Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
poison Diego
Vengeance Unbound Dark Taboo
455
|
Posted - 2014.10.12 19:27:00 -
[211] - Quote
Blueprint For Murder wrote:Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p wrote:All scouts are EWAR specialized suits, and thus should be the masters of eWAR in almost every way.
Sentinels are CQC combat specialized suits, and thus should be the masters of CQC combat in almost every way.
Assaults are mid range skirmishing specialized suits, with the versatility to go from mid range to long range to short range at a moments notice, and the excel at this in almost every way.
Logis are support specialized suits and thus should be the masters of support in almost every way.
Commandos are suppression specialists and thus should be the masters of suppression in almost every way This is why they should be side arm only their ewar alone makes them viable. I have not tried it but I would bet it wouldn't even be that hard to pull off a melee scout despite low starting melee dmg.
Would you make the shotgun a sidearm then?
I give up
R.I.P ADS
getting more proficiency in the shotgun so I can kill every single f*ck I see using swarmlauncher
|
Magnus Amadeuss
Bragian Order Amarr Empire
1150
|
Posted - 2014.10.12 19:35:00 -
[212] - Quote
Magnus Amadeuss wrote: Refusing to address these facts will result in your agreement with every single one of them.
Adipem Nothi wrote:I refuse to respond
Ok glad we got that clear. Your words, not mine.
Adipem Nothi wrote: that it'll eventually make you flame.
pretty sure trolling is against forum rules
Adipem Nothi wrote:For EWAR to work, all scouts need to be able to beat all scans.*
*for a sacrifice
Also, why even have the gallogi then?
Why even have the gal/cal dampening bonus since in your opinion beating all scans should be a class speciality, not a suit specialty... doesn't this just make dampening bonuses a double bonus and thus overkill (and unbalancing by default)?
Anyway, really excited that we agree on all of those facts above. Really encapsulates how the EWAR system is completely broken right now.
Fixing EWAR
|
Poison Howl
D.A.R.K L.E.G.I.O.N D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
159
|
Posted - 2014.10.12 19:45:00 -
[213] - Quote
This thread is the largest pissing contest I have ever seen on the forums. You people need to learn "compromise".
For every point of happiness we gain in this game, our madness increases exponentially.
|
el OPERATOR
Capital Acquisitions LLC General Tso's Alliance
378
|
Posted - 2014.10.12 19:54:00 -
[214] - Quote
Adipem Nothi wrote:
For EWAR to work for one class, in favor of one class and to perpetuate gross overall game imbalance all scouts need to be able to beat all scans as well as retain all the other advantages of the class.
FTFY.
Open-Beta Vet.
Drunk Night Tree Burner.
This is my Main and Original.
DUST514 is WARFARE, not WAR-FAIR.
|
Adipem Nothi
Nos Nothi
5826
|
Posted - 2014.10.12 20:04:00 -
[215] - Quote
el OPERATOR wrote:Adipem Nothi wrote:
For EWAR to work for one class, in favor of one class and to perpetuate gross overall game imbalance all scouts need to be able to beat all scans as well as retain all the other advantages of the class.
FTFY. Because scouts are running rampant, wholly unchecked, and pushing KDRs substantially higher than every other class. It is a proven fact that all slayers now run scout suits all the time.
Shoot scout with yes.
- Ripley Riley
|
One Eyed King
Land of the BIind
4770
|
Posted - 2014.10.12 20:04:00 -
[216] - Quote
el OPERATOR wrote:Adipem Nothi wrote:
For EWAR to work for one class, in favor of one class and to perpetuate gross overall game imbalance all scouts need to be able to beat all scans as well as retain all the other advantages of the class.
FTFY. A scanned scout is a dead scout.
Why do you think Amarr and Minmatar were completely irrelevant between Alpha and Charlie?
Because Cal scouts could scan and broadcast their locations to every heavy in their squad.
If scouts were the most broken OP suit in the game, they would be a majority of fielded mercs in PC, but they are not. They are not even a majority.
When you come back with some real data to support your claim, let us know.
You can always tell a Millford Minja
|
KEROSIINI-TERO
The Rainbow Effect
1349
|
Posted - 2014.10.12 20:52:00 -
[217] - Quote
The fundamental flaw in Dust ewar is the fact that detection is ON/OFF. That makes it a dull one.
People would enjoy Dust a lot more if they accepted the fact that EVERYTHING is subject to change
|
Blueprint For Murder
Immortal Guides
110
|
Posted - 2014.10.12 20:56:00 -
[218] - Quote
In a world of the blind the one eyed man is king lol.. I think you are comparing sents with healers to a single scout pal. I saw someone post that pc makes up 1% of the players in dust is this proper? A gal logi can scan 18 db easily beaten by any scout even then the value of a chance to spot scout every once every 40 seconds is debatable.
New, delicious, Soylent green the miracle food of high-energy plankton gathered from the oceans of the world.
|
The Master Race
Immortal Guides
110
|
Posted - 2014.10.12 20:56:00 -
[219] - Quote
In a world of the blind the one eyed man is king lol.. I think you are comparing sents with healers to a single scout pal. I saw someone post that pc makes up 1% of the players in dust is this proper? A gal logi can scan 18 db easily beaten by any scout even then the value of taking the focused scanner for a chance to spot scout every once every 40 seconds is debatable.
New, delicious, Soylent green the miracle food of high-energy plankton gathered from the oceans of the world.
|
Jebus McKing
lol Proto
761
|
Posted - 2014.10.12 21:12:00 -
[220] - Quote
Magnus Amadeuss wrote:why even have the gallogi then? To beat Assaults with 2x complex damps.
Before the Gal Logi scanning bonus many people were using 2x damps on assaults to avoid being scanned by active scanners.
Guess what happened when CCP decided to make a scanning logi whose scans were so good that an Assault would need 5x damps to beat it? - Exactly. Dampened mediums almost completely disappeared.
And that is what is going to happen when scanning becomes even easier than it is right now.
People will most likely stack more HP instead of damps because HP is useful in all situations and has a success rate of 100%. (As opposed to some RNG dampening fail rate or some other BS like that.)
If you cannot rely on your dampening to work, then why even use it instead of more HP?
lol Proto // @JebusMcKing
|
|
Blueprint For Murder
Immortal Guides
110
|
Posted - 2014.10.12 21:22:00 -
[221] - Quote
Don't get me wrong m8 this is just beating around the bush as ewar is what makes a scout and can not be changed. Therefore the combat ability of a scout must be balanced which can not be done as long as they remain in the same weapon pool of the rest of the classes. The reason I suggest side arm only.
Beats all scans: 1.One damp + suit bonus 2.Two damps For all other scans apart from the focused scanner can be done with suit bonus + cloak bonus
New, delicious, Soylent green the miracle food of high-energy plankton gathered from the oceans of the world.
|
The Master Race
Immortal Guides
110
|
Posted - 2014.10.12 21:22:00 -
[222] - Quote
Don't get me wrong m8 this is just beating around the bush as ewar is what makes a scout and can not be changed. Therefore the combat ability of a scout must be balanced which can not be done as long as they remain in the same weapon pool of the rest of the classes. The reason I suggest side arm only.
Beats all scans: 1.One damp + suit bonus 2.Two damps For all other scans apart from the focused scanner can be done with suit bonus + cloak bonus
New, delicious, Soylent green the miracle food of high-energy plankton gathered from the oceans of the world.
|
KEROSIINI-TERO
The Rainbow Effect
1350
|
Posted - 2014.10.12 21:27:00 -
[223] - Quote
And before people ask me "what's an alternative to the ON/OFF detection?" I give an example here in this older thread. Even though written for active scanners, same mechanic would make passive scanning as well better.
The concept Detection strength on target building up in time.
People would enjoy Dust a lot more if they accepted the fact that EVERYTHING is subject to change
|
benandjerrys
NECROM0NGERS
23
|
Posted - 2014.10.12 21:30:00 -
[224] - Quote
BL4CKST4R wrote:This still gives scout a complete monopoly on EWAR. I would, pwrsonally, much rather ewar be split three fold between each suit tier. Medium gets best scans, scout best dampening, and heavy best scan radii. Smartest thing said all day. Assaults are now viable game is almost balanced. |
el OPERATOR
Capital Acquisitions LLC General Tso's Alliance
380
|
Posted - 2014.10.12 23:59:00 -
[225] - Quote
Adipem Nothi wrote:el OPERATOR wrote:Adipem Nothi wrote:
For EWAR to work for one class, in favor of one class and to perpetuate gross overall game imbalance all scouts need to be able to beat all scans as well as retain all the other advantages of the class.
FTFY. Because scouts are running rampant, wholly unchecked, and pushing KDRs substantially higher than every other class. It is a proven fact that all slayers now run scout suits all the time. If performance stats suggest otherwise, it's because performance stats are lies.
Again with the distraction kd leaderboard garbage? Feel free to post ANY actual performance statistics you're privy to. I didn't think that I would have to actually explain why the kdr leaderboards aren't relevent since anyone with even a basic actual understanding of statistical analysis would see that
1. The KDR leaderboard only goes for a couple thousand positions ( for a game with, by most estimates a population of roughly 12 thousand at any given point) which automatically excludes record of thousands of players. disclaimer: 12k is, yes, an estimate, based from threads on the topic and personal observation of the Tranquility player counter which, I know, is mostly EVE players.
2. In a game, such as Call of Duty or maybe HALO, where the overwhelming objective is killing the opponent solely using a kdr datapool could give a reasonable assessment of player activity. In a game like DUST514 however, since the perogative is not exclusively the killing of the opponent but rather the winning of the game by any of a number of means (elimination of clones being just one) focusing on kdrs solely ignores the other methods and the means of achieving them.
3. Your continuous insistence of focus on not just the kdr leaderboard but the top of it limits not just the scope of a sad datapool but also its breadth . You are pointing at statistical OUTLIERS and claiming that an average of them is an average of the entire group. Statistical outliers and any anomoly among them is proof of little nothing in general for the actual average and proof of ABSOLUTLEY NOTHING here.
A couple of times you have claimed or insinuated some knowledge or possession of "performance statistics". If you actually have either I invite, encourage and at this point demand you provide them here or in the words of Magnus^, " STFU and GTFO". So tired of theorycraft idiots trying to pony stupidity around as evidence. You affirm with every. Single. Self-interested Post. Exactly why crowdsourcing game improvement ideas from the playerbase can be such a **** idea.
Open-Beta Vet.
Drunk Night Tree Burner.
This is my Main and Original.
DUST514 is WARFARE, not WAR-FAIR.
|
el OPERATOR
Capital Acquisitions LLC General Tso's Alliance
380
|
Posted - 2014.10.13 00:02:00 -
[226] - Quote
benandjerrys wrote:BL4CKST4R wrote:This still gives scout a complete monopoly on EWAR. I would, pwrsonally, much rather ewar be split three fold between each suit tier. Medium gets best scans, scout best dampening, and heavy best scan radii. Smartest thing said all day. Assaults are now viable game is almost balanced.
So, Mediums see everyone except who they really need to, Scouts stay as overadvantaged as ever and Heavies are just as bling but for farther? Lookout, the smartbus just pulled in!
Open-Beta Vet.
Drunk Night Tree Burner.
This is my Main and Original.
DUST514 is WARFARE, not WAR-FAIR.
|
Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p
Fatal Absolution General Tso's Alliance
2553
|
Posted - 2014.10.13 00:10:00 -
[227] - Quote
Magnus come on man...I don't think Rattati is gonna respond to this one, but Ill still give you Gav's Troll of the Year seal, but you're starting to make me think that this isn't a troll anymore and that you're actually serious
"Minmitar Scout" and "Masochist" are synonyms.
FA's Shotgunning T-Dome Champ
Give the Minja active dampening!--By Bor
|
Adipem Nothi
Nos Nothi
5831
|
Posted - 2014.10.13 00:11:00 -
[228] - Quote
el OPERATOR wrote:Adipem Nothi wrote:el OPERATOR wrote:Adipem Nothi wrote:
For EWAR to work for one class, in favor of one class and to perpetuate gross overall game imbalance all scouts need to be able to beat all scans as well as retain all the other advantages of the class.
FTFY. Because scouts are running rampant, wholly unchecked, and pushing KDRs substantially higher than every other class. It is a proven fact that all slayers now run scout suits all the time. If performance stats suggest otherwise, it's because performance stats are lies. Again with the distraction kd leaderboard garbage? Feel free to post ANY actual performance statistics you're privy to. I didn't think that I would have to actually explain why the kdr leaderboards aren't relevent since anyone with even a basic actual understanding of statistical analysis would see that 1. The KDR leaderboard only goes for a couple thousand positions ( for a game with, by most estimates a population of roughly 12 thousand at any given point) which automatically excludes record of thousands of players. disclaimer: 12k is, yes, an estimate, based from threads on the topic and personal observation of the Tranquility player counter which, I know, is mostly EVE players. 2. In a game, such as Call of Duty or maybe HALO, where the overwhelming objective is killing the opponent solely using a kdr datapool could give a reasonable assessment of player activity. In a game like DUST514 however, since the perogative is not exclusively the killing of the opponent but rather the winning of the game by any of a number of means (elimination of clones being just one) focusing on kdrs solely ignores the other methods and the means of achieving them. 3. Your continuous insistence of focus on not just the kdr leaderboard but the top of it limits not just the scope of a sad datapool but also its breadth . You are pointing at statistical OUTLIERS and claiming that an average of them is an average of the entire group. Statistical outliers and any anomoly among them is proof of little nothing in general for the actual average and proof of ABSOLUTLEY NOTHING here. A couple of times you have claimed or insinuated some knowledge or possession of "performance statistics". If you actually have either I invite, encourage and at this point demand you provide them here or in the words of Magnus^, " STFU and GTFO". So tired of theorycraft idiots trying to pony stupidity around as evidence. You affirm with every. Single. Self-interested Post. Exactly why crowdsourcing game improvement ideas from the playerbase can be such a **** idea. Thank you for that digest.
In reality, if scout suits were super duper OP, we'd see nothing on the field but scout suits. Believe whatever you want broseph. Not my job to teach you to think straight.
Shoot scout with yes.
- Ripley Riley
|
el OPERATOR
Capital Acquisitions LLC General Tso's Alliance
380
|
Posted - 2014.10.13 00:22:00 -
[229] - Quote
One Eyed King wrote:el OPERATOR wrote:Adipem Nothi wrote:
For EWAR to work for one class, in favor of one class and to perpetuate gross overall game imbalance all scouts need to be able to beat all scans as well as retain all the other advantages of the class.
FTFY. A scanned scout is a dead scout. Why do you think Amarr and Minmatar were completely irrelevant between Alpha and Charlie? Because Cal scouts could scan and broadcast their locations to every heavy in their squad. If scouts were the most broken OP suit in the game, they would be a majority of fielded mercs in PC, but they are not. When you come back with some real data to support your claim, let us know.
A scanned scout is the best equipped frame in the game to survive having been scanned, provided it is scouting and not assaulting or logi'ing.
Because the other members of the class were favored for assaulting and now that assaults have been bonused/slotted differently some of the scout suit tourists have gone to greener pastures.
PC is rampant with scouts. If you don't see them you're either not pc active, oblivious to what situational awareness and combat causality is, or blind/deaf/dumb.
To support the imbalance of Scout base stats relative to all other frames I refer you to the base statbsheets yo can go read for yourself in the market under "Dropsuits". If that's no good then we know what answer to the pc question above is. hint: it's the last one.
Open-Beta Vet.
Drunk Night Tree Burner.
This is my Main and Original.
DUST514 is WARFARE, not WAR-FAIR.
|
el OPERATOR
Capital Acquisitions LLC General Tso's Alliance
382
|
Posted - 2014.10.13 01:29:00 -
[230] - Quote
Adipem Nothi wrote:el OPERATOR wrote:Adipem Nothi wrote:el OPERATOR wrote:Adipem Nothi wrote:
For EWAR to work for one class, in favor of one class and to perpetuate gross overall game imbalance all scouts need to be able to beat all scans as well as retain all the other advantages of the class.
FTFY. Because scouts are running rampant, wholly unchecked, and pushing KDRs substantially higher than every other class. It is a proven fact that all slayers now run scout suits all the time. If performance stats suggest otherwise, it's because performance stats are lies. Again with the distraction kd leaderboard garbage? Feel free to post ANY actual performance statistics you're privy to. I didn't think that I would have to actually explain why the kdr leaderboards aren't relevent since anyone with even a basic actual understanding of statistical analysis would see that 1. The KDR leaderboard only goes for a couple thousand positions ( for a game with, by most estimates a population of roughly 12 thousand at any given point) which automatically excludes record of thousands of players. disclaimer: 12k is, yes, an estimate, based from threads on the topic and personal observation of the Tranquility player counter which, I know, is mostly EVE players. 2. In a game, such as Call of Duty or maybe HALO, where the overwhelming objective is killing the opponent solely using a kdr datapool could give a reasonable assessment of player activity. In a game like DUST514 however, since the perogative is not exclusively the killing of the opponent but rather the winning of the game by any of a number of means (elimination of clones being just one) focusing on kdrs solely ignores the other methods and the means of achieving them. 3. Your continuous insistence of focus on not just the kdr leaderboard but the top of it limits not just the scope of a sad datapool but also its breadth . You are pointing at statistical OUTLIERS and claiming that an average of them is an average of the entire group. Statistical outliers and any anomoly among them is proof of little nothing in general for the actual average and proof of ABSOLUTLEY NOTHING here. A couple of times you have claimed or insinuated some knowledge or possession of "performance statistics". If you actually have either I invite, encourage and at this point demand you provide them here or in the words of Magnus^, " STFU and GTFO". So tired of theorycraft idiots trying to pony stupidity around as evidence. You affirm with every. Single. Self-interested Post. Exactly why crowdsourcing game improvement ideas from the playerbase can be such a **** idea. Thank you for that digest. In reality, if scout suits were super duper OP, we'd see nothing on the field but scout suits. That's not the case, but believe whatever you want broseph. Not my job to teach you to think straight.
You like that? Good. Digest that ****, yeah, brohamb. Digest it down reeeal good since the same way it's not your job to teach me how to think it's not mine to teach you either and my having to of had to still pisses me off.
BTW, this isn't and wasn't the/a "F ScoutsOPqqthread" from what I read of the OP, it was a "This could be equalized better like this..." proposal thread and you decided to turn it into a QQScoutNurf! horrorthread.
Your silence, as Magnus has pointed out repeatedly, is deafening regarding questions of anything that isn't your agreed perspective. Good thing you have reputation, eh? 'Cause you sure as hell don't seem to have **** else.
Open-Beta Vet.
Drunk Night Tree Burner.
This is my Main and Original.
DUST514 is WARFARE, not WAR-FAIR.
|
|
Alena Ventrallis
Vengeance Unbound Dark Taboo
1916
|
Posted - 2014.10.13 02:15:00 -
[231] - Quote
Okay, here's the thing.
Precision scans for a squad, and dampening is only for the suit fitting it. Therefore, dampening should win the race between precision/profile.
But they should be neck and neck the entire way.
The best passive scans should only be beat by the best dampened scout. If the scanner is sacrificing to pick you up, you should sacrifice in order to avoid detection.
I would have Caldari scout receive the precision bonus and Amarr the range bonus. I would have scout precision match its current profile. I would then run metrics and see if this needs more tweaking.
Listen to my muscle memory
Contemplate what I've been clinging to
Forty-six and two ahead of me
|
Magnus Amadeuss
Bragian Order Amarr Empire
1153
|
Posted - 2014.10.13 02:17:00 -
[232] - Quote
el OPERATOR wrote: You like that? Good. Digest that ****, yeah, brohamb. Digest it down reeeal good since the same way it's not your job to teach me how to think it's not mine to teach you either and my having to of had to still pisses me off.
BTW, this isn't and wasn't the/a "F ScoutsOPqqthread" from what I read of the OP, it was a "This could be equalized better like this..." proposal thread and you decided to turn it into a QQScoutNurf! horrorthread.
Your silence, as Magnus has pointed out repeatedly, is deafening regarding questions of anything that isn't your agreed perspective. Good thing you have reputation, eh? 'Cause you sure as hell don't seem to have **** else.
Here is the worst part, the trolls know that the easiest way to get CCP to not review a thread here is to fill it full of absolute crap, I guess I had forgotten that part. Just like adiphem/shottygobang/whatever other forum alts he/she has, they fill it with just worthless conversation. I will probably just delete the OP and remake the thread, cleaned up some as well.
I have no idea why in the world this would be a bad suggestion though. Scouts are still without doubt the very best ewar suits, it is just they can be challenged when they ****-fit. Scouts will still be able to avoid all passive scans. Its just that medium suits will be able to pick up slayer scouts now... boo hoo.
adiphem only wants 1 damp and 1 cloak to hide you for any medium suit in the game, and he calls that interplay (hint it isn't).
Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p is just a troll who has been trolling hard for like a year. He actually argued that the original amarr scout was balanced (lol). I have blocked them both now, and wil proceed to remake the OP and delete this one.
Fixing EWAR
|
Adipem Nothi
Nos Nothi
5837
|
Posted - 2014.10.13 02:22:00 -
[233] - Quote
Idea!
Believe it or not, I very much agree with the notion that more mercs should be able to scan undampened Scouts.
The problem is, we can't make it easier to scan undampened scouts at the high-end of the dB spectrum without also mucking up interplay at the low-end of the dB spectrum.
So how can we address the high-end of the spectrum (where "assault lite" lives) without kicking properly dampened Scouts in the pants?
I'm wondering how a buff to the 28 dB scanners might play out. The Focused Active Scanner is expensive and terrible, which is why it rarely used. The 28 dB scanners on the other hand are pretty dang sweet (especially the 200 meter / 90 degree one). If those could scan undampened Scouts, do you guys think people would use them?
Shoot scout with yes.
- Ripley Riley
|
Magnus Amadeuss
Bragian Order Amarr Empire
1153
|
Posted - 2014.10.13 02:23:00 -
[234] - Quote
Alena Ventrallis wrote:Okay, here's the thing.
Precision scans for a squad, and dampening is only for the suit fitting it. Therefore, dampening should win the race between precision/profile.
But they should be neck and neck the entire way.
The best passive scans should only be beat by the best dampened scout. If the scanner is sacrificing to pick you up, you should sacrifice in order to avoid detection.
I would have Caldari scout receive the precision bonus and Amarr the range bonus. I would have scout precision match its current profile. I would then run metrics and see if this needs more tweaking.
This is addressed in the OP.
Basically:
precision enhancers are only 80% as power as profile dampeners Cloaks give a dampening bonus which always puts it ahead of precision, and it is stacking free Scout profile is 12.5% lower than scout precision, 22.3% lower than logi precision, and 30% lower than assault precision putting it way out of any type of interplay range.
Add up all of this stuff and precision never had a chance, and in that 1/3rd of the entire EWAR tree was just nerfed into the ground.
Fixing EWAR
|
Magnus Amadeuss
Bragian Order Amarr Empire
1153
|
Posted - 2014.10.13 02:25:00 -
[235] - Quote
Adipem Nothi wrote:Idea!
Believe it or not, I very much agree with the notion that more mercs should be able to scan undampened Scouts.
The problem is, we can't make it easier to scan undampened scouts at the high-end of the dB spectrum without also mucking up interplay at the low-end of the dB spectrum.
So how can we address the high-end of the spectrum (where "assault lite" lives) without kicking properly dampened Scouts in the pants?
I'm wondering how a buff to the 28 dB scanners might play out. The Focused Active Scanner is expensive and terrible, which is why it rarely used. The 28 dB scanners on the other hand are pretty dang sweet (especially the 200 meter / 90 degree one). If those could scan undampened Scouts, do you guys think people would use them? Ok, so if you want to actually work with me, I would be more than willing to discuss scanners as I already admitted those stats are rough.
Like for instance, the flux is a B.S. scanner that should have never been released.. it is so incredibly OP that it is no wonder scanners were nerfed into the ground.
Fixing EWAR
|
Magnus Amadeuss
Bragian Order Amarr Empire
1153
|
Posted - 2014.10.13 02:36:00 -
[236] - Quote
The way I view it, scanners should all be tweaks of the plain jane one, at proto that is the Creodon active scanner.
100m 90 degrees 15/5 cooldown visibilty 28db precision (undamped scout precision)
So for the other varients, an increase in any stat results in a penalty in the others.
For example: Lets say the flux is the long range scanner so it would look like
200m 45 degrees 30/8 28 dB
OR the focused
100m 30 degree 40/5 20 dB
the quantum
100m 60 degrees 40/20 30 dB
The proximity 40 m 360 degrees 20/5 32 dB
Now the dB measurements are just for show right now, because we still need to work on the passive+cloak meta and get that RIGTH before we can really tweak scanners.
Also these stats have very little thought into them, so don't take them as final, but they all have distinct roles, rather than how it is now with the flux > all scanner
Fixing EWAR
|
Espartoi
Orkz Clan
336
|
Posted - 2014.10.13 02:47:00 -
[237] - Quote
Before continue the argument I will like to suggest for a CPM or DEV response, so you will know this matter will be inconsideration for the next hotfix if not people are just wasting keyboard/touch lifetime.
SHOOT SMASH STOMP CHOP
FLAK THE WORLD
|
Adipem Nothi
Nos Nothi
5840
|
Posted - 2014.10.13 03:20:00 -
[238] - Quote
Magnus Amadeuss wrote: Ok, so if you want to actually work with me, I would be more than willing to discuss scanners as I already admitted those stats are rough.
I agree that undampened Scouts should be easier to scan, but I believe that adjusting EWAR tables to accomplish this goal would create more problems than it'd solve. I like the idea of improving upon active scanners to satisfy the goal; fewer moving parts means less risk of unintended consequences.
Plus, Active Scanners are presumably underutilized, so we'll potentially solve two problems at once.
Some maths:
The undampened GA/CA Scout Profile is 27 dB uncloaked, 25 dB advance cloaked and 24 dB proto cloaked. If the 28 dB scanner were buffed to 24 dB, it would scan dampened MN/AM Scouts. It is not our goal to scan dampened Scouts; on these grounds I'd posit that 24 dB is too much.
If it were buffed to 25 dB, it would not scan dampened scouts unless wielded by the counter-recon specialist (i.e. GA Logi). A 25 dB proto scanner would scan at 19 dB when wielded by a GA Logi. MN/AM Scouts would need two dampeners to beat this specialist's scans; CA/GA Scouts would need two dampeners or one dampener and a proto cloak.
* Exception: An undampened GA/CA Scout running a proto cloak would duck a 25 dB scan. In my estimation and experience, however, "assault lite" do not run proto cloaks as they cannot afford the fitting costs without making substantial sacrifice to their weaponry and/or HP.
28 dB scanners being buffed to 25 dB seems reasonable to me. I believe it'd satisfy the demand of non-Scouts to be able to scan undampened Scouts, and I believe it'd encourage more Scouts to run damps instead of Plates. It'd also likely improve Active Scanner utilization rates, and would buff the GA Logi's counter-recon capabilities.
What do you think?
Shoot scout with yes.
- Ripley Riley
|
Adipem Nothi
Nos Nothi
5840
|
Posted - 2014.10.13 03:31:00 -
[239] - Quote
Magnus Amadeuss wrote: [snip] Active Scanner Improvements [/snip]
I'd propose we hold off on overhauling Active Scanners until they make it onto a Hotfix agenda.
For Echo, I'd pitch just one change: 28 dB Active Scanners --> 25 dB.
Easiest on the Devs this way, and it'd solve one of the biggest issues at the heart of this thread.
Edit: I'd probably append that one change with a 5 dB reduction to Assault Scan Profile so they can still beat Proto Scans with two complex damps; we don't want to nerf them by accident.
Shoot scout with yes.
- Ripley Riley
|
mollerz
5546
|
Posted - 2014.10.13 04:34:00 -
[240] - Quote
Espartoi wrote:Before continue the argument I will like to suggest for a CPM or DEV response, so you will know this matter will be inconsideration for the next hotfix if not people are just wasting keyboard/touch lifetime.
Fight it out here.. and then take a refined response here.
trust me. It works out better for everyone.
I'm seriously fukn serious
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |