever and however we chose.
If you bought a merc pack and the game closed servers the next day...morally speaking CCP cheated you. They didn't legally but morally they came up short. |
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star. EoN.
772
|
Posted - 2013.08.01 16:31:00 -
[512] - Quote
GTA-V FTW wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:GTA-V FTW wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:
HAVs on the FOTM list lolno
If they were not FOTM's then why did they get nerfed? Because infantry cried OP and refused to use teamwork to take them out until it got to a point where you can solo them without any skill required while on the otherhand AV got buffed 90% of the playerbase didnt use tanks, they all ran proto infantry and complained when a tank would kill them but wouldnt swap out to AV and even try to do so So what happened? Turrets nerfed, small and large nerfed, missiles/railguns nerfed, mods nerfed, resistances nerfed, speed mods nerfed, passive resistance mods nerfed, skills nerfed, pg nerfed, turret damage nerfed, skills removed, mods removed, AV buff It happened in BF3 to where majority of vehicles in the game are a joke and can be soloed by a player Okay so then you are blaming the FOTM players for your win button getting nerfed. Just admit it you suck at FPS's and you need a win button, and now that the FOTM skilled FPS's can destroy you over priced nerfed win button you are pissed. Anyway my guess is that since you are saying you are a CCP DUST fanboy that you will be taking a respec and not quiting then. What happens if and when CCP finally releases all the racial variants to the HAV's and there is a better one than what you have your 20 million SP's into and then that HAV starts blowing your derp HAV up?
Im blaming infantry who refuse to even use AV, they want to tryhard with a rifle and have nothing else kill them
FOTM players cannot kill a tank and im prob better than you at FPS anyways
I dont need a respec, i plan ahead, i have saved SP, 4.5mil SP free and it could be close to 8mil by time 1.5 comes around
Even if a better HAV comes out i will be ready for it and have SP ready unlike FOTM players who skill into the next crutch and then cry when it gets nerfed |
dday3six
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
149
|
Posted - 2013.08.01 19:45:00 -
[513] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:GTA-V FTW wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:
HAVs on the FOTM list lolno
If they were not FOTM's then why did they get nerfed? Because infantry cried OP and refused to use teamwork to take them out until it got to a point where you can solo them without any skill required while on the otherhand AV got buffed 90% of the playerbase didnt use tanks, they all ran proto infantry and complained when a tank would kill them but wouldnt swap out to AV and even try to do so So what happened? Turrets nerfed, small and large nerfed, missiles/railguns nerfed, mods nerfed, resistances nerfed, speed mods nerfed, passive resistance mods nerfed, skills nerfed, pg nerfed, turret damage nerfed, skills removed, mods removed, AV buff It happened in BF3 to where majority of vehicles in the game are a joke and can be soloed by a player
The biggest issue is how CCP designed the maps. IMO, they should have put in for more "no vehicle" safe zones to shelther infantry vs infantry combat. Right now tanks can get almost anywhere on each map, and that's the real problem with vechile balance, they can go nearly anywhere infantry can, but require swapping to AV to counter.
Like it or not most players are not always going to apply teamwork in public matches and I'm hard pressed to say they should be overly punished for it. If tanks always required multiple AV infantry units engaging to neutralize, it shifts the balance too greatly in favor of tank operators as the maps are currently designed in regards to public matches. I'd rather have maps be better deversified into areas were tanks shine in some and infantry shine in others. Then it would be more reasonable for tanks to require a more concentrated effort to despatch and it would also place a greater emphasis on selecting proper squad composition and positioning in PC.
|
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
700
|
Posted - 2013.08.02 01:44:00 -
[514] - Quote
damn, my respec thread turned into a tank thread |
dustwaffle
Gravity Prone EoN.
273
|
Posted - 2013.08.02 06:27:00 -
[515] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:damn, my respec thread turned into a tank thread What can you do eh? What starts off as a decent discussions turns into butthurt players insulting each other's FPS skills and correct/incorrect use of various terms.
Godwin is most likely around the corner as well |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
701
|
Posted - 2013.08.02 06:31:00 -
[516] - Quote
dustwaffle wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:damn, my respec thread turned into a tank thread What can you do eh? What starts off as a decent discussions turns into butthurt players insulting each other's FPS skills and correct/incorrect use of various terms. Godwin is most likely around the corner as well
yeah im talking to him now actually. he wants the respecs to happen cuz his class got nerfed |
Heathen Bastard
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
438
|
Posted - 2013.08.02 06:31:00 -
[517] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:damn, my respec thread turned into a tank thread
Who're the people most in need of a respec? Dropship pilots. followed very closely by tankers.
We won't even get a single ****ing balance pass for at least 6 ****ing months. |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
701
|
Posted - 2013.08.02 06:34:00 -
[518] - Quote
Heathen Bastard wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:damn, my respec thread turned into a tank thread Who're the people most in need of a respec? Dropship pilots. followed very closely by tankers. We won't even get a single ****ing balance pass for at least 6 ****ing months.
them and everyone else whos classes gets suddenly and unexpectedly nerfed |
Ankoku Daishogun
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
95
|
Posted - 2013.08.02 08:14:00 -
[519] - Quote
spec hopping and corp hopping go hand in hand it seems. |
maluble
WASTELAND JUNK REMOVAL
22
|
Posted - 2013.08.02 13:02:00 -
[520] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:You play a properly balanced, fair and fun class. Liking the class, you dump all 15 mill SP to your name into the class. Suddenly, new build/patch comes around and your class is nerfed without your consent and you now suck at the game. You spawn in your proto suit or your vehical and you are killed over and over, loosing all your ISK. You are told you can not play PC because the one class you are good at, sucks. Nobody wants you in any serious endeavor in dust because your class is nerfed to the point of uselessness. Like current shield tanks, dropships, lazers, plasma cannons and soon to be armor tanks when they fix the bug that is causing them to be balanced. You no longer want to play dust, as the class you played is ruined and so is your ability to enjoy playing dust, because the developers ruined the class you speced into. CCP later anounes that they will not be fixing your class for many months and they ask you to accept their most sincere apologies, despite changing the class that you speced into many months beforehand. Should you get a respec? This happened to the classes mentioned previously and will happen again when the fix the armor tanks
If you wear your basic or advanced fits in pub like your supposed to you would have ISK and fun, Proto isnt meant to pub stomp remember that. With a good squad you dont need proto just good players watching your back. |
|
XeroTheBigBoss
TeamPlayers EoN.
749
|
Posted - 2013.08.02 13:23:00 -
[521] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:GTA-V FTW wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:GTA-V FTW wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:
HAVs on the FOTM list lolno
If they were not FOTM's then why did they get nerfed? Because infantry cried OP and refused to use teamwork to take them out until it got to a point where you can solo them without any skill required while on the otherhand AV got buffed 90% of the playerbase didnt use tanks, they all ran proto infantry and complained when a tank would kill them but wouldnt swap out to AV and even try to do so So what happened? Turrets nerfed, small and large nerfed, missiles/railguns nerfed, mods nerfed, resistances nerfed, speed mods nerfed, passive resistance mods nerfed, skills nerfed, pg nerfed, turret damage nerfed, skills removed, mods removed, AV buff It happened in BF3 to where majority of vehicles in the game are a joke and can be soloed by a player Okay so then you are blaming the FOTM players for your win button getting nerfed. Just admit it you suck at FPS's and you need a win button, and now that the FOTM skilled FPS's can destroy you over priced nerfed win button you are pissed. Anyway my guess is that since you are saying you are a CCP DUST fanboy that you will be taking a respec and not quiting then. What happens if and when CCP finally releases all the racial variants to the HAV's and there is a better one than what you have your 20 million SP's into and then that HAV starts blowing your derp HAV up? Im blaming infantry who refuse to even use AV, they want to tryhard with a rifle and have nothing else kill them FOTM players cannot kill a tank and im prob better than you at FPS anyways I dont need a respec, i plan ahead, i have saved SP, 4.5mil SP free and it could be close to 8mil by time 1.5 comes around Even if a better HAV comes out i will be ready for it and have SP ready unlike FOTM players who skill into the next crutch and then cry when it gets nerfed
Do you even dust? |
Laurent Cazaderon
What The French CRONOS.
1905
|
Posted - 2013.08.02 13:35:00 -
[522] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:You play a properly balanced, fair and fun class. Liking the class, you dump all 15 mill SP to your name into the class. Suddenly, new build/patch comes around and your class is nerfed without your consent and you now suck at the game. You spawn in your proto suit or your vehical and you are killed over and over, loosing all your ISK. You are told you can not play PC because the one class you are good at, sucks. Nobody wants you in any serious endeavor in dust because your class is nerfed to the point of uselessness. Like current shield tanks, dropships, lazers, plasma cannons and soon to be armor tanks when they fix the bug that is causing them to be balanced. You no longer want to play dust, as the class you played is ruined and so is your ability to enjoy playing dust, because the developers ruined the class you speced into. CCP later anounes that they will not be fixing your class for many months and they ask you to accept their most sincere apologies, despite changing the class that you speced into many months beforehand. Should you get a respec? This happened to the classes mentioned previously and will happen again when the fix the armor tanks
Cry me a river.....
"Oh damn, me not OP anymore and need to learn back how to play without stomping everyone."
What has been so hardly nerfed lately ? And i mean, like in 1.2/1.3 that you cant even go into PC fights ? |
Heimdallr69
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
418
|
Posted - 2013.08.02 14:10:00 -
[523] - Quote
Laurent Cazaderon wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:You play a properly balanced, fair and fun class. Liking the class, you dump all 15 mill SP to your name into the class. Suddenly, new build/patch comes around and your class is nerfed without your consent and you now suck at the game. You spawn in your proto suit or your vehical and you are killed over and over, loosing all your ISK. You are told you can not play PC because the one class you are good at, sucks. Nobody wants you in any serious endeavor in dust because your class is nerfed to the point of uselessness. Like current shield tanks, dropships, lazers, plasma cannons and soon to be armor tanks when they fix the bug that is causing them to be balanced. You no longer want to play dust, as the class you played is ruined and so is your ability to enjoy playing dust, because the developers ruined the class you speced into. CCP later anounes that they will not be fixing your class for many months and they ask you to accept their most sincere apologies, despite changing the class that you speced into many months beforehand. Should you get a respec? This happened to the classes mentioned previously and will happen again when the fix the armor tanks Cry me a river..... "Oh damn, me not OP anymore and need to learn back how to play without stomping everyone." What has been so hardly nerfed lately ? And i mean, like in 1.2/1.3 that you cant even go into PC fights ? Tanks were OP one time I will admit that but since then they've been weak as hell why the hell should 1 guy be able to solo a tank? Yeah no proto tanks so they should have taken proto av out aswell |
Defy Gravity
Silver Talon Corporation
60
|
Posted - 2013.08.02 14:12:00 -
[524] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:You play a properly balanced, fair and fun class. Liking the class, you dump all 15 mill SP to your name into the class. Suddenly, new build/patch comes around and your class is nerfed without your consent and you now suck at the game. You spawn in your proto suit or your vehical and you are killed over and over, loosing all your ISK. You are told you can not play PC because the one class you are good at, sucks. Nobody wants you in any serious endeavor in dust because your class is nerfed to the point of uselessness. Like current shield tanks, dropships, lazers, plasma cannons and soon to be armor tanks when they fix the bug that is causing them to be balanced. You no longer want to play dust, as the class you played is ruined and so is your ability to enjoy playing dust, because the developers ruined the class you speced into. CCP later anounes that they will not be fixing your class for many months and they ask you to accept their most sincere apologies, despite changing the class that you speced into many months beforehand. Should you get a respec? This happened to the classes mentioned previously and will happen again when the fix the armor tanks Lol feel your pain.... On the nerf part |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
707
|
Posted - 2013.08.03 02:41:00 -
[525] - Quote
Heimdallr69 wrote:Laurent Cazaderon wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:You play a properly balanced, fair and fun class. Liking the class, you dump all 15 mill SP to your name into the class. Suddenly, new build/patch comes around and your class is nerfed without your consent and you now suck at the game. You spawn in your proto suit or your vehical and you are killed over and over, loosing all your ISK. You are told you can not play PC because the one class you are good at, sucks. Nobody wants you in any serious endeavor in dust because your class is nerfed to the point of uselessness. Like current shield tanks, dropships, lazers, plasma cannons and soon to be armor tanks when they fix the bug that is causing them to be balanced. You no longer want to play dust, as the class you played is ruined and so is your ability to enjoy playing dust, because the developers ruined the class you speced into. CCP later anounes that they will not be fixing your class for many months and they ask you to accept their most sincere apologies, despite changing the class that you speced into many months beforehand. Should you get a respec? This happened to the classes mentioned previously and will happen again when the fix the armor tanks Cry me a river..... "Oh damn, me not OP anymore and need to learn back how to play without stomping everyone." What has been so hardly nerfed lately ? And i mean, like in 1.2/1.3 that you cant even go into PC fights ? Tanks were OP one time I will admit that but since then they've been weak as hell why the hell should 1 guy be able to solo a tank? Yeah no proto tanks so they should have taken proto av out aswell
even the CPM raises his temper. you would think they would be more diplomatic on the topic of fixing the mistakes caused by rebalancing |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 :: [one page] |