Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 178 post(s) |
Cass Caul
1773
|
Posted - 2014.12.01 05:44:00 -
[25861] - Quote
This really makes me think Rattati is an idiot.
34m 15db Scan on Cal-Scout. Or, Even better!
Amarr Scout. 14dB at 34m
You know what it takes to beat 14dB precision? Gal-Scout with 3 damps and a cloak. Or Amarr Scout with 4 complex dampeners and a cloak. |
Cass Caul
1773
|
Posted - 2014.12.01 06:30:00 -
[25862] - Quote
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2490212#post2490212
Done.
I'll check NN site, but not even bothering to return to this thread. I don't play every day, but I did play at least once a week. All my desire was is gone.
Just. Wow. I really thought I'd play till the servers went down. Done. |
|
CCP Rattati
C C P C C P Alliance
12491
|
Posted - 2014.12.01 07:53:00 -
[25863] - Quote
Cass Caul wrote:This really makes me think Rattati is an idiot. 34m 15db Scan on Cal-Scout. Or, Even better! Amarr Scout. 14dB at 34m You know what it takes to beat 14dB precision? Gal-Scout with 3 damps and a cloak. Or Amarr Scout with 4 complex dampeners and a cloak.
You could help so much more, if you chose to be constructive. That being said, that comment is on the borderline, if not crossing.
"As well as stupid, Rattati is incredibly slow and accident-prone, and cannot even swim"
|
|
RedPencil
Abandoned Privilege Top Men.
150
|
Posted - 2014.12.01 09:00:00 -
[25864] - Quote
CCP Rattati wrote:Cass Caul wrote:This really makes me think Rattati is an idiot. 34m 15db Scan on Cal-Scout. Or, Even better! Amarr Scout. 14dB at 34m You know what it takes to beat 14dB precision? Gal-Scout with 3 damps and a cloak. Or Amarr Scout with 4 complex dampeners and a cloak. You could help so much more, if you chose to be constructive. That being said, that comment is on the borderline, if not crossing. Please don't make it even worse...
- No more trap RE and Prox, it's going to light up like a crismast tree. - Std and Adv min scout also light up like a crismast tree. - Shotgun would be ok, but NK is close to useless. - Invisible Uplink for roof camp
Make me wanna repeat what Cass Caul said....
Beware Paper cut M[;..;]M
|
Cat Merc
Onslaught Inc RISE of LEGION
13472
|
Posted - 2014.12.01 09:02:00 -
[25865] - Quote
CCP Rattati wrote:Cass Caul wrote:This really makes me think Rattati is an idiot. 34m 15db Scan on Cal-Scout. Or, Even better! Amarr Scout. 14dB at 34m You know what it takes to beat 14dB precision? Gal-Scout with 3 damps and a cloak. Or Amarr Scout with 4 complex dampeners and a cloak. You could help so much more, if you chose to be constructive. That being said, that comment is on the borderline, if not crossing. Report straight from the crime scene
Feline overlord of all humans - CAT MERC
n+ÅS¦¦Gùò GÇ+GÇ+ GùòS¦¦n++
|
Iron Wolf Saber
Den of Swords
17901
|
Posted - 2014.12.01 09:59:00 -
[25866] - Quote
Sorry guys my hands are clean of this since apparently I am not an expert at anything.
CPM 1
Omni-Soldier, Forum Warrior
\\= Prototype Forge Gun=// Unlocked
|
Cat Merc
Onslaught Inc RISE of LEGION
13472
|
Posted - 2014.12.01 10:13:00 -
[25867] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Sorry guys my hands are clean of this since apparently I am not an expert at anything. You're an expert at being hated by the forums.
Feline overlord of all humans - CAT MERC
n+ÅS¦¦Gùò GÇ+GÇ+ GùòS¦¦n++
|
J0LLY R0G3R
And the ButtPirates
1281
|
Posted - 2014.12.01 10:28:00 -
[25868] - Quote
CCP Rattati wrote:Cass Caul wrote:This really makes me think Rattati is an idiot. 34m 15db Scan on Cal-Scout. Or, Even better! Amarr Scout. 14dB at 34m You know what it takes to beat 14dB precision? Gal-Scout with 3 damps and a cloak. Or Amarr Scout with 4 complex dampeners and a cloak. You could help so much more, if you chose to be constructive. That being said, that comment is on the borderline, if not crossing. "As well as stupid, Rattati is incredibly slow and accident-prone, and cannot even swim"
- XD
TLDR : Last Dust Montage
|
Jebus McKing
Jebus Hates Scans
1134
|
Posted - 2014.12.01 10:49:00 -
[25869] - Quote
So, Logi with 2x precision and 2x range amps will have a "short range" 30m, 360-¦ focused scanner.
I'm having a hard time to contain my rage. This **** ain't funny. At all.
I'm working on a proposal, but this is gonna take a while.
|
jace silencerww
D.A.R.K L.E.G.I.O.N D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
99
|
Posted - 2014.12.01 10:53:00 -
[25870] - Quote
CCP Rattati wrote:Cass Caul wrote:This really makes me think Rattati is an idiot. 34m 15db Scan on Cal-Scout. Or, Even better! Amarr Scout. 14dB at 34m You know what it takes to beat 14dB precision? Gal-Scout with 3 damps and a cloak. Or Amarr Scout with 4 complex dampeners and a cloak. You could help so much more, if you chose to be constructive. That being said, that comment is on the borderline, if not crossing.
if you do the "EWAR Concentric Circle Scan Falloff Design" you will kill the Minnie scout. yes it will help the all the other suits but will be the death of the Minnie nova knife scout. amarr or gall scout with 2 complex precision and range amps will make it all but impossible for the Minnie even with 2-3 damps. Minnie need speed to get close or damps but with this damps will NOT help. |
|
Cass Caul
1773
|
Posted - 2014.12.01 11:05:00 -
[25871] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Sorry guys my hands are clean of this since apparently I am not an expert at anything.
That's not true at all, you're an expert at getting people to support some of the worst ideas ever proposed on the forums. Some prime examples were those that complained about scouts and cloaks, yet those same ones mysteriously changed their tune when purchasable skill point refunds appeared on the market.
|
Cass Caul
1773
|
Posted - 2014.12.01 11:06:00 -
[25872] - Quote
Jebus McKing wrote:So, Logi with 2x precision and 2x range amps will have a "short range" 30m, 360-¦ focused scanner. I'm having a hard time to contain my rage. This **** ain't funny. At all. I'm working on a proposal, but this is gonna take a while. You got it all wrong. Cal-Logi as a walking scanner is way better.
5 complex precision enhancers, all in the highs is 16.4237625, rounded down to 16 dB. 4 Complex Range Amps 43m.
Still takes the role of hiding in a corner but with more range than a Scout. It even forced the Min-Scout to use 3 complex damps and the cloak to get within those 43m of it.
Still, doesn't beat the Amarr Scout with unbeatable precision values.
If 1.8-base taught us anything it is that: Yes, people are willing to sacrifice their gameplay to provide nearly unbeatable scans.
Only difference is that it stops being "nearly" and becomes "actual." |
Cass Caul
1773
|
Posted - 2014.12.01 11:08:00 -
[25873] - Quote
CCP Rattati wrote: You could help so much more, if you chose to be constructive. That being said, that comment is on the borderline, if not crossing.
Ah yes, who else would inform you of the actual numbers for EWAR when a player min-maxes. Who else could possibly point out that the breach SMG has the highest DPS of the sidearms but still costs more to fit than a Combat Rifle. Who else would hope the Sniper Rifle would become a meaningful parts of the game yet see their favorite weapon nerfed because a Dev would rather stick to that Dev's opinions and ignore the player with more sniper rifle kills than anyone else in the game.
How was that Charge Sniper Rifle treating people? I know my friend refuses to play because it lost 200m and 2 bullets per clip.
Who was it that asked "How far away do you actually kill people with the sniper rifle from?" Got a response of "over 400m, often over 500m" and decided 350m was a good range?.
No, no. It's alright. I think it is much better to agree with someone that never participated in a Corp Battle or a PC match Or a player that has less experience actually playing the game than even our newest regulars.
Or a player that gets upset when directly quoted and calls it misquote and finding every way to defend themselves again people that are clearly just antagonizing him.
Oh, that's right. https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2371993#post2371993
It is apparently unusual to point out obvious things, like saying one number is bigger than another. |
Iron Wolf Saber
Den of Swords
17903
|
Posted - 2014.12.01 11:42:00 -
[25874] - Quote
Cass Caul wrote:CCP Rattati wrote: You could help so much more, if you chose to be constructive. That being said, that comment is on the borderline, if not crossing.
Ah yes, who else would inform you of the actual numbers for EWAR when a player min-maxes. Who else could possibly point out that the breach SMG has the highest DPS of the sidearms but still costs more to fit than a Combat Rifle. Who else would hope the Sniper Rifle would become a meaningful parts of the game yet see their favorite weapon nerfed because a Dev would rather stick to that Dev's opinions and ignore the player with more sniper rifle kills than anyone else in the game. How was that Charge Sniper Rifle treating people? I know my friend refuses to play because it lost 200m and 2 bullets per clip. Who was it that asked "How far away do you actually kill people with the sniper rifle from?" Got a response of "over 400m, often over 500m" and decided 350m was a good range?. No, no. It's alright. I think it is much better to agree with someone that never participated in a Corp Battle or a PC match Or a player that has less experience actually playing the game than even our newest regulars. Or a player that gets upset when directly quoted and calls it misquote and finding every way to defend themselves again people that are clearly just antagonizing him. Oh, that's right. https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2371993#post2371993It is apparently unusual to point out obvious things, like saying one number is bigger than another.
Thank you for pointing out that every change is going to have people that are going to be upset over it and that every change is going to have people happy about it.
CPM 1
Omni-Soldier, Forum Warrior
\\= Prototype Forge Gun=// Unlocked
|
Iron Wolf Saber
Den of Swords
17903
|
Posted - 2014.12.01 11:44:00 -
[25875] - Quote
Cass Caul wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Sorry guys my hands are clean of this since apparently I am not an expert at anything. That's not true at all, you're an expert at getting people to support some of the worst ideas ever proposed on the forums. Some prime examples were those that complained about scouts and cloaks, yet those same ones mysteriously changed their tune when purchasable skill point refunds appeared on the market.
Then I guess my greatest accomplishment was the 1.7 scout buff; that was absolutely a terrible idea and should never have happened.
CPM 1
Omni-Soldier, Forum Warrior
\\= Prototype Forge Gun=// Unlocked
|
Cass Caul
1775
|
Posted - 2014.12.01 11:50:00 -
[25876] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Cass Caul wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Sorry guys my hands are clean of this since apparently I am not an expert at anything. That's not true at all, you're an expert at getting people to support some of the worst ideas ever proposed on the forums. Some prime examples were those that complained about scouts and cloaks, yet those same ones mysteriously changed their tune when purchasable skill point refunds appeared on the market. Then I guess my greatest accomplishment was the 1.7 scout buff; that was absolutely a terrible idea and should never have happened.
And what part of that, exactly, was your idea? You just happened to do something entirely different from what you did with your work on Sniper Rifles and pushed for the opinion of the people that actually used the suit over your own opinion. Good job on that, by the way. I really don't think I can compliment this group enough for having a much more influential role than the last one. Because all I see is another person with a CPM tag rewriting the past despite quotable posts saying otherwise. |
jace silencerww
D.A.R.K L.E.G.I.O.N D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
99
|
Posted - 2014.12.01 12:21:00 -
[25877] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Cass Caul wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Sorry guys my hands are clean of this since apparently I am not an expert at anything. That's not true at all, you're an expert at getting people to support some of the worst ideas ever proposed on the forums. Some prime examples were those that complained about scouts and cloaks, yet those same ones mysteriously changed their tune when purchasable skill point refunds appeared on the market. Then I guess my greatest accomplishment was the 1.7 scout buff; that was absolutely a terrible idea and should never have happened.
your buff was way too strong. have you looked at the scouts. gal is still king due to it can do full ewar while armor or speed tanking. the caldari is second due to the hit box however that fixed then it would be balanced & even with the amarr. third is amarr being very balanced. being way back in fourth is the Minnie scout with ZERO ewar bonus. lol to keep up with the other scouts in ewar it has to give up everything as in no ehp or speed yet can still be spotted unless it has a proto cloaked active. looks great on paper but it is a big PILE OF B.S. in the game. lol so yea great job with scouts back in 1.7 |
Bayeth Mal
Opus Arcana Covert Intervention
1970
|
Posted - 2014.12.01 12:31:00 -
[25878] - Quote
Ok everyone calm down and remember what's important here so we can stay on topic.
What colour do you think Shottys underpants are today?
We'll bang, OK?
|
jace silencerww
D.A.R.K L.E.G.I.O.N D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
99
|
Posted - 2014.12.01 12:31:00 -
[25879] - Quote
Cass Caul wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Cass Caul wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Sorry guys my hands are clean of this since apparently I am not an expert at anything. That's not true at all, you're an expert at getting people to support some of the worst ideas ever proposed on the forums. Some prime examples were those that complained about scouts and cloaks, yet those same ones mysteriously changed their tune when purchasable skill point refunds appeared on the market. Then I guess my greatest accomplishment was the 1.7 scout buff; that was absolutely a terrible idea and should never have happened. And what part of that, exactly, was your idea? You just happened to do something entirely different from what you did with your work on Sniper Rifles and pushed for the opinion of the people that actually used the suit over your own opinion. Good job on that, by the way. I really don't think I can compliment this group enough for having a much more influential role than the last one. Because all I see is another person with a CPM tag rewriting the past despite quotable posts saying otherwise. I do snipe from time to time. so the range nerf was too much. should have been tact sr 375-425, charge 400-450 & rest being 425-475. oh great work with the scopes zoom. back in chrome we had an ok zoom with basic slightly better with the adv even better with proto then thales have the best zoom. don't tell me you can not change the zoom level. |
Cass Caul
1777
|
Posted - 2014.12.01 12:35:00 -
[25880] - Quote
@Jace. The 1.7 buff was increased base range from 10m to 16m, nova knife + shotgun hit detection + and god-damned Moody with his Combat Rifle.
You're talking about 1.8, maybe IWS was too, but the Gallente Scout gained a high slot but lost a low slot. Roves/Packs/Droves/Murder/Gaggle or whatever you call a group of scouts has always been effective.
What it is, is map design. Scouts specialize in Close Quarters Combat. All Skirmish Points are small areas. That's what most of this is about. "OMG that scout with a rifle is so OP in Ambush, would be an indication that the role is OP. I don't see that. I don't see that in everyones' post. The Scout outpreforms the generalist role in a specialized area, somewhere it should succeed.
If we make the Rifle-using-assault competitive with a shotgun-weilding-scout in CQC then we're back to 1.7 where an AR was a better choice than a shotgun. |
|
Cass Caul
1777
|
Posted - 2014.12.01 12:37:00 -
[25881] - Quote
Bayeth Mal wrote:Ok everyone calm down and remember what's important here so we can stay on topic.
What colour do you think Shottys underpants are today?
I bet, same color as mine. |
Vitantur Nothus
Nos Nothi
826
|
Posted - 2014.12.01 13:07:00 -
[25882] - Quote
Meanwhile, in Zatara Land: The nucleus of the Heavy Blob can now share scans at 17dB out to 42m. All the while repping the Heavy Blob for low-risk, periodic orbital strikes. |
Jebus McKing
Jebus Hates Scans
1135
|
Posted - 2014.12.01 13:22:00 -
[25883] - Quote
Proposal: Dampeners: 15/25/35 CAL/GAL profile bonus: 10% Scout profile: 40db Active scanners: 18/26/36/46
Damps will be needed sooner for Scouts, but equally or even more useful when stacked. Damps will be more useful to other suits. Fewer unbeatable scans.
CCP Rattati wrote:Design Principles Lvl 5 precision Assault should scan lvl 5 scouts in close - check; now even works for GAL/CAL scouts Close Range should be long enough and strong enough to matter - check; still good, just not as good when someone dedicates a suit to dampening Not changing Scout base numbers at all; this round - broken; it had to be done, for balance One dampener should get Mediums some benefit - check; one damp gets you below everything that does not have precision enhancers and that is not a proto scanner One precision should get Mediums some benefit - check; you can scan anything that is undampened 3X dampening on Sentinel should get good benefit - check; not much to say really. If you really want to use damps on a sentinel, you can. It's just still nowhere near as good as for other suits. Scouts are now only unscannable in Medium and Long Range - broken; Scans are too strong to allow anyone to have scans that are unavoidable. Thoughts?
EDIT: Scan table for science
|
Vitantur Nothus
Nos Nothi
826
|
Posted - 2014.12.01 13:25:00 -
[25884] - Quote
Looks like more Scout nerfs, Jebus. How 'bout we rollback that Logi range instead? |
Jebus McKing
Jebus Hates Scans
1135
|
Posted - 2014.12.01 13:29:00 -
[25885] - Quote
Vitantur Nothus wrote:Looks like more Scout nerfs, Jebus. How 'bout we rollback that Logi range instead? Not really. If you used damps before not much will change.
In fact it is easier now for AM/MN Scouts to beat the Gal Logi scan monster. (And also Amarr Scouts.)
|
Varoth Drac
Titans of Phoenix
412
|
Posted - 2014.12.01 13:43:00 -
[25886] - Quote
Can this be fixed by buffing Min scouts like Ratatti suggests?
I'm thinking, if we are continuing the theme of hunter and hunted, scout bonuses should be changed to fit these paradigms.
My proposal:
Hunters - Amarr scout, bonus to precision, stamina Caldari, bonus to range andGǪ..maybe cloak duration? Fits the idea of wide flanking for ranged combat Hunted - Gallente, bonus to damps andGǪ..maybe cloak recharge? Still fits the idea of stealth without further dampening bonuses - Minmatar, bonus to damps and hacking. Dampening fits and is very important for hacking and knifing, particularly with these proposed EWAR changes.
Other necessary changes.
Nova knife damage buffed by 25%. Controversial to remove the Min knife bonus, but Min scouts would still be best knifers with damp bonus and highest speed. Would be nice to make knives better for other scouts as well. Codebreakers in highs. Allows Min scouts to focus on hacking without sacrificing speed or damps. Gives all suits more high slot options, particularly useful for all scouts if shields and precision mods are going to have penalties.
What do people think? |
Vitantur Nothus
Nos Nothi
828
|
Posted - 2014.12.01 13:51:00 -
[25887] - Quote
Knives equipped, scan profile reduced
|
Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p
Fatal Absolution General Tso's Alliance
2975
|
Posted - 2014.12.01 14:08:00 -
[25888] - Quote
Varoth Drac wrote:Can this be fixed by buffing Min scouts like Ratatti suggests?
I'm thinking, if we are continuing the theme of hunter and hunted, scout bonuses should be changed to fit these paradigms.
My proposal:
Hunters - Amarr scout, bonus to precision, stamina Caldari, bonus to range andGǪ..maybe cloak duration? Fits the idea of wide flanking for ranged combat Hunted - Gallente, bonus to damps andGǪ..maybe cloak recharge? Still fits the idea of stealth without further dampening bonuses - Minmatar, bonus to damps and hacking. Dampening fits and is very important for hacking and knifing, particularly with these proposed EWAR changes.
Other necessary changes.
Nova knife damage buffed by 25%. Controversial to remove the Min knife bonus, but Min scouts would still be best knifers with damp bonus and highest speed. Would be nice to make knives better for other scouts as well. Codebreakers in highs. Allows Min scouts to focus on hacking without sacrificing speed or damps. Gives all suits more high slot options, particularly useful for all scouts if shields and precision mods are going to have penalties.
What do people think? I agree that knives should all have the min scout bonus, and the bonus removed.
Its been a long time coming, and would really give heavies more of a harder counter.
+1
"Minja" and "Masochist" are synonyms.
FA's Shotgunning T-Dome Champ
I piss Remote Explosives and shit Shotgun shells.
|
Varoth Drac
Titans of Phoenix
412
|
Posted - 2014.12.01 14:27:00 -
[25889] - Quote
Vitantur Nothus wrote:Knives equipped, scan profile reduced
I thought about this too, but I thought giving a weapon a suit bonus would be too much of an exception. This would add too much complexity to the game as no other weapon affects suit stats. |
Jebus McKing
Jebus Hates Scans
1138
|
Posted - 2014.12.01 14:37:00 -
[25890] - Quote
Damp bonus for Min Scouts?
Do. Want.
Quote:
- Nova knife damage buff 15-25%
- Remove Min Scout NK damage bonus
- Give dampening bonus
- Make codebreakers high slot modules
You have been scanned
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |