Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 178 post(s) |
Arkena Wyrnspire
Fatal Absolution Negative-Feedback
22744
|
Posted - 2015.03.15 10:19:00 -
[31261] - Quote
I just saw someone jump on a dropship and RE it.
They didn't kill it but it was magnificent.
Gallente Guide
|
xavier zor
0uter.Heaven
873
|
Posted - 2015.03.15 10:42:00 -
[31262] - Quote
Dreis Shadowweaver wrote:These days, I'm running Assault 90% of the time, and Scout 10%. I haven't played a Skirm in weeks... It's really easy to 'dominate' in Dom: I've got a weekly w/l over 22.00... It's so shiny; I'm afraid of damaging it by running Skirm. How can I get back to my roots? I wanna be 'Dreis the knifer', not 'Dreis the tryhard'... Quick, before the tryhard in me makes me change my mind!!! AAAAAAHHHHHHH!!!
T.R pub squads eh? Must get boring redlining the enemy half the time...
as to the FoTM the assault Scr is due to the buff, but i still choose the viziam over the carthum assault any day
The Scr is fine anyway where it is, it is meant to be the best 1v1 weapon, hence the overheat...the assault Scr on the other hand is doing to much damage
retired
stabbed musturd, duna, radar, tibs
returning December 2015 yay
|
Adipem Nothi
Nos Nothi
7656
|
Posted - 2015.03.15 14:35:00 -
[31263] - Quote
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:Adipem Nothi wrote:Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:I never seem to encounter focused scanners, even in PC.
Are they really that common? Assuming (please correct me if I'm wrong) that you aren't trying to beat scans, how would you know if you have or haven't encountered focused scans? You're wrong.
Don't be sadface! It was a fair question. Took you for a slayer, so I figured you've been running more Assault than Scout over the past few months. And there's nothing wrong with that; slayers should absolutely be favoring Assault over Scout.
Shoot scout with yes.
- Ripley Riley
|
Arkena Wyrnspire
Fatal Absolution Negative-Feedback
22757
|
Posted - 2015.03.15 15:34:00 -
[31264] - Quote
T'is not a sadface, but a disappointed face.
Unrelated: I was playing civ 5, and then the Romans mocked me for having a weak military. "I bet your empire will fall to barbarians," they said.
Gallente Guide
|
Ghost Kaisar
Negative-Feedback
10622
|
Posted - 2015.03.15 15:41:00 -
[31265] - Quote
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:I just saw someone jump on a dropship and RE it.
They didn't kill it but it was magnificent.
More than a few people in FA have "Flyswatter" fits now.
It's a super jump loaded frame with Lai Dai Packed AV grenades.
For when Assault drop ships decide to start messing with infantry in city.
Currently listening to: Max Anarchy OST
Old School Scout, watch out for the knives
|
Adipem Nothi
Nos Nothi
7656
|
Posted - 2015.03.15 15:44:00 -
[31266] - Quote
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:T'is not a sadface, but a disappointed face.
Shoot scout with yes.
- Ripley Riley
|
Arkena Wyrnspire
Fatal Absolution Negative-Feedback
22758
|
Posted - 2015.03.15 15:48:00 -
[31267] - Quote
Adipem Nothi wrote:Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:T'is not a sadface, but a disappointed face. So ... I called your bluff and hurt your feelings in the process? My bad, brah. Seriously, can't you check units sales from Eve and see for yourself whether or not Focused Scanners are being used?
Your ninja edits cannot hide from me.
Gallente Guide
|
Ghost Kaisar
Negative-Feedback
10622
|
Posted - 2015.03.15 15:55:00 -
[31268] - Quote
We haven't had a good bar brawl in awhile.....
Lets see if this pans out.
Currently listening to: Max Anarchy OST
Old School Scout, watch out for the knives
|
Adipem Nothi
Nos Nothi
7656
|
Posted - 2015.03.15 15:56:00 -
[31269] - Quote
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:Adipem Nothi wrote:Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:T'is not a sadface, but a disappointed face. So ... I called your bluff and hurt your feelings in the process? My bad, brah. Seriously, can't you check units sales from Eve and see for yourself whether or not Focused Scanners are being used? Your ninja edits cannot hide from me.
I don't even remember what I said. But what's above is what I meant.
I thought you were on a fact-finding mission, Arkena. Why are you suddenly focused on making issues out of non-issues?
Shoot scout with yes.
- Ripley Riley
|
Arkena Wyrnspire
Fatal Absolution Negative-Feedback
22759
|
Posted - 2015.03.15 16:07:00 -
[31270] - Quote
Making issues out of non-issues?
Dude, all I did was post a lighthearted equivalent of 'I am disappoint' and it prompts a vicious 'aww I hurt your feelings' response?
Can we drop the anti-nonscout (or perceived nonscout, as it is) rubbish and actually have a civil discussion? It wasn't even meant to be much of a discussion, I was just asking a question.
All I wanted to know was if focused scanners are actually used that much. As it is, no, I can't check from EVE. My subscription isn't active atm and I can't find the relevant stats on the internet.
Gallente Guide
|
|
Adipem Nothi
Nos Nothi
7659
|
Posted - 2015.03.15 16:59:00 -
[31271] - Quote
Fair enough. Post 31248: "I didn't actually answer your question. Can't speak for PC, but I do get scanned on occasion in pubs while running a 2x damped GalScout. Can't put a number on it, but I wouldn't call them rare."
To be perfectly candid, I truly enjoy your company, Arkena, but I question your motives when it comes to EWAR. I'm on the defensive anytime you bring it up, which is perhaps unfair to you. This dates back to the falloff discussions and your support for Cat Merc's proposal. His model was broken, and it seemed painfully obvious why it broken. Yet you supported it. Even after being told why it was broken, you supported it. I've been unable reconcile your support for something which would've entirely removed CQC Scouts from play. Either your judgment was off or your motives were off, and you strike me as too clever to have poor judgment.
So here we are. Right or wrong, I suspect your motives when it comes to EWAR and the backstab playstyle. I'd love for you to put at rest my suspicions, and I apologize for my defensive posture.
Shoot scout with yes.
- Ripley Riley
|
Kaeru Nayiri
Ready to Play
641
|
Posted - 2015.03.15 17:01:00 -
[31272] - Quote
Adipem Nothi wrote:FLAYLOCK Steve wrote: You're shotty go bang? Dude now I must really join your corp lol I can learn so much!
You'll learn more hanging around the Barbershop than you ever could from me in game. I'm just a numbers guy; there are way better scouts and shooters here than me.
I don't think I've EVER seen you BS harder in my time here. Wow what a way to sell yourself short. What a bastard.
EDIT: after reading the posts following the one I quoted, I hope this doesn't get taken out of context XD.
Know what cannot be known.
|
First Prophet
Nos Nothi
2573
|
Posted - 2015.03.15 17:03:00 -
[31273] - Quote
Ghost Kaisar wrote:We haven't had a good bar brawl in awhile.....
Lets see if this pans out. I got 100 isk on shotty.
People find this this review helpful!
|
Arkena Wyrnspire
Fatal Absolution Negative-Feedback
22765
|
Posted - 2015.03.15 17:08:00 -
[31274] - Quote
Let me assure you, Shotty, I don't have a hidden motive here.
TBH, even if I am some nefarious, shady sort hell bent on crushing all stealth out of the game... What would I even be able to do to accomplish that? vOv
I have no clue what you're referring to. I don't recall being particularly involved in the falloff rings discussion apart from getting annoyed after the changes when scan amps became useless. All I want to know right now is if I should actually be worrying about focused scanners.
Gallente Guide
|
Cat Merc
Negative-Feedback. Negative-Feedback
15507
|
Posted - 2015.03.15 17:15:00 -
[31275] - Quote
Adipem Nothi wrote:Fair enough. Post 31248: "I didn't actually answer your question. Can't speak for PC, but I do get scanned on occasion in pubs while running a 2x damped GalScout. Can't put a number on it, but I wouldn't call them rare." To be perfectly candid, I truly enjoy your company, Arkena, but I question your motives when it comes to EWAR. I'm on the defensive anytime you bring it up, which is perhaps unfair to you. This dates back to the falloff discussions and your support for Cat Merc's proposal. His model was broken, and it seemed painfully obvious why it broken. Yet you supported it. Even after being told why it was broken, you supported it. I've been unable reconcile your support for something which would've entirely removed CQC Scouts from play. Either your judgment was off or your motives were off, and you strike me as too clever to have poor judgment. So here we are. Right or wrong, I suspect your motives when it comes to EWAR and the backstab playstyle. I'd love for you to put at rest my suspicions, and I apologize for my defensive posture. My proposal was flawless! Flawless I tell you! *Shakes fist*
Cat Merc for C¦¦P¦¦M¦¦9¦¦ CPM Nyan!
Vote 'Keshava' for the new Gallente vehicle name!
|
Arkena Wyrnspire
Fatal Absolution Negative-Feedback
22766
|
Posted - 2015.03.15 17:17:00 -
[31276] - Quote
Aaaand cat gets involved.
*sigh*
Gallente Guide
|
Spademan
Fatal Absolution Negative-Feedback
6095
|
Posted - 2015.03.15 19:14:00 -
[31277] - Quote
Adipem Nothi wrote:Fair enough. Post 31248: "I didn't actually answer your question. Can't speak for PC, but I do get scanned on occasion in pubs while running a 2x damped GalScout. Can't put a number on it, but I wouldn't call them rare." To be perfectly candid, I truly enjoy your company, Arkena, but I question your motives when it comes to EWAR. I'm on the defensive anytime you bring it up, which is perhaps unfair to you. This dates back to the falloff discussions and your support for Cat Merc's proposal. His model was broken, and it seemed painfully obvious why it broken. Yet you supported it. Even after being told why it was broken, you supported it. I've been unable reconcile your support for something which would've entirely removed CQC Scouts from play. Either your judgment was off or your motives were off, and you strike me as too clever to have poor judgment. So here we are. Right or wrong, I suspect your motives when it comes to EWAR and the backstab playstyle. I'd love for you to put at rest my suspicions, and I apologize for my defensive posture. Perhaps it's a region thing? I've never been scanned below 20 dB.
What're you looking at me like that for? I'll shank you I will.
|
One Eyed King
Nos Nothi
8529
|
Posted - 2015.03.15 19:22:00 -
[31278] - Quote
I haven't been scanned too much lately, but I defintely do in my undampened hacking fit. Which sucks, because I am already giving up HP to hack, and now I gotta be lit up too...
While it hasn't been in the past week, there was definitely a period after the Circles where I saw a bunch of 15 dB scans in pubs. Was quite annoying and a big reason I wouldn't play. I shouldn't HAVE to pull out an expensive max dampened proto suit just because of a scanner.
Former CEO of the Land of the BIind.
Any double entendre is unintended I assure you.
|
voidfaction
Nos Nothi
1282
|
Posted - 2015.03.15 20:22:00 -
[31279] - Quote
I think I can count on 1 hand the times I have been scanned running at 20db in the past 2 months. I run at 27db with very little issues with active scans. This is running pubs.
[edit] I do run a gal logi with 2 focused and a cloak when I see lots of scouts running around though. I only have lvl 4 gal logi so I don't have that 1 extra db, lol
noi¦Ü+ö+Æßû+(V)Fac¦Üion
|
IAmDuncanIdaho II
Nos Nothi
1665
|
Posted - 2015.03.15 20:37:00 -
[31280] - Quote
**** me the stomp has been strong since downtime. days like today is what make me stop playing this game every now and then. meh. props to Haerr for sticking the game out we were in.
|
|
Eruditus 920
Nemo Malus Felix
1466
|
Posted - 2015.03.15 21:12:00 -
[31281] - Quote
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:T'is not a sadface, but a disappointed face.
Unrelated: I was playing civ 5, and then the Romans mocked me for having a weak military. "I bet your empire will fall to barbarians," they said.
Well then get ready bc that means they are about to declare war on you.
Curse Caesar!
Et tu Brute?
"Stay gold, Ponyboy..."
|
Arkena Wyrnspire
Fatal Absolution Negative-Feedback
22779
|
Posted - 2015.03.15 21:27:00 -
[31282] - Quote
Eruditus 920 wrote:Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:T'is not a sadface, but a disappointed face.
Unrelated: I was playing civ 5, and then the Romans mocked me for having a weak military. "I bet your empire will fall to barbarians," they said. Well then get ready bc that means they are about to declare war on you. Curse Caesar! Et tu Brute?
I pre-empted them and declared war on them instead.
Playing British on an Archipelago map, they tried to 'sneak' attack me with a naval force. It did not end well for them.
Gallente Guide
|
First Prophet
Nos Nothi
2574
|
Posted - 2015.03.15 21:39:00 -
[31283] - Quote
I've been getting scanned occasionally with a Complex damp and an active ADV cloak.
People find this this review helpful!
|
One Eyed King
Nos Nothi
8533
|
Posted - 2015.03.15 21:47:00 -
[31284] - Quote
First Prophet wrote:I've been getting scanned occasionally with a Complex damp and an active ADV cloak. Adv cloak doesn't do squat for dampening. Maybe gets you 1 dB lower. Its quite useless in that regard.
Former CEO of the Land of the BIind.
Any double entendre is unintended I assure you.
|
First Prophet
Nos Nothi
2574
|
Posted - 2015.03.15 22:10:00 -
[31285] - Quote
One Eyed King wrote:First Prophet wrote:I've been getting scanned occasionally with a Complex damp and an active ADV cloak. Adv cloak doesn't do squat for dampening. Maybe gets you 1 dB lower. Its quite useless in that regard. I assumed it did more, but it seems it only gives a -5% scan profile. I should probably read things more.
People find this this review helpful!
|
One Eyed King
Nos Nothi
8535
|
Posted - 2015.03.15 22:34:00 -
[31286] - Quote
First Prophet wrote:One Eyed King wrote:First Prophet wrote:I've been getting scanned occasionally with a Complex damp and an active ADV cloak. Adv cloak doesn't do squat for dampening. Maybe gets you 1 dB lower. Its quite useless in that regard. I assumed it did more, but it seems it only gives a -5% scan profile. I should probably read things more. It used to do more before the first cloak nerf.
Former CEO of the Land of the BIind.
Any double entendre is unintended I assure you.
|
Adipem Nothi
Nos Nothi
7666
|
Posted - 2015.03.15 22:43:00 -
[31287] - Quote
First Prophet wrote:I've been getting scanned occasionally with a Complex damp and an active ADV cloak. If you're running AM or MN, your profile is 22 dB w/1 cmp damp and an active advanced cloak. Could be 21 dB scanners picking you up.
Shoot scout with yes.
- Ripley Riley
|
First Prophet
Nos Nothi
2579
|
Posted - 2015.03.15 22:52:00 -
[31288] - Quote
Adipem Nothi wrote:First Prophet wrote:I've been getting scanned occasionally with a Complex damp and an active ADV cloak. If you're running AM or MN, . Apparently I haven't made it clear enough what I run.
People find this this review helpful!
|
First Prophet
Nos Nothi
2579
|
Posted - 2015.03.15 22:53:00 -
[31289] - Quote
One Eyed King wrote:First Prophet wrote:One Eyed King wrote:First Prophet wrote:I've been getting scanned occasionally with a Complex damp and an active ADV cloak. Adv cloak doesn't do squat for dampening. Maybe gets you 1 dB lower. Its quite useless in that regard. I assumed it did more, but it seems it only gives a -5% scan profile. I should probably read things more. It used to do more before the first cloak nerf. That makes sense. I did remember it doing more. I'm getting caught while cloaked directly behind people more than I'd like.
People find this this review helpful!
|
Adipem Nothi
Nos Nothi
7666
|
Posted - 2015.03.15 22:54:00 -
[31290] - Quote
First Prophet wrote:Adipem Nothi wrote:First Prophet wrote:I've been getting scanned occasionally with a Complex damp and an active ADV cloak. If you're running AM or MN, . Apparently I haven't made it clear enough what I run. You running Adv Cloak on an Assault these days?
(If you were running GA or CA Scout, then you're being pinged by a 15dB scanner).
Shoot scout with yes.
- Ripley Riley
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |