| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 |
161. Hey CCP I summon you to answer a simple request - in General Discussions [original thread]
Not really worth it unless your doing PC :/
- by RedZer0 MK1 - at 2013.10.06 19:30:00
|
162. So, how we suppose to play this game CCP ? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Don't die, regardless of win or lose. Just wish there was a reason to win though.
- by RedZer0 MK1 - at 2013.10.06 19:24:00
|
163. Let's talk HMG's. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Damage: AR>SMG>HMG The hmg is out of place. A SMG(sidearm) does more damage per round than the HMG(primary), why? The HMG should do more damage and more range than the smg, but less than an AR.
- by RedZer0 MK1 - at 2013.10.06 01:47:00
|
164. Full squad of Amarr Assaults with Imperial SRs - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ran into this, pain in the ass. They slightly out range everybody, with the option to one shot half the team.
- by RedZer0 MK1 - at 2013.10.04 22:14:00
|
165. Why do you people want to nerf the logistics class? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Take away the 10% weapon damage buff from everything. Give assault's a 1% damage buff per level as a class bonus, give Logi's the 5% reduction per level for equipment. Raise Logi base HP and reduce CPU/PG and high and low slots accordingly.
- by RedZer0 MK1 - at 2013.10.04 22:09:00
|
166. Why I honestly don't believe that HAV can ever be balanced. - in General Discussions [original thread]
All these problems would be solved with a change in map design. Two clearly defined bases for ambush with a central center local with a CRU and supply depot.
- by RedZer0 MK1 - at 2013.10.04 18:57:00
|
167. It's time for a test server - in General Discussions [original thread]
The idea of a test server is by far the best direct solution. But, considering the numerous hurdles involved, it isn't practical on PSN. A respec system would allow people to fully test and flesh out vehicles. Ensuring ample data and opinions coul...
- by RedZer0 MK1 - at 2013.10.03 18:57:00
|
168. If (when) there's a respec, why it should be a full respec instead of a part... - in General Discussions [original thread]
It really should be an across the board respec. It is a change to the makeup of the skill tree. It doesn't matter if Tue changes are vehicle based, the addition and removal of skills dictate a huge change in skill tree planning. The OP outlined a ...
- by RedZer0 MK1 - at 2013.10.03 17:47:00
|
169. Active Scanner is breaking this game - in General Discussions [original thread]
It is not even close to game breaking. No one ran active scanners (that I knew of) before the switch. Now? Not even a large minority are running them. They are quite easy to counter, if you want to. Not many things in this game have a hard counter...
- by RedZer0 MK1 - at 2013.09.27 17:02:00
|
170. Suggestion. Can you allow all my alts to gain passive SP? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
So, even if they do RE-instate passive sp for alts, we are already screwed. Those that have alts on different psn accounts will have them stuck there. Also, for those of us who had alts on the same account from the era of when they all got passive...
- by RedZer0 MK1 - at 2013.09.27 13:13:00
|
171. Pub Matches - ISK Payout Calculation - in General Discussions [original thread]
Knight Soiaire wrote: I heard its, the ISK cost of items the enemy lost, shared out among players on your team, based on their performance. (WP) Pretty much this. We get some weird contracts. "We will pay you based on how much destroy, rega...
- by RedZer0 MK1 - at 2013.09.26 22:56:00
|
172. Pub Matches - ISK Payout Calculation - in General Discussions [original thread]
The way it is calculated is strange to say the least. How can your performance not have a direct impact to your payout?
- by RedZer0 MK1 - at 2013.09.26 22:04:00
|
173. I'm getting pretty sick - in General Discussions [original thread]
The modules should work like weapons do, a 5% increase to base stat going up in tiers. Just look at shields, 22-33-66 it doesn't make sense. The basic form of modules should have the lion share of stats. Then as you progress they get incrementally...
- by RedZer0 MK1 - at 2013.09.26 18:58:00
|
174. Who's going to take the armour challenge? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Honestly if the CPU/PG was lower they would have a place. Anyway, the challenge can't be meet. There is just no place for reactive plates.
- by RedZer0 MK1 - at 2013.09.19 22:42:00
|
175. Heavies need some lovin - in General Discussions [original thread]
ladwar wrote: [quote=RedZer0 MK1]Played with the HMG after 1.4 update. Still bad, even more so with such large maps. They need range, even at the cost of some dispersion. A little extra damage wouldn't hurt. Still don't know how damage per roun...
- by RedZer0 MK1 - at 2013.09.19 19:05:00
|
176. Is a respec in your mind and hopes? - in General Discussions [original thread]
A respec system would bolster the number of players in the game, more players more money.
- by RedZer0 MK1 - at 2013.09.18 16:39:00
|
177. Heavies need some lovin - in General Discussions [original thread]
Played with the HMG after 1.4 update. Still bad, even more so with such large maps. They need range, even at the cost of some dispersion. A little extra damage wouldn't hurt. Still don't know how damage per round goes AR>SMG>HMG.
- by RedZer0 MK1 - at 2013.09.17 19:22:00
|
178. FW Wheres it going Next? - in General Discussions [original thread]
For FW to be the inbetween step for pubs an PC. Higher stakes, bigger rewards.
- by RedZer0 MK1 - at 2013.09.17 15:44:00
|
179. CCP what are you doing in the way of getting new people in dust 514? - in General Discussions [original thread]
MAG didn't have a very good ad campaign, and they averaged what dust does total per faction (3 factions with 2k~4k players). Many people have tried and passed on dust. If the game was in a stable place as far as mechanics, word of mouth would be m...
- by RedZer0 MK1 - at 2013.09.16 21:01:00
|
180. Im afraid to spec into anything - in General Discussions [original thread]
The level of uncertainty when making skill choices is absurd. We as players are lead to believe that our skill choices matter. Yet, be forever vulnerable to a 'balancing' pass making our choice barely relevant. The whole skill system, and subseque...
- by RedZer0 MK1 - at 2013.09.16 15:56:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |