Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
TechMechMeds
Swamp Tempo Canis Eliminatus Operatives
2566
|
Posted - 2014.02.05 13:07:00 -
[121] - Quote
Medic 1879 wrote:Well its kind of obvious that once the council has agreed rules they will be published, until then speculation about what the rules are and claiming ISK farming is allowed is merely speculation and I highly doubt farming is going to be allowed it defeats the purpose of PFC completely.
Yeah well I don't see any mention of farming being allowed in this thread.
If by that you mean the fact swamp will use the passive isk gain to launch attacks then you are wrong, it'll be used to launch attacks so we don't use what pc savings we have and can continue to grind pubs to add to it.
You see the logic in that? Why waste saved pc isk to train, getting into pc is the whole point.
Level 2 forum warrior.
Swamp iz on dat welevant flex fam
I sold my family to the Amarr for isk, its a valid tactic
|
TechMechMeds
Swamp Tempo Canis Eliminatus Operatives
2566
|
Posted - 2014.02.05 13:22:00 -
[122] - Quote
Anyway its probably best to wait to discuss the rules in a better place and iv now drunk a few lol. Kronenbourg
Level 2 forum warrior.
Swamp iz on dat welevant flex fam
I sold my family to the Amarr for isk, its a valid tactic
|
Medic 1879
Forsaken Immortals Top Men.
1708
|
Posted - 2014.02.05 13:32:00 -
[123] - Quote
TechMechMeds wrote:Medic 1879 wrote:Well its kind of obvious that once the council has agreed rules they will be published, until then speculation about what the rules are and claiming ISK farming is allowed is merely speculation and I highly doubt farming is going to be allowed it defeats the purpose of PFC completely. Yeah well I don't see any mention of farming being allowed in this thread. If by that you mean the fact swamp will use the passive isk gain to launch attacks then you are wrong, it'll be used to launch attacks so we don't use what pc savings we have and can continue to grind pubs to add to it. You see the logic in that? Why waste saved pc isk to train, getting into pc is the whole point.
I was infact referring to someone else claiming that by the look of it so far ISK farming was allowed and pointing out that it is all speculation until the council meets.
Lead Diplomat for Forsaken Immortals.
|
TechMechMeds
Swamp Tempo Canis Eliminatus Operatives
2566
|
Posted - 2014.02.05 13:36:00 -
[124] - Quote
Medic 1879 wrote:TechMechMeds wrote:Medic 1879 wrote:Well its kind of obvious that once the council has agreed rules they will be published, until then speculation about what the rules are and claiming ISK farming is allowed is merely speculation and I highly doubt farming is going to be allowed it defeats the purpose of PFC completely. Yeah well I don't see any mention of farming being allowed in this thread. If by that you mean the fact swamp will use the passive isk gain to launch attacks then you are wrong, it'll be used to launch attacks so we don't use what pc savings we have and can continue to grind pubs to add to it. You see the logic in that? Why waste saved pc isk to train, getting into pc is the whole point. I was infact referring to someone else claiming that by the look of it so far ISK farming was allowed and pointing out that it is all speculation until the council meets.
Haha, yeah the beer is settling in then, I apologise mate.
Level 2 forum warrior.
Swamp iz on dat welevant flex fam
I sold my family to the Amarr for isk, its a valid tactic
|
NAV HIV
The Generals General Tso's Alliance
1048
|
Posted - 2014.02.05 14:17:00 -
[125] - Quote
Few things that We have learned since the beginning of PFC:
- Fights are for training purposes only. Not to Flip the district. Which means both parties involved can discuss the terms of the battle prior to the battle if they chose to, or go all out with no gear restrictions...
- Ringers are frowned upon. If you can't field a team of full 16 Corp members, then you shouldn't be on the PFC. But sometimes there are issues with attendance, Hard freeze and so on... In those cases, Corps used to match number of players to have an even fight. (But its Rare, Everyone loves stomping)...
- Alliance members are not considered as Ringers. It's for training, so the District owner may choose to bring in alliance members for training purposes.
- So far we have only Had "GGs" After a PFC match. Not a single case of trash talking. Let's keep it civil
- There were no Set council... It was more like whoever had the best players at that time... No We are working on building one.. Hopefully we can keep this politics free and Focus solely on PFC... Lets keep our personal Agendas aside. Let's not make anyone the king of the ring and create unnecessary tension.
- We did not have any enforcers, hence all the drama surrounding PFC. . . But now NF is willing to take that contract. They are no doubt a Successful and trustworthy Contractor. But 10 mil a week is a bit steep IMO... But hopefully we can discuss that and lower it a bit. Corps training for PC could use the extra Mil or two ISK... No one has to hold the ISK. Corps can personally make arrangements with NF for payment. This would help avoid any confusion regarding Weekly payment. If a CORP forgets or fails to pay, that'd be up to the CORP... No one can blame the other person for it...
- Tenure in PFC should be discussed. Not forced upon any Corp. If a Corp feels that they have a Fully PC ready team, than they can discuss their departure. Sell it to someone else or do whatever transaction they feel comfortable with. Choose the next successor from a proper waiting list. Call in a Vote for a waiting list. Not like "My friend wants in" even though that friend has 10 players in the Corp. |
HowDidThatTaste
Ancient Exiles. Renegade Alliance
4490
|
Posted - 2014.02.05 14:55:00 -
[126] - Quote
TechMechMeds wrote:What is your part in pfc shiyou so I know who I'm speaking to.
I really hope your plan can work, I think PFC is important to give new corps the "Taste" of PC.
But i would remind you that you exist at the larger corps discretion, yes having NF police it is great( be glad they are willing to take on that headache )
So diplomacy is still important for PFC members challenging or insulting larger corps could be detrimental to PFC and I would caution against it when many corps already wish to burn it to the ground.
|
Gelhad Thremyr
Quebec United The CORVOS
51
|
Posted - 2014.02.05 15:18:00 -
[127] - Quote
Totally agree with NAV, from our first encouters with death legion we learned alot because we fielded 2 experienced mercs outside our alliance but people with whom we play often. They did not charge a dime and we considered them trainers. If we are to learn, one or two trainers should be acceptable the first x battles to get things booted, NF could even be invited to train each team by fielding on each side. Finally launching attacks on molden heath from a PFC district should be prohibited. It is ill conceived that a corp can corrupt the spirit of the defence contract and while protected, launch hostile actions outside. |
Bud Selig
10
|
Posted - 2014.02.05 15:21:00 -
[128] - Quote
HowDidThatTaste wrote:
I really hope your plan can work, I think PFC is important to give new corps the "Taste" of PC.
But i would remind you that you exist at the larger corps discretion, yes having NF police it is great( be glad they are willing to take on that headache )
So diplomacy is still important for PFC members challenging or insulting larger corps could be detrimental to PFC and I would caution against it when many corps already wish to burn it to the ground.
And thus a statue in the likeness of this gentleman shall be erected on the main concourse on a district on PFC, welcoming all newcomers to the area and serving as a reminder that there shall be zero tolerance for PED's in this system
well said sir
Commissioner
Regional BBQ Competition Judge
Rampage's Parole Officer
|
NAV HIV
The Generals General Tso's Alliance
1050
|
Posted - 2014.02.05 15:23:00 -
[129] - Quote
Gelhad Thremyr wrote:Totally agree with NAV, from our first encouters with death legion we learned alot because we fielded 2 experienced mercs outside our alliance but people with whom we play often. They did not charge a dime and we considered them trainers. If we are to learn, one or two trainers should be acceptable the first x battles to get things booted, NF could even be invited to train each team by fielding on each side. Finally launching attacks on molden heath from a PFC district should be prohibited. It is ill conceived that a corp can corrupt the spirit of the defence contract and while protected, launch hostile actions outside.
Ohh yes forgot to add that... |
Soraya Xel
The Corporate Raiders Top Men.
1336
|
Posted - 2014.02.05 15:27:00 -
[130] - Quote
Gelhad Thremyr wrote:Totally agree with NAV, from our first encouters with death legion we learned alot because we fielded 2 experienced mercs outside our alliance but people with whom we play often. They did not charge a dime and we considered them trainers. If we are to learn, one or two trainers should be acceptable the first x battles to get things booted, NF could even be invited to train each team by fielding on each side. Finally launching attacks on molden heath from a PFC district should be prohibited. It is ill conceived that a corp can corrupt the spirit of the defence contract and while protected, launch hostile actions outside.
People have run against us with like one or two ringers, and we usually don't make a big deal of it. Early on, there was one unpaid guy who was in a lot of our battles helping us out. We usually only take issue when someone brings a whole pile of ringers.
I'd like to be your CPM1 candidate
|
|
Gelhad Thremyr
Quebec United The CORVOS
51
|
Posted - 2014.02.05 15:56:00 -
[131] - Quote
Formalities should still be written down to prevent misunderstandings. We would like to have training duties added to the defence contractors obligations with one trainer on each side not taking part in the battle but giving advices. I think it can be beneficial to the contractor also to test strategies should the game balance be changed by ccp which is often the case. With this added value for our weekly payment we would have great training benefitS which would be visible even during time of peace. |
Mr Machine Guns
Nyain San Renegade Alliance
390
|
Posted - 2014.02.05 16:34:00 -
[132] - Quote
Soraya Xel wrote:Mr Machine Guns wrote:Having a Council make rules makes no sense to me because the council consist of corps who won't always have a district on PFC so every time more corps join new rules would have to be established because district ownership on PFC should be changing ever month or two, the newer corps may not like the old rules so they could change and just make everything confusing so I think a outside corp should set the rules
Edit: Zero-Day alliance should not have 3 district on PFC And as the Council changes, they may choose to vote to change out rules as warranted. You realize that having legislators make laws doesn't make any less sense because legislators eventually get replaced by other legislators, right?
you aren't understanding my point with the council adding and losing corps in a month or two, thats how long i think you should stay on PFC before you have to give up your spot. As the council changes the rules for PFC may be changed as well, I just feel the rules if they constantly change would just get to confusing to follow, thats why i feel like a outside corp should set the rules for PFC because not one corp is on PFC forever. |
TechMechMeds
Swamp Tempo Canis Eliminatus Operatives
2566
|
Posted - 2014.02.05 16:45:00 -
[133] - Quote
Mr Machine Guns wrote:Soraya Xel wrote:Mr Machine Guns wrote:Having a Council make rules makes no sense to me because the council consist of corps who won't always have a district on PFC so every time more corps join new rules would have to be established because district ownership on PFC should be changing ever month or two, the newer corps may not like the old rules so they could change and just make everything confusing so I think a outside corp should set the rules
Edit: Zero-Day alliance should not have 3 district on PFC And as the Council changes, they may choose to vote to change out rules as warranted. You realize that having legislators make laws doesn't make any less sense because legislators eventually get replaced by other legislators, right? you aren't understanding my point with the council adding and losing corps in a month or two, thats how long i think you should stay on PFC before you have to give up your spot. As the council changes the rules for PFC may be changed as well, I just feel the rules if they constantly change would just get to confusing to follow, thats why i feel like a outside corp should set the rules for PFC because not one corp is on PFC forever.
I'm fine with that provided its all discussed with the pfc corps ceos and directors seen as each corp has not only spent a considerable amount of isk buying a district but that each corp varies in its situation and operates differently. Swamps slow recruitment is an example, we don't just take anybod in.
Level 2 forum warrior.
Swamp iz on dat welevant flex fam
I sold my family to the Amarr for isk, its a valid tactic
|
Gelhad Thremyr
Quebec United The CORVOS
52
|
Posted - 2014.02.05 16:56:00 -
[134] - Quote
I dont see how rules can change that much if they are designed with intelligence and leave any personnal agenda out. Unless we were total idiots when designing them and the community fails to see something wrong and its reported months afterward, you can rest at peace, they should stay set for a rather long time. Now you have to split permanent rules with common affairs. the council still must take some actions to enforce rules. This will not make the rules invalid per see If extraordinary circumstances happens. There will always be a legacy of people instilling the current rules to newcomers, call them temporary conservatives on the council because they will have seen the benefits of the current rules in current affairs. So a newcommer will always face opposition in changing the rules from the existing land owners. Think like in real life, when does an outsider given the authority to change everything in a group from day one ? Almost never, he is forced into viewing things like the group first then he gets his chance to consteuctively change point of view as trust is gained from that outsider.
So fear not, we can do this constructively and have faith in its legacy. |
TechMechMeds
Swamp Tempo Canis Eliminatus Operatives
2567
|
Posted - 2014.02.05 16:56:00 -
[135] - Quote
Well actually we do take anybody in but if they don't fit in then they get corp suggestions and booted.
Level 2 forum warrior.
Swamp iz on dat welevant flex fam
I sold my family to the Amarr for isk, its a valid tactic
|
TechMechMeds
Swamp Tempo Canis Eliminatus Operatives
2567
|
Posted - 2014.02.05 16:59:00 -
[136] - Quote
Gelhad Thremyr wrote:I dont see how rules can change that much if they are designed with intelligence and leave any personnal agenda out. Unless we were total idiots when designing them and the community fails to see something wrong and its reported months afterward, you can rest at peace, they should stay set for a rather long time. Now you have to split permanent rules with common affairs. the council still must take some actions to enforce rules. This will not make the rules invalid per see If extraordinary circumstances happens. There will always be a legacy of people instilling the current rules to newcomers, call them temporary conservatives on the council because they will have seen the benefits of the current rules in current affairs. So a newcommer will always face opposition in changing the rules from the existing land owners. Think like in real life, when does an outsider given the authority to change everything in a group from day one ? Almost never, he is forced into viewing things like the group first then he gets his chance to consteuctively change point of view as trust is gained from that outsider.
So fear not, we can do this constructively and have faith in its legacy.
Your not wrong but that depends on experience, if someone is a newcomer but has greater experience than the current lot then they will take the newcomers ideas and input into great consideration.
Level 2 forum warrior.
Swamp iz on dat welevant flex fam
I sold my family to the Amarr for isk, its a valid tactic
|
Medic 1879
Forsaken Immortals Top Men.
1709
|
Posted - 2014.02.05 16:59:00 -
[137] - Quote
Mr Machine Guns wrote:Soraya Xel wrote:Mr Machine Guns wrote:Having a Council make rules makes no sense to me because the council consist of corps who won't always have a district on PFC so every time more corps join new rules would have to be established because district ownership on PFC should be changing ever month or two, the newer corps may not like the old rules so they could change and just make everything confusing so I think a outside corp should set the rules
Edit: Zero-Day alliance should not have 3 district on PFC And as the Council changes, they may choose to vote to change out rules as warranted. You realize that having legislators make laws doesn't make any less sense because legislators eventually get replaced by other legislators, right? you aren't understanding my point with the council adding and losing corps in a month or two, thats how long i think you should stay on PFC before you have to give up your spot. As the council changes the rules for PFC may be changed as well, I just feel the rules if they constantly change would just get to confusing to follow, thats why i feel like a outside corp should set the rules for PFC because not one corp is on PFC forever.
That is what has happened previously one corp deciding the rule. unfortunately as shown the ones in charge change so the same thing occurs every few months or so the rules change because of the corp in charge changing. With a council however if a set of rules are made then in say a month 3 corps have left and 3 new have joined that does not automatically mean the rules will change the new corps will take over the votes of the old and new rules may appear or they may not. It is not going to be a case of everytime some representatives change the entire rule set changes unless something drastic happens like a change in the mechanics of PC that affect PFC for example.
Lead Diplomat for Forsaken Immortals.
|
Gelhad Thremyr
Quebec United The CORVOS
52
|
Posted - 2014.02.05 17:01:00 -
[138] - Quote
Implementing a review process can also be done by saying each change to rules must garner x likes in a post before being evaluated by the council. |
NAV HIV
The Generals General Tso's Alliance
1051
|
Posted - 2014.02.05 17:05:00 -
[139] - Quote
Too many rules are gonna make things complicating... I've listed almost all the issues that are there. Not very difficult and doesn't require so much of arguments. It is a very simple matter. All we need is people to agree on terms and go on about shooting things and playing the game/// |
Mr Machine Guns
Nyain San Renegade Alliance
391
|
Posted - 2014.02.05 17:05:00 -
[140] - Quote
Medic 1879 wrote:Mr Machine Guns wrote:Soraya Xel wrote:Mr Machine Guns wrote:Having a Council make rules makes no sense to me because the council consist of corps who won't always have a district on PFC so every time more corps join new rules would have to be established because district ownership on PFC should be changing ever month or two, the newer corps may not like the old rules so they could change and just make everything confusing so I think a outside corp should set the rules
Edit: Zero-Day alliance should not have 3 district on PFC And as the Council changes, they may choose to vote to change out rules as warranted. You realize that having legislators make laws doesn't make any less sense because legislators eventually get replaced by other legislators, right? you aren't understanding my point with the council adding and losing corps in a month or two, thats how long i think you should stay on PFC before you have to give up your spot. As the council changes the rules for PFC may be changed as well, I just feel the rules if they constantly change would just get to confusing to follow, thats why i feel like a outside corp should set the rules for PFC because not one corp is on PFC forever. That is what has happened previously one corp deciding the rule. unfortunately as shown the ones in charge change so the same thing occurs every few months or so the rules change because of the corp in charge changing. With a council however if a set of rules are made then in say a month 3 corps have left and 3 new have joined that does not automatically mean the rules will change the new corps will take over the votes of the old and new rules may appear or they may not. It is not going to be a case of everytime some representatives change the entire rule set changes unless something drastic happens like a change in the mechanics of PC that affect PFC for example. It just makes it seem like with this council you are just trying to stay longer on PFC than corps should Here are 5 simple rules for PFC 1.) 1 to 2 months stay before you have to give up you district, If you are in an alliance you can't give it to another corp in your alliance 2.) 1 district per alliance on PFC some alliance have 2 to 3 district atm, this is to prevent an alliance to farm huge amounts of isk on PFC 3.) You can't own a district outside of PFC 4.) Ringers are allowed but you have to notify the crop you will be using them 5.) you can't move clones to attack a district outside PFC |
|
Soraya Xel
The Corporate Raiders Top Men.
1336
|
Posted - 2014.02.05 17:19:00 -
[141] - Quote
Mr Machine Guns wrote:you aren't understanding my point with the council adding and losing corps in a month or two, thats how long i think you should stay on PFC before you have to give up your spot.
The important point: Nobody gives a crud what a Nyain San member thinks should be done on PFC.
It doesn't affect you, and it's none of your business.
I'd like to be your CPM1 candidate
|
Common- Sense
Zumari Force Projection Caldari State
4
|
Posted - 2014.02.05 17:22:00 -
[142] - Quote
Soraya Xel wrote:Mr Machine Guns wrote:you aren't understanding my point with the council adding and losing corps in a month or two, thats how long i think you should stay on PFC before you have to give up your spot. The important point: Nobody gives a crud what a Nyain San member thinks should be done on PFC.It doesn't affect you, and it's none of your business.
Uh oh. |
Soraya Xel
The Corporate Raiders Top Men.
1336
|
Posted - 2014.02.05 17:26:00 -
[143] - Quote
The whole point of PFC members determining the rules of PFC is that the people deciding how to use it should be the people who actually use it for training and practice.
I'd like to be your CPM1 candidate
|
TechMechMeds
Swamp Tempo Canis Eliminatus Operatives
2567
|
Posted - 2014.02.05 17:29:00 -
[144] - Quote
HowDidThatTaste wrote:TechMechMeds wrote:What is your part in pfc shiyou so I know who I'm speaking to. I really hope your plan can work, I think PFC is important to give new corps the "Taste" of PC. But i would remind you that you exist at the larger corps discretion, yes having NF police it is great( be glad they are willing to take on that headache ) So diplomacy is still important for PFC members challenging or insulting larger corps could be detrimental to PFC and I would caution against it when many corps already wish to burn it to the ground.
Its painful how you have stated out the obvious but yes I know, thanks.
Level 2 forum warrior.
Swamp iz on dat welevant flex fam
I sold my family to the Amarr for isk, its a valid tactic
|
Mr Machine Guns
Nyain San Renegade Alliance
392
|
Posted - 2014.02.05 17:47:00 -
[145] - Quote
Soraya Xel wrote:Mr Machine Guns wrote:you aren't understanding my point with the council adding and losing corps in a month or two, thats how long i think you should stay on PFC before you have to give up your spot. The important point: Nobody gives a crud what a Nyain San member thinks should be done on PFC.It doesn't affect you, and it's none of your business.
Ok thats a little uncalled for all I'm saying alliances like Top Men, Zero-Day should not be allowed to have multiple district on PFC when our corps probably want a chance to train for pc |
Common- Sense
Zumari Force Projection Caldari State
5
|
Posted - 2014.02.05 17:51:00 -
[146] - Quote
You should worry very much about what Nyain San thinks as well as the rest of the forces of Molden Heath are thinking. You seem to forget that there is NO right for Planet Fight Club to exist and it does so only by the grace of the major powers of MH. Powers whom believe in giving smaller corps a chance to develop. Powers whom want Planetary Conquest to succeed and know that only by bringing in new players and new corps that it has a chance to do so.
However, these same powers now watch as PFC becomes a revenue stream for a potential rival with entry and protection fees vs. the act of charity it was to this point. They also watch as this new council and its leader spits in their face and tells them that their good will is no longer needed. NF is a great force and one to be respected and feared. However, if the whole of Molden Heath decides that Planet Fight Club is no longer of value there will be little that can be done to stop the resulting tidal wave.
I respect what you are trying to accomplish here. I really do. But, you would be wise to remember what I have stated before making these kind of statements. Your are running for office. Try being political and perhaps not poking the hibernating bear.
|
Sentient Archon
Fatal Absolution Public Disorder.
1549
|
Posted - 2014.02.05 17:53:00 -
[147] - Quote
Common- Sense wrote:You should worry very much about what Nyain San thinks as well as the rest of the forces of Molden Heath are thinking. You seem to forget that there is NO right for Planet Fight Club to exist and it does so only by the grace of the major powers of MH. Powers whom believe in giving smaller corps a chance to develop. Powers whom want Planetary Conquest to succeed and know that only by bringing in new players and new corps that it has a chance to do so.
However, these same powers now watch as PFC becomes a revenue stream for a potential rival with entry and protection fees vs. the act of charity it was to this point. They also watch as this new council and its leader spits in their face and tells them that their good will is no longer needed. NF is a great force and one to be respected and feared. However, if the whole of Molden Heath decides that Planet Fight Club is no longer of value there will be little that can be done to stop the resulting tidal wave.
I respect what you are trying to accomplish here. I really do. But, you would be wise to remember what I have stated before making these kind of statements. Your are running for office. Try being political and perhaps not poking the hibernating bear.
Reported for using the Phrase Common Sense is your name.
As per Article 17 Paragraph 14 of posting on dust forums I want this account banned.
The only troll to successfully troll CCP.
|
Gelhad Thremyr
Quebec United The CORVOS
52
|
Posted - 2014.02.05 17:53:00 -
[148] - Quote
Mr Machine Guns wrote:Soraya Xel wrote:Mr Machine Guns wrote:you aren't understanding my point with the council adding and losing corps in a month or two, thats how long i think you should stay on PFC before you have to give up your spot. The important point: Nobody gives a crud what a Nyain San member thinks should be done on PFC.It doesn't affect you, and it's none of your business. Ok thats a little uncalled for all I'm saying alliances like Top Men, Zero-Day should not be allowed to have multiple district on PFC when our corps probably want a chance to train for pc
What, your corp wants a chance to train for pc and you have more than 20% of molden heath ? Ok................
Did i miss something here..........
Do you seriously need a plan here ? What you have wrote makes no sense at all....
Ok cant write anymore.... Brrr...ain. Fried ! |
Mr Machine Guns
Nyain San Renegade Alliance
392
|
Posted - 2014.02.05 17:56:00 -
[149] - Quote
Gelhad Thremyr wrote:Mr Machine Guns wrote:Soraya Xel wrote:Mr Machine Guns wrote:you aren't understanding my point with the council adding and losing corps in a month or two, thats how long i think you should stay on PFC before you have to give up your spot. The important point: Nobody gives a crud what a Nyain San member thinks should be done on PFC.It doesn't affect you, and it's none of your business. Ok thats a little uncalled for all I'm saying alliances like Top Men, Zero-Day should not be allowed to have multiple district on PFC when our corps probably want a chance to train for pc What, your corp wants a chance to train for pc and you have more than 20% of molden heath ? Ok................ Did i miss something here.......... Do you seriously need a plan here ? What you have wrote makes no sense at all.... Ok cant write anymore.... Brrr...ain. Fried ! No you aren't understanding me why does alliances like the ones i mention get multiple district on PFC while others corp probably want to get a PFC district to train wasn't saying my corp but 3 PFC district for one alliance that is way too much |
Soraya Xel
The Corporate Raiders Top Men.
1341
|
Posted - 2014.02.05 18:02:00 -
[150] - Quote
Mr Machine Guns, in the case of Top Men, the only party I can speak for, we've been told by every major power who's ever run PFC that our case is acceptable. We operate in two time zones, US and EU time. The teams that practice and play on those districts are entirely different groups of people. And to this day, no PFC enforcement corp has mandated a one-per-alliance limit.
Whether or not this new group does or not largely depends on how the other members of PFC feel about it.
Personally, I'd be happy to see the PFC concept expand beyond Oddelulf, if needed, to provide enough space for any corps who wish to have a spot to get one. With PFC moving to a business model, this actually may now be a practical concept.
Common- Sense, I would not want to call myself the leader of the Council. I'm going to try and serve the Council's interests, by providing an organization framework, based almost entirely on their input. And once everything's put together, that will include the ability to replace me with someone else.
A member of Nyain San has almost no ability to comprehend what challenges do and do not face a smaller participant in PC. A month with a single district equals roughly 14 PC matches. It is ludicrous to believe that no corp should need more than 14 matches to be able to compete with Ancient Exiles or Nyain San. Especially when many of the PFC corps consist of players who do not all appear for every match, meaning any given player probably sees far less than 14 fights in that month. He should, I hope, be able to understand that he doesn't have the perspective necessary to make such a claim.
I'd like to be your CPM1 candidate
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |