Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 178 post(s) |
One Eyed King
Land of the BIind
4177
|
Posted - 2014.09.17 20:11:00 -
[22051] - Quote
Spademan wrote:One Eyed King wrote:Spademan wrote:So how's this going? I'm going to check it out later, see how good it is. F*ck yes! Now if only I had more time to play games... Good thing winter is around the corner. So I played about 4 games today. First 3 were ambushes, all completely one sided. Looked like match making was worse than before. But then I did a domination and got a great match. Absolutely superb. Maken did created a good post that suggested it was much improved over 10 matches or so.
Rattati also posted about contacting them in certain instances where it was still one sided so they could see what the deal was.
You can always tell a Millford Minja
|
Spademan
Fatal Absolution General Tso's Alliance
3631
|
Posted - 2014.09.17 20:14:00 -
[22052] - Quote
One Eyed King wrote:Spademan wrote:One Eyed King wrote:Spademan wrote:So how's this going? I'm going to check it out later, see how good it is. F*ck yes! Now if only I had more time to play games... Good thing winter is around the corner. So I played about 4 games today. First 3 were ambushes, all completely one sided. Looked like match making was worse than before. But then I did a domination and got a great match. Absolutely superb. Maken did created a good post that suggested it was much improved over 10 matches or so. Rattati also posted about contacting them in certain instances where it was still one sided so they could see what the deal was. Well the first two bushes were on europe servers and the 3rd was on american, all onesided. I'm wondering if there's something up that's screwing things. I'll look into it a bit tomorrow.
I am part shovel, part man, full scout, and a little bit special.
Official Time Lord of the Scout Community
|
Bayeth Mal
Opus Arcana Covert Intervention
1533
|
Posted - 2014.09.17 20:19:00 -
[22053] - Quote
RogueTrooper 2000AD wrote:Grrrr,aarrrgh.
So whose alt are you anyway?
We'll bang, OK?
|
One Eyed King
Land of the BIind
4177
|
Posted - 2014.09.17 20:34:00 -
[22054] - Quote
Spademan wrote:One Eyed King wrote:Spademan wrote:One Eyed King wrote:Spademan wrote:So how's this going? I'm going to check it out later, see how good it is. F*ck yes! Now if only I had more time to play games... Good thing winter is around the corner. So I played about 4 games today. First 3 were ambushes, all completely one sided. Looked like match making was worse than before. But then I did a domination and got a great match. Absolutely superb. Maken did created a good post that suggested it was much improved over 10 matches or so. Rattati also posted about contacting them in certain instances where it was still one sided so they could see what the deal was. Well the first two bushes were on europe servers and the 3rd was on american, all onesided. I'm wondering if there's something up that's screwing things. I'll look into it a bit tomorrow. Take some pictures or notes and forward them to Rattati.
You can always tell a Millford Minja
|
Spademan
Fatal Absolution General Tso's Alliance
3631
|
Posted - 2014.09.17 20:36:00 -
[22055] - Quote
One Eyed King wrote: Take some pictures or notes and forward them to Rattati.
Pictures could be troublesome, I don't believe I have a device capable.
I might have an old underwater camera buried somewhere around here...
I am part shovel, part man, full scout, and a little bit special.
Official Time Lord of the Scout Community
|
voidfaction
Nos Nothi
531
|
Posted - 2014.09.17 21:10:00 -
[22056] - Quote
New matchmaking is GREAT. Almost every match today has been a battle to the end. No one sided G.L.O.R.Y. hole proto stomps is nice. |
IAmDuncanIdaho II
R 0 N 1 N
962
|
Posted - 2014.09.17 21:33:00 -
[22057] - Quote
Spademan wrote:One Eyed King wrote: Take some pictures or notes and forward them to Rattati.
Pictures could be troublesome, I don't believe I have a device capable. I might have an old underwater camera buried somewhere around here...
You play DUST underwater? How the hell do you keep your playstation dry?
You must learn honor, or you deserve to learn nothing at all.
~ Rivvy Dinari - Swordmaster of Ginaz
|
Spademan
Fatal Absolution General Tso's Alliance
3631
|
Posted - 2014.09.17 21:38:00 -
[22058] - Quote
IAmDuncanIdaho II wrote:Spademan wrote:One Eyed King wrote: Take some pictures or notes and forward them to Rattati.
Pictures could be troublesome, I don't believe I have a device capable. I might have an old underwater camera buried somewhere around here... You play DUST underwater? How the hell do you keep your playstation dry? I cover it in sponges. They soak up the sea water, preventing it from reaching the playstation.
I am part shovel, part man, full scout, and a little bit special.
Official Time Lord of the Scout Community
|
Appia Nappia
1066
|
Posted - 2014.09.17 21:40:00 -
[22059] - Quote
voidfaction wrote:New matchmaking is GREAT. Almost every match today has been a battle to the end. No one sided G.L.O.R.Y. hole proto stomps is nice.
Maybe I should log in to muck it all up.
So very tired
|
Spademan
Fatal Absolution General Tso's Alliance
3631
|
Posted - 2014.09.17 21:49:00 -
[22060] - Quote
Appia Nappia wrote:voidfaction wrote:New matchmaking is GREAT. Almost every match today has been a battle to the end. No one sided G.L.O.R.Y. hole proto stomps is nice. Maybe I should log in to muck it all up. Wouldn't that cause all your enemies to be medicore-good and your allies to be the bottom of the barrel?
If I understand it correctly.
I am part shovel, part man, full scout, and a little bit special.
Official Time Lord of the Scout Community
|
|
Adipem Nothi
Nos Nothi
4949
|
Posted - 2014.09.17 21:50:00 -
[22061] - Quote
Me + 15 names I've not seen before vs Kaizuki sniper, ss modan and a handful of 1UP proto stompers
Let me help you with my Mu, Scotty. You've apparently mistaken me for someone else.
:: Leaves Battle ::
Next match had much better matchmaking.
Shoot scout with yes.
- Ripley Riley
|
hfderrtgvcd
417
|
Posted - 2014.09.17 22:09:00 -
[22062] - Quote
Adipem Nothi wrote:First Ambush of the Day ... Me + 15 names I've not seen before vs Kaizuki sniper, ss modan and a handful of 1UP proto stompers Let me help you with my Mu, Scotty. You've apparently mistaken me for someone else. :: Sees Bolas + HAV :: :: Leaves Battle ::
Next match had much better matchmaking. And the next!
That was your first mistake. Seriously though, I wouldn't play ambush solo if you forced me at gunpoint.
You can't fight in here! This is the war room.
|
One Eyed King
Land of the BIind
4179
|
Posted - 2014.09.17 22:13:00 -
[22063] - Quote
Adipem Nothi wrote:First Ambush of the Day ... Me + 15 names I've not seen before vs Kaizuki sniper, ss modan and a handful of 1UP Let me help you with my Mu, Scotty. You've apparently mistaken me for someone else. :: Sees Bolas + HAV :: :: Leaves Battle :: Next match had much better matchmaking. And the next! I am seeing more complaints about the matchmaking with Ambush than anything else I am seeing. I wonder if the WP people have in Skirmishes throw Mu off for a primarily KDR sensitive game mode.
You can always tell a Millford Minja
|
Adipem Nothi
Nos Nothi
4953
|
Posted - 2014.09.17 23:15:00 -
[22064] - Quote
Proposition: Double the movement penalty of plates on Scouts.
Who is opposed? Who is in favor?
Shoot scout with yes.
- Ripley Riley
|
One Eyed King
Land of the BIind
4181
|
Posted - 2014.09.17 23:22:00 -
[22065] - Quote
Adipem Nothi wrote:Proposition: Double the movement penalty of plates on Scouts.
Who is opposed? Who is in favor?
Sounds good to me.
You can always tell a Millford Minja
|
voidfaction
Nos Nothi
531
|
Posted - 2014.09.17 23:33:00 -
[22066] - Quote
Adipem Nothi wrote:Assumption: Assault Lite is making a comeback.
Proposition: Double the movement penalty of plates on Scouts.
Who is opposed? Who is in favor? FAVOR
|
Appia Nappia
1066
|
Posted - 2014.09.17 23:50:00 -
[22067] - Quote
Adipem Nothi wrote:Assumption: Assault Lite is making a comeback.
Proposition: Double the movement penalty of plates on Scouts.
Who is opposed? Who is in favor?
Opposed. Dude, get the **** off your high horse. If they play the game differently than the way you do just let them. They're already easy to pick off.
So very tired
|
Appia Nappia
1066
|
Posted - 2014.09.18 00:02:00 -
[22068] - Quote
Spademan wrote:Appia Nappia wrote:voidfaction wrote:New matchmaking is GREAT. Almost every match today has been a battle to the end. No one sided G.L.O.R.Y. hole proto stomps is nice. Maybe I should log in to muck it all up. Wouldn't that cause all your enemies to be medicore-good and your allies to be the bottom of the barrel? If I understand it correctly.
I've gone AFK in the MCC so many times my W/L ratio is unsalvageable. For several months I only played in PC matches. Never ran pubs. Just performed the role as speed hacker or city-shotgunner. PC KDR is way lower than Pub KDR. And played enough that I capped out every week from it too.
Singular matches aren't goingto to change the Mu, because it's by lifetime stats and not match to match stats.
So very tired
|
Immortal John Ripper
24665
|
Posted - 2014.09.18 00:04:00 -
[22069] - Quote
Appia Nappia wrote:Spademan wrote:Appia Nappia wrote:voidfaction wrote:New matchmaking is GREAT. Almost every match today has been a battle to the end. No one sided G.L.O.R.Y. hole proto stomps is nice. Maybe I should log in to muck it all up. Wouldn't that cause all your enemies to be medicore-good and your allies to be the bottom of the barrel? If I understand it correctly. I've gone AFK in the MCC so many times my W/L ratio is unsalvageable. For several months I only played in PC matches. Never ran pubs. Just performed the role as speed hacker or city-shotgunner. PC KDR is way lower than Pub KDR. And played enough that I capped out every week from it too. Singular matches aren't goingto to change the Mu, because it's by lifetime stats and not match to match stats.
This. I have pictures of my wallet where I never played a pub in weeks. Litterally 2 minutes after logging in I already was getting contacted to do pc. Then Just did pc all day long... People can laugh at my kdr all they want.... I am the one who got paid to play unlike pubstars.
I wonder how match making will handle me? I never had to worry about it or pad it... my kdr is quite low imo. My win loss... lol. I afked just as many matches as you I bet.
Donating all scammed isk to needy Matari. Tell me your sad story for it.
|
General John Ripper
24672
|
Posted - 2014.09.18 00:04:00 -
[22070] - Quote
Appia Nappia wrote:Spademan wrote:Appia Nappia wrote:voidfaction wrote:New matchmaking is GREAT. Almost every match today has been a battle to the end. No one sided G.L.O.R.Y. hole proto stomps is nice. Maybe I should log in to muck it all up. Wouldn't that cause all your enemies to be medicore-good and your allies to be the bottom of the barrel? If I understand it correctly. I've gone AFK in the MCC so many times my W/L ratio is unsalvageable. For several months I only played in PC matches. Never ran pubs. Just performed the role as speed hacker or city-shotgunner. PC KDR is way lower than Pub KDR. And played enough that I capped out every week from it too. Singular matches aren't goingto to change the Mu, because it's by lifetime stats and not match to match stats.
This. I have pictures of my wallet where I never played a pub in weeks. Litterally 2 minutes after logging in I already was getting contacted to do pc. Then Just did pc all day long... People can laugh at my kdr all they want.... I am the one who got paid to play unlike pubstars.
I wonder how match making will handle me? I never had to worry about it or pad it... my kdr is quite low imo. My win loss... lol. I afked just as many matches as you I bet.
Donating all scammed isk to needy Matari. Tell me your sad story for it.
|
|
Adipem Nothi
Nos Nothi
4953
|
Posted - 2014.09.18 00:12:00 -
[22071] - Quote
Appia Nappia wrote:Adipem Nothi wrote:Assumption: Assault Lite is making a comeback.
Proposition: Double the movement penalty of plates on Scouts.
Who is opposed? Who is in favor? Opposed. Dude, get the **** off your high horse. If they play the game differently than the way you do just let them. They're already easy to pick off.
The assumption above is that Assault Lite is making a comeback. If the assumption proves false, then we needn't worry. If the assumption proves true, then we'd do well to have a plan.
The only reason why Assault Lite would make a comeback is if slayers determine that its as good as -- if not better than -- the new Assault. If this is the case then we should address it, whether or not doing so adds to or subtracts from our individual playstyles.
I propose that doubling movement penalty on plates would be a better response to Assault Lite than the shoehorning that'd likely follow implementation of efficacy-based bonuses.
What would her highness propose?
Shoot scout with yes.
- Ripley Riley
|
Immortal John Ripper
24669
|
Posted - 2014.09.18 00:40:00 -
[22072] - Quote
How about we stop with assumptions and talk about facts? So what if it makes a comeback? How exactly is a bad thing? Scouts are already easy to kill... People need to focus on balance instead of nerfing everything they see that get's used. FOTM doesn't just mean unstoppable god mode suit of the month. I would love for a suit to be average and be fotm. This should be the goal, not going out of your way to find a new op suit every week just to nerf it.
Also what is wrong with Assault lite? This game was BUILT for customization. People should be allowed to fit their role however they want, not how you think they should fit it. Your opinion is not above the entire player base or any other player so let them fit their suits how they want. Suits have their roles and bonuses which should motivate them to build it a certain way to take advantage of that bonus but it doesn't have to be the driving force of their every build decision. This is part of the freedom and appeal of this game and I hate how some people want to take away those options and make them completely unviable.
Donating all scammed isk to needy Matari. Tell me your sad story for it.
|
General John Ripper
24672
|
Posted - 2014.09.18 00:40:00 -
[22073] - Quote
How about we stop with assumptions and talk about facts? So what if it makes a comeback? How exactly is a bad thing? Scouts are already easy to kill... People need to focus on balance instead of nerfing everything they see that get's used. FOTM doesn't just mean unstoppable god mode suit of the month. I would love for a suit to be average and be fotm. This should be the goal, not going out of your way to find a new op suit every week just to nerf it.
Also what is wrong with Assault lite? This game was BUILT for customization. People should be allowed to fit their role however they want, not how you think they should fit it. Your opinion is not above the entire player base or any other player so let them fit their suits how they want. Suits have their roles and bonuses which should motivate them to build it a certain way to take advantage of that bonus but it doesn't have to be the driving force of their every build decision. This is part of the freedom and appeal of this game and I hate how some people want to take away those options and make them completely unviable.
Donating all scammed isk to needy Matari. Tell me your sad story for it.
|
hfderrtgvcd
417
|
Posted - 2014.09.18 00:42:00 -
[22074] - Quote
Adipem Nothi wrote:Appia Nappia wrote:Adipem Nothi wrote:Assumption: Assault Lite is making a comeback.
Proposition: Double the movement penalty of plates on Scouts.
Who is opposed? Who is in favor? Opposed. Dude, get the **** off your high horse. If they play the game differently than the way you do just let them. They're already easy to pick off. The assumption above is that Assault Lite is making a comeback. If the assumption proves false, then we needn't worry. If the assumption proves true, then we'd do well to have a plan. The only reason why Assault Lite would make a comeback is if slayers determine that its as good as -- if not better than -- the new Assault. If the stats indicate that this is the case then we must address it, whether or not doing so adds to or subtracts from our individual playstyles. I propose that doubling movement penalty on plates would be a better response to Assault Lite than the shoehorning and standardization that'd likely follow implementation of efficacy-based bonuses. Not to mention the lack the consensus we'd face in trying to decide which Scout gets which bonus. What would her highness propose?
TL;DR: If there is a balance problem, and we could solve that problem with one small adjustment, why would we not? The only scouts I commonly see using rifles in pc are cal scouts, and a plate nerf wouldn't really effect them.
You can't fight in here! This is the war room.
|
Immortal John Ripper
24669
|
Posted - 2014.09.18 00:46:00 -
[22075] - Quote
hfderrtgvcd wrote:Adipem Nothi wrote:Appia Nappia wrote:Adipem Nothi wrote:Assumption: Assault Lite is making a comeback.
Proposition: Double the movement penalty of plates on Scouts.
Who is opposed? Who is in favor? Opposed. Dude, get the **** off your high horse. If they play the game differently than the way you do just let them. They're already easy to pick off. The assumption above is that Assault Lite is making a comeback. If the assumption proves false, then we needn't worry. If the assumption proves true, then we'd do well to have a plan. The only reason why Assault Lite would make a comeback is if slayers determine that its as good as -- if not better than -- the new Assault. If the stats indicate that this is the case then we must address it, whether or not doing so adds to or subtracts from our individual playstyles. I propose that doubling movement penalty on plates would be a better response to Assault Lite than the shoehorning and standardization that'd likely follow implementation of efficacy-based bonuses. Not to mention the lack the consensus we'd face in trying to decide which Scout gets which bonus. What would her highness propose?
TL;DR: If there is a balance problem, and we could solve that problem with one small adjustment, why would we not? The only scouts I commonly see using rifles in pc are cal scouts, and a plate nerf wouldn't really effect them.
Not to mention that making a special specific nerf for one specific suit would only lead to special specific nerfs to every other suit in the future. Making this whole balancing ordeal alot more complicated than it needs to be. Seems a little racist towards specific suits. Keep things on equal ground as they are now. Suits are given special bonus, not special nerfs.
Donating all scammed isk to needy Matari. Tell me your sad story for it.
|
General John Ripper
24672
|
Posted - 2014.09.18 00:46:00 -
[22076] - Quote
hfderrtgvcd wrote:Adipem Nothi wrote:Appia Nappia wrote:Adipem Nothi wrote:Assumption: Assault Lite is making a comeback.
Proposition: Double the movement penalty of plates on Scouts.
Who is opposed? Who is in favor? Opposed. Dude, get the **** off your high horse. If they play the game differently than the way you do just let them. They're already easy to pick off. The assumption above is that Assault Lite is making a comeback. If the assumption proves false, then we needn't worry. If the assumption proves true, then we'd do well to have a plan. The only reason why Assault Lite would make a comeback is if slayers determine that its as good as -- if not better than -- the new Assault. If the stats indicate that this is the case then we must address it, whether or not doing so adds to or subtracts from our individual playstyles. I propose that doubling movement penalty on plates would be a better response to Assault Lite than the shoehorning and standardization that'd likely follow implementation of efficacy-based bonuses. Not to mention the lack the consensus we'd face in trying to decide which Scout gets which bonus. What would her highness propose?
TL;DR: If there is a balance problem, and we could solve that problem with one small adjustment, why would we not? The only scouts I commonly see using rifles in pc are cal scouts, and a plate nerf wouldn't really effect them.
Not to mention that making a special specific nerf for one specific suit would only lead to special specific nerfs to every other suit in the future. Making this whole balancing ordeal alot more complicated than it needs to be. Seems a little racist towards specific suits. Keep things on equal ground as they are now. Suits are given special bonus, not special nerfs.
Donating all scammed isk to needy Matari. Tell me your sad story for it.
|
Adipem Nothi
Nos Nothi
4954
|
Posted - 2014.09.18 00:48:00 -
[22077] - Quote
There is no problem with Assault Lite. Unless it out-assaults Assaults.
The Forums are full of mercs who will tell you that this is the case. I'm not inclined to act upon their moaning, but there is a chance that they're right.
Its our job to plan ahead in case of such events. Its Appia's job to be obstructive. Its your job to breathe from mouth and quietly observe.
Shoot scout with yes.
- Ripley Riley
|
Immortal John Ripper
24672
|
Posted - 2014.09.18 00:58:00 -
[22078] - Quote
Adipem Nothi wrote:There is no problem with Assault Lite. Unless it out-assaults Assaults. The Forums are full of mercs who will tell you that this is the case. I'm not inclined to act upon their moaning, but there is a chance that they're right. Its the Bastards' job to plan ahead in case of such events. Its Appia's job to be obstructive and generally unpleasant. Its the Tourist's job to breathe from mouth and observe. I can't be a tourist when I AM the forums. Can't I just be mildy unpleasant with a side of Tabasco sauce?
Donating all scammed isk to needy Matari. Tell me your sad story for it.
|
General John Ripper
24672
|
Posted - 2014.09.18 00:58:00 -
[22079] - Quote
Adipem Nothi wrote:There is no problem with Assault Lite. Unless it out-assaults Assaults. The Forums are full of mercs who will tell you that this is the case. I'm not inclined to act upon their moaning, but there is a chance that they're right. Its the Bastards' job to plan ahead in case of such events. Its Appia's job to be obstructive and generally unpleasant. Its the Tourist's job to breathe from mouth and observe. I can't be a tourist when I AM the forums. Can't I just be mildy unpleasant with a side of Tabasco sauce?
Donating all scammed isk to needy Matari. Tell me your sad story for it.
|
voidfaction
Nos Nothi
532
|
Posted - 2014.09.18 01:14:00 -
[22080] - Quote
hfderrtgvcd wrote:Adipem Nothi wrote:Appia Nappia wrote:Adipem Nothi wrote:Assumption: Assault Lite is making a comeback.
Proposition: Double the movement penalty of plates on Scouts.
Who is opposed? Who is in favor? Opposed. Dude, get the **** off your high horse. If they play the game differently than the way you do just let them. They're already easy to pick off. The assumption above is that Assault Lite is making a comeback. If the assumption proves false, then we needn't worry. If the assumption proves true, then we'd do well to have a plan. The only reason why Assault Lite would make a comeback is if slayers determine that its as good as -- if not better than -- the new Assault. If the stats indicate that this is the case then we must address it, whether or not doing so adds to or subtracts from our individual playstyles. I propose that doubling movement penalty on plates would be a better response to Assault Lite than the shoehorning and standardization that'd likely follow implementation of efficacy-based bonuses. Not to mention the lack the consensus we'd face in trying to decide which Scout gets which bonus. What would her highness propose?
TL;DR: If there is a balance problem, and we could solve that problem with one small adjustment, why would we not? The only scouts I commonly see using rifles in pc are cal scouts, and a plate nerf wouldn't really effect them. I can do better with a shotgun than I can with an AR so does that mean when I use an AR is makes my scout have more armor? Now I'm really confused. Adding a rifle gives you more armor? What does the rifle have to do with armor stacking scouts?
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |