Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Maken Tosch
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
1805
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 21:53:00 -
[1] - Quote
Source: https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=66130
HowDidThatTaste wrote:
The solution would be giving an option to consumers to keep what you have and no SP/AUR reset or reset both SP and Aurum and you start over.
Either way when you log in you have to a check a box that agrees to the new terms and relinguishes there liability.
Every one gets a nice bonus from ccp and the issue goes away.
Not sure there is an answer everyone will like.
This may actually be a good idea for one. I didn't really think about it earlier. All this time we have been debating on whether or not CCP should either force everyone to keep what they have right now, or force everyone to reset everything. But not once did we consider the idea of making it an option, did we?
Imagine:
Come "commercial release" (May 6 perhaps) you log into Dust and suddenly you are greeted with a message from CCP giving you two options that you can only select once.
- Option 1: You get your AURUM back to your character, but you lose everything you gained including your SP, BPOs, ISK, and all other assets. The only exception to this is what you gained as a reward ('Exile' Assault Rifle BPO, 'Skinweave' Dropsuits, 'Quafe' Suits, etc.) unless you deleted those manually by deleting your character that has it.
- Option 2: You keep your assets, SP, ISK, and rewards, but you don't get back your AURUM.
Option 1 [Pros] - The terms in which you bought the merc pack for ( AURUM refunded on commercial release) finally gets satisfied. [Cons] - You start from scratch and face the prospect of facing players who decided to go for option 2. You also nullified your previous agreement when you were in closed beta by accepting the new agreement from CCP.
Option 2 [Pros] - You keep everything you worked hard for which is your assets, ISK, and SP and therefore you stay ahead of the game and avoid having to restart all over again. [Cons] - You willfully gave up any chance of getting your AURUM refunded by accepting the new agreement which nullified your previous agreement when you bought the merc pack during closed beta.
Once you made the choice, you receive a second message asking "ARE YOU SURE? PLEASE REVIEW YOUR CHOICE BEFORE MAKING THIS FINAL DECISION AND MAKE SURE THE FOLLOWING IS WHAT YOU SELECTED [insert player's option here]." Once the player clicks "YES" the message closes and the one-time option goes into effect.
But of course, we run into the problem of what CCP already posted earlier:
Source: https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=63890&find=unread
Quote:We have been getting a lot of questions about Skill Point resets lately. In order to help everyone find this information, here is CCP's official stance on resetting skill points.
We currently have no plans to reset your characters' skill points to a state where they are equivalent to a newly created character, barring something catastrophic.
That said, do you folks think this is a good idea? It may mean that CCP may have to contradict this above quote they posted (like they haven't contradicted themselves already), but at least the whole debate gets settled once and for all.
Or does it? |
BobThe843CakeMan
Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz Noir. Mercenary Group
158
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 21:57:00 -
[2] - Quote
i like this an i would keep my stuff. :) because i think they way i am now. |
Mithridates VI
Circle of Huskarl Minmatar Republic
511
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 21:58:00 -
[3] - Quote
Why should people who bought the merc pack have to choose which one of CCP's promises get kept to them?
One way they are put at a disadvantage to players who CCP didn't make the agreement with, greatly in excess of value of this AUR, the other they lose out on a purchase they made. |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
999
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 22:00:00 -
[4] - Quote
This punishes paying customers by making them choose between keeping their progress (like the non-paying customers) and only receiving half of the Merc Pack they purchased, or getting the Merc Pack they paid for but being screwed out of all progress they've made in-game.
Clearly the point of such an endeavor would be to hold our SP hostage to get us to relinquish our request to receive the entire Merc Pack.
If CCP goes this route I won't touch another product of theirs again
|
Maken Tosch
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
1805
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 22:01:00 -
[5] - Quote
Mithridates VI wrote:Why should people who bought the merc pack have to choose which one of CCP's promises get kept to them?
One way they are put at a disadvantage to players who CCP didn't make the agreement with, greatly in excess of value of this AUR, the other they lose out on a purchase they made.
Can you come up with a better solution? A solution that satisfies both sides. |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
999
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 22:04:00 -
[6] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:Mithridates VI wrote:Why should people who bought the merc pack have to choose which one of CCP's promises get kept to them?
One way they are put at a disadvantage to players who CCP didn't make the agreement with, greatly in excess of value of this AUR, the other they lose out on a purchase they made. Can you come up with a better solution? A solution that satisfies both sides.
"Both sides?"
Meaning "players" and "CCP?" |
Sete Clifton
PSU GHOST SYNDICATE
76
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 22:06:00 -
[7] - Quote
Baal Roo wrote:Maken Tosch wrote:Mithridates VI wrote:Why should people who bought the merc pack have to choose which one of CCP's promises get kept to them?
One way they are put at a disadvantage to players who CCP didn't make the agreement with, greatly in excess of value of this AUR, the other they lose out on a purchase they made. Can you come up with a better solution? A solution that satisfies both sides. "Both sides?" Meaning "players" and "CCP?"
No, there are plenty of us who believe a refund is not in order, and would rather just move on. |
Commercially Released
Sanmatar Kelkoons Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 22:06:00 -
[8] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:Mithridates VI wrote:Why should people who bought the merc pack have to choose which one of CCP's promises get kept to them?
One way they are put at a disadvantage to players who CCP didn't make the agreement with, greatly in excess of value of this AUR, the other they lose out on a purchase they made. Can you come up with a better solution? A solution that satisfies both sides.
Give everyone a refund of their AUR without a reset? It's essentially rewarding early adopters who paid attention to what they're getting.
The counter argument that this is "unfair" is just people who are upset for not snagging the deal while it lasted. |
BobThe843CakeMan
Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz Noir. Mercenary Group
158
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 22:06:00 -
[9] - Quote
Baal Roo wrote:This punishes paying customers by making them choose between keeping their progress (like the non-paying customers) and only receiving half of the Merc Pack they purchased, or getting the Merc Pack they paid for but being screwed out of all progress they've made in-game.
Clearly the point of such an endeavor would be to hold our SP hostage to get us to relinquish our request to receive the entire Merc Pack.
If CCP goes this route I won't touch another product of theirs again
well i don't want a refund because i would be losing money as i would have repurchase all the bpos tht cost a whole lot more. So unless you want tht just leave it alone. |
Maken Tosch
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
1805
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 22:06:00 -
[10] - Quote
Baal Roo wrote:Maken Tosch wrote:Mithridates VI wrote:Why should people who bought the merc pack have to choose which one of CCP's promises get kept to them?
One way they are put at a disadvantage to players who CCP didn't make the agreement with, greatly in excess of value of this AUR, the other they lose out on a purchase they made. Can you come up with a better solution? A solution that satisfies both sides. "Both sides?" Meaning "players" and "CCP?"
No.
The two sides are:
Side 1: The pro-refund crowd of players.
Side 2: The anti-refund crowd of players. |
|
Mithridates VI
Circle of Huskarl Minmatar Republic
513
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 22:07:00 -
[11] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:Mithridates VI wrote:Why should people who bought the merc pack have to choose which one of CCP's promises get kept to them?
One way they are put at a disadvantage to players who CCP didn't make the agreement with, greatly in excess of value of this AUR, the other they lose out on a purchase they made. Can you come up with a better solution? A solution that satisfies both sides.
There are plenty of other solutions to look at:
Give players who were promised future products to the value of a full merc pack non-AUR/booster items to the value of a merc pack.
A full SP refund for everyone, coupled with a merc pack for those purchased under those terms. Players who receive this merc pack have the SP which can be directly tied to their merc pack purchase deducted from their total.
CCP actually don't break any of their promises and on commercial release players are given another merc pack if they bought it under an agreement that said they could have another.
...trying to find a solution based on "oh, well this SEEMS fair" while disregarding the technical details of the issue isn't a good approach. |
Winscar Shinobi
Better Hide R Die
115
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 22:09:00 -
[12] - Quote
Aurum amplifies sp and asset gains, it isn't 100%
So that's punishing people because ccp can't keep promises.
Like I said in the other thread, you logic is so bad.
Maybe if ccp could remove all BONUS SP and aur items bought that would be a viable approach. As well as the ability to buy the aur BPOs at the reduced cost (maybe make it a 1 week sale after the reset) |
Mithridates VI
Circle of Huskarl Minmatar Republic
513
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 22:09:00 -
[13] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:Baal Roo wrote:Maken Tosch wrote:Mithridates VI wrote:Why should people who bought the merc pack have to choose which one of CCP's promises get kept to them?
One way they are put at a disadvantage to players who CCP didn't make the agreement with, greatly in excess of value of this AUR, the other they lose out on a purchase they made. Can you come up with a better solution? A solution that satisfies both sides. "Both sides?" Meaning "players" and "CCP?" No. The two sides are: Side 1: The pro-refund crowd of players. Side 2: The anti-refund crowd of players.
The pro-refund players are consumers who want exactly what they paid for.
The anti-refund players don't actually get a say in whether these consumers get what CCP agreed to give them and are free to stamp their feet and express their discontent but their opinions on what is fair have no bearing on the legal agreement between CCP and the players who are entitled to products to the value of a merc pack. |
Logi Bro
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
986
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 22:10:00 -
[14] - Quote
CCP has said there will be no more SP resets, the only thing we are looking at is AUR. In your first choice, SP, ISK, and AUR are all reset, that's a no no. |
Commercially Released
Sanmatar Kelkoons Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 22:13:00 -
[15] - Quote
Winscar Shinobi wrote:Aurum amplifies sp and asset gains, it isn't 100%
So that's punishing people because ccp can't keep promises.
Like I said in the other thread, you logic is so bad.
Maybe if ccp could remove all BONUS SP and aur items bought that would be a viable approach. As well as the ability to buy the aur BPOs at the reduced cost (maybe make it a 1 week sale after the reset)
So? They paid upfront to help support development. Does it really matter if they get something as insignificant as 90 days worth of boosters back? Chances are they are going to be a long term customer and will simply buy more of other things instead. Or trade the extras away keeping the Froob competitive. There are people out there with millions of SP more than you. Why is it so important to you that they have to pay more real life cash to get the same effect? Because that's what's at stake here. How much $ spent, not how many boosters they inject. |
Maken Tosch
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
1805
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 22:15:00 -
[16] - Quote
Mithridates VI wrote:Maken Tosch wrote:Mithridates VI wrote:Why should people who bought the merc pack have to choose which one of CCP's promises get kept to them?
One way they are put at a disadvantage to players who CCP didn't make the agreement with, greatly in excess of value of this AUR, the other they lose out on a purchase they made. Can you come up with a better solution? A solution that satisfies both sides. There are plenty of other solutions to look at: Give players who were promised future products to the value of a full merc pack non-AUR/booster items to the value of a merc pack. A full SP refund for everyone, coupled with a merc pack for those purchased under those terms. Players who receive this merc pack have the SP which can be directly tied to their merc pack purchase deducted from their total. CCP actually don't break any of their promises and on commercial release players are given another merc pack if they bought it under an agreement that said they could have another. ...trying to find a solution based on "oh, well this SEEMS fair" while disregarding the technical details of the issue isn't a good approach.
Hmm... hard to argue, but I still need to see all other options. Besides, how can I know which option is better? It just seems that no matter what CCP does, they still get screwed. So that makes three sides to satisfy: the pro-refund, anti-refund, and CCP.
Also, I'm not trying to disregard the technical details which is why I posted CCP's quote on my OP. I'm just trying to see what's the better solution. After all, my topic's title says "Possible" solution (not "definitive" solution). |
General Sideboob
Storm Wind Strikeforce Caldari State
12
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 22:15:00 -
[17] - Quote
Who cares? It's an FPS. Come home from work, turn it on, and start shooting.
PEW PEW PEW PEW PEW PEW PEW PEW PEWPEWPEWPEW |
Laheon
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
294
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 22:17:00 -
[18] - Quote
General Sideboob wrote:Who cares? It's an FPS. Come home from work, turn it on, and start shooting.
PEW PEW PEW PEW PEW PEW PEW PEW PEWPEWPEWPEW
+1 |
ReGnUM Public Relations
Imperfects Public Relations
67
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 22:18:00 -
[19] - Quote
Just Reset Everything |
Maken Tosch
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
1806
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 22:18:00 -
[20] - Quote
General Sideboob wrote:Who cares? It's an FPS. Come home from work, turn it on, and start shooting.
PEW PEW PEW PEW PEW PEW PEW PEW PEWPEWPEWPEW
I care. |
|
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
632
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 22:21:00 -
[21] - Quote
You guys didn't buy from CCP, you bought from Sony... who reserves the right to change their Terms of Service without telling you.
Or you could buy from Gamestop, I believe they have yet to fix the item's description. |
Commercially Released
Sanmatar Kelkoons Minmatar Republic
1
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 22:23:00 -
[22] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:You guys didn't buy from CCP, you bought from Sony... who reserves the right to change their Terms of Service without telling you.
Or you could buy from Gamestop, I believe they have yet to fix the item's description.
Changing terms for new sales does not change terms of sales already made. |
Skihids
The Tritan Industries
1109
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 22:24:00 -
[23] - Quote
I approve.
The folks who want a refund but also want to keep everything they bought with it have more greed than logic.
Any refund would be contingent upon surrendering the product.
Who would consider asking for a refund on a car and demanding that they get to keep it? I mean really? Who in their right mind thinks a business can operate this way?
So if someone wants to force a refund, let them. But then they return everything they purchased with that Aurum. That means a wipe of all boosted SP and all BPO's and any reminding BPC's. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
632
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 22:25:00 -
[24] - Quote
Commercially Released wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:You guys didn't buy from CCP, you bought from Sony... who reserves the right to change their Terms of Service without telling you.
Or you could buy from Gamestop, I believe they have yet to fix the item's description. Changing terms for new sales does not change terms of sales already made. They didn't change the term on the sale, they changed the terms on the product. |
Commercially Released
Sanmatar Kelkoons Minmatar Republic
1
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 22:29:00 -
[25] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Commercially Released wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:You guys didn't buy from CCP, you bought from Sony... who reserves the right to change their Terms of Service without telling you.
Or you could buy from Gamestop, I believe they have yet to fix the item's description. Changing terms for new sales does not change terms of sales already made. They didn't change the term on the sale, they changed the terms on the product. Not even close... |
Commercially Released
Sanmatar Kelkoons Minmatar Republic
1
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 22:32:00 -
[26] - Quote
Skihids wrote:I approve.
The folks who want a refund but also want to keep everything they bought with it have more greed than logic.
Any refund would be contingent upon surrendering the product.
Who would consider asking for a refund on a car and demanding that they get to keep it? I mean really? Who in their right mind thinks a business can operate this way?
So if someone wants to force a refund, let them. But then they return everything they purchased with that Aurum. That means a wipe of all boosted SP and all BPO's and any reminding BPC's.
Greed huh? Who is the greedy one in truth? The person who wants all of what they paid for? Or the person who wants another person not to get what they paid for? It doesn't hurt you at all, this is entirely an issue between early adopters (and current gamestop customers) and CCP. At the end of the day there are plenty who can afford to buy more anyway. This is only about making a few people feel better because they had to pay more to do it.
Irony alert, people are promoting pay to win as a way to preserve fairness! |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
632
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 22:33:00 -
[27] - Quote
Commercially Released wrote: Take it up with Sony then. |
Winscar Shinobi
Better Hide R Die
115
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 22:34:00 -
[28] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Commercially Released wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:You guys didn't buy from CCP, you bought from Sony... who reserves the right to change their Terms of Service without telling you.
Or you could buy from Gamestop, I believe they have yet to fix the item's description. Changing terms for new sales does not change terms of sales already made. They didn't change the term on the sale, they changed the terms on the product.
It still doesn't change the terms of your product after the fact.
Point in case:
I bought an apple iPhone 4 on release and got a warranty with it. That warranty covered water damage. About 7 months later they changed the terms and removed water damage coverage. About a year later I dropped my phone in my horses water tub. Apple refused to replace my phone because they didn't cover water damage anymore. I sued them, and got a new iPhone 4 and court costs paid.
Why? Because WHEN YOU BUY THE ITEM YOU AGREE TO THE TERMS. If the terms change, no matter how long after, the terms you agreed to at point of purchase remain the same.
And trust me, apples legal department can run circles around CCPs. |
Altina McAlterson
TRUE TEA BAGGERS
427
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 22:34:00 -
[29] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Commercially Released wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:You guys didn't buy from CCP, you bought from Sony... who reserves the right to change their Terms of Service without telling you.
Or you could buy from Gamestop, I believe they have yet to fix the item's description. Changing terms for new sales does not change terms of sales already made. They didn't change the term on the sale, they changed the terms on the product. What? I'm not following what you're saying.
It's simple really, the merc pack was purchased with the promise of future goods and services. CCP is obligated to provide those goods and services (or something of equal value) to those that purchased the item. This is why including statements about the future on products is monumentally stupid. Lifetime Guarantee is fine, but that's more of a marketing thing anyway. |
Sete Clifton
PSU GHOST SYNDICATE
78
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 22:34:00 -
[30] - Quote
Personally, I don't think it's worth fighting over. That being said, if you want a refund and are willing to accept a potential complete character/SP wipe (for everyone), then I have no reason to argue. |
|
Altina McAlterson
TRUE TEA BAGGERS
427
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 22:35:00 -
[31] - Quote
Winscar Shinobi wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:Commercially Released wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:You guys didn't buy from CCP, you bought from Sony... who reserves the right to change their Terms of Service without telling you.
Or you could buy from Gamestop, I believe they have yet to fix the item's description. Changing terms for new sales does not change terms of sales already made. They didn't change the term on the sale, they changed the terms on the product. It still doesn't change the terms of your product after the fact. Point in case: I bought an apple iPhone 4 on release and got a warranty with it. That warranty covered water damage. About 7 months later they changed the terms and removed water damage coverage. About a year later I dropped my phone in my horses water tub. Apple refused to replace my phone because they didn't cover water damage anymore. I sued them, and got a new iPhone 4 and court costs paid. Why? Because WHEN YOU BUY THE ITEM YOU AGREE TO THE TERMS. If the terms change, no matter how long after, the terms you agreed to at point of purchase remain the same. And trust me, apples legal department can run circles around CCPs.
It's "case in point" and that's not the same thing as this. That was a warranty, not a product.
|
Commercially Released
Sanmatar Kelkoons Minmatar Republic
1
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 22:38:00 -
[32] - Quote
Altina McAlterson wrote:Winscar Shinobi wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:Commercially Released wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:You guys didn't buy from CCP, you bought from Sony... who reserves the right to change their Terms of Service without telling you.
Or you could buy from Gamestop, I believe they have yet to fix the item's description. Changing terms for new sales does not change terms of sales already made. They didn't change the term on the sale, they changed the terms on the product. It still doesn't change the terms of your product after the fact. Point in case: I bought an apple iPhone 4 on release and got a warranty with it. That warranty covered water damage. About 7 months later they changed the terms and removed water damage coverage. About a year later I dropped my phone in my horses water tub. Apple refused to replace my phone because they didn't cover water damage anymore. I sued them, and got a new iPhone 4 and court costs paid. Why? Because WHEN YOU BUY THE ITEM YOU AGREE TO THE TERMS. If the terms change, no matter how long after, the terms you agreed to at point of purchase remain the same. And trust me, apples legal department can run circles around CCPs. It's "case in point" and that's not the same thing as this. That was a warranty, not a product.
Legally speaking, a warranty is a type of product. |
Commercially Released
Sanmatar Kelkoons Minmatar Republic
1
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 22:39:00 -
[33] - Quote
Sete Clifton wrote:Personally, I don't think it's worth fighting over. That being said, if you want a refund and are willing to accept a potential complete character/SP wipe (for everyone), then I have no reason to argue.
Question, if the community had a choice between a total reset for everyone and an AUR reset for everyone, why would they pick the total reset? How does CCP honoring their agreement hurt anyone? |
Kane Fyea
BetaMax. CRONOS.
111
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 22:41:00 -
[34] - Quote
How about not pay money for an unfinished product. |
Hauker Due
Rubber Chicken Bombers
27
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 22:43:00 -
[35] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:Mithridates VI wrote:Why should people who bought the merc pack have to choose which one of CCP's promises get kept to them?
One way they are put at a disadvantage to players who CCP didn't make the agreement with, greatly in excess of value of this AUR, the other they lose out on a purchase they made. Can you come up with a better solution? A solution that satisfies both sides.
While there will be a mix of how people ran boosters the solution is simple.
CCP should take away the extra .5 SP players have made with boosters. Players keep the Pre-booster SP. CCP refunds ALL purchases.
It's not perfect, but CCP screwed up so there is no perfect solution. This way contractually fulfills the refund and keeps us from all getting completely reset back to 0 because of a few that feel CCP owes them.
EXAMPLE
Player A - 4 Million SP -Never purchased AUR/Merc Packs (therefore never ran boosters)
Player B - 6 Million SP -Purchased AUR/Merc Packs (ran both passive and active hense he made 1.5x player A)
SOLUTION
1. Take away the extra .5 SP that player B has made off of boosters = 2 million in this example 2. Refund player B's AUR/Merc Packs 2. Give both player A and B the ability to respec their SP any way they want
i hope this is clear
Both player A and B would be given 4 Million SP to respec and player B would have AUR/Merc Pack refunded
|
Altina McAlterson
TRUE TEA BAGGERS
427
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 22:45:00 -
[36] - Quote
Commercially Released wrote:
Legally speaking, a warranty is a type of product.
Poor wording on my part, forgot to include the rest of my point. The Warranty includes a clause that the terms may change and the consumer agrees to that. A separate agreement would be required for the product. |
Commercially Released
Sanmatar Kelkoons Minmatar Republic
1
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 22:46:00 -
[37] - Quote
Altina McAlterson wrote:Commercially Released wrote:
Legally speaking, a warranty is a type of product.
Poor wording on my part, forgot to include the rest of my point. The Warranty includes a clause that the terms may change and the consumer agrees to that. A separate agreement would be required for the product.
Usually a change that the customer finds unacceptable results in a refund and termination of the contract. Both sides have to agree to the change or the sale is reversed. |
Winscar Shinobi
Better Hide R Die
115
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 22:47:00 -
[38] - Quote
Altina McAlterson wrote:Winscar Shinobi wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:Commercially Released wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:You guys didn't buy from CCP, you bought from Sony... who reserves the right to change their Terms of Service without telling you.
Or you could buy from Gamestop, I believe they have yet to fix the item's description. Changing terms for new sales does not change terms of sales already made. They didn't change the term on the sale, they changed the terms on the product. It still doesn't change the terms of your product after the fact. Point in case: I bought an apple iPhone 4 on release and got a warranty with it. That warranty covered water damage. About 7 months later they changed the terms and removed water damage coverage. About a year later I dropped my phone in my horses water tub. Apple refused to replace my phone because they didn't cover water damage anymore. I sued them, and got a new iPhone 4 and court costs paid. Why? Because WHEN YOU BUY THE ITEM YOU AGREE TO THE TERMS. If the terms change, no matter how long after, the terms you agreed to at point of purchase remain the same. And trust me, apples legal department can run circles around CCPs. It's "case in point" and that's not the same thing as this. That was a warranty, not a product. 1. I know what I said.
2. A warranty is a product.
|
Sete Clifton
PSU GHOST SYNDICATE
78
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 23:03:00 -
[39] - Quote
Commercially Released wrote:Sete Clifton wrote:Personally, I don't think it's worth fighting over. That being said, if you want a refund and are willing to accept a potential complete character/SP wipe (for everyone), then I have no reason to argue. Question, if the community had a choice between a total reset for everyone and an AUR reset for everyone, why would they pick the total reset? How does CCP honoring their agreement hurt anyone?
While I personally would be able to accept an AUR only reset, it would cause a problem because not everyone has bought it. The issue is that AUR is both directly (boosters) and indirectly (items) tied to SP and ISK gains. So, people who get their AUR refunded would essentially be getting free SP/items compared to people who have have little to nothing in AUR. It would effectively have made AUR an investment with 100% interest and those who didn't "invest" in it would be losing out. The more AUR/merc packs you bought, the more of an advantage you be getting (as everything is essentially multiplied by two). So the only fair option would be to reset everything. |
First Prophet
Matari Combat Research and Manufacture Inc.
45
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 23:30:00 -
[40] - Quote
ReGnUM Public Relations wrote:Just Reset Everything YES. DO IT. |
|
Maken Tosch
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
1807
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 23:49:00 -
[41] - Quote
Hauker Due wrote:Maken Tosch wrote:Mithridates VI wrote:Why should people who bought the merc pack have to choose which one of CCP's promises get kept to them?
One way they are put at a disadvantage to players who CCP didn't make the agreement with, greatly in excess of value of this AUR, the other they lose out on a purchase they made. Can you come up with a better solution? A solution that satisfies both sides. While there will be a mix of how people ran boosters the solution is simple. CCP should take away the extra .5 SP players have made with boosters. Players keep the Pre-booster SP. CCP refunds ALL purchases. It's not perfect, but CCP screwed up so there is no perfect solution. This way contractually fulfills the refund and keeps us from all getting completely reset back to 0 because of a few that feel CCP owes them. EXAMPLE Player A - 4 Million SP -Never purchased AUR/Merc Packs (therefore never ran boosters) Player B - 6 Million SP -Purchased AUR/Merc Packs (ran both passive and active hense he made 1.5x player A) SOLUTION 1. Take away the extra .5 SP that player B has made off of boosters = 2 million in this example 2. Refund player B's AUR/Merc Packs 2. Give both player A and B the ability to respec their SP any way they want i hope this is clear Both player A and B would be given 4 Million SP to respec and player B would have AUR/Merc Pack refunded
This actually seems logical and well thought out. I'll update my OP to include this. |
Skihids
The Tritan Industries
1109
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 00:25:00 -
[42] - Quote
Commercially Released wrote:Skihids wrote:I approve.
The folks who want a refund but also want to keep everything they bought with it have more greed than logic.
Any refund would be contingent upon surrendering the product.
Who would consider asking for a refund on a car and demanding that they get to keep it? I mean really? Who in their right mind thinks a business can operate this way?
So if someone wants to force a refund, let them. But then they return everything they purchased with that Aurum. That means a wipe of all boosted SP and all BPO's and any reminding BPC's. Greed huh? Who is the greedy one in truth? The person who wants all of what they paid for? Or the person who wants another person not to get what they paid for? It doesn't hurt you at all, this is entirely an issue between early adopters (and current gamestop customers) and CCP. At the end of the day there are plenty who can afford to buy more anyway. This is only about making a few people feel better because they had to pay more to do it. Irony alert, people are promoting pay to win as a way to preserve fairness!
I am an early adopter, having been here from early closed beta.
What I don't want is to be dictated to by another early adopter. I bought bonus SP with Aurum and my time, and I really don't want to be forced to spend both all over again. Unless you can somehow refund all the time I spent making my cap for several weeks? No? I didn't think so.
I've ground up from scratch five times now and as everyone is fond of pointing out the current build is not terribly exciting. If I'm looking at another reset I'll just stop right now because I have a lot more things to do with 10-15 hours a week.
I don't care which way you want to go, but ont drag me with you. |
Altina McAlterson
TRUE TEA BAGGERS
427
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 00:26:00 -
[43] - Quote
Winscar Shinobi wrote: 1. I know what I said.
2. A warranty is a product.
Yes, I know a warranty is a product. I meant to say the warranty, not the product. |
Maken Tosch
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
1807
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 00:31:00 -
[44] - Quote
Altina McAlterson wrote:Winscar Shinobi wrote: 1. I know what I said.
2. A warranty is a product.
Yes, I know a warranty is a product. I meant to say the warranty, not the product.
Guys, I don't want my thread to be derailed by some stupid debate over the difference/similarity between warranties and products. This is not about that. This thread is about trying to collaborate together to come up with a solution.
Again, don't derail my thread. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
636
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 00:46:00 -
[45] - Quote
Commercially Released wrote: Greed huh? Who is the greedy one in truth? The person who wants all of what they paid for? Or the person who wants another person not to get what they paid for?
The original "refund at commercial release" part was under the assumption that there would be another reset at release. We now know there won't be one, therfore those people did get what they paid for. What we have no is people trying to take an advantage of a technicality, kind of like AFK farmers.
Lets assume that OB was CR, that was the 22nd and the last reset was the 10th If I remember right. I would bet you 10 mill ISK that if that had been the case people would be complaining that they didn't get their Aurum back on the 22nd, even though they got it back on the 10th.
CCP has already honored the spirit of the agreement, now people are just trying to take an advantage of a technicality.
I agree with Maken about removing the booster part of peoples SP and just giving them the refund, if they want it. |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2170
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 00:50:00 -
[46] - Quote
Terms of purchase and terms of use are separate. Terms of purchase can't be changed after the fact, and include the advertising text used to sell the product at the time of purchase. If the text in the item description in the PS Store included reference to something, that particular inclusion is a legal obligation for the seller. When purchasing - BEFORE agreeing to terms of use, the terms of purchase included mention of the Aurum and items being reset at the commercial release.
That being said, I had a suggestion in another thread which I think will be the best of both worlds.
No SP reset. No ISK reset. No Booster reset. Full refund of all purchased non-Booster gear on commercial release.
This means EVERYTHING you own other than Boosters is sold back to the store at cost price. If you bought an item that wasn't a Booster with AUR, you get back the amount of AUR you spent on it. If you bought something that wasn't a booster with ISK, you get the ISK back. Boosters that were purchased as part of a game pack AREN'T refunded, but you keep all your SP, so you still have the EFFECT of that Booster. Any items awarded by these packs are refunded.
People who have been farming ISK don't get penalised by a reset. People who bought the Merc Pack and were advised they'd have all their stuff reset get it. People who spent Aurum on Boosters don't have to be reset and have to re-use their Boosters.
Best of all worlds, imo. |
Skihids
The Tritan Industries
1110
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 00:55:00 -
[47] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote:Terms of purchase and terms of use are separate. Terms of purchase can't be changed after the fact, and include the advertising text used to sell the product at the time of purchase. If the text in the item description in the PS Store included reference to something, that particular inclusion is a legal obligation for the seller. When purchasing - BEFORE agreeing to terms of use, the terms of purchase included mention of the Aurum and items being reset at the commercial release.
That being said, I had a suggestion in another thread which I think will be the best of both worlds.
No SP reset. No ISK reset. No Booster reset. Full refund of all purchased non-Booster gear on commercial release.
This means EVERYTHING you own other than Boosters is sold back to the store at cost price. If you bought an item that wasn't a Booster with AUR, you get back the amount of AUR you spent on it. If you bought something that wasn't a booster with ISK, you get the ISK back. Boosters that were purchased as part of a game pack AREN'T refunded, but you keep all your SP, so you still have the EFFECT of that Booster. Any items awarded by these packs are refunded.
People who have been farming ISK don't get penalised by a reset. People who bought the Merc Pack and were advised they'd have all their stuff reset get it. People who spent Aurum on Boosters don't have to be reset and have to re-use their Boosters.
Best of all worlds, imo.
You would still have people wanting their boosters back too on that technicality, but call that partial refund a third option and I'm good with it. |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1002
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 00:56:00 -
[48] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Commercially Released wrote: Greed huh? Who is the greedy one in truth? The person who wants all of what they paid for? Or the person who wants another person not to get what they paid for?
The original "refund at commercial release" part was under the assumption that there would be another reset at release. We now know there won't be one, therfore those people did get what they paid for. What we have no is people trying to take an advantage of a technicality, kind of like AFK farmers. Lets assume that OB was CR, that was the 22nd and the last reset was the 10th If I remember right. I would bet you 10 mill ISK that if that had been the case people would be complaining that they didn't get their Aurum back on the 22nd, even though they got it back on the 10th. CCP has already honored the spirit of the agreement, now people are just trying to take an advantage of a technicality. I agree with Maken about removing the booster part of peoples SP and just giving them the refund, if they want it.
The "spirit" of the Merc Pack was that it was a presale of items that we would have at launch. As far as I can tell, this build (0.7) is a pale comparison of next build (0.8), and next build ISN'T the full launch product either. We've got another month of beta until next build, it's been a month and a half since the last wipe, and who knows how much longer from 0.8 to 1.0.
You're really arguing that getting these items in a beta with only a small sliver of the game playable and probably AT LEAST 6 more months before the game launches is "in the spirit" of getting these items at launch?
|
Maken Tosch
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
1807
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 00:57:00 -
[49] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote:Terms of purchase and terms of use are separate. Terms of purchase can't be changed after the fact, and include the advertising text used to sell the product at the time of purchase. If the text in the item description in the PS Store included reference to something, that particular inclusion is a legal obligation for the seller. When purchasing - BEFORE agreeing to terms of use, the terms of purchase included mention of the Aurum and items being reset at the commercial release.
That being said, I had a suggestion in another thread which I think will be the best of both worlds.
No SP reset. No ISK reset. No Booster reset. Full refund of all purchased non-Booster gear on commercial release.
This means EVERYTHING you own other than Boosters is sold back to the store at cost price. If you bought an item that wasn't a Booster with AUR, you get back the amount of AUR you spent on it. If you bought something that wasn't a booster with ISK, you get the ISK back. Boosters that were purchased as part of a game pack AREN'T refunded, but you keep all your SP, so you still have the EFFECT of that Booster. Any items awarded by these packs are refunded.
People who have been farming ISK don't get penalised by a reset. People who bought the Merc Pack and were advised they'd have all their stuff reset get it. People who spent Aurum on Boosters don't have to be reset and have to re-use their Boosters.
Best of all worlds, imo.
This may work as well. After all, it is an idea. I'll update the OP. |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1002
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 00:59:00 -
[50] - Quote
Simple solution:
CCP honors the terms of the merc pack and gives the people who purchased the Merc Pack the items in the Merc Pack at "commercial release". This is an agreement between CCP and their paying customers. Whether it satisfies the "I don't want the people who paid to get the thing they purchased" crowd or not is really irrelevant as far as I'm concerned. If you wanted a Merc Pack, you should have bought one, if you didn't, then what's the problem? |
|
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
636
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 01:00:00 -
[51] - Quote
Baal Roo wrote:
You're really arguing that getting these items in a beta with only a small sliver of the game playable and probably AT LEAST 6 more months before the game launches is "in the spirit" of getting these items at launch?
I will keep my ISK, Salvage, and all other Assets, so yes. You're playing the game, however incomplete it may be. This is by all means a commercial release, even if CCP won't admit it. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
636
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 01:03:00 -
[52] - Quote
Baal Roo wrote:Simple solution:
CCP honors the terms of the merc pack and gives the people who purchased the Merc Pack the items in the Merc Pack at "commercial release". This is an agreement between CCP and their paying customers. Whether it satisfies the "I don't want the people who paid to get the thing they purchased" crowd or not is really irrelevant as far as I'm concerned. If you wanted a Merc Pack, you should have bought one, if you didn't, then what's the problem? And what problem do you have with giving up any boosted SP? CCP only said they wouldn't fully reset SP, not that they wouldn't take parts of it away.
Quote: We currently have no plans to reset your characters' skill points to a state where they are equivalent to a newly created character, barring something catastrophic.
As long as they don't put you back at 0, they technically haven't lied. |
Vrain Matari
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
460
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 01:06:00 -
[53] - Quote
Wow.
Didn't know this discussion was happening.
I was fully cognizant of my actions when I spent my AUR.
We were told that barring act-of-god catastrophe we had seen the final reset. To ask for a refund of AUR now, with all the complications that implies, seems insane to me.
|
Sete Clifton
PSU GHOST SYNDICATE
79
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 01:09:00 -
[54] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Baal Roo wrote:Simple solution:
CCP honors the terms of the merc pack and gives the people who purchased the Merc Pack the items in the Merc Pack at "commercial release". This is an agreement between CCP and their paying customers. Whether it satisfies the "I don't want the people who paid to get the thing they purchased" crowd or not is really irrelevant as far as I'm concerned. If you wanted a Merc Pack, you should have bought one, if you didn't, then what's the problem? And what problem do you have with giving up any boosted SP? CCP only said they wouldn't fully reset SP, not that they wouldn't take parts of it away. Quote: We currently have no plans to reset your characters' skill points to a state where they are equivalent to a newly created character, barring something catastrophic.
As long as they don't put you back at 0, they technically haven't lied.
Forcing them to refund AUR when they have no plans to could also very easily be considered "catastrophic", especially since AUR effects SP. So they could reset you to as low as zero and they still wouldn't have lied.
|
Maken Tosch
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
1807
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 01:10:00 -
[55] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Baal Roo wrote:Simple solution:
CCP honors the terms of the merc pack and gives the people who purchased the Merc Pack the items in the Merc Pack at "commercial release". This is an agreement between CCP and their paying customers. Whether it satisfies the "I don't want the people who paid to get the thing they purchased" crowd or not is really irrelevant as far as I'm concerned. If you wanted a Merc Pack, you should have bought one, if you didn't, then what's the problem? And what problem do you have with giving up any boosted SP? CCP only said they wouldn't fully reset SP, not that they wouldn't take parts of it away. Quote: We currently have no plans to reset your characters' skill points to a state where they are equivalent to a newly created character, barring something catastrophic.
As long as they don't put you back at 0, they technically haven't lied.
CCP could technically do a partial reset of SP as suggested by the second idea posted on my OP (original idea by Hauker Due). After all, CCP did say they won't do a reset that equates to a "state where they are equivalent to a newly created character". This way, no one's character starts all over again like a newly-created character. They will just adjusted based on the SP gained from boosters. |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1004
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 01:11:00 -
[56] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Baal Roo wrote:Simple solution:
CCP honors the terms of the merc pack and gives the people who purchased the Merc Pack the items in the Merc Pack at "commercial release". This is an agreement between CCP and their paying customers. Whether it satisfies the "I don't want the people who paid to get the thing they purchased" crowd or not is really irrelevant as far as I'm concerned. If you wanted a Merc Pack, you should have bought one, if you didn't, then what's the problem? And what problem do you have with giving up any boosted SP? CCP only said they wouldn't fully reset SP, not that they wouldn't take parts of it away. Quote: We currently have no plans to reset your characters' skill points to a state where they are equivalent to a newly created character, barring something catastrophic.
As long as they don't put you back at 0, they technically haven't lied.
I don't have any problem giving back boosted SP if I get my booster back. I just don't see why it's necessary. Seems like a complicated way of fixing a simple problem, and one that the only purpose of is to say "nanny nanny boo boo" to paying customers.
Furthermore, this issue STILL hasn't been officially clarified by CCP. Many people spent their stuff from the Merc Pack assuming that it would be refunded at launch. If CCP would communicate with the players about this it would really clear this up. |
Maken Tosch
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
1807
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 01:13:00 -
[57] - Quote
Baal Roo wrote:Seems like a complicated way of fixing a simple problem
There is a problem with this statement. The problem is not simple. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
636
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 01:14:00 -
[58] - Quote
Baal Roo wrote: Many people spent their stuff from the Merc Pack assuming that it would be refunded at launch
We all know what they say about assumptions.
|
Sete Clifton
PSU GHOST SYNDICATE
79
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 01:15:00 -
[59] - Quote
Baal Roo wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:Baal Roo wrote:Simple solution:
CCP honors the terms of the merc pack and gives the people who purchased the Merc Pack the items in the Merc Pack at "commercial release". This is an agreement between CCP and their paying customers. Whether it satisfies the "I don't want the people who paid to get the thing they purchased" crowd or not is really irrelevant as far as I'm concerned. If you wanted a Merc Pack, you should have bought one, if you didn't, then what's the problem? And what problem do you have with giving up any boosted SP? CCP only said they wouldn't fully reset SP, not that they wouldn't take parts of it away. Quote: We currently have no plans to reset your characters' skill points to a state where they are equivalent to a newly created character, barring something catastrophic.
As long as they don't put you back at 0, they technically haven't lied. I don't have any problem giving back boosted SP if I get my booster back. I just don't see why it's necessary. Seems like a complicated way of fixing a simple problem, and one that the only purpose of is to say "nanny nanny boo boo" to paying customers. Furthermore, this issue STILL hasn't been officially clarified by CCP. Many people spent their stuff from the Merc Pack assuming that it would be refunded at launch. If CCP would communicate with the players about this it would really clear this up.
Here's why it's necessary:
Player A buys a merc pack and uses a passive booster and get x amount of SP because of it. Player B doesn't buy a merc pack and doesn't use a booster.
Player A is refunded his merc pack, keeps his SP and uses another booster to get another x amount of SP. This brings his total SP to that of Player B's + 2x.
Again, I don't really care, but if you want things to all be square then gained SP needs to be taken away as well. I'm not sure that is even possible, so a total reset seems more likely. This isn't the only reason, but it's the general idea. |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1004
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 01:17:00 -
[60] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Baal Roo wrote: Many people spent their stuff from the Merc Pack assuming that it would be refunded at launch
We all know what they say about assumptions.
I think assuming that a purchase agreement will be fulfilled by the seller should generally be considered an exception to the rule. If I buy a big mac from you, I ASSUME I will receive a big mac in exchange for the money I paid. |
|
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
636
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 01:18:00 -
[61] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:Baal Roo wrote:Seems like a complicated way of fixing a simple problem There is a problem with this statement. The problem is not simple. Guy buys 3 merc packs for 20 dollars each, and uses the 3 30 day boosters knowing that their won't be another reset, he then expects CCP to give him 60 dollars worth of merchandise. Seems simple to me, if somewhat illogical...
If they just got to keep the items then sure, but that much free SP? Hell no! |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1004
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 01:20:00 -
[62] - Quote
Sete Clifton wrote:Baal Roo wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:Baal Roo wrote:Simple solution:
CCP honors the terms of the merc pack and gives the people who purchased the Merc Pack the items in the Merc Pack at "commercial release". This is an agreement between CCP and their paying customers. Whether it satisfies the "I don't want the people who paid to get the thing they purchased" crowd or not is really irrelevant as far as I'm concerned. If you wanted a Merc Pack, you should have bought one, if you didn't, then what's the problem? And what problem do you have with giving up any boosted SP? CCP only said they wouldn't fully reset SP, not that they wouldn't take parts of it away. Quote: We currently have no plans to reset your characters' skill points to a state where they are equivalent to a newly created character, barring something catastrophic.
As long as they don't put you back at 0, they technically haven't lied. I don't have any problem giving back boosted SP if I get my booster back. I just don't see why it's necessary. Seems like a complicated way of fixing a simple problem, and one that the only purpose of is to say "nanny nanny boo boo" to paying customers. Furthermore, this issue STILL hasn't been officially clarified by CCP. Many people spent their stuff from the Merc Pack assuming that it would be refunded at launch. If CCP would communicate with the players about this it would really clear this up. Here's why it's necessary: Player A buys a merc pack and uses a passive booster and get x amount of SP because of it. Player B doesn't buy a merc pack and doesn't use a booster. Player A is refunded his merc pack, keeps his SP and uses another booster to get another x amount of SP. This brings his total SP to that of Player B's + 2x. Again, I don't really care, but if you want things to all be square then gained SP needs to be taken away as well. I'm not sure that is even possible, so a total reset seems more likely. This isn't the only reason, but it's the general idea.
I don't see why this is a problem. This lone of reasoning could be applied to ANY AUR purchase. The Merc Pack purchase included the use of all items during the beta and a refund of those items at commercial release. That's what we bought. If you think that product is unfair, take it up with CCP, not me. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
636
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 01:21:00 -
[63] - Quote
Baal Roo wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:Baal Roo wrote: Many people spent their stuff from the Merc Pack assuming that it would be refunded at launch
We all know what they say about assumptions. I think assuming that a purchase agreement will be fulfilled by the seller should generally be considered an exception to the rule. If I buy a big mac from you, I ASSUME I will receive a big mac in exchange for the money I paid. When a is available to everyone and is charging for in-game items, then you should reasonably expect it to be a commercial release. |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1004
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 01:22:00 -
[64] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Maken Tosch wrote:Baal Roo wrote:Seems like a complicated way of fixing a simple problem There is a problem with this statement. The problem is not simple. Guy buys 3 merc packs for 20 dollars each, and uses the 3 30 day boosters knowing that their won't be another reset, he then expects CCP to give him 60 dollars worth of merchandise. Seems simple to me, if somewhat illogical... If they just got to keep the items then sure, but that much free SP? Hell no!
the Merc pack SPECIFICALLY STATES that the items within it will be refunded at launch. That has NOTHING to do with any reset announcements that have been made. Why would someone assume that they WONT get the products they purchased? I still don't understand what crazy opposite world logic some of you guys seem to be operating under. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
636
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 01:23:00 -
[65] - Quote
Baal Roo wrote:
I don't see why this is a problem. This lone of reasoning could be applied to ANY AUR purchase. The Merc Pack purchase included the use of all items during the beta and a refund of those items at commercial release. That's what we bought. If you think that product is unfair, take it up with CCP, not me.
The product was not unfair, it was stupid, that's why it no longer says that in it's description You already said you don't have a problem with them taking a portion of your Sp, so why do you insist on trying to keep it? |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1004
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 01:24:00 -
[66] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Baal Roo wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:Baal Roo wrote: Many people spent their stuff from the Merc Pack assuming that it would be refunded at launch
We all know what they say about assumptions. I think assuming that a purchase agreement will be fulfilled by the seller should generally be considered an exception to the rule. If I buy a big mac from you, I ASSUME I will receive a big mac in exchange for the money I paid. When a is available to everyone and is charging for in-game items, then you should reasonably expect it to be a commercial release.
Then CCP should inform all players that we have reached commercial release and remove the "beta" tag at the top of the screen at login. Instead, they repeatedly make it clear that they DO NOT consider this to be commercial release. They can't have their cake and eat it to. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
636
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 01:25:00 -
[67] - Quote
Baal Roo wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:Maken Tosch wrote:Baal Roo wrote:Seems like a complicated way of fixing a simple problem There is a problem with this statement. The problem is not simple. Guy buys 3 merc packs for 20 dollars each, and uses the 3 30 day boosters knowing that their won't be another reset, he then expects CCP to give him 60 dollars worth of merchandise. Seems simple to me, if somewhat illogical... If they just got to keep the items then sure, but that much free SP? Hell no! the Merc pack SPECIFICALLY STATES that the items within it will be refunded at launch. That has NOTHING to do with any reset announcements that have been made. Why would someone assume that they WONT get the products they purchased? I still don't understand what crazy opposite world logic some of you guys seem to be operating under. This has nothing top do with a product itself and everything to do with the SP. The SP is the issue here, no one gives a rats ass about the refund. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
636
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 01:26:00 -
[68] - Quote
Baal Roo wrote: They can't have their cake and eat it to.
You're both doing the same thing though... |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1004
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 01:30:00 -
[69] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Baal Roo wrote: They can't have their cake and eat it to.
You're both doing the same thing though...
I'm the customer, they are the ones selling the product. If they want to eat the cake and have it, then shouldn't we get the same? Why should the customers be the ones getting the short end of the stick. They already have MY money. They screwed up and botched this whole ordeal with a confusing and intentionally obfuscated release schedule, and now the people who expected to get to use their purchased items for a commercially released game have had those items considered "used up" during a friggin' BETA, but somehow WE are the assholes that everyone is irritated with. It's mind boggling. |
Sete Clifton
PSU GHOST SYNDICATE
79
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 01:31:00 -
[70] - Quote
Baal Roo wrote:I don't see why this is a problem. This lone of reasoning could be applied to ANY AUR purchase. The Merc Pack purchase included the use of all items during the beta and a refund of those items at commercial release. That's what we bought. If you think that product is unfair, take it up with CCP, not me.
It's a problem because you're turning a one time purchase essentially into an investment, and anyone who didn't "invest" in it is getting screwed over. Look, the merc pack was meant to give you one set of the said items/AUR for your account. You got those items. If you want them returned to you, then you should also have to return everything they provided for you (aka SP).
|
|
Maken Tosch
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
1807
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 01:31:00 -
[71] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Baal Roo wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:Maken Tosch wrote:Baal Roo wrote:Seems like a complicated way of fixing a simple problem There is a problem with this statement. The problem is not simple. Guy buys 3 merc packs for 20 dollars each, and uses the 3 30 day boosters knowing that their won't be another reset, he then expects CCP to give him 60 dollars worth of merchandise. Seems simple to me, if somewhat illogical... If they just got to keep the items then sure, but that much free SP? Hell no! the Merc pack SPECIFICALLY STATES that the items within it will be refunded at launch. That has NOTHING to do with any reset announcements that have been made. Why would someone assume that they WONT get the products they purchased? I still don't understand what crazy opposite world logic some of you guys seem to be operating under. This has nothing top do with a product itself and everything to do with the SP. The SP is the issue here, no one gives a rats ass about the refund.
Um. This is about the refund. The point of this thread is to come up with ideas that can help CCP how to properly apply the refunds if they have to.
I would opt for the second idea of doing a partial reset of SP (remove only the SP gained from boosters) and refund the AURUM paid for said boosters in addition to what else was said in the second idea of the OP.
CCP was able to properly calculate how much SP people lost during the Passive SP bug we encountered since open beta. I'm pretty sure they can figure out how much SP we gained from boosters. |
Maken Tosch
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
1807
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 01:34:00 -
[72] - Quote
One more thing.
For those of you looking for a refund...
Am I correct to assume that you are only looking for a refund of the merc pack that you bought that had the "original description of commercial release"? Or are you including the merc pack that you bought AFTER the change in the description? |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1004
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 01:35:00 -
[73] - Quote
Sete Clifton wrote:Baal Roo wrote:I don't see why this is a problem. This lone of reasoning could be applied to ANY AUR purchase. The Merc Pack purchase included the use of all items during the beta and a refund of those items at commercial release. That's what we bought. If you think that product is unfair, take it up with CCP, not me. It's a problem because you're turning a one time purchase essentially into an investment, and anyone who didn't "invest" in it is getting screwed over. Look, the merc pack was meant to give you one set of the said items/AUR for your account. You got those items. If you want them returned to you, then you should also have to return everything they provided for you (aka SP).
no, the Merc pack was sold as a "presale" for items to be received at launch/commercial release. Use of these items in beta was presented as a "bonus" by CCP, and the terms of sale make this pretty clear. At launch/commercial release I expect to receive the product I purchased, or something of equal value. This is still the beta, it's not my fault if CCP is handling the rollout in such a **** poor way. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
636
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 01:37:00 -
[74] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote: Um. This is about the refund. The point of this thread is to come up with ideas that can help CCP how to properly apply the refunds if they have to.
I would opt for the second idea of doing a partial reset of SP (remove only the SP gained from boosters) and refund the AURUM paid for said boosters in addition to what else was said in the second idea of the OP.
CCP was able to properly calculate how much SP people lost during the Passive SP bug we encountered since open beta. I'm pretty sure they can figure out how much SP we gained from boosters.
Yes, but no one is trying to deny people the refund that is rightfully theirs, what people don't want is for people to get free SP. So at it's core the problem here is about the SP, not the refund itself. |
Maken Tosch
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
1807
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 01:40:00 -
[75] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Maken Tosch wrote: Um. This is about the refund. The point of this thread is to come up with ideas that can help CCP how to properly apply the refunds if they have to.
I would opt for the second idea of doing a partial reset of SP (remove only the SP gained from boosters) and refund the AURUM paid for said boosters in addition to what else was said in the second idea of the OP.
CCP was able to properly calculate how much SP people lost during the Passive SP bug we encountered since open beta. I'm pretty sure they can figure out how much SP we gained from boosters.
Yes, but no one is trying to deny people the refund that is rightfully theirs, what people don't want is for people to get free SP. So at it's core the problem here is about the SP, not the refund itself.
So which idea would you recommend for this problem? |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1004
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 01:40:00 -
[76] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Maken Tosch wrote: Um. This is about the refund. The point of this thread is to come up with ideas that can help CCP how to properly apply the refunds if they have to.
I would opt for the second idea of doing a partial reset of SP (remove only the SP gained from boosters) and refund the AURUM paid for said boosters in addition to what else was said in the second idea of the OP.
CCP was able to properly calculate how much SP people lost during the Passive SP bug we encountered since open beta. I'm pretty sure they can figure out how much SP we gained from boosters.
Yes, but no one is trying to deny people the refund that is rightfully theirs, what people don't want is for people to get free SP. So at it's core the problem here is about the SP, not the refund itself.
Then those people should have complained when CCP announced that they weren't doing any more SP resets and this specific issue was brought up. This is how CCP has decided to go about the launch, don't penalize the paying customers among us for CCP's poor decisions. |
Iskandar Zul Karnain
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
282
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 01:40:00 -
[77] - Quote
Wow. No more resets. If some people are really so hurt about it a wipe an reset is not out of line for those players but don't impose this on everyone. I don't want my aur back. I bought what I wanted with it with no expectation of a refund come open beta.
Give us the choice to reset or not if its really necessary. I don't want to lose all the isk and items I've hoarded. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
636
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 01:42:00 -
[78] - Quote
Baal Roo wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:Maken Tosch wrote: Um. This is about the refund. The point of this thread is to come up with ideas that can help CCP how to properly apply the refunds if they have to.
I would opt for the second idea of doing a partial reset of SP (remove only the SP gained from boosters) and refund the AURUM paid for said boosters in addition to what else was said in the second idea of the OP.
CCP was able to properly calculate how much SP people lost during the Passive SP bug we encountered since open beta. I'm pretty sure they can figure out how much SP we gained from boosters.
Yes, but no one is trying to deny people the refund that is rightfully theirs, what people don't want is for people to get free SP. So at it's core the problem here is about the SP, not the refund itself. Then those people should have complained when CCP announced that they weren't doing any more SP resets and this specific issue was brought up. This is how CCP has decided to go about the launch, don't penalize the paying customers among us for CCP's poor decisions. You said you don't mind losing some SP, so why are you so adamantly against it? Just let the SP go, you didn't pay for it. |
Maken Tosch
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
1807
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 01:45:00 -
[79] - Quote
Guys, we need more ideas. |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2171
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 01:46:00 -
[80] - Quote
Skihids wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote:Terms of purchase and terms of use are separate. Terms of purchase can't be changed after the fact, and include the advertising text used to sell the product at the time of purchase. If the text in the item description in the PS Store included reference to something, that particular inclusion is a legal obligation for the seller. When purchasing - BEFORE agreeing to terms of use, the terms of purchase included mention of the Aurum and items being reset at the commercial release.
That being said, I had a suggestion in another thread which I think will be the best of both worlds.
No SP reset. No ISK reset. No Booster reset. Full refund of all purchased non-Booster gear on commercial release.
This means EVERYTHING you own other than Boosters is sold back to the store at cost price. If you bought an item that wasn't a Booster with AUR, you get back the amount of AUR you spent on it. If you bought something that wasn't a booster with ISK, you get the ISK back. Boosters that were purchased as part of a game pack AREN'T refunded, but you keep all your SP, so you still have the EFFECT of that Booster. Any items awarded by these packs are refunded.
People who have been farming ISK don't get penalised by a reset. People who bought the Merc Pack and were advised they'd have all their stuff reset get it. People who spent Aurum on Boosters don't have to be reset and have to re-use their Boosters.
Best of all worlds, imo. You would still have people wanting their boosters back too on that technicality, but call that partial refund a third option and I'm good with it. Then they can argue for a full SP reset.
They still, as mentioned, get to keep the RESULTS of the Boosters, so they arguably DO still have them. |
|
Eltra Ardell
Immobile Infantry
4
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 01:48:00 -
[81] - Quote
Whatever the result, I do find it stupid that others want my SP taken away because I used Merc Pack Aurum and not some other Aurum.
Aurum is Aurum, boosters are boosters, and what was offered is what was offered. The Merc Pack wasn't some special pack only available to some DUST-equivalent of BoB. Everyone had the opportunity to purchase it. Why are people whining that they're not getting Merc Pack benefits when they didn't purchase the Merc Pack? I'm not demanding the millions of SP others got over me from playing before I did.
Why do people feel so entitled to things they didn't do that others did? |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
638
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 01:54:00 -
[82] - Quote
Eltra Ardell wrote:Whatever the result, I do find it stupid that others want my SP taken away because I used Merc Pack Aurum and not some other Aurum.
Aurum is Aurum, boosters are boosters, and what was offered is what was offered. The Merc Pack wasn't some special pack only available to some DUST-equivalent of BoB. Everyone had the opportunity to purchase it. Why are people whining that they're not getting Merc Pack benefits when they didn't purchase the Merc Pack? I'm not demanding the millions of SP others got over me from playing before I did.
Why do people feel so entitled to things they didn't do that others did? Do you even know what the hell is going on here? This is about the old merc pack, not the current one. No one cares if you got the SP from a merc pack. They care if you paid for a booster, used the booster, got the booster refunded, but you got to keep the effect of the booster for some reason, you then went and bought another booster with the refunded Arum. That's SP you didn't pay for.
And no, it wasn't available to everyone, only CB testers. |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1004
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 01:57:00 -
[83] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Eltra Ardell wrote:Whatever the result, I do find it stupid that others want my SP taken away because I used Merc Pack Aurum and not some other Aurum.
Aurum is Aurum, boosters are boosters, and what was offered is what was offered. The Merc Pack wasn't some special pack only available to some DUST-equivalent of BoB. Everyone had the opportunity to purchase it. Why are people whining that they're not getting Merc Pack benefits when they didn't purchase the Merc Pack? I'm not demanding the millions of SP others got over me from playing before I did.
Why do people feel so entitled to things they didn't do that others did? Do you even know what the hell is going on here? This is about the old merc pack, not the current one. No one cares if you got the SP from a merc pack. They care if you paid for a booster, used the booster, got the booster refunded, and got to keep the effect of the booster for some reason, you then went and bought another booster. And no, it wasn't available to everyone, only CB testers.
But what you just described is precisely what the Merc Pack describes. Why WOULDNT we want to get our Merc pack items refunded to us at launch? That's the product we purchased. Again, if you don't like it, take it up with CCP, but don't argue that we shouldn't get it just because you think it's "unfair". |
Eltra Ardell
Immobile Infantry
4
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 01:59:00 -
[84] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Eltra Ardell wrote:Whatever the result, I do find it stupid that others want my SP taken away because I used Merc Pack Aurum and not some other Aurum.
Aurum is Aurum, boosters are boosters, and what was offered is what was offered. The Merc Pack wasn't some special pack only available to some DUST-equivalent of BoB. Everyone had the opportunity to purchase it. Why are people whining that they're not getting Merc Pack benefits when they didn't purchase the Merc Pack? I'm not demanding the millions of SP others got over me from playing before I did.
Why do people feel so entitled to things they didn't do that others did? Do you even know what the hell is going on here? This is about the old merc pack, not the current one. Know one cares if you got the SP from a merc pack, they care if you paid for a booster, got to keep the effect of the booster, and then had the aurum from the booster back so you could bgy another one. And no, it wasn't available to everyone, only CB testers.
I understand that. I was in CB. I didn't purchase that Merc Pack.
What's wrong with them receiving what they bought? Why do you want to remove SP they got because they used "special" Aurum and not "normal" Aurum? Why do you feel like they should be penalized for making a purchase that CCP allowed them to make? Why do you feel they have an advantage over others?
Anyone demanding some sort of penalization for purchasing the Merc Pack needs to ask themselves that. They're not using mystical Blueprint Proto weapons with minimal fitting requirements. They're not getting suits with several more slots than usual. They're...getting boosters they paid for. Boosters you too can obtain. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
638
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 02:00:00 -
[85] - Quote
Baal Roo wrote:
But what you just described is precisely what the Merc Pack describes. Why WOULDNT we want to get our Merc pack items refunded to us at launch? That's the product we purchased. Again, if you don't like it, take it up with CCP, but don't argue that we shouldn't get it just because you think it's "unfair".
The refund was promised you, not the free SP. Quit trying to ignore the actual issue. CCP should give you your Aurum back, but they should also take any SP that you gained from the initial purchase. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
638
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 02:02:00 -
[86] - Quote
Eltra Ardell wrote: What's wrong with them receiving what they bought?
If they get a refund then they didn't actualy buy it. The Merc pack included a 30 day booster, not a 30 day booster that you can use twice. |
Eltra Ardell
Immobile Infantry
4
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 02:02:00 -
[87] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote: The refund was promised you, not the free SP. Quit trying to ignore the actual issue. CCP should give you your Aurum back, but they should also take any SP that you gained from the initial purchase.
I believe you need to look up what "free" means. If it were free, wouldn't you have that SP too?
Or...perhaps they made a purchase that resulted in additional SP? |
Maken Tosch
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
1809
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 02:02:00 -
[88] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:One more thing.
For those of you looking for a refund...
Am I correct to assume that you are only looking for a refund of the merc pack that you bought that had the "original description of commercial release"? Or are you including the merc pack that you bought AFTER the change in the description?
I ask one more time. |
Eltra Ardell
Immobile Infantry
4
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 02:03:00 -
[89] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Eltra Ardell wrote: What's wrong with them receiving what they bought?
If they get a refund then they didn't actualy buy it. The Merc pack included a 30 day booster, not a 30 day booster that you can use twice.
The Merc Pack included a 30 Day Booster that would be refunded to you at a later date.
Why shouldn't they get exactly what they paid for? |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
638
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 02:03:00 -
[90] - Quote
Eltra Ardell wrote:Sloth9230 wrote: The refund was promised you, not the free SP. Quit trying to ignore the actual issue. CCP should give you your Aurum back, but they should also take any SP that you gained from the initial purchase.
I believe you need to look up what "free" means. If it were free, wouldn't you have that SP too? Or...perhaps they made a purchase that resulted in additional SP? 2 for 1 is also known as buy 1 get 1 free. They bought 1 booster, they want to get a 2nd free. |
|
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
638
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 02:05:00 -
[91] - Quote
Eltra Ardell wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:Eltra Ardell wrote: What's wrong with them receiving what they bought?
If they get a refund then they didn't actualy buy it. The Merc pack included a 30 day booster, not a 30 day booster that you can use twice. The Merc Pack included a 30 Day Booster that would be refunded to you at a later date. Why shouldn't they get exactly what they paid for? Because they already used it and will keep the benefits from it. Go to the theaters and watch a movie, once it's finished try and get a refund so you can watch another one. |
Eltra Ardell
Immobile Infantry
4
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 02:06:00 -
[92] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Eltra Ardell wrote:Sloth9230 wrote: The refund was promised you, not the free SP. Quit trying to ignore the actual issue. CCP should give you your Aurum back, but they should also take any SP that you gained from the initial purchase.
I believe you need to look up what "free" means. If it were free, wouldn't you have that SP too? Or...perhaps they made a purchase that resulted in additional SP? 2 for 1 is also known as buy 1 get 1 free. They bought 1 booster, they want to get a 2nd free.
Here, I'll do it for you. The wonders of the internet allow me to do this for you.
Google wrote: Adverb Without cost or payment
|
Eltra Ardell
Immobile Infantry
4
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 02:07:00 -
[93] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Eltra Ardell wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:Eltra Ardell wrote: What's wrong with them receiving what they bought?
If they get a refund then they didn't actualy buy it. The Merc pack included a 30 day booster, not a 30 day booster that you can use twice. The Merc Pack included a 30 Day Booster that would be refunded to you at a later date. Why shouldn't they get exactly what they paid for? Because they already used it and will keep the benefits from it. Go to the theaters and watch a movie, once it's finished try and get a refund so you can watch another one.
Gasp!
You mean...they would be getting precisely what they paid for!?
You're right! This is a problem! |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
638
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 02:11:00 -
[94] - Quote
Eltra Ardell wrote:
Gasp!
You mean...they would be getting precisely what they paid for!?
You're right! This is a problem!
The merc pack did not include a 2 30 day boosters, just 1. If people want the booster back, then they should give back the SP they gained from using it the first time because at no point in time did they pay for a second booster. |
Eltra Ardell
Immobile Infantry
6
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 02:12:00 -
[95] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Eltra Ardell wrote:
Gasp!
You mean...they would be getting precisely what they paid for!?
You're right! This is a problem!
The merc pack did not include a 2 30 day boosters, just 1. If people want the booster back, then they should give back the SP they gained from using it the first time.
The Merc Pack included a 30 day booster that would be refunded to you at a later date.
Are you perhaps confused about what a 30 day booster does? |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
638
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 02:14:00 -
[96] - Quote
Eltra Ardell wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:Eltra Ardell wrote:
Gasp!
You mean...they would be getting precisely what they paid for!?
You're right! This is a problem!
The merc pack did not include a 2 30 day boosters, just 1. If people want the booster back, then they should give back the SP they gained from using it the first time. The Merc Pack included a 30 day booster that would be refunded to you at a later date. Are you perhaps confused about what a 30 day booster does? That was before they decided this would be the last reset, it wasn't intended as some special offer. They bought 1 booster, not 2, it's a simple concept really.
They should only benefit from 1 booster because that's what they paid for. The refund wasn't intended as a 2 for 1 deal. |
King Kobrah
SyNergy Gaming
113
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 02:14:00 -
[97] - Quote
If the pack clearly said it would be refunded upon commercial release, they have a legal and moral obligation to fulfill that part of the deal, which is something we agreed to when we paid 20 dollars. They can't just randomly decide to go back on it, that's blatantly illegal and borderline stealing. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
638
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 02:17:00 -
[98] - Quote
King Kobrah wrote:If the pack clearly said it would be refunded upon commercial release, they have a legal and moral obligation to fulfill that part of the deal, which is something we agreed to when we paid 20 dollars. They can't just randomly decide to go back on it, that's blatantly illegal and borderline stealing. Yes you are entitled to your refund, but no one promised you a free 30 day booster so you should give the SP back. |
Eltra Ardell
Immobile Infantry
6
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 02:18:00 -
[99] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Eltra Ardell wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:Eltra Ardell wrote:
Gasp!
You mean...they would be getting precisely what they paid for!?
You're right! This is a problem!
The merc pack did not include a 2 30 day boosters, just 1. If people want the booster back, then they should give back the SP they gained from using it the first time. The Merc Pack included a 30 day booster that would be refunded to you at a later date. Are you perhaps confused about what a 30 day booster does? That was before they decided this would be the last reset, it wasn't intended as some special offer. They bought 1 booster, not 2, it's a simple concept really.
Yes, and you don't seem to be getting it. Here, let me explain it to you.
A 30 Day Booster included in the Merc Pack is an active booster that multiplies your active SP gain by 1.5x. That means if you make 1000 SP, you'd actually receive 1500 SP.
Now, once you use it up, it's gone. HOWEVER! This 30 Day Booster is to be refunded at a later date. When that happens, you get another 30 Day Booster! And guess what? This one does the same thing as the last one, which I hope you would expect! Pretty neat, huh? |
Eltra Ardell
Immobile Infantry
8
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 02:19:00 -
[100] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:King Kobrah wrote:If the pack clearly said it would be refunded upon commercial release, they have a legal and moral obligation to fulfill that part of the deal, which is something we agreed to when we paid 20 dollars. They can't just randomly decide to go back on it, that's blatantly illegal and borderline stealing. Yes you are entitled to your refund, but no one promised you a free 30 day booster so you should give the SP back.
Again, you seem to be ignoring what "free" means. I'm afraid I'm losing my patience and will have to ask you to refer to my previous post. |
|
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
638
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 02:22:00 -
[101] - Quote
Eltra Ardell wrote: Yes, and you don't seem to be getting it. Here, let me explain it to you.
A 30 Day Booster included in the Merc Pack is an active booster that multiplies your active SP gain by 1.5x. That means if you make 1000 SP, you'd actually receive 1500 SP.
Now, once you use it up, it's gone. HOWEVER! This 30 Day Booster is to be refunded at a later date. When that happens, you get another 30 Day Booster! And guess what? This one does the same thing as the last one, which I hope you would expect! Pretty neat, huh?
Commercial release was meant to include a reset, it no longer will. it was always meant to be 1 booster, not 2.
But w/e, I'm done with you.
Eltra Ardell wrote:
Again, you seem to be ignoring what "free" means. I'm afraid I'm losing my patience and will have to ask you to refer to my previous post.
If you eat a burger then get a refund after you ate it, then it was a free burger.
And yeah, I have no patience for you either. |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1004
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 02:23:00 -
[102] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Eltra Ardell wrote:
Gasp!
You mean...they would be getting precisely what they paid for!?
You're right! This is a problem!
The merc pack did not include a 2 30 day boosters, just 1. If people want the booster back, then they should give back the SP they gained from using it the first time because at no point in time did they pay for a second booster.
You're right, it didn't include 2. I've gotten many more 30 day boosters so far than just 2. It included a 30 day booster for each beta reset, and one more at commercial release.
I still don't understand what you aren't getting here. It's true that CCP has decided not to reset any more during the beta, but that's not our fault and it wasn't our choice. That decision on CCP's part doesn't retroactively change the purchase agreement of the Merc Pack. It was very clearly stated that we would receive all of the Merc pack items at commercial release. If they want to remove the SP we gained from the booster, then they can, but it seems silly to punish their paying customers simply because THEY have made some strange and confusing decisions about how they are handling the beta. |
Maken Tosch
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
1809
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 02:23:00 -
[103] - Quote
Guys, need I remind everyone here that the purpose of this thread is to collaborate in sharing ideas to address the problem? This is not the place to argue what's considered buy-one-get-one-free. |
King Kobrah
SyNergy Gaming
113
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 02:24:00 -
[104] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:King Kobrah wrote:If the pack clearly said it would be refunded upon commercial release, they have a legal and moral obligation to fulfill that part of the deal, which is something we agreed to when we paid 20 dollars. They can't just randomly decide to go back on it, that's blatantly illegal and borderline stealing. Yes you are entitled to your refund, but no one promised you a free 30 day booster so you should give the SP back. What? It clearly says in the merc pack it comes with a 30 day booster, which is what makes the pack even worth it to begin with...all of which have been refunded once there was a reset. |
King Kobrah
SyNergy Gaming
113
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 02:25:00 -
[105] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Eltra Ardell wrote: Yes, and you don't seem to be getting it. Here, let me explain it to you.
A 30 Day Booster included in the Merc Pack is an active booster that multiplies your active SP gain by 1.5x. That means if you make 1000 SP, you'd actually receive 1500 SP.
Now, once you use it up, it's gone. HOWEVER! This 30 Day Booster is to be refunded at a later date. When that happens, you get another 30 Day Booster! And guess what? This one does the same thing as the last one, which I hope you would expect! Pretty neat, huh?
Commercial release was meant to include a reset, it no longer will. it was always meant to be 1 booster, not 2. But w/e, I'm done with you. Eltra Ardell wrote:
Again, you seem to be ignoring what "free" means. I'm afraid I'm losing my patience and will have to ask you to refer to my previous post.
If you eat a burger then get a refund after you ate it, then it was a free burger. And yeah, I have no patience for you either. Regardless of their original intentions, they're still obligated to give us the entirety of what we paid for, which was clearly stated when I purchased my merc pack. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
638
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 02:26:00 -
[106] - Quote
King Kobrah wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:King Kobrah wrote:If the pack clearly said it would be refunded upon commercial release, they have a legal and moral obligation to fulfill that part of the deal, which is something we agreed to when we paid 20 dollars. They can't just randomly decide to go back on it, that's blatantly illegal and borderline stealing. Yes you are entitled to your refund, but no one promised you a free 30 day booster so you should give the SP back. What? It clearly says in the merc pack it comes with a 30 day booster, which is what makes the pack even worth it to begin with...all of which have been refunded once there was a reset. And you will get the booster back, but you shouldn't keep the benefits from having used it the first time. |
Eltra Ardell
Immobile Infantry
8
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 02:26:00 -
[107] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Eltra Ardell wrote: Yes, and you don't seem to be getting it. Here, let me explain it to you.
A 30 Day Booster included in the Merc Pack is an active booster that multiplies your active SP gain by 1.5x. That means if you make 1000 SP, you'd actually receive 1500 SP.
Now, once you use it up, it's gone. HOWEVER! This 30 Day Booster is to be refunded at a later date. When that happens, you get another 30 Day Booster! And guess what? This one does the same thing as the last one, which I hope you would expect! Pretty neat, huh?
Commercial release was meant to include a reset, it no longer will. it was always meant to be 1 booster, not 2. But w/e, I'm done with you. Eltra Ardell wrote:
Again, you seem to be ignoring what "free" means. I'm afraid I'm losing my patience and will have to ask you to refer to my previous post.
If you eat aa buya burger then get a refund after you ate it, then it was a free burger. And yeah, I have no patience for you either.
You seem to be very determined to act in willful ignorance. At this point I have to suspect that you may be motivated by a lack of general foresight and funding....and perhaps greed and jealousy.
It does seem more productive to ignore your comments from this point onward. A shame; you might have had something of worth to contribute. Then again, perhaps not. |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1004
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 02:26:00 -
[108] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Eltra Ardell wrote: Yes, and you don't seem to be getting it. Here, let me explain it to you.
A 30 Day Booster included in the Merc Pack is an active booster that multiplies your active SP gain by 1.5x. That means if you make 1000 SP, you'd actually receive 1500 SP.
Now, once you use it up, it's gone. HOWEVER! This 30 Day Booster is to be refunded at a later date. When that happens, you get another 30 Day Booster! And guess what? This one does the same thing as the last one, which I hope you would expect! Pretty neat, huh?
Commercial release was meant to include a reset, it no longer will. it was always meant to be 1 booster, not 2. But w/e, I'm done with you. Eltra Ardell wrote:
Again, you seem to be ignoring what "free" means. I'm afraid I'm losing my patience and will have to ask you to refer to my previous post.
If you eat a burger then get a refund after you ate it, then it was a free burger. And yeah, I have no patience for you either.
take it up with CCP. I don't understand why the decision they made has lead to you lobbying AGAINST the players and FOR CCP, when it seems to be CCP's decision that you have a disagreement with. It just doesn't make sense. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
638
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 02:27:00 -
[109] - Quote
King Kobrah wrote: Regardless of their original intentions, they're still obligated to give us the entirety of what we paid for, which was clearly stated when I purchased my merc pack.
Which you will get once they give you the booster back, any additional SP is not what you paid for. |
Eltra Ardell
Immobile Infantry
8
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 02:28:00 -
[110] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:Guys, need I remind everyone here that the purpose of this thread is to collaborate in sharing ideas to address the problem? This is not the place to argue what's considered buy-one-get-one-free. The problem appears to be several have-nots demanding those that have to not-have as well. The solution is to ignore these have-nots, no? |
|
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
638
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 02:29:00 -
[111] - Quote
Baal Roo wrote: take it up with CCP. I don't understand why the decision they made has lead to you lobbying AGAINST the players and FOR CCP, when it seems to be CCP's decision that you have a disagreement with. It just doesn't make sense.
How is this in anyway against the players? Quit trying to make yourself the victim, you did not buy SP, you baught a booster, which you should get back.
And we are taking it up with CCP, that's what this thread is for. |
Maken Tosch
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
1809
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 02:30:00 -
[112] - Quote
Eltra Ardell wrote:Maken Tosch wrote:Guys, need I remind everyone here that the purpose of this thread is to collaborate in sharing ideas to address the problem? This is not the place to argue what's considered buy-one-get-one-free. The problem appears to be several have-nots demanding those that have to not-have as well. The solution is to ignore these have-nots, no?
I just want us all to come up with ideas on how to fix this so that CCP can get an idea on what might work best to address the situation. Is that too much to ask? |
Eltra Ardell
Immobile Infantry
10
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 02:31:00 -
[113] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:Eltra Ardell wrote:Maken Tosch wrote:Guys, need I remind everyone here that the purpose of this thread is to collaborate in sharing ideas to address the problem? This is not the place to argue what's considered buy-one-get-one-free. The problem appears to be several have-nots demanding those that have to not-have as well. The solution is to ignore these have-nots, no? I just want us all to come up with ideas on how to fix this so that CCP can get an idea on what might work best to address the situation. Is that too much to ask?
Let me ask you this: What is there that needs fixing? |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1005
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 02:32:00 -
[114] - Quote
Eltra Ardell wrote:Maken Tosch wrote:Eltra Ardell wrote:Maken Tosch wrote:Guys, need I remind everyone here that the purpose of this thread is to collaborate in sharing ideas to address the problem? This is not the place to argue what's considered buy-one-get-one-free. The problem appears to be several have-nots demanding those that have to not-have as well. The solution is to ignore these have-nots, no? I just want us all to come up with ideas on how to fix this so that CCP can get an idea on what might work best to address the situation. Is that too much to ask? Let me ask you this: What is there that needs fixing?
yeah, this is what I don't get. All that needs to happen is CCP honor the terms of purchase. The end. |
King Kobrah
SyNergy Gaming
114
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 02:32:00 -
[115] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:King Kobrah wrote: Regardless of their original intentions, they're still obligated to give us the entirety of what we paid for, which was clearly stated when I purchased my merc pack.
Which you will get once they give you the booster back, any additional SP is not what you paid for. Removing SP is pretty much taking away weekly caps from all kinds of players, if you think for one second CCP is going to remove any SP, you're out of your ******* mind, people will literally quit over this. They have an obligation to give us back EVERYTHING IN THE PACK, it's not the consumer's fault they changed plans on a SP reset on release, and we will not be punished for it |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
638
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 02:34:00 -
[116] - Quote
Baal Roo wrote: I don't have any problem giving back boosted SP if I get my booster back.
And yet he's still trying to keep the bonus SP... |
King Kobrah
SyNergy Gaming
114
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 02:35:00 -
[117] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:King Kobrah wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:King Kobrah wrote:If the pack clearly said it would be refunded upon commercial release, they have a legal and moral obligation to fulfill that part of the deal, which is something we agreed to when we paid 20 dollars. They can't just randomly decide to go back on it, that's blatantly illegal and borderline stealing. Yes you are entitled to your refund, but no one promised you a free 30 day booster so you should give the SP back. What? It clearly says in the merc pack it comes with a 30 day booster, which is what makes the pack even worth it to begin with...all of which have been refunded once there was a reset. And you will get the booster back, but you shouldn't keep the benefits from having used it the first time. An unfortunate oversight by CCP, and it certainly doesn't give them some kind of legal loophole not to honor the original conditions the merc packs were purchased under. CCP isn't ******** enough to remove weeks of playtime for people across the board. You're then rewarding players who never used boosters, which is COMPLETELY backwards. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
638
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 02:35:00 -
[118] - Quote
King Kobrah wrote:we will not be punished for it No, but you should be rewarded for it right? |
Altina McAlterson
TRUE TEA BAGGERS
428
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 02:36:00 -
[119] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:Eltra Ardell wrote:Maken Tosch wrote:Guys, need I remind everyone here that the purpose of this thread is to collaborate in sharing ideas to address the problem? This is not the place to argue what's considered buy-one-get-one-free. The problem appears to be several have-nots demanding those that have to not-have as well. The solution is to ignore these have-nots, no? I just want us all to come up with ideas on how to fix this so that CCP can get an idea on what might work best to address the situation. Is that too much to ask? Yes, it is it would seem. Plus, there's not really a lot of wiggle room. CCP will either be bound by the conditions of the sale or they won't. So they either credit the items to the player's accounts or they don't. CCP made a colossal, enormous, hugely stupid, gigantic (the enormity of which can't be overstated) mistake in their wording. They have to decide where to go from here. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
638
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 02:36:00 -
[120] - Quote
King Kobrah wrote: An unfortunate oversight by CCP, and it certainly doesn't give them some kind of legal loophole not to honor the original conditions the merc packs were purchased under. CCP isn't ******** enough to remove weeks of playtime for people across the board. You're then rewarding players who never used boosters, which is COMPLETELY backwards.
Not if you get the booster back. |
|
King Kobrah
SyNergy Gaming
117
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 02:38:00 -
[121] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:King Kobrah wrote:we will not be punished for it No, but you should be rewarded for it right? You're right, how dare a company reward it's players for paying money and supporting them IN A CLOSED BETA, LET ALONE THE OPEN ONE. |
Eltra Ardell
Immobile Infantry
11
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 02:39:00 -
[122] - Quote
Calm thyself, King Kobrah. We're better off ignoring him, like I said. If we take him at face value, it's obvious he doesn't understand concepts as complex as "free" or "time."
The discussion shouldn't be finding some "solution" to the "problem" of people getting what they paid for.
The discussion should be determining whether there is a problem here at all. The fact that discussion is moving forward with the assumption that there is an issue is an issue in and of itself. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
639
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 02:42:00 -
[123] - Quote
King Kobrah wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:King Kobrah wrote:we will not be punished for it No, but you should be rewarded for it right? You're right, how dare a company reward it's players for paying money and supporting them IN A CLOSED BETA, LET ALONE THE OPEN ONE. Just 3 merc packs makes it a 60$ dollar reward. That's one big kitten reward.
There should be two options 1. Give up a portion of your SP to refund your merc pack with the 30 day booster 2. Get the merc pack back without a booster. Maybe throw in a three day booster as a gift. |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1007
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 02:46:00 -
[124] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:King Kobrah wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:King Kobrah wrote:we will not be punished for it No, but you should be rewarded for it right? You're right, how dare a company reward it's players for paying money and supporting them IN A CLOSED BETA, LET ALONE THE OPEN ONE. Just 3 merc packs makes it a 60$ dollar reward. That's one big kitten reward. There should be two options 1. Give up a portion of your SP to refund your merc pack with the 30 day booster 2. Get the merc pack back without a booster. Maybe throw in a three day booster as a gift.
1. Serves no purpose other than punish paying customers for a stupid decision on CCP's part. 2. Does not fulfill the purchase agreement.
If they want decide to do #1 I would begrudgingly accept (and never PAY another cent to CCP again for fear of them failing to keep their **** straight again). #2 is unacceptable as far as I'm concerned. |
King Kobrah
SyNergy Gaming
117
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 02:46:00 -
[125] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:King Kobrah wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:King Kobrah wrote:we will not be punished for it No, but you should be rewarded for it right? You're right, how dare a company reward it's players for paying money and supporting them IN A CLOSED BETA, LET ALONE THE OPEN ONE. Just 3 merc packs makes it a 60$ dollar reward. That's one big kitten reward. There should be two options 1. Give up a portion of your SP to refund your merc pack with the 30 day booster 2. Get the merc pack back without a booster. Maybe throw in a three day booster as a gift. What part of this don't you understand? Just because CCP ****** up and decided not to reset SP doesn't change the fact they're LEGALLY OBLIGATED to give us THE ENTIRE MERC PACK upon COMMERCIAL RELEASE. I even put the key words in caps.
paying 60 dollars in a closed beta and maybe getting a little coming back your way in the form of some extra boosters? OH LAWDY LAWD DATS GAME BREAKING PPL WHO PAY MONEY SHOULD GET SCREWED NOT REWARDED!!!!!!!!111111111111111 |
Maken Tosch
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
1809
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 02:48:00 -
[126] - Quote
Baal Roo wrote:Eltra Ardell wrote:Let me ask you this: What is there that needs fixing? yeah, this is what I don't get. All that needs to happen is CCP honor the terms of purchase. The end.
I know I get the feeling that CCP may have to honor the terms at one point, but what I'm trying to get across here is how CCP has to go about reimbursing people the AURUM and stuff given from the merc pack (the one with the original "commercial release" worded into it before the change).
Forget about the merc packs and AUR purchased AFTER the change. I'm assuming the refund people here are referring to is the one BEFORE the change. |
Altina McAlterson
TRUE TEA BAGGERS
428
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 02:49:00 -
[127] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:King Kobrah wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:King Kobrah wrote:we will not be punished for it No, but you should be rewarded for it right? You're right, how dare a company reward it's players for paying money and supporting them IN A CLOSED BETA, LET ALONE THE OPEN ONE. Just 3 merc packs makes it a 60$ dollar reward. That's one big kitten reward. There should be two options 1. Give up a portion of your SP to refund your merc pack with the 30 day booster 2. Get the merc pack back without a booster. Maybe throw in a three day booster as a gift. Again, probably won't be any options here. You'll either be credited all the items in the merc pack without having to give anything up, receive some token crap that no one wants, or get nothing. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
639
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 02:49:00 -
[128] - Quote
Baal Roo wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:King Kobrah wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:King Kobrah wrote:we will not be punished for it No, but you should be rewarded for it right? You're right, how dare a company reward it's players for paying money and supporting them IN A CLOSED BETA, LET ALONE THE OPEN ONE. Just 3 merc packs makes it a 60$ dollar reward. That's one big kitten reward. There should be two options 1. Give up a portion of your SP to refund your merc pack with the 30 day booster 2. Get the merc pack back without a booster. Maybe throw in a three day booster as a gift. 1. Serves no purpose other than punish paying customers for a stupid decision on CCP's part. 2. Does not fulfill the purchase agreement. If they want decide to do #1 I would begrudgingly accept (and never PAY another cent to CCP again for fear of them failing to keep their **** straight again). #2 is unacceptable as far as I'm concerned. Both of them have the exact same outcome. What if someone bought it but doesn't want grind again, then they pick option 2. These should be options, you should decide which one to accept before you log in. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
639
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 02:52:00 -
[129] - Quote
King Kobrah wrote:
paying 60 dollars in a closed beta and maybe getting a little coming back your way in the form of some extra boosters? OH LAWDY LAWD DATS GAME BREAKING PPL WHO PAY MONEY SHOULD GET SCREWED NOT REWARDED!!!!!!!!111111111111111
A little? you payed a 60 and then got 60 back, you got everything back.
CCP also isn't obligated to not partially reset you, they only said there wouldn't be a full SP reset. |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1007
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 02:55:00 -
[130] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:King Kobrah wrote:
paying 60 dollars in a closed beta and maybe getting a little coming back your way in the form of some extra boosters? OH LAWDY LAWD DATS GAME BREAKING PPL WHO PAY MONEY SHOULD GET SCREWED NOT REWARDED!!!!!!!!111111111111111
A little? you payed a 60 and then got 60 back, you got everything back. CCP also isn't obligated to not partially reset you, they only said there wouldn't be a full SP reset.
again, take it up with CCP if you don't like it. They are the ones that set it up this way, not us. We are simply asking them to honor the product they sold us. If you think it's such a great deal, you should have bought one. |
|
King Kobrah
SyNergy Gaming
117
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 02:56:00 -
[131] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:King Kobrah wrote:
paying 60 dollars in a closed beta and maybe getting a little coming back your way in the form of some extra boosters? OH LAWDY LAWD DATS GAME BREAKING PPL WHO PAY MONEY SHOULD GET SCREWED NOT REWARDED!!!!!!!!111111111111111
A little? you payed a 60 and then got 60 back, you got everything back. CCP also isn't obligated to not partially reset you, they only said there wouldn't be a full SP reset. What consumer in his right mind is going to give money to a company who is willing to REMOVE YOUR IN GAME SP to try and get around the terms and conditions clearly stated in a REAL MONEY PURCHASE? That would be suicide for this game, and CCP even said themselves they're NOT resetting or removing SP. This is a very clear cut open and close case, how people have trouble to grasp the extremely simple terms and conditions in the merc pack is beyond me. |
Maken Tosch
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
1809
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 02:57:00 -
[132] - Quote
I forgot to mention this:
The problem is that if CCP doesn't address this properly, there may be consequences that not even the pro-refund folks had intended to occur. For example. How would the refund impact the Dust economy once it goes fully open? Remember, if all of us who paid for the "commercial release" merc pack got a refund with nothing sacrificed, how for the excess AURUM affect overall prices in a player-driven BUY-SELL market for say... UVTs, Boosters, or BPOs? |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
639
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 02:57:00 -
[133] - Quote
Baal Roo wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:King Kobrah wrote:
paying 60 dollars in a closed beta and maybe getting a little coming back your way in the form of some extra boosters? OH LAWDY LAWD DATS GAME BREAKING PPL WHO PAY MONEY SHOULD GET SCREWED NOT REWARDED!!!!!!!!111111111111111
A little? you payed a 60 and then got 60 back, you got everything back. CCP also isn't obligated to not partially reset you, they only said there wouldn't be a full SP reset. again, take it up with CCP if you don't like it. They are the ones that set it up this way, not us. We are simply asking them to honor the product they sold us. If you think it's such a great deal, you should have bought one. I wasn't here, but that has nothing to do with this. And we are taking it up with CCP, that's what this thread is for. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
639
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 02:59:00 -
[134] - Quote
King Kobrah wrote:CCP even said themselves they're NOT resetting or removing SP. They only said they wouldn't bring you back to the level of a starting character. SP cuts are fair game. |
Maken Tosch
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
1810
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 03:01:00 -
[135] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:King Kobrah wrote:CCP even said themselves they're NOT resetting or removing SP. They only said they wouldn't bring you back to the level of a starting character. SP cuts are fair game.
That is a good point. Full resets are already out of the question. Partial resets are not. |
Altina McAlterson
TRUE TEA BAGGERS
428
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 03:04:00 -
[136] - Quote
And wow, it's all just starting to click as to what everyone is arguing about. I thought this was about the "All AUR will be refunded on Commercial Release" or whatever it said that was on the actual merc pack screen. This is a completely different issue.
Yea, you guys gotta be kidding me. You bought a merc pack. You still have the merc pack. Didn't say two merc packs $20. You got what you paid for. Unless someone wants to tell me they knew there wouldn't be a reset on Commercial Release and you actually thought you were going to get two packs. If that's the case, and you want to actually say you thought you were buying 2 of them this is nothing but greed.
You're a damn liar and a fool if you try and tell me you thought that. It's reasonable someone didn't know about that they wouldn't be getting refunded their AUR purchases since that's what it said on the merc pack and they might not check the forums. But as for the rest of it, good luck with that.
You got what you paid for. One Merc Pack. Seriously, I seriously want someone to tell me they thought they were going to get two of them and really mean that. Back it up with something, show me your reasoning behind it. |
Maken Tosch
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
1810
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 03:08:00 -
[137] - Quote
I guess I'll just have to ask CCP to close this thread. I feel like we're going nowhere here. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
641
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 03:09:00 -
[138] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:I guess I'll just have to ask CCP to close this thread. I feel like we're going nowhere here. That would appear to be the case |
Altina McAlterson
TRUE TEA BAGGERS
430
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 03:18:00 -
[139] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:I guess I'll just have to ask CCP to close this thread. I feel like we're going nowhere here. Seriously apologize for that, thought that was the other thread. But yea, like I said before there really aren't any options. They either give the people a new merc pack or they don't. If they are forced to honor the agreement they can't very well take something away to compensate for it without it meaning that the original purchase of one merc pack isn't being honored. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
642
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 03:22:00 -
[140] - Quote
The merc pack was honored in spirit, like you said, people who bought it still have it or have already used it. Right now people are trying to use a technicality to get more than they actually payed for, so yeah, it's just people being greedy. |
|
Maken Tosch
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
1812
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 03:25:00 -
[141] - Quote
@CCP Devs or GMs.
Please lock this thread. It's obvious at this point that we can't collaborate any good ideas to address the issue without this thread devolving into something else. |
General Tiberius1
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
346
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 03:27:00 -
[142] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:@CCP Devs or GMs.
Please lock this thread. It's obvious at this point that we can't collaborate any good ideas to address the issue without this thread devolving into something else.
it's too funny derailing conversations
cookies |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1008
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 03:28:00 -
[143] - Quote
Altina McAlterson wrote:And wow, it's all just starting to click as to what everyone is arguing about. I thought this was about the "All AUR will be refunded on Commercial Release" or whatever it said that was on the actual merc pack screen. This is a completely different issue.
Yea, you guys gotta be kidding me. You bought a merc pack. You still have the merc pack. Didn't say two merc packs $20. You got what you paid for. Unless someone wants to tell me they knew there wouldn't be a reset on Commercial Release and you actually thought you were going to get two packs. If that's the case, and you want to actually say you thought you were buying 2 of them this is nothing but greed.
You're a damn liar and a fool if you try and tell me you thought that. It's reasonable someone didn't know about that they wouldn't be getting refunded their AUR purchases since that's what it said on the merc pack and they might not check the forums. But as for the rest of it, good luck with that.
You got what you paid for. One Merc Pack. Seriously, I seriously want someone to tell me they thought they were going to get two of them and really mean that. Back it up with something, show me your reasoning behind it.
not only is this precisely what I expect, it's precisely what the Merc Pack stated. You get the Merc Pack items to play around with in beta, and then you get it again at release. It's not complicated. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
642
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 03:33:00 -
[144] - Quote
General Tiberius1 wrote:
cookies
I like the oatmeal raisin ones. |
Imp Smash
On The Brink CRONOS.
77
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 12:53:00 -
[145] - Quote
I'm sorry but I don't understand the argument OP. can you simplify this? What problem is going on here? |
Calgoth Reborn
United Front LLC
200
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 13:02:00 -
[146] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Baal Roo wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:King Kobrah wrote:
paying 60 dollars in a closed beta and maybe getting a little coming back your way in the form of some extra boosters? OH LAWDY LAWD DATS GAME BREAKING PPL WHO PAY MONEY SHOULD GET SCREWED NOT REWARDED!!!!!!!!111111111111111
A little? you payed a 60 and then got 60 back, you got everything back. CCP also isn't obligated to not partially reset you, they only said there wouldn't be a full SP reset. again, take it up with CCP if you don't like it. They are the ones that set it up this way, not us. We are simply asking them to honor the product they sold us. If you think it's such a great deal, you should have bought one. I wasn't here, so I couldn't buy one, but that has nothing to do with this. And we are taking it up with CCP, that's what this thread is for. Their agreement was for a refund, letting you keep the SP that resulted from the refund was never part of the deal.
Wait you didn't buy a merc pack now that I have read this then you should stay out of the discussion as it has nothing to do with you. |
Maken Tosch
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
1815
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 16:24:00 -
[147] - Quote
Imp Smash wrote:I'm sorry but I don't understand the argument OP. can you simplify this? What problem is going on here?
The problem is that the players who bought the merc pack during closed beta, the pack that had the description of "refund on commercial release" or something to that effect before it was changed, feel entitled to have a refund because they purchased those merc packs with the understanding that they will be refunded the merc pack upon commercial release. And since CCP Devs have officially confirmed that we are not yet in commercial release, a refund for the merc pack that had that description at the time of purchase is in order.
However, the issue includes how to account for the SP gained from boosters that were included in the packs and how the extra influx of AURUM could affect the market prices of various items such as UVT, boosters, suits, modules, etc. once the player-driven market goes live since those players also want to keep their progress.
Remember, we're talking about ONLY the merc packs that had the "refund on commercial release" description before CCP changed it. |
Skihids
The Tritan Industries
1110
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 16:27:00 -
[148] - Quote
King Kobrah wrote:If the pack clearly said it would be refunded upon commercial release, they have a legal and moral obligation to fulfill that part of the deal, which is something we agreed to when we paid 20 dollars. They can't just randomly decide to go back on it, that's blatantly illegal and borderline stealing.
CCP refunded every character wipe. The obvious intention was to restore you to the starting condition with a new character and all your purchases. This is my second go around with my three merc pack boosters under that system.
The original plan was a final wipe at commercial release so the verbiage and intent matched. Later CCP decided to remove the last wipe, and they told us in big bold letters that this was it, Every choice we made from here on out matters!
That implied no more refunds.
Now if you don't like that and you demand no change in the refund language, CCP is under no obligation to be held to their decision not to wipe your character. After all, that was not a legaly binding decision and was always hedged anyway.
So go ahead and demand the old agreement be upheld, that is your right. Just don't expect to escape the wipe that comes with the old agreement.
I just ask that I not be obligated to follow you in your choice. I like many others had my eyes open and fully accepted he change in plans. |
Maken Tosch
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
1815
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 16:29:00 -
[149] - Quote
Again, I ask the devs to lock this thread as I feel we're going nowhere here. |
|
GM Hercules
Game Masters C C P Alliance
373
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 16:57:00 -
[150] - Quote
As requested by the OP.
This thread is now locked.
GM Hercules Forum Community Moderator
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 :: [one page] |