Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Heimdallr69
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
360
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 07:21:00 -
[121] - Quote
For tankers should be given a respec..... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T85rSUPT5w8&feature=youtube_gdata_player , ill sign |
Heimdallr69
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
360
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 07:22:00 -
[122] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:Sadly. a motivator in why i stand up to the haters, speds, Devs and derps who vote against respecs. Because iknow first hand what its like to invest time and SP into a class and have it ruined due to balancing. I would gladly respec if i could, to have a fighting chance and be useful again but i cant becuase im doomed to play the mistake CCP gave me. Myslef and others I support it for vehicles but none of those calogis anything but them |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1326
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 07:24:00 -
[123] - Quote
A hilariously sad yet perfect description of the state of game balance in dust. +1 |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1326
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 07:25:00 -
[124] - Quote
Heimdallr69 wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:Sadly. a motivator in why i stand up to the haters, speds, Devs and derps who vote against respecs. Because iknow first hand what its like to invest time and SP into a class and have it ruined due to balancing. I would gladly respec if i could, to have a fighting chance and be useful again but i cant becuase im doomed to play the mistake CCP gave me. Myslef and others I support it for vehicles but none of those calogis anything but them
Yes those evil caldari logis should pay for their sins! |
Heimdallr69
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
360
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 07:27:00 -
[125] - Quote
ZDub 303 wrote:Heimdallr69 wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:Sadly. a motivator in why i stand up to the haters, speds, Devs and derps who vote against respecs. Because iknow first hand what its like to invest time and SP into a class and have it ruined due to balancing. I would gladly respec if i could, to have a fighting chance and be useful again but i cant becuase im doomed to play the mistake CCP gave me. Myslef and others I support it for vehicles but none of those calogis anything but them Yes those evil caldari logis should pay for their sins! Not so much that its OP but after the respec everyone went to it even though they knew it would get nerfed |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
628
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 07:30:00 -
[126] - Quote
LOLOL +1 so hard |
dday3six
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
126
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 07:34:00 -
[127] - Quote
Heimdallr69 wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:Heimdallr69 wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:Sadly. a motivator in why i stand up to the haters, speds, Devs and derps who vote against respecs. Because iknow first hand what its like to invest time and SP into a class and have it ruined due to balancing. I would gladly respec if i could, to have a fighting chance and be useful again but i cant becuase im doomed to play the mistake CCP gave me. Myslef and others I support it for vehicles but none of those calogis anything but them Yes those evil caldari logis should pay for their sins! Not so much that its OP but after the respec everyone went to it even though they knew it would get nerfed
"Don't play with that, it'll get nerfed", shouldn't be a required line of thinking when judging what to skill into. |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
628
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 07:34:00 -
[128] - Quote
Heimdallr69 wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:Heimdallr69 wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:Sadly. a motivator in why i stand up to the haters, speds, Devs and derps who vote against respecs. Because iknow first hand what its like to invest time and SP into a class and have it ruined due to balancing. I would gladly respec if i could, to have a fighting chance and be useful again but i cant becuase im doomed to play the mistake CCP gave me. Myslef and others I support it for vehicles but none of those calogis anything but them Yes those evil caldari logis should pay for their sins! Not so much that its OP but after the respec everyone went to it even though they knew it would get nerfed
as much as i agree that they dont diserve respecs for that logi abuse their class was molested by ccp so im morally inclined to say they should have respecs. reluctantly, of course but its the right thing to say ;3 |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1328
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 07:35:00 -
[129] - Quote
Heimdallr69 wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:Heimdallr69 wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:Sadly. a motivator in why i stand up to the haters, speds, Devs and derps who vote against respecs. Because iknow first hand what its like to invest time and SP into a class and have it ruined due to balancing. I would gladly respec if i could, to have a fighting chance and be useful again but i cant becuase im doomed to play the mistake CCP gave me. Myslef and others I support it for vehicles but none of those calogis anything but them Yes those evil caldari logis should pay for their sins! Not so much that its OP but after the respec everyone went to it even though they knew it would get nerfed
What if some people spec'd into it, wanting a shield tanked logistics, knowing full well the shield buff was probably going to be removed, but then are forced to deal with -40 base CPU. They tried to predict CCPs nerfs and failed. Now they have to pay for it. Running a logi class that might not be suited to what they intended from the get go?
Saying oh they have 9 slots stfu and gtfo is the reasonable answer?
Honestly, after they fix armor, min logi and gal logi will be the much better choice, and many of those guys who picked cal logi to logi with shields would probably have picked min... Now they just have to live with it... I think its ****** personally.
I actually think the CPU nerf is probably perfect for balance. But it's not what people bought with their 10 weeks of SP.
Hopefully we can see a respec for logis in 1.4, once they redone bonuses. Cause sounds like the changes are drastic. |
Heimdallr69
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
362
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 07:36:00 -
[130] - Quote
That was the first thing that came to my mind when I heard tanks, I love them so much but they suck |
|
Heimdallr69
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
362
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 07:39:00 -
[131] - Quote
ZDub 303 wrote:Heimdallr69 wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:Heimdallr69 wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:Sadly. a motivator in why i stand up to the haters, speds, Devs and derps who vote against respecs. Because iknow first hand what its like to invest time and SP into a class and have it ruined due to balancing. I would gladly respec if i could, to have a fighting chance and be useful again but i cant becuase im doomed to play the mistake CCP gave me. Myslef and others I support it for vehicles but none of those calogis anything but them Yes those evil caldari logis should pay for their sins! Not so much that its OP but after the respec everyone went to it even though they knew it would get nerfed What if some people spec'd into it, wanting a shield tanked logistics, knowing full well the shield buff was probably going to be removed, but then are forced to deal with -40 base CPU. They tried to predict CCPs nerfs and failed. Now they have to pay for it. Running a logi class that might not be suited to what they intended from the get go? Saying oh they have 9 slots stfu and gtfo is the reasonable answer? Honestly, after they fix armor, min logi and gal logi will be the much better choice, and many of those guys who picked cal logi to logi with shields would probably have picked min... Now they just have to live with it... I think its ****** personally. I actually think the CPU nerf is probably perfect for balance. But it's not what people bought with their 10 weeks of SP. Hopefully we can see a respec for logis in 1.4, once they redone bonuses. Cause sounds like the changes are drastic. Well I get that but the people that think they should have the bonus the highs lows and the equipment and use it for assault purposes..for true logis I apologize |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
629
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 07:40:00 -
[132] - Quote
Heimdallr69 wrote:That was the first thing that came to my mind when I heard tanks, I love them so much but they suck
We all wanted them to work out jus like we wanted the Olsen twins to make a good movie. Sucks how things end up. The only diffrence is were not forced to watch the Olsens twins movies if we bought them. If we bought tanks, were forced to ride them :(( |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1329
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 07:42:00 -
[133] - Quote
Heimdallr69 wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:
What if some people spec'd into it, wanting a shield tanked logistics, knowing full well the shield buff was probably going to be removed, but then are forced to deal with -40 base CPU. They tried to predict CCPs nerfs and failed. Now they have to pay for it. Running a logi class that might not be suited to what they intended from the get go?
Saying oh they have 9 slots stfu and gtfo is the reasonable answer?
Honestly, after they fix armor, min logi and gal logi will be the much better choice, and many of those guys who picked cal logi to logi with shields would probably have picked min... Now they just have to live with it... I think its ****** personally.
I actually think the CPU nerf is probably perfect for balance. But it's not what people bought with their 10 weeks of SP.
Hopefully we can see a respec for logis in 1.4, once they redone bonuses. Cause sounds like the changes are drastic.
Well I get that but the people that think they should have the bonus the highs lows and the equipment and use it for assault purposes..for true logis I apologize
It's the same song and dance for anything that gets nerfed in this game though, you know?
It's the reason I'm advocating respecs on changes... So people can adapt to nerfs/buffs CCP implements. I have no personal agenda here. |
Heimdallr69
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
362
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 07:44:00 -
[134] - Quote
dday3six wrote:Heimdallr69 wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:Heimdallr69 wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:Sadly. a motivator in why i stand up to the haters, speds, Devs and derps who vote against respecs. Because iknow first hand what its like to invest time and SP into a class and have it ruined due to balancing. I would gladly respec if i could, to have a fighting chance and be useful again but i cant becuase im doomed to play the mistake CCP gave me. Myslef and others I support it for vehicles but none of those calogis anything but them Yes those evil caldari logis should pay for their sins! Not so much that its OP but after the respec everyone went to it even though they knew it would get nerfed "Don't play with that, it'll get nerfed", shouldn't be a required line of thinking when judging what to skill into. I had to, I looked at it and thought and thought then decided wasn't worth the chance if you can see it coming why not avoid it? |
Heimdallr69
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
362
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 07:47:00 -
[135] - Quote
ZDub 303 wrote:Heimdallr69 wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:
What if some people spec'd into it, wanting a shield tanked logistics, knowing full well the shield buff was probably going to be removed, but then are forced to deal with -40 base CPU. They tried to predict CCPs nerfs and failed. Now they have to pay for it. Running a logi class that might not be suited to what they intended from the get go?
Saying oh they have 9 slots stfu and gtfo is the reasonable answer?
Honestly, after they fix armor, min logi and gal logi will be the much better choice, and many of those guys who picked cal logi to logi with shields would probably have picked min... Now they just have to live with it... I think its ****** personally.
I actually think the CPU nerf is probably perfect for balance. But it's not what people bought with their 10 weeks of SP.
Hopefully we can see a respec for logis in 1.4, once they redone bonuses. Cause sounds like the changes are drastic.
Well I get that but the people that think they should have the bonus the highs lows and the equipment and use it for assault purposes..for true logis I apologize It's the same song and dance for anything that gets nerfed in this game though, you know? It's the reason I'm advocating respecs on changes... So people can adapt to nerfs/buffs CCP implements. I have no personal agenda here. It would be nice to try other stuff cuz spending sp on a third and fourth rifle will suck just to see which you like more same goes for suits and if hmgs get racial variants and all that ****....yup I'm up for respecs seems legit to me |
AAA Hellcab
Theia Orpheum
39
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 07:52:00 -
[136] - Quote
If everyone starts using Flaylocks, I won't feel so ashamed for what I am about to do. What the ****? Honestly, what are they even doing in this game? |
dday3six
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
126
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 08:04:00 -
[137] - Quote
Heimdallr69 wrote:I had to, I looked at it and thought and thought then decided wasn't worth the chance if you can see it coming why not avoid it?
It's a huge black mark for any new content, if players have to constantly worry about trying new toys which might be broken for their trouble. It's a whole lot of forbidden fruit nonsense which only stigmatizes player experimentation. New content is going to keep the game alive, having to worry about booty traps within said new content is going to drive players away. |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
631
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 08:08:00 -
[138] - Quote
dday3six wrote:Heimdallr69 wrote:I had to, I looked at it and thought and thought then decided wasn't worth the chance if you can see it coming why not avoid it? It's a huge black mark for any new content, if players have to constantly worry about trying new toys which might be broken for their trouble. It's a whole lot of forbidden fruit nonsense which only stigmatizes player experimentation. New content is going to keep the game alive, having to worry about booty traps within said new content is going to drive players away.
As much as i hate you caldari logi f8gs your right, you guys speced into a class that could do everything and now you guys cant play it like you used to. I hate you guys, i really do, but your right. yal should get respeced out of it if youd still rather be a slayer over a logi. Logi does not appeal to slayers, its no longer what yal signed up for |
Heimdallr69
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
364
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 08:16:00 -
[139] - Quote
dday3six wrote:Heimdallr69 wrote:I had to, I looked at it and thought and thought then decided wasn't worth the chance if you can see it coming why not avoid it? It's a huge black mark for any new content, if players have to constantly worry about trying new toys which might be broken for their trouble. It's a whole lot of forbidden fruit nonsense which only stigmatizes player experimentation. New content is going to keep the game alive, having to worry about booty traps within said new content is going to drive players away. Yeah but a new player would be screwed where as players like us can blow sp and not worry cuz we've got others maxed |
Twomanchew
G.R.A.V.E
31
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 10:52:00 -
[140] - Quote
FOTM CAN SUCK IT! All I care about is getting skills put where I want them to be. I want the core foundation done so I can take the million of skills I have in other racial stuff and bring it to my own. I want one last respec when that day comes with that wonderful patch that will bring me something I have been waiting for since I heard about this game. If they choose not to do it, cause they do have that power to do that since it's their game. I am sure they will see a giant drop in the populace. Plus people who left the game have giant mouths. They should say some day soon that they will implement one last respec when all base racial stuff is in. That will remove a lot of pressure. Those who go up in arms and get all mad about respec(S) and their FOTM argument won't matter anymore. Sure people will always want something done here and there. That is always going to be in the forums. But unfinished game basics are a giant eye sore that needs to be fixed.
One last respec, after that, NO MORE! |
|
Xero The Mishima
Vherokior Combat Logistics Minmatar Republic
305
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 10:57:00 -
[141] - Quote
Heimdallr69 wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:Sadly. a motivator in why i stand up to the haters, speds, Devs and derps who vote against respecs. Because iknow first hand what its like to invest time and SP into a class and have it ruined due to balancing. I would gladly respec if i could, to have a fighting chance and be useful again but i cant becuase im doomed to play the mistake CCP gave me. Myslef and others I support it for vehicles but none of those calogis anything but them
Lol you support it for HIS case but not everybody elses... WHAT A SURPRISE! A "NF" supporting a "NF"! I would never think of this to happen! What a joke. |
Xero The Mishima
Vherokior Combat Logistics Minmatar Republic
305
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 10:58:00 -
[142] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:Heimdallr69 wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:Heimdallr69 wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:Sadly. a motivator in why i stand up to the haters, speds, Devs and derps who vote against respecs. Because iknow first hand what its like to invest time and SP into a class and have it ruined due to balancing. I would gladly respec if i could, to have a fighting chance and be useful again but i cant becuase im doomed to play the mistake CCP gave me. Myslef and others I support it for vehicles but none of those calogis anything but them Yes those evil caldari logis should pay for their sins! Not so much that its OP but after the respec everyone went to it even though they knew it would get nerfed as much as i agree that they dont diserve respecs for that logi abuse their class was molested by ccp so im morally inclined to say they should have respecs. reluctantly, of course but its the right thing to say ;3
Glad somebody in "NF" isn't worthless. +1 |
The Robot Devil
BetaMax. CRONOS.
788
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 11:10:00 -
[143] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:You play a properly balanced, fair and fun class. Liking the class, you dump all 15 mill SP to your name into the class. Suddenly, new build/patch comes around and your class is nerfed without your consent and you now suck at the game. You spawn in your proto suit or your vehical and you are killed over and over, loosing all your ISK. You are told you can not play PC because the one class you are good at, sucks. Nobody wants you in any serious endeavor in dust because your class is nerfed to the point of uselessness. Like current shield tanks, dropships, lazers, plasma cannons and soon to be armor tanks when they fix the bug that is causing them to be balanced. You no longer want to play dust, as the class you played is ruined and so is your ability to enjoy playing dust, because the developers ruined the class you speced into. CCP later anounes that they will not be fixing your class for many months and they ask you to accept their most sincere apologies, despite changing the class that you speced into many months beforehand. Should you get a respec? This happened to the classes mentioned previously and will happen again when the fix the armor tanks
They gave us all of our points back and some people dumped all their points into an untested class. No one was forced to place points anywhere and no one was forced to level 5 skills. If people would have taken their time and slowly skilled into proto gear then they would have know the problems before they were at level 5.
Things were changed with Uprising and we should have tested the waters more before we spent out points in a build that seems useless. It was a nice little trap. I keep telling you people that CCP is the ultimate troll. |
KEROSIINI-TERO
Seraphim Auxiliaries
617
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 12:23:00 -
[144] - Quote
ZDub 303 wrote:Duran Lex wrote:
Yes, once it gets to that point. But its not...so we still have the same argument being thrown back and forth.
One side - "It helps the game by letting people choose what they want to have fun with"
Other side - "It helps ruin the game by letting people choose the FOTM to have fun with."
It will never end.
Respecs have a few unique advantages though. 1. They show the metrics for FOTM much clearer to CCP, getting us closer to balance faster. 2. They allow people to spec into FOTM counters until FOTM can get fixed. 3. They don't alienate players who've been nerfed into oblivion by a 'balance patch' like tankers and scouts and heavies. 4. They can clearly see which suits are underutilized since people don't have to use them anymore, instead... People are just stuck with ****** suits and left to complain endlessly on the forum until they give up and quit the game.
That would also mean that those 'abandoned' speccing options are HARDER to balance (buff) again because no-one is using them anymore. No metrics, as you said. |
GTA-V FTW
Mannar Focused Warfare Gallente Federation
184
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 12:25:00 -
[145] - Quote
I demand a respec! |
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star. EoN.
749
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 12:29:00 -
[146] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:You play a properly balanced, fair and fun class. Liking the class, you dump all 15 mill SP to your name into the class. Suddenly, new build/patch comes around and your class is nerfed without your consent and you now suck at the game. You spawn in your proto suit or your vehical and you are killed over and over, loosing all your ISK. You are told you can not play PC because the one class you are good at, sucks. Nobody wants you in any serious endeavor in dust because your class is nerfed to the point of uselessness. Like current shield tanks, dropships, lazers, plasma cannons and soon to be armor tanks when they fix the bug that is causing them to be balanced. You no longer want to play dust, as the class you played is ruined and so is your ability to enjoy playing dust, because the developers ruined the class you speced into. CCP later anounes that they will not be fixing your class for many months and they ask you to accept their most sincere apologies, despite changing the class that you speced into many months beforehand. Should you get a respec? This happened to the classes mentioned previously and will happen again when the fix the armor tanks
We dont have proto tanks
When vehicles skills got changed we got a respec, not because they had changed but because the description was wrong and the skills didnt work and CCP didnt tell us what the new skills were and what they did
I found out via a GM response and got banned for posting it on the forums
The current changes to the FOTM toys are called balancing, they are blatently OP, kingbabar himself say he ran the numbers and found that the Cal Logi was the best suit, better than the assualt suits which logi were not designed for
Flaylocks are better than mass drivers and are spammed in PC and pubs
The armor rep nerf isnt coming in yet, thats been put back until 1.5 with the vehicle changed
Bottom line you shouldnt skill into FOTM stuff because it will get nerfed and you know it yet you will do it anyways |
Orion Vahid
DUST University Ivy League
93
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 12:33:00 -
[147] - Quote
Simply put: The only people against respecs are "veterans" with +20 million SP and do want anyone to become nearly as effective as them. There will ALWAYS be new content. Am I supposed to "wait" for a year before specing into anything? You are kidding yourselves. Just because something isn't FOTM right now and you spec into it, that doesn't mean that it won't be FOTM the next month. and then what are you supposed to do? Always spec into the worst things so they are never nerfed? CCP needs to stop catering to "veterans" and big corps and actually do what is best for everyone. |
TEXA5 HiTM4N
ROGUE SPADES EoN.
150
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 12:36:00 -
[148] - Quote
sucka. i only have 9 mill skill points and i am against a full respec. |
MlDDLE MANGEMENT
lMPurity
226
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 12:36:00 -
[149] - Quote
Cosgar wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Why did you constantly put more skill levels into an item you hate using? Then why are you hanging out with a corp that doesn't appreciate what you bring to the table? Then why are you wasting your energy asking for a respec instead of asking for balance to include missing items? Probably the same reason why even after my optional respec, went back into the Mass Driver, which was bugged, and Minmatar logi, which was lumped up with the CaLogi during everyone's nerf witch hunt. It's something you find fun, like doing, and you have faith in the developers that they'll make things right. If everyone cared more about being effective than having fun, we'd all be running around in shield tanking suits and ARs. Exmaple Core, I've been in the same boat you're in now. Not just with Dust or EVE, but in a lot of online games. Some of us are too stubborn to take the road less traveled with hopes that it pays off in the end. Sometimes it does, sometimes it doesn't, there's no guarantee. The only thing you can really do is think of the good times, or dream of the possible good times around the corner. If you decide to do anything that matters- don't give up. Whether it's too expensive, underpowered, or your peers don't respect what you do, find a way to keep things going- keep the faith and do it because it's what you like doing. "Adapt or Die..."
Yea but in those other games would it take you literally months to get into a new weapon or item was it plausible to get them in short order(2 weeks)
If the anti-respec crowd want it there way im willing to let them have it but we get NO SP CAP or 3x SP as the base weekly cap UNTIL a TRUE BALANCE is achieved,
/thread. |
Thor Odinson42
Molon Labe. League of Infamy
747
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 13:05:00 -
[150] - Quote
ZDub 303 wrote:Once we've reached some semblance of balance, respecs won't be necessary. But the people on this forum are dellusional if they think we are balanced now or will be balanced by the end of the year.
FOTM is a symptom of bad balance, not of the ability to respec. / thread |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |