|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
Awry Barux
New Eden Blades Of The Azure Zero-Day
758
|
Posted - 2014.02.17 19:03:00 -
[1] - Quote
Time to reiterate one more time why I believe a respec is necessary:
I skilled in to the Min Logi for the hack speed bonus. I spent a lot of time thinking about this, and spent my SP on something I was absolutely sure I liked. I've never once used a repair tool in my entire mercenary career, and have 0 SP in them. If you had asked me six months ago "Would you skill in to a suit that gave a bonus to repair tools?", I would have said no, and I will still say no today. My opinion and desired playstyle hasn't changed, but the effects of my carefully considered choices has changed drastically.
That warrants a respec. |
Awry Barux
New Eden Blades Of The Azure Zero-Day
760
|
Posted - 2014.02.17 19:13:00 -
[2] - Quote
Asterion Cretos wrote:Joel II X wrote:Pretty dark in here. I've brought extra torches. You guys want some? You're welcome. On topic. I honestly don't see why we have to fight for this. A Dropsuit Command respec should have been an obvious "yes" given the changes involved.
Bendtner92 wrote:A Dropsuit Command respec will not suffice in this case. There has to be a full infantry respec.
If you for example want to switch from the Amarr Sentinel to Caldari Sentinel you no longer have any use for your armor skills, but will need shield skills instead. Thus there has to be a respec for Dropsuit Upgrades as well.
If you want to switch from Gallente Assault to Minmatar Assault and want to take full advantage of the suit bonus you no longer have any use of the Assault Rifle you skilled into, but will need the Combat Rifle instead. Thus there has to be a respec for Weaponry as well.
I can go on with reasons for a full infantry respec. The point is just that a Dropsuit Command respec won't be enough as different suits require entirely different SP investments. |
Awry Barux
New Eden Blades Of The Azure Zero-Day
765
|
Posted - 2014.02.17 19:32:00 -
[3] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:Those against a respec are patently insane. They have no valid argument against one.
I've made the argument in favor of a respec multiple times.
When Spkr agrees with the infantry community on something, you know there can really be no debate about it. Respecs are warranted. |
Awry Barux
New Eden Blades Of The Azure Zero-Day
775
|
Posted - 2014.02.17 21:13:00 -
[4] - Quote
Yeeeuuuupppp wrote:Dropsuit command respec. That's it. No need to respec anything else.
Care to respond to any of the several compelling arguments as to why that's not enough? |
Awry Barux
New Eden Blades Of The Azure Zero-Day
780
|
Posted - 2014.02.17 22:16:00 -
[5] - Quote
The Robot Devil wrote:Awry Barux wrote:Yeeeuuuupppp wrote:Dropsuit command respec. That's it. No need to respec anything else. Care to respond to any of the several compelling arguments as to why that's not enough? I will all day long. This is a fun topic to me. Ask away.
Refer to post #3 of this thread for the primary argument for upgrade and weapon respecs.
To add to it, what if I was a Min RPer who went Min Assault to wait for the Min Heavy? Light weapon skills, while not 100% useless, no longer fit my role. Similarly, an Amarr heavy who was waiting to go Amarr scout probably has millions tied up in heavy weapons that are unusable on the scout suit. Again, similarly, someone who went with their racial medium, say, Min Logi, to wait for the Min Heavy, probably has millions tied up in equipment skills that are literally unusable in a sentinel suit. I can come up with 1000s of similar examples, but you get the idea. Weapon and dropsuit upgrade skill choice are not separable from dropsuit command- everyone skills into them with their dropsuit in mind, and if dropsuit choices are changing, the other trees must be re-chosen as well. |
Awry Barux
New Eden Blades Of The Azure Zero-Day
789
|
Posted - 2014.02.17 23:23:00 -
[6] - Quote
D legendary hero wrote:Dropsuits and weapons respec is all that is needed.
Core upgrades are fine as is. If your a logi, and you made a mistake in equipment, you can just use points from your weaponry to get the level equipment you need.
the goal is to respec as little as possible. the dropsuit upgrade is obvious, i mean i have been a heavy since chromosome waiting for my minmatar heavy to drop.
weaponry because, all weapon stats are changing, and this will lead to more diversity in weapon choices. period.
in short. dropsuit skill tree and weapons skill tree only
What about switching from shields to armor, or armor to shields? Or into/out of EWAR skills? |
Awry Barux
New Eden Blades Of The Azure Zero-Day
803
|
Posted - 2014.02.18 01:45:00 -
[7] - Quote
Aikuchi Tomaru wrote:D legendary hero wrote:who the **** knew the bonuses for every dropsuit in the game was gonna change a year in advance? sir, if you have clear boyance i need your help with some stock investments The devs pointed that out some time ago. Also it's not about the bonus change, it's about the role of the dropsuits. Logistics will always be there for support. The only role they may lose with 1.8 is the slayer role. But why did you spec into logistics if you wanted an assault class to begin with?
No, the roles are not the same, and more roles than slayer were lost. I went Min Logi for a scouty/speed-hacker suit, designed to get in, plant uplinks, hack, and keep moving. I refer you to post #11:
Awry Barux wrote:Time to reiterate one more time why I believe a respec is necessary:
I skilled in to the Min Logi for the hack speed bonus. I spent a lot of time thinking about this, and spent my SP on something I was absolutely sure I liked. I've never once used a repair tool in my entire mercenary career, and have 0 SP in them. If you had asked me six months ago "Would you skill in to a suit that gave a bonus to repair tools?", I would have said no, and I will still say no today. My opinion and desired playstyle hasn't changed, but the effects of my carefully considered choices have changed drastically.
That warrants a respec.
|
Awry Barux
New Eden Blades Of The Azure Zero-Day
803
|
Posted - 2014.02.18 01:55:00 -
[8] - Quote
The Robot Devil wrote:D legendary hero wrote:so, you are encouraging people to leave this game? illustration1 if they changed the ingredients and its really bad then yes i will vomit that meal up. you can do that in any resturant, in the inner cities at least the more country you get.... thats besides the point. You can actually, order a different meal again if the one you originally wanted was not good. (you cant do that continuously or they will call the police). Same here. most of what people specced into changed fundamentally over the past 12 months. we have a right to a respect also illustration 2 still holds and is true in almost every college. College credits are the closest thing to SP in real life because they never disappear and accumulate with time, are transferable and you can pay real money for them Only the vehicles have fundamentally changed. The skill and bonuses for infantry have changed little to none and they were all balance issues that needed to be done.
As I just said to Aikuchi, that's not true. I refer you to post # 175:
Awry Barux wrote:No, the roles are not the same, and more roles than slayer were lost. I went Min Logi for a scouty/speed-hacker suit, designed to get in, plant uplinks, hack, and keep moving. I had zero reason to think that this suit would be made the designated heavy-follower. I refer you to post #11: Awry Barux wrote:Time to reiterate one more time why I believe a respec is necessary:
I skilled in to the Min Logi for the hack speed bonus. I spent a lot of time thinking about this, and spent my SP on something I was absolutely sure I liked. I've never once used a repair tool in my entire mercenary career, and have 0 SP in them. If you had asked me six months ago "Would you skill in to a suit that gave a bonus to repair tools?", I would have said no, and I will still say no today. My opinion and desired playstyle hasn't changed, but the effects of my carefully considered choices have changed drastically.
That warrants a respec.
The Min Logi bonus change (not the loss of armor reps, that's fine, I don't care about that) is a fundamental change in the suit's role, not a balance adjustment. |
Awry Barux
New Eden Blades Of The Azure Zero-Day
807
|
Posted - 2014.02.18 02:22:00 -
[9] - Quote
Aikuchi, I take your lack of response to my post (Post #175) to mean that you have no valid counter-argument. Please respond or admit that respecs are justified. |
Awry Barux
New Eden Blades Of The Azure Zero-Day
807
|
Posted - 2014.02.18 02:42:00 -
[10] - Quote
Aikuchi Tomaru wrote:Awry Barux wrote:Aikuchi, I take your lack of response to my post (Post #175) to mean that you have no valid counter-argument. Please respond or admit that respecs are justified. I see you haven't answered my question what you're doing with the SP you're getting since the suits were announced. That must mean you ave no valid counter-argument. Please respond or admit that respecs aren't justified.
Again, you're not responding my point. I'm saving my SP in case there isn't a respec, but that has nothing to do with whether or not respecs are warranted. Happy?
The Robot Devil wrote:Awry Barux wrote:Aikuchi, I take your lack of response to my post (Post #175) to mean that you have no valid counter-argument. Please respond or admit that respecs are justified. New Eden changes like baby diapers, don't expect to have the exact same tools even six from now. It is not justified just because you can't do what you want in a suit or feel that it is. Things change and so does this game, if you want static gears then this isn't the game for you.
It's not a matter of not having the same tools, it's a fundamental role shift for the suit. I picked a role and CCP is planning to rip that role out from under me with a bonus change. A hacking speed bonus and a repair tool bonus are completely different, and it has invalidated the choice I made months ago, before any of these changes were announced or hinted at. Forcing me to stick with a completely different dropsuit than the one I carefully selected is essentially wasting the weeks of SP I poured into said suit, or equivalently, making that amount of SP's worth of boosters disappear from my account.
It's one thing to make balance changes, I would happily accept any rebalancing, like a removal of the intrinsic armor repair. It's something else to fundamentally change where the suit fits in the larger game flow- what was once a suit meant for speedy equipment use is now meant to stick behind a heavy with a repair tool. I couldn't care less what the name or race of my suit is, but I picked a specific role, and I don't think it's unreasonable to ask that I should still be able to play that role in 1.8. CCP's failure to finalize roles is theirs to bear, not mine to suffer through. |
|
Awry Barux
New Eden Blades Of The Azure Zero-Day
807
|
Posted - 2014.02.18 02:53:00 -
[11] - Quote
Aikuchi Tomaru wrote:Awry Barux wrote:Aikuchi Tomaru wrote:Awry Barux wrote:Aikuchi, I take your lack of response to my post (Post #175) to mean that you have no valid counter-argument. Please respond or admit that respecs are justified. I see you haven't answered my question what you're doing with the SP you're getting since the suits were announced. That must mean you ave no valid counter-argument. Please respond or admit that respecs aren't justified. Again, you're not responding my point. I'm saving my SP in case there isn't a respec, but that has nothing to do with whether or not respecs are warranted. Happy? So basically you agree that a respec isn't necessary. Because it doesn't matter if a respec happens or not: You can use the suit you want to use.
Uh, no, I most emphatically do not agree that it isn't necessary. I don't have maxed anything on my character, even within a single role, so to me, every point of SP is valuable. I can't just casually save SP and play at maximum efficiency like the veterans. A portion of the SP I spent working towards my current role will have to be outright chalked up as waste. I shouldn't have to take a hit to my character development due to CCP's fundamental suit changes. I spent real money to accelerate my development and that money is wasted if the skills I bought with that booster SP no longer apply to my role. |
Awry Barux
New Eden Blades Of The Azure Zero-Day
808
|
Posted - 2014.02.18 03:11:00 -
[12] - Quote
Aikuchi Tomaru wrote: But here's the point: You respec now but sooner or later you get to the point where you could spec into another suit anyways. So it doesn't really matter. So you could also just wait a little longer to spec into the stuff you need now and instead you have the possibility to use a second suit.
It DOES matter when this game's major monetization route is items that increase the rate at which you gain SP. I paid good money to wait less, and by making me wait more by changing what skills I need to do what I want to do, CCP is essentially telling me that the money I spent earlier was a waste. Not just that, but that they deliberately made it a waste, by moving the goalposts after I kicked the ball and refusing to allow me to re-do the kick.
I won't quit if there's no respec, but you can be damned sure that I won't be spending another cent on the game. |
Awry Barux
New Eden Blades Of The Azure Zero-Day
811
|
Posted - 2014.02.18 03:38:00 -
[13] - Quote
The Robot Devil wrote:Awry Barux wrote:Aikuchi Tomaru wrote: But here's the point: You respec now but sooner or later you get to the point where you could spec into another suit anyways. So it doesn't really matter. So you could also just wait a little longer to spec into the stuff you need now and instead you have the possibility to use a second suit.
It DOES matter when this game's major monetization route is items that increase the rate at which you gain SP. I paid good money to wait less, and by making me wait more by changing what skills I need to do what I want to do, CCP is essentially telling me that the money I spent earlier was a waste. Not just that, but that they deliberately made it a waste, by moving the goalposts after I kicked the ball and refusing to allow me to re-do the kick. I won't quit if there's no respec, but you can be damned sure that I won't be spending another cent on the game. The booster part of the equation is where CCP stepped in it. You are correct and I empathize with you and if it weren't for that then I would take a more firm stance but you did pay money "to get there faster" like the War Barge lady says and therefore I am more apt to side with you. However, it is only for a total change like we think is going to happen, in any other situation I would tell you to suck it up.
*nod* and I'd be fine with sucking it up if it was something other than a complete overhaul of dropsuit roles. I think we've reached an agreement.
I think I've made my points sufficiently well, all there is to do now is play and save SP and see what CCP's next move is.
|
Awry Barux
New Eden Blades Of The Azure Zero-Day
818
|
Posted - 2014.02.18 04:33:00 -
[14] - Quote
lee corwood wrote:DUST Fiend wrote:Brian LaFleur wrote:DUST Fiend wrote:It's a video game, let people use their SP how they want in relation to all these new changes
I for one will just collect passive for a good long while if they deny us a full infantry respec.
Tons of nice games already out and soon to be out. Planetside 2, Destiny, I'm already playing Blacklight: Retribution & Warframe. I've put a LOT of money into Dust, but if giving us a full respec is a problem, !@(& CCP. I have a ps4. I've only put in a little over $100, which is still a lot for a free game. If I had money that could be wasted I would have spent much more. I for one am looking at ESO right now since my brother said he'll buy me a years time. I have no problem setting this down for a good long while, though I would definitely suggest different games to people, and explain to them why paying for DUST is a trap by design. If we get a respec, I'm setting this game down for a good long while. Since 1.7 dropped, I've just run silly suits and honestly hung in there for my corp. They are a great bunch of folks, but this topsy turvy game flip flopping changes every.single.fuking patch is getting too much to bear. I've been here about a year now...maybe longer, I honestly don't know how to tell, but since then all my local friends have left and I refuse to recruit a new player into this hot mess. Waiting for Destiny so hard.
I'm confused- why would a respec make you leave? IMO it's the best possible thing CCP can do to mitigate the pain of the Dust's constant state of flux. |
Awry Barux
New Eden Blades Of The Azure Zero-Day
825
|
Posted - 2014.02.18 06:30:00 -
[15] - Quote
Gawen Eadan wrote:My argument would be not if just the majority of the player base wanted it, but if the CPM agreed with the player base.
No matter how many reasons we come up with, for why there should be a respec (although many arguments in this thread are valid in themselves with little need for explanation, yet are also explained) we elected a CPM to be our voice of reason, no matter how delirious or drunk we got, it was a democratic decision, that we elected mayors that would stand beside the people, with an authority, and say "yes, or "no", to our developers, who you could say are like the president and his secretaries in this scenario.
Sure a president and the secretaries could say "no", even thought his people and their representatives say "yes", but isn't that the french revolution in a nutshell? Don't get me wrong "viva la revolution!" but, we elected to have a CPM to avoid this issue instead of having a "monarchy" that completely looses support of the majority of people, which proceeds to crumble and fall apart? Sure, we can't go cut off the CEO's head, but we can sure as hell ditch the game, and if you lose 51% of a player base, or more, you're not going to be able to sustain this game and its f2p+transaction method.
So cast your vote, contact your CPM of choice with your opinion (not just " 'cause I want it! " but include a short valid argument why) and let democracy work as design intended.
Actually, I don't think I was here when the CPM was elected (I started playing last June). No lack of respecialization without representation! |
Awry Barux
New Eden Blades Of The Azure Zero-Day
833
|
Posted - 2014.02.18 15:50:00 -
[16] - Quote
Lynn Beck wrote:Spectral Clone wrote:Also, one important fact is that few peeps actually spend money on SP boosters. This furter complicates motivating not giving a full infantry respec, due to the fact that CCP may lose out on a business opportunity if the player cant see the value in buying SP boosters when their builds may change for the better or worst with every patch.
Im not even going to post goodbye if I dont get my infantry SP refunded. Ill just be gone ;) So first you're for respecs, then you're against it. First you state it's simply good will, that the should do it to keep as much of this dwindling playerbase as possible, then you stare that they shouldn't because it's better for their pockets? I seem to have the other idea. If you keep shitting on your customers, demanding that they put up with what your changes to their decisions are, nobody with a budget would spend money to 'accelerate' their learning, because CCP will just curb stomp your decisions again and again. Less boosters, less money. However if people actually have a feeling of customer worth, that when sweeping changes come by they'll be given fair treatment, they'll spend more BOOSTERS to optimize the setups they ACTUALLY want to run,not the nostalgic 'ahh, this thing used to have bonuses to hacking/profile dampeneing/armor repair/taco efficacy, now it's a reload bonus for nova knives.'
I think you've misinterpreted Spectral's post- I think he's saying exactly what you're saying, and what I said earlier this thread. If the skills I bought with Boosted SP no longer apply to my desired role, it is as though the booster and the money I spent on it has been wasted, and what's more, has been deliberately made a waste through CCP's refusal to allow respecialization. |
Awry Barux
New Eden Blades Of The Azure Zero-Day
833
|
Posted - 2014.02.18 15:56:00 -
[17] - Quote
The Headless Horseman wrote:CCP said, NO MOR RESPECS! Can u read? JUST SAY NO to respecs/refunds. im happy with my choices. fk the new garbage man suits. Im OP. Nerf me. Ako heavy, packing Proto SCR :)
I'm happy with my current choices. In 1.8, the effects of my current choices are changing drastically. Read. The. Thread.
You're going to have to do better than "just say no" to convince me that we don't deserve a respec. Read the thread and actually respond to the many, many arguments in favor of a respec.
The very existence of this designated thread for the discussion of respecs demonstrates that CCP has not made a hard-and-fast decision about whether or not to give one. In fact, it says so in LogiBro's OP. "Can u read?" |
Awry Barux
New Eden Blades Of The Azure Zero-Day
845
|
Posted - 2014.02.18 19:02:00 -
[18] - Quote
D legendary hero, leave it alone man. The Robot Devil came down on our side for this one instance after a lengthy discussion, let's not pick fights when we all want the same thing from CCP in 1.8. Aikuchi stopped posting, he gave up because he got out-debated, don't provoke him again. We as a player base must be unified if we're going to get CCP to do right thing here. |
Awry Barux
New Eden Blades Of The Azure Zero-Day
849
|
Posted - 2014.02.18 21:14:00 -
[19] - Quote
NextDark Knight wrote:Just saying,, since they talked about changing the dropsuit specs, I have saved up 4m sp. I hope you all without self controll get rewarded. I will be opening all my AUR / Contact Refund petition the moment a respect is confirmed cause being stuck with 300 of them damn things is just stupid.
I've said this 1000 times before and I'll say it again: it is NOT the same thing for you proto-ed vets to save SP as it is for all of us <15mil plebes to save SP. You can perform your role at maximum efficiency while saving SP. For everyone else, we have to directly suffer in the short term (the short term being multiple months) in order to save for CCP's wild changes. So quit playing the holier-than-thou game. |
Awry Barux
New Eden Blades Of The Azure Zero-Day
850
|
Posted - 2014.02.18 21:19:00 -
[20] - Quote
The Robot Devil wrote:Awry Barux wrote:NextDark Knight wrote:Just saying,, since they talked about changing the dropsuit specs, I have saved up 4m sp. I hope you all without self controll get rewarded. I will be opening all my AUR / Contact Refund petition the moment a respect is confirmed cause being stuck with 300 of them damn things is just stupid. I've said this 1000 times before and I'll say it again: it is NOT the same thing for you proto-ed vets to save SP as it is for all of us <15mil plebes to save SP. You can perform your role at maximum efficiency while saving SP. For everyone else, we have to directly suffer in the short term (the short term being multiple months) in order to save for CCP's wild changes. I just broke 16M and it isn't that bad.
True, it's really not bad once you're above 10 mil, but my point stands. |
|
Awry Barux
New Eden Blades Of The Azure Zero-Day
867
|
Posted - 2014.02.19 03:41:00 -
[21] - Quote
John Demonsbane wrote:This is one of the few instances where the FOTM argument doesn't apply (I am big time proponent of that argument, btw... Those flaylock wielding cal logis can suck it...). Racial parity is the only legitimate reason for one.
Dropsuit skills should be refunded, no question.
Core upgrades, a decent argument could be made either way. IMO core skills are never really wasted, but whatever.
Weapons.... Hmm.. I'm not sure about weapons. I'm inclined to say no because it should wait until more racial weapons come out. Mostly I think that once the remaining heavy weapons come out, that's the right time. Each race has a pretty decent selection of light weapons right now and tbh they are not nearly the SP sink that dropsuit or core skills are.
Core skills can totally be wasted. Armor modules on my cal scout? No thanks. Proto nanohives for my sentinel? Also no. Shield modules for my Gal heavy? Again, wasted. |
Awry Barux
New Eden Blades Of The Azure Zero-Day
867
|
Posted - 2014.02.19 03:55:00 -
[22] - Quote
John Demonsbane wrote:Awry Barux wrote:John Demonsbane wrote:This is one of the few instances where the FOTM argument doesn't apply (I am big time proponent of that argument, btw... Those flaylock wielding cal logis can suck it...). Racial parity is the only legitimate reason for one.
Dropsuit skills should be refunded, no question.
Core upgrades, a decent argument could be made either way. IMO core skills are never really wasted, but whatever.
Weapons.... Hmm.. I'm not sure about weapons. I'm inclined to say no because it should wait until more racial weapons come out. Mostly I think that once the remaining heavy weapons come out, that's the right time. Each race has a pretty decent selection of light weapons right now and tbh they are not nearly the SP sink that dropsuit or core skills are. Core skills can totally be wasted. Armor modules on my cal scout? No thanks. Proto nanohives for my sentinel? Also no. Shield modules for my Gal heavy? Again, wasted. Huh? So if you run cal scouts and gal heavies you need both shields and and armor. (I know what you really mean) More seriously, are you really not going to use any armor modules at all on Caldari suits? Ever? Not even if they fix reactives/ferroscales?
Yeah, sure, eventually- but if the point is that we're re-doing our SP choices due to drastic changes in suit functionality, upgrades need to be re-chosen too. I can change my suit to a Cal suit, but if I'm a month away from having proto shield extenders (because what armor tanker would even touch that tree?), that's a brutal wait. The whole issue could be avoided by just giving a core upgrade respec. Also, my point about equipment stands. |
Awry Barux
New Eden Blades Of The Azure Zero-Day
867
|
Posted - 2014.02.19 04:02:00 -
[23] - Quote
The Robot Devil wrote:Awry Barux wrote:John Demonsbane wrote:Awry Barux wrote:John Demonsbane wrote:This is one of the few instances where the FOTM argument doesn't apply (I am big time proponent of that argument, btw... Those flaylock wielding cal logis can suck it...). Racial parity is the only legitimate reason for one.
Dropsuit skills should be refunded, no question.
Core upgrades, a decent argument could be made either way. IMO core skills are never really wasted, but whatever.
Weapons.... Hmm.. I'm not sure about weapons. I'm inclined to say no because it should wait until more racial weapons come out. Mostly I think that once the remaining heavy weapons come out, that's the right time. Each race has a pretty decent selection of light weapons right now and tbh they are not nearly the SP sink that dropsuit or core skills are. Core skills can totally be wasted. Armor modules on my cal scout? No thanks. Proto nanohives for my sentinel? Also no. Shield modules for my Gal heavy? Again, wasted. Huh? So if you run cal scouts and gal heavies you need both shields and and armor. (I know what you really mean) More seriously, are you really not going to use any armor modules at all on Caldari suits? Ever? Not even if they fix reactives/ferroscales? Yeah, sure, eventually- but if the point is that we're re-doing our SP choices due to drastic changes in suit functionality, upgrades need to be re-chosen too. I can change my suit to a Cal suit, but if I'm a month away from having proto shield extenders (because what armor tanker would even touch that tree?), that's a brutal wait. The whole issue could be avoided by just giving a core upgrade respec. Also, my point about equipment stands. I am a armor man but I still skilled all shields to five. I don't consider it a waste at all. I don't use them often but when I do it is nice to have.
Hmm. If I had done that, I would consider it a waste. Or, not a waste, but a huge opportunity cost- that SP could have gone other, more useful places, like electronics/engineering.
|
Awry Barux
New Eden Blades Of The Azure Zero-Day
867
|
Posted - 2014.02.19 04:35:00 -
[24] - Quote
TheAmazing FlyingPig wrote:Personally, I would love a full respec to leave the life of a tanker and join the ranks of logibro's come 1.8. I know it's probably not going to happen, but a man can dream, right?
Didn't you have a chance to do that when 1.7 dropped? |
Awry Barux
New Eden Blades Of The Azure Zero-Day
909
|
Posted - 2014.02.19 18:40:00 -
[25] - Quote
Marc Rime wrote:Komodo Jones wrote:why should someone have to be stuck with the amarr heavy if they want the gallente heavy? But they aren't stuck with it. Well, yes, they will have that skill, but having it doesn't prevent them from skilling into whatever they want today. People seem to be stuck in the mindset of games with a maximum level, where points in one skill meant they could never get some other skill. Komodo Jones wrote:And also because it really won't hurt the game that much, if people use their respec to skill into the "fit of the month" it will only be good for a month, or until the next update, really not that big of a deal Yeah, because surely noone will requestdemand respecs next time something is added or changed. Especially not if there is one now. Komodo Jones wrote:some people may want to trim some fat or change into a playstyle that suits them better, what's wrong with that? With a constant influx of SP, nothing prevents anyone from changing their playstyle as it is. Also, hanging on to your old skills means that when you grow tired of the new stuff, or it gets nerfed, you have something to fall back to.
Awry Barux wrote: It DOES matter when this game's major monetization route is items that increase the rate at which you gain SP. I paid good money to wait less, and by making me wait more by changing what skills I need to do what I want to do, CCP is essentially telling me that the money I spent earlier was a waste. Not just that, but that they deliberately made it a waste, by moving the goalposts after I kicked the ball and refusing to allow me to re-do the kick.
I won't quit if there's no respec, but you can be damned sure that I won't be spending another cent on the game.
|
Awry Barux
New Eden Blades Of The Azure Zero-Day
909
|
Posted - 2014.02.19 19:24:00 -
[26] - Quote
Marc Rime wrote:Awry Barux wrote: It DOES matter when this game's major monetization route is items that increase the rate at which you gain SP. I paid good money to wait less, and by making me wait more by changing what skills I need to do what I want to do, CCP is essentially telling me that the money I spent earlier was a waste. Not just that, but that they deliberately made it a waste, by moving the goalposts after I kicked the ball and refusing to allow me to re-do the kick.
I guess that's where we differ. I don't consider points dumped into skills I no longer use wasted. Back when I bought the skill, I apparently wanted it, and I may want to use it again in the future. Furthermore, I don't find it the least surprising that they change things, in fact, I've picked my skills based on the presumption that things are going to change.
There's a difference between balance changes and what's going on in 1.8. I direct you to my post on page 1:
Awry Barux wrote: I skilled in to the Min Logi for the hack speed bonus. I spent a lot of time thinking about this, and spent my SP on something I was absolutely sure I liked. I've never once used a repair tool in my entire mercenary career, and have 0 SP in them. If you had asked me six months ago "Would you skill in to a suit that gave a bonus to repair tools?", I would have said no, and I will still say no today. My opinion and desired playstyle hasn't changed, but the effects of my carefully considered choices have changed drastically.
That warrants a respec.
|
Awry Barux
New Eden Blades Of The Azure Zero-Day
919
|
Posted - 2014.02.19 22:18:00 -
[27] - Quote
Marc Rime wrote:Awry Barux wrote:There's a difference between balance changes and what's going on in 1.8. I direct you to my post on page 1: Awry Barux wrote: I skilled in to the Min Logi for the hack speed bonus. I spent a lot of time thinking about this, and spent my SP on something I was absolutely sure I liked. I've never once used a repair tool in my entire mercenary career, and have 0 SP in them. If you had asked me six months ago "Would you skill in to a suit that gave a bonus to repair tools?", I would have said no, and I will still say no today. My opinion and desired playstyle hasn't changed, but the effects of my carefully considered choices have changed drastically.
That warrants a respec.
I see your point. In your situation I too might argue for a respec. The vast majority of the players wanting a respec, however, have no better claim than "because I want it" (whatever they say), and since I doubt it'd be possible for CCP to give out individual respecs I'll maintain my position that there shouldn't be any.
I don't accept that reasoning for maintaining your position, though it is certainly a common train of thought. It's like cutting welfare programs because a few people abuse the system when they don't need it. While some may not need it, many others genuinely do, and in my opinion it's far better to absorb the hit from those who would abuse the system than to leave those who genuinely need it out in the cold. Especially as in this case, when there are no major costs of providing the desired service, I see no reason to deny the request. We know a respecialization system exists, it's simply a matter of CCP deciding whether or not to hit the button. |
Awry Barux
New Eden Blades Of The Azure Zero-Day
924
|
Posted - 2014.02.20 01:16:00 -
[28] - Quote
Marc Rime wrote:Sam Tektzby wrote: Reason why thread is here is just one (actually aprox hundred in general discusion) and that reason is great wave of threads in general discussion. After aprox twenty pages we did not have any responce by devs. And thats reason why im really dissapointed (and trust me its not first time here and im not the only one).
Pretty sure the purpose of this thread was to get rid of all the spam in general discussion. It's possible someone at CCP reads it eventually, though I wouldn't count on it. ;)
At least by forcing LogiBro to give us a specific thread for it, we've made it clear that we're going to be a huge nuisance about this respec thing- this is one issue in Dust's development that the community is not going to let slide. I'll stick with Dust through bugs, broken balance, lack of content, stale game modes, and wild suit functionality changes, heck, I'll even defend it from naysayers, but the one thing that will incite my rage is if they destroy my playstyle without giving me an option to choose a new one.
Give me respecs or give me... I don't know. Just do the first thing. |
Awry Barux
New Eden Blades Of The Azure Zero-Day
925
|
Posted - 2014.02.20 01:41:00 -
[29] - Quote
NextDark Knight wrote:Awry Barux wrote:NextDark Knight wrote:Just saying,, since they talked about changing the dropsuit specs, I have saved up 4m sp. I hope you all without self controll get rewarded. I will be opening all my AUR / Contact Refund petition the moment a respect is confirmed cause being stuck with 300 of them damn things is just stupid. I've said this 1000 times before and I'll say it again: it is NOT the same thing for you proto-ed vets to save SP as it is for all of us <15mil plebes to save SP...... CCP or anyone in my corp can confirm I have no points in any proto suits or major vehicle skills. My 6m SP alt does have a proto suit but I hardly use him unless I want to have a good time with laser rifles. When I play him he doe rack up a good 2,000 plus warpoints so skillpoints aren't everything.
I know they're not everything, but they're definitely something, since they are the main form of progression in Dust as well as the primary monetization route (boosters). What you've said does nothing to mitigate the fact that 1.8 should include a full infantry respec due to massive changes in suit functionality. |
Awry Barux
New Eden Blades Of The Azure Zero-Day
927
|
Posted - 2014.02.20 02:01:00 -
[30] - Quote
Scheneighnay McBob wrote:My .02 ISK:
Only dropsuit fitting skills (dropsuit command and the skills branching from it) need to be refunded, because their entire functions are changing. Weapons, even with nerfs and buffs, still function the same way as they did before, so they should NOT be refunded.
It's not a matter of nerfs and buffs, it's a matter of achieving weapon-suit synergy. |
|
Awry Barux
New Eden Blades Of The Azure Zero-Day
937
|
Posted - 2014.02.20 06:36:00 -
[31] - Quote
Spectral Clone wrote:Its a won argument for respecs. Noone is motivating why a respec is bad, other than with comments regarding 'live with your choice', HTFU, or some new eden BS that doesn't make sense because we are playing dust on the same server cluster as EVE, but we do not play in the same universe yet. Hence beta. Hence respec.
Yup. The community has spoken quite clearly. At this point, I can think of only one reason why we wouldn't see a full respec in 1.8: the marketing team thinks they can absorb the good-will hit and still sell more boosters without one.
Take note, CCP employees reading this: That is not the case. The backlash will be large. Do the right thing here by providing a full infantry respec, and you'll inject quite a bit of life into the game. It's a matter of keeping the players who are on the fence about whether or not to abandon Dust- you need to hold their interest while you work on additional content. I wouldn't be surprised if a respec, combined with 1.8's new content, earns you a six-month high player count record. This is a win-win for the community and CCP. |
Awry Barux
New Eden Blades Of The Azure Zero-Day
951
|
Posted - 2014.02.20 18:57:00 -
[32] - Quote
Salt Dog 76 wrote:Alldin Kan wrote:NK Scout wrote:Because you have 30 mil sp Like it or not we are getting one And I already have proto Even this much SP isn't enough for me to go on other suits that I want: Cloak Scout with PRO knives Caldari Assault with PRO combat Rifle Minmatar Assault with shotgun/SMG Minmatar Logi for team support + Chromosome nostalgia It truly is going to be sad to see CCP lower themselves further to accept unnecessary demands by its playerbase that doesn't play this game properly and have no sense of progression. If anything, players should be asking when is Player Market coming (crucial aspect of game missing for too long). AMEN KAIN you are so right. SAVE up your SP like hundreds of us Vets do b4 every update. Crap how many weapons, vehicles, BPO's, Officer weapons, exc... do most of us have and will never use. Hell i have 123 Thales, Im a fricken hvy and hate all red dot (or line) snipers and will never use them. Give us our market to trade and/or sell these thousands of items, it will give everyone extra Iskies or Aurum in some cases, to use better gear which in turn will make payouts in game better its a win win. Why souldn't we be able to cash in our extra BPO's for some extra Aurum we dont need all these duplicate's, CCP GIVE US A MARKET please with a cherry on top.
God I can't believe I have to trot this argument out again. You would think it would be obvious... would you save your SP if you hadn't yet unlocked advanced suits or weapons, or your proto gear? Not everyone is a beta vet.
Awry Barux wrote: I've said this 1000 times before and I'll say it again: it is NOT the same thing for you proto-ed vets to save SP as it is for all of us <15mil plebes to save SP. You can perform your role at maximum efficiency while saving SP. For everyone else, we have to directly suffer in the short term (the short term being multiple months) in order to save for CCP's wild changes. So quit playing the holier-than-thou game.
|
Awry Barux
New Eden Blades Of The Azure Zero-Day
953
|
Posted - 2014.02.20 19:22:00 -
[33] - Quote
The Robot Devil wrote:ESO? I am not getting it, sorry.
Elder Scrolls Online |
Awry Barux
New Eden Blades Of The Azure Zero-Day
953
|
Posted - 2014.02.20 19:27:00 -
[34] - Quote
The Robot Devil wrote:I totally forgot about that one. Thanks. Skyrim made me so mad I said I would never play a Bethesna game again. They took my money and knowingly handed me a complete piece of crap. I knew the game would be buggy but never imagined it to be that bad. So I seriously doubt I will mess with it.
Yeah I agree entirely, I'm a Morrowind purist. Any Elder Scrolls game after that cannot possibly live up to Morrowind's legacy. |
Awry Barux
New Eden Blades Of The Azure Zero-Day
961
|
Posted - 2014.02.20 21:49:00 -
[35] - Quote
*waves at CCP* hey you all the way over there! A simple "we've read your opinions and have communicated them to the dev team" would be nice. Just that one sentence, please, Logibro? |
Awry Barux
New Eden Blades Of The Azure Zero-Day
971
|
Posted - 2014.02.20 23:04:00 -
[36] - Quote
Tallen Ellecon wrote:Let's have a respec every time something changes. That way us vets can do whatever they want without worrying about SP grind, new players benefit little, and decisions mean nothing. It will do wonders for balance because everyone will flock to the most OP thing every time there is an update so it can be immediately nerfed. We are also totally entitled to one because we shouldn't be responsible for our decisions or having the forethought to realize in a game evolving as fast as this one things might change.
Also a game that gives me free passive SP should allow me to be entitled to dictate what is done with it. Screw those guys in EVE who have to pay for theirs, have to update it every 24 hours and still don't get repecs (or SP refunds.... semantics) every time things change or are added.
*yawn* I can't believe I'm reposting my words from page 1 for the 4th time this thread. I made good decisions, which are about to become bad decisions in 1.8, through no fault of my own.
Awry Barux wrote:Time to reiterate one more time why I believe a respec is necessary:
I skilled in to the Min Logi for the hack speed bonus. I spent a lot of time thinking about this, and spent my SP on something I was absolutely sure I liked. I've never once used a repair tool in my entire mercenary career, and have 0 SP in them. If you had asked me six months ago "Would you skill in to a suit that gave a bonus to repair tools?", I would have said no, and I will still say no today. My opinion and desired playstyle hasn't changed, but the effects of my carefully considered choices have changed drastically.
That warrants a respec.
As for the "You get unlimited SP" argument, had you read the thread, you would know I've already answered that:
Awry Barux wrote: It DOES matter when this game's major monetization route is items that increase the rate at which you gain SP. I paid good money to wait less, and by making me wait more by changing what skills I need to do what I want to do, CCP is essentially telling me that the money I spent earlier was a waste. Not just that, but that they deliberately made it a waste, by moving the goalposts after I kicked the ball and refusing to allow me to re-do the kick.
I won't quit if there's no respec, but you can be damned sure that I won't be spending another cent on the game.
|
Awry Barux
New Eden Blades Of The Azure Zero-Day
971
|
Posted - 2014.02.20 23:07:00 -
[37] - Quote
echo47 wrote:No respec.
With the SP events advanced notice of changes we have all had plenty of time to save up skill points.
Ohhh my god let's play a game called "how many times can I repost answers to arguments I've already dealt with?"
Awry Barux wrote: I've said this 1000 times before and I'll say it again: it is NOT the same thing for you proto-ed vets to save SP as it is for all of us <15mil plebes to save SP. You can perform your role at maximum efficiency while saving SP. For everyone else, we have to directly suffer in the short term (the short term being multiple months) in order to save for CCP's wild changes. So quit playing the holier-than-thou game.
|
Awry Barux
New Eden Blades Of The Azure Zero-Day
975
|
Posted - 2014.02.20 23:29:00 -
[38] - Quote
LT SHANKS wrote:A respec seems necessary.
My role as a MinLogi is to rush to objectives, lay out uplinks, hack with the speed of one-thousand crack addicts, and dart off into the sunset, leaving all behind me.
I will not be able to do that anymore.
I specced into exactly the same role, which is why I'm being such a raging pain about the respec issue. Haven't once used a repair tool, it's the only boring part of Dust. |
Awry Barux
New Eden Blades Of The Azure Zero-Day
976
|
Posted - 2014.02.20 23:47:00 -
[39] - Quote
Godin Thekiller wrote:lol, it's going to happen.
I'll believe it when I see an official statement to that effect. Until then, I'm going to moan and whine and complain and make noise every single day. |
Awry Barux
New Eden Blades Of The Azure Zero-Day
977
|
Posted - 2014.02.21 00:07:00 -
[40] - Quote
Sam Tektzby wrote:Awry Barux wrote:Godin Thekiller wrote:lol, it's going to happen. I'll believe it when I see an official statement to that effect. Until then, I'm going to moan and whine and complain and make noise every single day. Its not a whining, they told its full release with all that POMPOUS celebration and now they have BACKSLASH for their faults. Its easy if its beta, name it beta. If its a full release, they should give COMMUNITY a chance to RESPEc after their IMPLEMENTS or CHANGES. Its only logical way, COMMUNITY needs equal GAME needs. Without US like community, there is no GAME.
I know, I know, I'm being facetious at everyone saying they're tired of hearing about it. |
|
Awry Barux
New Eden Blades Of The Azure Zero-Day
978
|
Posted - 2014.02.21 00:20:00 -
[41] - Quote
Tallen Ellecon wrote:Again, changes will happen, things will be added, respecs have only been issued for skill tree changes. Your stuff is changing......... but you're still using it now, why should you get a refund for something you've used? We all take the same risk, just learn to expect things to change.
There's a difference between balance changes, for which I would not expect a respec, and complete infantry overhauls. If, for example, they were simply removing logis' intrinsic reps, I would not expect a respec at all. However, 1.8 is going to kill my current playstyle and stick me with a suit meant to perform literally the opposite role. I was an uplink-dropping speed hacker with great mobility, a sort of scout-logi hybrid. In 1.8 I'm going to be the designated suit to sit behind a heavy with a rep tool. There was no possible way for me to predict or expect such an incredibly drastic change, and it's crap for you to tell me to "expect it".
Such a colossal change to the functions of skills is no less major than a rework of the skill tree structure, as happened with vehicles in 1.7.
The point of a persistent, permanent skill system is for your earlier choices to matter as you work towards your eventual goal. The changes in 1.8 will effectively make a large portion of my SP no longer relevant to the goal I've been working towards for more than 6 months. I should receive a refund because SP isn't meant for things that you use for a bit, then abandon- it's about making permanent choices about character development, choices which are made invalid when roles get outright swapped during subsequent patches. |
Awry Barux
New Eden Blades Of The Azure Zero-Day
979
|
Posted - 2014.02.21 01:19:00 -
[42] - Quote
Tallen Ellecon wrote:
That's why instead of speccing into a bunch of suits or a bunch of weapons I specced into core skills. Gear changes only affect a small portion of my total SP and anything new only takes about a month or two worth of grinding to be another top notch suit. I've started saving since they announced the new suits in January and I have over 5 mil SP. Can no one else do that? My **** got changed, it'll still work, I've still used it, why should I be entitled to reallocate all my infantry SP because they are changing the bonuses? The bonuses aren't why the Gal and Cal Logi have been the go to suits for try hards, it's the slot layout and base stats, these changes barely even touch that.
It's not about how big the change is, it's about the fundamental fact that they don't give respecs unless they have to, and that means skill tree reworks. These changes have all happened, added content, changed bonuses, changed slot layouts, and those didn't warrant respecs. Don't get me wrong though I understand why people want them and people aren't necessarily trying to jump onto FOTM, and a respec wouldn't be totally unwelcome by me, if it were the last, but this forum culture of "respecs should be a regular mechanic" and the reasoning behind it go against the way New Eden works. I mean FFS EVE characters can't respec at all, and they have to pay for every damn account. People here can create a dozen PSNs to make characters to spec into what they see fit or have backups in case, heavens forbid, CCP changes something.
Don't spite the rest of the player base just because you've got a bone to pick with some tryharding slayer logis.
It completely does matter how big the change is. I'm not asking for "respecs as a regular mechanic", I'm asking for this ONE respec in an exceptional case of extreme changes. I didn't spec into "a bunch of suits", I got ONE suit. My suit will quite simply NOT WORK in 1.8 for the purpose I explicitly selected it for. So you happened to pick things that still do what you wanted them to in 1.8, that's great for you, but some of us didn't. All this crap being spouted about "HTFU decisions are permanent in New Eden" means absolutely nothing when the meaning of my carefully thought-out decision changes radically. If you had asked me six months ago, "Would you, now or ever, spec into a suit that gave repair bonuses?", my answer would and will be a resounding NO. I picked my suit very, very carefully, and now it has become the opposite of what I selected, through no fault of my own.
I see no reason why I should have to spend another few months of grinding worth of SP to get a new suit and going all the way back to skilling up the basic frame when I already had the only suit I wanted. I spent cash on boosters to wait less- by forcing me to grind more to get what I originally wanted, and have always wanted, CCP is telling me that they reserve the right to deliberately turn my cash expenditure into a waste as they please. They do have that right, but they don't have to exercise it like this, and by doing so, they will alienate me, my wallet, and likely a large portion of their player base.
Tallen Ellecon wrote: You can't put cream cheese on a donut, they are two totally different things, and no bonus changes a suit so much that it's totally different. Unfair is the name of the game we all take the risk, it's a rough world HTFU.
The change for the Min Logi from a hack bonus to a repair bonus DOES change the suit so much that it's totally different. FFS. In this one case, CCP has a real chance to make it fair, to make it so that some people who happened to pick things that are changing completely don't get completely shafted, to appropriately compensate us for sticking with them through all the balance failures. This is more like buying a donut, getting a donut, getting halfway through eating it and enjoying it immensely, then having the donut shop magically transmogrify it into a stale bagel just as you go to take another bite. They did it deliberately and I have the right to at the very least ask the manager for the other half of my delicious donut.
It would be one thing to tell me to expect such changes and go with core skills if the game were still in beta, but technically, it's not. I had every reason to expect role stability- not numerical or balance stability, but role stability: the idea that the battlefield niche that my suit theoretically filled would remain reasonably constant. It makes no sense for the most mobile, lightly armored logistics suit to become the one that is effectively chained to a heavy. That is a colossal role change.
CCP is devastating my playstyle and I don't think it's too much to ask to be allowed to preserve my playstyle by re-doing my SP. No, I will not just "HTFU", at least not quietly. |
Awry Barux
New Eden Blades Of The Azure Zero-Day
981
|
Posted - 2014.02.21 02:05:00 -
[43] - Quote
Sneaky Fletcher wrote: *EDIT.- not to get your panties in a bunch, thou. am just guessing that tallen is only here to collect the tears I mean cuz damn man you be hatin real hard on this SP refund thingamajig
I have no tears, only the blinding and all-consuming fire of internet rage. |
Awry Barux
New Eden Blades Of The Azure Zero-Day
1016
|
Posted - 2014.02.22 03:06:00 -
[44] - Quote
Vordred Knight wrote:N1ck Comeau wrote:Basically confirmed. ^ This
Not confirmed enough. |
Awry Barux
New Eden Blades Of The Azure Zero-Day
1019
|
Posted - 2014.02.22 04:36:00 -
[45] - Quote
Scout Registry wrote:Chase FoTM. Keep FoTM.
Not in favor of respec.
- 32 million SP (some in bad places, but I own my decisions)
Time to address the FoTM argument for the millionth time. *yawn* Vets are sitting on millions of unallocated SP, completely ready to jump on the 1.8 FoTM train whether there's a respec or not. There's no way to stop that. FoTM is inevitable. The only players hurt by a lack of a respec are those who are still in the middle of skilling their first role, i.e. those with <10-15mil SP, who are going to have a comparatively huge portion of their SP tied up in suits, upgrades, and weapons that will be obsolete when the powerful new content is introduced. A respec can only help even the playing field.
Also, I know that I, and many other players, want particular suits and playstyles regardless of whether or not they turn out to be FoTM. A respec will allow us to preserve our battlefield roles despite 1.8's complete role overhaul (i.e. min logi going from speed hacker / scout-logi to the designated heavy humper). |
Awry Barux
New Eden Blades Of The Azure Zero-Day
1020
|
Posted - 2014.02.22 06:43:00 -
[46] - Quote
Sgt Buttscratch wrote:I disagree with the idea of a respec/refund totally rude to those who have played a scout or commando for the last x amount of bullshit months.
And the logis.....looool, their tears are epic, Keep em!!! You changed the stats...qq, well sorry guys you've had months of being everything but logis.
IDGAF about the balance changes. My scouty hacker logi is being turned into the designated heavy humper. Sticking me with a massive role shift like that seems pretty "rude" too. |
Awry Barux
New Eden Blades Of The Azure Zero-Day
1027
|
Posted - 2014.02.22 18:49:00 -
[47] - Quote
Aikuchi Tomaru wrote:Ryme Intrinseca wrote:Just confirm the respec CCP.
You know there is an overwhelming case in favour, given that you are changing how pretty much every combination of suit, weapons, and upgrades works. Sometimes even the playstyle is changing fundamentally, as with the minlogi.
You can also see that there is a massive majority in favour, and that you'll lose a lot of players if you don't do it. After the vehicle-only respec and months of invincible tanks, no infantry respec really would the last straw for a lot of infantry. What they see is a loud minority. In a poll which was hold not too long ago barely anybody cared about respecs.
The entire forums is only a loud minority, as is the subset of people who would take the time to fill out a poll on Dust. The fact is, players from every segment of the game's population have come out to support respecs, and that is as close to a majority mandate as we can come.
As for the players who don't care enough to ever read the forums, I can't imagine any of them would be disappointed to log in after 1.8 to discover that the role overhaul and introduction of racial parity for suits came with a full infantry respec. |
Awry Barux
New Eden Blades Of The Azure Zero-Day
1028
|
Posted - 2014.02.22 19:33:00 -
[48] - Quote
The Robot Devil wrote:Awry Barux wrote:Aikuchi Tomaru wrote:Ryme Intrinseca wrote:Just confirm the respec CCP.
You know there is an overwhelming case in favour, given that you are changing how pretty much every combination of suit, weapons, and upgrades works. Sometimes even the playstyle is changing fundamentally, as with the minlogi.
You can also see that there is a massive majority in favour, and that you'll lose a lot of players if you don't do it. After the vehicle-only respec and months of invincible tanks, no infantry respec really would the last straw for a lot of infantry. What they see is a loud minority. In a poll which was hold not too long ago barely anybody cared about respecs. The entire forums is only a loud minority, as is the subset of people who would take the time to fill out a poll on Dust. The fact is, players from every segment of the game's population have come out to support respecs, and that is as close to a majority mandate as we can come. As for the players who don't care enough to ever read the forums, I can't imagine any of them would be disappointed to log in after 1.8 to discover that the role overhaul and introduction of racial parity for suits came with a full infantry respec. Of course they do and it is because every other game does it in one shape or another. No other game I am aware of does their universe like New Eden and people can't handle it. They want what they want and they want to change it when they want and New Eden doesn't always work that way. "The entire forums is only a loud minority, as is the subset of people who would take the time to fill out a poll on Dust. The fact is, players from every segment of the game's population have come out to support respecs, and that is as close to a majority mandate as we can come." A loud minority shouldn't rule, ever. The owner, best qualified, duly elected or a representative of majority should dictate what should happen. Democracies fail like communism, it looks good on paper and it works for a while but once the entity hits a certain age or population it fail cascades back to its roots or dies all together. Letting the players totally dictate this game is the worst mistake CCP could make. 10 years of EVE didn't come from players dictating game development, it came from players interacting with the developers.
I didn't mean that a majority in favor should actually be the deciding factor- I was simply responding to Aikuchi's statement that almost no one cared about respecs. What should matter is the logical arguments on each side, and in this case I feel that the players have advanced a sufficient number of reasonable arguments that, assuming this is a conversation between the players and developers and not just a one-sided open letter, a respec should be granted.
|
Awry Barux
Ametat Security Amarr Empire
1028
|
Posted - 2014.02.22 20:11:00 -
[49] - Quote
Rinzler XVIII wrote:The Robot Devil wrote:Spectral Clone wrote:The Robot Devil wrote:snip I completely agree with you Robot, but the game was released too early and has too little content for this to be true IMO. If you didnt have any choices but one, how can you "live with your choices"? Im gonna compare this whole debate with buying a high end cell phone, it might not be exactly what you want in 3 years time (you-¦re looking for that extremely cool new cell phone with all those cool features). The difference between this example and Dust 514 SP is that the developers of the cell phone did not go in and downgrade your screen from 5" to 2", 64x48 pixel resolution instead of 720p and at the same time switching out the Cortex based microcontroller with a ****** 8 bit PIC MCU. You, who work with electronics, should understand this example clearly. Myself, I have a MSc Eng in ICT with specialization towards digital signal processing. I work with underground navigation systems. If you want to get down to release we could argue that the weapons and suits are released in some type of lore way. I am not huge into lore so please forgive my blatant ignorance. Lets say we are the first few versions of clones and if the Amarr were the first to have this tech then they released the heavy suit, the other races developed suits to try to counter the heavy and that is why we only have a handful of tech and some have suits missing. They can make up any kind of lore they want as long as it goes with the main narrative. These new suits are the next generation of clone equipment and have new and different skill sets and attributes because the engineers of New Eden has seen the need for these suits in the past year. Now that my BS is out of the way. I agree with a SP refund IF ALL THE SUITS are released at once or the skill is removed. If they are released or rebalanced one at a time then I don't think a refund is needed. A slow trickle and gradual change isn't that big of a deal but if they are going to change the entire bonus set and racial line up on one patch then they should give us the SP. It isn't fair that players wanted to play a race and couldn't but you know me, life isn't fair. I just come to this thread to make people type because the amount of passion or the lack of thought amazes me. Don't get me wrong passion is good but we have to weed out passion from lack of thought. CCP reads all this splork and they will do what they want because it is their game. I really don't care if they give a refund or not, I just like arguing for NO RESPEC. It makes me smile. I like causing instantaneous, uncontrollable outbursts of emotion. My friends either call me a pimp or the devil. I was called out by a palm reader in the middle of a Russian bizarre for being the devil when I was like 15 and was doing an exchange student kind of thing. Reported For Trolling
He's playing the role of devil's advocate, and playing it well. It's useful- he's helped refine the arguments as to why a respec is warranted. If CCP just saw a bunch of blathering on here, it likely wouldn't sway their opinion. But if CCP sees their internal arguments against one advanced by a forum member and then responded to in a logical, reasonable way, we may actually get what we want and deserve.
Unwad thy panties. |
Awry Barux
Ametat Security Amarr Empire
1040
|
Posted - 2014.02.23 19:05:00 -
[50] - Quote
Brian LaFleur wrote:Ghost Steps wrote:i think we whould get 1 last respec (being warned that is the last). Also the respec option with aur is a good idea 4 days to come as it is a name change (is not like u cant get an identity change in the EVE univers blackmarket ) and personalization features like those on eve, these r good ways to get incomes on free to play games. Why only one? What if they pull another across the board stat switch? Respects should be mandated whenever any changes to the meta are made. We cannot make informed decisions in how we place our sp when they are playing musical stats.
Heh that's a great turn of phrase. "Musical stats" I'm going to remember that one. |
|
Awry Barux
Ametat Security Amarr Empire
1168
|
Posted - 2014.02.26 21:19:00 -
[51] - Quote
Zatara Rought wrote:Tallen Ellecon wrote:Zatara Rought wrote:Just here to say as a humble member of the community I am against respecs, but FOR a respec in 1.8 and anytime our invested choices are dramatically altered. I used to have that stance, but that would mean a respec every 6 months to year, and it's not really anti respec anymore. No exception unless they alter the tree itself. We all take the same risk. i mean you kinda read into "dramatically altered" a little incorrectly. I would agree unless they absolutely transform ****... not like hacking going from a 5% bonus to a 3% per level. or scanner being rebalanced or weapons being tweaked just when **** is completely transformed.
^ this. My poor min logi |
Awry Barux
Ametat Security Amarr Empire
1477
|
Posted - 2014.03.07 15:44:00 -
[52] - Quote
At this point all I really ******* want is an announcement one way or the ******* other. It's a simple executive decision, and it seems absolutely disrespectful to keep us in the dark like this.
Respec in 1.8 due to huge battlefield role shift for MinLogi!
All my posts are respec posts (Gò»°Gûí°n+ëGò»n+¦ Gö+GöüGö+ LockmeBro!
|
|
|
|