Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 8 post(s) |
Pokey Dravon
OSG Planetary Operations
9375
|
Posted - 2017.06.01 21:18:00 -
[91] - Quote
Well people are locked into the idea that all assault suits need to be called "Assault". What if he just look at the types of roles in two very broad categories.
Assault - These are your primary damage dealers, the ones kicking the doors in, doing the most damage, and focusing on killing the enemy.
Support - These are the force multipliers. The roles that fill in the gaps and perform more specialist roles. They're the ones providing cover fire, healing allies, and picking off long range targets.
So now if we think in these broad terms, now let's say you have 6 corporations each making their own version of a suit that fits into one of those broad categories.
So corporation A-C builds their version an Assault Dropsuit. Corporations D-F builds their version of a Support dropsuit.
A builds a Vanguard B builds a Frontline C builds an infiltrator
D builds a Sentinel E builds a Logistics F builds a marksman
Does that make sense?
Project|Nova - What We Know So Far
|
Moorian Flav
676
|
Posted - 2017.06.01 22:16:00 -
[92] - Quote
First off, Pokey, I would like to point out I am not trying to be a jerk/troll and start stuff here. I am just giving my thoughts about Nova although my perspective in all honesty is filtered from my experience in both DUST and EVE. If you take DUST and EVE out of the equation, the little I've heard about Nova sounds like it might be pretty solid. I am just confused as at Fanfest it was said Nova was moved to Iceland to be more EVE like but am not seeing the likeness between Nova and EVE besides Insurance and Nova sharing some of EVE's NPC corporations. With all that said, I will back off on this thread so I can see where it goes instead of seemingly just adding bumps in the road.
I don't troll; I tell the truth.
I'm also known as "The ANTI-Propaganda Machine".
|
Pokey Dravon
OSG Planetary Operations
9375
|
Posted - 2017.06.01 22:49:00 -
[93] - Quote
I didn't get that impression at all man. Honestly just trying to talk it all out and swap ideas. You know, what forums are supposed to be like haha.
No need to back off, I'm enjoying the conversation.
Project|Nova - What We Know So Far
|
byte modal
1339
|
Posted - 2017.06.01 23:39:00 -
[94] - Quote
Pokey Dravon wrote:Well people are locked into the idea that all assault suits need to be called "Assault". What if he just look at the types of roles in two very broad categories.
Assault - These are your primary damage dealers, the ones kicking the doors in, doing the most damage, and focusing on killing the enemy.
Support - These are the force multipliers. The roles that fill in the gaps and perform more specialist roles. They're the ones providing cover fire, healing allies, and picking off long range targets.
So now if we think in these broad terms, now let's say you have 6 corporations each making their own version of a suit that fits into one of those broad categories.
So corporation A-C builds their version an Assault Dropsuit. Corporations D-F builds their version of a Support dropsuit.
A builds a Vanguard B builds a Frontline C builds an infiltrator
D builds a Sentinel E builds a Logistics F builds a marksman
Does that make sense?
I think the reason we are locked into the idea of assaults being assaults is because our only context is through what was experienced in DUST. That goes back to my point though with these smaller details. I think so much time has passed living in a holding pattern post-DUST waiting for the next thing, that we've more or less run our own speculations in a completely hypothetical environment---because there was nothing else provided to counter that. A lot of us DUST players are unfortunately stuck in the DUST mindset (some out of stubbornness, others simply because we have no other context to base our views upon than what we experienced). Assault is "assault" as DUST defined assault. for good or bad, that's our starting point of context.
Apparently our perspective is off now. Which is fine. Really. I think as time passes and more of us realize CCP's intentional redirection from a DUST replacement to a "NEW and SEPARATE game," we will all come around; however, there are still pockets of missing information where it is just too easy to rely on preconceived notions based on DUST's teachings and our experiences there.
Pokey: Keep fighting the good fight. Your posts are helping mediate between the two camps.
To the suit explanation, I think I get where you're coming from but I still say it would be impractical for a corporation to specialize in just one type of suit if that corporation has desire to field those suits for aggression against other corps. In your outline, that really would only make sense if each of the separate corporations had an agreement with one another to form some type of coalition to fight along side each other. This would be designed to take advantage of other corp suit types to complement their own suit weaknesses. Like, "Hey my suit is logi! I can't fight a battle for my corp with a field full of logis?! Your corp designed a kick-ass frontline attack suit? Hey! Let's work together!!! Or I'll sell you some of mine and you sell me some of yours?" I struggle with the idea that only a Minmatar corp would create a logi, and would be willing to share that logi tech for assault tech designed by an Amarr corp ...in mutual support for each other.
Let me repeat my earlier statement though: If the corp's sole purpose in development of a single suit type is to SELL for profit, then by all means let them. That makes perfect sense. If corps are creating and selling to us, the mercs to do with as we place, then I think that is logical. Otherwise I can't realistically see 16 Min logis running around a battlefield if individual corps are fighting their own wars.
Hey. I'm not trying to be difficult, I promise. I'm only providing an example of a seemingly subtle detail that could be causing confusion here, and as a result, more push back in resistance. It confused me (still does, to a small degree!!), but I'm trying to see it the way you are reading it.
Alright. I gotta leave for the day. Take care and thanks for the responses so far.
kitten bacon taco (nom)
|
DeathwindRising
ROGUE RELICS
1497
|
Posted - 2017.06.02 01:54:00 -
[95] - Quote
I've real issues with what's been said on the last few pages here.
first off, I'm not clear on the break down of classes/suits and their association with corps/factions.
When we say the classes are based on factions... i want to know who's factions? Amarr factions? Caldari Factions? Minmatar or Gallente?
"CCP Rattati We are not making 4 of each, so racial limitations are not smart. ItGÇÖs more GÇ£supportGÇ¥ weapons or GÇ£offensiveGÇ¥ weapons we are not making 4 races of every object."
http://biomassed.net/2017/05/18/project-nova-ongoing-updates-may-16th/
I think people may have gotten lost on this statement. it refers to weapon systems, not suits.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Togcb1rNnko
In the video, you'll see a gal scout in the menu, but amarr and minmatar scouts in game. Why put the effort into the art assets and not allow their use in game?
thats like saying only one corp in New Eden produces an assault suit and no other corp or race had need of an assault suit.
Eve Online: Assault ships... each races has TWO variants of the assault ships class. Each variant is made by a different corp.
But then there's this....
"CCP Rattati What are your favorite NPC corporations and why? We are exploring a new way to approach player classes. less focus on empires, and more on the fact that these are humans and humans interact with corporations more than empires. We are also not interested in making GÇÿ4 of eachGÇÖ anymore.
So you could start by playing the GÇ£heavy supportGÇ¥ or Sentinel. That Sentinel, much like and AK-47 is made by a company. The company inherits some flavor from its native empire. So the Sentinel is made by Kaalakiota lets say; the Vanguard is made by CONCORD. But, much like the M16 has factory settings, the Navy Seals have a custom M16 which could then be the Carthum M16. Same chassis, different decals and skin and GÇ£flavoredGÇ¥ stats GÇö Better damage, less clip"
http://biomassed.net/2017/05/20/project-nova-what-we-know-so-far/
This seems to actually indicated the the U.S., Russia, China, and U.K. all use an AK-47, but that we can choose a HK produced AK-47, or S&W produce AK-47, or and AK-47 made by some other company.
The reality is that, no. We're using AK-47, M16, G36c, FAMAS, and other stuff. But they are all of the "assault rifle class"
What needs to be clarified is whether CCP intends to give us corp based variants of a caldari assault suit, but not corp based variants of a amarr assault suit.
The NPC corps Kaalakiota and CreoDrone do not make variants of the same base design of a light scout.
Will there be Kaalakiota, CreoDron, Khanid Kingdom, Brutor Tribe vanguard suits? Each corp just named is from a different race, but each would be representing a "vanguard class" dropsuit.
|
DeathwindRising
ROGUE RELICS
1499
|
Posted - 2017.06.02 02:03:00 -
[96] - Quote
Pokey Dravon wrote:Well people are locked into the idea that all assault suits need to be called "Assault". What if he just look at the types of roles in two very broad categories.
Assault - These are your primary damage dealers, the ones kicking the doors in, doing the most damage, and focusing on killing the enemy.
Support - These are the force multipliers. The roles that fill in the gaps and perform more specialist roles. They're the ones providing cover fire, healing allies, and picking off long range targets.
So now if we think in these broad terms, now let's say you have 6 corporations each making their own version of a suit that fits into one of those broad categories.
So corporation A-C builds their version an Assault Dropsuit. Corporations D-F builds their version of a Support dropsuit.
A builds a Vanguard B builds a Frontline C builds an infiltrator
D builds a Sentinel E builds a Logistics F builds a marksman
Does that make sense?
No.
What is a Vanguard?
What is an Assault Dropsuit?
I'm reading this more like... the only assualt dropsuit in the game is one made by Brutor Tribe of the Minmatar Republic.
WTF happened to the gallente, caldari, and amarr assault dropsuit? Do none of their corps produce assault dropsuits?
That's like trying to tell me that Chinese based company in China has the only planes in the world. If you want to buy a plane, you have to buy theirs. But French companies make planes too, and American companies and lots of others.
or better yet cars. Are all cars made by Honda? This idea that only one company makes something is either complete BS that needs to be reviewed, or is in need of SEVERE clarification |
byte modal
1340
|
Posted - 2017.06.02 02:03:00 -
[97] - Quote
Yay! Some common ground here, finally ;)
kitten bacon taco (nom)
|
Pokey Dravon
OSG Planetary Operations
9378
|
Posted - 2017.06.02 02:21:00 -
[98] - Quote
Vanguard is the new name for Commando. I just said Frontline instead of Assault to avoid confusion.
As for the rest, I've explained this a few different ways but it seems none of them are really clicking with you, and for that I apologize. Perhaps someone else will have better luck, cause I'm not really sure how else to explain it.
Project|Nova - What We Know So Far
|
DeathwindRising
ROGUE RELICS
1499
|
Posted - 2017.06.02 02:51:00 -
[99] - Quote
Pokey Dravon wrote:Vanguard is the new name for Commando. I just said Frontline instead of Assault to avoid confusion.
As for the rest, I've explained this a few different ways but it seems none of them are really clicking with you, and for that I apologize. Perhaps someone else will have better luck, cause I'm not really sure how else to explain it.
I'm trying to get clarification.
Amarr Ship Tree
This picture illustrates my expectation for Nova.
Ship "Classes" break down into specialized ships, each of which developed by a corp that is a member of its race and based off a base line ship.
Will Nova follow this structure or not?
|
DUST Fiend
19268
|
Posted - 2017.06.02 03:02:00 -
[100] - Quote
DeathwindRising wrote:these are humans and humans interact with corporations more than empires. Wait.....what?
I didn't know humans could respawn |
|
DeathwindRising
ROGUE RELICS
1501
|
Posted - 2017.06.02 03:10:00 -
[101] - Quote
DUST Fiend wrote:DeathwindRising wrote:these are humans and humans interact with corporations more than empires. Wait.....what? I didn't know humans could respawn
"CCP Rattati What are your favorite NPC corporations and why? We are exploring a new way to approach player classes. less focus on empires, and more on the fact that these are humans and humans interact with corporations more than empires. We are also not interested in making GÇÿ4 of eachGÇÖ anymore."
[url]http://biomassed.net/2017/05/20/project-nova-what-we-know-so-far/[/url]
Why you saying I said something I never actually said? |
Pokey Dravon
OSG Planetary Operations
9378
|
Posted - 2017.06.02 03:16:00 -
[102] - Quote
DeathwindRising wrote:Pokey Dravon wrote:Vanguard is the new name for Commando. I just said Frontline instead of Assault to avoid confusion.
As for the rest, I've explained this a few different ways but it seems none of them are really clicking with you, and for that I apologize. Perhaps someone else will have better luck, cause I'm not really sure how else to explain it. I'm trying to get clarification. Amarr Ship TreeThis picture illustrates my expectation for Nova. Ship "Classes" break down into specialized ships, each of which developed by a corp that is a member of its race and based off a base line ship. Will Nova follow this structure or not?
From my understanding, no.
This is my understanding of how it will look (forgive the half assed flow chart) Remember that I am obviously not a developer and everything I know is available on Biomassed.net, so there is a degree of speculation on my part, so take it with a grain of salt.
http://biomassed.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Rough-Class-Progression-Page-1.png
Also I'm trying to get clarification about the "one faction for each class" thing. It's been implied to be that way but I will try to get a definitive confirmation one way or another.
Project|Nova - What We Know So Far
|
DUST Fiend
19268
|
Posted - 2017.06.02 03:44:00 -
[103] - Quote
DeathwindRising wrote:DUST Fiend wrote:DeathwindRising wrote:these are humans and humans interact with corporations more than empires. Wait.....what? I didn't know humans could respawn "CCP Rattati What are your favorite NPC corporations and why? We are exploring a new way to approach player classes. less focus on empires, and more on the fact that these are humans and humans interact with corporations more than empires. We are also not interested in making GÇÿ4 of eachGÇÖ anymore." [url]http://biomassed.net/2017/05/20/project-nova-what-we-know-so-far/[/url] Why you saying I said something I never actually said? Oops my bad, I didn't mean to imply you said it. Messed up the quotes. I need sleep not forums lol o7 |
DeathwindRising
ROGUE RELICS
1501
|
Posted - 2017.06.02 09:04:00 -
[104] - Quote
Pokey Dravon wrote:DeathwindRising wrote:Pokey Dravon wrote:Vanguard is the new name for Commando. I just said Frontline instead of Assault to avoid confusion.
As for the rest, I've explained this a few different ways but it seems none of them are really clicking with you, and for that I apologize. Perhaps someone else will have better luck, cause I'm not really sure how else to explain it. I'm trying to get clarification. Amarr Ship TreeThis picture illustrates my expectation for Nova. Ship "Classes" break down into specialized ships, each of which developed by a corp that is a member of its race and based off a base line ship. Will Nova follow this structure or not? From my understanding, no. This is my understanding of how it will look (forgive the half assed flow chart) Remember that I am obviously not a developer and everything I know is available on Biomassed.net, so there is a degree of speculation on my part, so take it with a grain of salt. http://biomassed.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Rough-Class-Progression-Page-1.pngAlso I'm trying to get clarification about the "one faction for each class" thing. It's been implied to be that way but I will try to get a definitive confirmation one way or another.
Well I see it as a problem if they don't.
I was hoping that overall "class" progression followed like in the flow chart, but also that each "class" is actually a category containing different base drop suits. What would be good is that it's totally capable of allowing new corps to be added to each "class"
The problem is how ccp said they don't want 4 of everything. If they followed the approach of multiple corps within each "class", then we'd get something like 8 caldari mega corps. 4 of which were ever represented in game for eve online. A ton of corps would be available for each race as corp product lines.
Instead of 4 empire/racial variants of a particular dropsuit, we could potentially see something over 30 different Corp based variants of the same "class".
A LOT more work but it provides a future wealth of potential content as more and more corps could added to the game. For example, caldari 4 major corps out of their 8 megacorps, are Kaalakiota, Ishikune, lai dai, wiyrkomi.
But a quick look at this more complete listing of caldari corps shows just how many corps there really are to pontentially create content for.
Caldari NPC Corps
|
Grimmiers
957
|
Posted - 2017.06.02 09:23:00 -
[105] - Quote
I'm not really a fan of being forced to play other classes to unlock gear you want, but the idea will work much better for new players.
One thing I hope for is the ability to manufacture gear that you can use without training a separate class. The resources required should be shared between eve and nova creating a real infantry market. Even npc corps should have a limited stock available on the market and allow players to sell unused resources to npc's to help them produce things.
Npc corps will even use blueprints sold to them. They'll use the blueprint in the most efficient way creating the most gear per blueprint, but the item will be on the market for anyone to buy. This will make player corporations a lot more meaningful if, for instance, corp members with the same manufacture skill trained will boost production and have control over who gets what. In the end game, players would desire player corp markets and create a more interesting corp battle motive, wherein dust you just sold excess clones.
tl;dr I like the system if there's manufactured gear that you can fit without having to play other classes. |
Clone D
Solo Zen
2256
|
Posted - 2017.06.02 09:46:00 -
[106] - Quote
Grimmiers wrote:I'm not really a fan of being forced to play other classes to unlock gear you want, but the idea will work much better for new players.
The fact that a skill tree is considered "too hard" for new players is frightening to me. What? Is this generation a bunch of bumbling buffoons? I can't tell you how many games with a skill tree that I played when I was a kid, and we all thought they were awesome. It is the RPG way, and it allows a strong level of self determination in character development.
I felt personal reward from learning and mastering the skill tree. It required some degree of planning and cultivated a sense of identity with my character.
In Dust, I often skipped using gear until I saved up enough SP to buy level 5 and reaped the benefits of the bonuses. In Nova characters will be subjected to developing the same skill bonuses over and over as they move through different classes in an attempt to unlock new modules. Oh boy |
Juno Tristan
Obscure Reference
1277
|
Posted - 2017.06.02 09:53:00 -
[107] - Quote
Grimmiers wrote:I'm not really a fan of being forced to play other classes to unlock gear you want, but the idea will work much better for new players.
One thing I hope for is the ability to manufacture gear that you can use without training a separate class. The resources required should be shared between eve and nova creating a real infantry market. Even npc corps should have a limited stock available on the market and allow players to sell unused resources to npc's to help them produce things.
Npc corps will even use blueprints sold to them. They'll use the blueprint in the most efficient way creating the most gear per blueprint, but the item will be on the market for anyone to buy. This will make player corporations a lot more meaningful if, for instance, corp members with the same manufacture skill trained will boost production and have control over who gets what. In the end game, players would desire player corp markets and create a more interesting corp battle motive, wherein dust you just sold excess clones.
Most of your gear will be BPOs, with consumable per match firmware
So there won't be an EVE style market for standard gear, hopefully for shiny consumable loot though
The Final PLC Kill
Dust 514 - My Final Moments
|
Joel II X
Bacon with a bottle of Quafe
10886
|
Posted - 2017.06.02 09:53:00 -
[108] - Quote
Pokey Dravon wrote:Joel II X wrote: Oh, psh yeah. No doubt it. I just thought CCP wanted to level the playing field by getting rid of tiers in favor of racial bonuses only. I thought the difference from a T1 to a T2 suit would be going to a more specialized suit by it both greater strength and weakness (as in going from 300 shields / 200 armor to 400/100, etc). Same amount of 'tokens', but placed in different locations.
Last question: in your article, did you mean that T1 suits will have T1 bonuses, and T2 will have both T1 and T2 bonuses?
Thanks.
Well the playing field hasn't been completely leveled, but the difference has been reduced significantly. Remember, you're not unlocking new suits, you're taking the base one you have and layering on new bonuses. So your T1 simply turns into your T2, it's not like you'll have a T1 suit sitting in your closet and then a T2 of the same suit sitting next to it. So yes, each suit has all of the benefits that come before it (T2 has T2 + T1 bonuses). So there is power increase there which was similar in Dust. However unlike Dust, the slots, hp, resources, ect. Are the same regardless of tech level. Also there are not tiers of weapons, modules, ect. So that's going to be a huge difference in closing that gap. Ahhhhh! Okay, okay. I get it now.
I think this is a pretty cool little thing, if the bonuses are balanced well enough.
Still though, not being able to edit them until T2 is a huge bummer for me. I hope they change their mind on this one before any sort of release.
Scouts United
Gk.0s & Quafes all day.
|
Thaddeus Reynolds
Dead Man's Game Preatoriani
759
|
Posted - 2017.06.02 11:47:00 -
[109] - Quote
One option for avoiding playing classes you don't like to gain equipment you do could be to do missions for specific corporations or factions that have unique variations of the suit class you like with the specific equipment type you want equipped already...nothing says that all suits of a given faction and race need have the same equipment baked in |
Pokey Dravon
OSG Planetary Operations
9378
|
Posted - 2017.06.02 13:56:00 -
[110] - Quote
DeathwindRising wrote:Instead of 4 empire/racial variants of a particular dropsuit, we could potentially see something over 30 different Corp based variants of the same "class". A LOT more work but it provides a future wealth of potential content as more and more corps could added to the game. For example, caldari 4 major corps out of their 8 megacorps, are Kaalakiota, Ishikune, lai dai, wiyrkomi. But a quick look at this more complete listing of caldari corps shows just how many corps there really are to pontentially create content for. Caldari NPC Corps
Valid concerns but like you said, a lot more work and more difficulty balancing/designing many variations of effectively the same thing. If anything the firmware system does allow for all of those variations, it just happens at the tail end of the progression rather than the beginning or middle.
Project|Nova - What We Know So Far
|
|
|
CCP Rattati
C C P C C P Alliance
28100
|
Posted - 2017.06.02 14:16:00 -
[111] - Quote
Thaddeus Reynolds wrote:One option for avoiding playing classes you don't like to gain equipment you do could be to do missions for specific corporations or factions that have unique variations of the suit class you like with the specific equipment type you want equipped already...nothing says that all suits of a given faction and race need have the same equipment baked in.
For instance, to use the Manufacturer System and a star-ship analogy Heavy Assault Cruisers are produced by both Khanid Innovations and Viziam. Let's assume for a minute for the sake of argument that they both produce a Vanguard Suit in the same way.
Khanid Innovations merges Caldari Weapon an Electronics Systems with Amarr Engineering and Metalurgy. A Khanid Vanguard may come equipped with a Rail Rifle or Scrambler Rifle with breach Action and an ECM Burst Generator, Armor Hardeners (simplifying for the sake of illustration), and Reactive Plates.
Viziam on the other hand favors traditional Amarrian Weapons philosophy, but general gears more towards precision, so may have a Scrambler Rifle with Tactical Action, a Damage Modifier, a heat sink, an Armor Repairer, and a Nanohive.
To add to that.
In EVE, the ship has to be manufactured ahead of time, explaining Navy Variants etc.
With clone technology you are 3D printing the suit on demand.
If you imagine Firmware being the software on top of the Dropsuit, you can re-wire the "hull and role" bonuses, and because the materials are 3D printed as well, change the skin/visuals.
The difference is, you set the 3D printing formula before battle, including the Firmware. So this battle you will be using a Creodron Dropsuit with a Federal Marine Firmware override, changing its bonuses from plus to Hybrid, to plus to Armour Repair.
The Federal Marine Firmware is then earned with Gallente Navy standings
"As well as stupid, Rattati is incredibly slow and accident-prone, and cannot even swim"
|
|
byte modal
1341
|
Posted - 2017.06.02 14:38:00 -
[112] - Quote
@CCP Rattati:
Ok,so to over-simplify here for me to get my head around something that I can relate to, dropsuits are going to be a generic nebulous thing, that we as players will then apply a software design to so that when "built on-the-fly," we can tweak the physical build of the suit to support whatever role we are looking to provide. If anything, it's the firmware patches that we earn/purchase/whatever that defines the suit being BUILT in our little player suitcase (or whatever we call it) that we take to the field.
I take that to mean the original design of a suit is some generic universal template, where race isn't even a factor anymore. Do I assume all races are using the same generic molding blank? I mean as far as lore goes? So each race will then have a "car" template. Basic 4 wheels, sedan, 6-cyl engine. Everyone in the universe has access to this due to some universal socialist-type agreement that this is everyone's base standard; or over some long time-frame that allowed all suit tech to distill itself down to the most basic common version? Instead of evolving the suit, the suit devolved until reaching that most comment default universal state, while custom firmware evolved instead?
Everyone buys a ps3, but with each software update, your ps3 goes to the next gen capability without really changing the ps3 case. Well, I guess in this example, you have a 3d printer at home just building a slightly modified version of the ps3 with each upgrade, but essentially the ps3 is the base model.
Who designed the default suit? How did enemy races get access to that design?
Please correct me where I am wrong. I am only trying to connect the dots. If I am understanding you right, this is *very* different than what we understand dropsuits to be based on our experience with DUST. That is not necessarily a complaint as it is just pointing out why it is so difficult for us out-of-the-know to grasp. We are trying, but all we really have to to relate to is coming from DUST experience. I think it would help greatly to preface everything with "this is not DUST... strap in, because this is going to be tricky to explain! Forget everything you know because it's no longer relatable." ;) I'm over here trying to conceptually patch your A to my understanding of what A used to be and it's no longer a one-to-one relationship. At least something like that would help break us from the ideas we have already built so many fantasies on since NOVA's announcement ;)
I mean that with respect and love btw.
I think I'm getting closer to getting what is going on. Assuming my post is anywhere near point. Thanks for the check-ins.
kitten bacon taco (nom)
|
|
CCP Rattati
C C P C C P Alliance
28102
|
Posted - 2017.06.02 14:45:00 -
[113] - Quote
byte modal wrote:@CCP Rattati:
Ok,so to over-simplify here for me to get my head around something that I can relate to, dropsuits are going to be a generic nebulous thing, that we as players will then apply a software design to so that when "built on-the-fly," we can tweak the physical build of the suit to support whatever role we are looking to provide. If anything, it's the firmware patches that we earn/purchase/whatever that defines the suit being BUILT in our little player suitcase (or whatever we call it) that we take to the field.
I take that to mean the original design of a suit is some generic universal template, where race isn't even a factor anymore. Do I assume all races are using the same generic molding blank? I mean as far as lore goes? So each race will then have a "car" template. Basic 4 wheels, sedan, 6-cyl engine. Everyone in the universe has access to this due to some universal socialist-type agreement that this is everyone's base standard; or over some long time-frame that allowed all suit tech to distill itself down to the most basic common version? Instead of evolving the suit, the suit devolved until reaching that most comment default universal state, while custom firmware evolved instead?
Everyone buys a ps3, but with each software update, your ps3 goes to the next gen capability without really changing the ps3 case. Well, I guess in this example, you have a 3d printer at home just building a slightly modified version of the ps3 with each upgrade, but essentially the ps3 is the base model.
Who designed the default suit? How did enemy races get access to that design?
Please correct me where I am wrong. I am only trying to connect the dots. If I am understanding you right, this is *very* different than what we understand dropsuits to be based on our experience with DUST. That is not necessarily a complaint as it is just pointing out why it is so difficult for us out-of-the-know to grasp. We are trying, but all we really have to to relate to is coming from DUST experience. I think it would help greatly to preface everything with "this is not DUST... strap in, because this is going to be tricky to explain! Forget everything you know because it's no longer relatable." ;) I'm over here trying to conceptually patch your A to my understanding of what A used to be and it's no longer a one-to-one relationship. At least something like that would help break us from the ideas we have already built so many fantasies on since NOVA's announcement ;)
I mean that with respect and love btw.
I think I'm getting closer to getting what is going on. Assuming my post is anywhere near point. Thanks for the check-ins.
Again, we are trying our best to translate the soul. What makes EVE and DUST so great, and where can we improvise without compromising the essence of New Eden.
"As well as stupid, Rattati is incredibly slow and accident-prone, and cannot even swim"
|
|
Pokey Dravon
OSG Planetary Operations
9378
|
Posted - 2017.06.02 14:50:00 -
[114] - Quote
You're too focused on "what race". The real question is "who is the base manufacturer?".
Each of the 6 base classes has 1 manufacturer. So the base suits design is based off of that manufacturers design specs. Now, that company may belong to a certain race, so those design specs may resemble that race in general.
So the Core Logistics will probably look Minmatar since Core is a Minmatar company.
If Sisters of EVE made a dropsuit, it would probably look like a Sisters of EVE ship, since they're same manufacturer.
The company may or may not be tied to a specific race, so stop focusing on "what race". Focus on the manufacturersGÇï.
Project|Nova - What We Know So Far
|
Thaddeus Reynolds
Dead Man's Game Preatoriani
760
|
Posted - 2017.06.02 14:57:00 -
[115] - Quote
byte modal wrote:@CCP Rattati:
Ok,so to over-simplify here for me to get my head around something that I can relate to, dropsuits are going to be a generic nebulous thing, that we as players will then apply a software design to so that when "built on-the-fly," we can tweak the physical build of the suit to support whatever role we are looking to provide. If anything, it's the firmware patches that we earn/purchase/whatever that defines the suit being BUILT in our little player suitcase (or whatever we call it) that we take to the field.
I take that to mean the original design of a suit is some generic universal template, where race isn't even a factor anymore. Do I assume all races are using the same generic molding blank? I mean as far as lore goes? So each race will then have a "car" template. Basic 4 wheels, sedan, 6-cyl engine. Everyone in the universe has access to this due to some universal socialist-type agreement that this is everyone's base standard; or over some long time-frame that allowed all suit tech to distill itself down to the most basic common version? Instead of evolving the suit, the suit devolved until reaching that most comment default universal state, while custom firmware evolved instead?
Everyone buys a ps3, but with each software update, your ps3 goes to the next gen capability without really changing the ps3 case. Well, I guess in this example, you have a 3d printer at home just building a slightly modified version of the ps3 with each upgrade, but essentially the ps3 is the base model.
Who designed the default suit? How did enemy races get access to that design?
Please correct me where I am wrong. I am only trying to connect the dots. If I am understanding you right, this is *very* different than what we understand dropsuits to be based on our experience with DUST. That is not necessarily a complaint as it is just pointing out why it is so difficult for us out-of-the-know to grasp. We are trying, but all we really have to to relate to is coming from DUST experience. I think it would help greatly to preface everything with "this is not DUST... strap in, because this is going to be tricky to explain! Forget everything you know because it's no longer relatable." ;) I'm over here trying to conceptually patch your A to my understanding of what A used to be and it's no longer a one-to-one relationship. At least something like that would help break us from the ideas we have already built so many fantasies on since NOVA's announcement ;)
I mean that with respect and love btw.
I think I'm getting closer to getting what is going on. Assuming my post is anywhere near point. Thanks for the check-ins. So, even in DUST our Suit setups were manufactured on-the-fly. Lore-wise not much has changed directly here.
Each manufacturer then creates a suit of a general size and class (Medium Assault is what might have been Assault, Medium Support is what might have been Logistics, Heavy Assault is what might have been Commando, Heavy Support is what might have been Sentinel...etc etc) and fills it with their equipment, and load their firmware to optimize its operation for their purpose. As you get more familiar with the dropsuit, you start being able to replace said pieces of equipment, and eventually gain the ability to flash the firmware to install any other firmware you are able to purchase or otherwise acquire.
Each Manufacturer has their basis within a Race's/Empire's space, and so ones from the same Empire will generally use very similar methodologies and have very similar looking final products along the classic general lines, but each manufacturer builds their suits for their purposes, so would obviously have different equipment loads built-in
Think of it like getting an "APEX" suit. Eventually you gain the ability to replace the pre-fit modules on it. And at high enough "level" you gain the ability to swap out the bonus on said suit to another compatible bonus (like changing from Hybrid Weapon Damage to Armor Repair Effectiveness) |
byte modal
1341
|
Posted - 2017.06.02 15:34:00 -
[116] - Quote
Pokey Dravon wrote:You're too focused on "what race". The real question is "who is the base manufacturer?".
Each of the 6 base classes has 1 manufacturer. So the base suits design is based off of that manufacturers design specs. Now, that company may belong to a certain race, so those design specs may resemble that race in general.
So the Core Logistics will probably look Minmatar since Core is a Minmatar company.
If Sisters of EVE made a dropsuit, it would probably look like a Sisters of EVE ship, since they're same manufacturer.
The company may or may not be tied to a specific race, so stop focusing on "what race". Focus on the manufacturersGÇï.
I'm focused on race because EvE. Everything is race. That's why I am pushing so hard to get a clear declaration of distinction between NOVA and EvE and/or DUST players' ideas of in-game player separations. Much of the confusion in this thread alone is rooted in the player's misconception that NOVA is treating race as the average EvE/DUST player would simply assume. That does not seem to be the case, which is fine. For me, I am now seeing my disconnect in understanding. I just think to highlight such an obvious (after the fact for me, unfortunately) disconnect in understanding would really help bridge the gap of understanding and translation here that some of us are struggling to obtain. I'm really not trying to be difficult, this is just how my brain works. If i'm thinking orange for the last 4 years, then you tell me, 'no. actually, everything is purple." It's going to take a moment to even comprehend what that means to then begin deconstructing all of my knowledge and now assumptions of how orange is actually not orange.
I get your description. Rat's follow-up helped clarify. I just find it odd that only one racial corp will make a base class. I've already written to that in a previous post. It just is what it is and that will be fine in the end. This is a different game. Part of the confusion comes because of things like this though. On one hand we are moving NOVA development to Iceland to be more EvE like. On the other, we aren't using EvE universe basic principles of how races interact with each other, which is the underlying current of the EvE history and existence.
But again, it's a different game. So be it. Cool. It would just help those of us hung up on looking at this from the perspective learned through EvE, DUST, and CCP to clearly remove the blurry lines on some of this. Or to reinforce that major conceptual differnce moving forward. Knowing that earlier on I think would have saved us both a lot of grief stopping me from posting the last 10-20 posts throughout the last week or so ;) I know you (and others) have got to be getting tired of my push-backs by now :)
Ultimately, I'm honestly just trying to break my assumptions from the vacuum that has been this past year. I want to understand and I am getting things more clearly now. I am pushing now to see if any of my questions, or analogies help others similarly confused by all of this. Concepts are not transposing one-to-one. Now I see why. Perhaps others will start to see it as well and we can all ease back onto the same page to move forward.
kitten bacon taco (nom)
|
byte modal
1341
|
Posted - 2017.06.02 15:43:00 -
[117] - Quote
CCP Rattati wrote: Again, we are trying our best to translate the soul. What makes EVE and DUST so great, and where can we improvise without compromising the essence of New Eden.
I did not see this response. Thanks for taking the time to reply.
kitten bacon taco (nom)
|
Pokey Dravon
OSG Planetary Operations
9379
|
Posted - 2017.06.02 15:50:00 -
[118] - Quote
I get you byte. It can be hard to break a deeply engrained perception of how things are from what you're used to.
It's like biting into an apple expecting it to taste like an apple, but it actually tastes like an orange. Not what you were expecting, but you may end up really liking the new taste anyways.
Project|Nova - What We Know So Far
|
byte modal
1341
|
Posted - 2017.06.02 16:34:00 -
[119] - Quote
Pokey Dravon wrote:I get you byte. It can be hard to break a deeply engrained perception of how things are from what you're used to.
It's like biting into an apple expecting it to taste like an apple, but it actually tastes like an orange. Not what you were expecting, but you may end up really liking the new taste anyways.
Yeah, and I'm ok with eating an orange if that's what it is in the end. Disappointments aside, my biggest concern at this point is the translation between these two positions. Which is really why I keep hammering these few, relatively minor points over and over. I hope that others will start to see what I'm now seeing to understand---whether or not they agree still is a different matter, just that at least our base level of understanding will be on equal footing. Biting into an orange, expecting an apple is jarring. My tastes will tell me what is what, once I've had time to process the experience. Being told that an apple will now taste like an orange without a real point of experience to confirm that is quite another thing altogether ;)
To be clear, I am not drinking the Kool-Aid just yet. I am terribly disappointed on a lot of levels. That's another matter. Understanding here is crucial though if there is to be any reasonable communication and expectation from the carry-over player base. That means CCP must draw very clear and distinct lines for as often as they can to begin breaking away from the DUST paradigm. I understand if there are PR or corporate restrictions preventing this. This is the real world, after all. But it would help tremendously.
Fortunately for CCP, the new player base will be just that: new, and without the influence of DUST and the remaining expectations that it created, for the most part at least. How that will sit with DUST vets grazing in other fields waiting for a sign of return is unknown. I seriously doubt all players are active forum or Discord participants. The old guard may not even matter in the end, if a large enough influx of new mercs come out to play. For good or bad, we'll see what comes.
Thanks for entertaining my rants.
kitten bacon taco (nom)
|
Moorian Flav
681
|
Posted - 2017.06.02 18:39:00 -
[120] - Quote
IDK. Since posting last, I did some serious thinking to wrap my head around all the info provided about Nova so far without any context to EVE or DUST. After doing so, I realized what I ended up with sounded like another game I played before. The game had in game class leveling for what you're playing, ability to easily switch between classes, weapon customization, in game weapon leveling, and had Factions you can pledge allegiance to where you can earn Reputation to buy Faction specific gear. Someone please tell me I am horribly off base here as I shan't even say the game's name I am referring to.
*EDIT: I thought of one more similarity; it's PVP is 6v6 like the Nova demo at Fanfest 2016.
I don't troll; I tell the truth.
I'm also known as "The ANTI-Propaganda Machine".
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |