| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 |
741. AR is the most useless Assault Rifle - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sgt Buttscratch wrote: I've beaten X RR and X CR users with my Duvolle, do it quite often actually, don't actually know why I also specced into CR, I don't even use them. Funny I have beaten numerous proto suits with duvolles with my std CR ...
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2014.01.05 19:29:00
|
742. Am i the only one who thinks that the rail rifle is a bit ridiculous at all ranges. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Soldiersaint wrote: Crimson Cerberes wrote: Yes, all the weapons are wonky. With the rail rifle you get double the range of a AR, and it only cost you a 0.2 sec spool up time (they do nearly the same DPS).... that is not balalnced. All ca...
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2014.01.05 19:26:00
|
743. AR is the most useless Assault Rifle - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jacques Cayton II wrote: Cat Merc wrote: Proto suit vs Adv suit AR vs CR Close range Would seem like the proto suit would win right? NOPE Double damage and proficiency, dropped his shields, he turns around (I was to his side) and deals ...
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2014.01.05 14:51:00
|
744. so i actually used swarms for the first time in 1.7... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Leonid Tybalt wrote: Jason Pearson wrote: Justicar Karnellia wrote: knight guard fury wrote: why is everyone saying they suck so much even though they are meant for anything but HAV's you just need to be skilled into it to solo a ADS i...
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2014.01.03 09:59:00
|
745. Come on Tankers, Give me a Straight Answer - in General Discussions [original thread]
AV nades only work on stupid tankers very well and not so much on shield tanked HAVs. You need to get close and by that you either get shreddered by the HAV (assuming it was a blaster HAV) or the surrounding infantry you cant shoot and throw at th...
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2014.01.02 22:23:00
|
746. Why do the null cannons still have shields? Null cannon shields block RE damage - in General Discussions [original thread]
stlcarlos989 wrote: I just hacked a letter and placed an RE 1/3 of the way up on the wall that is directly behind the hacking console. I saw a red dot go to the letter start hacking it, I triggered the RE which is literally a foot behind him di...
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2014.01.02 16:18:00
|
747. Scouts, AV and tanks.. - in General Discussions [original thread]
straya fox wrote: Like a lot of infantry I have been having issues with 1.7 tanks. Not much seems to work against tanks except tanks. But RE's on a fast scout seems to actually work. Softening them slightly with AV nades and then having a snea...
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2014.01.02 13:04:00
|
748. the QQ and av advice for anyone who cant get kills with low end av - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mortedeamor wrote: ok so ive been listening and reading the qq about tanks for about a month now..and this is what i have to say av is not underpowered the users are being stupid i killed 9 tanks in 1 skirm the other day witha baloch lav..and...
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2014.01.02 13:01:00
|
749. so i actually used swarms for the first time in 1.7... - in General Discussions [original thread]
knight guard fury wrote: Oswald Rehnquist wrote: I"ve recently jumped into av as well, doesn't seem too bad, my guess it was better before hand AV was incredibly OP before 1.7 and now that they were nerfed a tad people complain that they ...
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2014.01.02 08:48:00
|
750. remove wp from unclaimed turrerts - in General Discussions [original thread]
Galvan Nized wrote: I don't think tankers target turrets as preemptive strike, because I've never seen a tanker rush to the other side and destroy any red turrets in the beginning of a match. Why are they worried about turrets that could "pote...
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2013.12.31 22:30:00
|
751. a quetion for the new AV - in General Discussions [original thread]
Void Echo wrote: Crimson Cerberes wrote: before 1.7 - "Oh hey a tank, I better kill it before it kills 90 people" interesting, because I have never heard anyone say anything remotely similar to that or in that tone in over a year. ...
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2013.12.31 22:24:00
|
752. I'm not the only one that thinks cloaks in Dust are Ridiculous , Right? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Fusion Commander wrote: Oswald Rehnquist wrote: Fusion Commander wrote: The scout suit needs something and Im not agianst the cloaks, but in my opinion the just wouldnt be right for this game if it were exclusive for the scout or not ...
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2013.12.31 22:12:00
|
753. Tanks are completly balanced (and here is why :o) - in General Discussions [original thread]
GLOBAL RAGE wrote: Korvin Lomont wrote: GLOBAL RAGE wrote: Korvin Lomont wrote: Akdhar Saif wrote: I think statwise they're inline with RL Tanks which can only really be taken out by other tanks or by alot of people with AV. Having...
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2013.12.31 19:59:00
|
754. A challenge to EnglishSnake and other tankers... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Did someone show up? I am just curious...
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2013.12.31 19:43:00
|
755. Passive armor tank on tanks is totally OP - in General Discussions [original thread]
Webifiers are one solution another could be EMP grenades that disable all modules and weapons for a short period of time. They are already mentioned and used in the novels so they should be ok...
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2013.12.31 19:25:00
|
756. Tanks are completly balanced (and here is why :o) - in General Discussions [original thread]
GLOBAL RAGE wrote: Korvin Lomont wrote: Akdhar Saif wrote: I think statwise they're inline with RL Tanks which can only really be taken out by other tanks or by alot of people with AV. Having said that I think they need to increase the c...
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2013.12.31 19:17:00
|
757. Tanks are completly balanced (and here is why :o) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Akdhar Saif wrote: I think statwise they're inline with RL Tanks which can only really be taken out by other tanks or by alot of people with AV. Having said that I think they need to increase the cost or limit vehicle amount in matches because...
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2013.12.31 16:58:00
|
758. I'm not the only one that thinks cloaks in Dust are Ridiculous , Right? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ghosts Chance wrote: invisability in games breaks things. you think balance is hard now? wait for a clusterfuck if they ever implement it. cloaks cannot be balanced easily, and CCPs track record means they will either enter as useless things...
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2013.12.31 11:07:00
|
759. Are Plasma Cannons viable AV now? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Galvan Nized wrote: It's not a terrible weapon when paired with REs. If you are sneaky enough and get the REs planted fire the PlC and then blow the remotes. Usually the PlC will do enough shield damage to allow the remotes to kill...Sadly if ...
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2013.12.30 17:20:00
|
760. Are Plasma Cannons viable AV now? - in General Discussions [original thread]
The Robot Devil wrote: I have popped plenty of HAVs with a plasma cannon. It works well if you use it in the right situations, PLC with two sets of advanced prox and one set of standard proxs with some AV nades for fun. Takes practice and patie...
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2013.12.30 17:20:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |