Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
Chesyre Armundsen
Thanes Of Dust
435
|
Posted - 2014.02.18 22:42:00 -
[301] - Quote
The Robot Devil wrote:CHICAGOCUBS4EVER wrote:refund everything except Flaylock skills. everyone knew it was FoTM and specced anyway.. make them live with it I just skilled into Flaylocks the other day. They are kind of fun but hard to use.
I don't regret my Flaylock skills at all. They're a standard sidearm to all of my Assault suits and at worst I use them for crowd control. Reds run when they see anything coming towards them
That being said, while I support a respec I wouldn't cry without it. I skilled into my tree because of what I wanted and I don't regret those decisions. The only major gripe I would have is the new racial suit bonuses, but its not going to stop me from keeping a wardrobe of Galentte suits.
Mihi gravato Deus - "Let God lay the burden on me!"
|
Tech Ohm Eaven
L.O.T.I.S. D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
1291
|
Posted - 2014.02.18 22:46:00 -
[302] - Quote
The Robot Devil wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:Spectral Clone wrote:If I ran a business to business (b2b) company, and changed the software I released to a customer drastically, making their organizations planning go to hell, then I would be in no other position than to give that customer good will, or I would probably be fined and lose said customer.
Refunding infantry SP is a matter of professionalism and good will to the customers. Imagine if all employees at customer of you business would have to write several page long threads to your company about the issue at hand, without any official response for several weeks. Could you Imagine how pissed off the management of the customer company would be?
Maybe you cant understand the above, because you are 18 or younger and haven't had a real job yet. This is my only interpretation of the anti respec HTFU crowd.. Get a fking job Extremely well put, kind of my same thought too. It's not about who does or does not deserve it, it's about goodwill and professionalism. +1 Yeah because my degree in electronics isn't enough, I have had two or three jobs my entire life, I have two jobs right now. Some of you people are so well informed I am amazed that you even play a game like this. Thanks for coming off your high horse long enough to talk to the common folk.
No.
I paid for a service that was changed from the results I paid for. The proper thing to do is either refund the actual money or refund the service to be used for the RESULTS it was purchased for.
Thats why its either refund the money or refund the SP. And since the money has been SPENT by CCP.
That leaves: REFUND THE SP.
Abandon Ship!, Abandon Ship!!
Jumps into escape pod!
Selected destination Planet PS4.
|
Charlotte O'Dell
Fatal Absolution General Tso's Alliance
1965
|
Posted - 2014.02.18 22:48:00 -
[303] - Quote
Hi, I'm a vet. I have 28 mil SP. I have proto CALLOGI/ASSAULT, tanks shields/rails, equipment, MD, CR, and RR. I can save SP for months and not be affected. I newb saving is losing a lot more than I do BC I already have more gear than I use in a day. No respec hurts the new players, not vets, and respects always bring back old players. There is no way, from a business standpoint, that respects can be a bad thing.
Charlotte O'Dell is the highest level unicorn!
|
Sam Tektzby
Better Hide R Die
158
|
Posted - 2014.02.18 23:15:00 -
[304] - Quote
Charlotte O'Dell wrote:Hi, I'm a vet. I have 28 mil SP. I have proto CALLOGI/ASSAULT, tanks shields/rails, equipment, MD, CR, and RR. I can save SP for months and not be affected. I newb saving is losing a lot more than I do BC I already have more gear than I use in a day. No respec hurts the new players, not vets, and respects always bring back old players. There is no way, from a business standpoint, that respects can be a bad thing.
First of all its RESPEC, in old MAG game it was from re-specialization, what was realocating point what you spend. With CCPs decissions patch/implements/changes, the palyersbase should have this option. And youre wrong, newbie who sawed his SP for something what works for him and after limited time CCP make decission to change that, what can be gamebreaking for someone who start in game is not a hurt for newbie?! Wrong terribly wrong, it is actually pain and nobody can fell that more than someone who just spent his firts SP thousands. Try to give me more accurate reasson why Respec is bad idea.
Support - Tactician/Support
Deteis - Orator
|
Sam Tektzby
Better Hide R Die
158
|
Posted - 2014.02.18 23:31:00 -
[305] - Quote
FarQue FromAfar wrote:The only people who do not want a respec are the ones with enough SP in reserve to go proto in the new suits and weapons, which represents about 3% of the entire community. There are many who have thought out their choices in suits and weapons just to have them change or become obsolete. With the new bonuses and changes to equipment, changes to everything really, there needs to be a full respec of , well, everything. Again the only people who do not want a respec are those with massive amounts of SP. I do not see any players returning if they are skilled into a suit and weapon and equipment that does not mesh well together. After reading the majority of the forum posts, had I not already been playing, I would not want to come and play this game. I already am playing less and less on all my accounts due to nothing being delivered and this SoonTM becoming a serious offence to me.
Agree basicaly with everything boyo. I cant understand why some "people" here declined this idea. Its like i dont know, game cant profit on selfishness of some "SP milionares". Proper game profiting from relationship between palyer base and devs. Its simple and easy. If they lost connection with players through their stubbornness, that day they will lost everything. In that time i will want to see eyes and faces of that "three procents", when they will lost contenders and finally game itself.
Support - Tactician/Support
Deteis - Orator
|
The Robot Devil
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
1668
|
Posted - 2014.02.19 00:29:00 -
[306] - Quote
Tech Ohm Eaven wrote:The Robot Devil wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:Spectral Clone wrote:If I ran a business to business (b2b) company, and changed the software I released to a customer drastically, making their organizations planning go to hell, then I would be in no other position than to give that customer good will, or I would probably be fined and lose said customer.
Refunding infantry SP is a matter of professionalism and good will to the customers. Imagine if all employees at customer of you business would have to write several page long threads to your company about the issue at hand, without any official response for several weeks. Could you Imagine how pissed off the management of the customer company would be?
Maybe you cant understand the above, because you are 18 or younger and haven't had a real job yet. This is my only interpretation of the anti respec HTFU crowd.. Get a fking job Extremely well put, kind of my same thought too. It's not about who does or does not deserve it, it's about goodwill and professionalism. +1 Yeah because my degree in electronics isn't enough, I have had two or three jobs my entire life, I have two jobs right now. Some of you people are so well informed I am amazed that you even play a game like this. Thanks for coming off your high horse long enough to talk to the common folk. No. I paid for a service that was changed from the results I paid for. The proper thing to do is either refund the actual money or refund the service to be used for the RESULTS it was purchased for. Thats why its either refund the money or refund the SP. And since the money has been SPENT by CCP. That leaves: REFUND THE SP.
No one said the service was forever and ever. You received your service for the money you spent. The phone company changed from unlimited data to anything over 4GB is slowed down. I didn't want that service, ask for that service or even like what it has to offer but I have to take it. It is called life. Also, I am pretty sure somewhere in the agreement you agreed to there is a sentence that states they CCP had the right to change anything they want at anytime they want without notice. That sentence makes any and all monetary validated repecs null and void. You agreed and therefore they have your money and can do what they want. There is no legal issue here, it is all up to CCP.
"You people voted for Hubert Humphrey, and you killed Jesus."
Raoul Duke
|
The Robot Devil
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
1668
|
Posted - 2014.02.19 00:38:00 -
[307] - Quote
Charlotte O'Dell wrote:Hi, I'm a vet. I have 28 mil SP. I have proto CALLOGI/ASSAULT, tanks shields/rails, equipment, MD, CR, and RR. I can save SP for months and not be affected. I newb saving is losing a lot more than I do BC I already have more gear than I use in a day. No respec hurts the new players, not vets, and respects always bring back old players. There is no way, from a business standpoint, that respects can be a bad thing.
It may bring them back but CCP will do the same thing that drove them away from the game.
From a business standpoint: It takes time and manpower to read the forums and listen to the players about respecs.
It takes time and manpower to do the actual work needed to do the refunds.
If any refunds aren't handed out properly then it takes even more time and money.
It takes time and money to think of the rule of a respec and then explain them to use.
It will cause players to ask for more respecs.
It goes against one of the major selling points of New Eden in that choices do matter. (I understand that the game has and will changed but it still doesn't mean choices matter because they still do and still will.)
It causes frustration and consternation among players and CCP staff.
Lastly, it is emotionally taxing, the devs care about the game and are trying hard to make a great game and I would say any extra stress is a bad thing.
Business is about money but it also about passion and seeing your vision come to life. Not all companies only see the bottom dollar line. Artist are a prime example, most don't do it for the money because they love what they are doing.
"You people voted for Hubert Humphrey, and you killed Jesus."
Raoul Duke
|
DUST Fiend
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
11143
|
Posted - 2014.02.19 01:54:00 -
[308] - Quote
The Robot Devil wrote:Tech Ohm Eaven wrote:The Robot Devil wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:Spectral Clone wrote:If I ran a business to business (b2b) company, and changed the software I released to a customer drastically, making their organizations planning go to hell, then I would be in no other position than to give that customer good will, or I would probably be fined and lose said customer.
Refunding infantry SP is a matter of professionalism and good will to the customers. Imagine if all employees at customer of you business would have to write several page long threads to your company about the issue at hand, without any official response for several weeks. Could you Imagine how pissed off the management of the customer company would be?
Maybe you cant understand the above, because you are 18 or younger and haven't had a real job yet. This is my only interpretation of the anti respec HTFU crowd.. Get a fking job Extremely well put, kind of my same thought too. It's not about who does or does not deserve it, it's about goodwill and professionalism. +1 Yeah because my degree in electronics isn't enough, I have had two or three jobs my entire life, I have two jobs right now. Some of you people are so well informed I am amazed that you even play a game like this. Thanks for coming off your high horse long enough to talk to the common folk. No. I paid for a service that was changed from the results I paid for. The proper thing to do is either refund the actual money or refund the service to be used for the RESULTS it was purchased for. Thats why its either refund the money or refund the SP. And since the money has been SPENT by CCP. That leaves: REFUND THE SP. No one said the service was forever and ever. You received your service for the money you spent. The phone company changed from unlimited data to anything over 4GB is slowed down. I didn't want that service, ask for that service or even like what it has to offer but I have to take it. It is called life. Also, I am pretty sure somewhere in the agreement you agreed to there is a sentence that states that CCP has the right to change anything they want at anytime they want without notice. That sentence makes any and all monetary validated repecs null and void. You agreed and therefore they have your money and can do what they want. There is no legal issue here, it is all up to CCP. And we have the right to leave the game, write negative reviews, spread bad press and general warn people away from spending their money on a sinking ship.
A few people doing that doesn't hurt the game that much.
Create a culture where your players at BEST don't talk about your game, and you'll go the way of the MAG, with less of an impact.
Videos / Fiction
Closed Beta Vet; Incubus Pilot
|
The Robot Devil
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
1670
|
Posted - 2014.02.19 02:51:00 -
[309] - Quote
DUST Fiend wrote:
A few people doing that doesn't hurt the game that much, if at all.
Create a culture where your players at BEST don't talk much about your game, and you'll go the way of the MAG, with less of an impact.
I fully support talking with your money. I know it may seem hypocritical but they should make the game better, again, the problem lies in content and how it interacts with each other and the players. If CCP doesn't respect the players the game will fall off and go down the drain but at the same time they can't kowtow to players. There has to be a line that where CCP makes a decision and sometimes they will be really bad and sometimes they are genius. It is a total roll of the dice because they can't please everyone. This is a slow burn game and if we rush things too much it will die just as quickly as if we went too slow.
We need a stable core of suits, weapons, modules and skills and giving refunds and changing the core stats has to stop soon or we are dead in the water. It is a hard road for a team that hasn't ever made a PS3 shooter.
"You people voted for Hubert Humphrey, and you killed Jesus."
Raoul Duke
|
SOGZ PANDA
0uter.Heaven
53
|
Posted - 2014.02.19 02:54:00 -
[310] - Quote
For everyone saying "don't respec because you just help people spec fotm". Fotm is a form of community abuse. It isn't exactly ccp's fault people abuse op gear to win There will always be fotm and op gear because it's a videogame. That isn't an excuse to deter the devs from respecing earnt sp after they change racial bonuses to all suits
This respec is essential imo
Whatever Brianna Beach says about me.............It's not true
|
|
D legendary hero
Ultramarine Corp
1642
|
Posted - 2014.02.19 03:05:00 -
[311] - Quote
The Robot Devil wrote:D legendary hero wrote:Spectral Clone wrote:If I ran a business to business (b2b) company, and changed the software I released to a customer drastically, making their organizations planning go to hell, then I would be in no other position than to give that customer good will, or I would probably be fined and lose said customer.
Refunding infantry SP is a matter of professionalism and good will to the customers. Imagine if all employees at customer of you business would have to write several page long threads to your company about the issue at hand, without any official response for several weeks. Could you Imagine how pissed off the management of the customer company would be?
Maybe you cant understand the above, because you are 18 or younger and haven't had a real job yet. This is my only interpretation of the anti respec HTFU crowd.. Get a fking job very nice analogy. For anyone who hasn't had a job yet. just remember, REAL MONEY is involved in this scenario. if your in college, its like taking courses in a given major then having the course canceled and the school debates over whether to transfer your credits... then having to plead with the chancelor's of the school to get your credits (SP) transfered to another school. College credits don't always transfer. I spent almost two years getting certified in networking and then the job market was flooded with networkers and I couldn't find a job. I had to go back to college and get a degree in electronics. It then took me almost a year to find a job because no one will hire someone straight out of college with no experience. I was turned down for jobs because I was over qualified or had no experience. I took classes for electronics that I didn't have to have because the standards changed half way through my time at the school. I took classed in public speaking to become an electronics tech.
i can identify with this. I too have studied electronics. and every job i have had since college has been stuff i taught myself...
Sou o Defendeiro dos derrubados_Pronto saberá justiça
|
Text Grant
Death Firm. Canis Eliminatus Operatives
337
|
Posted - 2014.02.19 03:20:00 -
[312] - Quote
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote:KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote:It is one thing to want a respec because you're just tired of the stuff you skilled into. It is another thing to want a respec for new content since racial variants (especially for dropsuits) should have been there on release, but instead we were forced to spec into things that otherwise would not be our first choice to stay competitive because we weren't provided with all the options. This I think makes a respec completely justified, but its not the biggest reason. Its a completely different thing when CCP is changing the stats, bonuses, and slot layouts of suits. Such big fundamental things completely invalidates our choices, like buying an expensive sports car, and then the manufacturers break into your garage, and change the car into an expensive tractor. The tractor may be a great tractor, but if you're a race car driver and not a farmer then you're screwed; in such a case, you would feel that a refund for that car is something you are entitled to, likewise I feel that the 1.8 changes mean that infantry deserve in an SP refund. This is the biggest reason why a respec is absolutely required. The Minmatar logi is such an example. Awry Barux wrote: An example of the changes invalidating previous decisions: I generally run Min Logi, uplinks, hives, and a scanner. No rep tool because I'm not that kind of logi. I picked Min Logi for the hacking bonus (free complex codebreaker), which is being changed to a bonus to something that I have never used in the past and will never use in the future. That warrants a respec.
I thought the idea that these big changes warranted a respec would be clear and obvious to CCP, but CPM member Hans Jagerblitzen has informed me that its not guaranteed yet. This should be a guaranteed thing, not a maybe. For those worried about the favorite-of-the-month chasers, the respecs do not create the the problems, its poor balancing that leads to FoTMs; they will just get nerfed and re-balanced anyway. The fundamental issue is our choices not being invalidated. Many have claimed to oppose respecs because they say they want our choices to have meaning and consequence, but our choices need to be informed decisions to be meaningful; an uninformed choice is as meaningful as a coin toss. If the information (slots, stats, bonuses) about the things we chose changes, then the choice is no longer informed and meaningful since the information we made our choices on is no longer true. So yeah, respec for 1.8 please, for dropsuit command at the very least. Ideally all infantry skills. Here is why: Awry Barux wrote: Skilling into a different dropsuit necessitates very different SP distribution. If someone is switching from logi to heavy, what use would they have for equipment skills? If someone is switching from Amarr sentinel to Cal sentinel, they deserve to move their armor SP to shields.
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=142199 As always... You make too much sense. Ccp will nerf you if you keep it up |
The Robot Devil
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
1670
|
Posted - 2014.02.19 03:25:00 -
[313] - Quote
D legendary hero wrote:The Robot Devil wrote:D legendary hero wrote:Spectral Clone wrote:If I ran a business to business (b2b) company, and changed the software I released to a customer drastically, making their organizations planning go to hell, then I would be in no other position than to give that customer good will, or I would probably be fined and lose said customer.
Refunding infantry SP is a matter of professionalism and good will to the customers. Imagine if all employees at customer of you business would have to write several page long threads to your company about the issue at hand, without any official response for several weeks. Could you Imagine how pissed off the management of the customer company would be?
Maybe you cant understand the above, because you are 18 or younger and haven't had a real job yet. This is my only interpretation of the anti respec HTFU crowd.. Get a fking job very nice analogy. For anyone who hasn't had a job yet. just remember, REAL MONEY is involved in this scenario. if your in college, its like taking courses in a given major then having the course canceled and the school debates over whether to transfer your credits... then having to plead with the chancelor's of the school to get your credits (SP) transfered to another school. College credits don't always transfer. I spent almost two years getting certified in networking and then the job market was flooded with networkers and I couldn't find a job. I had to go back to college and get a degree in electronics. It then took me almost a year to find a job because no one will hire someone straight out of college with no experience. I was turned down for jobs because I was over qualified or had no experience. I took classes for electronics that I didn't have to have because the standards changed half way through my time at the school. I took classed in public speaking to become an electronics tech. i can identify with this. I too have studied electronics. and every job i have had since college has been stuff i taught myself...
I had to take micro processor programming I&II and then they dropped it down to just micro processor programming I and the next semester it was totally removed. That class was hard becasuse programming at the bit level is difficult and time consuming. I payed money for those classes and the books, I spent an hour a day 5 days a week for like 13 weeks on something that I have never even used. It did help in some PLC classes I had but it wasn't anything I couldn't have overcome. Digital makes a little bit more sense and things like flags and watchdogs made more sense afterwards.
Motorola M68HC11 The PDF is 650 pages and really dry but interesting. It will bring back memories if you have ever programmed bit level code and had to pop things on and off the stack.
"You people voted for Hubert Humphrey, and you killed Jesus."
Raoul Duke
|
John Demonsbane
Unorganized Ninja Infantry Tactics League of Infamy
2047
|
Posted - 2014.02.19 03:38:00 -
[314] - Quote
This is one of the few instances where the FOTM argument doesn't apply (I am big time proponent of that argument, btw... Those flaylock wielding cal logis can suck it...). Racial parity is the only legitimate reason for one.
Dropsuit skills should be refunded, no question. Anyone saying otherwise is just not thinking logically. Choices matter unless you didn't have a choice to make, like with heavies.
Core upgrades, a decent argument could be made either way. IMO core skills are never really wasted, but whatever.
Weapons.... Hmm.. I'm not sure about weapons. I'm inclined to say no because it should wait until more racial weapons come out. Mostly I think that once the remaining heavy weapons come out, that's the right time. Each race has a pretty decent selection of light weapons right now and tbh they are not nearly the SP sink that dropsuit or core skills are.
"The line between disorder and order lies in logistics" -Sun Tzu
Forum Warrior lv.2
Amarr victor!
|
Awry Barux
New Eden Blades Of The Azure Zero-Day
867
|
Posted - 2014.02.19 03:41:00 -
[315] - Quote
John Demonsbane wrote:This is one of the few instances where the FOTM argument doesn't apply (I am big time proponent of that argument, btw... Those flaylock wielding cal logis can suck it...). Racial parity is the only legitimate reason for one.
Dropsuit skills should be refunded, no question.
Core upgrades, a decent argument could be made either way. IMO core skills are never really wasted, but whatever.
Weapons.... Hmm.. I'm not sure about weapons. I'm inclined to say no because it should wait until more racial weapons come out. Mostly I think that once the remaining heavy weapons come out, that's the right time. Each race has a pretty decent selection of light weapons right now and tbh they are not nearly the SP sink that dropsuit or core skills are.
Core skills can totally be wasted. Armor modules on my cal scout? No thanks. Proto nanohives for my sentinel? Also no. Shield modules for my Gal heavy? Again, wasted. |
Thurak1
Psygod9 D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
511
|
Posted - 2014.02.19 03:43:00 -
[316] - Quote
Given the massive amount of content that is slated to be released with 1.8 I think it is reasonable to request at least partial respecs. Especially for dropsuits. A full respec would be very nice though given the amazing job CCP has been doing to "balance" AV (ok ok stop laughing) to allow more players to get rid of the wasted points in pretty much everything that is AV related and focus more on getting killed by tanks. |
John Demonsbane
Unorganized Ninja Infantry Tactics League of Infamy
2047
|
Posted - 2014.02.19 03:47:00 -
[317] - Quote
Awry Barux wrote:John Demonsbane wrote:This is one of the few instances where the FOTM argument doesn't apply (I am big time proponent of that argument, btw... Those flaylock wielding cal logis can suck it...). Racial parity is the only legitimate reason for one.
Dropsuit skills should be refunded, no question.
Core upgrades, a decent argument could be made either way. IMO core skills are never really wasted, but whatever.
Weapons.... Hmm.. I'm not sure about weapons. I'm inclined to say no because it should wait until more racial weapons come out. Mostly I think that once the remaining heavy weapons come out, that's the right time. Each race has a pretty decent selection of light weapons right now and tbh they are not nearly the SP sink that dropsuit or core skills are. Core skills can totally be wasted. Armor modules on my cal scout? No thanks. Proto nanohives for my sentinel? Also no. Shield modules for my Gal heavy? Again, wasted.
Huh? So if you run cal scouts and gal heavies you need both shields and and armor. (I know what you really mean)
More seriously, are you really not going to use any armor modules at all on Caldari suits? Ever? Not even if they fix reactives/ferroscales?
"The line between disorder and order lies in logistics" -Sun Tzu
Forum Warrior lv.2
Amarr victor!
|
Thurak1
Psygod9 D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
512
|
Posted - 2014.02.19 03:49:00 -
[318] - Quote
The Robot Devil wrote:D legendary hero wrote:The Robot Devil wrote:D legendary hero wrote:Spectral Clone wrote:If I ran a business to business (b2b) company, and changed the software I released to a customer drastically, making their organizations planning go to hell, then I would be in no other position than to give that customer good will, or I would probably be fined and lose said customer.
Refunding infantry SP is a matter of professionalism and good will to the customers. Imagine if all employees at customer of you business would have to write several page long threads to your company about the issue at hand, without any official response for several weeks. Could you Imagine how pissed off the management of the customer company would be?
Maybe you cant understand the above, because you are 18 or younger and haven't had a real job yet. This is my only interpretation of the anti respec HTFU crowd.. Get a fking job very nice analogy. For anyone who hasn't had a job yet. just remember, REAL MONEY is involved in this scenario. if your in college, its like taking courses in a given major then having the course canceled and the school debates over whether to transfer your credits... then having to plead with the chancelor's of the school to get your credits (SP) transfered to another school. College credits don't always transfer. I spent almost two years getting certified in networking and then the job market was flooded with networkers and I couldn't find a job. I had to go back to college and get a degree in electronics. It then took me almost a year to find a job because no one will hire someone straight out of college with no experience. I was turned down for jobs because I was over qualified or had no experience. I took classes for electronics that I didn't have to have because the standards changed half way through my time at the school. I took classed in public speaking to become an electronics tech. i can identify with this. I too have studied electronics. and every job i have had since college has been stuff i taught myself... I had to take micro processor programming I&II and then they dropped it down to just micro processor programming I and the next semester it was totally removed. That class was hard becasuse programming at the bit level is difficult and time consuming. I payed money for those classes and the books, I spent an hour a day 5 days a week for like 13 weeks on something that I have never even used. It did help in some PLC classes I had but it wasn't anything I couldn't have overcome. Digital makes a little bit more sense and things like flags and watchdogs made more sense afterwards. Motorola M68HC11 The PDF is 650 pages and really dry but interesting. It will bring back memories if you have ever programmed bit level code and had to pop things on and off the stack.
This is a funny discussion. My first degree was an associated in electronics back in 1999. I only had 1 job actually working in electronics at APC (then they were bought out and the plant i worked in closed) My second career field was Networking in 09 I got my BS in IT along with a few basic certs ( network +, security +, CCNA) Now i monitor firewalls for a living. I had to convince the school that a lot of the pre-requisits for my BS in IT had already been meet with my AS in electronics. BTW I got both degrees from the same college. |
Awry Barux
New Eden Blades Of The Azure Zero-Day
867
|
Posted - 2014.02.19 03:55:00 -
[319] - Quote
John Demonsbane wrote:Awry Barux wrote:John Demonsbane wrote:This is one of the few instances where the FOTM argument doesn't apply (I am big time proponent of that argument, btw... Those flaylock wielding cal logis can suck it...). Racial parity is the only legitimate reason for one.
Dropsuit skills should be refunded, no question.
Core upgrades, a decent argument could be made either way. IMO core skills are never really wasted, but whatever.
Weapons.... Hmm.. I'm not sure about weapons. I'm inclined to say no because it should wait until more racial weapons come out. Mostly I think that once the remaining heavy weapons come out, that's the right time. Each race has a pretty decent selection of light weapons right now and tbh they are not nearly the SP sink that dropsuit or core skills are. Core skills can totally be wasted. Armor modules on my cal scout? No thanks. Proto nanohives for my sentinel? Also no. Shield modules for my Gal heavy? Again, wasted. Huh? So if you run cal scouts and gal heavies you need both shields and and armor. (I know what you really mean) More seriously, are you really not going to use any armor modules at all on Caldari suits? Ever? Not even if they fix reactives/ferroscales?
Yeah, sure, eventually- but if the point is that we're re-doing our SP choices due to drastic changes in suit functionality, upgrades need to be re-chosen too. I can change my suit to a Cal suit, but if I'm a month away from having proto shield extenders (because what armor tanker would even touch that tree?), that's a brutal wait. The whole issue could be avoided by just giving a core upgrade respec. Also, my point about equipment stands. |
The Robot Devil
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
1670
|
Posted - 2014.02.19 03:56:00 -
[320] - Quote
Mine is in industrial control and robotics, I helped develop the curriculum for the instructional robots and get them certified by FUNAC to teach robotics with their machines. I had a bunch of computer and networking classes in the late 90's but the field was so flooded that I couldn't even get an interview.
"You people voted for Hubert Humphrey, and you killed Jesus."
Raoul Duke
|
|
The Robot Devil
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
1671
|
Posted - 2014.02.19 03:59:00 -
[321] - Quote
Awry Barux wrote:John Demonsbane wrote:Awry Barux wrote:John Demonsbane wrote:This is one of the few instances where the FOTM argument doesn't apply (I am big time proponent of that argument, btw... Those flaylock wielding cal logis can suck it...). Racial parity is the only legitimate reason for one.
Dropsuit skills should be refunded, no question.
Core upgrades, a decent argument could be made either way. IMO core skills are never really wasted, but whatever.
Weapons.... Hmm.. I'm not sure about weapons. I'm inclined to say no because it should wait until more racial weapons come out. Mostly I think that once the remaining heavy weapons come out, that's the right time. Each race has a pretty decent selection of light weapons right now and tbh they are not nearly the SP sink that dropsuit or core skills are. Core skills can totally be wasted. Armor modules on my cal scout? No thanks. Proto nanohives for my sentinel? Also no. Shield modules for my Gal heavy? Again, wasted. Huh? So if you run cal scouts and gal heavies you need both shields and and armor. (I know what you really mean) More seriously, are you really not going to use any armor modules at all on Caldari suits? Ever? Not even if they fix reactives/ferroscales? Yeah, sure, eventually- but if the point is that we're re-doing our SP choices due to drastic changes in suit functionality, upgrades need to be re-chosen too. I can change my suit to a Cal suit, but if I'm a month away from having proto shield extenders (because what armor tanker would even touch that tree?), that's a brutal wait. The whole issue could be avoided by just giving a core upgrade respec. Also, my point about equipment stands.
I am a armor man but I still skilled all shields to five. I don't consider it a waste at all. I don't use them often but when I do it is nice to have.
"You people voted for Hubert Humphrey, and you killed Jesus."
Raoul Duke
|
Awry Barux
New Eden Blades Of The Azure Zero-Day
867
|
Posted - 2014.02.19 04:02:00 -
[322] - Quote
The Robot Devil wrote:Awry Barux wrote:John Demonsbane wrote:Awry Barux wrote:John Demonsbane wrote:This is one of the few instances where the FOTM argument doesn't apply (I am big time proponent of that argument, btw... Those flaylock wielding cal logis can suck it...). Racial parity is the only legitimate reason for one.
Dropsuit skills should be refunded, no question.
Core upgrades, a decent argument could be made either way. IMO core skills are never really wasted, but whatever.
Weapons.... Hmm.. I'm not sure about weapons. I'm inclined to say no because it should wait until more racial weapons come out. Mostly I think that once the remaining heavy weapons come out, that's the right time. Each race has a pretty decent selection of light weapons right now and tbh they are not nearly the SP sink that dropsuit or core skills are. Core skills can totally be wasted. Armor modules on my cal scout? No thanks. Proto nanohives for my sentinel? Also no. Shield modules for my Gal heavy? Again, wasted. Huh? So if you run cal scouts and gal heavies you need both shields and and armor. (I know what you really mean) More seriously, are you really not going to use any armor modules at all on Caldari suits? Ever? Not even if they fix reactives/ferroscales? Yeah, sure, eventually- but if the point is that we're re-doing our SP choices due to drastic changes in suit functionality, upgrades need to be re-chosen too. I can change my suit to a Cal suit, but if I'm a month away from having proto shield extenders (because what armor tanker would even touch that tree?), that's a brutal wait. The whole issue could be avoided by just giving a core upgrade respec. Also, my point about equipment stands. I am a armor man but I still skilled all shields to five. I don't consider it a waste at all. I don't use them often but when I do it is nice to have.
Hmm. If I had done that, I would consider it a waste. Or, not a waste, but a huge opportunity cost- that SP could have gone other, more useful places, like electronics/engineering.
|
TheAmazing FlyingPig
Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation
5800
|
Posted - 2014.02.19 04:33:00 -
[323] - Quote
Personally, I would love a full respec to leave the life of a tanker and join the ranks of logibro's come 1.8. I know it's probably not going to happen, but a man can dream, right?
Never forget
May 14, 2013: Beta 2.0
|
DUST Fiend
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
11148
|
Posted - 2014.02.19 04:33:00 -
[324] - Quote
The Robot Devil wrote:Awry Barux wrote:John Demonsbane wrote:Awry Barux wrote:John Demonsbane wrote:This is one of the few instances where the FOTM argument doesn't apply (I am big time proponent of that argument, btw... Those flaylock wielding cal logis can suck it...). Racial parity is the only legitimate reason for one.
Dropsuit skills should be refunded, no question.
Core upgrades, a decent argument could be made either way. IMO core skills are never really wasted, but whatever.
Weapons.... Hmm.. I'm not sure about weapons. I'm inclined to say no because it should wait until more racial weapons come out. Mostly I think that once the remaining heavy weapons come out, that's the right time. Each race has a pretty decent selection of light weapons right now and tbh they are not nearly the SP sink that dropsuit or core skills are. Core skills can totally be wasted. Armor modules on my cal scout? No thanks. Proto nanohives for my sentinel? Also no. Shield modules for my Gal heavy? Again, wasted. Huh? So if you run cal scouts and gal heavies you need both shields and and armor. (I know what you really mean) More seriously, are you really not going to use any armor modules at all on Caldari suits? Ever? Not even if they fix reactives/ferroscales? Yeah, sure, eventually- but if the point is that we're re-doing our SP choices due to drastic changes in suit functionality, upgrades need to be re-chosen too. I can change my suit to a Cal suit, but if I'm a month away from having proto shield extenders (because what armor tanker would even touch that tree?), that's a brutal wait. The whole issue could be avoided by just giving a core upgrade respec. Also, my point about equipment stands. I am a armor man but I still skilled all shields to five. I don't consider it a waste at all. I don't use them often but when I do it is nice to have. And that's your choice.
There's absolutely no reason to force someone to make that choice, when we could simply refund infantry skills and be done with it.
Videos / Fiction
Closed Beta Vet; Incubus Pilot
|
Awry Barux
New Eden Blades Of The Azure Zero-Day
867
|
Posted - 2014.02.19 04:35:00 -
[325] - Quote
TheAmazing FlyingPig wrote:Personally, I would love a full respec to leave the life of a tanker and join the ranks of logibro's come 1.8. I know it's probably not going to happen, but a man can dream, right?
Didn't you have a chance to do that when 1.7 dropped? |
ThePlayerkyle13
Ametat Security Amarr Empire
58
|
Posted - 2014.02.19 04:42:00 -
[326] - Quote
Why do people & CCP treat DUST as a full game? Its not a full game, its still unfinished, plus their loads of content thats needs reviewing after each patch so a full respec is important so that we review it for CCP to patch & fix. Now obviously when the game is polished we should have our final full respec but atm the game is gimped.
Join my Corp HERE
|
TheAmazing FlyingPig
Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation
5802
|
Posted - 2014.02.19 05:22:00 -
[327] - Quote
Awry Barux wrote:TheAmazing FlyingPig wrote:Personally, I would love a full respec to leave the life of a tanker and join the ranks of logibro's come 1.8. I know it's probably not going to happen, but a man can dream, right? Didn't you have a chance to do that when 1.7 dropped? I did. I have no excuse, and will live with my choice.
It'd be nice to have a full one, but I'm not expecting it. I am, however, expecting a full infantry respec, as 1.8 changes the entire game.
Never forget
May 14, 2013: Beta 2.0
|
FarQue FromAfar
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
35
|
Posted - 2014.02.19 05:29:00 -
[328] - Quote
I am a armor man but I still skilled all shields to five. I don't consider it a waste at all. I don't use them often but when I do it is nice to have.[/quote] Well that is nice for you, it is also nice you have that much time on your hands and have been in game longer than most, but the point is just this, there is a major content change, where certain racial suits are being released, bonuses have changed, equipment has changed and not everyone has skills they do not use maxed out. No one wants a skill line with all that wasted SP in it just sitting there because the game, not the player, the game changed. It will improve players past this FoTM BS I keep hearing because they will finally have an option to get out of dead skill lines, or get in the actual suits they wanted to begin with. This New Eden stuff people keep regurgitating about no one forced you to skill into this line, or you were following FoTM and you need to live with it is getting old. the "Leet" do not want players with better suits and equipment that match their racial bonuses, because then their game will drop fighting tougher mercs. This game is seriously flawed, and most of the skill lines have changed every 2 months making some "OP" and some garbage, I have said it before and saying it again, those with all their skills trained and enough SP in reserve are saving SP so they can play FoTM weapons and new suits, so SP rich players can look into their skill lines and I bet many are using the RR and CR now, and answer this, how long did you use an Assault Rifle before 1.7 to get those skill points saved up.... For most who pad their SP in PC and proto stomping, probably not long, but for casual players it takes months to get a skill line built up just to have it become worthless. So a respec is in order. The palyer base is dropping fast, the content not being delivered because of SoonTM is getting very old. |
501st Headstrong
The Unit 514
111
|
Posted - 2014.02.19 06:00:00 -
[329] - Quote
Yes to a respec. Reasons being:
1. People have been witing years forcontent, but were forced to allign with other gear. Case and poijt: Minmatars running Amarr heavies. I am a major fan of Lore and this bugs me. A Respec will allow me to fufill my Raciql Inventory
2. People will always skill into FOTM, but to survive. Some say tyey did this with the Flaylock, and now everyone runs RRs? Guess what, the description of the RR says it is thr best rifle to date. All we want CCP is the choice to Spec ijto what we want
3. We refuse to wait for our new, very likely buggy suits when we are wwiting for this update, and years before that. A respec will sait us
4. So what if we cry in the future.If people scree this up, you at least know you gave us the opporutuniity. It hasbeen very long since we lived with those mistakes.
5. A full Respec can allow Avrs to change if thry have given up on it, allow Gallente to spec iinto We mor fully instead of shieldd, and more. Dont beat around thr bush
6. If I get a full 13 million is SP respec, I will go Proto. Not to stomp players thoigh, but to have a viable suit to counter those who would tty and stomp me. Many ppl cant geneate billions of Isk in PC. Please allow us to at least have thr capacity to fight back.
7. It's a nice thing to do considering 15 of these 17 current pages are good arguents for a Respec, and the rest are weak.
8. "CCP never gIves Respecs" They are givin me all my suits now along with new equipment and weapons. Also, respecs have been given before.
9. "Proplr knew thr Flaylock pistol was OP and skilled into it anyway" Thry did it in hopes of killing thr other guy before they died. Also, CCP doesnt release OP weapons that people csn tell by. I will happily atgue about How the weapons of Dust fit together in trrms of Countering, start up another thread. Full respec for all who do what it takes to survive, and lose what they are in thr process. Ex: HMG use to beweak. Heavies use AR. People cty about a problem thry caused, along eith lack of Anti Infantry HWs.
10. You have a majoritg of players that want a respec, and a rrfudal will alienate thrm. Majority rules CCP, so please appease hs. Or I assure you thr next big Update will have your biggest ultimatum: Repec now sincr you didnt give us one in 1.8 or I rrfuse ti play this gam.
There's 10 points why to give a respec. Any disputers? And yes, I will debate you on this. Sorry about Spelling mistakes, typing this onthr Vta :)
I am the reason you rage-quit =D
|
Spectral Clone
Dust2Dust. Top Men.
1291
|
Posted - 2014.02.19 06:44:00 -
[330] - Quote
FarQue FromAfar wrote:The only people who do not want a respec are the ones with enough SP in reserve to go proto in the new suits and weapons, which represents about 3% of the entire community. There are many who have thought out their choices in suits and weapons just to have them change or become obsolete. With the new bonuses and changes to equipment, changes to everything really, there needs to be a full respec of , well, everything. Again the only people who do not want a respec are those with massive amounts of SP. I do not see any players returning if they are skilled into a suit and weapon and equipment that does not mesh well together. After reading the majority of the forum posts, had I not already been playing, I would not want to come and play this game. I already am playing less and less on all my accounts due to nothing being delivered and this SoonTM becoming a serious offence to me.
I have saved up SP, over 3M, but I still feel cheated regarding my caldari assault.
Drop it like its hat.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |