Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Himiko Kuronaga
Greatness Achieved Through Training
8
|
Posted - 2013.03.06 11:41:00 -
[271] - Quote
BlG MAMA wrote:Himiko Kuronaga wrote:Flight sticks give an advantage in flight games. Flight games were originally created with these in mind.
Steering wheels give an advantage in racing games. Racing games were originally created with these in mind.
Arcade sticks give an incredible advantage in most fighting games (especially 2d). Obviously, they were born in arcades, so they were made with the stick in mind.
None of these communities ban the control methods or limit their use during competitive play. If anything, they encourage their community to embrace them because it leads to an overall better gaming experience at higher levels.
So why is the console FPS community the only one who is so entirely justified that alternate control methods be banned or segregated? I think the situation is being over thought by the developers who are all too tempted to giving in to lazy players who lack any real exposure to serious competitive gaming. DS3 users are the dominat here because Dust514 is on PS3 so you think that forcing them to play with Kb/M is a good ideea? Yes its forcing Kb/M if you want to have more chances of winning. If you want Dust514 to die ahead of its time go ahead and make Kb/M standard for win , AURUM is doing already a good job at keeping most people away. Dust514 needs filters for Kb/M and AURUM users if devs want more people to play Dust514. If you like Kb/M so much you should play against Kb/M users , why play against the weak and disabled that dont use AURUM and Kb/M? Adapt or die.
Is that what you've been doing? Adapting or dieing?
It sounds more like crying to me. |
xaerael Kabiel
Immobile Infantry
1
|
Posted - 2013.03.06 11:44:00 -
[272] - Quote
BlG MAMA wrote: If you want Dust514 to die ahead of its time go ahead and make Kb/M standard for win , AURUM is doing already a good job at keeping most people away.
Excuse me while I go and crack a few ribs laughing at you.
Dust right now is nothing like dust will be once Nullsec and PI become the primary focus of PvP. That mean a lot more native PC players being interested. That means a lot more preferred KB/M users.
You obviously have no idea what EvE's all about. I'd recommend you go and do a little research about the ultimate goals of Dust before you make another post.
Also, no one is forcing anyone to use either. If you choose to use a control input that you're convinced is BETTER... well... isn't that pretty much the definition of stubborn stupidity? |
BlG MAMA
PLAYSTATION4
5
|
Posted - 2013.03.06 11:46:00 -
[273] - Quote
Drones Attack , truth hurts eh?
|
Panther Alpha
Blueberries United
83
|
Posted - 2013.03.06 11:49:00 -
[274] - Quote
You know what.... I have the solution.
Do two leagues.
Pro / Vet league - Everything goes, all control types, any ping.
Noob / Lazy league - Only DS3, only perfect Pings, and everything have to be bellow tier 1 equipment.
Problem solved.
|
Himiko Kuronaga
Greatness Achieved Through Training
8
|
Posted - 2013.03.06 11:50:00 -
[275] - Quote
BlG MAMA wrote:Drones Attack , truth hurts eh?
I'm trying to understand the meaning behind this post, but I can't find it.
Assist?
Panther Alpha wrote:You know what.... I have the solution.
Do two leagues.
Pro / Vet league - Everything goes, all control types, any ping.
Noob / Lazy league - Only DS3, only perfect Pings, and everything have to be bellow tier 1 equipment.
Problem solved.
Matchmaking already takes skill into account, or is supposed to. Just let it do that job better.
Control type is irrelevant, results are the only thing that matter. Additional segregation just makes it harder to find a game. |
Kray Dytt
THE DOLLARS
11
|
Posted - 2013.03.06 11:55:00 -
[276] - Quote
BlG MAMA wrote: If you like Kb/M so much you should play against Kb/M users , why play against the weak and disabled that dont use AURUM and Kb/M?
Adapt or die.
Adapt, as in, get a KB/M if you think that's so much better? Hmmm
Also, you think CCP would seperate those who pay real money from those who don't, to lure in more people that don't pay money? Riiiiight :) Face it: if you're not paying real money, you're cannon-fodder meant to increase enjoyment and therefore willingness to spend cash for those who do
|
xaerael Kabiel
Immobile Infantry
2
|
Posted - 2013.03.06 11:57:00 -
[277] - Quote
Himiko Kuronaga wrote:BlG MAMA wrote:Drones Attack , truth hurts eh? I'm trying to understand the meaning behind this post, but I can't find it. Assist?
I think he's just trying to be clever, but not pulling it off very well. Especially when the truth is everyone is on a level playing field, which is what 90% of people have been saying.
Adapt or cry. (tm) |
BlG MAMA
PLAYSTATION4
5
|
Posted - 2013.03.06 11:58:00 -
[278] - Quote
Kray Dytt wrote:BlG MAMA wrote: If you like Kb/M so much you should play against Kb/M users , why play against the weak and disabled that dont use AURUM and Kb/M?
Adapt or die.
Adapt, as in, get a KB/M if you think that's so much better? Hmmm Also, you think CCP would seperate those who pay real money from those who don't, to lure in more people that don't pay money? Riiiiight :) Face it: if you're not paying real money, you're cannon-fodder meant to increase enjoyment and therefore willingness to spend cash for those who do i know and its sad
|
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
1862
|
Posted - 2013.03.06 12:00:00 -
[279] - Quote
xaerael Kabiel wrote:I've been reading this thread up till now, and can summarize it this way:
DS3 users who are good players that get killed by any KB/M player: KB/M support is fine. DS3 users who are bad players that get killed by DS3 users who are good players: BooHoo, there should be a ranking system. It's not fair that people who are better than me can play in the same matches. DS3 users who are bad players that get killed by KB/M players: BooHoo, KB/M is unfair because I got shot by a KB/M player once and choose the reason for that to be the hardware, not the skill and experience of someone who's probably been playing FPSs since LONG before a console even got a sniff in at FPSs, and probably longer than I've even been alive.
The supremacy of KB/M or DS3 is imagined. My k/d is pretty much identical whether I use either (I admit, my KB/M rate is probably a bit higher, but that's because that is the control system I'm accustomed to primarily). I'm an oldschool FPSer (wolfenstein/doom/hexen casual, then right up to being a dominant player on the old barrysworld UK half-life 1 and quake 2 servers before I stepped away from competitive play for university and work) so I use a KB/M mainly because that's what I learned to FPS on.
The bottom line is: If you can't beat them, join them. Then you'll realize that it was just you sucking at the game.
The small print is: This isn't CoD97/MW246-2/generic army shooter 124. Different strokes. You're playing an FPS plug-in to the most sandboxey of sandbox games. If you're upset about control inputs, You're likely to kill yourself when the game is fully integrated, and someone relieves your corp of it's leet gears. I'm an old-school FPSer as well (started out in Wolfenstein 3D at a cousin's house, and Doom was the first game I owned), but in the current-gen, I've been mostly console-based, and am more comfortable with the SIxaxis controller. I do get some PC time, and I've played the game with Sixaxis and with KB+M controls.
There ARE some glitches, and BOTH options need to have thorough layout customisation added (particularly with Sixaxis vehicle controls, which are a bit of a mess). But for the most part, the control schemes are really well balanced.
Mouse has better precision aim. Sixaxis has better precision movement.
As someone who plays with a focus on CQC, the movement advantage works to my favour, so I use my Sixaxis more than my mouse and keyboard. |
Himiko Kuronaga
Greatness Achieved Through Training
8
|
Posted - 2013.03.06 12:04:00 -
[280] - Quote
BlG MAMA wrote:Kray Dytt wrote:BlG MAMA wrote: If you like Kb/M so much you should play against Kb/M users , why play against the weak and disabled that dont use AURUM and Kb/M?
Adapt or die.
Adapt, as in, get a KB/M if you think that's so much better? Hmmm Also, you think CCP would seperate those who pay real money from those who don't, to lure in more people that don't pay money? Riiiiight :) Face it: if you're not paying real money, you're cannon-fodder meant to increase enjoyment and therefore willingness to spend cash for those who do i know and its sad
That's because you lack the mentality you are supposed to have when playing anything related to the eve universe.
You're supposed to view it as an opportunity to destroy peoples items that they bought with real money and take a dump on their efforts. Instead you're too busy whining about it.
New Eden is about having a good time by making other people miserable. Actually, its that way in every game. CCP just happen to be the ones who admit it and directly engineer things that way. |
|
xaerael Kabiel
Immobile Infantry
2
|
Posted - 2013.03.06 12:12:00 -
[281] - Quote
Kray Dytt wrote:BlG MAMA wrote: If you like Kb/M so much you should play against Kb/M users , why play against the weak and disabled that dont use AURUM and Kb/M?
Adapt or die.
Adapt, as in, get a KB/M if you think that's so much better? Hmmm Also, you think CCP would seperate those who pay real money from those who don't, to lure in more people that don't pay money? Riiiiight :) Face it: if you're not paying real money, you're cannon-fodder meant to increase enjoyment and therefore willingness to spend cash for those who do
Not quite. I don't pay for anything other than boosters and a few items to test. The heavy aurum users to me are just a massive payday. The isk reward from dropping those guys is huge, and ever since the protosuits have gone Aur I've been seeing payouts of over 500k on a regular basis.
Adapt or cry (tm) |
BlG MAMA
PLAYSTATION4
5
|
Posted - 2013.03.06 12:14:00 -
[282] - Quote
xaerael Kabiel wrote:Himiko Kuronaga wrote:BlG MAMA wrote:Drones Attack , truth hurts eh? I'm trying to understand the meaning behind this post, but I can't find it. Assist? I think he's just trying to be clever, but not pulling it off very well. Especially when the truth is everyone is on a level playing field, which is what 90% of people have been saying. Adapt or cry. (tm)
yeah im the one crying : "pwease let us kwill contwollel pipal wit our supiriur kb/m , don tke it away from uz pweaze"
all im trying is to have a balance in the game while you try to unbalance the game
|
xaerael Kabiel
Immobile Infantry
2
|
Posted - 2013.03.06 12:17:00 -
[283] - Quote
BlG MAMA wrote:xaerael Kabiel wrote:Himiko Kuronaga wrote:BlG MAMA wrote:Drones Attack , truth hurts eh? I'm trying to understand the meaning behind this post, but I can't find it. Assist? I think he's just trying to be clever, but not pulling it off very well. Especially when the truth is everyone is on a level playing field, which is what 90% of people have been saying. Adapt or cry. (tm) yeah im the one crying : "pwease let us kwill contwollel pipal wit our supiriur kb/m , don tke it away from uz pweaze" all im trying is to have a balance in the game while you try to unbalance the game
No, you're the one crying that you want to be a DS3 special snowflake.
It is balanced. Everyone can use the same hardware. If you choose to walk, don't complain the car got there first.
Working as intended.
Adapt or cry TT_TT |
KalOfTheRathi
CowTek
193
|
Posted - 2013.03.06 12:20:00 -
[284] - Quote
BlG MAMA wrote:yeah im the one crying : "pwease let us kwill contwollel pipal wit our supiriur kb/m , don tke it away from uz pweaze" What are you, a twelve year old?
The stated mod to Battle Finder will resolve this one way or the other. Either it will matter or it won't. Mercs will set the option and we will find out if it matters. If it does we stick to what we like. If the input method doesn't matter then who cares?
Being a complete child about this and claiming your QQ words are all about balance doesn't fly Kitten. Certainly not when adding drivel like the above.
|
Himiko Kuronaga
Greatness Achieved Through Training
8
|
Posted - 2013.03.06 12:27:00 -
[285] - Quote
oh lawdie, the tears are delicious.
If you're having problems now Mama, you're not going to be any better off if we all had to use DS3's. We will still end up running you down because we have a superior competitive mentality to yours.
Quit begging for a lifevest and learn how to swim. |
Kray Dytt
THE DOLLARS
11
|
Posted - 2013.03.06 12:46:00 -
[286] - Quote
BlG MAMA wrote:Kray Dytt wrote:BlG MAMA wrote: If you like Kb/M so much you should play against Kb/M users , why play against the weak and disabled that dont use AURUM and Kb/M?
Adapt or die.
Adapt, as in, get a KB/M if you think that's so much better? Hmmm Also, you think CCP would seperate those who pay real money from those who don't, to lure in more people that don't pay money? Riiiiight :) Face it: if you're not paying real money, you're cannon-fodder meant to increase enjoyment and therefore willingness to spend cash for those who do i know and its sad
I was of course exaggerating a bit here on the cannon-fodder part: you can be competitive without spending a dime.
However, I was very serious when it comes to separating paying from non-paying players. The game can only exist if it generates revenue. While non-paying players can "help" the game by making it more enjoyable for paying players, separating them would defeat that purpose meaning they are only "leeching", CCP would have absolutely no reason to want them around.
|
Kray Dytt
THE DOLLARS
11
|
Posted - 2013.03.06 12:50:00 -
[287] - Quote
xaerael Kabiel wrote:Kray Dytt wrote:BlG MAMA wrote: If you like Kb/M so much you should play against Kb/M users , why play against the weak and disabled that dont use AURUM and Kb/M?
Adapt or die.
Adapt, as in, get a KB/M if you think that's so much better? Hmmm Also, you think CCP would seperate those who pay real money from those who don't, to lure in more people that don't pay money? Riiiiight :) Face it: if you're not paying real money, you're cannon-fodder meant to increase enjoyment and therefore willingness to spend cash for those who do Not quite. I don't pay for anything other than boosters and a few items to test. The heavy aurum users to me are just a massive payday. The isk reward from dropping those guys is huge, and ever since the protosuits have gone Aur I've been seeing payouts of over 500k on a regular basis. Adapt or cry (tm)
I might not have been completely clear: what I mean is that one should not cry about people spending money, because they actually pay for your game. Demanding to be able to be separated from them is beyond ridiculous :) And yes, I agree, love getting high payouts thanks to AURUM spenders! I've only bought the merc pack so far and I won't buy expendable equipment with AUR, but boosters and BPO, yes.
|
Panther Alpha
Blueberries United
83
|
Posted - 2013.03.06 12:56:00 -
[288] - Quote
Kray Dytt wrote:BlG MAMA wrote:Kray Dytt wrote:BlG MAMA wrote: If you like Kb/M so much you should play against Kb/M users , why play against the weak and disabled that dont use AURUM and Kb/M?
Adapt or die.
Adapt, as in, get a KB/M if you think that's so much better? Hmmm Also, you think CCP would seperate those who pay real money from those who don't, to lure in more people that don't pay money? Riiiiight :) Face it: if you're not paying real money, you're cannon-fodder meant to increase enjoyment and therefore willingness to spend cash for those who do i know and its sad I was of course exaggerating a bit here on the cannon-fodder part: you can be competitive without spending a dime. However, I was very serious when it comes to separating paying from non-paying players. The game can only exist if it generates revenue. While non-paying players can "help" the game by making it more enjoyable for paying players, separating them would defeat that purpose meaning they are only "leeching", CCP would have absolutely no reason to want them around.
You have no idea how F2P games work do you ?
Long term players will end up Buying for "something" at one point or another, but not every one wants to pay for an advantage in regular basics. Eg ;only Buying for cosmetics now and again.
But the long term players are the ones that keep the game alive, regardless of how much real cash they spend on it.
The two things are needed in a F2P game.... The long term player that doesn't spend cash in regular basics, and the casual player that pays cash in regular basics. |
Kray Dytt
THE DOLLARS
11
|
Posted - 2013.03.06 13:07:00 -
[289] - Quote
Panther Alpha wrote:Kray Dytt wrote:
I was of course exaggerating a bit here on the cannon-fodder part: you can be competitive without spending a dime.
However, I was very serious when it comes to separating paying from non-paying players. The game can only exist if it generates revenue. While non-paying players can "help" the game by making it more enjoyable for paying players, separating them would defeat that purpose meaning they are only "leeching", CCP would have absolutely no reason to want them around.
You have no idea how F2P games work do you ? Long term players will end up Buying for "something" at one point or another, but not every one wants to pay for an advantage in regular basics. Eg ;only Buying for cosmetics now and again. But the long term players are the ones that keep the game alive, regardless of how much real cash they spend on it. The two things are needed in a F2P game.... The long term player that doesn't spend cash in regular basics, and the casual player that pays cash in regular basics.
Not entirely true. To keep the game alive, a certain amount of revenue is required. While it is true that long-term players are important to the game, if they do not generate enough revenue, it's "game over".
Now, the goal of any F2P game is to make a profit. To do this, the game needs to encourage people to spend money on it. Not everyone has to spend money, but enough players need to spend enough to keep it going. Non-paying players have "value" because the add to the game's enjoyability, which leads to more players including players that do pay.
However, if you allow people who don't pay to play separate from those that do, they do not add any reason for people to pay (or might even discourage people from paying, because they might end up with a smaller pool of players to play with/against). That is why it would be ridiculous. |
Panther Alpha
Blueberries United
84
|
Posted - 2013.03.06 13:56:00 -
[290] - Quote
Kray Dytt wrote:
Not entirely true. To keep the game alive, a certain amount of revenue is required. While it is true that long-term players are important to the game, if they do not generate enough revenue, it's "game over".
Now, the goal of any F2P game is to make a profit. To do this, the game needs to encourage people to spend money on it. Not everyone has to spend money, but enough players need to spend enough to keep it going. Non-paying players have "value" because they add to the game's enjoyability, which leads to more players including players that do pay.
You getting confuse with Pay To Win games ( P2W ).
Free To Play games are about "Volume", the biggest the community, the highest is the revenue ( Profit ).
If you have to pay to win, the community is smaller, and the profit margin is also smaller. You have to encourage people to "play" the game, regardless if the pay or not.
It is a reason why more and more companies are using this marketing model. Because in the long term, it generates more profit than a Play to win model. |
|
Kray Dytt
THE DOLLARS
11
|
Posted - 2013.03.06 14:16:00 -
[291] - Quote
Panther Alpha wrote:Kray Dytt wrote:
Not entirely true. To keep the game alive, a certain amount of revenue is required. While it is true that long-term players are important to the game, if they do not generate enough revenue, it's "game over".
Now, the goal of any F2P game is to make a profit. To do this, the game needs to encourage people to spend money on it. Not everyone has to spend money, but enough players need to spend enough to keep it going. Non-paying players have "value" because they add to the game's enjoyability, which leads to more players including players that do pay.
You getting confuse with Pay To Win games ( P2W ). Free To Play games are about "Volume", the biggest the community, the highest is the revenue ( Profit ). If you have to pay to win, the community is smaller, and the profit margin is also smaller. You have to encourage people to "play" the game, regardless if the pay or not. It is a reason why more and more companies are using this marketing model. Because in the long term, it generates more profit than a Play to win model.
I'm not sure I get your point. "Play to win" is a "label" put on some F2P games to indicate that optional sales are required (or at least a very important factor) to be able to be competitive. It is however not a different business model as such. It's still F2P, but it uses a rather crude method of "encouraging" people to pay, i.e., making it almost mandatory if you want to enjoy the game.
Yes, companies are moving away from this method because it isn't a very effective method. CCP has explicitly stated that they will not offer "pay to win" items. I.e. everything you can buy with money can be achieved without spending money as well. In the future this will be guaranteed by the open player market as well.
However, all that has nothing to do with separating paying from non-paying players. I'm not really sure why you brought it up to be honest. All I said was that separating paying from non-paying players (which the OP hinted at, because he felt that AUR item users where ruining the game for non-AUR item users) would be ridiculous because that separate group of non-paying players would have no "value" for the game. Their numbers mean nothing if they only play with/against each other and don't pay anything... Of course, the OP is suggesting that the game is "pay to win", which it isn't, which makes it even more ridiculous. |
Annabandak Mercery
Anunnaku Industrial Corp.
3
|
Posted - 2013.03.06 14:22:00 -
[292] - Quote
cool , will plug my ps3 controller in and when match begins i remove it and put my kbm back in |
I HateMyFace
BetaMax.
16
|
Posted - 2013.03.06 15:42:00 -
[293] - Quote
BlG MAMA wrote:Himiko Kuronaga wrote:Flight sticks give an advantage in flight games. Flight games were originally created with these in mind.
Steering wheels give an advantage in racing games. Racing games were originally created with these in mind.
Arcade sticks give an incredible advantage in most fighting games (especially 2d). Obviously, they were born in arcades, so they were made with the stick in mind.
None of these communities ban the control methods or limit their use during competitive play. If anything, they encourage their community to embrace them because it leads to an overall better gaming experience at higher levels.
So why is the console FPS community the only one who is so entirely justified that alternate control methods be banned or segregated? I think the situation is being over thought by the developers who are all too tempted to giving in to lazy players who lack any real exposure to serious competitive gaming. DS3 users are the dominat here because Dust514 is on PS3 so you think that forcing them to play with Kb/M is a good ideea? Yes its forcing Kb/M if you want to have more chances of winning. If you want Dust514 to die ahead of its time go ahead and make Kb/M standard for win , AURUM is doing already a good job at keeping most people away. Dust514 needs filters for Kb/M and AURUM users if devs want more people to play Dust514. If you like Kb/M so much you should play against Kb/M users , why play against the weak and disabled that dont use AURUM and Kb/M? Adapt or die.
You keep using the term adapt or die but you are doing the exact opposite. If you took the term seriously you wouldn't be concerned with input methods or aurum users. You would adapt.
Come on man you don't like seeing people who paid real life money for a weapon and killing hem with your free fitting? To me that's the best!
|
Stundryn
The Inf1dels Zombie Ninja Space Bears
3
|
Posted - 2013.03.06 15:53:00 -
[294] - Quote
xaerael Kabiel wrote: No, you're the one crying that you want to be a DS3 special snowflake.
It is balanced. Everyone can use the same hardware. If you choose to walk, don't complain the car got there first.
Working as intended.
Adapt or cry TT_TT
You have to pay extra for a kb/m. So if you want to have more control over your character you have to pay more. PTW?
The ps3 allows the use of a kb/m but does not mean dust should be able to use it for gaming.
Personally i won't play with a kb/m and if CCP does not disable them for everyone i will end up buying something like this.
I'll be paying a little more to be better. My semi-autos will be auto etc. I'll express my interest in having a modded Dust controller. They will make them.
|
Panther Alpha
Blueberries United
85
|
Posted - 2013.03.06 16:04:00 -
[295] - Quote
Stundryn wrote:xaerael Kabiel wrote: No, you're the one crying that you want to be a DS3 special snowflake.
It is balanced. Everyone can use the same hardware. If you choose to walk, don't complain the car got there first.
Working as intended.
Adapt or cry TT_TT
You have to pay extra for a kb/m. So if you want to have more control over your character you have to pay more. PTW? The ps3 allows the use of a kb/m but does not mean dust should be able to use it for gaming. Personally i won't play with a kb/m and if CCP does not disable them for everyone i will end up buying something like this. I'll be paying a little more to be better. My semi-autos will be auto etc. I'll express my interest in having a modded Dust controller. They will make them.
That is wrong in so many levels ......
You also have to pay extra for a TV, the biggest the TV, and the better the HD, the biggest the advantage i have ? so is Pay to Win then.....
What about my surround sound system ? .... that is definitely cheating .... i should be ban for that. |
Spkr4theDead
Namtar Elite Gallente Federation
26
|
Posted - 2013.03.06 21:25:00 -
[296] - Quote
No, it'll put those with keyboard and mouse against each other, with quick, precise movements of the wrist being king, and those of us console die-hards using only controllers facing each other. This is actually a balancing move I could support.
Go for it, CCP. Now, to fix the LAV physics. |
Spkr4theDead
Namtar Elite Gallente Federation
26
|
Posted - 2013.03.06 21:31:00 -
[297] - Quote
Stundryn wrote:xaerael Kabiel wrote: No, you're the one crying that you want to be a DS3 special snowflake.
It is balanced. Everyone can use the same hardware. If you choose to walk, don't complain the car got there first.
Working as intended.
Adapt or cry TT_TT
You have to pay extra for a kb/m. So if you want to have more control over your character you have to pay more. PTW? The ps3 allows the use of a kb/m but does not mean dust should be able to use it for gaming. Personally i won't play with a kb/m and if CCP does not disable them for everyone i will end up buying something like this. I'll be paying a little more to be better. My semi-autos will be auto etc. I'll express my interest in having a modded Dust controller. They will make them. It's because of worthless terrible gamers like yourself also that games are getting so easy and so easy to exploit cheating, because God forbid you should work to succeed. Naaaaah, have buttons that do everything for you, so you don't have to worry about anything. You were probably one of those people that if you were on SOCOM, you cheated with Code 9. It's because of people like you that gaming is being destroyed. |
Riffix Dathmor
Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation
2
|
Posted - 2013.03.06 21:35:00 -
[298] - Quote
One Universe // One War **
** Controller restrictions may apply |
Shijima Kuraimaru
WarRavens
173
|
Posted - 2013.03.07 03:45:00 -
[299] - Quote
I like the people who talk about not wanting to spend the large amounts of cash to change over to KB/M as their justification to hate the KB/M community. Fortunately, they don't have to change. I get taken down all the time by DS3 players. There's really nothing that can be done with the KB/M that can't be matched with the other two control methods.
DS3 = $59.99
PS Move = $47.50 PS Move Navigation controller = $28.51 Total = $76.01
My generic keyboard = $9.99 My generic wireless mouse = $12.99 Total = 22.98
How long till people QQ that the move is an unfair control method? |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
1867
|
Posted - 2013.03.07 04:27:00 -
[300] - Quote
Shijima Kuraimaru wrote:I like the people who talk about not wanting to spend the large amounts of cash to change over to KB/M as their justification to hate the KB/M community. Fortunately, they don't have to change. I get taken down all the time by DS3 players. There's really nothing that can be done with the KB/M that can't be matched with the other two control methods.
DS3 = $59.99
PS Move = $47.50 PS Move Navigation controller = $28.51 Total = $76.01
My generic keyboard = $9.99 My generic wireless mouse = $12.99 Total = 22.98
How long till people QQ that the move is an unfair control method? You're missing an important point here.
DS3 = FREE WITH THE CONSOLE. If you own the platform the game comes out on, it COMES WITH THE CONTROLLER.
PSMove = FREE in certain package deals, usually with a Move-compatible game or two.
As far as I'm aware, there isn't, and has never been, an official package deal that included a PS3 and a compatible keyboard and mouse for the console.
But the really important point is that THERE'S NO REAL ADVANTAGE ANYWAY. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |