| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
3721. CCP - Community Opinion on VEHICLE BALANCE - in General Discussions [original thread]
Duran Lex wrote: KING CHECKMATE wrote: Now 1st off i must say we are doing this wrong. The community, me included, is fighting almost daily ,Tankers vs AV and now our posts are unproductive. Now OBVIOUSLY everyone has a different point of...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.25 21:30:00
|
3722. it makes me laugh when i see some of ccp supposed fixes - in General Discussions [original thread]
Im sorry OP but im not gonna be involved in another sniper argument! But I wil tell you the basis of my opinion from my conversation with Jantheil We spent many pages discussing the changes to the sniper's abilities, spots, and even the basic ar...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.25 21:22:00
|
3723. Swarm Launchers vs Stinger Missiles - in General Discussions [original thread]
CharCharOdell wrote: To start off, I'm one of a few hundred qualified stinger (Fim-92) gunners in the USA. Compared the the multimillion dollar jets they shoot down, they're dirt cheap. They can kill a poorly "fit" aircraft extremely easily. An...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.25 21:03:00
|
3724. anti-vehicle and tankers alike, let me enlighten you - in General Discussions [original thread]
chase rowland wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Mossellia Delt wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: AV should not 1 shot a tankmbecause I have specced into them AV requires the person to skill into AV to get proto, he has to go through more levels to g...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.25 20:53:00
|
3725. "Estimated battle finder time" - in General Discussions [original thread]
I don't understand, but some you guys seem to get really really bad results. Every time I go for a match I get an estimated of about 12secs, and get put in a match around 2secs of waiting when im in a squad it takes 15secs max, and Imhave only lo...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.25 20:46:00
|
3726. CCP! HEAVIES DEMAND HEAVY REWARDS! (Petition-ish) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Forlorn Destrier wrote: JieXi Bao wrote: Forlorn Destrier wrote: DS 10 wrote: We are tired of being left out. One racial suit. No BPO HMG. No new weapons. The heavy class now is nearly the exact same as heavies at the drop of Uprising ...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.25 20:40:00
|
3727. Matchmaking- The Solution - in General Discussions [original thread]
GSP GoTSoMePoT wrote: So what's the bottom line then ? That there's no hope for the game as the player base slowly drops lower and lower. CCP needs to do somethng quick to get players to come to the game or come back and stay for longer then 2...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.25 17:24:00
|
3728. Overhaul the WP System: Tie WP to Suit/Role type - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mossellia Delt wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Mossellia Delt wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Emphasis on Proto, the scanner you are refering to specifically comes with a 12db prescision. But it also happens to come with a low pulse time, low FOV ...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.25 17:17:00
|
3729. Overhaul the WP System: Tie WP to Suit/Role type - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mossellia Delt wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Emphasis on Proto, the scanner you are refering to specifically comes with a 12db prescision. But it also happens to come with a low pulse time, low FOV and high recharge. You would only use this for...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.25 17:02:00
|
3730. Overhaul the WP System: Tie WP to Suit/Role type - in General Discussions [original thread]
Skihids wrote: Beren Hurin wrote: Skihids wrote: WP's should be awarded for what you DO, not what you do it WITH. Certain suits should be better at certain actions and that is the reason to chose them, but if you manage to do the same ac...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.25 16:56:00
|
3731. Overhaul the WP System: Tie WP to Suit/Role type - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mossellia Delt wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Well you see thats the thing, if you basing your argument on the mini suit bonus, I could go as far as to say based on gallante suit bonuses the gallante is perfect for sneaking around and keeping ou...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.25 16:51:00
|
3732. Overhaul the WP System: Tie WP to Suit/Role type - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mossellia Delt wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Mossellia Delt wrote: Beren Hurin wrote: Mossellia Delt wrote: I think this is an awful Idea as a scout looks like we would once again get the short end of the stick. Dang dude!?! Why so p...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.25 16:32:00
|
3733. Overhaul the WP System: Tie WP to Suit/Role type - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mossellia Delt wrote: Beren Hurin wrote: Mossellia Delt wrote: I think this is an awful Idea as a scout looks like we would once again get the short end of the stick. Dang dude!?! Why so pessimistic? Suggest something!! Don't JUST be ...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.25 16:04:00
|
3734. anti-vehicle and tankers alike, let me enlighten you - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mossellia Delt wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: AV should not 1 shot a tankmbecause I have specced into them AV requires the person to skill into AV to get proto, he has to go through more levels to get his av then you do for your tank ] BUL...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.25 15:47:00
|
3735. Matchmaking- The Solution - in General Discussions [original thread]
GSP GoTSoMePoT wrote: I have a post with almost the same idea in feedback. And I convinced you there it isn't the best idea. Age based stomping happens in every game, you don't know what your doing etc etc. NPE will ease this. Someone wil...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.25 15:23:00
|
3736. CCP - Community Opinion on VEHICLE BALANCE - in General Discussions [original thread]
jerrmy12 kahoalii wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Sheild tanks Passive Health: Pitiful (1K- 3K) Equivalent Active Health: Collasal (20-30 K) Main turret power: Low Speed: Hypersonic Ammo reserves: Moderate ** Rail: 40 ** Blaster: 300 **Missile: 30...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.25 15:10:00
|
3737. anti-vehicle and tankers alike, let me enlighten you - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mossellia Delt wrote: As long as risk vs reward arnt balanced, then tanks need a buff. 2+ mil isk tank shouldnt lose to a 150k isk dropsuit solo. Something that actually takes skill, massive amounts of SP and isk shouldnt lose to one guy si...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.25 14:37:00
|
3738. Matchmaking- The Solution - in General Discussions [original thread]
Segregating suit tiers is not the way to go. You just end up with Tier 1 standard Stompers Tier 2 Advanced Stompers Tier 3 Proto Stompers So now noobs are getting stomped at 3 tiers instead of just 1. It also near defeats the point of suot tier...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.25 14:32:00
|
3739. anti-vehicle and tankers alike, let me enlighten you - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ok then AV should not 1 shot a tank from behind why not? If he is behind you firing on yoir weak spot I would expect him to do serious damage, or disable the engine AV should not 1 shot a tank because it costs a lot of money Tanks are too ex...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.25 14:06:00
|
3740. anti-vehicle and tankers alike, let me enlighten you - in General Discussions [original thread]
chase rowland wrote: if i have everything unlocked for vehicles, i should not be 1 shotted by AV. why should a 50k peice of epuipment overpower a 2 mill tank? you arent using reason, your constantly discarding everything i represent and shoot ...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.25 13:44:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |