|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
Spectral Clone
Dust2Dust. Top Men.
1261
|
Posted - 2014.02.17 19:39:00 -
[1] - Quote
Okay, so lets take this discussion seriously and present some expected features of 1.8: - TTK will be tuned to be longer. => Dont know what skill tree this will affect, on an "abstract" level: all of them. - New racial content for infantry (heavies and scouts, yay!) => Approx 15-20% added SP sink to dropsuit skill tree. - Complete re-iteration of "old" dropsuit skill bonuses and stats => Change of 100% of current SP sink in dropsuit skill tree. - New weapons => Approx 10-15% more SP sink in weaponry skill tree. - Nerfs to "old" weapons, more specifically rifles => Rifles and SMG in weapon skill tree, estimated 30% of all weapons. - Weapon proficiency skill re-vamped to only affect armor or shield damage (depending on weapon) => Affects 100% of weaponry skill tree. - Over all equipment nerf => Various skills in dropsuit upgrades, estimated 15-20% of the SP sink affected.
The points above have touched every infantry skill tree skill (dropsuit upgrades, weaponry and dropsuits). Is there really anything to discuss in this thread CCP?
EDIT: Please calculate more exact figures of how many percent of each of the infantry skill trees that are affected, and make an informed decision with those numbers in mind.
Drop it like its hat.
|
Spectral Clone
Dust2Dust. Top Men.
1268
|
Posted - 2014.02.18 07:10:00 -
[2] - Quote
If I ran a business to business (b2b) company, and changed the software I released to a customer drastically, making their organizations planning go to hell, then I would be in no other position than to give that customer good will, or I would probably be fined and lose said customer.
Refunding infantry SP is a matter of professionalism and good will to the customers. Imagine if all employees at customer of you business would have to write several page long threads to your company about the issue at hand, without any official response for several weeks. Could you Imagine how pissed off the management of the customer company would be?
Maybe you cant, because you are 18 or younger and haven't had a real job yet. This is my only interpretation of the anti respec HTFU crowd.. Get a fking job
Drop it like its hat.
|
Spectral Clone
Dust2Dust. Top Men.
1279
|
Posted - 2014.02.18 15:19:00 -
[3] - Quote
Also, one important fact is that few peeps actually spend money on SP boosters. This furter complicates motivating not giving a full infantry respec, due to the fact that CCP may lose out on a business opportunity if the player cant see the value in buying SP boosters when their builds may change for the better or worst with every patch.
Im not even going to post goodbye if I dont get my infantry SP refunded. Ill just be gone ;)
Drop it like its hat.
|
Spectral Clone
Dust2Dust. Top Men.
1280
|
Posted - 2014.02.18 16:00:00 -
[4] - Quote
Awry Barux wrote:Lynn Beck wrote:Spectral Clone wrote:Also, one important fact is that few peeps actually spend money on SP boosters. This furter complicates motivating not giving a full infantry respec, due to the fact that CCP may lose out on a business opportunity if the player cant see the value in buying SP boosters when their builds may change for the better or worst with every patch.
Im not even going to post goodbye if I dont get my infantry SP refunded. Ill just be gone ;) So first you're for respecs, then you're against it. First you state it's simply good will, that the should do it to keep as much of this dwindling playerbase as possible, then you stare that they shouldn't because it's better for their pockets? I seem to have the other idea. If you keep shitting on your customers, demanding that they put up with what your changes to their decisions are, nobody with a budget would spend money to 'accelerate' their learning, because CCP will just curb stomp your decisions again and again. Less boosters, less money. However if people actually have a feeling of customer worth, that when sweeping changes come by they'll be given fair treatment, they'll spend more BOOSTERS to optimize the setups they ACTUALLY want to run,not the nostalgic 'ahh, this thing used to have bonuses to hacking/profile dampeneing/armor repair/taco efficacy, now it's a reload bonus for nova knives.' I think you've misinterpreted Spectral's post- I think he's saying exactly what you're saying, and what I said earlier this thread. If the skills I bought with Boosted SP no longer apply to my desired role, it is as though the booster and the money I spent on it has been wasted, and what's more, has been deliberately made a waste through CCP's refusal to allow respecialization.
Yup.
LOL! Reload bonus to nova knives. Sounds like the caldari assaults next suit bonus!
Drop it like its hat.
|
Spectral Clone
Dust2Dust. Top Men.
1285
|
Posted - 2014.02.18 20:29:00 -
[5] - Quote
The Robot Devil wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:Spectral Clone wrote:If I ran a business to business (b2b) company, and changed the software I released to a customer drastically, making their organizations planning go to hell, then I would be in no other position than to give that customer good will, or I would probably be fined and lose said customer.
Refunding infantry SP is a matter of professionalism and good will to the customers. Imagine if all employees at customer of you business would have to write several page long threads to your company about the issue at hand, without any official response for several weeks. Could you Imagine how pissed off the management of the customer company would be?
Maybe you cant understand the above, because you are 18 or younger and haven't had a real job yet. This is my only interpretation of the anti respec HTFU crowd.. Get a fking job Extremely well put, kind of my same thought too. It's not about who does or does not deserve it, it's about goodwill and professionalism. +1 Yeah because my degree in electronics isn't enough, I have had two or three jobs my entire life, I have two jobs right now. Some of you people are so well informed I am amazed that you even play a game like this. Thanks for coming off your high horse long enough to talk to the common folk.
Okay, you are not one of the chest thumping HTFU teenagers on this forum. Grats to you sir! If you have a professional career you would be for a respec... whats wrong with you? You like wasting cash on a "concept" or "might be"?
Drop it like its hat.
|
Spectral Clone
Dust2Dust. Top Men.
1291
|
Posted - 2014.02.19 06:44:00 -
[6] - Quote
FarQue FromAfar wrote:The only people who do not want a respec are the ones with enough SP in reserve to go proto in the new suits and weapons, which represents about 3% of the entire community. There are many who have thought out their choices in suits and weapons just to have them change or become obsolete. With the new bonuses and changes to equipment, changes to everything really, there needs to be a full respec of , well, everything. Again the only people who do not want a respec are those with massive amounts of SP. I do not see any players returning if they are skilled into a suit and weapon and equipment that does not mesh well together. After reading the majority of the forum posts, had I not already been playing, I would not want to come and play this game. I already am playing less and less on all my accounts due to nothing being delivered and this SoonTM becoming a serious offence to me.
I have saved up SP, over 3M, but I still feel cheated regarding my caldari assault.
Drop it like its hat.
|
Spectral Clone
Dust2Dust. Top Men.
1291
|
Posted - 2014.02.19 07:40:00 -
[7] - Quote
17 pages, and this is so far a player monologue.
Can you have a discussion with us CCP? Or are you busy doing other more important things?
Drop it like its hat.
|
Spectral Clone
Dust2Dust. Top Men.
1291
|
Posted - 2014.02.19 11:07:00 -
[8] - Quote
Bendtner92 wrote:Ronan Elsword wrote:They just made this thread so they no where to look when making arguments for and against a respec. Also the forums were being spammed by repsec, hiding other threads in the midst. They aren't commenting in order to keep hopes down in case they decide against it. More like they made this thread to get the respec spam away from General Discussion. If they wanted our input they would have made this thread weeks ago, and the devs would be replying to it.
Yep.
This thread is just CCP trolling the whole community.
Drop it like its hat.
|
Spectral Clone
Dust2Dust. Top Men.
1304
|
Posted - 2014.02.20 06:26:00 -
[9] - Quote
Its a won argument for respecs. Noone is motivating why a respec is bad, other than with comments regarding 'live with your choice', HTFU, or some new eden BS that doesn't make sense because we are playing dust on the same server cluster as EVE, but we do not play in the same universe yet. Hence beta. Hence respec.
Drop it like its hat.
|
Spectral Clone
Dust2Dust. Top Men.
1304
|
Posted - 2014.02.20 06:51:00 -
[10] - Quote
Awry Barux wrote:Spectral Clone wrote:Its a won argument for respecs. Noone is motivating why a respec is bad, other than with comments regarding 'live with your choice', HTFU, or some new eden BS that doesn't make sense because we are playing dust on the same server cluster as EVE, but we do not play in the same universe yet. Hence beta. Hence respec.
Yup. The community has spoken quite clearly. At this point, I can think of only one reason why we wouldn't see a full respec in 1.8: the marketing team thinks they can absorb the good-will hit and still sell more boosters without one.
If that happens, people should just rapidly close their wallets to make a statement. I told myself that I will not be spending any more money until I get a respec, back in the beginning of uprising when my caldari assault bonus was changed.
Drop it like its hat.
|
|
Spectral Clone
Dust2Dust. Top Men.
1305
|
Posted - 2014.02.20 07:41:00 -
[11] - Quote
Also, one very valid argument (warning, incoming irony) is to not refund infantry SP because it would cause tears on the forum.
What company would seriously consider that?
The people who write such things much be either drunk, high, or were dropped on the head when they were babies.
Drop it like its hat.
|
Spectral Clone
Dust2Dust. Top Men.
1340
|
Posted - 2014.02.21 06:50:00 -
[12] - Quote
Noone is going to ask for a respec from CCP because they made a mistake in their skill tree. This thread is not about our current misplaced SP, I could care less about it actually, Its about CCP revamping our roles, making many of our builds (builds that many spent many hours to theorycraft, plan and set up milestones for) and spent SP obsolete (which some of us spent money on boosters).
If youre a guy who just click around some in the skill tree without precaution or thought, this thread is not about you.
Drop it like its hat.
|
Spectral Clone
Dust2Dust. Top Men.
1345
|
Posted - 2014.02.21 10:13:00 -
[13] - Quote
Maken Tosch => Send me your ISK when the respec hits.
Drop it like its hat.
|
Spectral Clone
Dust2Dust. Top Men.
1355
|
Posted - 2014.02.21 13:00:00 -
[14] - Quote
Rei Shepard wrote: So 1.8 will be either sweet and ill tollerate everything that is bad about dust for now or its gonna be f*ck this ****, i am out of here...
I agree with you on every point here Rei, I know you are also a kb/m player, and I know what we in comparison to DS3 players have to put up with in addition to all the other broken things, stuff, etc.
It-¦s too bad CCP doesnt read this thread...
Drop it like its hat.
|
Spectral Clone
Dust2Dust. Top Men.
1363
|
Posted - 2014.02.22 19:04:00 -
[15] - Quote
The Robot Devil wrote:snip
I completely agree with you Robot, but the game was released too early and has too little content for this to be true IMO. If you didnt have any choices but one, how can you "live with your choices"?
Im gonna compare this whole debate with buying a high end cell phone, it might not be exactly what you want in 3 years time (you-¦re looking for that extremely cool new cell phone with all those cool features). The difference between this example and Dust 514 SP is that the developers of the cell phone did not go in and downgrade your screen from 5" to 2", 64x48 pixel resolution instead of 720p and at the same time switching out the Cortex based microcontroller with a ****** 8 bit PIC MCU.
You, who work with electronics, should understand this example clearly.
Myself, I have a MSc Eng in ICT with specialization towards digital signal processing. I work with underground navigation systems.
Drop it like its hat.
CCP - Working hard on the (d)evolution of Dust 514 since 2013.
|
Spectral Clone
Dust2Dust. Top Men.
1401
|
Posted - 2014.02.25 07:49:00 -
[16] - Quote
Asher Night wrote:Question for all of you who do not want CCP to give a respec: Will that ruin the game for YOU? Will you stop playing because someone else was given a respec to fix their character that CCP drastically changed? Will you delete Dust from your PS3?
Yes it will ruin the game for the anti-respec people. They are probably the worst crutch using scrubs in Dust 514-¦s history. And they are afraid that new players will crush them into the ground.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DTx054SNscw
Drop it like its hat.
CCP - Working hard on the (d)evolution of Dust 514 since 2013.
|
Spectral Clone
Dust2Dust. Top Men.
1401
|
Posted - 2014.02.25 07:51:00 -
[17] - Quote
Racro 01 Arifistan wrote:i lvoe these complaints abotu re-specs. when you get to my expericence and skillpoitn levle....thier just not worth it. sicne i can practially do everything i want to do. soif theres a respec i get skillpoints to go somewhere else if i dont like the changes or not happy with that skill. so i have no problems with a respec or not.
It-¦s not about the number of points you have making bad choices not matter, its about CCP treating their customers with respect when they rebuild the foundation of this game: weapons and classes.
Drop it like its hat.
CCP - Working hard on the (d)evolution of Dust 514 since 2013.
|
Spectral Clone
Dust2Dust. Top Men.
1401
|
Posted - 2014.02.25 07:59:00 -
[18] - Quote
Crimson ShieId wrote:...seeing huge amounts of FoTM fittings after a respec...
Well, if items stay OP for a long time (which is the REAL FOTM PROBLEM) players will just grind SP to get that OP sh*t. Increase in FOTM builts might be correlated to a respec.
......but
The real FOTM problem is caused by game imbalance, not respecs.
David Hume wrote: Correlation does not imply causation.
Drop it like its hat.
CCP - Working hard on the (d)evolution of Dust 514 since 2013.
|
Spectral Clone
Dust2Dust. Top Men.
1401
|
Posted - 2014.02.25 08:27:00 -
[19] - Quote
Malkai Inos wrote:Spectral Clone wrote:Crimson ShieId wrote:...seeing huge amounts of FoTM fittings after a respec... Well, if items stay OP for a long time (which is the REAL FOTM PROBLEM) players will just grind SP to get that OP sh*t. Increase in FOTM builds might be correlated to a respec. ......but The real FOTM problem is caused by game imbalance, not respecs.David Hume wrote: Correlation does not imply causation.
Bascially correct but note the bolded statements. FOTM chasing currently requires both time and effort. Since both could be spend otherwise, an opportunity cost is attached to the practice. Additionally, right now some things can theoratically be fixed before they ruin the soonGäó economy and everyone's game experience along with it. Respecs make FOTM easier and thus more prevalent, worsening overall perceived balance. This has already been observed two times now, no matter the monocausal/polycausal/correlative relation.
Ah, swarm launchers did not stay OP for a long time? Forge guns easymode splash damage OHK infantry since beta? Gallente assault rifles best weapon since closed beta (in one shape or another: First burst, then TAC, then regular when hit detection got fixed)?
Drop it like its hat.
CCP - Working hard on the (d)evolution of Dust 514 since 2013.
|
Spectral Clone
Dust2Dust. Top Men.
1403
|
Posted - 2014.02.25 10:20:00 -
[20] - Quote
Western Ways wrote:I think people need to stop worrying about what other people are rolling and just enjoy the ufckin game, and if you notice that somethings OP just call it out like you already do and let CCP do their thing.
I've never been one to chase the flavor of the month, but i actually think it's good in it's own way because it shows the developers whats broke. The problem with that is when they get overzealous and bend people over with a giant purple nerf dildo, but that's a separate issue.
Will a respec spark a new wave of FOTM bullisht? Maybe, but it will also let CCP see what if anything is broken in 1.8, and allow them to get the jump on all the data they need to refine the game for the patch after that. And the faster they hammer out all the broken isht in the game the more likely we are to see new content in the near future, and that i think is a good thing.
Exactly. Respecs are in line with the continuous improvement/agile work methods that I certainly hope CCP are using. You can guess all you want what stats weapons should have, but with a high probability, they will not be perfect at release. Following player (like CCP do) and evaluating what happens after a respec is a great strategy (also a scientifically correct one IMO) to empirically improve the game.
Drop it like its hat.
CCP - Working hard on the (d)evolution of Dust 514 since 2013.
|
|
Spectral Clone
Dust2Dust. Top Men.
1410
|
Posted - 2014.02.26 08:31:00 -
[21] - Quote
GhostSoldierX wrote:@ CCP let us be able to Respec when we want like a option under character development tab: consequence for respc- you dont get your isk back from skill books
This. Penalty will be proportional to how much SP you want to re-learn.
You can 'fix mistakes' in your skill tree for losing a small amount of ISK, but huge mistakes such as specing into a FoTM suit which got nerfed, will not be nice to your wallet. This is what "your choices have consequences" could mean in a f2p FPS on the PS3.
Or make respecs a rare commodity that is sold in FW for a lot of loyalty points.
Drop it like its hat.
CCP - Working hard on the (d)evolution of Dust 514 since 2013.
|
Spectral Clone
Dust2Dust. Top Men.
1482
|
Posted - 2014.03.05 07:02:00 -
[22] - Quote
Total remake of suits reminds me of Sony actually. First gen PS3s had the option to run linux (OpenOS). I remember that many scientists were very excited about this for supercomputing cluster at the time.
Then, Sony removed this feature with a system update (Firmware). How do you think the people felt that bought hundred PS3s for their projects?
Sony got sued by several parties in the US, but they were never brought before justice.
CCP dont 'do a Sony' please.
Drop it like its hat.
|
Spectral Clone
Dust2Dust. Top Men.
1482
|
Posted - 2014.03.05 07:16:00 -
[23] - Quote
Brian LaFleur wrote:Spectral Clone wrote:Total remake of suits reminds me of Sony actually. First gen PS3s had the option to run linux (OpenOS). I remember that many scientists were very excited about this for supercomputing cluster at the time.
Then, Sony removed this feature with a system update (Firmware). How do you think the people felt that bought hundred PS3s for their projects?
Sony got sued by several parties in the US, but they were never brought before justice.
CCP dont 'do a Sony' please. I know exactly of what you speak. Then GEOHOT jail broke it, then Sony sued GEOHOT, then anonymous took down the PSN for a month+. Ah, 2011.... what a year....
Sony are true cunts. But they do make good products. Its kind of like Apple.
Back on topic. You didnt see the people getting scammed by Sony jumping around, thumping their chests and telling everyone to HTFU like the brainwashed gorillas on this forum.
Drop it like its hat.
|
Spectral Clone
Dust2Dust. Top Men.
1514
|
Posted - 2014.03.05 19:52:00 -
[24] - Quote
DUST Fiend wrote:I am going to laugh my way to the bank if there's no respec HMG Sentinel is the new Flavor of the Game lmfao. Forge gun is already the only AV worth wielding, and with the damage mod and grenade nerfs, it will be the only option aside from Jihad LAV or a rail tank against any remotely competent tank driver. HAHAHAHHA, classic, classic DUST, 100% Good show, good show indeed ::hugs his crystal ball::
At least the gal scout will be great to brick tank, better at assaulting than logis and assault.
Drop it like its hat.
|
Spectral Clone
Dust2Dust. Top Men.
1527
|
Posted - 2014.03.06 06:47:00 -
[25] - Quote
The Robot Devil wrote:Only seven more pages
Its over 9000!!!
Drop it like its hat.
|
Spectral Clone
Dust2Dust. Top Men.
1527
|
Posted - 2014.03.06 07:36:00 -
[26] - Quote
Tallen Ellecon wrote:CCP Logibro wrote:Unfortunately we didn't get a chance to redo the slots and PG/CPU for all the medium frames in Uprising 1.8. Expect those changes to come in a future update. So if we have a respec in 1.8, we should get one a month later as well? A slot layout change is a big deal.
Im starting to think were not getting a infantry respec until the next expansion now. Manly due to the fact that mediums did not get slot layout changed.
I will spec into gal scout for sure now. Bricktank 514.
Drop it like its hat.
|
Spectral Clone
Dust2Dust. Top Men.
1570
|
Posted - 2014.03.07 07:22:00 -
[27] - Quote
Or just always refund SP when a change is made.
Drop it like its hat.
|
Spectral Clone
Dust2Dust. Top Men.
1610
|
Posted - 2014.03.11 10:21:00 -
[28] - Quote
Spectral Clone wrote:Okay, so lets take this discussion seriously and present some expected features of 1.8: - TTK will be tuned to be longer. => Dont know what skill tree this will affect, on an "abstract" level: all of them. - New racial content for infantry (heavies and scouts, yay!) => Approx 15-20% added SP sink to dropsuit skill tree. - Complete re-iteration of "old" dropsuit skill bonuses and stats => Change of 100% of current SP sink in dropsuit skill tree. - New weapons => Approx 10-15% more SP sink in weaponry skill tree. - Nerfs to "old" weapons, more specifically rifles => Rifles and SMG in weapon skill tree, estimated 30% of all weapons. - Weapon proficiency skill re-vamped to only affect armor or shield damage (depending on weapon) => Affects 100% of weaponry skill tree. - Over all equipment nerf => Various skills in dropsuit upgrades, estimated 15-20% of the SP sink affected.
The points above have touched every infantry skill tree skill (dropsuit upgrades, weaponry and dropsuits). Is there really anything to discuss in this thread CCP?
Quoting myself to update with the latest knowledge:
CONFIRMED TTK will be tuned to be longer. CONFIRMED New racial content for infantry. CONFIRMED Complete re-iteration of "old" dropsuit skill bonuses (stats not revamped now). CONFIRMED New weapons. CONFIRMED, TTK fix Nerfs to "old" weapons, more specifically rifles. CONFIRMED, TTK fix Weapon proficiency skill re-vamped to only affect armor or shield damage. CONFIRMED Over all equipment nerf
I have to say I am pretty good at guessing what will happen. What I did miss here was the infantry weapon damage mods being nerfed as well, and the grenade nerf. But I was right about everything else. It just adds to the SP-refund stew.
So, in conclusion: - The infantry weaponry skill tree is affected by the weapon damage mod nerf, grenade nerf, proficiency nerf and weapon damage nerf. - The dropsuit command skill tree is completely changed, except for basic frames. - The dropsuit upgrades is staying the same, except for all the equipment nerfs.
TL;DR Is there really anything to discuss in this thread CCP?
Drop it like its hat.
|
Spectral Clone
Dust2Dust. Top Men.
1612
|
Posted - 2014.03.11 10:39:00 -
[29] - Quote
Lunatic Kota wrote: -Players with +20mil SP will become even more godly (spending all points to coincide with a more slaying role and advancement on the battlefield)
^ 20M+ SP players do already have several weapons and suits to run. They will only get marginally better than the guy with 5M SP that has to focus getting that first suit up and running with core skills.
Linky: https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=147023&find=unread
The argument above failed.
Lunatic Kota wrote: -More "Flavor of the Month" Suit/Weapon combinations will arise and become nerfed and people will troll forums/battlegrounds with them
^ Flavor of the month will happen, not because there is a respec, but because of CCPs slow updates to balance weapons and dropsuits. Even without a respec, many vets might already have the OP suit/weapon (OP stuff can be buffed items as well), or they saved 3-5M SP to spec into new stuff when the patch hits, because they already have so many weapons and suits.
This argument also failed.
That leaves you with 6 pro-¦s for and 1 con against a respec.
Drop it like its hat.
|
Spectral Clone
Dust2Dust. Top Men.
1614
|
Posted - 2014.03.11 11:47:00 -
[30] - Quote
Sam Tektzby wrote:I still dont know what is bad on respec, nobody told before anywhere. And i tell you, i will NO GRIND ONCE MORE from START, just because CCP is lazy. NO FULL RESPEC = DELETE OF DUST End of story.
The players that are anti-respec are afraid that other players will be able to correct their builds and become better than them.
I think more competition is just good for the game.
Drop it like its hat.
|
|
Spectral Clone
Dust2Dust. Top Men.
1615
|
Posted - 2014.03.11 12:01:00 -
[31] - Quote
Sam Tektzby wrote:I know, dont tell me, but thats not a proper reason.
Some does not seem to understand that this is the only underlying anti respec argument. Like you said earlier, noone can motivate why we should not get a full infantry refund.
The argument about living with our choices is void and null when now that we have more information about what is going to happen in 1.8 (like I posted earlier).
Drop it like its hat.
|
Spectral Clone
Dust2Dust. Top Men.
1615
|
Posted - 2014.03.11 13:06:00 -
[32] - Quote
DUST Fiend wrote: The only truly legitimate argument against respecs I've ever heard is how it would completely **** up a player market, because demand would shift randomly and make it impossible to corner, exploit, or merely profit from market trends.
What market?
Drop it like its hat.
|
Spectral Clone
Dust2Dust. Top Men.
1642
|
Posted - 2014.03.12 08:38:00 -
[33] - Quote
When racial parity is done for skills, i.e. we have logi/assault suits, scouts, and heavies, CCP dont have to add new skills when adding new content.
They could instead, as an example, add a new variant or tier of the assault suit, that is unlocked by the same skill.
I dearly hope that this is the plan after the final respec.
Drop it like its hat.
|
Spectral Clone
Dust2Dust. Top Men.
1644
|
Posted - 2014.03.12 08:54:00 -
[34] - Quote
501st Headstrong wrote:That would be AWESOME. Add it for rifles for example: Burst Fire Proficiency, maybe even unlock attachments that way down the extremely long road. And by attachments I don't mean underbarrel grenade launchers, but different sights, maybe even different ARs themselves. It would be cool if you unlock the broad category, AR, and can use the ones we have currently, but to use more extensive ones, you have to travel into specifics. Say Auto, Burst, Semi Auto?
Oops, straying away from a Respec topic. Sorry!
QFT.
I so want a pistol with a laser sight. Be able to reload EMP rounds into a combat rifle, just like in EVE, depending on the combat situation.
Imagine a combat rifle with exploding EMP rounds for equipment clearing. Oh my god!
Drop it like its hat.
|
Spectral Clone
Dust2Dust. Top Men.
1656
|
Posted - 2014.03.12 17:06:00 -
[35] - Quote
Its silly that the weapon skill tree was changed the most of all trees, and we didnt get refunded for that. See you guys in a year, or perhaps not, because this game will be out of comission then.
Loldust. Lol laser focus on ps3. Lol Cpm.
Nothing has changed since uprising 1.0.
You almost got me to pay money for this game again CCP, but this decision broke the deal. Sorry.
Drop it like its hat.
|
Spectral Clone
Dust2Dust. Top Men.
1658
|
Posted - 2014.03.12 17:16:00 -
[36] - Quote
DJINN Marauder wrote:Looks like everyone wasted their times posting their opinions and logic on this thread.
It is so disrespectful. I am disgusted with CCP right now.
Drop it like its hat.
|
Spectral Clone
Dust2Dust. Top Men.
1659
|
Posted - 2014.03.12 17:26:00 -
[37] - Quote
DUST Fiend wrote:Malkai Inos wrote:DJINN Marauder wrote:Looks like everyone wasted their times posting their opinions and logic on this thread. Last i checked a dropsuit command tree respec was going to happen. Have they since changed their mind or do you just consider anything but full compliance a complete failure to comply? Considering the total lack of discussion by CCP on this issue, and the complete dismissal of the fact that, among other things, Armor and Shield skills are now wasted if you try switching to your new (read: OLD) backlogged suit, well...you're just sol. Buy boosters and deal with it.
The thing is, this has put me off of buying any AUR boosters again. I will never pay a dime more for this game. Its such poor quality, poor community management and bad will.
Drop it like its hat.
|
Spectral Clone
Dust2Dust. Top Men.
1659
|
Posted - 2014.03.12 17:33:00 -
[38] - Quote
Vordred Knight wrote:Im disgusted I can't believe ccp pulled something like this this is painful
You are not the only one.
The worst thing is that the new EP, CCP Rogue, has signed off on this decision. He cannot be unaware of it.
No old vets will return. More players will leave the game. Less players will pay for boosters.
Great work there CCP Rogue, you are no different than the old EP.
Drop it like its hat.
|
Spectral Clone
Dust2Dust. Top Men.
1659
|
Posted - 2014.03.12 17:50:00 -
[39] - Quote
The Attorney General wrote:Spectral Clone wrote:
The thing is, this has put me off of buying any AUR boosters again. I will never pay a dime more for this game. Its such poor quality and poor community management and bad will.
This is just yet another in the long line of poor decisions that makes me glad that I shut my wallet to these people awhile ago. They have shown time and time again since then that they have no desire to actually work with the community, let alone try and repair the damage they have done to their reputation.
They cant repair this PR blunder.
Drop it like its hat.
|
Spectral Clone
Dust2Dust. Top Men.
1663
|
Posted - 2014.03.12 21:14:00 -
[40] - Quote
o7
*goes to find a better game*
Drop it like its hat.
|
|
Spectral Clone
Dust2Dust. Top Men.
1880
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 12:50:00 -
[41] - Quote
Blue Waffle1 wrote:I haven't played in a while and I see that all my Dropsuit skills are gone, and I can't afford the skill books to get them back....
You should have been refunded for the skill books.
Drop it like its hat.
|
|
|
|