| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
3701. Why do logis have so many slots? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cosgar wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: TechMechMeds wrote: Sarducar Kahn wrote: They are super assaulters simply because they can stack complex HP/DPS mods why not reduce the amount if slots to make up for the gain in equipment slots. While t...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.26 13:56:00
|
3702. anti-vehicle and tankers alike, let me enlighten you - in General Discussions [original thread]
chase rowland wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: jerrmy12 kahoalii wrote: Dunk Mujunk wrote: jerrmy12 kahoalii wrote: you have got to be ******* serious, or trolling. 1 person, easily destroy a TANK??? then whats the point of a TANK? 1v1 blas...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.26 13:46:00
|
3703. Why do logis have so many slots? - in General Discussions [original thread]
TechMechMeds wrote: Sarducar Kahn wrote: They are super assaulters simply because they can stack complex HP/DPS mods why not reduce the amount if slots to make up for the gain in equipment slots. While the have slots, pg and CPU the will alw...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.26 13:42:00
|
3704. it makes me laugh when i see some of ccp supposed fixes - in General Discussions [original thread]
Crash Monster wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: An OP weapon is when the ONLY way to take out a weapon x is with a weapon x! Now if they were roof camping, redline camping, or somewhere in the back beyond with a full view of the entire map, that was...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.26 12:06:00
|
3705. it makes me laugh when i see some of ccp supposed fixes - in General Discussions [original thread]
Crash Monster wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: There was considerably less risk to sniping then any other proffesion, if camper found a good spoint and glitched his barrel through the terrain he could be untoachable. And don't forget if the only wa...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.26 11:45:00
|
3706. anti-vehicle and tankers alike, let me enlighten you - in General Discussions [original thread]
jerrmy12 kahoalii wrote: Dunk Mujunk wrote: jerrmy12 kahoalii wrote: you have got to be ******* serious, or trolling. 1 person, easily destroy a TANK??? then whats the point of a TANK? 1v1 blaster, this isn't ******* COD kid, whoever shoo...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.26 11:26:00
|
3707. it makes me laugh when i see some of ccp supposed fixes - in General Discussions [original thread]
Crash Monster wrote: I would argue that sniping has always had an appropriate level of risk. The easiest people to snipe are snipers. I think part of the problem is that people fit for CQC find that they can't take out a sniper with their own ...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.26 11:20:00
|
3708. Matchmaking- The Solution - in General Discussions [original thread]
Vyzion Eyri wrote: Tiercide: remove tiers and at the same time, tears. There will be minor despair and doomsaying about loss of progression, but to be honest tiercide is the best-looking alternative to this gear system which many seem to disag...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.26 11:10:00
|
3709. Call for Friggin, Respec - in General Discussions [original thread]
Now this is my first time debating respecs, so feel free to challenge, pick apart, or support my points, im always good for a civillised debate! I would like to draw attention to this video. http://youtu.be/3fjch0kBjQI This is the only part o...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.26 11:03:00
|
3710. Matchmaking- The Solution - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sir Petersen wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Sir Petersen wrote: The best solution to matchmaking is no matchmaking. Yeah cause game where you get Super Awsome Player, Proto gear Awsome Player, Proto gear Average Player, mlt gear Poor Play...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.26 10:26:00
|
3711. Matchmaking- The Solution - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sir Petersen wrote: The best solution to matchmaking is no matchmaking. Yeah cause game where you get Super Awsome Player, Proto gear Awsome Player, Proto gear Average Player, mlt gear Poor Player, mlt gear Sounds fun!
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.26 09:47:00
|
3712. Matchmaking- The Solution - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kasote Denzara wrote: Sleepy Shadow wrote: Gear based matchmaking is not a good idea. You can verify this in three easy steps. 1. Create an alt 2. Slaughter some new players in battle academy 3. Come back and admit gear based matchmaking i...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.26 09:35:00
|
3713. CCP and DUST have no real Competition. - in General Discussions [original thread]
First off all, PS2 players would like come over to dust as well. We are still in the early stages of the 10yr roadmap. While competition can be good, this early in development it isn't! If EVE had competition in its infant years it wouldn't end u...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.25 23:23:00
|
3714. [ requests ] dropships - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Nguruthos IX wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Fristname Family name wrote: I would like to see mobil CRU spawn give some war points. And the logistics dropships to be faster/more maneuverable to avoid getting hit and to be able to take more hits....
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.25 22:52:00
|
3715. anti-vehicle and tankers alike, let me enlighten you - in General Discussions [original thread]
THUNDER HOURSE wrote: not trolling I agree that an tank is an force multiplier that deserves more than one person tanking an tank down. as such like the map where an drop ship puts an AVer to where an tank can not be able to move the turrets hi...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.25 22:49:00
|
3716. it makes me laugh when i see some of ccp supposed fixes - in General Discussions [original thread]
Poonmunch wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: As for 5 this is dependant on the suit type, I would expect it to be hard for say a commando to snipe from behind enemy lines, but it is important role for a scout sniper. I'm not sure I disagree with yo...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.25 22:45:00
|
3717. anti-vehicle and tankers alike, let me enlighten you - in General Discussions [original thread]
THUNDER HOURSE wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: jerrmy12 kahoalii wrote: 1. i can solo my assault, but not my tank? 2. there are times where i roll with infintry(see wat i did thar)and still get destroyed by forge/swarm/1hk lai dais. 3. i went 15...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.25 22:29:00
|
3718. it makes me laugh when i see some of ccp supposed fixes - in General Discussions [original thread]
Poonmunch wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Im sorry OP but im not gonna be involved in another sniper argument! But I wil tell you the basis of my opinion from my conversation with Jantheil We spent many pages discussing the changes to the sniper'...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.25 22:22:00
|
3719. anti-vehicle and tankers alike, let me enlighten you - in General Discussions [original thread]
jerrmy12 kahoalii wrote: 1. i can solo my assault, but not my tank? 2. there are times where i roll with infintry(see wat i did thar)and still get destroyed by forge/swarm/1hk lai dais. 3. i went 15-0 a match infintry solo, no team mates. 4. fo...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.25 21:57:00
|
3720. anti-vehicle and tankers alike, let me enlighten you - in General Discussions [original thread]
jerrmy12 kahoalii wrote: Dunk Mujunk wrote: CCP needs to not Buff or Nerf anything and some how make a game mode that forces Tanks and Infantry to work together. I have no idea what this mode would be. Maybe a capture the flag esq type game ...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.25 21:34:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |