Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Icy Tiger
Universal Allies Inc.
1034
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 21:22:00 -
[1] - Quote
This is a gamebreaking turret on tanks. It promotes camping like a little b**** (cough* chaos mistress and 0tryhard514* cough)and sniping any tanks willing to put up resistance. Railgun tanks do way to much damage for the little risk they take, and can 1 shot basically anything. Large Railgun 80 GJ or whatever can 3 shot most enemy tanks.
This is the one turret that is killing tank on tank combat. Please drastically change it. |
slap26
Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz RISE of LEGION
476
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 21:24:00 -
[2] - Quote
Icy Tiger wrote:This is a gamebreaking turret on tanks. It promotes camping like a little b**** (cough* chaos mistress and 0tryhard514* cough)and sniping any tanks willing to put up resistance. Railgun tanks do way to much damage for the little risk they take, and can 1 shot basically anything. Large Railgun 80 GJ or whatever can 3 shot most enemy tanks.
This is the one turret that is killing tank on tank combat. Please drastically change it.
Sounds like a scrub tank driver got owned, URA ready to CB us yet or do you still have your dodging skills maxed??????????? |
NightEagle11
Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz RISE of LEGION
21
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 21:26:00 -
[3] - Quote
slap26 wrote:Icy Tiger wrote:This is a gamebreaking turret on tanks. It promotes camping like a little b**** (cough* chaos mistress and 0tryhard514* cough)and sniping any tanks willing to put up resistance. Railgun tanks do way to much damage for the little risk they take, and can 1 shot basically anything. Large Railgun 80 GJ or whatever can 3 shot most enemy tanks.
This is the one turret that is killing tank on tank combat. Please drastically change it. Sounds like a scrub tank driver got owned, UA ready to CB us yet or do you still have your dodging skills maxed???????????
Come on slap he runs around in a scout suit of course he's still dodging. GGGGGGG |
WyrmHero1945
IMPSwarm Negative-Feedback
26
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 21:26:00 -
[4] - Quote
But railgun is the closest thing we have that looks like a true main cannon for a tank!!!! It's awesome!!!!! |
gbghg
L.O.T.I.S. Legacy Rising
473
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 21:27:00 -
[5] - Quote
Icy Tiger wrote:This is a gamebreaking turret on tanks. It promotes camping like a little b**** (cough* chaos mistress and 0tryhard514* cough)and sniping any tanks willing to put up resistance. Railgun tanks do way to much damage for the little risk they take, and can 1 shot basically anything. Large Railgun 80 GJ or whatever can 3 shot most enemy tanks.
This is the one turret that is killing tank on tank combat. Please drastically change it. Isn't the whole purpose of railgun tanks to kill other tanks? but it is annoying when they hide behind the redline and don't come out to play with my AV |
Harkon Vysarii
Dead Six Initiative
7
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 21:33:00 -
[6] - Quote
Are you kidding me?
First everyone complains and nerfs missiles into the ground and now you want to make blaster the only effective turrent?
Seriously some of the guy on this forum need to HTFU, not get caught up in this mysterious component of games called "fairness" or "honour" and understand that even if a gun can three shot a tank it comes with significan weaknesses....
Like slow rotation speed and poor CQC targeting..... Oh and did I mention tanks are so flimsy its ridiculous? |
Robert Brady III
L.O.T.I.S. Legacy Rising
8
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 21:38:00 -
[7] - Quote
I am pretty sure this is a clear case of scissors complaining about rock. |
Heathen Bastard
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 21:38:00 -
[8] - Quote
Harkon Vysarii wrote:Are you kidding me?
First everyone complains and nerfs missiles into the ground and now you want to make blaster the only effective turrent?
Seriously some of the guy on this forum need to HTFU, not get caught up in this mysterious component of games called "fairness" or "honour" and understand that even if a gun can three shot a tank it comes with significan weaknesses....
Like slow rotation speed and poor CQC targeting..... Oh and did I mention tanks are so flimsy its ridiculous?
Quoted For Truth
two beginners with forge guns will kill a basic tank before he can run, and if he doesn't have a gunner manning the blaster cannon, even a heavy can out-walk his turret rotation speed.
I mean, I don't want to go back to TANKS ARE GOD status there was a while ago, but damn it almost feels bad sometimes. |
Centurion mkII
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
16
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 21:39:00 -
[9] - Quote
Rails are not over powered. There not game breaking either. |
Icy Tiger
Universal Allies Inc.
1035
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 21:40:00 -
[10] - Quote
Harkon Vysarii wrote:Are you kidding me?
First everyone complains and nerfs missiles into the ground and now you want to make blaster the only effective turrent?
Seriously some of the guy on this forum need to HTFU, not get caught up in this mysterious component of games called "fairness" or "honour" and understand that even if a gun can three shot a tank it comes with significan weaknesses....
Like slow rotation speed and poor CQC targeting..... Oh and did I mention tanks are so flimsy its ridiculous?
First off, get your facts straight, and read. I don't care about tanks vs infantry, it's tank on tank that is a problem because of railguns. |
|
Noc Tempre
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
1180
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 21:41:00 -
[11] - Quote
Better maps fix this problem.
Partially at least. |
Icy Tiger
Universal Allies Inc.
1035
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 21:41:00 -
[12] - Quote
slap26 wrote:Icy Tiger wrote:This is a gamebreaking turret on tanks. It promotes camping like a little b**** (cough* chaos mistress and 0tryhard514* cough)and sniping any tanks willing to put up resistance. Railgun tanks do way to much damage for the little risk they take, and can 1 shot basically anything. Large Railgun 80 GJ or whatever can 3 shot most enemy tanks.
This is the one turret that is killing tank on tank combat. Please drastically change it. Sounds like a scrub tank driver got owned, UA ready to CB us yet or do you still have your dodging skills maxed??????????? Some of us specd into AV tanks, so keep driving your pubstomper
lol and all of you are redline *******. Tryhard ran every single time some swarms were shot at him, often all the way back to his base, coming out occasionally to camp on a mountain. Also, you're a railgun tanker, so its easy to see bias. |
The legend345
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
73
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 21:43:00 -
[13] - Quote
agreed the damage you can get with skills behind the railgun is broken |
Icy Tiger
Universal Allies Inc.
1035
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 21:43:00 -
[14] - Quote
WyrmHero1945 wrote:But railgun is the closest thing we have that looks like a true main cannon for a tank!!!! It's awesome!!!!!
Want to make it like a true cannon? Add drop distance, distance based damage, and an ammunition count. |
gbghg
L.O.T.I.S. Legacy Rising
473
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 21:43:00 -
[15] - Quote
Icy Tiger wrote:Harkon Vysarii wrote:Are you kidding me?
First everyone complains and nerfs missiles into the ground and now you want to make blaster the only effective turrent?
Seriously some of the guy on this forum need to HTFU, not get caught up in this mysterious component of games called "fairness" or "honour" and understand that even if a gun can three shot a tank it comes with significan weaknesses....
Like slow rotation speed and poor CQC targeting..... Oh and did I mention tanks are so flimsy its ridiculous? First off, get your facts straight, and read. I don't care about tanks vs infantry, it's tank on tank that is a problem because of railguns. But railguns are an anti-vehicle weapon, of course they're going to dominate in tank vs tank. as robert said this is a case of scissors complaining about rock |
Mavado V Noriega
SyNergy Gaming
2315
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 21:44:00 -
[16] - Quote
Problem isnt the railgun its the broken dmg mods giving out insane dmg bonuses 2 shottin and 3 shottin a well fitted tank is just boring
before CCP broke dmg mods rail fights were the best thing for a tanker now its not really that exciting at least for me hence my swap to blasters
The rail turret itself is fine its more the dmg mods and all the passive dmg skills stackin up on the turret that makes tank fights end too fast or end up in a stalemate |
Icy Tiger
Universal Allies Inc.
1035
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 21:45:00 -
[17] - Quote
gbghg wrote:Icy Tiger wrote:Harkon Vysarii wrote:Are you kidding me?
First everyone complains and nerfs missiles into the ground and now you want to make blaster the only effective turrent?
Seriously some of the guy on this forum need to HTFU, not get caught up in this mysterious component of games called "fairness" or "honour" and understand that even if a gun can three shot a tank it comes with significan weaknesses....
Like slow rotation speed and poor CQC targeting..... Oh and did I mention tanks are so flimsy its ridiculous? First off, get your facts straight, and read. I don't care about tanks vs infantry, it's tank on tank that is a problem because of railguns. But railguns are an anti-vehicle weapon, of course they're going to dominate in tank vs tank. as robert said this is a case of scissors complaining about rock
I didn't know that scissors could do about 3k damage in one shot. |
WyrmHero1945
IMPSwarm Negative-Feedback
26
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 21:45:00 -
[18] - Quote
Icy Tiger wrote:WyrmHero1945 wrote:But railgun is the closest thing we have that looks like a true main cannon for a tank!!!! It's awesome!!!!! Want to make it like a true cannon? Add drop distance, distance based damage, and an ammunition count.
But we are in the future!!!!!
|
Icy Tiger
Universal Allies Inc.
1035
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 21:46:00 -
[19] - Quote
Mavado V Noriega wrote:Problem isnt the railgun its the broken dmg mods giving out insane dmg bonuses 2 shottin and 3 shottin a well fitted tank is just boring
before CCP broke dmg mods rail fights were the best thing for a tanker now its not really that exciting at least for me hence my swap to blasters
The rail turret itself is fine its more the dmg mods and all the passive dmg skills stackin up on the turret that makes tank fights end too fast or end up in a stalemate Exactly, thank you. |
Drake435
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
7
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 21:48:00 -
[20] - Quote
Icy Tiger wrote:This is a gamebreaking turret on tanks. It promotes camping like a little b**** (cough* chaos mistress and 0tryhard514* cough)and sniping any tanks willing to put up resistance. Railgun tanks do way to much damage for the little risk they take, and can 1 shot basically anything. Large Railgun 80 GJ or whatever can 3 shot most enemy tanks.
This is the one turret that is killing tank on tank combat. Please drastically change it.
Err.......I'm not sure how to respond to this....
Railguns are MEANT to be anti-vehicle and destroy things in a couple or one shot. Infantry are harder to hit with though.
Blasters on the other hand are meant to be purely anti-infantry but suck at dealing with heavy vehicles or ships.
Just take a look at the forge gun. That thing is a beast on vehicles and installations. Because that's its primary use. |
|
Fraceska
Opus Arcana Orion Empire
33
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 21:48:00 -
[21] - Quote
I say the same thing about dropships. We are like 30 thousand years into the future, build ships that travel faster than light, ships that are kilometers long and you are telling me they are still using VTOL craft for planetary warfare? Something seems a bit off. |
Robert Brady III
L.O.T.I.S. Legacy Rising
9
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 21:49:00 -
[22] - Quote
Icy Tiger wrote:I didn't know that scissors could do about 3k damage in one shot.
In this analogy you are scissors. |
gbghg
L.O.T.I.S. Legacy Rising
473
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 21:50:00 -
[23] - Quote
Icy Tiger wrote:gbghg wrote:Icy Tiger wrote:Harkon Vysarii wrote:Are you kidding me?
First everyone complains and nerfs missiles into the ground and now you want to make blaster the only effective turrent?
Seriously some of the guy on this forum need to HTFU, not get caught up in this mysterious component of games called "fairness" or "honour" and understand that even if a gun can three shot a tank it comes with significan weaknesses....
Like slow rotation speed and poor CQC targeting..... Oh and did I mention tanks are so flimsy its ridiculous? First off, get your facts straight, and read. I don't care about tanks vs infantry, it's tank on tank that is a problem because of railguns. But railguns are an anti-vehicle weapon, of course they're going to dominate in tank vs tank. as robert said this is a case of scissors complaining about rock I didn't know that scissors could do about 3k damage in one shot. when you consider the fact that 've been hit by forge guns doing 4k+ damage that seems a little underwhelming for a tank |
Scheneighnay McBob
Bojo's School of the Trades
1076
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 21:50:00 -
[24] - Quote
Railguns aren't actually easy to hit infantry with. Especially tank mounted ones. Most of my railgun snipes are from installations, because they're more stable than tanks. |
Berserker007
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
216
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 21:52:00 -
[25] - Quote
WyrmHero1945 wrote:But railgun is the closest thing we have that looks like a true main cannon for a tank!!!! It's awesome!!!!!
U do know a railgun isnt a futreistic weapon, but are actually around today... |
Beld Errmon
Tal-Romon Legion Amarr Empire
488
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 21:53:00 -
[26] - Quote
The problem as i see it is that not only do rails pwn you at long range, if you do manage to sneak your blaster tank into range its still going to kick your arse because it will alpha straight through your reps and probably does more DPS as well.
It maybe a case of paper complaining about scissors but wheres rock? only thing that can compete with scissors is another set of scissors. |
Pokey Dravon
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
607
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 21:55:00 -
[27] - Quote
Drake435 wrote:Icy Tiger wrote:This is a gamebreaking turret on tanks. It promotes camping like a little b**** (cough* chaos mistress and 0tryhard514* cough)and sniping any tanks willing to put up resistance. Railgun tanks do way to much damage for the little risk they take, and can 1 shot basically anything. Large Railgun 80 GJ or whatever can 3 shot most enemy tanks.
This is the one turret that is killing tank on tank combat. Please drastically change it. Err.......I'm not sure how to respond to this.... Railguns are MEANT to be anti-vehicle and destroy things in a couple or one shot. Infantry are harder to hit with though. Blasters on the other hand are meant to be purely anti-infantry but suck at dealing with heavy vehicles or ships. Just take a look at the forge gun. That thing is a beast on vehicles and installations. Because that's its primary use. EDIT: Oh, you meant the damage mods. That's a separate issue.
I disagree. I have not checked the numbers in a while, but the base DPS of the Large Blaster is significantly higher than the DPS of the railgun. The reason the Railgun is useful is because it has very long effective range, and all the DPS happens at once, making it difficult to rep through the damage like you can a Blaster. This does not however mean the Blaster sucks at dealing with other vehicles. If you get close enough within the effective range of the Blaster, it does an insane amount of damage that is difficult to survive, even with reps going. On top of that Surya gets a damage bonus to Blasters further increasing its lethality.
In a 1 on 1 fight, chances are the railgun will probably win, but that doesn't mean the blaster is a bad AV weapon. Now Large Missile turrets on the other hand... |
Heathen Bastard
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 21:55:00 -
[28] - Quote
Icy Tiger wrote:WyrmHero1945 wrote:But railgun is the closest thing we have that looks like a true main cannon for a tank!!!! It's awesome!!!!! Want to make it like a true cannon? Add drop distance, distance based damage, and an ammunition count.
these battlefields are typically not even a full kilometer. the speed of current railguns is Mach 7, or seven times the speed of sound(and this was a test firing at low power, 7 pound aluminum slug)
that is 2.380 kilometers. per. second. it doesn't have enough distance to travel to drop noticeably, and quite frankly, there being any noticeable travel time on those shots is highly unrealistic.
the sheer kinetic force of the impact is what gives it destructive power, railguns do not use any type of warhead. It just uses a heavy chunk of metal fired at ridiculous speed and lets the laws of physics do the rest.
you should be happy your tank even exists after a single hit from one. |
gbghg
L.O.T.I.S. Legacy Rising
473
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 21:56:00 -
[29] - Quote
Beld Errmon wrote:The problem as i see it is that not only do rails pwn you at long range, if you do manage to sneak your blaster tank into range its still going to kick your arse because it will alpha straight through your reps and probably does more DPS as well.
It maybe a case of paper complaining about scissors but wheres rock? only thing that can compete with scissors is another set of scissors. AV infantry in this case. |
gbghg
L.O.T.I.S. Legacy Rising
473
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 21:56:00 -
[30] - Quote
Beld Errmon wrote:The problem as i see it is that not only do rails pwn you at long range, if you do manage to sneak your blaster tank into range its still going to kick your arse because it will alpha straight through your reps and probably does more DPS as well.
It maybe a case of paper complaining about scissors but wheres rock? only thing that can compete with scissors is another set of scissors. AV infantry in this case. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |