My sagaris tank had 6000 shields, 1000 armor, and a shield resist was engaged.

Just made a TD soma fit to figure out the cost, it's 806,000 ISK or so. Seems balanced to me, it has absolutely no tank so its easy to kill.

Yet, you can snipe any tank from across the map with it easily, preferably from behind the redline if you wish to prevent the enemy from taking infantry to you. Also, railguns are affected by a number of factors, my idea to change it somehow was only 1 possible solution, as many have said, Damage Mods/Passive Boosts do way too much to boost the damage, and maps are pretty garbage as well due to redlines.

First off, get your facts straight, and read. I don't care about tanks vs infantry, it's tank on tank that is a problem because of railguns.

Actualy it just sound's like every other nerf cry " it's not my build nerf it so I can have an advantage".

I can spec into railguns anytime I want, last build it was my primary turret of choice, I can tell that it is an unfair advantage over all other turrets unless in specific scenarios.

Aircraft - Problem solved.

Actualy it just sound's like every other nerf cry " it's not my build nerf it so I can have an advantage".

the overlooked answer to dealing with a railgun tank with high dps and line of sight on the majority of the map is don't give it a target.

So instead of bringing to light the issue then, you simply took advantage of it and are only complaining now that it negatively affects you?

Want to make it like a true cannon? Add drop distance, distance based damage, and an ammunition count.

That sounds like a wonderful tactic, kinda resembles "screw you guys im going home" or "gee this MCC is comfortable I think i'll just sit here for 15 mins"

it's supposed to be infantry killed by blaster tanks killed by railgun tanks killed by infantry. blaster tanks should be killed by railguns EVERY TIME. also, railguns should do more dmg than puny little forge guns but they dont- WHY!?

um you think forge gun damage is too low?

I think tank and forge gun dmg is too high. . .
WORLD OF TANX

it's supposed to be infantry killed by blaster tanks killed by railgun tanks killed by infantry. blaster tanks should be killed by railguns EVERY TIME. also, railguns should do more dmg than puny little forge guns but they dont- WHY!?

You should return to the beta forums when you have an original thought, parroting the cat calls of people with vested interests is a misuse of your towering intellect.



That sounds like a wonderful tactic, kinda resembles "screw you guys im going home" or "gee this MCC is comfortable I think i'll just sit here for 15 mins"



Yes by far the more honourable thing to do is abuse the broken mechanics and oppose any calls for the problem to be fixed "get gud" outweighs game balance in any thread.

PS Icy Tiger I still think you and your corp are the dregs of my homebrew kit, don't mistake my agreement with you in this thread as any form of fondness.

I didn't know that scissors could do about 3k damage in one shot.

RPS analogy works well, actually.

Rock (Railgun) does massive damage in one hit, "breaking" scissors (Blaster). Hit a pair of scissors a couple of times with a rock to break them.

Scissors (Blaster) "cuts" paper. Blaster tanks CUT DOWN infantry really quickly. Cutting is usually achieved with a series of actions rather than the single action of bashing a pair of scissors with a rock, much like the Blaster deals small amounts of damage repeatedly to destroy infantry.

Paper (infantry) wraps rock. Infantry swarm tanks. They surround the enemy without taking damage, or while taking only minimal casualties, much like a piece of paper gets creased, but not torn, when wrapped around a rock.

EDIT: Was that a Pratchett reference, Baal?

Of course, I always called it "Parchment Stones and Shears", but perhaps I'm old fashioned. (+1 to the first one who gets that reference )

I like quartz, parchment, shears better.

Bingo! The first clue was in the mistake! Give the man a +1!

Edit: Hell, I'll switch to my alt and give you another.

Railgun tanks do way to much damage for the little risk they take, and can 1 shot basically anything.

This is a gamebreaking turret on tanks. It promotes camping like a little b**** (cough* chaos mistress and 0tryhard514* cough)and sniping any tanks willing to put up resistance. Railgun tanks do way to much damage for the little risk they take, and can 1 shot basically anything. Large Railgun 80 GJ or whatever can 3 shot most enemy tanks.

This is the one turret that is killing tank on tank combat. Please drastically change it.

I am happy that I got an 8 page thread about this. ^.^ I thought you were going to bring up something I might have done that wasn't nice (like killing blue dot gunners )


edit: also, shield railgun tanks can get solod by ONE good AV. I'm not going to tell everyone on forums how, but there are a few people who know how to do it (and devs can check logs :P)

This is a gamebreaking turret on tanks. It promotes camping like a little b**** (cough* chaos mistress and 0tryhard514* cough)and sniping any tanks willing to put up resistance. Railgun tanks do way to much damage for the little risk they take, and can 1 shot basically anything. Large Railgun 80 GJ or whatever can 3 shot most enemy tanks.

This is the one turret that is killing tank on tank combat. Please drastically change it.

WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH NERF TANKS WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!

Seriously, I'm waiting for the brave person to start a thread calling for tanks to be removed from the game. This is how incrementalism works in politics. Your end-game is to have them removed completely, just like you're doing with the heavy.