| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 |
1081. Tanks are meant to wreck you. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Lorhak Gannarsein wrote: Korvin Lomont wrote: dogmanpig wrote: Shijima Kuraimaru wrote: Your siganture "Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry." is blatantly false as HAVs have never...
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2013.12.13 12:43:00
|
1082. Why can tanks solo, but not AV? - in General Discussions [original thread]
WeapondigitX V7 wrote: tanking usually does require team work now unfortunately. the good news: the enemy tank be trying to kill your team mates thus distracting him while you get behind him stealthily. REs now stick to walls and vehicles (sta...
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2013.12.13 12:37:00
|
1083. [Feedback] HAVs too strong against infantry - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
At first I really liked the concept of powerfull tanks rushing in doing stuff while theri modules are activated and beeing vulnerable during the cooldown. But CCP did not make this happen when modules run out tanks simply are able to retreat too...
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2013.12.13 12:33:00
|
1084. Why can tanks solo, but not AV? - in General Discussions [original thread]
IraqiFriendshipExplosive wrote: Its very very easy to solo a tank - strap lots of remote explosives to a cheap LAV - Drive straight into enemy tank - BOOM! Unless the tanker is VERY aware of his surroundings or has a fit specifically to counte...
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2013.12.13 12:20:00
|
1085. Active scanner must die - in General Discussions [original thread]
Removing the scanner texts would be my first aproach -> either you catch a signal or not its on your tac net so I don't need that thing to tell me that it has scanned and this would make dampeners viable as you could achieve stealth...
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2013.12.13 11:27:00
|
1086. You do not think that the Plasma Cannon should be improved? - in General Discussions [original thread]
There are two things I don't like on the PLC: - The firing Arc does not make sense to me and I generally don't like those arcs. - its inability to harm vehicles This is a gallente weapon and should have the highest DPS with the shortest Range o...
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2013.12.13 11:23:00
|
1087. Active scanner must die - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cat Merc wrote: PARKOUR PRACTIONER wrote: I love executing blissfully unaware people who think they're safe because they have scanners. XD As much as I love that, if they have eyes, they will kill you since they aren't sacrificing their su...
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2013.12.13 11:13:00
|
1088. Tanks are meant to wreck you. - in General Discussions [original thread]
dogmanpig wrote: Shijima Kuraimaru wrote: Your siganture "Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry." is blatantly false as HAVs have never required teamwork to be effective. when vehicle...
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2013.12.13 10:59:00
|
1089. Tank vs AV: In my opinion. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jason Pearson wrote: Rei Shepard wrote: CCP Remnant wrote: wripple wrote: Quote: We had damage-based WP many moons ago but they were removed because of WP farming. Now, however, we have a global limiter that prevents mass-WP farming...
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2013.12.13 10:51:00
|
1090. This Rail Rifle - in General Discussions [original thread]
HYENAKILLER X wrote: Sir Petersen wrote: You guys know that I love this game but why make a weapon so ridiculously overpowered? Does this make people happy? Run around with a crutch? I don-Št get it.. Its good, but in cqc vs ar or smg it...
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2013.12.13 10:34:00
|
1091. This Rail Rifle - in General Discussions [original thread]
CrotchGrab 360 wrote: It's like a faster firing slightly less powerful TACAR. And leave it alone! Dam I love the rail rifle, using iron sights on a vanilla assault rifle, with strong aim assist got boring. using the same gun all the time was ...
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2013.12.13 10:27:00
|
1092. Why can tanks solo, but not AV? - in General Discussions [original thread]
The Attorney General wrote: You can solo a tank, it just takes smarts, and patience. When you develop them, tanks will fall. Until then, practice. The only solid way to solo a tank right now is with a suicide LAV and this won't work in ...
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2013.12.13 10:11:00
|
1093. Tank vs AV: In my opinion. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Commander Tzu wrote: The main problem I have seen is lack of AV in FW and pub. I ran a ton of gallente and minmatar FW, about 15 games, and saw a whopping 4 people try to kill me with AV. Two when I was in an armor tank and two when I was in sh...
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2013.12.13 10:03:00
|
1094. So who HASN'T been banned yet from FW? - in General Discussions [original thread]
not yet
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2013.12.13 09:19:00
|
1095. Suicide LAV - in General Discussions [original thread]
RED FARM wrote: Raeb Mond wrote: BOOM! WTF! I got tagged by a suicide LAV today, talk about a surprise! I spent the rest of the match frantically scanning everything for that sneaky bastard. That is really an effective tactic against tanks...
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2013.12.13 08:24:00
|
1096. Intelligence is OP - in General Discussions [original thread]
to 2) So we agree the PLC is UP and not very viable as AV weapon ^^ to 6) Its easy 1 person should be able to fight of 1 tank as long as 1 person is enough to have a tank fully operable and the teamsize is fixed. I admit AV was on the upper hand ...
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2013.12.12 15:34:00
|
1097. Scouts can't beat the scanner - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sana Rayya wrote: You, sir, have no idea what you're talking about. Is this a troll post or are you really that ignorant? Facts: Lvl 5 Scouts beat advanced scanners inherently, and this scanner is the most widely used in pubs. To beat 28 dB ...
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2013.12.12 15:24:00
|
1098. Intelligence is OP - in General Discussions [original thread]
Regarding your answers: to 2) Regarding the PLC its really a poor AV weapon and thats the reason it is used against Infantry (and ist rarely used overall). The reason is simply the damage is not very high for an AV weapon considering the HP you c...
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2013.12.12 15:12:00
|
1099. Uplinks are overpowered - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cat Merc wrote: The fact that you spawn invisible, and can fire for a second before the invisibility wears off (the game doesn't react fast enough) means you get insta popped often for approaching an uplink :\ Should be a second timer before y...
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2013.12.12 14:42:00
|
1100. [Request] Increase Swarm Launcher Missile Speed - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Mobius Wyvern wrote: OH MY GOD A DIRTY VEHICLE SCUM WANTS AV BUFFED?! Yes, actually, I do. For a guided missile weapon, the Swarm Launcher has pathetically slow missiles. To clarify, its prior ability to do thousands of damage without the use...
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2013.12.12 14:39:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |