DUST Search - The vapid hatred and phobia of tanks.

All Channels

General Discussions

The vapid hatred and phobia of tanks.

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
ACE OF JOKERS AMARR IMPERIAL CRUSADERS 142	Posted - 2013.11.21 00:44:00 - [271] - Quote True Adamance wrote: You know most AV weapons cant actually destroy vehicles in a single hit...but they can damage them significantly... this is essentially why Im going to BF 4 asap. Would rather play with good balanced vehicles than the absolute biased bullshit argumentative guys we see here, of which I am rapidly becoming. 1st.They might not completley DESTROY vehicles, but they can at least Kill their drivers 95% + of the time,SPECIALLY a JAvelin missile (there by their massive Co$t). I could live with killing a tanker,stealing their tank and repairing it if thats what you are implying... i've always liked vehicle balance in BF series too...
True Adamance PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris 4197	Posted - 2013.11.21 00:47:00 - [272] - Quote 4447 wrote: True Adamance wrote: Crash Monster wrote: Tallen Ellecon wrote: It's not fun when a tank can't be taken down by six guys with milita swarms or forge guns. Yeah, I agree. So maybe we can resolve down to one player with a lot of time (tank doesn't hide or get out of range) or more than one player with reducing amounts of time. It's okay if sometimes you get stomped... **** happens. It's also okay if once in a while one players can do the impossible. I would rather not just have a cookie cutter you pulled the trigger so you win. I don't think that's a good direction -- though maybe that's where we are going to go. I just want a tank that does what a tank should do and is not taken down every 5 mins by a newberry with a CZR and the ability to strafe through my bullets. Every 7 mins because one or two skilled Avers catch me napping would be acceptable. I think you've got Dust 514 mix up with Tanks of war. So you who have contributed absolutely no useful arguments to this thread have something prospectively more worthless to say. Thanks though atleast this is a reprieve from the argument since you just aren't worth the time. Is it not reasonable to want a tank that does not explode everytime some jackass who hasn't rendered or hasn't left the redline looks at me? "All things were created by the Divine, and so the glory of our faith is inherent to us all"
Shokhann Echo Chatelain Rapid Response Gallente Federation 62	Posted - 2013.11.21 00:58:00 - [273] - Quote True Adamance wrote: 4447 wrote: True Adamance wrote: Crash Monster wrote: Tallen Ellecon wrote: It's not fun when a tank can't be taken down by six guys with milita swarms or forge guns. Yeah, I agree. So maybe we can resolve down to one player with a lot of time (tank doesn't hide or get out of range) or more than one player with reducing amounts of time. It's okay if sometimes you get stomped... **** happens. It's also okay if once in a while one players can do the impossible. I would rather not just have a cookie cutter you pulled the trigger so you win. I don't think that's a good direction -- though maybe that's where we are going to go. I just want a tank that does what a tank should do and is not taken down every 5 mins by a newberry with a CZR and the ability to strafe through my bullets. Every 7 mins because one or two skilled Avers catch me napping would be acceptable. I think you've got Dust 514 mix up with Tanks of war. So you who have contributed absolutely no useful arguments to this thread have something prospectively more worthless to say. Thanks though atleast this is a reprieve from the argument since you just aren't worth the time. Is it not reasonable to want a tank that does not explode everytime some jackass who hasn't rendered or hasn't left the redline looks at me? infantry scrub for yah Void Echo's Alt Back-up Profile Back on main 12-20-2013
4447 Pure Innocence. EoN. 823	Posted - 2013.11.21 01:00:00 - [274] - Quote True Adamance wrote: 4447 wrote: True Adamance wrote: Crash Monster wrote: Tallen Ellecon wrote: It's not fun when a tank can't be taken down by six guys with milita swarms or forge guns. Yeah, I agree. So maybe we can resolve down to one player with a lot of time (tank doesn't hide or get out of range) or more than one player with reducing amounts of time. It's okay if sometimes you get stomped... **** happens. It's also okay if once in a while one players can do the impossible. I would rather not just have a cookie cutter you pulled the trigger so you win. I don't think that's a good direction -- though maybe that's where we are going to go. I just want a tank that does what a tank should do and is not taken down every 5 mins by a newberry with a CZR and the ability to strafe through my bullets. Every 7 mins because one or two skilled Avers catch me napping would be acceptable. I think you've got Dust 514 mix up with Tanks of war. So you who have contributed absolutely no useful arguments to this thread have something prospectively more worthless to say. Thanks though atleast this is a reprieve from the argument since you just aren't worth the time. Is it not reasonable to want a tank that does not explode everytime some jackass who hasn't rendered or hasn't left the redline looks at me? Maybe, you haven't got any gun game, uh that's right you drive a tank. This game is a fps, tanks are secondary weapons in a fps, also what ever a tank cost your getting more armour then a standard player...
Spkr4theDead Red Star. EoN. 1281	Posted - 2013.11.21 01:08:00 - [275] - Quote Zahle Undt wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Zahle Undt wrote: From my perspective the hatred of tanks comes down to the fact that SOME tankers think that because they spent a lot of ISK on a tank they should be entitled to run the table in a match. When several infantry need to equip AV to take out a tank that means several less troops to try and take objectives, it means that those people are now at increased danger from other infantry. Most of all I dislike tanks because of the red line, eliminate the red line and I would have muck less to complain about. I do think, however, it is premature to complain too much about the swarm launcher nerf until we see how it goes against the revamped vehicles. I also wish we had another light weapon AV option something akin to the LAW rocket That's giving the tanker's team an advantage either way, forcing some to switch to AV, making them less capable to deal with AV. I see absolutely no problem with that. Do you see a problem with that? Do you think it's unfair? I would answer those questions with a no IF those AV infantry wouldn't see their efforts rewarded with the tank they've almost destroyed running off to a safe zone to repair or recall their vehicle while the AV infantry are stuck now trying to deal with infantry in AV set ups. Maybe its just me and terrible luck, but most of the time when I go to AV either I only successfully drive off the tank (no points for that) or it vanishes and now I'm fighting a butt load of infantry with only my trusty SMG. So I guess in a Dust with a red zone I would say the ideal would be 2-3 infantry with equivalent level AV should be needed to take out a tank of around the same meta level. So I will agree that right now since I can solo tanks with only adv level AV grenades and swarms that isn't right, but having to use a whole squad to kill a tank isn't right either. If the AV is getting pounded from the front, and the rear by the tanker's team, why should they be angry if the tank gets away? It's about doing everything you can to get the upper hand. Infantry makes it sound like it's not fair they have to use any AV at all, because it takes away from PRO stomping. Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry.
Spkr4theDead Red Star. EoN. 1281	Posted - 2013.11.21 01:10:00 - [276] - Quote 4447 wrote: Maybe, you haven't got any gun game, uh that's right you drive a tank. This game is a fps, tanks are secondary weapons in a fps, also what ever a tank cost your getting more armour then a standard player... My hull alone is about a PRO fitting. A 180mm plate or heavy armor repper costs more than PRO AV. All told, tanks are upwards of 1.2mil ISK. As infantry, you don't have a leg to stand on when talking about ISK cost. No leg at all. Also, do you have any tank game? Since I have over 25mil SP, half of it is in infantry. I'm okay as far as infantry goes. You probably couldn't beat a Soma I could put together if I gave you a Madrugar to use. Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry.
4447 Pure Innocence. EoN. 823	Posted - 2013.11.21 01:16:00 - [277] - Quote Spkr4theDead wrote: 4447 wrote: Maybe, you haven't got any gun game, uh that's right you drive a tank. This game is a fps, tanks are secondary weapons in a fps, also what ever a tank cost your getting more armour then a standard player... My hull alone is about a PRO fitting. A 180mm plate or heavy armor repper costs more than PRO AV. All told, tanks are upwards of 1.2mil ISK. As infantry, you don't have a leg to stand on when talking about ISK cost. No leg at all. Also, do you have any tank game? Since I have over 25mil SP, half of it is in infantry. I'm okay as far as infantry goes. You probably couldn't beat a Soma I could put together if I gave you a Madrugar to use. If you can't field a tank then don't field it, duh. On another note, silly wanker, I mean tanker.
Spkr4theDead Red Star. EoN. 1281	Posted - 2013.11.21 01:17:00 - [278] - Quote Tallen Ellecon wrote: It's not fun when a tank can't be taken down by six guys with milita swarms or forge guns. If you want to argue that "of course it's milita" is bullshit, why even give players AV if it only works on militia tanks. It's a starter fit for a reason, to see if new players want to bother with any type of AV at all. Duh Odds are they're probably doing it wrong. Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry.
True Adamance PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris 4200	Posted - 2013.11.21 01:18:00 - [279] - Quote 4447 wrote: Maybe, you haven't got any gun game, uh that's right you drive a tank. This game is a fps, tanks are secondary weapons in a fps, also what ever a tank cost your getting more armour then a standard player... Tell that to a successful game like BF3 and BF4 "All things were created by the Divine, and so the glory of our faith is inherent to us all"
Our Deepest Regret The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY 308	Posted - 2013.11.21 01:19:00 - [280] - Quote GûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûêGûêGûêGûêGûêGûêGûê ]GûäGûäGûäGûäGûäGûäGûäGûä 1.7 is coming. GûéGûäGûàGûêGûêGûêGûêGûêGûêGûêGûêGûêGûàGûäGûâGûé There will be many tears shed. GûêGûêGûêGûêGûêGûêGûêGûêGûêGûêGûêGûêGûêGûêGûêGûêGûêGûêGûê]. Yes, I copied this from youtube. GùÑGèÖGû¦GèÖGû¦GèÖGû¦GèÖGû¦GèÖGû¦GèÖGû¦GèÖGùñ.. So what? it's still funny.

Spkr4theDead Red Star. EoN. 1281	Posted - 2013.11.21 01:19:00 - [281] - Quote 4447 wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: 4447 wrote: Maybe, you haven't got any gun game, uh that's right you drive a tank. This game is a fps, tanks are secondary weapons in a fps, also what ever a tank cost your getting more armour then a standard player... My hull alone is about a PRO fitting. A 180mm plate or heavy armor repper costs more than PRO AV. All told, tanks are upwards of 1.2mil ISK. As infantry, you don't have a leg to stand on when talking about ISK cost. No leg at all. Also, do you have any tank game? Since I have over 25mil SP, half of it is in infantry. I'm okay as far as infantry goes. You probably couldn't beat a Soma I could put together if I gave you a Madrugar to use. If you can't field a tank then don't field it, duh. On another note, silly wanker, I mean tanker. I'm space rich, I could field tanks all day, but that's not the point. It makes no sense for handheld weapons to do so much more than vehicle mounted weapons. Look at the size of a forge gun compared to a railgun. Railgun is what, 8 to 10 ft long, whereas a forge is maybe 3 ft long? Tell me which one has more available power, and more magnetic coils to produce a more powerful weapon. Makes zero sense that a forge gun is so much more powerful than a railgun. Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry.
Spkr4theDead Red Star. EoN. 1281	Posted - 2013.11.21 01:21:00 - [282] - Quote True Adamance wrote: 4447 wrote: Maybe, you haven't got any gun game, uh that's right you drive a tank. This game is a fps, tanks are secondary weapons in a fps, also what ever a tank cost your getting more armour then a standard player... Tell that to a successful game like BF3 and BF4 Successful to what end, that DICE and EA got everybody's money, then didn't care about the game afterward? Note, they nerfed vehicles as well because infantry complained. Either DICE's or EA's COO actually said that the problems with BF4 simply aren't true, yet I see my friends constantly complaining about BF4 on PS4 and PC. Would you trust a COO that lies that openly? Just ask your friends, all your friends, about the stability of the game. Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry.
True Adamance PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris 4201	Posted - 2013.11.21 01:25:00 - [283] - Quote Spkr4theDead wrote: True Adamance wrote: 4447 wrote: Maybe, you haven't got any gun game, uh that's right you drive a tank. This game is a fps, tanks are secondary weapons in a fps, also what ever a tank cost your getting more armour then a standard player... Tell that to a successful game like BF3 and BF4 Successful to what end, that DICE and EA got everybody's money, then didn't care about the game afterward? Note, they nerfed vehicles as well because infantry complained. Either DICE's or EA's COO actually said that the problems with BF4 simply aren't true, yet I see my friends constantly complaining about BF4 on PS4 and PC. Would you trust a COO that lies that openly? Just ask your friends, all your friends, about the stability of the game. Atleast in BF game tanks do what tanks are meant to do, not spray and pray like you do in Dust....yes you know how much I hate the Effing Large Blaster. "All things were created by the Divine, and so the glory of our faith is inherent to us all"
Our Deepest Regret The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY 310	Posted - 2013.11.21 01:36:00 - [284] - Quote Ghosts Chance wrote: as infantry, i dont need no stinkin points for gimping a tank, or scaring it off, or manuvering in such a way as to not be an easy target.... thats just smart gameplay.... why the hell would i need WP for that Well, to be fair, you have an absurd advantage. Blowing up a tank isn't difficult at all, Chance. Excluding the invisible swarms glitch, it's very easy to stand outside of a tank's render range and rain fire. I don't begrudge AV grenadiers their kills, because they have to bring the fight to the tank to get the results they want, and you really have to be a complete herb to just stand there letting someone chuck lai dais at you. But swarmers? Bleeeeeh. I only kill those guys when they get greedy and chase me. The smart ones never leave cover.
Racro 01 Arifistan 501st Knights of Leanbox 76	Posted - 2013.11.21 01:41:00 - [285] - Quote Spkr4theDead wrote: I actually had someone tell me on here that nitrous injectors aren't fair, because they allow us to escape danger too fast. someone said this to me after they saw my vayu wich runs 1125 shield and 5173 armour while fielding a scattered ion cannon said to me. after going 35/0 with it they said my vayu was under powered and i shouldnt use it and his wykomis couldnt land a hit on me. when i siad i was running a fusion aceelerator (tier 3 prop mod) he replied its op and makes me go too fast and shouldnt be able toi escape swarms. after engaging and destoying a madrugar with its own 6753 armour/scattered ion cannon. with no rep. HOW THE HELL DO I ESCAPE HIS WYKOMI. with a propulsion module all the way home to redline to repup and cool down.
Spkr4theDead Red Star. EoN. 1281	Posted - 2013.11.21 01:41:00 - [286] - Quote True Adamance wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: True Adamance wrote: 4447 wrote: Maybe, you haven't got any gun game, uh that's right you drive a tank. This game is a fps, tanks are secondary weapons in a fps, also what ever a tank cost your getting more armour then a standard player... Tell that to a successful game like BF3 and BF4 Successful to what end, that DICE and EA got everybody's money, then didn't care about the game afterward? Note, they nerfed vehicles as well because infantry complained. Either DICE's or EA's COO actually said that the problems with BF4 simply aren't true, yet I see my friends constantly complaining about BF4 on PS4 and PC. Would you trust a COO that lies that openly? Just ask your friends, all your friends, about the stability of the game. Atleast in BF game tanks do what tanks are meant to do, not spray and pray like you do in Dust....yes you know how much I hate the Effing Large Blaster. Tanks get dropped from full HP to ~30% with one hit from either a tank or RPG. If real tanks were that weak, we wouldn't use them. Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry.
Spkr4theDead Red Star. EoN. 1281	Posted - 2013.11.21 01:43:00 - [287] - Quote Racro 01 Arifistan wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: I actually had someone tell me on here that nitrous injectors aren't fair, because they allow us to escape danger too fast. someone said this to me after they saw my vayu wich runs 1125 shield and 5173 armour while fielding a scattered ion cannon said to me. after going 35/0 with it they said my vayu was under powered and i shouldnt use it and his wykomis couldnt land a hit on me. when i siad i was running a fusion aceelerator (tier 3 prop mod) he replied its op and makes me go too fast and shouldnt be able toi escape swarms. after engaging and destoying a madrugar with its own 6753 armour/scattered ion cannon. with no rep. HOW THE HELL DO I ESCAPE HIS WYKOMI. with a propulsion module all the way home to redline to repup and cool down. It's because infantry is usually bad and wants everything to go their way. Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry.
True Adamance PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris 4201	Posted - 2013.11.21 01:46:00 - [288] - Quote Spkr4theDead wrote: True Adamance wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: True Adamance wrote: 4447 wrote: Maybe, you haven't got any gun game, uh that's right you drive a tank. This game is a fps, tanks are secondary weapons in a fps, also what ever a tank cost your getting more armour then a standard player... Tell that to a successful game like BF3 and BF4 Successful to what end, that DICE and EA got everybody's money, then didn't care about the game afterward? Note, they nerfed vehicles as well because infantry complained. Either DICE's or EA's COO actually said that the problems with BF4 simply aren't true, yet I see my friends constantly complaining about BF4 on PS4 and PC. Would you trust a COO that lies that openly? Just ask your friends, all your friends, about the stability of the game. Atleast in BF game tanks do what tanks are meant to do, not spray and pray like you do in Dust....yes you know how much I hate the Effing Large Blaster. Tanks get dropped from full HP to ~30% with one hit from either a tank or RPG. If real tanks were that weak, we wouldn't use them. I'm not too worried about that... its not all that dissimilar from Dust in that regard, except tanks are more manoeuvrable and pack some serious hurt. "All things were created by the Divine, and so the glory of our faith is inherent to us all"
Ranger SnakeBlood OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention 220	Posted - 2013.11.21 01:52:00 - [289] - Quote True Adamance wrote: What I never understood about players mind sets in this game is that as in many other games you will see the progression of units as they grown in power and size mess with each other. E.G- Slay Infantry < Mech Mech < Tank Tank < Super Mech Super Mech < Infantry But why is the Supermech defeated by infantry? Because they are numerous and the Supermech is a massive investment into a single unit. As such infantry can be thrown at a Super to silence it. XCOM Sectoid < Trooper Trooper < Crysalid Crysalid < Veternan Trooper Veteran Trooper < Mechtoid Mechtoid < Troopers Same deal. Massed fire power on a single unit destroys a bigger unit. But in Dust infantry don't want to play this game? Why not? Why don't you want to work together to take down a Tank and shift the tide of battle? This Type of balence can not be done with the game and the tank set up right now due to the way it is essentially a lobby shooter with very finite team sizes 16 v 16 say for example it takes 3 people dedicated to AV to kill a tank that is manned by one person this is simply not balenced as the tank would have the power of 3 therefore it would be 18 vrs 16, 2 tanks would make it a 20 vrs 16 essentially.(the units are not players but the manpower of a team), sadly this is also the problem with proto gear in this game it creates a power imbalance that causes issues. How could this method of balence work: 1: if dust was as open as eve then we could use larger amount of smaller cheaper units to swarm large targets thing a Battleship in eve being killed by a T1 frig swarm. 2: If tanks required the same amount of people to operate them as it takes to kill them say it takes 3 people to kill them then it should take 3 people to run one to any effect also. But most of the tank guys dont want to need a other people to man their tanks. My own opinion the tank should be a support vehicle for battering fortified hostile positions and other light medium and heavy armor s not for hunting infantry giving it a role on the battlefield rather than a advancement from infantry, also mobile artillary would be nice but thats just optimism.
MINA Longstrike 2Shitz 1Giggle 51	Posted - 2013.11.21 01:54:00 - [290] - Quote Korvin Lomont wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Read my post again. In Chromosome, the best tanks and tankers had to worry about mediocre tankers with just a few million SP into them because of how much damage railguns did to tanks. That. Was. Balanced. You have an interesting opinion on balance. Balance usually uses a rock, scissor and paper model to avoid unbalanced gameplay. Regarding Vehicles vs Infantry this translates to Tank > Infantry > AV Infantry > Tanks. Thats called balance. You want Tank > Tank > Everything else. This IS a problem especially in a first person shooter. And really back in Chromosome most tankers had gone for infantry and easy kills not for other tankers hell I saw tankers hiding in the redline as soon as another tank showed on the map because they were afraid of loosing their tank. And this behaviour will not change and I highly doubt that you see many tank battles what you will see is tankers going again after infantry and farming kills/installations and maybe a small friction of tankers that enjoy tank battles but I am sure the majority will simply go after infantry for easy success Rock Paper Scissors models are awful as they are predicated on hard counters : ie people wanting to be able to kill every tank forever because they have a swarm launcher or av grenades. Soft counters are good, and that is what we are moving more towards with swarm launchers range and damage nerf - it will take more than one launcher to kill a tank.

CharCharOdell 1608	Posted - 2013.11.21 02:40:00 - [291] - Quote Jack McReady wrote: Ninjanomyx wrote: 98.9% of AVers are trash. 0.1% of Pure AVers are capable. 1% of the most capable AVers are Tankers. Tankers are 0.3% of DUST 514's Community. LOLTruth 99% of tank drivers are whiny COD kids that want to solo entire squads alone did you know that 76% of statistics are made up? Did you know that 99% of CoD scrubs use the AR? Gùñ-é-º+¼+ò+¦GÖÑ+ú+ú+¡ GÖÑ'Ðe+ü+üGùÑ Gùú -ä>-üð+++Ç++§<-¡<-¡ Gùó Speaker of the Mangrove / King of QQ / Co-Founder of the Learning Coalition
Atiim Living Like Larry Schwag 1215	Posted - 2013.11.21 03:14:00 - [292] - Quote True Adamance wrote: So you who have contributed absolutely no useful arguments to this thread have something prospectively more worthless to say. Thanks though atleast this is a reprieve from the argument since you just aren't worth the time. Is it not reasonable to want a tank that does not explode everytime some jackass who hasn't rendered or hasn't left the redline looks at me? Yes, it is reasonable. I see no problem in fixing the rendering glitch. Check out my corp's new website here :D -HAND
Atiim Living Like Larry Schwag 1218	Posted - 2013.11.21 03:19:00 - [293] - Quote Crash Monster wrote: ACE OF JOKERS wrote: Ok. I just need a Javelin. (BTW tanks in this game are insanly fast with afterburners) Or, we could just launch you and Altiim at tanks... you both appear to be anti-tank weapons. It's Atiim. Why do people keep spelling my name wrong like that? It's on the left side of every post I make. Are people really that stupid? And sure you can throw me at a tank. If I have 6 Boundless REs and 3 Lai Dai Packed AV Grenades. Check out my corp's new website here :D -HAND
Shokhann Echo Chatelain Rapid Response Gallente Federation 64	Posted - 2013.11.21 03:52:00 - [294] - Quote Atiim wrote: Crash Monster wrote: ACE OF JOKERS wrote: Ok. I just need a Javelin. (BTW tanks in this game are insanly fast with afterburners) Or, we could just launch you and Altiim at tanks... you both appear to be anti-tank weapons. It's Atiim. Why do people keep spelling my name wrong like that? It's on the left side of every post I make. Are people really that stupid? And sure you can throw me at a tank. If I have 6 Boundless REs and 3 Lai Dai Packed AV Grenades. exactly, mega op Void Echo's Alt Back-up Profile Back on main 12-20-2013
Roger Cordill The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY 11	Posted - 2013.11.21 03:53:00 - [295] - Quote The only statement I disagree with is the one referring to the WP's. that seems very fair (it would even fit into how HAV's are going to work this time around) for them to get WP's for hurting and scaring us away, basically taking us out of the battle, and giving them a steady income of WP's and ISK (for non-PC battles).
Atiim Living Like Larry Schwag 1219	Posted - 2013.11.21 03:57:00 - [296] - Quote Shokhann Echo wrote: Atiim wrote: Crash Monster wrote: ACE OF JOKERS wrote: Ok. I just need a Javelin. (BTW tanks in this game are insanly fast with afterburners) Or, we could just launch you and Altiim at tanks... you both appear to be anti-tank weapons. It's Atiim. Why do people keep spelling my name wrong like that? It's on the left side of every post I make. Are people really that stupid? And sure you can throw me at a tank. If I have 6 Boundless REs and 3 Lai Dai Packed AV Grenades. exactly, mega op Um I don't know what you've been smoking lately, but If a vehicle gets hit by 6 Boundless Remote Explosives and 3 PRO AV Grenades, IT SHOULD DIE Check out my corp's new website here :D -HAND
Spkr4theDead Red Star. EoN. 1281	Posted - 2013.11.21 04:00:00 - [297] - Quote Atiim wrote: Shokhann Echo wrote: Atiim wrote: Crash Monster wrote: ACE OF JOKERS wrote: Ok. I just need a Javelin. (BTW tanks in this game are insanly fast with afterburners) Or, we could just launch you and Altiim at tanks... you both appear to be anti-tank weapons. It's Atiim. Why do people keep spelling my name wrong like that? It's on the left side of every post I make. Are people really that stupid? And sure you can throw me at a tank. If I have 6 Boundless REs and 3 Lai Dai Packed AV Grenades. exactly, mega op Um I don't know what you've been smoking lately, but If a vehicle gets hit by 6 Boundless Remote Explosives and 3 PRO AV Grenades, IT SHOULD DIE Those should merely be support weapons for AV, not direct hard counters by themselves. Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry.
Atiim Living Like Larry Schwag 1227	Posted - 2013.11.21 04:03:00 - [298] - Quote Spkr4theDead wrote: Atiim wrote: Shokhann Echo wrote: exactly, mega op Um I don't know what you've been smoking lately, but If a vehicle gets hit by 6 Boundless Remote Explosives and 3 PRO AV Grenades, IT SHOULD DIE Those should merely be support weapons for AV, not direct hard counters by themselves. 9 AV weapons all at PRO tier hitting at the exact same time should kill any HAV. 6 and 3 is not by themselves Check out my corp's new website here :D -HAND
Marlin Kirby KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION 107	Posted - 2013.11.21 04:04:00 - [299] - Quote Spkr4theDead wrote: Marlin Kirby wrote: I'm use to it. He use to believe that anyone better than him in MAG was clearly cheating despite the proof of cheaters has never existed besides glitching out of the map. He even came to the MAG forums a few months back complaining about randoms on his team. When the community made fun of him, he kept asked "how many hours you have?" and "who are you?" as if he was suppose to be some sort of MAG celebrity. He even acted like it online: http://youtu.be/4_dUpkT4fWY?t=4m3s Nobody, not once, ever, admitted the slightest possibility of lag having anything to do at all with how many kills they would get. I remember one of Dark Flock's snipers literally sprinting around me in a circle, firing his pistol while I could do to keep up was spin in a circle. If that's not evidence of any lag at all, then I don't know what is. Not like KEQ has done much anyway on any game. Neither did you. Vehicles would run me over despite that they appeared 20 feet in front of me on my screen. Happened all the time. Everyone lagged a little. I went from bad to better internet (crappy small bandwidth in S. Florida to a large bandwidth in Jacksonville, [North] Florida) and I actually started doing better. In a more extreme case, MUD had the same experience as me when he upgraded his internet and I don't think he changed his location. And it wasn't just lag, you claimed they used aim-bots too. http://community.us.playstation.com/t5/MAG-Discussion/I-just-went-73-7-defending-Raven-acq/m-p/31562165#M82274 (Your sentence on the Flock sniper didn't make sense. I think you're missing a few words.) Oh my bad, where's your old clan? The not logic bomb!
Shokhann Echo Chatelain Rapid Response Gallente Federation 64	Posted - 2013.11.21 04:04:00 - [300] - Quote Atiim wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Atiim wrote: Shokhann Echo wrote: exactly, mega op Um I don't know what you've been smoking lately, but If a vehicle gets hit by 6 Boundless Remote Explosives and 3 PRO AV Grenades, IT SHOULD DIE Those should merely be support weapons for AV, not direct hard counters by themselves. 9 AV weapons all at PRO tier hitting at the exact same time should kill any HAV. 6 and 3 is not by themselves not saying your op for using them, im saying your op for being able to fit them on your scrubsuit Void Echo's Alt Back-up Profile Back on main 12-20-2013



Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.