Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
iliel
Capital Acquisitions LLC Renegade Alliance
11
|
Posted - 2014.03.05 00:40:00 -
[781] - Quote
What about a constant respec option which costs a percentage of SP. For the sake of an example, let's say you may have a respec if you relinquish 15% of your SP. Such a system would make respec's more viable for newer players than for older ones. Also, having it as a constant feature, CCP wouldn't have to worry anymore about this discussion as they make addiional changes to the game. |
Malkai Inos
Onikanabo Brigade Caldari State
1179
|
Posted - 2014.03.05 00:49:00 -
[782] - Quote
iliel wrote:What about a constant respec option which costs a percentage of SP. For the sake of an example, let's say you may have a respec if you relinquish 15% of your SP. Such a system would make respec's more viable for new players than old ones. Also, having it as a constant feature, CCP wouldn't have to worry anymore about this discussion as they make addiional changes to the game. Just do the math how often you could respec from one 12m SP role to another and regain the penalty to do it again and you will see why 15% is no deterrent.
Also, by that ruleset doing what i just described would generally be the superior approach to just hoarding the SP. Needing even three months to regain the penalty (at around 30% of 12m SP) is way faster than conventionally speccing those 12m. No one would bother accumulating more SP than needed for their role.
You can take a benign object, -you can take a cheeseburger and deconstruct it to its source...
|
501st Headstrong
G0DS AM0NG MEN D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
122
|
Posted - 2014.03.05 02:02:00 -
[783] - Quote
No no no! We want a Respec just for 1.8, not consistent ones. Consistent Respecs destroys Dust since none of your choices give meaning! All that is needed is this one respec so we can clear the air and refresh ourselves. I do not support consistent respecs however that can be done at will, even if for money.
Full Respec for this second to last time or until Dust has another MASSIVE (This does not mean the introduction of the Pilot suits) overhaul
NO PAID RESPECS
I may be Minmatar, but I will hold that ridge until victory, or I become one with the sand. Long live my battle brothers
|
see see-pee
A.O.D. VP Gaming Alliance
0
|
Posted - 2014.03.05 03:44:00 -
[784] - Quote
RESPEC !!!! WE WANT IT.. WE DEMAND IT WE HAVE SPOKEN*
don't jock my name either...
See See-Pee On U Fools~
|
Brian LaFleur
RETR0 PR0 GAMERS
16
|
Posted - 2014.03.05 05:29:00 -
[785] - Quote
501st Headstrong wrote:No no no! We want a Respec just for 1.8, not consistent ones. Consistent Respecs destroys Dust since none of your choices give meaning! All that is needed is this one respec so we can clear the air and refresh ourselves. I do not support consistent respecs however that can be done at will, even if for money.
Full Respec for this second to last time or until Dust has another MASSIVE (This does not mean the introduction of the Pilot suits) overhaul
NO PAID RESPECS
Ok, that would be fair if our choices aren't changed durning an update. If they make drastic changes (like dropsuit functions or equipment-dropsuit synergy) then a respect is the only decent way to go. They're figuring this sh!t as they go, so until they reach their final product, we have to be given the chance to adjust. Only exception: rail rifles. If you spec'ed into those, I hope you gag on the nerf hammer they hit you with =ƒÿá
Petals within petals, tadpole;
The truth lies beneath an opulence of illusion.
|
Jin no kami
Valor Coalition
27
|
Posted - 2014.03.05 05:39:00 -
[786] - Quote
What if it started at 15% of your current sp for. A respec then went to 30% then 45%etc would that work =ƒÖê=ƒÖë=ƒÖè=ƒÖî |
Brian LaFleur
RETR0 PR0 GAMERS
16
|
Posted - 2014.03.05 05:46:00 -
[787] - Quote
Tallen Ellecon wrote:Firstly I think it's funny when people say "look how big this thread is, they have to give us a respec" as if this was a democracy and thread size equated to support. A good portion of these posts are me and others explaining why they shouldn't give us one in 1.8.
Secondly they made this post and posted it up top because one day the entire forums was flooded with posts about respecs. This post is an excuse for them to bury every other post on the forums, and not a confirmation or denial of a respec. The fact that they've remained silent support neither side.
Thirdly I don't know how many other "you better do blank or else I'll leave" posts have actually got any traction, but I don't think that phases them much. Just leave if you have a problem, player counts affect how they approach things more than anything, and I honestly think more people will comeback to try the new suits than leave because they didn't get a respec for it. Until they add a proper new player experience nothing else will sway the numbers much, and even 500 regular players leaving in order to facilitate a game that hopes to have an open market is a small sacrifice.
Lastly those of us who oppose a respec in 1.8 don't necessarily want them to never give us a respec, many of us would rather wait until the game is more balanced and complete. I agree with many of the arguments for one, but right now it would do so little in the larger scheme, and would make people think repsecs will come every time something changes, which was never their intended use. A game with an open market driven by supply and demand can't thrive in a respec culture, the balancing in game will do more than enough to sway markets.
Some of us are looking at the bigger picture, and since a respec at the release of 1.8 doesn't do anything to help a player who joins afterwards IMO it doesn't matter.
Ya know what? That's a pretty decent point. A respec once they finalize the core game would appease me, though by that point I doubt I'll be gaming for the arthritis in my hands and my battles with Alzheimer's. It took them something around 10 years to get eve fairly balanced, and that's their flagship title. It seems CCP has the dust devs operating on a skeleton crew and a piggy bank for financing. The changes are too slow, too minute to inspire awe. I mean jeeesus, entire species evolve faster than this game. Darwin sits in awe. I understand the whole FotM argument, but they are forcing me to be a full time rep guy(min logi) when the versatility and survivability of the suit is why I spec'ed into it. No more assault logis? Fine, gimme back my points so I can go where I wanted to be to begin with. They really need to focus on balance because the FotM stuff is a huge turn off. Also, here's to our corps! Hope we make that thing happen! (Either ya know or ya don't) =ƒÿÄ
Petals within petals, tadpole;
The truth lies beneath an opulence of illusion.
|
Brian LaFleur
RETR0 PR0 GAMERS
16
|
Posted - 2014.03.05 05:51:00 -
[788] - Quote
iliel wrote:What about a constant respec option which costs a percentage of SP. For the sake of an example, let's say you may have a respec if you relinquish 15% of your SP. Such a system would make respec's more viable for newer players than for older ones. Also, having it as a constant feature, CCP wouldn't have to worry anymore about this discussion as they make addiional changes to the game.
That would benefit the older gamers who have a surplus of sp laying around. Newer players would hurt
Petals within petals, tadpole;
The truth lies beneath an opulence of illusion.
|
Tallen Ellecon
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
1525
|
Posted - 2014.03.05 06:04:00 -
[789] - Quote
Brian LaFleur wrote:Tallen Ellecon wrote:Firstly I think it's funny when people say "look how big this thread is, they have to give us a respec" as if this was a democracy and thread size equated to support. A good portion of these posts are me and others explaining why they shouldn't give us one in 1.8.
Secondly they made this post and posted it up top because one day the entire forums was flooded with posts about respecs. This post is an excuse for them to bury every other post on the forums, and not a confirmation or denial of a respec. The fact that they've remained silent support neither side.
Thirdly I don't know how many other "you better do blank or else I'll leave" posts have actually got any traction, but I don't think that phases them much. Just leave if you have a problem, player counts affect how they approach things more than anything, and I honestly think more people will comeback to try the new suits than leave because they didn't get a respec for it. Until they add a proper new player experience nothing else will sway the numbers much, and even 500 regular players leaving in order to facilitate a game that hopes to have an open market is a small sacrifice.
Lastly those of us who oppose a respec in 1.8 don't necessarily want them to never give us a respec, many of us would rather wait until the game is more balanced and complete. I agree with many of the arguments for one, but right now it would do so little in the larger scheme, and would make people think repsecs will come every time something changes, which was never their intended use. A game with an open market driven by supply and demand can't thrive in a respec culture, the balancing in game will do more than enough to sway markets.
Some of us are looking at the bigger picture, and since a respec at the release of 1.8 doesn't do anything to help a player who joins afterwards IMO it doesn't matter. Ya know what? That's a pretty decent point. A respec once they finalize the core game would appease me, though by that point I doubt I'll be gaming for the arthritis in my hands and my battles with Alzheimer's. It took them something around 10 years to get eve fairly balanced, and that's their flagship title. It seems CCP has the dust devs operating on a skeleton crew and a piggy bank for financing. The changes are too slow, too minute to inspire awe. I mean jeeesus, entire species evolve faster than this game. Darwin sits in awe. I understand the whole FotM argument, but they are forcing me to be a full time rep guy(min logi) when the versatility and survivability of the suit is why I spec'ed into it. No more assault logis? Fine, gimme back my points so I can go where I wanted to be to begin with. They really need to focus on balance because the FotM stuff is a huge turn off. Also, here's to our corps! Hope we make that thing happen! (Either ya know or ya don't) =ƒÿÄ
So you're against any respecs ever again? Cool, even better. You finally get New Eden, it's fair because we're all equally fuc*ked.
Where is my Gallente sidearm? 1.8? When is that? SoonGäó514
"No blue tags make Tallen go crazy."
|
Brian LaFleur
RETR0 PR0 GAMERS
16
|
Posted - 2014.03.05 06:53:00 -
[790] - Quote
Tallen Ellecon wrote:Brian LaFleur wrote:Tallen Ellecon wrote:Firstly I think it's funny when people say "look how big this thread is, they have to give us a respec" as if this was a democracy and thread size equated to support. A good portion of these posts are me and others explaining why they shouldn't give us one in 1.8.
Secondly they made this post and posted it up top because one day the entire forums was flooded with posts about respecs. This post is an excuse for them to bury every other post on the forums, and not a confirmation or denial of a respec. The fact that they've remained silent support neither side.
Thirdly I don't know how many other "you better do blank or else I'll leave" posts have actually got any traction, but I don't think that phases them much. Just leave if you have a problem, player counts affect how they approach things more than anything, and I honestly think more people will comeback to try the new suits than leave because they didn't get a respec for it. Until they add a proper new player experience nothing else will sway the numbers much, and even 500 regular players leaving in order to facilitate a game that hopes to have an open market is a small sacrifice.
Lastly those of us who oppose a respec in 1.8 don't necessarily want them to never give us a respec, many of us would rather wait until the game is more balanced and complete. I agree with many of the arguments for one, but right now it would do so little in the larger scheme, and would make people think repsecs will come every time something changes, which was never their intended use. A game with an open market driven by supply and demand can't thrive in a respec culture, the balancing in game will do more than enough to sway markets.
Some of us are looking at the bigger picture, and since a respec at the release of 1.8 doesn't do anything to help a player who joins afterwards IMO it doesn't matter. Ya know what? That's a pretty decent point. A respec once they finalize the core game would appease me, though by that point I doubt I'll be gaming for the arthritis in my hands and my battles with Alzheimer's. It took them something around 10 years to get eve fairly balanced, and that's their flagship title. It seems CCP has the dust devs operating on a skeleton crew and a piggy bank for financing. The changes are too slow, too minute to inspire awe. I mean jeeesus, entire species evolve faster than this game. Darwin sits in awe. I understand the whole FotM argument, but they are forcing me to be a full time rep guy(min logi) when the versatility and survivability of the suit is why I spec'ed into it. No more assault logis? Fine, gimme back my points so I can go where I wanted to be to begin with. They really need to focus on balance because the FotM stuff is a huge turn off. Also, here's to our corps! Hope we make that thing happen! (Either ya know or ya don't) =ƒÿÄ So you're against any respecs ever again? Cool, even better. You finally get New Eden, it's fair because we're all equally fuc*ked.
LMAO I can't say I'm against respects ever, only acknowledging the good points. I'm only half joking when I say respec everything but rail rifles. But I'm an experienced player. Respec would help me collect a few errant sp from my noob days, but if it f@$k$ over the lame FotM rail users, I can live with my regrets. =ƒÿê
Petals within petals, tadpole;
The truth lies beneath an opulence of illusion.
|
|
Spectral Clone
Dust2Dust. Top Men.
1482
|
Posted - 2014.03.05 07:02:00 -
[791] - Quote
Total remake of suits reminds me of Sony actually. First gen PS3s had the option to run linux (OpenOS). I remember that many scientists were very excited about this for supercomputing cluster at the time.
Then, Sony removed this feature with a system update (Firmware). How do you think the people felt that bought hundred PS3s for their projects?
Sony got sued by several parties in the US, but they were never brought before justice.
CCP dont 'do a Sony' please.
Drop it like its hat.
|
Brian LaFleur
RETR0 PR0 GAMERS
16
|
Posted - 2014.03.05 07:05:00 -
[792] - Quote
Spectral Clone wrote:Total remake of suits reminds me of Sony actually. First gen PS3s had the option to run linux (OpenOS). I remember that many scientists were very excited about this for supercomputing cluster at the time.
Then, Sony removed this feature with a system update (Firmware). How do you think the people felt that bought hundred PS3s for their projects?
Sony got sued by several parties in the US, but they were never brought before justice.
CCP dont 'do a Sony' please.
I know exactly of what you speak. Then GEOHOT jail broke it, then Sony sued GEOHOT, then anonymous took down the PSN for a month+. Ah, 2011.... what a year....
Petals within petals, tadpole;
The truth lies beneath an opulence of illusion.
|
Spectral Clone
Dust2Dust. Top Men.
1482
|
Posted - 2014.03.05 07:16:00 -
[793] - Quote
Brian LaFleur wrote:Spectral Clone wrote:Total remake of suits reminds me of Sony actually. First gen PS3s had the option to run linux (OpenOS). I remember that many scientists were very excited about this for supercomputing cluster at the time.
Then, Sony removed this feature with a system update (Firmware). How do you think the people felt that bought hundred PS3s for their projects?
Sony got sued by several parties in the US, but they were never brought before justice.
CCP dont 'do a Sony' please. I know exactly of what you speak. Then GEOHOT jail broke it, then Sony sued GEOHOT, then anonymous took down the PSN for a month+. Ah, 2011.... what a year....
Sony are true cunts. But they do make good products. Its kind of like Apple.
Back on topic. You didnt see the people getting scammed by Sony jumping around, thumping their chests and telling everyone to HTFU like the brainwashed gorillas on this forum.
Drop it like its hat.
|
Brian LaFleur
RETR0 PR0 GAMERS
17
|
Posted - 2014.03.05 07:21:00 -
[794] - Quote
Spectral Clone wrote:Brian LaFleur wrote:Spectral Clone wrote:Total remake of suits reminds me of Sony actually. First gen PS3s had the option to run linux (OpenOS). I remember that many scientists were very excited about this for supercomputing cluster at the time.
Then, Sony removed this feature with a system update (Firmware). How do you think the people felt that bought hundred PS3s for their projects?
Sony got sued by several parties in the US, but they were never brought before justice.
CCP dont 'do a Sony' please. I know exactly of what you speak. Then GEOHOT jail broke it, then Sony sued GEOHOT, then anonymous took down the PSN for a month+. Ah, 2011.... what a year.... Sony are true cunts. But they do make good products. Its kind of like Apple. Back on topic. You didnt see the people getting scammed by Sony jumping around, thumping their chests and telling everyone to HTFU like the brainwashed gorillas on this forum.
Just like anywhere on the internet, you can meet brilliant, thought provoking people who can challenge your thoughts on a topic in an intelligent, enlightening manner; then you have the ones who, well, you know the other ones.
Petals within petals, tadpole;
The truth lies beneath an opulence of illusion.
|
major faux-pas
Valor Coalition
105
|
Posted - 2014.03.05 08:14:00 -
[795] - Quote
Tallen Ellecon wrote:Firstly I think it's funny when people say "look how big this thread is, they have to give us a respec" as if this was a democracy and thread size equated to support. A good portion of these posts are me and others explaining why they shouldn't give us one in 1.8.
Secondly they made this post and posted it up top because one day the entire forums was flooded with posts about respecs. This post is an excuse for them to bury every other post on the forums, and not a confirmation or denial of a respec. The fact that they've remained silent support neither side.
Thirdly I don't know how many other "you better do blank or else I'll leave" posts have actually got any traction, but I don't think that phases them much. Just leave if you have a problem, player counts affect how they approach things more than anything, and I honestly think more people will comeback to try the new suits than leave because they didn't get a respec for it. Until they add a proper new player experience nothing else will sway the numbers much, and even 500 regular players leaving in order to facilitate a game that hopes to have an open market is a small sacrifice.
Lastly those of us who oppose a respec in 1.8 don't necessarily want them to never give us a respec, many of us would rather wait until the game is more balanced and complete. I agree with many of the arguments for one, but right now it would do so little in the larger scheme, and would make people think repsecs will come every time something changes, which was never their intended use. A game with an open market driven by supply and demand can't thrive in a respec culture, the balancing in game will do more than enough to sway markets.
Some of us are looking at the bigger picture, and since a respec at the release of 1.8 doesn't do anything to help a player who joins afterwards IMO it doesn't matter.
hi tallen,
ok, i think the same about some of the threats etc. and i think only a few will switch off. im not personally convinced a *full* respec is entirely necessary (though some HAVE justified it). HOWeVEr i still only see one half of a reason you give above as to why a full respec should NOT be given. the first part about everyone thinking theyll get one with every change is not really justified because 1) this is a BIG change (arguably the one to take dust out of 'beta') .... ok there is only a number 1 here.
more importantly, i'd say do not fear a respec culture, it is just a consequence of developing this game into something close to what it proclaims to be, while having gone 'live'. little tweaks will never call for respecs as is happening now.
the reason you gave was to do with supply and demand. if we look at this: actually, there was previously no demand for the amar scout etc., and every heavy is now highly skilled in amar dropsuits. what does this mean? it means this precious (if indeed it is precious) balance of supply and demand will be completely skewed from the start IF there is NO respec. |
major faux-pas
Valor Coalition
106
|
Posted - 2014.03.05 08:34:00 -
[796] - Quote
Malkai Inos wrote:
The 1.8 respec is not the end of the world either since we're getting some broad changes and supposedly the missing suits. The tricky part for CCP here is, if they choose to do a respec, to formulate their reasoning in way that can(read: will) not be used to justify one more, then another one rinse and repeat every other month.
CCP has to greatly improve their approach to game balance in order to make meaningful long-term decisions possible
well said.... and I'd support one last full respec as the rest of the dropsuits come online. CCP have our email addresses, they could petition us for a vote, if we vote in support then their 'get out of jail' card will be granted: 'the community voted for no more respecs past 1.8' |
Rami Hamilo
Ghost Wolf Industries Alpha Wolf Pack
44
|
Posted - 2014.03.05 11:16:00 -
[797] - Quote
Draco Cerberus wrote:Many of you may have seen some of my posts opposed to the proposed LOGI changes for 1.8 and I think it is easy enough to find them, so I will keep this short. I want to keep the built in armor repairer, that said the Minmatar Hacking bonus was why I got the skills for the suit in the first place. CCP thanks for figuring out, a year into the full release after telling us that No More Respecs are going to happen, what "appropriate bonuses" for LOGI are. This left everyone no choice but to skill FOTY. From what I understand, the changes are slated to cover weapon balance, suits, and equipment. That sounds like all areas. Give us our SP back for all things Suit, Weapon, and Upgrade related. You have decided to change everything so it is time for a choice to be available. While you are at it you can also give us all the isk we have spent on assets back to cover our losses due to dev choices which have made this patch such a fail in terms of timeliness, game preservation, balance and KISS principle (Keep Itthe Same Stupid). CCP, don't be this Guy. Give a full respec.
I could do so much with 30.6 million SP. If Logi are going to be nerfed so hard that we have not only stand right next to a heavy, but all of our other equipment is nerfed, I want to go heavy and scout.
Also, bring back the promethius. |
The Robot Devil
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
1823
|
Posted - 2014.03.05 11:21:00 -
[798] - Quote
Rami Hamilo wrote:Draco Cerberus wrote:Many of you may have seen some of my posts opposed to the proposed LOGI changes for 1.8 and I think it is easy enough to find them, so I will keep this short. I want to keep the built in armor repairer, that said the Minmatar Hacking bonus was why I got the skills for the suit in the first place. CCP thanks for figuring out, a year into the full release after telling us that No More Respecs are going to happen, what "appropriate bonuses" for LOGI are. This left everyone no choice but to skill FOTY. From what I understand, the changes are slated to cover weapon balance, suits, and equipment. That sounds like all areas. Give us our SP back for all things Suit, Weapon, and Upgrade related. You have decided to change everything so it is time for a choice to be available. While you are at it you can also give us all the isk we have spent on assets back to cover our losses due to dev choices which have made this patch such a fail in terms of timeliness, game preservation, balance and KISS principle (Keep Itthe Same Stupid). CCP, don't be this Guy. Give a full respec. I could do so much with 30.6 million SP. If Logi are going to be nerfed so hard that we have not only stand right next to a heavy, but all of our other equipment is nerfed, I want to go heavy and scout. Also, bring back the promethius.
Sticking with #logilove FTW and because I am a really bad shot.
"You people voted for Hubert Humphrey, and you killed Jesus."
Raoul Duke
|
bamboo x
Eternal Beings Proficiency V.
127
|
Posted - 2014.03.05 11:23:00 -
[799] - Quote
I'm worried that although most of 1.8 has been revealed to us... there is little to no mention of a respec.
But the vast majority of players will be disappointed if there isn't.
bamboo x (Federation Specialist Duvolle Assault Rifle) you
|
The Robot Devil
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
1823
|
Posted - 2014.03.05 11:30:00 -
[800] - Quote
The only thing noted so far is some weapon stuff, don't get down yet. It is difficult to produce the next version of dropsuits, we are very picky.
"You people voted for Hubert Humphrey, and you killed Jesus."
Raoul Duke
|
|
Jin no kami
Valor Coalition
27
|
Posted - 2014.03.05 11:32:00 -
[801] - Quote
Yea they haven't said anything about respecs so it might not happen instead they might throw a triple sp week early April =ƒÖê=ƒÖë=ƒÖè=ƒÖì |
Skylight Atoma
The Phoenix Federation Proficiency V.
1
|
Posted - 2014.03.05 13:08:00 -
[802] - Quote
Malkai Inos wrote:
The 1.8 respec is not the end of the world either since we're getting some broad changes and supposedly the missing suits. The tricky part for CCP here is, if they choose to do a respec, to formulate their reasoning in way that can(read: will) not be used to justify one more, then another one rinse and repeat every other month.
CCP has to greatly improve their approach to game balance in order to make meaningful long-term decisions possible
I don't think that is a very difficult thing for CCP to word well enough to not invoke a riot. There have been plenty of good reasons for a respec in 1.8 mentioned so far but I'll list off what comes to the top of my head.
1. The wasted SP sunk into basic medium frames 5 to unlock assault, logistics, and light frame 5 for scout suits which happened some time after release. They used to require lvl 5 basic, then they changed it to 3. There is no good/optimal reason to train basic light/medium frames 5 and the SP was not refunded which is 1mil SP per racial suit. Even IF you implement anything that requires basic suit lvl 5, at this rate it won't be for years. It wasn't just people from the beta running into this.
2. The simple argument that vehicles got a respec when they got a complete revamp, therefore infantry should get one as well. While infantry isn't getting a skill tree revamp, many, many things are changing all at once.
-All 4 races of heavy and light suits are supposed to be released in 1.8, 4 of the most popular light weapons are getting damage reductions (the new proto is weaker than the current standard) as well as the SMG. The damage reduction will change how comfortable many players feel with each weapon and will start using others that suit them better based on how they fight (the amount of time on a target does influence what you prefer to shoot.)
-Not only the damage reduction, but the new proficiency does the bonus damage to either armor or shield depending on the weapon, not both. That's kind of a big thing that will create new synergy with the already existing innate damage bonuses each weapon has to shield/armor (which is hidden from the game UI afaik, so it's not intuitive to people who know nothing about EVE) For example, I expect Minmatar assault to become a very strong choice with a combat rifle and flaylock with the increase clip sizes. It should be very strong in the current meta of armor tanking. These are the kinds of new synergies that we need the ability to experiment with without grinding another 5mil for the proto gear.
-Speaking of Minmatar suits, not every suit role is changing drastically, but the Minmatar Logi suit sure is. It will become the COMPLETE opposite of what it is used for currently. It doesn't matter that veterans are usually sitting on millions of SP at a time, they're still saving it up (especially the minny logi) in the case that you don't give a respec which prevents them from investing that SP into ANYTHING else that they would actually enjoy.
3. Aside from potentially correcting "noob" mistakes with SP allocation, the new logi and assault suits are very interesting and appealing to try out. I'm sure there are people who are not happy with what they are currently specced into and its new bonuses. It's been close to a year since DUST has been playable and longer term players have been able to discover what htey like and dislike. I'm not saying that a respec every year should happen, but since a lot of intricacies are changing with 1.8 I think it's a justification on par with a skill tree revamp.
4. All of this AND some new handguns? It's great that you want to do a lot at once, but we need something to set us on our way.
5. Less of a reason and more of a critique. This mess really would not be as bad if there was any amount more of communication. Why are we dealing with NASCAR tanks for months? Did something just completely fall through the floor with your new builds attempting to address that issue? Are they meant to be the capitals of DUST, while Infantry are the subcapitals? Are you even considering giving us respecs or did you just want less clutter on the forums? Are any reasons given here convincing to you? Something, any kind of indication of what you are thinking would be great.
1.8 isn't a paradigm shift, but with all the changes in it and the little changes building up since release it's getting harder to continue to have fun. I'm not grinding out months of SP in a suit/weapon that I don't like, I'll just stop playing and come back in a year to try things out if DUST is still around. |
The Robot Devil
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
1829
|
Posted - 2014.03.05 13:19:00 -
[803] - Quote
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
"You people voted for Hubert Humphrey, and you killed Jesus."
Raoul Duke
|
Tallen Ellecon
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
1528
|
Posted - 2014.03.05 13:35:00 -
[804] - Quote
The Robot Devil wrote:zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
WAKE UP!!! GRAB A BRUSH AND PUT A LITTLE MAKEUP!!!!!
Where is my Gallente sidearm? 1.8? When is that? SoonGäó514
"No blue tags make Tallen go crazy."
|
The Robot Devil
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
1833
|
Posted - 2014.03.05 13:39:00 -
[805] - Quote
I go natural, no need for makeup. If I had more hair I would be unstoppable, I guess I need to HTFU and just accept nearly perfect.
Men want to be me and women think they can change me.
"You people voted for Hubert Humphrey, and you killed Jesus."
Raoul Duke
|
Giros Copic
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2014.03.05 13:45:00 -
[806] - Quote
Hi, i need a SP refund for this character, thanks for the queue. |
The Robot Devil
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
1833
|
Posted - 2014.03.05 14:00:00 -
[807] - Quote
Spectral Clone wrote:Brian LaFleur wrote:Spectral Clone wrote:Total remake of suits reminds me of Sony actually. First gen PS3s had the option to run linux (OpenOS). I remember that many scientists were very excited about this for supercomputing cluster at the time.
Then, Sony removed this feature with a system update (Firmware). How do you think the people felt that bought hundred PS3s for their projects?
Sony got sued by several parties in the US, but they were never brought before justice.
CCP dont 'do a Sony' please. I know exactly of what you speak. Then GEOHOT jail broke it, then Sony sued GEOHOT, then anonymous took down the PSN for a month+. Ah, 2011.... what a year.... Sony are true cunts. But they do make good products. Its kind of like Apple. Back on topic. You didnt see the people getting scammed by Sony jumping around, thumping their chests and telling everyone to HTFU like the brainwashed gorillas on this forum.
SONY did that to themselves. They developed a console that was backwards compatible, full of new tech and what customers wanted. Customers didn't like the price so they scaled back the PS3 to make it more affordable. Putting a different OS on the PS3 enabled pirates and game companies didn't like it. Consumers may pay the bills but they don't always want what is best.
All the people who wanted to make supercomputers needed to do was not update the firmware, it's not like they were playing PS games. PS3 is a beast and if it had more memory that was in one large pool it would have been unstoppable. SONY said that they made it difficult to program for on purpose so it wouldn't be maxed out on the first day and it could last years. I guess they can't win them all. SONY makes the best electronics, they often use more ICs to do the same thing as other companies because the output quality is better than with fewer components. To be honest they use better components in cheaper electronics and more components that are slower in their more expensive stuff. Why? This is was told to my face by a SONY engineer, because they want their inexpensive electronics to work as well as their expensive electronics.
"You people voted for Hubert Humphrey, and you killed Jesus."
Raoul Duke
|
SILVERBACK 02
SVER True Blood General Tso's Alliance
483
|
Posted - 2014.03.05 14:07:00 -
[808] - Quote
after years of grinding sp..
being commited to the game..
donating AUR to CCP...
being pubstomped every step of the way to finally get to the proto gear myself...
CCP has decided to NERF me, unless their is a FULL RESPEC in 1.8 vehicles included i shall leave simple... and i shall go play,
METAL GEAR SOLID 1 for the PS1 as i know komani arent suddenly going to nerf my FAMAS into the ground
FULL RESPEC 1.8 IS REQUESTED BY THE PLAYERBASE.
level 0 forum warrior
weapon of choice:
MARK V PYTHON.
-STB sky marshall
|
The Robot Devil
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
1834
|
Posted - 2014.03.05 14:10:00 -
[809] - Quote
SILVERBACK 02 wrote: METAL GEAR SOLID 1
Probably the best game ever made and if not then it has the best boss battles of any game.
"You people voted for Hubert Humphrey, and you killed Jesus."
Raoul Duke
|
Sam Tektzby
Better Hide R Die
285
|
Posted - 2014.03.05 14:16:00 -
[810] - Quote
Hello all i sending you all greeting from hospital. Im here just for few, to observe how situation goin (due my healt issue with neck spin). Oki i have this idea, since CCPs no responce im pretty sure we made big YELL. (f.c.u.k. i feel really sick after that painkillers, that neck killing me and now stomach XD ) I'll sent here and on their support NEED RESPEC with link on this thread. And maybe we wll have some answer, i know its just try but what ican lose :P Who try with me?!
Support - Tactician/Support
Deteis - Orator
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |