Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 8 post(s) |
One Eyed King
Nos Nothi
17208
|
Posted - 2017.06.04 19:33:00 -
[151] - Quote
Maybe I am not understanding your argument. I think you are saying that the races were the base, with the manufacturer becoming the variants?
And that you currently believe that the manufacturer cannot be both base AND variant?
If I misunderstood, please correct me.
If however I got the gist of what you are saying, then I am going to have to disagree. History is full of people combining things or adding just a bit to them to do something new. People constantly use various electronic hardware and create new software to change the intended use. Most recently, people took the NES Classic and made all sorts of classic games playable on it, even non Nintendo games.
That hack happened despite Nintendo not intending it. I don't see why it can't be the same for Nova. The suits are just hardware. Some base stats will be innate to hardware, with software optimizing those. Other stats will be all software. Changing software would remove the software only bonuses (provided the new software doesn't have the same or better), and while that new software doesn't necessarily optimize the hardware, it also can't take away the innate nature of the hardware. In the end you will have something not quite what it was, but not entirely different either.
Edit: Pokey probably said it better.
Former CEO of the Land of the BIind.
Any double entendre is unintended I assure you.
|
Pokey Dravon
OSG Planetary Operations
9387
|
Posted - 2017.06.04 19:43:00 -
[152] - Quote
One Eyed King wrote: And that you currently believe that the manufacturer cannot be both base AND variant?
I think that might be the disconnect. I don't see why (functionally) they can't do both.
Project|Nova - What We Know So Far
|
DeathwindRising
ROGUE RELICS
1505
|
Posted - 2017.06.04 19:49:00 -
[153] - Quote
One Eyed King wrote:Maybe I am not understanding your argument. I think you are saying that the races were the base, with the manufacturer becoming the variants?
And that you currently believe that the manufacturer cannot be both base AND variant?
If I misunderstood, please correct me.
If however I got the gist of what you are saying, then I am going to have to disagree. History is full of people combining things or adding just a bit to them to do something new. People constantly use various electronic hardware and create new software to change the intended use. Most recently, people took the NES Classic and made all sorts of classic games playable on it, even non Nintendo games.
That hack happened despite Nintendo not intending it. I don't see why it can't be the same for Nova. The suits are just hardware. Some base stats will be innate to hardware, with software optimizing those. Other stats will be all software. Changing software would remove the software only bonuses (provided the new software doesn't have the same or better), and while that new software doesn't necessarily optimize the hardware, it also can't take away the innate nature of the hardware. In the end you will have something not quite what it was, but not entirely different either.
Edit: Pokey probably said it better.
I'm saying America holds competitions for new weapons contracts. The Army has certain design specifications in mind. Manufacturers then produce weapons based on those design specs.
Another manufacturer may later go and create "improvements" to the design accepted by the U.S. Army and sell it on the market. But it's still provided the same basic functions laid out in the design specs, or it can even look the same but do different things. But it was based on the original design specs.
|
Pokey Dravon
OSG Planetary Operations
9388
|
Posted - 2017.06.04 19:56:00 -
[154] - Quote
DeathwindRising wrote:
I'm saying America holds competitions for new weapons contracts. The Army has certain design specifications in mind. Manufacturers then produce weapons based on those design specs.
Another manufacturer may later go and create "improvements" to the design accepted by the U.S. Army and sell it on the market. But it's still provided the same basic functions laid out in the design specs, or it can even look the same but do different things. But it was based on the original design specs.
Right, so in Nova, the initial manufacturer produces a weapon/suit based on that criteria.
Another manufacturer may later for and create "improvements" (firmware) to the design accepted by the original buyer and then sell it on the market. It can look the same but do different things, but it is still based on the original design specs.
Project|Nova - What We Know So Far
|
DeathwindRising
ROGUE RELICS
1505
|
Posted - 2017.06.04 20:04:00 -
[155] - Quote
Pokey Dravon wrote:One Eyed King wrote: And that you currently believe that the manufacturer cannot be both base AND variant?
I think that might be the disconnect. I don't see why (functionally) they can't do both.
by definition you can not be a source and variation. A variation is a mutation of the source.
So either one manufacture is mysteriously the source, and the other are variations of it
or
The is a source design spec somewhere and the manufacturers all built variations of that.
The problem is that there's no explanation. so somebody over at CCP would need to go back and say....
Brutor Tribe built the original assault suit used by Minmatar ground forces back in whatever year when they were commission by Republic Fleet Command.
THEN what you've been going on about, would make sense. But since it was never done in Eve online, it's a bit mysterious to be seeing it now.
|
Pokey Dravon
OSG Planetary Operations
9389
|
Posted - 2017.06.04 20:08:00 -
[156] - Quote
DeathwindRising wrote:Pokey Dravon wrote:[quote=One Eyed King] And that you currently believe that the manufacturer cannot be both base AND variant?
Brutor Tribe built the original assault suit used by Minmatar ground forces back in whatever year when they were commission by Republic Fleet Command. And then other manufacturers copied and improved it.
Is that all it would take to make you feel better about it?
Project|Nova - What We Know So Far
|
DeathwindRising
ROGUE RELICS
1505
|
Posted - 2017.06.04 20:14:00 -
[157] - Quote
Part of the problem was Pokey initially describe the progression as
Starting class (civilian) > Tech 1 (gear bonus) > Tech 2 (role bonus) > Tech 3 (firmware)
that's different from:
NOVA
Base Manufacturer > Role/Frame Bonuses (Tech I) > Specialization Bonuses (Tech II) > Manufacturer Firmware
Where Firmware modifies Tech II, improving potentially both Tech I and Tech II bonuses
|
Pokey Dravon
OSG Planetary Operations
9389
|
Posted - 2017.06.04 20:25:00 -
[158] - Quote
DeathwindRising wrote:Part of the problem was Pokey initially describe the progression as
Starting class (civilian) > Tech 1 (gear bonus) > Tech 2 (role bonus) > Tech 3 (firmware)
that's different from:
NOVA
Base Manufacturer > Role/Frame Bonuses (Tech I) > Specialization Bonuses (Tech II) > Manufacturer Firmware
Where Firmware modifies Tech II, improving potentially both Tech I and Tech II bonuses
well....they're different words for the same thing, but I apologize if I caused confusion.
Project|Nova - What We Know So Far
|
Thaddeus Reynolds
Dead Man's Game Preatoriani
765
|
Posted - 2017.06.04 20:32:00 -
[159] - Quote
DeathwindRising wrote:That's unnecessary.
The Vx. 1 Apex suits were literally the same dropsuit, color scheme, and stats as the original apex suit, but with a different load out.
If we can eventually swap modules from other suits after progressing through them, there's no need to offer something so similar. The way progression was described by Rattati, we would be able to swap out modules on the suit we want and then choose firmware to give the appropriate bonuses.
Suggesting we add Carthum Vanguard next to a Viziam Vanguard, is redundant if they only differ by load out. It produces an item that item otherwise created by the players through progression.
This I kinda what I've been getting at for a week now. The only logical additions to any class, are those manufacturers whose who belong to a different race. Don't add another Amarr vanguard manufacture if one already exists. Players can basically create those themselves using firmware. We would add caldari vanguard manufacturer instead. The base stats would be different for a Lai Dai vanguard vs a Viziam vanguard and would also have different modules. The bonuses can be swapped out. I also think the base stats should change based on firmware.
The Vx.1 analogy is insufficient I agree...maybe we could look at eve, the difference between a Khanid and VIziam Vanugard suit could be more like the difference between a Sacrilege and Zealot class Heavy Assault Cruisers, both bonuses and base stats are slightly different along with their equipment load-outs being different |
DeathwindRising
ROGUE RELICS
1505
|
Posted - 2017.06.04 20:49:00 -
[160] - Quote
Thaddeus Reynolds wrote:DeathwindRising wrote:That's unnecessary.
The Vx. 1 Apex suits were literally the same dropsuit, color scheme, and stats as the original apex suit, but with a different load out.
If we can eventually swap modules from other suits after progressing through them, there's no need to offer something so similar. The way progression was described by Rattati, we would be able to swap out modules on the suit we want and then choose firmware to give the appropriate bonuses.
Suggesting we add Carthum Vanguard next to a Viziam Vanguard, is redundant if they only differ by load out. It produces an item that item otherwise created by the players through progression.
This I kinda what I've been getting at for a week now. The only logical additions to any class, are those manufacturers whose who belong to a different race. Don't add another Amarr vanguard manufacture if one already exists. Players can basically create those themselves using firmware. We would add caldari vanguard manufacturer instead. The base stats would be different for a Lai Dai vanguard vs a Viziam vanguard and would also have different modules. The bonuses can be swapped out. I also think the base stats should change based on firmware.
The Vx.1 analogy is insufficient I agree...maybe we could look at eve, the difference between a Khanid and VIziam Vanugard suit could be more like the difference between a Sacrilege and Zealot class Heavy Assault Cruisers, both bonuses and base stats are slightly different along with their equipment load-outs being different
I think that's what the firmware is for. But i've also been reading that firmware may or may not changes base stats. I think the base stats should change personally because they come from different manufacturers.
But i'm getting the feeling firmware is basically taking a computer... and swapping the operating system from Mac to Linux to Windows.
It's easier to just change and balance bonuses instead of the base stats. There should be a control variable somewhere for reference.
|
|
Pokey Dravon
OSG Planetary Operations
9389
|
Posted - 2017.06.04 21:13:00 -
[161] - Quote
To use your analogy,
Firmware is like switching operating systems. Changing the software isn't going to physically turn your PC into a Mac.
Project|Nova - What We Know So Far
|
One Eyed King
Nos Nothi
17209
|
Posted - 2017.06.04 21:17:00 -
[162] - Quote
Pokey Dravon wrote:To use your analogy,
Firmware is like switching operating systems. Changing the software isn't going to physically turn your PC into a Mac. Haken Tosch would be an excellent Nova Alt I think.
Former CEO of the Land of the BIind.
Any double entendre is unintended I assure you.
|
Derpty Derp
Dead Man's Game
1930
|
Posted - 2017.06.04 21:25:00 -
[163] - Quote
Pokey Dravon wrote:To use your analogy,
Firmware is like switching operating systems. Changing the software isn't going to physically turn your PC into a Mac. So firmware changes are going to give you a different UI, but do exactly the same thing?
And one will skip version 9, for no apparent reason. |
One Eyed King
Nos Nothi
17209
|
Posted - 2017.06.04 21:38:00 -
[164] - Quote
Derpty Derp wrote:Pokey Dravon wrote:To use your analogy,
Firmware is like switching operating systems. Changing the software isn't going to physically turn your PC into a Mac. So firmware changes are going to give you a different UI, but do exactly the same thing? And one will skip version 9, for no apparent reason. How else would they be able to make sure you have just the ads you need just when you need it.
Start getting shot by a merc from your 6, BOOM, "Have you tried our new firmware that alerts you to someone sneaking up behind you? It is absolutely free!*"
*Provided you allow us access to all your contacts, GPS, and conversation history with Jara.
Former CEO of the Land of the BIind.
Any double entendre is unintended I assure you.
|
Pokey Dravon
OSG Planetary Operations
9389
|
Posted - 2017.06.04 21:47:00 -
[165] - Quote
Derpty Derp wrote:Pokey Dravon wrote:To use your analogy,
Firmware is like switching operating systems. Changing the software isn't going to physically turn your PC into a Mac. So firmware changes are going to give you a different UI, but do exactly the same thing? And one will skip version 9, for no apparent reason.
Don't read too much into it lol
Project|Nova - What We Know So Far
|
DeathwindRising
ROGUE RELICS
1505
|
Posted - 2017.06.05 20:51:00 -
[166] - Quote
I had a moment of clarity today.
When Eve players think of corp manufacturers, the ones that are brought up the most often are the associated with Tech 2 ships.
I forgot that there are many "lesser" corps in Eve.
Using the lesser corps as the manufacturer of the baseline dropsuits protects the corps most people will know. I think it's the most elegant solution that provides what the devs want, and also "makes sense."
NPC Corporations
Any of the corps listed under "Manufacturing and Industry" would be suitable selection for the "civilian" dropsuit models that can used as the baseline.
|
Pokey Dravon
OSG Planetary Operations
9395
|
Posted - 2017.06.05 21:57:00 -
[167] - Quote
DeathwindRising wrote:I had a moment of clarity today. When Eve players think of corp manufacturers, the ones that are brought up the most often are the associated with Tech 2 ships. I forgot that there are many "lesser" corps in Eve. Using the lesser corps as the manufacturer of the baseline dropsuits protects the corps most people will know. I think it's the most elegant solution that provides what the devs want, and also "makes sense." NPC CorporationsAny of the corps listed under "Manufacturing and Industry" would be suitable selection for the "civilian" dropsuit models that can used as the baseline.
I feel feel dirty because I agree with you.
Making the base suits be created by industry corps (since that's likely where a lot of this tech originated) actually makes a lot of sense. Then the bigger corps can create high end firmware that improves the upgraded suit further.
Project|Nova - What We Know So Far
|
Shotty GoBang
Nos Nothi
4911
|
Posted - 2017.06.06 02:52:00 -
[168] - Quote
DeathwindRising wrote:I had a moment of clarity today. When Eve players think of corp manufacturers, the ones that are brought up the most often are the associated with Tech 2 ships. I forgot that there are many "lesser" corps in Eve. Using the lesser corps as the manufacturer of the baseline dropsuits protects the corps most people will know. I think it's the most elegant solution that provides what the devs want, and also "makes sense." NPC CorporationsAny of the corps listed under "Manufacturing and Industry" would be suitable selection for the "civilian" dropsuit models that can used as the baseline. Clever!
o7
|
Cyrus Grevare
WarRavens Imperium Eden
498
|
Posted - 2017.06.06 03:26:00 -
[169] - Quote
The grind while long was nice, kept me interested getting skill points for that next unlock.
I dunno, personally I always liked passive SP, felt good returning after a break or trip to find some sense of progression still happening, I found this unique, nothing similar in other shooters. I never saw FotM as a problem arising from saving SP specifically, rather from unfortunate balancing issues between the suits or modules on new releases or updates enticing players to all go to the FotM.
I also loved that proto suits were better version of cheap suits, sure, there was proto stomping, but again, I would say matchmaking and open faucet PC were maybe more to blame, the economy concept was great, things costing you and if you died in a proto suit it could likely set you back.
I remember my corp held a competition with prizes and all at one time, I faced a corp member heavily armed with officer weapons and all, I lost in part because I only had like 6 Balac's ARs and ended up outgunned, it sucked that apart from loosing the competition I spent my cache of items and ISK, but it was awesome.
What I mean is that I liked that there were more powerful suits and weapons than entry level ones. Just my opinion.
I don't know if the new system will be better maybe it will, but I'll miss the old ways.
www.protofits.com - a Dust 514 fitting tool
|
Cyrus Grevare
WarRavens Imperium Eden
499
|
Posted - 2017.06.06 03:42:00 -
[170] - Quote
Am I beating a dead horse?
I'm beating a dead horse ain't I...
Sorry, was reading through the thread and just had the opinion and remembrance in like page 3, I revisit these threads only occasionally nowadays
Hope the game's coming along nicely
www.protofits.com - a Dust 514 fitting tool
|
|
Pokey Dravon
OSG Planetary Operations
9401
|
Posted - 2017.06.06 03:48:00 -
[171] - Quote
Cyrus Grevare wrote:Am I beating a dead horse? I'm beating a dead horse ain't I... Sorry, was reading through the thread and just had the opinion and remembrance in like page 3, I revisit these threads only occasionally nowadays Hope the game's coming along nicely
For the record, Passive SP (out of battle) is not off the table. Only Passive SP in battle (to discourage AFKing -- you actually have to fight to get active SP). So it's not a for sure thing, but out of battle passive SP might still be a thing in Nova.
Rattati talked about in the discord. (I really need to do a new compilation post)
Project|Nova - What We Know So Far
|
DeathwindRising
ROGUE RELICS
1507
|
Posted - 2017.06.06 08:55:00 -
[172] - Quote
I think passive sp was important. It was a huge reason players would login, even after weeks or months of not playing. They login see a bunch of sp, unlock something new, play a few matches.
This meant that ccp could always have a stream of returning players. Any opportunity to get players coming back is great. It's another chance to make an addict out of them. Maybe they'll find a group of players they really enjoy playing with. Maybe there's been balance changes that make the game more playable for them.
Usually, people only come back when there's new content. DLC, an event or something usually will cause a brief surge in active players. They'll try things out for a bit, then maybe leave again. But it's a chance for ccp to show improvements, or the community to reclaim a player that left.
Passive SP keeps players coming back regularly. That's a good thing for everyone, but it's up to ccp and this community to make the most of that and keep players from wanting to leave in the first place. |
Lady Hellfirer
EVE'S Best
61
|
Posted - 2017.06.06 18:56:00 -
[173] - Quote
CCP Rattati wrote:DUST Fiend wrote:All Im gonna say is theres no such thing as a Civilian dropsuit lol. where does it not exist, in your mind? I remember fighting you in a battle. Do you remember me Rattati? I'm sorry I keep killing you at your teams spawn point. I hate that the redline was moved up closer on that map. Wish we could have played together just once.
I remember you! You was laying at me feet with your color slowly fading.
|
Lady Hellfirer
EVE'S Best
61
|
Posted - 2017.06.06 18:58:00 -
[174] - Quote
Shotty GoBang wrote:DeathwindRising wrote:I had a moment of clarity today. When Eve players think of corp manufacturers, the ones that are brought up the most often are the associated with Tech 2 ships. I forgot that there are many "lesser" corps in Eve. Using the lesser corps as the manufacturer of the baseline dropsuits protects the corps most people will know. I think it's the most elegant solution that provides what the devs want, and also "makes sense." NPC CorporationsAny of the corps listed under "Manufacturing and Industry" would be suitable selection for the "civilian" dropsuit models that can used as the baseline. I remember when we scouted together it was lots of fun. Hope we can do it on Nova! Clever!
I remember you! You was laying at me feet with your color slowly fading.
|
Russel Moralles
Klandatu
252
|
Posted - 2017.06.07 01:34:00 -
[175] - Quote
DeathwindRising wrote:Thaddeus Reynolds wrote:DeathwindRising wrote:That's unnecessary.
The Vx. 1 Apex suits were literally the same dropsuit, color scheme, and stats as the original apex suit, but with a different load out.
If we can eventually swap modules from other suits after progressing through them, there's no need to offer something so similar. The way progression was described by Rattati, we would be able to swap out modules on the suit we want and then choose firmware to give the appropriate bonuses.
Suggesting we add Carthum Vanguard next to a Viziam Vanguard, is redundant if they only differ by load out. It produces an item that item otherwise created by the players through progression.
This I kinda what I've been getting at for a week now. The only logical additions to any class, are those manufacturers whose who belong to a different race. Don't add another Amarr vanguard manufacture if one already exists. Players can basically create those themselves using firmware. We would add caldari vanguard manufacturer instead. The base stats would be different for a Lai Dai vanguard vs a Viziam vanguard and would also have different modules. The bonuses can be swapped out. I also think the base stats should change based on firmware.
The Vx.1 analogy is insufficient I agree...maybe we could look at eve, the difference between a Khanid and VIziam Vanugard suit could be more like the difference between a Sacrilege and Zealot class Heavy Assault Cruisers, both bonuses and base stats are slightly different along with their equipment load-outs being different I think that's what the firmware is for. But i've also been reading that firmware may or may not changes base stats. I think the base stats should change personally because they come from different manufacturers. But i'm getting the feeling firmware is basically taking a computer... and swapping the operating system from Mac to Linux to Windows. It's easier to just change and balance bonuses instead of the base stats. There should be a control variable somewhere for reference.
If I understand this correctly.
Its like this.
I bought a computer with win xp home ed. dualcore 2gb ram built graphics.
I upgraded it to a quadcore and 4gb ram.
Then i upgraded again with a graphics card.
Then upgraded to xp ult. to use all the 4gb ram coz home ed only uses 2gb.
Now i want to buy a pc.
Dang.
|
DiablosMajora
463
|
Posted - 2017.06.07 15:33:00 -
[176] - Quote
Ultimately, I think this thread can be boiled down to thus: Theorycrafting is all well and good but you'll never get a true feel for the idea unless it's been thoroughly tested ;D
Prepare your angus
|
Moorian Flav
683
|
Posted - 2017.06.07 16:15:00 -
[177] - Quote
DiablosMajora wrote:Ultimately, I think this thread can be boiled down to thus: Theorycrafting is all well and good but you'll never get a true feel for the idea unless it's been thoroughly tested ;D Yeah. I think I may be done theorizing until I see a trailer. After all, Rattati does seem to have a charted course he is on. After all, he has rarely ever steered us wrong (except for maybe the whole super jumping fiasco ).
I don't troll; I tell the truth.
I'm also known as "The ANTI-Propaganda Machine".
|
Pokey Dravon
OSG Planetary Operations
9413
|
Posted - 2017.06.07 16:28:00 -
[178] - Quote
DiablosMajora wrote:Ultimately, I think this thread can be boiled down to thus: Theorycrafting is all well and good but you'll never get a true feel for the idea unless it's been thoroughly tested ;D
But I still got you all to have a good discussion about it which is great feedback
Project|Nova - What We Know So Far
|
Moorian Flav
685
|
Posted - 2017.06.07 16:51:00 -
[179] - Quote
Pokey Dravon wrote:But I still got you all to have a good discussion about it which is great feedback "Good" and "great" are subjective.
JK, Pokey. Even though this thread may have went off the rails a few times, it was better than just discussing other games while waiting for Nova.
I don't troll; I tell the truth.
I'm also known as "The ANTI-Propaganda Machine".
|
Pokey Dravon
OSG Planetary Operations
9413
|
Posted - 2017.06.07 16:55:00 -
[180] - Quote
Moorian Flav wrote:Pokey Dravon wrote:But I still got you all to have a good discussion about it which is great feedback "Good" and "great" are subjective. JK, Pokey. Even though this thread may have went off the rails a few times, it was better than just discussing other games while waiting for Nova.
I often use descriptors without caution, for I too enjoy living dangerously.
Project|Nova - What We Know So Far
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |