Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 19 20 30 40 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
Awry Barux
New Eden Blades Of The Azure Zero-Day
976
|
Posted - 2014.02.20 23:47:00 -
[451] - Quote
Godin Thekiller wrote:lol, it's going to happen.
I'll believe it when I see an official statement to that effect. Until then, I'm going to moan and whine and complain and make noise every single day. |
Varjac Theobroma Montenegro
PAND3M0N1UM Lokun Listamenn
191
|
Posted - 2014.02.20 23:49:00 -
[452] - Quote
Awry Barux wrote:Godin Thekiller wrote:lol, it's going to happen. I'll believe it when I see an official statement to that effect. Until then, I'm going to moan and whine and complain and make noise every single day.
Everyday? I will believe it when I see it.
Don't let me down brone (bro + clone)
FAME
Click Here for Recruitment
|
Sam Tektzby
Better Hide R Die
181
|
Posted - 2014.02.20 23:59:00 -
[453] - Quote
Awry Barux wrote:Godin Thekiller wrote:lol, it's going to happen. I'll believe it when I see an official statement to that effect. Until then, I'm going to moan and whine and complain and make noise every single day.
Its not a whining, they told its full release with all that POMPOUS celebration and now they have BACKSLASH for their faults. Its easy if its beta, name it beta. If its a full release, they should give COMMUNITY a chance to RESPEc after their IMPLEMENTS or CHANGES. Its only logical way, COMMUNITY needs equal GAME needs. Without US like community, there is no GAME.
Support - Tactician/Support
Deteis - Orator
|
Awry Barux
New Eden Blades Of The Azure Zero-Day
977
|
Posted - 2014.02.21 00:07:00 -
[454] - Quote
Sam Tektzby wrote:Awry Barux wrote:Godin Thekiller wrote:lol, it's going to happen. I'll believe it when I see an official statement to that effect. Until then, I'm going to moan and whine and complain and make noise every single day. Its not a whining, they told its full release with all that POMPOUS celebration and now they have BACKSLASH for their faults. Its easy if its beta, name it beta. If its a full release, they should give COMMUNITY a chance to RESPEc after their IMPLEMENTS or CHANGES. Its only logical way, COMMUNITY needs equal GAME needs. Without US like community, there is no GAME.
I know, I know, I'm being facetious at everyone saying they're tired of hearing about it. |
Tallen Ellecon
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
1469
|
Posted - 2014.02.21 00:09:00 -
[455] - Quote
Again, changes will happen, things will be added, respecs have only been issued for skill tree changes. Your stuff is changing......... but you're still using it now, why should you get a refund for something you've used? We all take the same risk, just learn to expect things to change.
Where is my Gallente sidearm? 1.8? When is that? SoonGäó514
"No blue tags make Tallen go crazy."
|
Lynn Beck
Granite Mercenary Division Top Men.
798
|
Posted - 2014.02.21 00:19:00 -
[456] - Quote
Just wait till gallente commando ends up with a bug whwre its reload speed bonus is 20% per level instead of 5%, and you're complaining that NS is hacking because they were 'smart' and saved SP for gal commandos, whereas the rest lf is are walking around going '******* nyain, commando stomping everyone, ehy doesn't my amarr commando do that!?' And nobody tells CCP because nobody trustworthy skilled it to find out.
No SP refund=academy stomping FOR DAYYZ
Proud owner of 69 'Fleshriver' Nk's.
No i don't buy AUR
|
Awry Barux
New Eden Blades Of The Azure Zero-Day
978
|
Posted - 2014.02.21 00:20:00 -
[457] - Quote
Tallen Ellecon wrote:Again, changes will happen, things will be added, respecs have only been issued for skill tree changes. Your stuff is changing......... but you're still using it now, why should you get a refund for something you've used? We all take the same risk, just learn to expect things to change.
There's a difference between balance changes, for which I would not expect a respec, and complete infantry overhauls. If, for example, they were simply removing logis' intrinsic reps, I would not expect a respec at all. However, 1.8 is going to kill my current playstyle and stick me with a suit meant to perform literally the opposite role. I was an uplink-dropping speed hacker with great mobility, a sort of scout-logi hybrid. In 1.8 I'm going to be the designated suit to sit behind a heavy with a rep tool. There was no possible way for me to predict or expect such an incredibly drastic change, and it's crap for you to tell me to "expect it".
Such a colossal change to the functions of skills is no less major than a rework of the skill tree structure, as happened with vehicles in 1.7.
The point of a persistent, permanent skill system is for your earlier choices to matter as you work towards your eventual goal. The changes in 1.8 will effectively make a large portion of my SP no longer relevant to the goal I've been working towards for more than 6 months. I should receive a refund because SP isn't meant for things that you use for a bit, then abandon- it's about making permanent choices about character development, choices which are made invalid when roles get outright swapped during subsequent patches. |
Vakki Yuki
Eastern Aexun Society
8
|
Posted - 2014.02.21 00:34:00 -
[458] - Quote
I reiterate, we wanted doughnuts and they're giving us bagels.
We chose everything that we chose because of how we play.
To change these things without some sort of compensation is simply unfair.
End of arguement.
Specialization in improvisation.
|
Cmdr Wolfe
Carbon 7 CRONOS.
50
|
Posted - 2014.02.21 00:38:00 -
[459] - Quote
Varjac Theobroma Montenegro wrote:FOTM will happen no matter what. It is inevitable. So what does it matter.
its not "inevitable" its just down to poor game machanics and balancing on CCPs part... yes CCP the whole ****-ing company is to blame as none of them came up with the idea to pay DICE to make this game, |
Tallen Ellecon
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
1473
|
Posted - 2014.02.21 00:43:00 -
[460] - Quote
Awry Barux wrote:Tallen Ellecon wrote:Again, changes will happen, things will be added, respecs have only been issued for skill tree changes. Your stuff is changing......... but you're still using it now, why should you get a refund for something you've used? We all take the same risk, just learn to expect things to change. There's a difference between balance changes, for which I would not expect a respec, and complete infantry overhauls. If, for example, they were simply removing logis' intrinsic reps, I would not expect a respec at all. However, 1.8 is going to kill my current playstyle and stick me with a suit meant to perform literally the opposite role. I was an uplink-dropping speed hacker with great mobility, a sort of scout-logi hybrid. In 1.8 I'm going to be the designated suit to sit behind a heavy with a rep tool. There was no possible way for me to predict or expect such an incredibly drastic change, and it's crap for you to tell me to "expect it". Such a colossal change to the functions of skills is no less major than a rework of the skill tree structure, as happened with vehicles in 1.7. The point of a persistent, permanent skill system is for your earlier choices to matter as you work towards your eventual goal. The changes in 1.8 will effectively make a large portion of my SP no longer relevant to the goal I've been working towards for more than 6 months. I should receive a refund because SP isn't meant for things that you use for a bit, then abandon- it's about making permanent choices about character development, choices which are made invalid when roles get outright swapped during subsequent patches.
That's why instead of speccing into a bunch of suits or a bunch of weapons I specced into core skills. Gear changes only affect a small portion of my total SP and anything new only takes about a month or two worth of grinding to be another top notch suit. I've started saving since they announced the new suits in January and I have over 5 mil SP. Can no one else do that? My **** got changed, it'll still work, I've still used it, why should I be entitled to reallocate all my infantry SP because they are changing the bonuses? The bonuses aren't why the Gal and Cal Logi have been the go to suits for try hards, it's the slot layout and base stats, these changes barely even touch that.
It's not about how big the change is, it's about the fundamental fact that they don't give respecs unless they have to, and that means skill tree reworks. These changes have all happened, added content, changed bonuses, changed slot layouts, and those didn't warrant respecs. Don't get me wrong though I understand why people want them and people aren't necessarily trying to jump onto FOTM, and a respec wouldn't be totally unwelcome by me, if it were the last, but this forum culture of "respecs should be a regular mechanic" and the reasoning behind it go against the way New Eden works. I mean FFS EVE characters can't respec at all, and they have to pay for every damn account. People here can create a dozen PSNs to make characters to spec into what they see fit or have backups in case, heavens forbid, CCP changes something.
Where is my Gallente sidearm? 1.8? When is that? SoonGäó514
"No blue tags make Tallen go crazy."
|
|
Tallen Ellecon
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
1473
|
Posted - 2014.02.21 00:44:00 -
[461] - Quote
Cmdr Wolfe wrote:Varjac Theobroma Montenegro wrote:FOTM will happen no matter what. It is inevitable. So what does it matter. its not "inevitable" its just down to poor game machanics and balancing on CCPs part... yes CCP the whole ****-ing company is to blame as none of them came up with the idea to pay DICE to make this game,
CALLOGITAR514 after the second respec was far worse than addition to this game since.
Where is my Gallente sidearm? 1.8? When is that? SoonGäó514
"No blue tags make Tallen go crazy."
|
Tallen Ellecon
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
1473
|
Posted - 2014.02.21 00:48:00 -
[462] - Quote
Vakki Yuki wrote:I reiterate, we wanted doughnuts and they're giving us bagels.
We chose everything that we chose because of how we play.
To change these things without some sort of compensation is simply unfair.
End of arguement.
You can't put cream cheese on a donut, they are two totally different things, and no bonus changes a suit so much that it's totally different. Unfair is the name of the game we all take the risk, it's a rough world HTFU.
Where is my Gallente sidearm? 1.8? When is that? SoonGäó514
"No blue tags make Tallen go crazy."
|
Awry Barux
New Eden Blades Of The Azure Zero-Day
979
|
Posted - 2014.02.21 01:19:00 -
[463] - Quote
Tallen Ellecon wrote:
That's why instead of speccing into a bunch of suits or a bunch of weapons I specced into core skills. Gear changes only affect a small portion of my total SP and anything new only takes about a month or two worth of grinding to be another top notch suit. I've started saving since they announced the new suits in January and I have over 5 mil SP. Can no one else do that? My **** got changed, it'll still work, I've still used it, why should I be entitled to reallocate all my infantry SP because they are changing the bonuses? The bonuses aren't why the Gal and Cal Logi have been the go to suits for try hards, it's the slot layout and base stats, these changes barely even touch that.
It's not about how big the change is, it's about the fundamental fact that they don't give respecs unless they have to, and that means skill tree reworks. These changes have all happened, added content, changed bonuses, changed slot layouts, and those didn't warrant respecs. Don't get me wrong though I understand why people want them and people aren't necessarily trying to jump onto FOTM, and a respec wouldn't be totally unwelcome by me, if it were the last, but this forum culture of "respecs should be a regular mechanic" and the reasoning behind it go against the way New Eden works. I mean FFS EVE characters can't respec at all, and they have to pay for every damn account. People here can create a dozen PSNs to make characters to spec into what they see fit or have backups in case, heavens forbid, CCP changes something.
Don't spite the rest of the player base just because you've got a bone to pick with some tryharding slayer logis.
It completely does matter how big the change is. I'm not asking for "respecs as a regular mechanic", I'm asking for this ONE respec in an exceptional case of extreme changes. I didn't spec into "a bunch of suits", I got ONE suit. My suit will quite simply NOT WORK in 1.8 for the purpose I explicitly selected it for. So you happened to pick things that still do what you wanted them to in 1.8, that's great for you, but some of us didn't. All this crap being spouted about "HTFU decisions are permanent in New Eden" means absolutely nothing when the meaning of my carefully thought-out decision changes radically. If you had asked me six months ago, "Would you, now or ever, spec into a suit that gave repair bonuses?", my answer would and will be a resounding NO. I picked my suit very, very carefully, and now it has become the opposite of what I selected, through no fault of my own.
I see no reason why I should have to spend another few months of grinding worth of SP to get a new suit and going all the way back to skilling up the basic frame when I already had the only suit I wanted. I spent cash on boosters to wait less- by forcing me to grind more to get what I originally wanted, and have always wanted, CCP is telling me that they reserve the right to deliberately turn my cash expenditure into a waste as they please. They do have that right, but they don't have to exercise it like this, and by doing so, they will alienate me, my wallet, and likely a large portion of their player base.
Tallen Ellecon wrote: You can't put cream cheese on a donut, they are two totally different things, and no bonus changes a suit so much that it's totally different. Unfair is the name of the game we all take the risk, it's a rough world HTFU.
The change for the Min Logi from a hack bonus to a repair bonus DOES change the suit so much that it's totally different. FFS. In this one case, CCP has a real chance to make it fair, to make it so that some people who happened to pick things that are changing completely don't get completely shafted, to appropriately compensate us for sticking with them through all the balance failures. This is more like buying a donut, getting a donut, getting halfway through eating it and enjoying it immensely, then having the donut shop magically transmogrify it into a stale bagel just as you go to take another bite. They did it deliberately and I have the right to at the very least ask the manager for the other half of my delicious donut.
It would be one thing to tell me to expect such changes and go with core skills if the game were still in beta, but technically, it's not. I had every reason to expect role stability- not numerical or balance stability, but role stability: the idea that the battlefield niche that my suit theoretically filled would remain reasonably constant. It makes no sense for the most mobile, lightly armored logistics suit to become the one that is effectively chained to a heavy. That is a colossal role change.
CCP is devastating my playstyle and I don't think it's too much to ask to be allowed to preserve my playstyle by re-doing my SP. No, I will not just "HTFU", at least not quietly. |
Sneaky Fletcher
Three-body Solution
65
|
Posted - 2014.02.21 01:23:00 -
[464] - Quote
Tallen Ellecon wrote:Unfair is the name of the game we all take the risk, it's a rough world HTFU.*
EULA covers CCP's a$s and means this is NOT a democracy. They call the shots.
Threads like this, even if perceived as whining/QQ, are the only way we can [against the odds) expect/hope/beg to have a say on the matter.
CCP is above all a company, we are the consumers a good relationship between both is paramount to he success of this Soon TM promise.
* It's true that we SHOULD shut up and adapt, adapting is why I like this game
yet Here we have an opportunity! seeing as a blue tag has ever so slightly acknowleged our cries, NOT CONFIRMED ANYTHING AT ALL, this makes us hope that we can have a say and witness that CCP can make a choice that'll make the costumer relationship that much better.
P.S: either that or fix the bleeping game! if they got their sh*t together the masses would be gathering and throwing cash at them regardless of this kinda changes IMO
*EDIT.- not to get your panties in a bunch, thou. am just guessing that tallen is only here to collect the tears I mean cuz damn man you be hatin real hard on this SP refund thingamajig |
The Robot Devil
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
1699
|
Posted - 2014.02.21 02:03:00 -
[465] - Quote
Sam Tektzby wrote:The Robot Devil wrote:We need to make a good pro and con list real quick
Pro Helps noobs Helps everyone Everything changed - suit SP Everything changed - IRL $ spent Diversity Attract and keep new blood Vets come back and stay Choices don't matter "I made bad choices" "I want to try something new"
Con Noobs don't have enough SP to matter Players can FotM Suits are changing but can still be used You got what you paid for if you have already used the weapon or booster FotM is not diversity SP isn't to blame for NPE, content and training is CCP releases borked gear and the vets will flock to the new OP and still quit b/c borked Lore Respec doesn't help igornace /stupidity Try doesn't mean proto, trying is level 1 or 2
Add to the list, I can be swayed either way. Someone told me once that a lawyer never asks a question that they don't know the answer to. There is no cons, how you can put decission of CCP put in cons. Their Fault are their faults and fais. That not about RESPEC. RESPEC itself is help in big implements and changes to game. If they make bad decission and players ergo COMMUNITY are damaged by it, there should be ..wait there MAY be a chance to overcome that by respec. COMMUNITY cant be PUSHED to something what wasnt their IDEA. Thats pure nonsence. BTW dividing playerbase only on Vets and Noobs is not good at all, thats frst thing. Second one FOTM is again a CCPs fault (they made issue in balacings not the players). Suits will have different Impact with new implements, what is another reason VOTING for RESPEC. And finally. ONLY IGNORANCE AND STUPIDITY IS AGAINST RESPEC
I love this thread. I wish they had done this a long time ago.
"You people voted for Hubert Humphrey, and you killed Jesus."
Raoul Duke
|
Awry Barux
New Eden Blades Of The Azure Zero-Day
981
|
Posted - 2014.02.21 02:05:00 -
[466] - Quote
Sneaky Fletcher wrote: *EDIT.- not to get your panties in a bunch, thou. am just guessing that tallen is only here to collect the tears I mean cuz damn man you be hatin real hard on this SP refund thingamajig
I have no tears, only the blinding and all-consuming fire of internet rage. |
Tallen Ellecon
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
1473
|
Posted - 2014.02.21 02:21:00 -
[467] - Quote
Awry Barux wrote:Sneaky Fletcher wrote: *EDIT.- not to get your panties in a bunch, thou. am just guessing that tallen is only here to collect the tears I mean cuz damn man you be hatin real hard on this SP refund thingamajig
I have no tears, only the blinding and all-consuming fire of internet rage.
Delicious tears.....
Where is my Gallente sidearm? 1.8? When is that? SoonGäó514
"No blue tags make Tallen go crazy."
|
echo47
Minmatar Republic
193
|
Posted - 2014.02.21 02:49:00 -
[468] - Quote
Awry Barux wrote:echo47 wrote:No respec. With the SP events advanced notice of changes we have all had plenty of time to save up skill points. Ohhh my god let's play a game called "how many times can I repost answers to arguments I've already dealt with?" Awry Barux wrote: I've said this 1000 times before and I'll say it again: it is NOT the same thing for you proto-ed vets to save SP as it is for all of us <15mil plebes to save SP. You can perform your role at maximum efficiency while saving SP. For everyone else, we have to directly suffer in the short term (the short term being multiple months) in order to save for CCP's wild changes. So quit playing the holier-than-thou game.
I posted my opinion son. No proto suits here.
The thing is the majority of changes CCP is implementing is based on the QQ, I mean feedback, from the same players asking for a respec. The changes affect everyone.
Fact is players with more skill points will be the ones who benefit. you will still have 15 mil SP the vet will still have twice as many.
The only way younger players would actually benefit is if CCP lessens the amount of SP's needed.
If CCP does allow a respec it will just be one more thing the players asked for then moan about two months later. Let CCP focus on finishing the game.
I would rather look bad and win, than look good and lose.
|
Spectral Clone
Dust2Dust. Top Men.
1340
|
Posted - 2014.02.21 06:50:00 -
[469] - Quote
Noone is going to ask for a respec from CCP because they made a mistake in their skill tree. This thread is not about our current misplaced SP, I could care less about it actually, Its about CCP revamping our roles, making many of our builds (builds that many spent many hours to theorycraft, plan and set up milestones for) and spent SP obsolete (which some of us spent money on boosters).
If youre a guy who just click around some in the skill tree without precaution or thought, this thread is not about you.
Drop it like its hat.
|
THE INFAMOUS Sniper
Inf4m0us
0
|
Posted - 2014.02.21 06:51:00 -
[470] - Quote
I think its fair for infantry to get a suits weapons and equiptment respec because they're all getting changed around drastically in the case of new suits and suit stats regarding specific weapon and equiptment rolls for each in most cases along with weapon changes and new weapons being added in. Its just a game let us have our fun and run what we like and this is not coming from a FOTM chaser. |
|
Skylight Atoma
The Phoenix Federation Proficiency V.
0
|
Posted - 2014.02.21 10:00:00 -
[471] - Quote
I'm putting in my vote for a respec.
A view from someone who has played off and on since release, recently playing more "seriously" (really just more often and with a corp), this game has changed entirely too much over the last year to not warrant a full infantry respec (perhaps even a vehicle respec, but that may be too soon.) If the dropsuit and weapon changes are going to be anything like I have read about it would be very frustrating to have to save up a few million SP to decently use the newer suits, or even the updated suits I already have skills in. It would be frustrating to the point of I don't think I would play as much, and I know others who would simply quit.
I've already felt like I've wasted points getting flaylock specialization 4 (I use the scrambler pistol now instead, which i don't have proto with), and without a heat bonus to amarr suits I most likely wouldn't use the scrambler rifle either, which is also specialization 4. Hell, my advanced swarm launcher with advanced damage mods feel like a waste after the vehicle rebalance. There's at least 2 mil down the drain. It's not even that I'm raging at the changes, but simply that the new suits being released will not be available to the vast majority of players. No one is going to sit on 3 mil SP for a few months just to effectively hop into a new type of suit that we don't even have official word of what the bonuses will be like, afaik all we have is speculation and scattered dev posts.
We have had plenty of time to figure out what infantry suits and weapons we like and don't like, now is a better time than any to let us refocus our skills into the playstyles we enjoy, and to discover new ones. |
Sum1ne Else
WASTELAND JUNK REMOVAL Top Men.
917
|
Posted - 2014.02.21 10:10:00 -
[472] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:CCP, you just opened a can of grade-A worms here. &
Maken Tosch wrote:#9Posted: 2013.07.28 18:26 20 million ISK says that won't happen.
Maken Tosch, I hold you to this, If it does happen The whole community now sees you will send 20million isk to my wallet. If you dont ..it makes you even more of a douchebag then you already are.
I dont know you, I have never seen you in game but you are the most annoying kretin on these forums when it comes to respecs WHY ARE YOU SO AGAINST THEM!? You are a n00b who does not want to get owned by 'FOTM' users??WTF..thats bs dude.
You did say after all the racial suits have been released you would see no reason why there wouldnt be a respec, but after trawling through your 21 pages of respec/no respec posts I couldnt seem to find this particular post.
This is NOT eve. FPS games have a completely different market. Its happening, so please ensure you send me 20m isk.
Public Relations WJR
Its a leopleuradon Charlie a magical leoplueradon, its gunna guide our way to candy mountain!
|
Spectral Clone
Dust2Dust. Top Men.
1345
|
Posted - 2014.02.21 10:13:00 -
[473] - Quote
Maken Tosch => Send me your ISK when the respec hits.
Drop it like its hat.
|
Rei Shepard
The Rainbow Effect Negative-Feedback
1599
|
Posted - 2014.02.21 12:30:00 -
[474] - Quote
CCP Logibro wrote:Due to the excesive spamming of topics related to the possibility of a respec, all discussion about respecs must take place in this thread. This includes any posts in support or against a respec. Any other topics anywhere else on the forums will be locked or deleted, and linked to this thread, and repeated starting new topics may result in a warning or bans as per the forum rules.
Note that this is not a confirmation that we will or will not be providing a respec in 1.8, this is merely a venue to discuss it.
If there is no respec given to infantry when Vehicle users got one, it will be another slap in our faces and i would then let my wallet do the talking by quitting Dust and cancelling my 4 Eve Accounts and ill just go back to APB Reloaded or Titanfall on PC, at least there i got proper controls and framerates.
I am pretty sure i wont be the only one to put and end to their accounts, ive been Pro Dust for an entire year and gave you guys the benefit of the doubt that you guys could deliver, this hasn't happened yet, for me 1.8 will be either making it or breaking it as 1.7 with the Nascar Tanks @ Walmart prices didnt exactly inspire me with much confidence that you guys are on the ball right now, letting them run wild for 2 months didnt excatly win you any more points either.
So 1.8 will be either sweet and ill tollerate everything that is bad about dust for now or its gonna be f*ck this ****, i am out of here...
Winner of the EU Squad Cup
"Go Go Power Rangers!"
"Accuracy"
|
Tech Ohm Eaven
L.O.T.I.S. D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
1302
|
Posted - 2014.02.21 12:47:00 -
[475] - Quote
Rei Shepard wrote:CCP Logibro wrote:Due to the excesive spamming of topics related to the possibility of a respec, all discussion about respecs must take place in this thread. This includes any posts in support or against a respec. Any other topics anywhere else on the forums will be locked or deleted, and linked to this thread, and repeated starting new topics may result in a warning or bans as per the forum rules.
Note that this is not a confirmation that we will or will not be providing a respec in 1.8, this is merely a venue to discuss it. If there is no respec given to infantry when Vehicle users got one, it will be another slap in our faces and i would then let my wallet do the talking by quitting Dust and cancelling my 4 Eve Accounts and ill just go back to APB Reloaded or Titanfall on PC, at least there i got proper controls and framerates. I am pretty sure i wont be the only one to put and end to their accounts, ive been Pro Dust for an entire year and gave you guys the benefit of the doubt that you guys could deliver, this hasn't happened yet, for me 1.8 will be either making it or breaking it as 1.7 with the Nascar Tanks @ Walmart prices didnt exactly inspire me with much confidence that you guys are on the ball right now, letting them run wild for 2 months didnt excatly win you any more points either. So 1.8 will be either sweet and ill tollerate everything that is bad about dust for now or its gonna be f*ck this ****, i am out of here... agreed.
Abandon Ship!, Abandon Ship!!
Jumps into escape pod!
Selected destination Planet PS4.
|
Spectral Clone
Dust2Dust. Top Men.
1355
|
Posted - 2014.02.21 13:00:00 -
[476] - Quote
Rei Shepard wrote: So 1.8 will be either sweet and ill tollerate everything that is bad about dust for now or its gonna be f*ck this ****, i am out of here...
I agree with you on every point here Rei, I know you are also a kb/m player, and I know what we in comparison to DS3 players have to put up with in addition to all the other broken things, stuff, etc.
It-¦s too bad CCP doesnt read this thread...
Drop it like its hat.
|
The Terminator T-1000
Skynet Incorporated
127
|
Posted - 2014.02.21 13:14:00 -
[477] - Quote
If proficiency and dmg mods are affected I would want a SP refund!! |
Piraten Hovnoret
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
343
|
Posted - 2014.02.21 15:22:00 -
[478] - Quote
Wow page 24 and still nothing from CCP
MAYBE THEY NEED SOME LOVE
1 Miljon isk to the first dev that post somthing after this post.
Feel the love CCP
LOVE LOVE LOVE LOVE LOVE LOVE
And FINALY
Some more
LOVE
War never changes
|
IR Scifi
Knights of Eternal Darkness League of Infamy
112
|
Posted - 2014.02.21 15:50:00 -
[479] - Quote
At the very least the dropsuit tree should be refunded. I know many a heavy who only specced into amarr heavy because they had to. I'm disappointed my suicide-hack winmatar logi is going away but I'll still roll winmatar logi either way so that won't affect me too much. |
Vakki Yuki
Eastern Aexun Society
10
|
Posted - 2014.02.21 16:34:00 -
[480] - Quote
Fine, I'll be the one to say it.
Go ahead and screw over your player base. Watch how quickly we cast Dust aside for Titanfall or Destiny. Two games that are going to shut Dust down anyways. (Titanfall is astonishing.)
CCP (and all you hater fools who can't comprehend logic), we're not complaining just to complain.
WE HAVE A LEGITIMATE REASON.
You're changing friggin everything and no one, NO ONE, is happy.
Let me know if I'm wasting my time, and the months I've put into Dust were a waste of time. I'll gladly leave. Let me know you're not pulling my pecker and I'll gladly stay.
Specialization in improvisation.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 19 20 30 40 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |