| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
1041. Removing KDR? - in General Discussions [original thread]
KDR encourages a CoD mentality which we would all rather do without. It causes people to avoid revives because those hurt their KDR, which is stupid. However KDR is useful to PC where clones are high cost. Actually a clones lost stat would be mo...
- by Skihids - at 2013.10.04 20:59:00
|
1042. Petition to keep the Assault Dropship in during vehicle balancing. - in General Discussions [original thread]
DUST Fiend wrote: Aero Yassavi wrote: When was the last time you saw an enforcer? Or for that matter, when was the last time you saw a scout LAV? Ok, now when was the last time you saw a logistics vehicle besides a LLAV murder taxi? Yet you...
- by Skihids - at 2013.10.04 20:33:00
|
1043. Announcement:Vehicle Changes and Beyond - Part 2 - in General Discussions [original thread]
NINJAPIRATEROBOTZOMBIE wrote: CCP Logibro wrote: As far as partial respecs/refunds for vehicle related stuff goes, they are on the table. No details yet, but that's because we're still discussing how we want to do it. We will let you know wh...
- by Skihids - at 2013.10.04 19:06:00
|
1044. Announcement:Vehicle Changes and Beyond - Part 2 - in General Discussions [original thread]
CCP Logibro wrote: We would love to have a test server, but at current there are a number of factors and considerations that are preventing us from running one. Additionally, based on your feedback it seems you really want the Assault Dropship...
- by Skihids - at 2013.10.04 17:19:00
|
1045. Announcement:Vehicle Changes and Beyond - Part 2 - in General Discussions [original thread]
This cries out or a test server. You want pilots to put millions of ISK on the line for your test, but already gun-shy pilots either can't or won't empty the last of their wallets for something they consider insane. Dropship numbers will be even ...
- by Skihids - at 2013.10.04 16:53:00
|
1046. Game Realism, Sniping, and You - in General Discussions [original thread]
Realism can be taken to mean two different things: 1) Consistent with what we have now 2) Internally consistent "Current Day" games need to be concerned with the first, but SF or Fantasy games need to worry more about the second. Any good SF st...
- by Skihids - at 2013.10.03 20:35:00
|
1047. It's time for a test server - in General Discussions [original thread]
Magnus Amadeuss wrote: CCP has a test server, it is called singularity. As luck would have it, Dust used to run on singularity. Now part of the problem would most likely be that you would need a different build (game install) for the game to ...
- by Skihids - at 2013.10.03 19:46:00
|
1048. It's time for a test server - in General Discussions [original thread]
RedZer0 MK1 wrote: The idea of a test server is by far the best direct solution. But, considering the numerous hurdles involved, it isn't practical on PSN. A respec system would allow people to fully test and flesh out vehicles. Ensuring ample ...
- by Skihids - at 2013.10.03 19:03:00
|
1049. It's time for a test server - in General Discussions [original thread]
ZDub 303 wrote: Skihids wrote: Vin Vicious wrote: The problem is not CCP doesn't want to give us a test server, the problem is SONY will not allow CCP to have one. Even if it will save the game and ultimately make more money for Sony? ...
- by Skihids - at 2013.10.03 18:57:00
|
1050. So did vehicles get a buff? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Banning Hammer wrote: Apparently tanks are useless now, i guess that is why recently i always see at least a couple of tanks in every battle. Anyone have seen Swarm Launchers recently ? Do still are in the game ? Yes, I use my SL starter fi...
- by Skihids - at 2013.10.03 18:30:00
|
1051. It's time for a test server - in General Discussions [original thread]
Vin Vicious wrote: The problem is not CCP doesn't want to give us a test server, the problem is SONY will not allow CCP to have one. Even if it will save the game and ultimately make more money for Sony? What is the downside for Sony?
- by Skihids - at 2013.10.03 18:27:00
|
1052. It's time for a test server - in General Discussions [original thread]
DUST Fiend wrote: Skihids wrote: Then there's the matter of your test population. Most veteran dropship pilots took a respec and no longer have any points in them so they won't be testing. A QA server would let CCP give them pilot characters...
- by Skihids - at 2013.10.03 16:45:00
|
1053. It's time for a test server - in General Discussions [original thread]
The test server needs its own test client for maximum control and flexibility. CCP needs to be able to assign new characters or reset them for testing.
- by Skihids - at 2013.10.03 14:48:00
|
1054. It's time for a test server - in General Discussions [original thread]
The way this is going it will completely rip up people's main characters with 20m+ SP invested in vehicles over a period of months. We have people declaring they are done. That may be an exaggeration for most, but some will be leaving. Then there...
- by Skihids - at 2013.10.03 14:22:00
|
1055. It's time for a test server - in General Discussions [original thread]
TEXA5 HiTM4N wrote: this has been suggested before, and i think CCP said it would be hard to do. but hell it would save them a lot of time if we could test it out. It might be difficult to implement, but the need has never been this great be...
- by Skihids - at 2013.10.03 13:54:00
|
1056. It's time for a test server - in General Discussions [original thread]
I've been in IT for thirty years and I've learned never to release large changes in production without user acceptance testing in QA, and the coming vehicle rebalance definitely qualifies as large. It is going to create a HUGE disruption to the g...
- by Skihids - at 2013.10.03 13:37:00
|
1057. AV players, would you accept a temporary removal of advance weapons? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Not that we players haves say in it, but just consider the long term. Whatever AV stays in is going to be balanced against STD vehicles, then ADV and PROTO vehicles will be added back. If I were an AV player I would demand AV be striped down to ...
- by Skihids - at 2013.10.03 12:59:00
|
1058. [TTH] The Delusions of Player Communication Requests - in General Discussions [original thread]
Those three rules apply to ALL software development. I've been in the business thirty years and I can attest to it being a deep seated part of human nature.
- by Skihids - at 2013.10.03 00:13:00
|
1059. Petition for New Vehicle Changes to be Thrown in the Meatgrinder in Favor of Add... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Now is the time to introduce capacitors. It would re energize the pilot community, increase flexibility, reduce complexity, and forge a tighter link with EVE. There is no reason not to, and every reason to do it.
- by Skihids - at 2013.10.02 21:16:00
|
1060. Announcement:Vehicle Changes and Beyond - Part 2 - in General Discussions [original thread]
To really test the balance and get rid of the noise AV will lo have to be stripped down to the STD versions just like vehicles. This isn't a nerf whine, but rather a realistic testing requirement unless you are trying to balance STD vehicles agai...
- by Skihids - at 2013.10.02 21:07:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |