| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
861. LOL, about those supply depots in 1.7 - in General Discussions [original thread]
So maybe we Logis can get points for repairing supply depots?
- by Skihids - at 2013.11.20 20:03:00
|
862. Reduce 1.7 vehicle SP sink! - in General Discussions [original thread]
darkiller240 wrote: Its ment to be high or everyone will go into viehicals The high cost will definitely ensure pilots will be serious about their career. I dont want to deny anyone the joy and challenge of piloting, but a part of me is ok...
- by Skihids - at 2013.11.20 19:52:00
|
863. Reduce 1.7 vehicle SP sink! - in General Discussions [original thread]
I'll probably max out a Logistics and Assault suit, Dropsuit Upgrades, two light weapons, and one sidearm before saving SP to get back into vehicles. That should be around 36M SP. Being versatile as infantry is also rather expensive and grabbing ...
- by Skihids - at 2013.11.20 14:51:00
|
864. Reduce 1.7 vehicle SP sink! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Vehicles appear headed for an endgame role after you attain one or two infantry roles. Unless they become very inexpensive and more maps open up you won't be able to sustain piloting financially at the start of your career. You will definitely ne...
- by Skihids - at 2013.11.20 05:21:00
|
865. [Discussion] The sidearm-only logi argument. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Quote: Quote: Ummm, Quote: I have my rep tool on him 24/7 I'm pretty sure that I read this correctly. As an effective Logi you should at minimum be laying down cover fire to help your assault partner rather than hiding in the back le...
- by Skihids - at 2013.11.18 05:46:00
|
866. [Discussion] The sidearm-only logi argument. - in General Discussions [original thread]
You state: Quote: I have my rep tool on him 24/7 Then you protest: Quote: That I'm just repping is basically ignorant. So you were blowing smoke up our asses with your first post?
- by Skihids - at 2013.11.18 05:39:00
|
867. [Discussion] The sidearm-only logi argument. - in General Discussions [original thread]
XxGhazbaranxX wrote: Skihids wrote: XxGhazbaranxX wrote: Why don't I need a light weapon? This is simple. My work is to keep my teammate alive. If I cannot do this then I am no logi. Every engagement, every battle comes down to communicat...
- by Skihids - at 2013.11.18 05:32:00
|
868. [Discussion] The sidearm-only logi argument. - in General Discussions [original thread]
XxGhazbaranxX wrote: Why don't I need a light weapon? This is simple. My work is to keep my teammate alive. If I cannot do this then I am no logi. Every engagement, every battle comes down to communication and having a partner with which you ca...
- by Skihids - at 2013.11.18 05:10:00
|
869. Take A Look At This Video.... - in General Discussions [original thread]
As a Logi I LOVE Domination on that map! It's a gigantic meat grinder, guaranteed to give me over 1K WP on my uplinks alone. I augment that with triage hives and the points roll in. When I have a spare moment I lob grenades from a few kills of my...
- by Skihids - at 2013.11.18 05:00:00
|
870. [Discussion] The sidearm-only logi argument. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Logistics is a support class, so it should be able to use supporting weapons such as the mass driver and any other that gets released. These are light weapons, so the logistics suit must be able to fit light weapons.
- by Skihids - at 2013.11.18 04:13:00
|
871. Why is it that CCP needs a freaking video to acknowledge that there's someth... - in General Discussions [original thread]
It really feels like it takes a video to get CCP's attention.
- by Skihids - at 2013.11.16 15:00:00
|
872. 1.6 Dropship changes - in General Discussions [original thread]
Here's a thought, create variants that are more maneuverable and require more player skill to operate. Instead of buffing eHP or slot counts significantly when going ADV or PROTO, you give players a more complex base frame that is capable of more...
- by Skihids - at 2013.11.12 20:41:00
|
873. 1.6 Dropship changes - in General Discussions [original thread]
It's OK to have a vehicle role that requires practice and player skill to use well. Personal challenge is what makes a game fun long term. Too many people want it to be easy, not realizing that anything so easily mastered is of little value. DU...
- by Skihids - at 2013.11.12 20:13:00
|
874. 1.6 Dropship changes - in General Discussions [original thread]
I want player skill to be required for high level play. Yes, anyone can fly a dropship to crash it on top of a roof to set up a sniper nest, but they won't be effective assault pilots. The easier a weapon is to use the less damage it can be allow...
- by Skihids - at 2013.11.12 15:38:00
|
875. I'm having the most fun I've had in this game since chromosome - in General Discussions [original thread]
I find it difficult to let go of the controller to take a drink without getting shot, it's just constant dancing even when I'm not headed anywhere. When I scan I add a spin to the dance for which I simply have to close my eyes or I get sick.
- by Skihids - at 2013.11.11 20:40:00
|
876. I'm having the most fun I've had in this game since chromosome - in General Discussions [original thread]
With a minuscule TTK and snipers you must be in constant motion. Need ammo? Dance around the hive. Guarding an objective? Run around and through it. It's enough to give me a headache some times.
- by Skihids - at 2013.11.11 17:05:00
|
877. How a logibro thinks. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Aren't Caldri shield tankers and Gallente armor tankers? Why would the Caldari specialize in armor repair?
- by Skihids - at 2013.11.11 16:56:00
|
878. 1.6 Dropship changes - in General Discussions [original thread]
Talos Vagheitan wrote: The-Errorist wrote: [quote=Skihids][quote=The-Errorist][quote=Skihids] With auto-leveling, it wouldn't make being a pilot as nearly as easy as it was back then at E3. To even suggest that is laughable. What he's sa...
- by Skihids - at 2013.11.11 15:22:00
|
879. 1.6 Dropship changes - in General Discussions [original thread]
Azri Sarum wrote: Is it just me or did the vertical thrust on milita dropships become buggy in 1.6? I ask because it seems like at times i will be flying along, noes down to pick up some forward speed. I then bring up the nose (to horizontal) b...
- by Skihids - at 2013.11.11 15:05:00
|
880. 1.6 Dropship changes - in General Discussions [original thread]
The-Errorist wrote: Skihids wrote: Dropship pilots are a fiercely loyal to their ships. They have endured repeated nerfs, neglect, and wallet draining expense because they love flying. They love it because being an accomplished pilot meant s...
- by Skihids - at 2013.11.11 04:41:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |