| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
1201. War Room > all - in The War Room [original thread]
Honestly, I actually feel like as much as we may hate each other on a given day the War Room is a real focal point of the Dust community.
- by Kain Spero - at 2014.04.24 19:05:00
|
1202. Dear DDB: - in The War Room [original thread]
Holy &*%$ this thread is still going? I'm impressed. I'm surprised that alliance leadership requesting that DDB field a mixed team could cause so much QQ.
- by Kain Spero - at 2014.04.24 19:02:00
|
1203. A Neautral View Of DNS - A Open Debate. - in The War Room [original thread]
Moorian Flav wrote: This is what I love about the Spero; when PC gets changed, DNS (and Spero) can say "Look what we did.". Doesn't/Won't matter that what's going on in PC now is more than likely just an excuse to farm ISK as CCP has already re...
- by Kain Spero - at 2014.04.24 01:54:00
|
1204. A Neautral View Of DNS - A Open Debate. - in The War Room [original thread]
Spartacus Dust wrote: Last but not least him and the rest of DNS seem to have the impression that they are forcing CCP's hand by controlling MH. Fanfest is like 8 days away, what ever DNS thinks they are doing with 100% control is irrelevant, ...
- by Kain Spero - at 2014.04.23 22:01:00
|
1205. DNSBlack and the Dirt Nap League: Decide For Yourself - in The War Room [original thread]
I have now listened to the podcast. I had a meeting last night with TWL and DNSBlack and I have put the relationship between DNS and TWL on hold. When it comes to matters of Dust 514 and the Dust community DNSBlack will now be deferring to me. T...
- by Kain Spero - at 2014.04.18 13:30:00
|
1206. DNSBlack and the Dirt Nap League: Decide For Yourself - in The War Room [original thread]
Without having someone gobble up all of Molden Heath I doubt the anti-passive ISK discussion would have been able to gain as much traction. Again the only reason folks have to change tags is if they want to participate in events that would involve...
- by Kain Spero - at 2014.04.17 23:08:00
|
1207. DNSBlack and the Dirt Nap League: Decide For Yourself - in The War Room [original thread]
Jaysyn Larrisen wrote: I see a serious disconenct between Black's interview statements, EVE side coms discussions, and position statements and videos and what you are saying. I'm also pretty confident that when Black comments on this in his DN...
- by Kain Spero - at 2014.04.17 22:31:00
|
1208. DNSBlack and the Dirt Nap League: Decide For Yourself - in The War Room [original thread]
Jaysyn Larrisen wrote: Kain, I can justify working with someone who's in-game goals are opposed to mine if i truly believe they are trying to make the game better and they are willing to step back from the "in-game" and work it off-line to fi...
- by Kain Spero - at 2014.04.17 22:10:00
|
1209. DNSBlack and the Dirt Nap League: Decide For Yourself - in The War Room [original thread]
Soraya Xel wrote: Why would anyone get on board with it? Why would anyone in their right mind get on board with it? DNS is responsible for killing PFC, which was better for the community than what DNSBlack is trying to push. PFC was based on...
- by Kain Spero - at 2014.04.17 21:46:00
|
1210. DNSBlack and the Dirt Nap League: Decide For Yourself - in The War Room [original thread]
DNSBlack has his own way of discussing issues and is free to express himself just as anyone else. You may not like what he says or how he says it, but hate him or love him he drives the discourse forward even he happens to execute it like someone ...
- by Kain Spero - at 2014.04.17 19:30:00
|
1211. DNSBlack and the Dirt Nap League: Decide For Yourself - in The War Room [original thread]
I've been so busy at work so I haven't had a chance to listen to the pod cast. I do have the following to say about PFC and the Dirt Nap League: I'll be honest in that I think that PFC was a good system despite its flaws. That's why I'm still pay...
- by Kain Spero - at 2014.04.17 18:51:00
|
1212. Dirt Nap Squad...You Win Im Out - in The War Room [original thread]
Ghostt Shadoww wrote: Not going to make this big. Plain and simple. Everything i said has happen. I tried really hard to get people to listen and plan. Butall they wamt to do is fight and argue. Everything i have taught DNS is doing. But again...
- by Kain Spero - at 2014.04.16 20:07:00
|
1213. Any KEQ officers around? Hoping to get something adressed. - in The War Room [original thread]
I'm sorry but outright cheating to make a match not count is never justified no matter how much you may hate your enemy. Use the tools in the game (no multi-attack exploiting isn't a tool) to accomplish your goals. I'm sure CCP will make the rig...
- by Kain Spero - at 2014.04.16 17:57:00
|
1214. Proposed Ideas to Improve Planetary Conquest - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
The Robot Devil wrote: Kain Spero wrote: Soraya Xel wrote: Kain Spero wrote: I think CCP understands that there are complex issues regarding Planetary Conquest with some potentially straight forward changes. The most important of these...
- by Kain Spero - at 2014.04.16 17:49:00
|
1215. Proposed Ideas to Improve Planetary Conquest - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Soraya Xel wrote: Kain Spero wrote: I think CCP understands that there are complex issues regarding Planetary Conquest with some potentially straight forward changes. The most important of these issues being passive ISK and clone pack size. ...
- by Kain Spero - at 2014.04.16 15:06:00
|
1216. Would you fight for and hold land if there was no passive ISK? - in General Discussions [original thread]
The meeting with CCP went very well. I think CCP understands that there are complex issues regarding Planetary Conquest with some potentially straight forward changes that could improve the situation. The most important of these issues being pas...
- by Kain Spero - at 2014.04.16 14:40:00
|
1217. Proposed Ideas to Improve Planetary Conquest - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
The meeting with CCP went very well. I think CCP understands that there are complex issues regarding Planetary Conquest with some potentially straight forward changes. The most important of these issues being passive ISK and clone pack size.
- by Kain Spero - at 2014.04.16 14:39:00
|
1218. CCP PC 1.0 Needs to Be Addressed: Auto Sale & Clone Packs - in General Discussions [original thread]
The meeting with CCP went very well. I think CCP understands that there are complex issues regarding Planetary Conquest with some potentially straight forward changes. The most important of these issues being passive ISK and clone pack size.
- by Kain Spero - at 2014.04.16 14:38:00
|
1219. Any KEQ officers around? Hoping to get something adressed. - in The War Room [original thread]
Flyingconejo wrote: There is no rage like a nerd's rage. Just submit your support ticket, and CCP will probably revert the situation back to us under attack from FA with 70 clones left. @To Fiddlestap, Kane, Free Beers, rest of DNS groupie...
- by Kain Spero - at 2014.04.16 14:17:00
|
1220. KILL-EM-QUICK Corp Is Now Recruiting - in Corporation Recruitment [original thread]
District: Audesder III - District 4 Time of battle: 2014.03.02 04:30:00 Attacking corporation: jobless bums with neckbeards ************** District: Audesder III - District 4 Time of battle: 2014.03.02 04:20:00 Attacking corporation: jobless bum...
- by Kain Spero - at 2014.04.16 06:34:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |