| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
Void Echo
Edimmu Warfighters
Gallente Federation
1728
   |
Posted - 2013.10.11 19:03:00 -
[751] - Quote
HUNK tm wrote:Please sign the petition today to avoid another 1.5 ...
doesn't matter anymore.
CCP will either kill vehicle pilots all together or save it somehow, and by the way the notes looks.... it seems as though were going to be killed off. |
KenKaniff69
Subdreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
554
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 00:27:00 -
[752] - Quote
Void Echo wrote:HUNK tm wrote:Please sign the petition today to avoid another 1.5 ... doesn't matter anymore. CCP will either kill vehicle pilots all together or save it somehow, and by the way the notes looks.... it seems as though were going to be killed off.
Following the simple suggestions in this thread could have balanced tanks with ease. Dropships have a similar petition as well. There was no need to gut the system and force all vehicles to have to endure 60 second cool down times on all modules and reduced health. Just ********. Zero sense of reality on CCP's part. |
Obodiah Garro
Tech Guard
RISE of LEGION
405
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 00:39:00 -
[753] - Quote
The way CCP sees it, HAV is currently viable if you fit properly with whats available and pilot them accordingly.
They arent going to risk turning the game into World of Tanks because the vocal minority want off the wall buffs, I do agree the lack of feedback to some of the hundreds of good suggestions is quite sad, but face it, game is still in beta and HAV/DS are not high on the priority list atm. |
KalOfTheRathi
Nec Tributis
806
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 00:43:00 -
[754] - Quote
Why bother? The die is cast and we are just waiting to see which numbers are going to be on the top. Which will be obvious because we will be on the bottom of the die.
CCP only wants vehicles to be played the exact way they want them played. Cool, it's their game. It is really funny personally because right now I am listening to a GDC Vault film by CCP developer, Matthew Woodward, about the three pillars for sandbox games. None of which is working in DUST, IMO.
Just give me my Vehicle Command, Vehicle Operations and Turret Operations SP back. Then they can do whatever they want to any vehicle and I will never care again. |
KenKaniff69
Subdreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
554
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 02:19:00 -
[755] - Quote
Obodiah Garro wrote:The way CCP sees it, HAV is currently viable if you fit properly with whats available and pilot them accordingly.
They arent going to risk turning the game into World of Tanks because the vocal minority want off the wall buffs, I do agree the lack of feedback to some of the hundreds of good suggestions is quite sad, but face it, game is still in beta and HAV/DS are not high on the priority list atm.
Vocal minority? Look at the people who have signed this. Half of them are dedicated HAV pilots. This half composes 80% of the portion of the dust community that can run tanks because of how pathetic they are. Take today's AV vs the tanks of Chrome and then we would have balanced fights. There might only be 50 or so tank drivers left who can really run an HAV. That's just sad. When tanks were balanced in Chrome, there were numerous tank battles which were fun. Now it goes down as one guy with proto swarms and a dead tank(s). The solution? Revert to Chrome vehicle mechanics AND rendering. Gutting everything is the last thing they should have done. |
Void Echo
Edimmu Warfighters
Gallente Federation
1730
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 03:09:00 -
[756] - Quote
Obodiah Garro wrote:The way CCP sees it, HAV is currently viable if you fit properly with whats available and pilot them accordingly.
They arent going to risk turning the game into World of Tanks because the vocal minority want off the wall buffs, I do agree the lack of feedback to some of the hundreds of good suggestions is quite sad, but face it, game is still in beta and HAV/DS are not high on the priority list atm.
funny thing is that they ran the risk of making this a call of duty clone and now look at it, the game is nearly dead because its almost mainly infantry retards controlling everything. |
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
EoN.
1009
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 03:25:00 -
[757] - Quote
Void Echo wrote:GM Archduke wrote:Oh my. I really do want to read this, but seriously, 37 pages? This is going to take ages. I better go get some coffee. its about time, not our fault for there being so many pages, you couldv gotten here when it was at 25 pages lol. also, do you have an option to make me the author of this thread? the original author is no longer here and there are more names that need to be seen
I don't see mine. |
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
EoN.
1009
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 03:27:00 -
[758] - Quote
GM Archduke wrote:Void Echo wrote:its about time, not our fault for there being so many pages, you couldv gotten here when it was at 25 pages lol.
also, do you have an option to make me the author of this thread? the original author is no longer here and there are more names that need to be seen Well, to be honest I'm just a random GM interested in vehicles. The DEVs you are trying to reach with this are always checking the Forum (lurking in the shadows) - although this topic should probably be in Feedback/Requests. I would also suggest to start a new topic, but in the appropriate section this time.
Well with the proposed changes to vehicles, doesn't exactly look like they're taking any pilot's advice. |
KenKaniff69
Subdreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
555
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 03:54:00 -
[759] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:GM Archduke wrote:Void Echo wrote:its about time, not our fault for there being so many pages, you couldv gotten here when it was at 25 pages lol.
also, do you have an option to make me the author of this thread? the original author is no longer here and there are more names that need to be seen Well, to be honest I'm just a random GM interested in vehicles. The DEVs you are trying to reach with this are always checking the Forum (lurking in the shadows) - although this topic should probably be in Feedback/Requests. I would also suggest to start a new topic, but in the appropriate section this time. Well with the proposed changes to vehicles, doesn't exactly look like they're taking any pilot's advice.
There were two main routes to rebalancing vehicle, as I saw it. Take the players advice across the board (chrome mechanics+dropship balances+lav nerfs) OR gut everything and start from scratch with no timeline.
Looks like they are way in over their heads. Given their current track record, I have no confidence left in them any more. Why should anyone who is specced into vehicles even remotely trust CCP's plans?
A failure to lead. Simple as that. |
KenKaniff69
Subdreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
731
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 23:19:00 -
[760] - Quote
Clearly CCP took something from this 38 page discussion on tanks in their vehicle re-balance. Oh, wait CCP hates vehicles and those who use them. |
|
|
Void Echo
Algintal Core
Gallente Federation
1874
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 00:49:00 -
[761] - Quote
KenKaniff69 wrote:Clearly CCP took something from this 38 page discussion on tanks in their vehicle re-balance. Oh, wait CCP hates vehicles and those who use them.
how the **** did they get eve right? |
KenKaniff69
Subdreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
734
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 00:55:00 -
[762] - Quote
Void Echo wrote:KenKaniff69 wrote:Clearly CCP took something from this 38 page discussion on tanks in their vehicle re-balance. Oh, wait CCP hates vehicles and those who use them. how the **** did they get eve right?
I have no idea how EVE is so beautiful constructed, yet dust has ended up being a degenerating product as it ages. The ages of the two are completely opposite, but then again there is the little known fact that CCP has been working on this game since 2006. So the ages of the two games are somewhat similar in that way.
Still this is no excuse for taking ZERO player feedback in regards to a massive overhaul. Can't wait to be the one to say-"I told you so" |
Lynn Beck
Granite Mercenary Division
150
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 01:11:00 -
[763] - Quote
TakeCover OrDie wrote:So far the supporters of the list are numbering over 100:
Tank Gorillarape
Die Quickly
I Keel You
TakeCoverOrDie
FIghter4All
Barbosa07z
Void Echo
CharCharOdell
TheLegend345
Killer-12
Vethosis
Viktor Viktrizi
Tai karl
Oso Tiburon
GodHands9
Exergonic
gboh8
Dark Deviser
NINJAPIRATEROBOTZOMBIE
Cy Clone1
Racro 01 Arifitsan
Code Slucid
Xender17
Tank Creno
Shield Creno
BatKing Deltor
Cormacks modified Griefr
Sgt ButtScratch
Cucch Commander
Nix Vulken
Crimson Judgement
Patoman Radient
Xocoyl Zaraoul
bear90211
Don Savage2013
DickMason
Andrew Sheafer
BobThe843CakeMan
Godin The Killer
pegasis prime
Dizzy Rocket
marksmn
Aleksander Black
CHIPMINT BUTTERCUP
Takahir Kashuken
LudiKure ninda
Brjann Innree
Ninjanomyx
We Are 138
Sylwester Dziewiecki
Pombe Greek
Andra Syra
Gary Togeris
Bendaiii Schrodinger
Robotic Tortoise
Alpha 443-6732
ladwar
MetaWolf-cell
Shadow Of War88
TITANICA Xangore
Covert Clay
Washlee
richiesutie2
Aythadis Smith
Blammo
ChicagoCubs4ever
Sponglyboy Squaredoo
Hired Pinp
Lorhark Gannarsein
Ken Kaniff69
Ludicure Ninda
Brjann Innree
Adeila Lafayette
Purona
English Snake
undeadsoldier90
Harpyja
thhrey euwayreurer
Sotapopgrey gay
Kam Elto
Azura Sakura
Death Klok
Serimos Haeraven
Sucia Kelly
Harpja
Dumpster Juice
Dre PrEach
Abby invo
Pocket Rocker Girl
The Window Licker
Sheneingay Mcbob
Eurydice McBob
Svipgdar Hero
Ghost Kaiser
Syther Shadows
Gogo O'dell
Kekklian Noobatronic
demonkiller12
raex001
Xera The Mishima
Pikachu Power
noname warrior
Muud Kipz
Seymour Krellborn
maliki iceni
Operative 1171 Aaiji
Jason Pearson
SoldierSaint
sev alcatraz
Hrm.. A tanking petition, and im NOT signed up? Well we'll have to fix that.
Tired of my gunnlogi thats designed as evasive maneuvers anti infantry getting popped by any and all madrugars. I even jumped behind a gunnlogi and blasted his weakspot with adv turrets and lost to a plasma cannon, i mean wtf?
Plas 1, lemme on that list! |
KenKaniff69
Subdreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
735
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 01:26:00 -
[764] - Quote
Lynn Beck wrote:
Hrm.. A tanking petition, and im NOT signed up? Well we'll have to fix that.
Tired of my gunnlogi thats designed as evasive maneuvers anti infantry getting popped by any and all madrugars. I even jumped behind a gunnlogi and blasted his weakspot with adv turrets and lost to a plasma cannon, i mean wtf?
Plas 1, lemme on that list!
unfortunately the OP has since not been seen playing dust after this post quickly racked up 30 pages of discussions and over 100 supporters at the time-without any CCP acknowledgement. I suppose I could make an updated list, but then again why? CCP clearly paid no attention to this thread, if you read the vehicle changes inbound. |
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |