Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
Awry Barux
New Eden Blades Of The Azure Zero-Day
807
|
Posted - 2014.02.18 02:42:00 -
[211] - Quote
Aikuchi Tomaru wrote:Awry Barux wrote:Aikuchi, I take your lack of response to my post (Post #175) to mean that you have no valid counter-argument. Please respond or admit that respecs are justified. I see you haven't answered my question what you're doing with the SP you're getting since the suits were announced. That must mean you ave no valid counter-argument. Please respond or admit that respecs aren't justified.
Again, you're not responding my point. I'm saving my SP in case there isn't a respec, but that has nothing to do with whether or not respecs are warranted. Happy?
The Robot Devil wrote:Awry Barux wrote:Aikuchi, I take your lack of response to my post (Post #175) to mean that you have no valid counter-argument. Please respond or admit that respecs are justified. New Eden changes like baby diapers, don't expect to have the exact same tools even six from now. It is not justified just because you can't do what you want in a suit or feel that it is. Things change and so does this game, if you want static gears then this isn't the game for you.
It's not a matter of not having the same tools, it's a fundamental role shift for the suit. I picked a role and CCP is planning to rip that role out from under me with a bonus change. A hacking speed bonus and a repair tool bonus are completely different, and it has invalidated the choice I made months ago, before any of these changes were announced or hinted at. Forcing me to stick with a completely different dropsuit than the one I carefully selected is essentially wasting the weeks of SP I poured into said suit, or equivalently, making that amount of SP's worth of boosters disappear from my account.
It's one thing to make balance changes, I would happily accept any rebalancing, like a removal of the intrinsic armor repair. It's something else to fundamentally change where the suit fits in the larger game flow- what was once a suit meant for speedy equipment use is now meant to stick behind a heavy with a repair tool. I couldn't care less what the name or race of my suit is, but I picked a specific role, and I don't think it's unreasonable to ask that I should still be able to play that role in 1.8. CCP's failure to finalize roles is theirs to bear, not mine to suffer through. |
Reign Omega
BurgezzE.T.F General Tso's Alliance
149
|
Posted - 2014.02.18 02:43:00 -
[212] - Quote
I agree with a refund, at the very minimum dropsuit command, but not limited to equipment and the like. Core skills maybe not so much as they benefit all suits though I can understand not maxing certain modules for certain playstyles. I would safe to be fair and safe full infantry minus weapons, as it doesn't take a long time to become proficient in a single weapon. |
Aikuchi Tomaru
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1804
|
Posted - 2014.02.18 02:46:00 -
[213] - Quote
Awry Barux wrote:Aikuchi Tomaru wrote:Awry Barux wrote:Aikuchi, I take your lack of response to my post (Post #175) to mean that you have no valid counter-argument. Please respond or admit that respecs are justified. I see you haven't answered my question what you're doing with the SP you're getting since the suits were announced. That must mean you ave no valid counter-argument. Please respond or admit that respecs aren't justified. Again, you're not responding my point. I'm saving my SP in case there isn't a respec, but that has nothing to do with whether or not respecs are warranted. Happy?
So basically you agree that a respec isn't necessary. Because it doesn't matter if a respec happens or not: You can use the suit you want to use.
Sign up for Caldari FW and defeat the evil Gallente Overlords!
|
MINA Longstrike
2Shitz 1Giggle
299
|
Posted - 2014.02.18 02:48:00 -
[214] - Quote
D legendary hero wrote:MINA Longstrike wrote:D legendary hero wrote:Aikuchi Tomaru wrote:Respecs in Dust are not necessary. ...stuff so, why did vehicles need a respec? if you agreed with the vehicle respec then you automatically agreed for an infantry respec. if, you don't, then all the vehicles should have their SP returned to their prexisting categories, and anywhere a category was removed the SP that was their should just be "lost". besides, I highly doubt you actually believe in what your saying. Otherwise, you'd have dropsuit operation to level 5 even though there is no reason too. Vehicles didn't 'demand' a respec - it was mandatory because of what they did with the tree. An infantry respec/refund at this point is optional not 'mandatory' as so many scream that it is. they didnt need to refund SP for vehicles. You accumulate SP endlessly, you potentially can have everything to level 5. so... that was optional too. tankers were crying so hard ccp gave it.
Yes they did need to refund the skillpoints because of the fact that they more or less deleted skills and rolled them into a different bunch. They are not deleting infantry skills, or obsoleting them, you are simply getting more dropsuits.
I don't think you understand what the word mandatory means and are just ranting with inanities like "they should have taken 4-7m skillpoints away from tanks". This is no longer an intelligent debate it is merely you whining and insinuating that the rest of the player base should have been harmed over a perceived slight, you are refusing to concede any points that don't support your views and are deliberately avoiding answering things that would force you to make any concessions or admit that you might be in any way wrong or making deliberate fallacies. |
Awry Barux
New Eden Blades Of The Azure Zero-Day
807
|
Posted - 2014.02.18 02:53:00 -
[215] - Quote
Aikuchi Tomaru wrote:Awry Barux wrote:Aikuchi Tomaru wrote:Awry Barux wrote:Aikuchi, I take your lack of response to my post (Post #175) to mean that you have no valid counter-argument. Please respond or admit that respecs are justified. I see you haven't answered my question what you're doing with the SP you're getting since the suits were announced. That must mean you ave no valid counter-argument. Please respond or admit that respecs aren't justified. Again, you're not responding my point. I'm saving my SP in case there isn't a respec, but that has nothing to do with whether or not respecs are warranted. Happy? So basically you agree that a respec isn't necessary. Because it doesn't matter if a respec happens or not: You can use the suit you want to use.
Uh, no, I most emphatically do not agree that it isn't necessary. I don't have maxed anything on my character, even within a single role, so to me, every point of SP is valuable. I can't just casually save SP and play at maximum efficiency like the veterans. A portion of the SP I spent working towards my current role will have to be outright chalked up as waste. I shouldn't have to take a hit to my character development due to CCP's fundamental suit changes. I spent real money to accelerate my development and that money is wasted if the skills I bought with that booster SP no longer apply to my role. |
Reign Omega
BurgezzE.T.F General Tso's Alliance
149
|
Posted - 2014.02.18 02:56:00 -
[216] - Quote
MINA Longstrike wrote:D legendary hero wrote:MINA Longstrike wrote:D legendary hero wrote:Aikuchi Tomaru wrote:Respecs in Dust are not necessary. ...stuff so, why did vehicles need a respec? if you agreed with the vehicle respec then you automatically agreed for an infantry respec. if, you don't, then all the vehicles should have their SP returned to their prexisting categories, and anywhere a category was removed the SP that was their should just be "lost". besides, I highly doubt you actually believe in what your saying. Otherwise, you'd have dropsuit operation to level 5 even though there is no reason too. Vehicles didn't 'demand' a respec - it was mandatory because of what they did with the tree. An infantry respec/refund at this point is optional not 'mandatory' as so many scream that it is. they didnt need to refund SP for vehicles. You accumulate SP endlessly, you potentially can have everything to level 5. so... that was optional too. tankers were crying so hard ccp gave it. Yes they did need to refund the skillpoints because of the fact that they more or less deleted skills and rolled them into a different bunch. They are not deleting infantry skills, or obsoleting them, you are simply getting more dropsuits. I don't think you understand what the word mandatory means and are just ranting with inanities like "they should have taken 4-7m skillpoints away from tanks". This is no longer an intelligent debate it is merely you whining and insinuating that the rest of the player base should have been harmed over a perceived slight, you are refusing to concede any points that don't support your views and are deliberately avoiding answering things that would force you to make any concessions or admit that you might be in any way wrong or making deliberate fallacies.
Pardon my intrusion, but the vehicle tree was reworked, changing vehicles intended roles and play in the field, and the refund was given to allow pilots to choose whether or not they agreed with said changes. They could have easily just refunded the unused so from deleted skills but they chose to allow pilots the choice of returning to the intended roles. I'm sure that most pilots are back in the cockpit, but they had the option to change, it would only be fair to give infantry the same option while denying pilots the ability to choose into these skills except for saving so. They are fundamentally changing the logistics effectiveness, and changing the way assaults push the field. Aside from New choices for those of us who didn't have the option in the intro to choose what we want. |
Reign Omega
BurgezzE.T.F General Tso's Alliance
149
|
Posted - 2014.02.18 03:02:00 -
[217] - Quote
Also with vehicles some things are open, if I skill into HAV, which I have 12 mil into, and they release racial parity tanks...I automatically have access to them with the way skills are now, same with LAV. I don't have to invest more unless they either change the trees again, or release enforcer/prototype tanks. |
Aikuchi Tomaru
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1804
|
Posted - 2014.02.18 03:04:00 -
[218] - Quote
Awry Barux wrote:Aikuchi Tomaru wrote:Awry Barux wrote:Aikuchi Tomaru wrote:Awry Barux wrote:Aikuchi, I take your lack of response to my post (Post #175) to mean that you have no valid counter-argument. Please respond or admit that respecs are justified. I see you haven't answered my question what you're doing with the SP you're getting since the suits were announced. That must mean you ave no valid counter-argument. Please respond or admit that respecs aren't justified. Again, you're not responding my point. I'm saving my SP in case there isn't a respec, but that has nothing to do with whether or not respecs are warranted. Happy? So basically you agree that a respec isn't necessary. Because it doesn't matter if a respec happens or not: You can use the suit you want to use. Uh, no, I most emphatically do not agree that it isn't necessary. I don't have maxed anything on my character, even within a single role, so to me, every point of SP is valuable. I can't just casually save SP and play at maximum efficiency like the veterans. A portion of the SP I spent working towards my current role will have to be outright chalked up as waste. I shouldn't have to take a hit to my character development due to CCP's fundamental suit changes. I spent real money to accelerate my development and that money is wasted if the skills I bought with that booster SP no longer apply to my role.
But here's the point: You respec now but sooner or later you get to the point where you could spec into another suit anyways. So it doesn't really matter. So you could also just wait a little longer to spec into the stuff you need now and instead you have the possibility to use a second suit.
Sign up for Caldari FW and defeat the evil Gallente Overlords!
|
lee corwood
Knights Of Ender Galactic Skyfleet Empire
496
|
Posted - 2014.02.18 03:08:00 -
[219] - Quote
I think a respec should happen for suits. Having suits for all races alone would be enough to warrant one for say a heavy that never wanted to be Amarr, but also the bonuses are definitely changing.
I don't think core should be respec. Skills affect all suits and even if you want to switch up your playstyle, you invested points that you then used so I say that's an investment worth keeping in the past. Sure, I'm not longer going to have my hacking bonus but I used it for what it was worth for several patches now. I don't feel cheated to not have that back.
Weapons I was on the fence about. Now I strongly sit on no weapon respec. Yes, my proto MD hasn't been touched in the last 2 patches. Yes, my proto swarmer is a useless brick but you have to expect with the new changes AND the nerfs/buffs they are still playing with balance and none of them were in their final iterations. You can ***** and moan about the suit bonuses but of all the SP sinks, weapons aren't one of them and most everyone took their past refunds and put it into the FOTM weapon. Just look at the kill feed. Nothing but RR and CR with a splatter of AR.
I don't want to hear about your hard earned SP argument for a weapon refund for your 'bonuses that are changing with the new suits' as I have a total of 5mil sp in ALL weapons on my 15+ mil sp char. I've heard so many people talk down to newbies to just buck down and get up to 1 mil in a month by capping out. If you can dish that out, you can do the same. Future weapons/eq will probably always be in the works. We always will want for more content and we're always going to skill into something we either end up hating or suddenly love the crap out of until the next love comes along. Refunding this section constantly is only hurting the playerbase more and more.
Minmatar Logisis | Heavy lover. Come get some badass Band-Aids from this chick
|
Awry Barux
New Eden Blades Of The Azure Zero-Day
808
|
Posted - 2014.02.18 03:11:00 -
[220] - Quote
Aikuchi Tomaru wrote: But here's the point: You respec now but sooner or later you get to the point where you could spec into another suit anyways. So it doesn't really matter. So you could also just wait a little longer to spec into the stuff you need now and instead you have the possibility to use a second suit.
It DOES matter when this game's major monetization route is items that increase the rate at which you gain SP. I paid good money to wait less, and by making me wait more by changing what skills I need to do what I want to do, CCP is essentially telling me that the money I spent earlier was a waste. Not just that, but that they deliberately made it a waste, by moving the goalposts after I kicked the ball and refusing to allow me to re-do the kick.
I won't quit if there's no respec, but you can be damned sure that I won't be spending another cent on the game. |
|
The Robot Devil
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
1654
|
Posted - 2014.02.18 03:20:00 -
[221] - Quote
Awry Barux wrote:Aikuchi Tomaru wrote:Awry Barux wrote:Aikuchi, I take your lack of response to my post (Post #175) to mean that you have no valid counter-argument. Please respond or admit that respecs are justified. I see you haven't answered my question what you're doing with the SP you're getting since the suits were announced. That must mean you ave no valid counter-argument. Please respond or admit that respecs aren't justified. Again, you're not responding my point. I'm saving my SP in case there isn't a respec, but that has nothing to do with whether or not respecs are warranted. Happy? The Robot Devil wrote:Awry Barux wrote:Aikuchi, I take your lack of response to my post (Post #175) to mean that you have no valid counter-argument. Please respond or admit that respecs are justified. New Eden changes like baby diapers, don't expect to have the exact same tools even six from now. It is not justified just because you can't do what you want in a suit or feel that it is. Things change and so does this game, if you want static gears then this isn't the game for you. It's not a matter of not having the same tools, it's a fundamental role shift for the suit. I picked a role and CCP is planning to rip that role out from under me with a bonus change. A hacking speed bonus and a repair tool bonus are completely different, and it has invalidated the choice I made months ago, before any of these changes were announced or hinted at. Forcing me to stick with a completely different dropsuit than the one I carefully selected is essentially wasting the weeks of SP I poured into said suit, or equivalently, making that amount of SP's worth of boosters disappear from my account. It's one thing to make balance changes, I would happily accept any rebalancing, like a removal of the intrinsic armor repair. It's something else to fundamentally change where the suit fits in the larger game flow- what was once a suit meant for speedy equipment use is now meant to stick behind a heavy with a repair tool. I couldn't care less what the name or race of my suit is, but I picked a specific role, and I don't think it's unreasonable to ask that I should still be able to play that role in 1.8. CCP's failure to finalize roles is theirs to bear, not mine to suffer through.
I agree that they change things and that those changes sometimes go against what your vision of how the suit is/was. You are correct that you that is sucks we do have to suffer through it. My point is that is should be expected, we cannot plan how CCP is going to change the game but the point still stands that there has been and there probably still is time to save SP. I don't agree with refunds but for this one patch/update/release in which all suits are being reworked and the rest of the suits are being added then I will support it but for one suit or small section that is rebalanced or the bonus is changed then I don't agree. We agree for the most part on what needs to be done.
"You people voted for Hubert Humphrey, and you killed Jesus."
Raoul Duke
|
silvergap Shen
Die Valkyrja Renegade Alliance
1
|
Posted - 2014.02.18 03:21:00 -
[222] - Quote
i agree to respec the dropsuit SP .
most of dropsuits are not usrfuln+îespecially assault dropsuitn+êstill in 1.8 discussionn+ë.
s+ósà¦S¦ïµPün+îFç¦S¦Äµùás+ópÇé
|
The Robot Devil
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
1654
|
Posted - 2014.02.18 03:27:00 -
[223] - Quote
Awry Barux wrote:Aikuchi Tomaru wrote: But here's the point: You respec now but sooner or later you get to the point where you could spec into another suit anyways. So it doesn't really matter. So you could also just wait a little longer to spec into the stuff you need now and instead you have the possibility to use a second suit.
It DOES matter when this game's major monetization route is items that increase the rate at which you gain SP. I paid good money to wait less, and by making me wait more by changing what skills I need to do what I want to do, CCP is essentially telling me that the money I spent earlier was a waste. Not just that, but that they deliberately made it a waste, by moving the goalposts after I kicked the ball and refusing to allow me to re-do the kick. I won't quit if there's no respec, but you can be damned sure that I won't be spending another cent on the game.
The booster part of the equation is where CCP stepped in it. You are correct and I empathize with you and if it weren't for that then I would take a more firm stance but you did pay money "to get there faster" like the War Barge lady says and therefore I am more apt to side with you. However, it is only for a total change like we think is going to happen, in any other situation I would tell you to suck it up.
"You people voted for Hubert Humphrey, and you killed Jesus."
Raoul Duke
|
Awry Barux
New Eden Blades Of The Azure Zero-Day
811
|
Posted - 2014.02.18 03:38:00 -
[224] - Quote
The Robot Devil wrote:Awry Barux wrote:Aikuchi Tomaru wrote: But here's the point: You respec now but sooner or later you get to the point where you could spec into another suit anyways. So it doesn't really matter. So you could also just wait a little longer to spec into the stuff you need now and instead you have the possibility to use a second suit.
It DOES matter when this game's major monetization route is items that increase the rate at which you gain SP. I paid good money to wait less, and by making me wait more by changing what skills I need to do what I want to do, CCP is essentially telling me that the money I spent earlier was a waste. Not just that, but that they deliberately made it a waste, by moving the goalposts after I kicked the ball and refusing to allow me to re-do the kick. I won't quit if there's no respec, but you can be damned sure that I won't be spending another cent on the game. The booster part of the equation is where CCP stepped in it. You are correct and I empathize with you and if it weren't for that then I would take a more firm stance but you did pay money "to get there faster" like the War Barge lady says and therefore I am more apt to side with you. However, it is only for a total change like we think is going to happen, in any other situation I would tell you to suck it up.
*nod* and I'd be fine with sucking it up if it was something other than a complete overhaul of dropsuit roles. I think we've reached an agreement.
I think I've made my points sufficiently well, all there is to do now is play and save SP and see what CCP's next move is.
|
Brian LaFleur
RETR0 PR0 GAMERS INTERGALACTIC WARPIGS
4
|
Posted - 2014.02.18 04:11:00 -
[225] - Quote
DUST Fiend wrote:It's a video game, let people use their SP how they want in relation to all these new changes
I for one will just collect passive for a good long while if they deny us a full infantry respec.
Tons of nice games already out and soon to be out.
Planetside 2, Destiny, I'm already playing Blacklight: Retribution & Warframe. I've put a LOT of money into Dust, but if giving us a full respec is a problem, !@(& CCP. I have a ps4. |
DUST Fiend
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
11046
|
Posted - 2014.02.18 04:16:00 -
[226] - Quote
Brian LaFleur wrote:DUST Fiend wrote:It's a video game, let people use their SP how they want in relation to all these new changes
I for one will just collect passive for a good long while if they deny us a full infantry respec.
Tons of nice games already out and soon to be out. Planetside 2, Destiny, I'm already playing Blacklight: Retribution & Warframe. I've put a LOT of money into Dust, but if giving us a full respec is a problem, !@(& CCP. I have a ps4. I've only put in a little over $100, which is still a lot for a free game. If I had money that could be wasted I would have spent much more.
I for one am looking at ESO right now since my brother said he'll buy me a years time. I have no problem setting this down for a good long while, though I would definitely suggest different games to people, and explain to them why paying for DUST is a trap by design.
Videos / Fiction
Closed Beta Vet; Incubus Pilot
|
lee corwood
Knights Of Ender Galactic Skyfleet Empire
498
|
Posted - 2014.02.18 04:29:00 -
[227] - Quote
DUST Fiend wrote:Brian LaFleur wrote:DUST Fiend wrote:It's a video game, let people use their SP how they want in relation to all these new changes
I for one will just collect passive for a good long while if they deny us a full infantry respec.
Tons of nice games already out and soon to be out. Planetside 2, Destiny, I'm already playing Blacklight: Retribution & Warframe. I've put a LOT of money into Dust, but if giving us a full respec is a problem, !@(& CCP. I have a ps4. I've only put in a little over $100, which is still a lot for a free game. If I had money that could be wasted I would have spent much more. I for one am looking at ESO right now since my brother said he'll buy me a years time. I have no problem setting this down for a good long while, though I would definitely suggest different games to people, and explain to them why paying for DUST is a trap by design.
If we get a respec, I'm setting this game down for a good long while. Since 1.7 dropped, I've just run silly suits and honestly hung in there for my corp. They are a great bunch of folks, but this topsy turvy game flip flopping changes every.single.fuking patch is getting too much to bear. I've been here about a year now...maybe longer, I honestly don't know how to tell, but since then all my local friends have left and I refuse to recruit a new player into this hot mess.
Waiting for Destiny so hard.
Minmatar Logisis | Heavy lover. Come get some badass Band-Aids from this chick
|
Brian LaFleur
RETR0 PR0 GAMERS INTERGALACTIC WARPIGS
4
|
Posted - 2014.02.18 04:30:00 -
[228] - Quote
DUST Fiend wrote:Brian LaFleur wrote:DUST Fiend wrote:It's a video game, let people use their SP how they want in relation to all these new changes
I for one will just collect passive for a good long while if they deny us a full infantry respec.
Tons of nice games already out and soon to be out. Planetside 2, Destiny, I'm already playing Blacklight: Retribution & Warframe. I've put a LOT of money into Dust, but if giving us a full respec is a problem, !@(& CCP. I have a ps4. I've only put in a little over $100, which is still a lot for a free game. If I had money that could be wasted I would have spent much more. I for one am looking at ESO right now since my brother said he'll buy me a years time. I have no problem setting this down for a good long while, though I would definitely suggest different games to people, and explain to them why paying for DUST is a trap by design.
Bro, ESO is a given! I'm with ya! add me on psn, I'll accept when I get on in the morning. |
Awry Barux
New Eden Blades Of The Azure Zero-Day
818
|
Posted - 2014.02.18 04:33:00 -
[229] - Quote
lee corwood wrote:DUST Fiend wrote:Brian LaFleur wrote:DUST Fiend wrote:It's a video game, let people use their SP how they want in relation to all these new changes
I for one will just collect passive for a good long while if they deny us a full infantry respec.
Tons of nice games already out and soon to be out. Planetside 2, Destiny, I'm already playing Blacklight: Retribution & Warframe. I've put a LOT of money into Dust, but if giving us a full respec is a problem, !@(& CCP. I have a ps4. I've only put in a little over $100, which is still a lot for a free game. If I had money that could be wasted I would have spent much more. I for one am looking at ESO right now since my brother said he'll buy me a years time. I have no problem setting this down for a good long while, though I would definitely suggest different games to people, and explain to them why paying for DUST is a trap by design. If we get a respec, I'm setting this game down for a good long while. Since 1.7 dropped, I've just run silly suits and honestly hung in there for my corp. They are a great bunch of folks, but this topsy turvy game flip flopping changes every.single.fuking patch is getting too much to bear. I've been here about a year now...maybe longer, I honestly don't know how to tell, but since then all my local friends have left and I refuse to recruit a new player into this hot mess. Waiting for Destiny so hard.
I'm confused- why would a respec make you leave? IMO it's the best possible thing CCP can do to mitigate the pain of the Dust's constant state of flux. |
DUST Fiend
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
11050
|
Posted - 2014.02.18 04:33:00 -
[230] - Quote
lee corwood wrote:DUST Fiend wrote:Brian LaFleur wrote:DUST Fiend wrote:It's a video game, let people use their SP how they want in relation to all these new changes
I for one will just collect passive for a good long while if they deny us a full infantry respec.
Tons of nice games already out and soon to be out. Planetside 2, Destiny, I'm already playing Blacklight: Retribution & Warframe. I've put a LOT of money into Dust, but if giving us a full respec is a problem, !@(& CCP. I have a ps4. I've only put in a little over $100, which is still a lot for a free game. If I had money that could be wasted I would have spent much more. I for one am looking at ESO right now since my brother said he'll buy me a years time. I have no problem setting this down for a good long while, though I would definitely suggest different games to people, and explain to them why paying for DUST is a trap by design. If we get a respec, I'm setting this game down for a good long while. Since 1.7 dropped, I've just run silly suits and honestly hung in there for my corp. They are a great bunch of folks, but this topsy turvy game flip flopping changes every.single.fuking patch is getting too much to bear. I've been here about a year now...maybe longer, I honestly don't know how to tell, but since then all my local friends have left and I refuse to recruit a new player into this hot mess. Waiting for Destiny so hard. Well, congrats on being the first person I've seen who would stop playing with a Respec. It's good to be unique.
I barely even play since 1.7, this game is just a total mess right now lol. Honestly I'm kind of with the anti respec crowd, I need the extra motivation to set this game down for a good long while.
Videos / Fiction
Closed Beta Vet; Incubus Pilot
|
|
Brian LaFleur
RETR0 PR0 GAMERS INTERGALACTIC WARPIGS
4
|
Posted - 2014.02.18 04:34:00 -
[231] - Quote
lee corwood wrote:DUST Fiend wrote:Brian LaFleur wrote:DUST Fiend wrote:It's a video game, let people use their SP how they want in relation to all these new changes
I for one will just collect passive for a good long while if they deny us a full infantry respec.
Tons of nice games already out and soon to be out. Planetside 2, Destiny, I'm already playing Blacklight: Retribution & Warframe. I've put a LOT of money into Dust, but if giving us a full respec is a problem, !@(& CCP. I have a ps4. I've only put in a little over $100, which is still a lot for a free game. If I had money that could be wasted I would have spent much more. I for one am looking at ESO right now since my brother said he'll buy me a years time. I have no problem setting this down for a good long while, though I would definitely suggest different games to people, and explain to them why paying for DUST is a trap by design. If we get a respec, I'm setting this game down for a good long while. Since 1.7 dropped, I've just run silly suits and honestly hung in there for my corp. They are a great bunch of folks, but this topsy turvy game flip flopping changes every.single.fuking patch is getting too much to bear. I've been here about a year now...maybe longer, I honestly don't know how to tell, but since then all my local friends have left and I refuse to recruit a new player into this hot mess. Waiting for Destiny so hard.
You're on ps4? Add me.
|
Rasatsu
Much Crying Old Experts
1063
|
Posted - 2014.02.18 04:38:00 -
[232] - Quote
I also want to destroy DUST 514, so go ahead with the respec. |
lee corwood
Knights Of Ender Galactic Skyfleet Empire
498
|
Posted - 2014.02.18 04:40:00 -
[233] - Quote
Awry Barux wrote: I'm confused- why would a respec make you leave? IMO it's the best possible thing CCP can do to mitigate the pain of the Dust's constant state of flux.
The call for a discussion for a respec, whether warranted or not, by CCP only puts in my mind how out of sync the game is to where they expect it to be. Since I started playing this game, I've lived through I -believe- 2 respecs. This would be the 3rd though it feels like more than that. (The full respec from beta, the vehicle one, and I feel like there was one more in the middle but I could be wrong)
Either way, at this point, I don't feel like CCP has their sh*t together at all and with all their black box of 'our hands are tied and we just can't tell you the direction we *think* we're going', I think only gives them further liberty to not have to admit that their roadmap is no where in the works. I feel like its a game of guessing instead of actual calculated progression into a real vision of something. I'd rather get the respec and sit on it then spend the sp to yet again have it given back to me for another glaring overhaul. I'll just wait a few years and see if anything meaningful between dust and eve exists yet.
Minmatar Logisis | Heavy lover. Come get some badass Band-Aids from this chick
|
DUST Fiend
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
11052
|
Posted - 2014.02.18 04:41:00 -
[234] - Quote
Rasatsu wrote:I also want to destroy DUST 514, so go ahead with the respec. Respecs don't destroy DUST
Broken game modes and perma locked ISK fountains destroy DUST
Get with the times bro
Videos / Fiction
Closed Beta Vet; Incubus Pilot
|
Brian LaFleur
RETR0 PR0 GAMERS INTERGALACTIC WARPIGS
6
|
Posted - 2014.02.18 04:43:00 -
[235] - Quote
lee corwood wrote:Awry Barux wrote: I'm confused- why would a respec make you leave? IMO it's the best possible thing CCP can do to mitigate the pain of the Dust's constant state of flux.
The call for a discussion for a respec, whether warranted or not, by CCP only puts in my mind how out of sync the game is to where they expect it to be. Since I started playing this game, I've lived through I -believe- 2 respecs. This would be the 3rd though it feels like more than that. (The full respec from beta, the vehicle one, and I feel like there was one more in the middle but I could be wrong) Either way, at this point, I don't feel like CCP has their sh*t together at all and with all their black box of 'our hands are tied and we just can't tell you the direction we *think* we're going', I think only gives them further liberty to not have to admit that their roadmap is no where in the works. I feel like its a game of guessing instead of actual calculated progression into a real vision of something. I'd rather get the respec and sit on it then spend the sp to yet again have it given back to me for another glaring overhaul. I'll just wait a few years and see if anything meaningful between dust and eve exists yet.
Ya know, I'm ok with them not having a road map. EVE was the same way, in some ways still is, but it's a good game now. It doesn't bother me when they unexpectedly change directions. It bothers me when they do and I don't have the chance to change my heading. |
lee corwood
Knights Of Ender Galactic Skyfleet Empire
502
|
Posted - 2014.02.18 04:52:00 -
[236] - Quote
Brian LaFleur wrote: Ya know, I'm ok with them not having a road map. EVE was the same way, in some ways still is, but it's a good game now. It doesn't bother me when they unexpectedly change directions. It bothers me when they do and I don't have the chance to change my heading.
I wholeheartedly agree with that sentiment.
Minmatar Logisis | Heavy lover. Come get some badass Band-Aids from this chick
|
The Robot Devil
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
1655
|
Posted - 2014.02.18 05:05:00 -
[237] - Quote
DUST Fiend wrote:Brian LaFleur wrote:DUST Fiend wrote:It's a video game, let people use their SP how they want in relation to all these new changes
I for one will just collect passive for a good long while if they deny us a full infantry respec.
Tons of nice games already out and soon to be out. Planetside 2, Destiny, I'm already playing Blacklight: Retribution & Warframe. I've put a LOT of money into Dust, but if giving us a full respec is a problem, !@(& CCP. I have a ps4. I've only put in a little over $100, which is still a lot for a free game. If I had money that could be wasted I would have spent much more. I for one am looking at ESO right now since my brother said he'll buy me a years time. I have no problem setting this down for a good long while, though I would definitely suggest different games to people, and explain to them why paying for DUST is a trap by design.
It is a trap by design, much like the lottery. I have enjoyed the money I have spent on DUST. If nothing else this crazy ass forum is worth the money spent.
"You people voted for Hubert Humphrey, and you killed Jesus."
Raoul Duke
|
Darken-Soul
BIG BAD W0LVES
816
|
Posted - 2014.02.18 05:07:00 -
[238] - Quote
I waste a lot of time trying to see where CCP is coming from. The only thing I come up with is they have no clue. They blindly stumble thru the development of this game. They get taken advantage of by clients who know how to manipulate them. I lose my temper almost everytime I hear any of their plans for the future. I made some awesome friends in New Eden, the real reason I still play. When they get screwed and leave I couldn't think of a reason to stay. Its just a matter of time. I have stopped spending money. I feel no attatchment to my assets or isk. They really dropped the ball.
Who wants some?
|
Brian LaFleur
RETR0 PR0 GAMERS INTERGALACTIC WARPIGS
7
|
Posted - 2014.02.18 05:09:00 -
[239] - Quote
The Robot Devil wrote:DUST Fiend wrote:Brian LaFleur wrote:DUST Fiend wrote:It's a video game, let people use their SP how they want in relation to all these new changes
I for one will just collect passive for a good long while if they deny us a full infantry respec.
Tons of nice games already out and soon to be out. Planetside 2, Destiny, I'm already playing Blacklight: Retribution & Warframe. I've put a LOT of money into Dust, but if giving us a full respec is a problem, !@(& CCP. I have a ps4. I've only put in a little over $100, which is still a lot for a free game. If I had money that could be wasted I would have spent much more. I for one am looking at ESO right now since my brother said he'll buy me a years time. I have no problem setting this down for a good long while, though I would definitely suggest different games to people, and explain to them why paying for DUST is a trap by design. It is a trap by design, much like the lottery. I have enjoyed the money I have spent on DUST. If nothing else this crazy ass forum is worth the money spent.
And to be fair, THAT, above all other reasons, is why I keep playing Dust: the community. There are some real D-Bags that play Dust. Some of them I call friend (cough} Devin Xer). But, for whatever reason, (musical notes) They Keep Me Hanging On. |
Gawen Eadan
Altyr Initiative
30
|
Posted - 2014.02.18 06:27:00 -
[240] - Quote
My argument would be not if just the majority of the player base wanted it, but if the CPM agreed with the player base.
No matter how many reasons we come up with, for why there should be a respec (although many arguments in this thread are valid in themselves with little need for explanation, yet are also explained) we elected a CPM to be our voice of reason, no matter how delirious or drunk we got, it was a democratic decision, that we elected mayors that would stand beside the people, with an authority, and say "yes, or "no", to our developers, who you could say are like the president and his secretaries in this scenario.
Sure a president and the secretaries could say "no", even thought his people and their representatives say "yes", but isn't that the french revolution in a nutshell? Don't get me wrong "viva la revolution!" but, we elected to have a CPM to avoid this issue instead of having a "monarchy" that completely looses support of the majority of people, which proceeds to crumble and fall apart? Sure, we can't go cut off the CEO's head, but we can sure as hell ditch the game, and if you lose 51% of a player base, or more, you're not going to be able to sustain this game and its f2p+transaction method.
So cast your vote, contact your CPM of choice with your opinion (not just " 'cause I want it! " but include a short valid argument why) and let democracy work as design intended. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |