Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 18:50:00 -
[1] - Quote
Universal Voice Transmitters are biomechanical implants that provide personal access to subspace routers, allowing users to communicate instantly with one another wherever they may be. The implants degrade over time and cease to function when fully absorbed by the user.
1-day 3-day 7-day 30-day
60 150 250 900
Aurum.
WTF am I looking at? Is voicechat pay2play? SERIOUSLY?
*[beyond this point is material from later in the thread that I thought might be good to front load for people to see]*
A 30 day UVT costs 900 Aurum.
900 Aurum = $3.60US = 92,932,150.20 ISK
Lets say you have a mixed DUST/EVE alliance with 90 DUST Players.
81000 Aurum = $324US = 8,363,893,518.00 ISK
Your alliance has 3 options:
Pay $300+ to be able to communicate.
Pay 8 billion ISK + (likely a lot more as I don't see this market being high volume, so prices will be dictated by the sellers, subject to inflation and the whims of the market including limited availability and quantity)
Use 3rd party software (for comparisons sake: Ventrilo, Teamspeak and Mumble servers for $40US a month for 100 slots).
UVTs cost 7.5x as much as the alternatives.
The current conversion rate for $0.40US (cost per server slot) is about 100 Aurum.
If the 30 day UVT costs 100 Aurum it will the same price as the competition, with the added benefits of its integration into DUST and EVE.
I still think it unnecessarily fractures the player base and would be better for everyone if it was free and its costs subsidized by boosters and sidegrades, because its in everyone's best interests to make communication and free flow of information as open and accessible as possible, but I guess I could live with it as a compromise if I had to. |
Veigar Mordekaiser
Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire
676
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 18:51:00 -
[2] - Quote
yeah, my question too. |
PEEEEEEETREEEEEEEEEEEEEE
Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State
781
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 18:53:00 -
[3] - Quote
Umallon Macross wrote:Universal Voice Transmitters are biomechanical implants that provide personal access to subspace routers, allowing users to communicate instantly with one another wherever they may be. The implants degrade over time and cease to function when fully absorbed by the user.
1-day 3-day 7-day 30-day
60 150 250 900
Aurum.
WTF am I looking at? Is voicechat pay2play? SERIOUSLY?
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
i hope this is a joke |
Veigar Mordekaiser
Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire
676
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 18:55:00 -
[4] - Quote
PEEEEEEETREEEEEEEEEEEEEE wrote:LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
i hope this is a joke Nope, they're on the market, and I have yet to hear anyone speak in the 4 games I've been in. |
xprotoman23
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
1452
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 18:55:00 -
[5] - Quote
PEEEEEEETREEEEEEEEEEEEEE wrote:Umallon Macross wrote:Universal Voice Transmitters are biomechanical implants that provide personal access to subspace routers, allowing users to communicate instantly with one another wherever they may be. The implants degrade over time and cease to function when fully absorbed by the user.
1-day 3-day 7-day 30-day
60 150 250 900
Aurum.
WTF am I looking at? Is voicechat pay2play? SERIOUSLY? LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL i hope this is a joke
nahh this **** is real dudes. If I have to pay2talk count me out |
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 18:55:00 -
[6] - Quote
PEEEEEEETREEEEEEEEEEEEEE wrote:Umallon Macross wrote:Universal Voice Transmitters are biomechanical implants that provide personal access to subspace routers, allowing users to communicate instantly with one another wherever they may be. The implants degrade over time and cease to function when fully absorbed by the user.
1-day 3-day 7-day 30-day
60 150 250 900
Aurum.
WTF am I looking at? Is voicechat pay2play? SERIOUSLY? LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL i hope this is a joke
I don't even.
|
Thor Thunder Fist
Better Hide R Die
79
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 18:55:00 -
[7] - Quote
yes they are only for player made groups though not for squads. it was announced in the past that we would have to pay aurum for these but we were promised reasonable prices those seem a little....... |
Naturi Riclenore
BetaMax.
120
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 18:56:00 -
[8] - Quote
HAHAHAHAHAHA
OMG - I can't wait to get home - 2 more hours........ I gotta see this |
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 18:58:00 -
[9] - Quote
Thor Thunder Fist wrote:yes they are only for player made groups though not for squads. it was announced in the past that we would have to pay aurum for these but we were promised reasonable prices those seem a little.......
Who in their right mind would pay for this?
|
PEEEEEEETREEEEEEEEEEEEEE
Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State
781
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 18:59:00 -
[10] - Quote
xprotoman23 wrote:PEEEEEEETREEEEEEEEEEEEEE wrote:Umallon Macross wrote:Universal Voice Transmitters are biomechanical implants that provide personal access to subspace routers, allowing users to communicate instantly with one another wherever they may be. The implants degrade over time and cease to function when fully absorbed by the user.
1-day 3-day 7-day 30-day
60 150 250 900
Aurum.
WTF am I looking at? Is voicechat pay2play? SERIOUSLY? LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL i hope this is a joke nahh this **** is real dudes. If I have to pay2talk count me out
This isn't even pay 2 win. This is pay 2 even have a chance to win.
|
|
xprotoman23
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
1452
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 19:00:00 -
[11] - Quote
PEEEEEEETREEEEEEEEEEEEEE wrote:xprotoman23 wrote:PEEEEEEETREEEEEEEEEEEEEE wrote:Umallon Macross wrote:Universal Voice Transmitters are biomechanical implants that provide personal access to subspace routers, allowing users to communicate instantly with one another wherever they may be. The implants degrade over time and cease to function when fully absorbed by the user.
1-day 3-day 7-day 30-day
60 150 250 900
Aurum.
WTF am I looking at? Is voicechat pay2play? SERIOUSLY? LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL i hope this is a joke nahh this **** is real dudes. If I have to pay2talk count me out This isn't even pay 2 win. This is pay 2 even have a chance to win.
CS:GO for $12 is looking better and better.
|
Veigar Mordekaiser
Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire
676
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 19:00:00 -
[12] - Quote
Thor Thunder Fist wrote:yes they are only for player made groups though not for squads. it was announced in the past that we would have to pay aurum for these but we were promised reasonable prices those seem a little....... I'd like a link to this announcement please. I would also like a link to the petition saying "CCP ******* scrap that or count me out" - assuming this is accurate. |
Veigar Mordekaiser
Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire
676
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 19:01:00 -
[13] - Quote
xprotoman23 wrote: CS:GO for $12 is looking better and better.
Yeah, and all this time they were talking about "true F2P". **** that. If I have to pay for voice chat, I'm uninstalling Dust. |
Abner Kalen
Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State
100
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 19:02:00 -
[14] - Quote
FACEPALM!!
I can see paying for side-grades or gear that might have slightly better stats vs cpu requirements or something, but you can't be serious making us pay for voice comms.
I've never ever ever ever ever seen a game try to charge people to communicate with each other.
Do I also need to purchase a monocol to see my teammates??!! |
mr merkzdem
38
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 19:02:00 -
[15] - Quote
what were they thinking least skype is free i supose? |
jackbubu
United Pwnage Service RISE of LEGION
24
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 19:04:00 -
[16] - Quote
From the description it looks like this is only for out of battle voice coms, but i have yet to try out if "in battle" voice works unrestricted.
if not this would be literally the worst thing ever
This is a rough translation from the german version (**** not being able to switch the language)
"The Universal Voice Transmitter are biological implants that allow the user personal access to the subspace-router, which allow him to talk with other users directly where ever in the galaxy they may be"
bolded the important parts |
Veigar Mordekaiser
Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire
676
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 19:06:00 -
[17] - Quote
jackbubu wrote:From the description it looks like this is only for out of game voice coms, but i have yet to try out if "in battle" voice works unrestricted.
if not this would be literally the worst thing ever I have yet to hear anyone on comms. |
Pokey Dravon
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
583
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 19:07:00 -
[18] - Quote
Thor Thunder Fist wrote:yes they are only for player made groups though not for squads. it was announced in the past that we would have to pay aurum for these but we were promised reasonable prices those seem a little.......
So basically you need them to create voice chat rooms outside of battle? |
aurius rholar
16
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 19:08:00 -
[19] - Quote
I think that that is for chatting with anyone on the squad team or corp if so it might be useful if not CCP is going to lose some players |
Abner Kalen
Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State
100
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 19:09:00 -
[20] - Quote
I'm at work and so I may be jumping to conclusions here. I can see a LOW rate for out-of-game comms paid service, however Eve-Gate has had Corp voice chat for a while.
If they do a paid service, there should be something tangible to download like a companion iOS/Android/Vita app that connects to the voice network. Still, these services are usually free or part of a larger service. They really need to get ahead of this before more people start to see it.
Give us an official statement CCP - let us know your thoughts. |
|
jackbubu
United Pwnage Service RISE of LEGION
24
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 19:09:00 -
[21] - Quote
Veigar Mordekaiser wrote:jackbubu wrote:From the description it looks like this is only for out of game voice coms, but i have yet to try out if "in battle" voice works unrestricted.
if not this would be literally the worst thing ever I have yet to hear anyone on comms. well that doesnt have to mean anything, i'd rather test it myself then jump to conclusions |
Pokey Dravon
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
583
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 19:11:00 -
[22] - Quote
Obviously this will end up being a popular items to buy for ISK on the player market, even so I think it's a very ballsy and foolish idea on CCP's part as its going to really agitate a lot of the player base. I'm arguably a CCP fanboy, and even I'm pretty worked up over this. |
Veigar Mordekaiser
Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire
676
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 19:13:00 -
[23] - Quote
jackbubu wrote:Veigar Mordekaiser wrote:jackbubu wrote:From the description it looks like this is only for out of game voice coms, but i have yet to try out if "in battle" voice works unrestricted.
if not this would be literally the worst thing ever I have yet to hear anyone on comms. well that doesnt have to mean anything, i'd rather test it myself then jump to conclusions I don't think anyone has heard me either. When I looked in the chat list, the little voice bubble had a red "X" through it, and didn't turn green when I spoke. |
Xavier Hastings
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
243
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 19:13:00 -
[24] - Quote
We need to hear a Dev's opinion on this. |
BAD FURRY
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
247
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 19:15:00 -
[25] - Quote
Umallon Macross wrote:Thor Thunder Fist wrote:yes they are only for player made groups though not for squads. it was announced in the past that we would have to pay aurum for these but we were promised reasonable prices those seem a little....... Who in their right mind would pay for this? i did and they dont work at all . |
Veigar Mordekaiser
Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire
676
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 19:15:00 -
[26] - Quote
Xavier Hastings wrote:We need to hear a Dev's opinion on this. Or get a Dev's confirmation of removal. Wtf, who charges for voice chat in an FPS? |
BAD FURRY
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
247
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 19:15:00 -
[27] - Quote
BAD FURRY wrote:Umallon Macross wrote:Thor Thunder Fist wrote:yes they are only for player made groups though not for squads. it was announced in the past that we would have to pay aurum for these but we were promised reasonable prices those seem a little....... Who in their right mind would pay for this? i did and they dont work at all . by the way i pushed to talk as well. |
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 19:16:00 -
[28] - Quote
I was excited about this patch. Now I can't fit my vehicles and CCP wants to charge us to talk. |
xprotoman23
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
1452
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 19:16:00 -
[29] - Quote
Veigar Mordekaiser wrote:Xavier Hastings wrote:We need to hear a Dev's opinion on this. Or get a Dev's confirmation of removal. Wtf, who charges for voice chat in an FPS?
CCP |
Veigar Mordekaiser
Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire
676
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 19:19:00 -
[30] - Quote
xprotoman23 wrote:Veigar Mordekaiser wrote:Xavier Hastings wrote:We need to hear a Dev's opinion on this. Or get a Dev's confirmation of removal. Wtf, who charges for voice chat in an FPS? CCP Yeah, Pay 2 Talk, and severely gimped KBM. This patch rocks! |
|
Iso Shalim
Eclipse Industrials Quantum Forge
56
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 19:19:00 -
[31] - Quote
If CCP does this, Dust will fail.
Not a troll, serious opinion. |
BAD FURRY
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
247
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 19:19:00 -
[32] - Quote
xprotoman23 wrote:Veigar Mordekaiser wrote:Xavier Hastings wrote:We need to hear a Dev's opinion on this. Or get a Dev's confirmation of removal. Wtf, who charges for voice chat in an FPS? CCP yes only ccp wold ask you to buy a 80$ UDS online boots and tell you every time you talk you have to pay a talk fee of 5 UDS and tax of 7% just for a online game
|
PEEEEEEETREEEEEEEEEEEEEE
Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State
781
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 19:20:00 -
[33] - Quote
Iso Shalim wrote:If CCP does this, Dust will fail.
Not a troll, serious opinion.
it's a sound opinion.
|
Yosef Autaal
SONS of LEGION RISE of LEGION
19
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 19:22:00 -
[34] - Quote
from way it was worded it might mean pay to talk to people who are not local i.e other star systems and not in battle and possible talk to eve online players??
if its just pay to talk to people out of the match possibly people on other matches fair enough don't know why would spend money to do that unless there is levels of coordination between battles we haven't seen yet.
no matter what reason though paying to talk to someone seems a bit greedy and wrong. |
Veigar Mordekaiser
Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire
676
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 19:22:00 -
[35] - Quote
PEEEEEEETREEEEEEEEEEEEEE wrote:Iso Shalim wrote:If CCP does this, Dust will fail.
Not a troll, serious opinion. it's a sound opinion. And a good one. |
Liu Kaizong
Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State
41
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 19:23:00 -
[36] - Quote
15:21<[CCP]Nullarbor>: you get voice for free in battle 15:21<[CCP]Nullarbor>: voice out of battle is going to be more for player corps and private channels which you need the UVT for |
EnglishSnake
Zumari Force Projection Caldari State
1012
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 19:24:00 -
[37] - Quote
lol CCP this is going to be the DUST version of the EVE monocle scandle |
gangsta nachos
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
377
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 19:24:00 -
[38] - Quote
If its ptt I won't use it anyway doesn't matter pay or not then. But paying is crazy |
EriktheHeartless
Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire
168
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 19:24:00 -
[39] - Quote
maybe one of the ccp devs gets migranes and has been in a game with bad furry and his bad loud music and just decided it would be better to not hear anything at all.(havent even downloaded new patch and now i am not sure i will when i get back from work,i would rather talk on laggy mag) |
Pokey Dravon
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
583
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 19:25:00 -
[40] - Quote
Just spoke with a Dev
Quote: <[CCP]Nullabor> you get voice for free in battle <[CCP]Nullabor> voice out of battle is going to be more for player corps and private channels which you need the UVT for
So in battle voice chat will be free, out of battle, if you want to talk to different squads, will require you to pay. If people are serious about player corps and whatnot I suggest TS or Skype. Regardless, fear not, in-battle voice is going to be free. |
|
Thor Thunder Fist
Better Hide R Die
79
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 19:25:00 -
[41] - Quote
Veigar Mordekaiser wrote:Thor Thunder Fist wrote:yes they are only for player made groups though not for squads. it was announced in the past that we would have to pay aurum for these but we were promised reasonable prices those seem a little....... I'd like a link to this announcement please. I would also like a link to the petition saying "CCP ******* scrap that or count me out" - assuming this is accurate.
think it was one of the fanfest vids I donno though I remember hearing about them...... sorry read so many articles and other stuff donno where to look for it :/ |
Veigar Mordekaiser
Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire
676
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 19:26:00 -
[42] - Quote
Liu Kaizong wrote:15:21<[CCP]Nullarbor>: you get voice for free in battle 15:21<[CCP]Nullarbor>: voice out of battle is going to be more for player corps and private channels which you need the UVT for Tell him if they want to have hope for their game, they better scrap that one. With massive clans coming in from other games, they're all going to leave when they realize they have to be in game to talk. |
Sniper no Sniping
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
21
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 19:26:00 -
[43] - Quote
Veigar Mordekaiser wrote:PEEEEEEETREEEEEEEEEEEEEE wrote:LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
i hope this is a joke Nope, they're on the market, and I have yet to hear anyone speak in the 4 games I've been in.
Ive been using my mic, maybe alot of people don't know you have to push the left directional button to talk and release it when you're done.
|
Rasatsu
Much Crying Old Experts
437
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 19:27:00 -
[44] - Quote
Perhaps CCP just didn't want to give freeloaders free voice servers when they should be in game making content for people who actually pay? |
Veigar Mordekaiser
Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire
676
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 19:27:00 -
[45] - Quote
Sniper no Sniping wrote:Veigar Mordekaiser wrote:PEEEEEEETREEEEEEEEEEEEEE wrote:LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
i hope this is a joke Nope, they're on the market, and I have yet to hear anyone speak in the 4 games I've been in. Ive been using my mic, maybe alot of people don't know you have to push the left directional button to talk and release it when you're done. LOL so you have to quit moving to use push to talk.. fail. That does explain it though. |
PEEEEEEETREEEEEEEEEEEEEE
Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State
781
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 19:28:00 -
[46] - Quote
EnglishSnake wrote:lol CCP this is going to be the DUST version of the EVE monocle scandle
nobody do any beta testing in protest.
stay off the servers. |
BAD FURRY
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
247
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 19:28:00 -
[47] - Quote
Sniper no Sniping wrote:Veigar Mordekaiser wrote:PEEEEEEETREEEEEEEEEEEEEE wrote:LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
i hope this is a joke Nope, they're on the market, and I have yet to hear anyone speak in the 4 games I've been in. Ive been using my mic, maybe alot of people don't know you have to push the left directional button to talk and release it when you're done. no im doing that and cant talk |
Veigar Mordekaiser
Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire
676
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 19:29:00 -
[48] - Quote
Rasatsu wrote:Perhaps CCP just didn't want to give freeloaders free voice servers when they should be in game making content for people who actually pay? "Freeloaders"? You're joking right? In a -Free To Play- game, you're going to label someone a "freeloader"? I'm sorry, but in what realm of logic does that make sense? |
Rugman91
Deep Space Republic
143
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 19:29:00 -
[49] - Quote
Has anyone thought that the isk equivalents may just be missing right now like the repair tools were |
Veigar Mordekaiser
Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire
676
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 19:29:00 -
[50] - Quote
PEEEEEEETREEEEEEEEEEEEEE wrote:EnglishSnake wrote:lol CCP this is going to be the DUST version of the EVE monocle scandle nobody do any beta testing in protest. stay off the servers. I logged of a second ago. Broken KBM and paid voice, no thanks. |
|
EnglishSnake
Zumari Force Projection Caldari State
1012
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 19:30:00 -
[51] - Quote
PEEEEEEETREEEEEEEEEEEEEE wrote:EnglishSnake wrote:lol CCP this is going to be the DUST version of the EVE monocle scandle nobody do any beta testing in protest. stay off the servers.
Nah just get a petition going, imma still be playing i still have keyboard |
BAD FURRY
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
247
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 19:30:00 -
[52] - Quote
PEEEEEEETREEEEEEEEEEEEEE wrote:EnglishSnake wrote:lol CCP this is going to be the DUST version of the EVE monocle scandle nobody do any beta testing in protest. stay off the servers.
yes EVERY ONE BE STRONG AND CLOSE YOUR FREE BETA ACCOUNT ! AND SAY YOU WONT COME BACK UNTILL YOU HAVE IT YOUR WAY >! |
Veigar Mordekaiser
Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire
676
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 19:30:00 -
[53] - Quote
Rugman91 wrote:Has anyone thought that the isk equivalents may just be missing right now like the repair tools were Thats like saying the ISK equivalents of Skill Boosters aren't on the market right now - because they're never going to be. |
EnglishSnake
Zumari Force Projection Caldari State
1012
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 19:31:00 -
[54] - Quote
Sniper no Sniping wrote:Veigar Mordekaiser wrote:PEEEEEEETREEEEEEEEEEEEEE wrote:LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
i hope this is a joke Nope, they're on the market, and I have yet to hear anyone speak in the 4 games I've been in. Ive been using my mic, maybe alot of people don't know you have to push the left directional button to talk and release it when you're done.
Really i dunno about that tbh, gonna be a pain to use really |
Veigar Mordekaiser
Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire
676
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 19:31:00 -
[55] - Quote
BAD FURRY wrote:PEEEEEEETREEEEEEEEEEEEEE wrote:EnglishSnake wrote:lol CCP this is going to be the DUST version of the EVE monocle scandle nobody do any beta testing in protest. stay off the servers. yes EVERY ONE BE STRONG AND CLOSE YOUR FREE BETA ACCOUNT ! AND SAY YOU WONT COME BACK UNTILL YOU HAVE IT YOUR WAY >! Considering that some people have been paying CCP, it would strike a blow. Even if nobody paid them, the fact that everyone just logged off would be a pretty big deal. |
Roccano1
152
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 19:32:00 -
[56] - Quote
CCP, PLEASE dont do this, seriously, find a better way to get the money you need, OTHER than making people pay for the ability to speak to one another in game. This is seriously a bad idea. |
PEEEEEEETREEEEEEEEEEEEEE
Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State
781
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 19:34:00 -
[57] - Quote
Veigar Mordekaiser wrote:PEEEEEEETREEEEEEEEEEEEEE wrote:EnglishSnake wrote:lol CCP this is going to be the DUST version of the EVE monocle scandle nobody do any beta testing in protest. stay off the servers. I logged of a second ago. Broken KBM and paid voice, no thanks.
you knew kbm was going to be severely gimped. |
Veigar Mordekaiser
Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire
676
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 19:36:00 -
[58] - Quote
PEEEEEEETREEEEEEEEEEEEEE wrote:Veigar Mordekaiser wrote:PEEEEEEETREEEEEEEEEEEEEE wrote:EnglishSnake wrote:lol CCP this is going to be the DUST version of the EVE monocle scandle nobody do any beta testing in protest. stay off the servers. I logged of a second ago. Broken KBM and paid voice, no thanks. you knew kbm was going to be severely gimped. I knew it would be gimped, but not THIS bad. It's worse than just using the gamepad. |
Aaron Atreides
140
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 19:37:00 -
[59] - Quote
Liu Kaizong wrote:15:21<[CCP]Nullarbor>: you get voice for free in battle 15:21<[CCP]Nullarbor>: voice out of battle is going to be more for player corps and private channels which you need the UVT for
Well here is one of those things that CCP had to try, but I think we all agree (which might be a first) that this is absolutely the worst idea.
If you want to develop a community, you do not limit the amount of talking going on. You never, ever charge players to talk to each other when every other MMO, has this option for free.
Players spend more time out of battle hanging out with friends then they do playing. This is what builds a community and its players, this is how we make new friends, discuss tactics and ideas. By doing a Pay to Talk, in any shape or form you are ruining one of the best things about a MMO, the friendships you make in game. CCP what ever high paid, know it all exec told you this was a great way to make money, should be FIRED today, right now and never allowed back into any game company.
Like many others have said, you pay to talk, then you just killed this game for me, all of my friends and well everyone.
Do I think this will be taken out by the time the real game comes out, yes. But to even try this nonsense is beyond stupid IMO.
|
Rugman91
Deep Space Republic
143
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 19:37:00 -
[60] - Quote
Veigar Mordekaiser wrote:Rugman91 wrote:Has anyone thought that the isk equivalents may just be missing right now like the repair tools were Thats like saying the ISK equivalents of Skill Boosters aren't on the market right now - because they're never going to be. Your probably right but i see no reason why there couldnt be isk versions |
|
Iso Shalim
Eclipse Industrials Quantum Forge
56
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 19:37:00 -
[61] - Quote
Paying for voice is going to kill Dust.
What's going to happen is they will just migrate to TS3/Ventrilo servers for out of game communication, so CCP will fail to get revenue from this item. Worse, it will have a VERY negative effect on CCP, and further paint them as a company that's greedy for money and figuring out how to bleed its customers dry. They barely dodged a bullet with the Monocole scandal, and the release of the "Greed is Good" newsletter. To continue down this road will only bring all this back into light, and with an even worse effect than before. |
Veigar Mordekaiser
Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire
676
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 19:38:00 -
[62] - Quote
Iso Shalim wrote:Paying for voice is going to kill Dust.
What's going to happen is they will just migrate to TS3/Ventrilo servers for out of game communication, so CCP will fail to get revenue from this item. Worse, it will have a VERY negative effect on CCP, and further paint them as a company that's greedy for money and figuring out how to bleed its customers dry. They barely dodged a bullet with the Monocole scandal, and the release of the "Greed is Good" newsletter. To continue down this road will only bring all this back into light, and with an even worse effect than before. what was the monocle scandal? |
The dark cloud
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
1060
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 19:40:00 -
[63] - Quote
lol screw this im not paying for beeing aible to talk. Hello skype. Thats for free. I just make a group, invite every 1 to skype and then talk like this. There are ways around that so bah very bad buisness idea. |
Abner Kalen
Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State
100
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 19:41:00 -
[64] - Quote
Veigar Mordekaiser wrote:Iso Shalim wrote:Paying for voice is going to kill Dust.
What's going to happen is they will just migrate to TS3/Ventrilo servers for out of game communication, so CCP will fail to get revenue from this item. Worse, it will have a VERY negative effect on CCP, and further paint them as a company that's greedy for money and figuring out how to bleed its customers dry. They barely dodged a bullet with the Monocole scandal, and the release of the "Greed is Good" newsletter. To continue down this road will only bring all this back into light, and with an even worse effect than before. what was the monocle scandal?
The $80 monocle allowed you to see your opponents better. |
Veigar Mordekaiser
Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire
676
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 19:43:00 -
[65] - Quote
Abner Kalen wrote:Veigar Mordekaiser wrote:Iso Shalim wrote:Paying for voice is going to kill Dust.
What's going to happen is they will just migrate to TS3/Ventrilo servers for out of game communication, so CCP will fail to get revenue from this item. Worse, it will have a VERY negative effect on CCP, and further paint them as a company that's greedy for money and figuring out how to bleed its customers dry. They barely dodged a bullet with the Monocole scandal, and the release of the "Greed is Good" newsletter. To continue down this road will only bring all this back into light, and with an even worse effect than before. what was the monocle scandal? The $80 monocle allowed you to see your opponents better. LOL That sounds like a bad business decision! |
gangsta nachos
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
377
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 19:43:00 -
[66] - Quote
Did I already say remove pay to talk, after that remove ptt as well and give the ******* option to mute instead good god |
Iso Shalim
Eclipse Industrials Quantum Forge
56
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 19:44:00 -
[67] - Quote
Veigar Mordekaiser wrote:Iso Shalim wrote:Paying for voice is going to kill Dust.
What's going to happen is they will just migrate to TS3/Ventrilo servers for out of game communication, so CCP will fail to get revenue from this item. Worse, it will have a VERY negative effect on CCP, and further paint them as a company that's greedy for money and figuring out how to bleed its customers dry. They barely dodged a bullet with the Monocole scandal, and the release of the "Greed is Good" newsletter. To continue down this road will only bring all this back into light, and with an even worse effect than before. what was the monocle scandal?
This was when Aurum was first released in Eve. To buy a monocole cost something in the realm of $100 USD (I might be off on the number, but I know it was high). Someone leaked out an internal mail from Hilmar, the CEO of CCP that basically had him saying "**** off" to people that were complaining about it. This lead to the Jita Riots, the leak of an internal CCP newsletter, and changes done by CCP, most of which have involved ignoring the Aurum and NEX storefront stuff.
Short version, for a better one with details, just google "Monocolegate". |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax.
2867
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 19:46:00 -
[68] - Quote
I call this the first offical thread naught of dust 514
btw this is for out of battle areas such as local corp group ect ect. |
Chao Wolf
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
209
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 19:46:00 -
[69] - Quote
Remove pay to talk and give the OPTION of push to talk. Some people prefer push to talk system. Personally I think it will be a pain to use push to talk while in combat. |
gangsta nachos
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
377
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 19:48:00 -
[70] - Quote
Chao Wolf wrote:Remove pay to talk and give the OPTION of push to talk. Some people prefer push to talk system. Personally I think it will be a pain to use push to talk while in combat. must not have read it is ptt
nevermind i think i know what you were saying the option to turn off ptt |
|
Iso Shalim
Eclipse Industrials Quantum Forge
56
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 19:49:00 -
[71] - Quote
Here's a good overview for what I was talking about. Forgot a few more important details.
http://massively.joystiq.com/2011/06/26/eve-evolved-the-day-that-eve-online-died/
|
tribal wyvern
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
673
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 19:50:00 -
[72] - Quote
Umallon Macross wrote:Universal Voice Transmitters are biomechanical implants that provide personal access to subspace routers, allowing users to communicate instantly with one another wherever they may be. The implants degrade over time and cease to function when fully absorbed by the user.
1-day 3-day 7-day 30-day
60 150 250 900
Aurum.
WTF am I looking at? Is voicechat pay2play? SERIOUSLY?
Ok! Here's how it goes. Technically its a type of voice chat but if you read the description of the item it says what it does. I've just been in a few matches talking up a storm with my fellow dusters and I haven't bought those things. But what they enable you to do is basically talk to people who aren't even in the same game as you, they could be fighting on a totally different planet......and you can still talk. that's what they are 'Universal voice transmitters' and 'wherever they may be' are the key words |
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 19:51:00 -
[73] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:I call this the first offical thread naught of dust 514
btw this is for out of battle areas such as local corp group ect ect.
I'd be well pleased with myself if I wasn't busy being horrified at the sudden turn for the worst this game has taken.
|
Chao Wolf
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
209
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 19:51:00 -
[74] - Quote
gangsta nachos wrote:Chao Wolf wrote:Remove pay to talk and give the OPTION of push to talk. Some people prefer push to talk system. Personally I think it will be a pain to use push to talk while in combat. must not have read it is ptt nevermind i think i know what you were saying the option to turn off ptt yea but it probably wouldn't be a bad idea to add in an individual player mute function |
Natu Nobilis
51
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 19:54:00 -
[75] - Quote
Shitstorm coming.
People, be reasonable: (HAHAHAHHA)
Talking during fight: Free Talking on the corp channel: Not sure about that, probably free.
Talking to people like a freaking cell phone using your vita and the neocom: A paid service.
Does this REALLY seems unreasonable for you ?
I wouldn-Št pay, but charge a vita neocom voice chat is not unreasonable.
Loved the graphics, prefered the old voices, THE HELL HAPPEND TO MY DROPSHIPS. I used to pilot, now i suck completely.
|
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 19:54:00 -
[76] - Quote
tribal wyvern wrote:Umallon Macross wrote:Universal Voice Transmitters are biomechanical implants that provide personal access to subspace routers, allowing users to communicate instantly with one another wherever they may be. The implants degrade over time and cease to function when fully absorbed by the user.
1-day 3-day 7-day 30-day
60 150 250 900
Aurum.
WTF am I looking at? Is voicechat pay2play? SERIOUSLY? Ok! Here's how it goes. Technically its a type of voice chat but if you read the description of the item it says what it does. I've just been in a few matches talking up a storm with my fellow dusters and I haven't bought those things. But what they enable you to do is basically talk to people who aren't even in the same game as you, they could be fighting on a totally different planet......and you can still talk. that's what they are 'Universal voice transmitters' and 'wherever they may be' are the key words
OK! Here's how it goes. CCP =/= phone company. I don't care what fluff they attach to it, its garbage.
|
Sinker1346
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
8
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 19:56:00 -
[77] - Quote
you should not have this item in the game, if they dont want to implement chat out of battle then they should just drop that item from the game and let players use third party chat out of a battle. |
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 19:56:00 -
[78] - Quote
Natu Nobilis wrote:Shitstorm coming.
People, be reasonable: (HAHAHAHHA)
Talking during fight: Free Talking on the corp channel: Not sure about that, probably free.
Talking to people like a freaking cell phone using your vita and the neocom: A paid service.
Does this REALLY seems unreasonable for you ?
I wouldn-Št pay, but charge a vita neocom voice chat is not unreasonable.
Loved the graphics, prefered the old voices, THE HELL HAPPEND TO MY DROPSHIPS. I used to pilot, now i suck completely.
Unreasonable? A company that talks about communication being the key to emergent gameplay wanting to charge you for the privilege of talking?
Yeah.
|
EnglishSnake
Zumari Force Projection Caldari State
1012
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 19:57:00 -
[79] - Quote
tribal wyvern wrote:Umallon Macross wrote:Universal Voice Transmitters are biomechanical implants that provide personal access to subspace routers, allowing users to communicate instantly with one another wherever they may be. The implants degrade over time and cease to function when fully absorbed by the user.
1-day 3-day 7-day 30-day
60 150 250 900
Aurum.
WTF am I looking at? Is voicechat pay2play? SERIOUSLY? Ok! Here's how it goes. Technically its a type of voice chat but if you read the description of the item it says what it does. I've just been in a few matches talking up a storm with my fellow dusters and I haven't bought those things. But what they enable you to do is basically talk to people who aren't even in the same game as you, they could be fighting on a totally different planet......and you can still talk. that's what they are 'Universal voice transmitters' and 'wherever they may be' are the key words
Even if it is a specialist voice service so you can hear what is going on in another battle while you are on CQ or in another battle then it should be ISK
ISK is easily gained tbh, and make the 30day one cheap like 5K tbh so ppl can easily afford it and wont be bothered by 5k of ISK for 1 month
AUR is not the way to go since its real money and ppl can avoid it altogether
|
Grimm Trip
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
12
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 19:59:00 -
[80] - Quote
You guys realize ccp has to make money somehow right? They arent making a f2p game just for the hell of it and because they like you. |
|
EnglishSnake
Zumari Force Projection Caldari State
1012
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 20:01:00 -
[81] - Quote
Grimm Trip wrote:You guys realize ccp has to make money somehow right? They arent making a f2p game just for the hell of it and because they like you.
AUR items and boosters will do that alone |
Naturi Riclenore
BetaMax.
120
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 20:02:00 -
[82] - Quote
tribal wyvern wrote:Umallon Macross wrote:Universal Voice Transmitters are biomechanical implants that provide personal access to subspace routers, allowing users to communicate instantly with one another wherever they may be. The implants degrade over time and cease to function when fully absorbed by the user.
1-day 3-day 7-day 30-day
60 150 250 900
Aurum.
WTF am I looking at? Is voicechat pay2play? SERIOUSLY? Ok! Here's how it goes. Technically its a type of voice chat but if you read the description of the item it says what it does. I've just been in a few matches talking up a storm with my fellow dusters and I haven't bought those things. But what they enable you to do is basically talk to people who aren't even in the same game as you, they could be fighting on a totally different planet......and you can still talk. that's what they are
You don't understand....
Making VC on a CONSOLE P2C is just simply crazy. Trying to type with a virtual KB/M is insanely difficult, and VC is BUILT INTO THE FREAKING CONSOLE. It's like saying "OK, from now on in EVE, you have to P2C using the KB/M" Even the FREE FPS's on a PC I've played recognize that VC is a fundamental requirement. For an FPS, KB/M chat is no good. I have to STOP what I'm doing, just to say something.
And remember it's 900 AUR for 30 days. That means every 3 months you have to pay another $20 to talk another 3 months. BTW, that's $80 yr = $7 mo JUST to talk (not including any other items you may purchase like the sp boosters) to your friends / corp outside of a match. |
Fredreichson von Fredreich
40
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 20:02:00 -
[83] - Quote
So let me get up to speed on this thread so far:
- Baddies with ADHD read the first three words of the item description and immediately come to the worst possible conclusion (I CANT USE VOICE CHAT AT ALL THIS IS A CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY) and flip out on the forums writing very angry rants about something they did not even try to understand
- More baddies reinforce this incorrect conclusion by failing to notice Push-To-Talk is now the default setting and must be changed in the options menu
- The three people who trained the skill reading comprehension past level 1 have their sensible posts buried under a mountain of idiots crying about the game being ruined (again)
Yup just another good old CCP patch day
That said I still think this implementation is a little dumb and all this is going to do is push corps to do some awkward **** with teamspeak/ventrilo and a laptop
Would probably be less bad if they cost 10% as much as they do now or lasted a LONG amount of time (1 month, 3 month, 6 month, year instead of 1 day, 3 day, 1 week, 1 month) imho tbh fyi fgsfds |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax.
2867
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 20:03:00 -
[84] - Quote
The thing is the lords of the internet charge for voice comms somone has to foot the bill. In eve its built into the sub (ccp ate the bill on that one basically) however for dust 514 its unreasonable for a compnay that barelys gets 66 million a year to pay for voice coms for a potential million people.
Asking eve players to also hoof the bill may not be a good thing either as it would almsot require a price increase on subs. |
Debacle Nano
Shadow Company HQ
639
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 20:03:00 -
[85] - Quote
There are chat channels that mix with EVE and Dust people. To chat in them you have to have that Universal thing. For squads and in game, you don't. |
Terram Nenokal
BetaMax.
115
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 20:04:00 -
[86] - Quote
This is like Eve Voice all over again.
It used to be an addition $4 a month on top of an Eve subscription fee. Only way for it to be useful was for your whole corp to purchase the account upgrade. The result was predictably bad. CCP eventually made it free for everyone, so hopefully this is a similar case. |
Natu Nobilis
51
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 20:04:00 -
[87] - Quote
Umallon Macross wrote:
Unreasonable? A company that talks about communication being the key to emergent gameplay wanting to charge you for the privilege of talking?
Yeah.
Stop the flamming dude.
They-Šre not making you pay to talk. You can talk just like before, on specific locatiosn relevant to the game (battle, perhaps corp chat). Was here before, still here now.
Now, on a DIFFERENT scenario, one that we perhaps didnt even IMAGINED before, they added a service and are charging for it. Something that wasnt here before. No loss from previous rights.
And you still think this is unreasonable?
The PR of the thing was a mess (seriously CCP, you should have learned by now your market mentality on surprises like this), but the funcionality is not absurd.
|
EnglishSnake
Zumari Force Projection Caldari State
1012
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 20:09:00 -
[88] - Quote
The more i think about the more i think it maybe also used between DUST and EVE players espc for OB
I still say make it ISK and not AUR tho but we will see how it plays out and what CCP do say |
Mirun Hirute
Algintal Core Gallente Federation
111
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 20:09:00 -
[89] - Quote
You don't need to purchase Universal Voice Transmitters to use voice chat in battles (this includes in the prebattle lobbies). However, you do now need to find the chat channel with everyone in it and activate it for voice (press X, a context menu will appear, activate voice is somewhere there). Once that's done, you'll be able to hear everyone else and see who is using voice chat.
What the UVT appears to be is an awkward means to allow out of battle chat for whenever you are anywhere in New Eden. It may also be the means for voice comms between Dust and EVE, but this is presently unknown as far as I'm aware. Also, voice chat may be available out of battle but only within squad chat channels you set up before jumping into a battle. |
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 20:12:00 -
[90] - Quote
Natu Nobilis wrote:Umallon Macross wrote:
Unreasonable? A company that talks about communication being the key to emergent gameplay wanting to charge you for the privilege of talking?
Yeah.
Stop the flamming dude. They-Šre not making you pay to talk. You can talk just like before, on specific locatiosn relevant to the game (battle, perhaps corp chat). Was here before, still here now. Now, on a DIFFERENT scenario, one that we perhaps didnt even IMAGINED before, they added a service and are charging for it. Something that wasnt here before. No loss from previous rights. And you still think this is unreasonable? The PR of the thing was a mess (seriously CCP, you should have learned by now your market mentality on surprises like this), but the funcionality is not absurd.
Flame this: Restricting communications is bad for the game universe. Restricting the most convenient communication method of the medium is a death sentence. Do you think EVE would even exist if they charged real money for using text chat? |
|
Abner Kalen
Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State
100
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 20:13:00 -
[91] - Quote
tribal wyvern wrote:Umallon Macross wrote:Universal Voice Transmitters are biomechanical implants that provide personal access to subspace routers, allowing users to communicate instantly with one another wherever they may be. The implants degrade over time and cease to function when fully absorbed by the user.
1-day 3-day 7-day 30-day
60 150 250 900
Aurum.
WTF am I looking at? Is voicechat pay2play? SERIOUSLY? Ok! Here's how it goes. Technically its a type of voice chat but if you read the description of the item it says what it does. I've just been in a few matches talking up a storm with my fellow dusters and I haven't bought those things. But what they enable you to do is basically talk to people who aren't even in the same game as you, they could be fighting on a totally different planet......and you can still talk. that's what they are 'Universal voice transmitters' and 'wherever they may be' are the key words
Isn't this feature already included as part of PS3 network? I usually play everything on my xbox and it's possible to open a party chat or a private chat with anyone you want, so I would assume this is the case with PS3 as well, right? Why would anyone in their right mind pay money for voice chat??? Seems like something integral to the game, and something that would promote the game (thus more spending) by bringing people together, increasing communication between players. |
Natu Nobilis
51
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 20:31:00 -
[92] - Quote
Umallon Macross wrote:
Flame this: Restricting communications is bad for the game universe. Restricting the most convenient communication method of the medium is a death sentence. Do you think EVE would even exist if they charged real money for using text chat?
Your reading comprehension surpases mine in some way, for i can-Št read that much into it.
I had something before, i still have it now. Somehting news shows up, something new is being charged for.
No loss for anything i-Šve been experiencing since entering the beta.
Really can-Št see your point. Would you care to elaborate in an objective way ? |
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 20:34:00 -
[93] - Quote
Natu Nobilis wrote:Umallon Macross wrote:
Flame this: Restricting communications is bad for the game universe. Restricting the most convenient communication method of the medium is a death sentence. Do you think EVE would even exist if they charged real money for using text chat?
Your reading comprehension surpases mine in some way, for i can-Št read that much into it. I had something before, i still have it now. Somehting news shows up, something new is being charged for. No loss for anything i-Šve been experiencing since entering the beta. Really can-Št see your point. Would you care to elaborate in an objective way ?
You don't play EVE do you?
|
Luxuro
3
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 20:37:00 -
[94] - Quote
With this much complaining they will hopefully get rid of it or make it more reasonable. Another thing is based on the description it sounds like something for talking to people not in your game, like party chat on xbox. People will either leave in protest or find a way around it, even if they can afford it. |
howard sanchez
Conspiratus Immortalis
448
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 20:46:00 -
[95] - Quote
Umallon Macross wrote:Thor Thunder Fist wrote:yes they are only for player made groups though not for squads. it was announced in the past that we would have to pay aurum for these but we were promised reasonable prices those seem a little....... Who in their right mind would pay for this?
I will.
What thefuck do you people want?! The moon delivered on a silver platter for your selfish gluttonous consumption?
You know that voice comms have sucked hard up to this point but we all managed to play the game. And win
And it sounds like this option is for additional comms bandwidth - not squad comms (not sure haven't seen it yet)
So- yah - if it is not play to win then it is fair game. I will take my hard earned personal income and use it to gain any additional fun and/or advantage I can gain
And for the record: I would still pay Aurum for detailed info and reports about other corporations' assets, capabilities, contracts, etc
|
uruz7 fish
FDF Industries Hedonistic Imperative
108
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 20:47:00 -
[96] - Quote
1) be able to send aur to another player 2) have a corp version that can be purchased on eve side or dust side
|
gangsta nachos
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
377
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 20:48:00 -
[97] - Quote
howard sanchez wrote:Umallon Macross wrote:Thor Thunder Fist wrote:yes they are only for player made groups though not for squads. it was announced in the past that we would have to pay aurum for these but we were promised reasonable prices those seem a little....... Who in their right mind would pay for this? I will. What thefuck do you people want?! The moon delivered on a silver platter for your selfish gluttonous consumption? You know that voice comms have sucked hard up to this point but we all managed to play the game. And win And it sounds like this option is for additional comms bandwidth - not squad comms (not sure haven't seen it yet) So- yah - if it is not play to win then it is fair game. I will take my hard earned personal income and use it to gain any additional fun and/or advantage I can gain And for the record: I would still pay Aurum for detailed info and reports about other corporations' assets, capabilities, contracts, etc you're going to pay to talk on a game lol |
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 20:49:00 -
[98] - Quote
howard sanchez wrote:Umallon Macross wrote:Thor Thunder Fist wrote:yes they are only for player made groups though not for squads. it was announced in the past that we would have to pay aurum for these but we were promised reasonable prices those seem a little....... Who in their right mind would pay for this? I will. What thefuck do you people want?! The moon delivered on a silver platter for your selfish gluttonous consumption? You know that voice comms have sucked hard up to this point but we all managed to play the game. And win And it sounds like this option is for additional comms bandwidth - not squad comms (not sure haven't seen it yet) So- yah - if it is not play to win then it is fair game. I will take my hard earned personal income and use it to gain any additional fun and/or advantage I can gain And for the record: I would still pay Aurum for detailed info and reports about other corporations' assets, capabilities, contracts, etc
Good for you. Those of us that don't suck on anything stuck in our face will use free alternatives, and be a lot more careful which of CCP's crazy schemes we'll spend our money on.
|
howard sanchez
Conspiratus Immortalis
448
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 20:49:00 -
[99] - Quote
Forget what you think you know or have experienced with other games.
That is a box you're living in--get out of it. Try something new. The Aurum will be refunded and you don't have to use it for additional comms channels again.
I love that they are willing to try something new in the micro transaction market. Increased comms bandwidth: brilliant! |
Natu Nobilis
51
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 20:50:00 -
[100] - Quote
Umallon Macross wrote: You don't play EVE do you?
Since 2007.
Well mate, if you-Šre not going to elaborate further, then there-Šs no point in talking. Not interested in a background check opening space for ad hominem.
Something news howed up, people are scared of changes, shitstorm is coming, the PR crew will sort this out (hahahhaha) and everyone will be mery in their ways.
And CCP, please stop feeding the trolls. You know this is the kind of thing that will be over simplified and cause embaracment for everyone, next step is the media coverage, than the questions "will Dust suceed after such a turmoil?" and then a zombie apocalypse shows up the world ends and the universe explodes, all because a little change.
*Sight* |
|
Chao Wolf
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
209
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 20:52:00 -
[101] - Quote
I think we need a dev to explain exactly what the UVT does and does not do.
If it allows you to talk to players only the other side of the galaxy and not in your alliance/corp/team/squad then ok, but if it is required to talk to any player your not currently in a battle with not ok. |
howard sanchez
Conspiratus Immortalis
448
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 20:52:00 -
[102] - Quote
Umallon Macross wrote:howard sanchez wrote:Umallon Macross wrote:Thor Thunder Fist wrote:yes they are only for player made groups though not for squads. it was announced in the past that we would have to pay aurum for these but we were promised reasonable prices those seem a little....... Who in their right mind would pay for this? I will. What thefuck do you people want?! The moon delivered on a silver platter for your selfish gluttonous consumption? You know that voice comms have sucked hard up to this point but we all managed to play the game. And win And it sounds like this option is for additional comms bandwidth - not squad comms (not sure haven't seen it yet) So- yah - if it is not play to win then it is fair game. I will take my hard earned personal income and use it to gain any additional fun and/or advantage I can gain And for the record: I would still pay Aurum for detailed info and reports about other corporations' assets, capabilities, contracts, etc Good for you. Those of us that don't suck on anything stuck in our face will use free alternatives, and be a lot more careful which of CCP's crazy schemes we'll spend our money on.
Good for you: stay with what you know and love Mag,cod,bf whatever. I won't judge you for not trying something new. Don't you try to squelch every attempt at innovation that doesn't look just like what you are familiar with |
Abner Kalen
Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State
100
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 20:55:00 -
[103] - Quote
howard sanchez wrote:Forget what you think you know or have experienced with other games.
That is a box you're living in--get out of it. Try something new. The Aurum will be refunded and you don't have to use it for additional comms channels again.
I love that they are willing to try something new in the micro transaction market. Increased comms bandwidth: brilliant!
It seems a little incredulous that they'd expect people to pay for something that should already be included as a part of the game. People are concerned now in the beta because once this game goes live and the price hasn't been significantly reduced or even eliminated, people will not think well on a game that tries to charge people for comms, even if it is for "expanded" comms. It just gives off a bad vibe. |
howard sanchez
Conspiratus Immortalis
448
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 21:06:00 -
[104] - Quote
Veigar Mordekaiser wrote:xprotoman23 wrote: CS:GO for $12 is looking better and better.
Yeah, and all this time they were talking about "true F2P". **** that. If I have to pay for voice chat, I'm uninstalling Dust.
Veigar, what is 'true free to play'? What does that mean to you?
does it mean that you can do everything, have everything in game without ever dropping a single Aurum?
Done
I will be going into the UVT business. I have a few extra dollars lying around since I don't pay 14.99 for this or that sub
I will purchase UVTs and resell the to you for isk. That way, I can afford to drive a tank or drop ship in the evenings after work And you can grind isk all day to buy my UVTs so you can sit in a private channel and ***** about p2w or hit detection or the newest e-peen enhancement drug
Win-win |
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 21:07:00 -
[105] - Quote
Natu Nobilis wrote:Umallon Macross wrote: You don't play EVE do you?
Since 2007. Well mate, if you-Šre not going to elaborate further, then there-Šs no point in talking. Not interested in a background check opening space for ad hominem. Something news howed up, people are scared of changes, shitstorm is coming, the PR crew will sort this out (hahahhaha) and everyone will be mery in their ways. And CCP, please stop feeding the trolls. You know this is the kind of thing that will be over simplified and cause embaracment for everyone, next step is the media coverage, than the questions "will Dust suceed after such a turmoil?" and then a zombie apocalypse shows up the world ends and the universe explodes, all because a little change. *Sight*
Condescending much?
How about this: people communicate in EVE by text because its a PC game and typing is the universal PC means of communication. On modern consoles voice chat is the universal means of communication.
Furthermore, consider this: CCP want DUST players to be as involved, and have as much impact on the shared universe, as EVE players.
No one is going to pay for this when they can get it free. This makes it more difficult for groups in DUST to organise. Increased difficulty means less people will bother. Less people bothering means less emergent gameplay for CCP to boast about and use as a selling point.
Most of the players in EVE and DUST agree that RMT should be limited to cosmetic and sidegrade items. Charging for communication is not only money-grubbing, bizarre, stupid, unnecessary, and annoying, it is also self defeating.
|
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 21:10:00 -
[106] - Quote
howard sanchez wrote:pyramid
Good for you: stay with what you know and love Mag,cod,bf whatever. I won't judge you for not trying something new. Don't you try to squelch every attempt at innovation that doesn't look just like what you are familiar with
I don't need any MORE companies overcharging me for talking to people who are far away.
|
Maximus Stryker
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
393
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 21:10:00 -
[107] - Quote
I do not see a problem with it in principle, I do think the prices could come down a bit...what is it like $4.50 for a month worth of talk...
If I am in a game and I want to talk to someone else who is in a different game...can't do that on other PS3 FPS... |
Derpdut Zakall
Ordus Trismegistus
2
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 21:16:00 -
[108] - Quote
Pay to talk, well, hopefully the jack***es won't pay for it. I don't mind paying reasonable prices to talk to my team, as long as I can drop the morons from the team. |
Natu Nobilis
51
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 21:19:00 -
[109] - Quote
Umallon Macross wrote:
Condescending much?
How about this: people communicate in EVE by text because its a PC game and typing is the universal PC means of communication. On modern consoles voice chat is the universal means of communication.
Furthermore, consider this: CCP want DUST players to be as involved, and have as much impact on the shared universe, as EVE players.
No one is going to pay for this when they can get it free. This makes it more difficult for groups in DUST to organise. Increased difficulty means less people will bother. Less people bothering means less emergent gameplay for CCP to boast about and use as a selling point.
Most of the players in EVE and DUST agree that RMT should be limited to cosmetic and sidegrade items. Charging for communication is not only money-grubbing, bizarre, stupid, unnecessary, and annoying, it is also self defeating.
Hello.
First, people don-Št use text in EVE. (Except for spam in local, drawing genitalia and such). They use TS3 / Vent. No one in a serious corp uses text. Voice is the mean of communication. You can-Št coordinate combats with text. EVE even provides a free com (EVE Voice) for people, but habit / someotherthings make them use external clients.
What is "this" that you mention? We only have a description of an item, in my head its for making PS VITAs using NEOCOM an expensive walkie talkie and paying for it. In yours, it-Šs a restriction on voice comms, removing features that are present as we write (just had a battle using the push to talk (yay \o/) buttons. No charge for it. Same thing as before.
In the future, we-Šll probably use EVE Voice to communicate with the corp members (corporations can have both dust and eve players). It will probably be free, since it uses the client already in the server we are at ! (One server to rule them all, remember?)
I only see mass hysteria around here, but, that-Šs exactly what a shitstorm is. People manufacturing information out of their heads, assuming they-Šre truth, and complaining about speculations that they themselves created.
How about waiting for clarifications from devs before announcments of "ruined game" ?
Best regards |
howard sanchez
Conspiratus Immortalis
448
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 21:20:00 -
[110] - Quote
Abner Kalen wrote:howard sanchez wrote:Forget what you think you know or have experienced with other games.
That is a box you're living in--get out of it. Try something new. The Aurum will be refunded and you don't have to use it for additional comms channels again.
I love that they are willing to try something new in the micro transaction market. Increased comms bandwidth: brilliant! It seems a little incredulous that they'd expect people to pay for something that should already be included as a part of the game. People are concerned now in the beta because once this game goes live and the price hasn't been significantly reduced or even eliminated, people will not think well on a game that tries to charge people for comms, even if it is for "expanded" comms. It just gives off a bad vibe.
Abner, I hear you. And I agree that when CCP has tried this idea out with a test community that will give it a chance they may decide to adjust how UVTs work or what value we get out of them
I want to encourage all of us to not fall into the 'should already be included as a part of the game' paradigm.
I feel that a lot of the nay-sayers hear about something they are unfamiliar with or haven't tested and judgement is passed immediately
Folks, look at my past posts. Sometimes I am in ccp's camp on issues and sometimes I am not
I am not blindly jumping on whatever bandwagon rolls through town.
I just believe that the micro transaction business model for massive online games has not been fully matured. There is a whole world of value out there to be tested and explored with regard to what a game can offer
I hate the closed minded approach to every new thing
Aurum will be refunded at launch. Try stuff out. If you hate it- say so- but give honest and objective feedback as to why
Help CCP make this something bigger and better than anything else you have thought of
It is not easy to do that if every new idea or product gets rage-flamed by the test crowd the minute it's rolled out
Thank you for considering my opinions |
|
LISA MICHELLE WARRIORS
74
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 21:22:00 -
[111] - Quote
Thor Thunder Fist wrote:yes they are only for player made groups though not for squads. it was announced in the past that we would have to pay aurum for these but we were promised reasonable prices those seem a little....... Its for talking to people on your contacts/ friend list. we cant all get in a match but BS'in with each other would be nice. You have large corp communication would be nice |
Gauder Berwyck
Deadly Blue Dots RISE of LEGION
217
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 21:24:00 -
[112] - Quote
Rabble! Rabble! |
ICECREAMK1NG WARRIORS
99
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 21:27:00 -
[113] - Quote
Pay nearly -ú4.00 a month just to talk to people on a game............ Are you fuk1n kidding CCPiss takers.... good luck with getting all your clan members to do that ****..... |
Aaron Atreides
140
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 21:28:00 -
[114] - Quote
ICECREAMK1NG WARRIORS wrote:Pay nearly -ú4.00 a month just to talk to people on a game............ Are you fuk1n kidding CCPiss takers.... good luck with getting all your clan members to do that ****.....
Again you assume to know what the VT does, but really we dont yet. So just stop acting like its the end of the world already. |
Natu Nobilis
51
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 21:28:00 -
[115] - Quote
I-Šm in the middle of combat. I-Šm using my normal (free) comms with my squad and my team in battle.
I-Šm a spy.
I want to contact my friend outside the corp, so he can launch an orbital strike.
How do i, using my regular (free) squad comms, do this?
*roll drumms* |
howard sanchez
Conspiratus Immortalis
448
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 21:29:00 -
[116] - Quote
Umallon Macross wrote:howard sanchez wrote:pyramid
Good for you: stay with what you know and love Mag,cod,bf whatever. I won't judge you for not trying something new. Don't you try to squelch every attempt at innovation that doesn't look just like what you are familiar with I don't need any MORE companies overcharging me for talking to people who are far away.
Dude, what do you mean 'talking to people who are far away'? Every single company has done this since, when- money was invented?
The East India company, pony express, AT&T,apple. You are always charged to communicate over a distance.
When has this not been the case? And I won't over charge you! I will offer UVTs at low low competitive Isk rates
|
The Polish Hammer
Doomheim
373
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 21:31:00 -
[117] - Quote
This whole thread makes my brain hurt. It's not pay to talk. There have been several people who have said that they are still able to chat like they used to. And really, how many times have you said to yourself, "You know what I need, I need to talk to someone on a different planet, RIGHT NOW."
Everyone needs to cool their ****, this seems like a tool that will be needed by high ranking corp members and those who are cross communicating with EVE players. |
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 21:31:00 -
[118] - Quote
Natu Nobilis wrote:Umallon Macross wrote:
Condescending much?
How about this: people communicate in EVE by text because its a PC game and typing is the universal PC means of communication. On modern consoles voice chat is the universal means of communication.
Furthermore, consider this: CCP want DUST players to be as involved, and have as much impact on the shared universe, as EVE players.
No one is going to pay for this when they can get it free. This makes it more difficult for groups in DUST to organise. Increased difficulty means less people will bother. Less people bothering means less emergent gameplay for CCP to boast about and use as a selling point.
Most of the players in EVE and DUST agree that RMT should be limited to cosmetic and sidegrade items. Charging for communication is not only money-grubbing, bizarre, stupid, unnecessary, and annoying, it is also self defeating.
Hello. First, people don-Št use text in EVE. (Except for spam in local, drawing genitalia and such). They use TS3 / Vent. No one in a serious corp uses text. Voice is the mean of communication. You can-Št coordinate combats with text. EVE even provides a free com (EVE Voice) for people, but habit / someotherthings make them use external clients. What is "this" that you mention? We only have a description of an item, in my head its for making PS VITAs using NEOCOM an expensive walkie talkie and paying for it. In yours, it-Šs a restriction on voice comms, removing features that are present as we write (just had a battle using the push to talk (yay \o/) buttons. No charge for it. Same thing as before. In the future, we-Šll probably use EVE Voice to communicate with the corp members (corporations can have both dust and eve players). It will probably be free, since it uses the client already in the server we are at ! (One server to rule them all, remember?) I only see mass hysteria around here, but, that-Šs exactly what a shitstorm is. People manufacturing information out of their heads, assuming they-Šre truth, and complaining about speculations that they themselves created. How about waiting for clarifications from devs before announcments of "ruined game" ? Best regards
That's a lot of assumption and wishful thinking there dude.
|
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 21:33:00 -
[119] - Quote
All you guys saying this is fine:
Enjoy being suckered out of your money. |
Vitriol18
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
56
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 21:33:00 -
[120] - Quote
Renember when you first released eve voice CCP, renember how you first wanted to charge people to be able to use it.
What happened, NO ONE USED IT, you advertiised it on the splash sceen, let people have a free trial, NO ONE USED IT, you eventually gave up on a bad idea and let everyone use it for free, adding content to eve for small ad-hoc entities (such as old FW) shame you let it rot on the vine though, the constant random kicks from the server basically killed it for serious fleet work.
If everyone has to seperately buy this, for out of game voice chat it will not work, organised groups will just use skype or TS or mumble or w/e, unorganised groups just wont use it.
If just for example 1 person bought it and it worked for the whole clan i could just about maybe see it working, maybe. Still wouldnt bet on it though. |
|
ICECREAMK1NG WARRIORS
99
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 21:34:00 -
[121] - Quote
Aaron Atreides wrote:ICECREAMK1NG WARRIORS wrote:Pay nearly -ú4.00 a month just to talk to people on a game............ Are you fuk1n kidding CCPiss takers.... good luck with getting all your clan members to do that ****..... Again you assume to know what the VT does, but really we dont yet. So just stop acting like its the end of the world already.
I'm NOT assuming sh!!t .................. we've used , tried. experimented...... what I said is CORRECT. |
Natu Nobilis
51
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 21:39:00 -
[122] - Quote
Umallon Macross wrote:
That's a lot of assumption and wishful thinking there dude.
Exactly! Because there-Šs no information about the issue, and everyone is talking crazy!
Give them some time to adress the feature. |
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 21:44:00 -
[123] - Quote
Natu Nobilis wrote:Umallon Macross wrote:
That's a lot of assumption and wishful thinking there dude.
Exactly! Because there-Šs no information about the issue, and everyone is talking crazy! Give them some time to adress the feature.
Y'know, or I can point out my concerns as they arise. Think I'll stick with that actually, and leave the 'expecting corporations to be cuddly happy BFFs' to apologists like yourself.
|
howard sanchez
Conspiratus Immortalis
448
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 21:45:00 -
[124] - Quote
ICECREAMK1NG WARRIORS wrote:Aaron Atreides wrote:ICECREAMK1NG WARRIORS wrote:Pay nearly -ú4.00 a month just to talk to people on a game............ Are you fuk1n kidding CCPiss takers.... good luck with getting all your clan members to do that ****..... Again you assume to know what the VT does, but really we dont yet. So just stop acting like its the end of the world already. I'm NOT assuming sh!!t .................. we've used , tried. experimented...... what I said is CORRECT.
Wait wait- what? You have tested these UVT products in game? And you hate them? But are unwilling to say why? Or how you tested them?
Fair enough, icecreamkingwarrior person. Thank you for the feedback
You will understand that given the scope of data regarding your recent testing and findings the rest of us (speaking strictly for myself) will withhold judgment pending further review |
Aaron Atreides
140
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 21:49:00 -
[125] - Quote
The Polish Hammer wrote:This whole thread makes my brain hurt. It's not pay to talk. There have been several people who have said that they are still able to chat like they used to. And really, how many times have you said to yourself, "You know what I need, I need to talk to someone on a different planet, RIGHT NOW."
Everyone needs to cool their ****, this seems like a tool that will be needed by high ranking corp members and those who are cross communicating with EVE players.
Ice cream princess or what ever the F@@@ your name is, see this post? No you didn't that and using it on the PS Vita are probably what they are used for.
Again you assumed to know everything, but really you no nothing..
If I am a spy in the middle of a battle and don't want to chat with the corp I am spying on, then I use VT to talk to my real team to attack or bomb the planet I am on. |
Degren Cthulhu
Bragian Order Amarr Empire
22
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 21:49:00 -
[126] - Quote
i think the primary use for this will be to keep in touch with your REAL corp haha |
Natu Nobilis
51
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 21:50:00 -
[127] - Quote
Umallon Macross wrote:Natu Nobilis wrote:Umallon Macross wrote:
That's a lot of assumption and wishful thinking there dude.
Exactly! Because there-Šs no information about the issue, and everyone is talking crazy! Give them some time to adress the feature. Y'know, or I can point out my concerns as they arise. Think I'll stick with that actually, and leave the 'expecting corporations to be cuddly happy BFFs' to apologists like yourself.
Sure thing mate. In the mean time, i-Šll continue to gladly have chat with my squad members using the free voice comms that Dust provides.
|
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 21:51:00 -
[128] - Quote
Aaron Atreides wrote:The Polish Hammer wrote:This whole thread makes my brain hurt. It's not pay to talk. There have been several people who have said that they are still able to chat like they used to. And really, how many times have you said to yourself, "You know what I need, I need to talk to someone on a different planet, RIGHT NOW."
Everyone needs to cool their ****, this seems like a tool that will be needed by high ranking corp members and those who are cross communicating with EVE players. Ice cream princess or what ever the F@@@ your name is, see this post? No you didn't that and using it on the PS Vita are probably what they are used for. Again you assumed to know everything, but really you no nothing.. If I am a spy in the middle of a battle and don't want to chat with the corp I am spying on, then I use VT to talk to my real team to attack or bomb the planet I am on.
So you are refuting his assumption with someone elses assumption? Classy.
|
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 21:52:00 -
[129] - Quote
Natu Nobilis wrote:Umallon Macross wrote:Natu Nobilis wrote:Umallon Macross wrote:
That's a lot of assumption and wishful thinking there dude.
Exactly! Because there-Šs no information about the issue, and everyone is talking crazy! Give them some time to adress the feature. Y'know, or I can point out my concerns as they arise. Think I'll stick with that actually, and leave the 'expecting corporations to be cuddly happy BFFs' to apologists like yourself. Sure thing mate. In the mean time, i-Šll continue to gladly have chat with my squad members using the free voice comms that Dust provides.
And eventually the games will be interconnected enough that having to pay for comms will be a real hassle, and you'll wish you spoke out about it. Good luck with that.
|
Aaron Atreides
140
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 21:57:00 -
[130] - Quote
Umallon Macross wrote:Aaron Atreides wrote:The Polish Hammer wrote:This whole thread makes my brain hurt. It's not pay to talk. There have been several people who have said that they are still able to chat like they used to. And really, how many times have you said to yourself, "You know what I need, I need to talk to someone on a different planet, RIGHT NOW."
Everyone needs to cool their ****, this seems like a tool that will be needed by high ranking corp members and those who are cross communicating with EVE players. Ice cream princess or what ever the F@@@ your name is, see this post? No you didn't that and using it on the PS Vita are probably what they are used for. Again you assumed to know everything, but really you no nothing.. If I am a spy in the middle of a battle and don't want to chat with the corp I am spying on, then I use VT to talk to my real team to attack or bomb the planet I am on. So you are refuting his assumption with someone elses assumption? Classy.
Yup I sure am, because this makes sense, while charging for Voice chat is not realistic. They have already stated corps will have chat channels, groups will have chat channels, so what does VT do but allow you to talk to players not in those groups. |
|
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 21:59:00 -
[131] - Quote
Aaron Atreides wrote:Umallon Macross wrote:Aaron Atreides wrote:The Polish Hammer wrote:This whole thread makes my brain hurt. It's not pay to talk. There have been several people who have said that they are still able to chat like they used to. And really, how many times have you said to yourself, "You know what I need, I need to talk to someone on a different planet, RIGHT NOW."
Everyone needs to cool their ****, this seems like a tool that will be needed by high ranking corp members and those who are cross communicating with EVE players. Ice cream princess or what ever the F@@@ your name is, see this post? No you didn't that and using it on the PS Vita are probably what they are used for. Again you assumed to know everything, but really you no nothing.. If I am a spy in the middle of a battle and don't want to chat with the corp I am spying on, then I use VT to talk to my real team to attack or bomb the planet I am on. So you are refuting his assumption with someone elses assumption? Classy. Yup I sure am, because this makes sense, while charging for Voice chat is not realistic. They have already stated corps will have chat channels, groups will have chat channels, so what does VT do but allow you to talk to players not in those groups.
What it does is unnecessarily charge players for something that should be free, and force them to use third party software to play the game.
|
David Malcom
Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation
9
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 21:59:00 -
[132] - Quote
This is why I hate free to play games. **** like this. |
TEBOW BAGGINS
FIREFLY ATLANTIS ENTERPRISES UNLIMITED TACNET
549
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 22:01:00 -
[133] - Quote
Natu Nobilis wrote:Umallon Macross wrote: You don't play EVE do you?
and then a zombie apocalypse shows up the world ends and the universe explodes, all because a little change. *Sight*
no duuude!!! December 2012!! Nibooboo is on its waaaay!1 |
Pytonus
BetaMax.
10
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 22:06:00 -
[134] - Quote
Boy, that escalated quickly |
howard sanchez
Conspiratus Immortalis
448
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 22:07:00 -
[135] - Quote
Umallon Macross wrote:Aaron Atreides wrote:Umallon Macross wrote:Aaron Atreides wrote:The Polish Hammer wrote:This whole thread makes my brain hurt. It's not pay to talk. There have been several people who have said that they are still able to chat like they used to. And really, how many times have you said to yourself, "You know what I need, I need to talk to someone on a different planet, RIGHT NOW."
Everyone needs to cool their ****, this seems like a tool that will be needed by high ranking corp members and those who are cross communicating with EVE players. Ice cream princess or what ever the F@@@ your name is, see this post? No you didn't that and using it on the PS Vita are probably what they are used for. Again you assumed to know everything, but really you no nothing.. If I am a spy in the middle of a battle and don't want to chat with the corp I am spying on, then I use VT to talk to my real team to attack or bomb the planet I am on. So you are refuting his assumption with someone elses assumption? Classy. Yup I sure am, because this makes sense, while charging for Voice chat is not realistic. They have already stated corps will have chat channels, groups will have chat channels, so what does VT do but allow you to talk to players not in those groups. What it does is unnecessarily charge players for something that should be free, and force them to use third party software to play the game.
See, there you go again: 'unnecessarily charge'. Says you! You think that ccp&sony get to host hundreds if not thousands of separate live voice conversations for free!?
So- it's ok if they charge everyone $15/month whether you use a lot of voice comms or not. But it's wrong for them to charge a much smaller amount for just those that want to use comms when they want to use them
You kids need to stay in school. Math & economics. Try it! |
Aaron Atreides
140
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 22:07:00 -
[136] - Quote
Umallon Macross wrote:Aaron Atreides wrote:Umallon Macross wrote:Aaron Atreides wrote:The Polish Hammer wrote:This whole thread makes my brain hurt. It's not pay to talk. There have been several people who have said that they are still able to chat like they used to. And really, how many times have you said to yourself, "You know what I need, I need to talk to someone on a different planet, RIGHT NOW."
Everyone needs to cool their ****, this seems like a tool that will be needed by high ranking corp members and those who are cross communicating with EVE players. Ice cream princess or what ever the F@@@ your name is, see this post? No you didn't that and using it on the PS Vita are probably what they are used for. Again you assumed to know everything, but really you no nothing.. If I am a spy in the middle of a battle and don't want to chat with the corp I am spying on, then I use VT to talk to my real team to attack or bomb the planet I am on. So you are refuting his assumption with someone elses assumption? Classy. Yup I sure am, because this makes sense, while charging for Voice chat is not realistic. They have already stated corps will have chat channels, groups will have chat channels, so what does VT do but allow you to talk to players not in those groups. What it does is unnecessarily charge players for something that should be free, and force them to use third party software to play the game.
We should get group chat, in game chat and corp chat all for FREE.
What they are charging you 6.66 for is to use a VT that allows you to speak to other players as a spy (again my theory on this). But to do so it will cost $$ to do it. You don't have to use this, its not forced on you. Its there as an extra tool for the spies and backstabbing that is part of this universe. |
CookieStein
32
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 22:17:00 -
[137] - Quote
Haven't read the whole thread cause I'm about to head out the door so sorry if it's already been posted...switch push to talk to off. That will give you in battle mics and out of battle mics while sitting in a squad and going through menus or what ever. Have no idea what this transmition thing is yet. |
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 22:21:00 -
[138] - Quote
howard sanchez wrote: You kids need to stay in school. Math & economics. Try it!
Here's some economics for you: less people use a service if it costs money than if its free. If the service facilitates your business model ie. COMMUNICATIONS in an ONLINE GAME then it is usaully more cost effective to provide the service free and use other revenue streams to subsidize it.
Its wrong for them to charge for communicating when communication is the WHOLE POINT. They SELL EVE and DUST on the premise of a single shard server where player interactions matter, and impeding communications of players is SHOOTING THEMSELVES IN THE FOOT.
It is in CCP's best interests to streamline player communication make it quick, easy, and free, because doing so makes the games more appealing and interesting to the audience and INCREASES USER NUMBERS.
Being frustrated by communications in a game about communicating IS A DEAL BREAKER that LOSES CUSTOMERS.
|
TEBOW BAGGINS
FIREFLY ATLANTIS ENTERPRISES UNLIMITED TACNET
549
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 22:21:00 -
[139] - Quote
Umallon Macross wrote:All you guys saying this is fine:
Enjoy being suckered out of your money.
if CCP doesn't get my money then Smirnoff and Coors would.. i guess either way i'm getting my money took by someone |
Corban Lahnder
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
158
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 22:35:00 -
[140] - Quote
The major problem here is not weather this is fair or not its that CCP never bothered to ask. They had a survey for Dust. All they had to do was add this question: If you had to pay for out of battle coms how much would you pay?
A. Nothing B. 5$ for a week C. 2.50 for a week D. 1.00 for a week Or what ever values you wish you get the picture.
Now you have established either a rough price point or even better weather or not to implement the feature at all. If 90% of the community says I wouldn't pay or I would pay little you now know that this is not your cash cow.
You also know either you cant charge for this feature or if you do, you at the least will make your customers mad and they will play and they wont use it. Or they will get angry and leave because they view it as a paying mans advantage. Either way it gives you reason not to implement it.
I'm personally mad not because of UVT but the fact that this whole **** storm could have been avoided. Ironic it happened on a day when on the EVE dust forum I said I hoped ccp wouldn't reinvent the wheel. Low and behold.
I was going to a gaming convention with other eve players where we were going to be ready to sing the praises of dust and eve to new "converts" and instead I have to deal with the fall out of this mess.
CCP get your house in order. Nowish. |
|
Iceyburnz
316
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 22:38:00 -
[141] - Quote
CCP have got this very wrong.
This paradigm is based on the premise that millions of people will play this game and love it and won't mind paying for voice chat services.
This is actually an off putter into playing the game. Its another reason not to play. At what point would any sane person after asking about Dust 514 someone says "Oh yeah one thing you have to buy ingame currency to use the voice chat service" would anyone, ANYONE say "Oh that sounds awesome, sign me up" or even "Fair enough, I mean it is free to play" nobody because it is engrained in the psyche of gamers that voice chat comes with console games.
They've got this wrong, so very wrong.
Its not too late though, if we make enough noise we can turn it around. |
gangsta nachos
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
377
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 22:40:00 -
[142] - Quote
I would like to take the time to tell everyone to go back through these 8 pages and like everyone that hates this thank you
|
Naturi Riclenore
BetaMax.
120
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 22:42:00 -
[143] - Quote
Im in-game now (finally) so lets see I can help clarify a bit ....
You have to enable VC on the channel. So if you want it on CORP, you have to highlight CORP in your chat menu, and select CORP - Activate voice. If you want if for your squad, slect SQUAD - Activate Voice. Even on your custom squad you have to do this. Then you can hear the VC (even outside of battle) while in your quarters.
PTT is turned on by default, you can go into the options and turn if off (for instance if you have a mute button already). No way to mute individuals, it's all or nothing. This new AUR chat option is... I don't know. The item description needs a better description. |
Ad ski
IMPSwarm Negative-Feedback
209
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 22:45:00 -
[144] - Quote
Voice chat works in game. It is auto set to, Push to talk ON. You have to do all your settings again. Not sure if you can talk for free in the squad outside of a game. |
Chihiro Itto
66
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 22:56:00 -
[145] - Quote
Do CCP push out these updates and then just go to bed? Guys, we need a clarification here.
My instinct says this is for more high level communication... while I dislike the idea of paying, they have to charge for some things and those things are the parts of the game that aren't essential but are added extras. Like high-level play with EVE players. Or spying/agent-work.
I'm actually extremely comfortable that prospective spies and agents might have to to pay hard cash to do so (although why they would actually need to...?). I'm not comfortable at all with charging for in-squad or in-corp voice chat, but I doubt that will be the case.
If it is the case, it's a second decent reason to buy a Vita (Skype/Party chat and Neo-Com in one handy portable package), which might actually work out cheaper in the long run.
Clarification from CCP please! |
howard sanchez
Conspiratus Immortalis
448
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 23:13:00 -
[146] - Quote
Chihiro,
Good post! I concur with your conclusion, position and argument.
People need to look closer at this new option before they throw everything out with the bath water |
Dead's Lackey
Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State
43
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 23:23:00 -
[147] - Quote
T H I S I S B U L L S H I T ! ! ! |
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 23:46:00 -
[148] - Quote
Dead's Lackey wrote:T H I S I S B U L L S H I T ! ! !
Yup. People talk about map packs fracturing player bases. WTF do they think limiting who can talk to who will do?
|
Paran Tadec
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
902
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 00:04:00 -
[149] - Quote
time for a good old riot. Lets goto jita and shoot the towers... |
Red at Math
Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire
41
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 00:26:00 -
[150] - Quote
All I've seen in this thread are people who don't seem to understand the mechanics yelling loudly about how upset they are.
You have gained options with voice chat you did not have before.
You can speak to your entire team while in a match.
You can form a squad of 4 and talk to them, even while sitting around in your Merc Quarters.
You need to purchase a UVT to speak to a custom channel that you create.
There is Push To Talk enabled by default, turn it off if that bothers you.
If you want to make a custom channel and address (using voice chat) a group of hundreds? Then you need a UVT. Or you could get a Vent server...which you will also pay for. |
|
J'Jor Da'Wg
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
648
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 00:44:00 -
[151] - Quote
Veigar Mordekaiser wrote:Liu Kaizong wrote:15:21<[CCP]Nullarbor>: you get voice for free in battle 15:21<[CCP]Nullarbor>: voice out of battle is going to be more for player corps and private channels which you need the UVT for Tell him if they want to have hope for their game, they better scrap that one. With massive clans coming in from other games, they're all going to leave when they realize they have to be in game to talk.
CCP SCREW YOU I CAN USE TS BUT THIS IS RIDICULOUS
W T FFFFFFFFFFFF |
J'Jor Da'Wg
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
648
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 00:47:00 -
[152] - Quote
No but seriously this CANNOT HAPPEN
LET PAY2TALKGATE BEGIN |
LISA MICHELLE WARRIORS
74
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 00:51:00 -
[153] - Quote
7 of us bought it and it works but its not worth what they are charging..... After our 30 days runs out we all will revert back to skype |
gangsta nachos
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
377
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 00:54:00 -
[154] - Quote
They need a cap on yhe amount of likes you can give because I have given so many in this thread
Likes are like tanks " if you know what I mean" |
Cyris Fortune
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
66
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 00:57:00 -
[155] - Quote
So let me get the speculation right..... This item can
1) allows you talk to your entire corp, even when not in game (party chat)
Or 2) same as 1 but this includes cross chat to eve players using eve chat?
Eve Chat is free? Yet eve players use Skype / ts for free also. But let's be honest pc gamers have used these methods since Jesus was a kid. So people are thinking, yea your point?
When dust join or are contracted to corp contracts they will no doubt use the same free methods that eve players use. The only real problem is many console players do not know how, cant be arsed or don't have pc / laptop. This then pushes a divide in the new Eden community. Leaving 3 options
1) pay to talk 2)get on Skype or other median 3) leave game 4) go without added extra.
I think option 2 will be taken by most "hardcore" players (those that want a full eve/dust experiance). Option 3 and more likely 4 willbe taken by "pick up and play" gamers. Those that choose 3 will release negativity towards dust.
So what it boils down to is IMHO no one has any real reason to purchase this. It causes more harm than good so "get rid" or "make free" either way it will make very little return. |
Returner Tekki
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
24
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 01:57:00 -
[156] - Quote
Aaron Atreides wrote:Liu Kaizong wrote:15:21<[CCP]Nullarbor>: you get voice for free in battle 15:21<[CCP]Nullarbor>: voice out of battle is going to be more for player corps and private channels which you need the UVT for Well here is one of those things that CCP had to try, but I think we all agree (which might be a first) that this is absolutely the worst idea. If you want to develop a community, you do not limit the amount of talking going on. You never, ever charge players to talk to each other when every other MMO, has this option for free. Players spend more time out of battle hanging out with friends then they do playing. This is what builds a community and its players, this is how we make new friends, discuss tactics and ideas. By doing a Pay to Talk, in any shape or form you are ruining one of the best things about a MMO, the friendships you make in game. CCP what ever high paid, know it all exec told you this was a great way to make money, should be FIRED today, right now and never allowed back into any game company. Like many others have said, you pay to talk, then you just killed this game for me, all of my friends and well everyone. Do I think this will be taken out by the time the real game comes out, yes. But to even try this nonsense is beyond stupid IMO.
Yo CCP read what Aaron Atreides wrote. I am a totally eve online fanboy. I am one of the few how liked the station additions and the clothing and yes I even bought the monocle. Charging to communicate is ******* stupid even out of battle. If this stays I will not be playing DUST 514. |
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 02:23:00 -
[157] - Quote
Does CCP want organisations in EVE and DUST to work smoothly together to make the game awesome?
How does forcing them all to organize using 3rd party software help? DUST and EVE are supposed to be integrated, not segregated. |
Mic McCoy
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
19
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 02:29:00 -
[158] - Quote
Im not sure how this is supposed to jive with eve, where you can talk with anyone you want whenever you want. Just seems like a useless money grab to me. I love CCP, but this is a little sketchy... |
Naturi Riclenore
BetaMax.
120
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 02:57:00 -
[159] - Quote
Naturi Riclenore wrote:Im in-game now (finally) so lets see I can help clarify a bit ....
You have to enable VC on the channel. So if you want it on CORP, you have to highlight CORP in your chat menu, and select CORP - Activate voice. If you want if for your squad, slect SQUAD - Activate Voice. Even on your custom squad you have to do this. Then you can hear the VC (even outside of battle) while in your quarters.
PTT is turned on by default, you can go into the options and turn if off (for instance if you have a mute button already). No way to mute individuals, it's all or nothing. This new AUR chat option is... I don't know. The item description needs a better description.
im quoting myself to clarify the post...
I have not bought the new AUR item. What I described is chat w/o buying the AUR item. You can only have 1 channel active at a time. The AUR item needs a better description for what it's for. As well, would have been nice for CCP to better explain the changes they made to chat |
Surtur Reaperson
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
49
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 03:15:00 -
[160] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:The thing is the lords of the internet charge for voice comms somone has to foot the bill. In eve its built into the sub (ccp ate the bill on that one basically) however for dust 514 its unreasonable for a compnay that barelys gets 66 million a year to pay for voice coms for a potential million people.
Asking eve players to also hoof the bill may not be a good thing either as it would almsot require a price increase on subs.
Here is the deal,they are PLENTY of ways to charge for stuff in a f2p business model. But THIS its not one of them.
And for the ignuramous fanboy who is gonna crawl up saying *nerdvoice* "but you dont have to pay for it if you dont want to"
Yes dickweed you could push your car around, that doesnt make the idea of a car with no engine less idiotic. |
|
J'Jor Da'Wg
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
648
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 03:20:00 -
[161] - Quote
Heres my opinion after my kneejerk reaction:
If UVTs affect squad chat; it is crazy.
If UVTs affect team chat IN GAME, they are crazy.
If UVTs affect team chat out of game, its ridiculous (once deploys for not just squads get working.)
If UVTs affect corp chat, they need removed. If UVTs affect chat between two players temporarily, (say a meeting between an EVE and a DUST player) CCP is of their rocker.
If UVTs are used to make a mass broadcasts or meetings much like a Teamspeak Server (with up to 100s of people not necessarily in a team or squad) then I could see that.
Remember, in MAG you could have a clan deploy with 128 people and have Voice chat with all of them (so go over strategies, tactics, etc. although I doubt anyone ever used all 128 slots and filled the lobby)
As long as I can form a lobby and anyone in that lobby can talk to me, its cool. Selling UVTs as an in game version of TS or Vivox is ok with me since they cost. But the importance of bein able to form relatively large groups of people (at least a full team) and talk for free is paramount. |
Kcobra Rod
Foxhound Corporation
55
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 03:23:00 -
[162] - Quote
... WTF!!!! |
Rasatsu
Much Crying Old Experts
437
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 03:37:00 -
[163] - Quote
Surtur Reaperson wrote:Here is the deal,they are PLENTY of ways to charge for stuff in a f2p business model. But THIS its not one of them.
And for the ignuramous fanboy who is gonna crawl up saying *nerdvoice* "but you dont have to pay for it if you dont want to"
Yes dickweed you could push your car around, that doesnt make the idea of a car with no engine less idiotic. Difference is, you paid for the gas for your car.
You didn't pay for DUST, and voice chat bandwidth costs money especially on a large scale. Why should CCP pay lots of money so that you guys can talk about dicks and boobs and fart all day in your private channel? |
LISA MICHELLE WARRIORS
74
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 03:45:00 -
[164] - Quote
We bought and its GARBAGE....................... It has an internal error every 5 mins.... then you have to reboot twice to get it working again.. Dont buy it everyone.. skype works WAY better |
J'Jor Da'Wg
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
648
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 04:08:00 -
[165] - Quote
Rasatsu wrote:Surtur Reaperson wrote:Here is the deal,they are PLENTY of ways to charge for stuff in a f2p business model. But THIS its not one of them.
And for the ignuramous fanboy who is gonna crawl up saying *nerdvoice* "but you dont have to pay for it if you dont want to"
Yes dickweed you could push your car around, that doesnt make the idea of a car with no engine less idiotic. Difference is, you paid for the gas for your car. You didn't pay for DUST, and voice chat bandwidth costs money especially on a large scale. Why should CCP pay lots of money so that you guys can talk about dicks and boobs and fart all day in your private channel?
You honestly don't get it so you?
EVERY OTHER GAME WITH TEAMWORK AND BETWEEN GAME PARTIES DOES THAT. Play MAG. They don't cost you to talk in anclan lonby all day long if you want.
Same with any other teamsork/objective based game or mmo
Also you did afine job of dodging that, when he talks of pushing the car due to lack of engine you talk about buying gas... Clever. But meaningless and amorphous. Cannot be tied down to anything solid but allows a clever job of shadowing the fact that its a standard for all other games, and its not innovative t all, its money grubbing and stupid. |
Ghural
The Southern Legion
63
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 04:10:00 -
[166] - Quote
Posting in yet another .. OMG I WANTS IT ALL FOR FREE .. thread
Remember kiddies, everything in Dust can be brought and sold on the market for ISK as well. |
J'Jor Da'Wg
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
648
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 04:13:00 -
[167] - Quote
Ghural wrote:Posting in yet another .. OMG I WANTS IT ALL FOR FREE .. thread
Remember kiddies, everything in Dust can be brought and sold on the market for ISK as well.
LOL not for a while at any rate. Keep that stock response rolling as you spend hundreds of dollars during that time. |
Surtur Reaperson
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
49
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 04:15:00 -
[168] - Quote
Rasatsu wrote:Surtur Reaperson wrote:Here is the deal,they are PLENTY of ways to charge for stuff in a f2p business model. But THIS its not one of them.
And for the ignuramous fanboy who is gonna crawl up saying *nerdvoice* "but you dont have to pay for it if you dont want to"
Yes dickweed you could push your car around, that doesnt make the idea of a car with no engine less idiotic. Difference is, you paid for the gas for your car. You didn't pay for DUST, and voice chat bandwidth costs money especially on a large scale. Why should CCP pay lots of money so that you guys can talk about dicks and boobs and fart all day in your private channel?
Why would you pay gas for a car with no engine.
Please, its like CCP would start to charge us for their electrical bill. |
Rasatsu
Much Crying Old Experts
437
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 04:16:00 -
[169] - Quote
J'Jor Da'Wg wrote:You honestly don't get it so you?
EVERY OTHER GAME WITH TEAMWORK AND BETWEEN GAME PARTIES DOES THAT. Play MAG. They don't cost you to talk in anclan lonby all day long if you want.
Same with any other teamsork/objective based game or mmo
Also you did afine job of dodging that, when he talks of pushing the car due to lack of engine you talk about buying gas... Clever. But meaningless and amorphous. Cannot be tied down to anything solid but allows a clever job of shadowing the fact that its a standard for all other games, and its not innovative t all, its money grubbing and stupid. MAG is only free if you stole it from the shop.
Try again. |
Pt3D
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
221
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 04:24:00 -
[170] - Quote
.......................................................................................................... . . . |
|
Chris Ridgeway
42
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 04:29:00 -
[171] - Quote
So far I know you can talk in battle, and to squad members from your Merc Quarters and in battle. So Im not seeing the big deal YET!
Now as far as Corp Chat goes, if you have to pay for that then so be it. It would be like having a Ventrilo or TS server. So get over it.
Sometimes I think people expect way to much. You're getting to play a game that is groundbreaking as far as Technology goes. Computers and PS3s in the same world and server. It's an awesome FPS game so far, and we're in BETA, and it's just gonna get better. And you don't HAVE to spend a ******* dime on it if you don't want to.
So just because you can't talk to every single mutherfucking gamer on the internet while playing DUST for free, does not mean CCP is stupid or wrong for charging you for it. |
Star Killer 420
Algintal Core Gallente Federation
13
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 04:35:00 -
[172] - Quote
i believe its 4 EVE players & Dust players to talk to each other not Dust player to Dust player |
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 05:01:00 -
[173] - Quote
Ghural wrote:Posting in yet another .. OMG I WANTS IT ALL FOR FREE .. thread
Remember kiddies, everything in Dust can be brought and sold on the market for ISK as well.
Remember kiddies, this entirely depends on: 1. people being stupid enough to buy UVTs in the first place 2. people being dumb enough to spend billions of ISK on resold UVTs instead of skype / messenger / ventrilo / teamspeak / telephone / 2-way radio / cans with string
|
Surtur Reaperson
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
49
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 05:23:00 -
[174] - Quote
Rasatsu wrote: MAG is only free if you stole it from the shop.
Try again.
1 question, how does it feel to have such a punctured schfinter? |
Rasatsu
Much Crying Old Experts
437
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 05:28:00 -
[175] - Quote
Surtur Reaperson wrote:1 question, how does it feel to have such a puntured schfinter? All my excrement is made of pure logic, so it can be a bit scary to be around me when I start spewing it forth in massive quantities. |
ICECREAMK1NG WARRIORS
99
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 05:34:00 -
[176] - Quote
This now is at the point where you punch your granny in the face or just **** laughing. Congrats ccp I just punched my granny in the face.
|
Surtur Reaperson
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
49
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 05:38:00 -
[177] - Quote
I was wondering since if you rode a **** any harder, you would've appeared on a jenna jameson's compilation.
And no, your logic its a festering pile of failure, huh I guess its like regular ****. Well thanks for letting us know about your oral diarrhea, now we know. |
|
CCP Frame
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
351
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 07:47:00 -
[178] - Quote
Hello,
Just to clarify what UVT is supposed to enable and what you get for free:
UVT Gives you:
- Ability to voice chat in custom channels, DUST or EVE/DUST - Ability to voice chat in corporation channels, alliance channels, ect.
UVT is NOT required for:
- Team voice chat - Squad voice chat
Text chat is of course free everywhere. Players can speak / listen to one channel at a time.
Keep in mind that price is still subject to change during the beta period. |
|
Pt3D
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
221
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 07:52:00 -
[179] - Quote
CCP Frame wrote:Hello,
Just to clarify what UVT is supposed to enable and what you get for free:
UVT Gives you:
- Ability to voice chat in custom channels, DUST or EVE/DUST - Ability to voice chat in corporation channels, alliance channels, ect.
UVT is NOT required for:
- Team voice chat - Squad voice chat
Text chat is of course free everywhere. Players can speak / listen to one channel at a time.
Keep in mind that price is still subject to change during the beta period.
Now, that's how you DEFLATE a ballon, kids. |
Grit Breather
BetaMax.
660
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 07:59:00 -
[180] - Quote
CCP Frame wrote:Hello,
Just to clarify what UVT is supposed to enable and what you get for free:
UVT Gives you:
- Ability to voice chat in custom channels, DUST or EVE/DUST - Ability to voice chat in corporation channels, alliance channels, ect.
UVT is NOT required for:
- Team voice chat - Squad voice chat
Text chat is of course free everywhere. Players can speak / listen to one channel at a time.
Keep in mind that price is still subject to change during the beta period. I have a question/clarification about UVT usage.
Currently when I buy UVT it allows me one month of free voice chat on any private channel. But this UVT item is linked to just the character I bought it with. So if I have 3 characters I have to buy the UVT 3 times. As I am only able to use one character at a time, I don't believe this is designed well.
As I see it, the UVT item should be linked to the player (or have multiple items, one for each character). After all, it's not like a skill booster where the character actually enjoys the module. It's something I as a player use and my character gains nothing. As it is now, I would have to spend 3x900 AUR if I have 3 characters just to get something I already have. Seems wrong. |
|
Debacle Nano
Shadow Company HQ
639
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 08:01:00 -
[181] - Quote
I think it's fine. |
ICECREAMK1NG WARRIORS
99
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 08:03:00 -
[182] - Quote
Debacle Nano wrote:I think it's fine.
Work for ccp do ya ? Or just have no friends ? |
Debacle Nano
Shadow Company HQ
639
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 08:06:00 -
[183] - Quote
ICECREAMK1NG WARRIORS wrote:Debacle Nano wrote:I think it's fine. Work for ccp do ya ? Or just have no friends ?
No. I just understand what CCP is doing. Text chat for corps and alliances is fine. It doesn't harm anyone. If a corp wants to go the extra mile to explain there pre-battle plans, they can buy UVT. |
Ourors
Doomheim
130
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 08:07:00 -
[184] - Quote
pretty sure this is so dust players can talk with all corp mates in dust or eve in private channels
in game comms STILL WORK JUST FINE. |
Rasatsu
Much Crying Old Experts
437
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 08:07:00 -
[185] - Quote
ICECREAMK1NG WARRIORS wrote:@ DEV Frame.
Sorry this is an excuse and a weak one at that.
Team chat........... Who cares, most of the time I don't want to talk to a load of random morons, or have to figure out how many I have to mute every game.
Squad chat........... Wow that huge 4man squad, well I have more than 3 friends and clan mates that I would like to group and play with. Even if we pay for this rip off chat so we can all talk we can't get in the same game let alone be on the same team.
I think instead of having an in house joke with MAG uniforms you have more important game breaking problems to worry about. 12000 AURUM gold monocles is something to complain about, the above is just lame.
CCP has always said that we'll be paying for convenience, not for win. And the UVT system is of convenience and something that is completely understandable that they'd charge for.
Price perhaps twice as high as it should be though. |
Ourors
Doomheim
130
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 08:14:00 -
[186] - Quote
CCP Frame wrote:Hello,
Just to clarify what UVT is supposed to enable and what you get for free:
UVT Gives you:
- Ability to voice chat in custom channels, DUST or EVE/DUST - Ability to voice chat in corporation channels, alliance channels, ect.
UVT is NOT required for:
- Team voice chat - Squad voice chat
Text chat is of course free everywhere. Players can speak / listen to one channel at a time.
Keep in mind that price is still subject to change during the beta period.
just requoting this so stragglers looking for a blue post can see it
|
ICECREAMK1NG WARRIORS
99
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 08:15:00 -
[187] - Quote
Do you know what I'm sick to the back teeth of all you know nothing about nothing, brown nosing ccp eve morons. and I say eve because anyone who knows the first thing about a console fps wouldn't be saying the stupid crap you're saying. |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax.
2867
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 08:16:00 -
[188] - Quote
Rasatsu wrote:ICECREAMK1NG WARRIORS wrote:@ DEV Frame.
Sorry this is an excuse and a weak one at that.
Team chat........... Who cares, most of the time I don't want to talk to a load of random morons, or have to figure out how many I have to mute every game.
Squad chat........... Wow that huge 4man squad, well I have more than 3 friends and clan mates that I would like to group and play with. Even if we pay for this rip off chat so we can all talk we can't get in the same game let alone be on the same team.
I think instead of having an in house joke with MAG uniforms you have more important game breaking problems to worry about. 12000 AURUM gold monocles is something to complain about, the above is just lame. CCP has always said that we'll be paying for convenience, not for win. And the UVT system is of convenience and something that is completely understandable that they'd charge for. Price perhaps twice as high as it should be though.
Artist do not fix server problems. Its not pretty to send a guy with a paintbrush to fix a router.
Marketing also doesnt fix servers either. They are the ones however that came out with the idea likely to help pay the morgate.
Server guys however work on servers.
As for the first interation of grouping, expect refinments and expansion of that. |
Debacle Nano
Shadow Company HQ
639
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 08:16:00 -
[189] - Quote
ICECREAMK1NG WARRIORS wrote:Do you know what I'm sick to the back teeth of all you know nothing about nothing, brown nosing ccp eve morons. and I say eve because anyone who knows the first thing about a console fps wouldn't be saying the stupid crap you're saying.
Sorry, everything isn't catered to you on a silver plate. Welcome to life. |
mr merkzdem
38
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 08:18:00 -
[190] - Quote
are you for real are you smokeing crack ? wtf rong with you people trying to defend this garbage ? |
|
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax.
2867
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 08:20:00 -
[191] - Quote
ICECREAMK1NG WARRIORS wrote:Do you know what I'm sick to the back teeth of all you know nothing about nothing, brown nosing ccp eve morons. and I say eve because anyone who knows the first thing about a console fps wouldn't be saying the stupid crap you're saying.
Anyone who's very intersted in game development would have a far better understanding the throes and pacing and definetly knows more than you are unwilling to accept as a possibility.
Most of the testers here know we're far from the FPS we are wanting. However we are not paying customers we're just testers and we have to do our voulenteered job to tell the developers 'this is not how you make an FPS.' or "This is not a good mmo element to put into fps' or 'you made a boo boo over here' finally 'Its so OP because of falcon so nerf it this way!'
|
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax.
2867
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 08:21:00 -
[192] - Quote
mr merkzdem wrote:are you for real are you smokeing crack ? wtf rong with you people trying to defend this garbage ?
Scenario: 1,000,000,000 phone customers They all want to talk. Provide this for free. Go.
|
ICECREAMK1NG WARRIORS
99
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 08:22:00 -
[193] - Quote
Debacle Nano wrote:ICECREAMK1NG WARRIORS wrote:Do you know what I'm sick to the back teeth of all you know nothing about nothing, brown nosing ccp eve morons. and I say eve because anyone who knows the first thing about a console fps wouldn't be saying the stupid crap you're saying. Sorry, everything isn't catered to you on a silver plate. Welcome to life.
Don't lecture me about life ******* I have 2 kids probably older than you. |
Debacle Nano
Shadow Company HQ
639
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 08:22:00 -
[194] - Quote
mr merkzdem wrote:are you for real are you smokeing crack ? wtf rong with you people trying to defend this garbage ?
I think CCP is right for doing this. They need to make some profit and convenience is the way to go.
Want easier communication in corps? Go buy a UVT or go use another program. |
mr merkzdem
38
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 08:23:00 -
[195] - Quote
i payed for the betta and this pay to talk crap i think that makes me a payin customer |
Debacle Nano
Shadow Company HQ
639
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 08:24:00 -
[196] - Quote
ICECREAMK1NG WARRIORS wrote:Debacle Nano wrote:ICECREAMK1NG WARRIORS wrote:Do you know what I'm sick to the back teeth of all you know nothing about nothing, brown nosing ccp eve morons. and I say eve because anyone who knows the first thing about a console fps wouldn't be saying the stupid crap you're saying. Sorry, everything isn't catered to you on a silver plate. Welcome to life. Don't lecture me about life ******* I have 2 kids probably older than you.
I'll lecture anyone that is selfish enough to want everything free. It's free to play. Not everything in the game is free. |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax.
2867
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 08:25:00 -
[197] - Quote
ICECREAMK1NG WARRIORS wrote:Debacle Nano wrote:ICECREAMK1NG WARRIORS wrote:Do you know what I'm sick to the back teeth of all you know nothing about nothing, brown nosing ccp eve morons. and I say eve because anyone who knows the first thing about a console fps wouldn't be saying the stupid crap you're saying. Sorry, everything isn't catered to you on a silver plate. Welcome to life. Don't lecture me about life ******* I have 2 kids probably older than you.
That doesnt stop grandpa joe getting told by the city that hoarding is bad and if he dont cease and disist theyll plow his house down. |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax.
2867
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 08:27:00 -
[198] - Quote
mr merkzdem wrote:i payed for the betta and this pay to talk crap i think that makes me a payin customer
Still you have responsibilities as a tester. If its not a good FPS game then you better leave feedback, complainign about this game not being an FPS and keeping it to yourself is rather selfish and silly and waste of your 20$ |
Arramakaian Eka
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
363
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 08:38:00 -
[199] - Quote
It's fine. Any serious corp already has a mumble/vent/ts server, so they're not affected. For the rest UVT is a matter of convenience, and doesn't really give an edge in fight. |
Dewie Cheecham
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
677
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 08:42:00 -
[200] - Quote
CCP Frame wrote:Hello,
Just to clarify what UVT is supposed to enable and what you get for free:
UVT Gives you:
- Ability to voice chat in custom channels, DUST or EVE/DUST - Ability to voice chat in corporation channels, alliance channels, ect.
UVT is NOT required for:
- Team voice chat - Squad voice chat
Text chat is of course free everywhere. Players can speak / listen to one channel at a time.
Keep in mind that price is still subject to change during the beta period.
But those PRICES! Have CCP not learned the lesson from the MonocleGate screw up? Strike AT LEAST a zero off the ends of those prices, 900 AUR a month is just INSANE. At this rate, with all the AUR sinks I'm more or less forced into buying in order to be competitive in any way or form (aka PAY 2 WIN), I'm looking at having to kill two of my EVE accounts just to afford ONE Dust account! |
|
Debacle Nano
Shadow Company HQ
639
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 08:43:00 -
[201] - Quote
Dewie Cheecham wrote:CCP Frame wrote:Hello,
Just to clarify what UVT is supposed to enable and what you get for free:
UVT Gives you:
- Ability to voice chat in custom channels, DUST or EVE/DUST - Ability to voice chat in corporation channels, alliance channels, ect.
UVT is NOT required for:
- Team voice chat - Squad voice chat
Text chat is of course free everywhere. Players can speak / listen to one channel at a time.
Keep in mind that price is still subject to change during the beta period. But those PRICES! Have CCP not learned the lesson from the MonocleGate screw up? Strike AT LEAST a zero off the ends of those prices, 900 AUR a month is just INSANE. At this rate, with all the AUR sinks I'm more or less forced into buying in order to be competitive in any way or form (aka PAY 2 WIN), I'm looking at having to kill two of my EVE accounts just to afford ONE Dust account!
Keep in mind that price is still subject to change during the beta period. |
Rasatsu
Much Crying Old Experts
437
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 08:47:00 -
[202] - Quote
mr merkzdem wrote:Rasatsu wrote:ICECREAMK1NG WARRIORS wrote:Ever heard of SKYPE ? Or any other fps game. I said I would have rather paid -ú100. for a decent fps that works rather than this so called FTP rip off rubbish. Ever heard of how Skype does its thing and why it would be a security issue for a game such as DUST? And while most people won't be crazy enough to cut the cable to your house during fleet fights (crazy russkies lol), there will be plenty enough people who'll throw a good DDOS at you during matches using botnets. No, I'm not ******* kidding. It will happen. again what are you mumbleing on about? paranoid much are we? I'm the author of a well known BitTorrent client and do virtualised networking as my day job.
Skype operates quite similar to BitTorrent's DHT and P2P transfers, and the main weakness is that the connections are directly between the clients. Thus your IP address will be easily known to everyone on your team, corp, alliance, etc, that are on any channel you're listening on.
All communication between DUST and EVE clients, even voice, goes through CCP's servers, so there's no practical way of getting this information.
Once they got your IP they can DDOS you.
And yes, I'm paranoid cause in EVE we learn to be. |
Dewie Cheecham
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
677
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 08:50:00 -
[203] - Quote
Debacle Nano wrote:Keep in mind that price is still subject to change during the beta period.
Bad excuse really. CCP have previously had an inflated/unrealistic sense of cost, unless we scream and complain about it, the prises will increase instead.
Edit: My point is really this. The AVERAGE player should not pau more for a free 2 play on a monthly basis, than a regular subscription. If CCP insist on hiking prices like this, squeezing their players. Most will leave.
For the skill booster alone (and we haven't seen any of the other augmentations yet) for a weekend warrior, will run you to 1400 AUR a month minimum. For being social: another 900 AUR.
See a trend here?
The absolute limit is 3000 AUR, equivalent to 1 month on EVE, and still some 50% above most other subscriptions I know of, which are usually at $10 or less. |
Debacle Nano
Shadow Company HQ
639
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 08:52:00 -
[204] - Quote
Dewie Cheecham wrote:Debacle Nano wrote:Keep in mind that price is still subject to change during the beta period. Bad excuse really. CCP have previously had an inflated/unrealistic sense of cost, unless we scream and complain about it, the prises will increase instead.
Actually no. They listen to well thought out reasonable responses as well. |
mr merkzdem
38
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 08:53:00 -
[205] - Quote
Dewie Cheecham wrote:Debacle Nano wrote:Keep in mind that price is still subject to change during the beta period. Bad excuse really. CCP have previously had an inflated/unrealistic sense of cost, unless we scream and complain about it, the prises will increase instead.
in that case ccp sort your sh!t out this is straght up bullshit |
BLENDEDDAVE WARRIORS
29
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 08:54:00 -
[206] - Quote
i was using the text channel to try to communicate to my m8 icecreaml1ng that he was about be shot in the back he was a long time dead before i hit the enter button .lol verbal chat no advantage at all |
mr merkzdem
38
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 08:54:00 -
[207] - Quote
Rasatsu wrote:mr merkzdem wrote:Rasatsu wrote:ICECREAMK1NG WARRIORS wrote:Ever heard of SKYPE ? Or any other fps game. I said I would have rather paid -ú100. for a decent fps that works rather than this so called FTP rip off rubbish. Ever heard of how Skype does its thing and why it would be a security issue for a game such as DUST? And while most people won't be crazy enough to cut the cable to your house during fleet fights (crazy russkies lol), there will be plenty enough people who'll throw a good DDOS at you during matches using botnets. No, I'm not ******* kidding. It will happen. again what are you mumbleing on about? paranoid much are we? I'm the author of a well known BitTorrent client and do virtualised networking as my day job. Skype operates quite similar to BitTorrent's DHT and P2P transfers, and the main weakness is that the connections are directly between the clients. Thus your IP address will be easily known to everyone on your team, corp, alliance, etc, that are on any channel you're listening on. All communication between DUST and EVE clients, even voice, goes through CCP's servers, so there's no practical way of getting this information. Once they got your IP they can DDOS you. And yes, I'm paranoid cause in EVE we learn to be.
tin foil hats all round then huh crazy mofo lol |
Debacle Nano
Shadow Company HQ
639
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 08:56:00 -
[208] - Quote
BLENDEDDAVE WARRIORS wrote:i was using the text channel to try to communicate to my m8 icecreaml1ng that he was about be shot in the back he was a long time dead before i hit the enter button .lol verbal chat no advantage at all
Notice how they say voice chat in game is free. You sure do read well! |
Dewie Cheecham
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
677
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 08:57:00 -
[209] - Quote
mr merkzdem wrote:tin foil hats all round then huh crazy mofo lol
Mofo? Guess it takes one to know one.
No, in EVE it is never paranoia, because history have shown that they ARE really after you. |
Dewie Cheecham
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
677
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 08:58:00 -
[210] - Quote
Debacle Nano wrote:BLENDEDDAVE WARRIORS wrote:i was using the text channel to try to communicate to my m8 icecreaml1ng that he was about be shot in the back he was a long time dead before i hit the enter button .lol verbal chat no advantage at all Notice how they say voice chat in game is free. You sure do read well!
I read that, but I couldn't get the damned thing to work. |
|
BLENDEDDAVE WARRIORS
29
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 09:00:00 -
[211] - Quote
bigger groups would solve most of my beefs!!! |
Debacle Nano
Shadow Company HQ
639
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 09:01:00 -
[212] - Quote
Dewie Cheecham wrote:Debacle Nano wrote:BLENDEDDAVE WARRIORS wrote:i was using the text channel to try to communicate to my m8 icecreaml1ng that he was about be shot in the back he was a long time dead before i hit the enter button .lol verbal chat no advantage at all Notice how they say voice chat in game is free. You sure do read well! I read that, but I couldn't get the damned thing to work.
There's a PTT button. Left D-Pad. You can turn it off in the options as well. |
Zat Earthshatter
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
304
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 09:01:00 -
[213] - Quote
Ok... so the effect on the game BEFORE the cross-game interaction is about zero during matches.
How about once a co-ordinated assault between both space and ground forces is necessary to victory?? Do remember a PS3 user can't access Ventrillo/TS as effectively as an EVE player. Even though it's not as tangible as a Forge Gun, it is a tactical advantage to those who cough up AUR, or have the resources to trade for it. And in New Eden, a tactical advantage is the most dangerous advantage.
i'll keep my monocle-less eyes on this one... |
Lurchasaurus
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
808
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 09:20:00 -
[214] - Quote
i can see how someone from the outside would think this is silly, but for those who have played EVE this is a reality. There are crazy people on EVE. You dont come across this stuff when all you do is start match, shoot, end match, start match again on diff map. shoot, end match, etc. |
Lurchasaurus
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
808
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 09:35:00 -
[215] - Quote
beating your chest at CCP will get you nowhere. Good night. |
DichromaticB3C
Circle of Huskarl Minmatar Republic
10
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 09:38:00 -
[216] - Quote
Veigar Mordekaiser wrote:jackbubu wrote:Veigar Mordekaiser wrote:jackbubu wrote:From the description it looks like this is only for out of game voice coms, but i have yet to try out if "in battle" voice works unrestricted.
if not this would be literally the worst thing ever I have yet to hear anyone on comms. well that doesnt have to mean anything, i'd rather test it myself then jump to conclusions I don't think anyone has heard me either. When I looked in the chat list, the little voice bubble had a red "X" through it, and didn't turn green when I spoke.
Might be because push to talk was enabled by default in the update.
|
|
CCP Frame
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
351
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 09:44:00 -
[217] - Quote
If you have any issues regarding post deletion send us an email over at [email protected] and we will look into it. Otherwise please refrain from discussing post deletion as they most likely violated our forum rules that can be found right here https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=18206&find=unread
Keep it civil, guys. |
|
4447
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
649
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 09:44:00 -
[218] - Quote
CCP Frame wrote:Hello,
Just to clarify what UVT is supposed to enable and what you get for free:
UVT Gives you:
- Ability to voice chat in custom channels, DUST or EVE/DUST - Ability to voice chat in corporation channels, alliance channels, ect.
UVT is NOT required for:
- Team voice chat - Squad voice chat
Text chat is of course free everywhere. Players can speak / listen to one channel at a time.
Keep in mind that price is still subject to change during the beta period.
if we're going to pay for chat make a premium service and with this service you get some free tanks, weapons and mods every month plus talking in the clan? |
BLENDEDDAVE WARRIORS
29
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 09:56:00 -
[219] - Quote
so my civility is in question ? |
Primus Core
Brimstone Tactical Covert Intervention
22
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 09:58:00 -
[220] - Quote
CCP Frame wrote:Hello,
Just to clarify what UVT is supposed to enable and what you get for free:
UVT Gives you:
- Ability to voice chat in custom channels, DUST or EVE/DUST - Ability to voice chat in corporation channels, alliance channels, ect.
UVT is NOT required for:
- Team voice chat - Squad voice chat
Text chat is of course free everywhere. Players can speak / listen to one channel at a time.
Keep in mind that price is still subject to change during the beta period.
Everyone's just going to use teamspeak or some other form of voice comms. I mean, both have mobile phone apps as well, so it's not like people won't use them because they're not near the computer.
|
|
WARR1OR OF WARRIORS
11
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 10:04:00 -
[221] - Quote
They sure do have big brooms in Iceland... Wink wink. |
GoatRoper2100
Autocannons Anonymous Late Night Alliance
4
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 10:04:00 -
[222] - Quote
Okay, this addition is kicking a hornet nest. First off the prices are ridiculous but subject to change so hey. The problem is, reasonable or not, this will immediately spark people to not bother picking up dust or otherwise cause people who were giving it a try to say f--- that ill play something else. It does not matter how reasonable the price is on this, as people will only see the following; "You have to pay to voice chat? WTF?!" Misunderstandings of the intended system immediately will escalate. Consider the mob mentality of the masses. You can respond till you are blue in the face about "well we dont need those kind of people on dust!" but the issue is if they aren't playing, they aren't paying for aur for those shiny guns you keep killing them with, and ccp looses money overall. Its a loose loose. Down the line once rumors fly it will go to "if they are charging for this, what else are they going to nickel and dime me for?" I understand that voice servers get expensive. This can be done, but CCP is going to need to be very careful about how this is explained and presented, presentation is everything. |
WARR1OR OF WARRIORS
11
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 10:14:00 -
[223] - Quote
[quote=Rasatsu][quote=ICECREAMK1NG WARRIORS]@ DEV Frame.
Sorry this is an excuse and a weak one at that.
Team chat........... Who cares, most of the time I don't want to talk to a load of random morons, or have to figure out how many I have to mute every game.
Squad chat........... Wow that huge 4man squad, well I have more than 3 friends and clan mates that I would like to group and play with. Even if we pay for this rip off chat so we can all talk we can't get in the same game let alone be on the same team.
I think instead of having an in house joke with MAG uniforms you have more important game breaking problems to worry about.
Truth... How is a four man squad supposed to accomplish anything. ? |
mr merkzdem
38
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 10:16:00 -
[224] - Quote
WARR1OR OF WARRIORS wrote:[quote=Rasatsu][quote=ICECREAMK1NG WARRIORS]@ DEV Frame.
Sorry this is an excuse and a weak one at that.
Team chat........... Who cares, most of the time I don't want to talk to a load of random morons, or have to figure out how many I have to mute every game.
Squad chat........... Wow that huge 4man squad, well I have more than 3 friends and clan mates that I would like to group and play with. Even if we pay for this rip off chat so we can all talk we can't get in the same game let alone be on the same team.
I think instead of having an in house joke with MAG uniforms you have more important game breaking problems to worry about.
Truth... How is a four man squad supposed to accomplish anything. ?
this+1 |
BLENDEDDAVE WARRIORS
29
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 10:20:00 -
[225] - Quote
GoatRoper2100 wrote:Okay, this addition is kicking a hornet nest. First off the prices are ridiculous but subject to change so hey. The problem is, reasonable or not, this will immediately spark people to not bother picking up dust or otherwise cause people who were giving it a try to say f--- that ill play something else. It does not matter how reasonable the price is on this, as people will only see the following; "You have to pay to voice chat? WTF?!" Misunderstandings of the intended system immediately will escalate. Consider the mob mentality of the masses. You can respond till you are blue in the face about "well we dont need those kind of people on dust!" but the issue is if they aren't playing, they aren't paying for aur for those shiny guns you keep killing them with, and ccp looses money overall. Its a loose loose. Though they may make a quick buck now, down the line once rumors fly it will go to "if they are charging for this, what else are they going to nickel and dime me for?" I understand that voice servers get expensive. This can be done, but CCP is going to need to be very careful about how this is explained and presented, presentation is everything.
if the squads were bigger this would not even have come up clans need to group and communicate freely the yvt good for leaders of large groops ie more than one or two squads who can GROUP TOGETHER!!! |
RPGio
BetaMax.
34
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 10:35:00 -
[226] - Quote
CCP Frame wrote:Hello,
Just to clarify what UVT is supposed to enable and what you get for free:
UVT Gives you:
- Ability to voice chat in custom channels, DUST or EVE/DUST - Ability to voice chat in corporation channels, alliance channels, ect.
UVT is NOT required for:
- Team voice chat - Squad voice chat
Text chat is of course free everywhere. Players can speak / listen to one channel at a time.
Keep in mind that price is still subject to change during the beta period.
As in EVE Users will use 3rd party free voice comms ...
... corp voice chat should be free! The rest i can live with.
Will the UVTs be tradeble in the ISK market ? (Buy for Aur, sell for isk). If so, it's okay too. |
Zerlathon
Algintal Core Gallente Federation
213
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 10:44:00 -
[227] - Quote
CCP Frame wrote:Hello,
Just to clarify what UVT is supposed to enable and what you get for free:
UVT Gives you:
- Ability to voice chat in custom channels, DUST or EVE/DUST - Ability to voice chat in corporation channels, alliance channels, ect.
UVT is NOT required for:
- Team voice chat - Squad voice chat
Text chat is of course free everywhere. Players can speak / listen to one channel at a time.
Keep in mind that price is still subject to change during the beta period.
At least the matter of what the UVT is for has been clarified.
I think we gotta look at this from a rational perspective...
Although a little inconvenient, the "free version" of the game won't be unplayable. I think that as long as the full use of all of the features costs no more than the monthly cost of an EVE subscription, then there's little wrong with the method that CCP have adopted (I must stress that I'm not including the purchase of premium weapons and/ or skill/ SP boosters).
|
WARR1OR OF WARRIORS
11
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 11:03:00 -
[228] - Quote
@ zerlathon.
Yes the free game will not be ''unplayable '' I think most people want a little more than '' it's not unplayable '' .
|
Darkz azurr
Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire
105
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 11:33:00 -
[229] - Quote
so, how's grouping with friends work ? i add a friend to a squad i guess while in my merc quarters ...then what ? , we sit in silence as i try to read his mind what map we should do, what pve mission we should choose etc ?
edit: CCP Jian: To be clear: Voice is FREE for Teams and Squads.
:D |
William HBonney
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
318
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 11:35:00 -
[230] - Quote
People will find a way to chat for free...ventrillo, teamspeak, clans love working together and I think this is where a problem comes in. Currently we see the grouping of 4 people...I am sure corp battles will be different, but 4 people is a bit slim, but still a beta, so we will see.
A few people will pay for this voice chat, most will ignore it and use free DL programs, some will see it and not want to play the game thinking CCP is a money grubbing company. |
|
Ghural
The Southern Legion
63
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 11:51:00 -
[231] - Quote
Dear CCP.
Learn to communicate clearly and accurately. You should have learned this by now.
Geez |
Zerlathon
Algintal Core Gallente Federation
213
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 12:20:00 -
[232] - Quote
WARR1OR OF WARRIORS wrote:@ zerlathon.
Yes the free game will not be ''unplayable '' I think most people want a little more than '' it's not unplayable '' .
I can get where you're coming from, but at the end of the day CCP have provided you with what they are legally obliged to provide you with in terms of a "Free Game". It's not as if they are eliminating the possibility of communicating with your Corporation, they are merely making the primary (and most convenient way) to communicate accessible via an optional item.
There are alternative ways around it, and when Player Trading is introduced into the game, I'm sure that there will be people whom will be selling them for ISK. |
woess
Kanalanal
23
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 12:22:00 -
[233] - Quote
talking with guys on skype or ts on my phone while playing... lol pay for ingame voice... |
EnIgMa99
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
219
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 12:24:00 -
[234] - Quote
this sucks |
Iceyburnz
316
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 12:25:00 -
[235] - Quote
I don't know why CCP thought this wouldn't be misinterpreted by the community.
Everyone is going to circumvent it in the situations that it's required and think a little worse of CCP as a result.
What where you thinking CCP, really? |
EnglishSnake
Zumari Force Projection Caldari State
1012
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 12:25:00 -
[236] - Quote
Imma wait on see on this one for now |
Mobius Wyvern
BetaMax.
1216
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 12:27:00 -
[237] - Quote
[quote=CCP Frame]Hello,
Just to clarify what UVT is supposed to enable and what you get for free:
UVT Gives you:
- Ability to voice chat in custom channels, DUST or EVE/DUST - Ability to voice chat in corporation channels, alliance channels, ect.
UVT is NOT required for:
- Team voice chat - Squad voice chat
Text chat is of course free everywhere. Players can speak / listen to one channel at a time.
Keep in mind that price is still subject to change during the beta period.[/quote] See, this is an interesting one. I can understand such an implant as a description for allowing such communication, because it fits with the backstory, but why the heck does this need to be an MT item, and at this level of price? I realize this isn't a subscription based game like EVE Online, but the ability to voice chat with members of your own corporation is only available if you pay for it? I just don't get it. I mean, I get that providing communication infrastructure costs both time and money, but at the very least these should either drop to a fourth the cost they have right now, at the very least, or make them ISK items. Not gonna lie, this is crap. |
Encharrion
L.O.T.I.S. Legacy Rising
104
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 12:27:00 -
[238] - Quote
I can understand UVT for custom channels and communication with eve players, but corporation chat really should be free. And either way it needs to be cheaper. |
MrZIONY
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
38
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 14:11:00 -
[239] - Quote
Just read this and I have to say if CCP are going to charge us to be able to speak to friends out of game when voice chat has always been free in EvE Online I'm out.
Who ever thought of this new money grab should be sacked! |
Alshadow
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
71
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 14:21:00 -
[240] - Quote
i have a usb key board so i dont give a damn |
|
J'Jor Da'Wg
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
648
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 14:22:00 -
[241] - Quote
Rasatsu wrote:J'Jor Da'Wg wrote:You honestly don't get it so you?
EVERY OTHER GAME WITH TEAMWORK AND BETWEEN GAME PARTIES DOES THAT. Play MAG. They don't cost you to talk in anclan lonby all day long if you want.
Same with any other teamsork/objective based game or mmo
Also you did afine job of dodging that, when he talks of pushing the car due to lack of engine you talk about buying gas... Clever. But meaningless and amorphous. Cannot be tied down to anything solid but allows a clever job of shadowing the fact that its a standard for all other games, and its not innovative t all, its money grubbing and stupid. MAG is only free if you stole it from the shop. Try again. They asked for the price of the game upfront. I never had to pay another dime. If I am going to be paying them, I would rather pay a defined amount and drop this whole free 2 play crap |
Maximus Stryker
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
393
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 14:23:00 -
[242] - Quote
CCP Frame wrote:Hello,
Just to clarify what UVT is supposed to enable and what you get for free:
UVT Gives you:
- Ability to voice chat in custom channels, DUST or EVE/DUST - Ability to voice chat in corporation channels, alliance channels, ect.
UVT is NOT required for:
- Team voice chat - Squad voice chat
Text chat is of course free everywhere. Players can speak / listen to one channel at a time.
Keep in mind that price is still subject to change during the beta period.
I am good with this but I do think the price needs to be cut in half and/or carry over for all three of your characters.
Furthermore, I am good with the 4 man squad. It is enough so I can play with some friendly faces but not too large where I and my random team will get crushed by a group of 12 guys grouped up together every time. It is still a beta and I for one vote too keep the squads limited until the full release of the game where it will be encouraged to group up and corp up and thus I believe the grouping mechanism will be quite a bit larger.
Another side note, no one paid for the beta and CCP has no obligation to you. Even if you paid for the merc pack, you A) paid for it voluntarily and B) it included a lot of items for people in the beta and if you happened to not be in the beta, than you got the items and access to the beta. If you bought the merc pack, you paid money to test a product/service...not receive a product/service.
If you can not handle the fact that this is a beta and you are testing out functions of the game than I suggest you spend your time elsewhere. |
Chaz Lewis
71
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 14:37:00 -
[243] - Quote
You guys know if you select activate voice on the corp channel you can everyone talking, right? I'm sure it will stay that way when we get player corps. If we don't, then use teamspeak or something. |
J'Jor Da'Wg
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
648
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 14:41:00 -
[244] - Quote
It sucks and thats all there is too it. All the nerd fanboys slithering around tryig to say "well its optional" STFU
One even said "Hey they are just making the easiest and most accessible form of corp communication optional"
Hey dimwit, thats the dumbest defense I ever heard!
Truth is, there are only a few good options here.
1. Get rid of UVTs entirely 2. Make squad sizes 6, and enable full teams ro group up and deploy (my favorite, STFU carebears who say it would be OP, go find some friends) 3. Make UVTs waaaaaaayyyyyy less money 4. Make UVTs only to use as large corp broadcasts or alliance meetings with more than multiple platoons of players. |
Iso Shalim
Eclipse Industrials Quantum Forge
56
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 14:41:00 -
[245] - Quote
CCP Frame wrote:Hello,
Just to clarify what UVT is supposed to enable and what you get for free:
UVT Gives you:
- Ability to voice chat in custom channels, DUST or EVE/DUST - Ability to voice chat in corporation channels, alliance channels, ect.
UVT is NOT required for:
- Team voice chat - Squad voice chat
Text chat is of course free everywhere. Players can speak / listen to one channel at a time.
Keep in mind that price is still subject to change during the beta period.
Question: why are you charging us for a service that doesn't cost you any money whatsoever for bandwidth? It's covered by Sony, so why the microtransaction for a feature that is free in other online games?
Second, I don't know if you were on the EVE team when the Eve Voice stuff hit the fan, but the same thing wound up happening, and now it's free there, but ONLY after a big row about it that didn't make CCP look too good. Perhaps given the feedback/noise in this thread so far, it should be an issue that's reconsidered. I promise you that a lot of people will get to the point where they realize paragraph #1 is true, and they're going to quit in droves. That, or just migrate to a 3rd party tool.
What'll wind up happening either way is that noone will use the UVT's, and it will only further add onto CCP's rep as a company trying to nickel and dime their customers. Worst case scenario you'll lose Dust players, which will wind up effecting Eve as well. I really don't care to see Eve OR CCP tank, but it's something you guys are flirting with by doing this. |
Maximus Stryker
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
393
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 14:50:00 -
[246] - Quote
J'Jor Da'Wg wrote:It sucks and thats all there is too it. All the nerd fanboys slithering around tryig to say "well its optional" STFU
One even said "Hey they are just making the easiest and most accessible form of corp communication optional"
Hey dimwit, thats the dumbest defense I ever heard!
Truth is, there are only a few good options here.
1. Get rid of UVTs entirely 2. Make squad sizes 6, and enable full teams ro group up and deploy (my favorite, STFU carebears who say it would be OP, go find some friends) 3. Make UVTs waaaaaaayyyyyy less money 4. Make UVTs only to use as large corp broadcasts or alliance meetings with more than multiple platoons of players.
2. It is a beta, i would support this in the full release of the game 3. Agreed 4. Agree as well
(Side note, your post would be more meaning full without using words/phrases like STFU or hey dimwit...just an FYI) |
J'Jor Da'Wg
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
648
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 14:57:00 -
[247] - Quote
Maximus Stryker wrote:J'Jor Da'Wg wrote:It sucks and thats all there is too it. All the nerd fanboys slithering around tryig to say "well its optional" STFU
One even said "Hey they are just making the easiest and most accessible form of corp communication optional"
Hey dimwit, thats the dumbest defense I ever heard!
Truth is, there are only a few good options here.
1. Get rid of UVTs entirely 2. Make squad sizes 6, and enable full teams ro group up and deploy (my favorite, STFU carebears who say it would be OP, go find some friends) 3. Make UVTs waaaaaaayyyyyy less money 4. Make UVTs only to use as large corp broadcasts or alliance meetings with more than multiple platoons of players. 2. It is a beta, i would support this in the full release of the game 3. Agreed 4. Agree as well (Side note, you post would be more meaning full with using words/phrases like STFU or hey dimwit...just an FYI)
At this point in the thread he only way to get your point across to pound it into peoples thick skulls |
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 16:16:00 -
[248] - Quote
CCP Frame wrote:Hello,
Just to clarify what UVT is supposed to enable and what you get for free:
UVT Gives you:
- Ability to voice chat in custom channels, DUST or EVE/DUST - Ability to voice chat in corporation channels, alliance channels, ect.
UVT is NOT required for:
- Team voice chat - Squad voice chat
Text chat is of course free everywhere. Players can speak / listen to one channel at a time.
Keep in mind that price is still subject to change during the beta period.
Is it likely to change to 0 Aurum? Do you really think that corporations and alliances are really going to tell everyone in them to buy these ridiculous items so they can talk rather than using 3rd party software? Do you really think that by bottle-necking communications you are doing whats best for the shared universe?
|
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 16:40:00 -
[249] - Quote
You can't have your cake and eat it too. You can't say on the one hand that you provide a sandbox for amazing things to happen through player interaction, but on the other hand charge REAL MONEY for vital communication links.
The example from the trailer, the EVE pilot talking to guys on the ground? Pretend it didn't happen. The EVE pilot and the DUST merc were actually talking 'telepathically' via teamspeak.
UVT, as far as I'm concerned, is the first nail in the coffin of this experiment. CCP aren't dedicated to making this universe an amazing experience for all involved. They are too blind to see how this initiative stabs at the very heart of the experience they are so proud to boast of.
Subscriptions, Aurum, NEX, PLEX, sidegrades, boosters, this is how we subsidize our involvement in this universe.
UVTs go against EVERYTHING DUST stands for in its bid to make a mark on the gaming industry by combining 2 different titles into one immersive universe. |
crazy space
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
879
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 17:01:00 -
[250] - Quote
Dewie Cheecham wrote:CCP Frame wrote:Hello,
Just to clarify what UVT is supposed to enable and what you get for free:
UVT Gives you:
- Ability to voice chat in custom channels, DUST or EVE/DUST - Ability to voice chat in corporation channels, alliance channels, ect.
UVT is NOT required for:
- Team voice chat - Squad voice chat
Text chat is of course free everywhere. Players can speak / listen to one channel at a time.
Keep in mind that price is still subject to change during the beta period. But those PRICES! Have CCP not learned the lesson from the MonocleGate screw up? Strike AT LEAST a zero off the ends of those prices, 900 AUR a month is just INSANE. At this rate, with all the AUR sinks I'm more or less forced into buying in order to be competitive in any way or form (aka PAY 2 WIN), I'm looking at having to kill two of my EVE accounts just to afford ONE Dust account! On one hand yes, those should be 900 for a 3 month pass.
But what would you want it for anyways? I'm trying to see the need to voice chat in corp. We have a teamspeak server allready. |
|
Maximus Stryker
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
393
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 17:09:00 -
[251] - Quote
people can still get in groups of 2 - 12/16/24 once the game is released and talk for free (just like in a lot of other FPS). It is my understanding that UVT is for a much larger communication tool >50 >100 >250 (who are in a variety of different places both in and out of game) as well as a way to communicate with EVE players directly. |
Xavier Hastings
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
243
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 17:16:00 -
[252] - Quote
CCP Frame wrote:Hello,
Just to clarify what UVT is supposed to enable and what you get for free:
UVT Gives you:
- Ability to voice chat in custom channels, DUST or EVE/DUST - Ability to voice chat in corporation channels, alliance channels, ect.
UVT is NOT required for:
- Team voice chat - Squad voice chat
Text chat is of course free everywhere. Players can speak / listen to one channel at a time.
Keep in mind that price is still subject to change during the beta period. This is the official Dev post regarding this issue.
Now the way I see it there are four camps.
1. By far the most fervent of the four camps, the people of Pay 2 Talk believe well, paying to talk is rational.
2. Ruled by a conglomerate of mega-fanboys, this camp's is filled with people who defend CCP and their occasionally ludicrous policies. Their generally response is "You don't have to pay for it if you don't want to." These responses have brought their people more followers, or made them be ignored. But mostly ignored.
3. Champions of free-dom and not paying for anything, the Freedom 2 Talk the only true opinion of The Forums. They believe that Free 2 Play means Free 2 Talk. This camp generally uses bots to get their point across, but not as mush as they used to, for robotics can get you oh so far...
4. Resembles a Feral Tribe more than anything, the Trolls feed on the misery and stress of The Forums. This camp is a master of camouflage, so they disguise their posts as meaningful works of art, or pure spam.
The most secretive of the camps, the Dev's rarely ever tell us what is going on in plain English. They usually just dance around using fancy wordplay. Or just not telling us. Few outsiders have seen their homeland...
Seriously though. Remember the monocle scandal? When you tried to get EVE players to pay for online? Did it work? Were people happy with you? Oh, and that email. Icing on the cake isn't it CCP? This game is made by the players, for players. So I suggest to you, CCP. Take it out. The UVT. Please just take it out. This will destroy this game. |
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 18:13:00 -
[253] - Quote
I'm really just disappointed that CCP is so short-sighted. |
Boss Dirge
Sanmatar Kelkoons Minmatar Republic
71
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 18:36:00 -
[254] - Quote
So has no one noticed that in this update we got virtually everything we asked for and more? Pretty much every nerf request, or buff request has been applied. Almost every feature that has been bitched about on this forum in the past 2 months has been implemented by the developers.
So go ahead and throw your temper tantrums and wail and moan. They listened the last time, and they probably will again. Just don't go on about like little babies if they don't do it on your timetable. |
Chris Ridgeway
42
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 18:39:00 -
[255] - Quote
WARR1OR OF WARRIORS wrote:[quote=Rasatsu][quote=ICECREAMK1NG WARRIORS]@ DEV Frame.
Sorry this is an excuse and a weak one at that.
Team chat........... Who cares, most of the time I don't want to talk to a load of random morons, or have to figure out how many I have to mute every game.
Squad chat........... Wow that huge 4man squad, well I have more than 3 friends and clan mates that I would like to group and play with. Even if we pay for this rip off chat so we can all talk we can't get in the same game let alone be on the same team.
I think instead of having an in house joke with MAG uniforms you have more important game breaking problems to worry about.
Truth... How is a four man squad supposed to accomplish anything. ?
So what I got from this is your friends are a load of random morons? Cause if they are on your team in game, and not in your squad you can still talk to them during the match...hence team chat, but since it seems you and your friends are morons you can't make the ******* connection from squad to team..I gotcha. |
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 19:00:00 -
[256] - Quote
Boss Dirge wrote:So has no one noticed that in this update we got virtually everything we asked for and more? Pretty much every nerf request, or buff request has been applied. Almost every feature that has been bitched about on this forum in the past 2 months has been implemented by the developers.
So go ahead and throw your temper tantrums and wail and moan. They listened the last time, and they probably will again. Just don't go on about like little babies if they don't do it on your timetable.
Oh. I forgot its ok for companies to make pants-on-head ******** decisions that shoot themselves in the foot whilst hurting their customers if they DO THEIR JOBS? Their implementation of the game is not a PRESENT. They are not GIVING us patches out of GOODNESS AND GENEROSITY. They are doing it to get more players and, therefore, more money.
We are complaining because UVTs do more to fracture and damage the game and the user base than they return in profit.
In other words, UVTs may make a little money up front, but will damage the user experience and user numbers in the long run, and will actively interfere in the joint EVE/DUST experience, which is the WHOLE POINT OF THE GAME. |
Marwan2
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
60
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 19:00:00 -
[257] - Quote
Teamspeak! |
4447
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
649
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 19:09:00 -
[258] - Quote
can i just say something? if so do CCP do cola because if they do i would order one.... |
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 19:33:00 -
[259] - Quote
4447 wrote:can i just say something? if so do CCP do cola because if they do i would order one....
There's Quafe, but I don't think you can buy these days.
|
Orin the Freak
Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz RISE of LEGION
334
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 19:35:00 -
[260] - Quote
alright, well, my main draw for playing DUST was to chat with friends AND play a game. i don't see why you would want to charge for something every other console game gives for free. I understand your desire for funds, but this is not where to get them.
I mean, who is going to only want voice chat for a day? or 30 days for that matter? this is just a cheap, sleazy way to charge a (albeit small) monthly fee, and that is rather silly.
Honestly, I think I'll pass. not really worth the money. ever since WoW I have a thing against monthly fees. The only reason I played EVE for as long as I did was because I didn't have to pay for it every month.
Certainly one could argue "you don't HAVE to pay to play", but I would argue, with as many friends as I have, why WOULDN'T you want to talk to them?
besides, I suppose I could just use Teamspeak, and not play DUST.
Either way, I didn't support Microsoft because they come off as greedy, charging for online play and voice chat.
I refuse to support a company that sees greed as necessary for profit.
if you want to charge a monthly fee, charge a monthly fee, don't make the "game" free, then microtransaction the hell out of us.
Seriously though, if you just make universal voice comms free, and charged more for other things, I would be fine with that.
Voice comms, particularly alliance/corp UVC need to be free IMO. |
|
Abner Kalen
Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State
100
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 19:39:00 -
[261] - Quote
CCP Frame wrote:Hello,
Just to clarify what UVT is supposed to enable and what you get for free:
UVT Gives you:
- Ability to voice chat in custom channels, DUST or EVE/DUST - Ability to voice chat in corporation channels, alliance channels, ect.
UVT is NOT required for:
- Team voice chat - Squad voice chat
Text chat is of course free everywhere. Players can speak / listen to one channel at a time.
Keep in mind that price is still subject to change during the beta period.
Doesn't the PS3 already offer a party-line voice chat channel?? Why wouldn't we use that instead, or set up a TS3 or C3 that's not dependent on the character you're playing as? I can understand the thought process behind something like this but it's extremely short-sighted, and doesn't quite seem thought out. Making us pay for outside corp or eve to dust links is one thing, but making us pay for corporation and alliance channel voice chat? Also requiring us to pay per character, not per account, it's not a very intelligent decision in my opinion, and one that I think would do more harm than good.
|
Chao Wolf
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
209
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 19:42:00 -
[262] - Quote
My 0.02 isk I'm fine with charging us for voice in custom comms but corp and alliance voice comms should be free |
Mobius Wyvern
BetaMax.
1216
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 20:00:00 -
[263] - Quote
Chao Wolf wrote:My 0.02 isk I'm fine with charging us for voice in custom comms but corp and alliance voice comms should be free Agreed. Members of a Dust corporation should be able to communicate with each other without additional expenditure. |
Benjamin Hellios
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
259
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 20:10:00 -
[264] - Quote
CCP Frame wrote:Hello,
Just to clarify what UVT is supposed to enable and what you get for free:
UVT Gives you:
- Ability to voice chat in custom channels, DUST or EVE/DUST - Ability to voice chat in corporation channels, alliance channels, ect.
UVT is NOT required for:
- Team voice chat - Squad voice chat
Text chat is of course free everywhere. Players can speak / listen to one channel at a time.
Keep in mind that price is still subject to change during the beta period.
I know EVE players already pay a monthly fee, but does this mean that they'll also have to get UVTs or do they already have them? |
Mobius Wyvern
BetaMax.
1216
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 20:18:00 -
[265] - Quote
Benjamin Hellios wrote:CCP Frame wrote:Hello,
Just to clarify what UVT is supposed to enable and what you get for free:
UVT Gives you:
- Ability to voice chat in custom channels, DUST or EVE/DUST - Ability to voice chat in corporation channels, alliance channels, ect.
UVT is NOT required for:
- Team voice chat - Squad voice chat
Text chat is of course free everywhere. Players can speak / listen to one channel at a time.
Keep in mind that price is still subject to change during the beta period. I know EVE players already pay a monthly fee, but does this mean that they'll also have to get UVTs or do they already have them? Voice chat in any channel, including player-made ones, is part of what we pay a subscription for. |
Arc Brimstone
Stella Pulvis
4
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 20:26:00 -
[266] - Quote
Is it just me or am I the only one who doesn't really care about this. It's a free game... We don't have to pay for the game up front, there's no monthly subscription. CCP has to make money somehow to support the game. If you don't want to shell out the less than $5 a month for voice support use skype or teamspeak or something. It's really not that big of a deal.... lol |
Benjamin Hellios
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
259
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 20:31:00 -
[267] - Quote
Mobius Wyvern wrote:Benjamin Hellios wrote:CCP Frame wrote:Hello,
Just to clarify what UVT is supposed to enable and what you get for free:
UVT Gives you:
- Ability to voice chat in custom channels, DUST or EVE/DUST - Ability to voice chat in corporation channels, alliance channels, ect.
UVT is NOT required for:
- Team voice chat - Squad voice chat
Text chat is of course free everywhere. Players can speak / listen to one channel at a time.
Keep in mind that price is still subject to change during the beta period. I know EVE players already pay a monthly fee, but does this mean that they'll also have to get UVTs or do they already have them? Voice chat in any channel, including player-made ones, is part of what we pay a subscription for.
Ok, I was wondering if that included eve/dust channels or if you'd need a seperate module for that but I'm assuming that's not the case. |
Quiverous
Dark Harlequin
37
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 21:09:00 -
[268] - Quote
I want a beer for reading this threadnaught, next time I'm in Reykjavik I'm collecting, 1 Polar beer and it better be cold.
I was unimpressed with the idea but thought it made some commercial sense. But there are a lot of sound counter arguments to this introduction, I reckon a u-turn now will save some embarressment later.
In case there is any doubt, I am a CCP fanboi, except I'm a girl. |
Orin the Freak
Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz RISE of LEGION
334
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 21:23:00 -
[269] - Quote
yeah, they need to really do a quick "woops" on this, instead of just letting it fly.
c'mon CCP. I know you guys like your reputation for listening to your patrons, well.. your patrons are speaking. are you going to ignore us and go with greed? if so, then you're not the company I thought you were. |
Sandromin Hes
Sand Mercenary Corps Inc.
204
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 21:49:00 -
[270] - Quote
press < to talk? anyone realize that? at all? that's for in battle. now for out of battle is different i guess makes me sad for that decision outside of battle :| |
|
Chaz Lewis
71
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 21:53:00 -
[271] - Quote
Arc Brimstone wrote:Is it just me or am I the only one who doesn't really care about this. It's a free game... We don't have to pay for the game up front, there's no monthly subscription. CCP has to make money somehow to support the game. If you don't want to shell out the less than $5 a month for voice support use skype or teamspeak or something. It's really not that big of a deal.... lol I don't really care either. Seriously, who talks to someone when they're not in the same match? That's what the text chat is for. A lot of these people seem to be over-reacting a bit, and need to stop focusing on an unimportant issue and focus on bugs and glitches and such. |
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 21:59:00 -
[272] - Quote
Chaz Lewis wrote:Arc Brimstone wrote:Is it just me or am I the only one who doesn't really care about this. It's a free game... We don't have to pay for the game up front, there's no monthly subscription. CCP has to make money somehow to support the game. If you don't want to shell out the less than $5 a month for voice support use skype or teamspeak or something. It's really not that big of a deal.... lol I don't really care either. Seriously, who talks to someone when they're not in the same match? That's what the text chat is for. A lot of these people seem to be over-reacting a bit, and need to stop focusing on an unimportant issue and focus on bugs and glitches and such.
Try saying this again after you try to organise a coordinated strike against multiple planets with fleet support.
|
WARR1OR OF WARRIORS
11
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 00:06:00 -
[273] - Quote
Chris Ridgeway wrote:WARR1OR OF WARRIORS wrote:[quote=Rasatsu][quote=ICECREAMK1NG WARRIORS]@ DEV Frame.
Sorry this is an excuse and a weak one at that.
Team chat........... Who cares, most of the time I don't want to talk to a load of random morons, or have to figure out how many I have to mute every game.
Squad chat........... Wow that huge 4man squad, well I have more than 3 friends and clan mates that I would like to group and play with. Even if we pay for this rip off chat so we can all talk we can't get in the same game let alone be on the same team.
I think instead of having an in house joke with MAG uniforms you have more important game breaking problems to worry about.
Truth... How is a four man squad supposed to accomplish anything. ? So what I got from this is your friends are a load of random morons? Cause if they are on your team in game, and not in your squad you can still talk to them during the match...hence team chat, but since it seems you and your friends are morons you can't make the ******* connection from squad to team..I gotcha.
LOL... Troll fail... That's what you got was it ? Then may I suggest you get someone older and wiser to explain it for you. |
Zat Earthshatter
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
304
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 00:27:00 -
[274] - Quote
A wild Thought appears! ...if the UVT turns out to be tradable in the market -and reasonably priced- there wouldn't be a problem here. On the contrary, this would make it a valuable wartime commodity like radios, traveling on freighters down the major pipes... *Homer drool* mmm... Freighter wrecks...
If you go this route CCP, try to set the AUR cost according to server prices in the major 3rd party comm providers. |
Talaryes
Bene Gesserit ChapterHouse Sanctuary Pact
8
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 01:18:00 -
[275] - Quote
Greed is Good |
DON RODIE II
Deep Space Republic
168
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 01:33:00 -
[276] - Quote
it's not pay to win.
It's pay to talk
you can't get out of both lol |
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 01:35:00 -
[277] - Quote
Zat Earthshatter wrote:A wild Thought appears! ...if the UVT turns out to be tradable in the market -and reasonably priced- there wouldn't be a problem here. On the contrary, this would make it a valuable wartime commodity like radios, traveling on freighters down the major pipes... *Homer drool* mmm... Freighter wrecks...
If you go this route CCP, try to set the AUR cost according to server prices in the major 3rd party comm providers.
There is no such thing as 'on the market + reasonably priced'
If UVTs are available through the market / contracts they will be sold at whatever price demand dictates.
At the moment, a 30 day UVT is worth 900 Aurum.
900 Aurum = $3.60US = 92,932,150.20 ISK
Lets say you have a mixed DUST/EVE alliance with 3 corps of 30 members, and you get wardecced by another Alliance.
81000 Aurum = $324US = 8,363,893,518.00 ISK
Your alliance has 3 options:
Pay $300+ to be able to communicate.
Pay 8 billion ISK + (likely a lot more as I don't see this market being high volume, so prices will be dictated by the sellers, subject to inflation and the whims of the market including limited availability and quantity)
Use 3rd party software (for comparisons sake: Ventrilo, Teamspeak and Mumble servers for $40US a month for 100 slots).
UVTs cost 7.5x as much as common alternatives. |
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 01:39:00 -
[278] - Quote
To give another perspective:
CCP wants to charge $3.60 per person per 30 days.
Teamspeak, Ventrilo, Mumble $0.40 per person per 30 days. |
sendeth
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
45
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 02:14:00 -
[279] - Quote
Umallon Macross wrote:Chaz Lewis wrote:Arc Brimstone wrote:Is it just me or am I the only one who doesn't really care about this. It's a free game... We don't have to pay for the game up front, there's no monthly subscription. CCP has to make money somehow to support the game. If you don't want to shell out the less than $5 a month for voice support use skype or teamspeak or something. It's really not that big of a deal.... lol I don't really care either. Seriously, who talks to someone when they're not in the same match? That's what the text chat is for. A lot of these people seem to be over-reacting a bit, and need to stop focusing on an unimportant issue and focus on bugs and glitches and such. Try saying this again after you try to organise a coordinated strike against multiple planets with fleet support.
agreed. i think most of the people saying they don't care are probably not eve players and do not understand the scale of what happens in that game. for those who do not play eve, all i can say is it is brutal, organized, and when the plan works, the carnage is beautiful even when you are on the losing end. |
Adaris Manpher
70
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 02:45:00 -
[280] - Quote
CCP Frame wrote:Hello,
Just to clarify what UVT is supposed to enable and what you get for free:
UVT Gives you:
- Ability to voice chat in custom channels, DUST or EVE/DUST - Ability to voice chat in corporation channels, alliance channels, ect.
UVT is NOT required for:
- Team voice chat - Squad voice chat
Text chat is of course free everywhere. Players can speak / listen to one channel at a time.
Keep in mind that price is still subject to change during the beta period. Hold the phone we have to pay to talk to eve players that is kinda bogis dude I mean if we can still talk to them while we are on the battle field that is fine i guess but yeah I think that is a little to much CCP |
|
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 03:20:00 -
[281] - Quote
Adaris Manpher wrote:CCP Frame wrote:Hello,
Just to clarify what UVT is supposed to enable and what you get for free:
UVT Gives you:
- Ability to voice chat in custom channels, DUST or EVE/DUST - Ability to voice chat in corporation channels, alliance channels, ect.
UVT is NOT required for:
- Team voice chat - Squad voice chat
Text chat is of course free everywhere. Players can speak / listen to one channel at a time.
Keep in mind that price is still subject to change during the beta period. Hold the phone we have to pay to talk to eve players that is kinda bogis dude I mean if we can still talk to them while we are on the battle field that is fine i guess but yeah I think that is a little to much CCP
The best way to connect 2 games together in one universe is to make players of one of the games have to pay real money to talk to the players in the other game.
It just makes sense.
|
Zat Earthshatter
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
304
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 03:41:00 -
[282] - Quote
Umallon Macross wrote:Zat Earthshatter wrote:A wild Thought appears! ...if the UVT turns out to be tradable in the market -and reasonably priced- there wouldn't be a problem here. On the contrary, this would make it a valuable wartime commodity like radios, traveling on freighters down the major pipes... *Homer drool* mmm... Freighter wrecks...
If you go this route CCP, try to set the AUR cost according to server prices in the major 3rd party comm providers. There is no such thing as 'on the market + reasonably priced' If UVTs are available through the market / contracts they will be sold at whatever price demand dictates. At the moment, a 30 day UVT is worth 900 Aurum. 900 Aurum = $3.60US = 92,932,150.20 ISK Lets say you have a mixed DUST/EVE alliance with 3 corps of 30 members, and you get wardecced by another Alliance. 81000 Aurum = $324US = 8,363,893,518.00 ISK Your alliance has 3 options: Pay $300+ to be able to communicate. Pay 8 billion ISK + (likely a lot more as I don't see this market being high volume, so prices will be dictated by the sellers, subject to inflation and the whims of the market including limited availability and quantity) Use 3rd party software (for comparisons sake: Ventrilo, Teamspeak and Mumble servers for $40US a month for 100 slots). UVTs cost 7.5x as much as common alternatives. ...Which is why i suggested that they Change The Cost to at least match competitors, if not undercut them, in the last line. That doesn't mean I don't agree. EDIT : Even though your math doesn't include EVE players that don't have to pay extra, such costs could present a problem for smaller alliances If the AUR price stays the same or increases, i will jump off the fence into your side of the story. |
J'Jor Da'Wg
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
648
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 03:42:00 -
[283] - Quote
Chaz Lewis wrote:Arc Brimstone wrote:Is it just me or am I the only one who doesn't really care about this. It's a free game... We don't have to pay for the game up front, there's no monthly subscription. CCP has to make money somehow to support the game. If you don't want to shell out the less than $5 a month for voice support use skype or teamspeak or something. It's really not that big of a deal.... lol I don't really care either. Seriously, who talks to someone when they're not in the same match? That's what the text chat is for. A lot of these people seem to be over-reacting a bit, and need to stop focusing on an unimportant issue and focus on bugs and glitches and such.
I guess you don't plan on playing seriously with a corp... Love it when people say "focus on the issues"...
Well. Here is the issue. Right in this thread. |
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 03:55:00 -
[284] - Quote
J'Jor Da'Wg wrote:Chaz Lewis wrote:Arc Brimstone wrote:Is it just me or am I the only one who doesn't really care about this. It's a free game... We don't have to pay for the game up front, there's no monthly subscription. CCP has to make money somehow to support the game. If you don't want to shell out the less than $5 a month for voice support use skype or teamspeak or something. It's really not that big of a deal.... lol I don't really care either. Seriously, who talks to someone when they're not in the same match? That's what the text chat is for. A lot of these people seem to be over-reacting a bit, and need to stop focusing on an unimportant issue and focus on bugs and glitches and such. I guess you don't plan on playing seriously with a corp... Love it when people say "focus on the issues"... Well. Here is the issue. Right in this thread.
LET'S PRESS THE ISSUE!
I'm Maurice Chavez, not chaves, not chaveez.
|
Chaz Lewis
71
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 04:00:00 -
[285] - Quote
J'Jor Da'Wg wrote:Chaz Lewis wrote:Arc Brimstone wrote:Is it just me or am I the only one who doesn't really care about this. It's a free game... We don't have to pay for the game up front, there's no monthly subscription. CCP has to make money somehow to support the game. If you don't want to shell out the less than $5 a month for voice support use skype or teamspeak or something. It's really not that big of a deal.... lol I don't really care either. Seriously, who talks to someone when they're not in the same match? That's what the text chat is for. A lot of these people seem to be over-reacting a bit, and need to stop focusing on an unimportant issue and focus on bugs and glitches and such. I guess you don't plan on playing seriously with a corp... Love it when people say "focus on the issues"... Well. Here is the issue. Right in this thread. I'm already in a corp called FoxHound dude. I was just stating my opinion. |
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 04:07:00 -
[286] - Quote
Zat Earthshatter wrote:Umallon Macross wrote:Zat Earthshatter wrote:A wild Thought appears! ...if the UVT turns out to be tradable in the market -and reasonably priced- there wouldn't be a problem here. On the contrary, this would make it a valuable wartime commodity like radios, traveling on freighters down the major pipes... *Homer drool* mmm... Freighter wrecks...
If you go this route CCP, try to set the AUR cost according to server prices in the major 3rd party comm providers. There is no such thing as 'on the market + reasonably priced' If UVTs are available through the market / contracts they will be sold at whatever price demand dictates. At the moment, a 30 day UVT is worth 900 Aurum. 900 Aurum = $3.60US = 92,932,150.20 ISK Lets say you have a mixed DUST/EVE alliance with 3 corps of 30 members, and you get wardecced by another Alliance. 81000 Aurum = $324US = 8,363,893,518.00 ISK Your alliance has 3 options: Pay $300+ to be able to communicate. Pay 8 billion ISK + (likely a lot more as I don't see this market being high volume, so prices will be dictated by the sellers, subject to inflation and the whims of the market including limited availability and quantity) Use 3rd party software (for comparisons sake: Ventrilo, Teamspeak and Mumble servers for $40US a month for 100 slots). UVTs cost 7.5x as much as common alternatives. ...Which is why i suggested that they Change The Cost to at least match competitors, if not undercut them, in the last line. That doesn't mean I don't agree. EDIT : Even though your math doesn't include EVE players that don't have to pay extra, such costs could present a problem for smaller alliances If the AUR price stays the same or increases, i will jump off the fence into your side of the story.
Well, it turns out that at the current rate $0.40US is about 100 Aurum.
If the 30 day UVT costs 100 Aurum it will the same price as the competition, with the added benefits of its integration into the games.
I still think it unnecessarily fractures the player base and would be better for everyone if it was free and its costs subsidized by boosters and sidegrades, because its in everyone's best interests to make communication and free flow of information as open and accessible as possible, but I guess I could live with it as a compromise.
I don't see it happening though.
|
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 04:08:00 -
[287] - Quote
Chaz Lewis wrote:J'Jor Da'Wg wrote:Chaz Lewis wrote:Arc Brimstone wrote:Is it just me or am I the only one who doesn't really care about this. It's a free game... We don't have to pay for the game up front, there's no monthly subscription. CCP has to make money somehow to support the game. If you don't want to shell out the less than $5 a month for voice support use skype or teamspeak or something. It's really not that big of a deal.... lol I don't really care either. Seriously, who talks to someone when they're not in the same match? That's what the text chat is for. A lot of these people seem to be over-reacting a bit, and need to stop focusing on an unimportant issue and focus on bugs and glitches and such. I guess you don't plan on playing seriously with a corp... Love it when people say "focus on the issues"... Well. Here is the issue. Right in this thread. I'm already in a corp called FoxHound dude. I was just stating my opinion.
Do your corp know that you don't care because its free? Because I wouldn't hire you.
|
Chaz Lewis
71
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 04:14:00 -
[288] - Quote
Umallon Macross wrote:Chaz Lewis wrote:J'Jor Da'Wg wrote:Chaz Lewis wrote:Arc Brimstone wrote:Is it just me or am I the only one who doesn't really care about this. It's a free game... We don't have to pay for the game up front, there's no monthly subscription. CCP has to make money somehow to support the game. If you don't want to shell out the less than $5 a month for voice support use skype or teamspeak or something. It's really not that big of a deal.... lol I don't really care either. Seriously, who talks to someone when they're not in the same match? That's what the text chat is for. A lot of these people seem to be over-reacting a bit, and need to stop focusing on an unimportant issue and focus on bugs and glitches and such. I guess you don't plan on playing seriously with a corp... Love it when people say "focus on the issues"... Well. Here is the issue. Right in this thread. I'm already in a corp called FoxHound dude. I was just stating my opinion. Do your corp know that you don't care because its free? Because I wouldn't hire you. No, I just don't think it's a game-breaking issue, that's all. |
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 04:20:00 -
[289] - Quote
Chaz Lewis wrote:
[*pyramid*]
No, I just don't think it's a game-breaking issue, that's all.
Thats because the real game hasnt started yet.
|
Longshot Ravenwood
Algintal Core Gallente Federation
680
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 04:45:00 -
[290] - Quote
CCP Frame wrote:Hello,
Just to clarify what UVT is supposed to enable and what you get for free:
UVT Gives you:
- Ability to voice chat in custom channels, DUST or EVE/DUST - Ability to voice chat in corporation channels, alliance channels, ect.
UVT is NOT required for:
- Team voice chat - Squad voice chat
Text chat is of course free everywhere. Players can speak / listen to one channel at a time.
Keep in mind that price is still subject to change during the beta period.
ICECREAMK1NG WARRIORS wrote:@ DEV Frame.
Sorry this is an excuse and a weak one at that.
Team chat........... Who cares, most of the time I don't want to talk to a load of random morons, or have to figure out how many I have to mute every game.
Squad chat........... Wow that huge 4man squad, well I have more than 3 friends and clan mates that I would like to group and play with. Even if we pay for this rip off chat so we can all talk we can't get in the same game let alone be on the same team.
I think instead of having an in house joke with MAG uniforms you have more important game breaking problems to worry about.
Team Chat -- Implies that you can listen to everyone on the team you're playing with. So if you join a CORP MATCH or an ALLIANCE MATCH you can hear everyone on your team from your corp/alliance while you're playing your match. Seems useful in my opinion.
There is NOTHING game breaking about this when there are additional options for communication outside of battle. Worst case scenario, you're less likely to get into a verbal ****ing match with someone resulting in a wardeck or the dissolution of your corp/alliance (which happens when people don't man the **** up and act like adults).
Also, this is BETA -- and after the beta ends all of our Aurum will be refunded. This is an opportunity to provide constructive feedback regarding how we feel about these kinds of things. Would I like to see a non-AUR version of this? Yeah, I would. Does it ruin my gaming experience if I don't? Not at all. |
|
Mo Gallas Gentralde
Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation
178
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 04:57:00 -
[291] - Quote
SKYPE VS UVT
When 50% of the involved parties use computers (everyone playing EVE), and the other 50% can use laptops etc...
looks like Skype wins.
What is the purpose of trying to sell VOIP service ingame when people can bypass it for FREE? |
Surtur Reaperson
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
49
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 06:47:00 -
[292] - Quote
Soory to interrupt the naught, just had to chime in real quick, did anyone saw this?
Dewie Cheecham wrote:mr merkzdem wrote:tin foil hats all round then huh crazy mofo lol Mofo? Guess it takes one to know one. No, in EVE it is never paranoia, because history have shown that they ARE really after you. I haven't laughed so hard in days, speaking of feeding stereotypes, are these guys for real? OH NOES THEI KAN TRAKS ME. Really the whole "EVE is serious business" its just so effin pathetic, So what if they can track you? So what if they go full anon on your ass, its a videogame. You may lose at the videogame but its not the end of the world as you know it, jesus, tin foil hat freaks.
Tl:dr: Tinfoils!
Now continue with the matter at hand.
... Crispy chicken! |
MrZIONY
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
38
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 10:09:00 -
[293] - Quote
comon guys lets keep pressing the UVT issue. A few people have suggested good alternatives for ccp to make their money from cosmetic upgrades or UVT at channel level only and not player level. A response to these suggestions from a dev would be nice. |
Sergeant Wiznowski
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
38
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 10:13:00 -
[294] - Quote
I am really more concerned about VC not being on by default. Usual number of people that know that you need to turn it on even to hear anyone about 2 to 4 per game max. You are welcome to scream no one can hear you.
From PS3 player perspective only in game comms matter much.
|
Buzzwords
Deadly Blue Dots RISE of LEGION
416
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 10:28:00 -
[295] - Quote
the existence of any kind of real money voice chat, COMBINED with the fact that even free voice chat is hidden behind default options that nobody seems to understand. (it was off by default in the last build, and is push to talk by default in this build. not to mention different channels for squad and team.) is a recipe for a massive shitstorm.
people will log in, try to talk to people, and get no response because they're not pushing to talk. or they are not opted in for voice chat, or even if they are nobody else is so all they hear back is silence... they will then wonder why voice chat "isn't working" they will see a real money item that has ANYTHING to do with voice chat, and they will flip a ****. instantly "knowing" that that was why their voice chat didn't work earlier.
if you don't believe me, think of how rare comms were in the last build. even LATE in the last build. that **** was out for how long? and MOST players either never plugged in a headset, or never figured out that they were "opted out" of voice chat by default.
the very PERCEPTION is dangerous here CCP. |
|
CCP Jian
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
9
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 12:03:00 -
[296] - Quote
Reminding again: there is completely FREE Team and Squad voice chat, completely FREE text chat for all channels, completely FREE in-game mail for all users - everything other console shooters have and more, for FREE... And, yes, of course, we are looking into additional options, offers, features, etc for UVT's.
Orin the Freak wrote:alright, well, my main draw for playing DUST was to chat with friends AND play a game. i don't see why you would want to charge for something every other console game gives for free. I understand your desire for funds, but this is not where to get them.
I mean, who is going to only want voice chat for a day? or 30 days for that matter? this is just a cheap, sleazy way to charge a (albeit small) monthly fee, and that is rather silly.
Honestly, I think I'll pass. not really worth the money. ever since WoW I have a thing against monthly fees. The only reason I played EVE for as long as I did was because I didn't have to pay for it every month.
Certainly one could argue "you don't HAVE to pay to play", but I would argue, with as many friends as I have, why WOULDN'T you want to talk to them?
besides, I suppose I could just use Teamspeak, and not play DUST.
Either way, I didn't support Microsoft because they come off as greedy, charging for online play and voice chat.
I refuse to support a company that sees greed as necessary for profit.
if you want to charge a monthly fee, charge a monthly fee, don't make the "game" free, then microtransaction the hell out of us.
Seriously though, if you just make universal voice comms free, and charged more for other things, I would be fine with that.
Voice comms, particularly alliance/corp UVC need to be free IMO. |
|
LT Dans Legs
Tritan-Industries Legacy Rising
72
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 12:20:00 -
[297] - Quote
Ya. Thats kinda lame. Id rather pay a monthly fee than pay to talk. Or just charge 60 bucks like everyone else for the game and thats that. |
MrZIONY
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
38
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 12:32:00 -
[298] - Quote
CCP Jian wrote:Reminding again: there is completely FREE Team and Squad voice chat, completely FREE text chat for all channels, completely FREE in-game mail for all users - everything other console shooters have and more, for FREE... And, yes, of course, we are looking into additional options, offers, features, etc for UVT's.
Yes but once the game goes live players who wants to be in serious corps/alliances will have to pay this or be of no use at all to their respective corp/alliance. Jian your reply also comes across as emotive, have we hit a nerve at CCP with this one especially after CCP had the same fiasco with EvE Voice and had to back down. The player are trying to tell you that we dont mind paying micro transactions for a whole host of things. Just not something that is vital to a corp/alliance based shooter where co-operation across planets and even entire sections of the EvEverse will be required.
Edit - Just to add CCP many of your players see this as nothing more than a money grab and putting "Free" in caps doesn't change that or the view that your game is quickly becoming pay to win. |
Natu Nobilis
51
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 12:45:00 -
[299] - Quote
Is this still going on?
And CCP PR Damagen Control II hasn-Št kicked in yet?
CCP Jian mate, if you continue to adress the issue like this, it may actually make people more pissed off.
You are being rational pointing out that in absolute terms, your game provides everything others do, and a little more for free. Any rational mind would be ok with this.
The public however, is working on an emotional tone, they are looking in a relative perspective, so it doesn-Št matter that i have X + 1 features for free compared to other games, they only read "I only have X% of the total 100% features for free, this sux, you sux, die in a fire, ragequit"
Also, they-Šre filled with cognitive distortions and either you carefully avoid this mental traps, or turn on the big F and let the fire burn (but right now, after the 2011 thing, and the whole tech bugs in the new build close to the joining of the larger audience, that-Šs not a good option).
Seriously, i-Šm playing and Following EVE since 2007, i know you guys do an excellent job, but your PR area is terrible in terms of response time, way of adressing the public and others.
Hire an organizational Psychologist or something. You folks are talking different things thatn the public, even on the same subject (UVT).
Best regards.
PS - In case you-Šre looking for a psychologist that already has plenty of knowledge of your game universe, I-Šm available for international realocation! |
Laurent Cazaderon
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
1155
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 13:23:00 -
[300] - Quote
i think you guys at CCP went the wrong way with those private chat AUR stuff.
Those things shouldnt be based on private chat participants but on private chat renters ! Offer people some sort of little mumble or TeamSpeak. People willing to pay a monthly fee for those things should then get to invite people they want based on standings and such.
Also, most of those rentals will be made by corp leaders and managers. And they will find out a way to get something back from their corp members through ISK corp tax just like in EVE. Also it s way easier to have five close friends co-rent one server and share the cost and allow multiple other people to connect on it than having 30 people willing to pay even a small amount of money.
Seriously, this paper deserves a F. It s neither practical nor very good looking in terms of F2P against P2W.
|
|
howard sanchez
Conspiratus Immortalis
448
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 13:33:00 -
[301] - Quote
CCP;
I urge you to continue listening to your customer community, your WHOLE customer community.
Many of us feel the offering of UVTs ( and their specific functionality) is a good business and gaming decision.
Many of us feel that what you are offering is, in fact, the option for players to communicate in ways that most other, even remotely similar,games do not offer. That is exactly the kind of additional elective choice that fits very well within the micro-transaction business model
You know better than most of us what your target and potential market looks like. You know the likely percentage of players that will, very casually, use DUST as the free, fun,15-30 minutes of FPS gameplay that it will be.
A great many of those customers will never opt to use the extended voice capabilities that the UVT provides.
Thank you for offering us the choice. Thank you for not charging everyone for things they would otherwise not use.
Please continue to monitor the data as well as listen to all community feedback (not just the verbose minority that most game forums represent).
And please consider making all items that players can purchase for Aurum reselable for isk in the player market.
|
MrZIONY
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
38
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 13:38:00 -
[302] - Quote
A great many customers just wont play and go to planetside 2.
Edit And reading this whole thread we are not the minority, your view is inm afraid. |
howard sanchez
Conspiratus Immortalis
448
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 13:40:00 -
[303] - Quote
Umallon Macross wrote:Chaz Lewis wrote:
[*pyramid*]
No, I just don't think it's a game-breaking issue, that's all.
Thats because the real game hasnt started yet.
Excellent point, Umallon. And as one of the most vocal opponents of UVTs as proposed by CCP you could consider taking your own advice and waiting till the game has started before decrying this whole thing as a failure. |
MrZIONY
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
38
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 13:43:00 -
[304] - Quote
The scale of the game on release will make UVT's practically compulsory on full release if you want to be part of a decent corp/alliance. |
Gordon WarHammer
Corporate Industrial Industries Corporation
3
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 13:58:00 -
[305] - Quote
CCP Frame wrote:Hello,
Just to clarify what UVT is supposed to enable and what you get for free:
UVT Gives you:
- Ability to voice chat in custom channels, DUST or EVE/DUST - Ability to voice chat in corporation channels, alliance channels, ect.
UVT is NOT required for:
- Team voice chat - Squad voice chat
Text chat is of course free everywhere. Players can speak / listen to one channel at a time.
Keep in mind that price is still subject to change during the beta period.
makes sense to me to have to pay a little to talk between platforms... my only hope is that they can control the cost and not let this one get skewed by all the nefarious types in Dust/Eve (most all of them) |
howard sanchez
Conspiratus Immortalis
448
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 13:59:00 -
[306] - Quote
MrZIONY wrote:The scale of the game on release will make UVT's practically compulsory on full release if you want to be part of a decent corp/alliance.
MrZ, that assumption may be born out as fact. In fact, I hope it is. I also hope that CCP goes forward with the UVT plan as stated while adjusting price and function based on a combination of full customer base feedback and hard data to accomplish two things:
Provide a choice to players that enhances gameplay options and
Provide a valuable revenue stream for CCP to continue to develop DUST and EVE into a transformational, industry changing entertainment experience
Because Free to Play does not mean Free to Develop
The cost for unlimited voice communications across two AAA games on multiple platforms should not be free.
If F2P meant what a lot of the anti-UVT crowd seem to think then CCP would buy them a television , PS3, lunch and rent as well as developing DUST and giving them every single aspect of gameplay with no option for players to support CCP in further development
Do some of you feel that last statement is excessive hyperbole? You are right and that is exactly how your arguments against micro transactions as a fair business model come across: unreasonable excessive hyperbole |
MrZIONY
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
38
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 14:05:00 -
[307] - Quote
I'm not arguing against micro transactions to fund the development of the game, I prefer it as opposed to a subscription based model. It means if I can't play for whatever reason I don't have to keep paying for the whole month. What I'm opposed to in a free 2 play game is a vital mechanic of said game being a paid element.
I would probably pay around the cost of a subscription for a month of EvE in micro-tans for things like cooler looking suits etc. But not for an element that will be required to play the game as was intended. As part of a corp/alliance and taking and holding planets in null sec.
Edit - I bought the merc pack even though I already had a beta key because I wanted to help develop the game, my opinion is that UVT's(In their current format) is wrong. |
howard sanchez
Conspiratus Immortalis
448
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 14:08:00 -
[308] - Quote
MrZIONY wrote:A great many customers just wont play and go to planetside 2.
Edit And reading this whole thread we are not the minority, your view is inm afraid.
You assume that the loudest and most repetitive voices are the majority. I contend that You are not the majority. In fact, without real data regarding how many players are registered and participating in closed beta neither of us really know who is in the majority
I respect your freedom to continue to voice your concerns about what you believe is a game breaking feature. Thank you for returning the same. Perhaps none of us represent the majority. It's ccp's company and game. They have the data. I hope they use it to make the best business decision for DUST |
MrZIONY
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
38
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 14:12:00 -
[309] - Quote
Well at least we can both agree that we want dust to do well
CCP Should have known this issue would generate some heated debate they have been through it all before with EvE. Only time will tell how it pans out. |
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 14:28:00 -
[310] - Quote
howard sanchez wrote:Umallon Macross wrote:Chaz Lewis wrote:
[*pyramid*]
No, I just don't think it's a game-breaking issue, that's all.
Thats because the real game hasnt started yet. Excellent point, Umallon. And as one of the most vocal opponents of UVTs as proposed by CCP you could consider taking your own advice and waiting till the game has started before decrying this whole thing as a failure.
Or, conversely, I could use this BETA to make my opinions heard and acknowledged.
It is my opinion that this 'feature' does more damage than its worth in cold hard cash, and that even if it was charged at rates comparable to competitors services it would STILL do more damage.
I believe it is in the games' and CCP's best interests to make communication between players as easy and accessible as possible, and charging individuals on one side exorbitant rates for communication that is vital to CCP's vision of these games is contrary to both user demand and the healthiness of the universe and its products.
|
|
Maximus Stryker
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
393
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 14:36:00 -
[311] - Quote
CCP Jian wrote:Reminding again: there is completely FREE Team and Squad voice chat, completely FREE text chat for all channels, completely FREE in-game mail for all users - everything other console shooters have and more, for FREE... And, yes, of course, we are looking into additional options, offers, features, etc for UVT's.
@ CCP Jian Thumbs Up, thank you.
@Everyone else who does not understand that you will get at a minimum the same voice/chat options as every other game on the market and likely more for FREE. SMH. What you are paying for is an add on, an extra feature in game. The only thing that needs to change is the price point, which needs to come down at least by half.
Further break down for emphasis: -Team and Squad voice chat is completely FREE (Not sure about the Team aspect but squad chat is both in and OUT of game) -Text chat for all channels is completely FREE -In-game mail for all users is completely FREE -Everything other console shooters is completely FREE (If you were able to communicate in other games and operate/be active in your corps/clans, you will have the same resources in this game completely FREE)
-And, yes, of course, we are looking into additional options, offers, features, etc for UVT's (This is CCP being flexible and increasing the value of UVT's) |
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 14:47:00 -
[312] - Quote
CCP Jian wrote:Reminding again: there is completely FREE Team and Squad voice chat, completely FREE text chat for all channels, completely FREE in-game mail for all users - everything other console shooters have and more, for FREE... And, yes, of course, we are looking into additional options, offers, features, etc for UVT's. Orin the Freak wrote:alright, well, my main draw for playing DUST was to chat with friends AND play a game. i don't see why you would want to charge for something every other console game gives for free. I understand your desire for funds, but this is not where to get them.
I mean, who is going to only want voice chat for a day? or 30 days for that matter? this is just a cheap, sleazy way to charge a (albeit small) monthly fee, and that is rather silly.
Honestly, I think I'll pass. not really worth the money. ever since WoW I have a thing against monthly fees. The only reason I played EVE for as long as I did was because I didn't have to pay for it every month.
Certainly one could argue "you don't HAVE to pay to play", but I would argue, with as many friends as I have, why WOULDN'T you want to talk to them?
besides, I suppose I could just use Teamspeak, and not play DUST.
Either way, I didn't support Microsoft because they come off as greedy, charging for online play and voice chat.
I refuse to support a company that sees greed as necessary for profit.
if you want to charge a monthly fee, charge a monthly fee, don't make the "game" free, then microtransaction the hell out of us.
Seriously though, if you just make universal voice comms free, and charged more for other things, I would be fine with that.
Voice comms, particularly alliance/corp UVC need to be free IMO.
CCP Jian thats nice and all, but how can CCP justify charging 7.5x the going rate for VOIP? |
Maximus Stryker
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
393
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 14:57:00 -
[313] - Quote
Umallon Macross wrote: CCP Jian thats nice and all, but how can CCP justify charging 7.5x the going rate for VOIP?
Most agree this price needs to come down, hopefully we can shift the argument to --- "What is a more appropriate price for the UVT's" |
MrZIONY
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
38
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 14:59:00 -
[314] - Quote
Maximus Stryker wrote:@Everyone else who does not understand that you will get at a minimum the same voice/chat options as every other game on the market and likely more for FREE. SMH. What you are paying for is an add on, an extra feature in game. The only thing that needs to change is the price point, which needs to come down at least by half.
I would probably say the price needs to come down 75% to be competitive with TS/Mumble/Vent. You describe the feature as an extra, that maybe so compared to other PS3 games but it doesn't change the fact that for corps to function across several sectors of the eve universe effectively will require comms. Yes require not "it would be nice to be able to". Although a minimum of 50% reduction of price would probably get a few of us off our high horses and accept it. |
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 15:03:00 -
[315] - Quote
MrZIONY wrote:Maximus Stryker wrote:@Everyone else who does not understand that you will get at a minimum the same voice/chat options as every other game on the market and likely more for FREE. SMH. What you are paying for is an add on, an extra feature in game. The only thing that needs to change is the price point, which needs to come down at least by half. I would probably say the price needs to come down 75% to be competitive with TS/Mumble/Vent. You describe the feature as an extra, that maybe so compared to other PS3 games but it doesn't change the fact that for corps to function across several sectors of the eve universe effectively will require comms. Yes require not "it would be nice to be able to". Although a minimum of 50% reduction of price would probably get a few of us off our high horses and accept it.
100 Aurum a month would be the same cost as vent/teamspeak.
Wish I could be there to see whoever thought 900 a month was a good idea balk at it.
|
MrZIONY
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
38
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 15:05:00 -
[316] - Quote
Yeah 900 a month is just laughable. |
crazy space
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
879
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 15:06:00 -
[317] - Quote
CCP Jian wrote:Reminding again: there is completely FREE Team and Squad voice chat, completely FREE text chat for all channels, completely FREE in-game mail for all users - everything other console shooters have and more, for FREE... And, yes, of course, we are looking into additional options, offers, features, etc for UVT's.
If it' free maybe you should think about putting it somewhere other than RIGHT ON TOP OF THE CHAT BOX TO THE LEFT OF THE PUSH TO TALK BUTTON
It's right in your face, it sure looks like it's pay to talk. Shouldn't you hide that in the Aur store? please? |
crazy space
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
879
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 15:07:00 -
[318] - Quote
Maximus Stryker wrote:Umallon Macross wrote: CCP Jian thats nice and all, but how can CCP justify charging 7.5x the going rate for VOIP?
Most agree this price needs to come down, hopefully we can shift the argument to --- "What is a more appropriate price for the UVT's"
this, it should cost the same as any other paided voice chat option since that's what ccp is running between eve and dust. Or you use your own allaince TS channels but the cost needs to be what we expect from those services. |
Iceyburnz
316
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 15:10:00 -
[319] - Quote
crazy space wrote:Maximus Stryker wrote:Umallon Macross wrote: CCP Jian thats nice and all, but how can CCP justify charging 7.5x the going rate for VOIP?
Most agree this price needs to come down, hopefully we can shift the argument to --- "What is a more appropriate price for the UVT's" this, it should cost the same as any other paided voice chat option since that's what ccp is running between eve and dust. Or you use your own allaince TS channels but the cost needs to be what we expect from those services.
This is in my opinion the main issue.
They got people backs up by ramming it in without any explanation and its way too expensive to be tempting. Those 900 aur could be spent on a booster implant while you get the laptop out for team speak 3. Look at the problem they have getting people to use eve voice a free service. Alliances are going to demand dust allies use third party programs, especially when the find out cross chat costs real money.
Very ill conceived idea the UVT thingy.
*shrug* they know how we feel, its up to CCP now. |
Natu Nobilis
51
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 15:11:00 -
[320] - Quote
A little bit how things work in EVE, so we can try an analogy.
For mundane chit chat, op calling, motivational texts, damage control, all sorts of tatical instructions people use:
(External) - Forums - Ts3 / Vent - IRC
(Internal) - EVE Voice - EVE Gate - Corp Bulletin boards - EVE Forum
For the external options, you usually pay a fee, have maintance and regular fund supply from the members to do shiny things with your site and comms. Not all people pay, for it-Šs a community thing, some pepole finance alone, others pay a little but, other simply hop along and use without paying, but it-Šs a paid service.
I-Šm not going to enter the merit of the vulnerabilities of the external options, for it has been said before. (DDoS is a ***** when you-Šre trying to coordinate 1k people in battle).
This is the human communtaion. The avarage "so, how you doing?*. It-Šs already a paid service.
The thing is: paid by whom?
The internal choices are included in you subscription (even if at one point they tried to charge for EVE Voice [hahahhaa]). NO ONE plays eve for "free", even the ones that buy plex with isk, are being "real money subsidized" by people who bought the plexes with real money. You pay with your time and isk and recieve money converted in game time.
The external ones, are also paid services. You need to rent slots on voice comms, you need the domain registry, the forum maintance and such. The money comes from somewhere, be it altruist players, monthly fund raises, or ads.
The avarage player got used to benefit from the community without making thedirect financial contribution. (For the alliance leaders get their investment back, multiple times actually, from your activity, ratting, defense power and corp taxes).
***
Now, let-Šs move to our current situation.
We have the Dust game, that is a shooter one.
People hop in, go around, shoot faces, be happy about it. (Not the recieving end. [Usually. Looking at you masochists]). Much like a regular big fleet in EVE, you pick a ship, you lock the primary called by the FC, press F1 (Grouped weapons), and hope to not die in the process.
(I like solo pvp or small gang, so no blobing talk please)
Now, what-Šs the diference?
In EVE, i have pretty much ALL the external options built in game (except IRC), and they are included the subscription fee. Even tough, most part of the people PAY AGAIN (with time or money) for the external options.
In DUST, we may be able to use the MAJORITY of the features for free. Corporation is Corporation, be it in EVE or Dust, even if we don-Št pay anything.
EVE Gate, EVE Forum, Corp Bulletin Boards, all the regular corp features are common. You schedule big ops by Alliance mail and forums. "Be in X system at Y time, Z fleet doctrine". That-Šs strategic value available for everyone.
I don-Št know the costs of voice communication for the company, or how the process works when games on different plataforms FOR THE FIRST TIME EVER try to talk to each other, but certain costs should be paid somehow.
That leads to the question of "what should be paid for?"
***
What are the essential, fundamental things that a shooter game needs in order to be playable? Are they implemented in the game? Are they free or paid to be used?
What are the things that are not essential, but make a game "work" and be "enjoyable", hence, populated? Are they implemented in the game? Are they free or paid to be used?
What are the things that have no necessity, but are a commodity to have? Are they implemented in the game? Are they free or paid to be used?
The essential things, are confirmed to be implemented and free. I don-Št think anyone disagrees with that. Without battle comms there-Šs no game, period.
This leads to the "Enjoyable" and "Vanity" comms.
Corp comms is a gray area. They are not "essential" to the game, but are definetly enjoyable and a gound base for a game to work, for MMOS are built on the interatcion among people.
I think that-Šs the biggest atriction area here, and personally i would prefer it to be free, would understand it being charged for, and unless is a team effort like the renting of X slots for the entire team, people won-Št pay single handedly for it.
As for private channels, vita walkie talkie, spy work and such, that-Šs definetly a commodity for the PS3 - VITA users that are playing the game for FREE, unlike the EVE players that have the costs inside the subscription / plex.
Prioritize and get feedback on the community of Waht-Šs "Essential" - "Enjoyable" - "Vanity", and work out better payment modes, because a strategy of depending on everyone to pay alone for a thing that is used in group (as in corp chat), it-Šs kinda doomed. X aurum for Y slots is a better, market tested model.
Best regards
|
|
Maximus Stryker
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
393
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 15:19:00 -
[321] - Quote
MrZIONY wrote:Maximus Stryker wrote:@Everyone else who does not understand that you will get at a minimum the same voice/chat options as every other game on the market and likely more for FREE. SMH. What you are paying for is an add on, an extra feature in game. The only thing that needs to change is the price point, which needs to come down at least by half. I would probably say the price needs to come down 75% to be competitive with TS/Mumble/Vent. You describe the feature as an extra, that maybe so compared to other PS3 games but it doesn't change the fact that for corps to function across several sectors of the eve universe effectively will require comms. Yes require not "it would be nice to be able to". Although a minimum of 50% reduction of price would probably get a few of us off our high horses and accept it.
Agreed, if you want a deeper experience, expect to pay a little $ into something that you spent $0.00 to download.
Free to download and shoot people in the face...not free to get all the features you ever wanted in a FPS/MMO game
And I agree with you, a 75% reduction would be nice and at a minimum, half. |
StormForce64
11
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 15:48:00 -
[322] - Quote
MrZIONY wrote:CCP Jian wrote:Reminding again: there is completely FREE Team and Squad voice chat, completely FREE text chat for all channels, completely FREE in-game mail for all users - everything other console shooters have and more, for FREE... And, yes, of course, we are looking into additional options, offers, features, etc for UVT's. Yes but once the game goes live players who wants to be in serious corps/alliances will have to pay this or be of no use at all to their respective corp/alliance. Jian your reply also comes across as emotive, have we hit a nerve at CCP with this one especially after CCP had the same fiasco with EvE Voice and had to back down. The player are trying to tell you that we dont mind paying micro transactions for a whole host of things. Just not something that is vital to a corp/alliance based shooter where co-operation across planets and even entire sections of the EvEverse will be required. Edit - Just to add CCP many of your players see this as nothing more than a money grab and putting "Free" in caps doesn't change that or the view that your game is quickly becoming pay to win.
I agree 100% The Corp/Alliance feature attracted me to this game. FPS are simply way better when playing in groups that can communicate easily before getting into a game. The microtransactions alone amount to death by a thousand paper cuts. Paying to talk to more than your immediate squad or team in a particular game goes over board. |
Maximus Stryker
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
393
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 16:06:00 -
[323] - Quote
StormForce64 wrote:MrZIONY wrote:CCP Jian wrote:Reminding again: there is completely FREE Team and Squad voice chat, completely FREE text chat for all channels, completely FREE in-game mail for all users - everything other console shooters have and more, for FREE... And, yes, of course, we are looking into additional options, offers, features, etc for UVT's. Yes but once the game goes live players who wants to be in serious corps/alliances will have to pay this or be of no use at all to their respective corp/alliance. Jian your reply also comes across as emotive, have we hit a nerve at CCP with this one especially after CCP had the same fiasco with EvE Voice and had to back down. The player are trying to tell you that we dont mind paying micro transactions for a whole host of things. Just not something that is vital to a corp/alliance based shooter where co-operation across planets and even entire sections of the EvEverse will be required. Edit - Just to add CCP many of your players see this as nothing more than a money grab and putting "Free" in caps doesn't change that or the view that your game is quickly becoming pay to win. I agree 100% The Corp/Alliance feature attracted me to this game. FPS are simply way better when playing in groups that can communicate easily before getting into a game. The microtransactions alone amount to death by a thousand paper cuts. Paying to talk to more than your immediate squad or team in a particular game goes over board.
You will still be able to talk in groups/clans/coprs outside of games when you are in your MQ of where ever not in match
Further break down for emphasis: -Team and Squad voice chat is completely FREE (Not sure about the Team aspect but squad chat is both in and OUT of game) -Text chat for all channels is completely FREE -In-game mail for all users is completely FREE -Everything other console shooters is completely FREE (If you were able to communicate in other games and operate/be active in your corps/clans, you will have the same resources in this game completely FREE)
|
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 16:26:00 -
[324] - Quote
Maximus Stryker wrote:StormForce64 wrote:MrZIONY wrote:CCP Jian wrote:Reminding again: there is completely FREE Team and Squad voice chat, completely FREE text chat for all channels, completely FREE in-game mail for all users - everything other console shooters have and more, for FREE... And, yes, of course, we are looking into additional options, offers, features, etc for UVT's. Yes but once the game goes live players who wants to be in serious corps/alliances will have to pay this or be of no use at all to their respective corp/alliance. Jian your reply also comes across as emotive, have we hit a nerve at CCP with this one especially after CCP had the same fiasco with EvE Voice and had to back down. The player are trying to tell you that we dont mind paying micro transactions for a whole host of things. Just not something that is vital to a corp/alliance based shooter where co-operation across planets and even entire sections of the EvEverse will be required. Edit - Just to add CCP many of your players see this as nothing more than a money grab and putting "Free" in caps doesn't change that or the view that your game is quickly becoming pay to win. I agree 100% The Corp/Alliance feature attracted me to this game. FPS are simply way better when playing in groups that can communicate easily before getting into a game. The microtransactions alone amount to death by a thousand paper cuts. Paying to talk to more than your immediate squad or team in a particular game goes over board. You will still be able to talk in groups/clans/coprs outside of games when you are in your MQ of where ever not in match Further break down for emphasis: -Team and Squad voice chat is completely FREE (Not sure about the Team aspect but squad chat is both in and OUT of game) -Text chat for all channels is completely FREE -In-game mail for all users is completely FREE -Everything other console shooters is completely FREE (If you were able to communicate in other games and operate/be active in your corps/clans, you will have the same resources in this game completely FREE)
I like how CCP says:
'We are something amazing above and beyond other shooters!'
and then
'But you get everything other shooters have for FREE!'
If CCP's plan is to charge a premium for what makes this game different from other console shooters, then they are punishing those who want to see this game live up to its vision, INCLUDING THEMSELVES.
How about this CCP: alter David Reid's ad nauseum propaganda spiel to 'Dust is everything you are used to seeing from online console shooters, and if you pay more you can have this vast experience beyond that!'
'You've heard these stories about assassinations and bank heists in EVE Online, and now console players can be a part of that as long as they cough up the $3.60 a month 'being allowed to talk to people' cover charge.' |
Maximus Stryker
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
393
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 17:08:00 -
[325] - Quote
Umallon Macross wrote:Maximus Stryker wrote:StormForce64 wrote:MrZIONY wrote:CCP Jian wrote:Reminding again: there is completely FREE Team and Squad voice chat, completely FREE text chat for all channels, completely FREE in-game mail for all users - everything other console shooters have and more, for FREE... And, yes, of course, we are looking into additional options, offers, features, etc for UVT's. Yes but once the game goes live players who wants to be in serious corps/alliances will have to pay this or be of no use at all to their respective corp/alliance. Jian your reply also comes across as emotive, have we hit a nerve at CCP with this one especially after CCP had the same fiasco with EvE Voice and had to back down. The player are trying to tell you that we dont mind paying micro transactions for a whole host of things. Just not something that is vital to a corp/alliance based shooter where co-operation across planets and even entire sections of the EvEverse will be required. Edit - Just to add CCP many of your players see this as nothing more than a money grab and putting "Free" in caps doesn't change that or the view that your game is quickly becoming pay to win. I agree 100% The Corp/Alliance feature attracted me to this game. FPS are simply way better when playing in groups that can communicate easily before getting into a game. The microtransactions alone amount to death by a thousand paper cuts. Paying to talk to more than your immediate squad or team in a particular game goes over board. You will still be able to talk in groups/clans/coprs outside of games when you are in your MQ of where ever not in match Further break down for emphasis: -Team and Squad voice chat is completely FREE (Not sure about the Team aspect but squad chat is both in and OUT of game) -Text chat for all channels is completely FREE -In-game mail for all users is completely FREE -Everything other console shooters is completely FREE (If you were able to communicate in other games and operate/be active in your corps/clans, you will have the same resources in this game completely FREE) I like how CCP says: 'We are something amazing above and beyond other shooters!' and then 'But you get everything other shooters have for FREE!' If CCP's plan is to charge a premium for what makes this game different from other console shooters, then they are punishing those who want to see this game live up to its vision, INCLUDING THEMSELVES. How about this CCP: alter David Reid's ad nauseum propaganda spiel to 'Dust is everything you are used to seeing from online console shooters, and if you pay more you can have this vast experience beyond that!' 'You've heard these stories about assassinations and bank heists in EVE Online, and now console players can be a part of that as long as they cough up the $3.60 a month 'being allowed to talk to people' cover charge.'
They should say that if they are charging $60 for their game and then charging $3.60 a month for things that make their game different from other console shooters. But they are not charging $60 for their game... |
steadyhand 08 orti
Doomheim
43
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 17:09:00 -
[326] - Quote
sssoooo i have two choices either A pay for this to talk to peeps in my corp and EvE
ooorrrrr B get a TS sever and do the same thing anyway
i cant see this as a buy-able thing lasting their are a lot free alternative options out their for people to use. |
Mr TamiyaCowboy
Condotta Rouvenor Gallente Federation
121
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 17:14:00 -
[327] - Quote
meh just dual client.
i have the PS3 Right beside the PC so i can in theory play both eve and dust at the same time.
tami in dust : Rawr i call in lasor lights of doom tami in eve : F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 , picks up ps3 dualshock 3 controller and chuckles
enemy merc 1: OMG tamiyacowboy just OB'd me enemy merc 2 : eh ? what theres two, na i just killed him enemy merc 2: omg he just killed me to with an OB |
tribal wyvern
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
673
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 17:27:00 -
[328] - Quote
gangsta nachos wrote:Did I already say remove pay to talk, after that remove ptt as well and give the ******* option to mute instead good god
You can remove push to talk yourself!! Ffs why are people ignorant to this!!?? Press select to get the side bar/window up with corp/local chat etc......and the option is at the top right next to 'buy universal voice transmitter' |
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 17:29:00 -
[329] - Quote
steadyhand 08 orti wrote:sssoooo i have two choices either A pay for this to talk to peeps in my corp and EvE
ooorrrrr B get a TS sever and do the same thing anyway
i cant see this as a buy-able thing lasting their are a lot free alternative options out their for people to use.
And remember, TS is a fraction of the cost!
|
Orin the Freak
Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz RISE of LEGION
334
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 18:22:00 -
[330] - Quote
like I said, Charge slightly more for the add ons, and make corp/alliance UVT free.
I do find it kind of car-salesmanlike of the CCP forum devs to insist that the things we ARE getting for "FREE" are a bargain, but that isn't the case. you tried charging for voice comms separately for EVE as well, and how did that turn out? you could argue that the EVE subscription costs cover that, but I could argue that they could make the OTHER microtransactions in DUST cover free voice comms for everyone (at least for corp/alliance chats).
Heck, then I wouldn't even mind you charged 900 AUR a month for private CUSTOM voice chat (with people outside your corp/alliance) I would be fine with that.
but seriously, I am very active in my corp/alliance, and will need that link, but I absolutely refuse to pay. Here's the question. As not just a business, but a video game developing business, when you see an opportunity to make a buck, but at the cost of coming off as either greedy, or downright out-of-touch to some/most (depending on how you look at it) of your fans/followers, do you take that opportunity, or do you find alternative, less.. invasive ways of making a profit?
Granted, you may have been jaded by all the complaints about microtransactions and skill boosters, etc. in the recent past, most of which have blown over by now. So you might think this is just another one of those things, and people will just swallow their pride and wallets and just pay the cost.
But I have a feeling this isn't one of those things. In a lot of peoples minds, mine included, voice comms, in any form, are NOT to be made an "extra option". But I am not willing to pay extra for it. I can't speak for everyone else, but I can guarantee you, a lot of people are probably with me on this. |
|
Bob Deorum
15
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 18:27:00 -
[331] - Quote
ya i agree this is crazy to have to pay for voice comms. |
Mr TamiyaCowboy
Condotta Rouvenor Gallente Federation
121
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 18:59:00 -
[332] - Quote
I would like to ask a valid question.
Is it possible CCP if you can ask US what we will pay for.
i can honestly say i would pay to have my eve char imported to dust ( imported as in full body avatar) with all the sparkle. |
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 19:08:00 -
[333] - Quote
Mr TamiyaCowboy wrote: I would like to ask a valid question.
Is it possible CCP if you can ask US what we will pay for.
i can honestly say i would pay to have my eve char imported to dust ( imported as in full body avatar) with all the sparkle.
LOL, CCP doesn't ask until Jita is on fire.
|
MrZIONY
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
38
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 19:40:00 -
[334] - Quote
I'm definitely of the same opinion as you Orin, I like the idea of charging for custom channels etc, but keeping your corp/alliance chat free. Maybe a system where the UVT could be used at management level to expand the number of channels etc within the corp channels to allow for better organization. I would think alot of corp leaders would like to be able to setup private channels for different things like meetings and to divide the corp chat depending where you are in space. |
Xavier Hastings
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
243
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 20:23:00 -
[335] - Quote
Maximus Stryker wrote:
You will still be able to talk in groups/clans/coprs outside of games when you are in your MQ of where ever not in match
Further break down for emphasis: -Team and Squad voice chat is completely FREE (Not sure about the Team aspect but squad chat is both in and OUT of game) -Text chat for all channels is completely FREE -In-game mail for all users is completely FREE -Everything other console shooters is completely FREE (If you were able to communicate in other games and operate/be active in your corps/clans, you will have the same resources in this game completely FREE)
Thank you for needlessly reposting exactly what the Dev said. |
Maximus Stryker
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
393
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 20:42:00 -
[336] - Quote
Xavier Hastings wrote:Maximus Stryker wrote:
You will still be able to talk in groups/clans/coprs outside of games when you are in your MQ of where ever not in match
Further break down for emphasis: -Team and Squad voice chat is completely FREE (Not sure about the Team aspect but squad chat is both in and OUT of game) -Text chat for all channels is completely FREE -In-game mail for all users is completely FREE -Everything other console shooters is completely FREE (If you were able to communicate in other games and operate/be active in your corps/clans, you will have the same resources in this game completely FREE)
Thank you for needlessly reposting exactly what the Dev said.
Some people only learn my repetition.... |
Lee Church II
FridgeOre Mining Group The Butterfly Effect Alliance
3
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 21:55:00 -
[337] - Quote
thats freaking awsome dude |
Zat Earthshatter
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
304
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 22:00:00 -
[338] - Quote
For all the pyramids and opinions, i have two things to say :
If it turns out OK : UVT-holding space piniatas, get the tear vial ready.
If it is still unacceptable : Wait until release to do anything drastic. There will be more people then that can voice their opinion with you.
In the meantime, make sure CCP makes it turn out OK, all the while keeping track of anything in the map that looks like a monument... |
Knarf Black
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
397
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 22:31:00 -
[339] - Quote
My $.02: I don't have a problem with UVT in theory, but they're going to have to be dirt cheap or no one will bother.
If they make them cost next to nothing but unsellable for ISK, then people still have to pay in to use them while not feeling ripped off. |
Corvus Ravensong
Skyel Industries Subspace Exploration Agency
179
|
Posted - 2012.08.17 01:28:00 -
[340] - Quote
Yea, we shouldn't have to pay extra to talk to some dude 600 LY away, after all my radio can do it for FREE!!!.........
Oh wait, damn that's right, radio waves move at light speed - well I can't wait 1200 years for a response, so I guess I better pay the bill for my FTL coms rig......
Really guys, they are talking about letting you have voice chat with people in a completely different game - it's not a necessity (the close range coms are FREE after all), hell, if your corp is all that you should already have a callendar, oog e-mail mailing list, oog voice chat, and at least among your top brass, each other's cell phone #'s........ |
|
Chao Wolf
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
209
|
Posted - 2012.08.17 02:48:00 -
[341] - Quote
Voice comm suggestion
Free: all in battle comms(team & squad), corp main channel, alliance main channel, and once walking around areas is added local ( players in your general area)
Pay: custom created channel (channels not tied to corp/alliance/battle/local), extra corp channels (the ability to added additional channels to corp allowing a rank/permission set to add extra channels that other players can use with out paying), extra alliance channels (same as extra corp channels) |
Longshot Ravenwood
Algintal Core Gallente Federation
680
|
Posted - 2012.08.17 03:35:00 -
[342] - Quote
MrZIONY wrote:CCP Jian wrote:Reminding again: there is completely FREE Team and Squad voice chat, completely FREE text chat for all channels, completely FREE in-game mail for all users - everything other console shooters have and more, for FREE... And, yes, of course, we are looking into additional options, offers, features, etc for UVT's. Yes but once the game goes live players who wants to be in serious corps/alliances will have to pay this or be of no use at all to their respective corp/alliance. Jian your reply also comes across as emotive, have we hit a nerve at CCP with this one especially after CCP had the same fiasco with EvE Voice and had to back down. The player are trying to tell you that we dont mind paying micro transactions for a whole host of things. Just not something that is vital to a corp/alliance based shooter where co-operation across planets and even entire sections of the EvEverse will be required. Edit - Just to add CCP many of your players see this as nothing more than a money grab and putting "Free" in caps doesn't change that or the view that your game is quickly becoming pay to win.
Thank you CCP for not forcing me to have to listen to this guy over voice com unless I have the misfortune of joining a match with him. I appreciate anything you do to help keep his voice out of any room I'm in.
hen I attend a conference call at work I DON'T HAVE THE ENTIRE COMPANY ON A CALL. Whoever's in charge attends, or communicates via e-mail, then everyone else is advised in person of the game plan, or sent an e-mail. It stops the "he said she said" bull**** that interferes with professionalism.
You have a ****ing squad leader for a reason. If you're in a battlegroup he's the only one who needs to communicate with anyone else for strategy.
I'm already tired of all of this ****ing carebear tear-filled whiny **** . You aren't failing to get support because you didn't get the special com. You were just auto-muted when everyone heard you complaining about them when we dropped in for the match.
You've got a message system that lets you in-game e-mail people. Keyboard & mouse support that will allow you to type in a chat room. Voice coms for organization in battle. You're *****ing about not getting free voice coms for free private rooms to chat in. This isn't some new phone service through your PS3 so that you can chat up the girl you just saw in the hot scout suit last game. If you want her in your battle group you'll just have to send her a message & see if she replies back. |
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.17 03:41:00 -
[343] - Quote
Longshot Ravenwood wrote:MrZIONY wrote:CCP Jian wrote:Reminding again: there is completely FREE Team and Squad voice chat, completely FREE text chat for all channels, completely FREE in-game mail for all users - everything other console shooters have and more, for FREE... And, yes, of course, we are looking into additional options, offers, features, etc for UVT's. Yes but once the game goes live players who wants to be in serious corps/alliances will have to pay this or be of no use at all to their respective corp/alliance. Jian your reply also comes across as emotive, have we hit a nerve at CCP with this one especially after CCP had the same fiasco with EvE Voice and had to back down. The player are trying to tell you that we dont mind paying micro transactions for a whole host of things. Just not something that is vital to a corp/alliance based shooter where co-operation across planets and even entire sections of the EvEverse will be required. Edit - Just to add CCP many of your players see this as nothing more than a money grab and putting "Free" in caps doesn't change that or the view that your game is quickly becoming pay to win. Thank you CCP for not forcing me to have to listen to this guy over voice com unless I have the misfortune of joining a match with him. I appreciate anything you do to help keep his voice out of any room I'm in. hen I attend a conference call at work I DON'T HAVE THE ENTIRE COMPANY ON A CALL. Whoever's in charge attends, or communicates via e-mail, then everyone else is advised in person of the game plan, or sent an e-mail. It stops the "he said she said" bull**** that interferes with professionalism. You have a ****ing squad leader for a reason. If you're in a battlegroup he's the only one who needs to communicate with anyone else for strategy. I'm already tired of all of this ****ing carebear tear-filled whiny **** . You aren't failing to get support because you didn't get the special com. You were just auto-muted when everyone heard you complaining about them when we dropped in for the match. You've got a message system that lets you in-game e-mail people. Keyboard & mouse support that will allow you to type in a chat room. Voice coms for organization in battle. You're *****ing about not getting free voice coms for free private rooms to chat in. This isn't some new phone service through your PS3 so that you can chat up the girl you just saw in the hot scout suit last game. If you want her in your battle group you'll just have to send her a message & see if she replies back.
So lets say your company's communication provider was charging more than 7.5x the going rate for its services, and these services only allowed you to communicate with people on the same service, and not any other networks. Would you find this acceptable too? |
Corvus Ravensong
Skyel Industries Subspace Exploration Agency
179
|
Posted - 2012.08.17 03:52:00 -
[344] - Quote
Hmm, you're cellphone was through Verizon till your contract expired too huh?
And in actuality, it's more like having a provider who charges through the nose for long distance but then gives you unlimited e-mails & text. |
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.17 04:15:00 -
[345] - Quote
Corvus Ravensong wrote:Hmm, you're cellphone was through Verizon till your contract expired too huh?
And in actuality, it's more like having a provider who charges through the nose for long distance but then gives you unlimited e-mails & text.
I'm in Australia. My provider had horrible coverage, and sold out to what is arguably the worst provider in the country.
|
MrZIONY
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
38
|
Posted - 2012.08.17 10:12:00 -
[346] - Quote
Longshot U Mad Bro?
I don't ask for free comms, just resonably priced ones. Read all my posts in the thread before your go nuclear dude. The only tears are yours |
BLENDEDDAVE WARRIORS
29
|
Posted - 2012.08.17 11:43:00 -
[347] - Quote
i have 10 m8s squads of 4 suck we have to pay to chat and try to group up in a game .if squads can group up team chat may be ok just have to see but in most games were squd are small you can join on a frend and get in but you should be able to group 4 squds up and chat free .pay to chat will kill this game for big clans and big clans =$$$$$ |
mr merkzdem
38
|
Posted - 2012.08.17 14:12:00 -
[348] - Quote
would have to agree with you statement there mate well said man+1 |
Laurent Cazaderon
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
1155
|
Posted - 2012.08.17 18:19:00 -
[349] - Quote
hey CCP_Jian, nice to see you down here.
If audio chat when grouping with friends remains free and we get to create groups up to the max player cap a team can sustain in a battle then this is okay. Even though i think it 's still best to offer some audio channel the way mumble does : charging one guy willing to buy it (even if more expensive) and then letting him invite whoever he wants in it.
it would work a lot better with Dust and corporation imo than asking every participants to pay a fee in order to get inside the channel. |
Markus Barak
Algintal Core Gallente Federation
10
|
Posted - 2012.08.17 18:29:00 -
[350] - Quote
CCP really has one of two options. Leave the prices as they stand now and you will have very few people use an overpriced service with not so many options.... Or they lower the price GREATLY from where it is now.... LOTS of people use and and get others to use it cause... everyone else will be!!!!! Then you make mo money CCP!!!! Would you rather have 10 people paying 900 or 10000 people paying like 100. |
|
SILENTSAM 69
Pro Hic Immortalis RISE of LEGION
421
|
Posted - 2012.08.17 18:31:00 -
[351] - Quote
Do people think they need to buy a UVT to have comms in game?
The UVT is for side comms out of game, not in game comms that you need.
I personally see nothing wrong with charging for voice activation on the side comms for the game. It is only for unessential comms and it cuts down on wasted network resources. it is a good de-marketing idea.
There are enough free alternatives that it is not a big deal. maybe they could adjust prices, but it is not a big issue. |
CLONE 2774
Tritan-Industries Legacy Rising
83
|
Posted - 2012.08.17 18:33:00 -
[352] - Quote
Oh God...The overpowered Aurum weapons i could deal with but this...Dear God |
Sparten 269
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
89
|
Posted - 2012.08.17 19:18:00 -
[353] - Quote
I know in battle voice is free but really, do they really need to make it pay2talk outside of battles, people would be crazy to buy this since the majority of players will not need it. Plus there beings ways around it like things such as Skype, if I need to talk to a Guy out of battle I would just invite him to a pre-made squad, this just seems really impractical.
Though this is just my opinion I take it a few feel the same. |
Nomex Gallatin
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
6
|
Posted - 2012.08.17 20:05:00 -
[354] - Quote
Awesome... |
Cobalt Monkey
Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation
140
|
Posted - 2012.08.17 20:33:00 -
[355] - Quote
CCP Frame wrote:Hello,
Just to clarify what UVT is supposed to enable and what you get for free:
UVT Gives you:
- Ability to voice chat in custom channels, DUST or EVE/DUST - Ability to voice chat in corporation channels, alliance channels, ect.
UVT is NOT required for:
- Team voice chat - Squad voice chat
Text chat is of course free everywhere. Players can speak / listen to one channel at a time.
Keep in mind that price is still subject to change during the beta period.
Make a game based around the importance of teamwork, then put a money block on being able to use it? Wow. Just...wow. Unacceptable. |
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.18 10:25:00 -
[356] - Quote
Cobalt Monkey wrote:CCP Frame wrote:Hello,
Just to clarify what UVT is supposed to enable and what you get for free:
UVT Gives you:
- Ability to voice chat in custom channels, DUST or EVE/DUST - Ability to voice chat in corporation channels, alliance channels, ect.
UVT is NOT required for:
- Team voice chat - Squad voice chat
Text chat is of course free everywhere. Players can speak / listen to one channel at a time.
Keep in mind that price is still subject to change during the beta period. Make a game based around the importance of teamwork, then put a money block on being able to use it? Wow. Just...wow. Unacceptable.
Pay wall around the whole reason for the game to exist? Check.
|
gangsta nachos
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
377
|
Posted - 2012.08.18 10:27:00 -
[357] - Quote
why did you bump this back up i mean come on 18 pages what else is there to say |
Atomic TBag
Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2012.08.18 11:20:00 -
[358] - Quote
gangsta nachos wrote:why did you bump this back up i mean come on 18 pages what else is there to say
I'd like to suggest a feature of "pay to silence". I just browsed these pages and came to the conclusion not everyone needs to talk in game. |
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.18 11:21:00 -
[359] - Quote
gangsta nachos wrote:why did you bump this back up i mean come on 18 pages what else is there to say
There's plenty more to say until its addressed.
|
Galactus VI
Algintal Core Gallente Federation
43
|
Posted - 2012.08.18 11:49:00 -
[360] - Quote
CCP Frame wrote:Hello,
Just to clarify what UVT is supposed to enable and what you get for free:
UVT Gives you:
- Ability to voice chat in custom channels, DUST or EVE/DUST - Ability to voice chat in corporation channels, alliance channels, ect.
UVT is NOT required for:
- Team voice chat - Squad voice chat
Text chat is of course free everywhere. Players can speak / listen to one channel at a time.
Keep in mind that price is still subject to change during the beta period.
You basically just put a finger up the ass of all the players....
Wanna talk to more than 4 players.... give us money!
|
|
4447
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
649
|
Posted - 2012.08.18 11:53:00 -
[361] - Quote
Galactus VI wrote:CCP Frame wrote:Hello,
Just to clarify what UVT is supposed to enable and what you get for free:
UVT Gives you:
- Ability to voice chat in custom channels, DUST or EVE/DUST - Ability to voice chat in corporation channels, alliance channels, ect.
UVT is NOT required for:
- Team voice chat - Squad voice chat
Text chat is of course free everywhere. Players can speak / listen to one channel at a time.
Keep in mind that price is still subject to change during the beta period. You basically just put a finger up the ass of all the players.... Wanna talk to more than 4 players.... give us money!
why are you always taking about fingers and donkeys for? |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
1849
|
Posted - 2012.08.18 12:42:00 -
[362] - Quote
Pretty sure the "default OFF" voice comms got reset by the last patch so you just have to turn them on again.
And pretty sure this paid system is ONLY for out-of-battle comms or for comms with people not in your match.
If I'm wrong, then... this is completely ridiculous and NO CCP THIS IS A TERRIBLE IDEA, but I don't think I'm wrong. |
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.18 15:11:00 -
[363] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote:Pretty sure the "default OFF" voice comms got reset by the last patch so you just have to turn them on again.
And pretty sure this paid system is ONLY for out-of-battle comms or for comms with people not in your match.
If I'm wrong, then... this is completely ridiculous and NO CCP THIS IS A TERRIBLE IDEA, but I don't think I'm wrong.
Ability to voice chat in custom channels, DUST or EVE/DUST Ability to voice chat in corporation channels, alliance channels, ect.
CCP don't want DUST corps to have the same facilities as EVE corps unless they pay for it apparently, and pay 7.5x + the cost of services like vent and teamspeak. |
Tony Calif
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
2002
|
Posted - 2012.08.18 15:14:00 -
[364] - Quote
It doesn't matter. No one is using in game comms anyway. I'm just fed up of Playin with a bunch of retards too busy listening to vent/TS to work with their ******* team. Game's **** because of it. |
Mathiassen
New Eden Regimental Navy Rebel Alliance of New Eden
8
|
Posted - 2012.08.18 15:22:00 -
[365] - Quote
No, this is fine, especially since this is not integral to gameplay. (as in, you don't need UVT to speak in squads/team)
Most of you that use TeamSpeak in EVE Online are forgetting that someone is footing the bill to keep it up. UVT is essentially the same thing, but cutting out extra hassle. :p |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
1849
|
Posted - 2012.08.18 15:42:00 -
[366] - Quote
Umallon Macross wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote:Pretty sure the "default OFF" voice comms got reset by the last patch so you just have to turn them on again.
And pretty sure this paid system is ONLY for out-of-battle comms or for comms with people not in your match.
If I'm wrong, then... this is completely ridiculous and NO CCP THIS IS A TERRIBLE IDEA, but I don't think I'm wrong. Ability to voice chat in custom channels, DUST or EVE/DUST Ability to voice chat in corporation channels, alliance channels, ect. CCP don't want DUST corps to have the same facilities as EVE corps unless they pay for it apparently, and pay 7.5x + the cost of services like vent and teamspeak. After a short run actually playing, the voice comms work just fine in mission. Haven't got any way to check whether you get voice comms outside of missions without paying, but probably not, and that sounds like it's going to be the only thing you have to pay for.
Honestly, I don't have a problem with this. Only thing I don't like is the fact that voice defaults to "off" and PTT defaults to "on" when it should logically be the other way around for a console FPS that uses this much of the controller already. |
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.18 18:43:00 -
[367] - Quote
Tony Calif wrote:It doesn't matter. No one is using in game comms anyway. I'm just fed up of Playin with a bunch of retards too busy listening to vent/TS to work with their ******* team. Game's **** because of it.
If you want people to play as a team, then you want CCP to make communications viable, which means not pulling **** like UVT's that fracture the communications userbase.
If DUST voice chat was both competitive pricewise, and gave real advantages ( ease of use, corp communications, organisation, knowledge is power), then the vast majority of EVE players would use it.
The current model will drive players to other communcations options, which means if you end up in a game with lots of guys working together, chances are they will be talking over another network so you will hear nothing.
The same goes for EVE voice. If it was as easy to use as popular alternatives, everyone would use it.
Surely everyone can agree that it makes life better for everyone if communications are cheap, easy to use, and work within the games framework.
CCP has managed to hit 1 out of 3.
|
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.18 18:44:00 -
[368] - Quote
Mathiassen wrote:No, this is fine, especially since this is not integral to gameplay. (as in, you don't need UVT to speak in squads/team)
Most of you that use TeamSpeak in EVE Online are forgetting that someone is footing the bill to keep it up. UVT is essentially the same thing, but cutting out extra hassle. :p
UVT costs 7.5x + MORE than teamspeak.
|
oneshytalk
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
71
|
Posted - 2012.08.19 11:36:00 -
[369] - Quote
Tony Calif wrote:It doesn't matter. No one is using in game comms anyway. I'm just fed up of Playin with a bunch of retards too busy listening to vent/TS to work with their ******* team. Game's **** because of it.
You are absolutely right, sadly. They left grouping to late and people found ways round it like SKYPE which they are now sticking with as they don't want to pay the game price, but more so the squad size is ridiculously small and you can't group squads to make a team. This needs to be sorted ASAP or comms on this game will not be used and it wiil die fast. |
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.19 15:49:00 -
[370] - Quote
oneshytalk wrote:Tony Calif wrote:It doesn't matter. No one is using in game comms anyway. I'm just fed up of Playin with a bunch of retards too busy listening to vent/TS to work with their ******* team. Game's **** because of it. You are absolutely right, sadly. They left grouping to late and people found ways round it like SKYPE which they are now sticking with as they don't want to pay the game price, but more so the squad size is ridiculously small and you can't group squads to make a team. This needs to be sorted ASAP or comms on this game will not be used and it wiil die fast.
You woul think they would have learned this from EVE voice
|
|
Le-gen Dairy
6
|
Posted - 2012.08.20 13:45:00 -
[371] - Quote
Grit Breather wrote:CCP Frame wrote:Hello,
Just to clarify what UVT is supposed to enable and what you get for free:
UVT Gives you:
- Ability to voice chat in custom channels, DUST or EVE/DUST - Ability to voice chat in corporation channels, alliance channels, ect.
UVT is NOT required for:
- Team voice chat - Squad voice chat
Text chat is of course free everywhere. Players can speak / listen to one channel at a time.
Keep in mind that price is still subject to change during the beta period. I have a question/clarification about UVT usage. Currently when I buy UVT it allows me one month of free voice chat on any private channel. But this UVT item is linked to just the character I bought it with. So if I have 3 characters I have to buy the UVT 3 times. As I am only able to use one character at a time, I don't believe this is designed well. As I see it, the UVT item should be linked to the player (or have multiple items, one for each character). After all, it's not like a skill booster where the character actually enjoys the module. It's something I as a player use and my character gains nothing. As it is now, I would have to spend 3x900 AUR if I have 3 characters just to get something I already have. Seems wrong.
I agree with Grit Breather. This is an item that provides no boost to the character. If AUR is shared across characters, shouldn't this be something that could be done as well? |
The Warbot
Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State
85
|
Posted - 2012.08.20 13:51:00 -
[372] - Quote
Umallon Macross wrote:Universal Voice Transmitters are biomechanical implants that provide personal access to subspace routers, allowing users to communicate instantly with one another wherever they may be. The implants degrade over time and cease to function when fully absorbed by the user.
1-day 3-day 7-day 30-day
60 150 250 900
Aurum.
WTF am I looking at? Is voicechat pay2play? SERIOUSLY?
*[beyond this point is material from later in the thread that I thought might be good to front load for people to see]*
A 30 day UVT costs 900 Aurum.
900 Aurum = $3.60US = 92,932,150.20 ISK
Lets say you have a mixed DUST/EVE alliance with 90 DUST Players.
81000 Aurum = $324US = 8,363,893,518.00 ISK
Your alliance has 3 options:
Pay $300+ to be able to communicate.
Pay 8 billion ISK + (likely a lot more as I don't see this market being high volume, so prices will be dictated by the sellers, subject to inflation and the whims of the market including limited availability and quantity)
Use 3rd party software (for comparisons sake: Ventrilo, Teamspeak and Mumble servers for $40US a month for 100 slots).
UVTs cost 7.5x as much as the alternatives.
The current conversion rate for $0.40US (cost per server slot) is about 100 Aurum.
If the 30 day UVT costs 100 Aurum it will the same price as the competition, with the added benefits of its integration into DUST and EVE.
I still think it unnecessarily fractures the player base and would be better for everyone if it was free and its costs subsidized by boosters and sidegrades, because its in everyone's best interests to make communication and free flow of information as open and accessible as possible, but I guess I could live with it as a compromise if I had to.
This is absurd and silly at the same time. I don't understand why it would be necessary to pay for communicating in a console game.... lol.
That being said, like always, Have a nice day.
|
MF Dust
2
|
Posted - 2012.08.20 15:02:00 -
[373] - Quote
CCP might as well give this one up they're not going to win this. Even if all the players don't decide to walk out on them, it's not as if there aren't already a plethora of other free voice chat services that will work just as well as in game for corp chat. All the rage aside this just isn't a pragmatic business model, thinking an organization will pay you for something they can get elsewhere for free. |
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.20 18:31:00 -
[374] - Quote
MF Dust wrote:CCP might as well give this one up they're not going to win this. Even if all the players don't decide to walk out on them, it's not as if there aren't already a plethora of other free voice chat services that will work just as well as in game for corp chat. All the rage aside this just isn't a pragmatic business model, thinking an organization will pay you for something they can get elsewhere for free.
Its funny, CCP puts years of thought into ship balancing, and zero thought into 'services' it wants to charge for.
|
Moorian Flav
Ectype Inc.
20
|
Posted - 2012.08.20 19:07:00 -
[375] - Quote
CCP should at least give a trial of such services they want players to pay for so we know what we're missing. |
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.20 23:43:00 -
[376] - Quote
Moorian Flav wrote:CCP should at least give a trial of such services they want players to pay for so we know what we're missing.
CCP have never been good at easing people into things. Or realistic price points.
|
tribal wyvern
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
673
|
Posted - 2012.08.20 23:59:00 -
[377] - Quote
MF Dust wrote:CCP might as well give this one up they're not going to win this. Even if all the players don't decide to walk out on them, it's not as if there aren't already a plethora of other free voice chat services that will work just as well as in game for corp chat. All the rage aside this just isn't a pragmatic business model, thinking an organization will pay you for something they can get elsewhere for free.
Uvt's are NOT for team chat, or squad chat, or for any kind of chat in a match. They are for communication between eve and dust players who ARE NOT on the same planet but are in fact in other star systems. If you can find a way to use another free chat service to talk to eve/dust players in a different star system then by all means go right ahead, but good luck with that.....you'll need it.
Uvt's - for communication between dust mercs/eve pilots/corporations etc who are not within typical communication range I.E another planet/star system. Not for 'in match' chat between dust mercs and eve pilots IN ORBIT of the location of the match. In match chat is free. Long distance chat is not. Live with it. how many times are people going to NEED to chat with another merc/eve pilot who are 10 star systems away? What purpose would it serve unless you are part of a corporation? What matters is the communication between pilots in orbit and mercs, and between merc to merc. If you don't wish to pay for Uvt's then don't buy them simple as that. If you need one for a few hours then buy the 24hr uvt.
At the end of the day no one is being forced to buy anything, aur assets and isk assets will all be tradeable upon full release, Uvt's are a way to communicate long distance but are optional, I don't see the problem |
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 00:29:00 -
[378] - Quote
tribal wyvern wrote:MF Dust wrote:CCP might as well give this one up they're not going to win this. Even if all the players don't decide to walk out on them, it's not as if there aren't already a plethora of other free voice chat services that will work just as well as in game for corp chat. All the rage aside this just isn't a pragmatic business model, thinking an organization will pay you for something they can get elsewhere for free. Uvt's are NOT for team chat, or squad chat, or for any kind of chat in a match. They are for communication between eve and dust players who ARE NOT on the same planet but are in fact in other star systems. If you can find a way to use another free chat service to talk to eve/dust players in a different star system then by all means go right ahead, but good luck with that.....you'll need it. Uvt's - for communication between dust mercs/eve pilots/corporations etc who are not within typical communication range I.E another planet/star system. Not for 'in match' chat between dust mercs and eve pilots IN ORBIT of the location of the match. In match chat is free. Long distance chat is not. Live with it. how many times are people going to NEED to chat with another merc/eve pilot who are 10 star systems away? What purpose would it serve unless you are part of a corporation? What matters is the communication between pilots in orbit and mercs, and between merc to merc. If you don't wish to pay for Uvt's then don't buy them simple as that. If you need one for a few hours then buy the 24hr uvt. At the end of the day no one is being forced to buy anything, aur assets and isk assets will all be tradeable upon full release, Uvt's are a way to communicate long distance but are optional, I don't see the problem
Wow.
You manage to not read the post you quoted, read way to much into the fluff description of UVTs while not actually knowing what they do, and somehow have convinced yourself that VOIP technology is rare and expensive.
Ok.
|
tribal wyvern
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
673
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 00:39:00 -
[379] - Quote
Umallon Macross wrote:tribal wyvern wrote:MF Dust wrote:CCP might as well give this one up they're not going to win this. Even if all the players don't decide to walk out on them, it's not as if there aren't already a plethora of other free voice chat services that will work just as well as in game for corp chat. All the rage aside this just isn't a pragmatic business model, thinking an organization will pay you for something they can get elsewhere for free. Uvt's are NOT for team chat, or squad chat, or for any kind of chat in a match. They are for communication between eve and dust players who ARE NOT on the same planet but are in fact in other star systems. If you can find a way to use another free chat service to talk to eve/dust players in a different star system then by all means go right ahead, but good luck with that.....you'll need it. Uvt's - for communication between dust mercs/eve pilots/corporations etc who are not within typical communication range I.E another planet/star system. Not for 'in match' chat between dust mercs and eve pilots IN ORBIT of the location of the match. In match chat is free. Long distance chat is not. Live with it. how many times are people going to NEED to chat with another merc/eve pilot who are 10 star systems away? What purpose would it serve unless you are part of a corporation? What matters is the communication between pilots in orbit and mercs, and between merc to merc. If you don't wish to pay for Uvt's then don't buy them simple as that. If you need one for a few hours then buy the 24hr uvt. At the end of the day no one is being forced to buy anything, aur assets and isk assets will all be tradeable upon full release, Uvt's are a way to communicate long distance but are optional, I don't see the problem Wow. You manage to not read the post you quoted, read way to much into the fluff description of UVTs while not actually knowing what they do, and somehow have convinced yourself that VOIP technology is rare and expensive. Ok.
what the Uvt's do is in their description on the market, it doesn't take a genius to work it out bro. And you miss mY point regarding voip, how is on suppose to communicate with RANDOM eve players and RANDOM dust players if they choose to use an alternative means of communication????????? I read the post I quoted, and my response was fitting. I'm sick of seeing little whiney bitches moan about the whole pay to talk thing, and 'my mic doesn't work' etc etc etc. Its not pay to talk, and try turning the voice chat on. |
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 02:11:00 -
[380] - Quote
tribal wyvern wrote:Umallon Macross wrote:tribal wyvern wrote:MF Dust wrote:CCP might as well give this one up they're not going to win this. Even if all the players don't decide to walk out on them, it's not as if there aren't already a plethora of other free voice chat services that will work just as well as in game for corp chat. All the rage aside this just isn't a pragmatic business model, thinking an organization will pay you for something they can get elsewhere for free. Uvt's are NOT for team chat, or squad chat, or for any kind of chat in a match. They are for communication between eve and dust players who ARE NOT on the same planet but are in fact in other star systems. If you can find a way to use another free chat service to talk to eve/dust players in a different star system then by all means go right ahead, but good luck with that.....you'll need it. Uvt's - for communication between dust mercs/eve pilots/corporations etc who are not within typical communication range I.E another planet/star system. Not for 'in match' chat between dust mercs and eve pilots IN ORBIT of the location of the match. In match chat is free. Long distance chat is not. Live with it. how many times are people going to NEED to chat with another merc/eve pilot who are 10 star systems away? What purpose would it serve unless you are part of a corporation? What matters is the communication between pilots in orbit and mercs, and between merc to merc. If you don't wish to pay for Uvt's then don't buy them simple as that. If you need one for a few hours then buy the 24hr uvt. At the end of the day no one is being forced to buy anything, aur assets and isk assets will all be tradeable upon full release, Uvt's are a way to communicate long distance but are optional, I don't see the problem Wow. You manage to not read the post you quoted, read way to much into the fluff description of UVTs while not actually knowing what they do, and somehow have convinced yourself that VOIP technology is rare and expensive. Ok. what the Uvt's do is in their description on the market, it doesn't take a genius to work it out bro. And you miss mY point regarding voip, how is on suppose to communicate with RANDOM eve players and RANDOM dust players if they choose to use an alternative means of communication????????? I read the post I quoted, and my response was fitting. I'm sick of seeing little whiney bitches moan about the whole pay to talk thing, and 'my mic doesn't work' etc etc etc. Its not pay to talk, and try turning the voice chat on.
Are you saying that you can create custom voice channels and talk in corp/alliance chat for free when you're in the same system? Because you'd be wrong.
MY point is that no one will use UVTs because they are too expensive, and when you want to talk to someone using Teamspeak or Ventrilo you will have to use those also, with the advantage that the organiser of the channel pays for everyone, instead of everyone paying for themselves.
Because of this mismanagement, it will be more difficult for players in DUST and EVE to communicate than it needs to be, out of sheer greed as they are charging 10x more for this service than it is worth.
Serious DUST players are already turning to alternatives for communications, and CCP will have to play catch up if they want those users back using in-game communication. The more people that go external, the harder it will be for new players to communicate, and therefore harder to get into the game, and therefore less repeat custom and aurum sales.
It is in the best interests of CCP to make communications of all kinds in the EVE and DUST universe as smooth and cheap as possible, because these are both games about communications. By fracturing the means by which players communicate CCP are fracturing the games.
I'M sick of seeing 'little whiney bitches' moan about legitimate complaints that go over their heads because they don't stop to think before trolling and flaming. |
|
Septem Mortuus
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
86
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 02:57:00 -
[381] - Quote
We need Jita in DUST so we can burn it in protest about things.
CCP - this was a daft idea. I understand you want something for developing the technology to have PS3 and PC clients allowing voice-chat across the entire shard, I'm sure it wasn't easy. But this isn't the way to go about it - and to be blunt, you know that.
Stop F'ing around trying to cobble together a business model to make your backers happy - that should have been long done by now. Go add some shiny to the market so there's actually something to spend AUR on and you'll get your cash (Hell, you could make your entire development costs back 5 times over by selling fricking colour-schemes for AUR without pulling this stunt) I have plenty of AUR, but nothing to spend it on.
The link between EvE and DUST is one of the biggest selling points of this game, charging to make full use of that harms DUST and limits DUST players involement in the game (How are the New DUSTERS going to decide if they want to join corps etc if they can't talk to the EvE players without paying? Who pays to talk to people they might not want to talk to?)
I know this is a new service, I understand it isn't cheap to provide, but making it free = huge bonus to gamers, free advertising from word of mouth, more players paying AUR. Charging for it = annoyed players, a barrier to communitcations within the game universe and less players. It's just not a good look to charge for this particular function in my opinion. |
Ghural
The Southern Legion
63
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 03:19:00 -
[382] - Quote
Go play League of Legends and see what unrestricted chat can do. There is so much trolling going on at times. Personally I think that the UVTs are fine. Especially since once you are in a battle Voice is free anyway.
If you don't want to use them, then type. Geez, is it really that hard to get your head around? |
RolyatDerTeufel
D3ath D3alers RISE of LEGION
1648
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 03:31:00 -
[383] - Quote
CCP Frame wrote:Hello,
Just to clarify what UVT is supposed to enable and what you get for free:
UVT Gives you:
- Ability to voice chat in custom channels, DUST or EVE/DUST - Ability to voice chat in corporation channels, alliance channels, ect.
UVT is NOT required for:
- Team voice chat - Squad voice chat
Text chat is of course free everywhere. Players can speak / listen to one channel at a time.
Keep in mind that price is still subject to change during the beta period.
I tryed it when i had an NPC corp chat up, that is now gone...
The NPC corp Voice Chat was free, just had to activate the chat channel's option for it. |
Tawkis Tawharr
Sanmatar Kelkoons Minmatar Republic
4
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 03:56:00 -
[384] - Quote
Umallon Macross wrote: Are you saying that you can create custom voice channels and talk in corp/alliance chat for free when you're in the same system? Because you'd be wrong.
Very true, however this doesn't automatically make the system bad. Unless I'm very mistaken, the CCP provided chat is equal to most other PS3 shooters. Lobby, squad and match chat.
Umallon Macross wrote: MY point is that no one will use UVTs because they are too expensive, and when you want to talk to someone using Teamspeak or Ventrilo you will have to use those also, with the advantage that the organiser of the channel pays for everyone, instead of everyone paying for themselves. I tend the agree that the price point FEELS high. To be fair we also have no idea how much this costs to implement. As much as we would like to pretend otherwise, if the design and support costs are high enough the price may need to be at this level. CCP cannot lower the price to where the service will lose money in the long run. Better to sink the cost and keep numbers low to lessen the incremental costs... or kill the UVT all together.
I also agree that this should be implemented corporation wide. While I don't feel that CCP should feel obligated to give premium chat away for free, I do feel that selling chat servers in increments of 5, 10, 50, 100 would be the best way to go. The offering would seem to make a lot more sense to me in that format.
Umallon Macross wrote: Because of this mismanagement, it will be more difficult for players in DUST and EVE to communicate than it needs to be, out of sheer greed as they are charging 10x more for this service than it is worth.
Calling this pure greed without knowledge of the backend costs is pure speculation. If we want the service to improve we should probably leave the Ad hominem attacks at the door. I'm also not sure mismanagement is the right word, to my knowledge CCP is asking you to pay for features above and beyond what is currently available on the platform.
Umallon Macross wrote: Serious DUST players are already turning to alternatives for communications, and CCP will have to play catch up if they want those users back using in-game communication. The more people that go external, the harder it will be for new players to communicate, and therefore harder to get into the game, and therefore less repeat custom and aurum sales.
Speculative and over generalized, but I will of course concede the possibility. I would need to see evidence beyond Beta forum rage to agree on a broader scale.
Umallon Macross wrote:It is in the best interests of CCP to make communications of all kinds in the EVE and DUST universe as smooth and cheap as possible, because these are both games about communications. By fracturing the means by which players communicate CCP are fracturing the games.
Smooth yes
Cheap: Only in so far as the communication is not a running loss. I tend to think just giving hundreds of thousands ( possibly) of players the massive bandwidth you're asking for seems to be a very expensive proposition.
For the average PS3 player setting up a 3rd party chat simply won't be worth it. MY PC is in the same room, and it a PITA I just don't want to do.
If I'm honest, in concept I don't see anything wrong with this. I think the individual targeting in not the way to go.
What I would like to see:
UVT: Sell UVT on a user cap system, 10, 20 etc Limit the "rooms" based on allowable users. If you have room for 5 people do you REALLY need more than one room? Chat servers may be tied to individual players or corporations. Pricing probably needs to be figured out.
To CCP's credit this is NOT Monaclegate. Every single AUR you may or may not have you will get back.
That's my 2 CDN cents... because Iceland will be using our currency soon.
I expect EVE Online to reflect this accordingly.
|
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 04:37:00 -
[385] - Quote
Tawkis Tawharr wrote:Pyramid
Equal isn't good enough for 'we are doing something amazing thats never been done before'
The price point doesn't FEEL high, it IS high. We DO know how much it costs. Typefrag charges $0.40US per slot per month for TeamSpeak, Ventrilo and Mumble, compared to CCP's $3.60US per slot per month, and CCP can subsidize it with their Aurum sales (assuming they make any money at all considering their track record).
If CCP want to charge for the service, they should have a competitive price point, software with full EVE and DUST integration, and a stand-alone client. They could even sell apps for it in the Apple and Android stores, and you could talk to your corp buddies any time, any place.
What they shouldn't do is charge individuals 10x the going rate so if any corps are dumb enough to use it they would peer pressure members into buying more UVTs.
Like I said, we do know the back-end costs, and CCP's dubious 'micro'-transaction record, so I don't believe calling this unannounced and expensive service greedy is too outlandish.
I talk mismanagement from a PR standpoint, and a 'of all the ways to handle this issue this wasn't one of them' standpoint.
EVE is example enough for players ignoring CCP's offerings in this area, a lot of which can be attributed towards CCP's attempts to charge for the service, before making it free. A lot of people never bothered switching back after they left, and it is FREE for EVE players.
Communications for games like EVE and DUST are worth running at a loss, because a smooth communication facility keeps the universe flowing, and keeps players playing. The better it works, the more 'emergent gameplay' happens. CCP boast on the one hand about player interactions in their games while shooting themselves in the foot by trying to charge excessive amounts of money for features that facilitate it. |
WILLMA-DUST Gauss
Algintal Core Gallente Federation
20
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 05:07:00 -
[386] - Quote
CCP Frame wrote:Hello,
Just to clarify what UVT is supposed to enable and what you get for free:
UVT Gives you:
- Ability to voice chat in custom channels, DUST or EVE/DUST - Ability to voice chat in corporation channels, alliance channels, ect.
UVT is NOT required for:
- Team voice chat - Squad voice chat
Text chat is of course free everywhere. Players can speak / listen to one channel at a time.
Keep in mind that price is still subject to change during the beta period.
Eve Voice is free for Capsuleers, therefore it will be free for everyone. What you guys at CCP get to decide is whether you get yet another PR egg on your face before realizing it or not.
|
|
CCP Frame
C C P C C P Alliance
470
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 11:16:00 -
[387] - Quote
Dear players,
We are quite impressed and inspired by your feedbacks and comments regarding the UVT introduction. Therefore, we have made some changes and a more detailed description on what the UVT is and offers. We hope that this will address many of your concerns and illustrate its value to players. We look forward to hearing your feedback as you test the UVT during beta and together we can improve its implementation.
Fostering smooth and easy communication for our players is hugely important for CCP and a key element of DUST 514. Long-time EVE Online players know that we think a thriving community is imperative to a gameGÇÖs success.
WeGÇÖd like to clarify how the chat and voice function will work within DUST 514 and between DUST 514 and EVE Online. WeGÇÖre offering a very robust suite of options for free.
- Voice chat in DUST 514 for teams in a battle is free.
- Voice chat in DUST 514 pre-made squads, both in and out of battle, is free.
- All text chat, including text chat between DUST 514 and EVE Online, is free.
- All mail, including mail between DUST 514 and EVE Online, is free
The following activities will require the purchase of a Universal Voice Transmitter (UVT) using Aurum (AUR), the currency purchased with real world money in DUST 514.
- Voice chat in a custom channel in DUST 514 (which can include both DUST 514 and EVE Online players)
- Voice chat in a Corp channel (which can include both DUST 514 and EVE Online players) when Corps are implemented in DUST 514
We have not finalized pricing for the UVT GÇô it is likely that the prices youGÇÖve seen will be reduced by the time the game exits closed beta. We are also looking into offering the ability for Corps to buy UVT items that cover the entire group.
In addition, in order to test the voice chat feature, we are going to reduce the cost of the UVT to 1 AUR for the duration of the closed beta.
Lastly, weGÇÖll soon be adding a player-driven market to DUST 514 that will allow players to buy and sell all manner of items for ISK (the currency you earn in game), including UVTs.
FAQ:
Q: Why do DUST players have to pay for voice chat and EVE players do not? A: In EVE Online, we can cover the ongoing costs of voice chat through the gameGÇÖs subscription fee. Because DUST is free-to-play, we will need players to cover some of the costs of voice chat.
Q: How do you enable voice chat across DUST 514 and EVE Online? A: You can purchase a Universal Voice Transmitter in DUST 514 using Aurum
Q: How much does a UVT cost? A: We have not finalized pricing for the UVT. The pricing in the closed beta test is preliminary and we would love to get feedback from players via the beta testing forums.
Q: Will the price of a UVT stay at 1 AUR after closed beta ends? A: No, this is a temporary price to encourage players to test the feature. Final pricing for UVTs has not been determined.
Q: Will EVE players have to pay to voice chat with DUST players? A: No, we have no plans at this time to charge extra for EVE players to cross-game voice chat
Q: When will the player market be added to DUST 514? A: This is something the development team is working on. We are definitely planning to implement it.
Q: ArenGÇÖt UVTs a pay-to-win feature since they make communication easier and are only available for purchase with AUR? A: We understand this concern and plan to address it before the game ships via the in-game player market, which will allow players to buy and sell UVTs with ISK, the currency awarded in game. |
|
Absolute Idiom II
BetaMax.
68
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 11:34:00 -
[388] - Quote
You'll just end up encouraging the use of out of game comms, just like happens in Eve. See the reasons why you decided not to charge for Eve Voice despite your initial plans. More out of game comms means a higher barrier to casual play. I really don't want to have to use a laptop for comms and my PS3 for game sounds. I can't even think of an easy way to do this that doesn't have Dust gameplay sounds coming from my tv/speakers. |
Forte Haulerson
Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State
6
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 11:50:00 -
[389] - Quote
Thanks for the clarification... Not sure it will change sentiment since it will cost to voice with my in corp Mercs on the ground.
Also, unless someone has the kb/m, Texting on the console takes way too long to execute when under fire ... It still feels pay to win...
Increase the price of AUR to cover the VoIP costs...
I like the idea of being able to spend ISK to get the functions, but if it costs the price of a PLEX to do so, then that's just too much and might as well add a subscription option to DUST like mentioned in another thread....
L8r, FH
|
Garrett Whetshaft
Hateful Munitions
31
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 11:59:00 -
[390] - Quote
we all have been using skype on dust and / or teamspeak on eve if there's lots of us.
I got the UVT thingy, but no SISI to login to and check. I managed to lookup my Dust character from Eve in SISI last week.. but not seen this working. maybe in a few days.
also, I spent 900 Au on a 30 day item and now it's 1Au?
I want my 899Au's back :'''(
lol |
|
Kevales
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
2
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 12:00:00 -
[391] - Quote
Absolute Idiom II wrote:You'll just end up encouraging the use of out of game comms, just like happens in Eve. See the reasons why you decided not to charge for Eve Voice despite your initial plans. More out of game comms means a higher barrier to casual play. I really don't want to have to use a laptop for comms and my PS3 for game sounds. I can't even think of an easy way to do this that doesn't have Dust gameplay sounds coming from my tv/speakers. Very much this.
If your voice comms are not exceptionally good, in a way that trumps all existing OOG comms methods, then this will only be an minor annoyance to most players, and an incentive for new/casual players to go somewhere else.
Setting extra barriers to entry, especially barriers to the part of the game that cause tie-in, is not good business sense.
PS: I hate voice chat anyway, especially in FPSes, so I don't personally care - I just think you're making a mistake.
|
howard sanchez
Conspiratus Immortalis
448
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 12:31:00 -
[392] - Quote
CCP Frame wrote:Dear players, We are quite impressed and inspired by your feedbacks and comments regarding the UVT introduction. Therefore, we have made some changes and a more detailed description on what the UVT is and offers. We hope that this will address many of your concerns and illustrate its value to players. We look forward to hearing your feedback as you test the UVT during beta and together we can improve its implementation. Fostering smooth and easy communication for our players is hugely important for CCP and a key element of DUST 514. Long-time EVE Online players know that we think a thriving community is imperative to a gameGÇÖs success. WeGÇÖd like to clarify how the chat and voice function will work within DUST 514 and between DUST 514 and EVE Online. WeGÇÖre offering a very robust suite of options for free.
- Voice chat in DUST 514 for teams in a battle is free.
- Voice chat in DUST 514 pre-made squads, both in and out of battle, is free.
- All text chat, including text chat between DUST 514 and EVE Online, is free.
- All mail, including mail between DUST 514 and EVE Online, is free
The following activities will require the purchase of a Universal Voice Transmitter (UVT) using Aurum (AUR), the currency purchased with real world money in DUST 514.
- Voice chat in a custom channel in DUST 514 (which can include both DUST 514 and EVE Online players)
- Voice chat in a Corp channel (which can include both DUST 514 and EVE Online players) when Corps are implemented in DUST 514
We have not finalized pricing for the UVT GÇô it is likely that the prices youGÇÖve seen will be reduced by the time the game exits closed beta. We are also looking into offering the ability for Corps to buy UVT items that cover the entire group. In addition, in order to test the voice chat feature, we are going to reduce the cost of the UVT to 1 AUR for the duration of the closed beta. Lastly, weGÇÖll soon be adding a player-driven market to DUST 514 that will allow players to buy and sell all manner of items for ISK (the currency you earn in game), including UVTs. FAQ:Q: Why do DUST players have to pay for voice chat and EVE players do not?A: In EVE Online, we can cover the ongoing costs of voice chat through the gameGÇÖs subscription fee. Because DUST is free-to-play, we will need players to cover some of the costs of voice chat. Q: How do you enable voice chat across DUST 514 and EVE Online?A: You can purchase a Universal Voice Transmitter in DUST 514 using Aurum Q: How much does a UVT cost?A: We have not finalized pricing for the UVT. The pricing in the closed beta test is preliminary and we would love to get feedback from players via the beta testing forums. Q: Will the price of a UVT stay at 1 AUR after closed beta ends?A: No, this is a temporary price to encourage players to test the feature. Final pricing for UVTs has not been determined. Q: Will EVE players have to pay to voice chat with DUST players?A: No, we have no plans at this time to charge extra for EVE players to cross-game voice chat Q: When will the player market be added to DUST 514?A: This is something the development team is working on. We are definitely planning to implement it. Q: ArenGÇÖt UVTs a pay-to-win feature since they make communication easier and are only available for purchase with AUR?A: We understand this concern and plan to address it before the game ships via the in-game player market, which will allow players to buy and sell UVTs with ISK, the currency awarded in game.
CCP thank you for this very informative post.
I do hope the DUSTtest community can withhold any short fused emotionally driven response (hey-I can hope!) and give UVTs a good test before passing judgment on their value
|
Major Apostrope
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 12:32:00 -
[393] - Quote
CCP Frame wrote: A reasonable attempt to reassure us with some flawed assumptions
EVE ONLINE CORPORATIONS DO NOT USE EVE VOICE
Seriously CCP, Almost every significant Eve corporation does not use Eve Voice. The reasons are many, but mostly Eve players don't want to use an integrated voice chat that means you loose voice comms if your client crashes. And while eve voice isn't bad, it sure as hell isn't nearly as good as Mumble.
And here's another fun fact .... Mumble is OPEN SOURCE
So basically, trying to charge for a voice service that most eve online corporations will not use is a pointless exercise. Its also a mind numbingly STUPID IDEA because all you are doing is making your customers angry. Please, you have to find a better solution.
|
Aq'sa
L.O.T.I.S. Legacy Rising
44
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 13:08:00 -
[394] - Quote
As much as I hat the idea of UVT= real world cash - there are two large elephants to deal with.
1. If a million or two PS3 users start playing DUST quickly, as we all hope, there will be a significant cost in bandwidth and hosting of 2 million people on voice chat. CCP has to be able to pay for that cost to support the influx well- and not turn off people with faulty comms.
2. The fact that all items will be on player market which will operate in ISK. There will be interesting economics in the ISK-AURUM conversion rate for items only sourced in AUR but traded in ISK. Some people will have a Willingness-To-Pay more ISK than the conversion rate, because they never buy AUR. Besides quirky economics, this is the CCP answer to PTW - we need to see the market implemented to really see if people will want to broker AUR only items for personal ISK gain- knowing Eve traders- someone will. |
Tawkis Tawharr
Sanmatar Kelkoons Minmatar Republic
4
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 13:25:00 -
[395] - Quote
Equal is perfectly acceptable. Under an F2P model premium services are charged. We don't have to like it, at all. I would like full chat to be free too. Someone has to foot the bill and there are no subscriptions to swallow the cost.
I was referring to cost in terms of CCP's development, otherwise I would have said price. As I said, the price feels ( is ) high. Unless you have knowledge of CCP's inner workings you do not know the cost.
Not being available out of game will be the biggest draw-back of this service, agreed.... aside from price.
EVE is run on a PC, I can download ventrilo/TS with zero problem and log into a chat server. Unless I'm mistaken, it is significantly harder to install a 3rd party chat on PS3. If you try to tell someone they need to spend 2-3 hours installing a 3rd party chat to play with you on PS3 they'll probably laugh.
Communication is worth running at a loss if and only if the cost of that loss can be made up in other areas. If every other AUR item has to increase by 500% then it probably wouldn't be worth running at a loss. The other sales would drop too much.
Don't get me wrong, if I could fire up Ventrilo on my PS3 I'd do it in a heartbeat. I'd probably pay to support my corps server. TS and Ventrilo are excellent.
|
Vrain Matari
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
404
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 13:27:00 -
[396] - Quote
Hey CCP! Thanks for the first-rate feedback. You guys rock.
My take on the UVT is that I have to pay for voice coms now in the form of a Teamspeak or Vent or Mumble monthly server fee, and I certainly don't expect CCP to provide that service for free. On the other hand, I don't want to feel like I'm being taken advantage of because I'm married to DUST on the PS3 and have nowhere else to go.
BTW, This whole UVT argument applies only to DUST, because PC players have lots of options, and having fleet comms independent of the game client is the most important issue there anyway.
My question/suggestion is this: Is it possible to build a 'socket' into the DUST client that would allow connection to an independent TS/Vent/Mumble server? It's a feature I'd be willing to pay for at a reduced rate because it gives me access to my comms of choice. It allows communication with the EVE corps who use these communication channels exclusively.
It would be a mistake to try and strongarm EVE corps into using EVE Voice because you've got them by the balls if they want to have voicecomms with DUST corps. I'm sure you know that already.
If the 'socket' idea is unworkable, then as a DUST player a squad or group or corp based UVT fee would be an acceptabe compromise, so long as the pricing is comparable to what is out there for voice servers today.
As an EVE player, being railroaded into using EVE Voice if I want to communicate with DUST is going to be very unpalatable. Please don't do it. If you have to do it, lay out in clean technical language exactly WHY you are forced to do it that way. Provide enough technical detail that we can call bullshit on or verify your argument. If you do this, then the rational parts of the community can act as your reluctant champions to the 90% that will most certainly turn this issue into a shitstorm of epic porportions. |
jackbubu
United Pwnage Service RISE of LEGION
24
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 16:08:00 -
[397] - Quote
Major Apostrope wrote:CCP Frame wrote: A reasonable attempt to reassure us with some flawed assumptions
EVE ONLINE CORPORATIONS DO NOT USE EVE VOICESeriously CCP, Almost every significant Eve corporation does not use Eve Voice. The reasons are many, but mostly Eve players don't want to use an integrated voice chat that means you loose voice comms if your client crashes. And while eve voice isn't bad, it sure as hell isn't nearly as good as Mumble. And here's another fun fact .... Mumble is OPEN SOURCE So basically, trying to charge for a voice service that most eve online corporations will not use is a pointless exercise. Its also a mind numbingly STUPID IDEA because all you are doing is making your customers angry. Please, you have to find a better solution. well unless its possible to use mumble on the PS3, i dont think its possible to provide cross plattfrom voice chat without using EVE Voice (which actually is vivox the last time i checked)
However the pricing should be more around the cost of a TS3/mumble whatever server per slot.
and here we are looking at around 10 euro cents per Month (!), so to keep it reasonable(and acceptable by most customers) imo the cost of a UVP should never be above 1GéŒ per month. |
Raol Tigg
Sanmatar Kelkoons Minmatar Republic
2
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 16:31:00 -
[398] - Quote
CCP Frame wrote: We are also looking into offering the ability for Corps to buy UVT items that cover the entire group.
I think the above is fairly critical here. If this is implemented then I don't really see any issues - any semi-serious Corp should be able to afford and support its own channel to remove the burden/barrier to entry from individual players. All the basic communications that are essential (i.e. in-match) are free anyway.
No complaints from me CCP. |
Mobius Wyvern
BetaMax.
1216
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 17:04:00 -
[399] - Quote
Major Apostrope wrote:CCP Frame wrote: A reasonable attempt to reassure us with some flawed assumptions
EVE ONLINE CORPORATIONS DO NOT USE EVE VOICESeriously CCP, Almost every significant Eve corporation does not use Eve Voice. The reasons are many, but mostly Eve players don't want to use an integrated voice chat that means you loose voice comms if your client crashes. And while eve voice isn't bad, it sure as hell isn't nearly as good as Mumble. And here's another fun fact .... Mumble is OPEN SOURCE So basically, trying to charge for a voice service that most eve online corporations will not use is a pointless exercise. Its also a mind numbingly STUPID IDEA because all you are doing is making your customers angry. Please, you have to find a better solution. There isn't any other solution. You can't install Mumble or Teamspeak on your PS3, after all. The only voice system they can support across both platforms is their own. |
Khun-Al
135
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 18:01:00 -
[400] - Quote
CCP Frame wrote:Dear players, We are quite impressed and inspired by your feedbacks and comments regarding the UVT introduction. Therefore, we have made some changes and a more detailed description on what the UVT is and offers. We hope that this will address many of your concerns and illustrate its value to players. We look forward to hearing your feedback as you test the UVT during beta and together we can improve its implementation. Fostering smooth and easy communication for our players is hugely important for CCP and a key element of DUST 514. Long-time EVE Online players know that we think a thriving community is imperative to a gameGÇÖs success. WeGÇÖd like to clarify how the chat and voice function will work within DUST 514 and between DUST 514 and EVE Online. WeGÇÖre offering a very robust suite of options for free.
- Voice chat in DUST 514 for teams in a battle is free.
- Voice chat in DUST 514 pre-made squads, both in and out of battle, is free.
- All text chat, including text chat between DUST 514 and EVE Online, is free.
- All mail, including mail between DUST 514 and EVE Online, is free
The following activities will require the purchase of a Universal Voice Transmitter (UVT) using Aurum (AUR), the currency purchased with real world money in DUST 514.
- Voice chat in a custom channel in DUST 514 (which can include both DUST 514 and EVE Online players)
- Voice chat in a Corp channel (which can include both DUST 514 and EVE Online players) when Corps are implemented in DUST 514
We have not finalized pricing for the UVT GÇô it is likely that the prices youGÇÖve seen will be reduced by the time the game exits closed beta. We are also looking into offering the ability for Corps to buy UVT items that cover the entire group. In addition, in order to test the voice chat feature, we are going to reduce the cost of the UVT to 1 AUR for the duration of the closed beta. Lastly, weGÇÖll soon be adding a player-driven market to DUST 514 that will allow players to buy and sell all manner of items for ISK (the currency you earn in game), including UVTs.
If team chat means talking to every allied person on and over the planet including allied eve players its okay. Otherwise you could make an installation which allows the team to talk to every allied person on the planet.
|
|
Vrain Matari
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
404
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 18:07:00 -
[401] - Quote
Septem Mortuus wrote:We need Jita in DUST so we can burn it in protest about things.
CCP - this was a daft idea. I understand you want something for developing the technology to have PS3 and PC clients allowing voice-chat across the entire shard, I'm sure it wasn't easy. But this isn't the way to go about it - and to be blunt, you know that.
Stop F'ing around trying to cobble together a business model to make your backers happy - that should have been long done by now. Go add some shiny to the market so there's actually something to spend AUR on and you'll get your cash (Hell, you could make your entire development costs back 5 times over by selling fricking colour-schemes for AUR without pulling this stunt) I have plenty of AUR, but nothing to spend it on.
The link between EvE and DUST is one of the biggest selling points of this game, charging to make full use of that harms DUST and limits DUST players involement in the game (How are the New DUSTERS going to decide if they want to join corps etc if they can't talk to the EvE players without paying? Who pays to talk to people they might not want to talk to?)
I know this is a new service, I understand it isn't cheap to provide, but making it free = huge bonus to gamers, free advertising from word of mouth, more players paying AUR. Charging for it = annoyed players, a barrier to communitcations within the game universe and less players. It's just not a good look to charge for this particular function in my opinion.
^ What he says. Put some attractive vanity items/decals/colour schemes on the AUR market, at a reasonable price, and watch the AUR roll in. |
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 21:04:00 -
[402] - Quote
Tawkis Tawharr wrote:Equal is perfectly acceptable. Under an F2P model premium services are charged. We don't have to like it, at all. I would like full chat to be free too. Someone has to foot the bill and there are no subscriptions to swallow the cost. I was referring to cost in terms of CCP's development, otherwise I would have said price. As I said, the price feels ( is ) high. Unless you have knowledge of CCP's inner workings you do not know the cost. Not being available out of game will be the biggest draw-back of this service, agreed.... aside from price. EVE is run on a PC, I can download ventrilo/TS with zero problem and log into a chat server. Unless I'm mistaken, it is significantly harder to install a 3rd party chat on PS3. If you try to tell someone they need to spend 2-3 hours installing a 3rd party chat to play with you on PS3 they'll probably laugh. Communication is worth running at a loss if and only if the cost of that loss can be made up in other areas. If every other AUR item has to increase by 500% then it probably wouldn't be worth running at a loss. The other sales would drop too much. Don't get me wrong, if I could fire up Ventrilo on my PS3 I'd do it in a heartbeat. I'd probably pay to support my corps server. TS and Ventrilo are excellent.
Equal is not acceptable when they are saying they are doing new/amazing/never been done before. Its like saying 'our film has special effects technology never before seen in film' and selling 3d glasses for a dollar on top of every ticket.... oh wait...
Cost? If it is costing them so much then perhaps they should have done more research before contracting a third party provider.
Agreed.
They will laugh. Then they will attempt to join a corp, who will knock them back, not from lack of skill, or wrong skillset, but because they aren't willing to use teamspeak.
Lets assume for a second that 1 in 28 people buy 7-day boosters once a week. These cost CCP nothing to sell, they are just data. This is enough USD to pay for those same 28 people to all have slots in a teamspeak channel. If CCP"s "service" costs more than this then they are doing it wrong.
If players aren't buying enough aurum to subsidize $0.40US a month in communications, then CCP needs to seriously look at their F2P model (which they do anyway, they keep talking about League of Legends in their press releases and interviews, but don't seem to have learned anything from its model).
|
SWEETY muffin CAKES
Sanmatar Kelkoons Minmatar Republic
42
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 21:04:00 -
[403] - Quote
How about an option, like the merc pack, That includes all the features that would usually be free in other games.
cause paying 20 dollars for a game makes sense....
especially since considering what you get for free already.... I don't see the big deal. People would rather pay 60 dolalrs for a broken game, then free, and have the OPTION of paying what...10 bucks... ONCE to get some extra features that you need?
Its great, because people that don't ever use voice comms.... don't have to subsidize the costs of people who do. |
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 21:21:00 -
[404] - Quote
CCP Frame wrote:Dear players, We are quite impressed and inspired by your feedbacks and comments regarding the UVT introduction. Therefore, we have made some changes and a more detailed description on what the UVT is and offers. We hope that this will address many of your concerns and illustrate its value to players. We look forward to hearing your feedback as you test the UVT during beta and together we can improve its implementation. Fostering smooth and easy communication for our players is hugely important for CCP and a key element of DUST 514. Long-time EVE Online players know that we think a thriving community is imperative to a gameGÇÖs success. WeGÇÖd like to clarify how the chat and voice function will work within DUST 514 and between DUST 514 and EVE Online. WeGÇÖre offering a very robust suite of options for free.
- Voice chat in DUST 514 for teams in a battle is free.
- Voice chat in DUST 514 pre-made squads, both in and out of battle, is free.
- All text chat, including text chat between DUST 514 and EVE Online, is free.
- All mail, including mail between DUST 514 and EVE Online, is free
The following activities will require the purchase of a Universal Voice Transmitter (UVT) using Aurum (AUR), the currency purchased with real world money in DUST 514.
- Voice chat in a custom channel in DUST 514 (which can include both DUST 514 and EVE Online players)
- Voice chat in a Corp channel (which can include both DUST 514 and EVE Online players) when Corps are implemented in DUST 514
We have not finalized pricing for the UVT GÇô it is likely that the prices youGÇÖve seen will be reduced by the time the game exits closed beta. We are also looking into offering the ability for Corps to buy UVT items that cover the entire group. In addition, in order to test the voice chat feature, we are going to reduce the cost of the UVT to 1 AUR for the duration of the closed beta. Lastly, weGÇÖll soon be adding a player-driven market to DUST 514 that will allow players to buy and sell all manner of items for ISK (the currency you earn in game), including UVTs. FAQ:Q: Why do DUST players have to pay for voice chat and EVE players do not?A: In EVE Online, we can cover the ongoing costs of voice chat through the gameGÇÖs subscription fee. Because DUST is free-to-play, we will need players to cover some of the costs of voice chat. Q: How do you enable voice chat across DUST 514 and EVE Online?A: You can purchase a Universal Voice Transmitter in DUST 514 using Aurum Q: How much does a UVT cost?A: We have not finalized pricing for the UVT. The pricing in the closed beta test is preliminary and we would love to get feedback from players via the beta testing forums. Q: Will the price of a UVT stay at 1 AUR after closed beta ends?A: No, this is a temporary price to encourage players to test the feature. Final pricing for UVTs has not been determined. Q: Will EVE players have to pay to voice chat with DUST players?A: No, we have no plans at this time to charge extra for EVE players to cross-game voice chat Q: When will the player market be added to DUST 514?A: This is something the development team is working on. We are definitely planning to implement it. Q: ArenGÇÖt UVTs a pay-to-win feature since they make communication easier and are only available for purchase with AUR?A: We understand this concern and plan to address it before the game ships via the in-game player market, which will allow players to buy and sell UVTs with ISK, the currency awarded in game.
The detail is appreciated, but what I really want to know is how are you planning to combat the bleed out to other communications tools?
This issue has been fracturing communications since its introduction as EVE Voice, and despite its unpopularity with capsuleers little seems to have been done to entice them back.
What are CCP's plans regarding making EVE Voice and UVT more attractive to both player bases than the competition?
In this thread I have already mentioned that having a service with a stand-alone client (PC and PS3 preferably), full DUST-EVE integration, mobile apps, EVE Gate and DUST Gate would go some way towards this, as well as having a competitive price point, and an easy to use interface.
The new tutorials in EVE are some nice baby steps to correcting NPE subscription losses (something that needs to be addressed in DUST also, although we haven't seen any sign of it yet), but making EVE Voice and UVT's the default rather than the bastard red-headed step-child would surely have as much of an impact on user numbers.
Nothing turns players off like finding out the new software they installed needs new software to run properly, and that's the state of communications across EVE and DUST at the moment.
*edit* I can see why you didn't care before. While everyone is paying for EVE Voice through their subscriptions it's in your best interests to have NOBODY using it. The less they use the service they are already paying for, the less it costs you in server time. But now you are asking people to pay for it. Whole new ball game. |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax.
2867
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 21:39:00 -
[405] - Quote
The other solution.
Seperate downloadable eve voice client with competitive costs and the security of new eden API systems. |
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.22 00:07:00 -
[406] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:The other solution.
Seperate downloadable eve voice client with competitive costs and the security of new eden API systems.
Imagine a communications client that combines all the features of EVE Mail, EVE Voice, Contacts Lists, Chat Channels.
Lets call it Fluid.
You plug in the details for each of your accounts and it gives you complete access to any means of communication your characters have access to, including things like Local Chat for the system you are in, even without your EVE or DUST client running.
It gives you controls to facilitate things like transferring contacts between accounts.
You can use it to talk via text or voice with players on EVE, DUST, EVE Gate, DUST Gate, or the Fluid client.
Non-EVE accounts would have access to most features, but could subscribe to the rest for 100 Aurum a month, or they could be sponsored by their corporation. They would also get free months of Fluid sub every time they make an Aurum purchase.
1 free month with 400 Aurum 2 free months with 1100 Aurum 5 free months with 2500 Aurum 10 free months with 5000 Aurum
For EVE players it would be included in their subscription.
The Fluid client could be released for PC, PS3, iOS and Android.
Imagine if you could join a briefing of DUST mercs by a corp CEO in EVE, using the Fluid client on your iphone.
|
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax.
2867
|
Posted - 2012.08.22 02:09:00 -
[407] - Quote
Umallon Macross wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:The other solution.
Seperate downloadable eve voice client with competitive costs and the security of new eden API systems. Imagine a communications client that combines all the features of EVE Mail, EVE Voice, Contacts Lists, Chat Channels. Lets call it Fluid. You plug in the details for each of your accounts and it gives you complete access to any means of communication your characters have access to, including things like Local Chat for the system you are in, even without your EVE or DUST client running. It gives you controls to facilitate things like transferring contacts between accounts. You can use it to talk via text or voice with players on EVE, DUST, EVE Gate, DUST Gate, or the Fluid client. Non-EVE accounts would have access to most features, but could subscribe to the rest for 100 Aurum a month, or they could be sponsored by their corporation. They would also get free months of Fluid sub every time they make an Aurum purchase. 1 free month with 400 Aurum 2 free months with 1100 Aurum 5 free months with 2500 Aurum 10 free months with 5000 Aurum For EVE players it would be included in their subscription. The Fluid client could be released for PC, PS3, iOS and Android. Imagine if you could join a briefing of DUST mercs by a corp CEO in EVE, using the Fluid client on your iphone.
The ingame version will still exist regardless though but with the outside client you get a bit more flexibility for its payment and deployability.
There should be a corproate pricing scheeme that supports a number of people for a good rate as well. |
howard sanchez
Conspiratus Immortalis
448
|
Posted - 2012.08.22 02:13:00 -
[408] - Quote
Umallon Macross wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:The other solution.
Seperate downloadable eve voice client with competitive costs and the security of new eden API systems. Imagine a communications client that combines all the features of EVE Mail, EVE Voice, Contacts Lists, Chat Channels. Lets call it Fluid. You plug in the details for each of your accounts and it gives you complete access to any means of communication your characters have access to, including things like Local Chat for the system you are in, even without your EVE or DUST client running. It gives you controls to facilitate things like transferring contacts between accounts. You can use it to talk via text or voice with players on EVE, DUST, EVE Gate, DUST Gate, or the Fluid client. Non-EVE accounts would have access to most features, but could subscribe to the rest for 100 Aurum a month, or they could be sponsored by their corporation. They would also get free months of Fluid sub every time they make an Aurum purchase. 1 free month with 400 Aurum 2 free months with 1100 Aurum 5 free months with 2500 Aurum 10 free months with 5000 Aurum For EVE players it would be included in their subscription. The Fluid client could be released for PC, PS3, iOS and Android. Imagine if you could join a briefing of DUST mercs by a corp CEO in EVE, using the Fluid client on your iphone.
Finally, Umallon and I agree on something! You may all rejoice. Cool idea,Sir. ++1 |
Super Cargo
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
428
|
Posted - 2012.08.22 02:44:00 -
[409] - Quote
yea, selling the communication feature seems stupid. Communication is what makes the game work, so why would CCP make you pay for it?
It's too early to break the game. |
Tawkis Tawharr
Sanmatar Kelkoons Minmatar Republic
4
|
Posted - 2012.08.22 03:35:00 -
[410] - Quote
Umallon Macross wrote: They will laugh. Then they will attempt to join a corp, who will knock them back, not from lack of skill, or wrong skillset, but because they aren't willing to use teamspeak.
I think on most points we need to agree to disagree, we're actually not THAT far apart.
Is there a way for me to easily boot up either Teamspeak or Ventrilo on my PS3. If yes, you may very well be right on the quoted.
If the answer is no, then I will submit that it won't matter what the few demand. They will be crushed under the tide of the majority.
|
|
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.22 05:18:00 -
[411] - Quote
Tawkis Tawharr wrote:Umallon Macross wrote: They will laugh. Then they will attempt to join a corp, who will knock them back, not from lack of skill, or wrong skillset, but because they aren't willing to use teamspeak.
I think on most points we need to agree to disagree, we're actually not THAT far apart. Is there a way for me to easily boot up either Teamspeak or Ventrilo on my PS3. If yes, you may very well be right on the quoted. If the answer is no, then I will submit that it won't matter what the few demand. They will be crushed under the tide of the majority.
We'll see.
|
Aldz D
Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation
49
|
Posted - 2012.08.22 08:33:00 -
[412] - Quote
WTF IS This true? paying to communicate with others
CCP if you are on date on console news lately....ps3 has been mocked for having issues with VOIP and problems with it in most games that are on ps3,,,,,,we ps3 owners don't have crossgame chat....:( hoping this issue is made clear,,, |
JoshuaEvil666
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar
33
|
Posted - 2012.08.22 09:58:00 -
[413] - Quote
they have to pay for eve voice someway... |
Sasquatch MacNamara
Circle of Huskarl Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2012.08.22 10:07:00 -
[414] - Quote
My general opinion on this has already been covered; voip is expensive to run, so it makes sense that it is a bit limited. Most games don't allow you to talk outside of the battle/staging area anyway, so this is just paying for an added feature.
BUT, it is important to realize that if DUST is part of EVE, and CCP wants to foster the same level of communication and metagaming that has made their world as much a classic (and for the same reasons) as the board game Diplomacy, communications are going to have to be either free, or at approximate cost of bandwidth.
That said, most who get serious about DUST will do it the same way EVE players do- multi-boxing. For corporation and Alliance leaders, most of your time is spent doing admin and diplomacy work outside of the game, so you're going to be sitting next to a computer anyway. A CCP game is not for the faint of heart. Horrible things will be said of you and all you love. To play the metagame, you're going to have to be the sort of dedicated **** willing to have a PC sitting next to your console. The same way most EVE players have multiple screens and a Hi-Sec miner running on their laptop.
This is a console game though, and most console gamers just want to do the same thing we all do; sit down, grab a beer, and play a game. They just like the extra convenience of not having to worry about all the stuff that comes with PC gaming. This convenience can easily be monetized, and I think CCP is taking a very unusual strategy of targeting casual gamers rather than the hard core "whales" on which most F2P devs focus their monetization efforts.
In short, I think this means people who just play DUST on the weekends or on occasion will wind up paying for the convenience of treating it like a normal console game. These players won't be regular, and so they will be paying for Aurum they don't really use: they might use comms, they might not. Either way, they're buying Aurum because they think they might need it, and CCP makes ends meet.
If so, I think lowering the cost of the UVT to just 1Aurum for the duration of the beta test would be a huge error, as it will give false feedback about the desirability of this solution to comms as opposed to simply running a laptop, tablet, or smartphone (all can be used for VOIP) for your metagaming needs.
Final conclusion, pricing should be such that a player can purchase the smallest possible ammount of Aurum, get the one month UVT, and still have some left over for other things. A regular player should be able to buy one with straight ISK on the open market just like PLEX. Power gamers and guys just stopping by can support the community with their wallets. The rest of us can just play the game. |
Zalifer Nakamoda
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
56
|
Posted - 2012.08.22 10:42:00 -
[415] - Quote
My 2 cents.
1) All the VoIP relevant to the gameplay is free. Battle comms, and squad comms, even out of game. No one is ever at a disadvantage in battle.
2) EVE voice is not used in EVE, so nobody will be buying it to talk to EVE people. Corp/alliance chats, or other text channels that are used in EVE are free for text use from DUST too, so that's that covered.
3) EVE corps with VoIP servers will just let their dusties use it for free.
These 3 points mean that 99% of people will have access to all the comms they need. Play now and again on your own, or with a few friends? Battle and Squad chat is free, so you're sorted. Play with a big corp or alliance? They will have their own text channels, and external VoIP servers.
Now the only people left are those new DUST corps starting up. The vast majority of people these days have computers, especially the people who will have an internet connection and PS3, which are required for DUST anyway. They can therefore be presumed to be able to use external comms like mumble or TS3. A 100 person mumble server , at the quick pricing I just did, was $32 a month. For 100 people to get the voicebox, costs $360 a month (using the numbers at the start of this thread).
Now while that is a case of each person chipping in a little, it's clearly not just them covering bandwidth costs. There is a massive profit to be had there. I'm not saying they can't make money, it's F2P so there has to be some nice profits from somewhere, but assuming that mumble hosting is not making any profit (which is, of course, false) then CCP are making $328 a month, assuming similar costs hosting the VoIP (which, again is probably wrong, their huge datacentres are no doubt tuned better than small VoIP hosting companies.)
If it sells, I don't mind, people will pay for what they need, and per person, it isn't a lot per month. But to make it an attractive option to anyone in the know, they will have to drop costs dramatically. I would suggest moving the cost away from individual users, and making voiceboxes something that a corp or person requires to open a channel to voice comms. Price it along the same lines as similar VoIP offerings on PC. So for example, a 10,000 aurum voicebox, allows 100 voice users on the corp channel. That is around $40, which is a much more realistic cost for the service. Actually, just price voiceboxes at 100 aurum, per month, per slot. Then when creating a channel you select the number of voice slots, and it creates a standing order for that from the corp aurum wallet (which all members can pay into, to help fund the voip costs, and whatever else the corp is buying).
Edit :
While this idea does mean that each channel needs to be paid for, instead of each person, meaning i can't pay my 900 aurum and talk anywhere, it does mean that each individual person does not need to buy it. If john doe can't afford aurum, or is not able to buy aurum for some reason, then he can still talk. |
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.22 12:19:00 -
[416] - Quote
JoshuaEvil666 wrote:they have to pay for eve voice someway...
You mean like charging real money for consumable items of data?
|
Kain Spero
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
904
|
Posted - 2012.08.23 17:44:00 -
[417] - Quote
All versions of the UVT have been reduced to 1 AUR. CCP has heard your feedback and responded. |
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.24 00:57:00 -
[418] - Quote
Kain Spero wrote:All versions of the UVT have been reduced to 1 AUR. CCP has heard your feedback and procrastinated.
fixed that for ya. |
Saiibot
Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation
142
|
Posted - 2012.08.24 01:12:00 -
[419] - Quote
p2S(kill) B(oost) p2T(alk) Whats next??... p2T(ext) |
Ragna Soul
Algintal Core Gallente Federation
90
|
Posted - 2012.08.24 01:40:00 -
[420] - Quote
The UVT is to speak to other players, whether EVE players or Dust players, that are not in battle and are in a different part of the galaxy. all battle comms is free problem is that i dont think people have noticed that there is a push to talk option and it is on so if anything people are talking but they forget to push the button to speak so turn off that option so u can freely speak to ur team and squad
|
|
Lazarus Solo
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
66
|
Posted - 2012.08.24 01:54:00 -
[421] - Quote
I saw it yesterday when I first got into the beta, thought it was a bit ridiculous. All voice chat should be free. |
RydogV
57
|
Posted - 2012.08.24 03:47:00 -
[422] - Quote
It seems this plan goes against much of the F2P data I have read. Most of which acknowledges that in this model a vast majority of players will spend nothing or next to nothing in-game. A considerable amount of "profit" is made from a small number of players spending a lot.
Targeting UVT's as a source of profit aims to try and capitalize on the majority element. This seems like a poor business decision regardless whether or not it is "fair". Perception is a strong force, especially within the greater gaming community.
It feels wrong. It will be perceived as wrong no matter how people try and justify it. Therefore, it will hurt the game and ultimately undercut CCP in the long run. Better to hit restart and try to develop a profitable element of the game that will be more widely accepted by the greater community.
Just my opinion. |
Yotta Guns
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
7
|
Posted - 2012.08.24 04:38:00 -
[423] - Quote
this is some bull crap! plain and simple. super excited about this game i really am but this.... this is just dumb. i get the tanks and the level boosters (while seem unfair) make some sense.... but paying to talk?... mistake, this will turn off a LOT of players. |
Buzzwords
Deadly Blue Dots RISE of LEGION
416
|
Posted - 2012.08.24 05:00:00 -
[424] - Quote
RydogV wrote:It seems this plan goes against much of the F2P data I have read. Most of which acknowledges that in this model a vast majority of players will spend nothing or next to nothing in-game. A considerable amount of "profit" is made from a small number of players spending a lot.
Targeting UVT's as a source of profit aims to try and capitalize on the majority element. This seems like a poor business decision regardless whether or not it is "fair". Perception is a strong force, especially within the greater gaming community.
It feels wrong. It will be perceived as wrong no matter how people try and justify it. Therefore, it will hurt the game and ultimately undercut CCP in the long run. Better to hit restart and try to develop a profitable element of the game that will be more widely accepted by the greater community.
Just my opinion.
i was thinking "i thought i read somewhere that only about 10% of people actually pay for stuff in f2p games" but i had no idea if maybe i just imagined that.
i am now emboldened in that i probably didn't imagine HIM reading it to.
so i submit that the uvt be changed to an out of clone augmentation. plug it into your custom channel to enable voice chat for the entire channel. this way the 10% who are willing to spend money can, and it won't be utterly useless because the other 90% won't be on uvt anyway.
at the same time however, i still feel it is incredibly important that voice chat be ON by default, and push to talk be OFF by default. as it causes a lot of misunderstandings about how voice chat works and what uvts actually do.
i had a clanmate message me "are UVTs needed?" he was not new to dust. he had his voice chat properly set up, but since nobody else did, all he heard was silence. making him wonder "maybe it's the uvt ******* me over" now if he were a slightly less level headed man, or didn't have a clanmate to ask, you could EASILY see him coming here and being pissed right? |
Isarian Menoptra
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
85
|
Posted - 2012.08.24 14:01:00 -
[425] - Quote
Natu Nobilis wrote:Shitstorm coming.
People, be reasonable: (HAHAHAHHA)
Talking during fight: Free Talking on the corp channel: Not sure about that, probably free.
Talking to people like a freaking cell phone using your vita and the neocom: A paid service.
Does this REALLY seems unreasonable for you ?
I wouldn-Št pay, but charge a vita neocom voice chat is not unreasonable.
Loved the graphics, prefered the old voices, THE HELL HAPPEND TO MY DROPSHIPS. I used to pilot, now i suck completely.
He used to pilot, then he took a Precursor to the knee. |
Isarian Menoptra
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
85
|
Posted - 2012.08.24 14:11:00 -
[426] - Quote
Chaz Lewis wrote:You guys know if you select activate voice on the corp channel you can everyone talking, right? I'm sure it will stay that way when we get player corps. If we don't, then use teamspeak or something.
CCP Frame wrote:Hello,
Just to clarify what UVT is supposed to enable and what you get for free:
UVT Gives you:
- Ability to voice chat in custom channels, DUST or EVE/DUST - Ability to voice chat in corporation channels, alliance channels, ect.
Look again Chaz, UVT will be required for corp chat. |
Isarian Menoptra
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
85
|
Posted - 2012.08.24 14:16:00 -
[427] - Quote
CCP Frame wrote:Hello,
Just to clarify what UVT is supposed to enable and what you get for free:
UVT Gives you:
- Ability to voice chat in custom channels, DUST or EVE/DUST - Ability to voice chat in corporation channels, alliance channels, ect.
I will not pay for UVT in EVE - I'll truck out a computer to the TV or hook up my phone with Mumble first. I imagine other DUSTers who are affiliated with established alliances in EVE will do the same. |
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.25 02:39:00 -
[428] - Quote
Isarian Menoptra wrote:CCP Frame wrote:Hello,
Just to clarify what UVT is supposed to enable and what you get for free:
UVT Gives you:
- Ability to voice chat in custom channels, DUST or EVE/DUST - Ability to voice chat in corporation channels, alliance channels, ect.
I will not pay for UVT in EVE - I'll truck out a computer to the TV or hook up my phone with Mumble first. I imagine other DUSTers who are affiliated with established alliances in EVE will do the same.
You imagine right. Especially at their proposed price point. It would be cheaper for me to talk to my EVE corp buddies on the PHONE.
|
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.28 11:27:00 -
[429] - Quote
People keep making new threads about this since it isn't on the front page, so bump. |
Garrett Whetshaft
Hateful Munitions
31
|
Posted - 2012.08.31 20:21:00 -
[430] - Quote
I am loving this game.
but.
I spent 900 AU on this 30 day thing. Before they made it 1 AU.
It does NOT work yet.
but thats cool its early days. |
|
Blu Dann
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.08.31 21:46:00 -
[431] - Quote
I'm not sure how much this UVT thing actually affects me since I'm new to EVE/DUST and I don't even have a bluetooth for my PS3 (so I wasn't planning on voice chat anyway); however, perhaps those voice chat services that aren't free can only charge for the ability to chat itself. In other words, you're free to listen; however, you can't respond unless you've paid for the UVT. What do you think of this solution? |
Cpl Quartz
127
|
Posted - 2012.08.31 22:06:00 -
[432] - Quote
we need chat on screen
|
Carl Dublin
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
0
|
Posted - 2012.09.01 10:49:00 -
[433] - Quote
I was quite disappointed when I discovered what the UVT is for and the fact we're expected to pay to use it. Honestly it's putting a restriction on a serious part of the game... Text chat is very difficult on the PS3 unless you have a keyboard handy.
People who are serious about this game will likely make use of Skype or another alternative.
Very poor move CCP. |
sansey Inferno
Inferno Inc
43
|
Posted - 2012.09.01 12:04:00 -
[434] - Quote
dont read all topic when ccp provide voice chat in eve first time its cost some price after that makes it free. i think in dust will be something like that btw corp\ally\squad chats must be free custom channels can be for the aur i hope ccp dont make mistakes with prices like with monocles |
S0UL PH0ENIX
10
|
Posted - 2012.09.01 12:19:00 -
[435] - Quote
Good grief, what a bunch of sniveling ingrates. lol You are getting everything offered in traditional MP FPS games for FREE in a FREE to play game. Seriously, was a mission to wade through all the snot from from the last 20 pages.
@CCP - Don't listen to these kiddies and their bloated sense of entitlement. Your business model is fine. |
Aardwolf Pneumatic
SyNergy Gaming
18
|
Posted - 2012.09.01 12:53:00 -
[436] - Quote
Biggest joke. Let alone unbalanced gameplay. |
Debacle Nano
Shadow Company HQ
639
|
Posted - 2012.09.01 13:10:00 -
[437] - Quote
My corp will use them and buy them. You guys can go use another program :P |
ICECREAMK1NG WARRIORS
134
|
Posted - 2012.09.01 16:42:00 -
[438] - Quote
S0UL PH0ENIX wrote:Good grief, what a bunch of sniveling ingrates. lol You are getting everything offered in traditional MP FPS games for FREE in a FREE to play game. Seriously, was a mission to wade through all the snot from from the last 20 pages.
@CCP - Don't listen to these kiddies and their bloated sense of entitlement. Your business model is fine.
I can't even answer you, this post is so fanboy contradictory. |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax.
2867
|
Posted - 2012.09.01 16:43:00 -
[439] - Quote
Please give player corproate wide options... thank you.
and no talking in npc corp/local channels please for the love of all things amarr consider holy.
It would be enough to turn any voice channel of such nature into the barrens chat. |
iDieALotx
Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation
23
|
Posted - 2012.09.01 17:07:00 -
[440] - Quote
So far you just have to turn on your mic in options. Unfortunately it only also you to speak to your squad though :( |
|
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.09.04 02:53:00 -
[441] - Quote
S0UL PH0ENIX wrote:Good grief, what a bunch of sniveling ingrates. lol You are getting everything offered in traditional MP FPS games for FREE in a FREE to play game. Seriously, was a mission to wade through all the snot from from the last 20 pages.
@CCP - Don't listen to these kiddies and their bloated sense of entitlement. Your business model is fine.
Quick poll:
1. Who is here for 'traditional FPS multi-player experience for free'
2. And who is here for DUST + EVE = 'We are doing something amazing that's never been done before'
If you answered number 1, then UVTs may not affect you, NOW. But you may find that the further down the rabbit hole you go, the more you want to get involved. You'll see big corporations organizing and dominating, and you are going to want to get in on that. Putting up a pay wall around communications options WILL prevent players from even trying, trapping them in the 'traditional FPS multi-player experience for free' zone. Does anyone think this is good for the game? Less people will utilize a service if they have to pay for it, that's just how business works. For people who answered number 1, UVTs are a deterrent from ever getting deeper in the game.
If you answered number 2, then you know that UVT is not only annoying, too expensive, and an impediment to everyone's communications, but that CCP have tried this before. EVE Voice left such a bad taste in the mouths of EVE players that even when it was made free it was widely ignored. Now CCP have taken similiar steps with UVT. EVE players who are working towards organizing DUST corps and DUST/EVE joint ventures know that UVTs are expensive and awkward. Other alternatives (Skype, Teamspeak, Ventrilo, etc) are cheaper, and in an age of laptops and mobile devices can be less awkward to use than the clunky systems integrated into DUST and EVE. UVTs and the neglected EVE Voice could be an attractive option IF they had competitive features and pricepoints.
Segregating DUST players from EVE players by a paywall also runs contrary to CCP's much proclaimed shared universe experience.
Soul Phoenix: Rampant fanboy flaming. No knowledge of business. Irresponsible consumer.
|
Wilbur Robinson
Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation
4
|
Posted - 2012.09.07 07:18:00 -
[442] - Quote
Zalifer Nakamoda wrote:My 2 cents.
1) All the VoIP relevant to the gameplay is free. Battle comms, and squad comms, even out of game. No one is ever at a disadvantage in battle.
2) EVE voice is not used in EVE, so nobody will be buying it to talk to EVE people. Corp/alliance chats, or other text channels that are used in EVE are free for text use from DUST too, so that's that covered.
3) EVE corps with VoIP servers will just let their dusties use it for free.
These 3 points mean that 99% of people will have access to all the comms they need. Play now and again on your own, or with a few friends? Battle and Squad chat is free, so you're sorted. Play with a big corp or alliance? They will have their own text channels, and external VoIP servers.
Now the only people left are those new DUST corps starting up. The vast majority of people these days have computers, especially the people who will have an internet connection and PS3, which are required for DUST anyway. They can therefore be presumed to be able to use external comms like mumble or TS3. A 100 person mumble server , at the quick pricing I just did, was $32 a month. For 100 people to get the voicebox, costs $360 a month (using the numbers at the start of this thread).
Now while that is a case of each person chipping in a little, it's clearly not just them covering bandwidth costs. There is a massive profit to be had there. I'm not saying they can't make money, it's F2P so there has to be some nice profits from somewhere, but assuming that mumble hosting is not making any profit (which is, of course, false) then CCP are making $328 a month, assuming similar costs hosting the VoIP (which, again is probably wrong, their huge datacentres are no doubt tuned better than small VoIP hosting companies.)
If it sells, I don't mind, people will pay for what they need, and per person, it isn't a lot per month. But to make it an attractive option to anyone in the know, they will have to drop costs dramatically. I would suggest moving the cost away from individual users, and making voiceboxes something that a corp or person requires to open a channel to voice comms. Price it along the same lines as similar VoIP offerings on PC. So for example, a 10,000 aurum voicebox, allows 100 voice users on the corp channel. That is around $40, which is a much more realistic cost for the service. Actually, just price voiceboxes at 100 aurum, per month, per slot. Then when creating a channel you select the number of voice slots, and it creates a standing order for that from the corp aurum wallet (which all members can pay into, to help fund the voip costs, and whatever else the corp is buying).
Edit :
While this idea does mean that each channel needs to be paid for, instead of each person, meaning i can't pay my 900 aurum and talk anywhere, it does mean that each individual person does not need to buy it. If john doe can't afford aurum, or is not able to buy aurum for some reason, then he can still talk.
++1 to this.
Also.. as pointed out above there is a huge flaw in CCPs logic. EVE VOICE isn't used in EVE.
I have been an EVE player since Nov 2011 (fairly new compared to most of the EVE players here actually).. I have been in 2 corps.. and also part of a random fleet of noobs when I started. We tried EVE voice.. it was TERRIBLE! So we started using Teamspeak.. even as noobs! Later both corps I was a part of used Teamspeak as does my current Corp.
The problem CCP will have is DUST players paying for a communications service.. that does not let them communicate with EVE players. Sure, it will let them connect with EVE voice.. but there won't be anyone to talk to since EVE players don't (and won't) use it. I see nothing wrong with offering enhanced voice communications in DUST for a price.. as long as it is clear to players what they are getting.. which in practical terms will be ONLY DUST-centered communications. It may connect them to EVE.. but the line is dead on the other end. All they will hear will be the emptiness of space. DUST corps who get serious will learn this soon enough, and then will stop paying for the service, move to the other options being used by EVE players, and there goes CCPs profit on this item.
Just my 2 cents as well. I DO applaud CCP for attempting this though..so maybe EVE voice will finally get some love. (we can hope)
|
Wilbur Robinson
Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation
4
|
Posted - 2012.09.07 07:22:00 -
[443] - Quote
Major Apostrope wrote:CCP Frame wrote: A reasonable attempt to reassure us with some flawed assumptions
EVE ONLINE CORPORATIONS DO NOT USE EVE VOICESeriously CCP, Almost every significant Eve corporation does not use Eve Voice. The reasons are many, but mostly Eve players don't want to use an integrated voice chat that means you loose voice comms if your client crashes. And while eve voice isn't bad, it sure as hell isn't nearly as good as Mumble. And here's another fun fact .... Mumble is OPEN SOURCE So basically, trying to charge for a voice service that most eve online corporations will not use is a pointless exercise. Its also a mind numbingly STUPID IDEA because all you are doing is making your customers angry. Please, you have to find a better solution. +1 |
Wilbur Robinson
Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation
4
|
Posted - 2012.09.07 07:26:00 -
[444] - Quote
Umallon Macross wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:The other solution.
Seperate downloadable eve voice client with competitive costs and the security of new eden API systems. Imagine a communications client that combines all the features of EVE Mail, EVE Voice, Contacts Lists, Chat Channels. Lets call it Fluid. You plug in the details for each of your accounts and it gives you complete access to any means of communication your characters have access to, including things like Local Chat for the system you are in, even without your EVE or DUST client running. It gives you controls to facilitate things like transferring contacts between accounts. You can use it to talk via text or voice with players on EVE, DUST, EVE Gate, DUST Gate, or the Fluid client. Non-EVE accounts would have access to most features, but could subscribe to the rest for 100 Aurum a month, or they could be sponsored by their corporation. They would also get free months of Fluid sub every time they make an Aurum purchase. 1 free month with 400 Aurum 2 free months with 1100 Aurum 5 free months with 2500 Aurum 10 free months with 5000 Aurum For EVE players it would be included in their subscription. The Fluid client could be released for PC, PS3, iOS and Android. Imagine if you could join a briefing of DUST mercs by a corp CEO in EVE, using the Fluid client on your iphone. +++1 THIS is what EVE VOICE should REALLY be.. CCP should hire you my good sir to make this happen!
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 :: [one page] |