|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
Brian LaFleur
RETR0 PR0 GAMERS INTERGALACTIC WARPIGS
4
|
Posted - 2014.02.18 04:11:00 -
[1] - Quote
DUST Fiend wrote:It's a video game, let people use their SP how they want in relation to all these new changes
I for one will just collect passive for a good long while if they deny us a full infantry respec.
Tons of nice games already out and soon to be out.
Planetside 2, Destiny, I'm already playing Blacklight: Retribution & Warframe. I've put a LOT of money into Dust, but if giving us a full respec is a problem, !@(& CCP. I have a ps4. |
Brian LaFleur
RETR0 PR0 GAMERS INTERGALACTIC WARPIGS
4
|
Posted - 2014.02.18 04:30:00 -
[2] - Quote
DUST Fiend wrote:Brian LaFleur wrote:DUST Fiend wrote:It's a video game, let people use their SP how they want in relation to all these new changes
I for one will just collect passive for a good long while if they deny us a full infantry respec.
Tons of nice games already out and soon to be out. Planetside 2, Destiny, I'm already playing Blacklight: Retribution & Warframe. I've put a LOT of money into Dust, but if giving us a full respec is a problem, !@(& CCP. I have a ps4. I've only put in a little over $100, which is still a lot for a free game. If I had money that could be wasted I would have spent much more. I for one am looking at ESO right now since my brother said he'll buy me a years time. I have no problem setting this down for a good long while, though I would definitely suggest different games to people, and explain to them why paying for DUST is a trap by design.
Bro, ESO is a given! I'm with ya! add me on psn, I'll accept when I get on in the morning. |
Brian LaFleur
RETR0 PR0 GAMERS INTERGALACTIC WARPIGS
4
|
Posted - 2014.02.18 04:34:00 -
[3] - Quote
lee corwood wrote:DUST Fiend wrote:Brian LaFleur wrote:DUST Fiend wrote:It's a video game, let people use their SP how they want in relation to all these new changes
I for one will just collect passive for a good long while if they deny us a full infantry respec.
Tons of nice games already out and soon to be out. Planetside 2, Destiny, I'm already playing Blacklight: Retribution & Warframe. I've put a LOT of money into Dust, but if giving us a full respec is a problem, !@(& CCP. I have a ps4. I've only put in a little over $100, which is still a lot for a free game. If I had money that could be wasted I would have spent much more. I for one am looking at ESO right now since my brother said he'll buy me a years time. I have no problem setting this down for a good long while, though I would definitely suggest different games to people, and explain to them why paying for DUST is a trap by design. If we get a respec, I'm setting this game down for a good long while. Since 1.7 dropped, I've just run silly suits and honestly hung in there for my corp. They are a great bunch of folks, but this topsy turvy game flip flopping changes every.single.fuking patch is getting too much to bear. I've been here about a year now...maybe longer, I honestly don't know how to tell, but since then all my local friends have left and I refuse to recruit a new player into this hot mess. Waiting for Destiny so hard.
You're on ps4? Add me.
|
Brian LaFleur
RETR0 PR0 GAMERS INTERGALACTIC WARPIGS
6
|
Posted - 2014.02.18 04:43:00 -
[4] - Quote
lee corwood wrote:Awry Barux wrote: I'm confused- why would a respec make you leave? IMO it's the best possible thing CCP can do to mitigate the pain of the Dust's constant state of flux.
The call for a discussion for a respec, whether warranted or not, by CCP only puts in my mind how out of sync the game is to where they expect it to be. Since I started playing this game, I've lived through I -believe- 2 respecs. This would be the 3rd though it feels like more than that. (The full respec from beta, the vehicle one, and I feel like there was one more in the middle but I could be wrong) Either way, at this point, I don't feel like CCP has their sh*t together at all and with all their black box of 'our hands are tied and we just can't tell you the direction we *think* we're going', I think only gives them further liberty to not have to admit that their roadmap is no where in the works. I feel like its a game of guessing instead of actual calculated progression into a real vision of something. I'd rather get the respec and sit on it then spend the sp to yet again have it given back to me for another glaring overhaul. I'll just wait a few years and see if anything meaningful between dust and eve exists yet.
Ya know, I'm ok with them not having a road map. EVE was the same way, in some ways still is, but it's a good game now. It doesn't bother me when they unexpectedly change directions. It bothers me when they do and I don't have the chance to change my heading. |
Brian LaFleur
RETR0 PR0 GAMERS INTERGALACTIC WARPIGS
7
|
Posted - 2014.02.18 05:09:00 -
[5] - Quote
The Robot Devil wrote:DUST Fiend wrote:Brian LaFleur wrote:DUST Fiend wrote:It's a video game, let people use their SP how they want in relation to all these new changes
I for one will just collect passive for a good long while if they deny us a full infantry respec.
Tons of nice games already out and soon to be out. Planetside 2, Destiny, I'm already playing Blacklight: Retribution & Warframe. I've put a LOT of money into Dust, but if giving us a full respec is a problem, !@(& CCP. I have a ps4. I've only put in a little over $100, which is still a lot for a free game. If I had money that could be wasted I would have spent much more. I for one am looking at ESO right now since my brother said he'll buy me a years time. I have no problem setting this down for a good long while, though I would definitely suggest different games to people, and explain to them why paying for DUST is a trap by design. It is a trap by design, much like the lottery. I have enjoyed the money I have spent on DUST. If nothing else this crazy ass forum is worth the money spent.
And to be fair, THAT, above all other reasons, is why I keep playing Dust: the community. There are some real D-Bags that play Dust. Some of them I call friend (cough} Devin Xer). But, for whatever reason, (musical notes) They Keep Me Hanging On. |
Brian LaFleur
RETR0 PR0 GAMERS INTERGALACTIC WARPIGS
7
|
Posted - 2014.02.18 06:47:00 -
[6] - Quote
Gawen Eadan wrote:My argument would be not if just the majority of the player base wanted it, but if the CPM agreed with the player base.
No matter how many reasons we come up with, for why there should be a respec (although many arguments in this thread are valid in themselves with little need for explanation, yet are also explained) we elected a CPM to be our voice of reason, no matter how delirious or drunk we got, it was a democratic decision, that we elected mayors that would stand beside the people, with an authority, and say "yes, or "no", to our developers, who you could say are like the president and his secretaries in this scenario.
Sure a president and the secretaries could say "no", even thought his people and their representatives say "yes", but isn't that the french revolution in a nutshell? Don't get me wrong "viva la revolution!" but, we elected to have a CPM to avoid this issue instead of having a "monarchy" that completely looses support of the majority of people, which proceeds to crumble and fall apart? Sure, we can't go cut off the CEO's head, but we can sure as hell ditch the game, and if you lose 51% of a player base, or more, you're not going to be able to sustain this game and its f2p+transaction method.
So cast your vote, contact your CPM of choice with your opinion (not just " 'cause I want it! " but include a short valid argument why) and let democracy work as design intended.
H1t73r was also democratically elected. Just sayin'....
Petals within petals, tadpole;
The truth lies beneath an opulence of illusion.
|
Brian LaFleur
RETR0 PR0 GAMERS INTERGALACTIC WARPIGS
9
|
Posted - 2014.02.23 18:50:00 -
[7] - Quote
Ghost Steps wrote:i think we whould get 1 last respec (being warned that is the last). Also the respec option with aur is a good idea 4 days to come as it is a name change (is not like u cant get an identity change in the EVE univers blackmarket ) and personalization features like those on eve, these r good ways to get incomes on free to play games.
Why only one? What if they pull another across the board stat switch? Respects should be mandated whenever any changes to the meta are made. We cannot make informed decisions in how we place our sp when they are playing musical stats.
Petals within petals, tadpole;
The truth lies beneath an opulence of illusion.
|
Brian LaFleur
RETR0 PR0 GAMERS INTERGALACTIC WARPIGS
10
|
Posted - 2014.02.23 20:36:00 -
[8] - Quote
Malkai Inos wrote:Brian LaFleur wrote:Ghost Steps wrote:i think we whould get 1 last respec (being warned that is the last). Also the respec option with aur is a good idea 4 days to come as it is a name change (is not like u cant get an identity change in the EVE univers blackmarket ) and personalization features like those on eve, these r good ways to get incomes on free to play games. Why only one? What if they pull another across the board stat switch? Respects should be mandated whenever any changes to the meta are made. We cannot make informed decisions in how we place our sp when they are playing musical stats. Because your definition would lead to a respec every single patch, leaving the skillsystem with basically no worthwhile function beyond a pointless powergrind. At that point just gutting the SP system altogether and going with ordinary character levels would be more sensible as that is effectively what the progression would boil down to. The market is full of games that do just that. Again. Bad balance is bad balance is bad balance! Respecs have nothing to do with it.
Really? Every time, huh? Yeah, I can't recall the last time they changed dropsuit functions. I've been around since 1.4 and this is the first time it's happened to me. Also, I've never had a full respec so I see no reason why I shouldn't get one since my allocation of skill points no longer do what they did when I applied them. A pointless power bring? That's exactly what I would call not having any say in what you spec into. It's like making a Mage character then midway through the game they make you a priest. Whenever major changes occur, they either let us change with it or deal with the backlash. It's simple, really. There's no down side to a respec, period. There are only pro's. I think an annual respec should be standard. Let's people optimize and correct their mistakes. You guys arguing against a respec make absolutely no sense.
Petals within petals, tadpole;
The truth lies beneath an opulence of illusion.
|
Brian LaFleur
RETR0 PR0 GAMERS
11
|
Posted - 2014.03.01 05:39:00 -
[9] - Quote
Rinzler XVIII wrote:Its pretty obvious that we aren't getting an infantry respec, the vehicle respec was announced well in advance of 1.7.
1.8 may well become the time I set the user free never to return to the digital realm of New Eden ..
I'm there, too. But here's what's gonna happen: CCP will give us a dropsuit command, dropsuit upgrade, and weapons respec if not a full respec. This is because this game already has low ratings among all the game review magazines because it's a mediocre game. They have a loyal fan base and the outcry from that base is heavily in favor of a respec. They could gamble with the attitude that they could feed us **** and we'd keep on eating it, but I highly doubt they'd want to further alienate an already discontent and dwindling fan base. The only reason I'm still playing is my corpmates. But when ESO releases, how quick and easy would it be to shelve Dust for another big title?
Petals within petals, tadpole;
The truth lies beneath an opulence of illusion.
|
Brian LaFleur
RETR0 PR0 GAMERS
13
|
Posted - 2014.03.03 03:58:00 -
[10] - Quote
Vegetation Monster wrote:
=ƒÿÆ it didn't say that in any way, shape, or form.
Petals within petals, tadpole;
The truth lies beneath an opulence of illusion.
|
|
Brian LaFleur
RETR0 PR0 GAMERS
13
|
Posted - 2014.03.03 04:21:00 -
[11] - Quote
CCP, please explain the decision making process the Dev team goes through. We've been waiting on some word but we don't get any. This is why there are multiple threads on the subject because it seems to be the only way to get a response from you. Maybe a reddit thread? Or 4chan /b/?
Petals within petals, tadpole;
The truth lies beneath an opulence of illusion.
|
Brian LaFleur
RETR0 PR0 GAMERS
16
|
Posted - 2014.03.05 05:29:00 -
[12] - Quote
501st Headstrong wrote:No no no! We want a Respec just for 1.8, not consistent ones. Consistent Respecs destroys Dust since none of your choices give meaning! All that is needed is this one respec so we can clear the air and refresh ourselves. I do not support consistent respecs however that can be done at will, even if for money.
Full Respec for this second to last time or until Dust has another MASSIVE (This does not mean the introduction of the Pilot suits) overhaul
NO PAID RESPECS
Ok, that would be fair if our choices aren't changed durning an update. If they make drastic changes (like dropsuit functions or equipment-dropsuit synergy) then a respect is the only decent way to go. They're figuring this sh!t as they go, so until they reach their final product, we have to be given the chance to adjust. Only exception: rail rifles. If you spec'ed into those, I hope you gag on the nerf hammer they hit you with =ƒÿá
Petals within petals, tadpole;
The truth lies beneath an opulence of illusion.
|
Brian LaFleur
RETR0 PR0 GAMERS
16
|
Posted - 2014.03.05 05:46:00 -
[13] - Quote
Tallen Ellecon wrote:Firstly I think it's funny when people say "look how big this thread is, they have to give us a respec" as if this was a democracy and thread size equated to support. A good portion of these posts are me and others explaining why they shouldn't give us one in 1.8.
Secondly they made this post and posted it up top because one day the entire forums was flooded with posts about respecs. This post is an excuse for them to bury every other post on the forums, and not a confirmation or denial of a respec. The fact that they've remained silent support neither side.
Thirdly I don't know how many other "you better do blank or else I'll leave" posts have actually got any traction, but I don't think that phases them much. Just leave if you have a problem, player counts affect how they approach things more than anything, and I honestly think more people will comeback to try the new suits than leave because they didn't get a respec for it. Until they add a proper new player experience nothing else will sway the numbers much, and even 500 regular players leaving in order to facilitate a game that hopes to have an open market is a small sacrifice.
Lastly those of us who oppose a respec in 1.8 don't necessarily want them to never give us a respec, many of us would rather wait until the game is more balanced and complete. I agree with many of the arguments for one, but right now it would do so little in the larger scheme, and would make people think repsecs will come every time something changes, which was never their intended use. A game with an open market driven by supply and demand can't thrive in a respec culture, the balancing in game will do more than enough to sway markets.
Some of us are looking at the bigger picture, and since a respec at the release of 1.8 doesn't do anything to help a player who joins afterwards IMO it doesn't matter.
Ya know what? That's a pretty decent point. A respec once they finalize the core game would appease me, though by that point I doubt I'll be gaming for the arthritis in my hands and my battles with Alzheimer's. It took them something around 10 years to get eve fairly balanced, and that's their flagship title. It seems CCP has the dust devs operating on a skeleton crew and a piggy bank for financing. The changes are too slow, too minute to inspire awe. I mean jeeesus, entire species evolve faster than this game. Darwin sits in awe. I understand the whole FotM argument, but they are forcing me to be a full time rep guy(min logi) when the versatility and survivability of the suit is why I spec'ed into it. No more assault logis? Fine, gimme back my points so I can go where I wanted to be to begin with. They really need to focus on balance because the FotM stuff is a huge turn off. Also, here's to our corps! Hope we make that thing happen! (Either ya know or ya don't) =ƒÿÄ
Petals within petals, tadpole;
The truth lies beneath an opulence of illusion.
|
Brian LaFleur
RETR0 PR0 GAMERS
16
|
Posted - 2014.03.05 05:51:00 -
[14] - Quote
iliel wrote:What about a constant respec option which costs a percentage of SP. For the sake of an example, let's say you may have a respec if you relinquish 15% of your SP. Such a system would make respec's more viable for newer players than for older ones. Also, having it as a constant feature, CCP wouldn't have to worry anymore about this discussion as they make addiional changes to the game.
That would benefit the older gamers who have a surplus of sp laying around. Newer players would hurt
Petals within petals, tadpole;
The truth lies beneath an opulence of illusion.
|
Brian LaFleur
RETR0 PR0 GAMERS
16
|
Posted - 2014.03.05 06:53:00 -
[15] - Quote
Tallen Ellecon wrote:Brian LaFleur wrote:Tallen Ellecon wrote:Firstly I think it's funny when people say "look how big this thread is, they have to give us a respec" as if this was a democracy and thread size equated to support. A good portion of these posts are me and others explaining why they shouldn't give us one in 1.8.
Secondly they made this post and posted it up top because one day the entire forums was flooded with posts about respecs. This post is an excuse for them to bury every other post on the forums, and not a confirmation or denial of a respec. The fact that they've remained silent support neither side.
Thirdly I don't know how many other "you better do blank or else I'll leave" posts have actually got any traction, but I don't think that phases them much. Just leave if you have a problem, player counts affect how they approach things more than anything, and I honestly think more people will comeback to try the new suits than leave because they didn't get a respec for it. Until they add a proper new player experience nothing else will sway the numbers much, and even 500 regular players leaving in order to facilitate a game that hopes to have an open market is a small sacrifice.
Lastly those of us who oppose a respec in 1.8 don't necessarily want them to never give us a respec, many of us would rather wait until the game is more balanced and complete. I agree with many of the arguments for one, but right now it would do so little in the larger scheme, and would make people think repsecs will come every time something changes, which was never their intended use. A game with an open market driven by supply and demand can't thrive in a respec culture, the balancing in game will do more than enough to sway markets.
Some of us are looking at the bigger picture, and since a respec at the release of 1.8 doesn't do anything to help a player who joins afterwards IMO it doesn't matter. Ya know what? That's a pretty decent point. A respec once they finalize the core game would appease me, though by that point I doubt I'll be gaming for the arthritis in my hands and my battles with Alzheimer's. It took them something around 10 years to get eve fairly balanced, and that's their flagship title. It seems CCP has the dust devs operating on a skeleton crew and a piggy bank for financing. The changes are too slow, too minute to inspire awe. I mean jeeesus, entire species evolve faster than this game. Darwin sits in awe. I understand the whole FotM argument, but they are forcing me to be a full time rep guy(min logi) when the versatility and survivability of the suit is why I spec'ed into it. No more assault logis? Fine, gimme back my points so I can go where I wanted to be to begin with. They really need to focus on balance because the FotM stuff is a huge turn off. Also, here's to our corps! Hope we make that thing happen! (Either ya know or ya don't) =ƒÿÄ So you're against any respecs ever again? Cool, even better. You finally get New Eden, it's fair because we're all equally fuc*ked.
LMAO I can't say I'm against respects ever, only acknowledging the good points. I'm only half joking when I say respec everything but rail rifles. But I'm an experienced player. Respec would help me collect a few errant sp from my noob days, but if it f@$k$ over the lame FotM rail users, I can live with my regrets. =ƒÿê
Petals within petals, tadpole;
The truth lies beneath an opulence of illusion.
|
Brian LaFleur
RETR0 PR0 GAMERS
16
|
Posted - 2014.03.05 07:05:00 -
[16] - Quote
Spectral Clone wrote:Total remake of suits reminds me of Sony actually. First gen PS3s had the option to run linux (OpenOS). I remember that many scientists were very excited about this for supercomputing cluster at the time.
Then, Sony removed this feature with a system update (Firmware). How do you think the people felt that bought hundred PS3s for their projects?
Sony got sued by several parties in the US, but they were never brought before justice.
CCP dont 'do a Sony' please.
I know exactly of what you speak. Then GEOHOT jail broke it, then Sony sued GEOHOT, then anonymous took down the PSN for a month+. Ah, 2011.... what a year....
Petals within petals, tadpole;
The truth lies beneath an opulence of illusion.
|
Brian LaFleur
RETR0 PR0 GAMERS
17
|
Posted - 2014.03.05 07:21:00 -
[17] - Quote
Spectral Clone wrote:Brian LaFleur wrote:Spectral Clone wrote:Total remake of suits reminds me of Sony actually. First gen PS3s had the option to run linux (OpenOS). I remember that many scientists were very excited about this for supercomputing cluster at the time.
Then, Sony removed this feature with a system update (Firmware). How do you think the people felt that bought hundred PS3s for their projects?
Sony got sued by several parties in the US, but they were never brought before justice.
CCP dont 'do a Sony' please. I know exactly of what you speak. Then GEOHOT jail broke it, then Sony sued GEOHOT, then anonymous took down the PSN for a month+. Ah, 2011.... what a year.... Sony are true cunts. But they do make good products. Its kind of like Apple. Back on topic. You didnt see the people getting scammed by Sony jumping around, thumping their chests and telling everyone to HTFU like the brainwashed gorillas on this forum.
Just like anywhere on the internet, you can meet brilliant, thought provoking people who can challenge your thoughts on a topic in an intelligent, enlightening manner; then you have the ones who, well, you know the other ones.
Petals within petals, tadpole;
The truth lies beneath an opulence of illusion.
|
Brian LaFleur
RETR0 PR0 GAMERS
21
|
Posted - 2014.03.07 03:20:00 -
[18] - Quote
Alena Ventrallis wrote:FOTM won't go away because there's no respect. There will always be FOTM chasers. Why punish people who are getting their suits changed because some people will chase whatever is OP?
If the Devs understood balance, FotM could be resolved. It's all math. I don't see how they can run a business while sucking so bad at it.
Petals within petals, tadpole;
The truth lies beneath an opulence of illusion.
|
Brian LaFleur
RETR0 PR0 GAMERS
23
|
Posted - 2014.03.10 03:48:00 -
[19] - Quote
501st Headstrong wrote:This works with me. I plan on going all Minmatar anyway, for better or worst, along with Core Dropsuits. So many people have SP they wish they didn't spend.
I'm with ya on that. Min commando will be my go to for: anti vehicle, combat rifle/mass driver/ flay lock/ remotes =ƒÿÄ
Petals within petals, tadpole;
The truth lies beneath an opulence of illusion.
|
|
|
|