| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
2481. remove rail turrets - in General Discussions [original thread]
Eurydice Itzhak wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Eurydice Itzhak wrote: Nobody enjoys these turrets. I hate that i have to rail tank on every single map besides line harvest and that one tiny circular map with lots of cover. Nobody enjoys playing...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.01.16 08:48:00
|
2482. remove rail turrets - in General Discussions [original thread]
Eurydice Itzhak wrote: Because my missiles are so deadly to infantry. I can squeeze out some kills but its main purpose is anti vehicle. Im just wanted another av turret to replace the rail turret. Lasers. pew pew. Missiles are multi purpo...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.01.16 00:34:00
|
2483. logibro...the thankless job - operation "logistical nightmare" - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mass Driving is also a thankless job. Truth be told unless your running an AR, ar users don't ever understand your worth.
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.01.16 00:25:00
|
2484. REALLY!!?! - in General Discussions [original thread]
I would have said he is better than you. Mathematically you will have had higher DPS and higher EHP so its got nothing to do with the fact he has a rail rifle, he just shot you more.
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.01.16 00:21:00
|
2485. remove rail turrets - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Aikuchi Tomaru wrote: Eurydice Itzhak wrote: dust badger wrote: I enjoy these turrets pew pew Said no vehicle user ever post 1.7 Because vehicle users don't like competition. No we do, but when its as si...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.01.16 00:17:00
|
2486. remove rail turrets - in General Discussions [original thread]
Eurydice Itzhak wrote: Nobody enjoys these turrets. I hate that i have to rail tank on every single map besides line harvest and that one tiny circular map with lots of cover. Nobody enjoys playing against these turrets. Nobody likes losing a ...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.01.16 00:00:00
|
2487. I think the whole ScR+AK.0 Q_Q, is adorable. - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: True Adamance wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: True Adamance wrote: I don't understand your bitching ReGnYuM. The ScR will always be good even without the heat bonus in CQC, all the bonus mean was ...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.01.15 23:42:00
|
2488. I think the whole ScR+AK.0 Q_Q, is adorable. - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: True Adamance wrote: ReGnYuM wrote: Firstly, If you cannot understand why it is detrimental to game design and diversity, when someone spends approximately 2.7 million SP on a Proto suit for speci...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.01.15 23:06:00
|
2489. I think the whole ScR+AK.0 Q_Q, is adorable. - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: ReGnYuM wrote: Firstly, If you cannot understand why it is detrimental to game design and diversity, when someone spends approximately 2.7 million SP on a Proto suit for specific variant of a weapon, then you're part of ...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.01.15 22:47:00
|
2490. What Is Your Quote When You Kill An Enemy? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Grenade Kill - How do you like my cooking? Rifle Kill - Hahaha Taste my Miltia Suit Mass Driver Kill - Kaboom Mass Driver Combo Kill (Used Grenade/ Secondary Weapon) - Skadoosh Sidearm Kill - oooh! HMG Kill - AAAAARRRRRRGGGGGGHHHHHH!!!
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.01.15 08:44:00
|
2491. are there Devs disguised as us, arguing with us? - in General Discussions [original thread]
What? No? That Preposterous, I mean maybe? Umm I'm just going to go now.
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.01.13 09:12:00
|
2492. Official CCP Response on TTK (Time To Kill) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Aero Yassavi wrote: CCP has a bad habit of releasing valuable information that the community would love to hear and provide feedback for, but hiding it within random threads. So I am here to bring it more closely to everyone's attention. http...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.01.13 08:42:00
|
2493. New game mode in "near future." Could it be in 1.8? Taking bets - in General Discussions [original thread]
Aero Yassavi wrote: Bendtner92 wrote: I seriously doubt we will see this anytime soon, maybe not until we're on the PS4. With a larger gamemode we will absolutely need more than 16 players on each team, and I truly can't see that happening ...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.01.12 23:48:00
|
2494. New game mode in "near future." Could it be in 1.8? Taking bets - in General Discussions [original thread]
It sounds like large Scale skirmish. You rember the three gallante maps realeased in 1.4, they are all the same map, conquest will effectively be skirmish on the 5x5 maps.
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.01.12 23:45:00
|
2495. Buff the Massdriver and Flaylock and Plasma Cannon. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Dexter307 wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Dexter307 wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: As a Mass Driver user the Mass Driver does not require a buff, the TTK formthe Mass Driver is perfect. Instead the TTK for the Rifles, HMG and SMG need to be nerfed ...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.01.12 19:45:00
|
2496. Buff the Massdriver and Flaylock and Plasma Cannon. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Dexter307 wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: As a Mass Driver user the Mass Driver does not require a buff, the TTK formthe Mass Driver is perfect. Instead the TTK for the Rifles, HMG and SMG need to be nerfed by approximately 20% in total, assuming t...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.01.12 16:57:00
|
2497. Buff the Massdriver and Flaylock and Plasma Cannon. - in General Discussions [original thread]
As a Mass Driver user the Mass Driver does not require a buff, the TTK formthe Mass Driver is perfect. Instead the TTK for the Rifles, HMG and SMG need to be nerfed by approximately 20% in total, assuming the ROF bonus for assaults. The only thin...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.01.11 19:18:00
|
2498. ADV-PRO tanks? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Roy Ventus wrote: >.> Then yeah...AV would definitely be too UP if we use the same stats to go against brought in ADV-PRO tanks. I do agree @Sinboto, that bringing in the other tanks means we could get a re-balance in stats. It would onl...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.01.11 17:00:00
|
2499. ADV-PRO tanks? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sinboto Simmons wrote: Amarrgheddon wrote: I doubt we need ADV or Proto tanks. Give a good reason for them. Most people cant even deal with the basic ones we have now. Balance perhaps, with ADV and PRO tanks on the field ADV and PRO AV can...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.01.11 16:59:00
|
2500. ADV-PRO tanks? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Roy Ventus wrote: @Asha true. But once they get two or three of them destroyed, you'd imagine they would switch. Takahiro Kashuken wrote: We dont have any which is unfair Wait is that the truth? There are no adv or proto HULLS a...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.01.11 16:50:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |