Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
yep derrith again
Shining Flame Amarr Empire
111
|
Posted - 2014.04.16 14:44:00 -
[61] - Quote
superjoe360x wrote:Kain Spero wrote:Tallen Ellecon wrote:Kain Spero wrote:A DISTRICT BELONGING TO YOUR CORPORATION HAS BEEN ATTACKED:
DISTRICT: ODDELULF III - DISTRICT 3 TIME OF BATTLE: 2014.04.16 02:20:00 ATTACKING CORPORATION: FATAL ABSOLUTION
***********************************
A DISTRICT BELONGING TO YOUR CORPORATION HAS BEEN ATTACKED:
DISTRICT: ODDELULF III - DISTRICT 3 TIME OF BATTLE: 2014.04.16 02:50:00 ATTACKING CORPORATION: ETERNAL BEINGS
KEQ would like an apology. We do not know how this constitutes glitching by us. Please remove the slander from our recruitment thread. You should remove yourself from Dust and biomass your characters in shame. Same goes for all you highly skilled lets blue up nobody has any respect for you DNS loser. Let me tell you a quick story about what respect gets you in this world. Particularly in the sack. Respect and dignity are what rob you of a good time. You ever bent someone over and, well....... then you turn them around and spit in.......... trying to avoid any dirty movie stuff, but it seems I may be failing at that. OH, then when they ask you to get on all fours and tie a dog collar around you and a horsey saddle on your back and play old country western music......... and........ I've forgotten my point.
This post officially brought to you by. |
Knight Solitaire
751
|
Posted - 2014.04.16 14:48:00 -
[62] - Quote
Here's a little song I wrote, might want to sing it note for note, don't worry, be happy. In every life we have some trouble, when you worry you make it double, don't worry, be happy. Don't worry, be happy now!
Take it away War Room!
Faigh dea
"Knight Soiaire has the best RE Game" - Crimson Moon V
|
Zatara Rought
Fatal Absolution
2563
|
Posted - 2014.04.16 15:06:00 -
[63] - Quote
The really damning issue for me is that a few months ago I sniped 2 KEQ districts on the same day. KEQ ticketed CCP when our battle fell last in the order (the one which would have been efficacious and would have resulted in their previous battles being nullified) because we didn't hit it first so CCP refunded the pack and said try again.
And then DID NOT REPORT it when the later battle on the same day had us going first but was obviously nullified due to a battle that occurred after.
Of course, having no knowledge at the time...I reported it to CCP but was unable to articulate exactly what happened, I blame myself for not recognizing the insidious nature of why they would report one set of clone packs hitting....but not report the other in the same manner. Now it seems to make perfect sense.
It was assumed I simply hadn't tried to re-attack after the win, and CCP only changed the clone count to reflect their battle loss.
KEQ reported the bug when it benefited them...and did not when they knew it favored them and that our win wouldn't count due to the glitch.
Disappointing. No need for anything more than CCP editing their district to remove the 150 clones and implementing the reattack I intended to send.
Hope to see KEQ on the battlefield soon.
Abusing 'working as intended' bad mechanics like district locking is indeed different than double, triple, or quad locking districts, and reporting it only discriminately.
I could be totally off, just the way it felt after everything that has happened. I'm wrong a lot.
If they did submit a ticket for yesterdays battle BEFORE it took place, than bravo to them and I think we all owe KEQ an apology.
But sadly I'm almost positive they will conjure some excuse why they did not "well we've reported it so many times before and so we decided not to report these cause they don't do anything about it...except when an enemies battle is last..."
CEO of FA
B3RT>PFBHz>TP>IMP>FA
Follow me on twitter Skype Zatara.Rought
|
KenKaniff69
Fatal Absolution
2344
|
Posted - 2014.04.16 15:23:00 -
[64] - Quote
Zatara Rought wrote:The really damning issue for me is that a few months ago I sniped 2 KEQ districts on the same day. KEQ ticketed CCP when our battle fell last in the order (the one which would have been efficacious and would have resulted in their previous battles being nullified) because we didn't hit it first so CCP refunded the pack and said try again. And then DID NOT REPORT it when the later battle on the same day had us going first but was obviously nullified due to a battle that occurred after. Of course, having no knowledge at the time...I reported it to CCP but was unable to articulate exactly what happened, I blame myself for not recognizing the insidious nature of why they would report one set of clone packs hitting....but not report the other in the same manner. Now it seems to make perfect sense. It was assumed I simply hadn't tried to re-attack after the win, and CCP only changed the clone count to reflect their battle loss. KEQ reported the bug when it benefited them...and did not when they knew it favored them and that our win wouldn't count due to the glitch. Disappointing. No need for anything more than CCP editing their district to remove the 150 clones and implementing the reattack I intended to send. Hope to see KEQ on the battlefield soon. Abusing 'working as intended' bad mechanics like district locking is indeed different than double, triple, or quad locking districts, and reporting it only discriminately. I could be totally off, just the way it felt after everything that has happened. I'm wrong a lot. If they did submit a ticket for yesterdays battle BEFORE it took place, than bravo to them and I think we all owe KEQ an apology. But sadly I'm almost positive they will conjure some excuse why they did not "well we've reported it so many times before and so we decided not to report these cause they don't do anything about it...except when an enemies battle is last..." As a person who watched all of this happen I cannot express enough how this is 100% true in every way.
KEQ should feel ashamed of themselves for not reporting this.
Why anyone would want to join a corporation that has thrived off of gltiching everything possible just to hold land is beyond me.
The problem with tanks
|
ER-Bullitt
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
1362
|
Posted - 2014.04.16 15:39:00 -
[65] - Quote
KenKaniff69 wrote:
Why anyone would want to join a corporation that has thrived off of gltiching everything possible just to hold land is beyond me.
If this is true, dont care either way, they are trolling you blue donut faggots hard... and its ******* AWESOME (high five amirite)
That's reason enough for me. Sending in application right now. |
ER-Bullitt
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
1362
|
Posted - 2014.04.16 15:45:00 -
[66] - Quote
P.S. 99%... close enough.
LOL
|
21yrOld Knight
Pradox XVI
748
|
Posted - 2014.04.16 15:46:00 -
[67] - Quote
KenKaniff69 wrote:Zatara Rought wrote:The really damning issue for me is that a few months ago I sniped 2 KEQ districts on the same day. KEQ ticketed CCP when our battle fell last in the order (the one which would have been efficacious and would have resulted in their previous battles being nullified) because we didn't hit it first so CCP refunded the pack and said try again. And then DID NOT REPORT it when the later battle on the same day had us going first but was obviously nullified due to a battle that occurred after. Of course, having no knowledge at the time...I reported it to CCP but was unable to articulate exactly what happened, I blame myself for not recognizing the insidious nature of why they would report one set of clone packs hitting....but not report the other in the same manner. Now it seems to make perfect sense. It was assumed I simply hadn't tried to re-attack after the win, and CCP only changed the clone count to reflect their battle loss. KEQ reported the bug when it benefited them...and did not when they knew it favored them and that our win wouldn't count due to the glitch. Disappointing. No need for anything more than CCP editing their district to remove the 150 clones and implementing the reattack I intended to send. Hope to see KEQ on the battlefield soon. Abusing 'working as intended' bad mechanics like district locking is indeed different than double, triple, or quad locking districts, and reporting it only discriminately. I could be totally off, just the way it felt after everything that has happened. I'm wrong a lot. If they did submit a ticket for yesterdays battle BEFORE it took place, than bravo to them and I think we all owe KEQ an apology. But sadly I'm almost positive they will conjure some excuse why they did not "well we've reported it so many times before and so we decided not to report these cause they don't do anything about it...except when an enemies battle is last..." As a person who watched all of this happen I cannot express enough how this is 100% true in every way. KEQ should feel ashamed of themselves for not reporting this. Why anyone would want to join a corporation that has thrived off of gltiching everything possible just to hold land is beyond me.
Feel ashamed of what? That they dodge the power of DNS
This isn't the real world trying to use hegemony won't work.
Mike Ruan Said I was Dust Famous
DNS first to use game theory.
Neo-Realism.
Prisoner dilemma look it up b4 you meta
|
Flyingconejo
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
793
|
Posted - 2014.04.16 16:17:00 -
[68] - Quote
Zatara Rought wrote:............really long post........
Amazing, I didn't see Spero's mouth move even once! Nice trick! How the mighty have fallen!
Just kidding, just kidding.
I can tell you that I know I did not send a support ticket. Since CCP stopped their support service in Spanish, I stopped reporting bugs. They don't support me, I don't support them.
I also know that KEQ has sent support tickets in every other instance of this bug happening, even when it would have benefitted us not to do so.
I also know that in some cases, even with KEQ sending a support ticket before the battle, CCP has been too slow/ has not wanted to remove the extra battles. The last time was when we had 2 battles in the same district against Eternal Beings. I guess that CCP has made some cuts on the Support personnel, but since there is no support in Spanish, I could not care less.
I was not around for yesterday battles so I don't know for sure if we send a ticket or not for this one, but it would surprise me that we didn't since we have done before every time. I would ask around and find it for you, but lets be honest, you guys really don't care about what really happened, since you have a pretty nice story already mounted in which you are tragic heroes and all that crap. Far from me to burst that bubble.
CCP will surely revert the district to the state it was after the first attack, with you reattacking against 70 clones.
I know it must be boring in DNS, but all that drama about "glitchers", "exploiters", and "systematically quad locking and making billions" is just the tinfoil party screaming while mounted on the slander train.
And with this, I'm off. I dislike Dust, I dislike its forums, and I particularly dislike the War Room, and you trolls have kept me here too much already. See you in a while. o7
|
Moorian Flav
165
|
Posted - 2014.04.16 16:23:00 -
[69] - Quote
Quote:Why anyone would want to join a corporation that has thrived off of everything possible just to hold land is beyond me. LOL Isn't that what FA and all the other add-on corps did by joining DNS? The amount of irony in this thread is incredible; exploiters calling out exploiters, cowards calling out cowards, etc, etc. I am sure DNS corps will now quad-lock "so CCP will fix it".
I don't troll; I tell the truth.
|
yep derrith again
Shining Flame Amarr Empire
112
|
Posted - 2014.04.16 16:28:00 -
[70] - Quote
Moorian Flav wrote:Quote:Why anyone would want to join a corporation that has thrived off of everything possible just to hold land is beyond me. LOL Isn't that what FA and all the other add-on corps did by joining DNS? The amount of irony in this thread is incredible; exploiters calling out exploiters, cowards calling out cowards, etc, etc. I am sure DNS corps will now quad-lock "so CCP will fix it". Probably, but I rest easier knowing that my pillow is not made of duck feathers, but instead, cold hard isk. Besides, you can chastise FA all you like, but sometimes to dispense justice, you have to do unjust things. |
|
Moorian Flav
167
|
Posted - 2014.04.16 16:31:00 -
[71] - Quote
Quote:sometimes to dispense justice, you have to do unjust things. Whatever you have to say to justify your own actions (while condemning other players' actions).
I don't troll; I tell the truth.
|
yep derrith again
Shining Flame Amarr Empire
113
|
Posted - 2014.04.16 16:38:00 -
[72] - Quote
Moorian Flav wrote:Quote:sometimes to dispense justice, you have to do unjust things. Whatever you have to say to justify your own actions (while condemning other players' actions). You mistake me for condemning them. Besides, I've grown to the point to where I just can't care anymore, I've heard every story and opinion in the book, and no matter how much I try to explain my thoughts, you all are too thick skulled to consider my side, and vice versa, TBH. So I've given up, it's clear we won't see eye to eye on this. There are people who will continually dream up "facts" and stories to support their claim, and those who just don't listen. It isn't mine or your fault if we don't see things the way you or I do. |
Leither Yiltron
Ahrendee Mercenaries
860
|
Posted - 2014.04.16 17:52:00 -
[73] - Quote
Zatara Rought wrote:The really damning issue for me is that a few months ago I sniped 2 KEQ districts on the same day. KEQ ticketed CCP when our battle fell last in the order (the one which would have been efficacious and would have resulted in their previous battles being nullified) because we didn't hit it first so CCP refunded the pack and said try again.
And then DID NOT REPORT it when the later battle on the same day had us going first but was obviously nullified due to a battle that occurred after.
Of course, having no knowledge at the time...I reported it to CCP but was unable to articulate exactly what happened, I blame myself for not recognizing the insidious nature of why they would report one set of clone packs hitting....but not report the other in the same manner. Now it seems to make perfect sense.
It was assumed I simply hadn't tried to re-attack after the win, and CCP only changed the clone count to reflect their battle loss.
KEQ reported the bug when it benefited them...and did not when they knew it favored them and that our win wouldn't count due to the glitch.
You're completely incorrect on what went down, Zat, which is understandable because you were able to see all of 1/3 of the information related to the corporations involved. I own the corporation which was locking KEQ's districts at the time, and which was party to many of the attacks in this particular instance.
The multiple attacks which engaged were completely unintentional. The attempt was to prevent you from sniping the lock from the districts, so naturally there were multiple directors online in the locking corporation who were spamming attacks immediately when the districts became unlocked. You, similarly, had multiple people online. This was obvious since Fatal Absolution registered two attacks simultaneously against at least one of the districts (the thing which prompted you to report anything in the first place). The way this particular mechanic works, simultaneous attacking of a single district instigates it. Simultaneously attacking a single district is also the most efficient sniping/locking/attacking strategy under conventional mechanics.
Two characters reported everything that went on that night- a director character from KEQ and the CEO character of the locking corporation. Your ticket and ours weren't touched until about 8 hours before the battles were set to occur. When they were, the intervention was mishandled. It turns out that battle SCHEDULING and district LOCKING are handled by two different parts of the infrastructure. Typically these pieces are interlinked in such a way that a district is always deemed UNDER ATTACK if a subsequent battle is scheduled on it.
When GM's intervened, the districts were all but one rescheduled so that only one corp was attacking them. Additionally, each of those districts was forced into ONLINE status by the GM despite battles being scheduled on them. This allowed other corps to schedule MORE battles. This was rather early in the day- STB managed to attack one of the onlined districts, the rest were simply re-locked. Again, we had multiple battles from multiple corporations scheduled on each district.
I filed a SUBSEQUENT ticket immediately and attempted to contact CCP personnel to further resolve these issues. In fact I actually skipped a class that day so that I could do it as fast as possible in order to give everyone (FA, KEQ, and our alliance mates) the best chance of resolving the issue quickly. No additional administrative action was taken that day.
There were two battles which involved Fatal Absolution. The first had been rescheduled in such a way that FA's attack was the only one against that district. You lost.
The second battle was on a district which had been onlined by GM's. My corp was used to attack the district after it had been onlined in the middle of the day since STB had already attacked a district onlined in this way. Thus there was a battle subsequently scheduled on it for the NEXT day. This nullified the results of the match on that district, which we lost.
That night I filed a THIRD ticket reporting all of these results. The district which STB had attacked didn't have any FA battles on it in the first place. The GM's decided to nullify STB's scheduled attack against that district. For whatever reason, their decision on the second district in line was to allow the current state to hold. Obviously we didn't file any more tickets because this was their last ruling on the entire thing.
So yeah Zatara, it'd be best if you didn't go talking about situations where you know less than 1/3rd of the story. The only thing which was intentional, and ever has been, is using multiple directors to lock districts because it's the only strategy that makes sense. What else are people supposed to do? Allow their opponents to have a head start in aggressive, competitive scenarios because the background mechanics are bugged?
Have a pony
|
THUNDERGROOVE
Fatal Absolution Dirt Nap Squad.
667
|
Posted - 2014.04.16 17:54:00 -
[74] - Quote
Moorian Flav wrote:Quote:Why anyone would want to join a corporation that has thrived off of everything possible just to hold land is beyond me. LOL Isn't that what FA and all the other add-on corps did by joining DNS? The amount of irony in this thread is incredible; exploiters calling out exploiters, cowards calling out cowards, etc, etc. I am sure DNS corps will now quad-lock "so CCP will fix it". Locking is a bad game mechanic.
Bypassing the 1 hour time a corp has to reattack and multiple attacks are actual bugs in the game. Understand the difference before you speak.
Running at 10.6 m/s ak.0
Projects: TDBS | SDETool
ScrubzBScrubz
|
Timbo101
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
224
|
Posted - 2014.04.16 17:55:00 -
[75] - Quote
Leither Yiltron wrote:Zatara Rought wrote:The really damning issue for me is that a few months ago I sniped 2 KEQ districts on the same day. KEQ ticketed CCP when our battle fell last in the order (the one which would have been efficacious and would have resulted in their previous battles being nullified) because we didn't hit it first so CCP refunded the pack and said try again.
And then DID NOT REPORT it when the later battle on the same day had us going first but was obviously nullified due to a battle that occurred after.
Of course, having no knowledge at the time...I reported it to CCP but was unable to articulate exactly what happened, I blame myself for not recognizing the insidious nature of why they would report one set of clone packs hitting....but not report the other in the same manner. Now it seems to make perfect sense.
It was assumed I simply hadn't tried to re-attack after the win, and CCP only changed the clone count to reflect their battle loss.
KEQ reported the bug when it benefited them...and did not when they knew it favored them and that our win wouldn't count due to the glitch.
You're completely incorrect on what went down, Zat, which is understandable because you were able to see all of 1/3 of the information related to the corporations involved. I own the corporation which was locking KEQ's districts at the time, and which was party to many of the attacks in this particular instance. The multiple attacks which engaged were completely unintentional. The attempt was to prevent you from sniping the lock from the districts, so naturally there were multiple directors online in the locking corporation who were spamming attacks immediately when the districts became unlocked. You, similarly, had multiple people online. This was obvious since Fatal Absolution registered two attacks simultaneously against at least one of the districts (the thing which prompted you to report anything in the first place). The way this particular mechanic works, simultaneous attacking of a single district instigates it. Simultaneously attacking a single district is also the most efficient sniping/locking/attacking strategy under conventional mechanics. Two characters reported everything that went on that night- a director character from KEQ and the CEO character of the locking corporation. Your ticket and ours weren't touched until about 8 hours before the battles were set to occur. When they were, the intervention was mishandled. It turns out that battle SCHEDULING and district LOCKING are handled by two different parts of the infrastructure. Typically these pieces are interlinked in such a way that a district is always deemed UNDER ATTACK if a subsequent battle is scheduled on it. When GM's intervened, the districts were all but one rescheduled so that only one corp was attacking them. Additionally, each of those districts was forced into ONLINE status by the GM despite battles being scheduled on them. This allowed other corps to schedule MORE battles. This was rather early in the day- STB managed to attack one of the onlined districts, the rest were simply re-locked. Again, we had multiple battles from multiple corporations scheduled on each district. I filed a SUBSEQUENT ticket immediately and attempted to contact CCP personnel to further resolve these issues. In fact I actually skipped a class that day so that I could do it as fast as possible in order to give everyone the best chance of resolving the issue quickly. No additional administrative action was taken that day. There were two battles which involved Fatal Absolution. The first had been rescheduled in such a way that FA's attack was the only one against that district. You lost. The second battle was on a district which had been onlined by GM's. My corp was used to attack the district after it had been onlined in the middle of the day since STB had already attacked a district onlined in this way. Thus there was a battle subsequently scheduled on it for the NEXT day. This nullified the results of the match on that district, which we lost. That night I filed a THIRD ticket reporting all of these results. The district which STB had attacked didn't have any FA battles on it in the first place. The GM's decided to nullify STB's scheduled attack against that district. For whatever reason, their decision on the second district in line was to allow the current state to hold. Obviously we didn't file any more tickets because this was their last ruling on the entire thing. So yeah Zatara, it'd be best if you didn't go talking about situations where you know less than 1/3rd of the story. The only thing which was intentional, and ever has been, is using multiple directors to lock districts because it's the only strategy that makes sense. What else are people supposed to do? Allow their opponents to have a head start in aggressive, competitive scenarios because the background mechanics are bugged?
Hi Leither! Do you still play often? |
Fiddlestaxp
TeamPlayers Dirt Nap Squad.
791
|
Posted - 2014.04.16 17:56:00 -
[76] - Quote
Leither Yiltron wrote:Zatara Rought wrote:The really damning issue for me is that a few months ago I sniped 2 KEQ districts on the same day. KEQ ticketed CCP when our battle fell last in the order (the one which would have been efficacious and would have resulted in their previous battles being nullified) because we didn't hit it first so CCP refunded the pack and said try again.
And then DID NOT REPORT it when the later battle on the same day had us going first but was obviously nullified due to a battle that occurred after.
Of course, having no knowledge at the time...I reported it to CCP but was unable to articulate exactly what happened, I blame myself for not recognizing the insidious nature of why they would report one set of clone packs hitting....but not report the other in the same manner. Now it seems to make perfect sense.
It was assumed I simply hadn't tried to re-attack after the win, and CCP only changed the clone count to reflect their battle loss.
KEQ reported the bug when it benefited them...and did not when they knew it favored them and that our win wouldn't count due to the glitch.
You're completely incorrect on what went down, Zat, which is understandable because you were able to see all of 1/3 of the information related to the corporations involved. I own the corporation which was locking KEQ's districts at the time, and which was party to many of the attacks in this particular instance. The multiple attacks which engaged were completely unintentional. The attempt was to prevent you from sniping the lock from the districts, so naturally there were multiple directors online in the locking corporation who were spamming attacks immediately when the districts became unlocked. You, similarly, had multiple people online. This was obvious since Fatal Absolution registered two attacks simultaneously against at least one of the districts (the thing which prompted you to report anything in the first place). The way this particular mechanic works, simultaneous attacking of a single district instigates it. Simultaneously attacking a single district is also the most efficient sniping/locking/attacking strategy under conventional mechanics. Two characters reported everything that went on that night- a director character from KEQ and the CEO character of the locking corporation. Your ticket and ours weren't touched until about 8 hours before the battles were set to occur. When they were, the intervention was mishandled. It turns out that battle SCHEDULING and district LOCKING are handled by two different parts of the infrastructure. Typically these pieces are interlinked in such a way that a district is always deemed UNDER ATTACK if a subsequent battle is scheduled on it. When GM's intervened, the districts were all but one rescheduled so that only one corp was attacking them. Additionally, each of those districts was forced into ONLINE status by the GM despite battles being scheduled on them. This allowed other corps to schedule MORE battles. This was rather early in the day- STB managed to attack one of the onlined districts, the rest were simply re-locked. Again, we had multiple battles from multiple corporations scheduled on each district. I filed a SUBSEQUENT ticket immediately and attempted to contact CCP personnel to further resolve these issues. In fact I actually skipped a class that day so that I could do it as fast as possible in order to give everyone (FA, KEQ, and our alliance mates) the best chance of resolving the issue quickly. No additional administrative action was taken that day. There were two battles which involved Fatal Absolution. The first had been rescheduled in such a way that FA's attack was the only one against that district. You lost. The second battle was on a district which had been onlined by GM's. My corp was used to attack the district after it had been onlined in the middle of the day since STB had already attacked a district onlined in this way. Thus there was a battle subsequently scheduled on it for the NEXT day. This nullified the results of the match on that district, which we lost. That night I filed a THIRD ticket reporting all of these results. The district which STB had attacked didn't have any FA battles on it in the first place. The GM's decided to nullify STB's scheduled attack against that district. For whatever reason, their decision on the second district in line was to allow the current state to hold. Obviously we didn't file any more tickets because this was their last ruling on the entire thing. So yeah Zatara, it'd be best if you didn't go talking about situations where you know less than 1/3rd of the story. The only thing which was intentional, and ever has been, is using multiple directors to lock districts because it's the only strategy that makes sense. What else are people supposed to do? Allow their opponents to have a head start in aggressive, competitive scenarios because the background mechanics are bugged?
Quad attacks don't happen on accident.
|
Kain Spero
Escrow Removal and Acquisition Dirt Nap Squad.
3341
|
Posted - 2014.04.16 17:57:00 -
[77] - Quote
I'm sorry but outright cheating to make a match not count is never justified no matter how much you may hate your enemy. Use the tools in the game (no multi-attack exploiting isn't a tool) to accomplish your goals.
I'm sure CCP will make the right choices in dealing with the situation.
Owner of Spero Escrow Services
Follow @KainSpero for Dust and CPM news
|
ER-Bullitt
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
1379
|
Posted - 2014.04.16 17:58:00 -
[78] - Quote
Sounds a lot like... "my bad" |
Timbo101
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
224
|
Posted - 2014.04.16 17:58:00 -
[79] - Quote
Fiddlestaxp wrote:Leither Yiltron wrote:Zatara Rought wrote:The really damning issue for me is that a few months ago I sniped 2 KEQ districts on the same day. KEQ ticketed CCP when our battle fell last in the order (the one which would have been efficacious and would have resulted in their previous battles being nullified) because we didn't hit it first so CCP refunded the pack and said try again.
And then DID NOT REPORT it when the later battle on the same day had us going first but was obviously nullified due to a battle that occurred after.
Of course, having no knowledge at the time...I reported it to CCP but was unable to articulate exactly what happened, I blame myself for not recognizing the insidious nature of why they would report one set of clone packs hitting....but not report the other in the same manner. Now it seems to make perfect sense.
It was assumed I simply hadn't tried to re-attack after the win, and CCP only changed the clone count to reflect their battle loss.
KEQ reported the bug when it benefited them...and did not when they knew it favored them and that our win wouldn't count due to the glitch.
You're completely incorrect on what went down, Zat, which is understandable because you were able to see all of 1/3 of the information related to the corporations involved. I own the corporation which was locking KEQ's districts at the time, and which was party to many of the attacks in this particular instance. The multiple attacks which engaged were completely unintentional. The attempt was to prevent you from sniping the lock from the districts, so naturally there were multiple directors online in the locking corporation who were spamming attacks immediately when the districts became unlocked. You, similarly, had multiple people online. This was obvious since Fatal Absolution registered two attacks simultaneously against at least one of the districts (the thing which prompted you to report anything in the first place). The way this particular mechanic works, simultaneous attacking of a single district instigates it. Simultaneously attacking a single district is also the most efficient sniping/locking/attacking strategy under conventional mechanics. Two characters reported everything that went on that night- a director character from KEQ and the CEO character of the locking corporation. Your ticket and ours weren't touched until about 8 hours before the battles were set to occur. When they were, the intervention was mishandled. It turns out that battle SCHEDULING and district LOCKING are handled by two different parts of the infrastructure. Typically these pieces are interlinked in such a way that a district is always deemed UNDER ATTACK if a subsequent battle is scheduled on it. When GM's intervened, the districts were all but one rescheduled so that only one corp was attacking them. Additionally, each of those districts was forced into ONLINE status by the GM despite battles being scheduled on them. This allowed other corps to schedule MORE battles. This was rather early in the day- STB managed to attack one of the onlined districts, the rest were simply re-locked. Again, we had multiple battles from multiple corporations scheduled on each district. I filed a SUBSEQUENT ticket immediately and attempted to contact CCP personnel to further resolve these issues. In fact I actually skipped a class that day so that I could do it as fast as possible in order to give everyone (FA, KEQ, and our alliance mates) the best chance of resolving the issue quickly. No additional administrative action was taken that day. There were two battles which involved Fatal Absolution. The first had been rescheduled in such a way that FA's attack was the only one against that district. You lost. The second battle was on a district which had been onlined by GM's. My corp was used to attack the district after it had been onlined in the middle of the day since STB had already attacked a district onlined in this way. Thus there was a battle subsequently scheduled on it for the NEXT day. This nullified the results of the match on that district, which we lost. That night I filed a THIRD ticket reporting all of these results. The district which STB had attacked didn't have any FA battles on it in the first place. The GM's decided to nullify STB's scheduled attack against that district. For whatever reason, their decision on the second district in line was to allow the current state to hold. Obviously we didn't file any more tickets because this was their last ruling on the entire thing. So yeah Zatara, it'd be best if you didn't go talking about situations where you know less than 1/3rd of the story. The only thing which was intentional, and ever has been, is using multiple directors to lock districts because it's the only strategy that makes sense. What else are people supposed to do? Allow their opponents to have a head start in aggressive, competitive scenarios because the background mechanics are bugged? Quad attacks don't happen on accident.
I dont think you understand yet, everytime we lock we have multiple people locking, everytime we snipe we have multiple sniping. Everytime, without fail, why do you think we have so many people over there. |
Timbo101
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
229
|
Posted - 2014.04.16 17:59:00 -
[80] - Quote
Kain Spero wrote:I'm sorry but outright cheating to make a match not count is never justified no matter how much you may hate your enemy. Use the tools in the game (no multi-attack exploiting isn't a tool) to accomplish your goals.
I'm sure CCP will make the right choices in dealing with the situation.
Who are you responding to Kain? I'm a little confused here, can you rephrase this maybe? Being serious too |
|
Fiddlestaxp
TeamPlayers Dirt Nap Squad.
791
|
Posted - 2014.04.16 18:04:00 -
[81] - Quote
Timbo101 wrote:Fiddlestaxp wrote:Leither Yiltron wrote:Zatara Rought wrote:The really damning issue for me is that a few months ago I sniped 2 KEQ districts on the same day. KEQ ticketed CCP when our battle fell last in the order (the one which would have been efficacious and would have resulted in their previous battles being nullified) because we didn't hit it first so CCP refunded the pack and said try again.
And then DID NOT REPORT it when the later battle on the same day had us going first but was obviously nullified due to a battle that occurred after.
Of course, having no knowledge at the time...I reported it to CCP but was unable to articulate exactly what happened, I blame myself for not recognizing the insidious nature of why they would report one set of clone packs hitting....but not report the other in the same manner. Now it seems to make perfect sense.
It was assumed I simply hadn't tried to re-attack after the win, and CCP only changed the clone count to reflect their battle loss.
KEQ reported the bug when it benefited them...and did not when they knew it favored them and that our win wouldn't count due to the glitch.
You're completely incorrect on what went down, Zat, which is understandable because you were able to see all of 1/3 of the information related to the corporations involved. I own the corporation which was locking KEQ's districts at the time, and which was party to many of the attacks in this particular instance. The multiple attacks which engaged were completely unintentional. The attempt was to prevent you from sniping the lock from the districts, so naturally there were multiple directors online in the locking corporation who were spamming attacks immediately when the districts became unlocked. You, similarly, had multiple people online. This was obvious since Fatal Absolution registered two attacks simultaneously against at least one of the districts (the thing which prompted you to report anything in the first place). The way this particular mechanic works, simultaneous attacking of a single district instigates it. Simultaneously attacking a single district is also the most efficient sniping/locking/attacking strategy under conventional mechanics. Two characters reported everything that went on that night- a director character from KEQ and the CEO character of the locking corporation. Your ticket and ours weren't touched until about 8 hours before the battles were set to occur. When they were, the intervention was mishandled. It turns out that battle SCHEDULING and district LOCKING are handled by two different parts of the infrastructure. Typically these pieces are interlinked in such a way that a district is always deemed UNDER ATTACK if a subsequent battle is scheduled on it. When GM's intervened, the districts were all but one rescheduled so that only one corp was attacking them. Additionally, each of those districts was forced into ONLINE status by the GM despite battles being scheduled on them. This allowed other corps to schedule MORE battles. This was rather early in the day- STB managed to attack one of the onlined districts, the rest were simply re-locked. Again, we had multiple battles from multiple corporations scheduled on each district. I filed a SUBSEQUENT ticket immediately and attempted to contact CCP personnel to further resolve these issues. In fact I actually skipped a class that day so that I could do it as fast as possible in order to give everyone (FA, KEQ, and our alliance mates) the best chance of resolving the issue quickly. No additional administrative action was taken that day. There were two battles which involved Fatal Absolution. The first had been rescheduled in such a way that FA's attack was the only one against that district. You lost. The second battle was on a district which had been onlined by GM's. My corp was used to attack the district after it had been onlined in the middle of the day since STB had already attacked a district onlined in this way. Thus there was a battle subsequently scheduled on it for the NEXT day. This nullified the results of the match on that district, which we lost. That night I filed a THIRD ticket reporting all of these results. The district which STB had attacked didn't have any FA battles on it in the first place. The GM's decided to nullify STB's scheduled attack against that district. For whatever reason, their decision on the second district in line was to allow the current state to hold. Obviously we didn't file any more tickets because this was their last ruling on the entire thing. So yeah Zatara, it'd be best if you didn't go talking about situations where you know less than 1/3rd of the story. The only thing which was intentional, and ever has been, is using multiple directors to lock districts because it's the only strategy that makes sense. What else are people supposed to do? Allow their opponents to have a head start in aggressive, competitive scenarios because the background mechanics are bugged? Quad attacks don't happen on accident. I dont think you understand yet, everytime we lock we have multiple people locking, everytime we snipe we have multiple sniping. Everytime, without fail, why do you think we have so many people over there. And we have had multiple people locking too, not once did we come down with a quad attack. |
Timbo101
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
229
|
Posted - 2014.04.16 18:06:00 -
[82] - Quote
Fiddlestaxp wrote:Timbo101 wrote:Fiddlestaxp wrote:Leither Yiltron wrote:Zatara Rought wrote:The really damning issue for me is that a few months ago I sniped 2 KEQ districts on the same day. KEQ ticketed CCP when our battle fell last in the order (the one which would have been efficacious and would have resulted in their previous battles being nullified) because we didn't hit it first so CCP refunded the pack and said try again.
And then DID NOT REPORT it when the later battle on the same day had us going first but was obviously nullified due to a battle that occurred after.
Of course, having no knowledge at the time...I reported it to CCP but was unable to articulate exactly what happened, I blame myself for not recognizing the insidious nature of why they would report one set of clone packs hitting....but not report the other in the same manner. Now it seems to make perfect sense.
It was assumed I simply hadn't tried to re-attack after the win, and CCP only changed the clone count to reflect their battle loss.
KEQ reported the bug when it benefited them...and did not when they knew it favored them and that our win wouldn't count due to the glitch.
You're completely incorrect on what went down, Zat, which is understandable because you were able to see all of 1/3 of the information related to the corporations involved. I own the corporation which was locking KEQ's districts at the time, and which was party to many of the attacks in this particular instance. The multiple attacks which engaged were completely unintentional. The attempt was to prevent you from sniping the lock from the districts, so naturally there were multiple directors online in the locking corporation who were spamming attacks immediately when the districts became unlocked. You, similarly, had multiple people online. This was obvious since Fatal Absolution registered two attacks simultaneously against at least one of the districts (the thing which prompted you to report anything in the first place). The way this particular mechanic works, simultaneous attacking of a single district instigates it. Simultaneously attacking a single district is also the most efficient sniping/locking/attacking strategy under conventional mechanics. Two characters reported everything that went on that night- a director character from KEQ and the CEO character of the locking corporation. Your ticket and ours weren't touched until about 8 hours before the battles were set to occur. When they were, the intervention was mishandled. It turns out that battle SCHEDULING and district LOCKING are handled by two different parts of the infrastructure. Typically these pieces are interlinked in such a way that a district is always deemed UNDER ATTACK if a subsequent battle is scheduled on it. When GM's intervened, the districts were all but one rescheduled so that only one corp was attacking them. Additionally, each of those districts was forced into ONLINE status by the GM despite battles being scheduled on them. This allowed other corps to schedule MORE battles. This was rather early in the day- STB managed to attack one of the onlined districts, the rest were simply re-locked. Again, we had multiple battles from multiple corporations scheduled on each district. I filed a SUBSEQUENT ticket immediately and attempted to contact CCP personnel to further resolve these issues. In fact I actually skipped a class that day so that I could do it as fast as possible in order to give everyone (FA, KEQ, and our alliance mates) the best chance of resolving the issue quickly. No additional administrative action was taken that day. There were two battles which involved Fatal Absolution. The first had been rescheduled in such a way that FA's attack was the only one against that district. You lost. The second battle was on a district which had been onlined by GM's. My corp was used to attack the district after it had been onlined in the middle of the day since STB had already attacked a district onlined in this way. Thus there was a battle subsequently scheduled on it for the NEXT day. This nullified the results of the match on that district, which we lost. That night I filed a THIRD ticket reporting all of these results. The district which STB had attacked didn't have any FA battles on it in the first place. The GM's decided to nullify STB's scheduled attack against that district. For whatever reason, their decision on the second district in line was to allow the current state to hold. Obviously we didn't file any more tickets because this was their last ruling on the entire thing. So yeah Zatara, it'd be best if you didn't go talking about situations where you know less than 1/3rd of the story. The only thing which was intentional, and ever has been, is using multiple directors to lock districts because it's the only strategy that makes sense. What else are people supposed to do? Allow their opponents to have a head start in aggressive, competitive scenarios because the background mechanics are bugged? Quad attacks don't happen on accident. I dont think you understand yet, everytime we lock we have multiple people locking, everytime we snipe we have multiple sniping. Everytime, without fail, why do you think we have so many people over there. And we have had multiple people locking too, not once did we come down with a quad attack.
**** happens I guess? I thought you wanted to talk about it, as soon as I posted in our pub chat you left...
|
ER-Bullitt
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
1382
|
Posted - 2014.04.16 18:06:00 -
[83] - Quote
Not their fault you didn't do it right. |
Tallen Ellecon
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
1699
|
Posted - 2014.04.16 18:17:00 -
[84] - Quote
Fiddlestaxp wrote:Timbo101 wrote:Fiddlestaxp wrote: Quad attacks don't happen on accident.
I dont think you understand yet, everytime we lock we have multiple people locking, everytime we snipe we have multiple sniping. Everytime, without fail, why do you think we have so many people over there. And we have had multiple people locking too, not once did we come down with a quad attack.
So how is it not an accident if you can't replicate it with multiple people yourself? How can we say "okay we're going to get 4 attacks in at no profit by doing ____"? I don't see why this is so confusing.
Supporter of tiericide, EVE interaction, and a proper NPE SoonGäó514
"No blue tags make Tallen go crazy.
|
Erobthedude
0uter.Heaven Academy
73
|
Posted - 2014.04.16 19:03:00 -
[85] - Quote
Zatara Rought wrote:The really damning issue for me is that a few months ago I sniped 2 KEQ districts on the same day. KEQ ticketed CCP when our battle fell last in the order (the one which would have been efficacious and would have resulted in their previous battles being nullified) because we didn't hit it first so CCP refunded the pack and said try again. And then DID NOT REPORT it when the later battle on the same day had us going first but was obviously nullified due to a battle that occurred after. Of course, having no knowledge at the time...I reported it to CCP but was unable to articulate exactly what happened, I blame myself for not recognizing the insidious nature of why they would report one set of clone packs hitting....but not report the other in the same manner. Now it seems to make perfect sense. It was assumed I simply hadn't tried to re-attack after the win, and CCP only changed the clone count to reflect their battle loss. KEQ reported the bug when it benefited them...and did not when they knew it favored them and that our win wouldn't count due to the glitch. Disappointing. No need for anything more than CCP editing their district to remove the 150 clones and implementing the reattack I intended to send. Hope to see KEQ on the battlefield soon. Abusing 'working as intended' bad mechanics like district locking is indeed different than double, triple, or quad locking districts, and reporting it only discriminately. I could be totally off, just the way it felt after everything that has happened. I'm wrong a lot. If they did submit a ticket for yesterdays battle BEFORE it took place, than bravo to them and I think we all owe KEQ an apology. But sadly I'm almost positive they will conjure some excuse why they did not "well we've reported it so many times before and so we decided not to report these cause they don't do anything about it...except when an enemies battle is last..."
Not trolling here, but they can only take advantage of the glitch when they have won the match right?
"Dear Lord, without you we are butt dust."
|
Scheherazade VII
408
|
Posted - 2014.04.16 19:11:00 -
[86] - Quote
Pretty funny how a CPM member who has a close relationship with CCP would come crying on the forums like this instead of you know...saying perhaps... "hey do you know if xxxxxx exploit has been reported and if so, what intends to be done about the situation as I have evidence that..."
but the thing is, that would be in an instance where you actually give a damn. instead you want all the districts, anybody who wants to blue up and engulf the entire game and have ZERO battles in a game where the idea is to fight over planets really doesn't give a dam about DUST at all, only when it affects them personally.
How much ISK have you made from blueing up the ENTIRE GAME and you worry about people locking ONE district?
Didn't EVERYBODY lock districts? Wasn't billions if not trillions made from locking districts? But because this stands in the way of you obtaining 100% you come on the forums and cry like a little *****.
I'm not even sure if I'm talking to Kain or the OP right now but you're both babies crying over one minor little thing, why are you so hellbent on taking over 100% of the game just to sell districts then demand protection money, attack the district anyway and keep pumping and dumping back and forth to gain ISK?!
Wouldn't that be manipulation of the highest order? he who has the most power wins and it seems like your ass is red raw because now somebody else has the power!
that should put a new stirrer in the **** pot :D
i don't belong to any corp or really actively play DUST but it is fun, i guess now I'll get some uber serious post from some 17 year old kid in an elite corp about how I will be teamkilled in faction warfare. looooooooooool my facts could be untrue but who really cares :D |
Dust User
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
217
|
Posted - 2014.04.16 22:12:00 -
[87] - Quote
Fiddlestaxp wrote:Timbo101 wrote:Fiddlestaxp wrote: Quad attacks don't happen on accident.
I dont think you understand yet, everytime we lock we have multiple people locking, everytime we snipe we have multiple sniping. Everytime, without fail, why do you think we have so many people over there. And we have had multiple people locking too, not once did we come down with a quad attack.
If the almighty fiddle has never seen it then it must not be true.
Maybe you don't know how the game works as well as you think you do? You are a disgrace to neck-beards around the world.
Get over yourself. |
Zatara Rought
Fatal Absolution
2577
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 02:39:00 -
[88] - Quote
Moorian Flav wrote:Quote:Why anyone would want to join a corporation that has thrived off of everything possible just to hold land is beyond me. LOL Isn't that what FA and all the other add-on corps did by joining DNS? The amount of irony in this thread is incredible; exploiters calling out exploiters, cowards calling out cowards, etc, etc. I am sure DNS corps will now quad-lock "so CCP will fix it".
FA holds land? I think we just managed to get a few attacks in and actually aren't holding ANY land except for one odd district we just took and have no intention of keeping...tbh.
CEO of FA
B3RT>PFBHz>TP>IMP>FA
Follow me on twitter Skype Zatara.Rought
|
STYLIE77
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
157
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 02:46:00 -
[89] - Quote
Kain Spero wrote:I'm sorry but outright cheating to make a match not count is never justified no matter how much you may hate your enemy. Use the tools in the game (no multi-attack exploiting isn't a tool) to accomplish your goals.
I'm sure CCP will make the right choices in dealing with the situation.
I doubt you are sorry.
Multi-attack...
Kain... the issue here is a Multi-Defense.
KEQ was attacked, and we played the matches.
In the past we locked our districts just as most corps in PC did.
We attacked and we defended, using clones and clone packs.
When multiple locks occur, you LOSE 36 million isk per lock.
This "quad-lock" that is the shining gem of the FA accusations have absolutely NOTHING to do with Fatal Absolution and Eternal Beings attacking KEQ at the same instance.
That "quad-lock" cost us 108 million isk under the normal amount that a single lock would profit.
Now "tri-locks" or "dual-locks" cost KEQ dearly as well.
But that was months ago, and... it has nothing to do with FA and EB attacking KEQ at the same instance.
Nothing.
It is slanderous, and desperate. Plain and simple.
We were attacked, and we fought the battles.
We did not ACTIVELY exploit or glitch.
We played the games on the schedule.
Also, wtf is up with all the crying? Multiple threads? Really?
Seriously, you have most of the top 10% of the leader-board in your alliance... just attack us in a few days maybe?
This ONE TIME glitch that KEQ DID NOT DO... does nothing to stop your plans.
Two day delay... but you all choose to jump on here and act like spoiled brats in a multi-corp, multi-thread tantrum.
Only a few districts left... look how desperate...
Honestly, I think this has less to do with the glitch and more to do with the fact that my warchief told the FA directors NO.
|
Stiddlefaxq
Vherokior Combat Logistics Minmatar Republic
41
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 02:57:00 -
[90] - Quote
STYLIE77 wrote:Kain Spero wrote:I'm sorry but outright cheating to make a match not count is never justified no matter how much you may hate your enemy. Use the tools in the game (no multi-attack exploiting isn't a tool) to accomplish your goals.
I'm sure CCP will make the right choices in dealing with the situation. I doubt you are sorry. Multi-attack... Kain... the issue here is a Multi-Defense. KEQ was attacked, and we played the matches. In the past we locked our districts just as most corps in PC did. We attacked and we defended, using clones and clone packs. When multiple locks occur, you LOSE 36 million isk per lock. This "quad-lock" that is the shining gem of the FA accusations have absolutely NOTHING to do with Fatal Absolution and Eternal Beings attacking KEQ at the same instance. That "quad-lock" cost us 108 million isk under the normal amount that a single lock would profit. Now "tri-locks" or "dual-locks" cost KEQ dearly as well. But that was months ago, and... it has nothing to do with FA and EB attacking KEQ at the same instance. Nothing. It is slanderous, and desperate. Plain and simple. We were attacked, and we fought the battles. We did not ACTIVELY exploit or glitch. We played the games on the schedule. Also, wtf is up with all the crying? Multiple threads? Really? Seriously, you have most of the top 10% of the leader-board in your alliance... just attack us in a few days maybe? This ONE TIME glitch that KEQ DID NOT DO... does nothing to stop your plans. Two day delay... but you all choose to jump on here and act like spoiled brats in a multi-corp, multi-thread tantrum. Only a few districts left... look how desperate...
Honestly, I think this has less to do with the glitch and more to do with the fact that my warchief told the FA directors NO.
So let me get this straight... You lost 100 mllion isk every few days and you didn't find a better way to do it? I don't believe it for a second. You could have just set your corp wallet to 37 million isk and it would only register one attack.
What you are saying is disconnected from the frequency of occurrence in the evidence. Even if you weren't smart enough to figure out to set your corp wallet like that, you would at the very least figure to only have one guy locking it... Losing nearly a weeks worth of clone generation ISK surely isn't worth that.
Not buying it. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |