I don't really understand this post considering I can run across open terrain and just turn on any scrub that tries to shoot me in the back. Ccp made the health high so that skill is a more of a factor. In CoD If someone sneezes on you your dead.

So I am a bit confused by this post.

Still I don't think movement speeds should be nerfed in the name of complexity considering this is a high health complex strafe and shoot fps. Strafe speed adds to the complexity of gun fights therefor making dust a more complex game.

If I just wanted to blast people and head glitch behind cover, I would go play any other console fps.

You fundamentally don't understand* FPS games that aren't about circle strafing it seems.

*understand as in comprehend the playstyle and those who enjoy it

Shields are for people who don't take damage often or a warning layer for beefier guys to turn and engage a threat. Cover is for cover.

im not saying nerf speeds, im saying leave them as they are. I am not saying you need to hide behind cover like gears of war, i am simply saying circle strafing as an overall tactic is shenanigans.

why is having high health, tactical gameplay out of the question? We already have vehicle warfare with EW and orbital strikes. youve got enough to worry about already. You dont need to add to it by doing things that anybody whos ever fought wouldnt do in real life.

Okay, so your not risking your life cause its a game....fine, but you are risking your fittings which will be a lot more expensive soon. you can look at it the same way.

MAG COD and BF aren't circle strafers buddy. They are primarily ADS shooters.

Shields are cover in this game. If it wasn't for shields i guarantee people wouldn't run across the map without worrying about getting blown up.

Understand that a high strafing speed makes a good game that takes skill. A realistic game would be really boring and take no skill. Two shots to kill everyone. One shot extremely wounded.

lol interesting.....

edit: see how i added to that by quoting you?

Then CCP want the game to fail.
Enjoy.

JaZZa CCP wanting this game to fail is already evident by the fact the game is grind2win.

>>>>ADS shooter and circle strafing might as well be the same thing.
I'm sorry but I am going to have trouble taking anything else you say after that seriously.

One thing ive still yet to seeanyone address from my post is the idea of strafe ads vs hip. As like i said, whther is realistic or tactical, you shouldnt be strafing running in circles while you are in ads, hence the term ADS meaning you are trying to be pinpoint accurate, and running around in circles would negate the idea. At that point you would want to hipfire from normal ads ranges as that allows for your faster movements.

As i said, movements speed is fine now, as if you want to run around fast, use scouts & smgs which are mean to be hipfired essentially. Even CCP has said (i believe), that want people to play smart & use cover. Thats why we have buildings with lots of "trailers" to run around and hide behind for protection. If they wnated us to simply strafe our way out of battles theyd have less cover to be used.

But thats just my. 02

I'm done here Noc Tempre lost

, I bow down before your magnificence. .

I am pretty sure I addressed that. Nerf ADS strafe speed and then just put strafe speed back to what it was last build. Problem solved. You can't strafe your way out of anything if you can't aim. The person who has the better aim will win. Its all about skill. Since the game is already G2W lets at least make the gun fights about skill not corner camping/Cod tactics/camping. Thats lame imho.

Go back to CoD if you want a low strafe speed game TROLLOLOLOL

I jest.

If address it i missed it, as typing all this on my phone. Personally i find ads strafe speed to be perfect. The downside i see to increasing hipfire strafe, is that it will cater WAY to much to scouts. If they run adv/proto smgs, id say just about veryone will be donezo, as they are already are really hard to hit in a cqb situation, and with how fast RE can be SET (even with timer going into place), by time they set do a circle, they'll be able to set it off. Thats why i like how hipfire strafe is now. Overall i find the strafing gives everyone a good chance in all situations.

If heavy is caught in open w/o cover by assault he is in trouble. Scout catches heavy in cqb, heavy in trouble. Assault catches scout in midrange, he is in trouble, etc ... in all situaitons at moment, strafing can be effetctive whether its hipfire or ads; by altering it, it could cause more gameplay problems

you should tbqh

LOL

btw where is the real omnipotent one? Haven't seen him on the leader boards. zitro and lilmamaJ are moejoe wannabes.

This thread is a classic

Make this into a real strafe and shoot fps. What we are playing now just feels to slow and bulky.

Clearly CCP doesnt want the game to fail. You dont have to like complex battle simulators.....theres always arcade style shooters for ya bud.

edit: aimed at JaZZa01

The replication build was exactly this. But people complained because its wasn't "fast" enough. The result is what we have today. Ironically many of the people who complained left anyway.

IMHO the sights and hip fire in Replication for assault rifles was about right. E3 build totally sucks.