Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 14 15 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |
Chaz Lewis
71
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 21:53:00 -
[271] - Quote
Arc Brimstone wrote:Is it just me or am I the only one who doesn't really care about this. It's a free game... We don't have to pay for the game up front, there's no monthly subscription. CCP has to make money somehow to support the game. If you don't want to shell out the less than $5 a month for voice support use skype or teamspeak or something. It's really not that big of a deal.... lol I don't really care either. Seriously, who talks to someone when they're not in the same match? That's what the text chat is for. A lot of these people seem to be over-reacting a bit, and need to stop focusing on an unimportant issue and focus on bugs and glitches and such. |
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 21:59:00 -
[272] - Quote
Chaz Lewis wrote:Arc Brimstone wrote:Is it just me or am I the only one who doesn't really care about this. It's a free game... We don't have to pay for the game up front, there's no monthly subscription. CCP has to make money somehow to support the game. If you don't want to shell out the less than $5 a month for voice support use skype or teamspeak or something. It's really not that big of a deal.... lol I don't really care either. Seriously, who talks to someone when they're not in the same match? That's what the text chat is for. A lot of these people seem to be over-reacting a bit, and need to stop focusing on an unimportant issue and focus on bugs and glitches and such.
Try saying this again after you try to organise a coordinated strike against multiple planets with fleet support.
|
WARR1OR OF WARRIORS
11
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 00:06:00 -
[273] - Quote
Chris Ridgeway wrote:WARR1OR OF WARRIORS wrote:[quote=Rasatsu][quote=ICECREAMK1NG WARRIORS]@ DEV Frame.
Sorry this is an excuse and a weak one at that.
Team chat........... Who cares, most of the time I don't want to talk to a load of random morons, or have to figure out how many I have to mute every game.
Squad chat........... Wow that huge 4man squad, well I have more than 3 friends and clan mates that I would like to group and play with. Even if we pay for this rip off chat so we can all talk we can't get in the same game let alone be on the same team.
I think instead of having an in house joke with MAG uniforms you have more important game breaking problems to worry about.
Truth... How is a four man squad supposed to accomplish anything. ? So what I got from this is your friends are a load of random morons? Cause if they are on your team in game, and not in your squad you can still talk to them during the match...hence team chat, but since it seems you and your friends are morons you can't make the ******* connection from squad to team..I gotcha.
LOL... Troll fail... That's what you got was it ? Then may I suggest you get someone older and wiser to explain it for you. |
Zat Earthshatter
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
304
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 00:27:00 -
[274] - Quote
A wild Thought appears! ...if the UVT turns out to be tradable in the market -and reasonably priced- there wouldn't be a problem here. On the contrary, this would make it a valuable wartime commodity like radios, traveling on freighters down the major pipes... *Homer drool* mmm... Freighter wrecks...
If you go this route CCP, try to set the AUR cost according to server prices in the major 3rd party comm providers. |
Talaryes
Bene Gesserit ChapterHouse Sanctuary Pact
8
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 01:18:00 -
[275] - Quote
Greed is Good |
DON RODIE II
Deep Space Republic
168
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 01:33:00 -
[276] - Quote
it's not pay to win.
It's pay to talk
you can't get out of both lol |
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 01:35:00 -
[277] - Quote
Zat Earthshatter wrote:A wild Thought appears! ...if the UVT turns out to be tradable in the market -and reasonably priced- there wouldn't be a problem here. On the contrary, this would make it a valuable wartime commodity like radios, traveling on freighters down the major pipes... *Homer drool* mmm... Freighter wrecks...
If you go this route CCP, try to set the AUR cost according to server prices in the major 3rd party comm providers.
There is no such thing as 'on the market + reasonably priced'
If UVTs are available through the market / contracts they will be sold at whatever price demand dictates.
At the moment, a 30 day UVT is worth 900 Aurum.
900 Aurum = $3.60US = 92,932,150.20 ISK
Lets say you have a mixed DUST/EVE alliance with 3 corps of 30 members, and you get wardecced by another Alliance.
81000 Aurum = $324US = 8,363,893,518.00 ISK
Your alliance has 3 options:
Pay $300+ to be able to communicate.
Pay 8 billion ISK + (likely a lot more as I don't see this market being high volume, so prices will be dictated by the sellers, subject to inflation and the whims of the market including limited availability and quantity)
Use 3rd party software (for comparisons sake: Ventrilo, Teamspeak and Mumble servers for $40US a month for 100 slots).
UVTs cost 7.5x as much as common alternatives. |
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 01:39:00 -
[278] - Quote
To give another perspective:
CCP wants to charge $3.60 per person per 30 days.
Teamspeak, Ventrilo, Mumble $0.40 per person per 30 days. |
sendeth
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
45
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 02:14:00 -
[279] - Quote
Umallon Macross wrote:Chaz Lewis wrote:Arc Brimstone wrote:Is it just me or am I the only one who doesn't really care about this. It's a free game... We don't have to pay for the game up front, there's no monthly subscription. CCP has to make money somehow to support the game. If you don't want to shell out the less than $5 a month for voice support use skype or teamspeak or something. It's really not that big of a deal.... lol I don't really care either. Seriously, who talks to someone when they're not in the same match? That's what the text chat is for. A lot of these people seem to be over-reacting a bit, and need to stop focusing on an unimportant issue and focus on bugs and glitches and such. Try saying this again after you try to organise a coordinated strike against multiple planets with fleet support.
agreed. i think most of the people saying they don't care are probably not eve players and do not understand the scale of what happens in that game. for those who do not play eve, all i can say is it is brutal, organized, and when the plan works, the carnage is beautiful even when you are on the losing end. |
Adaris Manpher
70
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 02:45:00 -
[280] - Quote
CCP Frame wrote:Hello,
Just to clarify what UVT is supposed to enable and what you get for free:
UVT Gives you:
- Ability to voice chat in custom channels, DUST or EVE/DUST - Ability to voice chat in corporation channels, alliance channels, ect.
UVT is NOT required for:
- Team voice chat - Squad voice chat
Text chat is of course free everywhere. Players can speak / listen to one channel at a time.
Keep in mind that price is still subject to change during the beta period. Hold the phone we have to pay to talk to eve players that is kinda bogis dude I mean if we can still talk to them while we are on the battle field that is fine i guess but yeah I think that is a little to much CCP |
|
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 03:20:00 -
[281] - Quote
Adaris Manpher wrote:CCP Frame wrote:Hello,
Just to clarify what UVT is supposed to enable and what you get for free:
UVT Gives you:
- Ability to voice chat in custom channels, DUST or EVE/DUST - Ability to voice chat in corporation channels, alliance channels, ect.
UVT is NOT required for:
- Team voice chat - Squad voice chat
Text chat is of course free everywhere. Players can speak / listen to one channel at a time.
Keep in mind that price is still subject to change during the beta period. Hold the phone we have to pay to talk to eve players that is kinda bogis dude I mean if we can still talk to them while we are on the battle field that is fine i guess but yeah I think that is a little to much CCP
The best way to connect 2 games together in one universe is to make players of one of the games have to pay real money to talk to the players in the other game.
It just makes sense.
|
Zat Earthshatter
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
304
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 03:41:00 -
[282] - Quote
Umallon Macross wrote:Zat Earthshatter wrote:A wild Thought appears! ...if the UVT turns out to be tradable in the market -and reasonably priced- there wouldn't be a problem here. On the contrary, this would make it a valuable wartime commodity like radios, traveling on freighters down the major pipes... *Homer drool* mmm... Freighter wrecks...
If you go this route CCP, try to set the AUR cost according to server prices in the major 3rd party comm providers. There is no such thing as 'on the market + reasonably priced' If UVTs are available through the market / contracts they will be sold at whatever price demand dictates. At the moment, a 30 day UVT is worth 900 Aurum. 900 Aurum = $3.60US = 92,932,150.20 ISK Lets say you have a mixed DUST/EVE alliance with 3 corps of 30 members, and you get wardecced by another Alliance. 81000 Aurum = $324US = 8,363,893,518.00 ISK Your alliance has 3 options: Pay $300+ to be able to communicate. Pay 8 billion ISK + (likely a lot more as I don't see this market being high volume, so prices will be dictated by the sellers, subject to inflation and the whims of the market including limited availability and quantity) Use 3rd party software (for comparisons sake: Ventrilo, Teamspeak and Mumble servers for $40US a month for 100 slots). UVTs cost 7.5x as much as common alternatives. ...Which is why i suggested that they Change The Cost to at least match competitors, if not undercut them, in the last line. That doesn't mean I don't agree. EDIT : Even though your math doesn't include EVE players that don't have to pay extra, such costs could present a problem for smaller alliances If the AUR price stays the same or increases, i will jump off the fence into your side of the story. |
J'Jor Da'Wg
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
648
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 03:42:00 -
[283] - Quote
Chaz Lewis wrote:Arc Brimstone wrote:Is it just me or am I the only one who doesn't really care about this. It's a free game... We don't have to pay for the game up front, there's no monthly subscription. CCP has to make money somehow to support the game. If you don't want to shell out the less than $5 a month for voice support use skype or teamspeak or something. It's really not that big of a deal.... lol I don't really care either. Seriously, who talks to someone when they're not in the same match? That's what the text chat is for. A lot of these people seem to be over-reacting a bit, and need to stop focusing on an unimportant issue and focus on bugs and glitches and such.
I guess you don't plan on playing seriously with a corp... Love it when people say "focus on the issues"...
Well. Here is the issue. Right in this thread. |
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 03:55:00 -
[284] - Quote
J'Jor Da'Wg wrote:Chaz Lewis wrote:Arc Brimstone wrote:Is it just me or am I the only one who doesn't really care about this. It's a free game... We don't have to pay for the game up front, there's no monthly subscription. CCP has to make money somehow to support the game. If you don't want to shell out the less than $5 a month for voice support use skype or teamspeak or something. It's really not that big of a deal.... lol I don't really care either. Seriously, who talks to someone when they're not in the same match? That's what the text chat is for. A lot of these people seem to be over-reacting a bit, and need to stop focusing on an unimportant issue and focus on bugs and glitches and such. I guess you don't plan on playing seriously with a corp... Love it when people say "focus on the issues"... Well. Here is the issue. Right in this thread.
LET'S PRESS THE ISSUE!
I'm Maurice Chavez, not chaves, not chaveez.
|
Chaz Lewis
71
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 04:00:00 -
[285] - Quote
J'Jor Da'Wg wrote:Chaz Lewis wrote:Arc Brimstone wrote:Is it just me or am I the only one who doesn't really care about this. It's a free game... We don't have to pay for the game up front, there's no monthly subscription. CCP has to make money somehow to support the game. If you don't want to shell out the less than $5 a month for voice support use skype or teamspeak or something. It's really not that big of a deal.... lol I don't really care either. Seriously, who talks to someone when they're not in the same match? That's what the text chat is for. A lot of these people seem to be over-reacting a bit, and need to stop focusing on an unimportant issue and focus on bugs and glitches and such. I guess you don't plan on playing seriously with a corp... Love it when people say "focus on the issues"... Well. Here is the issue. Right in this thread. I'm already in a corp called FoxHound dude. I was just stating my opinion. |
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 04:07:00 -
[286] - Quote
Zat Earthshatter wrote:Umallon Macross wrote:Zat Earthshatter wrote:A wild Thought appears! ...if the UVT turns out to be tradable in the market -and reasonably priced- there wouldn't be a problem here. On the contrary, this would make it a valuable wartime commodity like radios, traveling on freighters down the major pipes... *Homer drool* mmm... Freighter wrecks...
If you go this route CCP, try to set the AUR cost according to server prices in the major 3rd party comm providers. There is no such thing as 'on the market + reasonably priced' If UVTs are available through the market / contracts they will be sold at whatever price demand dictates. At the moment, a 30 day UVT is worth 900 Aurum. 900 Aurum = $3.60US = 92,932,150.20 ISK Lets say you have a mixed DUST/EVE alliance with 3 corps of 30 members, and you get wardecced by another Alliance. 81000 Aurum = $324US = 8,363,893,518.00 ISK Your alliance has 3 options: Pay $300+ to be able to communicate. Pay 8 billion ISK + (likely a lot more as I don't see this market being high volume, so prices will be dictated by the sellers, subject to inflation and the whims of the market including limited availability and quantity) Use 3rd party software (for comparisons sake: Ventrilo, Teamspeak and Mumble servers for $40US a month for 100 slots). UVTs cost 7.5x as much as common alternatives. ...Which is why i suggested that they Change The Cost to at least match competitors, if not undercut them, in the last line. That doesn't mean I don't agree. EDIT : Even though your math doesn't include EVE players that don't have to pay extra, such costs could present a problem for smaller alliances If the AUR price stays the same or increases, i will jump off the fence into your side of the story.
Well, it turns out that at the current rate $0.40US is about 100 Aurum.
If the 30 day UVT costs 100 Aurum it will the same price as the competition, with the added benefits of its integration into the games.
I still think it unnecessarily fractures the player base and would be better for everyone if it was free and its costs subsidized by boosters and sidegrades, because its in everyone's best interests to make communication and free flow of information as open and accessible as possible, but I guess I could live with it as a compromise.
I don't see it happening though.
|
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 04:08:00 -
[287] - Quote
Chaz Lewis wrote:J'Jor Da'Wg wrote:Chaz Lewis wrote:Arc Brimstone wrote:Is it just me or am I the only one who doesn't really care about this. It's a free game... We don't have to pay for the game up front, there's no monthly subscription. CCP has to make money somehow to support the game. If you don't want to shell out the less than $5 a month for voice support use skype or teamspeak or something. It's really not that big of a deal.... lol I don't really care either. Seriously, who talks to someone when they're not in the same match? That's what the text chat is for. A lot of these people seem to be over-reacting a bit, and need to stop focusing on an unimportant issue and focus on bugs and glitches and such. I guess you don't plan on playing seriously with a corp... Love it when people say "focus on the issues"... Well. Here is the issue. Right in this thread. I'm already in a corp called FoxHound dude. I was just stating my opinion.
Do your corp know that you don't care because its free? Because I wouldn't hire you.
|
Chaz Lewis
71
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 04:14:00 -
[288] - Quote
Umallon Macross wrote:Chaz Lewis wrote:J'Jor Da'Wg wrote:Chaz Lewis wrote:Arc Brimstone wrote:Is it just me or am I the only one who doesn't really care about this. It's a free game... We don't have to pay for the game up front, there's no monthly subscription. CCP has to make money somehow to support the game. If you don't want to shell out the less than $5 a month for voice support use skype or teamspeak or something. It's really not that big of a deal.... lol I don't really care either. Seriously, who talks to someone when they're not in the same match? That's what the text chat is for. A lot of these people seem to be over-reacting a bit, and need to stop focusing on an unimportant issue and focus on bugs and glitches and such. I guess you don't plan on playing seriously with a corp... Love it when people say "focus on the issues"... Well. Here is the issue. Right in this thread. I'm already in a corp called FoxHound dude. I was just stating my opinion. Do your corp know that you don't care because its free? Because I wouldn't hire you. No, I just don't think it's a game-breaking issue, that's all. |
Umallon Macross
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
281
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 04:20:00 -
[289] - Quote
Chaz Lewis wrote:
[*pyramid*]
No, I just don't think it's a game-breaking issue, that's all.
Thats because the real game hasnt started yet.
|
Longshot Ravenwood
Algintal Core Gallente Federation
680
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 04:45:00 -
[290] - Quote
CCP Frame wrote:Hello,
Just to clarify what UVT is supposed to enable and what you get for free:
UVT Gives you:
- Ability to voice chat in custom channels, DUST or EVE/DUST - Ability to voice chat in corporation channels, alliance channels, ect.
UVT is NOT required for:
- Team voice chat - Squad voice chat
Text chat is of course free everywhere. Players can speak / listen to one channel at a time.
Keep in mind that price is still subject to change during the beta period.
ICECREAMK1NG WARRIORS wrote:@ DEV Frame.
Sorry this is an excuse and a weak one at that.
Team chat........... Who cares, most of the time I don't want to talk to a load of random morons, or have to figure out how many I have to mute every game.
Squad chat........... Wow that huge 4man squad, well I have more than 3 friends and clan mates that I would like to group and play with. Even if we pay for this rip off chat so we can all talk we can't get in the same game let alone be on the same team.
I think instead of having an in house joke with MAG uniforms you have more important game breaking problems to worry about.
Team Chat -- Implies that you can listen to everyone on the team you're playing with. So if you join a CORP MATCH or an ALLIANCE MATCH you can hear everyone on your team from your corp/alliance while you're playing your match. Seems useful in my opinion.
There is NOTHING game breaking about this when there are additional options for communication outside of battle. Worst case scenario, you're less likely to get into a verbal ****ing match with someone resulting in a wardeck or the dissolution of your corp/alliance (which happens when people don't man the **** up and act like adults).
Also, this is BETA -- and after the beta ends all of our Aurum will be refunded. This is an opportunity to provide constructive feedback regarding how we feel about these kinds of things. Would I like to see a non-AUR version of this? Yeah, I would. Does it ruin my gaming experience if I don't? Not at all. |
|
Mo Gallas Gentralde
Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation
178
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 04:57:00 -
[291] - Quote
SKYPE VS UVT
When 50% of the involved parties use computers (everyone playing EVE), and the other 50% can use laptops etc...
looks like Skype wins.
What is the purpose of trying to sell VOIP service ingame when people can bypass it for FREE? |
Surtur Reaperson
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
49
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 06:47:00 -
[292] - Quote
Soory to interrupt the naught, just had to chime in real quick, did anyone saw this?
Dewie Cheecham wrote:mr merkzdem wrote:tin foil hats all round then huh crazy mofo lol Mofo? Guess it takes one to know one. No, in EVE it is never paranoia, because history have shown that they ARE really after you. I haven't laughed so hard in days, speaking of feeding stereotypes, are these guys for real? OH NOES THEI KAN TRAKS ME. Really the whole "EVE is serious business" its just so effin pathetic, So what if they can track you? So what if they go full anon on your ass, its a videogame. You may lose at the videogame but its not the end of the world as you know it, jesus, tin foil hat freaks.
Tl:dr: Tinfoils!
Now continue with the matter at hand.
... Crispy chicken! |
MrZIONY
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
38
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 10:09:00 -
[293] - Quote
comon guys lets keep pressing the UVT issue. A few people have suggested good alternatives for ccp to make their money from cosmetic upgrades or UVT at channel level only and not player level. A response to these suggestions from a dev would be nice. |
Sergeant Wiznowski
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
38
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 10:13:00 -
[294] - Quote
I am really more concerned about VC not being on by default. Usual number of people that know that you need to turn it on even to hear anyone about 2 to 4 per game max. You are welcome to scream no one can hear you.
From PS3 player perspective only in game comms matter much.
|
Buzzwords
Deadly Blue Dots RISE of LEGION
416
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 10:28:00 -
[295] - Quote
the existence of any kind of real money voice chat, COMBINED with the fact that even free voice chat is hidden behind default options that nobody seems to understand. (it was off by default in the last build, and is push to talk by default in this build. not to mention different channels for squad and team.) is a recipe for a massive shitstorm.
people will log in, try to talk to people, and get no response because they're not pushing to talk. or they are not opted in for voice chat, or even if they are nobody else is so all they hear back is silence... they will then wonder why voice chat "isn't working" they will see a real money item that has ANYTHING to do with voice chat, and they will flip a ****. instantly "knowing" that that was why their voice chat didn't work earlier.
if you don't believe me, think of how rare comms were in the last build. even LATE in the last build. that **** was out for how long? and MOST players either never plugged in a headset, or never figured out that they were "opted out" of voice chat by default.
the very PERCEPTION is dangerous here CCP. |
|
CCP Jian
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
9
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 12:03:00 -
[296] - Quote
Reminding again: there is completely FREE Team and Squad voice chat, completely FREE text chat for all channels, completely FREE in-game mail for all users - everything other console shooters have and more, for FREE... And, yes, of course, we are looking into additional options, offers, features, etc for UVT's.
Orin the Freak wrote:alright, well, my main draw for playing DUST was to chat with friends AND play a game. i don't see why you would want to charge for something every other console game gives for free. I understand your desire for funds, but this is not where to get them.
I mean, who is going to only want voice chat for a day? or 30 days for that matter? this is just a cheap, sleazy way to charge a (albeit small) monthly fee, and that is rather silly.
Honestly, I think I'll pass. not really worth the money. ever since WoW I have a thing against monthly fees. The only reason I played EVE for as long as I did was because I didn't have to pay for it every month.
Certainly one could argue "you don't HAVE to pay to play", but I would argue, with as many friends as I have, why WOULDN'T you want to talk to them?
besides, I suppose I could just use Teamspeak, and not play DUST.
Either way, I didn't support Microsoft because they come off as greedy, charging for online play and voice chat.
I refuse to support a company that sees greed as necessary for profit.
if you want to charge a monthly fee, charge a monthly fee, don't make the "game" free, then microtransaction the hell out of us.
Seriously though, if you just make universal voice comms free, and charged more for other things, I would be fine with that.
Voice comms, particularly alliance/corp UVC need to be free IMO. |
|
LT Dans Legs
Tritan-Industries Legacy Rising
72
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 12:20:00 -
[297] - Quote
Ya. Thats kinda lame. Id rather pay a monthly fee than pay to talk. Or just charge 60 bucks like everyone else for the game and thats that. |
MrZIONY
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
38
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 12:32:00 -
[298] - Quote
CCP Jian wrote:Reminding again: there is completely FREE Team and Squad voice chat, completely FREE text chat for all channels, completely FREE in-game mail for all users - everything other console shooters have and more, for FREE... And, yes, of course, we are looking into additional options, offers, features, etc for UVT's.
Yes but once the game goes live players who wants to be in serious corps/alliances will have to pay this or be of no use at all to their respective corp/alliance. Jian your reply also comes across as emotive, have we hit a nerve at CCP with this one especially after CCP had the same fiasco with EvE Voice and had to back down. The player are trying to tell you that we dont mind paying micro transactions for a whole host of things. Just not something that is vital to a corp/alliance based shooter where co-operation across planets and even entire sections of the EvEverse will be required.
Edit - Just to add CCP many of your players see this as nothing more than a money grab and putting "Free" in caps doesn't change that or the view that your game is quickly becoming pay to win. |
Natu Nobilis
51
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 12:45:00 -
[299] - Quote
Is this still going on?
And CCP PR Damagen Control II hasn-¦t kicked in yet?
CCP Jian mate, if you continue to adress the issue like this, it may actually make people more pissed off.
You are being rational pointing out that in absolute terms, your game provides everything others do, and a little more for free. Any rational mind would be ok with this.
The public however, is working on an emotional tone, they are looking in a relative perspective, so it doesn-¦t matter that i have X + 1 features for free compared to other games, they only read "I only have X% of the total 100% features for free, this sux, you sux, die in a fire, ragequit"
Also, they-¦re filled with cognitive distortions and either you carefully avoid this mental traps, or turn on the big F and let the fire burn (but right now, after the 2011 thing, and the whole tech bugs in the new build close to the joining of the larger audience, that-¦s not a good option).
Seriously, i-¦m playing and Following EVE since 2007, i know you guys do an excellent job, but your PR area is terrible in terms of response time, way of adressing the public and others.
Hire an organizational Psychologist or something. You folks are talking different things thatn the public, even on the same subject (UVT).
Best regards.
PS - In case you-¦re looking for a psychologist that already has plenty of knowledge of your game universe, I-¦m available for international realocation! |
Laurent Cazaderon
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
1155
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 13:23:00 -
[300] - Quote
i think you guys at CCP went the wrong way with those private chat AUR stuff.
Those things shouldnt be based on private chat participants but on private chat renters ! Offer people some sort of little mumble or TeamSpeak. People willing to pay a monthly fee for those things should then get to invite people they want based on standings and such.
Also, most of those rentals will be made by corp leaders and managers. And they will find out a way to get something back from their corp members through ISK corp tax just like in EVE. Also it s way easier to have five close friends co-rent one server and share the cost and allow multiple other people to connect on it than having 30 people willing to pay even a small amount of money.
Seriously, this paper deserves a F. It s neither practical nor very good looking in terms of F2P against P2W.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 14 15 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |