Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
Western Ways
Krullefor Organization Minmatar Republic
4
|
Posted - 2014.02.19 07:21:00 -
[331] - Quote
lol When i see some of the arguments against a respec, i can't help but think of those douchebags that don't want to raise the minimum wage. "I have no need for it and it doesn't benefit me at all . . . so why should i give a ufck about what these broke bastards want"?
I'm fairly new to this game and i love it; even with all it's flaws, and I'd like to see it thrive. And even though there may be some negatives to a respec I think the pro's far outweigh the cons.
Yes for respec
|
Spectral Clone
Dust2Dust. Top Men.
1291
|
Posted - 2014.02.19 07:40:00 -
[332] - Quote
17 pages, and this is so far a player monologue.
Can you have a discussion with us CCP? Or are you busy doing other more important things?
Drop it like its hat.
|
Bendtner92
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
1742
|
Posted - 2014.02.19 09:09:00 -
[333] - Quote
Spectral Clone wrote:17 pages, and this is so far a player monologue.
Can you have a discussion with us CCP? Or are you busy doing other more important things? CCP doesn't want to talk with their community. They didn't two years ago and they don't now.
Winner of the EU Squad Cup & the closed beta Tester's Tournament.
Go Go Power Rangers!
R.I.P MAG.
|
Piraten Hovnoret
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
334
|
Posted - 2014.02.19 09:13:00 -
[334] - Quote
Spectral Clone wrote:17 pages, and this is so far a player monologue.
Can you have a discussion with us CCP? Or are you busy doing other more important things?
WORD
War never changes
|
Ronan Elsword
Dead Six Initiative Lokun Listamenn
180
|
Posted - 2014.02.19 09:39:00 -
[335] - Quote
Piraten Hovnoret wrote:Spectral Clone wrote:17 pages, and this is so far a player monologue.
Can you have a discussion with us CCP? Or are you busy doing other more important things? WORD They just made this thread so they no where to look when making arguments for and against a respec. Also the forums were being spammed by repsec, hiding other threads in the midst. They aren't commenting in order to keep hopes down in case they decide against it.
"War doesn't determine who is right, only who is left."
|
Bendtner92
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
1742
|
Posted - 2014.02.19 09:50:00 -
[336] - Quote
Ronan Elsword wrote:They just made this thread so they no where to look when making arguments for and against a respec. Also the forums were being spammed by repsec, hiding other threads in the midst. They aren't commenting in order to keep hopes down in case they decide against it. More like they made this thread to get the respec spam away from General Discussion.
If they wanted our input they would have made this thread weeks ago, and the devs would be replying to it.
Winner of the EU Squad Cup & the closed beta Tester's Tournament.
Go Go Power Rangers!
R.I.P MAG.
|
Spectral Clone
Dust2Dust. Top Men.
1291
|
Posted - 2014.02.19 11:07:00 -
[337] - Quote
Bendtner92 wrote:Ronan Elsword wrote:They just made this thread so they no where to look when making arguments for and against a respec. Also the forums were being spammed by repsec, hiding other threads in the midst. They aren't commenting in order to keep hopes down in case they decide against it. More like they made this thread to get the respec spam away from General Discussion. If they wanted our input they would have made this thread weeks ago, and the devs would be replying to it.
Yep.
This thread is just CCP trolling the whole community.
Drop it like its hat.
|
XxGhazbaranxX
TCD ToXiCaTeD RISE of LEGION
1032
|
Posted - 2014.02.19 12:36:00 -
[338] - Quote
I wrote:Now lets put it in other terms. Lets say I bought a plane because I wanted to fly, but then you switch my plane and give me a boat. Both are vehicles but both vehicles have different purposes and that is what has happened with the suits. It's not that I bough a jet and you switched it for a cesna to make it fair because it's a cesna game. It's because I bought a plane to fly with and you gave me a boat that is used for a completely different purpose. While I wouldn't necessarily have argued on the pro-respec side if it was just tweaks to the stats and numbers of Dropsuits, equipment and weapons, I have to agree that since the actual bonuses changed to entirely different things, a respec is at the least an option that should be considered by CCP.
Many people don't know this but eve has had a lot of changes to the ships in these last couple of cycles of ship re-balancing but those changes where numerical for the most part so where before you had a 5% bonus to shield resistance per level, now you have 4%. Where you had a 10% boost to webber range, now you have 40% to better fulfill it's role.
Now back to Dust. These changes that are being made are at the core of the suits themselves. CCP; you are not tweaking numbers, you are changing the whole concept of each dropsuit. Imagine for a moment that you trained your minmatar logi for the hacking bonus, which many did, then all of the sudden instead of being a hacking suit you have a repping suit that does not fit your playstyle. Now lets put it in other terms. Lets say I bought a plane because I wanted to fly, but then you switch my plane and give me a boat. Both are vehicles but both vehicles have different purposes and that is what has happened with the suits. It's not that I bough a jet and you switched it for a cesna to make it fair because it's a cesna game. It's because I bought a plane to fly with and you gave me a boat that is used for a completely different purpose.
Now, just because I am pro-respec at this moment doesn't mean I agree with respecs in general because I don't and I have made peace with the posibilty of not having one. But for this instance, I believe that suits where change in a fundamental way that will completely change the way they are used, not because they where tones down like the cal logi was when it was OP but because they changed the way they all function.
Plasma Cannon Advocate
|
Marc Rime
265
|
Posted - 2014.02.19 12:59:00 -
[339] - Quote
Awry Barux wrote:The Robot Devil wrote:I am a armor man but I still skilled all shields to five. I don't consider it a waste at all. I don't use them often but when I do it is nice to have. Hmm. If I had done that, I would consider it a waste. Or, not a waste, but a huge opportunity cost- that SP could have gone other, more useful places, like electronics/engineering. Maxing both has the added benefit of making you somewhat more resilient to balance changes. I did it for that very reason. It would appear that a lot of people chose not to, and instead dumped all their SP into whatever the forums said was best at the moment, that's their choice -- a choice they, for some reason, now wish to undo. |
The Terminator T-1000
Skynet Incorporated
114
|
Posted - 2014.02.19 13:04:00 -
[340] - Quote
I want a respec of dropsuit commands and upgrades. Why? Because the Amarr was the only heavy available so I had no choice. Also many suits are getting new bounuses changing my play style. |
|
The Terminator T-1000
Skynet Incorporated
114
|
Posted - 2014.02.19 13:18:00 -
[341] - Quote
I have noticed that most people against a respec are those that drive tanks. What are you afraid of? |
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star. EoN.
2634
|
Posted - 2014.02.19 13:27:00 -
[342] - Quote
The Terminator T-1000 wrote:I have noticed that most people against a respec are those that drive tanks. What are you afraid of?
Really?
If i get an infantry respec and i can clean that side up and maybe save a bit to put into more vehicles
Whats infantry going do? mostly respec out of swarms i bet and possibly into a FG or just focus on the infantry side instead
Less AV means i wont be as bothered as much
Intelligence is OP
|
The Robot Devil
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
1675
|
Posted - 2014.02.19 14:10:00 -
[343] - Quote
FarQue FromAfar wrote:the content not being delivered
This week was the third time I have ever hit the cap, I am about as casual as it gets. I don't have time to play and I haven't paid money in about a year. It is not about leet vets not wanting people to have good suits. You are correct in that the problem is content. Yes, I am against refunds but if the all the racial suits are released at one time then I do think now is a good time to refund dropsuit SP. I believe in rewarding players with time spent in game and those players should have an advantage over someone who has been here two weeks.
It is not leet mentality, it is a reward for playing. The problem is content, we don't have enough and CCP needs to get the core line up of suits worked out so that they can say no more respecs.
"You people voted for Hubert Humphrey, and you killed Jesus."
Raoul Duke
|
The Robot Devil
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
1675
|
Posted - 2014.02.19 14:14:00 -
[344] - Quote
Marc Rime wrote:Awry Barux wrote:The Robot Devil wrote:I am a armor man but I still skilled all shields to five. I don't consider it a waste at all. I don't use them often but when I do it is nice to have. Hmm. If I had done that, I would consider it a waste. Or, not a waste, but a huge opportunity cost- that SP could have gone other, more useful places, like electronics/engineering. Maxing both has the added benefit of making you somewhat more resilient to balance changes. I did it for that very reason. It would appear that a lot of people chose not to, and instead dumped all their SP into whatever the forums said was best at the moment, that's their choice -- a choice they, for some reason, now wish to undo.
Pretty much how I feel.
I do think heavy and light frames should get refunded even if they tell the rest of us to suck it up. Lights and heavies didn't have the variety of choices mediums had so it would be fair to them to give a refund on those.
"You people voted for Hubert Humphrey, and you killed Jesus."
Raoul Duke
|
The Robot Devil
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
1675
|
Posted - 2014.02.19 14:24:00 -
[345] - Quote
501st Headstrong wrote:Yes to a respec. Reasons being:
1. People have been witing years forcontent, but were forced to allign with other gear. Case and poijt: Minmatars running Amarr heavies. I am a major fan of Lore and this bugs me. A Respec will allow me to fufill my Raciql Inventory
2. People will always skill into FOTM, but to survive. Some say tyey did this with the Flaylock, and now everyone runs RRs? Guess what, the description of the RR says it is thr best rifle to date. All we want CCP is the choice to Spec ijto what we want
3. We refuse to wait for our new, very likely buggy suits when we are wwiting for this update, and years before that. A respec will sait us
4. So what if we cry in the future.If people scree this up, you at least know you gave us the opporutuniity. It hasbeen very long since we lived with those mistakes.
5. A full Respec can allow Avrs to change if thry have given up on it, allow Gallente to spec iinto We mor fully instead of shieldd, and more. Dont beat around thr bush
6. If I get a full 13 million is SP respec, I will go Proto. Not to stomp players thoigh, but to have a viable suit to counter those who would tty and stomp me. Many ppl cant geneate billions of Isk in PC. Please allow us to at least have thr capacity to fight back.
7. It's a nice thing to do considering 15 of these 17 current pages are good arguents for a Respec, and the rest are weak.
8. "CCP never gIves Respecs" They are givin me all my suits now along with new equipment and weapons. Also, respecs have been given before.
9. "Proplr knew thr Flaylock pistol was OP and skilled into it anyway" Thry did it in hopes of killing thr other guy before they died. Also, CCP doesnt release OP weapons that people csn tell by. I will happily atgue about How the weapons of Dust fit together in trrms of Countering, start up another thread. Full respec for all who do what it takes to survive, and lose what they are in thr process. Ex: HMG use to beweak. Heavies use AR. People cty about a problem thry caused, along eith lack of Anti Infantry HWs.
10. You have a majoritg of players that want a respec, and a rrfudal will alienate thrm. Majority rules CCP, so please appease hs. Or I assure you thr next big Update will have your biggest ultimatum: Repec now sincr you didnt give us one in 1.8 or I rrfuse ti play this gam.
There's 10 points why to give a respec. Any disputers? And yes, I will debate you on this. Sorry about Spelling mistakes, typing this onthr Vta :)
I know your pain on the VITA.
"You people voted for Hubert Humphrey, and you killed Jesus."
Raoul Duke
|
Marc Rime
267
|
Posted - 2014.02.19 14:49:00 -
[346] - Quote
The Terminator T-1000 wrote:I want a respec of dropsuit commands and upgrades. Why? Because the Amarr was the only heavy available so I had no choice. Also many suits are getting new bounuses changing my play style. In all fairness you might want to give up all the progress you earned while wearing that suit too, in that case.
Anyway, the patch is still a few weeks off, start saving now and you'll easily have enough SP to unlock the advanced sentinel or commando you want. If you grind away and max the bonus this week and the next you might even have enough for proto... And that's not even considering the 3x SP week we recently had, surely you saved some of that SP for 1.8? I mean, since you knew there'd be new gear you'd want to unlock? |
The Robot Devil
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
1675
|
Posted - 2014.02.19 14:52:00 -
[347] - Quote
Marc Rime wrote: In all fairness you might want to give up all the progress you earned while wearing that suit too, in that case.
Never thought of that one, I will have to keep that on tap. Very good job and thank you.
"You people voted for Hubert Humphrey, and you killed Jesus."
Raoul Duke
|
DUST Fiend
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
11178
|
Posted - 2014.02.19 15:18:00 -
[348] - Quote
This game is so far from complete.
Until we have a stable foundation, arguments against respecs are emotional and nothing more. They do NO damage to ANYTHING but your own roleplaying and imagination.
Period.
What the other guy runs is HIS / HER business, not mine, and even if it changed drastically every 5 minutes, it NEVER effects me unless I allow it to.
Basically: get over yourselves, and play the game.
And before anyone regurgitates any FoTM crap, news flash: SP rich players are sitting on millions of unallocated SP so that THEY benefit from no respec. So, before you spout off that it hurts newer players, it does exactly the opposite, and if you can't see that then you clearly haven't played enough DUST
Accurate depiction of anti respec people
Videos / Fiction
Closed Beta Vet; Incubus Pilot
|
Komodo Jones
Chaotik Serenity
514
|
Posted - 2014.02.19 17:58:00 -
[349] - Quote
Just saw this, do the respec, why? Because there's alot of stuff changing, there's alot of new stuff coming into the game, why should someone have to be stuck with the amarr heavy if they want the gallente heavy? And also because it really won't hurt the game that much, if people use their respec to skill into the "fit of the month" it will only be good for a month, or until the next update, really not that big of a deal and the last time infantry got a respec was almost a year ago, some people may want to trim some fat or change into a playstyle that suits them better, what's wrong with that?
This is a signature.
You're now reading it.
You may now reply to my post.
|
Marc Rime
269
|
Posted - 2014.02.19 18:26:00 -
[350] - Quote
Komodo Jones wrote:why should someone have to be stuck with the amarr heavy if they want the gallente heavy? But they aren't stuck with it. Well, yes, they will have that skill, but having it doesn't prevent them from skilling into whatever they want today. People seem to be stuck in the mindset of games with a maximum level, where points in one skill meant they could never get some other skill.
Komodo Jones wrote:And also because it really won't hurt the game that much, if people use their respec to skill into the "fit of the month" it will only be good for a month, or until the next update, really not that big of a deal Yeah, because surely noone will requestdemand respecs next time something is added or changed. Especially not if there is one now.
Komodo Jones wrote:some people may want to trim some fat or change into a playstyle that suits them better, what's wrong with that? With a constant influx of SP, nothing prevents anyone from changing their playstyle as it is. Also, hanging on to your old skills means that when you grow tired of the new stuff, or it gets nerfed, you have something to fall back to. |
|
CommanderBolt
ACME SPECIAL FORCES
714
|
Posted - 2014.02.19 18:27:00 -
[351] - Quote
DUST Fiend wrote:This game is so far from complete. Until we have a stable foundation, arguments against respecs are emotional and nothing more. They do NO damage to ANYTHING but your own roleplaying and imagination. Period. What the other guy runs is HIS / HER business, not mine, and even if it changed drastically every 5 minutes, it NEVER effects me unless I allow it to. Basically: get over yourselves, and play the game. And before anyone regurgitates any FoTM crap, news flash: SP rich players are sitting on millions of unallocated SP so that THEY benefit from no respec. So, before you spout off that it hurts newer players, it does exactly the opposite, and if you can't see that then you clearly haven't played enough DUST Accurate depiction of anti respec people
I Can confirm I have been a patient and forward thinking DUST player and I have saved up nearly 3Mill SP for 1.8. I expect to have even more by the time 1.8 drops.
If CCP do not respec anything then I know that at least I have a nice chunk of SP to put into the things I would like. |
Awry Barux
New Eden Blades Of The Azure Zero-Day
909
|
Posted - 2014.02.19 18:40:00 -
[352] - Quote
Marc Rime wrote:Komodo Jones wrote:why should someone have to be stuck with the amarr heavy if they want the gallente heavy? But they aren't stuck with it. Well, yes, they will have that skill, but having it doesn't prevent them from skilling into whatever they want today. People seem to be stuck in the mindset of games with a maximum level, where points in one skill meant they could never get some other skill. Komodo Jones wrote:And also because it really won't hurt the game that much, if people use their respec to skill into the "fit of the month" it will only be good for a month, or until the next update, really not that big of a deal Yeah, because surely noone will requestdemand respecs next time something is added or changed. Especially not if there is one now. Komodo Jones wrote:some people may want to trim some fat or change into a playstyle that suits them better, what's wrong with that? With a constant influx of SP, nothing prevents anyone from changing their playstyle as it is. Also, hanging on to your old skills means that when you grow tired of the new stuff, or it gets nerfed, you have something to fall back to.
Awry Barux wrote: It DOES matter when this game's major monetization route is items that increase the rate at which you gain SP. I paid good money to wait less, and by making me wait more by changing what skills I need to do what I want to do, CCP is essentially telling me that the money I spent earlier was a waste. Not just that, but that they deliberately made it a waste, by moving the goalposts after I kicked the ball and refusing to allow me to re-do the kick.
I won't quit if there's no respec, but you can be damned sure that I won't be spending another cent on the game.
|
Tech Ohm Eaven
L.O.T.I.S. D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
1296
|
Posted - 2014.02.19 18:56:00 -
[353] - Quote
The Robot Devil wrote:Tech Ohm Eaven wrote:The Robot Devil wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:Spectral Clone wrote:If I ran a business to business (b2b) company, and changed the software I released to a customer drastically, making their organizations planning go to hell, then I would be in no other position than to give that customer good will, or I would probably be fined and lose said customer.
Refunding infantry SP is a matter of professionalism and good will to the customers. Imagine if all employees at customer of you business would have to write several page long threads to your company about the issue at hand, without any official response for several weeks. Could you Imagine how pissed off the management of the customer company would be?
Maybe you cant understand the above, because you are 18 or younger and haven't had a real job yet. This is my only interpretation of the anti respec HTFU crowd.. Get a fking job Extremely well put, kind of my same thought too. It's not about who does or does not deserve it, it's about goodwill and professionalism. +1 Yeah because my degree in electronics isn't enough, I have had two or three jobs my entire life, I have two jobs right now. Some of you people are so well informed I am amazed that you even play a game like this. Thanks for coming off your high horse long enough to talk to the common folk. No. I paid for a service that was changed from the results I paid for. The proper thing to do is either refund the actual money or refund the service to be used for the RESULTS it was purchased for. Thats why its either refund the money or refund the SP. And since the money has been SPENT by CCP. That leaves: REFUND THE SP. No one said the service was forever and ever. You received your service for the money you spent. The phone company changed from unlimited data to anything over 4GB is slowed down. I didn't want that service, ask for that service or even like what it has to offer but I have to take it. It is called life. Also, I am pretty sure somewhere in the agreement you agreed to there is a sentence that states that CCP has the right to change anything they want at anytime they want without notice. That sentence makes any and all monetary validated repecs null and void. You agreed and therefore they have your money and can do what they want. There is no legal issue here, it is all up to CCP.
No.
If the service is no longer what I was OFFERED.
Then theres two options: Option 1: cave and say Yessa Massa! and accept the Bend Over Here It Comes Again ...BOHICA.
Option 2: Say screw this noise!! and DISCONTINUE that service.
Now what of these two options will result in happy CCP customers and a GROWING game?
And if CCP refuses to do a respec then theres other service options:
http://static.gamespot.com/uploads/original/1503/15037917/2439803-3964793538-65bCq.gif
Abandon Ship!, Abandon Ship!!
Jumps into escape pod!
Selected destination Planet PS4.
|
Marc Rime
270
|
Posted - 2014.02.19 19:07:00 -
[354] - Quote
Awry Barux wrote: It DOES matter when this game's major monetization route is items that increase the rate at which you gain SP. I paid good money to wait less, and by making me wait more by changing what skills I need to do what I want to do, CCP is essentially telling me that the money I spent earlier was a waste. Not just that, but that they deliberately made it a waste, by moving the goalposts after I kicked the ball and refusing to allow me to re-do the kick.
I guess that's where we differ. I don't consider points dumped into skills I no longer use wasted. Back when I bought the skill, I apparently wanted it, and I may want to use it again in the future. Furthermore, I don't find it the least surprising that they change things, in fact, I've picked my skills based on the presumption that things are going to change. |
Rinzler XVIII
Edimmu Warfighters Gallente Federation
9
|
Posted - 2014.02.19 19:17:00 -
[355] - Quote
Marc Rime wrote:Komodo Jones wrote:why should someone have to be stuck with the amarr heavy if they want the gallente heavy? But they aren't stuck with it. Well, yes, they will have that skill, but having it doesn't prevent them from skilling into whatever they want today. People seem to be stuck in the mindset of games with a maximum level, where points in one skill meant they could never get some other skill. Komodo Jones wrote:And also because it really won't hurt the game that much, if people use their respec to skill into the "fit of the month" it will only be good for a month, or until the next update, really not that big of a deal Yeah, because surely noone will requestdemand respecs next time something is added or changed. Especially not if there is one now. Komodo Jones wrote:some people may want to trim some fat or change into a playstyle that suits them better, what's wrong with that? With a constant influx of SP, nothing prevents anyone from changing their playstyle as it is. Also, hanging on to your old skills means that when you grow tired of the new stuff, or it gets nerfed, you have something to fall back to.
The proposed changes in 1.8 are going to completely change infantry roles, changed bonuses on existing suits, new suits, complete overhaul of weapon stats with nerfs and buffs, changes in equipment efficiency making them weaker when not used on a particular racial suit .. etc etc etc
This isn't 1 new weapon and a few bug fixes its a complete change in playstyles for infantry
Poeple have spent time and money into developing their playstyle and for it then to be completely changed means that all of those decisions you made in the past are now worthless ..
Honestly if there isn't a dropsuit command,upgrades and weaponry respec in 1.8 theres going to be a huge amount of unhappy players and an exodus of those aforementioned players
|
Awry Barux
New Eden Blades Of The Azure Zero-Day
909
|
Posted - 2014.02.19 19:24:00 -
[356] - Quote
Marc Rime wrote:Awry Barux wrote: It DOES matter when this game's major monetization route is items that increase the rate at which you gain SP. I paid good money to wait less, and by making me wait more by changing what skills I need to do what I want to do, CCP is essentially telling me that the money I spent earlier was a waste. Not just that, but that they deliberately made it a waste, by moving the goalposts after I kicked the ball and refusing to allow me to re-do the kick.
I guess that's where we differ. I don't consider points dumped into skills I no longer use wasted. Back when I bought the skill, I apparently wanted it, and I may want to use it again in the future. Furthermore, I don't find it the least surprising that they change things, in fact, I've picked my skills based on the presumption that things are going to change.
There's a difference between balance changes and what's going on in 1.8. I direct you to my post on page 1:
Awry Barux wrote: I skilled in to the Min Logi for the hack speed bonus. I spent a lot of time thinking about this, and spent my SP on something I was absolutely sure I liked. I've never once used a repair tool in my entire mercenary career, and have 0 SP in them. If you had asked me six months ago "Would you skill in to a suit that gave a bonus to repair tools?", I would have said no, and I will still say no today. My opinion and desired playstyle hasn't changed, but the effects of my carefully considered choices have changed drastically.
That warrants a respec.
|
Rinzler XVIII
Edimmu Warfighters Gallente Federation
9
|
Posted - 2014.02.19 19:31:00 -
[357] - Quote
Yes to a Respec of Infantry Dropsuit Command/Dropsuit Upgrades and Weaponry
Signed |
D legendary hero
Ultramarine Corp
1650
|
Posted - 2014.02.19 19:50:00 -
[358] - Quote
Western Ways wrote:lol When i see some of the arguments against a respec, i can't help but think of those douchebags that don't want to raise the minimum wage. "I have no need for it, and it doesn't benefit me at all . . . so why should i give a ufck about what these broke bastards want"?
Queue the BS about pulling yourself up by the bootstraps and having to deal with the choices you made instead of helping to bring about a change that could be mutually beneficial for everyone. Sound familiar?
Look . . . I'm fairly new to this game and i love it; even with all it's flaws, and I'd like to see it thrive. And even though there may be some negatives to a respec I think the pros far outweigh the cons.
Yes for respec
real life social issues... it hurts... *escapes into the game8 its here too *shivers*
Sou o Defendeiro dos derrubados_Pronto saberá justiça
|
D legendary hero
Ultramarine Corp
1650
|
Posted - 2014.02.19 20:00:00 -
[359] - Quote
CCP Logibro wrote:Due to the excesive spamming of topics related to the possibility of a respec, all discussion about respecs must take place in this thread. This includes any posts in support or against a respec. Any other topics anywhere else on the forums will be locked or deleted, and linked to this thread, and repeated starting new topics may result in a warning or bans as per the forum rules.
Note that this is not a confirmation that we will or will not be providing a respec in 1.8, this is merely a venue to discuss it.
Logibro I know your receiving all these notifications. Since you aren't the one to either confirm nor deny a respec for 1.8. At least confirm that someone is receiving this information and attempting to make an informed decision.
most like a decision making committe or body is in charge of deliberating such matters. Has any of this information reached them?
Sou o Defendeiro dos derrubados_Pronto saberá justiça
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star. EoN.
1848
|
Posted - 2014.02.19 20:04:00 -
[360] - Quote
The Terminator T-1000 wrote:I have noticed that most people against a respec are those that drive tanks. What are you afraid of? And infantry was against any kind of respec for vehicles at all, even though CCP was changing practically everything about them.
I've supported a full SP refund/respec for everything they're ever going to change. I won't change my opinion on that. What you said is incredibly stupid, and has no basis in reality.
I may be missing something, but I'm pretty sure that I didn't call for a tank nerf before Uprising 1.7. - Atiim
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |