|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 9 post(s) |
Alldin Kan
TeamPlayers EoN.
638
|
Posted - 2013.10.02 20:56:00 -
[1] - Quote
CCP Logibro wrote:Hi guys,
...[/i] Gathering Data... complete! Analyzing Data... complete! Processing...
Error: Unable to determine balance for Active Hardeners (fitting combinations with total CPU/PG used is varied) Error: Damage values for Blaster turrets are the same Error: Unable to determine Blast Radius values in meters
Displaying response...
- SP REFUND CONFIRMED
- New vehicle stats may be ok, maintain close attention to CPU/PG and slot layouts for possible tweaks.
- Vehicle Command: SP requirements to apply for all vehicles seems odd, consider dividing it for one race at a time (SP for Caldari? Caldari access only).
- Damage Mods are now on High Slot... OH NOOOOO MUH CALDARI FITS!!!!!!!!
- Damage Mod CPU value should remain high to prevent high presence of Madrugars with 2 or 3 modifiers + VERY high health.
- Blast damage value for Small missile is too high, give 25% increase to original blast damage value and increase clip size to 10. However, if you insist on keeping new damage, make sure to tweak clip size as necessary.
- Blast radius value for Small missile should be 3.0 meters, 4.0 for Large.
- Increase Max range of Small missiles to 350, 460 for Large (Railguns have x3 range).
- Direct damage value for Small railgun is too low, keep original values, remove projectile dispersion, and perhaps increase the projectile speed.
- Are you sure you didn't mean 4-round burst for Large Missile turrets and not Full Auto like blasters? If it's 4-round burst then give it a clip size of 24.
|
Alldin Kan
TeamPlayers EoN.
638
|
Posted - 2013.10.02 21:22:00 -
[2] - Quote
The legend345 wrote:This is terrible all of it. Its SOOO BAD are you kidding me ccp? Throw all this garbage away, yes its all garbage. Throw it away and simply buff the tanks now. You guys preached how your gonna change tanking blah blah blah this is your plan? This is terrible!!! I cant even stop saying how terrible this 0_0. Tanking is all about how long you can stay in the action. Neither a shield tank or armor will be able to "stay in the action" at all. One forge shot and ill be running. I wont have the module slots to properly fit the tank. Nor will i be able to get diversity without completely eliminating a strong point. You guys are pathetic. Nobody ask for the "gameplay to get reinvented". We wanted a vehicle buff thats it lol. All you had to do was bump up a few numbers and everything would have been fine. Shield tanking is a joke all that pg for a 1000 rep xD thats not even a milta armor rep now. Then on the other end for madrugars you plan on giving us passive reps. Um maybe if the plan was to have us redline sniping. Throw this garbage out and buff what we have. This **** would take so long for you guys to fix it would be sickening.
AV gonna get nerfed bro, isn't it obvious? |
Alldin Kan
TeamPlayers EoN.
639
|
Posted - 2013.10.02 21:51:00 -
[3] - Quote
You forgot to consider AV nerfs in CCP's update, post by OP is only about vehicles. AV thread should come in later, there's simply no way CCP could release the vehicles with AV being left untouched. |
Alldin Kan
TeamPlayers EoN.
641
|
Posted - 2013.10.02 22:17:00 -
[4] - Quote
Noc Tempre wrote:AV nerfs don't even matter. Looking at a strict vehicle vs vehicle fight it is already horrible. If you refer to the Madrugar fits you mentioned (dual rep + Hardener) then yes. Once that gets sorted (it has to right? ), if you still insist on long tank vs tank fits then all it's needed is to reduce damage on all turrets by a fixed percentage just like the infantry weapons in a earlier build. |
Alldin Kan
TeamPlayers EoN.
641
|
Posted - 2013.10.02 22:38:00 -
[5] - Quote
NextDark Knight wrote:DEVs can you Open up Singularity and your other test and development servers? It would be real fun if we could play with some of the items being developed on singularity. 100isk proto gear and 100isk suites for testing. l Plus maybe seeing some of the tanks being developed would be a nice addition. I WANT TO BELIEVE. |
|
|
|