| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 [50] 60 |
981. Should I bother with an active scanner without being Gallente? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ok, more simple solution. Replace Gal logi precision bonus with scan angle or cooldown reduction. Lower focused scanner precision to 10db (maybe nerf some other attribute). Add an advanced focused scanner. Reduce assault profile by 5 so they c...
- by Varoth Drac - at 2014.11.09 09:52:00
|
982. Should I bother with an active scanner without being Gallente? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: Why shouldn't active scanners be used to scan scouts? Why should scout scans be used to pick up scouts? So you have to use a scout to counter a scout? That's really not good balance. Frankly, of the two scan designs, ac...
- by Varoth Drac - at 2014.11.09 00:07:00
|
983. Should I bother with an active scanner without being Gallente? - in General Discussions [original thread]
I-Shayz-I wrote: The gallente bonus is terrible because all it allows you to do is scan the most dampened of dampened scouts. In other words, it's the hard counter against sneaky scouts and you'll be able to track them for longer before you hav...
- by Varoth Drac - at 2014.11.08 23:20:00
|
984. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: Vitantur Nothus wrote: Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: Varoth Drac wrote: We have respected veteran forum warriors saying things like "you need a Gal logi with a focused scanner to put scouts in damp mode and make them...
- by Varoth Drac - at 2014.11.08 22:32:00
|
985. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Proto (non focused) scanners are 28 db, which require a dampener. Also, any Gal or Am scout, without any precision enhancers, need a damp to avoid, at max skills all round. Going into battle without any dampening as a min scout is pointless. ...
- by Varoth Drac - at 2014.11.08 17:50:00
|
986. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
What pisses me off about the EWAR discussion, and scout discussion in general outside the shop, is the misinformation. We have respected veteran forum warriors saying things like "you need a Gal logi with a focused scanner to put scouts in damp m...
- by Varoth Drac - at 2014.11.08 12:31:00
|
987. Team balancing... why don't you love me? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Stomps do happen. I think the reason is, although the team balancing will do it's best to put all the best players vs the squad of Nyain San, it's unlikely they will prevent a stomp unless they are also a good organised squad. The only way to fix...
- by Varoth Drac - at 2014.11.08 11:32:00
|
988. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
One Eyed King wrote: [ When you mean scanners specialized for scanning certain roles do you mean like scanners that can only scan scouts, or only medium frames? Like Scanners that only have a range of 30 dB to 15 dB? Or 60 dB to 45 dB? THAT w...
- by Varoth Drac - at 2014.11.07 20:10:00
|
989. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
On EWAR change, I think they should distinguish active scanners as designed to scan mediums and passive scanners as being how to scan scouts (with the exception of focused scanners). To achieve this the Gal logi bonus should be changed from prec...
- by Varoth Drac - at 2014.11.07 18:32:00
|
990. 1.9 is a huge success... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cat Merc wrote: Most scouts I know of run with precision better than Proto. Sorry but I find that hard to believe. Though I'm sure some do. But then some logis are Gallente. Though I concede that a dual precision Amarr scout is probably more...
- by Varoth Drac - at 2014.11.05 11:52:00
|
991. 1.9 is a huge success... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cat Merc wrote: Varoth Drac wrote: Cat Merc wrote: CCP Rattati wrote: The "problem" is that its too easy to get a high quality scan. Mediums need to start fitting a dampener, and low tiered active scanners may get nerfed. Deployables w...
- by Varoth Drac - at 2014.11.05 10:27:00
|
992. 1.9 is a huge success... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cat Merc wrote: CCP Rattati wrote: The "problem" is that its too easy to get a high quality scan. Mediums need to start fitting a dampener, and low tiered active scanners may get nerfed. Deployables will get a tiered signature profile. You...
- by Varoth Drac - at 2014.11.05 08:32:00
|
993. So, will there be a scout nerf? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: The 1.9 changes are being perceived in one of two ways by people. By people who aren't scout supremacists, they're being seen as moderate at best and negligible at worst. By people who are scout supremacists, oh no! Th...
- by Varoth Drac - at 2014.11.02 11:07:00
|
994. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Placing uplinks behind enemy lines, out of the way, is also a very effective scout tactic.
- by Varoth Drac - at 2014.11.02 10:54:00
|
995. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Scout build tips? Skill up dampening, then range. Precision is less important as you need a lot of skill investment to make it useful. Even then it only helps against scouts (and not all) so has less use per sp. The following mods are good on s...
- by Varoth Drac - at 2014.11.02 10:33:00
|
996. So, will there be a scout nerf? - in General Discussions [original thread]
One Eyed King wrote: Did you bother to read the dev blog?
- by Varoth Drac - at 2014.11.02 09:13:00
|
997. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
One Eyed King wrote: Spademan wrote: Pseudogenesis wrote: I'm just not going to cloak while hacking anymore. CRUs and supply depots sure, but there's no reason to cloak while you're hacking a point. They already know where you are. Oh y...
- by Varoth Drac - at 2014.10.29 00:17:00
|
998. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
I get what you are saying OEK, in my opinion nerfing tanking ability on scouts would have been preferable to nerfing cloaking. However I am still optimistic about the changes. Superior stealth and scanning at the same time is pretty powerful. It w...
- by Varoth Drac - at 2014.10.28 22:35:00
|
999. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Llast 326 wrote: Varoth Drac wrote: One Eyed King wrote: Also, I really don't care for the range reduction while cloaked. If they have concerns for shared passives while cloaked, I would rather they just remove shared passives altogether...
- by Varoth Drac - at 2014.10.28 18:45:00
|
1000. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
One Eyed King wrote: Also, I really don't care for the range reduction while cloaked. If they have concerns for shared passives while cloaked, I would rather they just remove shared passives altogether. Otherwise, they should just come out an...
- by Varoth Drac - at 2014.10.28 18:25:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 [50] 60 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |