| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 |
1061. Charlie = 85.7 m 17.8 db ammar scout passive scan! - in General Discussions [original thread]
The difference is, scouts can damp below this with only 2 damps (and a pro cloak if Amarr or Minmatar), unlike Cal scout scans now. Also current Cal scouts have a range bonus as well, which Amarr scouts won't have, though they will have lots of sl...
- by Varoth Drac - at 2014.08.04 07:31:00
|
1062. I feel sick to even use my scout - in General Discussions [original thread]
Armour isn't the problem, as demonstrated by all the Caldari scouts. Cloaks aren't the problem either. Many don't use them. People using scouts for the assault role don't need them. They don't bother taking the time for a wide flank, where a cloa...
- by Varoth Drac - at 2014.08.03 22:29:00
|
1063. my scout has 774 ehp. wbu?logi/assault/tank. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mejt0 wrote: jonny battles wrote: That is crazy my total up on my advanced logo is 726 and my proto is 870 total hp He just said how much his bad scout fit have hp. Heavy can have 2k hp Logi can have around 1,2k + Assault 1k And scout a...
- by Varoth Drac - at 2014.07.30 13:13:00
|
1064. my scout has 774 ehp. wbu?logi/assault/tank. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mejt0 wrote: 1. Read charlie updates. Assaults will have as many slots as logi after changes and way more cpu/pg. 2. Scout with only hp modules is bad, easy to ki-¦ and scan. 3. Calvin b.. read scouts description. They are for assasinations,i...
- by Varoth Drac - at 2014.07.30 10:57:00
|
1065. Rattati put the nail in the coffin for me considering the Minja - in General Discussions [original thread]
I believe they are planning on reducing the pg requirements for kincats, code breakers and nova knives, which should help the pg situation a fair amount.
- by Varoth Drac - at 2014.07.28 16:30:00
|
1066. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
I also feel the proposed assault hp buff is a good way to go. Firstly it is simple, don't underestimate the value of a simple solution. Secondly it is new player friendly. I always thought assaults were meant to be a good solid new player option....
- by Varoth Drac - at 2014.07.19 11:29:00
|
1067. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
DeathwindRising wrote: One Eyed King wrote: Deathwind is why it is not ok for Dev groupies to just stop on in. There are plenty of other threads for feedback. The Barbershop was built for those who wanted to argue scout specific topics and c...
- by Varoth Drac - at 2014.07.13 18:13:00
|
1068. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Aero Yassavi wrote: Let's look at using a 25% baseline, 35% baseline, and a 50% baseline (with module at 45%) 25% / 35% / 50% Base Range (m): 20 / 20 / 20 Lv 5 skills (m): 30 / 30 / 30 Lv 5 racial (m): 37.5 / 40.5 / 45 1 complex mod (m): 46.9 ...
- by Varoth Drac - at 2014.07.13 18:02:00
|
1069. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Appia Vibbia wrote: Varoth Drac wrote: I still think my Cal scout would be a good fit as long as there weren't Amarr scouts around, but yours is good with Amarr around. I think that much range would be OP in pubs, but it's hard to balance ...
- by Varoth Drac - at 2014.07.13 16:18:00
|
1070. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Appia Vibbia wrote: Varoth Drac, I don't know you very well so I'm not sure if you know me. But Scoutly play in PC, number crunching, and figuring out the most effective fits is kinda my thing. You're Amarr and Caldari hypothetical builds, neit...
- by Varoth Drac - at 2014.07.13 15:42:00
|
1071. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cal scouts might be ok in PC as long as there are Amarr scouts to a counter them, but don't you think 10% range per level is a bit OP the rest of the time? What about pub matches? Active scanners will be used even less. I think it needs toning dow...
- by Varoth Drac - at 2014.07.13 14:48:00
|
1072. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
I approve of separating range bonuses from precision bonuses. However... New numbers FOTM: Cal scout - 4 comp shield extenders 1 comp profile dampener 1 comp range extender Enough CPU for Bk-42 ACR, AScP, flux, adv cloak, adv links 540 hp (453 s...
- by Varoth Drac - at 2014.07.13 12:21:00
|
1073. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Aero Yassavi wrote: Such terrible choices. You can't give one scout an efficacy bonus and the other three inherent bonuses. Using your example, either you'd either have to give Amarr a straight up inherent bonus to speed or melee or stamina or...
- by Varoth Drac - at 2014.07.13 08:45:00
|
1074. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cyrius Li-Moody wrote: I said it before and I'll say it again, 2 damps plus a cloak should be all that's needed to dodge the best scanner and best precision out there. Honestly if it were up to me I'd throw away the gallente's damp bonus and t...
- by Varoth Drac - at 2014.07.13 07:41:00
|
1075. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
CCP Rattati wrote: Is it not then fallacy to establish max passive scans to be below active and instead at equal or above? I know that brings back the GA logi, but why not? I would agree with this. Passive scanning is superior to active scann...
- by Varoth Drac - at 2014.07.12 22:57:00
|
1076. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
CCP Rattati wrote: We want everyone to have 2 bonuses, please suggest another bonus for the GA. The range of the CA, that's where I was playing around with the max range reached by other scouts with many lows. I wanted to beat the maximum rang...
- by Varoth Drac - at 2014.07.12 22:33:00
|
1077. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
It seems the spreadsheet has changed to a more moderate approach. Cal: 10% range per level. Seems ok but is in danger of making active scanners pointless (still) with such a high range, although range amps compete with damps to they probably won'...
- by Varoth Drac - at 2014.07.12 22:02:00
|
1078. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
IAmDuncanIdaho II wrote: I'm tending to agree...I don't think I'm particularly good about theorising on what should work and what shouldn't, but if we're saying precision is OP, then you have to ditch it as a bonus completely. Personally as I'v...
- by Varoth Drac - at 2014.07.12 13:42:00
|
1079. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cyrius Li-Moody wrote: The thing with E-war is at this point it is all messed up. The gal outmatches the cal quite easily and in those circumstances I lose my e-war and go EHP tanking. If I can't pick them up I'm going full slayer scout. At th...
- by Varoth Drac - at 2014.07.11 22:39:00
|
1080. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ok, caught up with the barbershop. I'm pleased most people seem to like the proposed suit bonuses. I like them. If they were changed to module efficiency bonuses at a later date the Cal bonus would have to stay innate to allow the fitting of damps...
- by Varoth Drac - at 2014.07.10 12:10:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |