| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 178 post(s) |
Adipem Nothi
Nos Nothi
7772
   |
Posted - 2015.03.16 22:55:00 -
[31441] - Quote
Archduke Ferd1nand wrote:Instead of nerfing scanners (scanners are fine), lets change the gallogi bonus and/or buff dampeners.
Jebus has suggested that damps reduce scan duration. I like the idea alot. I also like the idea of improving cloak's active damp bonus; we just have to figure out how to do it without resurrecting Assault Lite.
Shoot scout with yes.
- Ripley Riley
|
Archduke Ferd1nand
Nos Nothi
220
|
Posted - 2015.03.16 22:56:00 -
[31442] - Quote
Adipem Nothi wrote:Archduke Ferd1nand wrote:Adipem Nothi wrote:Archduke Ferd1nand wrote:Also, does anyone find it funny that when a scout has squad sharing perma scan out to 60 meters by sacrificing his entire fit, and having 0 combat viability, its "OP and needs to be nerfed into the ground", but when a Logi does it while stacking plates and shields out to 200 meters and shares with the entire team, "its underpowered, skillful, and needed to defend against the OP scouts"?
Absolutely it is. You should ask your CEO about it; I believe this was his intended design and expressed goal. Zat is no longer the CEO actually.... The Passive Recon ---> Active Recon switch makes sense from an FC's point-of-view. 1+ units per squad providing squad-wide recon. 1-2 units total providing team-wide recon. The new system is more reliable and more efficient.
Agreed.
In any PC match, id rather dedicate 2 Logis to perma scan than have a forced scout in each squad. The Logis can defend themselves, and sit up at a high point and still provide scans.
However, the increased reliability/efficiency is a problem. It makes perma scans too easy to maintain.
Id be fine with perma scan if there was an entire 6 man squad dedicated to it, but as it stands, you only need 1-2 people to ensure that your team can see directionals through walls on 80% of objectives.
BRB, looking for socks
Asslut Rifles OP, anal now
I shit shotgun shells and piss Remote Explosives
|
Arkena Wyrnspire
Fatal Absolution
Negative-Feedback
22810
|
Posted - 2015.03.16 22:57:00 -
[31443] - Quote
Archduke Ferd1nand wrote:Also, does anyone find it funny that when a scout has squad sharing perma scan out to 60 meters by sacrificing his entire fit, and having 0 combat viability, its "OP and needs to be nerfed into the ground", but when a Logi does it while stacking plates and shields out to 200 meters and shares with the entire team, "its underpowered, skillful, and needed to defend against the OP scouts"?
Even now, people are complaining about scout passives, which are gimmicky to say the best of them.
Confirmation bias much?
Plenty of GD threads pointing out how ridiculous active scans are at times.
Gallente Guide
|
Archduke Ferd1nand
Nos Nothi
230
|
Posted - 2015.03.16 22:59:00 -
[31444] - Quote
Adipem Nothi wrote:Archduke Ferd1nand wrote:Instead of nerfing scanners (scanners are fine), lets change the gallogi bonus and/or buff dampeners. Jebus has suggested that damps reduce scan duration. I like the idea alot. I also like the idea of improving cloak's active damp bonus; we just have to figure out how to do it without resurrecting Assault Lite.
I like this too.
That combined with limiting scanners to 1-2 per suit would make scanning more of a balanced optional advantage vs. a must have.
Also, vehicle scanner have remained off radar (haha), but I feel are too strong for what they are.
28 dB in a 360 at 100% uptime is ridiculous. You can make a cheap MLT tank with active scanners in the highs and perma scan an entire team.
They should be tiered, but they need to be worse than what they are now at proto especially.
BRB, looking for socks
Asslut Rifles OP, anal now
I shit shotgun shells and piss Remote Explosives
|
Adipem Nothi
Nos Nothi
7778
|
Posted - 2015.03.16 23:00:00 -
[31445] - Quote
Archduke Ferd1nand wrote:Adipem Nothi wrote:Archduke Ferd1nand wrote:Adipem Nothi wrote:Archduke Ferd1nand wrote:Also, does anyone find it funny that when a scout has squad sharing perma scan out to 60 meters by sacrificing his entire fit, and having 0 combat viability, its "OP and needs to be nerfed into the ground", but when a Logi does it while stacking plates and shields out to 200 meters and shares with the entire team, "its underpowered, skillful, and needed to defend against the OP scouts"?
Absolutely it is. You should ask your CEO about it; I believe this was his intended design and expressed goal. Zat is no longer the CEO actually.... The Passive Recon ---> Active Recon switch makes sense from an FC's point-of-view. 1+ units per squad providing squad-wide recon. 1-2 units total providing team-wide recon. The new system is more reliable and more efficient. Agreed. In any PC match, id rather dedicate 2 Logis to perma scan than have a forced scout in each squad. The Logis can defend themselves, and sit up at a high point and still provide scans. However, the increased reliability/efficiency is a problem. It makes perma scans too easy to maintain. Id be fine with perma scan if there was an entire 6 man squad dedicated to it, but as it stands, you only need 1-2 people to ensure that your team can see directionals through walls on 80% of objectives.
"Always On" scans. Precisely what we wanted to get away from. And now easier to come by than ever.
Shoot scout with yes.
- Ripley Riley
|
Archduke Ferd1nand
Nos Nothi
230
|
Posted - 2015.03.16 23:00:00 -
[31446] - Quote
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:Archduke Ferd1nand wrote:Also, does anyone find it funny that when a scout has squad sharing perma scan out to 60 meters by sacrificing his entire fit, and having 0 combat viability, its "OP and needs to be nerfed into the ground", but when a Logi does it while stacking plates and shields out to 200 meters and shares with the entire team, "its underpowered, skillful, and needed to defend against the OP scouts"?
Even now, people are complaining about scout passives, which are gimmicky to say the best of them.
Confirmation bias much? Plenty of GD threads pointing out how ridiculous active scans are at times.
Confirming Gallente bias much?
I haven't seen one since the scannerina nerf, other than the stray QQ.
BRB, looking for socks
Asslut Rifles OP, anal now
I shit shotgun shells and piss Remote Explosives
|
Arkena Wyrnspire
Fatal Absolution
Negative-Feedback
22810
|
Posted - 2015.03.16 23:01:00 -
[31447] - Quote
I dislike the binary scanned/not scanned system we have and strongly agree that it should be scaled based on profile. But is it possible to do? vOv
IMHO, ping a heavy with a focused scanner and he should be on scan for days. Ping a scout who is -just- above the profile and they shouldn't appear on there for long at all.
Gallente Guide
|
Adipem Nothi
Nos Nothi
7778
|
Posted - 2015.03.16 23:03:00 -
[31448] - Quote
Archduke Ferd1nand wrote:Adipem Nothi wrote:Archduke Ferd1nand wrote:Instead of nerfing scanners (scanners are fine), lets change the gallogi bonus and/or buff dampeners. Jebus has suggested that damps reduce scan duration. I like the idea alot. I also like the idea of improving cloak's active damp bonus; we just have to figure out how to do it without resurrecting Assault Lite. I like this too. That combined with limiting scanners to 1-2 per suit would make scanning more of a balanced optional advantage vs. a must have. Also, vehicle scanner have remained off radar (haha), but I feel are too strong for what they are. 28 dB in a 360 at 100% uptime is ridiculous. You can make a cheap MLT tank with active scanners in the highs and perma scan an entire team. They should be tiered, but they need to be worse than what they are now at proto especially.
I dislike the idea of limiting suits unless its absolutely necessary to do so. Haerr and I were discussing this issue earlier. I'm thinking that tweaks to team-sharing might be a better solution.
Higher performance scanners share squad-wide.
Lower performance scanners share team-wide.
Shoot scout with yes.
- Ripley Riley
|
Adipem Nothi
Nos Nothi
7778
|
Posted - 2015.03.16 23:05:00 -
[31449] - Quote
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:I dislike the binary scanned/not scanned system we have and strongly agree that it should be scaled based on profile. But is it possible to do? vOv
IMHO, ping a heavy with a focused scanner and he should be on scan for days. Ping a scout who is -just- above the profile and they shouldn't appear on there for long at all.
That would be awesome. Scan Duration as a function of Scan Profile.
Shoot scout with yes.
- Ripley Riley
|
One Eyed King
Nos Nothi
8601
|
Posted - 2015.03.16 23:05:00 -
[31450] - Quote
Gav 2.0 > Gav 1.0
Former CEO of the Land of the BIind.
Any double entendre is unintended I assure you.
|
|
|
Arkena Wyrnspire
Fatal Absolution
Negative-Feedback
22810
|
Posted - 2015.03.16 23:05:00 -
[31451] - Quote
Archduke Ferd1nand wrote:Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:Archduke Ferd1nand wrote:Also, does anyone find it funny that when a scout has squad sharing perma scan out to 60 meters by sacrificing his entire fit, and having 0 combat viability, its "OP and needs to be nerfed into the ground", but when a Logi does it while stacking plates and shields out to 200 meters and shares with the entire team, "its underpowered, skillful, and needed to defend against the OP scouts"?
Even now, people are complaining about scout passives, which are gimmicky to say the best of them.
Confirmation bias much? Plenty of GD threads pointing out how ridiculous active scans are at times. Confirming Gallente bias much? I haven't seen one since the scannerina nerf, other than the stray QQ.
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2668369#post2668369
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2668615#post2668615
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2654325#post2654325
Found in all of about 10 seconds. That was hard, wasn't it?
I find it particularly amusing that you're attempting to call me out on being biased because I'm Gallente and they're a Gallente item. Dude, I even said they were ridiculous. Am I biased? Should they be buffed instead because clearly as a biased Gallentean my opinion must be wrong? 
It's especially funny given the content of your threads are some of the most biased ones in GD, surpassed only by the likes of Sir Dukey.
Gallente Guide
|
Archduke Ferd1nand
Nos Nothi
230
|
Posted - 2015.03.16 23:06:00 -
[31452] - Quote
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:I dislike the binary scanned/not scanned system we have and strongly agree that it should be scaled based on profile. But is it possible to do? vOv
IMHO, ping a heavy with a focused scanner and he should be on scan for days. Ping a scout who is -just- above the profile and they shouldn't appear on there for long at all.
+1
This would add a non-binary system to active scans to complement passives.
Something like each AS would have a multiplier for duration instead of a number, and each dB difference is 1 second*multiplier for duration.
Multipliers would range from .5-1.5 IMO.
Ex. 30 dB damped Assault gets scanned by a 28 dB scan with a multiplier of 1.5. He is scanned for 3 seconds. If it was a .75 multiplier, it would be for 1.5 seconds.
Ex. 2: a 48 dB heavy is scanned by a 36 dB scanner with a 1.0 multiplier. He is scanned for 12 seconds.
This would really incentivize damps instead of plates in the lows.
BRB, looking for socks
Asslut Rifles OP, anal now
I shit shotgun shells and piss Remote Explosives
|
Ghost Kaisar
Negative-Feedback
10654
|
Posted - 2015.03.16 23:08:00 -
[31453] - Quote
Forced Death wrote:Ghost Kaisar wrote:Forced Death wrote:Dreis Shadowweaver wrote:These days, I'm running Assault 90% of the time, and Scout 10%. I haven't played a Skirm in weeks...  It's really easy to 'dominate' in Dom: I've got a weekly w/l over 22.00... It's so shiny; I'm afraid of damaging it by running Skirm.  How can I get back to my roots? I wanna be 'Dreis the knifer', not 'Dreis the tryhard'... Quick, before the tryhard in me makes me change my mind!!! AAAAAAHHHHHHH!!! You only have a w/l of 22.00 because you protostomp in Doms against blues in militia Or maybe its because I know how to win matches? http://imgur.com/wnneq7b <--- Teams http://imgur.com/iN7aBMY <--- Tiger Scout FTW Forgive the Potato quality Ok, great. But I've seen Dreis (or are you him in disguise why are you talking to me when I was talking to Dreis) run proto everytime I play with him. In Doms, he is always running a Proto Min Ass with a Boundless CR or Six Kin ACR. And when he ran scouts, he ran a Scout mk.0
I'm not, I'm just showing that having a high W/L is more likely due to the fact that a player KNOWS how to win a match. They know what must be done and takes it upon themselves.
In that match, I had to solo hold 2 objectives and contest the third the entire game by myself while a few blues held the outside.
And I freaking did it. Good players have High W/L ratios because they run in squads and do what must be done.
If he wants to run a proto suit, let him. Those things are almost impossible to run for profit in pubs without supplementary income from PC. If he can afford to run it, why shouldn't he?
I run Proto Min Assaults and Proto Min Scouts.
Are you going to accuse me of only getting my W/L and K/D from pure MLT stomping?
Currently listening to: Max Anarchy OST
Old School Scout, watch out for the knives
|
First Prophet
Nos Nothi
2647
|
Posted - 2015.03.16 23:08:00 -
[31454] - Quote
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:Archduke Ferd1nand wrote:Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:Archduke Ferd1nand wrote:Also, does anyone find it funny that when a scout has squad sharing perma scan out to 60 meters by sacrificing his entire fit, and having 0 combat viability, its "OP and needs to be nerfed into the ground", but when a Logi does it while stacking plates and shields out to 200 meters and shares with the entire team, "its underpowered, skillful, and needed to defend against the OP scouts"?
Even now, people are complaining about scout passives, which are gimmicky to say the best of them.
Confirmation bias much? Plenty of GD threads pointing out how ridiculous active scans are at times. Confirming Gallente bias much? I haven't seen one since the scannerina nerf, other than the stray QQ. https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2668369#post2668369https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2668615#post2668615https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2654325#post2654325https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2639851#post2639851Found in all of about 10 seconds. That was hard, wasn't it? I find it particularly amusing that you're attempting to call me out on being biased because I'm Gallente and they're a Gallente item. Dude, I even said they were ridiculous. Am I biased? Should they be buffed instead because clearly as a biased Gallentean my opinion must be wrong? It's especially funny given the content of your threads are some of the most biased ones in GD, surpassed only by the likes of Sir Dukey.
The only bias my threads have are towards farming likes.
People find this this review helpful!
|
Arkena Wyrnspire
Fatal Absolution
Negative-Feedback
22814
|
Posted - 2015.03.16 23:09:00 -
[31455] - Quote
First Prophet wrote:
The only bias my threads have are towards farming likes.
Mate.
<--
1v1 me *****
Gallente Guide
|
Archduke Ferd1nand
Nos Nothi
234
|
Posted - 2015.03.16 23:10:00 -
[31456] - Quote
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:Archduke Ferd1nand wrote:Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:Archduke Ferd1nand wrote:Also, does anyone find it funny that when a scout has squad sharing perma scan out to 60 meters by sacrificing his entire fit, and having 0 combat viability, its "OP and needs to be nerfed into the ground", but when a Logi does it while stacking plates and shields out to 200 meters and shares with the entire team, "its underpowered, skillful, and needed to defend against the OP scouts"?
Even now, people are complaining about scout passives, which are gimmicky to say the best of them.
Confirmation bias much? Plenty of GD threads pointing out how ridiculous active scans are at times. Confirming Gallente bias much? I haven't seen one since the scannerina nerf, other than the stray QQ. https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2668369#post2668369https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2668615#post2668615https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2654325#post2654325https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2639851#post2639851Found in all of about 10 seconds. That was hard, wasn't it? I find it particularly amusing that you're attempting to call me out on being biased because I'm Gallente and they're a Gallente item. Dude, I even said they were ridiculous. Am I biased? Should they be buffed instead because clearly as a biased Gallentean my opinion must be wrong? It's especially funny given the content of your threads are some of the most biased ones in GD, surpassed only by the likes of Sir Dukey.
1. Your original post calling me biased came before your sensible post that I +1'ed
2. Find me a biased thread Ive made in the past 6 months.
EDIT: Removed unneccesary personal flame attack.
BRB, looking for socks
Asslut Rifles OP, anal now
I shit shotgun shells and piss Remote Explosives
|
voidfaction
Nos Nothi
1288
|
Posted - 2015.03.16 23:12:00 -
[31457] - Quote
Archduke Ferd1nand wrote:voidfaction wrote:Archduke Ferd1nand wrote:Also, does anyone find it funny that when a scout has squad sharing perma scan out to 60 meters by sacrificing his entire fit, and having 0 combat viability, its "OP and needs to be nerfed into the ground", but when a Logi does it while stacking plates and shields out to 200 meters and shares with the entire team, "its underpowered, skillful, and needed to defend against the OP scouts"?
Even now, people are complaining about scout passives, which are gimmicky to say the best of them.
Active scanner range nerf is on the hotfix backlog. https://trello.com/b/bfGqdj7S/ccp-rattati-s-big-board-of-thingsNot to mention killing my cloaked gal logi fit with removing the logi cloak fitting bonus. Range nerf wont do it. Its imperative for any good squad or PC team to have a Gal logi for perma scan because of the HUGE advantage it gives you, not to mention the combat viability it has. The last time there was a suit like that (Cal Scout), it was nerfed into the ground. The perma scan meta has to go. Its silly. I don't have problems with scanners. I accept I should not be hidden from everything with no risk.
my only problem with active scanners.
flux having the widest angle and 200m (should not be more than 150m). I think the longer the scan range the more narrow the angle should be.
proximity should have the widest angle with its 60m range.
focused should be 50m with narrow angle
The db does not bother me as a scout it is the range at which they can scan that bothers me.
noi¦Ü+ö+Æßû+(V)Fac¦Üion
|
First Prophet
Nos Nothi
2650
|
Posted - 2015.03.16 23:13:00 -
[31458] - Quote
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:First Prophet wrote:
The only bias my threads have are towards farming likes.
1v1 me *****
NO ITEMS.
FOX ONLY.
FINAL DESTINATION.
LET'S GO.
People find this this review helpful!
|
Adipem Nothi
Nos Nothi
7779
|
Posted - 2015.03.16 23:13:00 -
[31459] - Quote
Archduke Ferd1nand wrote:
2. Find me a biased thread Ive made in the past 6 months.
This one's kinda derpy:
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2681643#post2681643
Don't know if its biased or not, but it isn't accurate. I will say, however, that your ratio of trash:quality is vastly improved. 
Shoot scout with yes.
- Ripley Riley
|
Archduke Ferd1nand
Nos Nothi
234
|
Posted - 2015.03.16 23:15:00 -
[31460] - Quote
I meant to say a scanning scout.
But fair enough.
BRB, looking for socks
Asslut Rifles OP, anal now
I shit shotgun shells and piss Remote Explosives
|
|
|
Adipem Nothi
Nos Nothi
7779
|
Posted - 2015.03.16 23:15:00 -
[31461] - Quote
voidfaction wrote:I don't have problems with scanners...
... says the GalScout.
Shoot scout with yes.
- Ripley Riley
|
Archduke Ferd1nand
Nos Nothi
234
|
Posted - 2015.03.16 23:15:00 -
[31462] - Quote
First Prophet wrote:Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:First Prophet wrote:
The only bias my threads have are towards farming likes.
1v1 me ***** NO ITEMS. FOX ONLY. FINAL DESTINATION. LET'S GO.
Meta Knight is OP
Marth was my char in melee and brawl.
Best for tournies cause he isn't banned.
BRB, looking for socks
Asslut Rifles OP, anal now
I shit shotgun shells and piss Remote Explosives
|
Ghost Kaisar
Negative-Feedback
10657
|
Posted - 2015.03.16 23:16:00 -
[31463] - Quote
Archduke Ferd1nand wrote:Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:Archduke Ferd1nand wrote:Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:Archduke Ferd1nand wrote:Also, does anyone find it funny that when a scout has squad sharing perma scan out to 60 meters by sacrificing his entire fit, and having 0 combat viability, its "OP and needs to be nerfed into the ground", but when a Logi does it while stacking plates and shields out to 200 meters and shares with the entire team, "its underpowered, skillful, and needed to defend against the OP scouts"?
Even now, people are complaining about scout passives, which are gimmicky to say the best of them.
Confirmation bias much? Plenty of GD threads pointing out how ridiculous active scans are at times. Confirming Gallente bias much? I haven't seen one since the scannerina nerf, other than the stray QQ. https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2668369#post2668369https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2668615#post2668615https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2654325#post2654325https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2639851#post2639851Found in all of about 10 seconds. That was hard, wasn't it? I find it particularly amusing that you're attempting to call me out on being biased because I'm Gallente and they're a Gallente item. Dude, I even said they were ridiculous. Am I biased? Should they be buffed instead because clearly as a biased Gallentean my opinion must be wrong? It's especially funny given the content of your threads are some of the most biased ones in GD, surpassed only by the likes of Sir Dukey. 1. Your original post calling me biased came before your sensible post that I +1'ed 2. Find me a biased thread Ive made in the past 6 months. 3. Those threads that you listed are easy to find with search functions. QQ Gallente sucks QQ doesn't provide quite as many results.
Let he who has no sin throw the first stone.
Seriously, all of us are biased to some degree. Some a lot more than others.
I would agree that Gav is a lot more biased than others, based on his posts in the past and having known him. At the same time, you've also put a lot of effort into trying to erase that.
Arkena is biased, but he tries VERY hard to work over it. Same as I do when trying not to sound elitist, while at the same time offering constructive criticism and advice.
So why don't we stop trying to yell at each other about who is worse, and instead try and use logical arguments instead.
These last few posts are literally the definition of "Ad Hominem"
Currently listening to: Max Anarchy OST
Old School Scout, watch out for the knives
|
Arkena Wyrnspire
Fatal Absolution
Negative-Feedback
22814
|
Posted - 2015.03.16 23:16:00 -
[31464] - Quote
Scan angle is ultimately irrelevant while spin scanning still exists.
Gallente Guide
|
One Eyed King
Nos Nothi
8603
|
Posted - 2015.03.16 23:16:00 -
[31465] - Quote
voidfaction wrote:Archduke Ferd1nand wrote:voidfaction wrote:Archduke Ferd1nand wrote:Also, does anyone find it funny that when a scout has squad sharing perma scan out to 60 meters by sacrificing his entire fit, and having 0 combat viability, its "OP and needs to be nerfed into the ground", but when a Logi does it while stacking plates and shields out to 200 meters and shares with the entire team, "its underpowered, skillful, and needed to defend against the OP scouts"?
Even now, people are complaining about scout passives, which are gimmicky to say the best of them.
Active scanner range nerf is on the hotfix backlog. https://trello.com/b/bfGqdj7S/ccp-rattati-s-big-board-of-thingsNot to mention killing my cloaked gal logi fit with removing the logi cloak fitting bonus. Range nerf wont do it. Its imperative for any good squad or PC team to have a Gal logi for perma scan because of the HUGE advantage it gives you, not to mention the combat viability it has. The last time there was a suit like that (Cal Scout), it was nerfed into the ground. The perma scan meta has to go. Its silly. I don't have problems with scanners. I accept I should not be hidden from everything with no risk. my only problem with active scanners. flux having the widest angle and 200m (should not be more than 150m). I think the longer the scan range the more narrow the angle should be. proximity should have the widest angle with its 60m range. focused should be 50m with narrow angle The db does not bother me as a scout it is the range at which they can scan that bothers me.
If only I remember High School geometry, someone could figure out total scan area in square meters. That might be a good way to make some comparisons.
Former CEO of the Land of the BIind.
Any double entendre is unintended I assure you.
|
Arkena Wyrnspire
Fatal Absolution
Negative-Feedback
22814
|
Posted - 2015.03.16 23:17:00 -
[31466] - Quote
Ghost Kaisar wrote:
Let he who has no sin throw the first stone.
Grenades or REs are better, of course.
What kind of pleb throws a mere stone in this day and age?
Gallente Guide
|
Adipem Nothi
Nos Nothi
7779
|
Posted - 2015.03.16 23:18:00 -
[31467] - Quote
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:Scan angle is ultimately irrelevant while spin scanning still exists.
Think this might require a KB/M now. Haerr switched to DS3. Need someone else to test.
Kaeru runs KB/M, right?
Shoot scout with yes.
- Ripley Riley
|
Ghost Kaisar
Negative-Feedback
10657
|
Posted - 2015.03.16 23:18:00 -
[31468] - Quote
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:Ghost Kaisar wrote:
Let he who has no sin throw the first stone.
Grenades or REs are better, of course. What kind of pleb throws a mere stone in this day and age?
*Throws Potato at Arkena*
YOU KNOW WHAT I MEANT
Currently listening to: Max Anarchy OST
Old School Scout, watch out for the knives
|
Archduke Ferd1nand
Nos Nothi
239
|
Posted - 2015.03.16 23:20:00 -
[31469] - Quote
Ghost Kaisar wrote:
These last few posts are literally the definition of "Ad Hominem"
I at least edited my post.
BRB, looking for socks
Asslut Rifles OP, anal now
I shit shotgun shells and piss Remote Explosives
|
FLAYLOCK Steve
Kinsho Swords
Caldari State
509
|
Posted - 2015.03.16 23:20:00 -
[31470] - Quote
I sent in an application to nos nothi |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |