Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 178 post(s) |
Cat Merc
Onslaught Inc RISE of LEGION
10967
|
Posted - 2014.07.14 20:20:00 -
[17581] - Quote
Ghost Kaisar wrote:Mollerz is spot on here How? Please explain. I'm seriously trying to see your guys point of view, but the only argument I've seen so far is "It's not realistic" and "It rewards poor tactics". The first is not a valid argument for game balance, the second needs further explaining.
Feline overlord of all humans - CAT MERC
|
Appia Vibbia
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
3415
|
Posted - 2014.07.14 20:23:00 -
[17582] - Quote
dammit. who unbanned soiaire
Appia Vibbia for CPM1
Personal Theme Song
|
Knight Soiaire
Fatal Absolution General Tso's Alliance
5455
|
Posted - 2014.07.14 20:24:00 -
[17583] - Quote
I don't think realism is a good balancing point. But if a crazy knife wielding merc was walking forward swinging at me. I'd be backpedaling pretty ******* fast especially if I was a clone built for combat, in a suit built for combat.
I'm free!
/o/
|
mollerz
3923
|
Posted - 2014.07.14 20:24:00 -
[17584] - Quote
Cat Merc wrote:*Cough* Elitist *Cough*
WHAT poor tactics. Seriously, what poor tactics? Explain to me.
"The scout is too fast, it rewards poor tactics" That sentence above sounds just as valid as your argument. You need to explain the poor tactics.
Also, modern military shooters are the most popular FPS types. So saying how other games don't do it doesn't really work.
I'd love for CCP to confirm my knife kill count. But it's got to be around 6K+ at the low ball count. I want to say probably around 8K.. but you know how one is prone to overstating such things. It is hard to talk tactics with a grasshopper. Go get a thousand knife kills under your belt, and then you'll start to understand.
Look, I've explained it to death, even my elderly Aunt would understand what I am talking about at this point. I get it. You like doomish pacman controls, probably use a keyboard, and are here for buffs.
Shotty- Send him a red jar on me. Raises glass, rolls eyes, and walks away.
You're Welcome... see their you go, Appia!
|
Ghost Kaisar
Fatal Absolution General Tso's Alliance
5929
|
Posted - 2014.07.14 20:27:00 -
[17585] - Quote
Cat Merc wrote:Ghost Kaisar wrote:Mollerz is spot on here How? Please explain. I'm seriously trying to see your guys point of view, but the only argument I've seen so far is "It's not realistic" and "It rewards poor tactics". The first is not a valid argument for game balance, the second needs further explaining.
At work, I will explain in detail later.
Main point against you: you seem to have a very wrong idea about "Tactics" in my book.
I'll explain in detail later, I have to finish work and go to an optometrist first.
How I Imagine I look when running Minmatar Scout
PSN: EVL_Elgost105
|
Haerr
Legio DXIV
1003
|
Posted - 2014.07.14 20:30:00 -
[17586] - Quote
If the changes in Rattatis EWAR calculation goes through it will be really fun to run:
Amarr Scout: 2c PEs 1c RA 3c PDs 1 Prototype Cloak Field
Will vote for: pÇîA·P·P·I·ApÇì & pÇîR·H·A·D·ApÇì despite them hating on Nordic food customs. ;)
|
One Eyed King
Land of the BIind
2557
|
Posted - 2014.07.14 20:31:00 -
[17587] - Quote
Cat Merc wrote: I'll take your word for it, since you understand nova knifing way more than I do.
I never made such a comment, and it is not helpful to try and put words in my mouth. I am trying to honestly engage you here.
Bad = rushing in, yet still being able to easily backpedal easily out of situations while simultaneously attacking and negating inherent strengths in other suits due to poor mechanics. Also, negating people playing to their strengths.
Good = Being rewarded for playing to your strengths, while punished for haphazard/unthoughtful play that overly exposes weakness.
In my opinion, the speed of back pedal as it currently stands is a mechanic that negates intended strengths and weaknesses.
This is how a minja feels
|
Cat Merc
Onslaught Inc RISE of LEGION
10969
|
Posted - 2014.07.14 20:32:00 -
[17588] - Quote
mollerz wrote:Cat Merc wrote:*Cough* Elitist *Cough*
WHAT poor tactics. Seriously, what poor tactics? Explain to me.
"The scout is too fast, it rewards poor tactics" That sentence above sounds just as valid as your argument. You need to explain the poor tactics.
Also, modern military shooters are the most popular FPS types. So saying how other games don't do it doesn't really work. I'd love for CCP to confirm my knife kill count. But it's got to be around 6K+ at the low ball count. I want to say probably around 8K.. but you know how one is prone to overstating such things. It is hard to talk tactics with a grasshopper. Go get a thousand knife kills under your belt, and then you'll start to understand. Look, I've explained it to death, even my elderly Aunt would understand what I am talking about at this point. I get it. You like doomish pacman controls, probably use a keyboard, and are here for buffs. Shotty- Send him a red jar on me. Raises glass, rolls eyes, and walks away. Except I use a controller, and I'm here because there's not better place to find scouts.
I can understand tactics, even if I never, ever used the gear in question. The amount of kills is irrelevant, it only builds muscle memory and quicker processing of tactics in your mind.
So go ahead, explain to me, because if you can't then they simply don't exist. (Or you don't understand them as well as you think you do)
Feline overlord of all humans - CAT MERC
|
Cat Merc
Onslaught Inc RISE of LEGION
10969
|
Posted - 2014.07.14 20:34:00 -
[17589] - Quote
One Eyed King wrote: Bad = rushing in, yet still being able to easily backpedal easily out of situations while simultaneously attacking and negating inherent strengths in other suits due to poor mechanics. Also, negating people playing to their strengths.
BOOM Found an argument I can understand and agree with.
Was that so hard?
Feline overlord of all humans - CAT MERC
|
Nrabatar Zorig
Nos Nothi
152
|
Posted - 2014.07.14 20:39:00 -
[17590] - Quote
I liked this place better when it didn't devolve to mudslinging wars, instigated by Rattati's request for feedback.
Shaman Zorig of the Vherokior Tribe
|
|
mollerz
3928
|
Posted - 2014.07.14 20:39:00 -
[17591] - Quote
Cat Merc wrote:One Eyed King wrote: Bad = rushing in, yet still being able to easily backpedal easily out of situations while simultaneously attacking and negating inherent strengths in other suits due to poor mechanics. Also, negating people playing to their strengths.
BOOM Found an argument I can understand and agree with. Was that so hard?
yep. If I were you I'd work on a few things.
You're Welcome... see their you go, Appia!
|
One Eyed King
Land of the BIind
2560
|
Posted - 2014.07.14 20:41:00 -
[17592] - Quote
Cat Merc wrote:One Eyed King wrote: Bad = rushing in, yet still being able to easily backpedal easily out of situations while simultaneously attacking and negating inherent strengths in other suits due to poor mechanics. Also, negating people playing to their strengths.
BOOM Found an argument I can understand and agree with. Was that so hard? Apparently I say that in regards to all parties involved FYI
This is how a minja feels
|
Cat Merc
Onslaught Inc RISE of LEGION
10974
|
Posted - 2014.07.14 20:41:00 -
[17593] - Quote
mollerz wrote:Cat Merc wrote:One Eyed King wrote: Bad = rushing in, yet still being able to easily backpedal easily out of situations while simultaneously attacking and negating inherent strengths in other suits due to poor mechanics. Also, negating people playing to their strengths.
BOOM Found an argument I can understand and agree with. Was that so hard? yep. If I were you I'd work on a few things. If I were you I would go over the lovely subject of "How to debate without being an a-hole".
Feline overlord of all humans - CAT MERC
|
Adipem Nothi
Nos Nothi
2758
|
Posted - 2014.07.14 20:42:00 -
[17594] - Quote
@ Cat
Significant effort, risk and specialized loadouts are required to sneak up within 1m of a target and execute a backstab. Little effort at all is required to bunnyhop / backpedal in response to being hit in the back.
Shoot scout with yes...
- Ripley Riley
|
mollerz
3928
|
Posted - 2014.07.14 20:42:00 -
[17595] - Quote
Cat Merc wrote:mollerz wrote:Cat Merc wrote:One Eyed King wrote: Bad = rushing in, yet still being able to easily backpedal easily out of situations while simultaneously attacking and negating inherent strengths in other suits due to poor mechanics. Also, negating people playing to their strengths.
BOOM Found an argument I can understand and agree with. Was that so hard? yep. If I were you I'd work on a few things. If I were you I would go over the lovely subject of "How to debate without being an a-hole".
lol.. I don't think it's in me.
You're Welcome... see their you go, Appia!
|
Cat Merc
Onslaught Inc RISE of LEGION
10974
|
Posted - 2014.07.14 20:43:00 -
[17596] - Quote
Adipem Nothi wrote:@ Cat
Little effort at all is required to bunnyhop / backpedal after being hit in back. Significant effort, risk and specialized loadouts are required to sneak up within 1m of a target.
Yup, I can see that.
Feline overlord of all humans - CAT MERC
|
Spademan
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
2182
|
Posted - 2014.07.14 20:44:00 -
[17597] - Quote
Here kitty kitty. This is my view on back pedalling.
It's bonkers. If you get the drop on someone, particularly with a short range weapon, a quick spin jump and back pedal will turn the odds your way. (especially with high hp) Bad if you ask me. Even a slightly longer ranged weapon, let's say an Assault rifle. (I know, not the longest ranged weapon, but still, longer than shotties and Knives)
Merc A, with an Ar just at the tip of his optimal, gets the drop on Merc B. Lets say Merc B is faster and has a Rail Rifle. Merc B often wins by turning, back pedalling, getting out of range and gunning down Merc A. Because of ludicrous back pedal.
I am part shovel, part man, full scout, and a little bit special.
Official Time Lord of the Scout Community
|
Knight Soiaire
Fatal Absolution General Tso's Alliance
5456
|
Posted - 2014.07.14 20:44:00 -
[17598] - Quote
Adipem Nothi wrote:@ Cat
Little effort at all is required to bunnyhop / backpedal after being hit in back. Significant effort, risk and specialized loadouts are required to sneak up within 1m of a target.
I usually just use a Cloak. No wonder you guys are pissed. You all over complicate things.
I'm free!
/o/
|
Cat Merc
Onslaught Inc RISE of LEGION
10974
|
Posted - 2014.07.14 20:46:00 -
[17599] - Quote
Spademan wrote:Here kitty kitty. This is my view on back pedalling.
It's bonkers. If you get the drop on someone, particularly with a short range weapon, a quick spin jump and back pedal will turn the odds your way. (especially with high hp) Bad if you ask me. Even a slightly longer ranged weapon, let's say an Assault rifle. (I know, not the longest ranged weapon, but still, longer than shotties and Knives)
Merc A, with an Ar just at the tip of his optimal, gets the drop on Merc B. Lets say Merc B is faster and has a Rail Rifle. Merc B often wins by turning, back pedalling, getting out of range and gunning down Merc A. Because of ludicrous back pedal. Eh, it doesn't really work with an AR. You can still do decent damage even slightly outside of your optimal.
With knives it's all or nothing, and with the shotty the damage drops super quickly.
Feline overlord of all humans - CAT MERC
|
One Eyed King
Land of the BIind
2561
|
Posted - 2014.07.14 20:51:00 -
[17600] - Quote
Knight Soiaire wrote:Adipem Nothi wrote:@ Cat
Little effort at all is required to bunnyhop / backpedal after being hit in back. Significant effort, risk and specialized loadouts are required to sneak up within 1m of a target.
I usually just use a Cloak. No wonder you guys are pissed. You all over complicate things. I tried that. I am way too squishy. They don't even have to see that I am there. Just spray and pray.
Not to mention, cloaks are fairly visible if you are looking for them. I am getting better at seeing them all the time.
Then I just assume they are carrying a shotgun, I jump and back away firing my CR.
This is how a minja feels
|
|
Appia Vibbia
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
3418
|
Posted - 2014.07.14 20:51:00 -
[17601] - Quote
Nrabatar Zorig wrote:I liked this place better when it didn't devolve to mudslinging wars, instigated by Rattati's request for feedback. It was much better when it was completely in-house instead of involving tourists
Appia Vibbia for CPM1
Personal Theme Song
|
Spademan
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
2184
|
Posted - 2014.07.14 20:52:00 -
[17602] - Quote
Cat Merc wrote: Eh, it doesn't really work with an AR. You can still do decent damage even slightly outside of your optimal.
With knives it's all or nothing, and with the shotty the damage drops super quickly.
The situation can still happen. Basically, regardless of the weapon (bar maybe the Hmg, scrambler rifle) back pedalling can screw you up when you get the drop and by all rights should get that guy. Same with sidestepping.
I am part shovel, part man, full scout, and a little bit special.
Official Time Lord of the Scout Community
|
Adipem Nothi
Nos Nothi
2761
|
Posted - 2014.07.14 20:53:00 -
[17603] - Quote
Knight Soiaire wrote:Adipem Nothi wrote:@ Cat
Little effort at all is required to bunnyhop / backpedal after being hit in back. Significant effort, risk and specialized loadouts are required to sneak up within 1m of a target.
I usually just use a Cloak. No wonder you guys are pissed. You all over complicate things. Didn't realize we were pissed; good to know.
Do you find that your cloak works well without damps? Mine doesn't at all, but I presume nothing. Perhaps Scotty is putting us into different queues.
Shoot scout with yes...
- Ripley Riley
|
mollerz
3930
|
Posted - 2014.07.14 20:55:00 -
[17604] - Quote
Knight Soiaire wrote:Adipem Nothi wrote:@ Cat
Little effort at all is required to bunnyhop / backpedal after being hit in back. Significant effort, risk and specialized loadouts are required to sneak up within 1m of a target.
I usually just use a Cloak. No wonder you guys are pissed. You all over complicate things.
Why would you use a cloak other than the dampening bonus in a backstab situation? Using a cloak to backstab is bad tactics.
The main reason is the time it takes to switch to knives as well as the propensity for you not to switch even tho you pressed the button to switch. Using a cloak, ironically to what you said, would actually complicate things.
If you are at the point you've snuck up on someone and are in knife range, either they plain can't pick you up on tacnet, or are oblivious to it. Their back is to you so they don't see you anyways. That is until their shield and half their armor evaporates, which at that point the crutch second chance mechanic of backpedaling saves them from their mistake of being caught with their pants down amongst their squad of protos. Every single odd was against the knifer, but he scored that hit. Why should that be the whole extent of the suits capabilities? Because at that point the knifer has little to no chance as the prey now has all the cards.
Maybe knives should do 1500 damage per uncharged slash? I wouldn't care about backpedalers then. They'd, like me, now have no chance after I hit them.
You're Welcome... see their you go, Appia!
|
Adipem Nothi
Nos Nothi
2761
|
Posted - 2014.07.14 20:57:00 -
[17605] - Quote
Cat Merc wrote: Eh, it doesn't really work with an AR. You can still do decent damage even slightly outside of your optimal.
With knives it's all or nothing, and with the shotty the damage drops super quickly.
Yes, yes and yes. The Fine Rifle for the win.
Backpedaling only penalizes NKs and SGs. If this is CCP's intent and desire, then so be it. But let's call it what it is, such that "slayers" not confuse their cashing in on a free-pass with "skill". Beating a shotgunner who hits in the back is no different than running a GalSentinel + Fine Rifle.
Shoot scout with yes...
- Ripley Riley
|
One Eyed King
Land of the BIind
2561
|
Posted - 2014.07.14 20:58:00 -
[17606] - Quote
mollerz wrote:Knight Soiaire wrote:Adipem Nothi wrote:@ Cat
Little effort at all is required to bunnyhop / backpedal after being hit in back. Significant effort, risk and specialized loadouts are required to sneak up within 1m of a target.
I usually just use a Cloak. No wonder you guys are pissed. You all over complicate things. Why would you use a cloak other than the dampening bonus in a backstab situation? Using a cloak to backstab is bad tactics. The main reason is the time it takes to switch to knives as well as the propensity for you not to switch even tho you pressed the button to switch. Using a cloak, ironically to what you said, would actually complicate things. If you are at the point you've snuck up on someone and are in knife range, either they plain can't pick you up on tacnet, or are oblivious to it. Their back is to you so they don't see you anyways. That is until their shield and half their armor evaporates, which at that point the crutch second chance mechanic of backpedaling saves them from their mistake of being caught with their pants down amongst their squad of protos. Every single odd was against the knifer, but he scored that hit. Why should that be the whole extent of the suits capabilities? Because at that point the knifer has little to no chance as the prey now has all the cards. Maybe knives should do 1500 damage per uncharged slash? I wouldn't care about backpedalers then. They'd, like me, now have no chance after I hit them. I will cloak if I am stalking someone out in the open to prevent being shot at from a distance before I can do anything. Otherwise if I am close enough, or have enough cover, I will just switch to the knives.
This is how a minja feels
|
mollerz
3932
|
Posted - 2014.07.14 20:59:00 -
[17607] - Quote
As an aside-
Adjusting backpedaling speed = adjusting an existing in game mechanic.
Introducing adhesion = adding a completely new untested mechanic.
Gee. What could go wrong?
Talk about over complicating things.
You're Welcome... see their you go, Appia!
|
Knight Soiaire
Fatal Absolution General Tso's Alliance
5456
|
Posted - 2014.07.14 20:59:00 -
[17608] - Quote
Adipem Nothi wrote:Knight Soiaire wrote:Adipem Nothi wrote:@ Cat
Little effort at all is required to bunnyhop / backpedal after being hit in back. Significant effort, risk and specialized loadouts are required to sneak up within 1m of a target.
I usually just use a Cloak. No wonder you guys are pissed. You all over complicate things. Didn't realize we were pissed; good to know. Do you find that your cloak works well without damps? Mine doesn't at all, but I presume nothing. Perhaps Scotty is putting us into different queues.
What kind of Scout needs damps? Heh, armour tank all day, every day. You fake Scouts blow my mind.
I'm free!
/o/
|
Knight Soiaire
Fatal Absolution General Tso's Alliance
5456
|
Posted - 2014.07.14 21:02:00 -
[17609] - Quote
mollerz wrote:Knight Soiaire wrote:Adipem Nothi wrote:@ Cat
Little effort at all is required to bunnyhop / backpedal after being hit in back. Significant effort, risk and specialized loadouts are required to sneak up within 1m of a target.
I usually just use a Cloak. No wonder you guys are pissed. You all over complicate things. Why would you use a cloak other than the dampening bonus in a backstab situation? Using a cloak to backstab is bad tactics. The main reason is the time it takes to switch to knives as well as the propensity for you not to switch even tho you pressed the button to switch. Using a cloak, ironically to what you said, would actually complicate things. If you are at the point you've snuck up on someone and are in knife range, either they plain can't pick you up on tacnet, or are oblivious to it. Their back is to you so they don't see you anyways. That is until their shield and half their armor evaporates, which at that point the crutch second chance mechanic of backpedaling saves them from their mistake of being caught with their pants down amongst their squad of protos. Every single odd was against the knifer, but he scored that hit. Why should that be the whole extent of the suits capabilities? Because at that point the knifer has little to no chance as the prey now has all the cards. Maybe knives should do 1500 damage per uncharged slash? I wouldn't care about backpedalers then. They'd, like me, now have no chance after I hit them.
You used so many words to explain the obvious. Holy over complications Batman!
I'm free!
/o/
|
One Eyed King
Land of the BIind
2562
|
Posted - 2014.07.14 21:02:00 -
[17610] - Quote
Knight Soiaire wrote:Adipem Nothi wrote:Knight Soiaire wrote:Adipem Nothi wrote:@ Cat
Little effort at all is required to bunnyhop / backpedal after being hit in back. Significant effort, risk and specialized loadouts are required to sneak up within 1m of a target.
I usually just use a Cloak. No wonder you guys are pissed. You all over complicate things. Didn't realize we were pissed; good to know. Do you find that your cloak works well without damps? Mine doesn't at all, but I presume nothing. Perhaps Scotty is putting us into different queues. What kind of Scout needs damps? Heh, armour tank all day, every day. You fake Scouts blow my mind.
The kind that don't want a red chevron over their head while cloaked?
This is how a minja feels
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |