Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |
4447
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
649
|
Posted - 2012.08.18 11:53:00 -
[361] - Quote
Galactus VI wrote:CCP Frame wrote:Hello,
Just to clarify what UVT is supposed to enable and what you get for free:
UVT Gives you:
- Ability to voice chat in custom channels, DUST or EVE/DUST - Ability to voice chat in corporation channels, alliance channels, ect.
UVT is NOT required for:
- Team voice chat - Squad voice chat
Text chat is of course free everywhere. Players can speak / listen to one channel at a time.
Keep in mind that price is still subject to change during the beta period. You basically just put a finger up the ass of all the players.... Wanna talk to more than 4 players.... give us money!
why are you always taking about fingers and donkeys for? |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
1849
|
Posted - 2012.08.18 12:42:00 -
[362] - Quote
Pretty sure the "default OFF" voice comms got reset by the last patch so you just have to turn them on again.
And pretty sure this paid system is ONLY for out-of-battle comms or for comms with people not in your match.
If I'm wrong, then... this is completely ridiculous and NO CCP THIS IS A TERRIBLE IDEA, but I don't think I'm wrong. |
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.18 15:11:00 -
[363] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote:Pretty sure the "default OFF" voice comms got reset by the last patch so you just have to turn them on again.
And pretty sure this paid system is ONLY for out-of-battle comms or for comms with people not in your match.
If I'm wrong, then... this is completely ridiculous and NO CCP THIS IS A TERRIBLE IDEA, but I don't think I'm wrong.
Ability to voice chat in custom channels, DUST or EVE/DUST Ability to voice chat in corporation channels, alliance channels, ect.
CCP don't want DUST corps to have the same facilities as EVE corps unless they pay for it apparently, and pay 7.5x + the cost of services like vent and teamspeak. |
Tony Calif
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
2002
|
Posted - 2012.08.18 15:14:00 -
[364] - Quote
It doesn't matter. No one is using in game comms anyway. I'm just fed up of Playin with a bunch of retards too busy listening to vent/TS to work with their ******* team. Game's **** because of it. |
Mathiassen
New Eden Regimental Navy Rebel Alliance of New Eden
8
|
Posted - 2012.08.18 15:22:00 -
[365] - Quote
No, this is fine, especially since this is not integral to gameplay. (as in, you don't need UVT to speak in squads/team)
Most of you that use TeamSpeak in EVE Online are forgetting that someone is footing the bill to keep it up. UVT is essentially the same thing, but cutting out extra hassle. :p |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
1849
|
Posted - 2012.08.18 15:42:00 -
[366] - Quote
Umallon Macross wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote:Pretty sure the "default OFF" voice comms got reset by the last patch so you just have to turn them on again.
And pretty sure this paid system is ONLY for out-of-battle comms or for comms with people not in your match.
If I'm wrong, then... this is completely ridiculous and NO CCP THIS IS A TERRIBLE IDEA, but I don't think I'm wrong. Ability to voice chat in custom channels, DUST or EVE/DUST Ability to voice chat in corporation channels, alliance channels, ect. CCP don't want DUST corps to have the same facilities as EVE corps unless they pay for it apparently, and pay 7.5x + the cost of services like vent and teamspeak. After a short run actually playing, the voice comms work just fine in mission. Haven't got any way to check whether you get voice comms outside of missions without paying, but probably not, and that sounds like it's going to be the only thing you have to pay for.
Honestly, I don't have a problem with this. Only thing I don't like is the fact that voice defaults to "off" and PTT defaults to "on" when it should logically be the other way around for a console FPS that uses this much of the controller already. |
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.18 18:43:00 -
[367] - Quote
Tony Calif wrote:It doesn't matter. No one is using in game comms anyway. I'm just fed up of Playin with a bunch of retards too busy listening to vent/TS to work with their ******* team. Game's **** because of it.
If you want people to play as a team, then you want CCP to make communications viable, which means not pulling **** like UVT's that fracture the communications userbase.
If DUST voice chat was both competitive pricewise, and gave real advantages ( ease of use, corp communications, organisation, knowledge is power), then the vast majority of EVE players would use it.
The current model will drive players to other communcations options, which means if you end up in a game with lots of guys working together, chances are they will be talking over another network so you will hear nothing.
The same goes for EVE voice. If it was as easy to use as popular alternatives, everyone would use it.
Surely everyone can agree that it makes life better for everyone if communications are cheap, easy to use, and work within the games framework.
CCP has managed to hit 1 out of 3.
|
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.18 18:44:00 -
[368] - Quote
Mathiassen wrote:No, this is fine, especially since this is not integral to gameplay. (as in, you don't need UVT to speak in squads/team)
Most of you that use TeamSpeak in EVE Online are forgetting that someone is footing the bill to keep it up. UVT is essentially the same thing, but cutting out extra hassle. :p
UVT costs 7.5x + MORE than teamspeak.
|
oneshytalk
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
71
|
Posted - 2012.08.19 11:36:00 -
[369] - Quote
Tony Calif wrote:It doesn't matter. No one is using in game comms anyway. I'm just fed up of Playin with a bunch of retards too busy listening to vent/TS to work with their ******* team. Game's **** because of it.
You are absolutely right, sadly. They left grouping to late and people found ways round it like SKYPE which they are now sticking with as they don't want to pay the game price, but more so the squad size is ridiculously small and you can't group squads to make a team. This needs to be sorted ASAP or comms on this game will not be used and it wiil die fast. |
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.19 15:49:00 -
[370] - Quote
oneshytalk wrote:Tony Calif wrote:It doesn't matter. No one is using in game comms anyway. I'm just fed up of Playin with a bunch of retards too busy listening to vent/TS to work with their ******* team. Game's **** because of it. You are absolutely right, sadly. They left grouping to late and people found ways round it like SKYPE which they are now sticking with as they don't want to pay the game price, but more so the squad size is ridiculously small and you can't group squads to make a team. This needs to be sorted ASAP or comms on this game will not be used and it wiil die fast.
You woul think they would have learned this from EVE voice
|
|
Le-gen Dairy
6
|
Posted - 2012.08.20 13:45:00 -
[371] - Quote
Grit Breather wrote:CCP Frame wrote:Hello,
Just to clarify what UVT is supposed to enable and what you get for free:
UVT Gives you:
- Ability to voice chat in custom channels, DUST or EVE/DUST - Ability to voice chat in corporation channels, alliance channels, ect.
UVT is NOT required for:
- Team voice chat - Squad voice chat
Text chat is of course free everywhere. Players can speak / listen to one channel at a time.
Keep in mind that price is still subject to change during the beta period. I have a question/clarification about UVT usage. Currently when I buy UVT it allows me one month of free voice chat on any private channel. But this UVT item is linked to just the character I bought it with. So if I have 3 characters I have to buy the UVT 3 times. As I am only able to use one character at a time, I don't believe this is designed well. As I see it, the UVT item should be linked to the player (or have multiple items, one for each character). After all, it's not like a skill booster where the character actually enjoys the module. It's something I as a player use and my character gains nothing. As it is now, I would have to spend 3x900 AUR if I have 3 characters just to get something I already have. Seems wrong.
I agree with Grit Breather. This is an item that provides no boost to the character. If AUR is shared across characters, shouldn't this be something that could be done as well? |
The Warbot
Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State
85
|
Posted - 2012.08.20 13:51:00 -
[372] - Quote
Umallon Macross wrote:Universal Voice Transmitters are biomechanical implants that provide personal access to subspace routers, allowing users to communicate instantly with one another wherever they may be. The implants degrade over time and cease to function when fully absorbed by the user.
1-day 3-day 7-day 30-day
60 150 250 900
Aurum.
WTF am I looking at? Is voicechat pay2play? SERIOUSLY?
*[beyond this point is material from later in the thread that I thought might be good to front load for people to see]*
A 30 day UVT costs 900 Aurum.
900 Aurum = $3.60US = 92,932,150.20 ISK
Lets say you have a mixed DUST/EVE alliance with 90 DUST Players.
81000 Aurum = $324US = 8,363,893,518.00 ISK
Your alliance has 3 options:
Pay $300+ to be able to communicate.
Pay 8 billion ISK + (likely a lot more as I don't see this market being high volume, so prices will be dictated by the sellers, subject to inflation and the whims of the market including limited availability and quantity)
Use 3rd party software (for comparisons sake: Ventrilo, Teamspeak and Mumble servers for $40US a month for 100 slots).
UVTs cost 7.5x as much as the alternatives.
The current conversion rate for $0.40US (cost per server slot) is about 100 Aurum.
If the 30 day UVT costs 100 Aurum it will the same price as the competition, with the added benefits of its integration into DUST and EVE.
I still think it unnecessarily fractures the player base and would be better for everyone if it was free and its costs subsidized by boosters and sidegrades, because its in everyone's best interests to make communication and free flow of information as open and accessible as possible, but I guess I could live with it as a compromise if I had to.
This is absurd and silly at the same time. I don't understand why it would be necessary to pay for communicating in a console game.... lol.
That being said, like always, Have a nice day.
|
MF Dust
2
|
Posted - 2012.08.20 15:02:00 -
[373] - Quote
CCP might as well give this one up they're not going to win this. Even if all the players don't decide to walk out on them, it's not as if there aren't already a plethora of other free voice chat services that will work just as well as in game for corp chat. All the rage aside this just isn't a pragmatic business model, thinking an organization will pay you for something they can get elsewhere for free. |
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.20 18:31:00 -
[374] - Quote
MF Dust wrote:CCP might as well give this one up they're not going to win this. Even if all the players don't decide to walk out on them, it's not as if there aren't already a plethora of other free voice chat services that will work just as well as in game for corp chat. All the rage aside this just isn't a pragmatic business model, thinking an organization will pay you for something they can get elsewhere for free.
Its funny, CCP puts years of thought into ship balancing, and zero thought into 'services' it wants to charge for.
|
Moorian Flav
Ectype Inc.
20
|
Posted - 2012.08.20 19:07:00 -
[375] - Quote
CCP should at least give a trial of such services they want players to pay for so we know what we're missing. |
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.20 23:43:00 -
[376] - Quote
Moorian Flav wrote:CCP should at least give a trial of such services they want players to pay for so we know what we're missing.
CCP have never been good at easing people into things. Or realistic price points.
|
tribal wyvern
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
673
|
Posted - 2012.08.20 23:59:00 -
[377] - Quote
MF Dust wrote:CCP might as well give this one up they're not going to win this. Even if all the players don't decide to walk out on them, it's not as if there aren't already a plethora of other free voice chat services that will work just as well as in game for corp chat. All the rage aside this just isn't a pragmatic business model, thinking an organization will pay you for something they can get elsewhere for free.
Uvt's are NOT for team chat, or squad chat, or for any kind of chat in a match. They are for communication between eve and dust players who ARE NOT on the same planet but are in fact in other star systems. If you can find a way to use another free chat service to talk to eve/dust players in a different star system then by all means go right ahead, but good luck with that.....you'll need it.
Uvt's - for communication between dust mercs/eve pilots/corporations etc who are not within typical communication range I.E another planet/star system. Not for 'in match' chat between dust mercs and eve pilots IN ORBIT of the location of the match. In match chat is free. Long distance chat is not. Live with it. how many times are people going to NEED to chat with another merc/eve pilot who are 10 star systems away? What purpose would it serve unless you are part of a corporation? What matters is the communication between pilots in orbit and mercs, and between merc to merc. If you don't wish to pay for Uvt's then don't buy them simple as that. If you need one for a few hours then buy the 24hr uvt.
At the end of the day no one is being forced to buy anything, aur assets and isk assets will all be tradeable upon full release, Uvt's are a way to communicate long distance but are optional, I don't see the problem |
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 00:29:00 -
[378] - Quote
tribal wyvern wrote:MF Dust wrote:CCP might as well give this one up they're not going to win this. Even if all the players don't decide to walk out on them, it's not as if there aren't already a plethora of other free voice chat services that will work just as well as in game for corp chat. All the rage aside this just isn't a pragmatic business model, thinking an organization will pay you for something they can get elsewhere for free. Uvt's are NOT for team chat, or squad chat, or for any kind of chat in a match. They are for communication between eve and dust players who ARE NOT on the same planet but are in fact in other star systems. If you can find a way to use another free chat service to talk to eve/dust players in a different star system then by all means go right ahead, but good luck with that.....you'll need it. Uvt's - for communication between dust mercs/eve pilots/corporations etc who are not within typical communication range I.E another planet/star system. Not for 'in match' chat between dust mercs and eve pilots IN ORBIT of the location of the match. In match chat is free. Long distance chat is not. Live with it. how many times are people going to NEED to chat with another merc/eve pilot who are 10 star systems away? What purpose would it serve unless you are part of a corporation? What matters is the communication between pilots in orbit and mercs, and between merc to merc. If you don't wish to pay for Uvt's then don't buy them simple as that. If you need one for a few hours then buy the 24hr uvt. At the end of the day no one is being forced to buy anything, aur assets and isk assets will all be tradeable upon full release, Uvt's are a way to communicate long distance but are optional, I don't see the problem
Wow.
You manage to not read the post you quoted, read way to much into the fluff description of UVTs while not actually knowing what they do, and somehow have convinced yourself that VOIP technology is rare and expensive.
Ok.
|
tribal wyvern
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
673
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 00:39:00 -
[379] - Quote
Umallon Macross wrote:tribal wyvern wrote:MF Dust wrote:CCP might as well give this one up they're not going to win this. Even if all the players don't decide to walk out on them, it's not as if there aren't already a plethora of other free voice chat services that will work just as well as in game for corp chat. All the rage aside this just isn't a pragmatic business model, thinking an organization will pay you for something they can get elsewhere for free. Uvt's are NOT for team chat, or squad chat, or for any kind of chat in a match. They are for communication between eve and dust players who ARE NOT on the same planet but are in fact in other star systems. If you can find a way to use another free chat service to talk to eve/dust players in a different star system then by all means go right ahead, but good luck with that.....you'll need it. Uvt's - for communication between dust mercs/eve pilots/corporations etc who are not within typical communication range I.E another planet/star system. Not for 'in match' chat between dust mercs and eve pilots IN ORBIT of the location of the match. In match chat is free. Long distance chat is not. Live with it. how many times are people going to NEED to chat with another merc/eve pilot who are 10 star systems away? What purpose would it serve unless you are part of a corporation? What matters is the communication between pilots in orbit and mercs, and between merc to merc. If you don't wish to pay for Uvt's then don't buy them simple as that. If you need one for a few hours then buy the 24hr uvt. At the end of the day no one is being forced to buy anything, aur assets and isk assets will all be tradeable upon full release, Uvt's are a way to communicate long distance but are optional, I don't see the problem Wow. You manage to not read the post you quoted, read way to much into the fluff description of UVTs while not actually knowing what they do, and somehow have convinced yourself that VOIP technology is rare and expensive. Ok.
what the Uvt's do is in their description on the market, it doesn't take a genius to work it out bro. And you miss mY point regarding voip, how is on suppose to communicate with RANDOM eve players and RANDOM dust players if they choose to use an alternative means of communication????????? I read the post I quoted, and my response was fitting. I'm sick of seeing little whiney bitches moan about the whole pay to talk thing, and 'my mic doesn't work' etc etc etc. Its not pay to talk, and try turning the voice chat on. |
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 02:11:00 -
[380] - Quote
tribal wyvern wrote:Umallon Macross wrote:tribal wyvern wrote:MF Dust wrote:CCP might as well give this one up they're not going to win this. Even if all the players don't decide to walk out on them, it's not as if there aren't already a plethora of other free voice chat services that will work just as well as in game for corp chat. All the rage aside this just isn't a pragmatic business model, thinking an organization will pay you for something they can get elsewhere for free. Uvt's are NOT for team chat, or squad chat, or for any kind of chat in a match. They are for communication between eve and dust players who ARE NOT on the same planet but are in fact in other star systems. If you can find a way to use another free chat service to talk to eve/dust players in a different star system then by all means go right ahead, but good luck with that.....you'll need it. Uvt's - for communication between dust mercs/eve pilots/corporations etc who are not within typical communication range I.E another planet/star system. Not for 'in match' chat between dust mercs and eve pilots IN ORBIT of the location of the match. In match chat is free. Long distance chat is not. Live with it. how many times are people going to NEED to chat with another merc/eve pilot who are 10 star systems away? What purpose would it serve unless you are part of a corporation? What matters is the communication between pilots in orbit and mercs, and between merc to merc. If you don't wish to pay for Uvt's then don't buy them simple as that. If you need one for a few hours then buy the 24hr uvt. At the end of the day no one is being forced to buy anything, aur assets and isk assets will all be tradeable upon full release, Uvt's are a way to communicate long distance but are optional, I don't see the problem Wow. You manage to not read the post you quoted, read way to much into the fluff description of UVTs while not actually knowing what they do, and somehow have convinced yourself that VOIP technology is rare and expensive. Ok. what the Uvt's do is in their description on the market, it doesn't take a genius to work it out bro. And you miss mY point regarding voip, how is on suppose to communicate with RANDOM eve players and RANDOM dust players if they choose to use an alternative means of communication????????? I read the post I quoted, and my response was fitting. I'm sick of seeing little whiney bitches moan about the whole pay to talk thing, and 'my mic doesn't work' etc etc etc. Its not pay to talk, and try turning the voice chat on.
Are you saying that you can create custom voice channels and talk in corp/alliance chat for free when you're in the same system? Because you'd be wrong.
MY point is that no one will use UVTs because they are too expensive, and when you want to talk to someone using Teamspeak or Ventrilo you will have to use those also, with the advantage that the organiser of the channel pays for everyone, instead of everyone paying for themselves.
Because of this mismanagement, it will be more difficult for players in DUST and EVE to communicate than it needs to be, out of sheer greed as they are charging 10x more for this service than it is worth.
Serious DUST players are already turning to alternatives for communications, and CCP will have to play catch up if they want those users back using in-game communication. The more people that go external, the harder it will be for new players to communicate, and therefore harder to get into the game, and therefore less repeat custom and aurum sales.
It is in the best interests of CCP to make communications of all kinds in the EVE and DUST universe as smooth and cheap as possible, because these are both games about communications. By fracturing the means by which players communicate CCP are fracturing the games.
I'M sick of seeing 'little whiney bitches' moan about legitimate complaints that go over their heads because they don't stop to think before trolling and flaming. |
|
Septem Mortuus
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
86
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 02:57:00 -
[381] - Quote
We need Jita in DUST so we can burn it in protest about things.
CCP - this was a daft idea. I understand you want something for developing the technology to have PS3 and PC clients allowing voice-chat across the entire shard, I'm sure it wasn't easy. But this isn't the way to go about it - and to be blunt, you know that.
Stop F'ing around trying to cobble together a business model to make your backers happy - that should have been long done by now. Go add some shiny to the market so there's actually something to spend AUR on and you'll get your cash (Hell, you could make your entire development costs back 5 times over by selling fricking colour-schemes for AUR without pulling this stunt) I have plenty of AUR, but nothing to spend it on.
The link between EvE and DUST is one of the biggest selling points of this game, charging to make full use of that harms DUST and limits DUST players involement in the game (How are the New DUSTERS going to decide if they want to join corps etc if they can't talk to the EvE players without paying? Who pays to talk to people they might not want to talk to?)
I know this is a new service, I understand it isn't cheap to provide, but making it free = huge bonus to gamers, free advertising from word of mouth, more players paying AUR. Charging for it = annoyed players, a barrier to communitcations within the game universe and less players. It's just not a good look to charge for this particular function in my opinion. |
Ghural
The Southern Legion
63
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 03:19:00 -
[382] - Quote
Go play League of Legends and see what unrestricted chat can do. There is so much trolling going on at times. Personally I think that the UVTs are fine. Especially since once you are in a battle Voice is free anyway.
If you don't want to use them, then type. Geez, is it really that hard to get your head around? |
RolyatDerTeufel
D3ath D3alers RISE of LEGION
1648
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 03:31:00 -
[383] - Quote
CCP Frame wrote:Hello,
Just to clarify what UVT is supposed to enable and what you get for free:
UVT Gives you:
- Ability to voice chat in custom channels, DUST or EVE/DUST - Ability to voice chat in corporation channels, alliance channels, ect.
UVT is NOT required for:
- Team voice chat - Squad voice chat
Text chat is of course free everywhere. Players can speak / listen to one channel at a time.
Keep in mind that price is still subject to change during the beta period.
I tryed it when i had an NPC corp chat up, that is now gone...
The NPC corp Voice Chat was free, just had to activate the chat channel's option for it. |
Tawkis Tawharr
Sanmatar Kelkoons Minmatar Republic
4
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 03:56:00 -
[384] - Quote
Umallon Macross wrote: Are you saying that you can create custom voice channels and talk in corp/alliance chat for free when you're in the same system? Because you'd be wrong.
Very true, however this doesn't automatically make the system bad. Unless I'm very mistaken, the CCP provided chat is equal to most other PS3 shooters. Lobby, squad and match chat.
Umallon Macross wrote: MY point is that no one will use UVTs because they are too expensive, and when you want to talk to someone using Teamspeak or Ventrilo you will have to use those also, with the advantage that the organiser of the channel pays for everyone, instead of everyone paying for themselves. I tend the agree that the price point FEELS high. To be fair we also have no idea how much this costs to implement. As much as we would like to pretend otherwise, if the design and support costs are high enough the price may need to be at this level. CCP cannot lower the price to where the service will lose money in the long run. Better to sink the cost and keep numbers low to lessen the incremental costs... or kill the UVT all together.
I also agree that this should be implemented corporation wide. While I don't feel that CCP should feel obligated to give premium chat away for free, I do feel that selling chat servers in increments of 5, 10, 50, 100 would be the best way to go. The offering would seem to make a lot more sense to me in that format.
Umallon Macross wrote: Because of this mismanagement, it will be more difficult for players in DUST and EVE to communicate than it needs to be, out of sheer greed as they are charging 10x more for this service than it is worth.
Calling this pure greed without knowledge of the backend costs is pure speculation. If we want the service to improve we should probably leave the Ad hominem attacks at the door. I'm also not sure mismanagement is the right word, to my knowledge CCP is asking you to pay for features above and beyond what is currently available on the platform.
Umallon Macross wrote: Serious DUST players are already turning to alternatives for communications, and CCP will have to play catch up if they want those users back using in-game communication. The more people that go external, the harder it will be for new players to communicate, and therefore harder to get into the game, and therefore less repeat custom and aurum sales.
Speculative and over generalized, but I will of course concede the possibility. I would need to see evidence beyond Beta forum rage to agree on a broader scale.
Umallon Macross wrote:It is in the best interests of CCP to make communications of all kinds in the EVE and DUST universe as smooth and cheap as possible, because these are both games about communications. By fracturing the means by which players communicate CCP are fracturing the games.
Smooth yes
Cheap: Only in so far as the communication is not a running loss. I tend to think just giving hundreds of thousands ( possibly) of players the massive bandwidth you're asking for seems to be a very expensive proposition.
For the average PS3 player setting up a 3rd party chat simply won't be worth it. MY PC is in the same room, and it a PITA I just don't want to do.
If I'm honest, in concept I don't see anything wrong with this. I think the individual targeting in not the way to go.
What I would like to see:
UVT: Sell UVT on a user cap system, 10, 20 etc Limit the "rooms" based on allowable users. If you have room for 5 people do you REALLY need more than one room? Chat servers may be tied to individual players or corporations. Pricing probably needs to be figured out.
To CCP's credit this is NOT Monaclegate. Every single AUR you may or may not have you will get back.
That's my 2 CDN cents... because Iceland will be using our currency soon.
I expect EVE Online to reflect this accordingly.
|
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 04:37:00 -
[385] - Quote
Tawkis Tawharr wrote:Pyramid
Equal isn't good enough for 'we are doing something amazing thats never been done before'
The price point doesn't FEEL high, it IS high. We DO know how much it costs. Typefrag charges $0.40US per slot per month for TeamSpeak, Ventrilo and Mumble, compared to CCP's $3.60US per slot per month, and CCP can subsidize it with their Aurum sales (assuming they make any money at all considering their track record).
If CCP want to charge for the service, they should have a competitive price point, software with full EVE and DUST integration, and a stand-alone client. They could even sell apps for it in the Apple and Android stores, and you could talk to your corp buddies any time, any place.
What they shouldn't do is charge individuals 10x the going rate so if any corps are dumb enough to use it they would peer pressure members into buying more UVTs.
Like I said, we do know the back-end costs, and CCP's dubious 'micro'-transaction record, so I don't believe calling this unannounced and expensive service greedy is too outlandish.
I talk mismanagement from a PR standpoint, and a 'of all the ways to handle this issue this wasn't one of them' standpoint.
EVE is example enough for players ignoring CCP's offerings in this area, a lot of which can be attributed towards CCP's attempts to charge for the service, before making it free. A lot of people never bothered switching back after they left, and it is FREE for EVE players.
Communications for games like EVE and DUST are worth running at a loss, because a smooth communication facility keeps the universe flowing, and keeps players playing. The better it works, the more 'emergent gameplay' happens. CCP boast on the one hand about player interactions in their games while shooting themselves in the foot by trying to charge excessive amounts of money for features that facilitate it. |
WILLMA-DUST Gauss
Algintal Core Gallente Federation
20
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 05:07:00 -
[386] - Quote
CCP Frame wrote:Hello,
Just to clarify what UVT is supposed to enable and what you get for free:
UVT Gives you:
- Ability to voice chat in custom channels, DUST or EVE/DUST - Ability to voice chat in corporation channels, alliance channels, ect.
UVT is NOT required for:
- Team voice chat - Squad voice chat
Text chat is of course free everywhere. Players can speak / listen to one channel at a time.
Keep in mind that price is still subject to change during the beta period.
Eve Voice is free for Capsuleers, therefore it will be free for everyone. What you guys at CCP get to decide is whether you get yet another PR egg on your face before realizing it or not.
|
|
CCP Frame
C C P C C P Alliance
470
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 11:16:00 -
[387] - Quote
Dear players,
We are quite impressed and inspired by your feedbacks and comments regarding the UVT introduction. Therefore, we have made some changes and a more detailed description on what the UVT is and offers. We hope that this will address many of your concerns and illustrate its value to players. We look forward to hearing your feedback as you test the UVT during beta and together we can improve its implementation.
Fostering smooth and easy communication for our players is hugely important for CCP and a key element of DUST 514. Long-time EVE Online players know that we think a thriving community is imperative to a gameGÇÖs success.
WeGÇÖd like to clarify how the chat and voice function will work within DUST 514 and between DUST 514 and EVE Online. WeGÇÖre offering a very robust suite of options for free.
- Voice chat in DUST 514 for teams in a battle is free.
- Voice chat in DUST 514 pre-made squads, both in and out of battle, is free.
- All text chat, including text chat between DUST 514 and EVE Online, is free.
- All mail, including mail between DUST 514 and EVE Online, is free
The following activities will require the purchase of a Universal Voice Transmitter (UVT) using Aurum (AUR), the currency purchased with real world money in DUST 514.
- Voice chat in a custom channel in DUST 514 (which can include both DUST 514 and EVE Online players)
- Voice chat in a Corp channel (which can include both DUST 514 and EVE Online players) when Corps are implemented in DUST 514
We have not finalized pricing for the UVT GÇô it is likely that the prices youGÇÖve seen will be reduced by the time the game exits closed beta. We are also looking into offering the ability for Corps to buy UVT items that cover the entire group.
In addition, in order to test the voice chat feature, we are going to reduce the cost of the UVT to 1 AUR for the duration of the closed beta.
Lastly, weGÇÖll soon be adding a player-driven market to DUST 514 that will allow players to buy and sell all manner of items for ISK (the currency you earn in game), including UVTs.
FAQ:
Q: Why do DUST players have to pay for voice chat and EVE players do not? A: In EVE Online, we can cover the ongoing costs of voice chat through the gameGÇÖs subscription fee. Because DUST is free-to-play, we will need players to cover some of the costs of voice chat.
Q: How do you enable voice chat across DUST 514 and EVE Online? A: You can purchase a Universal Voice Transmitter in DUST 514 using Aurum
Q: How much does a UVT cost? A: We have not finalized pricing for the UVT. The pricing in the closed beta test is preliminary and we would love to get feedback from players via the beta testing forums.
Q: Will the price of a UVT stay at 1 AUR after closed beta ends? A: No, this is a temporary price to encourage players to test the feature. Final pricing for UVTs has not been determined.
Q: Will EVE players have to pay to voice chat with DUST players? A: No, we have no plans at this time to charge extra for EVE players to cross-game voice chat
Q: When will the player market be added to DUST 514? A: This is something the development team is working on. We are definitely planning to implement it.
Q: ArenGÇÖt UVTs a pay-to-win feature since they make communication easier and are only available for purchase with AUR? A: We understand this concern and plan to address it before the game ships via the in-game player market, which will allow players to buy and sell UVTs with ISK, the currency awarded in game. |
|
Absolute Idiom II
BetaMax.
68
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 11:34:00 -
[388] - Quote
You'll just end up encouraging the use of out of game comms, just like happens in Eve. See the reasons why you decided not to charge for Eve Voice despite your initial plans. More out of game comms means a higher barrier to casual play. I really don't want to have to use a laptop for comms and my PS3 for game sounds. I can't even think of an easy way to do this that doesn't have Dust gameplay sounds coming from my tv/speakers. |
Forte Haulerson
Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State
6
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 11:50:00 -
[389] - Quote
Thanks for the clarification... Not sure it will change sentiment since it will cost to voice with my in corp Mercs on the ground.
Also, unless someone has the kb/m, Texting on the console takes way too long to execute when under fire ... It still feels pay to win...
Increase the price of AUR to cover the VoIP costs...
I like the idea of being able to spend ISK to get the functions, but if it costs the price of a PLEX to do so, then that's just too much and might as well add a subscription option to DUST like mentioned in another thread....
L8r, FH
|
Garrett Whetshaft
Hateful Munitions
31
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 11:59:00 -
[390] - Quote
we all have been using skype on dust and / or teamspeak on eve if there's lots of us.
I got the UVT thingy, but no SISI to login to and check. I managed to lookup my Dust character from Eve in SISI last week.. but not seen this working. maybe in a few days.
also, I spent 900 Au on a 30 day item and now it's 1Au?
I want my 899Au's back :'''(
lol |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |