The Logistics and Assault Dropships are going to be taken out temporarily, but they should be returning in the future. As was said in the first post, we want to go back to basics and get the core interactions working first. Then we can look at branching back out once we have a solid foundation.

This is terrible all of it. Its SOOO BAD are you kidding me ccp?
Throw all this garbage away, yes its all garbage. Throw it away and simply buff the tanks now. You guys preached how your gonna change tanking blah blah blah this is your plan? This is terrible!!! I cant even stop saying how terrible this 0_0. Tanking is all about how long you can stay in the action. Neither a shield tank or armor will be able to "stay in the action" at all. One forge shot and ill be running. I wont have the module slots to properly fit the tank. Nor will i be able to get diversity without completely eliminating a strong point. You guys are pathetic. Nobody ask for the "gameplay to get reinvented". We wanted a vehicle buff thats it lol. All you had to do was bump up a few numbers and everything would have been fine. Shield tanking is a joke all that pg for a 1000 rep xD thats not even a milta armor rep now. Then on the other end for madrugars you plan on giving us passive reps. Um maybe if the plan was to have us redline sniping. Throw this garbage out and buff what we have. This **** would take so long for you guys to fix it would be sickening.

I think just about anyone would agree that a tank with three people inside of it should be more powerful than a tank with only one.

OK So.....

WHY USE BLASTERS AT ALL

As you progress through tiers for some reason the damage and RoF do not change at all but CPU/PG usage increases, no differences in ammunition, nothing. There is no reason to use anything other than basic.....explain.

Crunching the numbers with the new modules and such, removing both small turrets is going to sacrifice more DPS then you will ever gain from EHP, putting you at an advantage against infantry but at a noticeable disadvantage in HAV vs HAV fights.

Nice to know all the ships I just invested in wont even exist.

You might actually require a dropship or LAV to cover the withdrawal of a tank. Hmmm, that could actually encourage multi-unit tactics.

So instead of whining about it, how about you propose something different?

Hi guys,

...[/i]

Thanks for ******* me in the ass ccp. All that time I've spent training vehicles is now an absolute waste.

This ^^^^ really.

We went from the promise of pilot suits really changing the way vehicles behave and such to now, 2 delayed patches and now they are taking even more stuff OUT of the game!?!

This is madness and its BACKWARDS compared to every other game.

I honestly have no faith, not only that but there really doesn't seem to be a 'plan' at all here.

caps..

To really test the balance and get rid of the noise AV will lo have to be stripped down to the STD versions just like vehicles.

This isn't a nerf whine, but rather a realistic testing requirement unless you are trying to balance STD vehicles against PROTO AV.

This is terrible all of it. Its SOOO BAD are you kidding me ccp?
Throw all this garbage away, yes its all garbage. Throw it away and simply buff the tanks now. You guys preached how your gonna change tanking blah blah blah this is your plan? This is terrible!!! I cant even stop saying how terrible this 0_0. Tanking is all about how long you can stay in the action. Neither a shield tank or armor will be able to "stay in the action" at all. One forge shot and ill be running. I wont have the module slots to properly fit the tank. Nor will i be able to get diversity without completely eliminating a strong point. You guys are pathetic. Nobody ask for the "gameplay to get reinvented". We wanted a vehicle buff thats it lol. All you had to do was bump up a few numbers and everything would have been fine. Shield tanking is a joke all that pg for a 1000 rep xD thats not even a milta armor rep now. Then on the other end for madrugars you plan on giving us passive reps. Um maybe if the plan was to have us redline sniping. Throw this garbage out and buff what we have. This **** would take so long for you guys to fix it would be sickening.

The Logistics and Assault Dropships are going to be taken out temporarily, but they should be returning in the future. As was said in the first post, we want to go back to basics and get the core interactions working first. Then we can look at branching back out once we have a solid foundation.

Active vs. passive modules. There will be a far greater emphasis on active module use than ever before. The intent here is to create GÇ£waves of opportunityGÇ¥ that allow vehicles to be devastatingGǪ temporarily. Active modules will greatly enhance a vehicleGÇÖs attributes, but when they enter cooldown, the vehicle is left exposed and vulnerable to attack (more on this below). This back-and-forth allows infantry to engage vehicles, but do so knowing that the vehicleGÇÖs pilot has a short window in which he can drastically alter the outcome of any engagement.

Active vs. Passive modules

WeGÇÖre rebuilding everything with the idea that active modules will allow a vehicle to survive a single encounter, while passive modules increase its long-term surviveability across multiple encounters. Active modules will provide very significant bonuses, but once used their long recharge times leave a lone vehicle vulnerable to any follow-up attacks. Passive modules on the other hand provide permanent bonuses that are comparatively small. The breakdown is as follows:

Armor/Shield Hardeners (A): Massive, temporary reduction to damage received.

Used to survive short, high-DPS situations. Long cool down times discourage overuse.