|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
HowDidThatTaste
Ancient Exiles. Renegade Alliance
4490
|
Posted - 2014.02.05 14:55:00 -
[1] - Quote
TechMechMeds wrote:What is your part in pfc shiyou so I know who I'm speaking to.
I really hope your plan can work, I think PFC is important to give new corps the "Taste" of PC.
But i would remind you that you exist at the larger corps discretion, yes having NF police it is great( be glad they are willing to take on that headache )
So diplomacy is still important for PFC members challenging or insulting larger corps could be detrimental to PFC and I would caution against it when many corps already wish to burn it to the ground.
|
HowDidThatTaste
Ancient Exiles. Renegade Alliance
4494
|
Posted - 2014.02.05 21:30:00 -
[2] - Quote
Soraya Xel wrote:Ares 514 wrote:Sorry to inform you but you lost my vote due to your support of the corruption that is PFC. Okay. I guess that's kinda sad, but I don't really decide how to play DUST based on how many votes it will get me. I do what I feel is best for my alliance and the community at large. PFC gives a lot more players a chance to play than the rest of PC does, and that's why I support it. Also, note that while PFC in the past was a bit of a New Eden anomaly, being a "charity" of sorts, this new model is more akin to a renter system in EVE. In New Eden, generally, territory is held by one of two ways: Being strong enough to defend it yourself, or renting it from someone who is. By contract with N-F, PFC should become a beneficial arrangement for all parties involved.
Just out of curiosity how is the contract you have with NF beneficial for the other landowners in PC?
You do see the problem that might occur if a corp felt left out or was offended by some arrangement that has no benefit to them?
You seem to be putting a large amount of this success in the hands of one very capable corp, while insulting a corp like Nyan San?
I would hope better diplomatic relations can be achieved to give PFC a fighting chance. |
HowDidThatTaste
Ancient Exiles. Renegade Alliance
4495
|
Posted - 2014.02.05 22:02:00 -
[3] - Quote
Soraya Xel wrote:HowDidThatTaste wrote:Just out of curiosity how is the contract you have with NF beneficial for the other landowners in PC? Well, your alliance is no longer being expected to maintain it for free, for one. HowDidThatTaste wrote:You do see the problem that might occur if a corp felt left out or was offended by some arrangement that has no benefit to them? Corps who would earnestly like to participate in what PFC is should probably get in touch with us. In my personal "I have no actual vote" opinion, everyone should be able to participate in PFC. PFC being a low-cost environment to get great fights without starting a war or drama, and practice up skills as a team. Personally, I have no inherent issue with corps outside PFC having districts on PFC, but the issue has always been the limitation that PFC is 24 districts, and a desire to prioritize those that "need" it more. If the new PFC model is financially viable, I see no reason PFC couldn't expand beyond the boundaries of Oddelulf itself so more parties could participate, and restrictions on who can and can't get a district could be more relaxed. Quote:You seem to be putting a large amount of this success in the hands of one very capable corp, while insulting a corp like Nyan San? I don't feel I insulted Nyain San. On the contrary, my point that to participate outside of PFC, you really need to be capable of defending from a threat like Nyain San, I am actually placing their corp as the gold standard of being an extremely significant threat. It is the amount of threat they pose, in fact, that disconnects them so heavily from what it's like to be one of the many corps that has few good alternatives besides being on PFC. I don't think a month on PFC will give new corps and players enough practice to take on Nyain San. How is that an insult to Nyain San?
As my alliance may not be running it for free. I also notice that this new arrangement is not paying us either.
So all of the landowners in PC who have fought for their districts are going to be expected to leave you alone yet you only pay one corp for protection I believe this is where this arrangement starts to get sticky.
|
HowDidThatTaste
Ancient Exiles. Renegade Alliance
4496
|
Posted - 2014.02.05 22:14:00 -
[4] - Quote
Soraya Xel wrote:HowDidThatTaste wrote:[quote=Soraya Xel]As my alliance may not be running it for free. I also notice that this new arrangement is not paying us either.
So all of the landowners in PC who have fought for their districts are going to be expected to leave you alone yet you only pay one corp for protection I believe this is where this arrangement starts to get sticky. My first thought, is that as far as I'm aware, N-F does indeed hire ringers. Perhaps those who don't participate in PFC should consider being a ringer to help defend it. And in that, get paid. Technically, there's nothing preventing other landowners from attacking PFC, I suppose. Except that N-F will be defending it. That being the reason N-F is getting paid.
This is where I see trouble. Imagine if a corp like AE or Nyan or FA STB decide they want to be paid?
The reason PFC has lasted in some form has been by the graces,donations of the more powerful corps. Now that money is at stake it changes that dynamic. |
HowDidThatTaste
Ancient Exiles. Renegade Alliance
4497
|
Posted - 2014.02.06 02:47:00 -
[5] - Quote
Soraya Xel wrote:Let me ask this. The contract involves a lot of work and cost. You can earn equivalent or more net income than this contract brings in by holding districts yourself. You can make much more ISK than this contract offers with far less than 24 districts to defend. As AE and Nyain, for example, both easily have district holdings that dwarf this project, what is the likelihood they could offer a competing rate to N-F's that's worthwhile to them? I would pose that the above mentioned groups may not find the dynamic as valuable, as their existing means of district income is more profitable. Particularly if they have to compete on pricing with N-F's offer.
Isk is isk. The real question is why does one corp get paid to defend a project that up to this point has been charity driven.
To me it seems like it is setting up a conflict that may be more detrimental to the concept of PFC, almost a challenge to see who will control the PFC revenue protection fund. Remember corps are looking for fights and I can easily see this as a challenge to see who can control this revenue stream even for little isk that's not what's really at stake.
I truly want PFC to work and know N-F will do a great job with the day to day operation. However just the thought of some corp making a profit off of PFC (as great a business model as it is !) Corps are going to want to fight over that control, and you have to ask yourself is that what PFC needs? If so then PFC members may have to pay more than just N-F for protection do you see where this leads?
Insert meta game here... pay nobody or pay us all |
HowDidThatTaste
Ancient Exiles. Renegade Alliance
4498
|
Posted - 2014.02.06 03:02:00 -
[6] - Quote
Soraya Xel wrote:On most counts, roughly half of PFC was being used as intended at any given time. The work of the Council should ensure that we no longer see issues where our guys don't know who to fight with their PFC district because there's nobody to fight. The protection contract, paid in by all members, will allow us to be well protected from the variety of people who have made it clear they think PFC should die.
Realistically, HowDidThatTaste, I'd suggest that once CCP fixes their stuff, PC landowners will be far too busy actually defending the districts they'd been holding without risk via district locking to irritate PFC. And I'd suggest going after PFC corps remains a "**** move", that should earn someone some manner of community shame for engaging in. Not that there are many people left who have spotless records in that manner. ;)
And then I would say you do not need to pay a corp for protection and PFC stay as a charity, respected by most larger corps like it has up to this point.
Sorya I respect what you are doing and think it is a sound endevour and think you are mostly on the right track.
But when money is being made off a planet in molden heath corps will fight for that revenue stream no matter how small it may be. And guess what might be destroyed in the process the concept of a hands off planet left to new corps to get acclimated to PC.
|
HowDidThatTaste
Ancient Exiles. Renegade Alliance
4498
|
Posted - 2014.02.06 03:18:00 -
[7] - Quote
Soraya Xel wrote:HowDidThatTaste wrote:And then I would say you do not need to pay a corp for protection and PFC stay as a charity, respected by most larger corps like it has up to this point. On the contrary, most of the posts from members of those larger corps indicate a distinct lack of respect for PFC, from everything I have seen. And I actually think there might be some merit to a maintenance cost actually encouraging people to only remain on PFC as long as they are getting value (i.e. fights) out of it. My recommendation to CCP for PC as a whole, in fact, would be to make maintaining districts cost money, so people claim what they need, rather than trying to take and hold the entirety of MH.
Oh I agree I see the merit of a maintence fee to encourage the proper use of PFC, but as it has been left to the most powerful corps up to this point to regulate at their discretion PFC it would infer that that corp will be the one that collects the PFC protection fund. Which means it will encourage corps to fight for that planets protection fund revenue stream, and guess what districts they will be using for those fights?
|
HowDidThatTaste
Ancient Exiles. Renegade Alliance
4501
|
Posted - 2014.02.06 14:41:00 -
[8] - Quote
Fiddlestaxp wrote:Soraya Xel wrote: On the contrary, most of the posts from members of those larger corps indicate a distinct lack of respect for PFC, from everything I have seen.
bigolenuts wrote:Burn PFC to the ground and use the ashes for something useful. Many AE members and past directors(maybe even current) have expressed similar opinions. Fact is that PFC was most successful when we were overseeing it. It will be more successful when PFC is running PFC. The proposed structure will help solve many of the problems associated with the past iterations. 1. It is a lot of work to run PFC. By splitting the enforcement and rulemaking roles, it will make it easier on all parties and they will be more apt to follow through on their duties. Members will be more likely to take part in a system that they control. 2. PFC has been an ISK farming ground since its inception. By having a fee associated with occupying the space, it will make members less likely to fall into that trap. 3. More democratic rule with less threat of force and better protection. The rules will finally be made by those playing the matches. And NF WILL be there to enforce them and protect them. Why NF? Our record is unblemished as far as contract fulfillment goes. We may have lost battles when not given proper resources(Clone pack attacks against top teams), but we always show up and we always do what we say we will. Cubs and Kane are trustworthy. If they say they are going to do something, they do it. Both of them have taken an active interest in promoting small independent corporations in the past. A whole area of MH was dedicated to indie corps when EoN. was on top. Kane has been moving corps into PC throughout it's existence. To protect Fight Club, you have to be able to compete with all teams. NF can do that. There are only 2 or 3 alternatives, none of which seem to be stepping into the role besides AE. And I ask you: What has AE ever done for the small guy?
I can see the Meta game has arrived is this the part where you try to win the hearts and minds of the little guys cause?
If PFC becomes a revenue stream for any corp then it is no longer the idealistic cause that allowed new corps a chance to learn to fight in PC. It will no become an asset to the corp who controls it and frankly in my personal opinion is open game.
I like the new business model and can get behind the concept of selling districts on planets for a so called practice arena But let's face it this is no longer the altruistic PFC where the big corps sat back and let them go at it unattested.
If this becomes a business model which it sounds like it already has then PFC is over and now it is a profit making business and should be treated as such.
I would say again I think PFC should continue without any corp making a business model out of it for profit. In my opinion if this happens then who ever wants to control it should be considered a target for acquisition , and the PFC districts become the battle ground for that control, I hope the new council considering this understands this.
Don't get me wrong I also like the idea that there will now be a reason to fight for control of a planet so if it does work as a business model it will bring some interesting dynamics to PC. But the hands off approach rom bigger corps is over because it is now a profit making planet in molden heath.
|
HowDidThatTaste
Ancient Exiles. Renegade Alliance
4501
|
Posted - 2014.02.07 15:50:00 -
[9] - Quote
Since PFC is now a business asset and fair game by larger corps, I wonder if the amount these new corps are paying for protection will be enough? Logic dictates that a majority of these new smaller corps will have timers that are stacked in prime time Making the logistics a nightmare for their protectors to defend all those districts at once.
If I was on the new PFC council I would ask to pay much more money for my protection since the goodwill of the larger corps is in jeopardy.
|
HowDidThatTaste
Ancient Exiles. Renegade Alliance
4502
|
Posted - 2014.02.07 17:23:00 -
[10] - Quote
Killar-12 wrote:HowDidThatTaste wrote: Since PFC is now a business asset and fair game by larger corps, I wonder if the amount these new corps are paying for protection will be enough? Logic dictates that a majority of these new smaller corps will have timers that are stacked in prime time Making the logistics a nightmare for their protectors to defend all those districts at once.
If I was on the new PFC council I would ask to pay much more money for my protection since the goodwill of the larger corps is in jeopardy.
Aside from Kain's point maybe have FA, TP, Imps, RND, AE, and 0.H each get a district on a planet, who ever controls the full planet first wins sort of a tourney style thing all districts must be on one of 4 timers agreed upon by all parties, sounds like fun tbqh and gives yall something to do.
We have all of molden heath to fight over, this particular thread is concerning the future of the new business model of PFC. Which is now going to be a bigger part of MH because it is now a revenue making stream. |
|
|
|
|