|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1314
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 04:03:00 -
[1] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Why did you constantly put more skill levels into an item you hate using? Then why are you hanging out with a corp that doesn't appreciate what you bring to the table? Then why are you wasting your energy asking for a respec instead of asking for balance to include missing items?
Cause we all know balance is months and months away... Iike it always has been for dust.
When it comes to corps... If you want to be competitive in PC you can't run terrible builds just cause you're a special snowflake. Most corps would probably tell him "Exmaple... You're a beast tanker. And when tanks become viable again next February we would love to run you again, but until then we need another assault on the field." |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1314
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 04:05:00 -
[2] - Quote
Once we've reached some semblance of balance, respecs won't be necessary. But the people on this forum are dellusional if they think we are balanced now or will be balanced by the end of the year.
FOTM is a symptom of bad balance, not of the ability to respec. |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1314
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 04:07:00 -
[3] - Quote
Duran Lex wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:You play a properly balanced, fair and fun class. Liking the class, you dump all 15 mill SP to your name into the class. Suddenly, new build/patch comes around and your class is nerfed without your consent and you now suck at the game. You spawn in your proto suit or your vehical and you are killed over and over, loosing all your ISK. You are told you can not play PC because the one class you are good at, sucks. Nobody wants you in any serious endeavor in dust because your class is nerfed to the point of uselessness. Like current shield tanks, dropships, lazers, plasma cannons and soon to be armor tanks when they fix the bug that is causing them to be balanced. You no longer want to play dust, as the class you played is ruined and so is your ability to enjoy playing dust, because the developers ruined the class you speced into. CCP later anounes that they will not be fixing your class for many months and they ask you to accept their most sincere apologies, despite changing the class that you speced into many months beforehand. Should you get a respec? This happened to the classes mentioned previously and will happen again when the fix the armor tanks Hmm, but if it was properly balanced and fair, then why would it get a nerf or buff? To be fair, plasma cannon was always bad. Laser nerf was pretty much just the viziam, otherwise the guns major change was just the iron sights. Which DID make it, in effect, a nerf...but technically it isnt. (and anyways, they are adding the red dot sight back to lasers which will bring back the melting of faces) I dunno, my HMG was nerfed into a shorter range then a shotgun with worse dispersion than an SMG...my forge gun was never correctly registering direct and splash radius hits for months, strafe speed was increased but they still left me fat and slow to turn... yet i still had fun. maybe I'm just a rare breed that enjoys the game i play, even through the rough patches.
There's a difference between casual play and wanting to compete in corp v corp matches. If CCPs goal is to chase out all of the competitive players.. They are doing a real disservice to this game. |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1315
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 04:11:00 -
[4] - Quote
Duran Lex wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:Once we've reached some semblance of balance, respecs won't be necessary. But the people on this forum are dellusional if they think we are balanced now or will be balanced by the end of the year.
FOTM is a symptom of bad balance, not of the ability to respec. I humbly disagree. FOTM is a symptom of both bad balance and respecs, imo. Bad balance is the drug. Respecs are the drug dealers.
So if we had a perfectly balanced game and unlimited respecs... There would still be FOTM chasing?
Fact of the matter, without respecs people are still FOTM chasing, it just takes a few weeks longer. Thus rewarding the people who speced early giving them much longer to play with OP weapons than they should have been able to.
Case in point: flaylocks.
They were OP for almost 6 weeks before they became FOTM. |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1315
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 04:15:00 -
[5] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote: Dunno! this is what happens though, has all the time. But its not about nerfing a class into uselessness now and fixing them 6 months later. Its about having your class ruined and not having a reason to play for the next 6 months, as youve been swindled out of your SP. So, your entitled to respecs
So true.. Very well put. |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1315
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 04:16:00 -
[6] - Quote
Malkai Inos wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:Duran Lex wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:Once we've reached some semblance of balance, respecs won't be necessary. But the people on this forum are dellusional if they think we are balanced now or will be balanced by the end of the year.
FOTM is a symptom of bad balance, not of the ability to respec. I humbly disagree. FOTM is a symptom of both bad balance and respecs, imo. Bad balance is the drug. Respecs are the drug dealers. So if we had a perfectly balanced game and unlimited respecs... There would still be FOTM chasing? There is no perfectly balanced game of this complexity. We could argue with fairies aswell by that standard.
Point still stands no? Yes reality is we will never have perfect balancing, but get close enough and 'fotm chasing' will be indistinguishable from play style preference. |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1315
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 04:20:00 -
[7] - Quote
Duran Lex wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:Duran Lex wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:Once we've reached some semblance of balance, respecs won't be necessary. But the people on this forum are dellusional if they think we are balanced now or will be balanced by the end of the year.
FOTM is a symptom of bad balance, not of the ability to respec. I humbly disagree. FOTM is a symptom of both bad balance and respecs, imo. Bad balance is the drug. Respecs are the drug dealers. So if we had a perfectly balanced game and unlimited respecs... There would still be FOTM chasing? That hypothetical is a matter of opinion. One side of the coin will say "the game is perfectly balanced, so you don't need respecs" The other side "the game is perfectly balance, so whats the harm in respecs?"
It's up to the game design philosophy at that point and i can live with either argument just fine.
Until we're even remotely balanced through, I think respecs would help more than they hurt. For reasons already listed. |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1315
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 04:22:00 -
[8] - Quote
DUST Fiend wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Why did you constantly put more skill levels into an item you hate using? Then why are you hanging out with a corp that doesn't appreciate what you bring to the table? Then why are you wasting your energy asking for a respec instead of asking for balance to include missing items? Isn't 1.4 supposed to be some massive shakeup? How are we supposed to plan for the future when we have absolutely no idea what is changing. :/
You don't plan for the future. And you don't spend any of your SP.
Even 1.4 won't be the end of it I'm positive.
Best off not spending any SP until Christmas IMHO....
It's why nobody wants to play anymore. |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1315
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 04:25:00 -
[9] - Quote
calvin b wrote:I understand how you feel. I also know that if CCP fails to offer a optional respec after all suits, weapons, and vehicles are released there will be a lot of unhappy players. Balance is needed, but lets be patient and wait for them to fix the current problems and release of all items. I say 6 months from now if not half of these items are not fixed, there may not be enough people left. You can only take so much before you throw your hands up. For example American cars, the auto industry thought they were invincible and kept making crap. Americans had enough of it and moved to Japanese built cars.
No one wants to sit on ****** builds for 6 months while they wait for CCP to figure this out though. We're all better of playing a different game :( |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1317
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 04:28:00 -
[10] - Quote
DUST Fiend wrote:Duran Lex wrote:DUST Fiend wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Why did you constantly put more skill levels into an item you hate using? Then why are you hanging out with a corp that doesn't appreciate what you bring to the table? Then why are you wasting your energy asking for a respec instead of asking for balance to include missing items? Isn't 1.4 supposed to be some massive shakeup? How are we supposed to plan for the future when we have absolutely no idea what is changing. :/ Here That tells us nothing. Not to say it's not a useful devblog, but apparently the entire Shanghai team has essentially been gutted, and 1.4 is supposed a big design leap. Vehicles and AV are getting a "balance pass" which with CCP, could literally be anything. That tank you love to drive today, might feel like garbage to you tomorrow. That forge gun you really enjoy all of a sudden just doesn't function like it has for so long, and the style is no longer fun. Those AV grenades you dumped oodles of SP into? Nah sorry, balance, those suck. We have no idea It's a crap shoot.
Amen, good post. |
|
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1317
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 04:33:00 -
[11] - Quote
Duran Lex wrote:
Yes, once it gets to that point. But its not...so we still have the same argument being thrown back and forth.
One side - "It helps the game by letting people choose what they want to have fun with"
Other side - "It helps ruin the game by letting people choose the FOTM to have fun with."
It will never end.
Respecs have a few unique advantages though.
1. They show the metrics for FOTM much clearer to CCP, getting us closer to balance faster. 2. They allow people to spec into FOTM counters until FOTM can get fixed. 3. They don't alienate players who've been nerfed into oblivion by a 'balance patch' like tankers and scouts and heavies. 4. They can clearly see which suits are underutilized since people don't have to use them anymore, instead... People are just stuck with ****** suits and left to complain endlessly on the forum until they give up and quit the game. |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1319
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 04:41:00 -
[12] - Quote
I will fully admit, respecs go against the design philosophy of this game and will probably be bad in the long run. But right now the game needs help, and people just want to have fun while they play.
For many people sitting on nerfed builds, not having the ability to spec out of bad design decisions made by CCP means they cannot have fun... So why should they play?
I'm happy with my cal logi build, I don't even want a respec that badly. I just sit here now and make comments on it everyday for people like Exmaple who got boned by bad design and just left the deal with it.
I like this game, and I want more people to play it. Despite any of my forum rage ive posted in other threads. |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1321
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 04:48:00 -
[13] - Quote
Malkai Inos wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:
Respecs have a few unique advantages though.
1. They show the metrics for FOTM much clearer to CCP, getting us closer to balance faster. 2. They allow people to spec into FOTM counters until FOTM can get fixed. 3. They don't alienate players who've been nerfed into oblivion by a 'balance patch' like tankers and scouts and heavies. 4. They can clearly see which suits are underutilized since people don't have to use them anymore, instead... People are just stuck with ****** suits and left to complain endlessly on the forum until they give up and quit the game.
In the right order: 1. They also amplify possibly insignificant balance issues, making reasonable balance harder to achieve and "nerfed into oblivion" scenarios more common. 2. A measure that could be fixed directly and and possibly easier without respecs as per my response to 1. 3. They alienate players whom value the "no respec" mentality and would take issue with such a step. (Leaving justification for either position aside for the sake of the argument) 4. "Underutilized does not mean UP. There are other possible reasons for that and better metrics to assess relative power in a no respec environment. Lastly there are other reasons against respecs, most of which have nothing/not much to do with FOTM chasing here, here, here, here, here and here. It is often overlooked that the no respec mentality of CCP has as variety of reasons behind it and the subject is not done due justice if they are ignored.
I would completely agree with all of your points and linked posts... If this game was even close to balanced.
So what should someone in exmaple's position do? Just quit the game? |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1321
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 04:54:00 -
[14] - Quote
It's easier for the 'no respec' crowd to deal with a temporary design philosophy change than it is for players who cannot enjoy the game with a broken class to wait months for CCP to fix their game. |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1321
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 04:55:00 -
[15] - Quote
Duran Lex wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:Duran Lex wrote:
Yes, once it gets to that point. But its not...so we still have the same argument being thrown back and forth.
One side - "It helps the game by letting people choose what they want to have fun with"
Other side - "It helps ruin the game by letting people choose the FOTM to have fun with."
It will never end.
Respecs have a few unique advantages though. 1. They show the metrics for FOTM much clearer to CCP, getting us closer to balance faster. 2. They allow people to spec into FOTM counters until FOTM can get fixed. 3. They don't alienate players who've been nerfed into oblivion by a 'balance patch' like tankers and scouts and heavies. 4. They can clearly see which suits are underutilized since people don't have to use them anymore, instead... People are just stuck with ****** suits and left to complain endlessly on the forum until they give up and quit the game. It can also be detrimental though. Lets say they gave the respec for tankers and most tankers respecced out of tanks. Now theres no use for large amounts of SP invested in AV, so AVer's respec out of it. There's very few tanks and AV now, so how are they going to collect data for those to balance it? Or what if those Tankers all decided to spec into LLAV, which is truly OP. Now you have 6 LLAV's driving around all match neigh unstoppable. LLAV gets nerfed too strong because of glorified data, everyone respecs out of it. No more LLAVs anymore. Respecs are indeed a way to keep things fresh, and to add enjoyment by speccing out of something you personally think isn't fun to play anymore. It just my opinion thats it cant work well for this game. It will only create a merry-go-round of extreme buffs and nerfs.
You give it 2-3 weeks and it would all settle to equilibrium. |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1322
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 05:35:00 -
[16] - Quote
I agree, once were relatively close to balancing the core gameplay (ie drop suit and weapon stats) then we can all confidently say that our skill points are true investments and we have no reason to QQ about changes.
But until then...
Until then, the answer is to stop playing. And that's what a lot of people are doing... Games generally die when people stop playing them... |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1323
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 05:40:00 -
[17] - Quote
Meeko Fent wrote:Very rarely do classes that weren't being abused get nerfed hard enough to makes respec necessary.
That's a matter of opinion though. Should people not have the ability to choose if that's the case? |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1323
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 05:48:00 -
[18] - Quote
Heathen Bastard wrote:
It's your choice to spend the SP on something that is obviously OP. It's your choice to continue playing after you were invalidated. It's your choice to whine on the forums for a respec that won't come.
What did he spec into that was obviously OP? Have you even read a single post in this thread?
/facepalm |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1323
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 05:52:00 -
[19] - Quote
Opus,
I think you're too optimistic. Given the last 6 months ive played this game, and how little has gone right since the beginning of chromosome. I cannot imagine this game with be balanced before February next year. |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1323
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 06:17:00 -
[20] - Quote
Heathen Bastard wrote:I'm a shield-missile tanker. My entire playstyle is invalidated by a single forge gunner, or even half-decent tank on the field. you know what I did? grabbed a heavy machine gun and a fatsuit after a week long break. it's nice to start at the bottom again, keeps you from making bullcrap posts demanding a respec even though they already said NO MORE a while ago.
That's easy to say when you're in an npc corp.
This kind of thinking needs to go away if things like corp battles and PC (ie non public matches) are to ever be taken seriously in this game.
And they've never once said no more respecs, they've only said no more resets. |
|
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1325
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 06:20:00 -
[21] - Quote
Cat Merc wrote:That's just the nature of things. Just pray to the CCP gods to have mercy and not to bring the nerf hammer, but the nerf chisel for your OP item.
But it doesn't have to be. |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1325
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 06:41:00 -
[22] - Quote
Malkai Inos wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:My opinion is that you should live with it. they said your decisions matter, And they do. You chose to spec into a very specific role on an ever changing battlefield. when the battlefield changed, and you broke. I decided to be more flexible.
If the balance has been shown to be volatile at best, then try to avoid speccing into things too terribly heavily unless you're sure that come rain, snow, fire, or flood, you'll be able to be happy with it. If you dont full spec into a class than you cant do anything well, thats as basic as it gets on an SP system. in fact, CCP encourages ppl to invest all their skill points into one class and become very efficent at it, there are videos with devs encouraging this from closed beta. You can not contribute to a team and make a difference without a full spec, nor will you be included in PC without a mono spec. Besides, we should not have to compensate with developers issuies, we should play the game like its meant to be played and feel secure in doing so. Do not post your incompetence on my threads It is currently designed that way but I don't think this is in line with CCPs vision. The skillsystem should allow specialization and generalization to be viable alternatives with varying ups and downs. The bonuses from Pro mods (especially tanking) are so strong that it's far too viable to fit proto whatever really. Since that one level an easily increase ehp by 20% with just the mods and almost triple it if combined with the suit. This defies the concept of diminishing returns. And is thus bad. I think that CCP can improve on this and interesting concepts have been proposed on these forums (among others from cat merc, of all people )
When it comes down to it, proto gear is the only gear worth using. And anyone who thinks otherwise is playing this game like an rpg and not an FPS.
And hey... Maybe that's what it really is. And all us FPS players should just gtfo.
|
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1326
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 07:04:00 -
[23] - Quote
Heimdallr69 wrote: I agree with a respec but after all the weapons are implemented and balanced so there is no fotm ****
Essentially you're telling people to stop playing for the next 4 months while CCP balances weapons then?
FOTM weaponry is largely unaffected by respecs anyways. Operation 5 is 1-2 weeks of SP. it's drop suits and vehicles that need respecs.
Telling a tanker to wait for weapon releases is pointless. |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1326
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 07:24:00 -
[24] - Quote
A hilariously sad yet perfect description of the state of game balance in dust. +1 |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1326
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 07:25:00 -
[25] - Quote
Heimdallr69 wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:Sadly. a motivator in why i stand up to the haters, speds, Devs and derps who vote against respecs. Because iknow first hand what its like to invest time and SP into a class and have it ruined due to balancing. I would gladly respec if i could, to have a fighting chance and be useful again but i cant becuase im doomed to play the mistake CCP gave me. Myslef and others I support it for vehicles but none of those calogis anything but them
Yes those evil caldari logis should pay for their sins! |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1328
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 07:35:00 -
[26] - Quote
Heimdallr69 wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:Heimdallr69 wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:Sadly. a motivator in why i stand up to the haters, speds, Devs and derps who vote against respecs. Because iknow first hand what its like to invest time and SP into a class and have it ruined due to balancing. I would gladly respec if i could, to have a fighting chance and be useful again but i cant becuase im doomed to play the mistake CCP gave me. Myslef and others I support it for vehicles but none of those calogis anything but them Yes those evil caldari logis should pay for their sins! Not so much that its OP but after the respec everyone went to it even though they knew it would get nerfed
What if some people spec'd into it, wanting a shield tanked logistics, knowing full well the shield buff was probably going to be removed, but then are forced to deal with -40 base CPU. They tried to predict CCPs nerfs and failed. Now they have to pay for it. Running a logi class that might not be suited to what they intended from the get go?
Saying oh they have 9 slots stfu and gtfo is the reasonable answer?
Honestly, after they fix armor, min logi and gal logi will be the much better choice, and many of those guys who picked cal logi to logi with shields would probably have picked min... Now they just have to live with it... I think its ****** personally.
I actually think the CPU nerf is probably perfect for balance. But it's not what people bought with their 10 weeks of SP.
Hopefully we can see a respec for logis in 1.4, once they redone bonuses. Cause sounds like the changes are drastic. |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1329
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 07:42:00 -
[27] - Quote
Heimdallr69 wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:
What if some people spec'd into it, wanting a shield tanked logistics, knowing full well the shield buff was probably going to be removed, but then are forced to deal with -40 base CPU. They tried to predict CCPs nerfs and failed. Now they have to pay for it. Running a logi class that might not be suited to what they intended from the get go?
Saying oh they have 9 slots stfu and gtfo is the reasonable answer?
Honestly, after they fix armor, min logi and gal logi will be the much better choice, and many of those guys who picked cal logi to logi with shields would probably have picked min... Now they just have to live with it... I think its ****** personally.
I actually think the CPU nerf is probably perfect for balance. But it's not what people bought with their 10 weeks of SP.
Hopefully we can see a respec for logis in 1.4, once they redone bonuses. Cause sounds like the changes are drastic.
Well I get that but the people that think they should have the bonus the highs lows and the equipment and use it for assault purposes..for true logis I apologize
It's the same song and dance for anything that gets nerfed in this game though, you know?
It's the reason I'm advocating respecs on changes... So people can adapt to nerfs/buffs CCP implements. I have no personal agenda here. |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1333
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 14:10:00 -
[28] - Quote
ADAM-OF-EVE wrote:i argue against it,
as much as i would like a respec to get back sp from skills i am no longer able to use effectively i disagree with your post. for a few reasons.
why should ccp punish players who didn't use op/unbalanced gear by rewarding people who did respecs so they can spec into the next op/unbalanced gear. its not ccp's problem you used op/unbalanced gear and as such are going to get nerfed. you reaped the rewards of the unbalance for months and now you have to pay for it
you only have yourself to blame by dumping everything you had into 1 role. i myself have about 20 different suits/vehicle fits for different roles and situations even specific ones for certain maps. some have been nerfed heavily and others not touched at all yet i fully expect more changes in the future.
everyone knows dust is going to be permanently adjusted over and over again and that sticking to 1 role is just a bad idea yet people still do it and cry respec when the inevitable balance happens
We need to abandon this kind of thinking if we're ever going to be able to take organized corp battles seriously in this game.
You know IWS is very similar to do you? He's put one point into every single skill and working on level 2 now.
That's cool and all, and good for him, but he will never have a place in PC, which is the only thing still keeping a lot of us here. |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1345
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 05:51:00 -
[29] - Quote
lowratehitman wrote:I have basically stopped playing the game, and doing videos. The whole experience has been a waste of many moons of grinding SP.
This community I have found out is not who you know but who you blow.... Too many "big chiefs" running around with titles that I NEVER NEVER see in the game, yet represent our best interests.....
I do not believe the forums are even related to the actual game anymore, or the interest of the daily player
Sad to see you go lowrate, I think a lot of us are right behind you...
Post QFT... All so pathetically true. |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1346
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 05:58:00 -
[30] - Quote
lowratehitman wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:lowratehitman wrote:I have basically stopped playing the game, and doing videos. The whole experience has been a waste of many moons of grinding SP.
This community I have found out is not who you know but who you blow.... Too many "big chiefs" running around with titles that I NEVER NEVER see in the game, yet represent our best interests.....
I do not believe the forums are even related to the actual game anymore, or the interest of the daily player Sad to see you go lowrate, I think a lot of us are right behind you... Post QFT... All so pathetically true. I still get on perhaps 1-2 hr per week vs the 40+ hrs a weeks I was sinking into the game. I have not and will not spend anymore money on boosters or anything like that, and have not for awhile now.
Same, Oceania afk farming till cap... Then a few PC matches.. And that's it. But I'm sadly struggling to even afk farm anymore... Haven't bought a merc pack since chrome... |
|
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1354
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 18:02:00 -
[31] - Quote
Stands Alone wrote:I think those of you who mention quitting, should stop making threats and just quit. Eve grew at a very slow pace, even though millions have tried and quit. but CCP kept it going, and now there is nothing to compare to the magnitude of what heppens in Eve. in fact, they just made BBC news today.
I know plenty of people who like this "adapt or die" about Dust, how you will not get a respec, to think ahead before you invest SP on whether you are investing it on yourself, or investing it into you K/D ratio...
they have a small team, they aren't a giant corporation. they dont need a huge amount of players to pay to keep operating... BF does, COD does, Halo does, but not Dust... there is like 10% of the team that those companies have working on dust...
you can keep telling yourself that they will not make enough to keep dust going but they will...
you can keep saying that all the players will leave, but they wont. there will always be the ones who are curious to see where it goes, and there will always be the ones who know where its going...
This is not a just a mindless FPS. this is a thinking man's game, and it will remain that way.
its not my fault if you didnt think ahead and chose the "best" weapon or suit at the time. you didnt think ahead to the consequences of using that too your advantage.... shoulda invest SP into yourself and not your K/D
There is no 'think before you spend your SP'... its 'try your best to predict the future before you spend your SP'. |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1354
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 18:11:00 -
[32] - Quote
Stands Alone wrote:ZDub 303 wrote: There is no 'think before you spend your SP'... its 'try your best to predict the future before you spend your SP'.
is that not thinking?
yeah I'll concede that. Its a terrible way to treat your player base though imo. |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1354
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 18:27:00 -
[33] - Quote
Sadly... this whole thread probably doesn't matter at all.
I doubt CCP could/would develop a system to implement respecs before 1.5... at which point they will have done a pass at both infantry and vehicle balancing.
I would be very surprised if they don't offer a respec for 1.5 after they have done these changes.
|
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1357
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 20:03:00 -
[34] - Quote
Stands Alone wrote:nope... i just think, if you cant adapt... then this isnt for you. Respec is dumb. shoulda did more research.
So have you found a way to predict the future? I would really like to know what it is.
Shoulda done more research... what a joke response. |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1359
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 20:44:00 -
[35] - Quote
dday3six wrote:SILENTSAM 69 wrote:I can not only argue with this. I can dismiss it out right.
I love seeing tears like this. I really hope CCP just ignores all thee tears, collects them for later enjoyment maybe, and just continues without respecs.
Respecs are for lesser people in other shooters. Seriously? Is there something in the water? WTF.
Just people drinking some awesome koolaid apparently.
Notice how all of the people arguing against respecs are non factors in npc corps or corps that could never compete in PC? |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1359
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 20:53:00 -
[36] - Quote
Stands Alone wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:dday3six wrote:SILENTSAM 69 wrote:I can not only argue with this. I can dismiss it out right.
I love seeing tears like this. I really hope CCP just ignores all thee tears, collects them for later enjoyment maybe, and just continues without respecs.
Respecs are for lesser people in other shooters. Seriously? Is there something in the water? WTF. Just people drinking some awesome koolaid apparently. Notice how all of the people arguing against respecs are non factors in npc corps or corps that could never compete in PC? we used to compete PC in a PC alliance... as did my previous corp... not sure why it makes a difference...
The fundamental difference in both arguments comes down to PC in its essence (organized battles). You need to be specialized and effective to make a difference in a corp battle. This is why people want respecs, so they can rework their SP to remain effective after their specialization has been nerfed. Everyone who is against just RPs in pub matches.
Your corp may have participated in the early days of PC but they clearly got run out by people with more skill and better planning of their SP paths., They may participate now simply because large corporations like EoN allow you to. But not having a solid specialization means you aren't competitive in PC.
This may not matter in another 6-8 months once a lot of people are pushing 30 million SP... but it matters right now.. and a lot of people are unhappy they don't really have a place in PC (or those kinds of matches in general).
god this game is just so broke.. |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1359
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 20:56:00 -
[37] - Quote
Malkai Inos wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:dday3six wrote:SILENTSAM 69 wrote:I can not only argue with this. I can dismiss it out right.
I love seeing tears like this. I really hope CCP just ignores all thee tears, collects them for later enjoyment maybe, and just continues without respecs.
Respecs are for lesser people in other shooters. Seriously? Is there something in the water? WTF. Just people drinking some awesome koolaid apparently. Notice how all of the people arguing against respecs are non factors in npc corps or corps that could never compete in PC? How is that relevant? Last i checked the subject was not PC. Engage the argument, not the person arguing.
Read my next post. Most of it comes down to how you approach the game play. And hell maybe it doesn't matter... by the time this game is worth playing 'competitively' it'll all be balanced and maybe corp matches will matter at that point. and most of the competitive players will probably be on PS4 anyways lol.
I dunno why I even care anymore. |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1361
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 21:02:00 -
[38] - Quote
dday3six wrote:I've been noticing that trend, and it seems to be very much the same "competitive vs causal" BS that most games and hobbies suffer from. "Causals" seems to hate "Competitors" because they don't understand their outlook, meanwhile many competitors ultimately desire a healthly mix of both players because they know Competitors often start as Causals.
It's the people who want tears and suffering from Cal-logis and Flaylock users. Some feel they should be punished for using the tools the developers gave them. It makes no sense to me.
The fundamental argument.
Is this an FPS or an RPG? |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1362
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 21:26:00 -
[39] - Quote
Malkai Inos wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:dday3six wrote:I've been noticing that trend, and it seems to be very much the same "competitive vs causal" BS that most games and hobbies suffer from. "Causals" seems to hate "Competitors" because they don't understand their outlook, meanwhile many competitors ultimately desire a healthly mix of both players because they know Competitors often start as Causals.
It's the people who want tears and suffering from Cal-logis and Flaylock users. Some feel they should be punished for using the tools the developers gave them. It makes no sense to me. The fundamental argument. Is this an FPS or an RPG? That's a good question and i answer it's both. The SP system is clearly a RPG mechanic. Respecs make this mechanic void. Unless we are fine with effectively removing this mechanic altogether respecs are out of question in my opinion.
On the other hand, the SP system is really hurting the idea of competitive game play when people are suddenly distinctly less effective after skill system changes.
The SP system is fundamentally designed such that you cannot ever max out the skill tree. By the time you could even get all of the current content there would be twice as much added in already.
So you have to make meaningful choices on what and where your SP should go... so when they nerf down a certain class.. that SP is essentially wasted. Some people may think its okay, and that others should 'adapt or die', but the fundamental issue at hand comes down to the fact that wasted SP = wasted time and for some, wasted money.
Is that the culture we want to encourage from CCP and this game? That this game is a waste of time and money? |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1362
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 21:33:00 -
[40] - Quote
Stands Alone wrote:na... we left on our own. didnt like the the drama. the last corp i was in was the same... didnt like the drama of PC...
Yeah a lot of corps that got run out of PC say that.
"She didn't dump me... I broke up with her!"
(just kidding there)
Anyways... the fact remains... these kinds of changes can hurt PC players fairly significantly. And will only encourage the burn out we're already seeing. Is it worth alienating people who want to play competitively just because some pub match role-players are inconvenienced? |
|
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1362
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 21:35:00 -
[41] - Quote
Malkai Inos wrote:*snip* quote limit dday3six wrote:Yes, some people feel that, and I'm not ignoring it. I'm acknowledging that some players don't want respecs because they want players to be punished for how they choose to play the game. You are picking out the weakest argument there is, spice it up with some nice hyperbole and keep smashing as if this is all that the SP system is supposed to do and does. Have a look here, here, here, here, here and here for reasons that are largely independent from the whole FOTM rambling that is going on here. It gets tiring when you have to repeat yourself countless times so i have picked a few good pieces to refer to.
We've already discussed all of that. None of it matters, as that content won't be out before initial balance passes are done and the respec options being proposed (released with balance patches) will be done anyways.
If you think a secondary market is out before Q2 2014, you're delusional. |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1362
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 21:38:00 -
[42] - Quote
Malkai Inos wrote:That is all true and i feel you in that regard. I'm probably going to dump 1.5m sp in core skills tomorrow just to maintain the current functionality of my cal logi. And i don't think it's ok to overnerf stuff, i assume no one does. But what we are looking at is a balancing issue first and foremost. [tbc in 10m, match started. ]
nerfing/buffing and balancing in general is a necessity. We just want a way to adapt to the changes while CCP figures out where they want this game to be. They could make more meaningful changes this way as well as they wouldn't have to worry about screwing people over. |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1364
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 22:01:00 -
[43] - Quote
Malkai Inos wrote:It matters because we all know too well that CCP won't get away with a "temporary respec phase" if you will. As soon as CCP is admitting that balance changes warrant a respec, this inevitably is the new default position.
It also seems like every other patch will have some content to it - 1.2 had, 1.4 will most likely have. So new content will not wait for several months, even when basic balance is not complete. They have to release this stuff because every addition can possibly change the combat dynamics and throw all balance back into the bin (cloack, everyone needs a sensor booster in PC, readjust all cpu to allow for that.)
They could do it if they wanted to... some people might get mad when its over but that's fine.
but we are not at a point where CCP can say 'classes in this game are pretty close to where we want them to be'... not at all... most of it comes down to the fact that uprising was never beta tested.
So now we're all in limbo with classes changing every patch. How can you make meaningful choices with your SP when literally every class will have changed within the next few months?
Are people supposed to just not play and wait until CCP can get around to figuring their **** out? |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1369
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 02:07:00 -
[44] - Quote
At this point maple... I think its best to just live with the state of the game until 1.5.
At which point we will probably get another respec, and if we're lucky the game will be halfway to balanced by then.
Its true 1.5 probably isn't due until late October though. So I suggest finding a new game until then. I'm currently working through my steam library right now.
Should have a solid month you can enjoy the game before PS4 releases.
So what I'm really saying.. is that anyone looking for a competitive fps should probably just quit now. |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1372
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 04:19:00 -
[45] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:They are not permante because CCP chances the classes your spend SP on.
This... we're not at a point where there is permanence in your decisions, as the classes change all of the time.
And there is a distinct difference between enjoying your time as a non factor in an npc corp derping in pub matches and wanting to be an integral part of a corp participating in high level corp matches.
I'm seriously starting to think... if you play competitively, you're best off just quitting. Maybe come back in a year or two once its on the PS4 and somewhat balanced with most of the missing basic content finally added in. By then im sure a respec will have been issue, and you can come back to 30-40 million unallocated SP.
Let the faithful non factors beta test the content |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1373
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 04:30:00 -
[46] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:They are not permante because CCP chances the classes your spend SP on. This... we're not at a point where there is permanence in your decisions, as the classes change all of the time. And there is a distinct difference between enjoying your time as a non factor in an npc corp derping in pub matches and wanting to be an integral part of a corp participating in high level corp matches. I'm seriously starting to think... if you play competitively, you're best off just quitting. Maybe come back in a year or two once its on the PS4 and somewhat balanced with most of the missing basic content finally added in. By then im sure a respec will have been issue, and you can come back to 30-40 million unallocated SP. yeah your right. Why play now when your getting screwed over when you can be rewarded for not playing at all and come back later? deffenetly how dust is supposed to be played. Its sad that CCP is endorsing this way of thinking by nerfing the classes we play so we cant win, and forcing us to stay in them for months. A shame, i once enjoyed dust. back when i was good... btw check out my post were i qouted that dude above yours. Hes prolly off crying somewere
Let the faithful non factors beta test the content
Dude, some of the people in this thread are drinking some major koolaid.
Its cool though, Titanfall and BF4 will be out soon. I'll have FF14 to keep me occupied until then.
Then hopefully TESO will be good too. We've got a bright, clean, non dusty future to look forward to! |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1388
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 21:27:00 -
[47] - Quote
Exmaple.
Doesn't matter now. OMS was removed from the queue this morning.
This game is officially dying.
Jump ship dude, I hear there are still a few lifeboats left over that way ~~~> |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1415
|
Posted - 2013.08.01 14:56:00 -
[48] - Quote
GTA-V FTW wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:
You will quit long before me FOTM player
I use an Exile on a Sever Logi suit. I carry BPO repair tool, advanced nanohive, a BPO pick me up stick, and a advanced flux. I have Two advanced code breakers and two BPO shield extenders. Last time I looked nothing in this ^ list was ever the FOTM, lol. Good try though. Humm last time I looked HAV's where on that FOTM list though and then they got nerfed and the tears have not stopped since. You are still holding on to that proud tradition as well, good for you. Again, you will either quit or respec when you get the chance.
I love how people throw around 'FOTM Player'.
Its like some sort of scarlet letter branded insult lol.
"Go back to COD FOTM player" ... sigh... /facepalm |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1416
|
Posted - 2013.08.01 15:02:00 -
[49] - Quote
GTA-V FTW wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:GTA-V FTW wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:
You will quit long before me FOTM player
I use an Exile on a Sever Logi suit. I carry BPO repair tool, advanced nanohive, a BPO pick me up stick, and a advanced flux. I have Two advanced code breakers and two BPO shield extenders. Last time I looked nothing in this ^ list was ever the FOTM, lol. Good try though. Humm last time I looked HAV's where on that FOTM list though and then they got nerfed and the tears have not stopped since. You are still holding on to that proud tradition as well, good for you. Again, you will either quit or respec when you get the chance. I love how people throw around 'FOTM Player'. Its like some sort of scarlet letter branded insult lol. "Go back to COD FOTM player" ... sigh... /facepalm Your guy is the one throwing it around you tool, LOL! Are you telling your own guy to go back to COD? LOL pure fail, I love it.
No... how other people say it... hence the quotes.. I wasn't directing that comment at you.. more of an example of the decreasing mental capabilities of people on this forum. |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1416
|
Posted - 2013.08.01 15:03:00 -
[50] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:Keep fighting for that respec because you are a short term short sighted player
Hard not to be shortsighted when this game won't be around much longer... |
|
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1416
|
Posted - 2013.08.01 15:35:00 -
[51] - Quote
Jaqen Morghalis wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:Keep fighting for that respec because you are a short term short sighted player Hard not to be shortsighted when this game won't be around much longer... If you honestly believe this, then why bother asking for a respec for a game that will probably be dead and buried by the time you get it anyway? In fact, why bother posting on the forum for an inevitably dead game at all? Just seems like a pointless waste of time and energy to me. In fact, without even trying, I'm sure I could think of literally HUNDREDS of better, more constructive things a person could do with their time, just off the top of my head.
I hope I'm wrong, and I post in threads like these that have good ideas to keep it from dying... at least until FF14 comes out later this month.
|
|
|
|