Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Spectral Clone
Dust2Dust. Top Men.
2326
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 19:09:00 -
[61] - Quote
Kain Spero wrote:I've been so busy at work so I haven't had a chance to listen to the pod cast. I do have the following to say about PFC and the Dirt Nap League:
I'll be honest in that I think that PFC was a good system despite its flaws. That's why I'm still paying the PFC council ISK weekly out of passive ISK generated by Oddelulf. Planetary Conquest is broken and the progression form Pubs to PC is broken as well and I think PFC could have filled a niche in that progression. No, I don't think every player should be coddled, but at the same time new corps don't deserve to be draped in raw meat and then thrown into a cage full of lions with only a toothpick as a weapon.
Right now though with the current 100% Molden Heath mentality PFC can't exist. I do think that the Dirt Nap League could be something completely unique in gaming and something worthwhile to really explore. I do however understand it has some major political hurdles before it that will be very difficult to overcome. If it doesn't work it doesn't work. Just like PFC at least something was tried to make the game more entertaining.
I do think the DNL is the best bet to continue to provide players content in the current Planetary Conquest environment unless something gives and CCP begins to address some of the glaring and lingering issues in Planetary Conquest 1.0. I do think that 98% control has caught the attention of CCP and helped to start the gears of change spinning, and if we end up with the system being repaired some and the Dirt Nap League is no longer possible or doesn't make sense so be it. At least we were able to demonstrate how broken the system is and foster the momentum needed to address issues such as passive ISK and clone pack size.
Did some random guy really have to come to dust and set up 5 vs 5 tournaments in skirmish to prove this?
You need to stop acting like clowns.
BTW Kain, push CCP to fix the bonus bug. It has existed in the game since Uprising 1.0: https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=156060&find=unread
HTFU Gë£ Live with CCP´s mistakes.
|
Spartacus Dust
NECROM0NGERS Caps and Mercs
400
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 19:09:00 -
[62] - Quote
I find Political Hurdles are easier when I don't speak and leave it to my diplo team, the idea coming from you sounds better and provides community leaders, even those who wage war against you with some faith, but after that pod side, I've lost all faith in anything DNS Black says.
I can't count how many times he said I built, I made, I, I, I.
Well I genuinely believe he doesn't care about the community, but I know you do Kain, you should take the soapbox and tell him to go hide in the blackness.
100% control currently does the following: Forces veteran players to do pubs and slaughter new players, making new players quit, Makes competitive players want to leave the game due to the broken mechanics in 1.0, Unites the community against DNSBlack,
Try a test run, see who is interested. You don't need 100% to schedule one battle.
Twitter @Matthew_Dust
Executor of Caps and Mercs Alliance.
|
Killar-12
OLDSPICE. Top Men.
2661
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 19:29:00 -
[63] - Quote
I think CCP's ability to create CUSTOM MATCHES which was used for every other tournament...
Except yours
How to Leave PC
|
Kain Spero
Escrow Removal and Acquisition Dirt Nap Squad.
3352
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 19:30:00 -
[64] - Quote
DNSBlack has his own way of discussing issues and is free to express himself just as anyone else. You may not like what he says or how he says it, but hate him or love him he drives the discourse forward even he happens to execute it like someone driving a semi through your living room.
When it comes to the DNL I am going to be the one taking the lead on setting it up and I understand the grave concerns the community has right now with the situation. I think we can work through those concerns and figure out a way to make this a win for everyone. If the community unites and starts a war against DNS so be it. We have gone from stagnation and brush fires to all out conflict that provides content to the whole community. If folks get on board with the DNL then great. We can run tourneys like back in the beta when we still had the fantastic tool of corp battles.
If people ask, "Why would Kain put in the time to run something like this?" My answer is that I love running sports stuff and have a history of doing so in the Dust community even at my own expense: http://dust514.com/news/blog/2013/04/community-spotlight-kain-spero-tournament-organizer/
I have some ideas on how we can pull this off, so if you are interested reach out to me and let's make this happen.
Owner of Spero Escrow Services
Follow @KainSpero for Dust and CPM news
|
Spartacus Dust
NECROM0NGERS Caps and Mercs
400
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 19:54:00 -
[65] - Quote
Kain Spero wrote:DNSBlack has his own way of discussing issues and is free to express himself just as anyone else. You may not like what he says or how he says it, but hate him or love him he drives the discourse forward even he happens to execute it like someone driving a semi through your living room. When it comes to the DNL I am going to be the one taking the lead on setting it up and I understand the grave concerns the community has right now with the situation. I think we can work through those concerns and figure out a way to make this a win for everyone. If the community unites and starts a war against DNS so be it. We have gone from stagnation and brush fires to all out conflict that provides content to the whole community. If folks get on board with the DNL then great. We can run tourneys like back in the beta when we still had the fantastic tool of corp battles. If people ask, "Why would Kain put in the time to run something like this?" My answer is that I love running sports stuff and have a history of doing so in the Dust community even at my own expense: http://dust514.com/news/blog/2013/04/community-spotlight-kain-spero-tournament-organizer/I have some ideas on how we can pull this off, so if you are interested reach out to me and let's make this happen.
Well to wage war, we need proper tools as you've already stated, I truly feel sorry for the CPM0 I feel like everything was cast aside to make way for fanfest.
That being said, this proposed league, has a lot of....RISK and no mention of reward.
Working with DNS burns bridges with many in the community, and of course provides DNS with income, DNS Black rambled about a reward, but so far has given no insight as to what that maybe.
Twitter @Matthew_Dust
Executor of Caps and Mercs Alliance.
|
Soraya Xel
Abandoned Privilege Top Men.
2024
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 20:28:00 -
[66] - Quote
Kain Spero wrote:When it comes to the DNL I am going to be the one taking the lead on setting it up and I understand the grave concerns the community has right now with the situation. I think we can work through those concerns and figure out a way to make this a win for everyone. If the community unites and starts a war against DNS so be it. We have gone from stagnation and brush fires to all out conflict that provides content to the whole community. If folks get on board with the DNL then great. We can run tourneys like back in the beta when we still had the fantastic tool of corp battles.
Why would anyone get on board with it? Why would anyone in their right mind get on board with it? DNS is responsible for killing PFC, which was better for the community than what DNSBlack is trying to push. PFC was based on the reality that it's been proven egotistical overlords running PFC don't work. That's why we had a Council.
Now you want us to bow down to an even more egotistical tool than we've ever seen before, and join his alliance to participate? You've gotta be kidding me, Kane. You're smarter than that. And so are the rest of us.
I'd like to be your CPM1 candidate
|
General John Ripper
20140
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 21:02:00 -
[67] - Quote
Soraya Xel wrote:Kain Spero wrote:When it comes to the DNL I am going to be the one taking the lead on setting it up and I understand the grave concerns the community has right now with the situation. I think we can work through those concerns and figure out a way to make this a win for everyone. If the community unites and starts a war against DNS so be it. We have gone from stagnation and brush fires to all out conflict that provides content to the whole community. If folks get on board with the DNL then great. We can run tourneys like back in the beta when we still had the fantastic tool of corp battles. Why would anyone get on board with it? Why would anyone in their right mind get on board with it? DNS is responsible for killing PFC, which was better for the community than what DNSBlack is trying to push. PFC was based on the reality that it's been proven egotistical overlords running PFC don't work. That's why we had a Council. Now you want us to bow down to an even more egotistical tool than we've ever seen before, and join his alliance to participate? You've gotta be kidding me, Kane. You're smarter than that. And so are the rest of us. All dns black wants is control. Your either with him or a nonfactor. You don't need 100% to hold a tourney. You don't need to be the ones who decides who gets to have fun and who doesn't. You don't need to strong arm and manipulate mercs to forcibly join your alliance. While it sounds good in theory, it will never work that way.
Everytime I get a like, another bug is fixed.
Everytime I get a like, Two more bugs are born.
|
Soraya Xel
Abandoned Privilege Top Men.
2028
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 21:05:00 -
[68] - Quote
That's why PFC let corps handle their own district. It's why PFC let the corps actually participating in PFC be the only party able to block another participant. Spero should realize that after PFC's existence, nobody in their right mind will accept an offer for a worse deal.
I'd like to be your CPM1 candidate
|
Mr Machine Guns
Nyain San Dirt Nap Squad.
676
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 21:31:00 -
[69] - Quote
Soraya Xel wrote:Kain Spero wrote:When it comes to the DNL I am going to be the one taking the lead on setting it up and I understand the grave concerns the community has right now with the situation. I think we can work through those concerns and figure out a way to make this a win for everyone. If the community unites and starts a war against DNS so be it. We have gone from stagnation and brush fires to all out conflict that provides content to the whole community. If folks get on board with the DNL then great. We can run tourneys like back in the beta when we still had the fantastic tool of corp battles. Why would anyone get on board with it? Why would anyone in their right mind get on board with it? DNS is responsible for killing PFC, which was better for the community than what DNSBlack is trying to push. PFC was based on the reality that it's been proven egotistical overlords running PFC don't work. That's why we had a Council. Now you want us to bow down to an even more egotistical tool than we've ever seen before, and join his alliance to participate? You've gotta be kidding me, Kane. You're smarter than that. And so are the rest of us.
Im just trying to play devils advocate here but name a corp that started on PFC and went on to be really successful in PC? None that i can think of, but you got to understand PFC does not work in the current state of PC for example lets say we left PFC alone and DNS took the rest of the district who are you going to attack and be able to maintain a district outside of PFC?
edit: people need to understand that if CCP does open up more land PFC might be able to be expanded beyond one planet and there comes a point were a corp can only hold x amount of land too |
Jaysyn Larrisen
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
907
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 21:43:00 -
[70] - Quote
Kain Spero wrote:DNSBlack has his own way of discussing issues and is free to express himself just as anyone else. You may not like what he says or how he says it, but hate him or love him he drives the discourse forward even he happens to execute it like someone driving a semi through your living room. When it comes to the DNL I am going to be the one taking the lead on setting it up and I understand the grave concerns the community has right now with the situation. I think we can work through those concerns and figure out a way to make this a win for everyone. If the community unites and starts a war against DNS so be it. We have gone from stagnation and brush fires to all out conflict that provides content to the whole community. If folks get on board with the DNL then great. We can run tourneys like back in the beta when we still had the fantastic tool of corp battles. If people ask, "Why would Kain put in the time to run something like this?" My answer is that I love running sports stuff and have a history of doing so in the Dust community even at my own expense: http://dust514.com/news/blog/2013/04/community-spotlight-kain-spero-tournament-organizer/I have some ideas on how we can pull this off, so if you are interested reach out to me and let's make this happen.
Kain,
I can justify working with someone who's in-game goals are opposed to mine if i truly believe they are trying to make the game better and they are willing to step back from the "in-game" and work it off-line to figure out how to achieve some things... you are a good example of that. I CAN"T justify working with an unstable meglomaniac like Black. Far as I'm concerned his name is now DNS BatShitCrazy. (That said this has all nicely set you up to swoop in as the "good guy" )
My short term recommendation would to be to push for a CCP vetted (with Player facilitation) third-party tourney on roughly a bi-montly basis. I've got a lot of basic concerns with mixing a tourney into the politcal PC landscape. The better option is that it is isolated from PC to bring 1) more interest and 2) a perception of legitimacy and impartiality.
Even if CCP doesn't want to go the third party route then use the special contract mechanics and run it all internal. For arena play to really take off we need some level of impartiality injected. Rightly or wrongly, anytime corp tags are involved using the existing mechanics available to players things will be shaky.
Long term, the corp contract mechanic would be great and could facilitate true 100% player generated and ran arena content (streams, ISK betting, the whole 9 yards).
"Endless money forms the sinews of War." - Cicero
Skype: jaysyn.larrisen
Twitter: @JaysynLarrisen
|
|
Killar-12
OLDSPICE. Top Men.
2666
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 21:45:00 -
[71] - Quote
Mr Machine Guns wrote:Soraya Xel wrote:Kain Spero wrote:When it comes to the DNL I am going to be the one taking the lead on setting it up and I understand the grave concerns the community has right now with the situation. I think we can work through those concerns and figure out a way to make this a win for everyone. If the community unites and starts a war against DNS so be it. We have gone from stagnation and brush fires to all out conflict that provides content to the whole community. If folks get on board with the DNL then great. We can run tourneys like back in the beta when we still had the fantastic tool of corp battles. Why would anyone get on board with it? Why would anyone in their right mind get on board with it? DNS is responsible for killing PFC, which was better for the community than what DNSBlack is trying to push. PFC was based on the reality that it's been proven egotistical overlords running PFC don't work. That's why we had a Council. Now you want us to bow down to an even more egotistical tool than we've ever seen before, and join his alliance to participate? You've gotta be kidding me, Kane. You're smarter than that. And so are the rest of us. Im just trying to play devils advocate here but name a corp that started on PFC and went on to be really successful in PC? None that i can think of, but you got to understand PFC does not work in the current state of PC for example lets say we left PFC alone and DNS took the rest of the district who are you going to attack and be able to maintain a district outside of PFC? edit: people need to understand that if CCP does open up more land PFC might be able to be expanded beyond one planet and there comes a point were a corp can only hold x amount of land too, but who knows what will happen with PC just need to wait for fanfest Nyain Chan...
How to Leave PC
|
Kain Spero
Escrow Removal and Acquisition Dirt Nap Squad.
3353
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 21:46:00 -
[72] - Quote
Soraya Xel wrote: Why would anyone get on board with it? Why would anyone in their right mind get on board with it? DNS is responsible for killing PFC, which was better for the community than what DNSBlack is trying to push. PFC was based on the reality that it's been proven egotistical overlords running PFC don't work. That's why we had a Council.
Now you want us to bow down to an even more egotistical tool than we've ever seen before, and join his alliance to participate? You've gotta be kidding me, Kane. You're smarter than that. And so are the rest of us.
People can get on board because if they want to be involved in Planetary Conquest they really don't have much of a choice other than going to war. Does that create a warm fuzzy feeling for everyone? Probably not and I can't out right say If PFC is better or worse than what will be the DNL because the DNL has yet to be established. How the DNL is going to function is something I am still working on but I can answer these two questions easily:
Will people have to have a DNS tag if they want to have land? Yes.
Will they have to have a DNS tag in order to participate in the DNL? No.
As I said before I will be leading up the establishment of the DNL, and I don't expect anyone to bow down to DNSBlack. A chunk of the community kept clamoring for PFC to be burnt down and as long as there were districts not under direct control or in the same organization that wasn't something that was going to be a sure thing. I'm not happy about PFC being mothballed for now, but I have some plans to establish PFC 2.0. Those plans will likely have to wait until after FanFest. In the meantime the PFC council continues to exist and I can see their input on the private PFC forums helping to move the dialogue forward.
Owner of Spero Escrow Services
Follow @KainSpero for Dust and CPM news
|
Soraya Xel
Abandoned Privilege Top Men.
2029
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 21:46:00 -
[73] - Quote
Mr Machine Guns wrote:Im just trying to play devils advocate here but name a corp that started on PFC and went on to be really successful in PC? None that i can think of, but you got to understand PFC does not work in the current state of PC for example lets say we left PFC alone and DNS took the rest of the district who are you going to attack and be able to maintain a district outside of PFC?
This is very much a mechanical problem. You might've noticed new corps don't enter PC. Period. Any new power in Planetary Conquest has simply been formed of the remains of another corp that had power. It's functionally impossible for new players to enter PC, unless an area such as PFC is opened. Both the mechanics of clone packs and passive ISK generation ensure existing players will always have complete dominance, until CCP replaces this terrible gamemode.
Mr Machine Guns wrote:edit: people need to understand that if CCP does open up more land PFC might be able to be expanded beyond one planet and there comes a point were a corp can only hold x amount of land too, but who knows what will happen with PC just need to wait for fanfest
This is complete bull. More space means more money for the same folks that are already making too much money. Nothing more, nothing less. The only people who want this, are people who have a ton of districts and can easily get more. Did you ever consider why they would suggest that so heavily?
I'd like to be your CPM1 candidate
|
Mr Machine Guns
Nyain San Dirt Nap Squad.
676
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 21:47:00 -
[74] - Quote
Killar-12 wrote:Mr Machine Guns wrote:Soraya Xel wrote:Kain Spero wrote:When it comes to the DNL I am going to be the one taking the lead on setting it up and I understand the grave concerns the community has right now with the situation. I think we can work through those concerns and figure out a way to make this a win for everyone. If the community unites and starts a war against DNS so be it. We have gone from stagnation and brush fires to all out conflict that provides content to the whole community. If folks get on board with the DNL then great. We can run tourneys like back in the beta when we still had the fantastic tool of corp battles. Why would anyone get on board with it? Why would anyone in their right mind get on board with it? DNS is responsible for killing PFC, which was better for the community than what DNSBlack is trying to push. PFC was based on the reality that it's been proven egotistical overlords running PFC don't work. That's why we had a Council. Now you want us to bow down to an even more egotistical tool than we've ever seen before, and join his alliance to participate? You've gotta be kidding me, Kane. You're smarter than that. And so are the rest of us. Im just trying to play devils advocate here but name a corp that started on PFC and went on to be really successful in PC? None that i can think of, but you got to understand PFC does not work in the current state of PC for example lets say we left PFC alone and DNS took the rest of the district who are you going to attack and be able to maintain a district outside of PFC? edit: people need to understand that if CCP does open up more land PFC might be able to be expanded beyond one planet and there comes a point were a corp can only hold x amount of land too, but who knows what will happen with PC just need to wait for fanfest Nyain Chan...
what about Nyain Chan?
|
Mr Machine Guns
Nyain San Dirt Nap Squad.
676
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 21:52:00 -
[75] - Quote
Soraya Xel wrote:Mr Machine Guns wrote:Im just trying to play devils advocate here but name a corp that started on PFC and went on to be really successful in PC? None that i can think of, but you got to understand PFC does not work in the current state of PC for example lets say we left PFC alone and DNS took the rest of the district who are you going to attack and be able to maintain a district outside of PFC? This is very much a mechanical problem. You might've noticed new corps don't enter PC. Period. Any new power in Planetary Conquest has simply been formed of the remains of another corp that had power. It's functionally impossible for new players to enter PC, unless an area such as PFC is opened. Both the mechanics of clone packs and passive ISK generation ensure existing players will always have complete dominance, until CCP replaces this terrible gamemode. Mr Machine Guns wrote:edit: people need to understand that if CCP does open up more land PFC might be able to be expanded beyond one planet and there comes a point were a corp can only hold x amount of land too, but who knows what will happen with PC just need to wait for fanfest This is complete bull. More space means more money for the same folks that are already making too much money. Nothing more, nothing less. The only people who want this, are people who have a ton of districts and can easily get more. Did you ever consider why they would suggest that so heavily?
whats compete bull how many district has Nyain gained since joining DNS? i tell you 0 so to say its easier to get more district while in DNS the third largest landholder in dust has gain no land since joining DNS |
Soraya Xel
Abandoned Privilege Top Men.
2031
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 21:59:00 -
[76] - Quote
I'm not trying to be rude, Mr Machine Guns, but the reality is that more land doesn't fix the problem. The only people who have ever said this is a solution are people who already own land, and can easily own more.
You're saying DNS (or Nyain San) doesn't want more land. Then why not give up some of the land you have? What happens when someone decides that the land you have isn't enough, and goes for more? Alliance and corporate leadership changes hands sometimes. What happens when someone like DNSBlack decides 100% MH isn't enough, and it's time to go for 100% MH+whateverregion?
The solution isn't to add something that only works as long as certain players adhere to their claimed intentions. We've seen the claimed intentions of DNS members swap so many times it's not even funny. We need a real solution to the game mechanics that prevents complete control, and maintains an atmosphere of constant conflict.
I'd like to be your CPM1 candidate
|
Killar-12
OLDSPICE. Top Men.
2666
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 22:02:00 -
[77] - Quote
Mr Machine Guns wrote:Killar-12 wrote:Mr Machine Guns wrote:Soraya Xel wrote:Kain Spero wrote:When it comes to the DNL I am going to be the one taking the lead on setting it up and I understand the grave concerns the community has right now with the situation. I think we can work through those concerns and figure out a way to make this a win for everyone. If the community unites and starts a war against DNS so be it. We have gone from stagnation and brush fires to all out conflict that provides content to the whole community. If folks get on board with the DNL then great. We can run tourneys like back in the beta when we still had the fantastic tool of corp battles. Why would anyone get on board with it? Why would anyone in their right mind get on board with it? DNS is responsible for killing PFC, which was better for the community than what DNSBlack is trying to push. PFC was based on the reality that it's been proven egotistical overlords running PFC don't work. That's why we had a Council. Now you want us to bow down to an even more egotistical tool than we've ever seen before, and join his alliance to participate? You've gotta be kidding me, Kane. You're smarter than that. And so are the rest of us. Im just trying to play devils advocate here but name a corp that started on PFC and went on to be really successful in PC? None that i can think of, but you got to understand PFC does not work in the current state of PC for example lets say we left PFC alone and DNS took the rest of the district who are you going to attack and be able to maintain a district outside of PFC? edit: people need to understand that if CCP does open up more land PFC might be able to be expanded beyond one planet and there comes a point were a corp can only hold x amount of land too, but who knows what will happen with PC just need to wait for fanfest Nyain Chan... what about Nyain Chan? They've got no competition and the timer is right for them, they could have a district... They are in DNS?
How to Leave PC
|
Jaysyn Larrisen
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
908
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 22:03:00 -
[78] - Quote
Kain Spero wrote: Will people have to have a DNS tag if they want to have land? Yes.
Will they have to have a DNS tag in order to participate in the DNL? No.
As I said before I will be leading up the establishment of the DNL, and I don't expect anyone to bow down to DNSBlack.
Just to clarify...That is exactly OPPOSITE of what DNS Black stated repeatedly and not just on that grease fire Podside episode the other day.
I see a serious disconenct between Black's interview statements, EVE side coms discussions, and position statements and videos and what you are saying. I'm also pretty confident that when Black comments on this in his DNS Black persona or CPM9 candidate hat it's the same position.
Why not let the PC system playout however it's going to play out and put the same amount of time and effort into workign with the CCP community team to run totally legit tournements outside the political construct of PC?
"Endless money forms the sinews of War." - Cicero
Skype: jaysyn.larrisen
Twitter: @JaysynLarrisen
|
General John Ripper
20145
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 22:04:00 -
[79] - Quote
Mr Machine Guns wrote:Soraya Xel wrote:Mr Machine Guns wrote:Im just trying to play devils advocate here but name a corp that started on PFC and went on to be really successful in PC? None that i can think of, but you got to understand PFC does not work in the current state of PC for example lets say we left PFC alone and DNS took the rest of the district who are you going to attack and be able to maintain a district outside of PFC? This is very much a mechanical problem. You might've noticed new corps don't enter PC. Period. Any new power in Planetary Conquest has simply been formed of the remains of another corp that had power. It's functionally impossible for new players to enter PC, unless an area such as PFC is opened. Both the mechanics of clone packs and passive ISK generation ensure existing players will always have complete dominance, until CCP replaces this terrible gamemode. Mr Machine Guns wrote:edit: people need to understand that if CCP does open up more land PFC might be able to be expanded beyond one planet and there comes a point were a corp can only hold x amount of land too, but who knows what will happen with PC just need to wait for fanfest This is complete bull. More space means more money for the same folks that are already making too much money. Nothing more, nothing less. The only people who want this, are people who have a ton of districts and can easily get more. Did you ever consider why they would suggest that so heavily? whats compete bull how many district has Nyain gained since joining DNS? i tell you 0 so to say its easier to get more district while in DNS the third largest landholder in dust has gain no land since joining DNS nyain san has a history of always backing the winning horse and changing sides if it looks like they are on a losing side. Doesn't seem like nyain has been big on expansion but very big on protecting its ASSets.
Everytime I get a like, another bug is fixed.
Everytime I get a like, Two more bugs are born.
|
Kain Spero
Escrow Removal and Acquisition Dirt Nap Squad.
3353
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 22:10:00 -
[80] - Quote
Jaysyn Larrisen wrote:Kain, I can justify working with someone who's in-game goals are opposed to mine if i truly believe they are trying to make the game better and they are willing to step back from the "in-game" and work it off-line to figure out how to achieve some things... you are a good example of that. I CAN"T justify working with an unstable meglomaniac like Black. Far as I'm concerned his name is now DNS BatShitCrazy. (That said this has all nicely set you up to swoop in as the "good guy" ) My short term recommendation would to be to push for a CCP vetted (with Player facilitation) third-party tourney on roughly a bi-montly basis. I've got a lot of basic concerns with mixing a tourney into the politcal PC landscape. The better option is that it is isolated from PC to bring 1) more interest and 2) a perception of legitimacy and impartiality. Even if CCP doesn't want to go the third party route then use the special contract mechanics and run it all internal. For arena play to really take off we need some level of impartiality injected. Rightly or wrongly, anytime corp tags are involved using the existing mechanics available to players things will be shaky. Long term, the corp contract mechanic would be great and could facilitate true 100% player generated and ran arena content (streams, ISK betting, the whole 9 yards).
I'm not a "good guy" and haven't claimed to be one, but I do care about the Dust community. I have to say that the the Urgent Fury tournament scarred me so bad I even have trouble thinking about TWL. Thankfully I can largely leave that to others that are interested in that sort of thing.
I understand where you are coming from regarding using existing mechanics to allow players to run their own tournaments and leagues. I had to deal with that exact issue when I was rocking out my Imperfects tag (will always be an IMP at heart), but there are ways to overcome it. As for CCP creating the tools to facilitate some kind of arena mode or way for players to run their own tournaments I would love to see that happen. That said I think that using DNS control of Molden Heath we can execute it here and now. Granted we are sacrificing Planetary Conquest for an arena/tourney mode, but Planetary Conquest was already a broken game mode and was only driving both winners and losers from Dust. The status quo had to go.
There are already discussions being had with websites like www.Eve-Bet.com and even some Dust players with Dev skills about setting up a way to have ISK betting be a reality for the DNL on the Eve and Dust side. We are also looking for folks that are interested in streaming as well for DNL matches. As crazy as the whole situation may seem DNS dot has the personnel, ISK financial resources, and territorial control to actually pull something like this off.
Owner of Spero Escrow Services
Follow @KainSpero for Dust and CPM news
|
|
Soraya Xel
Abandoned Privilege Top Men.
2033
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 22:14:00 -
[81] - Quote
Of course, Kain, "sacrificing" Planetary Conquest continues a giant ISK faucet into the pockets of every DNS corp in the meantime. And ensures that no member of DNS ever has any reason not to run full proto against every new player, destroying any chance of any new players ever joining this game.
I'd like to be your CPM1 candidate
|
Free Beers
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
2374
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 22:14:00 -
[82] - Quote
There will be NO Dirtnap league. Players want competition and victory to mean something not a ladder. DNS Black can **** Off and his weak attempts to show concern for dust players and the community.
Any corp that participates in this is accepting EVE as their master and chinese food is here so back later
Every mercs life ends the same way. It is only the details of how he lived and died that distinguishes one from another
|
lionshead nebula
Goonfeet Special Planetary Emergency Response Group
77
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 22:17:00 -
[83] - Quote
Free Beers wrote:There will be NO Dirtnap league. Players want competition and victory to mean something not a ladder. DNS Black can **** Off and his weak attempts to show concern for dust players and the community.
Any corp that participates in this is accepting EVE as their master and chinese food is here so back later
Yay munchies!! |
General John Ripper
20146
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 22:19:00 -
[84] - Quote
Kain Spero wrote:As crazy as the whole situation may seem DNS dot has the personnel, ISK financial resources, and territorial control to actually pull something like this off.
While true, nobody asked for, or wanted this. Yes we want a better pc experience. No we don't want you all in charge of it. Uniting a community like this won't work. People must wonder, is this all about helping provide a better pc experience for all players or another ploy to keep the same people in power?
tbh if this type of tournament league is what you want, you should instead push for free clone packs and no passive isk farming. That way people can attack at will. Stop trying to control everything under a guise that you just want to help people. The community is not that stupid. At least most of us aren't... Your trying to gain while trying to make everyone else feel good about it. It is not going to work.
Everytime I get a like, another bug is fixed.
Everytime I get a like, Two more bugs are born.
|
Mr Machine Guns
Nyain San Dirt Nap Squad.
676
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 22:31:00 -
[85] - Quote
General John Ripper wrote:Mr Machine Guns wrote:Soraya Xel wrote:Mr Machine Guns wrote:Im just trying to play devils advocate here but name a corp that started on PFC and went on to be really successful in PC? None that i can think of, but you got to understand PFC does not work in the current state of PC for example lets say we left PFC alone and DNS took the rest of the district who are you going to attack and be able to maintain a district outside of PFC? This is very much a mechanical problem. You might've noticed new corps don't enter PC. Period. Any new power in Planetary Conquest has simply been formed of the remains of another corp that had power. It's functionally impossible for new players to enter PC, unless an area such as PFC is opened. Both the mechanics of clone packs and passive ISK generation ensure existing players will always have complete dominance, until CCP replaces this terrible gamemode. Mr Machine Guns wrote:edit: people need to understand that if CCP does open up more land PFC might be able to be expanded beyond one planet and there comes a point were a corp can only hold x amount of land too, but who knows what will happen with PC just need to wait for fanfest This is complete bull. More space means more money for the same folks that are already making too much money. Nothing more, nothing less. The only people who want this, are people who have a ton of districts and can easily get more. Did you ever consider why they would suggest that so heavily? whats compete bull how many district has Nyain gained since joining DNS? i tell you 0 so to say its easier to get more district while in DNS the third largest landholder in dust has gain no land since joining DNS nyain san has a history of always backing the winning horse and changing sides if it looks like they are on a losing side. Doesn't seem like nyain has been big on expansion but very big on protecting its ASSets.
are you talking about alliance hoping?? Lets see Nyain joined NF then left NF after all of its players joined other corps no? Pro V Nyain joined only because AE. was going to join as well Nyain left pro v after AE joined RA and Nyain joined RA, LOI i believe they joined then the Kujo stealing the wallet thing happened so LOI lost it best players Nyain left. If I'm wrong please corrected me |
Kain Spero
Escrow Removal and Acquisition Dirt Nap Squad.
3353
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 22:31:00 -
[86] - Quote
Jaysyn Larrisen wrote: I see a serious disconenct between Black's interview statements, EVE side coms discussions, and position statements and videos and what you are saying. I'm also pretty confident that when Black comments on this in his DNS Black persona or CPM9 candidate hat it's the same position.
Why not let the PC system playout however it's going to play out and put the same amount of time and effort into workign with the CCP community team to run totally legit tournements outside the political construct of PC?
The PC system did play out and the blight that is passive ISK led to the inevitable outcome we now have. I fought long and hard to prevent the inevitable, but I wonder if I wasn't just delaying real solutions being put in place. From the CRONOS war, stoking the EON/LOI conflict, organizing the initial FEC assault, and fighting with GTA and then mercing for RA I tried to prevent equilibrium or one side being completely destroyed. It's a loosing battle when you are fighting against the core design of PC where you earn more money by farming then fighting. Maybe now that Planetary Conquest is essentially destroyed it will finally free up CCP to change the current paradigm and see what happens. The problem is that with a system that is even limping along there is the desire to maintain the status quo and not try bold experiments. With essentially the endgame of PC reached as was predicted by Free Beers before PC even launched you can't really screw up PC any more than it is right now.
As for working with the CCP community team there are folks that will still run some events through CCP, but there is something awesome about players taking the sandbox that is Planetary Conquest and truly shaping it into something unique that I don't think has ever been seen in gaming. We are on a new frontier and blazing the trail as we go, but I'm sure it will be a fun ride however it ends up. Sometimes things crashing down can provide as much content and entertainment as building them up.
Owner of Spero Escrow Services
Follow @KainSpero for Dust and CPM news
|
kiarbanor
S.e.V.e.N. General Tso's Alliance
391
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 22:45:00 -
[87] - Quote
Can we impeach CPM reps? Seriously. If they are there to represent the entire Dust 514 community and the majority no longer wants them, is there a way to get them removed?
I'm not only asking because I think Spero has lost his mind by hijacking a corp's recruiting thread and seriously considering this DNS overlord thing a good idea, but for all future CPMs that may get power hungry. |
Jaysyn Larrisen
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
909
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 22:46:00 -
[88] - Quote
Kain Spero wrote:Jaysyn Larrisen wrote:Kain, I can justify working with someone who's in-game goals are opposed to mine if i truly believe they are trying to make the game better and they are willing to step back from the "in-game" and work it off-line to figure out how to achieve some things... you are a good example of that. I CAN"T justify working with an unstable meglomaniac like Black. Far as I'm concerned his name is now DNS BatShitCrazy. (That said this has all nicely set you up to swoop in as the "good guy" ) My short term recommendation would to be to push for a CCP vetted (with Player facilitation) third-party tourney on roughly a bi-montly basis. I've got a lot of basic concerns with mixing a tourney into the politcal PC landscape. The better option is that it is isolated from PC to bring 1) more interest and 2) a perception of legitimacy and impartiality. Even if CCP doesn't want to go the third party route then use the special contract mechanics and run it all internal. For arena play to really take off we need some level of impartiality injected. Rightly or wrongly, anytime corp tags are involved using the existing mechanics available to players things will be shaky. Long term, the corp contract mechanic would be great and could facilitate true 100% player generated and ran arena content (streams, ISK betting, the whole 9 yards). I'm not a "good guy" and haven't claimed to be one, but I do care about the Dust community. I have to say that the the Urgent Fury tournament scarred me so bad I even have trouble thinking about TWL. Thankfully I can largely leave that to others that are interested in that sort of thing. I understand where you are coming from regarding using existing mechanics to allow players to run their own tournaments and leagues. I had to deal with that exact issue when I was rocking out my Imperfects tag (will always be an IMP at heart), but there are ways to overcome it. As for CCP creating the tools to facilitate some kind of arena mode or way for players to run their own tournaments I would love to see that happen. That said I think that using DNS control of Molden Heath we can execute it here and now. Granted we are sacrificing Planetary Conquest for an arena/tourney mode, but Planetary Conquest was already a broken game mode and was only driving both winners and losers from Dust. The status quo had to go. There are already discussions being had with websites like www.Eve-Bet.com and even some Dust players with Dev skills about setting up a way to have ISK betting be a reality for the DNL on the Eve and Dust side. We are also looking for folks that are interested in streaming as well for DNL matches. As crazy as the whole situation may seem DNS dot has the personnel, ISK financial resources, and territorial control to actually pull something like this off.
If you focus on developing a tournement event outside the PC equation you instantly remove the friction from this equation.
The simple fact is that at this point due to the communities perceptions of DNS Black, DNS dot, and to a lesser degree you as Kain Spero the player there is zero desire to be involved with this venture. Requiring players to change Alliance tags doesn't solve anything and ultimately does nothing positive for the community. There is absolutely know benefit to anyone other than feeding a very small number of folks egos.
There are clearly enough mechanics and means in the game to run a tournement....you've had that capability for a very long time by your own admission. But there is know positive incentive to participate.
Would you agree that a CCP sponsored regular tournement would be a better way to go? Why not put this amount of time and effort into that. If DNS Black had gone that route - gobbling up MH but leading the charge for impartial tournements this is a whole different discussion.
The problem with mixing arena play and PC mechanics is that it is entirely personality based and give zero recourse to those not in the circle of power. Most of us can except that PC is unfair (to a degree as it should be) but in an arena style event or league there is little to no tolerance for that to enter into the equation. The simple fact is that DNS would ALWAYS be in a position to take from players, negate wins, withold or tax winnings, or enforce constraints or restraints in the concept you are proposing. This is inherently what is creating the reaction that you guys are getting now.
I love the idea of generating content for the community....but if this is going to be a player driven thing then let's do this right and get a vetted system that is sponsored by CCP and run things in an entirely above board way. When the actual mechanics are there for real player generated tournements I'll be the first guy to sign up to help you organize them.
"Endless money forms the sinews of War." - Cicero
Skype: jaysyn.larrisen
Twitter: @JaysynLarrisen
|
Soraya Xel
Abandoned Privilege Top Men.
2035
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 22:52:00 -
[89] - Quote
Entirely right, Jaysyn. But we know DNSBlack would never have been interested in working with the community to run a tournament, or working with CCP to run a tournament. As he said "I don't want a tournament, I want a DNS tournament."
And Spero, remember, you're backing a guy who went out on a very public podcast and stated "I don't want community support". A guy who has essentially said "kitten the community" to all of us.
I'd like to be your CPM1 candidate
|
Tallen Ellecon
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
1751
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 22:56:00 -
[90] - Quote
Don't say you do what you do for the community while at the same time your actions are shrinking it, eliminating good fights, and making all gameplay more difficult for people who don't want to play your way.
Supporter of tiericide, EVE interaction, and a proper NPE SoonGäó514
"No blue tags make Tallen go crazy.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |