| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
441. Your Dev Blogs are a Joke - in General Discussions [original thread]
I'm ok with Dev Blogs on "soft" topics, but make them worth my time. This one was phoned in. You can make them interesting. You can make me care about the person in the "spotlight". You can at least act as if you tried. This one failed in all r...
- by Skihids - at 2014.02.28 21:29:00
|
442. Why are the rich so Rich & the poor so Poor?! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Allowing a few to become billionaires and throw proto gear around like it was militia for months makes me question CCP's will to make this economy work. Meanwhile they fret about the virtual "losses" they incur as a result of selling BPOs for real...
- by Skihids - at 2014.02.28 21:14:00
|
443. 80GJ weapons... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Charlotte O'Dell wrote: Did you know that you can dig a small trench under the barrel of an m2.50 just by firing it because the shockwave is just that crazy? And that's in hard packed dirt. My railgun should kill the whole map. It's kind of...
- by Skihids - at 2014.02.28 20:30:00
|
444. 80GJ weapons... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Fraceska wrote: 7 kilometers per second, damn that's fast. Whatever it hits is done for. There should be no survival from these weapons. Even a glancing it is going to create a pressure wave that is going to tear you apart. "Shields" is only go...
- by Skihids - at 2014.02.28 20:23:00
|
445. Rollover SP - in General Discussions [original thread]
There is no need for complicated expiration systems for active SP. Really. It simply accumulates. Active SP boosters would be sold not by "time", but by "SP amount". A weekly active booster would morph into a 194,000 SP booster. It boosts that ...
- by Skihids - at 2014.02.28 19:36:00
|
446. Help for a new ADS pilot - in General Discussions [original thread]
You only need the basic afterburner because it lasts long enough to get you out of danger and recovers faster than your shields or armor will. Don't waste the fitting and ISK on anything higher. I run a basic heavy armor rep and it saves my bacon...
- by Skihids - at 2014.02.28 18:35:00
|
447. I have discovered a new found hate for the spawn on point mechanic - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spawn on objective is a game crippling mechanic. What the hell are CRUs supposed to be for when you can simply teleport sans uplink? Why bother with uplinks when you own the point? It removes what little strategy there is in the game and reduces...
- by Skihids - at 2014.02.28 17:26:00
|
448. Hands on with DUST 514's "next major evolution" at Fan... - in General Discussions [original thread]
calisk galern wrote: they are creating occulus rift controls for dust. The PS3 is incapable of driving the Oculus Rift, and even the PS4 probably won't have the power. Now Sony is working on a headset that probably won't be as god but will...
- by Skihids - at 2014.02.28 15:02:00
|
449. Tanks are NOT OP - in General Discussions [original thread]
What's up with these presentations which are really rambling audios with a completely unrelated match video for background? The video content serves only to distract from the fact that you can't make your point clearly and succinctly. I kept wait...
- by Skihids - at 2014.02.28 14:02:00
|
450. Hands on with DUST 514's "next major evolution" at Fan... - in General Discussions [original thread]
The announcement promises "hands on", so one would assume there will be at least a beta build of this "new evolution". Therefore it can't all be pie in the sky promises (though there is sure to be plenty of that as well). My money is on PvE. They...
- by Skihids - at 2014.02.28 13:19:00
|
451. Would you be willing to wait? - in General Discussions [original thread]
I won't biomass, I've got far too much time and money spent. I also like a quick match so I wouldn't disappear or long stretches, but if we don't get my game modes beyond TDM and vehicles still compete directly with infantry for infantry kills I...
- by Skihids - at 2014.02.26 18:43:00
|
452. Tanks - Real Tanks to our Imaginary tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Vehicles need to compliment infantry, not compete with them. It's not only required, it's a good idea. There is no way to balance vehicles when they compete for the same role as a dropsuit. All versions of a role need to be equally powerful or yo...
- by Skihids - at 2014.02.26 13:46:00
|
453. The basic HAV goal - in General Discussions [original thread]
HAVs need a purpose is what they need. They need a role of their own, not to compete with infantry to slay infantry one at a time. As long as they compete directly with infantry they will need to be just as vulnerable. Give them a different rol...
- by Skihids - at 2014.02.26 03:49:00
|
454. TankBush - in General Discussions [original thread]
TheD1CK wrote: I repeat..... HAV limits 2 in Ambush 3 in Domination 4 in Skirmish Until enough people agree and push CCP to do this, Enjoy the Tank spam !!!! Artificial caps on otherwise OP suits is not the way. Tanks need to be given a...
- by Skihids - at 2014.02.25 20:18:00
|
455. TankBush - in General Discussions [original thread]
What's happening is that players are choosing the more appropriate suit for the task at hand. The task is to slay infantry and there is one suit that does so far better than all the rest. It has far more eHP, DPS, and speed than every other suit...
- by Skihids - at 2014.02.25 20:12:00
|
456. New Dev blog Up! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Heathen Bastard wrote: Obodiah Garro wrote: A satellite launcher huh. Woop Woop. This is going to change everything guys get hyped! Seriously though, instead of making new buildings, take what you got and make it look not so much ass? Good...
- by Skihids - at 2014.02.25 19:20:00
|
457. New Dev blog Up! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Two paragraphs about how neat it is to be a concept artist on this project. It's not even in league with "What I did on my summer vacation". A teacher would give it a poor grade for lack of content.
- by Skihids - at 2014.02.25 19:03:00
|
458. Tanks - Real Tanks to our Imaginary tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: Pisidon Gmen wrote: [ You wanted the changes. Why aren't you happy with them? change is good when it changes small things over time changing every thing at 1 time was stupid But that's what infantry wanted. Everythi...
- by Skihids - at 2014.02.25 18:52:00
|
459. Tanks - Real Tanks to our Imaginary tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Price, name, and description doesn't matter, it's the role. What we have is suit "A" and suit "B" that are competing directly for the same game role: slaying infantry. Suit "A" is faster than suit "B". Suit "A" has an order more magnitude eHP th...
- by Skihids - at 2014.02.25 18:23:00
|
460. Tanks - Real Tanks to our Imaginary tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
The problem is that tanks aren't acting like tanks, they act just like infantry suits. They have a main gun that they use to kill one merc at a time. They chase them down and kill them one at a time, one right after the other. THEY OCCUPY THE E...
- by Skihids - at 2014.02.25 17:54:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |