Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 178 post(s) |
Arkena Wyrnspire
Fatal Absolution Negative-Feedback
22565
|
Posted - 2015.03.09 07:02:00 -
[30751] - Quote
Adipem Nothi wrote: Fair enough. You've got me thinking ...
Logi gk.0: Cmp Shields (x3), Cmp Reactives (x5) Total HP 885
Assault gk.0: Cmp Shields (x3), Cmp Reactives (x5)[/u] Total HP 1085
This Battle Logi has no sidearm. If he runs a prototype Fine Rifle and Grenade, he won't be able run more than 2 Prototype Active Scanners. He might survive two CRG blasts; his Assault counterpart will absolutely take 3.
If Assaults and Logis switched speeds today, I don't believe that this GalLogi would be more durable or more deadly than a GalAssault. Especially if the GalAssault had a awesome racial bonus (like +RoF).
Logi gk.0: Complex damage mod x3, 5x Enhanced armour plate Armour HP = 830 while carrying 18 triage hives and dual scanners.
You don't quite understand how to abuse these things, Shotty.
Also just saying, whenever you use the phrase 'fine rifles' I immediately think you're on a hate rant and take you less seriously.
Gallente Guide
|
Bayeth Mal
Nos Nothi
2468
|
Posted - 2015.03.09 07:46:00 -
[30752] - Quote
Some Alaskan wrote:Whatever happened to the Overdrive units? I still have some on my guristas saga but for some reason they were taken off the store. Only thing they do for my lav is make the fuel injector into maximum overdrive so I can not fathom why they were removed.
lol, they removed those from the market back in 2013 when they removed a bunch of vehicle types (logi LAV/logi DS etc) and promised they would return after a quick "re-balancing" lol. I'm sitting on a bunch of them, was thinking they'd become pretty valuable when the market came...
*facepalm*
We'll bang, OK?
|
dzizur
Expert Intervention Caldari State
169
|
Posted - 2015.03.09 09:25:00 -
[30753] - Quote
I was thinking about all that assualt/logi slayers stuff etc. Could someone explain to me why a specialized suit has more slots than the more versatile (basic) one?
I understand that Dust is about customization and what not, but why not leave it to basic frames for maximum customizability, and specialized frames to specialise in some areas (having suit bonuses, not an abundance of empty slots to stack whatever you want). I mean what's the point of assault having zilion slots if 90% of them fit tank and/or damage? |
Jebus McKing
Nos Nothi
1670
|
Posted - 2015.03.09 09:51:00 -
[30754] - Quote
3,227,092. I think even with 48hrs more it is still questionable if we reach the 5mil goal.
dzizur wrote:I was thinking about all that assualt/logi slayers stuff etc. Could someone explain to me why a specialized suit has more slots than the more versatile (basic) one?
I understand that Dust is about customization and what not, but why not leave it to basic frames for maximum customizability, and specialized frames to specialise in some areas (having suit bonuses, not an abundance of empty slots to stack whatever you want). I mean what's the point of assault having zilion slots if 90% of them fit tank and/or damage? They gave Assaults more slots when they were horribly underused. Prior to that they had the same amount of slots than Basic Mediums.
I still think giving BMF another EQ slot alongside the CPU/PG buff in hotfix echo would put them in a really good position. Still worse at assaulting than Assaults and worse at being a Logibro than Logis, but at least they could do a bit of both -> becoming the unspecialized blend between Assault/Logi. They'd still have 1 high/low slot less than Assault/Logi and 100hp less base HP than Assault (60 more than Logi).
It makes so much sense to me.
But maybe something is wrong with me.
Jebus hates scans.
|
dzizur
Expert Intervention Caldari State
169
|
Posted - 2015.03.09 09:55:00 -
[30755] - Quote
Jebus, I know how it came to it, although my question is : how giving less slots to more versatile frames and more to specialized frames makes sense?
Everyone wants to add slots here, there, how about cutting down slots on specialized frames and buffing their intended role? |
dzizur
Expert Intervention Caldari State
169
|
Posted - 2015.03.09 10:12:00 -
[30756] - Quote
Oh and 5MCC extension message somehow seems so cool, krin himself is helping up :)
and another thing, is Krin a Gallente merc? This could be a hint @ the module... just some thoughts :) |
Jebus McKing
Nos Nothi
1671
|
Posted - 2015.03.09 10:43:00 -
[30757] - Quote
There is a theory floating around that the BPO might be one of the upcoming skin modules. Makes sense, me thinks.
dzizur wrote:Everyone wants to add slots here, there, how about cutting down slots on specialized frames and buffing their intended role? You want to cut down on slots of Assaults and Logis?!
*hears sounds of people grabbing their pitchforks and lighting their torches*
You better run.
It's already hard enough to convince people that Basic suits should get a buff even without telling them that we gonna nerf their beloved specialized suits. I'm not totally opposed to the idea, especially if specialized suits also get kick-ass bonuses, but people already would rather see Basic suits removed entirely than buffed in anyway or form.
Jebus hates scans.
|
dzizur
Expert Intervention Caldari State
171
|
Posted - 2015.03.09 11:28:00 -
[30758] - Quote
Jebus McKing wrote: It's already hard enough to convince people that Basic suits should get a buff even without telling them that we gonna nerf their beloved specialized suits.
I guess it's why I hate "democracy" as much as you hate scans ;) I always shudder when nerf/buff hammer strikes "because X is used 70% of the time and Y only 30%"
And yes, I'm all for "kick-ass" bonuses, but with major drawbacks. Can't handle the drawback? use a more versatile frame.
Right now it seems to me that only real bonus/drawback is implemented in heavy suits (loads of hp - very slow and very visible)
I think the gaps between classes(frames) should be much bigger. Take for example what happened with min assault and speed hp parity when compared to ligh frames.
To make it clearer - difference in hp between full tanked medframe and heavy should be enormous difference in speed between full speed tanked medframe and light frame should be enormous
Right now it seems that proto assaults can outtank mlt heavies , and outrun mlt scouts. Where's the drawback?
|
J0LLY R0G3R
And the ButtPirates
2228
|
Posted - 2015.03.09 12:18:00 -
[30759] - Quote
So since the fibs mod got added to it (jumps) why hasn't the mellow yellow mod get something added to it. Can't think of its name but it is the old bpo they took off the market. It does like half what a cardiac regulator does.
No Safety Net.
TLDR : XD
|
Adipem Nothi
Nos Nothi
7380
|
Posted - 2015.03.09 12:24:00 -
[30760] - Quote
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:Adipem Nothi wrote: Fair enough. You've got me thinking ...
Logi gk.0: Cmp Shields (x3), Cmp Reactives (x5) Total HP 885
Assault gk.0: Cmp Shields (x3), Cmp Reactives (x5)[/u] Total HP 1085
This Battle Logi has no sidearm. If he runs a prototype Fine Rifle and Grenade, he won't be able run more than 2 Prototype Active Scanners. He might survive two CRG blasts; his Assault counterpart will absolutely take 3.
If Assaults and Logis switched speeds today, I don't believe that this GalLogi would be more durable or more deadly than a GalAssault. Especially if the GalAssault had a awesome racial bonus (like +RoF).
Logi gk.0: Complex damage mod x3, 5x Enhanced armour plate Armour HP = 830 while carrying 18 triage hives and dual scanners. You don't quite understand how to abuse these things, Shotty. Also just saying, whenever you use the phrase 'fine rifles' I immediately think you're on a hate rant and take you less seriously.
Armor HP on equiv. Assault would be 948 (+118 more than Logi) Total HP on equiv. Assault 1142 (+200 more than Logi) Strafe w/5 enh plates: 3.67 (0.2 greater than Sentinel) Sprint w/5 enh plates: 5.99 (0.33 greater than Sentinel)
TL;DR: Your BattleLogi is slow, and its HP is near Creodron 2HK territory.
If Assault and Logi speeds were switched, I still do not see this BattleLogi (or other BattleLogi) competing with Assault slayers, especially if those slayers had meaningful, slay-oriented bonuses. If I'm wrong and it did displace them, then it'd be an easy fix.
PS: In my mind, the phrase "Fine Rifle" lost its tongue-in-cheek edge when weapon balance became a priority. Today, I use it as shorthand all Rifle Families excluding Laser Rifles and Sniper Rifles.
Shoot scout with yes.
- Ripley Riley
|
|
Edgar Reinhart
Resheph Interstellar Strategy Gallente Federation
28
|
Posted - 2015.03.09 13:20:00 -
[30761] - Quote
As a newish bro I was asking something similar about basics on the Rookie Training grounds,
"Thanks for the reply.... Clearly as I still mainly run starter suits I don't do much slaying either!!!
I can see the basic suits being useful to test stuff out on and their better cpu/pg etc could definitely be useful if you've got the ISK for modules.
Maybe it's because I currently only have Gallente suits to work with but as far as experimenting with fittings goes if for example I only had a G-1 Medium and an Assault G-1 to work with, they both cost the same ISK, but the Assault is 300-400,000 SP more.
They also both have the same slot layout. With the Assault I could use one of the Low Slots for something other than armour and still have more armour than the medium frame, meaning that I can try out the fitting and still be more survivable.
Then with the assault bonus helping with damage slightly I'm not losing much not putting a damage mod in the high slot meaning that I can try other things out here too and still be slightly better than standard at the shooty shooty side of things.
Arguably the PG/CPU bonus is slightly negated by the reduced fitting cost the Assaults have for weapons etc too.
I'd like to run things that aren't the starter suits but it seems to make sense to wait until I've saved the SP for an assault and splurge rather than steadily progress through the mediums first as I could runner a better 'cheap' fit on one of them?
Feel like I must be missing something though? Maybe just overthinking! and maths has never been my strongest suite."
I too am of the opinion that I'd rather see more people using mediums rather than remove them from the game but the only way I, personally, can see it happening at the moment is to make the assault suits etc LESS appealing. E.G. more expensive, less fitting options/capabilities, maybe need level 5 in the basics before they're unlocked.
None of those will be popular/good options though.... |
Adipem Nothi
Nos Nothi
7380
|
Posted - 2015.03.09 13:29:00 -
[30762] - Quote
The more we make Assaults less appealing, the greater risk of a slayer migration back to Assault Lite.
Why not go with Jebus' idea, and try out 2 EQ on basic Meds?
Shoot scout with yes.
- Ripley Riley
|
Edgar Reinhart
Resheph Interstellar Strategy Gallente Federation
30
|
Posted - 2015.03.09 14:19:00 -
[30763] - Quote
Adipem Nothi wrote:The less appealing we make Assaults, the greater risk of a slayer migration back to Assault Lite.
Why not go with Jebus' idea, and make basic Meds more appealing with 2 EQ?
I agree to a point and that's why I assumed it would be unpopular. For me coming up through the ranks the problem is ISK. I can run a better assault fit, and arguably scout fit, cheaper, than a comparable basic medium/light frame and strapping more modules onto it doesn't help that.
But that is just me. However I agree and think that the way to go with the basic suits is to make them more versatile than the specialist suits. Hence specialist. BUT to encourage people to do that I think there might need to be more of an ISK disparity too and maybe beyond just basics being cheaper.
I briefly mentioned it above but I should say that to a point this applies to basic light suits too and possibly heavy (although less so because eHP HMG) but being comparatively new don't have a lot of experience with everything..... apart from being instagibbed from all angles. |
J0LLY R0G3R
And the ButtPirates
2228
|
Posted - 2015.03.09 14:38:00 -
[30764] - Quote
2nd eqiup to basic frame assaults cuz screw logis. Sidearms to the basic frame logis cuz assaulta and amarr logi. Amarr scout was feeling lonely. Just screw heavies.
No Safety Net.
TLDR : XD
|
dzizur
Expert Intervention Caldari State
176
|
Posted - 2015.03.09 15:56:00 -
[30765] - Quote
http://web.ccpgamescdn.com/dust/img/universe/minmatar4.png http://dust514.com/universe/dropsuits/
2 sidearms
|
Edgar Reinhart
Resheph Interstellar Strategy Gallente Federation
31
|
Posted - 2015.03.09 15:58:00 -
[30766] - Quote
J0LLY R0G3R wrote:2nd eqiup to basic frame assaults cuz screw logis. Sidearms to the basic frame logis cuz assaulta and amarr logi. Amarr scout was feeling lonely. Just screw heavies.
Not the most constructive way to put it but yes this is true. EQ takes away from Logis, although you yourself have proven very capable with a scout logi so screw logis? Adding sidearms to logis loses the downside to their Equipment USP etc etc etc. I don't know what the answer is but ultimately few people use the basics.
Maybe then it's a case of rather than making them cheaper make them more expensive, so they cost the same as the assaults give them another slot, on the opposite side to their tank, (although this means that all of them except the minmatar become 4/4 which is a bit dull). Maybe OP
Maybe a less aggressive bonus than the assaults. Eg amour rep fitting reduction for the Gal? Or don't and keep them slightly cheaper than the assaults.
I'm sure all these ideas have been mentioned proposed before hence your frustrations. It's the nature of a complex interlinked set of stats being hard to see the bigger picture at all times.
Light, Heavies no idea never been able to use them. Like I keep saying, relatively new, enjoying the game, trying to learn more and be involved etc etc etc etc.
Can you make a video about something else being good now I'm fed up of being being mown down by GEK-38's |
Adipem Nothi
Nos Nothi
7384
|
Posted - 2015.03.09 16:04:00 -
[30767] - Quote
I like the new guy.
Shoot scout with yes.
- Ripley Riley
|
J0LLY R0G3R
And the ButtPirates
2229
|
Posted - 2015.03.09 16:33:00 -
[30768] - Quote
Adipem Nothi wrote:I like the new guy.
Is there a basic Logi and basic assault equivalent, or are the two consolidated as a single basic MedFrame? I agree that we should be careful not to step on Logi toes.
Consolidated.
No Safety Net.
TLDR : XD
|
J0LLY R0G3R
And the ButtPirates
2230
|
Posted - 2015.03.09 16:43:00 -
[30769] - Quote
I tried getting more to use the burst ar XD Next vid is prolly bpo scout logi vud in honor of the 5 mcc challenge.
No Safety Net.
TLDR : XD
|
Adipem Nothi
Nos Nothi
7384
|
Posted - 2015.03.09 16:43:00 -
[30770] - Quote
J0LLY R0G3R wrote:Adipem Nothi wrote:I like the new guy.
Is there a basic Logi and basic assault equivalent, or are the two consolidated as a single basic MedFrame? I agree that we should be careful not to step on Logi toes. Consolidated. If it's supposed to be an in-between, shouldn't it have 2 EQ? If it had none of the Logis EQ bonuses and significantly less bandwidth, would it still step on Logi toes?
( all spitballing, of course )
Shoot scout with yes.
- Ripley Riley
|
|
J0LLY R0G3R
And the ButtPirates
2231
|
Posted - 2015.03.09 17:21:00 -
[30771] - Quote
I looked at the basic frames as stepping stones not a destinations. A path I had to progress through to get to the better suit.
No Safety Net.
TLDR : XD
|
Kaeru Nayiri
Ready to Play
572
|
Posted - 2015.03.09 17:29:00 -
[30772] - Quote
XxBlazikenxX wrote:Greiv Rabbah wrote:Jebus McKing wrote:Him, everyone I'm talking to rather wants to see Basic suits removed completely than made viable, because lol no one will use Assaults anymore. Is this an indication for a problem with the Assault bonuses? Are they not worth speccing into? This actually is an indication that the Nerfvalanche is growing and threatens to consume all of dust. We already had things removed from Dust 514 due to the nerfvalanche, such as the OMS game mode queue. as well as the vehicles. and we had pilots removed from ambush. next pilots may be removed from the OMS game mode. next we will let dropsuits be removed due to nerfvalanche? If this is the direction we are headed, the game is doomed. some weapons and roles have already been destroyed by the nerfvalanche. I can almost see the end. Dust 514, as much as i hate to say it, may actually be about to die. I almost wish i hadnt cried out against legion now. almost. the only thing that keeps me from regretting that decision is that i know Dust 514 still could have become something greater. Please, help stop the nerfvalanche. every time you hear or see someone talking about something being nerfed or removed, tell them to shut up. warn them, as i have tried to warn them. beware the nerfvalanche. Pilots are being removed from OMS, it is confirmed in Hotfix Echo.
As a pilot myself, I am lamenting this.
My learned to fly in Ambush because the matches were short enough that as a budding pilot, I could lose isk more slowly. Shorter matches make less opportunity to lose the ship for the same 150k payout at the end as skirm or dom. I don't know what new pilots are going to do for padding isk loss without ambush.
Also this makes me think of the people who cried out for this change. Do they realize what the Nyain San kill squad will be doing if they don't have to worry about/field their own vehicles? Enjoy ambush in hotfix echo, careful what you wish for, guys.
Know what cannot be known.
|
Kaeru Nayiri
Ready to Play
572
|
Posted - 2015.03.09 17:43:00 -
[30773] - Quote
It was clear to me from the beginning that the BPO would be miyofibs, they always "give away" something that just got tweaked so rattati can get lots of data when the patch drops. Nothing worse than only a handful of people using something you just rebalanced when you want to know if it's too strong or not. Though usually it's a stack of 50x of the item or something like that. Fun that this time it's a BPO.
Still, I hope I am wrong, and we get something more interesting.
Know what cannot be known.
|
Adipem Nothi
Nos Nothi
7387
|
Posted - 2015.03.09 17:47:00 -
[30774] - Quote
J0LLY R0G3R wrote:I looked at the basic frames as stepping stones not a destinations. A path I had to progress through to get to the better suit. Completely agree. Thinking hypothetically only. If Rattati were to say "let's make basics meaningful/competitive/etc" , spitballing as to how we might meet that design goal. Don't necessarily agree with the design goal; i too am OK with the current stepping-stone flow.
Shoot scout with yes.
- Ripley Riley
|
Adipem Nothi
Nos Nothi
7387
|
Posted - 2015.03.09 17:49:00 -
[30775] - Quote
Kaeru Nayiri wrote: Also this makes me think of the people who cried out for this change. Do they realize what the Nyain San kill squad will be doing if they don't have to worry about (or field their own) vehicles?
Enjoy ambush in hotfix echo, careful what you wish for.
Milkman and Addict Punk field blaster gunnlogis every chance they get. I do not see Nyain San stomp squads benefitting from this change.
Shoot scout with yes.
- Ripley Riley
|
Kaeru Nayiri
Ready to Play
572
|
Posted - 2015.03.09 17:54:00 -
[30776] - Quote
Llast 326 wrote:Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:
EDIT: Unrelated: Do I prepare for an hour long presentation on my research paper tomorrow, or do I play GW2...? Choices, choices.
I find anything I've put enough research into can be talked about without preparationGǪ. GW2 it is
Fight what cannot be fought.
Know what cannot be known.
|
Jebus McKing
Nos Nothi
1683
|
Posted - 2015.03.09 18:29:00 -
[30777] - Quote
The problem is Basic MedFrames are absolutely useless and everyone hates them and wants to rather see them gone entirely than made viable. Everyone has to spec into them even though they don't want to use them and so the BMF level 4&5 only serves as a SP trap for people who don't have a clue that not everything you can spec into is actually worth it.
Still, I have yet to hear a really viable point against making BMFs less useless.
One point I hear the most is "oh if you make BMFs better then why would I want to use an Assault suit anymore?" BMFs are different from Assaults, a lot actually. They are clearly not just "Assaults without the bonus".
Assaults still have 100 base HP more, they have 1 high/low slot more, they have a bonus to handling of a racial light and sidearm weapon and they have a bonus to fitting of light, sidearm weapons, and grenades. They are and would still be all around better at slaying than BMFs. Better damage, better fitting, better tank.
Another one is "oh it will just be slayer logi 2.0". No, it won't. What made the slayer logis good was their f***ed up bonuses, native rep rate, and ability to use more and better modules than Assaults because Logis have more CPU/PG. But BMF have less fitting space than both Assault and Logis, no bonuses, and worse stats.
Logis would still have more high/low slots, more EQ slots, better fitting capabilities, better bonuses to certain equipments. If you want to do Logi stuff they would still be the better choice. I guess even tanking a proto logi is easier than a proto BMF.
Giving the BMFs an additional EQ slot will neither make Assaults useless, nor will it make running Logis less desireable.
But with an additional EQ slot all of a sudden we have a nice little niche for BMFs. They are better at doing Logi stuff than Assaults and better at assaulting than Logis. Creating a middle ground between the two for people who haven't decided yet if they want to specialize into Assaults or Logis.
The one thing I don't understand is all the hatred towards making BMF just slightly less useless. It is content that is just unused because it is not balanced right but instead of making it viable many people would prefer having less content. I just don't get it.
Jebus hates scans.
|
Ares 514
D.A.R.K L.E.G.I.O.N D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
1253
|
Posted - 2015.03.09 19:01:00 -
[30778] - Quote
Jebus McKing wrote:The problem is Basic MedFrames are absolutely useless and everyone hates them and wants to rather see them gone entirely than made viable. Everyone has to spec into them even though they don't want to use them and so the BMF level 4&5 only serves as a SP trap for people who don't have a clue that not everything you can spec into is actually worth it. Still, I have yet to hear a really viable point against making BMFs less useless. One point I hear the most is " oh if you make BMFs better then why would I want to use an Assault suit anymore?" BMFs are different from Assaults, a lot actually. They are clearly not just " Assaults without the bonus". Assaults still have 100 base HP more, they have 1 high/low slot more, they have a bonus to handling of a racial light and sidearm weapon and they have a bonus to fitting of light, sidearm weapons, and grenades. They are and would still be all around better at slaying than BMFs. Better damage, better fitting, better tank. Another one is " oh it will just be slayer logi 2.0". No, it won't. What made the slayer logis good was their f***ed up bonuses, native rep rate, and ability to use more and better modules than Assaults because Logis have more CPU/PG. But BMF have less fitting space than both Assault and Logis, no bonuses, and worse stats. Logis would still have more high/low slots, more EQ slots, better fitting capabilities, better bonuses to certain equipments. If you want to do Logi stuff they would still be the better choice. I guess even tanking a proto logi is easier than a proto BMF. Giving the BMFs an additional EQ slot will neither make Assaults useless, nor will it make running Logis less desireable. But with an additional EQ slot all of a sudden we have a nice little niche for BMFs. They are better at doing Logi stuff than Assaults and better at assaulting than Logis. Creating a middle ground between the two for people who haven't decided yet if they want to specialize into Assaults or Logis. The one thing I don't understand is all the hatred towards making BMF just slightly less useless. It is content that is just unused because it is not balanced right but instead of making it viable many people would prefer having less content. I just don't get it.
I think it would be better to just remove them. Get rid of the confusion in the first place instead of wasting time on something that isn't really adding much value. More suits / varieties makes balancing harder.
Overlord of Broman
|
First Prophet
Nos Nothi
2494
|
Posted - 2015.03.09 19:14:00 -
[30779] - Quote
I don't feel like getting to into it but I hate all the basic frames, and I'm totally in the remove them side. The hell is the point of the basic light frame?
People find this this review helpful!
|
Kaeru Nayiri
Ready to Play
572
|
Posted - 2015.03.09 19:40:00 -
[30780] - Quote
They could be really useful in the skill model that I posted a few pages back. But Dust != Eve, right?
Know what cannot be known.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |