DUST Search - Scout Registry / Killboard

Brokerib wrote:

Xx-VxF-xX wrote:

Adipem Nothi wrote:

Xx-VxF-xX wrote:

Matticus Monk wrote:

Scouts are doomed.... because CCP didn't buff us as requested. They overdid it... as we cautioned against. Now, we pay for their mistakes.... as we always do.

Situation normal: all ****** up.

didn't buff us as requested? most scouts demanded we got everything we got and still wanted more. not many wanted to give up anything. even the scouts saying before 1.8 that gallente would be the OP go to suit the scout community still argued they wanted more more more. To tell you the truth I only remember quill and I of the few willing to sacrifice anything for the buffs we was going to recieve. again as i said before then I have always ran gallente since open beta and even if I don't agree what happens to the other scouts ill welcome what ever the gallente gets good or bad because even the bad wont make it as bad as the rest of the suits.

No way, Bro!

What we asked was that (1) Scouts not have to give up squad-oriented equipment to carry cloak (2) Scouts not have to give up a primary or secondary weapon for cloak and (3) Scouts not have to give up our grenade slot for cloak.

But in the end, it wasn't cloak that made us OP. It was eHP.

We aren't OP by comparison to Heavies, Logi or Pilot. We are OP -- specifically when HP tanked -- by comparison to Assault. Which is why the FoTM and "Slayers" came running with their bricks. If CCP had given us better Assaults, there would've no FoTM / Slayer migration, far fewer HP-oriented Scouts, and far fewer complaints about Scouts.

you are right. scout said they would give up nothing for the cloak. said they would rather not have the cloak then give up anything. where are all those give up the cloak to keep what I want now that all they want to do is remove the dampening of the cloak? LOL
Scouts did not ask for lower base dampening/precision, longer base range, more cpu/pg, 2 equipment before cloaks was even a option, more slots before cloak was an option. I imagined that for the many many months of scout update being pushed back farther and farther. I am so sorry that we have become the EZ-Mode we used to claim anyone that did not run scout was. How we ran scout to not be EZ-Mode. Now we have everything we asked for and don't want to give up nothing still. We are the EZ-MODE we all complained about. Yes the gallente is the biggest EZ-Mode scout and still many fighting to not give up anything on it.

I think the reason for pushing to maintain the Gal isn't about maintaining easy mode. It's because the things that are broken aren't the scout. Fix the de-cloaking issue, and change how armor modules work. Then look at the Gal.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 178 post(s)
Spademan The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY 1709	Posted - 2014.05.22 23:37:00 - [14401] - Quote So losing the damp bonus is that bad, eh? I am part shovel, part man, full scout, and a little bit special. Official Time Lord of the Scout Community
Matticus Monk Ordus Trismegistus 1891	Posted - 2014.05.22 23:47:00 - [14402] - Quote Spademan wrote: So losing the damp bonus is that bad, eh? Not for the Gallente.... which kind of is taking things in the wrong direction given they are already the go-to scout suit for scout or light assault work. The Gallente feedback thread is pretty interesting, and given the constraints CCP has imposed (change one value?!?) Yeah, those kinds of limitiations and short signtedness will hose us all in the end. Double posting like a Kaiser.
Spademan The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY 1712	Posted - 2014.05.23 00:01:00 - [14403] - Quote Matticus Monk wrote: Spademan wrote: So losing the damp bonus is that bad, eh? Not for the Gallente.... which kind of is taking things in the wrong direction given they are already the go-to scout suit for scout or light assault work. The Gallente feedback thread is pretty interesting, and given the constraints CCP has imposed (change one value?!?) those kinds of limitiations and short signtedness will hose us all in the end. Shame, I'm probably not the best person to weigh in on cloaks, but what if the dampening bonus was a hard number? I don't really know what or who that'd help, just a thought. I am part shovel, part man, full scout, and a little bit special. Official Time Lord of the Scout Community
Adipem Nothi Nos Nothi 929	Posted - 2014.05.23 02:06:00 - [14404] - Quote Spademan wrote: So losing the damp bonus is that bad, eh? Good and Bad. Tough call. The Good GalScouts will be motivated to Dampen rather than Brick. Choose Slayer or Ghost; no more Slayer Ghost. If Slayer GalScouts are inferior to Assaults, then the FoTM chasers will migrate to Assaults. The Bad Cal Scouts and Min Scouts will have a hard time hiding; Amarr and Gallente have sufficient lows to duck radar. The CalScouts who sacrifice Shields for Enhancers will become better Scout Hunters. GalLogis will expose Scouts with minimal effort and sacrifice. Shoot scout with yes... - Ripley Riley
Xx-VxF-xX Void of Faction 54	Posted - 2014.05.23 02:17:00 - [14405] - Quote Matticus Monk wrote: Scouts are doomed.... because CCP didn't buff us as requested. They overdid it... as we cautioned against. Now, we pay for their mistakes.... as we always do. Situation normal: all ****** up. didn't buff us as requested? most scouts demanded we got everything we got and still wanted more. not many wanted to give up anything. even the scouts saying before 1.8 that gallente would be the OP go to suit the scout community still argued they wanted more more more. To tell you the truth I only remember quill and I of the few willing to sacrifice anything for the buffs we was going to recieve. again as i said before then I have always ran gallente since open beta and even if I don't agree what happens to the other scouts ill welcome what ever the gallente gets good or bad because even the bad wont make it as bad as the rest of the suits.
Appia Vibbia Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance 2547	Posted - 2014.05.23 02:26:00 - [14406] - Quote I like how Void Faction has more revisionist history than Glen Beck Appia Vibbia for CPM1 AppiaVibbia(at)gmail(dot)com AKA Nappia, AKA Mathppia
Xx-VxF-xX Void of Faction 56	Posted - 2014.05.23 02:28:00 - [14407] - Quote I would be ok with being nerfed to 1 equipment slot 1 light weapon slot (even if it is AR only before they buff it back up) replaced racial dampening bonus only so the other scouts can keep the dampening bonus of cloak. why because I know how powerful tac-net is and how OP gallente scout is.
Xx-VxF-xX Void of Faction 56	Posted - 2014.05.23 02:30:00 - [14408] - Quote Appia Vibbia wrote: I like how Void Faction has more revisionist history than Glen Beck I like how you have always defended you brink tank scout ;-) Your not part of the solution you are part of the problem.
Matticus Monk Ordus Trismegistus 1895	Posted - 2014.05.23 02:35:00 - [14409] - Quote Xx-VxF-xX wrote: Matticus Monk wrote: Scouts are doomed.... because CCP didn't buff us as requested. They overdid it... as we cautioned against. Now, we pay for their mistakes.... as we always do. Situation normal: all ****** up. didn't buff us as requested? most scouts demanded we got everything we got and still wanted more. not many wanted to give up anything. even the scouts saying before 1.8 that gallente would be the OP go to suit the scout community still argued they wanted more more more. To tell you the truth I only remember quill and I of the few willing to sacrifice anything for the buffs we was going to recieve. again as i said before then I have always ran gallente since open beta and even if I don't agree what happens to the other scouts ill welcome what ever the gallente gets good or bad because even the bad wont make it as bad as the rest of the suits. Yep. I don't recall most of us asking for the below during the pre 1.8 builds, which was the the combination received: Cloak (including super dampening bonus) + (extra PG/CPU) + (extra slots) + reduced profile dampening + increased scan range + reduced scan precision + extra EQ slot. What I remember is that there was a subset of the above that most scouts felt would be reasonable and balanced. And some of us wanted far, far less. It's true that once the intended buffs came out (and I don't remember them mentioning precision/scan profile at that time even) there was backlash when there was talk of removing the sidearm slot, but in terms of the months and months of feedback we gave CCP, and discussed here and in many threads, not once did I see anyone think it would take all of the items in the set we see above to put us right. Double posting like a Kaiser.
Ghost Kaisar The Last of DusT. General Tso's Alliance 4854	Posted - 2014.05.23 02:56:00 - [14410] - Quote Watch this Destiny Video, it has everything we know so far I am so hyped for this. Time to make myself into a LEGEND Headed to Destiny, to Hell with CCP PSN: EVL_Elgost105 RIP Dust514 05/02/14 GG CCP

Ghost Kaisar The Last of DusT. General Tso's Alliance 4854	Posted - 2014.05.23 02:58:00 - [14411] - Quote mollerz wrote: Like your sig Ghost! I made it right after that happened. Decided to keep it even after I started playing again Headed to Destiny, to Hell with CCP PSN: EVL_Elgost105 RIP Dust514 05/02/14 GG CCP
One Eyed King Land of the BIind 1626	Posted - 2014.05.23 02:58:00 - [14412] - Quote I just read that whole thread. My head hurts. And now I am going to suck again because I will still be minja, still run knives, and now I will show up on everyone's tacnet since passive scan sharing (another game mechanic much of us have asked to be rid of). I have a general question regarding balance, and would like some thoughts. Generally speaking, there is supposed to be a yin and yang thing going on for balance, like how plates reduce speed (even if they still offer too much hp for what they penalize with cost and speed reduction). What if scanning were the same? Increases in precision with mods meant decreases in profile. Decreases in profile with mods means higher scanning precision. I maxed out on mental CPU after that thought hit me, and could barely put it into a coherent statement (and possibly failed to do so) after reading 11 pages of argument, so I really wasn't able to process what that might do, if anything, to ewar balance. "I've made a huge mistake." -G.O.B. Bluth
Xx-VxF-xX Void of Faction 56	Posted - 2014.05.23 03:16:00 - [14413] - Quote One Eyed King wrote: I just read that whole thread. My head hurts. And now I am going to suck again because I will still be minja, still run knives, and now I will show up on everyone's tacnet since passive scan sharing (another game mechanic much of us have asked to be rid of). I have a general question regarding balance, and would like some thoughts. Generally speaking, there is supposed to be a yin and yang thing going on for balance, like how plates reduce speed (even if they still offer too much hp for what they penalize with cost and speed reduction). What if scanning were the same? Increases in precision with mods meant decreases in profile. Decreases in profile with mods means higher scanning precision. I maxed out on mental CPU after that thought hit me, and could barely put it into a coherent statement (and possibly failed to do so) after reading 11 pages of argument, so I really wasn't able to process what that might do, if anything, to ewar balance. isn't that the reason for the opposite slot layout of cal and gal? and one being high slot other being low? leaving the minmatar to be the most balanced in the 2 should one choose.
Xx-VxF-xX Void of Faction 56	Posted - 2014.05.23 03:37:00 - [14414] - Quote sorry all, nerve pain meds making me more chatty but does not improve my illiteracy (don't do drugs kids they really do mess you up for life) and greatly affecting my bipolar. sorry Appia I really do respect your opinions even the ones I don't agree with. Only ask you do the same.
Adipem Nothi Nos Nothi 932	Posted - 2014.05.23 04:14:00 - [14415] - Quote Xx-VxF-xX wrote: Matticus Monk wrote: Scouts are doomed.... because CCP didn't buff us as requested. They overdid it... as we cautioned against. Now, we pay for their mistakes.... as we always do. Situation normal: all ****** up. didn't buff us as requested? most scouts demanded we got everything we got and still wanted more. not many wanted to give up anything. even the scouts saying before 1.8 that gallente would be the OP go to suit the scout community still argued they wanted more more more. To tell you the truth I only remember quill and I of the few willing to sacrifice anything for the buffs we was going to recieve. again as i said before then I have always ran gallente since open beta and even if I don't agree what happens to the other scouts ill welcome what ever the gallente gets good or bad because even the bad wont make it as bad as the rest of the suits. No way, Bro! No one asked for the added Dampening Bonus to cloak, GalScout Armor Regen, Minmatar Stam Regen. Those all came as surprises. What we asked was that (1) we not have to give up role-based equipment to carry cloak (2) we not have to give up a primary or secondary weapon for cloak and (3) we not have to give up our grenade slot for cloak. But in the end, it wasn't cloak that made us OP. We aren't OP by comparison to Heavies, Logi or Pilot. We are OP -- when HP tanked -- by comparison to Assault, so the FoTM "slayers" came running with their bricks. If CCP had given us better Assaults, there would've no FoTM migration, and far fewer complaints about Scouts. Shoot scout with yes... - Ripley Riley
icdedppul PFB Pink Fluffy Bunnies 138	Posted - 2014.05.23 04:53:00 - [14416] - Quote actually I believe what we asked for was fix the scout before you add the cloak. then it was dont nerf us by making us need to use the cloak and now we have this which as we all know comes down to TacNet is OP and now we have the situation where non Gals need the cloak to temporarily avoid the OP TacNet so the real question... how do we balance TacNet and scout racial bonuses to it. I would go post in 1 of the other threads but i dont have a good answer for that
Xx-VxF-xX Void of Faction 57	Posted - 2014.05.23 05:13:00 - [14417] - Quote Adipem Nothi wrote: Xx-VxF-xX wrote: Matticus Monk wrote: Scouts are doomed.... because CCP didn't buff us as requested. They overdid it... as we cautioned against. Now, we pay for their mistakes.... as we always do. Situation normal: all ****** up. didn't buff us as requested? most scouts demanded we got everything we got and still wanted more. not many wanted to give up anything. even the scouts saying before 1.8 that gallente would be the OP go to suit the scout community still argued they wanted more more more. To tell you the truth I only remember quill and I of the few willing to sacrifice anything for the buffs we was going to recieve. again as i said before then I have always ran gallente since open beta and even if I don't agree what happens to the other scouts ill welcome what ever the gallente gets good or bad because even the bad wont make it as bad as the rest of the suits. No way, Bro! What we asked was that (1) Scouts not have to give up squad-oriented equipment to carry cloak (2) Scouts not have to give up a primary or secondary weapon for cloak and (3) Scouts not have to give up our grenade slot for cloak. But in the end, it wasn't cloak that made us OP. It was eHP. We aren't OP by comparison to Heavies, Logi or Pilot. We are OP -- specifically when HP tanked -- by comparison to Assault. Which is why the FoTM and "Slayers" came running with their bricks. If CCP had given us better Assaults, there would've no FoTM / Slayer migration, far fewer HP-oriented Scouts, and far fewer complaints about Scouts. you are right. scout said they would give up nothing for the cloak. said they would rather not have the cloak then give up anything. Scouts did not ask for lower base dampening/precision, longer base range, more cpu/pg, 2 equipment before cloaks was even a option, more slots before cloak was an option. I imagined that for the many many months of scout update being pushed back farther and farther. I am so sorry that we have become the EZ-Mode we used to claim anyone that did not run scout was. How we ran scout to not be EZ-Mode. Now we have everything we asked for and don't want to give up nothing still. We are the EZ-MODE we all complained about. Yes the gallente is the biggest EZ-Mode scout and still many fighting to not give up anything on it.
Brokerib Lone Wolves Club 1179	Posted - 2014.05.23 05:33:00 - [14418] - Quote Xx-VxF-xX wrote: Adipem Nothi wrote: Xx-VxF-xX wrote: Matticus Monk wrote: Scouts are doomed.... because CCP didn't buff us as requested. They overdid it... as we cautioned against. Now, we pay for their mistakes.... as we always do. Situation normal: all ****** up. didn't buff us as requested? most scouts demanded we got everything we got and still wanted more. not many wanted to give up anything. even the scouts saying before 1.8 that gallente would be the OP go to suit the scout community still argued they wanted more more more. To tell you the truth I only remember quill and I of the few willing to sacrifice anything for the buffs we was going to recieve. again as i said before then I have always ran gallente since open beta and even if I don't agree what happens to the other scouts ill welcome what ever the gallente gets good or bad because even the bad wont make it as bad as the rest of the suits. No way, Bro! What we asked was that (1) Scouts not have to give up squad-oriented equipment to carry cloak (2) Scouts not have to give up a primary or secondary weapon for cloak and (3) Scouts not have to give up our grenade slot for cloak. But in the end, it wasn't cloak that made us OP. It was eHP. We aren't OP by comparison to Heavies, Logi or Pilot. We are OP -- specifically when HP tanked -- by comparison to Assault. Which is why the FoTM and "Slayers" came running with their bricks. If CCP had given us better Assaults, there would've no FoTM / Slayer migration, far fewer HP-oriented Scouts, and far fewer complaints about Scouts. you are right. scout said they would give up nothing for the cloak. said they would rather not have the cloak then give up anything. where are all those give up the cloak to keep what I want now that all they want to do is remove the dampening of the cloak? LOL Scouts did not ask for lower base dampening/precision, longer base range, more cpu/pg, 2 equipment before cloaks was even a option, more slots before cloak was an option. I imagined that for the many many months of scout update being pushed back farther and farther. I am so sorry that we have become the EZ-Mode we used to claim anyone that did not run scout was. How we ran scout to not be EZ-Mode. Now we have everything we asked for and don't want to give up nothing still. We are the EZ-MODE we all complained about. Yes the gallente is the biggest EZ-Mode scout and still many fighting to not give up anything on it. I think the reason for pushing to maintain the Gal isn't about maintaining easy mode. It's because the things that are broken aren't the scout. Fix the de-cloaking issue, and change how armor modules work. Then look at the Gal. Knowledge is power
Xx-VxF-xX Void of Faction 58	Posted - 2014.05.23 06:11:00 - [14419] - Quote Brokerib wrote: Xx-VxF-xX wrote: Adipem Nothi wrote: Xx-VxF-xX wrote: Matticus Monk wrote: Scouts are doomed.... because CCP didn't buff us as requested. They overdid it... as we cautioned against. Now, we pay for their mistakes.... as we always do. Situation normal: all ****** up. didn't buff us as requested? most scouts demanded we got everything we got and still wanted more. not many wanted to give up anything. even the scouts saying before 1.8 that gallente would be the OP go to suit the scout community still argued they wanted more more more. To tell you the truth I only remember quill and I of the few willing to sacrifice anything for the buffs we was going to recieve. again as i said before then I have always ran gallente since open beta and even if I don't agree what happens to the other scouts ill welcome what ever the gallente gets good or bad because even the bad wont make it as bad as the rest of the suits. No way, Bro! What we asked was that (1) Scouts not have to give up squad-oriented equipment to carry cloak (2) Scouts not have to give up a primary or secondary weapon for cloak and (3) Scouts not have to give up our grenade slot for cloak. But in the end, it wasn't cloak that made us OP. It was eHP. We aren't OP by comparison to Heavies, Logi or Pilot. We are OP -- specifically when HP tanked -- by comparison to Assault. Which is why the FoTM and "Slayers" came running with their bricks. If CCP had given us better Assaults, there would've no FoTM / Slayer migration, far fewer HP-oriented Scouts, and far fewer complaints about Scouts. you are right. scout said they would give up nothing for the cloak. said they would rather not have the cloak then give up anything. where are all those give up the cloak to keep what I want now that all they want to do is remove the dampening of the cloak? LOL Scouts did not ask for lower base dampening/precision, longer base range, more cpu/pg, 2 equipment before cloaks was even a option, more slots before cloak was an option. I imagined that for the many many months of scout update being pushed back farther and farther. I am so sorry that we have become the EZ-Mode we used to claim anyone that did not run scout was. How we ran scout to not be EZ-Mode. Now we have everything we asked for and don't want to give up nothing still. We are the EZ-MODE we all complained about. Yes the gallente is the biggest EZ-Mode scout and still many fighting to not give up anything on it. I think the reason for pushing to maintain the Gal isn't about maintaining easy mode. It's because the things that are broken aren't the scout. Fix the de-cloaking issue, and change how armor modules work. Then look at the Gal. Agree and hope that fixes a lot. What about the Plasma Rifle buff. That is really going to be OP, lol No I don't think it needs a buff and is my go to rifle and most lvled. . all 5 except prof 4 ammo 4 optimization not needed with gal eWAR scout
mollerz 3548	Posted - 2014.05.23 06:31:00 - [14420] - Quote No offense guys, but wtf. Why fight much less give a rats ass about the direction of this game? CCP ****** us. Hilmar thinks he's the Steve jobs of video games somehow. The programmers they employ are stuck in the 90s. I'd love to see a talented dev come along and do what they tried to do, but correctly. With care. With talent. Basically take CCPs vision from them. They blew it. Don't fight with each other over their incompetence. Your Welcome

Brokerib Lone Wolves Club 1179	Posted - 2014.05.23 06:35:00 - [14421] - Quote mollerz wrote: No offense guys, but wtf. Why fight much less give a rats ass about the direction of this game? CCP ****** us. Hilmar thinks he's the Steve jobs of video games somehow. The programmers they employ are stuck in the 90s. I'd love to see a talented dev come along and do what they tried to do, but correctly. With care. With talent. Basically take CCPs vision from them. They blew it. Don't fight with each other over their incompetence. Arguing is an art form, it pays to stay in practice And while Dust doesn't have the vision it used to, it still fills the hours until the Destiny beta. If I can avoid the game being any more broken through incompetence until then, then all the better. Knowledge is power
Firbolg Barun Dust2Dust. Top Men. 0	Posted - 2014.05.23 06:37:00 - [14422] - Quote Spectral here, my main is banned due to telling players that want scan mods to be nerfed into the ground to go DIAF. I agree with you mollerz. We should just all stop posting. CCP Hilmar and his marketing team ruined everything. Summer is out, go catch some tail, get drunk or something...
Bayeth Mal OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention 377	Posted - 2014.05.23 07:14:00 - [14423] - Quote Welp... I'm happy again, after getting so frustrated last night jumped in with some corp buddies today and ran my Flanker-Wanker fit and felt like I was scouting back in 1.7 again. Gal, RR, UL + Clack (** you all I'm still gonna call it that) All this getting frustrated at each other over buffs and nerfs and unfairness... Time for some old fashioned story telling Playing some Faction Warfare. Match starts. "I'll just leg it to Delta, get stuff hacked while my squad goes in the compound." Proceed to hack Obj, CRU and supply. Switch out fits to replenish my Links when a red blaster maddy rolls past... then it stops. Backs up. Begins rolling around scanner going (sees nothing obviously). "Bugger, he's moving around and will spot me shimmering if I try to leave." See Gal assault come running over from the compound. "huh, probably in squad with tanker who's told him to come take the un-guarded objective... If I straight up shoot him, they'll know I'm here... I do have that supply depot though..." Switch to RE fit. Assault comes in and fluxes like a good boy before going for the hack. I come downstairs and drop an RE behind him. "Lets just pretend you missed one" +50 Blaster HAV is still patrolling around but isn't coming in close enough for a RE trap but is rolling through the open space I'd have to cross to leave. "Oh well, looks like I'll be here a while... View isn't bad." Notice same Gal Assault running back in. This time he goes straight for the hack without fluxing, probably assuming he'd already set off whatever trap was there. "Nope" +50 Surely they know I'm here by now. About 30 seconds later LAV came racing in with a sentinel and logi support. They moved immediately for the CRU. Hacked it quickly while the Blaster Maddy was on over watch. They then moved inside and smartly they decided to move up stairs to clear my Uplink before hacking. Not so smartly they took the path that goes past the objective. +50 +50 Because my timing sucks I tend to lay out 3 REs in a row. Begin CRU counter hack, hack completes as 2 more spawn in and I see a 3rd running in from outside (probably the original assault again). "Ok this is getting silly." Unaware of the CRU one goes for the objective hack while the other heads up stairs. Shoot the first off the hack and chase the other one up and shoot him in the back. At this point I've noticed "SCAN ATTEMPT PREVENTED" is pretty much permanently on the screen. "Huh, I wonder why..." Notice there is now another maddy, with a rail rolling around outside. "oh great" The Gal Assault has rehacked the CRU, as he completes the hack he looks up and finally gets to see me. Before getting railed in the face. But now the Blaster has seen me as well, I jump down and rehack the CRU. No spawns, phew, but now I have 2 tanks outside who know I'm here. The rail has moved up onto a hill taking random shots at the outside roof. "Welp, not gonna get up to the supply depot any time soon" I notice the blaster has been looking at the CRU for a little while now... Pilot gets out like he's gonna go for a quick hack. Caldari sentinel with rifle (of course). A few RR rounds to the face makes him reconsider and he gets back in and toodles on. A small moment of peace before the storm. I don't really remember the details of what happened after that, they must have had an uplink nearby because the logi and sentinel from earlier were back, they hacked the CRU and I gave up even trying to take it back when there were now 4 reds on the tac net surrounding it. I move down by the stairs and line my shot up at the doorway. First to walk in was a minnie medium. +50 The next was a Gal sentinel. +Nope I bounce around a bit shooting at anything that tries to come in the door way, never getting any kills but holding them back. I've taken too much damage, see on tac-net there's a red heading for the doorway behind me and have to retreat up stairs. I run up dropping an RE behind me and move around the corner hoping to set up another trap. Boom! I lose almost all the armour I had left. "what the..." I turn and get a missile to the face, fired from a Python hovering 10 feet from me. "Well " Looking at deployment screen. Tally :1 ADS, 3 HAVs and a load of reds all in and around the building and my uplink is gone... But they haven't even started the hack on Delta. "** it, I'm going in again, hopefully I'll spawn somewhere good." While waiting for spawn, D starts flashing, I spawn in roof top behind the ADS who hasn't moved for some reason, maybe they thought there was two of us? "Score!" I jump the railing and come in the entrance opposite the CRU. Sprint to the hack point... ...and there he is. The Gal assault... on the hack... all alone. Everyone else is on the roof or by the CRU. ... "I'm not even sorry." +50 I start harassing the guys by the CRU but get no kills. Then I see the shimmer of a Cloak coming down the stairs to my left. BAM, I bounce, 1st shot misses "Ugh, using the invisible shotgun exploit, what a scrub." BAM 2nd hits. "Huh... so that's what an Amarr scout looks like" BAM. Dead "You know what, that's fair enough actually, fair trade" Re-spawn on the still unhacked Delta but score 0 kills before getting nailed by the cloaked amarr shotty again. "Squad-lead... SIGH.... I'm giving up on delta now." The rest of the match I encountered the Amarr Shotty a few more times, got 2 revenge kills but he got at least one more on me that I remember. Like a dope I forgot his name and didn't think to message him. GG anon Amarr. GG. TL:DR: Amarr Scouts are OP. Heading over to Destiny Beta and a few others Hit me up for Skype and PSN
Llast 326 An Arkhos 3196	Posted - 2014.05.23 07:27:00 - [14424] - Quote I ******* LOVE storytime KRRROOOOOOM
Bayeth Mal OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention 378	Posted - 2014.05.23 07:29:00 - [14425] - Quote Firbolg Barun wrote: I agree with you mollerz. We should just all stop posting. CCP Hilmar and his marketing team ruined everything. Summer is out, go catch some tail, get drunk or something... Or just do what I do and basically only hang out here or on Nos Nothi. Both here and NN is bookmarked and are insta visits, check it out and move on. Very rarely will I look outside of here unless linked to it or bored. Heading over to Destiny Beta and a few others Hit me up for Skype and PSN
Jaceon Pale-eye DUST University Ivy League 20	Posted - 2014.05.23 07:41:00 - [14426] - Quote Mal, that was the best **** I've read in months. I wasn't even going to play tonight, but I'm firing up the ps3 now just because of that. "I'm not even sorry." lmao priceless
Brokerib Lone Wolves Club 1180	Posted - 2014.05.23 10:23:00 - [14427] - Quote Decisions have been made, stats are up - https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=163271&find=unread stats Changes to the plate fitting values and repair values looks promising. Knowledge is power
Jaceon Pale-eye DUST University Ivy League 22	Posted - 2014.05.23 10:59:00 - [14428] - Quote tfw the SP invested in proto cloaks (which I would later find to be unfittable on the STD scout suit) could have been much better spent on, oh, I dunno... Dropsuit Command 5? Vehicle command 5? HAV 5? (I realize those skills are not worth training past a certain point, would be equally wasted SP).
Spademan The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY 1712	Posted - 2014.05.23 11:03:00 - [14429] - Quote Brokerib wrote: Decisions have been made, stats are up - https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=163271&find=unread stats Changes to the plate fitting values and repair values looks promising. Don't see anything I disagree with (the cloak thing isn't my area to discuss) Really liking the Ferroscale changes, gonna save a lot of space I am part shovel, part man, full scout, and a little bit special. Official Time Lord of the Scout Community
Adipem Nothi Nos Nothi 940	Posted - 2014.05.23 11:56:00 - [14430] - Quote Why are folks not in favor of moving the Gallente Passive Rep to Amarr? Shoot scout with yes... - Ripley Riley



Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page