Does anyone know of a game that uses UE3 and is available on Mac OS X?

Duke Nukem Forever?

Edit:No, I think that's a different engine.

Re-Edit: Both the Borderlands games?

Hey guys sorry for my incompetence in reading the tables on my phone but I'm just wondering what my gal scout needs in damps to avoid max passives. I know 2 complex damps will do it but due to my very thin wallet if I can get away with less then complex that would save some per suit. Would 1 complex 1 basic do it? Or 2 enhanced etc? Cheapest route for a poor mofo thanks in advance

Well that much you certianly have in common with us (as I'm sure you've noticed by now).

You also lurk a lot moar than I realised. That's a good quality to have.

So... How much time do you Devs spend hanging around the water cooler laughing about these forum posts?
Or do you have weekly show and tell meetings?

Heads up, I made a suggestion thread for Logi Bonuses.
I don't actually use the suit, so it'd be great if there's anyone here who does (Looking at you OmniSoldier Appia) could weigh in.

@ Mollerz

Rattati is not a game designer; he is a statistician. He was pulled away from number crunching to cleanup someone else's mess. He is not responsible for the mess or the decisions which led to the mess. He is not responsible for Legion or the decisions which led to Legion. He had no hand in our post-Chrome Winter, nor is he to blame for whatever it is that fuels your angst.

Many of us (myself included) think that Rattati is doing a good job. Whether or not we agree with every decision he makes, all of us can agree that we're lucky to have him here making decisions.

TL;DR: We have no reason to attack or lecture Rattati.

Does anyone know of a game that uses UE3 and is available on Mac OS X?

Officer Event should have been point based.

5 Points for each MLT / STD Weapon kill
3 For ADV
1 For Proto / Officer

But that probably wouldn't boost AUR sales and siphon more money out of this dead game.

;_;

2 precision enhancers on teh Gal scout means enemy scouts need to r double dampen. That's pretty important. I think you're underestimating the number of people that only run 1 dampener or no dampeners at all because they want the speed or HP benefits more.

Not everyone is running PC fits 23/7 but with Gal-Scout running 2 complex precision enhancers you do force them to or let them suffer being seen

We can basically divide scouts into 4 categories right now. OG scouts that stuck with it since they started, new additions & converts like Mal and Jaceon, FOTM chasers, and people that only have them because they got a dropsuit command refund.

Definitely overlap between the categories as they aren't mutually exclusive, but the FotM chasers are like a tragic comedy on the forums while the the last group I just feel a little disappointed with them.

I couldn't give less ***** about the FOTM, I run repper Gal Assault with Duvolle and Ion Pistol

You are now my favourite cat.

The Ion Pistol killed me so many times.
And yet I still carry it.

MY GALLENTE PRIDE SHALL NOT BE HURT!

The Ion Pistol killed me so many times.
And yet I still carry it.

MY GALLENTE PRIDE SHALL NOT BE HURT!

What do you guys think about making the hacking bonus for the minja innate and adding a cloak damp bonus?

Like enough so that you can get under passives scans with 1 damp and a cloak, but need 2 damps+ cloak for a gallogi focused?

ID really like this with code breakers remaining low slots, as it gives us more utility, and brick tanking wouldn't be a problem (plates with speed penalties=retarted on a min scout, and you'd need another slot for a rep per)

The only thing it would do is make it so that the minja could run 2 kin cats 2 code breakers or one of each while avoiding passives, and if they get gallogi'd they could still run a range amp or something to try to find him, or a kin cat for faster searching, or a codebreaker to hack the depot he's camping

Thoughts? Is it game breaking? (Remember the only effect this will have is opening up another low for minjas, as they already require the cloak to get under passives)

This is a good change IMO as it gives all scouts an aspect of eWAR not just three of them. Splits the pie a little more evenly.

Remember, brick tanking on a min scout is not a problem (or possible ), and fitting ranges in the lows means that you lose shields to make them effective, so it would be balanced.

What do you guys think about ...

I think it oversteps Gal scouts role too much.

I think your posting privileges should be postponed until 51% or more of your ideas are good ideas.

I think it oversteps Gal scouts role too much.

Why you hate me shotty?

But seriously what do you think?

(And yes i know i post a lot of crazy stuff sometimes that is really stupid and irrelevant, but perhaps in a few of my more serious posts there are some hidden gemstones that we could all benefit from)

What do you guys think about making the hacking bonus for the minja innate and adding a cloak damp bonus?

Like enough so that you can get under passives scans with 1 damp and a cloak, but need 2 damps+ cloak for a gallogi focused?

ID really like this with code breakers remaining low slots, as it gives us more utility, and brick tanking wouldn't be a problem (plates with speed penalties=retarted on a min scout, and you'd need another slot for a rep per)

The only thing it would do is make it so that the minja could run 2 kin cats 2 code breakers or one of each while avoiding passives, and if they get gallogi'd they could still run a range amp or something to try to find him, or a kin cat for faster searching, or a codebreaker to hack the depot he's camping

Thoughts? Is it game breaking? (Remember the only effect this will have is opening up another low for minjas, as they already require the cloak to get under passives)

This is a good change IMO as it gives all scouts an aspect of eWAR not just three of them. Splits the pie a little more evenly.

Remember, brick tanking on a min scout is not a problem (or possible ), and fitting ranges in the lows means that you lose shields to make them effective, so it would be balanced.